JPH0335756Y2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0335756Y2 JPH0335756Y2 JP1984038841U JP3884184U JPH0335756Y2 JP H0335756 Y2 JPH0335756 Y2 JP H0335756Y2 JP 1984038841 U JP1984038841 U JP 1984038841U JP 3884184 U JP3884184 U JP 3884184U JP H0335756 Y2 JPH0335756 Y2 JP H0335756Y2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- stiffening plate
- main body
- thickness
- plate
- stiffening
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Description
【考案の詳細な説明】
〔産業上の利用分野〕
本考案は、船体や各種タンクの構造に利用され
る防撓板に関し、十分な強度を有しながら軽量化
を実現したものである。[Detailed Description of the Invention] [Industrial Field of Application] The present invention relates to a stiffening plate used in the structure of ship hulls and various tanks, which is lightweight while having sufficient strength.
例えば船体構造においては、船体を形成する外
板船倉間の隔壁、または居住区及びエンジン室間
等の隔壁、或いは甲板等に、撓みや振動を防止す
るために防撓板といわれる構造体が用いられてい
る。この防撓板は、従来は第1図に示すように例
えば鋼材より成る平板状(等厚板)の防撓板本体
1の一方側の面に、複数の骨部材2を平行状に伸
びるように設けて構成されている。
For example, in the hull structure, a structure called a stiffening plate is used to prevent deflection and vibration in the bulkhead between the outer holds that form the hull, the bulkhead between the living quarters and the engine room, or the deck. It is being Conventionally, as shown in FIG. 1, this stiffening plate has a plurality of rib members 2 extending in parallel on one side of a stiffening plate main body 1 made of, for example, steel and having a flat plate shape (equal thickness plate). It is set up and configured.
〔考案が解決しようとする課題〕
ところで防撓板本体1において、骨部材取付部
(図中N点)で必要とする強度は、互に隣接する
骨部材2,2間の中央部(図中M点)で必要とす
る強度より大きく、このため防撓板本体1の板厚
dは前記N点における必要強度から決定されてい
る。しかしながらこのような構造では、骨材2,
2間の中央部において余剰板厚を有していること
になり、例えばアスペクト化が2以上の一般船体
構造の防撓板についてはM点での必要強度がN点
での必要強度の68%程度であることから、防撓板
本体を構成する資材の量が相当無駄になつてい
た。[Problem to be solved by the invention] By the way, in the stiffening plate main body 1, the strength required at the bone member attachment part (point N in the figure) is determined by the strength required at the central part between the adjacent bone members 2 (point N in the figure). Therefore, the plate thickness d of the stiffening plate main body 1 is determined from the required strength at the N point. However, in such a structure, aggregate 2,
For example, for a stiffening plate of a general hull structure with an aspect ratio of 2 or more, the required strength at point M is 68% of the required strength at point N. As a result, a considerable amount of material constituting the stiffening plate body was wasted.
本考案はこのような事情のもとになされたもの
であり、十分な強度を有しながら資材の重量を軽
減化することができて省資材化を図ることのでき
る防撓板を提供することを目的とするものであ
る。 The present invention was developed under these circumstances, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a stiffening plate that has sufficient strength and can reduce the weight of materials, thereby saving materials. The purpose is to
この考案は、防撓板本体の両面を、複数の肉厚
部が平行状に伸びるように波形状をなす互いに対
称形状の連続する曲面にそれぞれ形成し、防撓板
本体の少なくとも一方側の面に、前記複数の肉厚
部の頂部に沿つて伸びるように複数の骨部材を設
けて成り、前記骨部材相互間の防撓板本体の肉厚
は前記波形形状に従つて緩やかに減少して中央部
で最小となるように形成されていることを特徴と
するものである。
This idea is to form both sides of the stiffening plate main body into continuous curved surfaces that are symmetrical to each other and have a wave shape in which a plurality of thick parts extend in parallel, and at least one side of the stiffening plate main body A plurality of bone members are provided so as to extend along the tops of the plurality of thick walled portions, and the wall thickness of the stiffening plate main body between the bone members gradually decreases according to the waveform shape. It is characterized by being formed so that it is smallest at the center.
この考案によれば、防撓板本体は断面形状が波
形に形成されて、必要強度が大きい部分(骨部材
が設けられる部分)については肉厚が大きく、必
要強度が小さい部分については肉厚が小さくなつ
ているから、十分な強度を有しながら資材の重量
を軽減化することができ、コストダウン及び省資
材化を図ることができる。
According to this idea, the main body of the stiffening plate is formed with a wave-shaped cross-section, and the wall thickness is large in the part where the required strength is high (the part where the bone members are installed), and the wall thickness is thick in the part where the required strength is low. Since it is smaller, it is possible to reduce the weight of materials while maintaining sufficient strength, and it is possible to reduce costs and save materials.
また、防撓板本体の面が連続した波形形状の曲
面にて形成されて、骨部材相互間の肉厚がこの波
形形状に従つて緩やかに減少して中央部で最小と
なるように形成されているので、平坦な板に局部
的に方形状や山形状の突条として肉厚部が形成さ
れている場合に比べて肉厚が急激に変化する部分
がなく、強度変化が連続的になり、応力集中がな
くなるので、亀裂の発生等を回避することができ
る。 In addition, the surface of the stiffening plate main body is formed as a continuous wave-shaped curved surface, and the wall thickness between the bone members is formed so that it gradually decreases according to the wave shape and becomes the minimum at the center. Because of this, there are no parts where the wall thickness changes suddenly, and the strength changes are continuous, compared to when the thick wall parts are locally formed as rectangular or mountain-shaped protrusions on a flat plate. Since there is no stress concentration, it is possible to avoid the occurrence of cracks.
また、波形形状を防撓板本体の平面側のみに形
成した場合には、板厚中心が肉薄部と肉厚部でず
れるので(第5図参照)、防撓板本体の板面に平
行な荷重(面内荷重)が加わつた場合に局部的に
偏心荷重がかかり、曲げモーメントが発生するの
で、肉薄部で容易に座屈したり変形したりするお
それがあるが、本考案では防撓板本体の両面に波
形形状を対称に形成したので、板厚中心が直線と
なり、板面に平行な荷重に対して曲げモーメント
が発生せず、容易に座屈したり、変形したりする
おそれがない。 In addition, if the waveform shape is formed only on the flat side of the stiffening plate body, the center of the plate thickness will shift between the thin and thick parts (see Figure 5), so When a load (in-plane load) is applied, a locally eccentric load is applied and a bending moment is generated, which may easily buckle or deform the thin wall part.However, in this invention, the stiffener body Since the corrugated shapes are symmetrically formed on both sides of the plate, the center of the plate thickness is a straight line, and no bending moment is generated under loads parallel to the plate surface, so there is no risk of easy buckling or deformation.
また、肉厚が最も厚い部分と最も薄い部分の比
が一定であれば、片面のみに波形を形成する場合
と本考案のように両面に波形を形成する場合とで
は、両面に形成する場合のほうが表面の凹凸が小
さくてすみ、船の甲板や船艙底板等に使用した場
合に凹部に残荷、ごみ、水などが溜まりにくくな
り、錆発生が少なくなる等メインテナンスが楽に
なる。また凹凸が小さく緩やかなので、歩行およ
び残荷除去等の作業もし易くなる。 In addition, if the ratio of the thickest part to the thinnest part is constant, there is a difference between forming corrugations on one side only and forming corrugations on both sides as in the present invention. The surface unevenness is smaller, and when used for the deck of a ship or the bottom of a ship's hold, it is difficult for residual cargo, dirt, water, etc. to accumulate in the recesses, and maintenance is easier, such as less rust. Furthermore, the unevenness is small and gentle, making it easier to walk and remove residual cargo.
以下図面によつて本考案の実施例について説明
する。
Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
第2図に示す実施例においては、防撓板本体1
はその両面11,12がそれぞれ正弦波状の対称
形状に形成されており、複数の肉厚部3が並行状
に伸びている。防撓板本体1の一方側の面12に
は、夫々前記複数の肉厚部3の頂部に沿つて伸び
るように複数の骨部材2が取り付けられている。 In the embodiment shown in FIG.
Both surfaces 11 and 12 are each formed in a symmetrical sinusoidal shape, and a plurality of thick portions 3 extend in parallel. A plurality of bone members 2 are attached to one side surface 12 of the stiffening plate main body 1 so as to extend along the tops of the plurality of thick portions 3, respectively.
防撓板本体1は、波のうねり方向と板の長さ方
向が同じ場合には、例えば圧延機にて板を一定速
度で送りながら、ロール間隔を周期的に作動させ
ることにより両面波形状に容易に作ることができ
る。 If the undulation direction of the waves and the length direction of the plate are the same, the stiffening plate main body 1 can be made into a wave shape on both sides by, for example, feeding the plate at a constant speed in a rolling mill and periodically operating the roll interval. It can be easily made.
ここで本考案の防撓板と従来の防撓板とについ
て、防撓板本体、例えば鋼板の重量を比較する。
第3図は本考案の防撓板の一例を模式的に示す平
面図であり、鎖線は骨部材を示す。縦横に伸びる
骨部材で囲まれた長方形状部材(斜線で囲まれた
部分)について考察すると、船体構造の防撓板は
等分布荷重を受ける周辺固定板として扱われ、防
撓板本体に加わる応力σは、
σ=K・σ0・P・b2/t2となる。但し、Pは単位
面積当りの等分布荷重、σ0は基準応力、bは長方
形状部分の短辺の長さ、tは防撓板本体の厚さ、
kは定数である。従つて防撓板本体の必要な厚さ
は、材質により定まる許容応力と最大等分布荷重
とから決定される。ところで上記の定数kは、長
方形状部分の各位置において一様な値ではなく、
長方形状部分の長辺の中央点A、短辺の中央点
B、中心点Cを代表して選ぶと、船体構造に用い
られる防撓板については長辺aと短辺bとの比
a/bが通常3より大きいことから、kA=0.500、
kB=0.343、kC=0.250となる。但しkA,kB,kCは
夫々A点、B点、C点における定数kである。従
つてA点、B点、C点における応力をそれぞれ
σA,σB,σCとすると、σA=kA・σ0・P・b2/t2,
σB
=kB・σ0・P・b2/t2,σC=kC・σ0・P・b2/t2と
な
り、
となり、防撓板本体が等厚板の場合には等分布
荷重に対してA点での応力が最も大きく、B点、
C点の順に小さくなる。このため従来ではA点で
の応力が許容応力を越えないように厚さtを定め
ていた。このときの厚さtは、許容応力をσS、最
大等分布荷重をP naxとすると、
(1/6S・kA・σ0・P nax・b2)1/2、となる。し
かしながらB点、C点における必要な厚さは、
夫々
(1/6S・kB・σ0・P nax・b2)1/2、(1/6S・kB・
σ0・P nax・b2)1/2であるから、B点、C点では
夫々必要な厚さの(kA/kB)1/2、(kA/kC)1/2
倍の大きさとなつている。即ちB点では略20・7
%、C点では略41.4%余剰の厚さである。これに
対し本考案では、上記の長辺形状部分の長辺から
中央に向うにつれて厚さを小さくし、例えば第4
図に示すように、上記の長辺の伸びる方向に沿つ
て肉厚部が並行状に伸びるように防撓板本体1の
両面11,12を互いに対称形状の正弦波形状に
形成し、長辺に相当する部分の厚さをT1中央部
に相当する部分の厚さT2をT2=0.83T1の大きさ
とすれば、鋼材重量に換算して従来よりも約10%
軽減できることになる。 Here, the weight of the stiffening plate main body, for example, a steel plate, will be compared between the stiffening plate of the present invention and a conventional stiffening plate.
FIG. 3 is a plan view schematically showing an example of the stiffening plate of the present invention, and the chain lines indicate bone members. When considering a rectangular member surrounded by longitudinally extending bone members (the area surrounded by diagonal lines), the stiffening plate of the hull structure is treated as a peripheral fixed plate that receives an evenly distributed load, and the stress applied to the main body of the stiffening plate is σ becomes σ=K・σ 0・P・b 2 /t 2 . However, P is the uniformly distributed load per unit area, σ 0 is the standard stress, b is the length of the short side of the rectangular part, t is the thickness of the stiffening plate body,
k is a constant. Therefore, the necessary thickness of the stiffening plate body is determined from the allowable stress determined by the material and the maximum uniformly distributed load. By the way, the above constant k is not a uniform value at each position of the rectangular part,
If the center point A of the long side of the rectangular part, the center point B of the short side, and the center point C are selected as representative points, the ratio a/ Since b is usually larger than 3, k A =0.500,
k B =0.343, k C =0.250. However, k A , k B , and k C are constants k at point A, point B, and point C, respectively. Therefore, if the stresses at points A, B, and C are respectively σ A , σ B , and σ C , then σ A =k A・σ 0・P・b 2 /t 2 ,
σ B =k B・σ 0・P・b 2 /t 2 , σ C =k C・σ 0・P・b 2 /t 2 , and if the stiffener body is a plate of equal thickness, then With respect to the distributed load, the stress at point A is the largest, and the stress at point B,
Point C becomes smaller in order. For this reason, in the past, the thickness t was determined so that the stress at point A did not exceed the allowable stress. The thickness t at this time is (1/6 S ·k A ·σ 0 · P nax ·b 2 )1/2, where σ S is the allowable stress and P nax is the maximum uniformly distributed load. However, the required thickness at points B and C is
(1/6 S・k B・σ0・P nax・b 2 ) 1/2 and (1/6 S・k B・σ 0・P nax・b 2 ) 1/2, respectively, so point B, At point C, the thicknesses are (k A /k B ) 1/2 and (k A /k C ) 1/2 times the required thickness, respectively. In other words, at point B it is approximately 20.7
%, and the thickness at point C is approximately 41.4% surplus. On the other hand, in the present invention, the thickness of the long side portion is decreased from the long side toward the center.
As shown in the figure, both surfaces 11 and 12 of the stiffening plate main body 1 are formed into a symmetrical sinusoidal shape so that the thick portions extend in parallel along the direction in which the long sides extend. If the thickness of the part corresponding to T 1 is the thickness of the part corresponding to the center part T 2 is T 2 = 0.83T 1 , then the weight of the steel material is approximately 10% compared to the conventional one.
This can be reduced.
また、第5図は防撓板本体1′の片面にのみ波
形形状を形成した場合aと本考案により防撓板本
体1の両面に波形形状を形成した場合bとを比較
したものである。 Further, FIG. 5 compares a case (a) in which a waveform is formed only on one side of the stiffening plate main body 1' and a case (b) in which a waveform is formed on both sides of the stiffener main body 1 according to the present invention.
防撓板本体1には板面に直角向きの荷重だけで
なく板面に平行な荷重も存在するが、aのように
片面のみ波形にした場合には、板厚中心mがうね
る(肉薄部と肉厚部でずれる)ため、防撓板本体
1′の左右から押圧力Fが加わつた場合に局部的
に偏心荷重がかかり、F×lの曲げモーメントが
発生して同図に示すように肉薄部で容易に座屈し
たり変形するおそれがある。これに対し、bのよ
うに両面を波形にした場合には、板厚中心mが直
線となるため、防撓板本体1の左右から押圧力F
を加えても、曲げモーメントは生ぜず、容易に座
屈したり変形することはない。 The stiffening plate body 1 is subject to not only loads perpendicular to the plate surface but also loads parallel to the plate surface. However, when only one side is corrugated as shown in a, the plate thickness center m is undulated (the thinner part (and misalignment in the thick part). Therefore, when a pressing force F is applied from the left and right sides of the stiffening plate main body 1', an eccentric load is applied locally, and a bending moment of F x l is generated, as shown in the figure. Thin parts may easily buckle or deform. On the other hand, when both sides are corrugated as shown in b, the plate thickness center m becomes a straight line, so the pressing force F from the left and right sides of the stiffening plate body 1
Even if a
また、肉厚の最も厚い部分の厚さをT1、最も
薄い部分の厚さをT2とする場合、第5図aの片
面のみ波形にした場合には、凹部4の深さはT1
−T2となるのに対し、bの両面波形にした場合
には、凹部4の深さはT1−T2/2と半分になる。し
たがつて、両面波形にすれば表面の凹凸が小さく
てすみ、船の甲板や船艙底板等に使用した場合に
凹部に残荷、ごみ、水などが溜まりにくくなり、
錆発生が少なくなる等メンテナンスが楽になる。
また凹凸が小さく緩やかであるので、歩行および
残荷除去等の作業もし易くなる。 Further, if the thickness of the thickest part is T 1 and the thickness of the thinnest part is T 2 , and if only one side of FIG. 5a is corrugated, the depth of the recess 4 is T 1
-T 2 , whereas in the case of double-sided corrugation b, the depth of the recess 4 is halved to T 1 -T 2 /2. Therefore, if both sides are corrugated, the unevenness on the surface will be small, and when used on the deck of a ship or the bottom of a ship's hold, it will be difficult for residual cargo, garbage, water, etc. to accumulate in the recesses.
Maintenance is easier due to less rust.
Furthermore, since the unevenness is small and gentle, it becomes easier to walk and carry out tasks such as removing residual cargo.
また、第6図a〜dは従来提案されていた防撓
板を示したものである。これらは、いずれも平板
状の防撓板本体10の片面に一定間隔ごとに突条
を形成したものである。aは突条13を方形状に
形成したものである。bは方形状の突条13を骨
部材2相互の中間部分にも形成したものである。
cは突条14を山形状に形成したものである。d
は山形状の突条14を骨部材2相互の中間部分に
も形成したものである。 Moreover, FIGS. 6a to 6d show stiffening plates that have been proposed in the past. All of these have protrusions formed at regular intervals on one side of a flat plate-shaped stiffening plate main body 10. A indicates a projection 13 formed into a rectangular shape. In b, a rectangular protrusion 13 is also formed at the intermediate portion between the bone members 2.
The projection 14 c is formed into a mountain shape. d
A mountain-shaped protrusion 14 is also formed at the intermediate portion between the bone members 2.
これらはいずれも突条13相互間あるいは突条
14相互間は表面が平坦であるため、突条13あ
るいは14とこの平坦部15との境界部分Pは肉
厚が急激に変化し、強度変化が急激になつてこの
部分Pで応力集中が生じ、亀裂が発生し易い。 Since the surfaces of these are flat between the protrusions 13 or between the protrusions 14, the thickness of the boundary portion P between the protrusions 13 or 14 and this flat portion 15 changes rapidly, and the strength does not change. Stress concentration occurs suddenly in this portion P, and cracks are likely to occur.
これに対し、本考案による防撓板本体1は第6
図eに示すように表面が連続した波形形状の曲面
に形成されて、骨部材2相互間の肉厚がその波形
形状に従つて緩やかに減少して中央部で最小とな
るように形成されているので、肉厚が急激に変化
する部分がなく、強度変化が連続的となつて応力
集中がなくなるので、亀裂の発生等を回避するこ
とができる。 In contrast, the stiffening plate main body 1 according to the present invention has a sixth
As shown in Figure e, the surface is formed into a continuous wavy curved surface, and the wall thickness between the bone members 2 is formed so that it gradually decreases in accordance with the wavy shape and becomes minimum at the center. Because of this, there are no parts where the wall thickness changes suddenly, and the strength changes continuously, eliminating stress concentration, so it is possible to avoid the occurrence of cracks.
以上説明したように、この考案によれば、防撓
板本体は断面形状が波形に形成されて、必要強度
が大きい部分(骨部材が設けられる部分)につい
ては肉厚が大きく、必要強度が小さい部分につい
ては肉厚が小さくなつているから、十分な強度を
有しながら資材の重量を軽減化することができ、
コストダウン及び省資材化を図ることができる。
As explained above, according to this invention, the stiffening plate main body is formed in a wave-shaped cross-section, and the parts where the required strength is large (the parts where the bone members are provided) have a large wall thickness, and the required strength is small. Since the wall thickness of the parts is reduced, it is possible to reduce the weight of the material while maintaining sufficient strength.
It is possible to reduce costs and save materials.
また、防撓板本体の面が連続した波形形状の曲
面にて形成されて、骨部材相互間の肉厚がこの波
形形状に従つて緩やかに減少して中央部で最小と
なるように形成されているので、平坦な板の部分
部分に方形状や山形状の突条として局部的に肉厚
部が形成されている場合に比べて肉厚が急激に変
化する部分がなく、強度変化が連続的になり応力
集中がなくなるので、亀裂の発生等を回避するこ
とができる。 In addition, the surface of the stiffening plate main body is formed as a continuous wave-shaped curved surface, and the wall thickness between the bone members is formed so that it gradually decreases according to the wave shape and becomes the minimum at the center. Because of this, there are no parts where the wall thickness changes suddenly compared to cases where a thick wall is locally formed as a rectangular or mountain-shaped protrusion on a flat plate, and the strength changes continuously. Since there is no stress concentration, the occurrence of cracks can be avoided.
また、波形形状を防撓板本体の片面側のみに形
成した場合には、板厚中心が肉薄部と肉厚部でず
れて、防撓板本体の板面に平行な荷重が加わつた
場合に局部的に偏心荷重がかかり、曲げモーメン
トが発生するので、肉薄部で容易に座屈したり変
形したりするおそれがあるが、本考案では防撓板
本体の両面に波形形状を対称に形成したので、板
厚中心が直線となり、板面に平行な荷重に対して
曲げモーメントが発生せず、容易に座屈したり、
変形したりするおそれがない。 In addition, if the waveform shape is formed only on one side of the stiffener body, the center of the plate thickness will shift between the thin and thick parts, and when a load parallel to the plate surface of the stiffener body is applied, Since a locally eccentric load is applied and a bending moment is generated, thin parts may easily buckle or deform, but in this invention, the waveform shape is formed symmetrically on both sides of the stiffener body. , the center of the plate thickness is a straight line, and bending moments do not occur against loads parallel to the plate surface, so it does not buckle easily.
There is no risk of deformation.
また、肉厚が最も厚い部分と最も薄い部分の比
が一定であれば、片面のみに波形を形成する場合
と本考案のように両面に波形を形成する場合とで
は、両面に形成する場合のほうが表面の凹凸が小
さくてすみ、船の甲板や船艙底板等に使用した場
合に凹部に残荷、ごみ、水などが溜まりにくくな
り、錆発生が少なくなる等メンテナンスが楽にな
る。また凹凸が小さく緩やかなので、歩行および
残荷除去等の作業もし易くなる。 In addition, if the ratio of the thickest part to the thinnest part is constant, there is a difference between forming corrugations on one side only and forming corrugations on both sides as in the present invention. The surface unevenness is smaller, and when used for the deck of a ship or the bottom of a ship's hold, it is difficult for residual cargo, dirt, water, etc. to accumulate in the recesses, and the occurrence of rust is reduced, making maintenance easier. Furthermore, the unevenness is small and gentle, making it easier to walk and remove residual cargo.
第1図は従来の防撓板を示す端面図、第2図は
本考案の一実施例を示す斜視図、第3図は防撓板
を模式的に示す平面図、第4図は第2図の防撓板
の一部を示す拡大端面図、第5図は片面波形と両
面波形との比較を示す端面図、第6図は従来提案
されていた突条を有する防撓板とこの考案による
防撓板との比較を示す端面図である。
1……防撓板本体、2……骨部材、3……肉厚
部。
Fig. 1 is an end view showing a conventional stiffening plate, Fig. 2 is a perspective view showing an embodiment of the present invention, Fig. 3 is a plan view schematically showing the stiffening plate, and Fig. 4 is a second Figure 5 is an enlarged end view showing a part of the stiffening plate shown in the figure, Figure 5 is an end view showing a comparison between single-sided corrugation and double-sided corrugation, and Figure 6 shows the conventionally proposed stiffening plate with ridges and this invention. It is an end view showing comparison with a stiffening board by. 1... Stiffening plate main body, 2... Bone member, 3... Thick part.
Claims (1)
伸びるよう波形状をなす互いに対称形状の連続す
る曲面にそれぞれ形成し、防撓板本体の少なくと
も一方側の面に、前記複数の肉厚部の頂部に沿つ
て伸びるように複数の骨部材を設けて成り、前記
骨部材相互間の防撓板本体の肉厚は前記波形形状
に従つて緩やかに減少して中央部で最小となるよ
うに形成されていることを特徴とする防撓板。 Both sides of the stiffening board main body are formed into mutually symmetrical continuous curved surfaces forming a wave shape such that a plurality of thick parts extend in parallel, and the plurality of A plurality of bone members are provided so as to extend along the top of the thick portion, and the wall thickness of the stiffening plate main body between the bone members gradually decreases according to the waveform shape and reaches a minimum at the center portion. A stiffening plate characterized by being formed so as to be.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP3884184U JPS60150992U (en) | 1984-03-16 | 1984-03-16 | Stiffening plate |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP3884184U JPS60150992U (en) | 1984-03-16 | 1984-03-16 | Stiffening plate |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS60150992U JPS60150992U (en) | 1985-10-07 |
| JPH0335756Y2 true JPH0335756Y2 (en) | 1991-07-29 |
Family
ID=30546220
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP3884184U Granted JPS60150992U (en) | 1984-03-16 | 1984-03-16 | Stiffening plate |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS60150992U (en) |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS58122282A (en) * | 1982-01-11 | 1983-07-20 | Hitachi Zosen Corp | panel structure |
-
1984
- 1984-03-16 JP JP3884184U patent/JPS60150992U/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS60150992U (en) | 1985-10-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4472473A (en) | Curved cap corrugated sheet | |
| US4144369A (en) | Composite deck panel | |
| GB2138860A (en) | Poured concrete floors | |
| US3760549A (en) | Construction element | |
| CN108595791A (en) | A kind of hull beam longitudinal strength specification check method considering strength superstructure | |
| WO1994019177A3 (en) | Angled i-beam honeycomb structure | |
| JP2821163B2 (en) | Railcar roof structure | |
| JP2021161793A (en) | Composite slab | |
| CN216232822U (en) | Novel horizontal groove type bulkhead pattern structure | |
| JP4493207B2 (en) | Steel plate web bridge structure | |
| JPS6342075Y2 (en) | ||
| JPH0952592A (en) | Bulkhead structure of liquid chemical carrier | |
| JP2005083083A (en) | Girder structure, bridge girder, corrugated web bridge and corrugated plate | |
| JPS6215183Y2 (en) | ||
| JPH0675776B2 (en) | Stiffening structure | |
| JPH0716809Y2 (en) | Stiffener | |
| JP3119789B2 (en) | Fender | |
| EP2268869B1 (en) | Profiled steel deck | |
| JPS6034554Y2 (en) | semi-submersible catamaran | |
| JPS5935607Y2 (en) | Support structure | |
| JPH052399Y2 (en) | ||
| JPS6231359Y2 (en) | ||
| JPS6243912B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0411073Y2 (en) | ||
| JPH0228236Y2 (en) |