JP7191424B1 - Diagnostic system, diagnostic method, and computer program - Google Patents

Abstract

The object of the present invention is to allow a patient to accurately grasp his/her own condition and to have an outlook after the program.
A question presenting unit 11 for presenting at least a skill question related to communication ability to a patient terminal 2 operated by the patient; an answer receiving unit 12 for acquiring an answer to the skill question via the patient terminal; A storage unit 1A in which answers to ability questions are stored in association with points assigned to a plurality of items in advance, a diagnosis unit 13 that calculates ability values for each item according to the assigned points, and a plurality of items different from the examinee. a simulation unit 14 for calculating, for each item, the estimated ability value of the second examinee after taking the program based on the rate of change in each ability value before and after taking the predetermined program; and the ability value and the estimated ability. A diagnostic system 1 comprising a result output unit 15 for displaying a value on a patient terminal.
[Selection drawing] Fig. 1

Description

Application of Article 30, Paragraph 2 of the Patent Act Dec. 13, 2021, https://checkup. parcys. com (Publications, etc.) December 13, 2021, https://y-guazu. com/press/7514 (Publications, etc.) December 13, 2021, https://www. akira drive. com (Publications, etc.) December 13, 2021, https://prtimes.com jp/main/html/rd/p/000000004.000081688. published in html

The present invention relates to diagnostic systems, diagnostic methods, and computer programs.

In recent years, programs for improving so-called communication skills are known. Since communication ability is an internal ability formed by one's subconsciousness and emotions, it is often difficult for patients themselves to grasp their ability. Also, it is more difficult for patients to imagine their own condition after the program. As a result, it was sometimes difficult for the examinees before the program to imagine the effectiveness of the program. Therefore, there is a need for a technique that enables the examinee to accurately grasp his/her own condition and to have an outlook after the program.

In Patent Document 1, a question is given to a subject, a score is given to the answer from the viewpoint of behavioral characteristics, ability is divided into multiple ability zones based on the analysis result, and based on the ability index of each ability zone A diagnostic system is described that outputs advice after analyzing the However, this system was limited to analyzing the current situation.

Japanese Patent No. 6778835

One of the objects of the present invention is to enable the examinee to accurately grasp his/her own condition and to have an outlook after the program.

In order to achieve the above object, a diagnostic system according to one aspect of the present invention includes a question presenting unit that presents at least a skill question related to communication ability to a patient terminal operated by the patient, an answer to the skill question, an answer receiving unit that is acquired via the terminal of the examinee; a storage unit that stores answers to the ability questions in association with points assigned to a plurality of items in advance; A diagnostic unit that calculates ability values, and an estimated ability value of said examinee after said program based on the rate of change in each of said ability values before and after a predetermined program in a plurality of second examinees different from said examinee. A simulation unit that calculates each of the items, and a result output unit that displays the ability value and the estimated ability value on the examinee's terminal.

The simulation unit estimates the ability value of the examinee after the first period based on a first rate of change when the program is continued for a predetermined first period, and performs the program more than the first period. The ability value of the examinee after the second period may be estimated based on the second rate of change when the second period continues for a long period of time.

A plurality of the programs are prepared, and the simulation unit refers to a rate of change that differs depending on the program to be taken, and determines the rate of change for taking the first program based on a third rate of change when taking the first program. The estimated ability value after the second program may be calculated, and the estimated ability value after the second program may be calculated based on a fourth rate of change when the second program is taken.

The question presenting unit presents profile questions related to attributes of the examinee to the terminal of the examinee, and the second examinee is a examinee whose answer to the profile question is the same as the examinee or within a predetermined range. and the diagnosis unit may estimate the ability value of the second examinee based on the rate of change in the second examinee.

The result output unit may display a comparative ability value calculated based on the ability value of the second examinee after the program, together with the ability value of the examinee, on the examinee terminal.

The diagnosis unit determines the personality type of the examinee based on the answers, and the simulation unit determines the change rate of the second examinee diagnosed with the same personality type as the examinee. Then, the ability value of the subject may be estimated.

A trainer terminal operated by a trainer who performs the program for a third patient is connected via a network, and the storage unit provides advice to the third patient by the trainer, which is acquired via the trainer terminal, The third examinee's personality type is stored in association with the third examinee's personality type, and the result output unit stores at least part of the advice stored in association with the same personality type as the examinee's personality type. may be output to the user terminal.

The storage unit stores the advice in association with the trouble information of the third examinee, the answer reception unit receives the trouble information of the examinee via the examinee terminal, and the result output unit At least part of the advice stored in association with the same personality type as that of the examinee and with the received trouble information may be output to the examinee terminal.

In order to achieve the above object, a diagnostic method according to one aspect of the present invention is a diagnostic method using a diagnostic system in which answers to ability questions related to communication ability are stored in advance in correspondence with allotted points for a plurality of items. a question presenting step of presenting at least the ability question to the examinee terminal operated by the examinee; an answer receiving step of obtaining an answer to the ability question via the examinee terminal; a diagnostic step of calculating an ability value for each of the items according to the above; and a result output step of displaying the ability values and the estimated ability values on the examinee's terminal.

In order to achieve the above object, a computer program according to one aspect of the present invention is a computer that controls a diagnostic system in which answers to ability questions related to communication ability and scores for a plurality of items are pre-stored in association with each other. A program comprising: a question presentation command for presenting at least the ability question to a patient terminal operated by the patient; an answer acceptance command for obtaining an answer to the ability question via the patient terminal; and a plurality of second examinees different from the examinee based on the rate of change in each of the ability values before and after a predetermined program for the examinee. A computer is caused to execute a simulation instruction for calculating the estimated ability value after programming for each of the items, and a result output instruction for displaying the ability value and the estimated ability value on the examinee's terminal.

The computer program can be stored in various data-readable recording media and provided, or can be provided in a downloadable manner via a network such as the Internet.

According to the present invention, it becomes possible for the examinee to accurately grasp his/her own condition and to have an outlook after the program.

1 is a functional block diagram showing the configuration and functions of a diagnostic system according to an embodiment of the present invention; FIG. It is a figure which shows one example of the table memorize|stored in the said diagnostic system, and is an example of (a) a partnership power table, (b) a comparative ability value table, and (c) a rate-of-change table. It is a figure which shows one example of the table memorize|stored in the said diagnostic system, and is an example of (a) trouble table and (b) program history table. It is a figure which shows one example of the processing flow performed in the said diagnostic system. It is (a) 1st example of the question screen displayed on the examinee's terminal connected to the said diagnostic system, (b) 2nd example. It is the 1st example of the result screen displayed on the said examinee's terminal. It is (a) 2nd example of the result screen displayed on the said examinee's terminal, (b) 3rd example. It is an example of the screen displayed on the terminal of the examinee, showing (a) a fourth example of the result screen and (b) an example of the simulation result screen.

●Outline A diagnostic system according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
The diagnostic system according to this embodiment presents questions about communication ability to the examinee, estimates the examinee's ability according to the answer, and outputs the result.

In addition, the diagnostic system estimates changes in ability values and presents them to the examinee when the examinee attends a program to improve communication ability. A program is a concept that includes various actions that are performed for the purpose of reforming the consciousness of the patient and improving the way of thinking, and its format is not limited. The program may be, for example, so-called counseling in which a trainer such as a clinical psychologist or a psychological counselor conducts a dialogue, or a lecture format in which one lecturer gives a class to a plurality of examinees. Alternatively, in addition to online classes in which transmission and reception are performed in real time, it may be a form of learning by viewing recorded delivery videos. The program may also be hands-on training, such as through role-playing. Furthermore, the program may be a real-time online or real-world dialogue that takes place in a community where a plurality of patients interact with each other, or an act of exchanging opinions in an SNS format. Moreover, these may be mixed.

In addition, the diagnosis system will be linked with the program participation history, collect the ability values of the participants after participating in the program, and the advice given to the examinee by the trainer during the program, and use it for the diagnosis and advice of other examinees. It is possible.

The diagnostic system may be realized by executing a predetermined computer program on a personal computer, for example, or part or all of its functions may be realized by a cloud computer. Moreover, the diagnosis system may be composed of a plurality of hardware configurations, and part or all of the functions may be provided in the examinee's terminal.

As shown in FIG. 1, the diagnostic system 1 is connected to, for example, patient terminals 2 (21, 22) and trainer terminals 3 through a network NW.
The examinee terminal 2 is a terminal used by the examinee, such as a personal computer, a tablet terminal, or a smart phone. The examinee terminal 2 includes at least a display section for displaying questions presented by the diagnostic system 1 and an input section for the examinee to input answers to the questions. Although two examinee terminals 2 are shown here, the number is arbitrary.

The trainer terminal 3 is a terminal used by a trainer who administers a program to a patient, and is, for example, a personal computer, a tablet terminal, or a smart phone. The trainer terminal 3 has at least an input unit for inputting advice to the examinee. The configuration may be such that an online meeting can be held by transmitting/receiving audio or moving images between the examinee terminal 2 and the trainer terminal 3 in real time. The number of trainer terminals 3 may be two or more, and is arbitrary.

The diagnostic system 1 includes, for example, an arithmetic unit such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a computer program executed by the CPU, a server having internal memory such as a RAM (Random Access Memory) and a ROM (Read Only Memory). Realized. As a result, the diagnosis system 1 mainly includes a question presentation section 11, an answer reception section 12, a diagnosis section 13, a simulation section 14, a result output section 15, a program information extraction section 16, a communication processing section 17, and a storage section 1A. Configure blocks.

As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the storage unit 1A mainly stores a partnership power table T101, a comparative ability value table T102, a rate of change table T103, a trouble table T104, and a program history table T105.

The partnership strength table T101 shown in FIG. 2(a) stores answers to questions about communication ability (hereinafter, also referred to as "ability questions") in association with allotted points for a plurality of items in advance. More specifically, in the partnership power table T101, answers to ability questions are associated with allotted points for each personality type. In this embodiment, there are six personality types. In the partnership strength table T101, a plurality of personality types may be added to one answer, or one or more points may be added to one personality type. According to this configuration, each answer can be reflected in various personality types in a stepwise manner, compared to a configuration in which only one point is added to one personality type for one answer.

Also, in the partnership strength table T101, answers to ability questions are associated with allotted points for a plurality of communication-related ability values. In this embodiment, there are five types of ability values: self-affirmation, listening ability, happiness, dialogue ability, and trust building ability, which are also collectively referred to as partnership ability. In the partnership power table T101, a plurality of ability values may be added to one answer, or one point or a plurality of points may be added to one ability value.

The comparison ability value table T102 shown in FIG. 2B is a table that associates attributes of examinees with ability values (also referred to as “comparison ability values”) displayed as comparison targets on the diagnosis result screen. The attributes of the examinee are, for example, sex, age, annual income, place of residence, or marital status, and are information representing the environment of the examinee apart from personality. A comparative ability score is the ability score of a person in a successful marriage or partnership. As comparative ability values, for example, an average value of the ability values after the examinee of each attribute continuously attends the program is stored. Further, as the comparative ability value, the average of the ability values of the examinees who are included in the predetermined top percentage among the examinees of each attribute after attending the program may be adopted. The comparative ability value table T102 may be updated when the examinee's data after taking the program is acquired.

A change rate table T103 shown in FIG. 2(c) is a table that stores the change rate of each ability value when the examinee receives the program. The change rate table T103 stores a plurality of change rates according to the program period. In this embodiment, the change rate table T103 stores a first change rate when the program is continued for three months and a second change rate when the program is continued for six months.
Three months is an example of the first period in the scope of claims, and six months is an example of the second period in the scope of claims.

The change rate table T103 stores the rate of change of each ability value when the examinee receives the program for each personality type. The degree of proficiency and the pace of proficiency in the program depends on the character of the examinee. In addition, since the program intended by the present invention has the aspect of improving psychological ability, the influence of personality is even more remarkable. In that respect, according to the configuration in which the rate of change is differentiated according to the personality type, it is possible to more accurately estimate the ability value of the examinee after taking the program.

Furthermore, when a plurality of programs are prepared, the change rate table T103 may store different change rates depending on the program to be attended. The rate of change table T103 may store different rate of change for each type of program, that is, the rate of change for receiving counseling and the rate of change for video learning, for example. Furthermore, the change rate table T103 may store different change rates for each program content. For example, a different rate of change may be stored for each course of the program, or the rate of change may be stored in association with the identification information of the learning video or the identification information of the trainer. Also, the rate of change when a plurality of programs are used in combination may be stored.

In the present embodiment, the rate of change is differentiated according to the personality type, but the rate of change may be varied according to the ability value by referring to a table in which the ability value and the rate of change are associated with each other. Further, in this case, the rate of change may vary depending on a specific ability value among the plurality of ability values, for example, an ability value related to the ability to listen to the trainer's advice, such as listening ability or dialogue ability. Furthermore, it is also possible to store a correction value for the rate of change according to the ability value, and correct the rate of change determined by the personality type with the correction value.

The change rate table T103 is configured to be editable. The rate of change table T103 may be changed by, for example, the administrator of the diagnostic system 1 correcting the rate of change. Further, the change rate table T103 may be automatically changed based on the ability values of the examinee before and after taking the program acquired by the diagnosis unit 13 . In this case, the processing unit that updates the change rate table T103 refers to the program attendance history of the examinee, and reflects the change in the ability value of the examinee in the change rate associated with the attended program.

The concern table T104 shown in FIG. 3A is a table that associates the type of concern of the examinee, the type of the person with whom the examinee is having trouble communicating, and the sentences H1 to H4 displayed to the examinee.

The program history table T105 shown in FIG. 3(b) is a table that stores the history of the programs performed for the examinees. The program history table T105 stores the advice for the examinee acquired via the trainer terminal 3 in association with the personality type of the examinee. The advice may be textual information entered by the trainer during or after the program, or audio or video of the trainer speaking. Also, the advice may be data obtained by transcribing the voice or video by voice recognition.

Further, the program history table T105 may store the advice in association with the patient's type of concern. Furthermore, the program history table T105 may also store the types of programs attended or identification information.

The question presenting unit 11 is a functional unit that presents questions to the examinee via the display unit of the examinee's terminal 2 and receives input of answers to the questions. The question presenting unit 11 presents at least questions about communication ability (hereinafter also referred to as "ability questions") to the patient terminal 2 operated by the patient. The ability questions include, for example, questions about personalities related to communication, and how to deal with troubles in human relationships. An answer format may be stored together with each question. If the answer format is a selection format, options are also stored. Also, an answer input rule may be stored.

In addition, the question presenting unit 11 presents profile questions about attributes of the examinee to the terminal of the examinee. The profile question is, for example, a question about attributes of the examinee, namely age, annual income, area of residence, and the like.

The answer receiving unit 12 is a functional unit that acquires answers to the ability questions and profile questions via the examinee's terminal 2 .
The response receiving unit 12 may receive the patient's trouble information via the patient's terminal 2 . The trouble information may be in a form in which the examinee selects from options of the trouble type presented by the diagnostic system 1, or in a form in which free input is accepted. In this case, the answer receiving unit 12 may analyze the trouble information input by free input and extract a trouble type that is similar in content. Further, the answer receiving unit 12 may extract characteristic terms indicating worries from the trouble information input by free input, and add them to options to be displayed from the next time onwards.

The diagnosis unit 13 is a functional unit that diagnoses the partnership strength of the examinee by referring to the partnership strength table T101. The diagnosis unit 13 calculates an ability value for each item according to the allocation of points. The diagnosis unit 13 refers to the partnership power table T101 and determines the examinee's personality type based on the answers to the ability questions.

That is, the diagnosis unit 13 estimates the ability value of the examinee based on the answers to the profile questions, that is, the rate of change in the examinee whose attributes are the same as the examinee's or within a predetermined range.

The simulation unit 14 calculates, for each item, an estimated ability value of each examinee after taking the program based on the rate of change in each ability value of a plurality of examinees different from the examinee before and after taking the predetermined program. . The simulation unit 14 may determine the rate of change by referring to either or both of the examinee's personality type and ability value. More specifically, for example, the simulation unit 14 may calculate the estimated ability value of the examinee based on the rate of change of the examinee who has the same personality type. Further, the simulation unit 14 calculates an estimated ability value of the examinee based on the rate of change of the examinee whose difference between each ability value before the program and each ability value of the examinee is less than a predetermined value. good too. Also, the simulation unit 14 may determine or modify the rate of change with reference to answers to specific questions.

The simulation unit 14 may estimate ability values at multiple points in time. Specifically, the simulation unit 14 estimates the ability value of the examinee after three months based on the first rate of change at the point in time when the program has been continuously attended for a predetermined three months. Based on the second rate of change after 6 months, the examinee's ability value after 6 months is estimated. Three months is an example of the first period, and six months is an example of the second period. The simulation unit 14 may estimate the ability value of the examinee based on the rate of change of the examinee diagnosed as having the same personality type as the examinee.

Further, the simulation unit 14 may refer to the rate of change table T103 to calculate different estimated ability values according to the programs assumed to be attended. This is because the change rate table T103 stores different change rates according to programs. Therefore, for example, the simulation unit 14 calculates a different estimated performance value for each type of program.

Furthermore, the simulation unit 14 may make a prediction when no programming is performed. The simulation unit 14 may predict the risk of continuing a human relationship for a predetermined number of years with the current ability value based on each ability value or the sum of a plurality of ability values. Specifically, each ability value or the sum of a plurality of ability values is stored in association with an explanatory text explaining a possible risk in the storage unit 1A, and the simulation unit 14 refers to this determine the risk of According to this configuration, it is possible to specifically present the situation in which the examinee would not attend the program, and allow the examinee to grasp the risks. As a result, it can be used as an opportunity for the examinee to attend the program.

Furthermore, the simulation unit 14 may calculate the probability that the examinee will meet a compatible type of person in the future. The simulation unit 14 refers to the state of divergence between the examinee's ability value and the comparative ability value, and calculates the probability. When the examinee's ability value is equal to or higher than the comparative ability value, a large score is given, while the smaller the examinee's ability value with respect to the comparative ability value, the lower the score. Also, the higher the total number of points given to each ability value, the higher the probability of meeting. This is because the smaller the ability value, the lower the communication ability, and the smaller the number of people who are compatible with each other. The probability is calculated based on the number of encounters, such as "1 in 100". According to this configuration, it is possible to further increase the examinee's motivation to improve the ability value.

The result output unit 15 is a functional unit that displays the examinee's ability value diagnosed by the diagnosis unit 13 on the examinee's terminal 2 . Further, the result output unit 15 displays on the examinee terminal 2 the estimated ability value estimated by the simulation unit 14 when the program is continued for a predetermined period. The result screen may be output to the examinee terminal 2 as well as to the trainer terminal 3, for example.

The result output unit 15 associates the program estimated by the simulation unit 14 and the estimated ability value when the program is taken with each other and displays them on the examinee terminal 2 . According to this configuration, the program that can be expected to improve the ability value becomes more specific. In addition, the result output unit 15 may display on the patient terminal 2 as a program that recommends a program with the highest estimated ability value. According to this configuration, the program to be taken becomes clear to the examinee, and the opportunity to take the course can be given.

The result output unit 15 displays on the examinee's terminal 2 the comparison ability value calculated based on the ability value after the program of the examinee with the same attribute, together with the ability value of the examinee. The ability value and the comparative ability value may be displayed as a vertical or horizontal bar graph, or as a radar chart, for example. According to this configuration, the examinee can clearly grasp the missing ability value. Moreover, according to the configuration in which the subject can be compared with the subject of the same attribute, the subject of comparison can be felt closer to the subject, and the subject's ambition can be heightened.

The result output unit 15 refers to the program history table T105, and outputs at least a part of the advice stored in association with the same personality type as the examinee and with the received worry type to the examinee's terminal. 2 may be output. Alternatively or additionally, the result output unit 15 may output to the patient terminal 2 at least part of the advice stored in association with the partner type accepted via the patient terminal 2. good. Note that the form of output may be audio or moving images in addition to text.

The information displayed on the result screen is stored in the storage unit 1A, and the result output unit 15 can generate the result screen by referring to the information in the storage unit 1A at an appropriate timing after the answer is input. An example of the result screen will be described later.

The program information extraction unit 16 is a functional unit that extracts program information from program records and stores it in the program history table T105. The program information extraction unit 16 extracts the identification information of the examinee, the execution date and time of the program of the examinee, the type of concern with which the program was consulted, and the type of the partner. Note that these pieces of information may be input by selective input or free description from the trainer terminal 3 . Also, the program information extraction unit 16 extracts the content of advice given by the trainer in the program. Furthermore, the program information extraction unit 16 may extract the contents of the report input by the trainer and store them in the program history table T105.

The program information extracting unit 16 may associate a plurality of worry types with one program recording, and extract and store advice content for each worry type. The advice content stored in this manner is referred to by the result output unit 15 and displayed as advice to another examinee. Extraction of the advice content can be performed by analyzing the words used for each sentence, or by appropriate AI technology. According to this configuration, the diagnosis system 1 learns the trainer's advice as it accumulates the program history, and can display more accurate and varied advice for the trouble.

The communication processing unit 17 transmits and receives various data to and from the examinee terminal 2 and the trainer terminal 3 via a network NW such as the Internet.
Specifically, with the examinee's terminal 2, the answers to the examinee's profile questions and ability questions and trouble information are received. In addition, with the trainer terminal 3, the contents of answers and ability values of the examinee are transmitted, and the history of the program is received.
The exchange of data and notifications between the examinee and the trainer via the examinee terminal 2 and the trainer terminal 3 can be done via the examinee's and trainer's own pages, etc., provided on a predetermined website, or through the examinee's personal page. and via trainer's e-mail.

●Flow of Processing FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of the flow of processing executed by the diagnostic system 1 .
First, a question is displayed on the examinee's terminal 2 by the question presentation unit 11 (S101). Next, an answer input to the examinee's terminal 2 is accepted (S102). Next, the diagnosis unit 13 determines the examinee's personality type based on the answers (S103). Further, the diagnostic unit 13 calculates the ability value of the examinee based on the answers (S104). The order of steps S103 and S104 is random.

Next, the simulation unit 14 determines the change rate of the ability value when the examinee receives the program based on the examinee's answer (S105). Next, the simulation unit 14 estimates the ability value after programming according to the rate of change (S106). The simulation unit 14 may calculate a plurality of estimated performance values according to the period. Next, the result output unit 15 displays the estimated ability value as a simulation result on the display unit of the patient terminal 2 (S107).

●Screen example FIG. 5 is an example of a question screen G100 displayed on the patient terminal 2. FIG. In the screen G100 shown in FIG. 5A, question columns G101 displaying questions and answer columns G102 displaying answers to the questions are alternately displayed. The question column G101 includes an operator icon G101a for asking the examinee a question, and a question text column G101b for displaying the content of the question. The operator icon G101a is displayed to the left of each question text column G101b. Also, the question text column G101b and the answer column G102 are different from each other in at least the background color or the character color.

On the question screen G100, when an input of an answer to a question is accepted, the next set question is displayed below the answer. As questions and answers are repeated, the question screen G100 automatically scrolls upward. Further, when the reselection area G103 for receiving a command to reselect the answer to the previous question is selected, the previous question is displayed below the question displayed when the input is accepted. displayed again.

According to the series of configurations described above, it is possible to give the examinee the impression that he or she is having a chat with the operator when answering the question. In addition, since the questions to be answered are displayed one by one, it is possible to prompt the user to answer without feeling oppressed, compared to a mode in which a plurality of questions are collectively displayed on one screen.

An entry field G104 for entering an answer is displayed at the bottom of the question screen G100. Note that the answer entry rule is associated with each question and stored in advance, and the answer column is displayed according to the entry rule. For example, an input field for receiving only numerical input is displayed for annual income, while an input field for receiving a single selected input of prefecture is displayed for housing.

FIG. 5B is an example of a question screen G110 displayed after answering the question on the question screen G100. Ability questions are presented on this question screen G110. On the screen, a message G111 is displayed to the right of the operator icon G101a to the effect that the questions displayed below are related to partnerships. According to this configuration, the distinction between the profile question and the ability question is clear even for the examinee. Below the message G111, a question column G112 regarding the partnership is displayed. Also, an answer column G113 indicating the content of the selected answer is displayed below the question column G112.

As shown in FIG. 6, when all the questions have been answered, a type diagnosis result screen G120 is displayed. The screen G120 displays a name field G121 of the type diagnosed based on the answer and an explanation field G122 for displaying an explanation of the type.

7 and 8 are examples of result screens G130, G140, G150, and G160 displayed by scrolling down the type diagnosis result screen G120. The type diagnosis result screen G120, result screens G130, G140, G150 and G160 are displayed as a series of web pages without screen transitions.

In the result screen G130 shown in FIG. 7(a), the ability values of other examinees who have the same attributes as those of the examinee or within a predetermined range and who have a successful marriage/partnership, that is, comparative ability values are displayed. A guideline G131 to the effect that they are displayed together, and a comparison result column G132 for each ability value are displayed. The comparison result column G132 includes, for example, an evaluation column G132a indicating the state of divergence from the comparative ability value, an ability value column G132b displaying the ability value of the examinee, a comparative ability value column G132c, and a difference value between the ability value and the comparative ability value. and a message field G132d containing

A result screen G140 shown in FIG. 7B displays a radar chart that plots the examinee's ability value and comparative ability value on the same axis.

A result screen G150 shown in FIG. 8A is a screen on which a message to the examinee is displayed. This message is selectively displayed according to the patient's personality type or each ability value. The message may have a configuration in which a plurality of sentences are selected according to the patient's personality type or each ability value, and these sentences are listed. Also, the trainer's name and face photo are displayed on the left side of the message.

A result screen G160 shown in FIG. 8B is a screen on which the estimated capacity value estimated by the simulation unit 14 is displayed. The result screen G160 includes a radar chart column G161 showing the current state, a radar chart column G162 superimposing the estimated ability value when the program is continued for 3 months and the current state, and a program for 6 months. A radar chart field G163 and the like are displayed in which the estimated capacity value in the case of continuation and the current state are drawn in a superimposed manner. In the radar chart columns G161 to G163, average values of the respective ability values are superimposed. According to this configuration, it is visually clear that the ability value will improve by continuing the program.

According to the diagnostic system according to the embodiment of the present invention described above, the examinee can accurately grasp his/her own condition and have an outlook after the program.

In the diagnostic system according to the present embodiment described above, the functional configuration of each terminal or device is an example, and the functional units shown in this example can be provided in a terminal or device different from this example.

1 diagnosis system 11 question presentation unit 12 answer reception unit 13 diagnosis unit 14 simulation unit 15 result output unit 16 program information storage unit 17 communication processing unit 1A storage unit T101 partnership power table T102 change rate table T103 trouble table T104 program history table 2 consultation Trainer terminal 3 Trainer terminal

Claims (10)

a question presentation unit that presents at least a skill question about communication ability to a patient terminal operated by the patient;
an answer receiving unit that acquires an answer to the ability question via the examinee terminal;
a storage unit in which answers to the ability questions are stored in advance in association with allotted points for a plurality of items;
a diagnosis unit that calculates an ability value for each of the items according to the allotted points based on the acquired answers to the ability questions ;
Based on the rate of change in each of the ability values of a plurality of second examinees different from the examinee before and after taking the predetermined program, an estimated ability value of the examinee after taking the program is calculated for each of the items. a simulation unit that
a result output unit that displays the ability value and the estimated ability value on the patient terminal;
comprising
diagnostic system. The simulation unit calculates the estimated ability value of the examinee after the first period based on a first change rate at the time when the program is continued for a predetermined first period, and performs the program for the first period. calculating the estimated ability value after the second period of the examinee based on the second rate of change at the time when the second period continued for a longer period;
The diagnostic system of claim 1. A plurality of said programs are prepared,
The simulation unit refers to a rate of change that differs depending on the program to be attended, and calculates the estimated ability value after taking the first program based on a third rate of change when taking the first program. , calculating the estimated ability value after attending the second program based on a fourth rate of change when attending the second program;
3. A diagnostic system according to claim 1 or 2. The question presenting unit presents profile questions related to attributes of the examinee to the terminal of the examinee,
The second examinee is a examinee whose answers to the profile question are the same as those of the examinee or within a predetermined range,
The diagnostic unit estimates the ability value of the examinee based on the rate of change in the second examinee.
A diagnostic system according to any one of claims 1 to 3. The result output unit displays a comparative ability value calculated based on the ability value of the second examinee after the program, together with the ability value of the examinee, on the examinee terminal.
5. The diagnostic system of claim 4. The diagnosis unit determines the personality type of the examinee based on the answer,
The simulation unit estimates the ability value of the examinee based on the rate of change of the second examinee diagnosed as having the same personality type as the examinee.
A diagnostic system according to any of claims 1-5. connected via a network to a trainer terminal operated by a trainer who implements the program for the third patient;
the storage unit stores the advice of the trainer for the third examinee acquired via the trainer terminal in association with the personality type of the third examinee;
The result output unit outputs at least part of the advice stored in association with the same personality type as that of the examinee to the examinee's terminal.
The diagnostic system of claim 6. The storage unit stores the advice in association with the type of concern of the third examinee,
The answer reception unit receives the type of concern of the examinee via the terminal of the examinee,
The result output unit outputs at least part of the advice stored in association with the same personality type as that of the examinee and with the received worry type to the examinee's terminal. ,
The diagnostic system of claim 7. A diagnosis method by a diagnosis system in which answers to ability questions regarding communication ability are stored in association with points assigned to a plurality of items in advance,
a question presenting step of presenting at least the ability question to a patient terminal operated by the patient;
an answer receiving step of obtaining an answer to the ability question via the examinee terminal;
a diagnosis step of calculating an ability value for each of the items according to the allotted points based on the acquired answers to the ability questions ;
Based on the rate of change in each of the ability values of a plurality of second examinees different from the examinee before and after taking the predetermined program, an estimated ability value of the examinee after taking the program is calculated for each of the items. a simulation step to
a result output step of displaying the ability value and the estimated ability value on the patient terminal;
The computer performs a diagnostic method. A computer program for controlling a diagnostic system in which answers to ability questions related to communication ability are stored in association with scores for a plurality of items in advance,
a question presentation command for presenting at least the ability question to a patient terminal operated by the patient;
an answer acceptance command for obtaining an answer to the ability question via the examinee terminal;
a diagnosis command for calculating an ability value for each of the items according to the allotted points based on the acquired answers to the ability questions ;
Based on the rate of change in each of the ability values of a plurality of second examinees different from the examinee before and after taking the predetermined program, an estimated ability value of the examinee after taking the program is calculated for each of the items. a simulation instruction to
a result output command for displaying the ability value and the estimated ability value on the patient terminal;
A computer program that causes a computer to execute

Images