JPS6231358Y2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS6231358Y2
JPS6231358Y2 JP1982002415U JP241582U JPS6231358Y2 JP S6231358 Y2 JPS6231358 Y2 JP S6231358Y2 JP 1982002415 U JP1982002415 U JP 1982002415U JP 241582 U JP241582 U JP 241582U JP S6231358 Y2 JPS6231358 Y2 JP S6231358Y2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
panel
bones
steel plate
span
double
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP1982002415U
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS58104792U (en
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to JP241582U priority Critical patent/JPS58104792U/en
Publication of JPS58104792U publication Critical patent/JPS58104792U/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JPS6231358Y2 publication Critical patent/JPS6231358Y2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Filling Or Discharging Of Gas Storage Vessels (AREA)
  • Drawing Aids And Blackboards (AREA)

Description

【考案の詳細な説明】 産業上の利用分野 この考案は、たとえば船の外板、甲板、隔壁な
どに用いられるパネル構造に関する。
[Detailed Description of the Invention] Industrial Application Field This invention relates to a panel structure used for, for example, the outer panel, deck, bulkhead, etc. of a ship.

従来の技術とその問題点 たとえば船の二重底タンク頂板(内底板)など
は、第1図および第2図に示されているように、
鋼板1の片面に複数の大骨(フロア)2および小
骨(スチフナ)3が固着されたパネル構造を有す
る。水圧などの垂直荷重を受けるこのような鋼板
に対する船級協会の要求板厚は、小骨および大骨
で周辺を固定されたパネルの塑性崩壊を主な基準
として提案されている。すなわち、垂直荷重を受
けるパネルの小骨間の短辺を取出した帯板に等分
布荷重を受けて最初の塑性ヒンジが発生するとき
の荷重をもつてこのパネルの塑性崩壊荷重と見做
した次の式が基準となつている。
Conventional technology and its problems For example, the top plate (inner bottom plate) of a ship's double bottom tank, as shown in Figures 1 and 2,
It has a panel structure in which a plurality of large bones (floors) 2 and small bones (stiffeners) 3 are fixed to one side of a steel plate 1. The required thickness of such steel plates, which are subjected to vertical loads such as water pressure, by classification societies is proposed mainly based on the plastic collapse of panels whose periphery is fixed with small and large bones. In other words, the load at which the first plastic hinge is generated when the short side of the panel between the small bones of the panel subjected to the vertical load is subjected to an evenly distributed load is considered as the plastic collapse load of this panel. The formula is the standard.

ここで、tはパネルの板厚、sは帯板のスパ
ン、σは帯板の降伏応力、wは帯板の崩壊荷重で
ある。第2図イのような等分布荷重を受ける帯板
の弾性域内での曲げモーメント分布は第2図ロの
ようになり、曲げモーメントは、小骨3上の点A
で最大となり、スパン中央の点Bでその半分とな
る。一方、パネルの塑性強度についてみると、大
骨2間の中央で小骨3上の点A、小骨3間の中央
で大骨2上の点C、大骨2間の中央で小骨3間の
中央の点Bの順に塑性ヒンジが発生し、第3図に
矢印で示すように塑性ヒンジが進展して屋根型崩
壊モードをとることが知られている。鋼板1の板
厚tを13mm、大骨2間のスパンs1を2115mm、小
骨3間のスパンsを925mmとし、パネルの鋼板1
表面における塑性ヒンジの発生状況とその進展に
ついて弾塑性解析プログラムを用いて検討した結
果、まず点Aにおいて約11.4t/m2の垂直荷重で
塑性ヒンジが生じ、ついで点Cにおいて約
16.5t/m2の荷重で、さらに点Bにおいて約
20.0t/m2の荷重で塑性ヒンジが発生し、垂直荷
重の増加にともなつて第3図の矢印方向に塑性ヒ
ンジが進展することが確められている。このよう
に、パネルの強度は点Aで決まり、従来のように
一様な板厚を有する鋼板を用いてパネルの構成す
る場合、点Aにおける強度上の要求を満すために
他の部分の板厚が必要以上に厚くなり、パネル全
体の重量が大きくなるというような問題がある。
Here, t is the thickness of the panel, s is the span of the strip, σ is the yield stress of the strip, and w is the collapse load of the strip. The bending moment distribution within the elastic region of the strip subjected to a uniformly distributed load as shown in Figure 2A is as shown in Figure 2B, and the bending moment is at point A on the small bone 3.
It reaches its maximum at point B, which is at the center of the span, and becomes half of it at point B at the center of the span. On the other hand, looking at the plastic strength of the panel, point A on the ossicle 3 at the center between the large bones 2, point C on the large bone 2 at the center between the 3 bones, and point C on the large bone 2 at the center between the 2 large bones and the center between the 3 small bones. It is known that a plastic hinge occurs in the order of point B, and as shown by the arrow in FIG. 3, the plastic hinge develops and takes a roof-type collapse mode. The thickness t of the steel plate 1 is 13 mm, the span s1 between the large bones 2 is 2115 mm, the span s between the small bones 3 is 925 mm, and the steel plate 1 of the panel is
As a result of examining the occurrence and development of plastic hinges on the surface using an elastic-plastic analysis program, we found that first, a plastic hinge occurs at point A under a vertical load of approximately 11.4t/ m2 , and then at point C, approximately
With a load of 16.5t/ m2 , approximately
It has been confirmed that a plastic hinge occurs at a load of 20.0t/m 2 and that the plastic hinge develops in the direction of the arrow in Figure 3 as the vertical load increases. In this way, the strength of the panel is determined at point A, and when constructing a panel using steel plates with uniform thickness as in the past, other parts must be adjusted to meet the strength requirements at point A. There are problems in that the board becomes thicker than necessary and the weight of the entire panel increases.

また、すでに建造済のタンク壁などが設計条件
の変更で板厚不足をきたすことがあり、このよう
な場合の補強対策として、鋼板を全面的に取替え
ること、小骨間のスパンを小さくするために現装
小骨間に新たに小骨を追加すること、パネルの縦
横比を小さくするために現装大骨間に新たに大骨
を追加することなどが考えられる。ところが、鋼
板を全体の板厚が一様に大きくなつたものと取替
える場合には、前述のようにパネルの重量が大幅
に増加し、骨材を追加する場合には、骨材を配置
する側がタンクなどであれば骨材の新設作業が困
難で補強対策にともなう費用が非常に高くつく。
Additionally, tank walls that have already been constructed may become insufficient in thickness due to changes in design conditions. In such cases, reinforcement measures include completely replacing the steel plates and reducing the span between the small bones. Possible options include adding new ossicles between existing ossicles, and adding new large bones between existing ossicles to reduce the aspect ratio of the panel. However, when replacing the steel plate with one whose overall thickness is uniformly increased, the weight of the panel increases significantly as described above, and when adding aggregate, the side where the aggregate is placed becomes In the case of tanks, etc., it is difficult to install new aggregate, and the costs associated with reinforcement measures are extremely high.

この考案の目的は、上記の問題を解決し、軽量
で強度が大きく、かつ建造済の従来のパネルから
簡単に改造することができるパネル構造を提供す
ることにある。
The purpose of this invention is to solve the above problems and provide a panel structure that is lightweight and strong, and that can be easily modified from conventional panels that have already been constructed.

問題点を解決するための手段 この考案によるパネル構造は、鋼板の片面に複
数の小骨が固着され、鋼板の他面の小骨に対する
対応する位置および小骨間のスパンの中央に二重
張板が固着されていることを特徴とするものであ
る。
Means for solving the problem In the panel structure according to this invention, a plurality of small bones are fixed to one side of a steel plate, and a double-clad plate is fixed to the other side of the steel plate at the corresponding position to the small bones and at the center of the span between the small bones. It is characterized by the fact that

作 用 鋼板の小骨に対応する位置および小骨間のスパ
ンの中央に二重張板が固着されていることによ
り、パネルの崩壊荷重が増して強度が大きくな
り、しかも、全体の板厚が一様に大きくなつた場
合に比べて、これと同等の大きな強度を有するに
もかかわらず、全体の重量増加が小さい。また、
鋼板の小骨と反対側に面に二重張板が固着されて
いるので、すでに建造済のタンク壁などを補強す
る場合、骨材がタンク側に配置されていても、鋼
板に二重張板を固着する改造作業をタンクの外側
から行なうことができる。
Function: Double clad plates are fixed to the steel plate at positions corresponding to the small bones and at the center of the span between the small bones, increasing the collapse load of the panel and increasing its strength.Moreover, the entire plate thickness is uniform. Although it has the same high strength, the overall weight increase is small compared to the case where the size is increased to 1. Also,
A double clad plate is fixed to the opposite side of the steel plate to the small ribs, so when reinforcing an already constructed tank wall, etc., even if aggregate is placed on the tank side, double clad plate is fixed to the steel plate. Modification work to secure the tank can be carried out from outside the tank.

実施例 この考案の実施例を説明する前に、第4図〜第
6図を参照して、比較例について説明する。
Example Before describing the example of this invention, a comparative example will be described with reference to FIGS. 4 to 6.

この比較例のパネル構造は、第1図〜第3図の
パネルに補強対策を施して改造したものであり、
鋼板1ならびに大骨2および小骨3の配置は第1
図〜第3図の場合と同一である。そして、鋼板1
の小骨3と反対側の面には、複数の細長い二重張
板(ダブラ)4が小骨3に対応する位置にのみ固
着されている。
The panel structure of this comparative example is a modified version of the panel shown in Figures 1 to 3 with reinforcement measures taken.
The arrangement of the steel plate 1, large bones 2, and small bones 3 is as follows.
This is the same as in the case of FIGS. And steel plate 1
On the surface opposite to the ossicles 3, a plurality of elongated double plates (doublers) 4 are fixed only at positions corresponding to the ossicles 3.

前記同様の弾塑性解析プログラムを用いて解析
した結果、小骨3に対応する位置に二重張板4を
固着することにより第1図〜第3図の場合に比べ
てパネルの崩壊荷重が増して強度が大きくなるこ
とが確められた。すなわち、第4図〜第6図にお
いて、二重張板4の幅bを200mm、その板厚t1
を8mmとした場合、大骨2間のスパンs1の中央
で二重張板4の幅方向側端部の点Dにおいて約
19.9t/m2の垂直荷重でまず塑性ヒンジが生じ、
ついで点C、点A、点Bの順にそれぞれ約21.9,
23.3,27.9t/m2の荷重で塑性ヒンジが発生し、
垂直荷重の増加にともなつて第6図の矢印方向に
塑性ヒンジが進展する。
As a result of analysis using the same elastoplastic analysis program as described above, it was found that by fixing the double clad plate 4 at the position corresponding to the small bone 3, the collapse load of the panel increased compared to the cases shown in Figs. 1 to 3. It was confirmed that the strength was increased. That is, in FIGS. 4 to 6, the width b of the double clad board 4 is 200 mm, and the board thickness t1.
is 8 mm, approximately
At a vertical load of 19.9t/ m2 , a plastic hinge first occurs,
Next, point C, point A, and point B each have approximately 21.9,
A plastic hinge occurs at a load of 23.3, 27.9t/ m2 ,
As the vertical load increases, the plastic hinge develops in the direction of the arrow in FIG.

次に、第7図〜第9図を参照して、本願考案の
1実施例を説明する。
Next, one embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 7 to 9.

この実施例のパネル構造も、第1図〜第3図の
パネルに補強対策を施して改造したものであり、
鋼板1ならびに大骨2および小骨3の配置は第1
図〜第3図の場合と同一である。そして、鋼板1
の小骨3と反対側の面には、複数の細長い二重張
板(ダブラ)4が小骨3に対応する位置および小
骨3間のスパンsの中央に固着されている。
The panel structure of this example is also a modification of the panel shown in Figures 1 to 3 by taking reinforcement measures.
The arrangement of the steel plate 1, large bones 2, and small bones 3 is as follows.
This is the same as in the case of FIGS. And steel plate 1
On the side opposite to the ossicles 3, a plurality of elongated double plates (doublers) 4 are fixed at positions corresponding to the ossicles 3 and at the center of the span s between the ossicles 3.

前記同様の弾塑性解析プログラムを用いて解析
した結果、小骨3に対応する位置および小骨3間
のスパンsの中央に二重張板4を固着することに
より第4図〜第6図の比較例の場合に比べてさら
にパネルの崩壊荷重が増して強度が大きくなるこ
とが確められた。すなわち、第7図〜第9図にお
いて、二重張板4の幅bを200mm、その板厚t1
を8mmとした場合、まず点Aにおいて約23.0t/
m2の垂直荷重で塑性ヒンジが生じ、ついで点C、
大骨2間のスパンs1の中央で小骨3間のスパン
s中央の二重張板4の幅方向側端部の点E、点D
の順にそれぞれ約27.0,33.0,35.0t/m2の荷重で
塑性ヒンジが発生し、垂直荷重の増加にともなつ
て第9図の矢印方向に塑性ヒンジが進展する。
As a result of analysis using the same elastic-plastic analysis program as described above, the comparative examples shown in FIGS. 4 to 6 were obtained by fixing the double-clad plate 4 at the position corresponding to the ossicles 3 and at the center of the span s between the ossicles 3. It was confirmed that the collapse load of the panel was further increased compared to the case of , and the strength was increased. That is, in FIGS. 7 to 9, the width b of the double clad board 4 is 200 mm, and the board thickness t1.
If it is 8mm, then at point A it will be about 23.0t/
A vertical load of m 2 produces a plastic hinge, then points C,
Points E and D at the widthwise side ends of the double-clad plate 4 at the center of the span s1 between the large bones 2 and the center of the span s between the small bones 3
A plastic hinge occurs at loads of approximately 27.0, 33.0, and 35.0 t/m 2 in this order, respectively, and as the vertical load increases, the plastic hinge develops in the direction of the arrow in Figure 9.

二重張板4の幅bおよび板厚t1は、パネルに
作用する最大垂直荷重、小骨3間のスパンsなど
を考慮して適宜決定される。
The width b and thickness t1 of the double-clad board 4 are appropriately determined in consideration of the maximum vertical load acting on the panel, the span s between the small bones 3, and the like.

考案の効果 この考案のパネル構造によれば、鋼板の小骨に
対応する位置および小骨間のスパンの中央に二重
張板が固着されているので、パネルの崩壊荷重が
増して全体の板厚が大きくなつた場合と同等の大
きな強度を有し、かつ従来のように全体の板厚が
一様に大きくなつたものに比べてパネルを軽量に
構成することができる。また、鋼板の小骨と反対
側の面に二重張板が固着されているので、すでに
建造済のタンク壁などを補強する場合、骨材がタ
ンク側に配置されていても、鋼板に二重張板を固
着する改造作業をタンクの外側から行なうことが
でき、作業が簡単で工期が短かくなり、改造に要
する費用が非常に少なくてすむ。
Effects of the invention According to the panel structure of this invention, double-clad plates are fixed at positions corresponding to the small bones of the steel plate and at the center of the span between the small bones, which increases the collapse load of the panel and reduces the overall plate thickness. It has the same great strength as a larger panel, and can be constructed to be lighter than a conventional panel in which the overall thickness is uniformly increased. In addition, since the double-clad plate is fixed to the side opposite to the small bones of the steel plate, when reinforcing an already constructed tank wall, etc., even if aggregate is placed on the tank side, double-clad plate is fixed to the steel plate. The modification work of fixing the cladding can be done from the outside of the tank, making the work simple, shortening the construction period, and minimizing the cost required for modification.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図〜第3図は従来例を示し、第1図はパネ
ルの部分平面図、第2図は第1図−線の拡大
断面図およびその曲げモーメント図、第3図は第
1図a部を拡大し鋼板表面における塑性ヒンジの
発生状況とその進展について弾塑性解析プログラ
ムを用いて解析した結果を示す図面、第4図〜第
6図は比較例を示し、第4図はパネルの部分拡大
平面図、第5図は第4図−線の断面図、第6
図は第4図a部を拡大した上記弾塑性解析プログ
ラムを用いて解析した結果を示す第3図相当の図
面、第7図、第8図および第9図はこの考案の1
実施例を示しそれぞれ第4図、第5図および第6
図に相当する図面である。 1……鋼板、3……小骨、4……二重張板。
1 to 3 show a conventional example, FIG. 1 is a partial plan view of the panel, FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view along the line of FIG. 1 and its bending moment diagram, and FIG. 3 is a diagram of FIG. Figures 4 to 6 show comparative examples; Figures 4 to 6 show comparative examples; An enlarged plan view, Fig. 5 is a sectional view along the line of Fig. 4, Fig. 6
The figure is an enlarged view of part a in Figure 4, which is equivalent to Figure 3 and shows the results of the analysis using the above-mentioned elastic-plastic analysis program.
Examples are shown in FIGS. 4, 5, and 6, respectively.
This is a drawing corresponding to the figure. 1...Steel plate, 3...Small ribs, 4...Double clad plate.

Claims (1)

【実用新案登録請求の範囲】[Scope of utility model registration request] 鋼板の片面に複数の小骨が固着され、鋼板の他
面の小骨に対応する位置および小骨間のスパンの
中央に二重張板が固着されていることを特徴とす
るパネル構造。
A panel structure characterized in that a plurality of ossicles are fixed to one side of a steel plate, and a double-clad plate is fixed to the other side of the steel plate at a position corresponding to the ossicles and at the center of the span between the ossicles.
JP241582U 1982-01-11 1982-01-11 panel structure Granted JPS58104792U (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP241582U JPS58104792U (en) 1982-01-11 1982-01-11 panel structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP241582U JPS58104792U (en) 1982-01-11 1982-01-11 panel structure

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS58104792U JPS58104792U (en) 1983-07-16
JPS6231358Y2 true JPS6231358Y2 (en) 1987-08-11

Family

ID=30015403

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP241582U Granted JPS58104792U (en) 1982-01-11 1982-01-11 panel structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS58104792U (en)

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4073865A (en) * 1976-09-27 1978-02-14 Union Carbide Corporation Silica polymorph and process for preparing same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS58104792U (en) 1983-07-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH09158490A (en) Reinforcement structure of existing building
JPH03250142A (en) steel composite beam
JPS6243912B2 (en)
JPS6231359Y2 (en)
Kennedy Orientation of ribs in waffle-slab skew bridges
CN214296903U (en) An external fixed reinforced hoarding and hoarding box
CN108867854A (en) Reinforced concrete frame and its construction method
CN208266714U (en) A kind of steel corrugated plating arch bridges and culverts exterior sheathing suitable for steel reinforced concrete combination
JP2568476Y2 (en) Reinforcement structure of column / beam joint
CN111779260A (en) A prefabricated combined formwork system and construction method thereof
CN222667596U (en) Aluminum alloy template system reentrant corner template reinforcing section bar for building
CN210164247U (en) U-plate connecting piece
JPH06270881A (en) Hull girder structure
JPS58120962A (en) Earthquake-proof wall made of reinforced concrete
JPH01156292A (en) elevator car floor
JP2529999Y2 (en) Concrete formwork
GB824823A (en) Constructional improvements in or relating to ships having longitudinal ribs and transverse bulkheads corrugated as viewed from above and methods of assembling separately manufactured large-sized sections of such ships
CN118886184A (en) A Stability Calculation Method for Complex Thin-walled Metal Structures
JP2795112B2 (en) Reinforced concrete structures with shielding requirements
JPH0649700Y2 (en) Reinforcing metal fittings in concrete openings
JPH0615820Y2 (en) Slot structure of hull
JPS6164940A (en) PC board in composite exterior wall
JPS6342077Y2 (en)
JP2000154668A (en) Damping frame
JPS59455A (en) Wall panel