GB2449311A - Backup network connectivity using a point-to-point satellite link - Google Patents

Backup network connectivity using a point-to-point satellite link Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2449311A
GB2449311A GB0709623A GB0709623A GB2449311A GB 2449311 A GB2449311 A GB 2449311A GB 0709623 A GB0709623 A GB 0709623A GB 0709623 A GB0709623 A GB 0709623A GB 2449311 A GB2449311 A GB 2449311A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
public network
service provider
satellite
network service
interconnect
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB0709623A
Other versions
GB2449311B (en
GB0709623D0 (en
Inventor
Scott Richardson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Avanti Broadband Ltd
Original Assignee
Avanti Broadband Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Avanti Broadband Ltd filed Critical Avanti Broadband Ltd
Priority to GB0709623A priority Critical patent/GB2449311B/en
Publication of GB0709623D0 publication Critical patent/GB0709623D0/en
Priority to ES08750246T priority patent/ES2392953T3/en
Priority to PL08750246T priority patent/PL2151102T3/en
Priority to PCT/EP2008/055786 priority patent/WO2008141961A1/en
Priority to EP08750246A priority patent/EP2151102B1/en
Priority to SI200830832T priority patent/SI2151102T1/en
Priority to US12/600,587 priority patent/US8861341B2/en
Priority to PT08750246T priority patent/PT2151102E/en
Publication of GB2449311A publication Critical patent/GB2449311A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2449311B publication Critical patent/GB2449311B/en
Priority to CY20121101033T priority patent/CY1113572T1/en
Priority to HRP20120959AT priority patent/HRP20120959T1/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00—Data switching networks
    • H04L12/28—Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
    • H04L12/2854—Wide area networks, e.g. public data networks
    • H04L12/2856—Access arrangements, e.g. Internet access
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/22—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received using redundant apparatus to increase reliability
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/06—Management of faults, events, alarms or notifications
    • H04L41/0654—Management of faults, events, alarms or notifications using network fault recovery
    • H04L41/0663—Performing the actions predefined by failover planning, e.g. switching to standby network elements
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0805—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters by checking availability
    • H04L43/0811—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters by checking availability by checking connectivity
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00—Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00—Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/22—Alternate routing
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00—Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/28—Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks using route fault recovery
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L61/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
    • H04L61/09—Mapping addresses
    • H04L61/25—Mapping addresses of the same type
    • H04L61/2503—Translation of Internet protocol [IP] addresses
    • H04L61/2514—Translation of Internet protocol [IP] addresses between local and global IP addresses

Abstract

A communications system comprising: a public network service provider (102); and a satellite hub (206), wherein the provider is connectable to a client system (100) by a first link (116) and to a public network e.g. Internet (104)by a second link, and wherein the satellite hub is connectable to the client system via a satellite link (200-204), wherein the public network service provider and the satellite hub are connected by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect (500). The satellite link is used by the client if the first link to the service provider fails, and enables data sent from remote hosts, unaware of the link failure, to reach the client. The satellite hub may also have a link to the network 104 (e.g. fig.6, not shown)

Description

* 2449311 Backup Network Connectivity
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the provision of a backup network connection which can be used to maintain connectivity to a public network when a primary link fails. In particular, embodiments relate to the provision of a satellite backup system.
Background of the Invention
In a world where access to the internet is critical, the sudden and unplanned loss of that access is at minimum disruptive and costly, and at worst catastrophic.
Access to the internet is usually, although not necessarily, made by means of terrestrial connections. The obvious solution to avoid the possibility of loss of access to the internet would be to install a secondary terrestrial connection to the internet which may be used if a primary terrestrial connection to the internet is lost.
Such an arrangement is illustrated schematically in Figure 1. In this arrangement a client system 100 is connected to an internet service provider 102 which is connected to the internet 104. The internet service provider 102 routes communications between the client system 100 and the internet 104. The client system may, for example, comprise servers 106, 108 connected to a common bus 110. A primary router 112 can route communications between the servers 106, 108 and a primary upstream router 114 in the internet service provider via a primary connection 116. In the event that the primary router 112 and/or the primary connection 116 and/or the primary upstream router 114 fails, communications are routed via a secondary router 118 and a secondary connection 120 to a failover upstream router 115 in the internet service provider 102 which then forwards the communications into the internet.
One problem with this arrangement is that terrestrial connections are likely to be laid in a common conduit, and thus any disruption to the primary connection is also likely to affect the secondary connection. As such, it would be advantageous to provide a secondary connection which is physically diverse from the primary system in order to reduce the possibility that both systems will be lost at the same time, for example, due to a common disruption.
One known way of providing physically diverse primary and secondary connections is to utilize a terrestrial primary connection and a satellite backup system as the secondary connection to the internet. As the terrestrial and satellite connections are physically diverse, there is less likelihood that both the connections will be disrupted at the same time.
Such an arrangement is illustrated schematically in Figure 2. To show how this arrangement relates to the arrangement illustrated in Figure 1, like component have been given like reference numbers. As is evident, the primary connection to the internet is substantially the same as that illustrated in Figure 1. However, the secondary backup connection is implemented by way of a satellite connection. in the event that the primary router 112 and/or the primary upstream router 114 and/or the primary connection 116 fails, communications from the client system 100 are routed via the secondary router 118 to a satellite transceiver 200. The communications are then transmitted via a satellite 202 to a transceiver 204 of a satellite hub 206. The communications can subsequently be forwarded into the internet 104 by a router 208 in the satellite hub over link 209.
A problem with the arrangement illustrated in Figure 2 is that while internet access may be assured, full internet presence/visibility is not provided. Full internet presence/visibility is desirable to ensure that incoming communications from other internet users are successfully transmitted to the client system. That is, the satellite backup system is not fully transparent to other internet users because it is in a different administrative domain and uses different routing protocols. If the primary route fails, communications from the client system to the internet can readily be re-routed via the backup satellite route. Furthermore, internet users receiving communications via the backup satellite route may reply via the backup satellite route as the necessary routing information can be provided in the communications sent out from the client system via the satellite route. However, other internet users, which have not received a communication from the client system via the backup satellite route, will not be aware that the primary route has failed and will continue to try and send communications to the client system via the primary route.
Similar problems to those discussed above for connectivity to the internet also exist for connections within an organisation's own private network. In this regard, prior art solutions provide a backup satellite connection for communication between two points in an organisation's own private network rather than providing a backup satellite connection to the internet.
Such an arrangement is illustrated schematically in Figure 3. To show how this arrangement relates to the arrangements illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, like components have been given like reference numbers. In this arrangement the client system 100 is connected to the headquarters 300 of their organisation via primary connection 116 in the organisation's private network. The headquarters 300 is connected to an internet service provider 102 which is connected to the internet 104. The internet service provider 102 routes communications between the headquarters 300 and the internet 104.
The client system may be structured in a similar manner as described in relation to Figure 2. A primary router 112 can route communications between the servers 106, 108 and a router 302 at headquarters via the primary connection 116. In the event that the primary router 112 and/or the primary connection 116 fail, communications from the client system 100 are routed via the secondary router 118 to a satellite transceiver 200. The communications are then transmitted via a satellite 202 to a transceiver 204 of a satellite hub 206. The communications can subsequently be forwarded to the headquarters by the router 208 in the satellite hub via a connection 304 made between the satellite hub and the headquarters. Similarly, communications from the headquarters can be sent to the client system in the reverse direction via the connection 304 and the satellite system in the event that the primary router 112 and/or the primary connection 116 fail. Routing between the client system 100, the satellite hub 206 and the headquarters 300 is static in nature as the satellite backup connection in this arrangement is only required to provide an alternative route between two fixed points within the organisations private network: the client system 100; and the headquarters 300.
The organisations primary connection to the internet is through headquarters 300 and the internet service provider 102 via connection 303. In the event that connection 303 fails, it may still be possible to re-route signals to the internet via the satellite hub 206 over link 209. F{owever, the arrangement suffers the same problems as outlined above in relation to Figure 2. Namely, while internet access may be assured, full internet presence/visibility is not provided. That is, the satellite backup system is not fully transparent to other internet users. If the primary route fails, communications from the client system to the internet could be re-routed via the backup satellite route.
Furthermore, internet users receiving communications via the backup satellite route may reply via the backup satellite route as the necessary routing information (e.g. as conveyed by network address translation (NAT)) can be provided in the communications sent out from the client system via the satellite route. However, other internet users, which have not received a communication from the client system via the backup satellite route, will not be aware that the primary route has failed and will continue to try and send communications to the client system via the primary route. In addition, providing a satellite backup system within an organisation's private network can be too expensive, especially for SMEs (small and medium sized enterprises) or SOHOs (Small Offices, Home Offices). Further still, backup systems can be difficult to implement in organisations with many sites such as retail chains.
Another known solution to providing backup connectivity requires the use of multiple internet service providers for re-routing communications. However, this solution requires multiple relationships with internet service providers which can be difficult to implement and manage. Furthermore, it may not always be possible to find a second service provider. Additionally, the use of multiple service providers can be expensive and may not offer true physical diversity.
Summary of the Invention
The present inventors have recognized that while several solutions may exist whereby access from a client system to the internet can be maintained, there is a need to maintain access from the rest of the world across the internet to the client system.
Inbound routing to, for example, SMEs and organisations with many sites like retail chains, is difficult using known architectures and procedures.
Embodiments of the present invention aim to solve one or more of the aforementioned problems. In particular, certain embodiments aim to provide a backup satellite connection which not only assures internet access but also assures fill internet presence/visibility. Thus, certain embodiments aim to provide an internet continuity product that resolves the problem of preserving full two-way transparent connectivity to the internet in the event of a primary connectivity failure. Furthermore, certain embodiments aim to provide an internet continuity product which is affordable for SMEs. Further still, certain embodiments aim to provide an internet continuity product which allows inbound routing to organisation with many sites like retail chains.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a communications system comprising: a public network service provider; and a satellite hub, wherein the public network service provider is connectable to a client system by a first link and connectable to a public network by a second link, and wherein the satellite hub is connectable to the client system via a satellite, wherein the public network service provider and the satellite hub are connected by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect.
By public network we mean a network which is available for public access such as the internet as opposed to, for example, a private corporate network.
By public network service provider we mean a network service provider which provides the public with services from a public network as opposed to, for example, a service provider within a private corporate network.
The dedicated point-to-point interconnect may be a virtual interconnect between the public network service provider and the satellite hub over the public network.
Alternatively, the dedicated point-to-point interconnect may be a physical interconnect between the public network service provider and the satellite hub. For example, the dedicated point-to-point interconnect can be provided in one of the following ways: tunnelled over the public network; VPN (Virtual Private Network) tunnelling over the public network; controlled routing over the public network; physical cross connect, for example, in a common Internet exchange or carrier neutral co-location; or via a leased line. The interconnect provides a dedicated point-to-point connection between the public network service provider and the satellite hub.
Providing a dedicated point-to-point interconnect between the public network service provider and the satellite hub allows outbound and inbound communications from the public network to be re-routed to the satellite hub in the event that the first link between the public network service provider and the client system fails. The architecture allows for full internet presence/visibility, which ensures that incoming communications from other internet users are successfully transmitted to the client system.
If the first (primary) route fails, communications from the client system to the public network can be re-routed via the backup satellite route. These outgoing communications may be routed via the interconnect and the public network service provider. Alternatively, a separate connection between the satellite hub and the public network may be provided. Furthermore, internet users receiving communications via the backup satellite route may reply via the backup satellite route as the necessary routing information (e.g. as conveyed by NAT) can be provided in the communications sent out from the client system via the satellite route. In this respect, the present invention can function in the same manner as the previously described prior art arrangements. However, the present invention differs from the prior art arrangements in the following way.
As described in relation to the prior art arrangements, other internet users, which have not received a communication from the client system via the backup satellite route, will not be aware that the primary route has failed and will continue to try and send conmiunjcatjons to the client system via the pnmary route. In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, these communications can be re-routed, by the public internet service provider, through the interconnect to the satellite hub where they can then be transmitted via satellite to the client system. Accordingly, even communications from other internet users will be successfully delivered to the client system when the firstlprimary connection fails. As such, the present invention allows full two-way connectivity to the internet in the event of a primary connectivity failure.
Furthermore, the communication system of the present invention can be implemented by the public internet service provider and the provider of the satellite hub in collaboration. As such, primary and a secondary links to the internet having full two-way connectivity can be provided to a client as a service without the client being required to make whole-sale modifications to their own private network by, for example, incorporating a satellite backup connection therein. Accordingly, the communication system of the present invention provides a viable solution for SMEs.
Further still, the public network service provider can readily be connected to a plurality of client systems and the satellite hub can be readily adapted to communicate with these client systems. Accordingly, the communication system can readily provide full two-way connectivity for a plurality of client systems such as, for example, in organisations with many sites like retail chains.
A single dedicated point-to-point interconnect between the public network service provider and the satellite hub can thus provide a backup link for a plurality of organizations. This contrast with the arrangement shown, for example, in Figure 3 in which each organization would require their own interconnect between their respective headquarters and a satellite hub. An additional advantage of the present invention over an arrangement such as that shown in Figure 3 is that the interconnect between an organizations headquarters and a satellite hub is likely to be long and expensive. In contrast, a public network service provider and a satellite hub are likely to be more closely located, for example in a common public network exchange point, and thus can be more easily and cheaply connected together via a dedicated point-to-point interconnect.
The public network may comprise a plurality of routers supporting a public dynamic routing protocol, e.g. the Internet. The public network service provider and the satellite hub can be adapted to utilize a common routing protocol in a private network for routing communications via the interconnect. The same protocol may also be used for routing communications between the public network service provider and the client system via the first (primary) link. The same protocol may also be used for routing communications between the satellite hub and the client system via the satellite link.
The public network service provider can be adapted to translate between the public dynamic routing protocol and the private routing protocol for routing communications between the public network and the client system. The satellite hub may also be connected to the public network. The satellite hub can be adapted to translate between the public dynamic routing protocol and the private routing protocol for routing communications between the public network and the client system The use of a private routing protocol in links to the client system is advantageous in that it is much cheaper and easier to implement. Acquisition of the various permissions and identifiers required for supporting a public dynamic routing protocol can be expensive and difficult, and often impossible for SMEs and SOHOs.
The private routing protocol may be dynamic or static in nature. Dynamic routing may be implemented using an interior gateway protocol (IGP) such as routing interchange protocol (RiP). While static routing has the advantage of being easy to implement when there are a small number of routers using the private routing protocol, this method may not work well if the routing information has to be changed frequently or needs to be configured on a large number of routers. In this case it would be advantageous to use a dynamic routing protocol such that when new clients are incorporated into the arrangement routing information will automatically be updated in the various components. The use of a private dynamic routing protocol is still more simple to implement than using a global dynamic routing protocol as the routing tables will be smaller and less routers will share the tables.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a public network service provider for use in the communications system of the first aspect. The public network service provider is connectable to a client system by a first link and connectable to a public network by a second link, and is adapted to connect to a satellite hub by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect.
According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a satellite hub for use in the communications system of the first aspect. The satellite hub is connectable to a client system via a satellite, and is adapted to connect to a public network service provider by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a communications network comprising: a client system comprising a satellite transceiver; a public network service provider supporting a public dynamic routing protocol; a public network comprising a plurality of routers supporting the public dynamic routing protocol; a satellite hub comprising a satellite transceiver; and a satellite, wherein the client system is connected to the public network service provider by a first link, the public network service provider is connected to the public network by a second link, and the satellite hub and the client system are connected via the satellite and the satellite transceivers, wherein the public network service provider and the satellite hub are connected by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect. The public network service provider and the satellite hub may be adapted to utilize a common private routing protocol for routing communications via the interconnect. The client system may also be adapted to support a standby router protocol such as HSRP (Hot Standby Router Protocol) or VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol). The public network service provider may be adapted to translate between the public dynamic routing protocol and the private routing protocol. The satellite hub may also be connected to the public network and may be adapted to translate between the public dynamic routing protocol and the private routing protocol.
According to a fifth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for providing connectivity between a client system and a public network by providing one or more of the first to fourth aspects of the present invention discussed above. In particular, there is provided a method for providing connectivity between a client system and a public network, the method comprising: providing a public network service provider and a satellite hub with a dedicated point-to-point interconnect therebetween, routing communications from the public network to the client device via a first link in normal operation, and re-routing communications from the public network via the dedicated point-to-point interconnect when the first link fails.
Brief Description of the Drawings
For a better understanding of the present invention and to show how the same may be carried into effect, embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a schematic diagram showing a client system connected to the internet via two terrestrial connections to an internet service provider; Figure 2 is a schematic diagram showing a client system connected to the Internet via a terrestrial connection to an internet service provider and a satellite backup link to a satellite hub; Figure 3 is a schematic diagram showing an arrangement comprising a satellite backup system connecting two points within an organisation's private network; Figure 4 is a schematic diagram showing the applicant's previous infrastructure for providing a satellite backup link to the internet; Figure 5 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention; and Figure 6 is a schematic diagram showing a more detailed embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description of Embodiments of the Invention The applicant (Avanti) has previously used a satellite infrastructure of the type illustrated in Figure 4. The infrastructure comprises satellite equipment itself (transceivers, antennas), and network equipment providing connectivity on layer 3 (satellite link routers -SLRs). The SLRs are connected to internet data centres (IDCs) managed by the applicant.
In order to provide a satellite backup connection for a customer, the applicant installs a backup/secondary router in the customer's system and a satellite transceiver to which this router is connected. The backup router is adapted to detect if the customer's primary router, the upstream internet service provider router, or primary link therebetween, has failed and route communications to the satellite transceiver which transmits the communications via satellite to a satellite hub managed by the applicant.
Communications can then be forwarded into the Internet via the SLRs and IDCs.
The arrangement is similar to that illustrated in Figure 2. As previously described in the summary of invention section, a problem with such an arrangement is that, while it works well for communications from the customer to the internet, it does not provide full presence/visibility for the client's satellite backup system in the internet.
An embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in Figure 5. To show how this arrangement relates to the arrangements illustrated in Figure 2, like components have been given like reference numbers.
As can readily be seen by comparison of Figure 2 and Figure 5, the main difference between these arrangements is the provision of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect 500 between the public internet service provider 102 and the satellite hub 206. In normal operation, communications between the public network 104 and the client device 100 are routed by the public internet service provider 102 using the first link 116. However, if the first link 116 or the router 112 fail, communications from the public network are re-routed by the public internet service provider via the dedicated point-to-point interconnect to the satellite hub 206 which then forwards the communications to the client system 100 via the satellite 202.
While in Figure 5, the public network service provide 102 is shown as having a single router 114, it will be understood that it may have a plurality of routers which may be interconnected. The first link 116 and the dedicated point-to-point interconnect 500 may be connected to different routers in the public network service provider 102 such that if one router fails, the other router may still be utilized.
A more detailed implementation of the present invention is illustrated in Figure 6. It can be seen that this implementation is based on a modification of the architecture illustrated in Figure 4. The difference between the arrangements illustrated in Figures 4 and 6 lies in the choice of routing protocols and the provision of a means of tunnelling between the primary ISP and the satellite hub in order to provide a high speed dedicated point-to-point interconnect therebetween. In order to arrive at the arrangement illustrated in Figure 6, from that illustrated, for example, in Figure 4, the following modifications may be made.
A router in the primary ISP is modified, or an additional router is provided, to use a suitable private routing protocol such as an interior gateway protocol like RIP. A modified/additional router supporting the private routing protocol is also provided in the satellite hub. A dedicated point-to-point interconnect is made between the two routers in order to provide a high speed interconnect therebetween. This may be done using a virtual interconnect or by providing a physical interconnect.
The interior gateway protocol used may be agreed upon between the Primary ISP and the satellite hub provider. This may be a distance-vector such as RIP or IGRP (interior gateway routing protocol), or a link-state such as OSPF (open shortest path first) or IS-IS (intermediate system to intermediate system). Coupled with policy-based routing, the interior gateway protocol can detect failure of the customer's primary router, the link between the customer and the primary ISP (e.g. via a wireless area network -WAN), or au upstream router, and then route ingress traffic over the high speed dedicated point-to-point interconnect between the ISP network and the satellite hub provider's network.
Static routing can be employed in the satellite network side, on the assumption that any ingress traffic arriving via the high speed dedicated point-to-point interconnect will always be routed via the satellite link.
Egress traffic may be protected from link failure between the customer and the public internet service provider (e.g. terrestrial WAN failure) in the following manner.
To provide default gateway redundancy to the customer's server farm, either HSRP (Hot Standby Router Protocol) or VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol -RFC2338, standard-based) may be used on the pair of customer routers. Using these protocols, one of the routers (primary) will respond to a virtual IP address which may be configured as the default gateway address on the servers. In the case of primary router failure, the secondary router will detect this failure arid start to respond to the virtual address. In the present case, the router with the link to the Primary ISP may be configured as the primary router and the router with the link to the satellite hub provider may be configured as the secondary router. Switchover time for HSRP with default timers is 10 seconds. Switchover time for VRRP with default timers is 4 seconds. To take into account slow routing protocol convergence, "pre-empt timeout" may be configured to allow enough time for the routing protocol to converge. Without this command, HSRP/VRRP may switchover faster than routing protocol can recalculate its routing table. Then the customer equipment will have already forwarded traffic to the correct router, but the routing protocol on this router will still not be ready to route this trafficcorrectly. This will result in a so called "black hole". As such, a "pre-empt timeout" may be used to make HSRP/VRRP wait for the routing protocol to converge.
The dedicated point-to-point interconnect between the Primary ISP and the satellite hub, over which customer traffic is routed when terrestrial failure occurs, can be built in various ways depending on cost and quality of service requirements. These include: tunnelling over the Internet -lowest cost, no quality of service (Q0S) guarantees, traffic in the clear; VPN (Virtual Private Network) tunnel over the Internet -low cost, no Q0S guarantees, traffic encrypted; controlled routing over the Internet -low cost, some QoS guarantees; physical cross connect in common Internet exchange or carrier neutral co-b (co-location) -higher cost, Q0S guarantee, secure route; or leased line -most expensive.
Embodiments of the present invention offer the following advantageous features: one stop solution with quality of service (via ISP sales channel); truly physical diversity (satellite and not terrestrial); ubiquitous (satellite coverage); low cost; and fully transparent using standard protocols.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood to those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (25)

  1. Claims 1. A communications system comprising: a public network service
    provider; and a satellite hub, wherein the public network service provider is connectable to a client system by a first link and connectable to a public network by a second link, wherein the satellite hub is connectable to the client system via a satellite link, and wherein the public network service provider and the satellite hub are connected by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect.
  2. 2. A communications system according to claim 1, wherein the interconnect is one of: a virtual interconnect between the public network service provider and the satellite hub over the public network; and a physical interconnect between the public network service provider and the satellite hub.
  3. 3. A communications system according to any preceding claim, wherein the interconnect is provided by one of: tunnelling over the public network; VPN (Virtual Private Network) tunnelling over the public network; controlled routing over the public network; a physical cross connect; a common internet exchange; a carrier neutral co-location; and a leased line.
  4. 4. A communications system according to any preceding claim, wherein the public network service provider comprises detecting means for detecting failure of the first link and routing means for re-routing inbound communications from the public network to the satellite hub via the interconnect in the event that the first link between the public network service provider and the client system fails.
  5. 5. A communications system according to any preceding claim, wherein the public network service provider and the satellite hub are adapted to utilize a common private routing protocol for routing communications via the interconnect.
  6. 6. A communications system according to claim 5, wherein the public network service provider is adapted to translate between a public dynamic routing protocol used by routers in the public network and the common private routing protocol.
  7. 7. A communications system according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the common private routing protocol is one of dynamic and static.
  8. 8. A communications system according to any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein the common private routing protocol is an interior gateway protocol (IGP).
  9. 9. A communications system according to any preceding claim, wherein the satellite hub is adapted to be further connectable to the public network.
  10. 10. A public network service provider comprising: means for connecting the public network service provider to a client system by a first link; means for connecting the public network service provider to a public network by a second link; and means for connecting the public network service provider to a satellite hub by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect.
  11. 11. A public network service provider according to claim 10, wherein the interconnect is one of: a virtual interconnect between the public network service provider and the satellite hub over the public network; and a physical interconnect between the satellite hub and the public network service provider.
  12. 12. A public network service provider according to claim 10 or 11, wherein the interconnect is provided by one of: tunnelling over the public network; VPN (Virtual Private Network) tunnelling over the public network; controlled routing over the public network; a physical cross connect; a common internet exchange; a carrier neutral co-location; and a leased line.
  13. 13. A public network service provider according to any one of claims 10 to 12, wherein the public network service provider comprises means for detecting failure of the first link and routing means for re-routing inbound communications from the public network to the satellite hub via the interconnect in the event that the first link between the public network service provider and the client system fails.
  14. 14. A public network service provider according to any one of claims 10 to 13, wherein the public network service provider is adapted to use a private routing protocol for routing communications via the interconnect.
  15. 15. A public network service provider according to claim 14, wherein the public network service provider comprises a translation means for translating between a public dynamic routing protocol used by routers in the public network and the private routing protocol.
  16. 16. A public network service provider according to claim 14 or 15, wherein the private routing protocol is one of dynamic and static.
  17. 17. A public network service provider according to claim 16, wherein the private routing protocol is an interior gateway protocol (IGP).
  18. 18. A satellite hub comprising: means for connecting the satellite hub to a client system via a satellite link; and means for connecting the satellite hub to a public network service provider by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect.
  19. 19. A satellite hub according to claim 18, wherein the interconnect is one of: a virtual interconnect between the satellite hub and the public network service provider over the public network; and a physical interconnect between the satellite hub and the public network service provider.
  20. 20. A satellite hub according to any one of claims 18 or 19, wherein the interconnect is provided by one of: tunnelling over the public network; VPN (Virtual Private Network) tunnelling over the public network; controlled routing over the public network; a physical cross connect; a common internet exchange; a carrier neutral co-location; and a leased line.
  21. 21. A satellite hub according to claim any one of claims 18 to 20, wherein the satellite hub comprises routing means adapted to use a private routing protocol for routing communications via the interconnect.
  22. 22. A satellite hub according to claim 21, wherein the private routing protocol is one of dynamic and static.
  23. 23. A satellite hub according to claim 22, wherein the private routing protocol is an interior gateway protocol (IGP).
  24. 24. A communications network comprising: a client system comprising a satellite transceiver; a public network service provider supporting a public dynamic routing protocol; a public network comprising a plurality of routers supporting the public dynamic routing protocol; a satellite hub comprising a satellite transceiver; and a satellite, wherein the client system is connected to the public network service provider by a first link, wherein the public network service provider is connected to the public network by a second link, and the satellite hub and the client system are connected via the satellite and the satellite transceivers, and wherein the public network service provider and the satellite hub are connected by means of a dedicated point-to-point interconnect.
  25. 25. A method for providing connectivity between a client system and a public network, the method comprising: providing a public network service provider and a satellite hub with a dedicated point-to-point interconnect therebet-ween; routing communications from the public network to the client device via a first link in normal operation; and re-routing communications from the public network via the dedicated point-to-point interconnect when the first link fails.
GB0709623A 2007-05-18 2007-05-18 Backup network connectivity Expired - Fee Related GB2449311B (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0709623A GB2449311B (en) 2007-05-18 2007-05-18 Backup network connectivity
PL08750246T PL2151102T3 (en) 2007-05-18 2008-05-09 Backup network connectivity
ES08750246T ES2392953T3 (en) 2007-05-18 2008-05-09 Backup network connectivity
PCT/EP2008/055786 WO2008141961A1 (en) 2007-05-18 2008-05-09 Backup network connectivity
EP08750246A EP2151102B1 (en) 2007-05-18 2008-05-09 Backup network connectivity
SI200830832T SI2151102T1 (en) 2007-05-18 2008-05-09 Backup network connectivity
US12/600,587 US8861341B2 (en) 2007-05-18 2008-05-09 Backup network connectivity
PT08750246T PT2151102E (en) 2007-05-18 2008-05-09 Backup network connectivity
CY20121101033T CY1113572T1 (en) 2007-05-18 2012-10-30 BACKGROUND NETWORK CONNECTION
HRP20120959AT HRP20120959T1 (en) 2007-05-18 2012-11-23 Backup network connectivity

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0709623A GB2449311B (en) 2007-05-18 2007-05-18 Backup network connectivity

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB0709623D0 GB0709623D0 (en) 2007-06-27
GB2449311A true GB2449311A (en) 2008-11-19
GB2449311B GB2449311B (en) 2009-07-29

Family

ID=38234727

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB0709623A Expired - Fee Related GB2449311B (en) 2007-05-18 2007-05-18 Backup network connectivity

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US8861341B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2151102B1 (en)
CY (1) CY1113572T1 (en)
ES (1) ES2392953T3 (en)
GB (1) GB2449311B (en)
HR (1) HRP20120959T1 (en)
PL (1) PL2151102T3 (en)
PT (1) PT2151102E (en)
SI (1) SI2151102T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008141961A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2540945A (en) * 2015-07-31 2017-02-08 Avanti Communications Group Plc Satellite operations support system
CN106452854A (en) * 2016-09-27 2017-02-22 南京国电南自轨道交通工程有限公司 Subway comprehensive monitoring system synchronous communication method based on multi-connection primary-secondary redundancy
GB2482795B (en) * 2010-08-13 2017-11-01 Avaya Inc Failover based on sending communications between different domains

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2449311B (en) 2007-05-18 2009-07-29 Avanti Comm Group Plc Backup network connectivity
US8565073B2 (en) * 2010-08-18 2013-10-22 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Dynamic rerouting of data paths in a wireless communication network
US8675543B2 (en) * 2011-02-24 2014-03-18 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Route limiting in border gateway protocol over satellite networks
US9026845B2 (en) * 2012-05-15 2015-05-05 Dell Products L.P. System and method for failure protection in a storage array
CN103974454B (en) * 2013-01-28 2017-10-31 财团法人资讯工业策进会 Transmission end direct communication device, receiving terminal direct communication device and its communication path switch method
CN104168193B (en) * 2014-08-12 2017-12-15 华为技术有限公司 A kind of method and routing device of Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol fault detect
US10110481B2 (en) 2015-05-19 2018-10-23 Cisco Technology, Inc. Virtual network functions with high availability in public clouds
US10051338B2 (en) 2015-10-21 2018-08-14 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for coordinating back-up services for land based content subscribers
US10326689B2 (en) * 2016-12-08 2019-06-18 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for providing alternative communication paths
US11470677B2 (en) * 2020-08-27 2022-10-11 Dish Network L.L.C. Systems and methods for a computer network intermediate router

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6038594A (en) * 1998-02-02 2000-03-14 Loral Cyberstar, Inc. Internet communication system and method with asymmetric terrestrial and satellite links
WO2001088737A1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2001-11-22 Pentamedia Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for providing satellite internet service to satellite internet terminal not joined in terrestrial internet line of satellite internet service provider
EP1202507A1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2002-05-02 BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company Telecommunications systems
US20030204617A1 (en) * 2002-04-24 2003-10-30 Intelsat Satellite internet communication system and method

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6748439B1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2004-06-08 Accelerated Networks System and method for selecting internet service providers from a workstation that is connected to a local area network
US6779039B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2004-08-17 Avaya Technology Corp. System and method for routing message traffic using a cluster of routers sharing a single logical IP address distinct from unique IP addresses of the routers
US6775235B2 (en) 2000-12-29 2004-08-10 Ragula Systems Tools and techniques for directing packets over disparate networks
US7707307B2 (en) * 2003-01-09 2010-04-27 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for constructing a backup route in a data communications network
JP4231766B2 (en) * 2003-10-24 2009-03-04 株式会社日立コミュニケーションテクノロジー A communication apparatus and a communication method for performing path control between ASs.
US7406032B2 (en) * 2005-01-06 2008-07-29 At&T Corporation Bandwidth management for MPLS fast rerouting
CA2601772A1 (en) * 2005-03-22 2006-09-28 Jasminder Singh Banga Systems and methods of network operation and information processing, including engaging users of a public-access network
US8442030B2 (en) * 2007-03-01 2013-05-14 Extreme Networks, Inc. Software control plane for switches and routers
GB2449311B (en) 2007-05-18 2009-07-29 Avanti Comm Group Plc Backup network connectivity

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6038594A (en) * 1998-02-02 2000-03-14 Loral Cyberstar, Inc. Internet communication system and method with asymmetric terrestrial and satellite links
WO2001088737A1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2001-11-22 Pentamedia Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for providing satellite internet service to satellite internet terminal not joined in terrestrial internet line of satellite internet service provider
EP1202507A1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2002-05-02 BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company Telecommunications systems
US20030204617A1 (en) * 2002-04-24 2003-10-30 Intelsat Satellite internet communication system and method

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2482795B (en) * 2010-08-13 2017-11-01 Avaya Inc Failover based on sending communications between different domains
GB2540945A (en) * 2015-07-31 2017-02-08 Avanti Communications Group Plc Satellite operations support system
GB2540945B (en) * 2015-07-31 2017-12-06 Avanti Communications Group Plc Satellite operations support system
CN106452854A (en) * 2016-09-27 2017-02-22 南京国电南自轨道交通工程有限公司 Subway comprehensive monitoring system synchronous communication method based on multi-connection primary-secondary redundancy
CN106452854B (en) * 2016-09-27 2019-04-26 南京国电南自轨道交通工程有限公司 A kind of subway comprehensive monitoring system synchronous communication method based on multi-connection master-slave redundancy

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2449311B (en) 2009-07-29
ES2392953T3 (en) 2012-12-17
EP2151102B1 (en) 2012-08-29
SI2151102T1 (en) 2013-01-31
EP2151102A1 (en) 2010-02-10
PT2151102E (en) 2012-11-14
CY1113572T1 (en) 2016-06-22
US20110032865A1 (en) 2011-02-10
WO2008141961A1 (en) 2008-11-27
PL2151102T3 (en) 2013-01-31
US8861341B2 (en) 2014-10-14
GB0709623D0 (en) 2007-06-27
HRP20120959T1 (en) 2012-12-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8861341B2 (en) Backup network connectivity
US10601699B2 (en) System and method for next hop BGP routing in a network
US11018758B2 (en) Mobility across satellite beams using L2 connectivity
US8787149B1 (en) MAC address synchronization for multi-homing with multichassis link aggregation
EP3373547B1 (en) Method for realizing disaster tolerance backup
EP2502389B1 (en) Method for the provision of gateway anycast virtual mac reachability in extended subnets
CN112840625A (en) First hop gateway redundancy in a network computing environment
US8427999B2 (en) Multi-satellite architecture
US8264947B1 (en) Fault tolerant wireless access system and method
EP1699186B1 (en) System and method for achieving path symmetry in an IP based network
US8694674B2 (en) Systems, methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for supporting remote hosting without using network address translation
WO2021227863A1 (en) Disaster recovery method and apparatus for hybrid cloud private line access network
US8139572B1 (en) Method for bi-directional symmetric routing in multi-homed networks with stateful firewalls
US20060098665A1 (en) Systems and methods for communicating with bi-nodal network elements
KR20210037086A (en) network switching administrating method utilizing virtual anycast node
Cisco Circuit and IP Configuration Mode Commands
KR102211282B1 (en) Methods of data routing and a switch thereof
Funakura Border gateway protocol best practices

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
732E Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977)

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20100916 AND 20100922

732E Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977)

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20101021 AND 20101027

PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20180518