GB2248152A - Pulse generator comprising a passive resonant circuit - Google Patents

Pulse generator comprising a passive resonant circuit Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2248152A
GB2248152A GB9111280A GB9111280A GB2248152A GB 2248152 A GB2248152 A GB 2248152A GB 9111280 A GB9111280 A GB 9111280A GB 9111280 A GB9111280 A GB 9111280A GB 2248152 A GB2248152 A GB 2248152A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
circuit
coil
series
waveform
parallel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB9111280A
Other versions
GB9111280D0 (en
GB2248152B (en
Inventor
Peter Mansfield
Ronald John Coxon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
National Research Development Corp UK
Original Assignee
National Research Development Corp UK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by National Research Development Corp UK filed Critical National Research Development Corp UK
Publication of GB9111280D0 publication Critical patent/GB9111280D0/en
Publication of GB2248152A publication Critical patent/GB2248152A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2248152B publication Critical patent/GB2248152B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/20Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
    • G01R33/28Details of apparatus provided for in groups G01R33/44 - G01R33/64
    • G01R33/32Excitation or detection systems, e.g. using radio frequency signals
    • G01R33/36Electrical details, e.g. matching or coupling of the coil to the receiver
    • G01R33/3628Tuning/matching of the transmit/receive coil
    • G01R33/3635Multi-frequency operation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/20Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
    • G01R33/28Details of apparatus provided for in groups G01R33/44 - G01R33/64
    • G01R33/38Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field
    • G01R33/385Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field using gradient magnetic field coils
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/20Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
    • G01R33/28Details of apparatus provided for in groups G01R33/44 - G01R33/64
    • G01R33/38Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field
    • G01R33/385Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field using gradient magnetic field coils
    • G01R33/3852Gradient amplifiers; means for controlling the application of a gradient magnetic field to the sample, e.g. a gradient signal synthesizer

Abstract

A coil circuit comprising a multi-mode resonant gradient or RF coil circuits for imaging and spectroscopy in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance systems.

Description

COIL CIRCUITS The present invention relates to coil circuits and more particularly to multi-mode resonant gradient or RF coil circuits for imaging and spectroscopy in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) systems.
Ultra high speed imaging techniques like echo-planar imaging, P. Mansfield, J. Phys. C. 10, L55 (1977) and echovolumar imaging, P. Mansfield, A.M. Howseman and R.J. Ordidge, J. Phys. E. 22, 324-330 (1989) require at least one gradient which is either sinusoidally or cosinusoidally modulated, or preferably trapezoidally modulated. Sinusoidal or cosinusoida, modulation is straight forward to achieve in practice by using a series or parallel resonant circuit in which the gradient coil assembly forms the inductance. Data acquisition in such an imaging arrangement can be achieved by varying the data sampling rate in order to get equal spin phase increments between sampling points. A disadvantage of this method is the fact that the peak gradient amplitude is rt/2 greater than the amplitude of an equivalent square wave modulation.This means that the gradient driver amplifier must be capable of supplying rut/2 more current than in the square or trapezoidal modulation case.
Another factor which militates against using sinusoidal modulation is patient safety. Induced currents within the body due to rapidly varying magnetic field gradients present a potential hazard if the induced current levels approach the neural stimulation threshold level. Neurone models suggest that the important factors determining neural stimulation are concerned with the charging and discharging of nodal capacitance in the process of achieving the neurone firing potential. This leads to a formula which involves the product of the rate of change of magnetic field within the body multiplied by the duration over which this time variation applies. When this function is suitably integrated, (it has been shown that P.
Mansfield [to be published) that the critical factor in calculating stimulation threshold levels for gradient switching is not the rate of change of magnetic field but the maximum field excursion experienced by the tissue. Indeed, neurone stimulation turns out to be independent of the rate of change of the gradient field. In this circumstance it is, therefore, more efficient, and in general, safer, to consider fast rise trapezoidal or square wave modulation of currents rather than sinusoidal gradients since for a given imaging time square wave gradients are 2/w lower that those with an equivaent sinusoidal modulation.
The practical problem is how to generate a fast rise square wave for use in a whole body imaging machine. It is clear that for the most efficient square wave modulation system, the circuit arrangement must be energy conserving. Such energy conserving non-linear switches have been developed and described (British Patent GB 2184625B). A difficulty with non-linear circuitry is that the switch is an active device and will have a maximum current carrying capacity and at the same time be required to have a high inverse voltage requirement. High power switches capable of carrying 500 to 1000 amps are not available with the requisite peak inverse voltage requirements of up to 10kV. Such devices may be developed in the future but are likely to be very expensive and temperamental.
The present invention provides an entirely passive circuit approach to the generation of trapezoidal and square wave modulated gradients for use in high speed NMR imaging. The circuit arrangement according to the present invention operates in a series drive arrangement which is eminently suitable for high current, low voltage audio amplifiers currently available commercially. A parallel multi-modal circuit has been described A. Macovski and C. Meyer, Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting, Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, New York, 1, 499 (1987) but is not as valuable because high voltage driver amplifiers are required.
The present invention provides a multi-mode resonant coil circuit suitable for a range of applications including generation of a square, trapezoidal or general output current waveform in an inductive coil which forms a magnetic field gradient coil when supplied with a series of suitably weighted Fourier harmonics forming the input waveform, or a multi-modal RF coil for the simultaneous transmission and/or reception of RF signals, the circuit comprising passive components.
Preferably the passive components comprise a plurality of capacitors, resistors and inductors the arrangement of which is placed in series with a coil, the plurality of capacitors, resistors and inductors being connected in at least two parallel circuits, each parallel circuit comprising at least one parallel capacitor/inductor combination.
The present invention also provides a method of generating a square wave, trapezoidal or other waveform for an NMR apparatus including connecting a passive electrical circuit including a plurality of parallel circuits each comprising at least one parallel capacitor/inductor combination in series with one terminal of a coil, connecting a current or voltage waveform source across the coil and the plurality of parallel circuits and energising said waveform current or voltage source.
The present invention also provides a method of designing a multi-mode resonant gradient coil circuit for generating a square wave, trapezoidal or other output current waveform through an inductor from a suitable input current waveform using only passive components.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure la shows a sketch of a bipolar square waveform with period T and unit amplitude; Figure 1b shows the simpler sine wave approximation to Fig.
la in which the areas under the sinusoidal and square wave curves in a half period are equal. Figure Ic shows partial synthesis of the square waveform of Fig. 1 from the first three Fourier harmonics; Figure 2 shows a simpler series resonant circuit and generator drive; Figure 3 shows a bimodal series resonant circuit of order 2 =3; Figure 4 shows a trimodal series resonant circuit of order Q = 5; Figure 5 shows a quadrimodal series resonant circuit of order e = 7 in the form of a ladder network. This form of filter 7 uses fewer tuned trap circuits.The transfer matrices An for each L-section are annotated; Figure 6 shows a trapezoidal waveform in which the rise time to full unit amplitude takes 1/6th of the period T; Figure 7 shows a trapezoidal waveform as in Fig. 6 plotted over a quarter period together with a first and fifth harmonic fit, (Eq. 11); Figure 8 shows a general trapezoidal waveform in which the rise time to the full unit amplitude is T/2p where T is the period of the waveform and p is an integer; Figure 9 shows a plot over a quarter period of a trapezoidal waveform of the type in Fig. 7 with p = 9.Also plotted is the waveform synthesis up to and including the order n. (Note that the amplitudes of all even orders vanish, Eq. 13); Figures 10 (a), (b), (c) show a comparison of the waveform convergence at T/4 for (a) a square wave, and trapezoidal waveforms with (b) p = 3 and (c) p = 9; Figure 11 shows a sketch of general trapezoidal waveform f(ss) with 2b windows. b) Sequence of triangular blips f(ss) useful for echo-planar or echo-volumar imaging; Figure 12 shows experimental results showing phase compensated trapezoidal wave apprbximations using three harmonic components. (a) Synthesised driver input. (b) Current output through the inductance with the Techron amplifier in constant voltage mode. (c) Current output through the inductance with the Techron amplifier in constant current mode. Time base in all cases 1 ms per large division. Peak current 10 A; Figure 13 shows experimental results showing synthesised square wave approximations using three Fourier harmonics. (a) Driver amplifier input. (b) Current output through inductance with amplifier in constant current mode. Time base is 200 ps per large division. Peak current 10 A; and Figure 14 shows experimental results showing synthesised trapezoidal waveforms using three Fourier harmonics with p = 7, equations (13) and (15). (a) Driver amplifier input. (b) Inductor current output. The rise time of the trapezoidal edge is " 80 zs. Time base is 200 zs per large division. Peak current 10 A.
The repeated bipolar square wave of unit amplitude shown in Fig. la may be represented by the Fourier series.
f(t) = (4/sin ot + (1/3)sin 3ut + (1/5)sin 5#t}...(1) where f(t) is the square wave function with period T = Equation 1 represents an odd harmonic expansion in which U is the fundamental frequency, 3 and 5z the third and fifth harmonics etc. in a slowly converging series. Figure lc shows an ideal square wave and its synthesis from a truncated series of harmonics. Although the series is slowly converging, we see that using the first and third harmonics give a recognisable approximation to a continuous square wave.Adding the fifth harmonic gives an even better approximation but more importantly brings the maximum waveform excursion down from err/2 in the case of the first harmonic to 1.2. Adding further harmonics like the seventh and ninth may not be worthwhile experimentally because of slow convergence. Also their contribution will not significantly affect the safety questions referred to hereinbefore.
The present invention is therefore to construct a multiresonant circuit capable of responding to a specified finite number of harmonics as indicated above.
We now describe a general and systematic approach to the generation of circuits which are effectively discrete frequency filters. Figure 2 shows a simple series resonant circuit in which L represents the inductance of the current coil assembly.
Also shown in this circuit is the amplifier drive arrangement here represented as a voltage generator but may alternatively be a current generator. In such a series arrangement it is clear that the total generator current i passes through L and thus represents the most efficient arrangement for producing high magnetic field gradients. The present high current commercial audio amplifiers are capable of delivering their full current capacity into what is effectively a short circuit, i.e. a series resonant circuit. These amplifiers can be operated either as voltage generators or alternatively as current generators. In the current generator mode, it is possible to control more accurately the response time when driving a series tuned circuit.
In general the rise time for a series tuned circuit as in Fig.
2 is determined by the quality factor Q given by Q = oL/r (2) The current for this circuit will rise to (1 - e~l) of its final current in Q/o cycles when driven in the voltage mode. In current mode the rise time can be significantly shorter so that the equilibrium situation can often be achieved in just one cycle.
In order to accommodate the necessary higher harmonics to form an approximate square wave, additional components are introduced to the simple series tuned circuit of Fig. 1, but in such a way that all the harmonic current components pass through L.
Figure 3 shows a modified circuit which accommodates the fundamental and third harmonic only. In calculating the requisite component values of this circuit, we take all resistors to be effectively zero in the first instance. It is also helpful but not absolutely necessary to make all inductors equal to L. The design process then reduces to calculating the component values starting with the highest harmonic, in this case the third harmonic, at which C3 and L are resonant, i.e. C3 = 1/9U2L. The parallel resonant circuit shunting C3 via 3 C1 C1 passes no current at 30 and can, therefore, be ignored to first approximation in calculating the resonant features of the main third harmonic current pathway.In calculating the fundamental harmonic resonance condition, it is noted that the parallel circuit behaves as an inductor at frequency o. This effective inductor, given by Lieff = (9/8)L (3) 3 is combined with the series capacitance C1 to produce an effective capacitance given by
This is combined in parallel with C3 to resonate with L at frequency o. Solution of the resonant circuit equation gives
If resistance is reintroduced into the circuits, the resonance conditions will be changed slightly so that the two resonant frequencies may not be exactly a factor of three different. It will then be necessary to trim capacitor C3 in order to get the exact frequency and phase relationship between the two harmonics.
The principles may be straightforwardly extended to include the first three or more resonant harmonics. Figure 4 shows the basic principle extended to cover the resonant modes up to and including 5U. The design process is similar to that outlined above, namely that the additional two shunt circuits are arranged to reject current at 5 in which case C5 and L form a simple series resonant circuit tuned to 50. Again we have chosen all inductors to be of value L and for the initial design we again assume all resistors are zero. Resistance is reintroduced at the next step when phase and frequency are adjusted by varying and C5 in an iterative cycle.
3 When all resistors are zero, we obtain for the circuit of Fig. 4 3 = (8/9) C5 and 5 = (100/13) C5. (6b) For a multi-modal resonant circuit like Figs. 3 and 4 with Q modes, in which all inductors have the same value L, the resonant capacitors for the nth mode, 1 < n Q, are given by Cn = 1/n2U2L. (7a) The series capacitors Cn may be represented by the expression
Knis a calculable constant for the eth order filter. For the 3rd 3 order filter of Fig. 3, therefore, K1 = 4/9. For the 5th order 5 filter of Fig. 4 K5 = 4/13 and K53 = 8/(9 x 25). For a 7th order filter K7 = 2.362275 x 10 -1 K 7 2.65736 x 10 2and K7 = 9.7959 x 10-3.
Circuit redundancy The 5th order circuit of figure 4 comprises two tuned rejection circuits or traps resonant at 5uO and one tuned circuit resonant at zero Higher order filters would include more duplication of the rejection circuits. However we note from figure 4 that if the rejection filter between points Y and Z is removed and points X and Y joined, the same purpose is served, namely, that each rejection filter isolates all circuitry above it from currents at or above its resonance frequency. This removes circuit redundancy, thereby making the filter easier and cheaper to construct. Fewer circuit components also reduce the resistance thereby making the overall Q higher. The circuit is therefore transformed from a parallel arrangement to a cascaded parallel arrangement or ladder network.
With this modification, the higher order filters simply require additional L-sections. Also the response of such a circuit is straightforward to calculate using the product of individual transfer matrices for each section. Figure 5 shows a 7th order filter or ladder network. The transfer matrix for this circuit is given by
where for LnX = L,' = L and C = Cn and for r = rn = 0
and
where ss = #/#0 (8d) and n = 1, 3 and 5.
The input and output voltages and currents are respectively v1 ii and v2. When i2 = 0 the input impedance Z1 is given in terms of the transfer matrix elements by
At the nodal resonance Z1 = 0 so that equations 8 and 9 can be used to evaluate the capacitor values. Because of the action of the traps, evaluation of the capacitors can be carried out in tandem starting with the highest mode and ignoring all other circuit sections of equal and lower frequency. Adopting this 7 approach we find for the 7th order filter that K5 = 9.7959 x 10-3; K3 = 2.37037 x 10-2 and K71= 2.22225 x 10 1.
3 As expected, the first ratio agrees with our previous result but the other values differ by virtue of the removed circuit redundancy.
In an alternative arrangement L7 and C7 are interchanged and 7 7 also the traps Ln, C n are interchanged with the ring capacitors C 7 n-2 ofthe ladder network.
A further alternative arrangement in which the capacitors = = O is also possible. In this case Ln # Ln' # L. A still further arrangement with Q' = O is possible in which the inductor L7 is interchanged with the ring capacitor C7 and Ln' interchanged with the ring capacitors Cn. It is to be understood that the resistors rn are values associated with their respective inductors and include the intrinsic resistance of the inductor.
The approach developed here is readily extended to any order including the selective odd and even frequency modes. This latter feature is useful in cases where frequency modes are not present in a required waveform A desirable feature of this discrete filter circuit is that all additional resistors when introduced to the parallel tuned circuits make rn equal. This means that the Q values of the various harmonics are given by Qn = n#L/r. (10a) The rise time tRn of all parallel circuits is given by tan = Th Qn/Tt = 2R/n)(nxL/rw) = 2L/r = ta, (10b) where Tn is the period of oscillation. This ensures that all harmonics stay in phase.If the rise times for all current harmonics in the gradient coil are not constant the initial response of this circuit will not maintain the correct phase relationships between all harmonics during the establishment of the steady state. The correct phase relationships can be established by introducing resistance rn into the circuit arms as indicated in figure 4. However, in this invention when appropriate we have chosen an alternative phase correction approach which is described below.
Once the equilibrium waveform is established, energy is exchanged between L and the capacitors in the discrete filter.
The net amplifier power P = dE/dt O. This means that only the small energy losses arising from the finite Qn values have to be supplied from the driver amplifier in order to sustain the waveform. In this case the transitions between waveform extrema can in principle be infinitely fast. In practice it means that the bandwidth of the amplifier limits the waveform rise time rather than the coil inductance and power output.
For a non-energy conserving arrangement comprising a lossless inductor L driven directly by an amplifier the square wave rise time or step response time at achievable is given by at = LI/E (10c) where I and E are respectively the peak current and voltage outputs of the driver amplifier. For our linear Techron driver amplifier I = 360 and E = 300. Using a typical gradient coil inductance of 110 H gives at = 132 rs. Experimentally we operate typically with a lower slew rate corresponding to at = 160 Rs in a non-energy conserving mode.
We shall see hereafter that trapezoidal rise times much shorter than 160 Rs can be readily achieved experimentally using the same values of current and voltage mentioned above in an energy conserving mode.
Trapezoidal Waveforms We have concentrated so far on the generation of approximations to a pure square wave modulation. However, in practice using linear amplifiers one often manages with trapezoidal waveforms. It is therefore interesting to note that trapezoidal waveforms may themselves be simulated by Fourier series and can often be more convergent than the generation of direct square wave functions. The difference between the peak currents required in a trapezoidal waveform versus a square wave is proportional to the ratio of the areas contained within or under the waveform in a half period.In the case of the rather severe trapezoidal waveform given in Figure 6 the Fourier series is given by f(t) = (6#3/#2){sin ot - (1/52)sin 50t + (1/72)sin 7ot (1/112)sin 11(0t }. (11) The amplitudes of the third, ninth and fifteenth harmonics are missing and it is also noted that the amplitude of the harmonics varies as 1/n2 making the series more rapidly convergent. Figure 6 shows the first two harmonics of Equation (11) and the fit to the trapezoidal waveform of Fig. 5. The Fourier harmonic amplitudes are given by
where T is the waveform period.
It is instructive to evaluate An for the general trapezoidal waveform shown in Fig. 8 in which the linear ramp rises to 1.0 in time T/2p where p is an integer. We define the function f(t) over the half period as f(t) = t(2p/T) for 0 < t < T/2p f(t) = 1 for T/2p < t < T(p-1)/2p f(t) = p-t(2p/T) for T(p-1)/2p < t < T/2.
These functions may be used to evaluate Ai, Eq. 12. This gives An = (4p/#2#2){sin(n#/2) cos[nw(p-2)/2p]} = (4/7t2) Bnp) . (13) Equation 13 shows that convergence to a given waveform approximation can be achieved by choosing p to remove particular harmonics in the series. For example when p is odd, odd harmonics starting with n = p are removed. When p is even, all lower odd harmonics remain.
The synthesis to various orders in n over a quarter cycle is shown in Fig. 9 for a trapezoidal waveform with p = 9. Since the 9th order vanishes the solid curve n = 7 is accurate up to 11th order.
Using Eqs. 1 and 13 we plot in Fig. 10 the waveform amplitude at time T/4 synthesised up to and including n = 11 for the square wave and various trapezoidal waveforms. By choosing the trapezoidal ramp time as described above it will be seen that the number of resonant modes in the discrete filter circuit may be reduced.
The more general trapezoidal waveform of figure lla may also be produced with relatively few odd harmonics. This function is represented by the expression f(p) = 4E {(sinnB - sinnb)sinnss}/R(B-b)n2. (14) n with n = 1, 3, 5... and where ss = (2nT)t and T is the period.
The delay 2b represents a useful window for the application of other gradients and/or RF pulses in EPI and EVI experiments.
Circuit Drive The discrete frequency filter approach developed above assumes that the output phase relationship of all harmonics is equal to that of the driving waveform. In an ideal circuit that would be the case. In practice there may be slight differences in phase between the harmonic components introduced by inequalities in inductance and resistance among the components and also through the effects of stray capacitance within the inductors which has been entirely ignored in this analysis. Of course, stray interturn capacitance within the inductances will only become important at very high frequencies, i.e. very high harmonics, and so may not constitute a problem. Nevertheless, the other factors mentioned can introduce undesirable phase shifts which could be tedious to eliminate.An alternative approach therefore is to tailor the input drive waveform by synthesising the desired Fourier components, but at the same time adding in a phase term to each Fourier component which may be varied in order to generate the correct output phase relationship in the circuit. In this case the driving waveform for the square wave modulation of Eq. 1 would become
with n = 1, 3, 5..., where On is the introduced phase shift for the nth mode and the coefficient An is given by equation (13).
The present invention discloses a systematic way of designing a discrete filter circuit which has a multi-mode series response useful for driving a series resonant gradient coil for use in ultra high speed NMR imaging. Detailed circuits are described which respond to a truncated Fourier series comprising two and three harmonics respectively. However, the principles described may be readily extended to higher harmonics and to the generation of waveforms other than square wave, where the Fourier series is more convergent and where the amplitude of particular harmonics may be designed to be zero, thus reducing the circuit complexity necessary to generate the waveform.
The circuits described above are entirely passive arrangements and therefore have a considerable advantage over switched non-linear circuits where expensive components are required. In some instances it is possible to generate usable waveforms for techniques like echo-planar imaging or echo-volumar imaging straight away using existing power amplifiers. This will be especially useful in situations where non-linear switching circuits capable of producing trapezoidal gradient waveforms of the desired strength are impractical with current technology.
We have concentrated on odd harmonic waveforms but more general current waveforms may be generated by including even harmonics in the filter. A DC current in the gradient coil may also be introduced by directly connecting an additional amplifier or power supply across the gradient coil at point P indicated in figure 4. This would constitute an independent current source.
To achieve sufficient isolation from a separate amplifier a simple resistor may be used to connect point P to the extra amplifier. This arrangement is fine when the DC current level (not shown) is relatively low. The resistors can then be high so as not to load the filter driver nor to introduce large current phase differences in the gradient coil. With DC and a sufficient number of harmonic modes, the circuit is capable of generating other waveforms including a series of positive or negative short duration current blips, also useful in echo-planar and echo-volumar imaging methods.A sequence of triangular blips is sketched in figure 11b and is represented by the convergent series f(ss) = b/2n + 2i {(1 - cosnb)cosnss}/whn2. (16) where n = 1, 2, 3... and in which ss = (2E/T)t.
Experimental Results Using the principles described above, we have constructed a 5th order discrete filter network as indicated in figure 4 in which the gradient coil inductance L = 130 ;iH. The fundamental frequency is 1.0 kHz with harmonics at 3.0 kHz and 5.0 kHz. The driver used in these experiments is a Techron amplifier. In the present experiments total peak currents of up to 10 A have been passed through the inductance. (Much larger currents have recently been achieved). The Techron amplifier was driven from a waveform controller in which the drive waveform was synthesised from three frequency components according to equation (1).
Figure 12a shows the synethesised driver waveform. When the Techron amplifiers are run in constant voltage mode, the current waveform through L is as indicated in figure llb. The overall rise time ta for this waveform is determined by equation (lOb) and indicates that the individual rise times tan for each harmonic component are in this case equal, thus preserving the trapezoidal waveform shape during establishment of equilibrium.
When the Techron amplifier is operated in a constant current mode, the output current through L is as indicated in figure llc.
Here the initial response is much speeded up, establishing the equilibrium conditions in approximately a half cycle. In all cases the driver waveform corresponds to a phase compensated square wave approximation.
Figure 13 shows the waveforms for a non-phase compensated square wave. Figure 13a is the drive input and figure 13b the current output through L. On this expanded time base of 200 Rs per large division, the rise time is " 80 Rs. These waveforms clearly indicate that three Fourier harmonics are not sufficient to give a good square wave approximation.
Figure 14 shows experimental trapezoidal waveforms corresponding to p = 7 in equations (13) and (15). This value of p gives a rise time of 71.4 Rs and is in good agreement with the experimentally observed value. The small ripple observed on the waveform plateaux can be further reduced by the addition of extra harmonics in the filter circuit.
Waveforms similar to those of figure 14 can now be routinely produced with peak currents of up to 360 A. Using the principles of active gradient coil screening (Mansfield, P. and Chapman, B., 1986, J. Mag. Res., 66, 573-576) our gradient set can be switched within the close confines of a superconductive magnet. The much reduced levels of induced eddy currents in the surrounding metallic structures produce negligible phase effects in our images.
In an alternative multi-mode circuit arrangement, all parallel resonant circuits in Figures 3 and 4 are replaced by inductors, thus turning the cascaded circuits AA', BB' etc. of Figure 4, for example, into a cascaded or parallel arrangement of series resonant band pass circuits. With this alternative discrete filter arrangement, however, unwanted frequency modes may occur in addition to the desired operating modes. This may not be a problem when the circuit is energised from a well chosen set of discrete frequency harmonics.
In a further embodiment capacitors C' in figure 5 may be removed so that the circuit reduces to a cascaded parallel set of inductors L , in series with capacitors Cm where m is the n order of the filter.
In order to minimise resistive losses in either of the discrete filter embodiments, the inductive components may be cooled in a refrigerant to reduce resistance.
We have concentrated on the generation of simple waveforms derived analytically from truncated Fourier series. However, an alternative approach is to start with the desired practical current waveform and then Fourier transform this to yield the harmonic spectrum. The harmonic spectrum amplitudes are then used directly to synthesise the waveform. In this approach the effect of a finite waveform train can be taken into account by adjusting the filter Q value.
We have described a systematic way of designing a discrete filter circuit which has a multi-mode series response useful for driving a series resonant gradient coil for use in ultra high speed NMR imaging. Detailed circuits are described which respond to a truncated Fourier series comprising two and three harmonics respectively. However, the principles described may be readily extended to higher harmonics and to the generation of waveforms other than square wave, where the Fourier series is more convergent and where the amplitude of particular harmonics may be designed to be zero, thus reducing the circuit complexity necessary to generate the waveform.In all cases our approach exploits the energy conserving principle so that current waveform rise times for a given gradient coil and driver amplifier can be considerably faster than can be achieved by direct non-resonant drive through the coil.
The circuits described above are entirely passive arrangements and therefore have a considerable advantage over switched non-linear circuits where expensive components are required. In some instances it will be possible to generate usable waveforms for techniques like echo-planar imaging or echo volumar imaging straight away using existing linear power amplifiers. This will be especially useful in situations where non-linear switching circuits capable of producing trapezoidal gradient waveforms of the desired strength are impractical with current technology.
Although emphasis has been given to the generation of multimodal harmonic gradients at relatively low frequencies, the circuits developed are general and could operate at higher frequencies including RF. Adaptation to RF coil design is preferably valuable for bi-modal, tri-modal and in general multimodal RF circuits for the transmission and/or reception of RF signals arising in multi-nucleii NMR including NMR imaging and NMR spectroscopy.

Claims (12)

1. A multi-mode resonant coil circuit suitable for a range of applications including generation of a square, trapezoidal or general output current waveform in an inductive coil which forms a magnetic field gradient coil when supplied with a series of suitably weighted Fourier Harmonics forming the input waveform, or a multi-modal RF coil for the simultaneous transmission and/or reception of RF signals, the circuit comprising passive components.
2. A multi-mode resonant coil circuit as claimed in claim 1 in which the passive components comprise a plurality of capacitors, resistors and inductors the arrangement of which is placed in series with a coil, the plurality of capacitors, resistors and inductors being connected in at least two parallel circuits each parallel circuit comprising at least one parallel capacitor/inductor combination.
3. A method of generating a square wave, trapezoidal or other waveform for an NMR apparatus including connecting a passive electrical circuit including a plurality of parallel circuits each comprising at least one parallel capacitor/inductor combination in series with one terminal of a coil, connecting a current or voltage waveform source across the coil and the plurality of parallel circuits and energising said waveform current or voltage source.
4. A multi-mode resonant coil circuit as claimed in claim 1 in the form of a ladder network or cascaded parallel circuit comprising a plurality of parallel resonant traps in series with periodically placed shunt capacitors forming the rings of the ladder network.
5. A multi-mode resonant coil circuit as claimed in claim 1 in the form of a ladder network or cascaded parallel circuit comprising a plurality of series capacitors with periodically placed parallel resonant traps forming the rungs of the ladder network.
6. A multi-mode resonant coil circuit as claimed in claim 1 in the form of a ladder network or cascaded parallel circuit comprising a plurality of series inductors with periodically placed shunt capacitors forming the rungs of the ladder network.
7. A multi-mode resonant coil circuit as claimed in claim 1 in the form of a ladder network or cascaded parallel circuit comprising a plurality of series capacitors with periodically placed shunt inductors forming the rungs of the ladder network.
8. A multi-mode resonant current as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 in which the circuit is driven by at least one constant current amplifier.
9. A multi-mode resonant circuit according to any of claims 1 to 7 in which the circuit is driven by at least one constant voltage amplifier.
10. A coil as claimed in claims 8 and 9 in which the coil is driven by two amplifiers.
11. A coil as claimed in claim 10 in which one of the amplifiers is a d.c. amplifier.
12. A coil as claimed in any one of claims 8, 9 or 10 in which at least one of the amplifiers is an RF amplifier.
GB9111280A 1990-05-25 1991-05-24 Coil circuits Expired - Fee Related GB2248152B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB909011757A GB9011757D0 (en) 1990-05-25 1990-05-25 Gradient coil circuits

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB9111280D0 GB9111280D0 (en) 1991-07-17
GB2248152A true GB2248152A (en) 1992-03-25
GB2248152B GB2248152B (en) 1994-06-01

Family

ID=10676575

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB909011757A Pending GB9011757D0 (en) 1990-05-25 1990-05-25 Gradient coil circuits
GB9111280A Expired - Fee Related GB2248152B (en) 1990-05-25 1991-05-24 Coil circuits

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB909011757A Pending GB9011757D0 (en) 1990-05-25 1990-05-25 Gradient coil circuits

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US5325060A (en)
EP (1) EP0531368B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3165439B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2083604C (en)
DE (1) DE69128472T2 (en)
GB (2) GB9011757D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1991019207A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9226522D0 (en) * 1992-12-19 1993-02-10 Harvey Geoffrey P Power saving electronic logic circuit
US5663648A (en) * 1995-03-17 1997-09-02 British Technology Group Usa, Inc. Gradient coils having increased performance and decreased power consumption for use in MR systems
DE10038669C1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2002-01-31 Siemens Ag Operating magnetic resonance device involves using movement model describing translation movements of at least defined points of image area with time dependency during acquisition
US6973178B1 (en) * 2002-12-16 2005-12-06 Alcatel Method and apparatus for implementing a bandlimited ringing signal for telephone networks
JP2007325826A (en) * 2006-06-09 2007-12-20 Hitachi Ltd Double-tuned rf coil
US8334696B2 (en) * 2010-04-02 2012-12-18 The General Hospital Corporation Method for magnetic resonance imaging with parallel and localized spatial encoding magnetic fields
CA3054684A1 (en) 2017-03-01 2018-09-07 Scanmed, Llc Dual tuned mri resonator, coil package, and method

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4680545A (en) * 1985-01-04 1987-07-14 General Electric Company Method for reduction of acoustical noise generated by magnetic field gradient pulses
GB8530930D0 (en) * 1985-12-16 1986-01-29 Mansfield P Inductive circuit arrangements
US4742304A (en) * 1986-05-02 1988-05-03 Phospho-Energetics, Inc. Multiple tuning NMR probe
JPS63229039A (en) * 1987-03-18 1988-09-22 株式会社東芝 Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus
US5168228A (en) * 1987-05-14 1992-12-01 National Researh Development Corporation Echo planar imaging systems
US5162736A (en) * 1987-08-14 1992-11-10 National Research Development Corporation NMR imaging
DE58909700D1 (en) * 1989-12-01 1996-08-14 Siemens Ag Method for operating a magnetic resonance tomography device with a resonance circuit for generating gradient fields

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Macovski et al. Proc.of 6th annual meeting, soc. of magneticresonance in medicine N.Y. 1,499 (1987). *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5325060A (en) 1994-06-28
JPH05507217A (en) 1993-10-21
GB9111280D0 (en) 1991-07-17
EP0531368B1 (en) 1997-12-17
CA2083604A1 (en) 1991-11-26
DE69128472T2 (en) 1998-04-09
GB2248152B (en) 1994-06-01
GB9011757D0 (en) 1990-07-18
JP3165439B2 (en) 2001-05-14
CA2083604C (en) 2000-11-07
EP0531368A1 (en) 1993-03-17
DE69128472D1 (en) 1998-01-29
WO1991019207A1 (en) 1991-12-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3515205B2 (en) Gradient magnetic field generator for magnetic resonance diagnostic equipment
KR100314358B1 (en) Switch-Mode Power Supplies for Bridged Linear Amplifiers
US5019954A (en) AC/DC conversion with reduced supply waveform distortion
KR950701466A (en) Compact and efficient transformerless power conversion system
US5325060A (en) Coil circuits
CN106787924A (en) A kind of high voltage pulsewidth quasi-square wave impulse generator long
JP4074688B2 (en) Magnetic field pulse generator
EP1595159A1 (en) Precision gradient amplifier with multiple output voltage levels
US5521507A (en) Gradient coil power supply and imaging method
US8648608B2 (en) VLF test generator
Mansfield et al. Multi-mode resonant gradient coil circuit for ultra high speed NMR imaging
CA3031774A1 (en) Method for operating a multi-frequency metal detector and multi-frequency metal detector
RU2352056C1 (en) High-voltage impulse generator
Sabate et al. Ripple cancellation filter for magnetic resonance imaging gradient amplifiers
JP3699965B2 (en) Gradient resonance type magnetic field generator for magnetic resonance diagnostic equipment
Li et al. Analysis and design of a novel three-level llcc inverter supplying an airborne piezoelectric brake actuator
de Queiroz Synthesis of multiple resonance networks
Fahlbusch et al. A SiC-based 15-Level Power Inverter for the Generation of Variable High Frequency Output Voltages
Ghasemi et al. A high frequency current source converter with adjustable magnitude to drive high power piezoelectric transducers
JP3445429B2 (en) Rectangular pulse current generator, microwave oscillator and high-frequency charged particle accelerator
SU1095121A1 (en) Magnetic field source for geoelectric prospecting
Akemoto et al. Klystron modulators with HV common-bus for the JLC
Kuthi et al. Core and copper loss effects on the stepped impedance transmission line pulse generator
SU976489A1 (en) Cascade high-voltage impulse generator
CN117220723A (en) Device and method for solving magnetic resonance communication detuning problem of wearable equipment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
732 Registration of transactions, instruments or events in the register (sect. 32/1977)
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20080524