JP6111910B2 - Abnormality monitoring device and abnormality monitoring program - Google Patents

Abnormality monitoring device and abnormality monitoring program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6111910B2
JP6111910B2 JP2013142935A JP2013142935A JP6111910B2 JP 6111910 B2 JP6111910 B2 JP 6111910B2 JP 2013142935 A JP2013142935 A JP 2013142935A JP 2013142935 A JP2013142935 A JP 2013142935A JP 6111910 B2 JP6111910 B2 JP 6111910B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
abnormality
image forming
interval
operation amount
forming apparatus
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2013142935A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2015018291A (en
Inventor
山口 昭治
昭治 山口
昌泰 高野
昌泰 高野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp
Original Assignee
Fuji Xerox Co Ltd
Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fuji Xerox Co Ltd, Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp filed Critical Fuji Xerox Co Ltd
Priority to JP2013142935A priority Critical patent/JP6111910B2/en
Publication of JP2015018291A publication Critical patent/JP2015018291A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6111910B2 publication Critical patent/JP6111910B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、異常監視装置及び異常監視プログラムに関する。   The present invention relates to an abnormality monitoring apparatus and an abnormality monitoring program.

紙などの記録材に画像を形成する機能を備えた画像形成装置として、複写機、プリンタ装置、ファクシミリ装置、これらの機能を併せもった複合機などが知られている。
このような画像形成装置において、画像形成機能の動作に支障をきたす異常(紙詰まりや転写不良等)が発生すると画像形成機能の利用が制限されてしまい、利用者に不便を生じることになる。異常の種類にもよるが、利用者が対処可能な軽微な異常については、利用者自身が異常を取り除いて画像形成機能の利用を継続することがある。また、利用者が対処不能な重度な異常や、軽微な異常であっても頻発する場合には、メンテナンス業者に対して画像形成装置の保守が要請され、当該要請を受けた業者が画像形成装置の設置場所に訪問し、異常の原因となった部品の交換や修理等の必要な処置を速やかに施すことで、画像形成機能の利用が制限された状態となる時間を低減することが行われる。
As an image forming apparatus having a function of forming an image on a recording material such as paper, a copying machine, a printer apparatus, a facsimile apparatus, and a multifunction machine having these functions are known.
In such an image forming apparatus, when an abnormality (such as a paper jam or a transfer failure) that hinders the operation of the image forming function occurs, the use of the image forming function is limited, which causes inconvenience to the user. Depending on the type of abnormality, for minor abnormalities that can be dealt with by the user, the user may remove the abnormality and continue using the image forming function. In the case of a serious abnormality that cannot be dealt with by the user or a minor abnormality that frequently occurs, maintenance of the image forming apparatus is requested to the maintenance company, and the supplier who has received the request The time required for the use of the image forming function to be reduced can be reduced by promptly taking necessary measures such as exchanging or repairing the part that caused the abnormality. .

これまで、画像形成装置の保守に係る技術に関し、種々の発明が提案されている。
例えば、特許文献1には、複数の画像形成装置で構成されるグループにおける異常の発生に関し、異常の種別毎に、異常の発生回数に対する当該異常が発生した画像形成装置の累計台数の分布と、異常の発生回数に対する当該異常の発生に伴って保守が施された画像形成装置の累計台数の分布との少なくとも一方を用いて、当該分布において予め定められた基準値を上回る異常の発生回数を特定し、当該特定した発生回数以上の異常が発生した画像形成装置で構成されるサブグループを抽出し、当該サブグループについて保守が施された場合の時系列的な異常の発生傾向に基づいて保守判定の基準を設定する発明が記載されている。
Up to now, various inventions have been proposed regarding technologies related to maintenance of image forming apparatuses.
For example, in Patent Document 1, regarding the occurrence of an abnormality in a group composed of a plurality of image forming apparatuses, the distribution of the cumulative number of image forming apparatuses in which the abnormality has occurred with respect to the number of occurrences of abnormality for each type of abnormality, Using at least one of the distribution of the cumulative number of image forming apparatuses that have undergone maintenance accompanying the occurrence of the abnormality relative to the number of occurrences of the abnormality, the number of occurrences of abnormality exceeding a predetermined reference value in the distribution is identified. Then, a sub-group composed of image forming apparatuses in which the abnormality has occurred more than the specified number of occurrences is extracted, and maintenance determination is made based on the time-series abnormality occurrence tendency when maintenance is performed on the sub-group An invention for setting the standard is described.

特開2012−149577号公報JP 2012-1449577 A

本発明は、画像形成装置の設置場所に訪問して行う保守作業を適切なタイミングで実施できるようにすることを目的とする。   SUMMARY An advantage of some aspects of the invention is that maintenance work performed by visiting an installation site of an image forming apparatus can be performed at an appropriate timing.

本発明(1)は、画像形成装置から、当該画像形成装置で発生した画像形成機能の異常の検出時点を示す情報と、当該画像形成機能の稼働量を示す情報とを取得する取得手段と、前記取得手段により取得された複数の前記異常の検出時点を示す情報に基づいて、前記異常の検出間隔を示す値を算出する算出手段と、記検出間隔が基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いか否かを判定する判定手段と、前記判定手段により前記検出間隔が前記基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いと判定されたことに応じて、前記画像形成装置に対する保守を促す通知を出力する出力手段と、を備えたことを特徴とする異常監視装置である。 According to the first aspect of the present invention , there is provided an acquisition unit configured to acquire, from the image forming apparatus, information indicating a detection point of abnormality of the image forming function that has occurred in the image forming apparatus, and information indicating an operation amount of the image forming function . based on the information indicating a plurality of time of detecting the abnormality that has been acquired by the acquisition means, and calculation means for calculating a value indicating a detection interval of the abnormality, before Symbol detection interval shorter rather than the reference interval, and the determination means for determining whether operation amount is larger than the reference operation amount, the determination means and the detection interval is rather short than the reference interval by, and, in that said operating amount is determined to greater than the reference operation amount Accordingly, an abnormality monitoring apparatus comprising: an output unit that outputs a notification that prompts maintenance of the image forming apparatus.

本発明(2)は、本発明(1)において、前記取得手段は、前記画像形成装置から前記異常の種類を示す情報を更に取得し、前記算出手段は、前記異常の種類毎に、前記検出間隔を示す値を算出し、前記判定手段は、前記異常の種類のいずれかにおいて前記検出間隔が当該種類について定められた前記基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いか否かを判定し、前記出力手段は、前記異常の種類のいずれかにおいて前記検出間隔が当該種類について定められた前記基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いと判定されたことに応じて、前記画像形成装置に対する保守を促す通知を出力する、ことを特徴とする異常監視装置である。 In the present invention (2), in the present invention (1), the acquisition unit further acquires information indicating the type of abnormality from the image forming apparatus, and the calculation unit detects the detection for each type of abnormality. or calculates a value indicating the distance, the determination means, the detection interval in any kind of the abnormality rather short than the reference interval defined for that type, and the operation amount is larger than the reference operation amount determines whether the output means Oite the detection interval to any kind of the abnormality rather short than the reference interval defined for that type, and, when the operating amount is larger than the reference operation amount An abnormality monitoring apparatus that outputs a notification for urging maintenance on the image forming apparatus in response to the determination.

本発明()は、コンピュータに、画像形成装置から、当該画像形成装置で発生した画像形成機能の異常の検出時点を示す情報と、当該画像形成機能の稼働量を示す情報とを取得する取得機能と、前記取得機能により取得された複数の前記異常の検出時点を示す情報に基づいて、前記異常の検出間隔を示す値を算出する算出機能と、記検出間隔が基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いか否かを判定する判定機能と、前記判定機能により前記検出間隔が前記基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いと判定されたことに応じて、前記画像形成装置に対する保守を促す通知を出力する出力機能と、を実現させるための異常監視プログラムである。 According to the third aspect of the present invention, the computer acquires, from the image forming apparatus, information indicating a point in time when the abnormality of the image forming function that has occurred in the image forming apparatus is detected and information indicating an operation amount of the image forming function. features and, based on the information indicating the detection time point of the a plurality of the abnormality acquired by the acquisition function, a calculation function for calculating a value indicating the detection interval of the abnormality, rather short than the previous SL detection interval reference interval, and, a determining function whether the operation amount is larger than the reference operation amount, the determination function by the detection interval is rather short than the reference interval, and, it is determined that the operation amount is larger than the reference operation amount And an output function for outputting a notification prompting maintenance of the image forming apparatus according to the situation.

本発明(1)、()によれば、本発明を適用しない場合に比べ、画像形成装置の設置場所に訪問して行う保守作業を適切なタイミングで実施できるようになる。また、画像形成装置の設置場所に訪問して行う保守作業が過剰に実施されることを抑制することができる。
本発明(2)によれば、画像形成装置の設置場所に訪問して行う保守作業のタイミングを、より適正化することができる
According to the present invention (1) and ( 3 ), it is possible to perform maintenance work by visiting the installation place of the image forming apparatus at an appropriate timing as compared with the case where the present invention is not applied. In addition, it is possible to suppress excessive maintenance work performed by visiting the installation site of the image forming apparatus.
According to the present invention (2), the timing of the maintenance work performed by visiting the place where the image forming apparatus is installed can be made more appropriate .

異常監視システムの全体構成の概略を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the outline of the whole structure of an abnormality monitoring system. 異常監視装置及び画像形成装置の機能ブロックの例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the functional block of an abnormality monitoring apparatus and an image forming apparatus. 異常監視装置の動作に関する処理フローの例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the processing flow regarding operation | movement of an abnormality monitoring apparatus. 日数の経過に伴う異常の発生状況の変化と顧客からの保守要請との関係の過去実績を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the past performance of the relationship between the change of the generation | occurrence | production state of the abnormality accompanying progress of days, and the maintenance request from a customer. 3台の画像形成装置について日数の経過に伴う異常の発生件数の変化を棒グラフで示す図である。It is a figure which shows the change of the generation | occurrence | production number of abnormality with the progress of days about three image forming apparatuses with a bar graph. 3台の画像形成装置について日数の経過に伴う異常の発生件数の変化を折れ線グラフで示す図である。It is a figure which shows the change of the generation | occurrence | production number of abnormality with the progress of days about three image forming apparatuses with a line graph. 印刷枚数の増加に伴う異常の発生状況の変化と顧客からの保守要請との関係の過去実績を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the past performance of the relationship between the change of the generation | occurrence | production state of abnormality accompanying the increase in the number of printed sheets, and the maintenance request from a customer. 判定基準となる基準間隔及び基準枚数の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the reference | standard space | interval used as a determination reference, and a reference | standard number of sheets.

本発明の一実施形態について図面を参照して説明する。
図1には、本発明の一実施形態に係る異常監視システムの全体構成の概略を示してある。本例の異常監視システム1は、異常監視装置2にネットワーク4を介して複数台(本例では、6台)の画像形成装置3A〜3F(以下、画像形成装置3)を接続した構成になっている。ネットワーク4としては、種々の通信路を用いることができ、例えば、LAN(Local Area Network)、WAN(Wide Area Network)、インターネットなどが用いられる。
An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 shows an outline of the overall configuration of an abnormality monitoring system according to an embodiment of the present invention. The abnormality monitoring system 1 of this example has a configuration in which a plurality of (six in this example) image forming apparatuses 3A to 3F (hereinafter, image forming apparatus 3) are connected to the abnormality monitoring apparatus 2 via a network 4. ing. As the network 4, various communication paths can be used. For example, a LAN (Local Area Network), a WAN (Wide Area Network), the Internet, or the like is used.

図2には、異常監視装置2及び画像形成装置3の機能ブロックの例を示してある。
画像形成装置3は、紙などの記録材にトナーによって画像を形成する画像形成処理部31を備えた装置であり、例えば、複写機、プリンタ装置、ファクシミリ装置、これらの機能を併せ持った複合機などが用いられる。
画像形成装置3は、画像形成処理部31の他に、画像形成処理部31に発生した種々の異常を検出する検出部32と、検出部32で検出した異常の種類を示す情報(本例では、異常ID)及び異常の検出時点を示す情報(本例では、検出日時)を、自己(画像形成装置3)を識別する情報(本例では、装置ID)と共に、消耗品管理装置2へネットワーク4を介して提供(送信)する通信部33とを備えている。
ここで、検出部32で検出する異常には、エラー(故障)、ワーニング(警告)、インフォメーション(情報)といった種々のレベルのものがある。
FIG. 2 shows an example of functional blocks of the abnormality monitoring device 2 and the image forming device 3.
The image forming apparatus 3 includes an image forming processing unit 31 that forms an image with a toner on a recording material such as paper. For example, a copier, a printer apparatus, a facsimile apparatus, a multi-function machine having these functions, or the like. Is used.
In addition to the image formation processing unit 31, the image forming apparatus 3 includes a detection unit 32 that detects various abnormalities that have occurred in the image formation processing unit 31, and information that indicates the type of abnormality detected by the detection unit 32 (in this example, , Abnormality ID) and information indicating the detection point of abnormality (in this example, detection date and time), together with information identifying the self (image forming apparatus 3) (in this example, the apparatus ID) to the consumables management apparatus 2 4 is provided (transmitted) via 4.
Here, the abnormality detected by the detection unit 32 has various levels such as an error (failure), a warning (warning), and information (information).

異常監視装置2は、例えば、メンテナンス業者の管理センタに設置され、顧客先のオフィス等の種々な場所に設置された複数の画像形成装置3をネットワーク4を介して遠隔監視する。
異常監視装置2は、異常の検出間隔(すなわち、異常の発生間隔)に基づいて保守の必要性を判定するものであり、通信部21、データ記憶部22、異常間隔算出部23、判定部24、指示出力部25を有している。
The abnormality monitoring apparatus 2 is installed in a management center of a maintenance company, for example, and remotely monitors a plurality of image forming apparatuses 3 installed in various places such as a customer's office via a network 4.
The abnormality monitoring device 2 determines the necessity of maintenance based on an abnormality detection interval (that is, an abnormality occurrence interval), and includes a communication unit 21, a data storage unit 22, an abnormal interval calculation unit 23, and a determination unit 24. The instruction output unit 25 is provided.

通信部21は、管理対象となる各々の画像形成装置3から異常ID及び検出日時をネットワーク4経由で取得(受信)する。
データ記憶部22は、管理対象となる各々の画像形成装置3から取得した装置ID、異常ID及び検出日時を対応付けて蓄積していく。すなわち、データ記憶部22には、装置ID毎に、異常ID及び検出日時が記憶される。したがって、データ記憶部22を参照することで、個々の画像形成装置3について、異常の種類毎に、当該異常の時系列的な発生状況を把握することが可能となる。
The communication unit 21 acquires (receives) the abnormality ID and the detection date / time from each image forming apparatus 3 to be managed via the network 4.
The data storage unit 22 accumulates the apparatus ID, the abnormality ID, and the detection date and time acquired from each image forming apparatus 3 to be managed in association with each other. That is, the data storage unit 22 stores the abnormality ID and the detection date / time for each device ID. Therefore, by referring to the data storage unit 22, it is possible to grasp the time series occurrence state of the abnormality for each type of abnormality for each image forming apparatus 3.

異常間隔算出部23は、データ記憶部22に記憶されている情報に基づいて、画像形成装置及び異常の種類毎に、異常の検出間隔を示す値を算出する。すなわち、装置ID及び異常IDが共通する複数の検出日時の情報に基づいて、異常の検出間隔を示す値を算出する。   The abnormal interval calculation unit 23 calculates a value indicating an abnormality detection interval for each image forming apparatus and each type of abnormality based on information stored in the data storage unit 22. That is, a value indicating an abnormality detection interval is calculated based on information on a plurality of detection dates and times that have a common device ID and abnormality ID.

本例では、同じ画像形成装置3において直近に発生した同種の2回の異常について、各々の検出時点間の時間長を、異常の検出間隔を示す値として算出する。すなわち、最新の異常の検出時点と、これと同種の前回の異常の検出時点との間の時間長を算出する。なお、3回以上の異常に基づいて異常の検出間隔を示す値を算出してもよく、この場合には、時系列上で連続する2つの異常の検出時点間の時間長をそれぞれ算出し、これらを平均して得られる平均間隔を、異常の検出間隔を示す値として用いてもよい。
なお、異常の検出間隔を示す値としては、異常の検出時点間の時間長でなくともよく、例えば、或る時間単位(例えば、1時間)あたりに検出された異常の件数(異常の検出頻度)など、他の種別の指標を用いてもよい。
In this example, for two abnormalities of the same type that have recently occurred in the same image forming apparatus 3, the time length between the respective detection points is calculated as a value indicating the detection interval of the abnormality. That is, the time length between the latest abnormality detection time and the previous abnormality detection time of the same type is calculated. Note that a value indicating an abnormality detection interval may be calculated based on three or more abnormalities. In this case, the time length between two abnormal detection points in time series is calculated, An average interval obtained by averaging these may be used as a value indicating an abnormality detection interval.
Note that the value indicating the abnormality detection interval may not be the time length between detection points of abnormality, for example, the number of abnormalities detected per unit of time (for example, one hour) (abnormality detection frequency). Other types of indicators may be used.

判定部24は、異常間隔算出部23により装置ID及び異常ID毎に算出された異常の検出間隔を示す値に基づいて、異常の検出間隔が予め定められた基準間隔より短いか否かを判定する。本例では、異常の種類毎に基準間隔を用意している。   The determination unit 24 determines whether the abnormality detection interval is shorter than a predetermined reference interval based on the device ID and the value indicating the abnormality detection interval calculated for each abnormality ID by the abnormality interval calculation unit 23. To do. In this example, a reference interval is prepared for each type of abnormality.

指示出力部25は、判定部24により異常の種類のいずれかについて異常の検出間隔が基準間隔より短いと判定されたことに応じて、該当する画像形成装置3に対する保守を指示する保守指示を出力する。保守指示の出力は種々の方法で行うことができ、例えば、電子メールによる出力や、専用アプリケーションによる出力などで行うことができる。また、音声メッセージによる出力でもよく、画像形成装置毎に設けたランプの点灯による出力でもよい。   The instruction output unit 25 outputs a maintenance instruction that instructs maintenance of the corresponding image forming apparatus 3 when the determination unit 24 determines that the abnormality detection interval is shorter than the reference interval for any of the types of abnormality. To do. The maintenance instruction can be output by various methods. For example, the maintenance instruction can be output by e-mail or by a dedicated application. Further, it may be output by voice message, or may be output by lighting a lamp provided for each image forming apparatus.

異常監視装置2の動作の概要について、図3を参照して説明する。
図3には、異常監視装置2の動作に関する処理フローの例を示してある。
すなわち、本例の異常監視装置2では、管理対象となる各々の画像形成装置3から装置ID、異常ID及び検出日時をネットワーク4経由で取得して、データ記憶部22に蓄積していく(ステップS11)。
また、異常間隔算出部23が、ステップS11で取得した装置ID、異常ID及び検出日時について、装置ID及び異常IDが共通する直近の1以上の検出日時をデータ記憶部22の情報に基づいて特定し、異常の検出間隔を示す値を算出する(ステップS12)。
次に、判定部24が、ステップS12で算出した異常の検出間隔が基準間隔より短いか否かを判定する(ステップS13)。
この判定の結果、異常の検出間隔が基準間隔より長いと判定された場合(ステップS13;No)には、ステップS11に戻る。一方、異常の検出間隔が基準間隔より短いと判定された場合(ステップS13;Yes)には、これに応じて、指示出力部25が、該当する画像形成装置3に対する保守指示を出力する(ステップS14)。
An outline of the operation of the abnormality monitoring device 2 will be described with reference to FIG.
In FIG. 3, the example of the processing flow regarding operation | movement of the abnormality monitoring apparatus 2 is shown.
That is, in the abnormality monitoring apparatus 2 of this example, the apparatus ID, the abnormality ID, and the detection date / time are acquired from each image forming apparatus 3 to be managed via the network 4 and accumulated in the data storage unit 22 (step S11).
Further, the abnormality interval calculation unit 23 specifies one or more latest detection dates and times with the common device ID and abnormality ID based on information in the data storage unit 22 for the device ID, abnormality ID, and detection date and time acquired in step S11. Then, a value indicating the abnormality detection interval is calculated (step S12).
Next, the determination unit 24 determines whether or not the abnormality detection interval calculated in step S12 is shorter than the reference interval (step S13).
As a result of this determination, when it is determined that the abnormality detection interval is longer than the reference interval (step S13; No), the process returns to step S11. On the other hand, when it is determined that the abnormality detection interval is shorter than the reference interval (step S13; Yes), the instruction output unit 25 outputs a maintenance instruction for the corresponding image forming apparatus 3 accordingly (step S13). S14).

これにより、異常の検出頻度の高まりを的確に捉えて保守指示の出力を行える。
具体的には、例えば、異常の一種である「紙詰まり」についての基準間隔として24時間/件が規定されている場合には、或る画像形成装置3における紙詰まりの検出間隔が24時間/件より長い間は、紙詰まりが何回検出されても保守指示を出力せず、紙詰まりの検出間隔が24時間/件より短くなったことに応じて、保守指示を出力する。
なお、異常の検出間隔と基準間隔が同じ場合の扱いは任意であり、本例では、異常の検出間隔と基準間隔が同じ場合にも保守指示を出力する。すなわち、本例では、異常の検出間隔が基準間隔以下となったことに応じて、保守指示の出力を行う。
As a result, it is possible to accurately output an increase in the detection frequency of abnormality and output a maintenance instruction.
Specifically, for example, when 24 hours / case is defined as a reference interval for “paper jam” which is a kind of abnormality, the detection interval of paper jam in an image forming apparatus 3 is 24 hours / case. If the paper jam is detected, the maintenance instruction is not output regardless of how many times the paper jam is detected, and the maintenance instruction is output when the paper jam detection interval is shorter than 24 hours / case.
Note that the handling when the abnormality detection interval and the reference interval are the same is arbitrary, and in this example, the maintenance instruction is output even when the abnormality detection interval and the reference interval are the same. That is, in this example, a maintenance instruction is output when the abnormality detection interval becomes equal to or less than the reference interval.

図4には、過去の実績として得られた、日数の経過に伴う異常の発生状況の変化と顧客からの保守要請との関係が示されている。同図のグラフにおいて、横軸は、時系列上の或る時点を基準にした経過日数を表し、縦軸は、異常の発生件数の累積値を表す。また、グラフ中の各曲線は、日数の経過に伴う異常の発生件数の累積値の変化を画像形成装置毎に表しており、画像形成装置毎に異常の発生の時系列的な増加具合を把握することができる。また、各曲線の端部等にある丸印(○)は、該当する画像形成装置3の顧客から保守要請があったことを示している。   FIG. 4 shows the relationship between changes in the occurrence of anomalies with the passage of days and maintenance requests from customers, obtained as past results. In the graph of the figure, the horizontal axis represents the number of days elapsed based on a certain point in time, and the vertical axis represents the cumulative value of the number of occurrences of abnormality. In addition, each curve in the graph shows the change in the cumulative value of the number of occurrences of abnormalities with the passage of days for each image forming device, and grasps the time-series increase in occurrence of abnormalities for each image forming device can do. Also, a circle (◯) at the end of each curve indicates that a maintenance request has been received from the customer of the corresponding image forming apparatus 3.

図4によれば、異常の発生件数が少なくても保守要請される場合がある一方で、異常の発生件数が多くても保守要請されない場合がある。ここで、保守要請された時点付近に着目すれば、或る程度のばらつきはあるが、保守要請の直前で異常の発生頻度が高まって曲線の傾斜が急峻になっている(つまり、異常の検出間隔が短くなっている)ことが把握できる。そこで、このような事象を利用して、本例の異常監視装置2では、異常の発生間隔に基づいて保守指示の必要性を判断するようにしてある。   According to FIG. 4, maintenance may be requested even if the number of occurrences of abnormality is small, but maintenance may not be requested even if the number of occurrences of abnormality is large. Here, focusing on the vicinity of the time when maintenance is requested, there is some variation, but the frequency of occurrence of abnormality increases immediately before the maintenance request and the slope of the curve becomes steep (that is, detection of abnormality). It can be understood that the interval is shortened. Therefore, by using such an event, the abnormality monitoring apparatus 2 of this example determines the necessity of a maintenance instruction based on the abnormality occurrence interval.

図5及び図6を参照して、従来方式と本発明との比較を行う。
まず、比較対象となる従来方式について説明しておく。
図5には、装置#1〜#3の3台の画像形成装置について、日数の経過に伴う異常の発生件数の変化を棒グラフで示してある。同図のグラフにおいて、横軸は、時間軸上の或る時点を基準にした経過日数を表し、縦軸は、異常の発生件数の累積値を表す。
従来方式では、判定基準となる閾値を8件とし、2週間の期間内における異常の発生件数が閾値(8件)以上となったタイミングで、保守指示を出力することとする。図5によれば、装置#1〜#3のいずれも、経過日数が11日の時点で異常の発生件数が8件となっており、このタイミングで保守指示が出力されることになる。つまり、従来方式では、異常の発生状況の時系列的な相違に関わらず、異常の発生件数が閾値以上となった時点で一律に保守指示が出力される。
A comparison between the conventional method and the present invention will be made with reference to FIGS.
First, the conventional method to be compared will be described.
FIG. 5 is a bar graph showing changes in the number of occurrences of abnormalities with the passage of days for the three image forming apparatuses # 1 to # 3. In the graph of the figure, the horizontal axis represents the number of days elapsed with respect to a certain time point on the time axis, and the vertical axis represents the cumulative value of the number of occurrences of abnormality.
In the conventional method, the threshold value serving as a determination criterion is set to 8 cases, and the maintenance instruction is output at the timing when the number of occurrences of abnormality within the 2-week period becomes equal to or greater than the threshold value (8 cases). According to FIG. 5, in any of the devices # 1 to # 3, the number of occurrences of abnormality is 8 when the number of elapsed days is 11, and a maintenance instruction is output at this timing. That is, in the conventional method, regardless of the time-series difference in the occurrence state of the abnormality, the maintenance instruction is output uniformly when the number of occurrences of the abnormality is equal to or greater than the threshold value.

図6には、装置#1〜#3の3台の画像形成装置について、日数の経過に伴う異常の発生件数の変化を折れ線グラフで示してある。同図のグラフにおいて、横軸は、時間軸上の或る時点を基準にした経過日数を表し、縦軸は、異常の発生件数の累積値を表す。
本発明では、判定基準となる閾値を24時間/件とし、異常の検出間隔が閾値(24時間/件)以下となったことタイミングで、保守指示を出力することとする。図6によれば、装置#1は、2日目の時点で算出される異常の検出間隔が24時間/件であるため、このタイミングで保守指示が出力される。装置#2は、4日目の時点で算出される異常の検出間隔が6時間/件であるため、このタイミングで保守指示が出力される。装置#3は、7日目の時点で算出される異常の検出間隔が3.4時間/件であるため、このタイミングで保守指示が出力される。なお、判定基準となる閾値を12時間/件とすれば、装置#1は保守指示が出力されず、装置#2は4日目の時点で保守指示が出力され、装置#3は7日目の時点で保守指示が出力されることになる。また、判定基準となる閾値を6時間/件とすれば、装置#1,#2は保守指示が出力されず、装置#3のみが7日目の時点で保守指示が出力されることになる。
FIG. 6 is a line graph showing changes in the number of occurrences of abnormalities with the passage of days for the three image forming apparatuses # 1 to # 3. In the graph of the figure, the horizontal axis represents the number of days elapsed with respect to a certain time point on the time axis, and the vertical axis represents the cumulative value of the number of occurrences of abnormality.
In the present invention, the threshold value used as the determination criterion is 24 hours / case, and the maintenance instruction is output when the abnormality detection interval becomes equal to or less than the threshold value (24 hours / case). According to FIG. 6, since the apparatus # 1 has an abnormality detection interval calculated at the time of the second day of 24 hours / case, a maintenance instruction is output at this timing. Since the abnormality detection interval calculated at the time of the fourth day is 6 hours / case, the apparatus # 2 outputs a maintenance instruction at this timing. In apparatus # 3, since the abnormality detection interval calculated at the time of the seventh day is 3.4 hours / case, a maintenance instruction is output at this timing. If the threshold value used as the criterion is 12 hours / case, the maintenance instruction is not output for the device # 1, the maintenance instruction is output for the device # 2, and the device # 3 is the seventh day. At this point, a maintenance instruction is output. If the threshold value used as a criterion is 6 hours / case, no maintenance instruction is output for the devices # 1 and # 2, and only the device # 3 outputs a maintenance instruction at the seventh day. .

このように、本発明では、異常の発生状況の時系列的な相違を考慮し、異常の発生頻度が高まってきたこと(異常の検出間隔が短くなったこと)を顧客からの保守要請の前兆と捉え、保守要請の可能性があるとして、このタイミングで保守指示を出力するようにしている。これにより、保守作業のための顧客訪問を、顧客からの保守要請に先んじて行うことが可能となり、顧客の満足度を高めることができる。
ここで、上記の例では、異常の種類毎に、異常の検出間隔が基準間隔より短くなったかを判定することで、保守指示の必要性の判断精度を高めているが、異常の種類を考慮せずに異常の検出間隔を算出し、基準間隔より短くなったかを判定してもよい。
As described above, in the present invention, considering the time-series difference in the occurrence state of the abnormality, the occurrence frequency of the abnormality (the detection interval of the abnormality is shortened) is a precursor to the maintenance request from the customer. Assuming that there is a possibility of a maintenance request, a maintenance instruction is output at this timing. As a result, a customer visit for maintenance work can be performed prior to a maintenance request from the customer, and customer satisfaction can be increased.
Here, in the above example, for each type of abnormality, it is determined whether the abnormality detection interval is shorter than the reference interval, thereby improving the accuracy of determining the necessity of maintenance instructions. Instead, the abnormality detection interval may be calculated, and it may be determined whether it has become shorter than the reference interval.

次に、異常監視装置2の処理内容の変形例について説明する。
図7には、過去の実績として得られた、印刷枚数の増加に伴う異常の発生状況の変化と顧客からの保守要請との関係が示されている。同図のグラフにおいて、横軸は、印刷枚数の累積値を表し、縦軸は、異常の発生件数の累積値を表す。また、グラフ中の各曲線は、印刷枚数の増加に伴う異常の発生件数の累積値の変化を画像形成装置毎に表しており、画像形成装置毎に印刷枚数の増加に伴う異常の発生の増加具合を把握することができる。また、各曲線の端部等にある丸印(○)は、該当する画像形成装置3の顧客から保守要請があったことを示している。
図7によれば、画像形成装置による印刷枚数、すなわち、画像形成装置(特に、画像形成処理部31)の稼働量は、異常の発生件数の増加に影響があることが把握できる。そこで、本変形例では、異常の検出間隔だけでなく、画像形成装置の稼働量を考慮して、保守指示の必要性を判断するようにしてある。
Next, a modified example of the processing content of the abnormality monitoring device 2 will be described.
FIG. 7 shows the relationship between a change in the occurrence of an abnormality accompanying an increase in the number of printed sheets and a maintenance request from a customer obtained as a past record. In the graph of the figure, the horizontal axis represents the cumulative value of the number of printed sheets, and the vertical axis represents the cumulative value of the number of occurrences of abnormality. In addition, each curve in the graph represents a change in the cumulative value of the number of occurrences of abnormalities accompanying an increase in the number of printed sheets for each image forming apparatus, and an increase in the occurrence of abnormalities accompanying an increase in the number of printed sheets for each image forming apparatus. You can grasp the condition. Also, a circle (◯) at the end of each curve indicates that a maintenance request has been received from the customer of the corresponding image forming apparatus 3.
According to FIG. 7, it can be understood that the number of printed sheets by the image forming apparatus, that is, the operation amount of the image forming apparatus (particularly, the image forming processing unit 31) has an influence on the increase in the number of occurrences of abnormality. In view of this, in this modification, the necessity of maintenance instruction is determined in consideration of not only the abnormality detection interval but also the operation amount of the image forming apparatus.

すなわち、本変形例に係る異常監視装置2では、通信部21により、画像形成装置3から印刷枚数の情報を更に取得(受信)する。そして、判定部24により、異常の検出間隔が予め定められた基準間隔より短いか否かの判定に加え、印刷枚数が予め定められた基準枚数より多いか否かの判定を行い、異常の検出間隔が基準間隔より短く、且つ、印刷枚数が基準枚数より多いと判定されたことに応じて、指示出力部25による保守指示の出力を行う。
ここで、基準間隔や基準枚数の値は、例えば、過去に保守を行った事例における異常の検出間隔や印刷枚数を統計処理等により解析した結果に基づいて、過剰な顧客訪問や訪問要請後の顧客訪問が低減するような値を見つけ出して設定することが好ましい。
That is, in the abnormality monitoring device 2 according to this modification, the communication unit 21 further acquires (receives) information on the number of printed sheets from the image forming device 3. Then, in addition to determining whether or not the abnormality detection interval is shorter than a predetermined reference interval, the determination unit 24 determines whether or not the number of printed sheets is larger than a predetermined reference number. In response to the determination that the interval is shorter than the reference interval and the number of printed sheets is greater than the reference number, the instruction output unit 25 outputs a maintenance instruction.
Here, the value of the reference interval and the reference number of sheets is, for example, based on the result of analyzing the abnormality detection interval and the number of printed sheets in cases where maintenance has been performed in the past by statistical processing, etc. It is preferable to find and set a value that reduces customer visits.

図8には、判定基準となる基準間隔及び基準枚数の例を示してある。Case1は、基準間隔のみを定めた例であり、Case2−1,2、Case3−2,2は、基準間隔と基準枚数の組合わせを定めた例である。
Case1では、異常の検出間隔が24時間/件以下となったことを保守要請の予兆と捉え、保守指示が出力される。
Case2−1では、異常の検出間隔が24時間/件以下となった場合に、印刷枚数が10万枚以上であれば保守要請の予兆と捉え、保守指示が出力される。Case2−2では、異常の検出間隔が24時間/件以下となった場合に、印刷枚数が50万枚以上であれば保守要請の予兆と捉え、保守指示が出力される。
Case3−1では、異常の検出間隔が36時間/件以下となった場合に、印刷枚数が50万枚以上であれば保守要請の予兆と捉え、保守指示が出力される。Case3−2では、異常の検出間隔が36時間/件以下となった場合に、印刷枚数が80万枚以上であれば保守要請の予兆と捉え、保守指示が出力される。
FIG. 8 shows an example of a reference interval and a reference number as a determination reference. Case 1 is an example in which only the reference interval is determined, and Cases 2-1 and 2 and Cases 3-2 and 2 are examples in which a combination of the reference interval and the reference number is determined.
In Case 1, the fact that the abnormality detection interval is 24 hours / case or less is regarded as a sign of a maintenance request, and a maintenance instruction is output.
In Case 2-1, when the abnormality detection interval is 24 hours / case or less, if the number of printed sheets is 100,000 or more, it is regarded as a sign of a maintenance request and a maintenance instruction is output. In Case 2-2, when the abnormality detection interval is 24 hours / case or less, if the number of printed sheets is 500,000 or more, it is regarded as a sign of a maintenance request and a maintenance instruction is output.
In Case 3-1, when the abnormality detection interval is 36 hours / case or less, if the number of printed sheets is 500,000 or more, it is regarded as a sign of a maintenance request and a maintenance instruction is output. In Case 3-2, when the abnormality detection interval is 36 hours / case or less, if the number of printed sheets is 800,000 or more, it is regarded as a sign of a maintenance request and a maintenance instruction is output.

このように、異常の検出間隔と画像形成装置の稼働量を組み合わせて保守の必要性を判断することで、過剰な顧客訪問を抑制することができ、保守指示を行うタイミングの更なる適正化を図ることができる。
ここで、上記の変形例では、画像形成装置の稼働量として、画像形成装置による印刷枚数を用いたが、これに代えてトナー供給用のディスペンサーモーターの通電積算時間を用いてもよく、画像形成装置の稼働量を特定可能な値であればよい。
In this way, by determining the necessity of maintenance by combining the detection interval of abnormalities and the amount of operation of the image forming apparatus, it is possible to suppress excessive customer visits and further optimize the timing of issuing maintenance instructions. Can be planned.
Here, in the above-described modification, the number of printed sheets by the image forming apparatus is used as the operation amount of the image forming apparatus. However, instead of this, the energization integration time of the dispenser motor for supplying the toner may be used. Any value that can identify the operating amount of the apparatus is acceptable.

なお、これまでの説明で用いた各種の数値は一例であり、本発明の技術思想に適合する種々の数値を適用可能なことは言うまでもない。
また、これまでの説明では、画像形成装置に対する保守を促す通知として、保守指示を用いたが、このように保守の実施を明確に要請する通知でなくともよく、保守を実施する必要性があることを担当者が認識可能な通知であればよい。
It should be noted that the various numerical values used in the above description are merely examples, and it goes without saying that various numerical values that conform to the technical idea of the present invention can be applied.
In the above description, the maintenance instruction is used as the notification for urging the maintenance of the image forming apparatus. However, the notification need not be clearly requested to perform the maintenance as described above, and the maintenance needs to be performed. Any notification that can be recognized by the person in charge is acceptable.

ここで、本例の消耗品管理装置2は、各種演算処理を行うCPU(Central Processing Unit)、CPUの作業領域となるRAM(Random Access Memory)や基本的な制御プログラムなどを記録したROM(Read Only Memory)等の主記憶装置、各種のプログラムやデータを記憶するHDD(Hard Disk Drive)等の補助記憶装置、各種の情報を表示出力するための表示装置及び操作者により入力操作に用いられる操作ボタンやタッチパネル等の入力機器とのインタフェースである入出力I/F、他の装置との間で有線又は無線により通信を行うインタフェースである通信I/F、といったハードウェア資源を備えたコンピュータにより実現されている。   Here, the consumables management apparatus 2 of this example has a CPU (Central Processing Unit) that performs various arithmetic processes, a RAM (Random Access Memory) that is a work area of the CPU, a ROM (Read) that records a basic control program, and the like. Main memory such as Only Memory), auxiliary storage such as HDD (Hard Disk Drive) that stores various programs and data, display device for displaying and outputting various information, and operations used for input operations by the operator Realized by a computer equipped with hardware resources such as an input / output I / F that is an interface with an input device such as a button or a touch panel, and a communication I / F that is an interface for performing wired or wireless communication with other devices. Has been.

そして、本発明に係るプログラムを補助記憶装置等から読み出してRAMに展開し、これをCPUにより実行させることで、本発明に係る消耗品管理装置の機能をコンピュータ上に実現している。
なお、本例では、本発明に係る取得手段の機能を通信部21により実現し、本発明に係る算出手段の機能を異常間隔算出部23により実現し、本発明に係る判定手段の機能を判定部24により実現し、本発明に係る出力手段の機能を指示出力部25により実現している。
Then, the program according to the present invention is read from the auxiliary storage device or the like, loaded into the RAM, and executed by the CPU, thereby realizing the function of the consumable management device according to the present invention on the computer.
In this example, the function of the acquisition unit according to the present invention is realized by the communication unit 21, the function of the calculation unit according to the present invention is realized by the abnormal interval calculation unit 23, and the function of the determination unit according to the present invention is determined. This is realized by the unit 24, and the function of the output means according to the present invention is realized by the instruction output unit 25.

ここで、本発明に係るプログラムは、例えば、当該プログラムを記憶したCD−ROM等の外部記憶媒体から読み込む形式や、通信網等を介して受信する形式などにより、消耗品管理装置2のコンピュータに設定される。
なお、本例のようなソフトウェア構成により各機能部を実現する態様に限られず、各機能部を専用のハードウェアモジュールで実現するようにしてもよい。
Here, the program according to the present invention is stored in the computer of the consumables management device 2 in a format that is read from an external storage medium such as a CD-ROM that stores the program or a format that is received via a communication network or the like. Is set.
Note that the present invention is not limited to a mode in which each functional unit is realized by a software configuration as in this example, and each functional unit may be realized by a dedicated hardware module.

本発明は、画像形成装置に対する保守の管理に関する種々のシステムや装置、これらのプログラム等に利用することができる。   The present invention can be used for various systems and apparatuses related to maintenance management for image forming apparatuses, and programs thereof.

1:消耗品管理システム、 2:異常監視装置、 3(3A〜3F):画像形成装置、 4:ネットワーク、
21:通信部、 22:データ記憶部、 23:異常間隔算出部、 24:判定部、 25:指示出力部、
31:画像形成処理部、 32:検出部、 33:通信部
1: Consumables management system 2: Abnormality monitoring device 3 (3A-3F): Image forming device 4: Network
21: Communication unit 22: Data storage unit 23: Abnormal interval calculation unit 24: Determination unit 25: Instruction output unit
31: Image formation processing unit 32: Detection unit 33: Communication unit

Claims (3)

画像形成装置から、当該画像形成装置で発生した画像形成機能の異常の検出時点を示す情報と、当該画像形成機能の稼働量を示す情報とを取得する取得手段と、
前記取得手段により取得された複数の前記異常の検出時点を示す情報に基づいて、前記異常の検出間隔を示す値を算出する算出手段と、
記検出間隔が基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いか否かを判定する判定手段と、
前記判定手段により前記検出間隔が前記基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いと判定されたことに応じて、前記画像形成装置に対する保守を促す通知を出力する出力手段と、
を備えたことを特徴とする異常監視装置。
Obtaining means for obtaining from the image forming apparatus information indicating a detection point of abnormality of the image forming function that has occurred in the image forming apparatus, and information indicating an operation amount of the image forming function ;
Calculation means for calculating a value indicating the detection interval of the abnormality based on information indicating the detection time points of the plurality of abnormality acquired by the acquisition means;
Before Symbol detection interval shorter rather than the reference interval, and, determining means for determining whether or not the operation amount is larger than the reference operation amount,
It said judging means and said detection interval is rather short than the reference interval by, and an output means for the operating amount according to the determination that more than the reference operation amount, and outputs a notification to prompt a maintenance for the image forming apparatus ,
An abnormality monitoring device characterized by comprising:
前記取得手段は、前記画像形成装置から前記異常の種類を示す情報を更に取得し、
前記算出手段は、前記異常の種類毎に、前記検出間隔を示す値を算出し、
前記判定手段は、前記異常の種類のいずれかにおいて前記検出間隔が当該種類について定められた前記基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いか否かを判定し、
前記出力手段は、前記異常の種類のいずれかにおいて前記検出間隔が当該種類について定められた前記基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いと判定されたことに応じて、前記画像形成装置に対する保守を促す通知を出力する、
ことを特徴とする請求項1に記載の異常監視装置。
The acquisition unit further acquires information indicating the type of abnormality from the image forming apparatus,
The calculation means calculates a value indicating the detection interval for each type of abnormality,
Said determining means, said detection interval in any of the types of abnormality rather short than the reference interval defined for that type, and determines whether the operation amount is larger than the reference operation amount,
And the output means, Oite the detection interval to any kind of the abnormality rather short than the reference interval defined for that type, and, according to the operation amount is determined to greater than the reference operation amount A notification prompting maintenance for the image forming apparatus,
The abnormality monitoring apparatus according to claim 1.
コンピュータに、
画像形成装置から、当該画像形成装置で発生した画像形成機能の異常の検出時点を示す情報と、当該画像形成機能の稼働量を示す情報とを取得する取得機能と、
前記取得機能により取得された複数の前記異常の検出時点を示す情報に基づいて、前記異常の検出間隔を示す値を算出する算出機能と、
記検出間隔が基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いか否かを判定する判定機能と、
前記判定機能により前記検出間隔が前記基準間隔より短く、且つ、前記稼働量が基準稼働量より多いと判定されたことに応じて、前記画像形成装置に対する保守を促す通知を出力する出力機能と、
を実現させるための異常監視プログラム。
On the computer,
An acquisition function for acquiring from the image forming apparatus information indicating the detection point of abnormality of the image forming function that has occurred in the image forming apparatus, and information indicating the amount of operation of the image forming function ;
A calculation function for calculating a value indicating a detection interval of the abnormality based on information indicating the detection time points of the plurality of abnormality acquired by the acquisition function;
Before Symbol detection interval shorter rather than the reference interval, and, a determination function whether the operation amount is larger than the reference operation amount,
The determination function by the detection interval is the reference interval from the rather short, and, in response to the operation amount is determined to greater than the reference operation amount, and an output function of outputting a notification that prompts the maintenance for the image forming apparatus ,
Abnormality monitoring program to realize
JP2013142935A 2013-07-08 2013-07-08 Abnormality monitoring device and abnormality monitoring program Active JP6111910B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013142935A JP6111910B2 (en) 2013-07-08 2013-07-08 Abnormality monitoring device and abnormality monitoring program

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013142935A JP6111910B2 (en) 2013-07-08 2013-07-08 Abnormality monitoring device and abnormality monitoring program

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2015018291A JP2015018291A (en) 2015-01-29
JP6111910B2 true JP6111910B2 (en) 2017-04-12

Family

ID=52439251

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2013142935A Active JP6111910B2 (en) 2013-07-08 2013-07-08 Abnormality monitoring device and abnormality monitoring program

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6111910B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5303975B2 (en) * 2008-03-18 2013-10-02 株式会社リコー DATA DISTRIBUTION DEVICE, DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, ERROR NOTIFICATION METHOD, PROGRAM THEREOF, AND RECORDING MEDIUM CONTAINING THE PROGRAM
JP5423427B2 (en) * 2010-01-26 2014-02-19 富士通株式会社 Information management program, information management apparatus, and information management method
JP2012190324A (en) * 2011-03-11 2012-10-04 Mitsubishi Denki Information Technology Corp Maintenance management system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2015018291A (en) 2015-01-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5528125B2 (en) Management apparatus, image forming apparatus management method, and program
JP6008665B2 (en) Unit replacement based on failure
JP4710720B2 (en) Failure prevention diagnosis support system and failure prevention diagnosis support method
JP5192887B2 (en) Method and system for detecting minor faults in network printers
US10412249B2 (en) Image processing apparatus and control method therefor, and storage medium
US20110270771A1 (en) System and method for a flexible management of the escalation of support for devices
JP5867000B2 (en) Failure prediction system, failure prediction device, and program
JP2006091343A (en) Image processor and method for notifying of abnormality
JP2012163805A (en) Image formation apparatus, management server and image formation system
JP6318674B2 (en) Failure prediction system, failure prediction device, and program
JP2020113324A (en) System, information processing apparatus, service determination method, and program
US11201971B1 (en) Maintenance support apparatus and maintenance support method
JP6710992B2 (en) Information processing system, information processing apparatus, and program
US8373881B2 (en) Image formation apparatus, recording medium, image formation method, and consumables management system
JP6065772B2 (en) Consumables management device and consumables management program
JP2008182295A (en) Image processor, image processor management system, and setting change processing method for image processor
JP6111910B2 (en) Abnormality monitoring device and abnormality monitoring program
JP5949236B2 (en) Defect estimation apparatus and program
JP2014002660A (en) Maintenance component production management device and maintenance component production management method
JP2011150586A (en) Management system for failure history
JP4621129B2 (en) Maintenance support system, maintenance support method, and maintenance support program
JP2016086313A (en) Information processing system and program
JP6477367B2 (en) Failure prediction management device, failure prediction management program
JP6388335B2 (en) Failure tendency determination device, failure tendency determination method, and program
JP7163687B2 (en) Information processing device, information processing system and information processing program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20160218

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20161101

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20161031

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20161228

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20170214

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20170227

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6111910

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350