EP4692562A1 - A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly - Google Patents

A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly

Info

Publication number
EP4692562A1
EP4692562A1 EP24306325.2A EP24306325A EP4692562A1 EP 4692562 A1 EP4692562 A1 EP 4692562A1 EP 24306325 A EP24306325 A EP 24306325A EP 4692562 A1 EP4692562 A1 EP 4692562A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
compressor
predefined
calculated
isentropic efficiency
pressure
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP24306325.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Joe HACHEM
Aymar DE BERGEYK
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TotalEnergies Onetech SAS
Original Assignee
TotalEnergies Onetech SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by TotalEnergies Onetech SAS filed Critical TotalEnergies Onetech SAS
Priority to EP24306325.2A priority Critical patent/EP4692562A1/en
Priority to PCT/EP2025/072430 priority patent/WO2026032939A1/en
Publication of EP4692562A1 publication Critical patent/EP4692562A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D27/00Control, e.g. regulation, of pumps, pumping installations or pumping systems specially adapted for elastic fluids
    • F04D27/001Testing thereof; Determination or simulation of flow characteristics; Stall or surge detection, e.g. condition monitoring
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/70Suction grids; Strainers; Dust separation; Cleaning
    • F04D29/701Suction grids; Strainers; Dust separation; Cleaning especially adapted for elastic fluid pumps

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly.
  • the present invention also concerns an associated computer program product.
  • the present invention also relates to an associated readable information carrier.
  • the invention relates to a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, the method being implemented by an assembly including a computer, at least one temperature sensor and at least one pressure sensor, said computer comprising memory means and being connected to said at least one temperature sensor and said at least one pressure sensor, said memory means storing a predefined thermodynamic model and a predefined mathematical model, the predefined thermodynamic model providing a calculation of the compressor isentropic efficiency from measured compressor temperature and pressure values, the predefined mathematical model being empirically calibrated using historical temperature and pressure data relating to the compressor in a full-load and stable mode of the latter, said at least one temperature sensor being configured to measure at least the compressor inlet temperature, said at least one pressure sensor being configured to measure at least the compressor inlet pressure, the method comprising an initial step of measuring the compressor inlet temperature and the compressor inlet pressure, the method comprising the computer-implemented following steps:
  • the method according to the invention may comprise one or more of the following features considered alone or in any combination that is technically possible:
  • the invention also relates to a computer program product comprising a readable information carrier having stored thereon a computer program comprising program instructions, the computer program being loadable onto a data processing unit and causing at least the steps of receiving a first and a second measured values, calculating the compressor isentropic efficiency, predicting the compressor isentropic efficiency, calculating the real time difference between the calculated compressor isentropic efficiency and the predicted compressor isentropic efficiency and providing at least one decision indicator of a method as previously described to be carried out when the computer program is carried out on the data processing unit.
  • the invention also relates to a readable information carrier on which is stored a computer program product as previously described.
  • FIG. 18 An example of an assembly 18 comprising a calculator 20, a computer program product 22 stocked thereon, a first temperature sensor 23A, a second temperature sensor 23B, a first pressure sensor 23C and a second pressure sensor 23D are illustrated on figure 1 .
  • the first temperature sensor 23A is configured to measure the compressor inlet temperature
  • the second temperature sensor 23B is configured to measure the compressor inlet pressure
  • the first pressure sensor 23C is configured to measure the compressor outlet temperature
  • the second pressure sensor 23D is configured to measure the compressor outlet pressure.
  • the calculator 20 is connected to the four sensors 23A-23D and is preferably a computer.
  • the calculator 20 is a computer or computing system, or similar electronic computing device adapted to manipulate and/or transform data represented as physical, such as electronic, quantities within the computing system's registers and/or memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computing system's memories, registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
  • the calculator 20 interacts with the computer program product 22.
  • the calculator 20 comprises a processor 24 comprising a data processing unit 26, memories 28 and a reader 30 for information media.
  • the calculator 20 comprises a human machine interface 32, such as a keyboard, and a display 34.
  • the memories 28 store a predefined thermodynamic model 35 and a predefined mathematical model 37.
  • the calculator 20 further comprises an information medium 36, on which is stored the computer program product 22.
  • the information medium 36 is a medium readable by the calculator 20, usually by the data processing unit 26.
  • the readable information medium 36 is a medium suitable for storing electronic instructions and capable of being coupled to a computer system bus.
  • the information medium 36 is a USB key, a floppy disk or flexible disk (of the English name "Floppy disc"), an optical disk, a CD-ROM, a magneto-optical disk, a ROM memory, a memory RAM, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, magnetic card or optical card.
  • the computer program 22 comprising program instructions.
  • the computer program 22 is loadable on the data processing unit 26 and is adapted to entail the implementation of a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, when the computer program 22 is loaded on the processing unit 26 of the calculator 20.
  • offline washing of a compressor is defined as the washing of the mechanical parts of the compressor when said compressor is not in operation and when the turbine-compressor assembly is offline. Neither the turbine-compressor assembly nor the compressor are shown in the figures, for clarity purposes.
  • the predefined thermodynamic model 35 provides a calculation of the compressor isentropic efficiency from measured compressor temperature and pressure values.
  • the thermodynamic model 35 is parameterized to provide the calculation of the compressor isentropic efficiency from the following equation (1):
  • C e Pr ⁇ ⁇ 1 ⁇ ⁇ 1 Tr ⁇ 1 ⁇ 100
  • Ce the compressor isentropic efficiency
  • Pr the pressure ratio between the compressor outlet pressure and the compressor inlet pressure
  • Tr the temperature ratio between the compressor outlet temperature and the compressor inlet temperature
  • is a numerical factor substantially equal to 1,4.
  • the predefined mathematical model 37 is empirically calibrated using historical temperature and pressure data relating to the compressor in a full-load and stable mode of the latter. More precisely, the predefined mathematical model 37 is a physics-informed machine learning model, or more specifically a physics-informed neural network.
  • physics-Informed Machine Learning integrates knowledge from data and mathematical physics models.
  • Machine Learning models can learn from governing physical rules and hence provide physically consistent priors that can be integrated as a bias or constraints in a data-based learning. If we consider a specific task, these physics priors can be embedded in the design choices made on the Neural Network architecture. For example, some physics principles like symmetry, invariance to rotations, shifts and other geometrical transformations can be reflected by some Neural Networks and their kernels like Convolution Neural Networks, Covariant Neural Networks or equivariant transformer networks. Some other physics properties can be also encoded in network the architecture (neuron structures, activations, etc.).
  • the predefined mathematical model 37 is a model already trained, calibrated and validated for its long-term physics consistency predictions.
  • the predefined mathematical model 37 is first trained on the basis of historical data in a full-load and stable mode of the compressor and then fine-tuned on the basis of more realistic data like reanalysis data.
  • the predefined mathematical model 37 comprises a single-layer non-convolutional neural network performing a linear regression. More preferably, the linear regression comprises a third-degree polynomial transform of the data.
  • the optimizing method comprises an initial step 110 which consists of the four sensors 23A-23D respectively measuring the compressor inlet temperature, the compressor inlet pressure, the compressor outlet temperature and the compressor outlet pressure.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 120 which consists of the calculator 20 receiving a first measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet temperature, a second measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet pressure, a third measured value corresponding to the compressor outlet temperature and a fourth measured value corresponding to the compressor outlet pressure.
  • the first measured value is provided by the first temperature sensor 23A
  • the second measured value is provided by the second temperature sensor 23B
  • the third measured value is provided by the first pressure sensor 23C
  • the fourth measured value is provided by the second pressure sensor 23D.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 121 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 calculating the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first, second, third and fourth measured values, using the predefined thermodynamic model 35. More precisely, in a particular embodiment, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 computes the compressor isentropic efficiency using the above-mentioned equation (1).
  • the optimizing method comprises a step 122 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 predicting the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first and second measured values, using the predefined mathematical model 37. More precisely, in a particular embodiment, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 predicts the compressor isentropic efficiency using the above-mentioned equation (2).
  • the calculating step 120 and the predicting step 122 can be performed in parallel, or alternatively the calculating step 120 can be performed before the predicting step 122, or alternatively the predicting step 122 can be performed before the calculating step 120.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 124 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 calculating the real time difference between the compressor isentropic efficiency calculated at step 120 and the compressor isentropic efficiency predicted at step 122. It is to be noted that the calculation at step 124 is performed on a single event (only one point per event).
  • the optimizing method comprises a step 126 which consists of the calculator 20 filtering a series of real time differences calculated at step 124 for predefined nominal and stable periods of the compressor (to this end, the calculator 20 includes digital filtering means, not shown in the figures, for clarity purposes).
  • nominal and stable periods of the compressor is defined as the periods during which the compressor operates in a stable and nominal mode. As a non-limiting example, it can be considered empirically (based on historical data) that the compressor operates in a stable and nominal mode after substantially 30 minutes of the first part of the compressor cycle.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 128 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 averaging the results output from the filtering step 126.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 130 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 comparing the average calculated at step 128 or a time derivative of a series of calculated averages calculated at step 128 to a first predefined threshold.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 132A during which the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets a decision indicator to indicate an offline washing of the compressor. For example, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets this decision indicator onto the display 34. If not, at a step 134, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets the decision indicator to indicate no offline washing of the compressor.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 134 during which the processor 24 of the calculator 20 calculates a difference between the maximum value and the minimum value among the results output from the filtering step 126.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 136 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 comparing the difference calculated at step 134 to a second predefined threshold.
  • the second predefined threshold is lower to the first predefined threshold.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 138A during which the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets the decision indicator to indicate no offline washing of the compressor.
  • the optimizing method then comprises a step 140 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 comparing variability of the input data to a predefined variability threshold. If said variability of the input data is lower to the predefined variability threshold, the optimizing method then comprises a step 142A during which the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets a decision indicator to indicate an offline washing of the compressor. For example, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets this decision indicator onto the display 34. If not, at a step 142B, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets the decision indicator to indicate no offline washing of the compressor.
  • the method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly according to the invention is cost effective, energy saving, and prevents too much degradation of the compressor by avoiding doing too many washings or not enough ones.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Control Of Positive-Displacement Pumps (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, the method comprising:
- measuring (110) the compressor inlet temperature and the compressor inlet pressure;
- receiving (120) a first measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet temperature, and a second measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet pressure;
- calculating (121) the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first and second measured values, using a predefined thermodynamic model;
- predicting (122) the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first and second measured values, using a predefined mathematical model;
- calculating (124) the real time difference between the calculated compressor isentropic efficiency and the predicted compressor isentropic efficiency;
- based on the calculated real time difference, providing (128, 130, 132A, 134, 136, 138A, 140, 142A, 142B) at least one decision indicator as to whether or not a compressor offline washing is necessary.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention concerns a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly. The present invention also concerns an associated computer program product. The present invention also relates to an associated readable information carrier.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • On single-shaft gas turbine lines comprising a turbine-compressor assembly, it is known to proceed to an offline washing of the compressor when the turbine-compressor assembly is shut-down, in order to prevent the compressor from becoming too fouled. Currently, such a washing procedure is carried out at regular, empirically determined intervals, typically at a frequency comprised between one washing every 700 operating hours and one washing every 1200 operating hours, or approximately 5 to 9 washings per year. However, such repeated washings have a high economic cost. Besides, the optimization of such a procedure is not optimal, because the compressor is sometimes washed even though it is only slightly fouled. Last but not least, such repeated washings might ultimately degrade or even damage the compressor.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • There exists a need for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, in a more cost effective and energy saving way, and which prevents too much degradation of the compressor by avoiding doing too many washings or not enough ones.
  • To this end, the invention relates to a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, the method being implemented by an assembly including a computer, at least one temperature sensor and at least one pressure sensor, said computer comprising memory means and being connected to said at least one temperature sensor and said at least one pressure sensor, said memory means storing a predefined thermodynamic model and a predefined mathematical model, the predefined thermodynamic model providing a calculation of the compressor isentropic efficiency from measured compressor temperature and pressure values, the predefined mathematical model being empirically calibrated using historical temperature and pressure data relating to the compressor in a full-load and stable mode of the latter, said at least one temperature sensor being configured to measure at least the compressor inlet temperature, said at least one pressure sensor being configured to measure at least the compressor inlet pressure, the method comprising an initial step of measuring the compressor inlet temperature and the compressor inlet pressure, the method comprising the computer-implemented following steps:
    • receiving a first measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet temperature, and a second measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet pressure;
    • calculating the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first and second measured values, using the predefined thermodynamic model;
    • predicting the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first and second measured values, using the predefined mathematical model;
    • calculating the real time difference between the calculated compressor isentropic efficiency and the predicted compressor isentropic efficiency;
    • based on the calculated real time difference, providing at least one decision indicator as to whether or not a compressor offline washing is necessary.
  • The method according to the invention may comprise one or more of the following features considered alone or in any combination that is technically possible:
    • said at least one temperature sensor is configured to further measure the compressor outlet temperature, said at least one pressure sensor is configured to further measure the compressor outlet pressure, the method further comprises a step of receiving a third measured value corresponding to the compressor outlet temperature and a fourth measured value corresponding to the compressor outlet pressure and, during the calculating step, the compressor isentropic efficiency is calculated from the first, second, third and fourth measured values, using the predefined thermodynamic model;
    • said predefined mathematical model comprises a single-layer non-convolutional neural network performing a linear regression;
    • said linear regression comprises a third-degree polynomial transform of the data;
    • the method further comprises a step of filtering a series of calculated real time differences for predefined nominal and stable periods of the compressor;
    • the method further comprises a step of averaging said results of the filtering step, and wherein the step of providing at least one decision indicator comprises a first sub-step of comparing said calculated average or a time derivative of a series of calculated averages to a predefined threshold, and a second sub-step during which, if said calculated average or said time derivative of a series of calculated averages is greater to said predefined threshold, the decision indicator is set to indicate an offline washing of the compressor;
    • the method further comprises a step of calculating a difference between the maximum value and the minimum value among said results of the filtering step, and wherein the step of providing at least one decision indicator comprises a third sub-step of comparing said calculated difference to a second predefined threshold, said second predefined threshold being lower to the first predefined threshold, and a fourth sub-step during which, if the calculated average or the time derivative of a series of calculated averages is lower to the first predefined threshold and if said calculated difference is lower to said second predefined threshold, the decision indicator is set to indicate no offline washing of the compressor;
    • the step of providing at least one decision indicator comprises a fifth sub-step during which, if the calculated average or the time derivative of a series of calculated averages is lower to the first predefined threshold and if said calculated difference is greater to said second predefined threshold, variability of the input data is compared to a predefined variability threshold, and if said variability is lower to said predefined variability threshold, the decision indicator is set to indicate an offline washing of the compressor.
  • The invention also relates to a computer program product comprising a readable information carrier having stored thereon a computer program comprising program instructions, the computer program being loadable onto a data processing unit and causing at least the steps of receiving a first and a second measured values, calculating the compressor isentropic efficiency, predicting the compressor isentropic efficiency, calculating the real time difference between the calculated compressor isentropic efficiency and the predicted compressor isentropic efficiency and providing at least one decision indicator of a method as previously described to be carried out when the computer program is carried out on the data processing unit.
  • The invention also relates to a readable information carrier on which is stored a computer program product as previously described.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention will be easier to understand in view of the following description, provided solely as an example and with reference to the appended drawings in which:
    • Figure 1 is a schematic view of an example of an assembly for implementing a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, said assembly including a computer, and
    • Figure 2 is a flowchart of an example of implementation of a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SOME EMBODIMENTS
  • An example of an assembly 18 comprising a calculator 20, a computer program product 22 stocked thereon, a first temperature sensor 23A, a second temperature sensor 23B, a first pressure sensor 23C and a second pressure sensor 23D are illustrated on figure 1. The first temperature sensor 23A is configured to measure the compressor inlet temperature, and the second temperature sensor 23B is configured to measure the compressor inlet pressure. The first pressure sensor 23C is configured to measure the compressor outlet temperature, and the second pressure sensor 23D is configured to measure the compressor outlet pressure.
  • The calculator 20 is connected to the four sensors 23A-23D and is preferably a computer.
  • More generally, the calculator 20 is a computer or computing system, or similar electronic computing device adapted to manipulate and/or transform data represented as physical, such as electronic, quantities within the computing system's registers and/or memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computing system's memories, registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
  • The calculator 20 interacts with the computer program product 22.
  • As illustrated on figure 1, the calculator 20 comprises a processor 24 comprising a data processing unit 26, memories 28 and a reader 30 for information media. In the example illustrated on figure 1, the calculator 20 comprises a human machine interface 32, such as a keyboard, and a display 34. The memories 28 store a predefined thermodynamic model 35 and a predefined mathematical model 37.
  • The calculator 20 further comprises an information medium 36, on which is stored the computer program product 22.
  • The information medium 36 is a medium readable by the calculator 20, usually by the data processing unit 26. The readable information medium 36 is a medium suitable for storing electronic instructions and capable of being coupled to a computer system bus.
  • By way of example, the information medium 36 is a USB key, a floppy disk or flexible disk (of the English name "Floppy disc"), an optical disk, a CD-ROM, a magneto-optical disk, a ROM memory, a memory RAM, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, magnetic card or optical card.
  • On the information medium 36 is stored the computer program 22 comprising program instructions.
  • The computer program 22 is loadable on the data processing unit 26 and is adapted to entail the implementation of a method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, when the computer program 22 is loaded on the processing unit 26 of the calculator 20.
  • A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, will now be described with reference to figure 2. In the description, "offline washing of a compressor" is defined as the washing of the mechanical parts of the compressor when said compressor is not in operation and when the turbine-compressor assembly is offline. Neither the turbine-compressor assembly nor the compressor are shown in the figures, for clarity purposes.
  • The predefined thermodynamic model 35 provides a calculation of the compressor isentropic efficiency from measured compressor temperature and pressure values. As a non-limiting example, when the compressor inlet temperature, the compressor outlet temperature, the compressor inlet pressure and the compressor outlet pressure values are available, the thermodynamic model 35 is parameterized to provide the calculation of the compressor isentropic efficiency from the following equation (1): C e = Pr γ 1 γ 1 Tr 1 100 where Ce is the compressor isentropic efficiency, Pr is the pressure ratio between the compressor outlet pressure and the compressor inlet pressure, Tr is the temperature ratio between the compressor outlet temperature and the compressor inlet temperature and γ is a numerical factor substantially equal to 1,4.
  • The predefined mathematical model 37 is empirically calibrated using historical temperature and pressure data relating to the compressor in a full-load and stable mode of the latter. More precisely, the predefined mathematical model 37 is a physics-informed machine learning model, or more specifically a physics-informed neural network.
  • Physics-Informed Machine Learning integrates knowledge from data and mathematical physics models. Machine Learning models can learn from governing physical rules and hence provide physically consistent priors that can be integrated as a bias or constraints in a data-based learning. If we consider a specific task, these physics priors can be embedded in the design choices made on the Neural Network architecture. For example, some physics principles like symmetry, invariance to rotations, shifts and other geometrical transformations can be reflected by some Neural Networks and their kernels like Convolution Neural Networks, Covariant Neural Networks or equivariant transformer networks. Some other physics properties can be also encoded in network the architecture (neuron structures, activations, etc.).
  • Hence, the predefined mathematical model 37 is a model already trained, calibrated and validated for its long-term physics consistency predictions.
  • Preferably, the predefined mathematical model 37 is first trained on the basis of historical data in a full-load and stable mode of the compressor and then fine-tuned on the basis of more realistic data like reanalysis data.
  • Preferably, the predefined mathematical model 37 comprises a single-layer non-convolutional neural network performing a linear regression. More preferably, the linear regression comprises a third-degree polynomial transform of the data. As a non-limiting example, the mathematical model 37 is parameterized to provide a prediction of the compressor isentropic efficiency from the following equation (2): Ece = 0.0012913174630341416 + 0.0060008691115246073 * Ti + 0.4207440902711638 * Pi + 0.30185402681107676 * Ti 2 - 0.008520932313727378 * Ti* Pi- 0.0005005281368429298 * Pi 2 + 8.892233927335477e -05 * Ti 3 - 0.0003159434683341549 * Ti 2 * Pi + 8.962081050559727e-06 * Ti * Pi 2 + 1.6778738147263305e -07 * Pi 3 where Ece is the prediction of the compressor isentropic efficiency, Pi is the compressor inlet pressure and Ti is the compressor inlet temperature.
  • The optimizing method comprises an initial step 110 which consists of the four sensors 23A-23D respectively measuring the compressor inlet temperature, the compressor inlet pressure, the compressor outlet temperature and the compressor outlet pressure.
  • The optimizing method then comprises a step 120 which consists of the calculator 20 receiving a first measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet temperature, a second measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet pressure, a third measured value corresponding to the compressor outlet temperature and a fourth measured value corresponding to the compressor outlet pressure. The first measured value is provided by the first temperature sensor 23A, the second measured value is provided by the second temperature sensor 23B, the third measured value is provided by the first pressure sensor 23C and the fourth measured value is provided by the second pressure sensor 23D.
  • The optimizing method then comprises a step 121 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 calculating the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first, second, third and fourth measured values, using the predefined thermodynamic model 35. More precisely, in a particular embodiment, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 computes the compressor isentropic efficiency using the above-mentioned equation (1).
  • The optimizing method comprises a step 122 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 predicting the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first and second measured values, using the predefined mathematical model 37. More precisely, in a particular embodiment, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 predicts the compressor isentropic efficiency using the above-mentioned equation (2).
  • It is to be noted that the calculating step 120 and the predicting step 122 can be performed in parallel, or alternatively the calculating step 120 can be performed before the predicting step 122, or alternatively the predicting step 122 can be performed before the calculating step 120.
  • The optimizing method then comprises a step 124 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 calculating the real time difference between the compressor isentropic efficiency calculated at step 120 and the compressor isentropic efficiency predicted at step 122. It is to be noted that the calculation at step 124 is performed on a single event (only one point per event).
  • Optionally, the optimizing method comprises a step 126 which consists of the calculator 20 filtering a series of real time differences calculated at step 124 for predefined nominal and stable periods of the compressor (to this end, the calculator 20 includes digital filtering means, not shown in the figures, for clarity purposes). In the description, "nominal and stable periods of the compressor" is defined as the periods during which the compressor operates in a stable and nominal mode. As a non-limiting example, it can be considered empirically (based on historical data) that the compressor operates in a stable and nominal mode after substantially 30 minutes of the first part of the compressor cycle.
  • The optimizing method then comprises a step 128 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 averaging the results output from the filtering step 126.
  • The optimizing method then comprises a step 130 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 comparing the average calculated at step 128 or a time derivative of a series of calculated averages calculated at step 128 to a first predefined threshold.
  • If said calculated average or said time derivative of a series of calculated averages is greater to the first predefined threshold, the optimizing method then comprises a step 132A during which the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets a decision indicator to indicate an offline washing of the compressor. For example, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets this decision indicator onto the display 34. If not, at a step 134, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets the decision indicator to indicate no offline washing of the compressor.
  • If said calculated average or said time derivative of a series of calculated averages is lower to the first predefined threshold, the optimizing method then comprises a step 134 during which the processor 24 of the calculator 20 calculates a difference between the maximum value and the minimum value among the results output from the filtering step 126.
  • The optimizing method then comprises a step 136 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 comparing the difference calculated at step 134 to a second predefined threshold. The second predefined threshold is lower to the first predefined threshold.
  • If said calculated difference is lower to the second predefined threshold, the optimizing method then comprises a step 138A during which the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets the decision indicator to indicate no offline washing of the compressor.
  • If said calculated difference is greater to the second predefined threshold, the optimizing method then comprises a step 140 which consists of the processor 24 of the calculator 20 comparing variability of the input data to a predefined variability threshold. If said variability of the input data is lower to the predefined variability threshold, the optimizing method then comprises a step 142A during which the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets a decision indicator to indicate an offline washing of the compressor. For example, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets this decision indicator onto the display 34. If not, at a step 142B, the processor 24 of the calculator 20 sets the decision indicator to indicate no offline washing of the compressor.
  • The method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly according to the invention is cost effective, energy saving, and prevents too much degradation of the compressor by avoiding doing too many washings or not enough ones.
  • The person skilled in the art will understand that the embodiments and variants described above can be combined to form new embodiments provided that they are technically compatible.

Claims (10)

  1. A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly, the method being implemented by an assembly including a computer (20), at least one temperature sensor (23A, 23B) and at least one pressure sensor (23C, 23D), said computer (20) comprising memory means (28) and being connected to said at least one temperature sensor (23A, 23B) and said at least one pressure sensor (23C, 23D), said memory means (28) storing a predefined thermodynamic model (35) and a predefined mathematical model (37), the predefined thermodynamic model (35) providing a calculation of the compressor isentropic efficiency from measured compressor temperature and pressure values, the predefined mathematical model (37) being empirically calibrated using historical temperature and pressure data relating to the compressor in a full-load and stable mode of the latter, said at least one temperature sensor (23A) being configured to measure at least the compressor inlet temperature, said at least one pressure sensor (23C) being configured to measure at least the compressor inlet pressure, the method comprising an initial step of measuring (110) the compressor inlet temperature and the compressor inlet pressure, the method comprising the computer-implemented following steps:
    - receiving (120) a first measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet temperature, and a second measured value corresponding to the compressor inlet pressure;
    - calculating (121) the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first and second measured values, using the predefined thermodynamic model (35);
    - predicting (122) the compressor isentropic efficiency from the first and second measured values, using the predefined mathematical mode (37);
    - calculating (124) the real time difference between the calculated compressor isentropic efficiency and the predicted compressor isentropic efficiency;
    - based on the calculated real time difference, providing (128, 130, 132A, 134, 136, 138A, 140, 142A, 142B) at least one decision indicator as to whether or not a compressor offline washing is necessary.
  2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one temperature sensor (23A, 23B) is configured to further measure the compressor outlet temperature, said at least one pressure sensor (23C, 23D) is configured to further measure the compressor outlet pressure, the method further comprises a step (120) of receiving a third measured value corresponding to the compressor outlet temperature and a fourth measured value corresponding to the compressor outlet pressure and, during the calculating step (121), the compressor isentropic efficiency is calculated from the first, second, third and fourth measured values, using the predefined thermodynamic model (35).
  3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said predefined mathematical model (37) comprises a single-layer non-convolutional neural network performing a linear regression.
  4. A method according to claim 3, wherein said linear regression comprises a third-degree polynomial transform of the data.
  5. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the method further comprises a step of filtering (126) a series of calculated real time differences for predefined nominal and stable periods of the compressor.
  6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the method further comprises a step of averaging (128) said results of the filtering step (126), and wherein the step of providing (128, 130, 132A, 134, 136, 138A, 140, 142A, 142B) at least one decision indicator comprises a first sub-step of comparing (130) said calculated average or a time derivative of a series of calculated averages to a predefined threshold, and a second sub-step (132A) during which, if said calculated average or said time derivative of a series of calculated averages is greater to said predefined threshold, the decision indicator is set to indicate an offline washing of the compressor.
  7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the method further comprises a step of calculating (134) a difference between the maximum value and the minimum value among said results of the filtering step (126), and wherein the step of providing (128, 130, 132A, 134, 136, 138A, 140, 142A, 142B) at least one decision indicator comprises a third sub-step of comparing (136) said calculated difference to a second predefined threshold, said second predefined threshold being lower to the first predefined threshold, and a fourth sub-step (138A) during which, if the calculated average or the time derivative of a series of calculated averages is lower to the first predefined threshold and if said calculated difference is lower to said second predefined threshold, the decision indicator is set to indicate no offline washing of the compressor.
  8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the step of providing (128, 130, 132A, 134, 136, 138A, 140, 142A, 142B) at least one decision indicator comprises a fifth sub-step (140) during which, if the calculated average or the time derivative of a series of calculated averages is lower to the first predefined threshold and if said calculated difference is greater to said second predefined threshold, variability of the input data is compared to a predefined variability threshold, and if said variability is lower to said predefined variability threshold, the decision indicator is set (142A) to indicate an offline washing of the compressor.
  9. A computer program product (22) comprising a readable information carrier having stored thereon a computer program comprising program instructions, the computer program (22) being loadable onto a data processing unit (26) and causing at least the steps of receiving (120) a first and a second measured values, calculating (121) the compressor isentropic efficiency, predicting (122) the compressor isentropic efficiency, calculating (124) the real time difference between the calculated compressor isentropic efficiency and the predicted compressor isentropic efficiency and providing (128, 130, 132A, 134, 136, 138A, 140, 142A, 142B) at least one decision indicator of a method according to any one of claims 1 to 8 to be carried out when the computer program (22) is carried out on the data processing unit (26).
  10. A readable information carrier on which a computer program product (22) according to claim 9 is stored.
EP24306325.2A 2024-08-05 2024-08-05 A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly Pending EP4692562A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP24306325.2A EP4692562A1 (en) 2024-08-05 2024-08-05 A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly
PCT/EP2025/072430 WO2026032939A1 (en) 2024-08-05 2025-08-05 A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP24306325.2A EP4692562A1 (en) 2024-08-05 2024-08-05 A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4692562A1 true EP4692562A1 (en) 2026-02-11

Family

ID=92583349

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP24306325.2A Pending EP4692562A1 (en) 2024-08-05 2024-08-05 A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP4692562A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2026032939A1 (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110513336A (en) * 2019-09-05 2019-11-29 哈尔滨电气股份有限公司 A kind of determination method of power station gas turbine off-line washing time
CN113027826A (en) * 2021-02-26 2021-06-25 北京京能高安屯燃气热电有限责任公司 Gas turbine compressor cleaning method and device

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110513336A (en) * 2019-09-05 2019-11-29 哈尔滨电气股份有限公司 A kind of determination method of power station gas turbine off-line washing time
CN113027826A (en) * 2021-02-26 2021-06-25 北京京能高安屯燃气热电有限责任公司 Gas turbine compressor cleaning method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2026032939A1 (en) 2026-02-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN113569338B (en) Gas compressor rotating stall early warning method based on time expansion convolutional network
US11169514B2 (en) Unsupervised anomaly detection, diagnosis, and correction in multivariate time series data
KR101955305B1 (en) Gas turbine sensor failure detection utilizing a sparse coding methodology
Doel TEMPER—a gas-path analysis tool for commercial jet engines
CN100504689C (en) Detecting faults of system components in a continuous process
US4755925A (en) Plant diagnostic system
Hayton et al. Static and dynamic novelty detection methods for jet engine health monitoring
CN108803576A (en) A kind of fault early warning method and relevant apparatus of temperature control system
EP1643332A2 (en) Hybrid model based fault detection and isolation system
EP2081132A2 (en) Novelty detection
CN116757534A (en) A reliability analysis method for smart refrigerators based on neural training network
US9754429B2 (en) System for monitoring a set of components of a device
US11237551B2 (en) Real-time automation for monitor and control of electro-mechanical system
KR102274139B1 (en) technical specification monitoring system in nuclear power plant
CN112128950B (en) Machine room temperature and humidity prediction method and system based on multiple model comparisons
CN116703568A (en) Credit card abnormal transaction identification method and device
Martínez-García et al. Measuring system entropy with a deep recurrent neural network model
Doel TEMPER: A gas-path analysis tool for commercial jet engines
WO2026032939A1 (en) A method for optimizing a procedure for triggering an offline washing of a compressor in a turbine-compressor assembly
CN115600191A (en) Behavior recognition method, device, equipment and medium
CN118536409A (en) Method and system for predicting inter-gate short circuit of generator rotor winding based on correction prediction
JP3721735B2 (en) Causality detector
JP7437163B2 (en) Diagnostic equipment, diagnostic methods and programs
JP2765456B2 (en) Pipeline leak detection method
CN121456852B (en) Filter life prediction methods, electronic equipment and media

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC ME MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR