ES2363355B2 - SYSTEM OF RALENTIZATION OF THE TRANSFER RATE OF A DEVICE BY CRYPTOGRAPHIC METHOD. - Google Patents

Abstract

System of slowing down the transfer rate of a device by cryptographic method comprising: processing means (1) configured to: select a type of encryption; encrypt information according to the type of encryption selected, comprising: converting the information to be encrypted into a string of numerical characters, dividing the string of characters into blocks of a variable number of characters and encrypting each of the blocks according to the type of encryption selected; randomly generate a plurality of keys; The system additionally comprises: a memory (2) that stores the plurality of keys generated, the encrypted information and the operations and intermediate variables performed by the processing means; and input and output means (3) configured to receive and send information from abroad to perform the encryption tasks.

Description

System of slowing down the transfer rate of a device by method

cryptographic.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention belongs to the field of cryptography.

STATE OF THE TECHNIQUE

So far cryptography has been used in its own sense, encrypt with a key and decrypt with a key. The following documents related to the present invention are noteworthy.

Document US2005210249-A1 offers an information storage device that is encrypted to maintain the security of the contents and the subsequent transmission of the same to other devices to be able to manipulate them only in case the authentication is correct and the data flow has been completely transferred. However, once the access code is known, you have permission to use the data and manipulate it while allowing it to be disseminated and made clear to anyone else without prior encryption, infringing copyright.

Document US7434067-B1 presents a comparator of security authorizations preventing indiscriminate access and allowing access under personal attributes. The comparator has a back door that allows access to decryption and decryption itself. But, the comparator is not expressly referred to content and does not have a backdoor that allows access to clear data absolutely.

Document US2008226069-A1 presents the encryption of data obtained by input devices, such as a keyboard or any other similar means, being able to decrypt them by means of functions of a processing module. However, it does not offer a quantification of the difficulty of decryption nor is it geared towards high amounts of data information. In document US2008226069-A1 contents are encrypted but it is possible to decrypt them so that they can be manipulated and disseminated without control by breaking the authorship rights, which should be controlled.

A system of slowing down the transfer rate of a device that would allow some control over the time required to decipher information was therefore desirable.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention presents a system for slowing down the transfer rate of a device by cryptographic method based on the control of the information decryption time. The method comprises the following stages:

one.

 Select the encryption to use:

Choice of an encryption method to encrypt the information in clear. The encryption can be selected from symmetric encryption DES, T-DES, AES, etc. and asymmetric RSA, ElGamal, Elliptic Curve, etc.

2.

Encrypt the information:

The slowdown will be determined based on the security that is to be attributed to the encrypted document, to the greater or lesser confidentiality that is to be attributed, and to the immediate provision or non-provision that is to be granted. To this end, the method applies a variable decryption difficulty that will result in a variation of the time required in decryption. By their nature, symmetric ciphers will be faster than asymmetric ones.

In the encryption stage, the information document will first be converted into a string of numeric characters (binary, decimal, etc.). If the document is audio or video it can be passed directly to a binary character string, if it is a text document, each character can be passed to its corresponding ASCII character, or use any other conversion system, and for example, pass the character string to a binary character string.

For encryption, the document is divided into blocks of k characters to encrypt each block according to the encryption chosen in the previous stage. Once each one of the blocks has been encrypted, they will together form the encrypted text.

3. Generate a plurality of keys:

This stage is what characterizes the proposed slower, in it, a plurality of keys is randomly generated. If the decryption key is kj, the method

would randomly generate a plurality of keys that along with kj, would be delivered to the

addressee. So the delivery will consist of! ,, ... k, ..., ∀. The amount of keys

kk kk

12 js # 1 s

offered will mean that - when "s" tends to infinity - the recipient has to prove approximately half of the number of keys delivered to decipher the document. Therefore, to increase the decryption time a thousand times, the method must randomly construct a plurality of two thousand keys.

Therefore, the method of slowing down the transfer rate of a

device by cryptographic method comprises: ∃ selecting a type of encryption; ∃ encrypt information according to the type of encryption selected, comprising:

convert the information to be encrypted into a string of numerical characters, divide the string of characters into blocks of a variable number of characters and encrypt each of the blocks according to the type of encryption selected in the previous stage;

∃ randomly generate a plurality of keys;

∃ distribute a set of keys to each recipient, each set consisting of a variable number of keys comprising the decryption key. Preferably, the selection of an encryption type will comprise the selection

alternative between: ∃ symmetric encryption, comprising: DES, T-DES, AES; ∃ asymmetric encryption, comprising: RSA, ElGamal, Elliptic Curve.

The device that implements the previous method comprises:

∃ processing means configured to: -select a type of encryption; - encrypt information according to the type of encryption selected,

comprising: converting the information to be encrypted into a string of numerical characters, dividing the string of characters into blocks of a variable number of characters and encrypting each of the blocks according to the type of encryption selected;

-

randomly generate a plurality of keys;

∃ a memory that stores the plurality of generated keys, the encrypted information and the operations and intermediate variables performed by the processing means;

∃ input and output means configured to receive and send information from abroad to perform encryption tasks.

Preferably, the processing means will alternatively select the type of encryption from:

∃ symmetric encryption, comprising: DES, T-DES, AES;

∃ asymmetric encryption, comprising: RSA, ElGamal, Elliptic Curve.

Because the submission to a different processor makes the decryption rate different, it is necessary for the device to have a known processor embedded on which the decryption is performed. This allows to control the time of offering the internal information, since the decryption time is given by the capacity of the processor.

Because the encrypted document may have a greater or lesser need to be slowed down, the previous method is applied to it. When the decryption key is unknown, the only usual way to get the text clear is to try all the possible keys one by one. This usually takes so long that this option is unfeasible. Therefore, being at the intermediate point between the brute force (test all possible keys) and knowledge of the key (test a single key), allows decryption to slow down since a set of keys is offered, among which is the correct. The more keys offered, the more difficult it will be to solve the decryption.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Next, to facilitate the understanding of the invention, an illustrative but not limiting way will describe an embodiment of the invention that refers to a figure.

Figure 1 depicts the data transfer rate slowing device by encryption.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT

Next, a way of realizing the system that is intended to be patented is detailed.

1. Select the encryption to use. RSA encryption

RSA encryption is the encryption method that will be used in the preferred embodiment of the invention. The RSA Algorithm, proposed in 1978 owes its name to the initials of the last names of its inventors Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir and Leonard Adleman, is based on the computational difficulty of obtaining the prime factors of very high numbers. It is easy to find high cousins and then multiply them to create a larger number, but starting from a high number and looking for their prime factors is an extremely complex operation.

5 Initial specifications

To make use of this Algorithm, a series of structures must be defined. The following table indicates the steps to be carried out and the way in which the elements involved in them should be treated, such elements may be

10 secrets or no secrets. The secret elements should not be disclosed, while the non-secrets will be public and should be offered to anyone who asks or needs them.

one.

Two prime numbers "p" and "q" Secret

2.

r = p * q Not secret

3.

() r% = (p-1) * (q-1) Secret

Four.

SK (Secret Key) is the Private Key Secret

5.

PK (Public Key) is the Public Key Not secret

6.

X is the message to be transmitted or Plaintext Secret

7.

And it is the encrypted message Not secret

Step 3 is easily deductible from the definition of Euler's function given the generation of "r" as a product of two cousins. 15 The general formula of this function is:

11 1

% () rr (1 ∋ #) (1

& ∋ #) (1 ...

∋∋ #)

pp p

12 n

where ppp,, ..., are the prime factors of "r".

1.2 3 n

This Euler phi function on “n”, also called Euler's Indicator, offers

20 as a result the number of relative cousins that has “n” less than himself. Thus, for example, φ (20) = 8, since 20 is broken down into two prime factors, 2 and 5, the first raised to 2, and the second raised to unity. They are therefore the following relative cousins with 20 minors than himself: 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 19.

25 Public and private keys have a strong relationship between them. To obtain this relationship between SK and PK an extension of Euler's Theorem is made:

If ab (modr, this means that for every exponent "m", am (bm modr. This leads to

r

that Euler's formula, a% () (1mod r can be rewritten as:

m% ()

a ∋ r (1mod r

where "a" is relative cousin with "r". Also, as ab (mod, then ∋ (∋bc mod

r acr, for every element "c" belonging to the integers. Using both results you can infer:

Xm∋% () 1st) (X modr

where the plain text X (plaintext) is a relative cousin with "r" - a restriction that will be indicated below how to remove.

The relationship between public and private keys, PK, SK, is as follows.

They must comply with the ratio SK ∋PK m% () 1

(∋ r), which can be expressed as follows:

SK ∋PK (1mod ()

% r

Being able to express the previous relationship as:

SK∋PK

X (X modr

Encryption and decryption

Noting by the usual English capital letters of encipherment and decipherment, "E" and "D" respectively, and offering in the subscripts the key to be used, the encryption and decryption of the RSA Algorithm can be expressed in a compact manner as:

Encryption:

PK () X Y XPK mod

E & (r

SK PK ∋SK

Decryption: D () (Y modr (X modr (X

SKY modr

Since these encryption and decryption operations are commutative, the reason is that SK * PK = PK * SK - it follows that encrypting decrypted text is the same as decrypting encrypted text:

D (E ()) & E (D ())

XX (X mod r

SKPK PKSK

Improving the Algorithm

There are a number of aspects that must continue to be considered, because what seems like a simple Algorithm, contains within it a series of deep and complex aspects that cannot be left out, so that they will be contemplated below.

PK PK

It is known that X modr & (X) m∋ r) mod r for any integer "m", and any plain text X, resulting in X, X + r, X + 2r, X + 576r, ... offer the same encrypted text . That is, the function is a function such that many elements - infinites - of the initial set offer the same image in the final set. To restrict these possibilities to a one-to-one function, the text X must be restricted to the set {0, 1, 2,…. r-1}. This entails the application, as previously expressed, of the formulas of encryption and decryption in a bijective way, one against one.

It has been proven that the realization of a series of guidelines, in the use of the RSA Algorithm, makes it difficult to break, in addition to training it to work properly.

a) The choice of prime numbers: Two prime numbers, "p" and "q", different from each other, must be selected. The product r = p * q is made public, but both prime numbers must remain secret, or their traces removed, that is, they are unknown to anyone, including the coding part. The inventors of the Algorithm recommend as additional protection a series of additional choices:

one.

"P" and "q" must differ by a few digits, but without being too close.

2.

Both (p-1) and (q-1) must contain large prime factors, p ’and q’, respectively.

3.

The gcf [(p-1), (q-1)] must be small.

Four.

That (p’-1) and (q’-1) have large prime factors, p ’’ and q ’’

respectively. b) The choice of keys: It must be fulfilled that SK ∋ PK (1mod ()

% r, that is, that the product of the private and public key is relative cousin with Euler's phi function. It must also be easy to compute SK and PK. Below is how to meet these requirements.

Let d = mcd (a, n), the greatest common divisor of two numbers "a" and "n". The congruence aX (b modn can be solved, that is, an entire “X” can be found that satisfies it only if the gcf (a, n) divides “b.” Without entering into the proof of this theorem, which is intended is that the gcf (a, n) divide

b. If that gcf (a, n) = 1, it always happens that 1 will divide b. Then we will look for mcd (a, n) to be 1. If you make the two equations d = mcd (a, n) and aX (b modn, actually be 1 = mcd (SK, ()) and SK ∋ PK (% r

% r 1mod (). To achieve what is sought, which is that the congruence SK ∋ PK (% r

1mod () can be solved, it is simply to actually search for 1 = mcd (SK, ()).

% r The gcf (SK,% () r) = 1 when SK and% r

() do not have common factors, that is they are relative cousins among them. Using the Euclidean Algorithm it is possible to find a suitable method to know relative cousins of a given number, being able to find from PK the value of PK, and vice versa, which would complete the private key search algorithm (SK) and public (PK).

2. Encrypt the documentation:

To encrypt a message, it must be previously divided into blocks that do not exceed the value r-1. Otherwise, ambiguous functions would be obtained by allowing diverse representations. One way to encode a literary text is to transform each letter to a numerical code, ASCII, ANSI, or any other. Assuming A = 01, B = 02, ... Z = 27 (including the letter Ñ as proper to the study alphabet). In addition, values could be assigned to other different and perhaps necessary signs such as,) (¿! @ /; ._ {} ç + * ~ z ©… so you should look for an appropriate assignment between each sign and a number. However, as an example this coding will be maintained, for simplicity.

If the message is “In a place in La Mancha, whose name I don't want to remember”, after putting it in capital letters and removing the tildes and blank spaces and commas, it could be written as: [05142214122207011904051201130114030801040503222616141613021905141618 220905191601031691.

The Algorithm values are now chosen. For example, p = 100003 and q = 1200007. The result of r = p * q = 120004300021.

The text to be encrypted is divided so that it does not exceed the value r-1, that is, 120004300020. To comply with this specification, the text will be divided into the following 8-digit blocks: [05142214,12220701,19040512,01130114, 03080104,05032226,16141613,02190514, 16182209,05191601,03161904,01191305]

Assuming that SK is 60238691159. To calculate PK, one must satisfy

SK ∋PK (1mod ()

% r

obtaining a value of PK = 671627.

Next, all the elements of the plain text are encrypted, raising each of them to the PK power and calculating the module value r.

This gives us the following values:

PK () X Y XPK mod

E & (r

[83071342073,11341992260,92701932291,33584471135,80369499959,24635225570, 45048183052,48263380423,74143246285,117149080760,78437239131,2056963927 2], which sets the encrypted text.

The decryption process consists of taking each of the encrypted blocks, and raising them to SK to later obtain its modular result on r.

SK PK ∋SK

D () (Y modr (X modr (X modr

SKY

Applying these operations the values are obtained: [05142214,12220701,19040512,01130114,03080104,05032226,16141613,02190514, 16182209,05191601,03161904,01191305]

If each of the pairs of digits is then set to literal value, according to the pattern A = 01, B = 02, ... Z = 27, the text is obtained - after inserting the original blank spaces: “In one place de la Mancha, whose name I don't want to remember. ” However, in this phase only the message is encrypted, not doing the decrypted phase. Only the encrypted text is constructed: [83071342073,11341992260,92701932291,33584471135,80369499959,24635225570, 45048183052,48263380423,74143246285,117149080760,78437239131,2056963927 2]

3. Generate a plurality of keys: Breaking the algorithm by brute force

Attempting to break the RSA encryption algorithm by brute force means that the encrypted text is divided, [83071342073,11341992260,92701932291,33584471135,80369499959,24635225570, 45048183052,48263380423,74143246285,117149080760,784692275272275272275275272275272395276272395276396392395 original in clear knowing only what is public, which is the value of r and PK. As SK is unknown, you must test all numbers j from 1 to r until you find the value that taking any piece of encrypted text, and raised to that value j module r give a number that is written in letters that offers a coherent sentence in a language. Due to the enormous amount of values at stake, the precise time to perform this operation is impossible to contemplate. This is a brute force attack.

Slow Deciphering

The method proposed here is halfway between brute force and knowledge of the SK key. In this case the user is given a set of keys, randomly generated including the correct one, for example the set: {1947284219, 60238691159, 817327811}. The choice of the extension of the wrench or keys will give the average time to obtain the clear text, so the decryption of the text is controlled.

For each of these SKj values, the results obtained on the first and second blocks of the encrypted text are the following: 83071342073 and 11341992260. For 1947284219, the following is obtained: [39588400026, 118687772076]. It cannot be because the first letter does not exist, "39" is outside the alphabet. For 60238691159, you get: [05142214,12220701]: ENUNLUGA For 817327811, you get: [68908968738,18311139167]: It can't be because the first letter doesn't exist, "68" is out of the alphabet. With this bunch of keys it is clear that the SK is 60238691159, since letters are always obtained, and with a certain semantic sense, so this SK key would be applied over all the encrypted text to get all the full text in clear.

The end result is that it has taken three times longer to decipher the text than if only one key were available, the correct one. In general, what is usually given is a larger number of keys, for example 10,000, which means that on average the correct key is around half, around 5,000, hence when 5,000 have possibly been tested has been given the correct one.

The possibility of this slower is to assume, for example, a file where several text, or audio, or video documents are located, and each one with a certain degree of confidentiality, which means that decryption will be slower or slower. Quick. So if, for example, if there were 3 documents, one of very confidential value, another of medium and another of low, a slowdown rate would be applied for each document, for example 10,000 keys for the most confidential, 3,000 keys for the medium, and 100 keys for the least confidential. This would mean that the most sensitive documentation would be the most difficult to handle and dispose of, the least important in terms of security being the easiest to be deciphered.

Thus, if the document consisting of encrypting and slowing down was the first chapter of a book, specifically “El Quijote”, which begins with “En un un de la Mancha…”, and ends in “came to call it Dulcinea del Toboso, because he was a native of Toboso, a name that seemed to be a musician and a pilgrim and significant, like all the others that he and his things had put ”, has a total of 8202 characters. If they are divided into 4-letter blocks, 2051 blocks will be obtained, the last of which will only have two letters. Applying normal encryption, the time it takes for this execution to be decrypted assumes an Intel (R) Core (TM) 2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83Ghz of 2,112.52 seconds, that is, about 35 minutes. If it were desired that the process lasted longer, a greater number of keys would be offered. If the number of keys that were given outside of {61627611,99299112,76764913,8723618246,7624551234,89746841634,72364273,82 37481273,3248846423,34234234,234235454,12098984823,34245,342412412,464647657687687687687 , 891818913,83578774734,487 8742374723,3434134,87873858179,3478783478,4387865324,31573894783,3489463 24,12347893784,234782844,347878341,34783743343,24134512532,34234242343453454453454453454453453454453454453454453453454453453453453453453454453454453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453453343 , 1947284219,938758234,20930353,1029333911,198001001,8989781172,602 38691159, 817327811,6651829934}, and each of them will be tested in this order, upon reaching the 49th the decryption would be resolved, which means a time of 108497, 34 on our device, that is, more than 30 hours to be able to have the first chapter of the novel "Don Quixote".

The way to industrially apply the described system follows from its description. However, its applicability in the industry related to computer, financial, governmental, police and security services and, in general in the industry related to all those areas or services that require the blocking of information that is available as a starting point is highlighted as more relevant. indiscriminately. It is about making the availability of information controlled in time, and if it already was, that it is not

5 is available until the decryption time has expired, a time that is previously controlled.

This control of time and resources in the availability of information makes it useful in the processes of information engineering, control and safeguarding of data or data protection, as in copyright. So by

For example, the manipulation of information by third parties could be so expensive in time and resources for them that it would make their availability unfeasible, but it would be easier, lighter and less expensive by the authorized holder, who would have a smaller set of keys.

Once the invention is clearly described, it is noted that the particular embodiments described above are subject to modifications in detail provided that they do not alter the fundamental principle and essence of the invention.

Claims (5)

1.-Method of slowing down the transfer rate of a device by cryptographic method comprising the steps:

!

select an encryption type and generate an encryption key according to the type

of selected encryption;

!

Encrypt an information document based on the type of encryption selected,

This encryption stage includes:

-convert the information document

to  encrypt in a string of

numeric characters,

-split the character string into blocks of a certain number

of characters; Y,

- encrypt each of the blocks according to the type of encryption selected in

the previous stage using the generated key;

characterized in that it additionally comprises the stages: ! randomly generate a number of keys other than the key already generated and according to the type of encryption selected proportional to the degree of slowdown to be provided; ! provide the recipient of the encrypted document and a set of keys, this set of keys comprising the randomly generated keys in the previous stage and the decryption key according to the type of encryption selected in the first stage; and, this key located in any position among the randomly generated keys. 2. Method of slowing down the transfer rate of a device by cryptographic method, according to the preceding claim; characterized in that the selection of an encryption type comprises the alternative selection between: ! symmetric encryption, comprising: DES, T-DES, AES; ! asymmetric encryption, comprising: RSA, EIGamal, Elliptic Curve. 3. System of slowing down the transfer rate of a device by cryptographic method configured to carry out a method according to claim 1 characterized in that it comprises: ! means of processing (1):

-

configured to select an encryption type and generate an encryption key according to the type of encryption selected;

-

configured to encrypt an information document according to the type of encryption selected, this encryption stage comprising:

•

convert the information document to be encrypted into a string of numeric characters,

•

divide the character string into blocks of a certain number of characters; Y,

•

encrypt each of the blocks according to the type of encryption selected in the previous stage using the generated key;

-

configured to randomly generate a number of keys other than the key already generated and according to the type of encryption selected proportional to the degree of slowdown to be provided;

! a memory (2) adapted to store the plurality of generated keys, the encrypted information document and the operations and intermediate variables performed by the processing means; ! input and output means (3) configured to receive and send external information to perform the encryption tasks, the processing means (1) and the input and output means (3) being configured to provide the recipient of the encrypted document and a set of keys, this set of keys comprising the keys randomly generated and the decryption key according to the type of encryption selected, this key being placed in any position among the randomly generated keys. 4. System for slowing down the transfer rate of a device by cryptographic method, according to claim 3, characterized in that the processing means (1) alternately select the type of encryption from: ! symmetric encryption, comprising: DES, T-DES, AES; ! asymmetric encryption, comprising: RSA, ElGamal, Elliptic Curve. SPANISH OFFICE OF THE PATENTS AND BRAND Application no .: 201031941 SPAIN Date of submission of the application: 24.12.2010 Priority Date: REPORT ON THE STATE OF THE TECHNIQUE 51 Int. Cl.: H04L9 / 14 (2006.01) H04L9 / 06 (2006.01) RELEVANT DOCUMENTS

Category

Documents cited Claims Affected

X

US 2007183599 (AGERE SYSTEMS INC), 1-4

TO

US 5703948 A (ELEMENTRIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD), one

TO

2002049818 (RES IN MOTION LTD, GILHULY B. J., LAZARIDIS M., MOUSSEAU G. P., RAHN S. M., VAN A. N., VAN ANH N., VAN N. A.), 2-4

TO

US 2008226066 A1 (SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD), 2-4

Category of the documents cited X: of particular relevance Y: of particular relevance combined with other / s of the same category A: reflects the state of the art O: refers to unwritten disclosure P: published between the priority date and the date of priority submission of the application E: previous document, but published after the date of submission of the application

This report has been prepared • for all claims • for claims no:

Date of realization of the report 18.07.2011

Examiner M. Muñoz Sanchez Page 1/4

REPORT OF THE STATE OF THE TECHNIQUE Application number: 201031941 Minimum documentation searched (classification system followed by classification symbols) H04L Electronic databases consulted during the search (name of the database and, if possible, terms of search used) INVENES, EPODOC, WPI State of the Art Report Page 2/4  WRITTEN OPINION Application number: 201031941 Date of Written Opinion: 18.07.2011 Statement

Novelty (Art. 6.1 LP 11/1986)

Claims 1-4 Claims IF NOT

Inventive activity (Art. 8.1 LP11 / 1986)

Claims Claims 1-4 IF NOT

The application is considered to comply with the industrial application requirement. This requirement was evaluated during the formal and technical examination phase of the application (Article 31.2 Law 11/1986).  Opinion Base.- This opinion has been made on the basis of the patent application as published. State of the Art Report Page 3/4  WRITTEN OPINION Application number: 201031941 1. Documents considered.- The documents belonging to the state of the art taken into consideration for the realization of this opinion are listed below.

Document

Publication or Identification Number publication date

D01

US 2007183599 (AGERE SYSTEMS INC) 09.08.2007

D02

US 5703948 A (ELEMENTRIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD) 30.12.1997

D03

2002049818 (RES IN MOTION LTD, GILHULY B. J., LAZARIDIS M., MOUSSEAU G. P., RAHN S. M., VAN A. N., VAN ANH N., VAN N. A.) 04.25.2002

D04

US 2008226066 A1 (SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD) 18.09.2008

2. Statement motivated according to articles 29.6 and 29.7 of the Regulations for the execution of Law 11/1986, of March 20, on Patents on novelty and inventive activity; quotes and explanations in support of this statement D01 is considered the closest document of the state of the art to the object of the request.  Independent claims: Claim 1: Document D01 discloses a method of distribution of keys for the transmission of information in a telecommunications network in which each recipient obtains a set of keys from an access point among which is the key to be used. during the transmission. The differences with document D01 refer to the randomness of the generated keys or the use of a type of encryption that is used being these of common general knowledge in the field of the request. In particular, random key generation appears in document D02 explicitly. Taking into account that, according to the wording of this claim, it is not interpreted exclusively that the rest of the keys of the set are not going to be used and that the cardinal of the set of keys is such that it is a great effort to test them all, document D01 affects the inventive activity of claim 1 according to article 8.1 of the Patent Law. Claim 3: The claimed system does not have any elements that are not well known in the technical field of the application and its use corresponds directly to the claimed method. Therefore, document D01 affects the inventive activity of claim 3 according to article 8.1 of the Patent Law.  Dependent claims Claims 2, 4: The types of encryption claimed form part of the common general knowledge in the technical field of the application, see D03, D04 and, consequently, document D01 affects the inventive activity of claims 2, 4 according to article 8.1 of the Patent Law. State of the Art Report Page 4/4