JP4035644B2 - Learning support device - Google Patents

Learning support device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4035644B2
JP4035644B2 JP2003100251A JP2003100251A JP4035644B2 JP 4035644 B2 JP4035644 B2 JP 4035644B2 JP 2003100251 A JP2003100251 A JP 2003100251A JP 2003100251 A JP2003100251 A JP 2003100251A JP 4035644 B2 JP4035644 B2 JP 4035644B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
answer
output
correct answer
correct
word
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2003100251A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2004309627A (en
Inventor
晴行 天野
Original Assignee
晴行 天野
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 晴行 天野 filed Critical 晴行 天野
Priority to JP2003100251A priority Critical patent/JP4035644B2/en
Publication of JP2004309627A publication Critical patent/JP2004309627A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4035644B2 publication Critical patent/JP4035644B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、単語,会話,問題集等の学習で、特に問題,正解および解説等を通して学習者の学習効果を高めるようにした学習支援装置に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
予め用意した問題,正解および解説等を反復繰り返すことにより学習効果の向上を図るようにした学習装置では、出題した問題は学習者の解答結果に基づいて以降の出題間隔,出題頻度などを決定することが多い。また学習者は学習が習熟するにつれ、出題に対する解答操作は早くなり正解することは多くなっていくので、学習装置は学習者の習熟度に応じて正解した問題は速やかに正解処理をして次の問題へ移行させ、また正解できない問題は学習者が理解できるようになるまで出題,正解を繰り返えし、十分な学習時間が確保できることが望ましい。従来の学習装置では、たとえば単語の意味を解答する問題を例にとれば、単語が表示で出力されて単語の意味が分かる場合には、その単語の意味の頭文字をキー入力したり、単語が音声で出力されて単語の意味が分かる場合には、その単語の綴りをキー入力したりするなどの煩わしい解答操作をする必要があった。また学習者が単語の意味が分からない場合には、「分からない」という解答操作をしないと正解が得られなかったりして学習効率を著しく妨げていた。また学習装置は学習者の上記解答操作に対し、正解であれば○印を、不正解の場合は×印などを表示し、不正解の場合は追って正解を出力するなど、習熟度が進み更に学習効率を上げたくても学習装置の学習効率には限度があった。またこの種の学習装置はパソコンを利用したものが多く、いつでも、どこでも、誰でもが学習できるという訳にはいかなかった。
【0003】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
本発明は上記問題点を解決しようとするもので、学習者の解答操作は、アルファベット等のキー操作によらない単純な操作にすることにより学習装置を小型化して、いつでも、どこでも、誰でもが学習できるようにする。また学習者の習熟の度合いに応じて、学習効率が最適になるように調整ができるようにして学習効果の向上を図るとともに、学習成果の維持が短時間の復習で効率的にできるようにする。
【0004】
【問題を解決するための手段】
請求項1記載の本発明の学習支援装置は、予め用意した問題,正解を学習者が自己判定しながら反復繰り返し学習する学習支援装置において、問題及び正解の格納部と、前記格納部から問題を出力する問題出力手段と、前記問題出力手段が問題を出力してから所定時間後に前記格納部から正解を出力する正解出力手段と、問題出力手段が問題を出力したあと学習者により操作される解答操作手段と、問題制御手段とを備え、前記問題制御手段は、問題出力手段が問題を出力してから正解出力手段が問題の正解を出力する前に解答操作手段が操作された場合は、当該問題は正解として格納部から除外し、正解出力手段が問題の正解を出力したあとに解答操作手段が操作された場合は、当該問題は不正解として格納部に残こすように制御することを特徴とする。請求項2記載の本発明の学習支援装置は、請求項1記載の学習支援装置において、前記問題出力手段が問題を出力してから、前記正解出力手段が正解を出力するまでの時間間隔を調整する手段を設けたことを特徴とする。
【0005】
【発明の実施の形態】
本発明の第1の実施の形態による学習支援装置は、予め用意した問題,正解を学習者が自己判定しながら反復繰り返し学習する学習支援装置において、問題及び正解の格納部と、前記格納部から問題を出力する問題出力手段と、前記問題出力手段が問題を出力してから所定時間後に前記格納部から正解を出力する正解出力手段と、問題出力手段が問題を出力したあと学習者により操作される解答操作手段と、問題制御手段とを備え、前記問題制御手段は、問題出力手段が問題を出力してから正解出力手段が問題の正解を出力する前に解答操作手段が操作された場合は、当該問題は正解として格納部から除外し、正解出力手段が問題の正解を出力したあとに解答操作手段が操作された場合は、当該問題は不正解として格納部に残こすように制御することを特徴とする。即ち、問題を表示または音声などで出題した後、所定の時間後に正解を出力し、学習者が自己判定をしながら反復繰り返すし学習する学習支援装置において、問題の正解が出力される前に学習者により解答操作手段が操作された場合は、当該問題は正解として当該問題を格納部から除外し、問題の正解が出力されあとに解答操作手段が操作された場合は、当該問題は不正解として当該問題を格納部に残すようにする。これにより、学習者は単純な解答操作で学習を進めることができるようになる。また正解できない問題は解答操作が行われるまで問題,正解が繰り返えし出力されるので、理解できるようになった時点で解答操作をすればよく、理解しにくい問題でも十分に時間をかけて学習することができる。このように、出題された問題は単純な操作で解答することができるので学習装置を小型化することができ、また学習者は問題の難易度に応じて学習時間を確保しながら次の問題に移ることができるので、習熟度に応じて学習効果を上げることができる。
【0006】
本発明の第2の実施の形態は、第1の実施の形態による学習支援装置において、前記問題出力手段が問題を出力してから、前記正解出力手段が正解を出力するまでの時間間隔を調整する手段を設けたもので、学習者は問題を出題してから正解を出力するまでの時間間隔を習熟の度合いに応じて調整することにより、学習効率を最適にして学習することができ、学習した成果は効率よく維持できるようになる。
【0007】
【実施例】
以下に、本発明の学習支援装置の一実施例を図面に基づいて説明する。図1は本発明の構成を説明するための一実施例ブロック図である。1は問題,正解等の格納部で、2は中央処理装置で問題出力手段3、正解出力手段4、問題制御手段5などで構成されている。格納部1の問題が問題出力手段3により表示または音声で問題出力8に出力されると、時間調整手段7で定めた時間T後に正解等が正解出力手段4により表示または音声で正解出力9に出力される。問題制御手段5は、解答操作手段6による解答操作が正解等の出力前に行われたかあとに行われたか、また正解でも当日初出題での正解か2度目以降の出題での正解か、また正解の操作をしたあとに取消操作が行われていないかなど、出題,解答操作に係る諸々の結果に基づいて当該問題を制御する。
【0008】
図2は本発明の学習支援装置を単語学習装置に実施した例で、解答操作が正解等の出力前に行われた場合の動作を説明するフローチャートである。実施例の単語記憶装置は、本発明を特願2000−220074に適用したもので、単語を一週間周期で覚えていたか忘れてしまったかをチェックし、覚えていた単語は当日の格納部から除外され、忘れた単語は当日の格納部に残されてすべての単語のチェック終了後に循環させられて再び出題され、何回も覚え直すことができるようになっている。そして、更に一週間後に最初のチェックで覚えていた単語は前記格納部から除外され、忘れていた単語は再び残されて覚え直すようになっている。なお、本単語記憶装置には覚える単語はすべて格納されているが、本実施例のフローチャート図2の説明は一週間のうちの一日分だけであり、かつ新たに補給される単語や正解により当日の格納部から除外された単語の動作説明等は含まれていない。
【0009】
本実施例における解答操作は、表示または音声で出題された単語に対し、例えば解答釦を押下するだけの単純な操作であり、正誤の照合は正解等の出力により自己判定する。即ち、単語が出題されたあと正解が頭に浮かんだ時点で解答操作をし、自分の頭の中の正解と表示または音声で出力された正解等とを自分で照合する。解答操作をしない場合、解答操作はしたが正解を間違えていたため取消の操作をした場合には取り消す前の状態に戻され、これらは当該単語と正解等は交互に解答操作がなされるまで出力するので、当該単語の記憶には十分な時間を確保することができ、更に忘れていた単語は当日何回でも循環させて覚えることができるので記憶を確実にすることができる。
【0010】
図2のフローチャートを図3のタイムチャートを用いて説明する。S201において電源を投入すると、S202で当日学習する単語等の格納部が選択され、図3のように問題出力8に最初の問題である単語1が出力される(S203)。単語の意味が分かる場合は、S204において直ちに解答操作手段6による解答操作1をすることができ、そのあとに正解出力9に正解1が出力される(S205)。単語1はS206において当日初めて出題された単語であることが認識され、S207において取消操作が行われていないことが確認されると単語1は当日の格納部から除外され次の単語2が出題される(S208)。
【0011】
本単語記憶装置では、単語が出題されたあと頭に浮かんだ正解と出力される正解等とを自己照合することにより判定しているため、S205の正解出力により間違えていたことが分かる場合がある。図3は、単語2が出力されたあと正解2が出力する前に解答操作2をしたので正解となり次の単語3が出題されたが、正解2の出力により間違えていたことが分かり、S207において取消操作をしたので解答操作2以前の状態に戻されて再び単語2と正解2は交互に再出力されることを示している。そして十分に記憶し直してから解答操作をすることにより、単語2は当日の格納部に戻されて次の単語3が出題される(S210)。また格納部に戻された単語2は循環して再出題されるが、再出題された単語はたとえ正解の解答操作をしてもS206において正解として扱われず当日の格納部に戻される(S209)。
【0012】
次に解答操作が正解等の出力後に行われた実施例を図4のタイムチャートにより説明する。図4では単語3の出力に対し正解3が出力した後に解答操作3をしたので単語3は不正解の扱いにされるが、取消の操作は行われていないので次の単語4が出題されることを示している。単語の意味が分からないので何もしないでいると図のように単語4,正解4が交互に解答操作4(図4に記載なし)をするまで出力されるので、単語4は十分に覚えることができる。
【0013】
単語の学習が全く初期の段階では、単語と正解が交互に繰り返えされる方が記憶効果はあり、また単語出力と正解出力との時間間隔Tは、短くすると正解できる単語も不正解にしてしまうことがあるので短くする必要はなかった。しかし、学習が進むにつれて単語出力に対する解答操作は早くなり、かつ正解が多くなると時間間隔Tを短くすることが要求されるようになる。特に単語の記憶が復習段階に入ると、単語学習装置は復習効率を上げることが要求され、時間調整手段7は時間間隔Tを短く調整することによりこれに対応できるようになっている。
【0014】
図5は本発明の他の実施例を説明するタイムチャートである。図5は単語の記憶が復習段階に入り、時間間隔Tは学習者の習熟度に合わせ、効率よく記憶の維持ができるようにした実施例である。図で単語1〜3は正解の解答操作をしているので、これらの単語は当日の格納部からは除外される。単語4は正解4が出力したあとに解答操作をしているので不正解として当日の格納部に残されるが、取消操作はしていないので次の単語5は出題され効率よく先へ進めることができる。当日の格納部に残される単語は僅かであり、この段階になると取消操作をしなくても循環させて覚え直すだけで十分に覚え直すことができる。このように、時間間隔Tを短くして正誤の判定条件を厳しくすることにより、少しでも曖昧な記憶の単語だけを残してまとめて復習することができるようになる。
【0015】
上記は単語の記憶を実施例として説明したが、単語に限定されるものではない。問題としては、外国語の会話,学校の教材,資格試験等の専門書,趣味・娯楽・教養などから、正解等としては○または×のほか外国語会話の邦訳、外国語会話のやりとり、教材,専門書等の解説等にいたるまで、いずれも音声または表示で出力することは可能であり、問答形式にしてあらゆる学習分野に適用することができる。
【0016】
【発明の効果】
以上説明したように、本発明の学習支援装置によれば、学習者の解答操作はアルファベットなどのキー入力によらず単純な操作にすることにより小型化することができ、どこでも、いつでも、誰でもが学習できる携帯型の学習支援装置が安価に提供できるようになる。また正解できる問題と正解できない問題とは明快に切り分けられ、正解できる問題は速やかに制御され、正解できない問題は解答操作が行われるまで出題,正解が繰り返えされるので、記憶または理解のために十分な時間をかけて学習することができ、学習効果の向上を図ることができる。また学習習熟度が進み復習段階に入っても、出題,正解等の各出力の時間間隔は学習者の習熟の度合いに応じて調整できるので、復習効率が最適になるようにして復習することができ、学習成果は短時間の復習で維持できるようになる。このように本発明の学習支援装置は、初学者,専門家からパソコン操作が苦手な高齢者にいたるまで、どこでも、いつでも、誰でもが単純な操作で学習することができ、学習効率を最適にして学習効果を向上させる効果を奏する。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の構成を説明するための一実施例ブロック図である
【図2】解答操作が正解等の出力前に行われた場合の動作を説明するフローチャートである
【図3】図2のフローチャートを説明するタイムチャートである
【図4】解答操作が正解等の出力後に行われた場合の動作を説明するタイムチャートである
【図5】本発明の他の実施例を説明するタイムチャートである
【符号の説明】
1…問題、正解、解説等の格納部
2…中央処理装置
3…問題出力手段
4…正解出力手段
5…問題制御手段
6…解答操作手段
7…時間調整手段
8…問題出力
9…正解出力
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a learning support apparatus that enhances the learning effect of a learner through learning of words, conversations, problem collections, and the like, in particular through problems, correct answers, and explanations.
[0002]
[Prior art]
In a learning device that attempts to improve learning effects by repeatedly repeating prepared questions, correct answers, explanations, etc., questions that are given questions are determined on the basis of the results of the learners, and the subsequent question interval, question frequency, etc. There are many cases. In addition, as learners become more proficient, the answering operations for questions will become faster and more correct answers will be made, so the learning device will promptly process correct answers according to the learner's proficiency level. It is desirable that enough problems can be secured by repeating the questions and correct answers until the learner can understand the problems that cannot be answered correctly. In a conventional learning device, for example, when the problem of answering the meaning of a word is taken as an example, if the word is output by display and the meaning of the word is known, the initial of the meaning of the word can be keyed in, If the meaning of the word is understood by outputting the voice, it is necessary to perform a troublesome answering operation such as inputting the spelling of the word. In addition, when the learner did not understand the meaning of the word, the correct answer could not be obtained unless the answer operation “I don't know” was made, which significantly hindered the learning efficiency. In addition, the learning device displays a ○ mark if the answer is correct, a cross mark if the answer is incorrect, and a correct answer is output later if the answer is incorrect. Even if we wanted to increase the learning efficiency, there was a limit to the learning efficiency of the learning device. In addition, many of these types of learning devices use personal computers, so anyone can learn anytime, anywhere.
[0003]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
The present invention is intended to solve the above-mentioned problems, and the learner's answering operation is a simple operation that does not rely on key operations such as alphabets. Be able to learn. Also, according to the level of learner's proficiency, learning efficiency can be adjusted to optimize learning efficiency, and learning results can be maintained efficiently with a short review. .
[0004]
[Means for solving problems]
The learning support device according to the first aspect of the present invention is a learning support device in which a learner repeatedly learns while preparing a problem and a correct answer prepared in advance while the learner makes a self-determination. A problem output means for outputting; a correct output means for outputting a correct answer from the storage unit a predetermined time after the problem output means outputs the problem; and an answer operated by the learner after the problem output means outputs the problem An operation means, and a problem control means, wherein the problem control means, when the answer operation means is operated before the correct output means outputs the correct answer of the problem after the problem output means outputs the problem, The problem is excluded from the storage unit as a correct answer, and if the answer operation means is operated after the correct output means outputs the correct answer of the problem, the problem is controlled to remain in the storage part as an incorrect answer. And features. According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided the learning support apparatus according to the first aspect, wherein the time interval from when the problem output means outputs a problem until the correct output means outputs a correct answer is adjusted. It is characterized by providing means for performing
[0005]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The learning support apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention is a learning support apparatus in which a learner repeatedly learns while preparing a problem and a correct answer prepared in advance, and includes a storage unit for the problem and the correct answer, and the storage unit. A problem output means for outputting a problem, a correct output means for outputting a correct answer from the storage unit a predetermined time after the problem output means outputs the problem, and a learner operated after the problem output means outputs the problem Answer operation means, and problem control means, wherein the problem control means is operated when the answer operation means is operated before the correct answer output means outputs the correct answer of the question after the question output means outputs the problem. The problem is excluded from the storage unit as a correct answer, and when the answer operation means is operated after the correct output means outputs the correct answer of the problem, the problem is controlled to remain in the storage part as an incorrect answer. And wherein the Rukoto. That is, after a question is displayed or displayed as a voice, a correct answer is output after a predetermined time, and the learner repeats learning while making self-determination and learns before the correct answer is output. If the answer operation means is operated by the user, the problem is excluded as a correct answer from the storage unit, and if the answer operation means is operated after the correct answer of the question is output, the problem is regarded as an incorrect answer. Leave the problem in the storage. As a result, the learner can advance learning with a simple answer operation. In addition, questions that cannot be answered correctly are output until the answer operation is performed, so the correct answer is output repeatedly, so you only need to perform the answer operation when you are able to understand. Can learn. In this way, the questions that have been asked can be answered with simple operations, so the learning device can be miniaturized, and the learner can solve the next problem while ensuring learning time according to the difficulty of the problem. Since it can move, the learning effect can be improved according to the proficiency level.
[0006]
According to the second embodiment of the present invention, in the learning support apparatus according to the first embodiment, a time interval from when the problem output unit outputs a problem until the correct answer output unit outputs a correct answer is adjusted. The learner can learn with optimal learning efficiency by adjusting the time interval from when a question is given to when the correct answer is output according to the level of proficiency. The results will be maintained efficiently.
[0007]
【Example】
Hereinafter, an embodiment of a learning support apparatus according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention. Reference numeral 1 denotes a storage unit for questions, correct answers, and the like. Reference numeral 2 denotes a central processing unit, which includes a problem output means 3, a correct answer output means 4, a problem control means 5, and the like. When the problem in the storage unit 1 is displayed or voiced to the question output 8 by the question output means 3, the correct answer or the like is displayed or voiced to the correct answer 9 by the correct answer means 4 after the time T determined by the time adjustment means 7. Is output. The problem control means 5 determines whether the answer operation by the answer operation means 6 is performed before or after the output of the correct answer, whether the correct answer is the correct answer in the first question on the day or the correct answer in the second and subsequent questions, The question is controlled based on various results relating to the questioning and answering operations, such as whether or not a canceling operation is performed after the correct answering operation.
[0008]
FIG. 2 is an example in which the learning support device of the present invention is implemented in a word learning device, and is a flowchart for explaining the operation when an answer operation is performed before outputting a correct answer or the like. The word storage device of the embodiment is an application of the present invention to Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-220074, and checks whether a word is remembered or forgotten in a cycle of one week, and the remembered word is excluded from the storage unit of the day. The forgotten words are left in the storage section of the day and are circulated after all the words have been checked, and the questions are given again, so that they can be remembered many times. Further, a word that was remembered in the first check after another week is excluded from the storage unit, and a forgotten word is left again and remembered. Note that all the words to be remembered are stored in the word storage device, but the explanation of the flowchart in FIG. 2 of this embodiment is only for one day in one week, and is based on newly replenished words and correct answers. It does not include an explanation of the operation of the word excluded from the storage unit for the day.
[0009]
The answer operation in the present embodiment is a simple operation of simply pressing an answer button for a word displayed or voiced, and correct / incorrect collation is self-determined based on an output of a correct answer or the like. That is, when a correct answer comes to mind after a word is given, an answer operation is performed, and the correct answer in his / her head is compared with the correct answer displayed or voiced. If the answer operation is not performed, the answer operation is performed but the correct answer is incorrect, so if the cancel operation is performed, the state before the cancellation is restored, and these words and correct answers are output until the answer operation is performed alternately. Therefore, a sufficient time can be secured for storing the word, and the forgotten word can be circulated and memorized any number of times on the day, so that the storage can be ensured.
[0010]
The flowchart of FIG. 2 will be described with reference to the time chart of FIG. When the power is turned on in S201, the storage unit for the word or the like to be learned on the day is selected in S202, and the first question word 1 is output to the problem output 8 as shown in FIG. 3 (S203). When the meaning of the word is known, the answer operation 1 by the answer operation means 6 can be immediately performed in S204, and then the correct answer 1 is output to the correct answer output 9 (S205). It is recognized that the word 1 is the first question given on the day in S206, and if it is confirmed in S207 that no cancel operation has been performed, the word 1 is excluded from the storage unit on the day and the next word 2 is given. (S208).
[0011]
In this word storage device, since the correct answer that comes to the head after the word is given and the correct answer that is output are determined by self-collation, it may be found that the correct answer in S205 is incorrect. . FIG. 3 shows that the answer operation 2 was performed after the word 2 was output and before the correct answer 2 was output, so that the next word 3 was set as the correct answer, but it was found that the correct answer 2 was output, and in S207 Since the cancel operation has been performed, the state before the answer operation 2 is returned to indicate that the word 2 and the correct answer 2 are again output again. When the answer operation is performed after sufficiently re-storing, the word 2 is returned to the storage unit of the day and the next word 3 is given (S210). The word 2 returned to the storage unit is circulated and re-questioned. However, even if the correct answer operation is performed, the re-examined word is not treated as a correct answer in S206 and is returned to the storage unit of the day (S209). .
[0012]
Next, an embodiment in which the answer operation is performed after outputting the correct answer will be described with reference to the time chart of FIG. In FIG. 4, the answer operation 3 is performed after the correct answer 3 is output with respect to the output of the word 3, so that the word 3 is treated as an incorrect answer, but since the cancel operation is not performed, the next word 4 is given. It is shown that. Since the meaning of the word is not known, if nothing is done, the word 4 and the correct answer 4 are alternately output until the answer operation 4 (not shown in FIG. 4) is performed as shown in the figure. Can do.
[0013]
In the very early stage of word learning, it is more effective to repeat the word and the correct answer alternately, and the time interval T between the word output and the correct output makes the word that can be correctly answered if the time interval T short is also incorrect. There was no need to shorten it. However, as the learning progresses, the answer operation for the word output becomes faster, and as the number of correct answers increases, it is required to shorten the time interval T. In particular, when the memory of the word enters the review stage, the word learning device is required to increase the review efficiency, and the time adjusting means 7 can cope with this by adjusting the time interval T to be short.
[0014]
FIG. 5 is a time chart for explaining another embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 5 shows an embodiment in which the memory of words enters the review stage, and the time interval T can be efficiently maintained according to the proficiency level of the learner. In the figure, since words 1 to 3 are correct answer operations, these words are excluded from the storage unit on that day. Since the answer operation is performed after the correct answer 4 is output for the word 4, it is left as an incorrect answer in the storage unit on the current day, but since the cancel operation is not performed, the next word 5 is given and can be advanced efficiently. it can. There are only a few words left in the storage part of the day, and at this stage, they can be remembered sufficiently by simply recirculating them and remembering them without performing a cancel operation. In this way, by shortening the time interval T and tightening the correctness / incorrectness determination conditions, it becomes possible to review all the words while leaving only slightly ambiguous stored words.
[0015]
Although the above has described the storage of words as an example, it is not limited to words. Problems include foreign language conversations, school materials, specialized books such as qualification exams, hobbies / entertainment / education, etc. As correct answers, Japanese translation of foreign language conversations, exchange of foreign language conversations, teaching materials , It is possible to output by voice or display until commentary on technical books, etc., and it can be applied to any learning field in question-answer format.
[0016]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the learning support device of the present invention, the answering operation of the learner can be miniaturized by making it a simple operation regardless of the key input such as the alphabet, and anywhere, anytime, anyone Can be provided at a low cost. In addition, questions that can be answered correctly and those that cannot be answered are clearly separated, problems that can be answered correctly are controlled promptly, and questions that cannot be answered correctly are answered and repeated until the answer operation is performed. Learning can take a sufficient amount of time, and the learning effect can be improved. In addition, even if the learning proficiency progresses and enters the review stage, the time interval between each output of questions, correct answers, etc. can be adjusted according to the level of proficiency of the learner, so it is possible to review so that the review efficiency is optimal. And learning outcomes can be maintained with a short review. As described above, the learning support device according to the present invention can perform learning with simple operations anywhere, anytime, from beginners and experts to senior citizens who are not good at computer operation, and optimize learning efficiency. This has the effect of improving the learning effect.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment for explaining the configuration of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a flowchart for explaining an operation when an answer operation is performed before outputting a correct answer and the like. Fig. 4 is a time chart for explaining the flowchart of Fig. 2. Fig. 4 is a time chart for explaining the operation when the answer operation is performed after outputting a correct answer or the like. Fig. 5 is a time for explaining another embodiment of the present invention. Chart [Explanation of symbols]
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Storage part 2 of question, correct answer, comment etc .... Central processing unit 3 ... Question output means 4 ... Correct output means 5 ... Problem control means 6 ... Answer operation means 7 ... Time adjustment means 8 ... Question output 9 ... Correct answer output

Claims (2)

予め用意した問題,正解を学習者が自己判定しながら反復繰り返し学習する学習支援装置において、問題及び正解の格納部と、前記格納部から問題を出力する問題出力手段と、前記問題出力手段が問題を出力してから所定時間後に前記格納部から正解を出力する正解出力手段と、問題出力手段が問題を出力したあと学習者により操作される解答操作手段と、問題制御手段とを備え、前記問題制御手段は、問題出力手段が問題を出力してから正解出力手段が問題の正解を出力する前に解答操作手段が操作された場合は、当該問題は正解として格納部から除外し、正解出力手段が問題の正解を出力したあとに解答操作手段が操作された場合は、当該問題は不正解として格納部に残こすように制御することを特徴とする学習支援装置。  In a learning support apparatus in which a learner repeatedly and repeatedly learns while preparing a problem and a correct answer prepared in advance, a problem and correct answer storage unit, a problem output unit that outputs a problem from the storage unit, and the problem output unit include a problem A correct answer output means for outputting a correct answer from the storage unit after a predetermined time from output, an answer operation means operated by a learner after the question output means outputs a problem, and a problem control means, When the answer operation means is operated before the correct output means outputs the correct answer after the problem output means outputs the problem, the control means excludes the problem from the storage unit as the correct answer, and correct output means When the answer operation means is operated after the correct answer of the question is output, the learning support device controls to leave the question as an incorrect answer in the storage unit. 前記問題出力手段が問題を出力してから、前記正解出力手段が正解を出力するまでの時間間隔を調整する手段を設けたことを特徴とする請求項1に記載の学習支援装置。  2. The learning support apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising means for adjusting a time interval from when the problem output means outputs a problem to when the correct answer output means outputs a correct answer.
JP2003100251A 2003-04-03 2003-04-03 Learning support device Expired - Fee Related JP4035644B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003100251A JP4035644B2 (en) 2003-04-03 2003-04-03 Learning support device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003100251A JP4035644B2 (en) 2003-04-03 2003-04-03 Learning support device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2004309627A JP2004309627A (en) 2004-11-04
JP4035644B2 true JP4035644B2 (en) 2008-01-23

Family

ID=33464443

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003100251A Expired - Fee Related JP4035644B2 (en) 2003-04-03 2003-04-03 Learning support device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4035644B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5105967B2 (en) * 2007-06-22 2012-12-26 株式会社ワオ・コーポレーション Information processing system, information processing apparatus, server apparatus, information processing method, and program
JP6466391B2 (en) * 2016-12-15 2019-02-06 株式会社ファニー Language learning device
JP7060857B2 (en) * 2018-07-04 2022-04-27 亨 金子 Language learning device and language learning program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2004309627A (en) 2004-11-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8777626B2 (en) Interactive system and method for multi-sensory learning
Archer et al. Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching
Ciardiello Did you ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies
Lenski et al. Strategy instruction from a sociocognitive perspective
Wall When Guided Reading Isn't Working: Strategies for Effective Instruction.
Rau Exploring the influence of teacher language on fourth grade students’ mindsets: A multi-case study
Quoc et al. Teachers' perspectives and practices in teaching English pronunciation at Menglish center
Jenkins et al. Tutoring first-grade struggling readers in phonological reading skills
Lambe Teaching reading comprehension in EFL classroom: A glance at some approaches and activities
Fadhilawati et al. Implanting vocabulary for long terms memory through Memrise and Quizlet applications
Khoshsima et al. The effect of computer-assisted language learning on Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners’ listening skill
Scataglini-Belghitar et al. Establishing appropriate conditions: Students learning to apply a theorem
Gehsmann et al. The alphabetic principle and concept of word in text: Two priorities for learners in the emergent stage of literacy development
Mei et al. Application of Gagne’s nine approaches to teach Arabic language for non-native speakers: Experimental study at Sultan Idris Education University Malaysia (UPSI)
JP4035644B2 (en) Learning support device
JP3590580B2 (en) Spelling learning method and system
KR100421651B1 (en) System and method that randomly makes question and answer sentences for enhancing user's foreign language speaking and listening abilities
Williams What educational psychology means to me: the journey of a reading researcher
Kimball et al. The dialog game: a prototypical activity for providing proper intake in formal instruction
JP2019049683A (en) Speaking version language learning system and program
Halpern Cognitive science and the work of reform
Nofal The Reasons Behind the Students' Weaknesses in University Requirement Language Courses in Speaking Skills.
JP4264945B2 (en) Learning device with password
Negru The silent way: an unconventional language teaching method
Werner Bypassing bilingualism: My journey from monolingualism to plurilingualism

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20050104

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20061116

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20061128

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070115

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20070424

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070608

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20071009

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20071012

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101109

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101109

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131109

Year of fee payment: 6

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees