JPH0571953A - Evaluation of metal plate transferring property of roller - Google Patents
Evaluation of metal plate transferring property of rollerInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0571953A JPH0571953A JP3231272A JP23127291A JPH0571953A JP H0571953 A JPH0571953 A JP H0571953A JP 3231272 A JP3231272 A JP 3231272A JP 23127291 A JP23127291 A JP 23127291A JP H0571953 A JPH0571953 A JP H0571953A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- peak
- surface roughness
- probability density
- density distribution
- amplitude probability
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Length Measuring Devices With Unspecified Measuring Means (AREA)
- Rollers For Roller Conveyors For Transfer (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、剪断やパンチ加工,プ
レス加工などに供される金属板のローラ搬送性の評価方
法に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for evaluating roller transportability of a metal plate used for shearing, punching, pressing, etc.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】金属板たとえば冷延鋼板は従来から自動
車のボデイ外板や家電製品などとして広く使用されてい
るが、近年、特に自動車のボデイ外板用には塗装後の鮮
映性が強く要求され、さらに防錆上の見地から溶融亜鉛
めっき鋼板などの表面処理鋼板を利用する割合が急速に
増加しており、表面処理鋼板における塗装後鮮映性とプ
レス成形性の両立が課題となっている。2. Description of the Related Art Metal sheets, such as cold-rolled steel sheets, have been widely used as automobile body exterior plates and home electric appliances, etc., but in recent years, particularly for automobile body exterior plates, the sharpness after painting is strong. In addition, from the viewpoint of rust prevention, the percentage of using surface-treated steel sheets such as hot-dip galvanized steel sheets is rapidly increasing, and it is an issue to balance the post-painting image clarity and press formability of surface-treated steel sheets. ing.
【0003】ところで、このような表面処理鋼板の表面
性状は、たとえば表面粗さ,表面うねり,周波数解析な
どによる鋼板表面の振幅レベルの評価法(JIS B0601 参
照)や、あるいは接触比,負荷曲線,振幅確立分布曲線
などによる鋼板表面の断面形状評価法によって評価する
のが一般的である。これら従来の評価法はすべて鋼板の
加工性や塗装性あるいは塗装後の仕上がり状態に関連づ
けられたものである。By the way, the surface texture of such a surface-treated steel sheet is evaluated by, for example, a method for evaluating the amplitude level of the steel sheet surface by surface roughness, surface waviness, frequency analysis, etc. (see JIS B0601), or contact ratio, load curve, Generally, the evaluation is performed by the sectional shape evaluation method of the steel sheet surface using the amplitude probability distribution curve or the like. All of these conventional evaluation methods are related to the workability and paintability of steel sheets or the finished state after painting.
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記し
た表面処理鋼板をユーザ側の高度に自動化された自動車
工場などにおいてはプレス加工その他の工程で素材鋼板
をたとえば長さが500 〜1000mmのブランキング材として
ローラを用いて搬送することが多いのであるが、原板に
ある特定の粗面化処理を施した溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の場
合は、往々にしてスリップが発生して円滑に搬送するこ
とができず、鋼板のハンドリングに支障を来し、生産性
を損なうという問題があった。However, in the automobile factory where the above-mentioned surface-treated steel sheet is highly automated on the user side, the blank steel sheet having a length of, for example, 500 to 1000 mm is used for press working and other processes. As a rule, rollers are often used for transportation, but in the case of hot-dip galvanized steel sheets that have undergone a certain roughening treatment on the original plate, slipping often occurs and it is not possible to smoothly transport them. However, there is a problem in that the handling of the steel sheet is hindered and the productivity is impaired.
【0005】そこで、鋼板の表面粗度とスリップの発生
とは密接な関係があると推察して、上記した従来の鋼板
表面性状評価法によってそれらの関係を調査してみた
が、いずれの方法を適用しても正確な対応がとれないこ
とが判明した。すなわち、表1は規格がGAである溶融
亜鉛めっき鋼板の場合について3次元表面粗さSRa と
スリップの発生の関係を例示したものであるが、この3
次元表面粗さではスリップの発生を予測することが困難
であることがわかる。Therefore, it was inferred that the surface roughness of the steel sheet and the occurrence of slip were closely related to each other, and the relation was investigated by the above-mentioned conventional steel sheet surface property evaluation method. It turned out that an accurate response could not be taken even if applied. That is, Table 1 exemplifies the relationship between the three-dimensional surface roughness SRa and the occurrence of slip in the case of the hot-dip galvanized steel sheet whose standard is GA.
It can be seen that it is difficult to predict the occurrence of slip with dimensional surface roughness.
【0006】[0006]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0007】本発明は、上記のような課題を解決すべく
してなされたものであって、金属板をローラで搬送する
際のスリップの発生の可能性を評価するのに適した方法
を提供することを目的とする。The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and provides a method suitable for evaluating the possibility of slippage occurring when a metal plate is conveyed by rollers. The purpose is to
【0008】[0008]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、金属板をロー
ラで搬送する際の搬送性を評価する方法であって、金属
板表面の表面性状を所定の長さにわたって測定して断面
曲線を作成する工程と、この断面曲線を最高山頂部から
最低谷底部までの間の各高さの値から振幅確率密度分布
を作成する工程と、この振幅確率密度分布のピークに対
応する切断高さレベルを求める工程と、このピークに対
応する切断高さレベルと前記断面曲線の最大高さとの比
から搬送性指数を求める工程と、からなることを特徴と
する金属板のローラ搬送性の評価方法である。The present invention is a method for evaluating the transportability when a metal plate is transported by rollers, in which the surface texture of the surface of the metal plate is measured over a predetermined length to obtain a sectional curve. The step of creating, and the step of creating the amplitude probability density distribution from the values of each height from the highest peak to the lowest valley bottom of this cross section curve, and the cutting height level corresponding to the peak of this amplitude probability density distribution And a step of obtaining a transportability index from the ratio of the cutting height level corresponding to this peak and the maximum height of the cross-sectional curve, the method of evaluating the roller transportability of a metal plate, comprising: is there.
【0009】[0009]
【作 用】図1は本発明に用いる表面粗度測定装置の構
成の一例を示す概要図であり、1は被測定材である鋼
板、2はたとえばレーザビーム式の表面粗度センサ、3
は表面粗度測定演算装置、4は演算結果表示装置であ
る。表面粗度センサ2で検出された鋼板1の表面粗さ信
号は表面粗度測定演算装置3に入力されて、表面粗度測
定演算装置3において以下のような手順で処理がなさ
れ、その結果を演算結果表示装置4に表示する。 まず、鋼板表面の表面性状を所定の長さL(mm)に
わたって測定して、図2(a) に示すような断面曲線Aを
作成する。 この断面曲線Aにおいて、最高山頂部Pから最低谷
底部Vまでの切断レベルをとったとき、図2(b) に示す
ように断面曲線がその切断レベルと等しくなる確率をグ
ラフにして振幅確率密度分布曲線Bとして作成する。 この振幅確率密度分布曲線Bのピーク値Cと最高山
頂部Pまでの切断レベル差Hu を求める。 この切断レベル差Hu と振幅確率密度分布の最大高
さRmax (=Hu +Hd)の比から搬送性指数Ho を下
記(1) 式で求める。[Operation] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the structure of a surface roughness measuring device used in the present invention. Reference numeral 1 is a steel plate as a material to be measured, 2 is a laser beam type surface roughness sensor, and 3 is a surface roughness sensor.
Is a surface roughness measurement calculation device, and 4 is a calculation result display device. The surface roughness signal of the steel plate 1 detected by the surface roughness sensor 2 is input to the surface roughness measuring and calculating device 3 and is processed by the surface roughness measuring and calculating device 3 in the following procedure. The calculation result is displayed on the display device 4. First, the surface texture of the steel plate surface is measured over a predetermined length L (mm), and a sectional curve A as shown in FIG. 2 (a) is created. In this cross-section curve A, when the cutting level from the highest peak P to the lowest valley bottom V is taken, the probability that the cross-section curve is equal to the cutting level is plotted in the graph as shown in Fig. 2 (b). Create as distribution curve B. The peak value C of the amplitude probability density distribution curve B and the cutting level difference Hu up to the highest peak P are obtained. From the ratio of the cutting level difference Hu and the maximum height Rmax (= Hu + Hd) of the amplitude probability density distribution, the transportability index Ho is obtained by the following equation (1).
【0010】 Ho ={Hu /(Hu +Hd )}×100 (%) ────────(1) 搬送性指数Ho を予め設定しておいた所定の基準値
Hs と比較してスリップ発生の有無を判定する。 ここで、上記した搬送性指数Ho について補足すると、
まず搬送性指数Ho が小であるということは、図3(a)
に示すように振幅確率密度分布曲線Bのピーク値Cの切
断レベルが高い状態であるから、図3(b) に示すように
深い谷部と高原状の地形を表し、この高原における小さ
いピークMは容易に磨滅して、ローラに接する面は滑ら
かな平面となり、スリップが生じ易くなる。とくに溶融
亜鉛めっき鋼板のように軟らかい表面ではこの傾向は顕
著である。Ho = {Hu / (Hu + Hd)} × 100 (%) ───────── (1) The transportability index Ho is compared with a predetermined reference value Hs that has been preset. Determine whether it has occurred. Here, supplementing the above-mentioned transportability index Ho,
First, the fact that the transportability index Ho is small means that Fig. 3 (a)
As shown in Fig. 3, since the cutting level of the peak value C of the amplitude probability density distribution curve B is high, it represents a deep valley and plateau-like topography as shown in Fig. 3 (b), and a small peak M in this plateau. Is easily worn away, and the surface in contact with the roller becomes a smooth flat surface, so that slip easily occurs. This tendency is remarkable especially on a soft surface such as a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet.
【0011】一方、搬送性指数Ho が大であるというこ
とは、図4(a) に示すようにピーク値Cの切断レベルが
低い状態であるから、図4(b) に示すように峻険な高い
山状を有する地形を表し、この山における高いピークN
はローラに接しても簡単には消滅せず、摩擦力を維持す
るので搬送性がよい。ただし、搬送性指数Ho を大きく
することは、一般的に粗面化加工費を高めることとな
り、かつ塗装表面の仕上がり品質にも悪影響を及ぼすの
で、ローラ搬送条件に合わせて必要なHo を付与するよ
うにするのがよい。On the other hand, the fact that the transportability index Ho is large means that the cutting level of the peak value C is low as shown in FIG. 4 (a), so that it is steep as shown in FIG. 4 (b). Represents a terrain with a high mountain shape, high peak N in this mountain
Does not easily disappear even when it comes into contact with the roller, and maintains the frictional force, so it has good transportability. However, increasing the transportability index Ho generally increases the roughening processing cost and adversely affects the finish quality of the coated surface. Therefore, the required Ho is added according to the roller transport conditions. It is better to do so.
【0012】[0012]
【実施例】以下に、本発明の実施例について説明する。
被測定材として、規格;GA材で板厚;1.6 mm×板幅;
1219mmのコイルとされる溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板10コイルに
ついて、本発明方法を用いて搬送性指数Ho の演算を行
った結果と、その後ブランキング材としてローラで搬送
したときのスリップの発生の有無について表2に示し
た。ここで、○印は“スリップ発生なし”、△印は“ス
リップ部分発生”、×印は“スリップ発生あり”をそれ
ぞれ示す。なお、比較のために、従来の3次元表面粗さ
SRaの測定を行い、その測定値を同表に併せて示し
た。EXAMPLES Examples of the present invention will be described below.
As the material to be measured, standard; GA material, plate thickness; 1.6 mm × plate width;
Table 10 shows the results of calculation of the transportability index Ho using the method of the present invention for 10 coils of 1219 mm hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, and the presence or absence of slippage when transported by rollers as blanking materials thereafter. Shown in 2. Here, ◯ indicates “no slip occurrence”, Δ indicates “slip portion occurrence”, and X indicates “slip occurrence”. For comparison, the conventional three-dimensional surface roughness SRa was measured, and the measured values are also shown in the same table.
【0013】[0013]
【表2】 [Table 2]
【0014】この表2の結果を搬送性指数と対応させて
それぞれ図5と図6に示した。ここで、スリップ発生指
数“0”はスリップ発生なし、“1”はスリップ部分発
生、“2”はスリップ発生ありをそれぞれ意味する。こ
れらの図を比較してわかるように、従来の3次元表面粗
さ(SRa)の場合は搬送性指数と対応させて判定する
のが困難であるが、本発明の搬送性指数Hoについては2
4〜26%を境にして24%未満ではスリップ発生し、26%
超ではスリップ発生なしであることが明らかである。こ
れゆえ、上記の鋼板の場合は搬送性指数の基準値Hs を
24〜26%の範囲に設定するようにすれば、スリップの発
生の有無を確実に判定することが可能である。The results of Table 2 are shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 in correspondence with the transportability index. Here, the slip generation index “0” means that no slip has occurred, “1” means that a slip portion has occurred, and “2” means that slip has occurred. As can be seen by comparing these figures, in the case of the conventional three-dimensional surface roughness (SRa), it is difficult to make a determination in correspondence with the transportability index, but the transportability index Ho of the present invention is 2
Slip occurs at less than 24% at the boundary of 4 to 26%, 26%
It is obvious that no slip occurs when the value exceeds. Therefore, in the case of the above steel sheet, the reference value Hs of the transportability index is
If it is set within the range of 24 to 26%, it is possible to reliably determine the occurrence of slip.
【0015】[0015]
【発明の効果】以上説明したように本発明によれば、振
幅確率密度分布のピークに対応する切断高さレベルを求
めて、このピークに対応する切断高さレベルと断面曲線
の最大高さとの比から搬送性指数を求めるようにしたの
で、ローラの搬送性について確度の高い判定を行うこと
ができ、プレス加工ラインの生産性の向上に寄与する。As described above, according to the present invention, the cutting height level corresponding to the peak of the amplitude probability density distribution is obtained, and the cutting height level corresponding to this peak and the maximum height of the sectional curve are calculated. Since the transportability index is obtained from the ratio, the transportability of the roller can be determined with high accuracy, which contributes to the improvement of the productivity of the press working line.
【図1】本発明に用いる表面粗度測定装置の構成の一例
を示す概要図である。FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the configuration of a surface roughness measuring device used in the present invention.
【図2】(a) 断面曲線、(b) 振幅確率密度分布曲線の特
性図である。FIG. 2 is a characteristic diagram of (a) cross-section curve and (b) amplitude probability density distribution curve.
【図3】搬送性指数Ho が小のときの(a) 振幅確率密度
分布曲線と(b) 断面曲線の説明図である。FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of (a) amplitude probability density distribution curve and (b) sectional curve when the transportability index Ho is small.
【図4】搬送性指数Ho が大のときの(a) 振幅確率密度
分布曲線と(b) 断面曲線の説明図である。FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of (a) amplitude probability density distribution curve and (b) sectional curve when the transportability index Ho is large.
【図5】搬送性指数Ho とスリップ発生指数の関係を示
す特性図である。FIG. 5 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between a transportability index Ho and a slip occurrence index.
【図6】3次元表面粗さSRaとスリップ発生指数の関
係を示す特性図である。FIG. 6 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between a three-dimensional surface roughness SRa and a slip generation index.
1 鋼板 2 表面粗度センサ 3 表面粗度測定演算装置 4 演算結果表示装置 1 Steel Plate 2 Surface Roughness Sensor 3 Surface Roughness Measurement Calculation Device 4 Calculation Result Display Device
Claims (1)
を評価する方法であって、金属板表面の表面性状を所定
の長さにわたって測定して断面曲線を作成する工程と、
この断面曲線を最高山頂部から最低谷底部までの間の各
高さの値から振幅確率密度分布を作成する工程と、この
振幅確率密度分布のピークに対応する切断高さレベルを
求める工程と、このピークに対応する切断高さレベルと
前記断面曲線の最大高さとの比から搬送性指数を求める
工程と、からなることを特徴とする金属板のローラ搬送
性の評価方法。1. A method for evaluating transportability when a metal plate is transported by rollers, the method comprising: measuring a surface texture of a surface of the metal plate over a predetermined length to create a sectional curve.
A step of creating an amplitude probability density distribution from each height value between the highest peak and the lowest valley bottom of this sectional curve, and a step of obtaining a cutting height level corresponding to the peak of this amplitude probability density distribution, And a step of obtaining a transportability index from a ratio of a cutting height level corresponding to this peak and a maximum height of the cross-section curve.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP23127291A JP2895275B2 (en) | 1991-09-11 | 1991-09-11 | Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP23127291A JP2895275B2 (en) | 1991-09-11 | 1991-09-11 | Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH0571953A true JPH0571953A (en) | 1993-03-23 |
JP2895275B2 JP2895275B2 (en) | 1999-05-24 |
Family
ID=16921005
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP23127291A Expired - Fee Related JP2895275B2 (en) | 1991-09-11 | 1991-09-11 | Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2895275B2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000161946A (en) * | 1998-11-27 | 2000-06-16 | Mitsutoyo Corp | Method and device for analyzing three-dimensional data |
JP2017090453A (en) * | 2015-11-04 | 2017-05-25 | 学校法人東京理科大学 | Surface roughness evaluation device and surface roughness evaluation method |
JP2020518919A (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2020-06-25 | ブルックス オートメーション インコーポレイテッド | Method and apparatus for integrity assessment of transport equipment |
-
1991
- 1991-09-11 JP JP23127291A patent/JP2895275B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000161946A (en) * | 1998-11-27 | 2000-06-16 | Mitsutoyo Corp | Method and device for analyzing three-dimensional data |
JP2017090453A (en) * | 2015-11-04 | 2017-05-25 | 学校法人東京理科大学 | Surface roughness evaluation device and surface roughness evaluation method |
JP2020518919A (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2020-06-25 | ブルックス オートメーション インコーポレイテッド | Method and apparatus for integrity assessment of transport equipment |
JP2023052128A (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2023-04-11 | ブルックス オートメーション インコーポレイテッド | Method and device for soundness evaluation of transport device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2895275B2 (en) | 1999-05-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP2704070B2 (en) | Alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet with excellent press mold sliding properties | |
JP2895275B2 (en) | Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate | |
EP3124654A1 (en) | Stainless steel plate | |
WO2014207947A1 (en) | Mold for ironing and method for manufacturing molded material | |
JP2012130966A (en) | Highly corrosion-resistant steel plate on which fingerprint and dirt are hardly conspicuous and method of manufacturing the same | |
Devenpeck et al. | Strip-drawing experiments with a sigmoidal die profile | |
JP2006247740A (en) | Copper or copper alloy sheet strip for press forming | |
CN114965935B (en) | Strip steel quality judging method and system based on customer requirements | |
JP5916012B2 (en) | Components for home appliances that use steel plates that are difficult to notice fingerprints and dirt | |
WO2022138837A1 (en) | Titanium material | |
JP2000193450A (en) | Evaluating method for press forming characteristics of steel sheet | |
KR100574403B1 (en) | A method for evaluating surface pop-up defect on a galvanized steel sheet | |
JP2001219219A (en) | Method and die for bending metal plate | |
JP3427138B2 (en) | Bending method | |
CN213350348U (en) | Detection mechanism with self-resetting function | |
JP4695618B2 (en) | Steel plate for 3-piece can, manufacturing method thereof, and apparatus used for manufacturing the same | |
JP2013244526A (en) | Member for vehicle using steel plate having fingerprint and stain made hardly conspicuous | |
JPS61186110A (en) | Aluminum and aluminum alloy sheet for deep drawing | |
JP3709028B2 (en) | Cold tandem rolling method and cold tandem rolling mill | |
Autio et al. | Optimizing Press Performance for Difficult Automotive Stampings | |
JPS63238903A (en) | Aluminum sheet and aluminum alloy sheet for deep drawing | |
JP2509651B2 (en) | Cold rolled steel sheet for press with good lubricity | |
JPH08174007A (en) | Steel sheet excellent in image clarity after coating and manufacture thereof | |
Granzow | Sheet formability of steels | |
JP2001288549A (en) | Manufacturing method of cold rolled steel plate excellent in press forming property and plated steel plate |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080305 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090305 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |