JP2013081261A

JP2013081261A - Method and apparatus for determining and managing congestion in wireless communications system

Info

Publication number: JP2013081261A
Application number: JP2013021821A
Authority: JP
Inventors: Joseph Kwak; クワクジョセフ; Angelo Cuffaro; クッファーロアンジェロ; Paul Marinier; マリニエールポール; Christopher Cave; ケイブクリストファー; Ahmed Ali; アリアハメド; Vincent Roy; ロイビンセント; Athmane Touag; トーグアスマン; Le Theta Frank; ラシータフランク; Marian Rudolf; ルドルフマリアン; Teresa Hunkeler; ハンケラーテレサ
Original assignee: Interdigital Technology Corp; インターデイジタルテクノロジーコーポレーション
Priority date: 2004-09-13
Filing date: 2013-02-06
Publication date: 2013-05-02
Anticipated expiration: 2025-09-13
Also published as: CN101390412B; JP4804470B2; TW200939703A; JP5496164B2; CN103327574A; AU2005284886B2; NO20071847L; MY150176A; AU2005284886A1; TWI514820B; WO2006031834A3; JP5575937B2; DK1792504T3; EP1792504A2; JP5832589B2; TW200618549A; CA2580311A1; CA2580311C; US20170325122A1; JP2008512975A

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a real status of congestion to an STA (wireless station) from an AP (access point).SOLUTION: The AP generates a service load index and transmits it. The service load index includes: a BE (best effort) delay field showing an indication of an average access delay about BE frames transmitted between measurement frames, unavailability of a BE service, and unavailability of the average access delay about the BE frames; a BK (background) delay field showing a similar indication of BK frames transmitted between the measurement frames; a VI (video) delay field showing a similar indication of VI frames transmitted between the measurement frames; and a VO (voice) delay field showing a similar indication of VO frames transmitted between the measurement frames. The STA receives the service load index as part of single messages from the AP.

Description

The present invention relates to the field of wireless communications. More specifically, the present invention provides means for determining and managing congestion (communication line congestion) using a carrier sense multiple access / collision avoidance scheme (CSMA / CA) mechanism, The present invention relates to a wireless local area network (WLAN) system that further enhances network management by providing novel medium access control (MAC) measurements in wireless communications.

Wireless communication systems are well known in the art. Generally, such systems include communication stations that transmit and receive wireless communication signals between each other. Depending on the system type, the communication station is typically either of the following two types: a base station or a wireless transmit / receive unit (WTRU) including a mobile unit (mobile).

As used herein, the term base station refers to a base station, Node B, site controller, access point, or other interface in a wireless environment that provides wireless access to the network with which the base station is associated. Devices are included, but not limited to the above.

As used herein, the term WTRU includes user equipment, mobile stations, fixed or mobile subscriber units, pagers, or any other type of device that can operate in a wireless environment. However, it is not limited to the above. The WTRU includes personal communication devices such as telephones, video telephones, and Internet-enabled telephones with network connections. In addition, WTRUs include personal computing devices such as PDAs and notebook computers that have wireless modems with similar network capabilities. A WTRU that is portable or otherwise mobile is called a mobile unit (mobile). In general, the base station is also a WTRU.

Typically, a base station network is provided so that each base station can perform wireless communication simultaneously with an appropriately configured WTRU group. Some WTRUs are configured to communicate wirelessly directly with each other, i.e. without being relayed through a base station in the network. This is commonly referred to as peer-to-peer wireless communication. When a WTRU is configured to communicate with other WTRU groups, the WTRU itself is configured as a base station and can function as a base station. A WTRU may be configured for use in multiple networks with both network capabilities and peer-to-peer communication capabilities.

One type of wireless system, called a wireless local area network (WLAN), is configured to communicate wirelessly with WTRUs with WLAN modems that can also perform peer-to-peer communication with WTRUs with similar provisions. Is possible. Currently, WLAN modems are incorporated into many conventional communication and computing devices by manufacturers. For example, cellular telephones (cell phones), personal digital assistants (personal digital assistants), and laptop computers (notebook computers) are built with one or more WLAN modems.

A typical local area network environment with one or more WLAN base stations, commonly referred to as access points (APs), is built according to a set of IEEE 802.11 standards. The exemplary 802.11 local area network (LAN) shown in FIG. 1 is based on an architecture in which the system is divided into cells. Each cell includes a basic service set (BSS) that includes at least one AP for communicating with one or more WTRUs commonly referred to as a station (STA) in the context of an 802.11 system. Communication between the AP and the STA is performed in accordance with the IEEE 802.11 standard that defines a wireless interface between the wireless STA and the wired network.

A wireless LAN (WLAN) can be formed by a single BSS with a single AP with a portal to the distribution system (DS). However, an installation usually consists of several cells, and AP groups are connected via a backbone (core line) called DS.

A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is also shown in FIG. MANET is a self-configuration network of mobile router groups (and related host groups) connected by wireless links, and the combination of router groups forms an arbitrary topology (connection form). Routers can move randomly and be free to organize themselves, so the wireless topology of the network can change rapidly and unpredictably. Such a network may operate stand-alone (proprietary not connected to the network) or connected to a larger Internet.

The interconnected WLANs, including the various cells, their respective APs, and DSs, are considered a single IEEE 802.11 network and are referred to as an extended service set (ESS). An IEEE 802.11 network typically exchanges information wirelessly between nodes (ie, STAs) of a WLAN network using a carrier sense multiple access / collision avoidance scheme (CSMA / CA) protocol. In the above framework, the STA groups that desire to transmit naturally compete for access to the wireless medium. The contention mechanism includes waiting for the medium to remain idle (idle) for a period of time (according to a set of rules defined by the standard) before transmitting the data packet. The time it takes for a node to access a channel and transmit its packets increases as the number of stations and data traffic (data access) increase. Congestion in such a system can occur when the time taken to gain access to the medium becomes unacceptable due to too many stations competing for the same medium. .

Due to the nature of the CSMA / CA protocol and considering that most transmissions are best effort, it is very difficult to determine when a system is classified as experiencing congestion. . Determining congestion in such a complex system is a simple task because one selected metric may indicate congestion while another metric may not indicate congestion. Absent.

Some metrics that can be used to indicate congestion include collision rate and channel uptime, i.e., how long the medium is in use. However, these metrics do not necessarily give the true situation of congestion when measured individually. For example, channel uptime metrics do not give an accurate picture of the congestion situation. A station may have only one on a channel and is always transmitting. In that case, the channel uptime metric is high. It may appear that the system is unable to support further traffic from other stations. However, if a new station accesses the channel, it may still experience good throughput thanks to the CSMA / CA mechanism. This is because the channel is then shared equally between the two stations. The system is competing for the same channel at a given time, causing significant delays because of the longer time and the greater number of collisions each station has to wait for access to the medium. In fact, when there are several stations that are experiencing, it is actually congested.

In another aspect, there are currently limited network management functions, particularly in systems compliant with the IEEE 802.11 standard and the IEEE 802.11k standard. The inventors have recognized that in the context of network management, there are some limitations to the usefulness of the currently used channel load information. There is also a need for an improved method for achieving better network management after considering the limitations of using channel load measurements. The present invention provides enhanced network management related to the IEEE 802.11 standard and the IEEE 802.11k standard in the context of channel load information.

The present invention provides a method for determining and advertising congestion in a wireless local area network (WLAN) system. The present invention also provides a method for managing congestion when congestion is detected. One embodiment of the present invention is applied to a wireless system using CSMA / CA. Preferably, several metrics are used to determine congestion, including: That is, average time of back-off procedure, basic service set (within BBS) delay rate (deferral rate), non-BSS delay rate, number of related stations, average WTRU channel operating time, and average buffer medium access control (MAC) occupation Rate. Measures taken to mitigate congestion preferably reorder the WTRU set in order of most wasted time trying to send acknowledged / unacknowledged packets, and reduce congestion Detaching each WTRU one by one until done.

The present invention also preferably provides an improved method of network management through the use of two new MAC measurements, particularly in the context of the IEEE 802.11 standard and the IEEE 802.11k standard. More specifically, the two new measurements include a STA uplink traffic load measurement and an access point (AP) service load measurement.

The present invention includes consideration of a transmission queue size management information base (MIB) indication that provides a new measurement of STA transmission load with respect to traffic requests queued in an unsupported queue. The present invention further includes consideration of the MIB indication of the AP service load that provides a new measurement of the AP service load used to assist the STA in making handoff decisions. Implementation of the above features is possible as software or in any other convenient form. The above aspects of the invention are generally applicable to Layer 1 and Layer 2 applied to IEEE 802.11k compliant systems in the context of, for example, Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) systems and Code Division Multiple Access 2000 (CDMA2000) systems. It is. However, the present invention also has general applicability to other scenarios.

The present invention is advantageously implemented in various forms of selectively configured WTRUs.

A more detailed understanding of the present invention can be obtained from the following description of preferred embodiments, given by way of example and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a conventional IEEE 802.11 WLAN with corresponding components. FIG. 2-9 are flow diagrams illustrating the techniques of the present invention for determining and managing congestion in a wireless communication system. More particularly, FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for determining congestion using a delay rate (DR) metric and a packet error rate (PER) metric. FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for decoupling a WTRU based on measuring time wasted trying to send / retransmit an unacknowledged packet. FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for managing load shedding by comparing the load of a node with the advertised load of neighboring nodes. FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for indicating a load advertised to a WTRU group based on an average delay from the time when a packet reaches the head of a queue to the time of packet transmission. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a method for indicating a transmission queue size (TQS) to neighboring nodes. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a method for indicating a contention-free transmission queue size (CFTQS) to neighboring nodes. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method for indicating a contention transmission queue size (CTQS) to neighboring nodes. A method used by a node to manage a channel based on an assessment of supported and unsupported traffic loads from the WTRUs and to provide a service load scalar for advertising to the WTRUs. It is a flowchart shown. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a method used by a WTRU group to select a node based on a load scalar provided by a neighbor node group. FIG. 4 shows a BSS load element format according to the present invention. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an access category service load element format according to the present invention. 1 is a diagram illustrating a communication station configured in accordance with the present invention.

Although the features and elements of the invention are described in specific combinations in the preferred embodiments, each feature or element is independent of each other (without the other features and other elements of the preferred embodiments). Can be used in various combinations, with or without other features of the invention and other elements.

One aspect of the present invention introduces the following two different approaches for measuring channel congestion load metrics: That is, first, a basic service set (BSS) based load metric based primarily on the load of individual APs. Second, a channel-based load metric, which is a metric indicating the load shared between the various APs.

A BSS-based load metric is a metric that determines high load conditions and high channel congestion. Two preferred BSS-based load metrics are an intra-BSS delay rate metric and a packet error rate metric.

The delay rate (DR) is such that the AP has one or more packets to be transmitted (ie, the AP queue is not empty), but the AP receiver is carrier-locked ( That is, a measurement that represents a percentage of time (clear channel assessment (CCA) indicates a busy condition). That is, DR represents the amount of time that the AP spends deferring transmission to other WLAN nodes.

Intra-BSS delay rate means that the AP has one or more packets to be transmitted while the AP's receiver has intra-BSS packets (ie, packets originating from one of the WTRUs associated with the BSS). Represents the percentage of time that the carrier is locked. That is, the intra-BSS DR spends the AP deferring its own transmission because one of the WTRUs associated with the AP dominates the medium (ie, is sending packets). Represents the amount of time.

Intra-BSS deferral rate indicates the current load level the system is experiencing and was spent in deferring transmission when it needs to be transmitted to another node within the same BSS By measuring time. A low intra-BSS deferral metric indicates that the load for that BSS is low. A high BSS delay rate indicates that there are a large number of nodes transmitting at the same time, and therefore a substantial load.

In the case where there are only two nodes in the system with a significant amount of data to be transmitted, the delay rate can be high, indicating congestion when used alone. However, since there are only two nodes in the system, this is not considered a congestion situation. To address the above situation, the present invention uses a packet error rate (PER) in addition to the delay rate metric.

Packet error rate (PER) is the ratio of the number of failed transmissions (ie, packet transmissions for which no ACK was received) to the total number of packets transmitted. The PER metric is a good indication of the collision rate in the system when a modest data transmission rate is used. The greater the number of nodes in the system, the higher the probability of collision. Using both the intra-BSS delay rate metric and the PER metric together provides a better indication of the AP load than either metric is used individually.

In the present invention, as shown in FIG. 2, in-step B1 delay metric and PER metric are measured in steps S1 and S3, respectively, and then in steps S2 and S4, respectively, a predefined period (eg, , 30 seconds). The average of both metrics is used in step S5 and step S6 to signal that congestion has occurred. More specifically, over a given time period (eg, 30 seconds), the intra-BSS delay rate (DR) metric exceeds a first predefined threshold as determined in step S5, and the PER metric If the determination in S6 exceeds the second predefined threshold, this is an indication of congestion.

Regardless of whether congestion is detected based on the criteria described above or using other techniques for determining congestion, the present invention provides the following actions. That is, first, in step S7, the AP reorders all WTRUs in the basic service set (BSS) in the order of the amount of time spent trying to retransmit. The wasted time is preferably calculated according to the wasted time algorithm ALG _wt described below. More specifically, a set or list of WTRUs with unacknowledged packets is created. For each unacknowledged packet to the WTRU, the sum of all wasted time trying to send and retransmit the packet (ie, the penalty for each packet retransmitted to packet size / packet transmission rate) Is added). The penalty reflects the increasing delay associated with retransmission, ie, the backoff (transmission delay after a collision occurs on the network) time due to doubling the congestion window (CW). The penalty represents the additional delay incurred from the time when the packet is ready for transmission until the time when the packet is actually transmitted over the medium. Thus, these retransmission time metrics are very large for stations that waste time in retransmitting packets after a collision. The retransmission time metric is normalized over the selected period.

An exemplary equation for determining wasted time for a WTRU is given by That is,

However,
wated_time _WTRU = Total wasted time spent trying to send unacknowledged packets to WTRU and retransmitting
j = jth packet
i = i-th transmission of _j -th packet #_pkts _j = # of transmission of j-th packet, e.g. 1, 2, 3, ... Pkt_size _ij = i-th transmission of j-th packet Size in bit units of transmission Pkt_tx_rate _ij = transmission rate RTx _{i> 1} = 2 ^i-2 in bps unit of i-th transmission of j-th packet, where i> 1, otherwise 0 Penalty = CW _min ^* slot time, eg CW _min = 32 and slot time = 20 microseconds Note: CW is the first transmission, 2 × CW _min #_pkts _j is the confirmation of the given packet Note that this matches the number of unanswered transmissions. If the packet is finally successfully transmitted, #_pkts _j exactly matches the number of retransmissions. If the packet is dropped (ie never sent successfully), #_pkts _j matches (number of retransmissions + 1).

An example of a wated_txtime _STA is given below. That is,
Suppose an AP has 20 packets to send to a particular STA. During multiple transmissions, the AP monitors and records whether the packet has been successfully acknowledged and the number of packet retransmissions, eg, as follows:
GGGGGBBB ↓ BBB ↓ GGGGGG ↑ GGGGGG ↑ BBB ↓ GGGG
However,
↑ = Rate increase ↓ = Rate decrease G = Acknowledgement, ie “good” frame B = No acknowledgment, ie “bad” frame The first B is the 6th packet , There were 6 transmissions of that sixth packet, ie BBB ↓ BBB.
#_pkts ₆ = 6
Pkt_size _i6 = 12000 bits
Pkt_tx_rate _i6 = {11.0, 11.0, 11.0, 5.5, 5.5, 5.5} Mbps
RTx _{i> 1} ^* Penalty = {0.0, 640.0, 1280.0, 2560.0, 5120.0, 10240.0} μs
The seventh B is the 17th packet, and there were three transmissions of the 17th packet, that is, ↑ BBB ↓.
#_pkts ₁₇ = 3
Pkt_size _i17 = 8000 bits
Pkt_tx_rate _i17 = {11.0, 11.0, 11.0} Mbps
RTx _{i> 1} ^* Penalty = {0.0, 640.0, 1280.0} μs
Therefore,
wasted_txtime _STA = (12000 / 11e6) + (12000 / 11e6 + 640.0) + (12000 / 11e6 + 1280.0) + (12000 / 5.5e6 + 2560.0) + (12000 / 5.5e6 + 5120.0) + (12000 / 5.5e6 + 10240.0 ) + (8000 / 11e6) + (8000 / 11e6 + 640.0) + (8000 / 11e6 + 1280.0) = 33.76 ms

Preferably, the WTRU is reordered from maximum time to minimum time in steps S7-S4. Next, the program proceeds to step S8. In step S8 (FIG. 2), each STA from the rearranged list is separated from the longer time until congestion is alleviated.

The present invention also allows the use of other metrics including: That is, the BSS-based load metric, the number of associated WTRUs, and the access point (AP) receives all ACKs (acknowledgments) (eg, fragmentation) related to that packet in medium access control (MAC). Time, and average buffer MAC occupancy (based on buffer size).

The present invention further provides a method that takes into account the load of neighboring APs when assessing the need for a system that performs either load shedding (ie, decoupling) or load balancing. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, if the load on each AP of the neighboring AP group that is collected in step S9 and step S10 and compared with the neighboring AP group in step S11 and step S12 is also high, the user may Since the possibility of receiving a service is low, that is, L1, L2, and L3 are all high (step S13), load shedding is delayed (step S14). The load cut-off is performed in step S16 when L1 or L2 has a load lower than a load that is advertised (periodically delivering the latest information necessary for network management) (step S15B). If the L3 load is less than L1 and L2, the AP can accept the WTRU as shown in step S15A and step S17.

The access point (AP) advertises the load to multiple stations (WTRUs) of the AP, for example, comparing the AP load against neighboring APs, ie AP (x) and AP (y). Can do. If the AP load is high compared to the estimated load of the AP's neighboring APs, the AP advertises the high load in response to the determination in step S15A (FIG. 3). If the AP load is low compared to the estimated load in the vicinity of the AP, the AP advertises the low load in response to the determination in step S15B.

Another method of the present invention is to use a metric that measures the media (eg, channel) load. That metric allows the WTRU to select the least loaded AP. A BSS with an intra-BSS channel load can simply be left to the neighboring BSS, so the intra-BSS channel load is not effective, as is the case when the AP load is low, but the medium load is high. In the case, a media load metric is used. In that case, the advertised load shall represent the media load. In that case, the AP advertises only a low load if it can support the new WTRU.

The metric that gives an indication of the media load is the average time (Avg D) required to perform a backoff procedure determined in a manner as shown in FIG. 4 for downlink transmission at the AP. More specifically, this metric is measured in steps S18-S23, and AvgD is advertised to the WTRU group in step S24 to initiate the packet transmission ready (ie, CSMA / CA access contention). ) To the medium access delay incurred by the packet from the start of transmission over the medium.

The size of the contention window affects the time required to perform the backoff procedure. The contention window size is increased whenever an acknowledgment is not received from the receiving node. This aspect covers cases where a collision occurs between nodes of the same BSS or between nodes of different BSSs. During the countdown of the backoff procedure, the countdown is paused whenever the media is sensed to be in use, thereby increasing the time of the backoff procedure. This further aspect covers the case where the medium is heavily loaded due to its own BSS WTRUs and / or neighboring BSS WTRUs. This metric alone provides a good indication of the congestion perceived by that node in the BSS. It is also possible to consider simply using the time that the medium is in use (channel uptime) as a metric. However, in embodiments where only one WTRU is associated with an access point (AP) and is sending or receiving large amounts of data, the channel uptime metric does not give a good indication of congestion. Channel uptime actually indicates high congestion when the system supports only one user. A second user (WTRU) added to the AP can be easily supported. In the single user example, the new proposed Avg. The D metric (ie, the average time to perform the backoff procedure) correctly indicates low congestion.

The AvgD metric is a preferred measure because if the long time indicates a heavily loaded medium, the short time required for the backoff procedure indicates a lightly loaded medium. As an example, consider the current IEEE 802.11b standard. The minimum value of the contention frame (CW) is 32 × 20 microseconds = 640 microseconds, and the maximum value is 1023 × 20 microseconds = 20.5 milliseconds. However, the time required to perform the backoff can be greater than the maximum size of the CW caused by a countdown pause due to sensing the medium in use. This increase in time gives an indication of the load due to media activity.

Reasons for using MAC load measurements in the context of the present invention include: That is, the MAC layer has a lot of information that is not currently available via the Management Information Base (MIB) or via measurements in the IEEE 802.11 standard and the IEEE 802.11k standard.
New information items provided by the present invention that are useful for higher layers can be provided within the 802.11k range, but are not currently available.
IEEE 802.11e has identified channel uptime (CU) as a useful load information item.

The present invention also recognizes the need for WTRU uplink load information and AP service load information. Some of the limitations of CU information include: That is,
Load information is useful for handoff decisions at WTRUs and APs.
CU information of potential target APs helps WTRUs in evaluating handoff options.
CU is the sum of the uplink-ready load (from all WTRUs to AP) and the downlink-ready load (from APs to all WTRUs), also known as channel uptime.
The traffic load, however, consists of the following two parts: a supported traffic load and an unsupported (queued) traffic load.
• The CU does not currently provide traffic load information that is queued dynamically.

The network has no current way to access unsupported uplink traffic requests (queued traffic load).

Advantages of WTRU uplink traffic load measurements (UTLM) in network management include: That is,
• High channel load indicates handled traffic close to the maximum value.
This is optimal channel management when the unsupported traffic demand is low.
• If unsupported traffic demand is high, this is not optimal.
Unsupported uplink traffic requests are very helpful to allow the AP to better divide the frame time uplink and downlink segments.
APs need to manage channels for maximum traffic uptime and minimum traffic block.
-The queued uplink traffic in the WTRUs indicates transmission delay and potential channel blocks.
• The amount of data queued in the MAC transmit buffer provides a good measure of the queued uplink load.

The present invention provides a new MAC management information base (MAC MIB) element for transmission traffic load, ie transmission queue size (TQS). The transmission queue size (TQS) is defined as follows. That is, the new MIB information includes the following three items. That is, the total transmission queue size (total TQS), which is the total of the transmission queue size without contention (CFTQS) and the contention transmission queue size (CFTQS).

TQS contains the current MAC queue size in bytes. The TQS can be included in the MAC MIB 802.11 Counters table. The Dot11Counters table is a data structure defined in the standard. The TQS information can be implemented by a counter as shown in FIG. 5, and the WTRU initializes the TQS counter to 0 at system startup in step S25. The WTRU receives the frame at step S26 and queues the frame in the MAC layer at step S27. In step S28, the WTRU increments the TQS counter by the number of bytes in the queued frame. Alternatively, the accumulation can be incremented by replacing PC (current count) with PC + 1 as the count is stored in memory and each byte of the frame is queued, for example. Software technology can be used.

When a session is initiated, the WTRU transmits a frame using the physical (PHY) layer in step S29, and if operating in an unacknowledged mode, or after PHY transmission, If an acknowledgment is made, in step S30, the TQS counter is decremented by the number of bytes transmitted. The WTRU communicates the TQS count to the neighboring AP group in step S31. TQS is a new MIB element. All MIB elements are sent to neighbors as needed via MIB queries that are performed to obtain elements from neighboring MIBs.

The contention transmission queue size (CTQS) is implemented, for example, as shown in FIG. 6, and the WTRU initializes the CTQS counter to 0 at system startup in step S32. The MAC layer of the WTRU receives the contention frame at step S33 and places the frame into the contention queue of the MAC layer at step S34. In step S35, the CTQS counter is incremented by the number of bytes of the received frame.

The WTRU uses the PHY layer to send the frame (eg, to the AP) if it is operating in a mode without acknowledgment in step S36, or if the frame is acknowledged after PHY transmission. Transmit, and in step S37, decrement the CTQS counter by the number of bytes transmitted if the frame is acknowledged in a mode with no acknowledgment or after PHY layer transmission. In step S38, the WTRU communicates the CTQS count to the neighboring AP group.

A contention-free transmit queue size (CFTQS) is implemented by providing a CFTQS counter, as shown in FIG. 7, and the WTRU initializes the CFTQS counter to 0 at system startup in step S39.

In step S40, the WTRU MAC layer receives a non-contention frame and places the frame in a non-contention queue (CFQ) in step S41. In step S42, the WTRU increments CFTQS by the number of bytes in the queued frame.

In step S43, the WTRU uses the PHY layer to transmit a non-conflicting frame, and in step S44 when the frame is acknowledged in a no acknowledge mode or after PHY layer transmission. Decrement the CFTQS counter by the number of bytes transmitted in the frame. In step S45, the WTRU communicates the count to the neighboring AP group.

FIG. 8 illustrates one way in which an AP utilizes MAC MIB information, for example, in steps S46, S47, and S48, respectively, for example, WTRU (x), WTRU (y), and From the WTRU (z), receive MAC MIB information including one or more of a TSQ count, a CTQS count, and a CFTQS count. This data representing unsupported traffic is combined with supported traffic data, such as channel load including both uplink and downlink loads, evaluated by the AP in step S49, and in step S50, for example, traffic By adjusting the traffic to maximize uptime and minimize traffic blocks, the channel is managed using supported and unsupported load data. The AP can adjust the uplink and downlink segments of the frame based on unsupported uplink traffic data to optimize channel uptime.

Considerations for providing AP service load measurements in the context of the present invention include the following. That is,
The WTRU group can consider multiple APs as a target AP group for handoff. If the two APs have similar channel loading and acceptable signal quality, the WTRU needs the ability to be able to determine which is the better AP. By allowing the APs to advertise information regarding the ability of the APs to serve the existing WTRU set and the ability to serve additional WTRUs, channel uptime can be optimized. . This information is similar to downlink traffic queue measurements for APs that have been modified by AP-specific information for expected capacity.

The following addresses the AP service load. That is,
A new MAC MIB information item is provided to assist the WTRU in WTRU handoff determination.

255 values from “currently not serving any WTRU” to “cannot handle any new services”, with a defined center point indicating that the supported load is optimal Quantitative display of scale (e.g. expressed in 8 binary bits).
For example, it is as follows. That is,
0 == no service to any WTRU (idle AP or WTRU is not an AP)
1 to 254 == scalar display of AP service load 255 == cannot accept new service at all The exact specification of this MIB item is processor dependent and does not have to be specified strictly, The detailed definition for obtaining uptime can be tailored to the characteristics of a particular network.

The new AP service load can be included in the MAC dot11Counters table or elsewhere in the MIB.

WTRUs with multiple APs that can be selected as target APs are shown in step S51, step S52, and step S53, respectively, in addition to channel load and acceptable signal quality considerations, as shown in FIG. , AP (x), AP (y), and AP (z) can receive load advertisements. In step S54, the received AP advertises (updates the latest information necessary for network management periodically. Can be determined based on a comparison of the advertised load advertised by the received AP, and in step S55, the AP can be select.

The AP service load (SL) is a scalar value, for example, based on supported and unsupported traffic, as well as, for example, signal quality based on statistical data, and expected capacity, etc. It can be based on other data. The AP SL scalar can be created as shown in step S50A of FIG. 8 and advertised to neighboring WTRUs as shown in step S50B.

The methods described above are preferably implemented in selectively configured WTRUs. For example, a WTRU may be configured to assist channel management in a wireless network by providing a memory device, a processor, and a transmitter. The memory device is preferably configured to provide a queue of data frames for the medium access control (MAC) layer of the WTRU. The processor is preferably configured to calculate queue size data representing traffic requests placed in an unsupported queue at each WTRU. The transmitter is preferably configured to communicate queue size data to an access point (AP) of the wireless network, whereby the receiving AP uses the queue size data to assist in channel management. In particular, the processor initializes a count representing the size of the queued data to zero at system startup, and when a frame is queued by the WTRU's medium access control (MAC) layer, the number of bytes in the frame is Configured to increment the counter. Preferably, the processor is configured to decrement the count by the number of bytes in the frame when the frame is transmitted by the WTRU physical (PHY) layer in an unacknowledged mode.
Alternatively, the processor decrements the count by the number of bytes in the frame when the frame is transmitted by the WTRU physical (PHY) layer when the frame is acknowledged after the PHY transmission. It can be configured as follows.

Within such a WTRU, the memory is preferably configured with a medium access control (MAC) layer contention queue and a contention-free queue, where the processor can queue traffic that is unsupported for the contention queue. Conflict transmit queue size (CTQS) data representing requests, non-contention transmit queue size (QFTQS) data representing queued traffic requests for non-contention queues, and all of the medium access control (MAC) layer Is configured to calculate total transmission queue size (TQS) data representing traffic requests queued in an unsupported queue for the first transmission data queue.

Also, such a WTRU preferably has a receiver configured to receive from the AP group a service load indicator created by the AP group based on queue size data received from the WTRU group, and received Also included is a controller configured to select an AP for wireless communication based on the load indicator.

An access point (AP) configured to provide channel management in a wireless network to both an access point (AP) group and a wireless transmit / receive unit (WTRU) that can wirelessly communicate with the AP group via a wireless channel. ) Can be provided. The receiver is configured to receive unsupported traffic request data received from WTRUs located within the AP's wireless service range. The AP preferably has a processor configured to calculate a service load indicator based on unsupported traffic request data received from the WTRUs. A transmitter configured to advertise a service load indicator is included in the WTRUs within the AP radio service range, and the WTRUs located within the AP radio service range of the AP use the advertised service load indicator. This can be used to select the AP of the other party that performs wireless communication. In such an AP, the receiver is preferably configured to receive an advertised service load indication from another AP group, and the processor is preferably advertised received from the other AP group. The service load index is used to assist in making decisions regarding detaching the associated WTRU group in operation from communication with the AP.

In another embodiment, a wireless transmit / receive unit (WTRU) is configured to manage congestion in a wireless communication system defined by a basic service set (BSS). The WTRU has a processor configured to calculate a delay rate (DR) within a basic service set (BSS) and average the DR over a given time interval. Preferably, the processor is also configured to calculate a packet error rate (PER) and average the PER over the time interval. A memory is configured to store a comparison value that reflects a wasted time spent attempting to transmit data for each WTRU in the WTRU group associated with the WTRU in the BSS. If the average DR and the average PER are greater than a given threshold, start with a WTRU with a stored comparison value that reflects the maximum time spent trying to transmit data, Above, a transceiver (radio telephone) configured to decouple associated WTRUs is included.

Within such a WTRU, the processor is preferably configured to average DR and PER over a time interval on the order of 30 seconds, and the transceiver will operatively transmit data for each WTRU associated with the WTRU. And periodically receiving comparison values reflecting the wasted time spent and updating the memory with those comparison values.

Within such a WTRU, the processor also measures the time it takes for the WTRU to receive a successful acknowledgment (ACK) or negative acknowledgment (NACK) in response to the transmitted data packet. It can also be configured to calculate a comparative wasted time value by summing the measured times during the beacon period and normalizing the sum by the beacon period. In that case, the transceiver is preferably configured to periodically send up-to-date comparison values reflecting the wasted time spent trying to send data to other WTRUs.

The access point AP also provides the WTRU with a selectively configured component for the wireless transceiver station (WTRU) to select the partner access point AP with which to perform wireless communication in the wireless communication system, It can be configured to assist. Preferably, the receiver is configured to receive advertised load metrics for other AP groups. A processor configured to compare the communication load of the AP with received advertised load metrics from other AP groups and calculate an adjusted load of the AP based on the comparison is included. The transmitter is configured to advertise the adjusted AP load to the WTRUs. Preferably, the processor is configured such that the transmitter periodically performs the comparing operation and the calculating operation in order to update a load advertised to the WTRU group.

Within such an AP, if the processor determines that the communication load of the AP is low compared to the advertised load of other AP groups, the transmitter advertises the low load and the communication load of the AP is reduced. If the processor determines that it is higher than the advertised load of other AP groups, it can be configured to advertise a higher load. The processor also measures the delay from when the data packet is ready to be transmitted to when the packet is actually transmitted to the WTRU, and averages the delay over a given period of time. It can also be configured to calculate the communication load of the AP by indicating the load using.

In another embodiment, the base station is configured to decouple the WTRUs from the operational association with the base station when a congestion condition is detected in the wireless network. The base station calculates, for each associated WTRU, the wasted time (Tw) spent attempting to send / retransmit unacknowledged packets and gives the wasted time Tw for each associated WTRU. Having a processor configured to normalize over a period of time. A memory configured to store a list of associated WTRU groups and the normalized wasted time for each of those WTRUs is provided. The transceiver is configured to decouple the WTRUs and mitigate the congestion based on each normalized WTRU's time spent, with the WTRU having the largest Tw being decoupled first. Preferably, the processor adds a penalty to the Tw that represents an increased delay associated with retransmissions, such as by being configured to calculate the wasted transmission time (Tw) of the WTRUs according to the equations described above. Configured as follows.

IEEE 802.11e supports several access categories (access types) such as, for example, voice traffic, video traffic, best effort traffic, and background traffic. In one embodiment, the present invention preferably utilizes AP service load per access category. The BSS load element includes information regarding the current station population, traffic level, and service level in the BSS.
FIG. 10 shows an example of an element information field according to the present invention.

The Length field is set to the number of octets (8 bits) in the subsequent field. The station count field is interpreted as an unsigned integer indicating the total number of STAs currently associated with that BSS. The station count field is purely by way of example and shall not be present in a beacon frame or a probe response frame if all of dot11QoOptionImplemented, dot11QBSSLoadImplemented, and dot11RadioMeasurementEnabled are true.

The channel utilization field is defined as the percentage of time that the AP senses that the medium is in use, as indicated by a physical or virtual carrier sensing mechanism. This percentage is expressed as a moving average of ((channel total uptime / (dot11ChannelUtilizationBeaconIntervals ^* dot11BeaconPeriod ^* 1024)) ^* 255), where the total channel uptime is the number of microseconds that the carrier sense mechanism indicated the channel busy indication. Defined as the number of seconds, dot11ChannelUtilizationBeaconIntervals represents the number of consecutive beacon intervals for which the average is to be calculated. The channel utilization field shall not be present in the beacon frame or probe response frame if dot11QoOptionImplemented, dot11QBSLLoadImplemented, and dot11RadioMeasurementEnabled are all true.

The AP service load is assumed to be a scalar display of the relative level of service load at the AP. A low value shall indicate more available service capacity than a higher value. A value of 0 indicates that the AP is not currently providing service to any STA. The value from 0 to 254 is the average medium access for DCF transmission packets measured from the time when the DCF packet is ready for transmission (ie, starting CSMA / CA access) to the actual packet transmission start time. It is assumed that the display is expressed in a logarithmic scale of the delay. A value of 1 shall represent a delay of 50 microseconds, whereas a value of 253 represents a delay of 5.5 milliseconds or any delay greater than 5.5 milliseconds. To do. A value of 254 shall indicate that no further AP service capacity is available. A value of 255 shall indicate that the AP service load is not available. The AP shall measure and average the media access delay for all transmitted packets using a DCF access mechanism over a predetermined grace period, such as a 30 second measurement window. The accuracy with respect to average media access delay shall be within +/− 200 microseconds when averaged over at least 200 packets.

Access category (AC) service load elements can only be provided in a BSS Load in a Quality of Service (QoS) Enhanced AP (QAP) group. The AC service load is a scalar display of average access delay (AAD) in QAP for services in the indicated access category. A low value shall indicate a shorter access delay than a higher value. A value of 0 shall indicate that the QAP is not currently providing the indicated AC service. Values from 0 to 254 are measured from the time when preparation for transmission of the EDCF packet is completed (that is, when the CSMA / CA access is started) to the time when actual packet transmission is started, and the value for the transmission packet transmission packet of the instruction AC It is assumed that the display is expressed in a logarithmic scale of the average medium access delay. A value of 1 represents a 50 microsecond delay, whereas a value of 253 represents a 5.5 millisecond delay or any delay greater than 5.5 milliseconds. . A value of 254 shall indicate that the service in the indication AC is currently blocked or suspended. A value of 255 shall indicate that the AC service load is not available.

The QAP shall measure and average the media access delay for all transmitted packets of the indicated AC using a EDCF access mechanism over a predetermined grace period, such as a continuous 30 second measurement window. The accuracy for average media access delay is within +/− 200 microseconds when averaged over at least 200 packets. The AC service load is preferably shown in FIG. 11 as a two-octet sub-element where the first octet contains an AC indication (ACI) and the second octet contains the measured value of the AAD for the indication AC. Formatted as follows. It should be noted that the octets shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 are given by way of example only, and any other octet can be utilized. Table 1 shows an example of ACI encoding.

Referring now to FIG. 12, a communication station 100 configured in accordance with the present invention is illustrated. Note that the communication station 100 can be an access point (AP), a WTRU, or any other type of device that can operate in a wireless environment. The communication station 100 preferably includes a receiver 102 configured to receive unsupported traffic request data from a group of WTRUs located within the radio service range 108 of the communication station 100. The communication station 100 also includes a processor 104. The processor 104 is preferably coupled to the receiver 102 and configured to calculate a BSS load element for each of a plurality of access categories. The communication station 100 also includes a transmitter 106. The transmitter 106 is preferably configured to advertise BSS load elements within the service range 108 of the communication station 100. In that case, the BSS load element may be received by other communication stations (e.g., access points and / or WTRUs) within the service area 108 of the communication station 100 to provide information related to the BSS to those stations. It is possible to provide.

(Embodiment 1)
Network uptime by both an access point (AP) group and a WTRU group (wireless transceiver unit) that can wirelessly communicate with each other over a wireless channel, including creating a service load indicator by the first AP for each access category A method for providing channel management in a wireless network to optimize performance.

(Embodiment 2)
2. The method of embodiment 1 further comprising advertising a service load indicator to WTRUs within the service range of the first AP.

(Embodiment 3)
The method of any preceding embodiment further comprising selecting an AP by the WTRU based on the service load indicator.

(Embodiment 4)
The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the service load indicator is an indication of average access delay at the first AP.

(Embodiment 5)
Embodiment 5. The method of embodiment 4 wherein the average access delay is measured within a predetermined validity period.

(Embodiment 6)
Embodiment 6. The method of embodiment 5 wherein the period is 30 seconds.

(Embodiment 7)
The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the access category includes voice traffic, video traffic, best effort traffic, and / or background traffic.

(Embodiment 8)
The method of any preceding embodiment, further comprising receiving an advertised service load indicator from the second AP.

(Embodiment 9)
9. The method of embodiment 8 further comprising using the advertised service load indicator in determining WTRU group detachment by the second AP.

(Embodiment 10)
Embodiment wherein the second AP decouples the WTRU group from the second AP if the service load index from the first AP is lower than the service load index measured by the second AP. The method of any one of embodiments 8-9.

(Embodiment 11)
An access point (AP) configured to provide channel management according to the method of any of the preceding embodiments.

Embodiment 12
12. The AP of embodiment 11 comprising a processor configured to calculate a service load indicator for each access category.

(Embodiment 13)
The AP of any of the preceding embodiments, comprising a transmitter configured to advertise a service load indicator to WTRUs within an AP wireless service range.

(Embodiment 14)
The AP of any of the above embodiments, wherein a WTRU group located within the AP wireless service range of the AP is used to select a partner AP to perform wireless communication using the advertised service load index .

(Embodiment 15)
The AP of any of the preceding embodiments comprising a receiver configured to receive an advertised service load indicator from another AP group.

(Embodiment 16)
The AP of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the processor is configured to help make a decision regarding detaching the WTRU group from the AP using the advertised service load indication received from the other AP group.

(Embodiment 17)
A wireless transmit / receive unit (WTRU) configured to provide channel management in a wireless network according to the method of any of the above embodiments.

(Embodiment 18)
[0069] 18. The WTRU of embodiment 17 comprising a receiver for receiving service load indications for each access category from the AP.

(Embodiment 19)
[0072] 19. The WTRU as in any one of embodiments 17-18, comprising a processor configured to utilize a service load indicator when selecting an AP with which to communicate wirelessly.

(Embodiment 20)
To optimize network uptime by a group of communication stations capable of wirelessly communicating with each other over a wireless channel, including a first communication station that provides a basic service set (BSS) load element for each of a plurality of access categories A method for providing channel management in a wireless network.

(Embodiment 21)
21. The method of embodiment 20 further comprising advertising the BSS load element to other communication stations within the service range of the first communication station.

(Embodiment 22)
22. The method of any of embodiments 20-21, further comprising at least one communication station that selects another communication station with which to communicate based on the BSS load element.

(Embodiment 23)
23. The method of any of embodiments 20-22, wherein the BSS load element includes an element identification field.

(Embodiment 24)
The BSS load element includes a communication station field, an AP field, or a WTRU service load field, and the communication station field, the AP field, or the WTRU service load field is a relative level of service load at the first communication station. Embodiment 24. The method of any of embodiments 20-23, wherein the method is a scalar display.

(Embodiment 25)
25. The method of any of embodiments 20-24, wherein the BSS load element includes a length field, wherein a value is set to a total number of octets included in all fields of the BSS load element.

(Embodiment 26)
26. The implementation as in any of the embodiments 20-25, wherein the BSS load element further includes a station count field, the station count field being an unsigned integer indicating the total number of communication stations associated with the current BSS. Form method.

(Embodiment 27)
27. The method of any of embodiments 20-26, wherein the first communication station is a quality of service (QoS) enhanced communication station (QCS) or a quality of service (QoS) enhanced AP (QAP).

(Embodiment 28)
Access formatted as four subfields, one by one, to provide a scalar indication of average access delay (AAD) in QCS or QAP for services of one access category in the access category 28. The method of embodiment 27 further comprising a category (AC) service load field.

(Embodiment 29)
29. The method of embodiment 28, wherein the AC service load field is included in the BSS load element only if the QoS-Option-Implemented parameter is true.

Embodiment 30
The four subfields include an AAD (AADBE) field for best effort, an AAD (AADBG) field for background, an AAD (AADVI) field for video, and / or an AAD (AADVO) field for audio,
Embodiment 30. The method of any of embodiments 28-29.

Embodiment 31
31. The method of any of embodiments 28-30, wherein a low AAD value indicates a shorter access delay than a higher AAD value.

(Embodiment 32)
When the QCS or QAP does not provide a service related to the indicated access category, the AAD value related to the first subfield of the four subfields is set in the right subfield adjacent to the first subfield. 32. The method of any of embodiments 28-31, further comprising setting to an AAD value.

Embodiment 33
The method of any preceding embodiment further comprising measuring and / or averaging the media access delay (MAD) values for all transmitted packets of the indicated access category.

(Embodiment 34)
The MAD values are measured and / or averaged using an EDCF access mechanism over a continuous grace period, and the averaged MAD has a predetermined accuracy range and a minimum number of transmitted packet delay measurements. Embodiment 34. The method of embodiment 33 based on values.

(Embodiment 35)
35. The method of embodiment 34, wherein the grace time is a 30 second measurement window, the predetermined accuracy range is 200 microseconds, and / or the MAD average is based on at least 200 transmitted packet delay measurements.

Embodiment 36
When an AAD value within a predetermined value in one of the four subfields is ready for transmission of an EDCF packet for the transmitted packet in the indicated access category, the EDCF packet is actually 36. The method of any of embodiments 28-35, wherein the method is a representation on a logarithmic scale of the average MAD measured until transmitted to.

(Embodiment 37)
37. The method of embodiment 36, wherein the range of values is from 0 to 254.

(Embodiment 38)
The predetermined AAD value in any of the above four subfields indicates that the QCS or QAP is not serving the indicated access category or any of the higher priority access categories. The method of any of embodiments 28-37, as shown.

(Embodiment 39)
40. The method of embodiment 39, wherein the predetermined AAD value is zero.

(Embodiment 40)
40. The method of any of embodiments 28-39, wherein other predetermined AAD values represent various average MAD times.

Embodiment 41
41. The method of any of embodiments 28-40, wherein an AAD value of 1 represents an average MAD of 50 microseconds.

(Embodiment 42)
42. The method of any of embodiments 28-41, wherein an AAD value of 253 represents an average MAD of 5.5 microseconds or greater.

(Embodiment 43)
43. The method of any of embodiments 28-42, wherein an AAD value of 254 indicates that the services in the indicated access category are currently blocked.

(Embodiment 44)
43. The method of any of embodiments 28-42, wherein an AAD value of 255 indicates that an AC service load is not available.

(Embodiment 45)
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein the BSS load element further comprises a channel utilization field.

(Embodiment 46)
46. The method of embodiment 45, wherein the channel utilization field defines a percentage of time that the first communication station sensed that the transmission medium is in use, as indicated by the carrier sense mechanism.

(Embodiment 47)
47. The method of embodiment 46, wherein the percentage of time is a moving average.

Embodiment 48
48. The method of embodiment 47, wherein the moving average is determined using at least one parameter selected from the group consisting of a channel total uptime parameter, a channel uptime beacon interval parameter, and / or a beacon period parameter.

(Embodiment 49)
48. The embodiment of any of embodiments 47-48, wherein the moving average is defined as the product of the channel total operating time parameter and 255 divided by the product of the channel operating time beacon interval parameter and the beacon period and 1024. Method.

(Embodiment 50)
50. The method of any of embodiments 48-49, wherein the channel total uptime parameter is defined as the number of microseconds that the carrier sense mechanism indicated a channel busy indication.

(Embodiment 51)
51. The method of any of embodiments 48-50, wherein the channel uptime beacon interval parameter is defined as the number of consecutive beacon intervals for which an average can be calculated.

(Embodiment 52)
52. The channel utilization field as in any one of embodiments 48-51, wherein the channel utilization field is included in a BSS load element when at least one of a QoS-Option-Implemented parameter and a PBSS-Load-Implemented parameter is false. Embodiment method.

(Embodiment 53)
A method of measuring media access delay (MAD) timing for a single access to a communication station, comprising measuring a first time point ready for transmission of a data packet.

(Embodiment 54)
54. The method of embodiment 53, wherein the first time is a time at which a carrier sense multiple access / collision avoidance scheme (CSMA / CA) protocol is initiated.

(Embodiment 55)
55. The method of any of embodiments 53-54, comprising measuring a second point in time when a transmission request is made to a physical (PHY) layer transmission process.

(Embodiment 56)
56. The method of any of embodiments 53-55, comprising measuring a third point in time when the transmission request is acknowledged.

(Embodiment 57)
57. The method of any of embodiments 53-56, comprising calculating packet transmission-acknowledgement timing as a difference between the second time point and the third time point.

(Embodiment 58)
58. The method of any of embodiments 53-57, comprising calculating the total access timing as a difference between the third time point and the first time point.

(Embodiment 58)
59. The method of any of embodiments 53-58, comprising calculating the MAD timing by subtracting the packet transmission-acknowledge timing from the total access timing.

(Embodiment 59)
60. The method of any of embodiments 53-59, wherein the transmission request is preceded by a Request-to-Send / Clear-to-Send (RTS / CTS) handshake.

(Embodiment 60)
A method of measuring MAD timing for data packet retransmission.
Embodiment 61
61. The method of embodiment 60 comprising measuring a first time when the data packet enters a medium access control (MAC) queue.

(Embodiment 62)
62. The method of any of the embodiments 60-61, comprising measuring a second time point when the data packet is at the head of the MAC queue.

(Embodiment 63)
[00117] 63. The method of any one of embodiments 60-62, comprising calculating the MAC queuing delay as a difference between the second time point and the first time point.

(Embodiment 64)
64. The method of any one of embodiments 60-63, comprising determining the first retransmission timing as a difference between the first transmission start time and the first transmission end time.

(Embodiment 65)
The first transmission start time indicates the start of the first transmission of the data packet, and the first transmission end time indicates the first transmission without receiving a transmission confirmation response. Embodiment 65. The method of embodiment 64, indicating termination.

Embodiment 66
65. The method of any one of embodiments 60-64, comprising determining the second retransmission timing as a difference between the second transmission start time and the second transmission end time.

Embodiment 67
The second transmission start time starts after the postponement / backoff period to indicate the start of the second transmission of the data packet, and the second transmission end time receives the transmission confirmation response. 67. The method of embodiment 66, indicating the end of the second transmission without any exception.

Embodiment 68
68. The method of any one of embodiments 60-67, comprising determining the Nth retransmission timing as the difference between the Nth transmission start time and the Nth transmission end time.

(Embodiment 69)
The Nth transmission start time starts after the postponement / backoff period to indicate the start of the Nth transmission of the data packet, and the Nth transmission end time indicates reception of a transmission confirmation response. 69. The method of embodiment 68 shown.

(Embodiment 70)
[0175] Embodiment 60. Any of the embodiments 60-69 including calculating the total retransmission timing as a sum of the first retransmission timing, the second retransmission timing, and the Nth retransmission timing. the method of.

Embodiment 71
71. The method of any one of embodiments 60-70, comprising determining a completion time indicating when the confirmation response was received.

(Embodiment 72)
Embodiments 60-71 comprising calculating the MAD timing for the data packet as a value obtained by subtracting the MAC queuing delay, subtracting the total retransmission timing, and dividing the whole by N from the difference between the completion time and the first time point. The method of any of the embodiments.

(Embodiment 73)
51. The implementation as in any of the embodiments 20-52, wherein the first communication station is an access point (AP) and features of the BSS load element are configured to be used at and / or by the AP. Form method.

Embodiment 74
54. The method of any of embodiments 20-53, wherein any of the other communication stations is an AP.

(Embodiment 75)
56. The method of any of embodiments 20-54, wherein the first communication station is a WTRU and features of the BSS load element are configured to be used by the WTRU.

Embodiment 76
56. The method of any of embodiments 20-55, wherein any of the other communication stations are within and / or by the WTRU.

Embodiment 77
[00117] 73. The method of any of embodiments 53-72, wherein the communication station is an AP.

Embodiment 78
[00117] 73. The method of any of the embodiments 53-72, wherein the communication station is a WTRU.

Embodiment 79
73. A communication station configured to provide channel management according to any of the methods of embodiments 20-52 and embodiments 73-76.

(Embodiment 80)
80. The communication station of embodiment 79 including a receiver configured to receive unsupported traffic request data from other communication station groups located within the wireless service range of the communication station.

Embodiment 81
81. The communication station of any of embodiments 79-80, comprising a processor configured to calculate a BSS load element for each of a plurality of access categories.

(Embodiment 82)
82. The communication station according to any of embodiments 79-81, comprising a transmitter configured to advertise BSS load elements to other communication stations within the service range of the communication station.

(Embodiment 83)
83. The communication station of any of embodiments 79-82, wherein the receiver is configured to receive an advertised BSS load element from another group of communication stations.

(Embodiment 84)
[00102] 81. Any of the embodiments 79-83, wherein the processor is further configured to assist the communications station group making a detach decision utilizing a received BSS load element from another communications station group. The communication station of the embodiment.

(Embodiment 85)
85. The communication station according to any of embodiments 79-84, wherein the communication station is an AP.

(Embodiment 86)
[00117] 85. The communication of any of embodiments 79-84, wherein the communication station is a WTRU.

(Embodiment 87)
The communication station according to any one of embodiments 79 to 86, wherein any communication station in the other communication station group is an AP.

(Embodiment 88)
88. The communication station according to any of embodiments 79-87, wherein any communication station in the other communication station group is a WTRU.

(Embodiment 89)
80. A communication station configured to calculate a media access delay according to any of the methods and / or features of embodiments 53-72 and embodiments 77-78.

(Embodiment 90)
90. The communication station of embodiment 89, wherein the communication station is an AP.

(Embodiment 91)
90. The communication station of embodiment 89, wherein the communication station is a WTRU.

(Embodiment 92)
The communication of any of embodiments 90-91, including a processor configured to calculate a media access delay according to any of the methods and / or features of embodiments 53-72 and 77-78. Bureau.

(Embodiment 93)
A method of calculating an average MAD timing evaluated over a predetermined validity period, comprising defining a validity period.

(Embodiment 94)
Determine the total packet transmission time by summing the packet transmission time and the time spent waiting for and / or receiving an acknowledgment for a certain amount of packet transmissions made during the above period. 94. The method of embodiment 93 comprising:

(Embodiment 95)
95. The method of any of embodiments 93-94, wherein the packet transmission includes packet retransmission.

(Embodiment 96)
96. The method of any one of embodiments 93-95, comprising determining a total empty transmission queue time for the plurality of access categories.

(Embodiment 97)
96. The method of any of embodiments 96, wherein the total empty transmission queue time includes a period during which the access category transmission queue remains empty.

Embodiment 98
99. The method of any of embodiments 93-96, comprising subtracting the total packet transmission time, the total empty transmission queue time, and / or the total transmission queue deferral time from the validity period to produce a grand total difference.

Embodiment 99
98. The method of any of embodiments 93-97, comprising dividing the aggregate difference by the amount of packet transmissions to obtain an average MAD timing.

(Embodiment 100)
99. The method of any one of embodiments 93-99, comprising determining a total transmit queue defer time for a plurality of access categories, wherein the transmit queue defer time is an access category for each of the categories. Including a period of time during which the transmission of the request has been deferred to a higher priority queue.

(Embodiment 101)
101. The method of embodiment 100 comprising subtracting the total transmit queue defer time from a total difference, and then dividing the total difference by the amount of packet transmissions to obtain an average MAD timing.

(Embodiment 102)
102. A communication station configured to measure MAD timing according to any of the methods and / or features of embodiments 93-101.

(Embodiment 103)
103. The communication station of embodiment 102 including a processor.

(Embodiment 104)
Embodiment 102. The communication station of any of embodiments 102 to 103, wherein the communication station is an AP.

(Embodiment 105)
102. The communication station of any of embodiments 102 to 103, wherein the communication station is a WTRU.

(Embodiment 106)
A communication station configured to perform any of the methods and / or features described in any of the above embodiments and / or including any of the features described in any of the above embodiments .

Embodiment 107
110. The communication station of embodiment 106, wherein the communication station is an AP.

Embodiment 108
110. The communication station of embodiment 106, wherein the communication station is a WTRU.

Although the invention has been particularly shown and described in connection with preferred embodiments, various changes in form and detail may be made in those embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as described above. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that this is possible.

Claims

A method for use in a wireless transmit / receive unit (WTRU) comprising:
For each of a plurality of access categories, receive an encoded indication of average access delay, a service load indicator indicating that a service is not available, or that the encoded indication of the average access delay is not available And
Selecting an AP (Access Point) based on the service load index, the service load index comprising an indication of an average access delay at the AP for data related to an access category. A method characterized by that.
The service load indicator includes a binary 8-bit encoded representation that includes a value from 1 to 252 that is an encoded representation of an average access delay of the plurality of access categories. The method described in 1.
The method of claim 1, wherein the average access delay is measured by the AP for a predetermined time period.
The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of access categories include an audio category, a video category, a best effort category, and a background category.