JPS59195967A - Construction of high building - Google Patents

Construction of high building

Info

Publication number
JPS59195967A
JPS59195967A JP6826983A JP6826983A JPS59195967A JP S59195967 A JPS59195967 A JP S59195967A JP 6826983 A JP6826983 A JP 6826983A JP 6826983 A JP6826983 A JP 6826983A JP S59195967 A JPS59195967 A JP S59195967A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
building
buildings
evacuation
fire
rise
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP6826983A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
照井 武
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP6826983A priority Critical patent/JPS59195967A/en
Publication of JPS59195967A publication Critical patent/JPS59195967A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

(57)【要約】本公報は電子出願前の出願データであるた
め要約のデータは記録されません。
(57) [Summary] This bulletin contains application data before electronic filing, so abstract data is not recorded.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 本発明は従来の所定敷地に建設する1個建での高層建築
物に於て、これを数分割に分割して建設し、以って火災
等の場合の人的及び物的損害を極度に防止せんとした建
設法の開発に関するものである。
[Detailed Description of the Invention] The present invention is a conventional high-rise building built on a predetermined site by dividing it into several parts, thereby reducing human resources in the event of a fire, etc. and the development of construction methods designed to prevent property damage to the utmost.

即ち一例である図面に付いて説明すると、第1図は従来
の建設法による1個建での高層ビルAで内側部に第2図
の如き明り取り空間部(11を設けたもので、これが現
在性なわれている一部ビルの形態である。
In other words, to explain the drawing as an example, Fig. 1 shows a single-story high-rise building A built using the conventional construction method, with a lighted space (11) as shown in Fig. 2 on the inside, which is currently This is the form of some buildings that are considered to be popular.

しかしこのような1個建ての建物の場合に於ては、室の
倒れかの一部においで火災等が発生した場合は、全建物
に被害を生ずる危険性があるばかりでなく、何れの個所
から避難するかが問題で、パニック状態になる可能性が
極めて犬であることは周知の事実であり、又消火活動の
場合も煙の出具合等により火元の発見が遅れ。
However, in the case of a single building like this, if a fire breaks out in one part of a collapsed room, there is a risk that not only the entire building will be damaged, but also any part of the building will be damaged. It is a well-known fact that dogs are highly susceptible to panic attacks, and in the case of firefighting, finding the source of the fire may be delayed due to factors such as the amount of smoke.

そのため思わぬ大火災となり、人的にも、また物的にも
大損害を蒙むっている。にも拘らず現在建設されている
もの、又は建設されつつある建物は殆んど一様に1個建
での高層ビルとなっているが、これは土地が高価である
ことと、建坪を出来るだけ有効に多く取ることに外なら
ないが、大型のビルの場合は何れも中間に明り取り空間
部を取ることは建設の常識である。即ちこの空間部を分
割ビルの間隔にすれば地所利用は同等である。
As a result, an unexpected large fire broke out, causing great damage to both people and property. Despite this, most of the buildings currently being constructed or being constructed are single-story high-rise buildings, but this is due to the high cost of land and the limited floor space available. However, it is common sense in construction to create a lighted space in the middle of any large building. In other words, if this space is used as the interval between divided buildings, the land use will be the same.

本発明は、このような災害に対する危険ある事を知りな
がら、尚続々と超高層ビルが1個建てとして建設されつ
つあるが、これ等高層建築に例いては個人的な考えより
も、むしろ都市造りの配慮と早急なる国としての強制指
導を要することは、特に都市に於て必須のことである。
Although the present invention is aware of the dangers of such disasters, skyscrapers are being constructed one after another as individual buildings. It is essential, especially in cities, that consideration should be given to construction and urgent national guidance.

そのため本発明は上記の如〈従来の高層建築様式に代え
、第3図の一例の如く1個建てとせず、これを少なくと
も2分割の2棟A、B以上とし、その間の適所に常設の
避難通路(2)を設ける。即(61等を通じ両ビルの直
の避難通路(2)を使用しで′13ビル側へ避難すれば
よく、又場合によっては避難ばしご(3)を使用して地
上へ避難すればよい。
Therefore, the present invention has been proposed as described above.Instead of the conventional high-rise building style, it is not a single building as shown in the example in Figure 3, but is divided into at least two buildings, A and B, and a permanent evacuation shelter is installed at a suitable location between them. A passage (2) is provided. You can immediately evacuate to the '13 Building side using the direct evacuation route (2) of both buildings through 61 etc., or if necessary, you can evacuate to the ground using the evacuation ladder (3). .

又消火活動する場合もAビルであることが極めて明白で
あるため広範囲に渉って消火活動することなく、該Aヒ
ルのみ集中的に行えば極めて効果的である。
Also, when firefighting is to be carried out, since it is very clear that Building A is the building, it is extremely effective to concentrate on building A without having to extinguish the fire over a wide area.

次に、第5図及び第6図は常設の避難通路でなく、第5
図は可動通路(41で回動式とし、又第6図は押出式通
路(5)で、AビルよりBビルに連結する。勿論可動は
電動式或は手動式の何れでもよく、火災の状態により倒
れでも簡単に使用出来ろようIcLでおく。(可動設備
は省略する。)尚ビルの建設は第3図の如く並列式でも
よくし、常設の避難通路(2)を設けたもので、要は避
難の際最良の場所に通路を設置するものである。
Next, Figures 5 and 6 are not permanent evacuation routes, but
The figure shows a movable passageway (41 is a rotating type, and Figure 6 shows a push-out type passageway (5) that connects Building A to Building B. Of course, the movable passageway (41) is a rotating type, and it connects Building A to Building B. Of course, the movable passageway (41) is a rotating type. We will use IcL so that it can be easily used even if it collapses depending on the situation. (Moveable equipment is omitted.) The building can be constructed in parallel as shown in Figure 3, and a permanent evacuation passage (2) is provided. The key point is to install passageways in the best locations for evacuation.

勿論避難通路には防火Pm等を従来の如く取付図面は本
発明実施の一例を示したもので、第1図は従来の1個建
での高層ビルの正面図、振2図は同上の平面図、第3図
は第1図のビルを2分割した正面図で、避難通路により
両ビル間通路の概略図、第5図及び第6図は避難ばしご
又は避a#SでAピルに設置したものをBビルへ電動又
は千載11fcよって回動又は押出しによって句」逍j
側− 架設する所を示す。第7図に2棟式の建設状態と避#1
通路のあり方を示した一例で、1個建でのビルにする所
を同一坪数上に分割建設した説明図である。
Of course, fire protection Pm etc. are installed in the evacuation route as in the past.The drawings show an example of the implementation of the present invention. Figure 1 is a front view of a conventional single-story high-rise building, and Figure 2 is a plan view of the same. Figure 3 is a front view of the building shown in Figure 1 divided into two parts, and a schematic diagram of the passageway between the two buildings using an evacuation route. The equipment installed at
Side - Indicates the location of erection. Figure 7 shows the construction status of the two-building type and Evacuation #1.
This is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the way the passageway should be, where a single building is divided and constructed on the same square footage.

尚図面において+I+・・・ビルの明り取り空間部(2
)・・避難通路 (S31・・・螺旋状避難ばしご (4)・・・回動式避難通路 手続補正書(自発) 昭和58年6月2−2日 特許庁長官若杉和夫殿 1、事件の表示 、特願昭58’、−68269号 2、発明の名称 高層建築物の建設法 3、補正をする者 事件との関係 (特許出願人) 住 所 東京都杉並区高円寺北3−35−164、補正
の対象 補   正   書 1、明細書箱2頁7行のU問題で」と「バニ・ツク状態
」の間に「例えば1階の何れかの個所より発火した場合
、入口、出口又は窓除の人は別として、広い内側部で仕
$をしている人は勿論エレベータ−に電気装置の故障あ
ることの想定から火災の場合は一部高層ビルにおいでは
使用を禁止しているため、当然非常階段にて上方へ避難
するしかなく、階段での避難の速さより火の手の泗りが
建物の構造によりでに想像しがたい速さのためノ4わざ
る犠牲者を出しでいる事は、過去の事実が証明している
所で、最後の避難場所としては屋上で、そこでヘリコプ
タ−の救助を待つしかなく、しかしこれが多人数の場合
は。
In addition, +I+...In the drawing, the lighted space part of the building (2
)... Evacuation path (S31... Spiral evacuation ladder (4)... Rotating evacuation path procedure amendment (voluntary) June 2-2, 1981 Kazuo Wakasugi, Commissioner of the Japan Patent Office 1, Indication of the case, Japanese Patent Application No. 1983, -68269 2, Name of the invention, Construction method for high-rise buildings 3, Person making the amendment Relationship to the case (Patent applicant) Address: 3-35 Koenji Kita, Suginami-ku, Tokyo -164, Correction subject to correction Book 1, Specification box page 2, line 7, U problem.'' and ``bunny-tsuku condition.'' Apart from people working on windows, people who work in large interior areas are prohibited from using elevators in some high-rise buildings in the event of a fire, assuming that there is a malfunction in the electrical equipment in the elevators. Naturally, the only option was to evacuate upwards using the emergency stairs, but the speed of the fire due to the structure of the building was unimaginable compared to the speed of evacuation using the stairs, resulting in 4 unharmed casualties. The fact is that past facts have proven that the last place of evacuation is the rooftop, where you have to wait for a helicopter to rescue you, but if there are many people involved.

どのような結果になるかは想Hに難くない。折角屋上に
避難しても、ヘリコプタ−等の救助数には1寺間的に自
ら限度がおり、残された避難者は心配と余りの火勢の強
さ等のため、才体きわまり死を覚悟、のもとに、或は助
かるかもとの念願゛のもとに早まって飛びおり、多数の
犠牲者を出している棚もある。伺かにしても高層σ)太
ビルにおいては多人数のため上記の如く想像しがたい。
It's not hard to imagine what the outcome will be. Even if they took the trouble to evacuate to the rooftop, each temple had its own limit on the number of rescues such as helicopters, and the remaining evacuees were anxious and prepared to die due to the strength of the fire. , or in the hope of being saved, some of them jump prematurely, resulting in numerous casualties. Even if you are in a high-rise building, it is difficult to imagine such a situation as there are many people in the building.

いち犬」の文面を加入する。Add the text "Ichi-inu".

以上 手続補正書(自発)  域〜ノ 昭和58年9月30日 特許庁長官 若 杉 和 夫  殿 1、事件の表示 特願昭58−68269号 2、発明の名称 高層建築物の建設法 4、補正の対象 明細書全部。that's all Procedural amendment (voluntary) Area - No September 30, 1982 Mr. Kazuo Wakasugi, Commissioner of the Patent Office 1.Display of the incident Patent Application No. 1982-68269 2. Name of the invention Construction methods for high-rise buildings 4. Subject of correction All statements.

5、補正の内容 別紙の通り。5. Contents of correction As per attached sheet.

補  正  明  細  書 ■1発明の名称 高(皆建条物の建設法2、特許請求の
範囲 所定の広さの建坪面に建設する高層建築物に於て、火災
による人的、物的損害を極度に防止するため、大高層ビ
ルも1線錐ての建物とせず。
Amendment Specification ■1 Title of the invention High-rise buildings (Construction Law for Buildings and Rows 2, Claims) In high-rise buildings constructed on a building surface of a predetermined area, human and property damage caused by fire In order to prevent this to the utmost, even large high-rise buildings should not be built with a straight line.

予め計画的にこれを分割数棟の建物にし、この数棟の建
物間を適宜個所において遊離通路を建設時に連結又は非
常用の電動、或は手動式の可動連結橋を適宜方法により
、即時架設又は架設するようにし、以って非常の場合の
避難を容易且迅速に行なうようにしたことを特徴とする
高層建築物の建設法。
This will be divided into several buildings in a planned manner, and free passages will be connected between these several buildings at appropriate locations during construction, or emergency electric or manual movable connecting bridges will be immediately erected using an appropriate method. A method of constructing a high-rise building, characterized in that the structure is constructed so that evacuation in the event of an emergency can be easily and quickly carried out.

3、発明の詳細な説明 本発明は従来の所定敷地に建設する1線錐での高層建築
物に於て、これ會予め計画的に数分割に分割して数棟と
し、以って火災等の場合の人的及び物的損害を未然に防
止せんとした建°設法の開発に関するものである。
3. Detailed Description of the Invention The present invention is a conventional single-line pyramid high-rise building built on a predetermined site, but is divided into several parts in advance to create several buildings, thereby preventing fires, etc. This study concerns the development of construction methods aimed at preventing human and property damage in the event of a disaster.

即ち一例である図面に付いて説明すると、第1図は従来
の建設法による1線錐での高層大ピルAで内側部に第2
図の如ぎ明り取り空間部(11を設けたもので、これが
現在性なわれて(する一般ビルの建設形態である。
In other words, to explain the drawing as an example, Fig. 1 shows a high-rise large pillar A with a single-line cone constructed by the conventional construction method, with a second pillar on the inside.
As shown in the figure, a lighted space (11) is provided, which is the current construction form of general buildings.

しかしこのような大ビル1線錐での建物の場合に於ては
、室の何れかの一部において火災等が発生した場合に、
全建物に被害を生ずる危険性があるばかりでなく、何れ
の個所から避難するかが問題で1例えば1,2階等の下
層階個所より発火した場合、入口、出口又は窓際の人は
別として、室内で仕事をし℃いる人は当然非常、階段そ
の他の方法にて上方へ避難するしかなく、最後の避難場
所としては屋上で、そこでヘリコプタ−等の救助を待つ
しかなく、シかしこれが多大数゛の場合は、どのような
結果になるかは想ら限lがあり、残された避難者は心配
と余りの火勢の強さ等のため、身体きわまり死を覚悟の
もとに、或は助かるかもとQ念願のもとに早まりて飛び
おり、多数の犠牲者を出している事もある。何れにして
も高層の大ビルにおいては多人数のため上記の如く想像
しがたい。いち犬パニック状態になる可能性が極めて大
であることは周知の事実であり、又消火活動の場合も煙
の出具合等により火元の発見が遅れ、そのため思わぬ大
火災となり1人的にも、また物的にも上記の如く大損害
を蒙むっている。にも拘らず現在建設されているもの、
又は建設されつつある犬、高層ビルの殆んどが一様に1
練性てとなっているが、これは土地が高価であるなしに
拘らず、周囲の環境等に応じ、建坪を出来るだけ有効に
多(取る意図に外ならないが、大型のビル1線錐での場
合は内側部に明り取り空間部分所要面積取ることは建設
の常識である。す1」ちこの空間部に代え分割数棟ビル
にしても、その建坪数は略同等となり、又同建坪数にす
る事ハ設計上可能である。
However, in the case of such a large building with a one-line conical structure, if a fire occurs in any part of the room,
Not only is there a risk of causing damage to the entire building, but it is also a problem to decide which location to evacuate from.1For example, if a fire ignites from a lower floor, such as the first or second floor, people at the entrance, exit, or by the window will not be affected. Naturally, people who work indoors have no choice but to evacuate upwards by emergency, stairs or other means, and the last evacuation site is the rooftop, where they have to wait for rescue by helicopters or other means. In the case of a large number of people, there is no way to predict what the outcome will be, and the remaining evacuees, due to anxiety and the strength of the fire, are physically prepared to die. Or, in the hope of being saved, Q jumps away prematurely, resulting in many casualties. In any case, it is difficult to imagine the above situation in a large, high-rise building due to the large number of people. It is a well-known fact that there is an extremely high possibility that a dog will panic, and in the case of firefighting, the discovery of the source of the fire may be delayed due to the amount of smoke, resulting in an unexpectedly large fire and the loss of one person. As mentioned above, they have also suffered major damage in terms of property. However, what is currently being constructed,
Or most of the high-rise buildings that are being constructed are uniformly 1
Regardless of whether the land is expensive or not, this means that large buildings can be built with a single-line pyramid to increase the floor space as effectively as possible, depending on the surrounding environment. In this case, it is common sense in construction to take the required area for the lighted space on the inside.Even if the building is divided into multiple buildings instead of the open space, the floor area will be approximately the same; It is possible to do so by design.

本発明は、上記のような災害に対する危険ある事を知り
ながらも、尚続々と超高層大ビルが1練性てとして建設
されつつあるが、これ等高層建築に付いては都市造りの
配慮として早急な指導を要することは必須のことであと
思う。
Although we are aware of the dangers of disasters as mentioned above, the present invention is based on the idea that skyscrapers are being constructed one after another as a trial run, but these high-rise buildings are being constructed as a consideration for urban development. I think it is essential that immediate guidance is required.

%vC最近大部市周辺その他に建築されている中・高層
の住宅用ビルに関してはこれを強調したしゝ0 これ等のことから、本発明は上記の如〈従来の中・高層
建築様式に代え、第3図の一例の如く1練性てとせず、
これを少なくとも2分割の2棟A、B以上の分割建築と
し、その数棟間の適所に常設の避難通路(2)を設ける
。即ち第4図はその平面図であって、仮りにAビル側に
火災が発生した場合は、矢印の如く各階の廊下(6)等
を通じ両線ビルの間の避難通路(2)ヲ使用してBビル
1則へ避難すればよく、又場合によっては常設の避難ば
しご(3)ヲ使用して地上へ避難すればよい。又消火活
動する場合もAピル側であることが極めて明白であるた
め広範囲に渉って消火活動する必要なく、該大ビルのみ
集中的に行えば極めて効果的である。
%vC We have emphasized this with regard to medium-to-high-rise residential buildings that have recently been constructed around Obe City and other areas. Instead, as shown in the example in Fig. 3, instead of just one practice,
This will be a divided building with at least two buildings, A and B, and a permanent evacuation passage (2) will be installed at the appropriate location between the buildings. In other words, Figure 4 is a plan view of the building, and if a fire were to occur on the A building side, the evacuation route (2) between the buildings on both lines would be used through the corridors (6) on each floor as shown by the arrows. You can evacuate to B Building 1 or, depending on the situation, use the permanently installed evacuation ladder (3) to evacuate to the ground. Also, when firefighting is to be carried out, it is very clear that A-Pill is on the side, so there is no need to carry out firefighting over a wide area, and it will be extremely effective if the firefighting is concentrated only on the large building.

次に、第5図及び第6図は常設の避難通路でなく、第5
図は可#I通路(41で回動式とし、又第6図は押出式
通路(5)で、Aビル側よりBビル側に連結する。勿論
架設に電動式或は手動式の倒れでもよく、火災の状態に
より何れでも簡単に使用出来るようにしておく。(可動
設備の構成は省略する。) 尚ビルの建設は第3図の如く並列式でもよく又第7図の
如く、例えば巴状A、82棟、或は十字型A 、 A’
 、 B 、 B′の4線錐て全適当間隔をおいて建設
し、常設の遊離通路(2)ヲ設けたもので、要は避難の
際最良の場所に通路を設置するものである。
Next, Figures 5 and 6 are not permanent evacuation routes, but
The figure shows a possible #I passage (41 is a rotating type, and Fig. 6 shows a push-out type passage (5), which connects the A building side to the B building side.Of course, the erection can be done by electric or manual type. It is often arranged so that it can be easily used depending on the fire situation. (The configuration of movable equipment is omitted.) Buildings may be constructed in parallel as shown in Figure 3, or for example in Tomoe as shown in Figure 7. Shape A, 82 buildings, or cross shape A, A'
, B, and B' were constructed at appropriate intervals, and a permanent free passageway (2) was provided.The main purpose was to install the passageway in the best place for evacuation.

勿論避#I−通路には防火戸扉等を従来の如く取付けお
けば、尚一層の防火効果がある。特に火炎′がビルの上
下に廻わらぬように何等かの装置又は設備を予めしてお
くことを強調する。尚諸事情で分線建設が不可能な高層
ビルに於ては中間に完全な防火壁にて縦又は横方向に設
けることも考えられる。
Of course, if a fire door or the like is installed in the escape #I passage in the conventional manner, the fire prevention effect will be even more effective. In particular, it is emphasized that some kind of device or equipment must be in place in advance to prevent flames from spreading above and below the building. In addition, in high-rise buildings where construction of branch lines is not possible due to various circumstances, it may be possible to install a complete fire wall in the middle either vertically or horizontally.

4、図面の簡単な説明 図面は本発明笑流の一例ケ示したもので、第1図は従来
の1練性ての高層ビルの正面図、第2図は同上の平面図
、第3図は第1図のビルを2分割した正面図で、避難通
路により両ピル間を連結したものである。第4図は同上
の平面図で避難状態を示したもので、ベランダ、バルコ
ニー、廊下及び避難通路の概略図、第5図及び第6図は
避難ばしご又は避1smで大ビルに設置したものをBビ
ルへ電動又は手動によって回動又は押出しによって架設
する所を示す。第7図V12棟及び4棟分割式の建設状
態と避難通路のあり方を示した一例で、1練性でのビル
にする所を同−坪数上に分割数棟建設した説明図である
4. Brief explanation of the drawings The drawings show an example of the method of the present invention. Fig. 1 is a front view of a conventional high-rise building, Fig. 2 is a plan view of the same, and Fig. 3 is a front view of a conventional high-rise building. is a front view of the building shown in Figure 1 divided into two, with an evacuation passage connecting the two buildings. Figure 4 is a plan view of the same as above, showing the evacuation situation, and a schematic diagram of balconies, balconies, corridors and evacuation passages, and Figures 5 and 6 are evacuation ladders or evacuation 1sm installed in large buildings. This shows the place where something is erected to Building B by electric or manual rotation or extrusion. Figure 7 is an example showing the state of construction and evacuation routes for V12 and 4-building divisions, and is an explanatory drawing where several buildings were constructed on the same square footage in place of a single building.

尚図面において(11・・・ビルの明り取り空間部(2
)・・・避難通路 (31・・・螺旋状避難ばしご (4)・・・非常用の回動式避難通路 (5)・・・非常用の押出式 同 (6)・・・廊 下 手続補正書(自発) 昭和58年10月31日 特許庁長官 若 杉 和 夫  殿 1、事件の表示 特願昭58−68269号 2、発明の名称 高層建築物の建設法 3補正をする者 事件との関係 特許出願人 4、補正の対象  昭和58年9月30日提出のNi正
明細書の特許請求の範囲、及び発明の詳細な説明の欄 補   正   書 1特許請求の範囲を下記の通り補正する。
In addition, in the drawing (11...lighted space part of the building (2)
)... Evacuation path (31... Spiral evacuation ladder (4)... Emergency rotating evacuation ladder (5)... Emergency push-out ladder (6)... Corridor Sub-procedural amendment (voluntary) October 31, 1980 Director General of the Patent Office Kazuo Wakasugi 1, Indication of Case Patent Application No. 58-68269 2, Title of Invention 3. Person making the amendment to the Construction Law for High-rise Buildings Relationship to the case Patent applicant 4, subject of amendment Amendment to the scope of the claims of the Ni original specification submitted on September 30, 1982, and the column of the detailed description of the invention. Correct as expected.

所定の広さの建坪面に建設する高層建築物に於て、火災
による人的、物的損害を極度に防止するため、犬高層ビ
ルを1線錐での建物とせず。
In order to extremely prevent human and property damage due to fire in high-rise buildings constructed on a floor area of a specified area, high-rise buildings are not built with single-line cones.

計画的にこれを分割数棟の建物にし、この数棟の建物間
を適宜個所において避難通路で連結又は非常用の電動、
或は手動式の可動連結橘を適宜方法により、即時架設又
は架設するよう′にし。
This was divided into several buildings in a planned manner, and these buildings were connected at appropriate locations with evacuation passages or emergency electric power,
Alternatively, a manually operated movable connecting bridge can be immediately erected or erected using an appropriate method.

以って非常の場合の避難を容易且迅速に行なうよ5vr
−1,たことを特徴とする高層建築物の建設法。
This allows for easy and quick evacuation in case of emergency.
-1. A construction method for high-rise buildings characterized by the following.

2袖正明、1油書第1頁16行のl−を間層建築物」と
あるケl−中iW*層建4′!′吻」と補正する。
2 Masaaki Sode, 1 Oil Book, page 1, line 16, it says, ``Inter-story building''! Correct as 'proboscis'.

3 同1    同 17行の1−数球とし」と「以っ
て」の間に1相対するビル面に防火装kを施すなどし」
の字句全加入する。
3 Id. 1 Id. Line 17, between ``1-several balls'' and ``therefore,'' apply fire prevention equipment to the opposite building surface.''
Add all the lexical elements.

4 同   第2頁10行の1−発火し」から1−窓際
O)人にjまで全1−発火し、下層方向への避難が不可
能となった場合、入口、出口又は窓際等の一部の人は」
と補正する。
4 In the same page 2, line 10, from 1 to 1-by the window O) If a person ignites and it is impossible to evacuate to the lower floors, evacuate to the entrance, exit, window, etc. The people in the department are
and correct it.

5、補正明細書第2頁11行の[仕事をしく(・る人は
」を「仕事をしでいる大部分の人1djと補正する。
5. On page 2, line 11 of the amended specification, [people who do work] should be amended to mean ``most people who do work.''

6 四    同 13行の1そこで」の字句’e l
’JIJ−除する。
6 4 Same line 13 1 The word 'e l
'JIJ-divide.

7、 同   第4頁5行σ)[高1響の住宅用ビルに
関しては」ヲ「高層共同住宅用ビルり、その他ホテル、
テバート等に関しては」と補正する。
7, p. 4, line 5 σ) [Regarding the residential building of the 1st Symphony High School” and “High-rise apartment buildings, other hotels,
Regarding Tebert et al.''

以上that's all

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 所定の広さの建坪面に建設する高層建築物に於て、火災
による人的、物的損害を極度に防止するため1個建での
建物とせず、これを数分割にし、分割した建物間を適宜
個所において避難にするようにしたことを特徴とする高
層建築物の建設法。
In high-rise buildings constructed on a floor area of a predetermined area, in order to prevent damage to people and property due to fire, the building is not built as a single building, but is divided into several parts, and the spaces between the divided buildings are A construction method for high-rise buildings characterized by providing evacuation at appropriate locations.
JP6826983A 1983-04-20 1983-04-20 Construction of high building Pending JPS59195967A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP6826983A JPS59195967A (en) 1983-04-20 1983-04-20 Construction of high building

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP6826983A JPS59195967A (en) 1983-04-20 1983-04-20 Construction of high building

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS59195967A true JPS59195967A (en) 1984-11-07

Family

ID=13368861

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP6826983A Pending JPS59195967A (en) 1983-04-20 1983-04-20 Construction of high building

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS59195967A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010172373A (en) * 2009-01-27 2010-08-12 Shimizu Corp Safety facility of inter-building communication passway
JP2020094407A (en) * 2018-12-12 2020-06-18 株式会社竹中工務店 Building structure

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5330111U (en) * 1976-08-20 1978-03-15

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5330111U (en) * 1976-08-20 1978-03-15

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010172373A (en) * 2009-01-27 2010-08-12 Shimizu Corp Safety facility of inter-building communication passway
JP2020094407A (en) * 2018-12-12 2020-06-18 株式会社竹中工務店 Building structure

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ahmadi et al. Collapse of the 16-story Plasco building in Tehran due to fire
Proulx The time delay to start evacuating upon hearing a fire alarm
Terpak Fireground size-up
JPS59195967A (en) Construction of high building
CN106978932A (en) One kind is taken precautions against natural calamities between escape
Hung et al. Review on fire regulations for new high-rise commercial buildings in Hong Kong and a brief comparison with those in overseas
Sun Egress as part of fire safety in high-rise buildings
BODUR Assessing Fire Safety in Sports Halls: An Investigation from Samsun
Kolomay et al. Firefighter rescue & survival
Tubbs et al. Evacuation Design Strategies and Considerations for Tall Buildings: Suggested Best Practices.
JPS59172373A (en) Structure and utilization method of outdoor elevator for refuge
MUHAMMAD ASSESSMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION STRATEGIES IN THE DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS IN VICTORIA ISLAND, LAGOS STATE, NIGERIA
TECHNICIAN Rescue Systems 3
Gerhard The Safety of Theatre Audiences and the Stage Personnel Against Danger from Fire and Panic: A Paper
Ahmed Roni et al. Investigation on Fire Protection System of Highrise Buildings in the Context of Bir Uttam Aminul Haque Avenue in Dhaka, Bangladesh
Della-Giustina Emergency planning for high-rise buildings
Decker Pitkin Charter School
Cannata et al. Study of an emergency plan in the event of a violent fire in a high-rise building
Frasca et al. CTBUHReview
Director School of Social Work
Devijver Fire at the “A l’Innovation” Department Store in Brussels on 22 May 1967
Yean Yng Ling et al. Improving the design of tall buildings after 9/11
EQUIPMENT FIRE GRADING OF BUILDINGS
Gartowski et al. The large fires of public utility premises in Poland
CN115040800A (en) Emergency escape fire fighting access