JPS6243912B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS6243912B2
JPS6243912B2 JP57002952A JP295282A JPS6243912B2 JP S6243912 B2 JPS6243912 B2 JP S6243912B2 JP 57002952 A JP57002952 A JP 57002952A JP 295282 A JP295282 A JP 295282A JP S6243912 B2 JPS6243912 B2 JP S6243912B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
panel
plate
bones
span
small
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP57002952A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS58122282A (en
Inventor
Masayoshi Higashimura
Koichi Masuda
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kanadevia Corp
Original Assignee
Hitachi Shipbuilding and Engineering Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Shipbuilding and Engineering Co Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Shipbuilding and Engineering Co Ltd
Priority to JP295282A priority Critical patent/JPS58122282A/en
Publication of JPS58122282A publication Critical patent/JPS58122282A/en
Publication of JPS6243912B2 publication Critical patent/JPS6243912B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B3/00Hulls characterised by their structure or component parts
    • B63B3/14Hull parts
    • B63B3/16Shells

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Panels For Use In Building Construction (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 産業上の利用分野 この発明は、たとえば船の外板、甲板、隔壁な
どに用いられるパネル構造に関する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Field of Industrial Application This invention relates to a panel structure used for, for example, a ship's shell, deck, bulkhead, etc.

従来の技術とその問題点 たとえば船の二重底タンク頂板(内底板)など
は、第1図および第2図に示されているように、
鋼板1の片面に複数の大骨(フロア)2および小
骨(スチフナ)3が固着されたパネル構造を有す
る。水圧などの垂直荷重を受けるこのような鋼板
に対する船級協会の要求板厚は、小骨および大骨
で周辺を固定されたパネルの塑性崩壊を主な基準
として規定されている。すなわち、垂直荷重を受
けるパネルの小骨間の短辺を取出した帯板に等分
布荷重を受けて最初の塑性ヒンジが発生するとき
の荷重をもつてこのパネルの塑性崩壊荷重と見做
した次の式が基準となつている。
Conventional technology and its problems For example, the top plate (inner bottom plate) of a ship's double bottom tank, as shown in Figures 1 and 2,
It has a panel structure in which a plurality of large bones (floors) 2 and small bones (stiffeners) 3 are fixed to one side of a steel plate 1. The required thickness by classification societies for such steel plates, which are subjected to vertical loads such as water pressure, is determined based primarily on the plastic collapse of panels whose periphery is fixed with small and large bones. In other words, the load at which the first plastic hinge is generated when the short side of the panel between the small bones of the panel subjected to the vertical load is subjected to an evenly distributed load is considered as the plastic collapse load of this panel. The formula is the standard.

ここで、tはパネルの板厚、sは帯板のスパ
ン、σは帯板の降伏応力、wは帯板の崩壊荷重で
ある。第2図イのような等分布荷重を受ける帯板
の弾性域内での曲げモーメント分布は第2図ロの
ようになり、曲げモーメントは、小骨3上の点A
で最大となり、スパン中央の点Bでその半分とな
る。一方、パネルの塑性強度についてみると、大
骨2間の中央で小骨3上の点A、小骨3間の中央
で大骨2上の点C、大骨2間の中央で小骨3間の
中央の点Bの順に塑性ヒンジが発生し、第3図に
矢印で示すように塑性ヒンジが進展して屋根型崩
壊モードをとることが知られている。鋼板1の板
厚tを13mm、大骨2間のスパンs1を2115mm、小
骨3間のスパンsを925mmとし、パネルの鋼板1
表面における塑性ヒンジの発生状況とその進展に
ついて弾塑性解析プログラムを用いて検討した結
果、まず点Aにおいて約11.4t/m2の垂直荷重で
塑性ヒンジが生じ、ついで点Cにおいて約
16.5t/m2の荷重で、さらに点Bにおいて約
20.0t/m2の荷重で塑性ヒンジが発生し、垂直荷
重の増加にともなつて第3図の矢印方向に塑性ヒ
ンジが進展することが確められている。このよう
に、パネルの強度は点Aで決まり、従来のように
一様な板厚を有する鋼板を用いてパネルを構成す
る場合、点Aにおける強度上の要求を満たすため
に他の部分の板厚が必要以上に厚くなり、パネル
全体の重量が大きくなるというような問題があ
る。
Here, t is the thickness of the panel, s is the span of the strip, σ is the yield stress of the strip, and w is the collapse load of the strip. The bending moment distribution within the elastic region of the strip subjected to a uniformly distributed load as shown in Figure 2A is as shown in Figure 2B, and the bending moment is at point A on the small bone 3.
It reaches its maximum at point B, which is at the center of the span, and becomes half of it at point B at the center of the span. On the other hand, looking at the plastic strength of the panel, point A on the ossicle 3 at the center between the large bones 2, point C on the large bone 2 at the center between the 3 bones, and point C on the large bone 2 at the center between the 2 large bones and the center between the 3 small bones. It is known that a plastic hinge occurs in the order of point B, and as shown by the arrow in FIG. 3, the plastic hinge develops and takes a roof-type collapse mode. The thickness t of the steel plate 1 is 13 mm, the span s1 between the large bones 2 is 2115 mm, the span s between the small bones 3 is 925 mm, and the steel plate 1 of the panel is
As a result of examining the occurrence and development of plastic hinges on the surface using an elastic-plastic analysis program, we found that first, a plastic hinge occurs at point A under a vertical load of approximately 11.4t/ m2 , and then at point C, approximately
With a load of 16.5t/ m2 , approximately
It has been confirmed that a plastic hinge occurs at a load of 20.0t/m 2 and that the plastic hinge develops in the direction of the arrow in Figure 3 as the vertical load increases. In this way, the strength of the panel is determined at point A, and when constructing a panel using steel plates with a uniform thickness as in the past, other parts of the plate are required to meet the strength requirements at point A. There are problems in that the thickness becomes thicker than necessary and the weight of the entire panel increases.

この発明の目的は、上記の問題を解決し、軽量
で強度の大きいパネル構造を提供することにあ
る。
An object of the present invention is to solve the above problems and provide a lightweight and strong panel structure.

問題点を解決するための手段 この発明によるパネル構造は、金属板の片面が
平坦に形成され、一定間隔おきに板厚が厚くなる
ように他面に複数の突条が形成されており、複数
の小骨がこの金属板のいずれか片面の1条おきの
突条に対応する位置に固着されて、小骨に対応す
る位置および小骨間のスパンの中央の板厚が厚く
なつていることを特徴とするものである。
Means for Solving the Problems In the panel structure according to the present invention, one side of a metal plate is formed flat, and a plurality of protrusions are formed on the other side so that the plate thickness increases at regular intervals. The ossicles are fixed at positions corresponding to every other protrusion on one side of the metal plate, and the thickness of the plate is thicker at the position corresponding to the ossicles and at the center of the span between the ossicles. It is something to do.

作 用 金属板の小骨に対応する位置および小骨間のス
パンの中央に突条が形成されて板厚が厚くなつて
いることにより、パネルの崩壊荷重が増して強度
が大きくなり、しかも、全体の板厚が一様に厚く
なつた場合に比べて、これと同等の大きな強度を
有するにもかかわらず、全体の重量増加が小さ
い。
Function: By forming protrusions on the metal plate at the positions corresponding to the small bones and at the center of the span between the small bones, and making the plate thicker, the collapse load of the panel increases and its strength increases, and the overall strength of the metal plate increases. Compared to a case where the plate thickness is uniformly increased, the overall weight increase is small even though it has the same great strength.

実施例 この発明の実施例を説明する前に、第4図〜第
6図を参照して、比較例について説明する。
Examples Before describing examples of the present invention, a comparative example will be described with reference to FIGS. 4 to 6.

この比較例のパネル構造では、鋼板11の片面
は平坦に形成され、他面には同じ大きさの方形断
面の複数の突条12が一定間隔おきに一体に形成
されており、板厚が一定間隔おきに厚くなつてい
る。鋼板11の平坦面11aには、複数の小骨3
が突条12の反対側の位置に固着されて、小骨3
に対応する位置の板厚のみが厚くなつており、さ
らに複数の大骨2が小骨3と直角に固着されてい
る。
In the panel structure of this comparative example, one side of the steel plate 11 is formed flat, and a plurality of protrusions 12 of the same size and square cross section are integrally formed at regular intervals on the other side, and the plate thickness is constant. It gets thicker at intervals. A plurality of small bones 3 are formed on the flat surface 11a of the steel plate 11.
is fixed at a position opposite to the protrusion 12, and the small bone 3
The thickness of the plate is increased only at the position corresponding to , and a plurality of large bones 2 are fixed at right angles to small bones 3.

前記同様の弾塑性解析プログラムを用いて解析
した結果、小骨3に対応する位置の板厚を大きく
することにより第1図〜第3図の場合に比べてパ
ネルの崩壊荷重が増して強度が大きくなることが
確められた。すなわち、第4図〜第6図におい
て、鋼板11の両面平坦部の板厚tを13mm、小骨
3に対応する位置に形成された方形断面の突条1
2の幅bを200mm、この部分の板厚t1を21mmと
し、他の条件を第1図〜第3図の場合と同一にし
た場合、大骨2間のスパンs1の中央で突条5と
両面平坦部との境界部分の点Dにおいて約
19.9t/m2の垂直荷重でまず塑性ヒンジが生じ、
ついで点C、点A、点Bの順にそれぞれ約21.9、
23.3、27.9t/m2の荷重で塑性ヒンジが発生し、
垂直荷重の増加にともなつて第6図の矢印方向に
塑性ヒンジが発展する。
As a result of analysis using the same elastic-plastic analysis program as above, it was found that by increasing the plate thickness at the position corresponding to the small bone 3, the collapse load of the panel increased compared to the cases shown in Figures 1 to 3, resulting in greater strength. It was confirmed that it would happen. That is, in FIGS. 4 to 6, the plate thickness t of the flat portion on both sides of the steel plate 11 is 13 mm, and the protrusion 1 with a rectangular cross section is formed at a position corresponding to the small bone 3.
When the width b of 2 is 200 mm, the plate thickness t1 of this part is 21 mm, and other conditions are the same as in Figs. 1 to 3, the protrusion 5 and Approximately at point D at the boundary with the flat part on both sides
At a vertical load of 19.9t/ m2 , a plastic hinge first occurs,
Next, point C, point A, and point B each have approximately 21.9,
A plastic hinge occurs at loads of 23.3 and 27.9t/ m2 ,
As the vertical load increases, a plastic hinge develops in the direction of the arrow in FIG.

次に、第7図〜第9図を参照して、この発明の
1実施例を説明する。
Next, one embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 7 to 9.

この実施例のパネル構造でも、鋼板13の片面
は平坦に形成されており、他面には同じ大きさの
方形断面の複数の突条14が一定間隔おきに一体
に形成されている。鋼板13の平坦面13aに
は、複数の小骨3が1条おきの突条14の反対側
の位置に固着されて、小骨3に対応する位置およ
び小骨3の間のスパンsの中央の板厚が厚くなつ
ている。他は比較例の場合と同様である。
In the panel structure of this embodiment as well, one side of the steel plate 13 is formed flat, and a plurality of protrusions 14 of the same size and square cross section are integrally formed on the other side at regular intervals. A plurality of small bones 3 are fixed to the flat surface 13a of the steel plate 13 at positions opposite to every other protrusion 14, and the plate thickness at the position corresponding to the small bones 3 and the center of the span s between the small bones 3 is fixed to the flat surface 13a of the steel plate 13. is getting thicker. The rest is the same as in the comparative example.

前記同様の弾塑性解析プログラムを用いて解析
した結果、小骨3に対応する位置および小骨3間
のスパンsの中央の板厚を厚くすることにより第
4図〜第6図の比較例の場合に比べてさらにパネ
ルの崩壊荷重が増して強度が大きくなることが確
かめられた。すなわち、第7図〜第9図におい
て、鋼板13の小骨3に対応する位置および小骨
3間のスパンsの中央に形成された方形断面の突
条14の幅bを200mm、この部分の板厚t1を21
mmとし、他の条件を第4図〜第6図の場合と同一
にした場合、まず点Aにおいて約23.0t/m2の垂
直荷重で塑性ヒンジが生じ、ついで点C、大骨2
間のスパンs1の中央で小骨3間のスパンs中央
の突条14と両面平坦部との境界部分の点E、点
Dの順にそれぞれ約27.0、33.0、35.0t/m2の荷重
で塑性ヒンジが発生し、垂直荷重の増加にともな
つて第9図の矢印方向に塑性ヒンジが進展する。
As a result of analysis using the same elastic-plastic analysis program as described above, it was found that by increasing the plate thickness at the position corresponding to the small bones 3 and at the center of the span s between the small bones 3, the comparative example shown in Figs. In comparison, it was confirmed that the collapse load of the panel increased and its strength increased. That is, in FIGS. 7 to 9, the width b of the protrusion 14 with a rectangular cross section formed at the position corresponding to the small bones 3 of the steel plate 13 and at the center of the span s between the small bones 3 is 200 mm, and the plate thickness at this part is t1 to 21
mm, and other conditions are the same as in Figures 4 to 6, a plastic hinge occurs first at point A under a vertical load of approximately 23.0t/ m2 , then at point C, the large bone 2
At the center of the span s1 between the ossicles 3, a plastic hinge is formed at points E and D at the boundary between the ridge 14 at the center of the span s and the flat portion on both sides under loads of approximately 27.0, 33.0, and 35.0t/ m2, respectively. occurs, and as the vertical load increases, the plastic hinge develops in the direction of the arrow in FIG.

なお、鋼板13の両面平坦部の板厚tならびに
突条14の部分の幅bおよび板厚t1は、パネル
に作用する最大垂直荷重、小骨3間のスパンsな
どを考慮して適宜決定される。
Note that the thickness t of the flat portion on both sides of the steel plate 13 and the width b and thickness t1 of the protrusion 14 are appropriately determined in consideration of the maximum vertical load acting on the panel, the span s between the small bones 3, etc. .

第10図は、上記と異なる実施例を示す。 FIG. 10 shows an embodiment different from the above.

この実施例のパネル構造では、鋼板15の片面
に、比較的大きな突条16と比較的小さな突条1
7とが一定間隔をおいて交互に形成されている。
そして、鋼板15の平坦面15aには、複数の小
骨3が大きな突条16の反対側の位置に固着さ
れ、小さな突条17が小骨3間のスパンsの中央
に位置している。他は第7図〜第9図の場合と同
様である。
In the panel structure of this embodiment, a relatively large protrusion 16 and a relatively small protrusion 1 are provided on one side of the steel plate 15.
7 are formed alternately at regular intervals.
A plurality of ossicles 3 are fixed to the flat surface 15a of the steel plate 15 at positions opposite to the large ridges 16, and the small ridges 17 are located at the center of the span s between the ossicles 3. The rest is the same as in the case of FIGS. 7 to 9.

この発明は、鋼板だけでなく、アルミニウム板
などのあらゆる金属板を使用したパネル構造に適
用できる。
This invention can be applied to panel structures using not only steel plates but also any metal plates such as aluminum plates.

発明の効果 この発明のパネル構造によれば、金属板の小骨
に対応する位置および小骨間のスパンの中央に突
条が形成されて板厚が厚くなつているので、軽量
で強度の大きいパネルを構成することができ、全
体の板厚が厚くなつた場合と同等の大きな強度を
有し、かつ従来のように全体の板厚が一様に厚く
なつたものに比べて全体の重量増加が小さくてす
む。
Effects of the Invention According to the panel structure of the present invention, protrusions are formed at positions corresponding to the small bones of the metal plate and at the center of the span between the small bones, and the plate thickness is increased, so that a lightweight and strong panel can be obtained. It has the same great strength as when the overall plate thickness is increased, and the overall weight increase is smaller than the conventional one where the overall plate thickness is uniformly thick. I'll try it.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図〜第3図は従来例を示し、第1図はパネ
ルの部分平面図、第2図は第1図―線の拡大
断面図およびその曲げモーメント図、第3図は第
1図a部を拡大し鋼板表面における塑性ヒンジの
発生状況とその進展について弾塑性解析プログラ
ムを用いて解析した結果を示す図面、第4図〜第
6図は比較例を示し、第4図はパネルの部分拡大
平面図、第5図は第4図―線の断面図、第6
図は第4図a部を拡大し上記弾塑性解析プログラ
ムを用いて解析した結果を示す第3図相当の図
面、第7図、第8図および第9図はこの発明の実
施例を示しそれぞれ第4図、第5図および第6図
に対応する図面、第10図はこの発明の他の実施
例を示す第8図相当の図面である。 13,15…鋼板(金属板)、14,16,1
7…突条、13a,15a…平坦面。
Figures 1 to 3 show a conventional example, Figure 1 is a partial plan view of the panel, Figure 2 is an enlarged sectional view along the line of Figure 1 and its bending moment diagram, and Figure 3 is Figure 1 a. Figures 4 to 6 show comparative examples; Figures 4 to 6 show comparative examples; Enlarged plan view, Fig. 5 is a sectional view taken along the line of Fig. 4, Fig. 6
The figure is an enlarged view of part a in Figure 4 and corresponds to Figure 3 showing the results of analysis using the above-mentioned elastic-plastic analysis program. Figures 7, 8, and 9 show embodiments of the present invention, respectively. 4, 5 and 6, and FIG. 10 is a drawing corresponding to FIG. 8 showing another embodiment of the present invention. 13, 15... Steel plate (metal plate), 14, 16, 1
7... Projection, 13a, 15a... Flat surface.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 金属板の片面が平坦に形成され、一定間隔お
きに板厚が厚くなるように他面に複数の突条が形
成されており、複数の小骨がこの金属板のいずれ
か片面の1条おきの突条に対応する位置に固着さ
れて、小骨に対応する位置および小骨間のスパン
の中央の板厚が厚くなつていることを特徴とする
パネル構造。
1 One side of a metal plate is formed flat, and the other side has a plurality of protrusions formed at regular intervals so that the plate thickness becomes thicker, and a plurality of small bones are formed on one side of the metal plate at every other line. The panel structure is fixed at a position corresponding to the protrusion of the ossicle, and has a thick plate thickness at a position corresponding to the ossicles and at the center of the span between the ossicles.
JP295282A 1982-01-11 1982-01-11 panel structure Granted JPS58122282A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP295282A JPS58122282A (en) 1982-01-11 1982-01-11 panel structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP295282A JPS58122282A (en) 1982-01-11 1982-01-11 panel structure

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS58122282A JPS58122282A (en) 1983-07-20
JPS6243912B2 true JPS6243912B2 (en) 1987-09-17

Family

ID=11543701

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP295282A Granted JPS58122282A (en) 1982-01-11 1982-01-11 panel structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS58122282A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS58191498U (en) * 1982-06-15 1983-12-20 三菱重工業株式会社 structural board
JPS60150992U (en) * 1984-03-16 1985-10-07 石川島播磨重工業株式会社 Stiffening plate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS58122282A (en) 1983-07-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2582020Y2 (en) Multi-inclined web plate made of aromatic polycarbonate (PC)
JPS6243912B2 (en)
JPS6231359Y2 (en)
Naruse et al. Scantling evaluations of plates and stiffeners based on elasto-plastic analysis under axial loads and lateral pressures
JOHNSON JR et al. Critical bending stress for flat rectangular plates supported along all edges and elastically restrained against rotation along the unloaded compression edge
JP2821163B2 (en) Railcar roof structure
JPS6231358Y2 (en)
JPH1136654A (en) Aseismic wall
JPH06270881A (en) Hull girder structure
JP2568476Y2 (en) Reinforcement structure of column / beam joint
Elangovan et al. Critical shear stress of flat rectangular plates with free edges
JPH07132876A (en) Hull bilge hopper construction
JP5176338B2 (en) Folded plate material for building structure
JPH0335756Y2 (en)
JPS58168762A (en) Rigidity adjustable shear wall
JPH07237577A (en) Double hull structure
JPS6218385A (en) Hull structure
JPS6296290A (en) Cage wall panel for elevator
AT384380B (en) REINFORCEMENT FOR A SHEET
JPH0716809Y2 (en) Stiffener
RU2028244C1 (en) Method of making sections of the metallic hull
JPH0629282Y2 (en) Seismic structure
JP2000073460A (en) Brace material
JP3027979U (en) Backing material for aluminum roofing materials
Ha et al. Stiffness matrices for exact analysis of sandwich beam systems