JP2021186833A - Rigidity evaluation method and shape determination method of press molding product, and press molding product - Google Patents

Rigidity evaluation method and shape determination method of press molding product, and press molding product Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2021186833A
JP2021186833A JP2020094503A JP2020094503A JP2021186833A JP 2021186833 A JP2021186833 A JP 2021186833A JP 2020094503 A JP2020094503 A JP 2020094503A JP 2020094503 A JP2020094503 A JP 2020094503A JP 2021186833 A JP2021186833 A JP 2021186833A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
press
rigidity
molded product
shape
displacement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2020094503A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP7264116B2 (en
Inventor
祐太 仮屋▲崎▼
Yuta Kariyazaki
豊久 新宮
Toyohisa Shingu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2020094503A priority Critical patent/JP7264116B2/en
Publication of JP2021186833A publication Critical patent/JP2021186833A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7264116B2 publication Critical patent/JP7264116B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Abstract

To provide a rigidity evaluation method which can accurately evaluate whether dents are generated or not so as to supply a press molding product without dents due to rigidity improvement.SOLUTION: A method evaluating rigidity of a press molding product is given in which: by the elastic analysis using displacement-load measuring experiment or CAE, when supposing two points in circumference of a molding product or molding shape data and when one side of the circumference divided by the two point is restricted and displacement in the press direction is provided to one point in the other side, it evaluates whether dents are generated or not on the basis of the relation between displacement and load at the point to which displacement is applied. A molding shape without dents is determined based on the method and a rigidity improvement measure by which a rigidity addition shape is added, and the press molding product is press-molded by use of the molding shape determination method.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 5

Description

本発明は、プレス成形品のべこつきの有無を判定する剛性評価方法およびそれを用いたべこつきのないプレス成形品の形状決定方法およびプレス成形品に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a rigidity evaluation method for determining the presence or absence of stickiness in a press-molded product, a method for determining a shape of a press-molded product without stickiness using the same, and a press-molded product.

近年、エネルギー問題や地球環境問題を契機に、燃費の向上を目的とした自動車車体の軽量化の要求が高まる一方で、衝突時の乗員保護のため、衝突特性、例えば、車体剛性の向上に対する要求も年々高まっている。この相反する二つの要求に応えるため、高強度鋼板の適用拡大が進んでいる。高強度鋼板を適用することによって、板厚を大きくすることなく、自動車車体の強度、剛性や衝突時の吸収エネルギーを高めることができる。 In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for weight reduction of automobile bodies for the purpose of improving fuel efficiency due to energy problems and global environmental problems, while demands for improving collision characteristics, for example, body rigidity, for occupant protection in the event of a collision. Is increasing year by year. In order to meet these two conflicting demands, the application of high-strength steel sheets is expanding. By applying a high-strength steel plate, it is possible to increase the strength and rigidity of the automobile body and the absorbed energy at the time of a collision without increasing the plate thickness.

しかしながら、一般に車体部品の加工に多用されているプレス成形においては、スプリングバックと呼ばれる形状凍結不良が問題となる。スプリングバックは、板状材料としての鋼板からプレス成形したプレス成形品を金型から離型した際に生じ、鋼板の材料強度の高まりに伴って大きくなる。スプリングバックは外観品質を損なうだけでなく組立て時の溶接不良の原因ともなるため、高強度鋼板の適用拡大には、スプリングバック対策が必要不可欠である。 However, in press molding, which is generally used frequently for processing vehicle body parts, a shape freezing defect called springback becomes a problem. Springback occurs when a press-molded product press-molded from a steel plate as a plate-like material is released from a die, and increases as the material strength of the steel plate increases. Since springback not only impairs the appearance quality but also causes welding defects during assembly, it is indispensable to take measures against springback in order to expand the application of high-strength steel sheets.

スプリングバックの原因は、残留応力の不均一によって生じる曲げモーメントがプレス成形品の離型時に解放されることによる弾性回復である。このため従来から、スプリングバック対策として残留応力の不均一を緩和させる方法等が提案されている。 The cause of the springback is the elastic recovery due to the bending moment caused by the non-uniformity of the residual stress being released at the time of mold release of the press-molded product. Therefore, conventionally, as a measure against springback, a method of alleviating the non-uniformity of residual stress has been proposed.

特許文献1では、伸びフランジ部にエンボスを配置し、縮みフランジ部に余肉ビードを配置した中間品を成形し、最終成形品の成形において、伸びフランジ部にはエンボスを潰すことで圧縮応力を与え、縮みフランジ部には余肉ビードによって引張応力を与えることで、プレス成形品の残留応力分布を平準化する技術が提案されている。 In Patent Document 1, an intermediate product in which an emboss is arranged in an elongated flange portion and a surplus bead is arranged in a contracted flange portion is formed, and in the molding of a final molded product, compressive stress is applied to the elongated flange portion by crushing the embossing. A technique has been proposed for leveling the residual stress distribution of a press-formed product by applying tensile stress to the shrinking flange portion by means of a surplus bead.

特許文献2では、製品形状での曲率半径よりも小さい曲率半径にプレス成形して中間部品を製造し、製造した中間部品を製品形状にプレス成形することで天板部とフランジ部の応力差により発生する曲げモーメントを低減し、キャンバーバックを抑制する技術が提案されている。 In Patent Document 2, an intermediate part is manufactured by press-molding to a radius of curvature smaller than the radius of curvature of the product shape, and the manufactured intermediate part is press-molded into the product shape due to the stress difference between the top plate portion and the flange portion. A technique has been proposed in which the bending moment generated is reduced and the camber back is suppressed.

特許文献3では、プレス成形後の金属パネルの表面をNヶの領域に分割し、それぞれの領域において前記金属パネルの表面に圧子を押し付けて変位と荷重の関係を測定し、べこつきの発生分布およびべこつきの発生荷重分布を求めることができる金属パネルの張り剛性評価方法が提案されている。 In Patent Document 3, the surface of a metal panel after press molding is divided into N regions, and an indenter is pressed against the surface of the metal panel in each region to measure the relationship between displacement and load, and the distribution of stickiness is generated. And a method for evaluating the tensile rigidity of a metal panel that can obtain the load distribution of stickiness has been proposed.

特開2009−255117号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2009-255117 国際公開2017/149955号International release 2017/149955 特開2013− 29332号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2013-29332

残留応力を平準化させる方法として、特許文献1では伸びフランジ部にエンボスを形成するとともに縮みフランジ部に余肉ビードを形成する方法を提案しているが、本発明が主に対象としている低剛性部品は、低応力でもスプリングバックが生じるため、特定部分の応力を低減させても不十分な場合がある。また、特定部分の応力を低減させた結果生じる新たな応力状態で、別の形態のスプリングバックが生じるおそれがある。 As a method for leveling the residual stress, Patent Document 1 proposes a method of forming an embossing in the extension flange portion and forming a surplus bead in the contraction flange portion, but the low rigidity which is the main object of the present invention is proposed. Since springback occurs in parts even at low stress, it may not be sufficient to reduce the stress in a specific part. In addition, another form of springback may occur in a new stress state resulting from reducing the stress in a particular portion.

特許文献2では、連続するハット形状が湾曲している場合を扱うが、本発明が主に対象としている低剛性部品は、成形深さが浅く、天板部の張出形状の有無により応力状態が大きく変わるため、特許文献2の技術のように一様の方法で応力低減を行うことはできない。 Patent Document 2 deals with the case where the continuous hat shape is curved, but the low-rigidity part mainly targeted by the present invention has a shallow molding depth and is in a stress state depending on the presence or absence of the overhanging shape of the top plate. Therefore, it is not possible to reduce the stress by a uniform method as in the technique of Patent Document 2.

特許文献3では、パネルの一部がべこつく場合には有効であるが、外周全体を拘束して測定するため、べこつきがパネル全体のねじれやゆがみ、外周の一部のハネあげや落ち込みにつながる場合には有効に判定できない問題があった。また、精度よく測定するには測定点数が多くなってしまう問題もあった。 In Patent Document 3, it is effective when a part of the panel is sticky, but since the measurement is performed by restraining the entire outer circumference, the stickiness causes twisting or distortion of the entire panel, and raising a part of the outer circumference. There was a problem that it could not be judged effectively when it led to a depression. In addition, there is a problem that the number of measurement points increases in order to measure accurately.

また、上記の技術および従来の対策技術により、スプリングバックを低減することができても、わずかなパネルのゆがみによりべこつきが発生する可能性がある。また、形状剛性が低い部品の場合はスプリングバックがゼロであってもべこつきが発生する可能性がある。そのため、べこつきを低減させるためには、従来のスプリングバック対策のみでは不十分であり、べこつきそのものの発生有無を評価し、部品の形状剛性を高め、べこつきが発生しない部品形状を決定する方法が必要である.
即ち、従来の技術の解決すべき課題を列記すると以下のようになる。
(1)べこつきそのものを評価する方法が必要であること。
(2)べこつきの評価と剛性向上をひとつのプロセスとして、同プロセスを複数回繰り返すことでべこつきの発生しない部品形状を決定する方法が必要であること。
Further, even if the springback can be reduced by the above-mentioned technique and the conventional countermeasure technique, stickiness may occur due to slight distortion of the panel. Further, in the case of a part having low shape rigidity, stickiness may occur even if the springback is zero. Therefore, in order to reduce stickiness, conventional springback measures alone are not sufficient, and the presence or absence of stickiness itself is evaluated, the shape rigidity of the part is increased, and the part shape that does not cause stickiness. We need a way to determine.
That is, the problems to be solved by the conventional technology are listed below.
(1) There is a need for a method to evaluate the stickiness itself.
(2) There is a need for a method to determine the shape of parts that do not cause stickiness by repeating the process multiple times, with the evaluation of stickiness and the improvement of rigidity as one process.

本発明は、上記課題に鑑みてなされたものであり、プレス成形品のべこつきの発生有無が判定可能な剛性評価方法を提案し、べこつきを発生させないプレス成形品の形状決定方法を提案するとともに、決定されたプレス成形形状を有するプレス成形品を提供することを目的としている。 The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and proposes a rigidity evaluation method capable of determining the presence or absence of stickiness in a press-molded product, and proposes a method for determining the shape of a press-molded product that does not cause stickiness. At the same time, it is an object of the present invention to provide a press-molded product having a determined press-molded shape.

上記課題を有利に解決する本発明のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法は、プレス成形した成形品の剛性を評価する方法であって、成形品の外周の2点および該2点で分割された前記外周の一方を拘束し、他方の外周の1点にプレス方向の変位を与え、変位を作用させた点の変位量と荷重の関係からべこつき発生有無を判断することを特徴としている。 The method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded product of the present invention, which advantageously solves the above problems, is a method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded molded product, which is divided into two points on the outer periphery of the molded product and the two points. One of the outer circumferences is restrained, a displacement in the pressing direction is given to one point on the other outer circumference, and the presence or absence of stickiness is determined from the relationship between the displacement amount and the load at the point where the displacement is applied.

また、本発明のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法は、プレス成形した成形品の剛性を評価する方法であって、CAE解析を用いて、成形品形状データの外周の2点および該2点で分割された前記外周の一方を拘束し、他方の外周の1点にプレス方向の変位を与え、変位を作用させた点の変位量と荷重の関係からべこつき発生有無を判断することを特徴としている。 Further, the rigidity evaluation method of the press-molded product of the present invention is a method of evaluating the rigidity of the press-molded molded product, and is divided into two points on the outer periphery of the molded product shape data and the two points using CAE analysis. One of the outer circumferences is restrained, a displacement in the pressing direction is given to one point on the other outer circumference, and the presence or absence of stickiness is determined from the relationship between the displacement amount and the load at the point where the displacement is applied. There is.

また、本発明のプレス成形品の形状決定方法は、上記プレス成形品の剛性評価方法によりプレス成形品のべこつきの発生有無を判断する剛性評価工程と、剛性付加形状を付加したプレス成形品を設計する剛性向上対策工程と、を繰り返し適用し、べこつきのないプレス成形形状を決定することを特徴としている。 Further, the method for determining the shape of the press-molded product of the present invention includes a rigidity evaluation step of determining whether or not stickiness occurs in the press-molded product by the above-mentioned rigidity evaluation method of the press-molded product, and a press-molded product to which a rigidity-added shape is added. It is characterized by repeatedly applying the design rigidity improvement measures process to determine a non-sticky press molding shape.

さらに、本発明のプレス成形品は、上記プレス成形品の形状決定方法によりプレス成形形状を決定し、プレス成形されたことを特徴としている。 Further, the press-molded product of the present invention is characterized in that the press-molded shape is determined by the above-mentioned method for determining the shape of the press-molded product, and the press-molded product is press-molded.

本発明のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法によれば、成形品の外周の2点および該2点で分割された前記外周の一方を拘束し、他方の外周の1点にプレス方向の変位を与え、変位を作用させた点の変位量と荷重の関係からべこつき発生有無を判断することとしたので、プレス成形品のねじれやゆがみによるべこつきを精度よく判断できる。 According to the rigidity evaluation method of the press-molded product of the present invention, two points on the outer circumference of the molded product and one of the outer circumferences divided by the two points are restrained, and one point on the outer circumference of the other is given a displacement in the pressing direction. Since it was decided to determine the presence or absence of stickiness from the relationship between the amount of displacement at the point where the displacement was applied and the load, it is possible to accurately determine the stickiness due to twisting or distortion of the press-molded product.

また、本発明のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法によれば、CAE解析を用いて、成形品形状データの外周の2点および該2点で分割された前記外周の一方を拘束し、他方の外周の1点にプレス方向の変位を与え、変位を作用させた点の変位量と荷重の関係からべこつき発生有無を判断することとしてので、プレス成形することなく、事前にプレス成形品のべこつきを精度よく判断できる。 Further, according to the rigidity evaluation method of the press-molded product of the present invention, CAE analysis is used to restrain two points on the outer circumference of the molded product shape data and one of the outer circumferences divided by the two points, and the other outer circumference. Since the presence or absence of stickiness is determined from the relationship between the displacement amount and the load at the point where the displacement is applied, the displacement in the press direction is given to one point, so the press-molded product is not pressed in advance. You can judge the stiffness accurately.

さらに、本発明のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法では、前記成形品または前記成形品形状データの外周の4隅のうち、3点を拘束し、他の1点に変位を与えることが好ましい。略四角形状の外周を有するプレス成形品では、簡便かつ効率的な剛性評価ができる。 Further, in the rigidity evaluation method of the press-molded product of the present invention, it is preferable to restrain three points among the four corners of the outer periphery of the molded product or the molded product shape data and give a displacement to the other one point. A press-molded product having a substantially square outer circumference can be easily and efficiently evaluated for rigidity.

また、本発明のプレス成形品の形状決定方法によれば、上記プレス成形品の剛性評価方法によりプレス成形品のべこつきの発生有無を判断する剛性評価工程と、剛性付加形状を付加したプレス成形品を設計する剛性向上対策工程と、を1回または2回以上繰り返し適用し、べこつきのないプレス成形形状を決定することとしたので、そのプレス成形品は、形状凍結性に優れ、他の部品との接合にあたって接合部のずれが少ない部品とすることが可能となり、たとえば、自動車の生産性向上に寄与することができる。 Further, according to the method for determining the shape of the press-molded product of the present invention, the rigidity evaluation step of determining whether or not the press-molded product is sticky by the rigidity evaluation method of the press-molded product and the press molding with the added rigidity added. Since it was decided to repeatedly apply the rigidity improvement measure process for designing the product once or twice or more to determine the press-molded shape without stickiness, the press-molded product has excellent shape freezeability and other When joining parts, it is possible to make parts with less displacement of the joints, which can contribute to improving the productivity of automobiles, for example.

本発明の一実施形態にかかるべこつきのないプレス成形品の成形形状を決定する工程を示す概略フロー図である。It is a schematic flow chart which shows the process of determining the molding shape of the press-molded article without stickiness which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明を適用する前のプレス成形形状を模式的に示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows typically the press molding shape before applying this invention. 本発明の一実施形態にかかる剛性評価のための測定点および拘束点を模式的に示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows typically the measurement point and the restraint point for the rigidity evaluation which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 図4の実施形態にかかる変位−荷重測定結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the displacement-load measurement result which concerns on embodiment of FIG. 本発明の一実施形態にかかる成形形状の決定方法により剛性付加形状を付加したプレス成形形状を模式的に示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows typically the press molding shape which added the rigidity addition shape by the method of determining the molding shape which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 図5の実施形態にかかる変位−荷重測定結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the displacement-load measurement result which concerns on embodiment of FIG. 本発明の他の実施形態にかかる成形形状の決定方法により剛性付加形状を付加したプレス成形形状を模式的に示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows typically the press molding shape which added the rigidity addition shape by the method of determining the molding shape which concerns on other embodiment of this invention.

発明者らは、上記課題を解決するために、鋭意検討した結果、プレス成形した成形品の外周の2点およびその2点で分割された成形品の外周の一方を拘束し、他方の外周の1点にプレス方向の変位を与え、変位を作用させた点の変位量と荷重の関係からプレス成形品の剛性を評価して、べこつき発生有無を判断することができることを見出した。また、べこつきが発生するプレス成形品については、剛性を向上させるビードや張出形状などからなる剛性付加形状を付加する剛性向上対策を施すことがべこつきの低減に有効であることを見出した。加えて、剛性評価と剛性向上対策を1回または2回以上繰り返し、べこつきのないプレス成形形状を決定できることを見出した。 As a result of diligent studies to solve the above problems, the inventors restrained two points on the outer circumference of the press-molded molded product and one of the outer circumferences of the molded product divided by the two points, and restrained one of the outer circumferences of the other. It has been found that it is possible to determine the presence or absence of stickiness by giving a displacement in the press direction to one point and evaluating the rigidity of the press-molded product from the relationship between the displacement amount and the load at the point where the displacement is applied. We also found that for press-molded products that generate stickiness, it is effective to take measures to improve rigidity by adding a rigidity-added shape consisting of beads and overhanging shapes that improve rigidity. rice field. In addition, it has been found that rigidity evaluation and rigidity improvement measures can be repeated once or twice or more to determine a non-sticky press-molded shape.

本発明の一実施形態のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法は、成形品の外周の2点およびその2点で分割された成形品の外周の一方を支持し、または、拘束し、他方の外周の1点にプレス方向の荷重を与え、変位を作用させた点の変位量と荷重の関係を用いて剛性を評価し、べこつき発生有無を判断するものである。ここで、拘束点、支持点や変位点は、厳密に外周上に位置するものではなく、必要に応じて所定長さ、外周から内側に位置していてもよい。また、支持し、または、拘束する側の外周は、1点で支持し、または、拘束してもよいが、複数点や線状の支持・拘束方法であっても構わない。支持する場合には、変位点に荷重を与えた場合に、支持点が変位しないように支持する必要がある。また、プレス方向は、たとえば、平板部の板厚方向である。たとえば、プレス成形後の成形品の4隅のうち対角の2隅を完全拘束し、他の対角の一方を支持し、または、拘束し、残る1隅にプレス方向の正負2方向に荷重を加えていくことが好ましい。4隅の決め方は、四角形あるいは矩形形状およびそれらに近似できる形状の場合は、頂点相当部4カ所とすることができる。その他の多角形形状や複雑形状の場合には、部品外周の任意の2点を結ぶ対角線の両端点と、その対角線によって分割される一方の外周上の1点と、他方の外周上の1点と、を選ぶことが好ましい。ここで、外周を略1/2に分断する対角線を選び、分断された一方の外周を支持し、または、拘束し、他方の外周の1点を測定点(変位点)とすることができる。さらに、4隅と定めた点のうち、対角線の両端点以外の2点は、対角線に対し軸対称の位置にあることが好ましい。「外周を略1/2」とは、たとえば、対角線がプレス成形品の重心を通るように構成とすることができる。なお、4隅の決定に際して、たとえば、突起状の形状のような極端に剛性が低い場所は、変位を与えた際に、変位点近傍のみが変形するのを避けるため、周方向や内側にずらして測定することが好ましい。また、外周上の5点以上を用いることも可能であり、外周上であれば、4点以上を拘束しても構わない。拘束する外周上の範囲は、プレス成形品の形状にもよるが、線長で1/6以上2/3程度までとすることが好ましい。あまりに拘束する範囲を狭くしすぎたり、広くしすぎたりすると、成形品全体のねじれや外周のゆがみに基づくべこつきの評価精度が低くなってしまう。 In the method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded product according to an embodiment of the present invention, one of the two points on the outer circumference of the molded product and one of the outer circumferences of the molded product divided by the two points is supported or constrained, and the outer periphery of the other is supported. A load in the pressing direction is applied to one point, the rigidity is evaluated using the relationship between the displacement amount and the load at the point where the displacement is applied, and the presence or absence of stickiness is determined. Here, the restraint point, the support point, and the displacement point are not strictly located on the outer circumference, but may be located inward from the outer circumference with a predetermined length, if necessary. Further, the outer circumference on the side to be supported or restrained may be supported or restrained at one point, but may be a plurality of points or a linear support / restraining method. When supporting, it is necessary to support the support point so that it will not be displaced when a load is applied to the displacement point. Further, the pressing direction is, for example, the plate thickness direction of the flat plate portion. For example, two diagonal corners of the four corners of the molded product after press molding are completely restrained, one of the other diagonals is supported or restrained, and the remaining one corner is loaded in two positive and negative directions in the press direction. It is preferable to add. In the case of a quadrangle or a rectangular shape and a shape that can be approximated to them, the four corners can be determined at four points corresponding to the vertices. In the case of other polygonal shapes or complex shapes, both ends of the diagonal line connecting any two points on the outer circumference of the part, one point on one outer circumference divided by the diagonal line, and one point on the other outer circumference. And, it is preferable to choose. Here, a diagonal line that divides the outer circumference into approximately 1/2 can be selected, one of the divided outer circumferences can be supported or constrained, and one point on the other outer circumference can be used as a measurement point (displacement point). Further, it is preferable that two points other than the points at both ends of the diagonal line among the points defined as the four corners are positioned axially symmetric with respect to the diagonal line. "Approximately 1/2 of the outer circumference" can be configured so that, for example, the diagonal line passes through the center of gravity of the press-molded product. When determining the four corners, for example, a place with extremely low rigidity such as a protruding shape is shifted in the circumferential direction or inward to avoid deformation only in the vicinity of the displacement point when a displacement is applied. It is preferable to measure. It is also possible to use 5 or more points on the outer circumference, and 4 or more points may be constrained as long as they are on the outer circumference. The range on the outer circumference to be restrained depends on the shape of the press-molded product, but the line length is preferably 1/6 or more and 2/3. If the restrained range is too narrow or too wide, the evaluation accuracy of stickiness based on the twist of the entire molded product and the distortion of the outer circumference will be low.

本実施形態では、上記のようにして決定した4隅のうち、3点を拘束し、残る1点にプレス方向の正負2方向の2条件を評価するものとして、合計8条件の剛性評価を行う。この剛性評価は、実験により、または、CAE(computer aided engineering)解析により、対象位置の変位−荷重関係を調査する。 In the present embodiment, three points out of the four corners determined as described above are constrained, and the remaining one point is evaluated for two conditions in the positive and negative directions of the press direction, and a total of eight conditions are evaluated for rigidity. .. This stiffness evaluation investigates the displacement-load relationship of the target position by experiment or by CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) analysis.

本実施形態で用いる成形品や成形品形状データは、正規寸法または正規寸法に準拠してプレス成形した成形品、もしくは正規寸法の形状データを用いることが好ましい。スプリングバック後の成形品の剛性を評価する場合には、スプリングバック後の成形品またはスプリングバック解析後の成形品データを用いることが好ましい。 As the molded product or the shape data of the molded product used in the present embodiment, it is preferable to use the regular size, the molded product press-molded according to the regular size, or the shape data of the regular size. When evaluating the rigidity of the molded product after springback, it is preferable to use the molded product data after springback or the molded product data after springback analysis.

以上のような条件で変位−荷重測定実験またはCAEによる弾性解析を実施し、変位測定点の変位−荷重関係を調査する。十分な剛性を有する成形品では、変位−荷重曲線が単調増加になる。一方、形状剛性が不十分でべこつきが発生する場合には、変位−荷重曲線が降下や停滞し、または振動し、単調増加とならない。これをもってべこつきの有無を判断する。なお、変位量は、少なくとも板厚の1.0倍以上とし、100mm程度までとすることが好ましく、通常プレスにおける下死点までとすることがより好ましい。測定する変位量が少なすぎるとべこつきが確認できず、多すぎると塑性変形を生じてしまうからである。 Under the above conditions, perform a displacement-load measurement experiment or elastic analysis by CAE to investigate the displacement-load relationship at the displacement measurement point. In a molded product with sufficient rigidity, the displacement-load curve becomes monotonically increasing. On the other hand, when the shape rigidity is insufficient and stickiness occurs, the displacement-load curve descends, stagnates, or vibrates, and does not increase monotonically. This is used to determine the presence or absence of stickiness. The amount of displacement is preferably at least 1.0 times the plate thickness, preferably up to about 100 mm, and more preferably up to the bottom dead center in a normal press. This is because if the amount of displacement to be measured is too small, stickiness cannot be confirmed, and if it is too large, plastic deformation occurs.

また、べこつきの有無の判断において、変位−荷重曲線に加えて、実験中の、または、CAEでの弾性解析中の成形品パネル全体のプレス方向への変位分布を用いることも有効である。画像解析や、レーザー測距、有限要素法での解析を利用できる。 In addition to the displacement-load curve, it is also effective to use the displacement distribution in the press direction of the entire molded product panel during the experiment or the elastic analysis by CAE in determining the presence or absence of stickiness. Image analysis, laser ranging, and finite element method analysis can be used.

次に、本発明の他の実施形態としてのプレス成形品の形状決定方法では、まず、上記実施形態に係るプレス成形品の剛性評価方法を用いてべこつきの発生有無を判断する(剛性評価工程)。次に、べこつきが発生していると判断された部位およびその周辺にビードや張出形状等の剛性付加形状を付加してプレス成形形状を設計する剛性向上対策を実施する(剛性向上対策工程)。この剛性評価工程と剛性向上対策工程とを1回または2回以上繰り返し適用し、べこつきが発生しないプレス成形形状を決定する。 Next, in the method for determining the shape of a press-molded product as another embodiment of the present invention, first, the presence or absence of stickiness is determined by using the rigidity evaluation method for the press-molded product according to the above embodiment (rigidity evaluation step). ). Next, we will implement rigidity improvement measures to design a press-molded shape by adding rigidity-added shapes such as beads and overhanging shapes to the part where stickiness is determined to occur and its surroundings (rigidity improvement measures). Process). This rigidity evaluation step and the rigidity improvement measure step are repeatedly applied once or twice or more to determine a press-molded shape in which stickiness does not occur.

また、本発明の他の実施形態としてのプレス成形品は、上記プレス成形品の形状決定方法でべこつきが発生しない形状を決定し、その形状をプレス成形して製造することで、形状凍結性に優れ、成形品の外周にねじれやゆがみが発生しにくい部品とすることができる。それゆえ、他の部品との接合にあたって、ずれの生じにくい高精度で効率的な接合を不具合なく実施することができる。たとえば、自動車の部品にこの実施形態を適用することで自動車の生産効率を高めることができる。 Further, the press-molded product as another embodiment of the present invention is manufactured by determining a shape that does not cause stickiness by the above-mentioned method for determining the shape of the press-molded product and press-molding the shape to freeze the shape. It is possible to make a part that has excellent properties and is less likely to be twisted or distorted on the outer periphery of the molded product. Therefore, when joining with other parts, it is possible to carry out high-precision and efficient joining with less occurrence of deviation without any trouble. For example, by applying this embodiment to automobile parts, the production efficiency of automobiles can be improved.

(実施例1)
実部品のAピラーロアインナーの成形に上記実施形態を適用し、CAEによる弾性解析による剛性評価を行った。概略長さ700mm×幅400mmの略矩形の部品である。材料は、980MPa級冷間圧延鋼板(ハイテン)で、板厚が0.9mmであり、機械特性は、降伏点(YP)が620MPa、引張強さ(TS)が1030MPa、伸び(El)が15%であった。
(Example 1)
The above embodiment was applied to the molding of the A-pillar lower inner of the actual part, and the rigidity was evaluated by the elastic analysis by CAE. It is a substantially rectangular part having an approximate length of 700 mm and a width of 400 mm. The material is a 980 MPa class cold-rolled steel sheet (HITEN) with a plate thickness of 0.9 mm, and the mechanical properties are yield point (YP) of 620 MPa, tensile strength (TS) of 1030 MPa, and elongation (El) of 15. %Met.

図1に適用した実施形態にかかるプレス成形品の形状決定方法を示す工程フローを示す。まず、プレス成形品の形状データを準備する(S10)。その形状データを用いて、CAEによる弾性解析により、変位−荷重曲線を求め(S11)、べこつきの有無を判断する(S12)剛性評価を行う(剛性評価工程)。べこつきが発生すると判断された場合には、剛性付加形状を付加して剛性向上対策を実施する(S13:剛性向上対策工程)。べこつきが発生しない形状となるまで、剛性評価工程と剛性向上対策工程を繰り返す。べこつきが発生しない形状をプレス成形の形状として決定する(S14)。 The process flow which shows the shape determination method of the press-molded article which concerns on embodiment applied to FIG. 1 is shown. First, shape data of the press-molded product is prepared (S10). Using the shape data, the displacement-load curve is obtained by elastic analysis by CAE (S11), and the presence or absence of stickiness is determined (S12), and the rigidity is evaluated (rigidity evaluation step). If it is determined that stickiness occurs, a rigidity-added shape is added and rigidity improvement measures are taken (S13: rigidity improvement measures step). The rigidity evaluation process and the rigidity improvement measure process are repeated until the shape does not cause stickiness. A shape that does not cause stickiness is determined as a press-molded shape (S14).

図2には、本実施例で用いるプレス成形品100の形状を斜視図で示す。長手方向右側の幅が大きい、略矩形形状となっており、手前側に断面Z形のステップ部12を有している。平板部11をXY面とし、長手方向を右側向きにX軸、幅方向をステップ部12から離れる方向にY軸と置き、平板部11に垂直でステップ部12を折り曲げた方向をZ軸の負とする座標系とする。以下に、同じ。 FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing the shape of the press-molded product 100 used in this embodiment. It has a substantially rectangular shape with a large width on the right side in the longitudinal direction, and has a step portion 12 having a Z-shaped cross section on the front side. The flat plate portion 11 is the XY plane, the longitudinal direction is the X axis to the right, the width direction is the Y axis in the direction away from the step portion 12, and the direction in which the step portion 12 is bent perpendicular to the flat plate portion 11 is the negative of the Z axis. Let the coordinate system be. Same below.

図3に本実施例で選択した4隅の位置を●印1、2、3、4で示す。上記実施形態に従い、4隅の内3点を拘束点とし、残り1点を変位−荷重測定点とする。たとえば、位置2および4を対角線の両端とし、位置3を成形品の外周13上の拘束点とし、位置1にZ軸上正負方向への荷重を与える。CAEによる弾性解析により、各点1、2、3、4の変位−荷重曲線を求め、図4に示す。図4では、変位を40mmまで解析した。荷重の最大値は140Nであった。図4の結果から、Z軸負の方向への変位では、2および3の位置の荷重が停滞しており、Z軸正の方向の変位では、1、2、3の位置の荷重が、停滞、下降または振動していることがわかる。 FIG. 3 shows the positions of the four corners selected in this embodiment with ● marks 1, 2, 3, and 4. According to the above embodiment, three points out of the four corners are set as restraint points, and the remaining one point is set as a displacement-load measurement point. For example, positions 2 and 4 are both ends of the diagonal line, position 3 is a constraint point on the outer circumference 13 of the molded product, and a load is applied to position 1 in the positive and negative directions on the Z axis. Displacement-load curves at points 1, 2, 3 and 4 are obtained by elastic analysis by CAE and are shown in FIG. In FIG. 4, the displacement was analyzed up to 40 mm. The maximum value of the load was 140 N. From the results of FIG. 4, the load at the positions 2 and 3 is stagnant in the displacement in the negative direction of the Z axis, and the load at the positions 1, 2 and 3 is stagnant in the displacement in the positive direction of the Z axis. It can be seen that it is descending or vibrating.

そこで、図5に示すように平板部11右側の広くなっている部分の中央より位置3に近い側に剛性付加形状としての張出形状14を設け、剛性向上対策後のプレス成形品101とした。そして、上記と同様の剛性評価を再度行った。各測定点1、2、3、4での変位−荷重曲線を求めて、図6に示す。上記と同様変位量は40mmまで解析した。荷重の最大値は140Nであった。図6から明らかなように剛性を向上させた図5の形状では、各測定点の変位−荷重曲線が単調増加となり、べこつきの発生が改善された。 Therefore, as shown in FIG. 5, an overhang shape 14 as an additional rigidity shape is provided on the side closer to the position 3 than the center of the wide portion on the right side of the flat plate portion 11, and the press-molded product 101 after the rigidity improvement measures is provided. .. Then, the same rigidity evaluation as above was performed again. The displacement-load curves at each measurement point 1, 2, 3, and 4 are obtained and shown in FIG. The displacement amount was analyzed up to 40 mm in the same manner as above. The maximum value of the load was 140 N. As is clear from FIG. 6, in the shape of FIG. 5 in which the rigidity is improved, the displacement-load curve at each measurement point increases monotonically, and the occurrence of stickiness is improved.

(実施例2)
実施例1と同様の外形形状の成形品に、剛性付加形状として、ビード15を設け、剛性向上対策後のプレス成形品101とした。ビードの設計にあたって、位置2から位置4まで直線状の第1のビード15とし、位置3から第1のビードへの垂線を垂らすように第2のビード15を設け、反対側の外形線までビードを延長した。ただし、交差するビード15が重ならないように、位置3からの第2のビード15は第1のビード15に交差する前後で分断するようにした。
(Example 2)
A bead 15 was provided as a rigidity-added shape to the molded product having the same outer shape as that of the first embodiment, and the press-molded product 101 was used as a press-molded product after measures for improving the rigidity. In designing the bead, the first bead 15 is linear from position 2 to position 4, the second bead 15 is provided so as to hang a perpendicular line from position 3 to the first bead, and the bead is provided to the outer line on the opposite side. Was extended. However, the second bead 15 from the position 3 is divided before and after crossing the first bead 15 so that the intersecting beads 15 do not overlap.

この剛性向上対策品も実施例1と同様、4隅の剛性評価結果、変位−荷重曲線が一様に増加するものとなった。 Similar to Example 1, this rigidity improvement measure product also shows that the displacement-load curve uniformly increases as a result of the rigidity evaluation at the four corners.

かくして本発明のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法は、べこつきによるパネルのねじれやゆがみを精度よく判断できるようになる。そして、本発明のプレス成形品の形状決定方法およびプレス成形品によれば、べこつきの発生を効率的に抑制することができる。本発明の技術は、形状剛性の低い平板状部品に適用して好適である。 Thus, the method for evaluating the rigidity of the press-molded product of the present invention can accurately determine the twist and distortion of the panel due to stickiness. Further, according to the method for determining the shape of the press-molded product and the press-molded product of the present invention, the occurrence of stickiness can be efficiently suppressed. The technique of the present invention is suitable for application to flat plate-shaped parts having low shape rigidity.

100 プレス成形品
101 剛性向上対策後のプレス成形品
11 平板部
12 ステップ部
13 外周
14 張出部(剛性付加形状)
15 ビード(剛性付加形状)
1、2、3、4 測定点および拘束点(支持点)
100 Press-molded product 101 Press-molded product after measures to improve rigidity 11 Flat plate part 12 Step part 13 Outer circumference 14 Overhanging part (rigidity added shape)
15 beads (additional rigidity)
1, 2, 3, 4 measurement points and restraint points (support points)

Claims (6)

プレス成形した成形品の剛性を評価する方法であって、成形品の外周の2点および該2点で分割された前記外周の一方を支持し、または、拘束し、他方の外周の1点にプレス方向の荷重を与え、変位を作用させた点の変位量と荷重の関係を用いて剛性を評価することを特徴とするプレス成形品の剛性評価方法。 A method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded molded product, in which one of the two points on the outer circumference of the molded product and the outer circumference divided by the two points is supported or restrained, and one point on the outer circumference of the other is supported. A method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded product, which comprises evaluating the rigidity by applying a load in the press direction and using the relationship between the displacement amount and the load at the point where the displacement is applied. プレス成形した成形品の剛性を評価する方法であって、CAE解析を用いて、成形品形状データの外周の2点および該2点で分割された前記外周の一方を支持し、または、拘束し、他方の外周の1点にプレス方向の荷重を与え、変位を作用させた点の変位量と荷重の関係を用いて剛性を評価することを特徴とするプレス成形品の剛性評価方法。 A method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded molded product, in which CAE analysis is used to support or restrain two points on the outer circumference of the molded product shape data and one of the outer circumferences divided by the two points. A method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded product, which comprises applying a load in the pressing direction to one point on the other outer periphery and evaluating the rigidity using the relationship between the displacement amount and the load at the point where the displacement is applied. 前記成形品または前記成形品形状データの外周の4隅のうち、対角の2隅を拘束し、他の対角の一方を支持し、または、拘束し、他の1隅に変位を与えることを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法。 Of the four corners of the outer periphery of the molded product or the molded product shape data, two diagonal corners are constrained, one of the other diagonal corners is supported or constrained, and the other corner is displaced. The method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded product according to claim 1 or 2. 前記変位量と前記荷重との関係からべこつき発生有無を判断することを特徴とする請求項1〜3のいずれか1項に記載のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法。 The method for evaluating the rigidity of a press-molded product according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the presence or absence of stickiness is determined from the relationship between the displacement amount and the load. 請求項4に記載のプレス成形品の剛性評価方法によりプレス成形品のべこつきの発生有無を判断する剛性評価工程と、剛性付加形状を付加したプレス成形品を設計する剛性向上対策工程と、を繰り返し適用し、べこつきのないプレス成形形状を決定することを特徴とするプレス成形品の形状決定方法。 The rigidity evaluation step of determining whether or not the press-molded product is sticky by the rigidity evaluation method of the press-molded product according to claim 4, and the rigidity improvement measure step of designing the press-molded product to which the added rigidity shape is added. A method for determining the shape of a press-molded product, which is repeatedly applied to determine a non-sticky press-molded shape. 請求項5に記載のプレス成形品の形状決定方法によりプレス成形形状を決定し、プレス成形されたことを特徴とするプレス成形品。
A press-molded product characterized in that the press-molded shape is determined by the method for determining the shape of the press-molded product according to claim 5, and the press-molded product is press-molded.
JP2020094503A 2020-05-29 2020-05-29 Method for evaluating rigidity of press-formed product, method for determining shape, and method for manufacturing press-formed product Active JP7264116B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020094503A JP7264116B2 (en) 2020-05-29 2020-05-29 Method for evaluating rigidity of press-formed product, method for determining shape, and method for manufacturing press-formed product

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020094503A JP7264116B2 (en) 2020-05-29 2020-05-29 Method for evaluating rigidity of press-formed product, method for determining shape, and method for manufacturing press-formed product

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2021186833A true JP2021186833A (en) 2021-12-13
JP7264116B2 JP7264116B2 (en) 2023-04-25

Family

ID=78850933

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2020094503A Active JP7264116B2 (en) 2020-05-29 2020-05-29 Method for evaluating rigidity of press-formed product, method for determining shape, and method for manufacturing press-formed product

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7264116B2 (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008247095A (en) * 2007-03-29 2008-10-16 Sumitomo Light Metal Ind Ltd Engine hood for automobile
JP2009255117A (en) * 2008-04-15 2009-11-05 Nippon Steel Corp Press-forming method excellent in shape fixability and apparatus therefor
JP2012141385A (en) * 2010-12-28 2012-07-26 Jfe Steel Corp Backlight chassis of liquid crystal display device
JP2013029332A (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-02-07 Jfe Steel Corp Tensile rigidity evaluation method for metal panel
JP2014046336A (en) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-17 Jfe Steel Corp Method for controlling springback of press molded article and analysis apparatus
WO2014069518A1 (en) * 2012-11-05 2014-05-08 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method and apparatus for measuring dynamic stretch rigidity of outer panel of automobile component
JP2017105427A (en) * 2015-12-04 2017-06-15 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Vehicular hood
WO2017149955A1 (en) * 2016-03-01 2017-09-08 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for manufacturing press molded product

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008247095A (en) * 2007-03-29 2008-10-16 Sumitomo Light Metal Ind Ltd Engine hood for automobile
JP2009255117A (en) * 2008-04-15 2009-11-05 Nippon Steel Corp Press-forming method excellent in shape fixability and apparatus therefor
JP2012141385A (en) * 2010-12-28 2012-07-26 Jfe Steel Corp Backlight chassis of liquid crystal display device
JP2013029332A (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-02-07 Jfe Steel Corp Tensile rigidity evaluation method for metal panel
JP2014046336A (en) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-17 Jfe Steel Corp Method for controlling springback of press molded article and analysis apparatus
WO2014069518A1 (en) * 2012-11-05 2014-05-08 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method and apparatus for measuring dynamic stretch rigidity of outer panel of automobile component
JP2017105427A (en) * 2015-12-04 2017-06-15 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Vehicular hood
WO2017149955A1 (en) * 2016-03-01 2017-09-08 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for manufacturing press molded product

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7264116B2 (en) 2023-04-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101692658B1 (en) Press-molding method
RU2668171C2 (en) Method of manufacturing stamped article and mold
JP2009255117A (en) Press-forming method excellent in shape fixability and apparatus therefor
JP2003157299A (en) System, method and program for aiding optimization of metal mold shape for plastic working
JP2019025533A (en) Press molded article manufacturing method
JP6202059B2 (en) Press forming method
JP6738055B2 (en) Press-molded product design method, press-molding die, press-molded product, and press-molded product manufacturing method
JP2021186833A (en) Rigidity evaluation method and shape determination method of press molding product, and press molding product
JP6784346B1 (en) Manufacturing method of pressed parts
JP6702521B1 (en) Press molding method, blank material of plate-shaped material, intermediate molded product, method of manufacturing press molded product, and press molded product
KR102174261B1 (en) Manufacturing apparatus and manufacturing method for stretch formed products
WO2019150933A1 (en) Press molding method, rigidity-improved-position specifying method, press-molding system, and press-molded product
TWI530341B (en) Compression molding method
JP7070287B2 (en) Manufacturing method of press-molded parts and press-molded parts
JP7006666B2 (en) Design method for press-molded products, manufacturing method for press-molded products and press-molded products
JP5609630B2 (en) Sheet metal distortion correction device
Tobita et al. Development of Forming Technology to Reduce Dimensional Scattering of Automotive Parts with Cambers by Using Bauschinger Effect
JP6531931B1 (en) Press forming method, rigidity improvement position specifying method and press forming system
KR102364201B1 (en) Rigidity improvement method for press-formed product, press-forming die, press-formed product, and method for producing press-formed product
WO2021241024A1 (en) Press-forming method
Sresomroeng et al. Sidewall-curl prediction in U-bending process of advanced high strength steel
WO2020144995A1 (en) Press-molding method, blank member of plate-shaped material, intermediate molded article, method for manufacturing press-molded article, and press-molded article
Özgen A Simplified Prediction Approach For Localized Unstable Springback Due To Oil Canning Effect
JP2021095013A (en) Component having shrink flange
Mohtar et al. AHSS auto stamping challenges: Rectifying springback

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20211129

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20220921

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20221004

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20221109

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20230314

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20230327

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7264116

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150