GB2051770A - Bacteriostatic filter media - Google Patents

Bacteriostatic filter media Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2051770A
GB2051770A GB8017551A GB8017551A GB2051770A GB 2051770 A GB2051770 A GB 2051770A GB 8017551 A GB8017551 A GB 8017551A GB 8017551 A GB8017551 A GB 8017551A GB 2051770 A GB2051770 A GB 2051770A
Authority
GB
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
lt
gt
sep
water
silver
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB8017551A
Other versions
GB2051770B (en )
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Everpure Inc
Original Assignee
Everpure Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/50Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition or application of a germicide or by oligodynamic treatment
    • C02F1/505Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by addition or application of a germicide or by oligodynamic treatment by oligodynamic treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/28Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
    • C02F1/283Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using coal, charred products, or inorganic mixtures containing them

Abstract

A bacteriostatic filter media mixture comprises specially treated, dried, silver-bearing, highly purified, inert material in particulate or fibrous form, such as cellulose fibers, mixed with specific proportions of powdered, activated carbon filter material.

Description

SPECIFICATION Bacteriostatic filter media BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to bacteriostatic water filtration media composition and water filters incorporating such water filtration media.

Powdered carbon as a water filtration media has come into extensive, relatively recent use for supplanting other types of media, principally cellulose. While neither cellulose nor powdered carbon are inherently bacteriostatic, the carbon does have the advantage of permanence, i.e., is non-biodegradable, and has good affinity for organic pollutants. The organics, due to their ever-growing quantity, chemical diversity, unknown long-range effect, and potential for highly serious health hazards, have been the subject of increased regulatory attention. Accordingly, water filters containing powdered carbon have posed a good approach to improved quality.

A particularly useful filter media and configuration is shown in the Oliver U.S. Patent 3,055,503 which employs a pleated filter element in a quick-change type of cartridge. The drainage grid has a balanced pressure design which permits even deposition of the precoatable carbon filter particles thereon.

A major problem with all types of water filters is that bacteria adsorb to the solid/liquid interface, and accordingly can multiply in and on the filtration media. If there is no bacterial control, the effluent bacterial count can rise beyond acceptable limits, particularly during times the filter is not in use.

As noted, carbon is not inherently bacteriostatic. One of the better, well-known bacteriostatic agents is silver. For example, U.S. Patent 2,040,806 shows a fibrous material treated with silver has disinfectant properties. U.S. Patent 2,701,792 shows that agents having bacteriostatic properties can be used to treat activated carbon filtering media. U.S. Patent 2,785,106 treats alpha cellulose with silver nitrate.

However, silver applied to granular of powdered carbon for filter media poses several hitherto unsolved problems. Principal among these is that the process of treatment is extremely messy and in many instances difficult to control the quantity of silver deposited on the powdered carbon. Further, the price of silver is increasing, and the process has become extremely costly. Also, the energy-intensive processing costs of treating all of the filter media, as opposed to treating only a small portion of it, is best avoided. Even more significant, the treatment of the powdered carbon with the silver can change its properties so that it is no longer efficiently suitable for filtration, particularly in the case of the precoat types of filter assemblies.

Treatment of the powdered carbon in such filters typically requires increase in the amount of carbon due to the loss of sorbative properties, which in turn results in increased costs.

All types of fibers are not a good filtration media in view of the fact that they may be difficult to handle when wet, may not precoat well as they may tend to become lumpy, may not disperse well, and may be biodegradable. They have a lower affinity for organics than carbon. Thus, a filter of fibers alone, even where treated with silver, would require large quantities in order to overcome the inherent problems of low filtering efficiency. We do not believe that cellulose used alone would be suitable in a precoat-type filter because of its characteristics. Further, due to the biodegradable nature of untreated cellulose, we would expect erratic performance due to potentially varying rates of bacterial degradation of the cellulose from filter to filter.

Accordingly, there is a very significant need for an effective filtration media which has the advantages of precoatable powdered carbon, yet can have the advantages of bacteriostatic properties to prevent bacterial build-up when that media is used in various types of filters, and is capable of passing the current EPA standards in regard to effluent bacterial count, filtration efficiency, and low silver elution.

THE INVENTION Objects It is an object of this invention to provide an improved water filtration media comprising a mixture of a major amount of powdered carbon and a minor portion of bacteriostatically treated cellulose.

It is another object of this invention to provide an improved bacteriostatic filter media comprising silver-treated cellulose and powdered carbon of the precoatable type in proportions that provide for total bacteriostatic effect in the media from a minor portion of cellulose that has been treated with the silver.

It is another object of this invention to provide an improved filter media that meets current U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations in terms of bacteriostatic effect in the filter, yet has a lower amount of silver eluted therefrom.

It is another object of this invention to provide a filter media of the above type, which can effectively be used in a precoat type of filter such as described above in U.S. Patent 3,055,503 in that it is evenly dispersible on the filtration surface so that channelization, blind spots, or filter failure do not occur.

Summary The invention comprises an improved bacteriostatic filter media having a minor proportion of specially treated dried, silver-bearing, high purified, inert particulate or fibrous material, preferably powdered cellulose combined intimately with a major proportion of powdered activated carbon of the precoatable type. Filters containing this media and methods of preparation of the filtration media are other aspects of the invention.The cellulose powder employed in this invention is at least of food grade purity, preferably analytic or reagent grade, and is of a wettable type of cellulose having an individual fiber size in the range of 10-1,000 micrometers (lim) having a range of about 2-25Fm in diameter and having a density of less than .3 grams per cc by the slurry filtration method or less than .4 grams per cc by dry tapped volume. The material is impregnated with silver by reducing a soluble salt of silver such as silver nitrate to provide from 1-5% of the dry weight of cellulose as silver, preferably 2-4% silver and most preferably 3% silver.

This silver-treated cellulose is then combined with a powdered carbon filter material of the activated precoatable type in an amount sufficient to provide bacteriostatic effect throughout the entire quantity of activated carbon with an elution of silver not exceeding 50 parts per billion (ppb) during the life of the filter.

This will range typically from 1 to 10% by weight of the silver-treated cellulose in the combined filtration media of this invention.

The filter media is then incorporated in various sizes of filtration devices of precoat type. We particularly use a charge of the improved bacteriostatic filter media of this invention in a quick-change type of filtration cartridge as shown in U.S. Patent 3,055,503. Such a filter employing the improved bacteriostatic filter media of this invention is shown to pass the EPA regulations FR 41:152, pp. 32778 - 32782 (August 5, 1976), and has reduced quantities of effluent bacteria as compared to untreated filter media and low silver elution, below 50 ppb and typically in the range of from about 15-35 ppb.

The silver-bearing material may be any inert, insoluble, non-toxic, precoatable material onto which silver can be adsorbed, and which is hydraulically compatible with precoat-type filter operation. The silver is adsorbed, not bonded, to the inert material, and thus its chemical identity is of little bearing if it has the properties described above. While we prefer cellulose, and more particularly chopped cotton fibers, wood fibers are also suitable. Other materials which can be used include synthetic and natural particulate and fibrous material (of the size range described below) such as rayon, polyolefins (polyethylene, polypropylene), diatomaceous earth, silica, polystyrene, polyester resins, PVC, PVA, and the like. We will refer to cellulose in the detailed description below, but it is only by way of example of the various types of inert materials that can be used.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION The following detailed description and specific examples are by way of illustration and not by way of limitation of the principles of this invention. More particularly, the filter media of this invention can be used in all types of filter configurations for water filtration treatment.

Preparation and specifications for bacteriostatic agent component The bacteriostatic agent which is intimately dispersed throughout the powdered carbon filtration material to form the mixed filter media of this invention comprises an inert material (such as cellulose) having the following specifications: The inert material or cellulose shall be of at least food grade purity, preferably analytic or reagent grade. The inert material or cellulose should be easily and instantly wettable which may be determined as follows: A pinch of the dry material when dropped onto the surface of water shall neither spread out or ball up on the surface. Instead, it should immediately begin to absorb water by capillary action and sink below the surface.

The inert material or cellulose should also disperse freely when suspended in water. Thus, in the test noted above for wettability, as the pinch of inert material sinks below the surface, the material should not retain its identity as a single mass, like a cotton ball, but should disperse into tiny particles by itself. If the inert material is supplied in compressed form, a small amount should be reduced to a powder in a mortar and pestle for testing as noted above forwettability and dispersion characteristics.

Upon dispersing of the inert material in water to form a slurry, that slurry should appear homogeneous with no kinks, knots, snarls, balls or the like evident. Under microscopic examination, the slurry should not -have aggregates of more than 10 particles or fibers, nor any aggregates having a dimension dimension of larger than 500 Fm.

With regard to particle size, in the case of powdered material, the mean diameter may range from 2-100 ym and preferably from 5-20 Fm. For fiber forms, the individual fiber size of the inert material (e.g., cellulose) should be within a range of 10-1,0001lm in length, with a mean of 100-500 m. The fiber (e.g., cellulose) diameter should range from 2-25 ijm, with a mean of from 5-101lm.The inert material should have a dry tap density of less than 0.40 grams per cc, or less than 0.30 grams per cc when measured by the slurry filtration method.

Procedure for rendering cellulose bacteriostatic.

Powdered cellulose of the type and purity described above is mixed with distilled water to make a slurry.

An amount of reagent grade silver nitrate, or other soluble salt of silver, sufficient to provide an amount of silver equal to from 1-5% of the dry weight of the cellulose, preferably 2-4% and typically 3%, is added as a solution in distilled water to the cellulose slurry with stirring. This solution is then chemically reduced by addition of reducing agents, alone or in combination, such as sulfite salts, hydrazine, formaldehyde or the like. This results in individual particles of elemental silver being introduced onto and into the individual fibers of cellulose. After the reaction is completed, the silver-impregnated cellulosic fibers are rinsed thoroughly with distilled water and dried.

More specifically, 30 gallons of distilled water are added to a 50-gallon tank into which is added while stirring 11.25 kg of the above-described cellulose powder. The mixture is stirred into a slurry. In a separate container, dissolve 750 grams silver nitrate in 2-3 gallons of distilled water, and carefully pour this into the slurry while mixing. In another separate container, dissolve 1930 grams of sodium sulfite, 300 grams of sodium hydroxide, and 950 mililiters of formaldehyde in 5 gallons of distilled water. This reducing solution is then added slowly to the slurry while stirring. The mixing continues for 10-15 minutes, is then stopped, and the slurry allowed to settle. The supernatant is then siphoned off and discarded. The remaining thick slurry is completely dewatered by filtration.After the dewatering, the treated cellulose is resuspended in 30 gallons of distilled water, mixed for 10 minutes, let stand to settle, siphoned and filtered again. This cycle of resuspension, mixing, settling, siphoning, and filtration is repeated eight more times to provide a thorough washing of the cellulose fibers. The resulting washed and filtered silver-impregnated cellulose is then dried at 1 000C in an oven and sieved until fluffy. This provides bacteriostatic agents sufficient for approximately 1000 quick-change water filters of the precoat type, such as the Model QC 4 cartridge type filter manufactured by Everpure, Inc. of Westmount, Illinois.

Filter media preparation.

The silver-treated cellulose inert fiber material as described above is then mixed thoroughly with a finely powdered, activated carbon precoat filter material. This activated carbon is typically 100%-200 mesh activated carbon, and is of a powdered type rather than a granular type. This powdered carbon may contain inert materials as conventionl filter aids for such activated carbon filter material, for example, diatomaceous earth, silica, alumina and the like. It is thought that these filter aid materials are conventionally supplied to assist in filter cake formation. We prefer to use "MICROPURE" brand precoatable activated powdered carbon material as made by Everpure, Inc. of Westmont, Illinois.

10 grams of the filter media of this invention are then employed in a QC-4* (Trademark of Everpure, Inc.) cartridge-type, quick-change water filter of the type manufactured by Everpure, Inc. in the tests described below. The mixed filter media of this invention is observed to precoat evenly and completely across the exterior surface of the folded filter fabric, providing a cake approximately .1 inch (.254 cm) thick.

In use, excellent bacteriostatic effect is observed as determined by running this filter in the EPA tests for filter media and cartridge, as described in FR 41:152. Less than 50 ppb of silver are eluted during the life of the filter. Typically this is on the order of 15-35 ppb with 18 ppb being usual. The outlet water can be described as clean, bright, taste4ree water. Cloudiness and dirt in the water are removed, off-tastes and odors are extracted, bacteria pass-through is controlled, and in-situ propagation of bacteria internal to the filter cartridge during stagnant periods is inhibited. The pressure drop across the filter face through the fine layer of filter media is excellent. There is no cake "drop-off" due to increased density of the filter media.

Neither bed-type channeling nor spool-type of unloading is observed. Asbestos fiber in inlet water is absent from the outlet water indicating efficient filtration. The reduction in outlet bacterial count after stagnant periods indicates that the silver treated cellulose dispersed throughout the activated carbon filtration material is an effective and efficient source of dissolving silver which permeates the entire media as it dissolves so that bacterial growth in and on the carbon filtration material is inhibited.

Comparative test.

This example shows the results of attempting direct impregnation of silver into the activated carbon to impart bacteriostatic properties thereto. The resulting material was unsuitable for precoat-type of filters.

Precoat-type, powdered, activated carbon filter media was impregnated with silver by chemical reduction of a silver salt solution. The silver-treated material was then studied for its precoat and cake-forming abilities by incorporating it into a transparent pressure vessel functionally and hydraulically identical to the above-described QC-4 type filter.

The silver-treated carbon filter media failed to form a slurry when the inlet water flowed into the apparatus, that is, when the apparatus was activated. As a result, cake formation on the surface of the filter was too poor to be acceptable. Th cake was uneven, and gaps were visible in several places. It was estimated that only 60% of the filter surface was actually covered by cake.

The silver-treated, activated carbon powder was then moisturized in an attempt to alleviate the problem.

This moisturized material did wet adequately to form a slurry, but it still did not form a good precoat cake. It was not evenly deposited, and it fell to the bottom of the vessel when the flow of water was stopped. This is an especially serious disadvantage because it severely reduces the useful lifetime of the filter due to rapid clogging and the comcomitant back pressure increase. In addition, it means that each time the water flow is turned on and off, there must be an even filter cake laid down or else filtration gaps will occur.

On further testing it was found that treatment of the carbon filter media with silver resulted in an 18% density increase. While we do not wish to be bound by theory, we believe that this may be a major factor contributing to the drop-off of the cake from the filter surface. This is in addition to the poor wetting characteristics apparently due to the treatment by silver. We concluded that treatment of all or a major portion of the carbon filter media is entirely unacceptable to provide a precoat-type filter having anti-microbial properties. Because of the failure to be able to produce a filter cartridge having a silver-treated activated carbon, it could not be tested against the improved silver-treated, cellulose/precoatable, powdered carbon filter media of this invention. In addition, the effluent silver concentration from the cartirdge employing only activated carbon treated entirely with silver averaged 54 ppb which is above the maximum limit of 50 ppb specified by the EPA. While the data on effluent silver concentration was sufficiently variable to produce a degree of uncertainty, it is clear from the other poor properties of such treated carbon that it was unsuitable for filtration to produce potable water.

Comparative tests ofnon-bacteriostatically treated, powdered, activated carbon with the filter media of this invention.

Hard water from a private deep well in Northbrook, Illinois, was demineralized by dual bed ion exchange followed by a single mixed bed ion exchange for final polishing and pH control. This highly purified water was mixed with tap water bypassing the ion exchange system to produce water containing 20-40 ppm total dissolved solids, verified by a commercial conductivity meter which monitored the water quality continuously throughout the test. Finally, the test water was passed through a column of "ordinary" granular activated carbon (containing no bacteriostat), which served as a breeder tank for the bacteria naturally indigenous to the water supply. The system was maintained at 20-40 psi throughout the test.

Plumbing materials were brass and plastic only, and the test water was verified to contain no detectable dissolved copper.

In order to bacterially contaminate the water for test purposes, a Pseudomonas fluorescens culture (ATTC 13525) was propagated on tryptone-glucose extract agar slants and transferred to Difco m-TGE broth for growth at room temperature. One ml of a 24 hour culture was used to innoculate one gallon of sterile tap water fortified with 30 ml of the same broth (minimal media) for 24 hours. Just before the time of artificially contaminating the system, a measured aliquot of this secondary 24-hour culture was added to a second gallon of sterile tap water. This diluted culture was immediately fed into the test system with a proportioning feeder pump calibrated to deliver 200 ml/min at the rate of two pulses/sec for 15 minutes before the initial "influent" sample was taken.The contaminated water passed through a mixing tank before entering the module bearing the six filters being tested and the "influent" sample port. The feeder pump rate and dilution factor necessary to produce the desired level of bacteria in the water were determined in advance.

All samples were collected in 500 ml Erlenmeyer flasks which were dry-heat sterilized (greater than 2000C for more than 12 hours). The brass sampling ports were thoroughly flamed on the outside just prior to sampling. Each sample, about 450 ml, was shaken vigorously before pouring 100 ml aliquots into duplicate, sterile, bacteriological sample bottles and duplicate polyethylene bottles for silver analysis. Just before sampling, the bacteriological sample bottles were fortified with one ml of neutralizing solution (Chambers thioglycollate thiosulfate solution), and the silver sample bottles were treated with the required amount of concentrated nitric acid. All analyses were begun within 30 minutes of sampling.Samples from test and control units were taken simultaneously in matched pairs to equalize any possible inflations in the bacteriological quality of the influent water. The "influent" samples of artificially contaminated water, both before and after the 24-hour holding periods, were taken from the "influent" sample port, which is served directly by the brass plumbing of the test module.

Each duplicate sample was analyzed for bacteria using the materials and methods prescribed in the Federal Register (U.S. Government publication), Vol. 41, No. 152. Acidifed samples were processed for silver analysis according to the procedure outlined in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 1971, to concentrate the silver ten-fold before quantifying by atomic absorption spectrometry. Standards and blanks were carried through the entire procedure. In analyzing the standard samples recoveries of greater than 90% were achieved, and the standard deviation was found to be iS ppb at the 30 ppb level.

TABLE I <img class="EMIRef" id="027289590-00050001" />

Record <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Conditions <tb> <SEP> Influent* <SEP> Effluent <tb> <SEP> Cumulative <SEP> Flow <SEP> Rate <SEP> Temp. <SEP> Flow <SEP> Rate <SEP> Temp. <tb>

Schedule <SEP> Unit <SEP> No. <SEP> Time <SEP> Gallonage <SEP> gpm <SEP> C#1 <SEP> pH <SEP> gpm <SEP> C#1 <SEP> pH <tb> Start <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 3/4 <SEP> 16.5 <SEP> 6.9 <SEP> 3/4 <SEP> 16.5 <SEP> 6.9 <tb> <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 8:15 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-1 <SEP> A.M.<SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 25% <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> 375 <tb> Filter <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <tb> Life <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 4:30 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-1 <SEP> P.M. <tb>

<SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <tb> 8 <SEP> Hr <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> 4:30 <tb> Holding <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> P.M. <tb>

Period <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-1 <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> 12:30 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> A.M. <tb>

50% <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> 870 <SEP> 3/4 <SEP> 22 <SEP> 6.9 <SEP> 3/4 <SEP> 22 <SEP> 6.9 <tb> Filter <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> Life <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 11:00 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-1 <SEP> A.M. <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> TABLE I(Cont...) <img class="EMIRef" id="027289590-00060001" />

<SEP> Influent* <SEP> Effluent <tb> Record <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Conditions <SEP> Cumulative <SEP> Flow <SEP> Rate <SEP> Temp. <SEP> Flow <SEP> Rate <SEP> Temp. <tb>

<SEP> Unit <SEP> No. <SEP> Time <SEP> Gallonage <SEP> gpm <SEP> C#1 <SEP> pH <SEP> gpm <SEP> C#1 <SEP> pH <tb> 75% <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> 1,125 <tb> Filter <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> # <tb> Life <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 4:30 <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-1 <SEP> P.M. <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> # <tb> 8 <SEP> Hr <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> 4:30 <tb> Holding <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> P.M. <tb>

Period <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-1 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> 1:40 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> A.M. <tb>

95% <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> # <SEP> 1,425 <SEP> 3/4 <SEP> 22 <SEP> 7.3 <SEP> 3/4 <SEP> 22 <SEP> 7.3 <tb> Filter <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> Life <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 8:30 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-1 <SEP> A.M.<SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> *Alkalilnity as CaCO3 of tap water = 10mg/l Total Dissolved Sollds of tap water = 25 mg/l Hardness as CaCo3 = mg/l TABLE II <img class="EMIRef" id="027289590-00070001" />

<tb> Bacteriological <SEP> and <SEP> chemical <SEP> test <SEP> results <tb> <SEP> Microorganisms/ml <SEP> Silver <SEP> (ppb) <tb> Schedule <SEP> Unit <SEP> No.<SEP> Influent <SEP> Effluent <SEP> Influent <SEP> Effluent <tb> Start <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-l <SEP> 0 <SEP> 2 <SEP> * < 5 <SEP> < 5 <tb> <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 8 <tb> <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 3 <SEP> < 5 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-i <SEP> 1 <SEP> <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> # <SEP> 30 <tb> <SEP> 50% <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> 5-1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 1 <SEP> < 5 <tb> <SEP> Filter <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> 1 <SEP> < 5 <tb> <SEP> Life <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 1 <SEP> < 5 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-i <SEP> 1 <SEP> <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> 7 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> , <SEP> 2 <tb> <SEP> Addition <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> 5-1 <SEP> 650 <tb> <SEP> Artificially <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <tb> <SEP> Contaminated <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <tb> <SEP> Water <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-i <SEP> <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <tb> <SEP> 24 <SEP> Hr. <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> 775 <SEP> 2 <SEP> 6 <tb> <SEP> Holding <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 8 <tb> <SEP> Period <SEP> at <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 7 <tb> <SEP> 50% <SEP> of <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-i <SEP> 31 <tb> <SEP> Filter <SEP> Life* <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> 85 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> 1,250 <tb> <SEP> 95% <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-l <SEP> 2 <SEP> 3 <SEP> 14 <tb> <SEP> Filter <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 13 <tb> <SEP> Life <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 11 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-i <SEP> 2 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> 1 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> 8 <SEP> , <SEP> 0 <SEP> <tb> <SEP> Addition <SEP> of <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> 5-1 <SEP> 5,400 <tb> <SEP> Artificially <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <tb> <SEP> Contaminated <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <tb> Water <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-i <SEP> <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <tb> <SEP> 24 <SEP> Hr.<SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-1 <SEP> 33,000 <SEP> 315 <SEP> 11 <tb> <SEP> Holding <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-2 <SEP> 625 <SEP> 11 <tb> <SEP> Period <SEP> at <SEP> Test <SEP> Unit <SEP> S-3 <SEP> 715 <SEP> 10 <tb> <SEP> 95% <SEP> of <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-i <SEP> 3,250 <tb> <SEP> Filter <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-2 <SEP> 1,150 <tb> <SEP> Life* <SEP> Control <SEP> Unit <SEP> C-3 <SEP> 1,450 <tb> Artificially contaminated water control - org/ml = at 50% 650 at 95% 5,400 * 5 ppb is the lower limit detection Discussion of comparative test results.

The generally low level of bacteria present in the system is notable. The breeder tank of activated carbon was included specifically to propagate the native bacteria, but for some reason it was not effective. The ion exchange demineralizing system would be expected to kill the bacteria in the main stream, of course, due to the extremes of pH produced, and it appears that the tap water by-pass did not supply a significantly large population of organisms. Bacterial counts did achieve moderately high levels by the end of the test, however, and did demonstrate the absence of toxic or inhibitory conditions in the system.

The efficacy of the silver treated units of this invention (units 5-1,5-2 and S-3) can be evaluated by studying the bacteriological test results contained in Table II. At start up and two other instances, the number of bacteria present in both the invention units (S 1-3) and the control units (c 1-3) is so low that a statistical analysis would be meaningless. It is notable that in these cases the samples were taken during periods of continuous flow. There are two reasons for the low levels of bacteria found. One reason is that, until artificial contamination was purposely introduced, few bateria were actually present in the system. The other, and more important, reason is that the precoat filtration method achieves unusually fine filtration.Many bacteria are physically removed, and high bacterial counts are generally not found in the effluents of these filters, even without a bacteriostat, during continuous use. During extended period of non-use, bacteria entrapped within the filter propagate, and some daughter cells are able to penetrate the filtration barrier. Nearly all of these bacteria are quickly washed away as soon as the water resumes flowing. Samples taken during these conditions are represented after the two 24-hour holding periods. At 50% of filter life, with 775 bacterial/ml going into the filter, the average control effluent in C 1-3 was 445, and the average effluent from the filtration media/units of this invention was 1.At 95% of filter life, with 33,000/ml going in, the controls averaged 1950/ml in the effluent, and the silver-treated units of this invention produced an average of only 552 organisms per ml. These figures show that the mixed cellulose/precoat powdered carbon filter media of this invention is significantly effective in inhibiting the growth of such bacteria entrapped within the filter.

Comparative testing coliform bacteria suppression during stagnant periods.

A most important aspect of filter effectiveness can be appreciated in the fact that they are not always in use. During flow conditions there is a natural variation in the porosity from filter to filter which explains occasional higher counts of bacteria passing through the filters. However, most filters pass higher numbers of bacteria after an extended period of stagnation during which bacteria which has flowed into the filter has the opportunity to propagate therein. Upon start-up of the filter, that is, upon opening the tap and commencing the water flow after the period of stagnation, there can be a very high count of bacteria in the initially drawn water.The following test protocol shows the results of sampling two control filters employing powdered carbon filter materials as compared to two filters containing the silver-treated cellulose/powdered carbon filter media of this invention, called silver 1 and silver 2 in the following example.

Four filters as described above were prepared, two using the powdered carbon material without silver, and two using the filter media of this invention. These filters were inserted into quick-change heads, Model QC-4 of Everpure, in a laboratory test module. The module was supplied with softened water, dechlorinated by a large granular activated carbon bed followed by fine filtration by a large precoat filter. The effluent plumbing from each filter and the influent sample port was served by a 1.0 gpm flow controller and a timer-activated solenoid. Coliform organisms were artificially added just before the manifolding leading to the four standard QC-4 heads containing the test filters. These organisms were Enterobacteraerogenes (ATCC 15038), a species believed by some to be the most vigorous and hardy member of the coliform group.They were acclimated for 18 hours in sterile, dechlorinated tap water with 0.4% lactose broth. After passing 1,735 gallons through each filter, this charge was changed to the use of 24-hour agar slants, the organisms being transferred without intentional nutrients. The choice of organism, the water pretreatment and the acclimation in minimal media were all designed to produce conditions most favorable for optimum coliform survival. The media containing the coliforms were pumped into the inflowing feedwater so that the coliform would collect in filters prior to the stagnation tests.

The units were operated for several days, 1,000 gallons through each filter, to accumulate a high concentration of organisms before bacteriological sampling was begun. i-liter samples were taken in sterile flasks immediately after overnight or weekend downtimes. These were thoroughly mixed before transferring portions to sterile bacteriological sample bottles and were processed within one hour by Standard Methods procedures for Total Coliforms. The influent sample port was always sampled first.The data is collected and shown below in Table Ill TABLE Ill ln-filter coliform bacteriostaticity Stagnation Meter Reading Unit or Sample Coliforms/1 00 ml Hours Period atx Gallons Upon Start-Up Stagnant 1 1002 Influent 810 Effluent: Control 1 13 Effluent Control 2 5 17 Effluent Silver 1 Effluent Silver 2 < 1 2 1434 Influent 2500 Effluent: Control 1 10 Effluent Control 2 15 17 Effluent Silver 1 < 1 Effluent Silver 2 1 3 1674 Influent 52000 Effluent: Control 1 25 Effluent Control 2 110 68 Effluent Silver 1 1 Effluent Silver 2 < 1 4 1980 Influent 320000 Effluent: Control 1 650 Effluent Control 2 1300 68 Effluent Silver 1 2 Effluent Silver 2 7 5 220 Influent 52000 Effluent: Control 1 120 Effluent Control 2 2700 17 Effluent Silver 1 14 Effluent Silver 2 140 Discussion of stagnancy test results.

The coliform-containing water was passed into the four test units continuously by pump until 1,002 gallons had accumulated on the flow meter. At that point in time, the flow was stopped and the first stagnational period of 17 hours (overnight) was begun. Immediately upon termination of that stagnation period, the water flow was started, and the influent and effluent sample ports were tested. The influent port was tested first, and as shown in stagnation period 1,810 coliforms/100 ml were assayed. The effluent from each of the four test filters was then collected and assayed showing the figures in column 4 of Table Ill.

Thereafter, coliforms were continuously added for another 200 gallons until meter reading 1242 was reached, at which time the system was shut down for a weekend.

The following Monday there commenced pumping another 192 gallons of water containing the artificially added coliforms through the test bench set-up until meter reading 1434 gallons, at which time a 17-hour stagnation period (period 2) was started. At the end of that time, the influent port assayed 2500 coliforms per 1 00/my, and the two controls in the range of 10-15, while the two filters of this invention assayed approximately 1 (identified as Silver 1 and Silver 2 in Table Ill in the third stagnation period).

Similarly, the balance of the table for stagnation periods 3,4 and 5 can be understood. The improved coliform suppression in the two test filters containing the silver-treated cellulose/precoatcarbon filtration media of this invention as compared to that of the two control filters is statistically highly significant, at the 99% confidence level, based on Student's "t" test.

While not wishing to be bound by theory, we have the following observations in regard to the principles of the present invention. We have found quite unexpectedly that rather than following the prior art methods of evenly distributing silver throughout filter materials, by segregating the bacteriostatic property of the silver into a different material, we are able to obtain an improved filtration medium. We have been able by the mixed filtration medium of this invention to maintain the adsorptive and precoatable properties of the powdered, activated carbon filter material without any increases in density or drop-off. By use of silver-impregnated inert material (e.g., cellulose), we are able to get slow release of the silver atoms which disperse into, or penetrate the interstitial carbon which acts as the filtration medium.We believe that the silver ions are thus only loosely adsorbed onto the powdered, activated carbon filtration material where they are available to act effectively as bacteriostatic agents, but without adversely affecting the essential sorptive properties of the carbon.

In contrast, as noted by the comparative tests above, by directly treating the powdered carbon filtration material, the carbon properties are changed so that effective filtration cakes cannot be produced. Thus, the silver in the special filtration medium of this invention does not cause change in the chemical or hydraulic properties of the powdered carbon filtration material. The powdered carbon filtration material is not densified so there is no increase in fall-off. Indeed, by use of the inert material (e.g., cellulose), we are able to control the density of the mixed filtration medium so that there is even less tendency toward fall-off.

Unexpectedly, we found that by this process of segregation, smaller quantities of silver bound to the cellulose still provide bacteriostatic protection for the entire mixed filtration medium. Thus, one of the advantages of this invention is that only small quantities of inert material (e.g., cellulose) need be treated to provide the overall bacteriostatic properties of the mixed filter media. This means that there is no possibility of the powdered carbon filtration material losing any of its sorptive properties as a result of the combination of the components of the mixed filter media of this invention. We have also been able to overcome the disadvantage of biodegradability of the cellulose, and its inability to be formable into a precoat-type filter cake.We decrease the raw material and processig costs involved in use of silver as a bacteriostatic agent, and also reduce the effluent silver quantities to below that currently recommended by the EPA. We are able to improve or maintain the permeability of the filter cake to that suitable for superfine filtration in precoat-type of filters. Thus, the filters are able to retain their indigenous bacteria filtration properties.

We believe that in operation the filter medium of this invention there is a true synergistic effect in the following respects: The treatment of the inert material (e.g., cellulose) with the silver does not apparently so bind the silver to the cellulose that it cannot be slowly released (gradually dissolved or eluted) from the surface of the cellulose fibers to permeate the interstitial carbon powder. And, during such use, the silver does not appear to become so bound to the carbon that it adversely affects the permeability of the filter cake through densification, nor cause other physical or chemical changes in the carbon that affect it, such as producing "drop-off".Indeed, the silver appears to be adsorbed onto the surface of the carbon in a manner not fully understood yet which gives full range to the bacteriostatic effect of the silver, while permitting the carbon to exhibit improved, as compared to silver-treated carbon, properties of filtration of pollutant solids, oganics and gases. This result is entirely unexpected as it was thought that the segregation and providing only a minor portion of the entire filter with a bacteriostatic property would lead to lower overall bacteriostatic effect in the combined filter media. Indeed, the filter media of this invention may be better termed a "combined" filter media than a mixture.

It should be understood that various modifications within the scope of this invention can be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit thereof. We therefore wish our invention to be defined by the scope of the appended claims as broadly as the prior art will permit, and in view of this specification if need be. For example, we can use any dispersible type of fiber within the specification set forth herein. In addition, we can use any powdered carbon below 200 mesh which has the precoatability properties. Filters using the media of this invention are useful for removal of gases typically producing bad taste in water, suspended solids producing turbidity in water, including fine particles down to 1 micron, asbestos below 1 micron, and removal of organics and bacteria. The carbon useful herein may be any commercially available activated carbon of potable water filtration quality.

Claims (13)

1. A bacteriostatic water filtration media composition for use in water filters having: a) a first, adsorbent component comprising a powdered activated carbon filter material; b) a second, silver-providing component, comprising an inert, finely divided, water-insoluble, non-toxic material impregnated with 1 to 5 weight percent of silver; c) said second, silver-providing component being intimately and uniformly dispersed within said first, adsorbent component to form said water filtration media composition; d) said second, silver-providing component being present in said composition in an amount sufficient to provide bacteriostatic effect throughout the entire filtration media for the life of the filter;; e) said second component providing upon flow of water into contact therewith slow release of said silver therefrom and dispersion of said silver throughout said composition, thereby to permit said silver to be effectively present in association with the carbon of said filtration media composition to provide said bacteriostatic effect throughout the entire filtration media, and f) said media composition of said second component dispersed in said first component having the property of uniform precoatabilitywithout i) inhibiting carbon adsorptive properties, or ii) causing densification of said carbon to promote precoat fall-off from filtration surfaces.
2. A bacteriostatic water filtration media composition as in claim 1 wherein said second, silver-providing component is present in said filtration media composition in a range from 1 to 10 percent by weight on a dry basis.
3. A bacteriostatic water filtration media composition as in claim 2 wherein said second silver-providing component is selected from powdered or fibrous cellulose.
4. A bacteriostatic water filtration media composition as in claim 3 wherein said cellulose is a wettable cellulose comprising individual fibers of sizes in the range of 10-1 000 ijm, diameters in the range of from 2-25 m, and dry tap density of less than .4g/cc.
5. A bacteriostatic water filtration media composition as in claims 3 or 4 wherein said silver is prsent in said cellulose in an amount of from 2 to 4 weight percent on a dry basis.
6. A bacteriostatic water filtration media composition as in claims 1-4 wherein said activated carbon material contains a minor percentage of a filter aid selected from the group of diatomaceous earth, silica, alumina, and mixtures thereof.
7. A water filter assembly comprising in operative combination: a) a housing for a water filter element; b) a water filter element disposed therein; c) an impure water inlet; d) a purified water outlet; e) a means for directing said impure water through said elements; and f) a filtration media disposed in association with said filter element, said filtration media having a composition as defined in one or more of claims 1-6.
8. Method of filtering water comprising the steps of: a) providing a water filter element in a housing having the properties of supporting a filtration media while permitting water to pass therethrough; b) providing a water filtration media as in claim 1 in said housing; c) introducing impure water requiring filtration into said housing containing a water filter element; d) contacting said water with said media so that there is simultaneous action of: i) said activated carbon for adsorption of materials including particulates and organics, and of ii) said silver-providing component to provide bacteriostatic effect throughout the entire filtration media, thereby to treat said water; e) passing said treated water through said filter element to filter said water; and f) passing said treated and filtered water from said housing for use.
9. Method ofwaterfiltration as in claim 8wherein: a) said contacting step includes passing said impure water into said housing and through said element in a manner that provides for precoating of said media on said filter element.
10. Method of water filtration as in claim 8 or 9 wherein: a) said media composition is the media as claimed in one or more of claims 1-6.
11. A bacteriostatic filter medium substantially as herein before described.
12. Water when purified by filtration through a bacteriostatic filter medium as claimed in any of claims 1 to 6 or 11.
13. Water when filtered through a filter as claimed in claim 7 or by the method of any of claims 8 to 10.
GB8017551A 1979-06-01 1980-05-29 Bacteriostatic filter media Expired GB2051770B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US4442079 true 1979-06-01 1979-06-01

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB2051770A true true GB2051770A (en) 1981-01-21
GB2051770B GB2051770B (en) 1983-04-07

Family

ID=21932293

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB8017551A Expired GB2051770B (en) 1979-06-01 1980-05-29 Bacteriostatic filter media

Country Status (7)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS641197B2 (en)
BE (1) BE883574A (en)
CA (1) CA1140522A (en)
DE (1) DE3020615C2 (en)
FR (1) FR2457708B1 (en)
GB (1) GB2051770B (en)
NL (1) NL192029C (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996000321A1 (en) * 1994-06-24 1996-01-04 Suntory Limited Antibacterial fiber, textile and water-treating element using the fiber and method of producing the same
GB2383999A (en) * 2001-12-15 2003-07-16 Salamander Anti-bacterial treatment
US7712613B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-05-11 Pur Water Purification Products, Inc. Water filter materials and water filters containing a mixture of microporous and mesoporous carbon particles
US7740766B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-06-22 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods for treating water
US7740765B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-06-22 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods for treating water
US7749394B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-07-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods of treating water
US7850859B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-12-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Water treating methods

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4114526A1 (en) * 1991-05-03 1992-11-05 Envi Lab Electronics Gmbh Collector mixt. for absorbing oil sopills etc. from water - consists of sawdust, paper cuttings and biological binder e.g. maize flour
US5178768A (en) * 1992-08-20 1993-01-12 Pall Corporation Mixed filter bed composition and method of use
DE19703413C1 (en) * 1997-01-30 1998-04-23 Bayrol Chem Fab Gmbh Filter material with disinfecting properties used in swimming pool filters
DE102016107485A1 (en) * 2016-04-22 2017-10-26 Poromembrane Gmbh Water treatment device

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB422948A (en) * 1933-05-15 1935-01-22 Dozent Dr Fritz Feigl Method of producing therapeutically and disinfectantly active substances
US2785106A (en) * 1952-08-16 1957-03-12 Ions Exchange And Chemical Cor Process for making antiseptic article
US3268444A (en) * 1963-06-05 1966-08-23 Commercial Filters Corp Method of disinfecting potable waters
GB1063669A (en) * 1963-12-23 1967-03-30 Pall Corp Filter assembly for sterilizing water
DE2316668A1 (en) * 1972-04-03 1973-10-18 Sunwave Kogyo K K A device for purification of water
CA1011476A (en) * 1972-11-09 1977-05-31 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. Bactericidal water purifier for dechlorinated water
CA982779A (en) * 1973-02-07 1976-02-03 Gulick John A. Van Water purifier
DE2544230A1 (en) * 1975-10-03 1977-04-14 Draegerwerk Ag HEPA filters with microbicidal filter material

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996000321A1 (en) * 1994-06-24 1996-01-04 Suntory Limited Antibacterial fiber, textile and water-treating element using the fiber and method of producing the same
US7850859B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-12-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Water treating methods
US7922008B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2011-04-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Water filter materials and water filters containing a mixture of microporous and mesoporous carbon particles
US7712613B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-05-11 Pur Water Purification Products, Inc. Water filter materials and water filters containing a mixture of microporous and mesoporous carbon particles
US7740766B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-06-22 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods for treating water
US7740765B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-06-22 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods for treating water
US7749394B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2010-07-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods of treating water
US8119012B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2012-02-21 The Procter & Gamble Company Water filter materials and water filters containing a mixture of microporous and mesoporous carbon particles
GB2383999A (en) * 2001-12-15 2003-07-16 Salamander Anti-bacterial treatment
GB2383999B (en) * 2001-12-15 2005-06-01 Salamander Anti-bacterial treatment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
CA1140522A (en) 1983-02-01 grant
GB2051770B (en) 1983-04-07 grant
DE3020615C2 (en) 1994-12-15 grant
NL8003150A (en) 1980-12-03 application
FR2457708A1 (en) 1980-12-26 application
NL192029B (en) 1996-09-02 application
JPS641197B2 (en) 1989-01-10 grant
JP1001197B (en) grant
DE3020615A1 (en) 1980-12-11 application
BE883574A (en) 1980-12-01 grant
CA1140522A1 (en) grant
JP1533515C (en) grant
BE883574A1 (en) grant
NL192029C (en) 1997-01-07 grant
FR2457708B1 (en) 1988-01-22 grant
JPS55162390A (en) 1980-12-17 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3803029A (en) Materials purification
LeChevallier et al. Water treatment and pathogen control
No et al. Application of chitosan for treatment of wastewaters
Tomaszewska et al. Removal of organic matter by coagulation enhanced with adsorption on PAC
Shon et al. Effluent organic matter (EfOM) in wastewater: constituents, effects, and treatment
Yamato et al. Difference in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) caused by membrane polymer materials
US5082568A (en) Method for removing low concentrations of metal contaminants from water
Huang et al. Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: a review
US6080317A (en) Process and apparatus for the purification of waste water
US7186344B2 (en) Membrane based fluid treatment systems
Lin et al. Effects of humic substance characteristics on UF performance
US5024764A (en) Method of making a composite filter
US4430226A (en) Method and apparatus for producing ultrapure water
Lin et al. Ultrafiltration processes for removing humic substances: effect of molecular weight fractions and PAC treatment
Laîné et al. Status after 10 years of operation—overview of UF technology today
Carroll et al. The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment
US6833075B2 (en) Process for preparing reactive compositions for fluid treatment
Trebouet et al. Stabilized landfill leachate treatment by combined physicochemical–nanofiltration processes
Choo et al. Effect of anaerobic digestion broth composition on membrane permeability
US3872013A (en) Bactericidal water purifier for dechlorinated water
US6599429B1 (en) Water treatment product and method
Jacangelo et al. Mechanism of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and MS2 virus removal by MF and UF
US5374357A (en) Filter media treatment of a fluid flow to remove colloidal matter
US5190659A (en) Contamination removal system employing filtration and plural ultraviolet and chemical treatment steps and treatment mode controller
Wilf et al. Application of low fouling RO membrane elements for reclamation of municipal wastewater

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PE20 Patent expired after termination of 20 years

Effective date: 20000528