KR20010103810A - Education valuation system using a computer and the operation method thereof - Google Patents

Education valuation system using a computer and the operation method thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20010103810A
KR20010103810A KR1020010041079A KR20010041079A KR20010103810A KR 20010103810 A KR20010103810 A KR 20010103810A KR 1020010041079 A KR1020010041079 A KR 1020010041079A KR 20010041079 A KR20010041079 A KR 20010041079A KR 20010103810 A KR20010103810 A KR 20010103810A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
test
item
subject
method
computer
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020010041079A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
박성협
Original Assignee
박정
주식회사 에버케이션
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 박정, 주식회사 에버케이션 filed Critical 박정
Priority to KR1020010041079A priority Critical patent/KR20010103810A/en
Publication of KR20010103810A publication Critical patent/KR20010103810A/en

Links

Abstract

The present invention constructs a high-quality test paper based on the unique characteristics of the question by using each item constituting the test paper as an analysis unit, and performs a series of test execution, scoring, result analysis, and data storage and management using the test paper. By performing the test process by the computer which provides various functions, it is possible to execute the test and its test results more accurately and quickly, and also adopts the test method that corresponds to the individual's ability level. The present invention relates to an educational evaluation system using a computer and an operation method thereof for accurately analyzing characteristics.
In addition, the educational fungal system using the computer, the system is configured to allow the object (subject) to be connected online via a predetermined network to test through a test sheet provided from a certain computer; The system includes first and second terminal devices 102a to 102n for online connection via the network, and selects a test method and a test sheet for a predetermined time through the terminal devices 102a to 102n and performs a test. The test method performs the overall control operation according to the schedule operating program 112 so that the n-th subject 100a-100n and the first to nth subjects 100a-100n can be connected online to perform the test. And an operation module unit for operating an inspection sheet and an item management unit for producing various types of questions such as voice, picture, video items, listening evaluation questions, and fingerprint items according to the control operation of the operation module unit 110. 120a, the problem area management unit 120b for systematically managing the items produced by the item management unit 120a, and the information related to the item as well as the contents of the items stored in the problem areas An inspection method selection module unit 130 for selecting and operating a predetermined inspection method and an inspection sheet based on the management module unit 120 provided with the question bank management unit 120c and the completed items manufactured by the management module unit 120. And the test method and the test paper are selected by the first to n-th test subjects 100a-100n through the test method selection module unit 130 and the test result for each test subject is completed when the test process is completed. And a test analysis program storage unit 140 which stores a corresponding test analysis program for processing and analyzing the item analysis result, personal information and item information of the first to nth subjects 100a-100n, and the analyzed subject. It is achieved by including a database 150 provided with a personal information storage unit 152, a question bank information storage unit 154 and a test result information storage unit 156 to store the test results.

Description

EDUCATION VALUATION SYSTEM USING A COMPUTER AND THE OPERATION METHOD THEREOF}

The present invention relates to a computer-based educational evaluation system and a method of operating the same, and more particularly, to analyze an item characteristic necessary for a test through a predetermined computer system to construct an effective test sheet, as well as to provide the test item and a subject through a predetermined test procedure. The present invention relates to a computer-aided educational evaluation system and its operation method for accurately calculating and presenting abilities.

As is well known, in order to perform a measurement of a subject's ability for a given individual / group, a test method is generally provided in which a test paper printed on a paper is used and a test is performed with all subjects provided with the same question. In addition, a variety of methods are used to perform observations on certain objects and to write schedule answers, to provide descriptive answers to interviews and questions, or to evaluate subjects in various ways such as experiments.

That is, the above-described test / evaluation method adopts the same test method as the general paper test in a form in which a subject takes a test or answers a given question for a predetermined time according to the contents recorded on the print medium.

However, the paper-based test and the general evaluation method as described above require a long test time, a long length test with various difficulty levels, and a large number of subjects who examine the test / evaluation. Since it takes a long time for the subject to be notified, in some cases, it was difficult to obtain sufficient data for the subject who wanted an immediate test result.

In addition, the paper-based test has a disadvantage in that it is difficult to accurately analyze the performance according to the subject's ability difference, and since the reliability of the test method is low, the individual or a specific group for actually performing such a test method or using the test result is This results in a lack of confidence in the test results.

Accordingly, the present invention has been made in order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the quality of the test paper based on the unique characteristics of the item by using each item of the questionnaire that constitutes a test sheet for a given subject (individual / group) as an analysis unit In addition, by carrying out a series of inspection processes, including test execution, scoring, analysis of results, data storage, and management, using a test sheet by a computer that can provide various functions, the inspection and its results can be performed more accurately and quickly. The present invention provides a computer-based educational evaluation system and its operation method.

In addition, another object of the present invention is to adopt and provide a test method corresponding to the individual's ability level, thereby accurately analyzing / providing each individual's ability or characteristics according to high reliability.

In addition, the present invention provides the test results of the test subjects with immediate feedback to provide learning correction and enhancement, as well as to circumvent the temporal and spatial constraints of the test and to continuously manage various information about the items and the test subjects. There is another purpose.

In the educational evaluation system using a computer according to the present invention for achieving the above object, in a system configured so that an object (subject) connected online through a predetermined network can be examined through a test sheet provided from a certain computer ; The system includes a first terminal device for providing an online connection via the network, the first to nth subjects who select and test a test method and a test sheet for a predetermined time through the terminal device, and perform the test. Perform the overall control operation according to the schedule operation program so that the subject can be connected online to perform the test, the operation module unit for operating the test method and the test sheet management, and the voice, picture, video according to the control operation of the operation module unit The item management unit which produces various types of items such as the item, the listening evaluation question and the fingerprint type item, the problem area management unit which systematically manages the items produced by the item management unit, and the contents of the items stored in the problem area as well as the above items and A management module unit provided as a question bank management unit for classifying and storing related information; An inspection method selection module unit for selecting and operating a predetermined inspection method and an inspection sheet based on the completed item by the module unit, and the inspection method and the inspection sheet are selected by the first to nth subjects through the inspection method selection module unit; And a test analysis program storage unit for storing a corresponding program for processing and analyzing the test result and the item analysis result for each of the test subjects, the personal information and the item information of the test subject, and the analysis of the test subject. It comprises a database provided with a personal information storage unit, question bank information storage unit and the test result information storage unit to store the test results.

Preferably, the inspection method selection module unit is provided in the form of the paper test and the inspection content and the order of the test using a test paper printed on paper, while the inspection information is displayed on a predetermined display and fixed for a predetermined time Computer-based test (CBT), which is provided for inputting answers through input media, and certain test banks for analyzing question characteristics such as difficulty and discrimination of the question, construct a specific question bank and test subjects. It is characterized by consisting of Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) for presenting items for each ability.

In addition, the test analysis program storage unit is a line graph of item difficulty, discrimination degree, incorrect answer attractiveness and reliability, individual score analysis, and test score according to the classical test theory presenting an analysis process for the average and the test total score of the subject group. Based on the test analysis program 'TestAn' which provides a test and the item response theory that analyzes the characteristics of each of the items, the difficulty and estimation error, discrimination and estimation error, subject ability parameter and estimation error, Capability among 'Expected a Posteriori (EAP), Bayesan Modal Estimation (MAP) and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) by' RaschAn 'and Bayesian statistical methods that provide true scores, test information functions and test characteristic curves Select the estimation method and subtract the difficulty and the estimation error, the subject's ability parameter, the estimation error, the true score, the test information function, and the test characteristic curve. Test analysis program, 'Bayesan' that is characterized in that the storage management.

In order to achieve the above object, the method of operating a computer-based educational evaluation system according to the present invention analyzes the characteristics of each item constituting a predetermined test sheet, and based on the information of the analyzed item, the purpose of the test for each subject. The purpose of the subject's examination and the purpose of providing the paper test, the computer use test, and the computerization adaptation test, respectively, according to the step of producing a question meeting the questionnaire and the selection of the test method of the test subject after the establishment of the question bank. Configuring a test sheet according to the contents, selecting one of the paper test, the computer use test, and the computerization test according to the test method selection of the subject, and performing the test; Then, based on the test analysis program according to the test method, the results of the item analysis and the test subject's ability were individually determined. It is provided in real time, and the analysis result of the item parameter estimated by the analysis result and the item difficulty, discrimination degree, the estimation degree, etc. each of the items consists of storing in the question bank.

In this case, if the computerized ability test is presented with a question suitable for the subject's ability, if the predetermined question is corrected during the execution of the test, the difficulty level of the next item is presented, and if it is wrong, the difficulty of the next item is the same. The item is presented at an easier level than the item.

In addition, the test paper configuration using the computerized adaptive test is the entry level, branching rule and end so that individual test for each subject can be provided in addition to the test paper according to the computer use test Characterized in that it is achieved by an algorithm that includes a stopping rule.

Figure 1 is a block diagram presented to explain the educational evaluation system using a computer according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention,

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a basic screen displayed when the system is initially executed by the operating program of FIG. 1. FIG.

Figure 3 is an embodiment showing a basic screen of the item editing window for inputting and editing items when configuring items according to the present invention,

4A and 4B are exemplary views illustrating question input and answer processing using the edit window shown in FIG. 3;

5 is a schematic flowchart illustrating a method of operating an education evaluation system using a computer according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a predetermined item processing process in the computerization ability adaptation test according to the selection of the test method of FIG. 5;

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a process of the computerization adaptation test of FIG. 6.

* Explanation of symbols for the main parts of the drawings *

100a-100n: first to nth subjects, 102a-102n: terminal device,

110: operation module unit, 112: operating program,

120: management module unit, 130: inspection analysis program storage unit,

132: inspection paper production unit, 140: inspection method selection module unit,

140a: computer-aided inspection unit (CBT), 140c: computerized adaptation inspection unit (CAT),

150: database.

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Figure 1 is a block diagram presented to explain the educational evaluation system using a computer according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 1, the first to nth subjects 100a-100n are provided with predetermined terminal devices 102a-102n so as to be connected online through a predetermined network, and the test method and the test sheet described below are selected and tested. In addition, the first to n-th subject (100a-100n) performs an overall control operation to perform the test by accessing the online, the operation module unit 110 for operating the test method and test strip management, and the operation module According to the control operation of the unit 110, the item management unit 120a for producing a plurality of items such as audio, picture, video questions, listening evaluation questions, and fingerprint questions, and the items produced by the item management unit 120a systematically A management module unit 120 provided with a problem area management unit 120b for managing a problem and a question bank management unit 120c for classifying and storing information related to the item as well as the content of the item stored in the problem area; The inspection method through the inspection method selection module unit 130 and the inspection method selection module unit 130 for selecting and operating a predetermined inspection method and inspection paper based on the completed items by the management module unit 120. And a test analysis program storage unit 140 for storing a corresponding program for processing and analyzing a test result and an item analysis result for each test subject when a test sheet is selected and a predetermined test process is completed, and personal information and item information of the test subject. The database 150 includes a personal information storage unit 152, a question bank information storage unit 154, and a test result information storage unit 156 to store the test result of the analyzed subject.

Here, the inspection method selection module unit 130 is provided in the same form and the inspection content and order of the paper test (130a) for taking a test using a test paper printed on paper, the inspection content is provided in a predetermined display unit Computer based test (CBT) 130b displayed and provided to perform an answer input through a predetermined input medium (e.g., a mouse keyboard) for a predetermined time, and item characteristics such as difficulty and discrimination degree of the question. It consists of a computerized adaptive test (CAT) 130c, which constitutes a specific question bank according to a schedule test theory for analyzing a and presents an item according to each subject's ability.

In addition, the test theory is individually classified by the Classical Test Theory, which presents an analysis process for the average and the total test score of the subject group, and an Item Characteristic Curve (ICC) that shows the characteristics of each item. It is divided into Item Response Theory, which analyzes items.

That is, the computerized test (CT) forms a question bank through item analysis based on an item response theory.

In addition, the test analysis program storage unit 140 is TestAn (140a) which is a test analysis program that provides a line graph of item difficulty, discrimination degree, incorrect answer attractiveness and reliability, individual score analysis, and test score according to the classical test theory. And RaschAn (140b), a test and analysis program that applies the item response theory and provides the difficulty and estimated error, subject capability parameter and estimated error, true score, test information function, and test characteristic curve of the item by Rasch model. Select the capability estimation method from 'Expected a Posteriori (EAP), Bayesan Modal Estimation (MAP), Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)' by Bayesian statistical method, and select the difficulty, estimated error, subject ability parameter and estimation error BayesiAn (140c), a test and analysis program that provides a score, test information function, and test characteristic curve, is divided and stored.

In addition, the Item Characteristic Curve (ICC) indicates a probability (P (θ)) of answering an item according to a subject's ability level (θ) in a specific item, and each item has a different type of item characteristic. A curve will appear.

Reference numeral 132 denotes an inspection paper production unit that provides an inspection sheet according to an inspection method of a paper-based inspection, a computer-use inspection (CBT), and a computerization adaptation inspection (CAT) when a question bank is formed by the management module unit 120. .

The operation method of the education evaluation system using the computer of the present invention configured as described above will be described.

First, a subject who wants to see a paper & pencil test or a computerized test (CT) is connected to an operation module unit through a predetermined network (step 200), and performs a computerized test (CT). Download and install the operating program for the installation, or to be installed on the subject's own terminal device via an offline medium (eg, a CD in which the operating program is stored).

Thereafter, the subject performs a test through a questionnaire supported by a specific question or a problem area and a test form from a question bank stored in the database 150 of the operation module unit 110 through a predetermined authentication procedure such as a member or a non-member. In this case, the question bank is a test subject or a subject to store a variety of question production and question bank in the database 150 according to the process of building the problem bank of the management module unit 120 (step 202).

The process of building such a question bank is described in detail as follows.

First, the question bank is created by inputting a question bank name to be created according to the selection operation of the menu selection bar (usually located at the top of the screen) on the basic screen displayed after the installation of the operating program (see FIG. 2). Under the question bank, several levels of problem areas are organized by the same method as the above-mentioned problem bank creation.

Here, the basic screen includes a question bank, a problem area, a problem area and a function to configure, modify, and delete a test, a menu bar for checking item information, and item information, a question bank to which a predetermined item belongs, and a problem. It consists of the item path information bar indicating the item parameters such as the item path bar indicating the area, the difficulty and discrimination degree of the item analyzed by the classical test theory or the item response theory.

Subsequently, the questionnaire for each of the above problem areas is produced. The questionnaire production is authentic, connected, multiple, short-answer, parenthesis, essay, fingerprint-inserted, fingerprint-clicked, TOEFL, and various foreign language proficiency tests and countries. Various types of questions are supported, including certification exams.

In other words, when making authentic or multiple-choice questions, select a problem area for inputting an item, and then operate the item name input and item type selection / item edit clicks sequentially through the menu selection operation, and then the edit window is displayed. Input and edit question and answer frames and various articles / comments by using various toolbars, and answer item information such as item source, item topic, item table, expected difficulty, main control, and commentary. If you save the input, the item input operation is completed.

As described above, in the state of selecting the item type to be input, the question, correct answer, and the item suitable for the type according to the item editing function as shown in FIG. 3, which shows the basic screen of the item editing window for inputting and editing the item when configuring the item. If you input the information sequentially, the item input is completed.

Here, the item input process may produce an item having a multimedia function with a sound, a picture, a video, etc. attached to the item, as well as the text. If the picture is applied to the item, the picture is first selected through a menu selection operation. By clicking the frame to create a frame where the picture is to be placed and then selecting and specifying the picture from a predetermined picture tool box or the like, an item into which the picture is inputted can be produced (see FIG. 4A).

In addition, in the process of producing an item, a fingerprint for a predetermined problem is presented first, and then the header fingerprint type in which the problem is presented later, and the individual fingerprint type item in which the problem and the fingerprint are displayed on the same screen are also displayed within the corresponding problem area. The item will be saved. In other words, as shown in FIG. 4B, a predetermined fingerprint is selected and input using a fingerprint tool box (not shown), and the subject answers questions about the fingerprint. Then, the response input process for the question is processed based on a predetermined rule according to each item type.

On the other hand, the question bank, the problem area and the item can be modified through the menu selection bar or the like, or delete the stored data, of course.

The questions stored in the question banks can be moved between question banks and question areas, and can be stored in other question banks and question areas.

As described above, when the question bank is completed, the questionnaire forms a questionnaire for conducting the test, and the questionnaire may form test strips for each area according to the purpose and content of the subject, and when the questionnaire is integrated, Comprehensive inspection sheet can be constructed.

In addition, the test sheet is further provided with a test area that can be configured when a specific subject or test unit area is to be subdivided, where the minimum unit of the subject's score calculation and analysis is the test sheet.

Hereinafter, the process of forming the test paper will be divided into computer-use test (CBT) and computerized ability adaptation test (CAT).

First, while the paper-based examination and its inspection contents and order are provided in the same form, the inspection contents are displayed on a predetermined display and explain the process of constructing the examination paper of the computer-based examination that performs the answer input through a predetermined input medium for a predetermined time. Let's do it.

First of all, the computer-use test is presented in the order determined in the construction of the test sheet, and the total number of questions is fixed in the order of the comprehensive test, the test area and the test paper.

To configure this, select the computer-based test (CBT) according to the selection operation on the predetermined menu selection bar, and then input the comprehensive test name and the result report method that the subject selects the test result item or confirms the acceptance. do.

After that, the inspection area is configured before the test paper so that the inspection area can be freely constructed. After selecting the comprehensive test to which the inspection area belongs, the question is searched by the question bank, the problem area and the subject in the comprehensive test. The parameters are selected within a certain range, the items are selected by item characteristics, and a plurality of inspection areas are configured.

After the inspection area is configured, an inspection sheet is configured, wherein the inspection sheet is configured to selectively select one or more inspection regions from among the inspection regions, and inputs basic degrees such as inspection place name, inspection time, and perfect score of inspection site. .

The test sheet may include a message for notifying a break time provided between the test regions, a test start, and the like.

The following describes the process of constructing the test paper applied to the CAT.

First, the process of constructing the test paper according to the computerization adaptation test is made by using the selection menu bar as in the computer use test. In this case, in the method of reporting the results, the ability parameters based on the item response theory can be reported. Select the termination criteria algorithm.

Subsequently, the inspection area name and the contents of the inspection area are input to configure the inspection area, and the environment setting is performed such as inputting the number of questions that are the questions to be asked in the inspection area. In order to estimate the subject's ability, the test area considers and configures the item parameters such as difficulty and distinction of the item, and configures the test area with more items than the number of questions to be varied and abundant.

When the configuration of the inspection area is completed, the inspection place name, inspection time, inspection point, etc. are inputted, and the inspection sheet is made. In this case, if there are more than two test papers constituting the comprehensive test, it is impossible to move to the previous question when the computerized ability test is performed, so the test paper can be composed of computer use test and computerized test. In addition, a message for notifying the test sheet and the time when the test area is configured, the start of the test, and the like may be input. The method is the same as the computer-based test described above.

On the other hand, as described above, when the test sheet configuration is completed, the test subject can perform the test, in which the subject operates the test method selection module unit 130, the paper-based test (130a), computer-use test (130b), computerization ability One of the test type is selected from the adaptive test method (130c). That is, if one of the test types of paper-based inspection (130a), computer-use inspection (130b) and computerization ability adaptation examination (130c) is selected, the operation module unit 110 can be tested by a specific comprehensive test paper for each inspection type In this case, the remaining time and the number of questions can be checked while the inspection proceeds, and in the case where a plurality of inspection sheets are composed of one comprehensive examination, the inspection sheet can be terminated and the next inspection sheet can be moved to continue the inspection ( Step 204, step 206).

During the inspection, the tool key is used to respond to the inspection. For example, if the user selects the replay, the user can move to the previous item by clicking the replay while the predetermined item is displayed. Apply.

In this case, the contents and the order of the test are different depending on the computer use test and the computerization ability adaptation test according to the selection of the test method when the test proceeds. The description will be limited to the ability adaptation test.

Since the computerized adaptive test is provided so that a suitable test can be made for each individual according to the test subject's ability, such as the configuration of the test paper as described above, an item suitable for the individual subject's ability is presented.

According to such computerized adaptive test, when a subject connects to the educational evaluation system, that is, the operation module unit 110, and solves a question presented in a predetermined test area (steps 212-step 216), if a specific item is answered (step 212-step 216). Yes, at 218), the item is presented at a more difficult level than the item (step 220), and if it is wrong, an easier item is presented (step 222). After the test is completed, the subject confirms the analysis data for each item (steps 224 and 226).

At this time, the inspection process is proceeded by a start rule, a progress rule, and an end criterion for presenting items corresponding to the intermediate difficulty items and pass points as shown in FIG.

In other words, if the question is selected from the question bank according to the starting criteria such as the difficulty level of the item and the passing point during the inspection (step 230, step 232), and the response is processed for each item, the item response theory is used for the characteristic of the item. In addition to the analysis, the subject's ability is estimated accordingly (steps 234 and 236). Thereafter, when the end criteria such as the estimated error, the number of test items, and the test time set before the test are reached, the test is finished, and the result analysis for the test is calculated and provided to the subject (steps 238 and 240). At this time, the item analysis information and the subject's ability information, etc. are respectively stored in the corresponding information storage unit of the database 150.

On the other hand, for the computerized test as described above, it is necessary to accurately analyze the characteristics of the items, such as the difficulty of the item and the degree of discrimination, and the classical test theory and the item response theory are proposed as a theory for analyzing the characteristics of the items.

In other words, the item characteristic curve is a curve showing the probability of answering an item according to a subject's ability level in a specific item, and since each item has a unique property of an item, a different type of item characteristic curve appears. Figure 1).

[Figure 1]

The difficulty of the item, which indicates the degree of difficulty of the item, can be determined according to the position of the item characteristic curve. If the item curve position is located to the right, the more difficult item is represented (Figure 2).

[Figure 2]

In addition, the item discrimination, which indicates the degree to which the item discriminates the subject, is more discriminating the subject as the item characteristic curve is steeper (Figure 3).

[Figure 3]

In addition, the test characteristic curve which is the sum of the probability of answering the question in addition to the item characteristic curve required for the above-described item characteristic, the item difficulty degree indicating the probability of answering the item, and the item discrimination degree which is the slope on the item characteristic curve indicating the item difficulty In addition, the questionnaire provides an item information function indicating the amount of information provided by a particular item according to a subject's ability level, and a test information function indicating how accurately a particular test consisting of multiple items estimates a subject's characteristics or capabilities. Analyze the quality of the items that make up the test and the level of achievement of the test.

When the test performed for a predetermined time is terminated according to the selected test method as described above, the test subject may perform the item analysis and the ability analysis by the test analysis program stored in the test analysis program storage 140.

In other words, the subject may provide information such as difficulty, discrimination, estimation, response rate per item, item information function, and frequency of use of the item, which are calculated according to the analysis process based on classical test theory or item response theory after completion of the test. The subject is provided so that the subject can immediately check, and the analysis result is stored and managed by the subject in the question bank information storage unit 154, so that the question bank is constructed to enable individual customized learning according to the characteristics of the subject.

As described above, according to the educational evaluation system using the computer of the present invention and its operation method, it is possible to easily produce various types of questions because the computer is used for the production and execution of test papers, scoring and analysis, and report results. Even before the test is completed, the subject can recognize the answer to the answer in real time in real time, so that the learning correction and enhancement according to the subject's own ability is effective.

In addition, since a large number of subjects can be tested through a schedule network, it is possible to expect a temporal / spatial escaping. By providing a variety of information on questions and subjects, data collection and management of the subjects can be efficiently performed.

Claims (11)

  1. A system configured to allow an object (subject) to be online to connect via a predetermined network to perform an examination through an examination sheet provided from a certain computer;
    The system,
    A first to n-th subject having a predetermined terminal device 102a-102n so as to be connected online via the network, and selecting and selecting a test method and a test paper for a predetermined time through the terminal devices 102a-102n ( 100a-100n),
    Operation module unit for performing the overall control operation according to the schedule operating program 112 so that the first to n-th subject (100a-100n) can be connected online to perform the test (operation method unit and the test method management) 110),
    According to the control operation of the operation module unit 110, an item management unit 120a for producing various types of items such as audio, picture, video questions, listening evaluation questions, and fingerprint questions, and the item management unit 120a A management module unit 120 provided with a problem area management unit 120b for systematically managing items and a question bank management unit 120c for classifying and storing information related to the items as well as the content of the items stored in the problem areas;
    An inspection method selection module unit 130 for selecting and operating a predetermined inspection method and an inspection sheet based on the completed items manufactured by the management module unit 120;
    The test method and the test paper are selected by the first to nth subjects 100a-100n through the test method selection module unit 130 and when the corresponding test process is completed, the test result and the item analysis for each test subject. An inspection analysis program storage unit 140 for storing a corresponding inspection analysis program for processing and analyzing the results;
    The personal information storage unit 152, the question bank information storage unit 154, and the test result information to store the personal information and the question information of the first to nth subjects 100a-100n, and the test result of the analyzed subject. Education evaluation system using a computer, characterized in that it comprises a database (150) provided with a storage unit (156).
  2. The method of claim 1,
    The inspection method selection module unit 130 is provided in the same form as the paper test and the inspection content and the order of the test using a test paper printed on paper, the inspection content is displayed on a predetermined display unit for a predetermined time A computer based test (CBT) 130b provided to perform an answer input through a predetermined input medium;
    Computerized adaptive test (CAT) 130c which constructs a specific question bank according to a certain test theory for analyzing item characteristics such as difficulty and discrimination of the item and presents the item according to the ability of each subject (130c) Education evaluation system using a computer, characterized in that is configured to include.
  3. The method of claim 1,
    The test analysis program storage unit 140 checks the item difficulty, discrimination degree, incorrect answer attractiveness, and reliability, individual score analysis, and test score by the classical test theory presenting an analysis process for the average and the total test score of the subject group. 'TestAn' (140a), a test analysis program that provides a line graph,
    Based on the Item Response Theory, which analyzes the characteristics of each item, the Rasch model is a test and analysis program that provides the difficulty and estimated error, subject capability parameter, estimated error, true score, test information function, and test characteristic curve. Select the capability estimation method among 'Expected a Posteriori (EAP), Bayesan Modal Estimation (MAP) and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) by RaschAn' (140b) and Bayesian statistical method. A computer-aided educational evaluation system characterized by storing and managing 'BayesiAn' (140c), which is a test analysis program that provides subject capability parameters, estimated errors, true scores, test information functions, and test characteristic curves.
  4. The method of claim 1,
    When the question bank is configured by the management module unit 120, the test paper making unit 132 may provide the test paper according to the test method of the paper-based test, the computer use test (CBT), and the computerization ability adaptation test (CAT). Further, the examinee paper making unit 132 is a test area configured by subdividing the area of a predetermined subject or test unit according to the test purpose and content of the subject, a test paper consisting of one or more test areas, and Educational evaluation system using a computer, characterized in that composed of a comprehensive test consisting of the test paper.
  5. The method of claim 3, wherein
    The Item Response Theory, which analyzes the characteristics for each of the items, is a question feature curve indicating the probability of answering the question according to the subject's ability, an item difficulty degree indicating the probability of answering the question, and an item characteristic curve indicating the item difficulty Item discrimination, which is the slope of the image, item estimation on the item curve, test characteristic curve that is the sum of the probability of answering the item, an item information function that indicates how accurately a particular item estimates the subject's characteristics or ability, and multiple items A computer-aided education evaluation system, characterized in that for providing a test information function indicating how accurately a particular test consisting of the subject's characteristics or capabilities.
  6. Analyzing the characteristics of each item constituting the predetermined test sheet, and preparing items corresponding to the test objectives for each subject based on the information of the analyzed item;
    Constructing a test sheet according to the test purpose and contents of the test subject so that a paper-based test, a computer use test, and a computerization test can be provided according to the selection of the test method of the test subject, the test subject after establishment of the question bank;
    Selecting any one of the paper test, computer use test, and computerization test according to the test method of the subject and performing the test;
    After the test is performed, the test results are individually and in real time, based on a test analysis program according to the test method, and the test subjects are provided with the test results. Operating method of a computer-based educational evaluation system, characterized in that the step of storing the analysis results, such as the guess degree in the question bank.
  7. The method of claim 6,
    The question bank construction step,
    After the formation of a question bank with the desired name, the question bank consists of several stages of problem areas, and in the question areas, the authenticity, the connection, the multiple choice, the short answer, the parentheses, the essay, the fingerprint insertion, A method of operating a computer-based educational evaluation system, comprising the steps of constructing various types of questions, such as a fingerprint click type and a previously presented ability evaluation question.
  8. The method of claim 7, wherein
    The test sheet can be configured according to the test purpose and contents of the test subject so as to support the paper test, computer use test, and computerized ability test, respectively. Computer-based education comprising the steps of constructing a test area by identifying and selecting item characteristics according to difficulty, discriminantity, and degree of estimation, and configuring the test area by selectively configuring the test area. How the evaluation system works.
  9. The method of claim 8,
    Configuring the test area belonging to the lower level than the test paper before the test paper is configured to selectively configure the test area from the pre-configured test areas, the method of operating an educational evaluation system using a computer.
  10. The method of claim 6,
    In the computerized ability test, if a question that meets the subject's ability is presented, an item with a difficulty level of the next item is presented if a predetermined item is met during execution of the test, and if it is wrong, the difficulty of the next item is higher than the item. A method for operating an educational evaluation system using a computer, characterized by an easy-level question.
  11. The method of claim 10,
    The test sheet using the computerized adaptive test can be provided with an entry level, a branching rule, and a stopping criterion to provide individual test for each subject in addition to the test paper according to the computer use test. A method for operating an educational evaluation system using a computer, which is achieved by an algorithm including a rule).
KR1020010041079A 2001-07-10 2001-07-10 Education valuation system using a computer and the operation method thereof KR20010103810A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020010041079A KR20010103810A (en) 2001-07-10 2001-07-10 Education valuation system using a computer and the operation method thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020010041079A KR20010103810A (en) 2001-07-10 2001-07-10 Education valuation system using a computer and the operation method thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20010103810A true KR20010103810A (en) 2001-11-24

Family

ID=45811654

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020010041079A KR20010103810A (en) 2001-07-10 2001-07-10 Education valuation system using a computer and the operation method thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20010103810A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7281219B2 (en) 2003-12-05 2007-10-09 International Business Machines Corporation Blended learning experience tool and method
US7371070B2 (en) 2003-12-05 2008-05-13 International Business Machines Corporation Operationalizing a learning solution
US7914288B2 (en) 2004-10-07 2011-03-29 International Bussiness Machines Corporation On demand learning
KR101327314B1 (en) * 2008-08-20 2013-11-08 정근수 System of producing test contents by program
US9472114B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2016-10-18 International Business Machines Corporation Computer-implemented method, system and program product for providing an educational program

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9472114B2 (en) 2003-05-01 2016-10-18 International Business Machines Corporation Computer-implemented method, system and program product for providing an educational program
US7281219B2 (en) 2003-12-05 2007-10-09 International Business Machines Corporation Blended learning experience tool and method
US7371070B2 (en) 2003-12-05 2008-05-13 International Business Machines Corporation Operationalizing a learning solution
US7603324B2 (en) 2003-12-05 2009-10-13 International Business Machines Corporation Operationalizing a learning solution
US7914288B2 (en) 2004-10-07 2011-03-29 International Bussiness Machines Corporation On demand learning
KR101327314B1 (en) * 2008-08-20 2013-11-08 정근수 System of producing test contents by program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Viberg et al. The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education
Ruipérez-Valiente et al. ALAS-KA: A learning analytics extension for better understanding the learning process in the Khan Academy platform
Lee et al. Enhancing pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice
Muse et al. A systematic review of methods for assessing competence in cognitive–behavioural therapy
US20180012507A1 (en) Context-aware adaptive data processing application
Means et al. Teachers' Ability to Use Data to Inform Instruction: Challenges and Supports.
Robinson Evaluating criteria for English learner reclassification: A causal-effects approach using a binding-score regression discontinuity design with instrumental variables
Shepard Commentary: Evaluating the validity of formative and interim assessment
Simon High school outreach and family involvement
Range et al. Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective
Ruiz-Primo et al. On the validity of cognitive interpretations of scores from alternative concept-mapping techniques
Hanson Institutional theory and educational change
Duschl Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria
Meier et al. A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes
Mertler Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom
Al‐Eisa et al. An empirical examination of the effects of self‐efficacy, supervisor support and motivation to learn on transfer intention
Cochran-Smith Constructing outcomes in teacher education
Grandzol et al. Interaction in online courses: More is not always better
Barnett et al. Transformational leadership in schools–panacea, placebo or problem?
Anderson Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model
Ke et al. Evaluating online learning communities
de Lancer Julnes Performance measurement: An effective tool for government accountability? The debate goes on
Mostow et al. Some useful tactics to modify, map and mine data from intelligent tutors
Hallinger Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership
Nichols et al. Cognitively diagnostic assessment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
G15R Request for early opening
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E601 Decision to refuse application