JP5179622B2 - A system for sharing comparison support functions and results via the Internet - Google Patents

Description

The present invention provides a completed input form for one comparison and one comparison to registered users and groups (hereinafter collectively referred to as “comparators”) via the Internet, and a plurality of input forms are input to this. By comparing each comparison object and its related evaluation, a relative evaluation between each comparison object and one comparison object (hereinafter referred to as “reference designation”) as a standard for relative evaluation is generated and displayed as a comparison result in a numerical format. -A function to save and publish, a function to share these with viewers, and a function to provide the client with the comparison information and browsing status extracted, aggregated, analyzed and displayed (hereinafter referred to as "BI function") It is related to a system consisting of

In the classification of user posting information and its sharing system via the Internet, there have been inventions related to moving images and photographs as follows.
Youtube <URL: http: //www.youtube.com/> Flickr <URL: http: //www.flickr.com/>

In addition, according to the classification of user comparative evaluation information and its shared system via the Internet, there have been inventions related to comparison of selling prices and comparison evaluation of products and services as described below.
Kakaku.com JP 2001-256356 A, <URL: http://kakaku.com/> Eyestyle JP-A-2005-235139, <URL: http://www.cosme.net/> Gurunavi JP2003-167971, <URL: http://www.gnavi.co.jp/>

In the conventional comparative evaluation information and its shared system, since one comparator evaluates one object, what is the evaluation based on the criteria (comparison object, expected value)? From the viewpoint of, there are some cases that are ambiguous.
Some of the comparators who are aware of the above problems may make evaluations with this specified, but even in such cases, the standards are consistent in the tabulation results with other comparators. Therefore, the evaluation display is very ambiguous, and in either case, there was a factor of misrecognition when viewed from the viewer side.

In addition, in the evaluation for each comparison element, as in the case described above, there are some cases where the evaluation is ambiguous when viewed from the viewer side as to what the evaluation is based on which the superiority or inferiority is determined.
In addition, as a fundamental problem, there are many cases where the evaluation score given in the case of the standard is not clearly described.
For this reason, even if different comparisons have the same sense of evaluation, there may be variations in the evaluation points to be given, and in these cases, the standards are not consistent in the tabulation results, etc. This is a very ambiguous evaluation display, and when viewed from the viewer side, there was a cause of misrecognition.

In addition, when the evaluation is collected for a long period of time, there is a possibility that the old evaluation may not represent the correct evaluation at the present time due to the technology, taste, and trend becoming obsolete.
Even in such a case, in the display of the aggregated result etc. in which the old evaluation and the new evaluation are mixed, it is considered that it is not the true evaluation at that time. It becomes a factor to give.

  In addition, there is no input form template providing comparison support system for one comparator to compare a plurality of objects. Therefore, there is no system for providing a comparison result display based on relative evaluation.

In addition, for comparison, the comparison target is added in a timely manner, and at that time, it is thought that there are many cases where the evaluation is also reviewed in the past comparison target, but the flexibility to adapt to this and its history (progress) will be later There is currently no system that can be followed.

  This system provides the following comparison support functions and utility functions for comparators via the Internet, browsing functions for displaying comparison results for viewers according to categorization and keyword search, comparison information and browsing status for clients, etc. This is a BI function that extracts, aggregates, analyzes and processes the display.

The comparison support function provides the comparison person with an input form that is completed within one comparison for the comparison on this system . From the information input to these comparisons, the comparison target specified by the standard and other comparisons are compared. By calculating the relative evaluation with the object, it is generated and displayed as a comparison result.
In addition, the comparer can save and publish the generated comparison, and similarly generate multiple comparisons, update the comparison contents as needed after saving and publishing, and snap the comparison results before updating It is also possible to save the update history (hereinafter referred to as “snapshot function”) by making a shot (copying at that time).
The main input form items are
01) "Comparison title"
02) “Prerequisites for the comparison”
03) “Elements to be emphasized when comparing (hereinafter referred to as“ elements ”), weights, and evaluation methods (below, superiority or inferiority level based on evaluation criteria (neutral level) assumed in advance when assigning evaluation levels, or The larger the real number, the higher the evaluation, the smaller the selection = the higher evaluation) ・ Annotations ”(multiple sets)
04) “Comparison” (multiple)
05) "Standard designation" (one of the comparison targets)
06) “Evaluation of each comparison target for each element (according to the evaluation method selected above, superiority or inferiority level or real number based on one index) (hereinafter, both are collectively referred to as“ evaluation level ”)”
Consists of. (For example, when the number of comparison targets is x and the number of elements is m in one comparison, the number of evaluation levels is x * m)

The utility function is a list display of comparisons generated by using the comparison support function for each comparator on this system (also serves as a comparison result display option), a predetermined condition (for example, a relative evaluation value of 110 or more) List of comparison targets given evaluations that satisfy the comparison target registration date (within 30 days of comparison) (hereinafter referred to as “high evaluation list display function for a predetermined period”. This also serves as an option for displaying comparison results including the comparison target), snap List display of shot comparisons (also serves as a comparison result display option), list display of favorite comparisons (if you feel helpful when browsing comparison results published by other comparators, register here for nice registration It will be displayed so that it can be easily browsed afterwards ( also serves as a comparison result display option), and provides a memo field.

As described in claim 1 , the present invention is a system for providing an input form that is completed within one comparison and one comparison as a comparison support function for the comparison, and the comparison result includes a plurality of comparison targets and one of them. It becomes a form to display numerically to the relative evaluation with the comparison target specified by one standard.
For this reason, all the problems listed in the above 0004 and 0007 are solved.
Further, the above-mentioned 0006 is also solved because the comparison target without obsolescence is inevitably given a higher evaluation level than the comparison object obsolescent within one comparison.

According to the present invention, as described in claim 2, when the comparison person assigns the evaluation level for each element in the comparison generation, the superiority / inferiority level input based on a preliminarily assumed standard (neutral level) (e.g., when seven stages are used ( : Overwhelming high, 6: Clearly high, 5: Slightly high, 4: Standard, 3: Slightly low, 2: Clearly low, 1: Overwhelming low)), or real number input based on one index ( For example, calories, mass, price, fuel consumption, etc.).
For this reason, the problem mentioned in the above-mentioned 0005 is solved. In addition, as described in claim 3, since the evaluation leveling of one element can be set as an arithmetic expression based on the evaluation levels of other elements in the same comparison, a proportional element or the like can be accurately and simply Elements can be set (limited to real level evaluation level).

In the present invention, as described in claim 4 , the comparator can save and publish the completed comparison on the system, and update it at any time (addition / deletion of comparison object, change of reference specification) , Elements can be added (the number of terms is limited), weights can be changed, evaluation levels can be changed, etc. for all items in the input form). At that time, it also has a snapshot function for saving the update history.
For this reason, the above-mentioned problems are solved.

According to the present invention, as described in claim 6, as a function of the viewer, the reference designation can be arbitrarily changed from the comparison targets when viewing the comparison result, and accordingly, the relative evaluation value is recalculated and the comparison result is obtained. It also has a function to display updates.
For this reason, it becomes possible for the viewer to refer to the comparison result more subjectively with respect to the problems listed in the above-mentioned 0004.

According to the present invention, the comparator is, for example,
a1) Wish list a2) Evaluation of possessed goods a3) Competitive comparison before purchase a4) “Compare” such as evaluation of goods and services b1) Simple and logical b2) Free elements that can express their own values Setting and its priority (weight) setting b3) Relative evaluation in the comparison target is digitized, and ranking display b4) Self preference and thought arrangement b5) Comparison content is updated at any time b6) Change in preference by snapshot function Can be visualized.
In addition, as described in the invention of claim 5, the high evaluation list display function for a predetermined period can be utilized for, for example, examination of candidate purchases, alerting of seasonal items, recent interest item libraries, etc. Become.

According to the present invention, the viewer can
c1) Prerequisites for comparison are specified c2) Comparison result is expressed as a relative evaluation between the comparison target and one of the reference specified comparison targets c3) Elements and their weights are specified in each comparison C4) Since the evaluation criteria for the elements are defined, the comparison results are d1) in consideration of the environment of the comparator. D5) While taking into account the preference and thinking to some extent, d5) The ability to re-calculate the relative evaluation value by changing the specification of the standard so that it can be referred and understood more subjectively In addition to enjoying the comparison content more accurately and deeply, for example, reference for competitive comparison before purchase, reference for decision making regarding action plans, verification by differences with own values and empathy, It is possible to use as a high source of information of priority in place, such as a new discovery of trends and products and the like.

According to the present invention, the stored comparison results and the browsing status data are extracted and analyzed from various viewpoints, for example,
e1) Market research on new products and services, etc. e2) Analysis by market evaluation of own products and services and consideration of competition e3) Analysis and verification of recognition by extracting before and after promotion e4) Free for each comparator / comparison Visualization and grasping of diversified values from elements set in e5) Age-specific distribution of comparators for comparison objects e6) Analysis of interest level according to browsing status for comparison objects e7) Supported comparison results and their It can be used as an extremely valuable tool that is useful for analyzing market trends and the like by comparison.
In addition, it is possible to make a business method in which compensation is provided by providing such information to the client .

(System configuration)
FIG. 8 is a system configuration diagram according to an embodiment of the present system. As shown in FIG. 8, this system includes a web server, a database server, a BI server, and a client web server.

The web server returns information in response to access from the user terminal and the viewer terminal via the Internet, or issues a command or information to the database server and generates a page based on the response information and returns a response.
Further, when a comparison result generation / update request is made, this process (including the comparison algorithm) is executed, and the process result is reflected in the response information and the database server.

  The database server is composed of a comparator ID database, a comparator attribute database, an evaluation level coefficient database, a comparison ID database, a comparison information database, a snapshot ID database, and a snapshot information database, and according to instructions from the web server and BI server Add / update / extract data etc. and return information.

  The BI server extracts various information stored in the database server from various viewpoints in response to access from an in-house terminal via the in-house intranet, and performs aggregation, analysis, display processing, and the like. It also returns information to the client web server for data writing and requests.

  The client web server returns information in response to access from a client terminal via the Internet, or issues a command or information to the BI server and generates a page based on the response information and returns the information.

(data structure)
The data structure of each database will be described with reference to FIG. All databases are of the relational model type, with a comparator ID (identification code issued for each comparator), comparison data ID (identification code issued for each comparison), and snapshot ID (identification code issued for each snapshot). ).
However, only the evaluation level coefficient database is a non-relational model type that is referred to when converting the evaluation level of an element into a coefficient in the processing flow of the comparison algorithm at the time of comparison result generation and comparison result regeneration.

  The comparator ID database stores authentication information related to the user-registered comparator, and is written / updated by the registration input information of the comparator and the system. A field (data item of one record) includes a comparator ID, an e-mail address, a password, a login status, and the like, and one record is assigned to one comparator ID.

  The comparator attribute database stores basic information about the comparator, and is written / updated by the registered input information / request of the comparator and the system. The fields are a comparator ID, registration date, name, public name (handle name), date of birth, gender, address, occupation, hobby, memo column (the number of characters is limited), favorite comparison data ID [1, 2,. 50] (when the limit of the number of favorites that can be set is 50), etc., and one record is assigned to one comparator ID.

  The evaluation level coefficient database stores a conversion table for converting an evaluation level given to each element for each comparison object into a coefficient in the comparison algorithm, and is defined in advance by the system operator. The fields are registration date, superiority / inferiority level, coefficient, etc., and one record is assigned to one superiority / inferiority level.

The comparison ID database stores basic information and preconditions defined for each comparison, and is written and updated by the comparison input information of the comparator and the system. The fields are a comparator ID, a comparison data ID, a comparison title, a precondition for the comparison, and an element [1, 2,... 20] (when the limit of the number of elements that can be set is 20. This condition is referred to below. The average value [1, 2,..., 20] of the evaluation level given to the element within one comparison, the maximum evaluation level and the evaluation given to the element within one comparison. Level average value difference [1, 2,... 20], the difference between the minimum evaluation level given to the element in one comparison and the evaluation level average value [1, 2,. Weight [1, 2,... 20], its annotation [1, 2,... 20], new comparison generation date, comparison update date, nice count (of the viewers of the comparison results corresponding to the comparison data ID) , the number of people who were "nice registration" the result of this comparison), the view count (comparison Day A number of viewers), and the comparison results corresponding to the ID, assigned one record 1 comparison data ID.

  The comparison information database stores basic information and evaluation levels of objects to be compared, and is written / updated by the comparison input information of the comparator and the system. The fields are: comparison data ID, comparison brand name, comparison object name, comparison object link data 1 (URL1), comparison object link data 2 (URL2), presence / absence of CHECK, presence / absence of reference designation, relative evaluation value, relative Evaluation value rank, evaluation value, highest evaluation number, evaluation level [1, 2,... 20] for the element, coefficient [1, 2,. And one record is assigned to one comparison target.

Snapshot ID database is equivalent to the comparison ID database of comparison result snapshot, the system by comparing's snapshot request you write and update. The field includes a comparator ID, a snapshot ID, a comparison title, an element [1, 2,... 20], and an average value [1, 2,. ..20], the difference between the maximum evaluation level given to the element within one comparison and the average evaluation level [1, 2,... 20], given to the element within one comparison Difference between minimum evaluation level and average evaluation level [1, 2,... 20], weight [1, 2,... 20], annotation [1, 2,. , Nice count (snapshot point), view count (snapshot point), etc., and one record is assigned to one snapshot ID.

  The snapshot information database corresponds to a comparison information database related to a comparison result that has been snapshot, and is written and updated by the system in response to a snapshot request from a comparator. The fields are snapshot ID, comparison brand name, comparison object name, comparison object link data 1 (URL1), comparison object link data 2 (URL2), presence of CHECK, presence / absence of reference designation, relative evaluation value, relative Evaluation value rank, evaluation value, highest evaluation number, evaluation level [1, 2,... 20] for the element, coefficient [1, 2,. And one record is assigned to one comparison target.

(System function)
FIG. 9 is a schematic functional diagram of the system configuration according to an embodiment of the present system. The basic functions of this system are the following comparison support functions for comparators and the following utility functions via the Internet, browsing functions for displaying comparison results for viewers according to categorization and keyword search, and comparison information for clients. And a BI function that extracts, aggregates, analyzes and displays the browsing status and the like.

The procedure for realizing each function will be described below.
a. Comparison Support Function FIG. 5 shows a procedure sequence diagram between the user and the system when a user uses the comparison support function to newly generate, save, and publish a comparison.
The web server of this system receives access from the user (browser terminal) via the Internet, responds to the display of the Top screen (see FIG. 1), and after the user registration is completed (including issue of the comparator ID) , The comparator information is stored in the database server, and further, a response for displaying a comparator Top screen (see FIG. 2) is made. Accordingly, in response to a request for new comparison generation , a comparison data ID issuance and a comparator comparison generation screen (see FIG. 3) display are responded, and one comparison result is generated from the contents input in this input form. This comparison result generation process flow (see FIG. 12) includes a process for storing input contents in a corresponding database, a process for issuing a comparison data ID, and a process for converting all element evaluation levels into coefficients for each comparison target by the comparison algorithm. The process includes the process of calculating the evaluation value from the coefficient / the process of calculating the relative evaluation value with the comparison target specified as the reference from the evaluation values of all the comparison targets (see FIGS. 16 and 17). A display response including a result table is performed, and further, a procedure for saving and publishing to a database server is performed.

b. Utility Function FIG. 6 shows a procedure sequence diagram between the comparator and this system when the comparator uses the utility function to update, save, and disclose the stored comparison results.
The web server of this system receives access from the comparator (comparator terminal) via the Internet, responds to the display of the Top screen (see FIG. 1), and after user registration authentication, the database server relates to the comparator. Information is read, a comparator Top screen generation process (see FIG. 14) corresponding to the corresponding comparator is performed, and this display (see FIG. 2) is responded. Therefore, in response to a selection / display request (see FIG. 13) of the comparison result to be updated, information relating to the corresponding comparison is further read from the database server, and a comparison comparison generation screen (see FIG. 3) display is responded. Then , the update content on the input form is received from the comparator , and the corresponding comparison result is regenerated. This comparison result regeneration process flow (see FIG. 12) includes the process of storing input contents in the corresponding database and the process of converting all element evaluation levels into coefficients for each comparison target by the comparison algorithm / calculating evaluation values from these coefficients. Display process including a comparison result table based on these processing results and input items, etc. (see FIG. 16 and FIG. 17). In addition, it becomes the procedure of saving and publishing to the database server .
In addition, the processing flow at the time of snapshot from the comparator is as follows: the web server stores the corresponding record in the comparison ID database and the comparison information database in which the corresponding comparison result is stored, the snapshot ID database and the snapshot information database, respectively. Is copied as a new record, given a snapshot ID and a snapshot date, and stored in the database server . The processing flow of the snapshot display is a procedure in which the web server reads the record from the database server and responds with the comparison result browsing screen display.
In addition, the processing flow of the high evaluation list display function for a predetermined period is as follows. The web server registers the comparator by comparing the comparison ID database from the corresponding comparator ID, comparing the comparison data ID, and then comparing the comparison information database. All the comparison targets can be referred to, and these are compared with predetermined conditions (for example, a relative evaluation value of 110 or more and within 30 days of the comparison target registration date), and by extracting those satisfying this, the comparison targets are displayed and responded. It becomes a procedure.
Also, in the processing flow of the favorite (nice registered) comparison display function, the web server reads the favorite comparison data ID and further comparison information from the comparator attribute database of the database server, and responds with this comparison result browsing screen display. It becomes a procedure.

c. Browsing Function FIG. 7 shows a sequence diagram of a procedure between the viewer and the system when the viewer browses the comparison result by using the browsing function.
The web server of this system receives access from a viewer (browser terminal) via the Internet, responds to the display of the Top screen (see FIG. 1), selects a comparison result to be browsed there, or searches for keywords / After the comparison result list display / selection is received and the comparison result is generated (see FIG. 13), the comparison result browsing screen (see FIG. 4) display is responded. Here, if there is a request for changing the reference designation, the corresponding comparison result is regenerated. This comparison result regeneration process flow calculates a relative evaluation value from each comparison target evaluation value (evaluation value in the corresponding record of the comparison information database) of the corresponding comparison result (see FIG. 16 relative evaluation value calculation unit), and then compares the procedure of the results of the display response. However, the comparison result regenerated by this browsing function is not stored or disclosed.
The processing flow of the nice registration request from the viewer is a procedure in which the web server stores the comparison data ID of the corresponding comparison in the comparator attribute database of the database server.

d. BI Function FIG. 11 shows a procedure sequence diagram between the client, the system operator, and the system when the client uses the BI function to provide analysis data for the client.
The BI server of this system sets extraction conditions for provided data in response to access via the in-house intranet of a system operator who has received a data provision request contract with a client. Then, by performing data extraction request / response communication with the database server, data such as corresponding comparison results, comparison information, and browsing status are stored. Furthermore, this information is aggregated, and analysis and display processing from various viewpoints are performed. (See Figure 15)
After the system operator confirms and adjusts the data generated in this way , it writes it out and issues an account for the client.
The client (client terminal) is provided with this account, and accesses the corresponding analysis data (see FIG. 10) through the Internet via the client web server.

Information display image (Top screen) according to an embodiment of the present invention Image of information display according to one embodiment of the present invention (Comparator Top screen) Image of information display according to one embodiment of the present invention (comparator comparison generation screen) Image of information display according to one embodiment of the present invention (browser comparison result browsing screen) Procedure sequence diagram when a user according to an embodiment of the present invention newly generates, saves, and publishes a comparison Procedure sequence diagram when updating, storing and publishing the comparison result stored by the comparator according to the embodiment of the present invention Procedure sequence diagram when a viewer according to an embodiment of the present invention browses a comparison result System configuration diagram according to an embodiment of the present invention Functional outline diagram in system configuration concerning one embodiment of the present invention Example display image of analysis data for client according to one embodiment of the present invention Sequence chart for providing analysis data for clients according to an embodiment of the present invention Processing flow of comparison result generation function according to one embodiment of the present invention Processing flow of comparison result reading according to one embodiment of the present invention Processing flow of comparison Top screen generation according to one embodiment of the present invention BI function processing flow according to an embodiment of the present invention Processing flow of comparison algorithm according to one embodiment of the present invention Processing flow of evaluation level coefficient conversion unit of comparison algorithm according to one embodiment of the present invention The coefficient-real number function graph when the evaluation leveling is a real number by the conversion of the evaluation level coefficient of the comparison algorithm according to the embodiment of the present invention (the position of the real number average value (A) in the figure varies depending on the distribution of the real number, The graph changes accordingly)

____: Abbreviated symbol with link (underline in the image screens of FIGS. 1 to 4)
DB: Abbreviation of database SS: Abbreviation of snapshot A: Average value of evaluation level in one element of one comparison MaxA: Maximum value of evaluation level in one element of one comparison−average value (A)
MinA: Minimum value of evaluation level in one element of one comparison-average value (A)
Coefficient Std: Coefficient coefficient of the standard superiority / inferiority level defined in the evaluation level coefficient database Max: Coefficient coefficient of the highest superiority / inferiority level defined in the evaluation level coefficient database Min: Coefficient of the lowest superiority / inferiority level defined in the evaluation level coefficient database

Claims (15)

A web server, a database server, a comparator terminal, and a viewer terminal are connected via a network, respectively, and a system for sharing the comparison support function,
The web server
In response to a request from the comparator terminal, comprising a means for transmitting an input form completed within one comparison and one comparator to the comparator terminal,
The comparator terminal is
The comparison title input in the received input form, the preconditions for the comparison, a plurality of comparison objects, a plurality of comparison elements for the comparison object, a weight for each comparison element, an evaluation level for each comparison element, and a relative A means for transmitting one comparison target as a criterion for evaluation to the web server;
The web server further includes:
The received title of the comparison, the preconditions for the comparison, the comparison object, the comparison element, the weight for each comparison element, the evaluation level for each comparison element, and one comparison object serving as a reference for the relative evaluation, Based on the predefined evaluation level and coefficient conversion table received from the database server, the conversion is performed from the evaluation level to the coefficient for each comparison element, multiplied by the weight, and these are added for all comparison elements for each comparison target. Means for calculating an evaluation value of each comparison target,
Means for calculating a relative evaluation value between a comparison object serving as a reference for relative evaluation specified in the input form and other comparison objects using the evaluation value of each comparison object;
Based on the calculated relative evaluation value and the related information, a means for editing the comparison result display format and transmitting to the comparator terminal;
Means for transmitting the calculated relative evaluation value and its related information to a database server;
The database server is
Means for storing the received relative evaluation value and related information;
The comparator terminal further includes:
Means for displaying the received data of the comparison result display format;
The web server further includes:
In response to a request from the viewer terminal, the comparison server obtains a comparison result and its related information from the database server, edits the comparison result display format, and includes means for transmitting to the viewer terminal,
The viewer terminal is
Means for displaying the received data of the comparison result display format;
A comparison support function characterized by this and a system for sharing the results. The evaluation level for each comparison element can be input to the input form as a superiority / inferiority level based on a preliminarily assumed standard (neutral level) or a real number based on one index,
The database server further includes:
Means for setting the conversion table;
The system for sharing the comparison support function and the result according to claim 1. The evaluation level for each comparison element can be input to the input form as an arithmetic expression.
3. A system for sharing a comparison support function according to claim 1 and a result thereof. The web server further includes:
In response to a comparison update request from the comparator terminal, the corresponding comparison result and its related information are acquired from the database server, edited in the input form format, and provided with means for transmitting to the comparator terminal,
The comparator terminal further includes:
Means for displaying the received input form format and transmitting update comparison information input thereto to the web server;
The web server further includes:
Means for recalculating the comparison result and updating the comparison update date and time based on the received update comparison information received;
Based on the updated comparison result and its related information, the comparison result display format is edited and transmitted to the comparator terminal;
Means for transmitting the updated comparison result and its related information to a database server;
The database server is
Means for updating and storing the received comparison result and its related information received;
The comparator terminal further includes:
Means for displaying the received data of the updated comparison result display format;
A system for sharing a comparison support function according to any one of claims 1 to 3 and a result thereof. The web server further includes:
In response to a snapshot request for the comparison result from the comparator terminal, comprising a means for transmitting a copy of the relevant comparison result at that time and its related information to the database server,
The database server further includes:
Means for storing the received comparison result and related information;
The comparator terminal further includes:
Means for requesting display of the snapshot comparison result and related information;
The web server further includes:
In response to a snapshot comparison result and related information display request from the comparator terminal, the comparison result snapshot and the related information snapshotd by the corresponding comparator are acquired from the database server and edited in a comparison result display format. And means for transmitting to the comparator terminal,
The comparator terminal further includes:
Means for displaying the received data of the comparison result display format;
5. A system for sharing a comparison support function according to claim 1 and a result thereof. The web server further includes:
In response to a request from the comparator terminal, a comparison target that satisfies a predetermined condition is obtained from the database server, the related information of the corresponding comparison target is obtained, and the related information is transmitted to the comparator terminal,
The comparator terminal further includes:
Means for displaying a corresponding comparison target list from the received related information;
6. A system for sharing a comparison support function according to claim 1 and a result thereof. The web server further includes:
Means for recalculating the relative evaluation value using the evaluation value of each comparison object of the comparison result in response to a change request for one comparison object serving as a reference for relative evaluation from the browser terminal that has transmitted the comparison result; ,
Based on the calculated relative evaluation value and its related information, it is edited into a comparison result display format, and includes means for transmitting to the viewer terminal,
The browser terminal further includes:
Means for displaying the received data of the comparison result display format;
The system for sharing the comparison support function according to any one of claims 1 to 6 and the result thereof. The web server further includes:
In response to a nice registration request from the browser terminal that sent the comparison result, the means for sending the ID of the corresponding comparison to the database server,
The database server further includes:
Means for storing the received ID of the corresponding comparison;
The browser terminal further includes:
Means for requesting display of the nicely registered comparison and related information;
The web server further includes:
In response to the nice registered comparison and the related information display request from the reader terminal, the ID of the comparison registered by the corresponding reader is obtained from the database server, and the corresponding comparison result and the related information are further acquired from the ID. And a means for editing the comparison result display format and transmitting it to the viewer terminal,
The browser terminal further includes:
Means for displaying the received data of the comparison result display format;
A system for sharing the comparison support function according to any one of claims 1 to 7 and a result thereof. A method of operating a comparison support function and a system for sharing the same, in which a web server, a database server, a comparator terminal, and a viewer terminal are connected to each other via a network,
The web server is
In response to a request from the comparator terminal, a step of transmitting an input form completed within one comparison and one comparator to the comparator terminal;
The comparator terminal is
A plurality of comparison objects input to the received input form, a plurality of comparison elements for the comparison objects, a weight for each comparison element, an evaluation level for each comparison element, and one comparison object serving as a reference for relative evaluation Sending to the web server;
The web server further comprises:
The received comparison object, the comparison element, the weight for each comparison element, the evaluation level for each comparison element, one comparison object serving as a reference for the relative evaluation, and the predefined evaluation received from the database server Based on the conversion table of levels and coefficients, the evaluation level of each comparison object is calculated by converting the evaluation level into a coefficient for each comparison element, multiplying by the weight, and adding them for each comparison element. And steps to
Calculating a relative evaluation value between a comparison target serving as a reference for relative evaluation specified in the input form and another comparison target using the evaluation value of each comparison target;
Based on the calculated relative evaluation value and its related information, editing into a comparison result display format, and transmitting to the comparator terminal;
Transmitting the calculated relative evaluation value and its related information to a database server;
The database server is
Storing the received relative evaluation value and related information;
The comparator terminal further comprises:
Displaying the received comparison result display format data;
The web server further comprises:
In response to a request from the viewer terminal, obtaining a comparison result and its related information from the database server, editing the comparison result display style, and transmitting to the viewer terminal;
The viewer terminal is
Displaying the received comparison result display format data;
A comparison support function characterized in that the system is executed and a method of operating the system sharing the result. The database server further includes:
Setting the conversion table;
10. The operation method of the system for sharing the comparison support function and the result thereof according to claim 9, wherein: The web server further includes:
In response to a comparison update request from the comparator terminal, obtaining a corresponding comparison result and its related information from the database server, editing the input form format, and transmitting to the comparator terminal;
The comparator terminal further includes:
Displaying the received input form format and transmitting update comparison information input thereto to the web server;
The web server further includes:
Recalculating the comparison result and updating the comparison update date and time based on the received update comparison information received;
Editing the comparison result display format based on the updated comparison result and its related information, and sending it to the comparator terminal;
Transmitting the updated comparison result and related information to a database server;
The database server is
Updating and storing the received comparison result and related information received;
The comparator terminal further includes:
Displaying the received data of the updated comparison result display format;
The comparison supporting function according to claim 9 or 10, and a method of operating a system sharing the result. The web server further includes:
In response to a snapshot request for the comparison result from the comparator terminal, a copy of the corresponding comparison result at that time and its related information to the database server;
The database server further includes:
Storing the received comparison result and related information;
The comparator terminal further includes:
Requesting display of the snapshot comparison result and related information;
The web server further includes:
In response to a snapshot comparison result and related information display request from the comparator terminal, the comparison result snapshot and the related information snapshotd by the corresponding comparator are acquired from the database server and edited in a comparison result display format. Transmitting to the comparator terminal;
The comparator terminal further includes:
Displaying the received comparison result display format data;
The method of operating a system for sharing a comparison support function according to any one of claims 9 to 11 and a result thereof. The web server further includes:
In response to a request from the comparator terminal, for a comparison target that satisfies a predetermined condition, obtaining relevant information of the corresponding comparison target from the database server, and transmitting the relevant information to the comparator terminal;
The comparator terminal further includes:
Displaying a corresponding comparison target list from the received related information;
The comparison support function according to any one of claims 9 to 12 and a method of operating a system sharing the result thereof. The web server further includes:
Recalculating the relative evaluation value using the evaluation value of each comparison object of the comparison result in response to a change request for one comparison object serving as a reference for relative evaluation from the browser terminal that has transmitted the comparison result; ,
Based on the calculated relative evaluation value and its related information, editing the comparison result display style, and transmitting to the viewer terminal;
The browser terminal further includes:
Displaying the received comparison result display format data;
14. The operation method of the system for sharing the comparison support function according to any one of claims 9 to 13 and the result thereof. The web server further includes:
In response to a nice registration request from the viewer terminal that transmitted the comparison result, the step of transmitting the ID of the corresponding comparison to the database server;
The database server further includes:
Storing the received ID of the corresponding comparison;
The browser terminal further includes:
Requesting display of the nice registered comparison and related information;
The web server further includes:
In response to the nice registered comparison and the related information display request from the reader terminal, the ID of the comparison registered by the corresponding reader is obtained from the database server, and the corresponding comparison result and the related information are further acquired from the ID. Editing the comparison result display style and sending it to the viewer terminal;
The browser terminal further includes:
Displaying the received comparison result display format data;
15. The operation method of the system for sharing the comparison support function according to any one of claims 9 to 14 and the result thereof.