EP4662755A2

EP4662755A2 - Method, evaluation module and detection system for detecting electric series arcs or glowing contacts by use of a time course of a relevant current

Info

Publication number: EP4662755A2
Application number: EP23832962.7A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Philipp RAGGINGER
Original assignee: Eaton Intelligent Power Ltd
Current assignee: Eaton Intelligent Power Ltd
Priority date: 2023-02-10
Filing date: 2023-12-12
Publication date: 2025-12-17
Also published as: WO2024165116A3; WO2024165116A2

Abstract

A method and an evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) for detecting an event at two electric conductors is disclosed, wherein a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors is measured and a frequency course of said current is generated by performing a fast Fourier transformation, optionally including filtering. The event is classified as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the above frequency ranges exceeds a current threshold level of 5 μA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 μA. Alternatively, the event is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 μA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 μA.

Description

METHOD, EVALUATION MODULE AND DETECTION SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ELECTRIC SERIES ARCS OR GLOWING CONTACTS BY USE OF A TIME COURSE OF A RELEVANT CURRENT

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to a method, an evaluation module and a detection system for detecting an event at two electric conductors, concretely for detecting electric series arcs or glowing contacts.

BACKGROUND ART

Methods and devices for detecting arcs in general are known in prior art and are used, for example, in electrical installations to protect people and/or the installation itself from the destructive effects of an arc caused by a short circuit, or at least to mitigate its effects. In many cases, monitoring of electrical systems is done by measuring the current flowing through the electrical conductors and detecting the extremely intense light emitted by an arc. If both criteria are met, then an alarm signal is issued, or a switching signal to close a switch between said conductors at different voltage potentials.

However, although numerous proposals have been made for detection, there is still room for improvement in particular in view of more special phenomena. Concretely, the proposed method, evaluation module and detection system focus on detecting electric series arcs or glowing contacts.

An electric series arcs can occur when a current flows via a gap between electric conductors of the same phase. For example, a loosely connected screw terminal, a broken wire or also defective switching contacts may cause electric series arcs. The very same counts for a glowing contact, where in fact no arc is burning, but where a molten oxide bridge can get formed across a small gap after repeated on and off cycles. The molten oxide bridge can get very hot (up to and even over 1000°C) and can glow bright orange.

Both, an electric series arc and a glowing contact are undesired events, which can get very dangerous under certain circumstances. For example, if an electric series arc or a glowing contact occurs nearby flammable materials, fire and thus destruction and injury can be caused. However, even if the consequences are less dramatic, said events are at least undesired because waste of energy and malfunction can be caused. As said, the above phenomena are hard to detect and even harder to distinguish. However, there is a big difference for the need of intervention in terms of what is to be done and when it is to be done depending on whether an electric series arc or a glowing contact occurs.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

Accordingly, an object of the invention is the provision of an improved method, an improved evaluation module and an improved detection system for detecting an event at two electric conductors. In particular, an electric series arc and a glowing contact shall be reliably detected and distinguished.

Three embodiments, representing alternative solutions for detecting an event based on a time course of a current, are now described.

Embodiment 1 : Fast Fourier Transformation

The object of the invention is solved by a method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current flowing over the two electric conductors, generating a frequency course of said current by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course or on a filtered course of said time course and a1) classifying the event as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or a2) classifying the event as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or

6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or b) classifying the event as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

Moreover, the object of the invention is solved by an evaluation module for detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising an input for a time course of a current flowing over the two electric conductors, a fast Fourier transformation module, which is coupled to said input and which is designed to generate a frequency course of said current by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course and in a case A) a maximum detection module, which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the frequency course and a decision making module, which is coupled to the maximum detection module and which a1) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or in a case B) a summation module, which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module and which is designed to sum the frequency course and a decision making module, which is coupled to the summation module and which a2) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz,

4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or b) to classify the event as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

Optionally, a filter can be provided between the input of the evaluation module and the fast Fourier transformation module.

Finally, the object of the invention is solved by a detection system, which comprises current measuring means and an evaluation module as disclosed above, the input of which is connected to the current measuring means.

It has turned out during intensive development that the above conditions a1), a2) and b) are particularly useful for reliably detecting distinguishing electric series arcs and glowing contacts in a gap between two electric conductors. In case a1) single maximums in the frequency course are used for detection, whereas in cases a2) and b) a sum or integral of the frequency course in particular frequency ranges is used. Cases or conditions a1) and a2) can also be used in combination. For example, an event can be classified as an electric series arc if both conditions a1) and a2) are true. The presented structure of the evaluation module in particular is related to its function and is no prejudice for a physical structure of a real evaluation module. Functions may be embodied in software and/or hardware. Finally one should note that numerical values in particular shall include a deviation of +/- 10% from their base value throughout the disclosure. Further advantageous embodiments are disclosed in the claims and in the description as well as in the figures.

In a beneficial embodiment, the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or a filtered course of said time course is differentiated and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein c) the event is classified as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s in cases a1) and a2) or d) the event is classified as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s in case b). Accordingly, the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a time differential module, which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module and which is designed to differentiate the time course, wherein the decision making module is further prepared c) to classify the event as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or d) to classify the event as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

In this embodiment, a further criterion is used to classify the event at two electric conductors. Concretely, the changing rate or slope of the differentiated time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is used for that reason.

In yet another beneficial embodiment, the partial discharge equivalents based on the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or on a filtered course of said time course are used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein a partial discharge equivalent is the charge of said current during a first time span, wherein e) the event is classified as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC in cases a1) and a2) or f) the event is classified as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC in case b).

Accordingly the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a maximum detection module, which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the time course and a summation module, which is coupled to the maximum detection module and which is designed to generate a partial discharge equivalent, which is a sum of the time course at the detected maximum during a first time span, wherein the decision making module is further prepared e) to classify the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC or f) to classify the event as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

In this embodiment, yet another further criterion is used to classify the event at two electric conductors. Concretely, the charge of the current flowing over the two electric conductors over a given time period, in particular at or after a maximum of said current is detected. This charge may also be referred as “partial discharge equivalent”. For example, the partial discharge equivalent can be determined by summation or integration of the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or of a filtered course of said time course around a detected maximum. The partial discharge equivalent can also be determined by quasi summation or integration, where the measured maximum is just multiplied by a factor. Doing so in particular is useful if the shape of a current pulse around its maximum is known. For example, the time course of the current around a maximum can have a Gaussian shape.

Beneficially the first time span can be in a range of 0.5 to 5.0 is and in particular can be 2.0 jis. For example, the partial discharge equivalent can be determined by summation or integration of the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or of a filtered course of said time course during +/- 1 is around a detected maximum. Further on, the second time span beneficially can be in a range of 100 to 500 is and in particular can be 200 jis.

Beneficially, for obtaining the filtered time course, the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors can be band pass filtered with a band pass filter having a lower cut off frequency of 100 kHz and an upper cut off frequency of 1 MHz. These filter values are particularly useful if the partial discharge equivalent is determined by real summation or integration.

In an alternative embodiment, for obtaining the filtered time course, the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors can be band pass filtered with a band pass filter having a lower cut off frequency of 100 kHz and an upper cut off frequency in a range of 200 kHz to 1 MHz. These filter values are particularly useful if the partial discharge equivalent is determined by quasi summation or integration, where the measured maximum is just multiplied by a factor.

In another very advantageous embodiment, an event is classified as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including at least option a1) and/or a2) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

Accordingly the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a decision making module, which is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including at least option a1) and/or a2) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

In this way, more certainty can be obtained when an event is classified because the classification is based on more than one fulfilled condition. In detail, the sub results of the single conditions can be joined by a logical AND-function to obtain an overall result. For example two of four conditions, three of four conditions or all four conditions can be used.

In yet another very advantageous embodiment, an event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including the weighted result of condition a1) and/or a2) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

Accordingly the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a decision making module, which is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including the weighted result of condition a1) and/or a2) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

In this way, more certainty can be obtained when a event is classified, too, because the classification is based on more than one fulfilled condition again. However, there is not just a simple a logical AND-function for joining the sub results of the single conditions to obtain an overall result, but the weighting factors are used to prioritize some of the results. For example, the classification resulting from the condition a1) may be multiplied by 0.5, the classification resulting from the condition a2) may be multiplied by 0.2, the classification resulting from the condition c) may be multiplied by 0.2 and the classification resulting from the condition e) may be multiplied by 0.1. An event can be classified as an electric series arc if the sum of the four single classifications is above a first decision threshold of 0.3. Again two of four conditions, three of four conditions or all four conditions can be used. In one embodiment, there is only a common decision making module, which classifies the event, whereas in an alternative embodiment, for each condition a dedicated decision making sub module is provided, wherein the results of the decision making sub modules are fed to a common decision making module.

Beneficially, the current flowing over the two electric conductors is measured by means of a transformer, wherein the current over the two electric conductors flows through a primary winding of the transformer and the current measurement takes places at the secondary winding of the transformer or by means of an arrangement, comprising a magnetic core, a winding, which is wound around the magnetic core and through which the current over the two electric conductors flows, and a Hall sensor, which is arranged in an air gap of the magnetic core and which is prepared to measure the magnetic flux generated by the current through the winding. In this way, the current pulses before and during an electric arc can be measured with high accuracy.

Embodiment 2: Differentiated Time Course

The object of the invention is solved by a method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current flowing over the two electric conductors, generating a differentiated time course by differentiating said time course or a filtered course of said time course and a) classifying the event as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or b) classifying the event as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

Moreover, the object of the invention is solved by an evaluation module for detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising an input for a time course of a current flowing over the two electric conductors, a time differential module, which is coupled to said input and which is designed to differentiate the time course, and a decision making module, which is coupled to the time differential module and which a) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or b) to classify the event as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

Optionally, a filter can be provided between the input of the evaluation module and the time differential module.

It has turned out during intensive development that the above conditions a) and b) are particularly useful for reliably detecting distinguishing electric series arcs and glowing contacts in a gap between two electric conductors. In both cases, a current changing rate of a differentiated time course of the relevant current is used. The presented structure of the evaluation module in particular is related to its function and is no prejudice for a physical structure of a real evaluation module. Functions may be embodied in software and/or hardware. Finally one should note that numerical values in particular shall include a deviation of +/- 10% from their base value throughout the disclosure.

Further advantageous embodiments are disclosed in the claims and in the description as well as in the figures.

In a beneficial embodiment, a frequency course of said current is generated by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course or on a filtered course of said time course and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein: c1) the event is classified as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course additionally is located in one or more of the frequency ranges

3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz in case a) or c2) the event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or

6.1 to 6.7 MHz additionally exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA in case a) or d) the event is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz additionally exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA in case b).

Accordingly, the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a fast Fourier transformation module, which is coupled to said input and which is designed to generate a frequency course of said current by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course and in a case C) a maximum detection module, which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the frequency course, wherein the decision making module is further prepared c1) to classify the event as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or in a case D) a summation module, which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module and which is designed to sum the frequency course, wherein the decision making module is further prepared c2) to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or d) to classify the event as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

In this embodiment, a further criterion is used to classify the event at two electric conductors. Concretely, the frequency course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is used for that reason. In case c1) single maximums in the frequency course are used for detection, whereas in cases c2) and d) a sum or integral of the frequency course in particular frequency ranges is used. Cases or conditions c1) and c2) can also be used in combination. For example, an event can be classified as an electric series arc if both conditions c1) and c2) are true. Optionally, a filter can be provided between the input of the evaluation module and the fast Fourier transformation module. In yet another beneficial embodiment, the partial discharge equivalents based on the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or on a filtered course of said time course are used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein a partial discharge equivalent is the charge of said current during a first time span, wherein e) the event is classified as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC in cases a) or f) the event is classified as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC in case b).

In another very advantageous embodiment, an event is classified as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including at least option a) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

Accordingly the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a decision making module, which is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including at least option a) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

In yet another very advantageous embodiment, an event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including the weighted result of condition a) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

Accordingly the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a decision making module, which is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including the weighted result of condition a) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

In this way, more certainty can be obtained when a event is classified, too, because the classification is based on more than one fulfilled condition again. However, there is not just a simple a logical AND-function for joining the sub results of the single conditions to obtain an overall result, but the weighting factors are used to prioritize some of the results. For example, the classification resulting from the condition a) may be multiplied by 0.5, the classification resulting from the condition c1) may be multiplied by 0.2, the classification resulting from the condition c2) may be multiplied by 0.2 and the classification resulting from the condition e) may be multiplied by 0.1. An event can be classified as an electric series arc if the sum of the four single classifications is above a first decision threshold of 0.3. Again two of four conditions, three of four conditions or all four conditions can be used. In one embodiment, there is only a common decision making module, which classifies the event, whereas in an alternative embodiment, for each condition a dedicated decision making sub module is provided, wherein the results of the decision making sub modules are fed to a common decision making module.

Beneficially, the current flowing over the two electric conductors is measured by means of a transformer, wherein the current over the two electric conductors flows through a primary winding of the transformer and the current measurement takes places at the secondary winding of the transformer or by means of an arrangement, comprising a magnetic core, a winding, which is wound around the magnetic core and through which the current over the two electric conductors flows, and a Hall sensor, which is arranged in an air gap of the magnetic core and which is prepared to measure the magnetic flux generated by the current through the winding. In this way, the current pulses before and during an electric arc can be measured with high accuracy. Embodiment 3: Partial Discharge Equivalents

The object of the invention is solved by a method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current flowing over the two electric conductors and determining the partial discharge equivalents based on said time course or on a filtered course of said time course, wherein a partial discharge equivalent is the charge of said current during a first time span, and a) classifying the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge over 100 pC or b) classifying the event as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

Moreover, the object of the invention is solved by an evaluation module for detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising an input for a time course of a current flowing over the two electric conductors, a maximum detection module, which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the time course and a summation module, which is coupled to the maximum detection module and which is designed to generate a partial discharge equivalent, which is a sum of the time course at the detected maximum during a first time span, and a decision making module, which is coupled to the time differential module and which a) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge over 100 pC or b) to classify the event as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

Optionally, also a filter can be provided between the input of the evaluation module and the maximum detection module.

It has turned out during intensive development that the above conditions a) and b) are particularly useful for reliably detecting distinguishing electric series arcs and glowing contacts in a gap between two electric conductors. In both cases, partial discharge equivalents of the relevant current are used. In detail, the charge of the current flowing over the two electric conductors over a given time period, in particular at or after a maximum of said current is detected. This charge may also be referred as “partial discharge equivalent”. For example, the partial discharge equivalent can be determined by summation or integration of the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or of a filtered course of said time course around a detected maximum. The partial discharge equivalent can also be determined by quasi summation or integration, where the measured maximum is just multiplied by a factor. Doing so in particular is useful if the shape of a current pulse around its maximum is known. For example, the time course of the current around a maximum can have a Gaussian shape.

The presented structure of the evaluation module in particular is related to its function and is no prejudice for a physical structure of a real evaluation module. Functions may be embodied in software and/or hardware. Finally one should note that numerical values in particular shall include a deviation of +/- 10% from their base value throughout the disclosure.

In another beneficial embodiment, a frequency course of said current is generated by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course or on a filtered course of said time course and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein: c1) the event is classified as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course additionally is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz in case a) or c2) the event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or

In this embodiment, a further criterion is used to classify the event at two electric conductors. Concretely, the frequency course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is used for that reason. In case c1) single maximums in the frequency course are used for detection, whereas in cases c2) and d) a sum or integral of the frequency course in particular frequency ranges is used. Cases or conditions c1) and c2) can also be used in combination. For example, an event can be classified as an electric series arc if both conditions c1) and c2) are true. Optionally, a filter can be provided between the input of the evaluation module and the fast Fourier transformation module.

In a further beneficial embodiment, the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or a filtered course of said time course is differentiated and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein e) the event is classified as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s in case a) or f) the event is classified as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s in case b). Accordingly, the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a time differential module, which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module and which is designed to differentiate the time course, wherein the decision making module is further prepared e) to classify the event as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or f) to classify the event as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

In this embodiment, a further criterion is used to classify the event at two electric conductors. Concretely, the changing rate or slope of the differentiated time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is used for that reason. Optionally, a filter can be provided between the input of the evaluation module and the time differential module.

In another very advantageous embodiment, an event is classified as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including at least option a) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled. Accordingly the evaluation module beneficially can comprise a decision making module, which is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including at least option a) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

Beneficially, the current flowing over the two electric conductors is measured by means of a transformer, wherein the current over the two electric conductors flows through a primary winding of the transformer and the current measurement takes places at the secondary winding of the transformer or by means of an arrangement, comprising a magnetic core, a winding, which is wound around the magnetic core and through which the current over the two electric conductors flows, and a Hall sensor, which is arranged in an air gap of the magnetic core and which is prepared to measure the magnetic flux generated by the current through the winding.

In this way, the current pulses before and during an electric arc can be measured with high accuracy.

It should be noted at this point that embodiments related to the proposed method and their advantages similarly relate to embodiments related to the proposed evaluation module and detection system and their advantages and vice versa.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The invention now is described in more detail hereinafter with reference to particular embodiments, which the invention however is not limited to.

Fig. 1 shows an exemplary electric circuit and a detection system for detecting electric series arcs or glowing contacts;

Fig. 2 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of a first example of a detection system based on FFT;

Fig. 3 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of a second example of a detection system based on FFT;

Fig. 4 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of a detection system using more than one condition for the event classification;

Fig. 5 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of an example of a detection system based on a time differential of the relevant current; Fig. 6 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of a detection system using more than one condition for the event classification;

Fig. 7 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of an example of a detection system based on partial discharge equivalents of the relevant current;

Fig. 8 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of a detection system using more than one condition for the event classification; and

Fig. 9 shows exemplary current measuring means with a magnetic core, a winding and a Hall sensor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally, same parts or similar parts are denoted with the same/similar names and reference signs. The features disclosed in the description apply to parts with the same/similar names respectively same/similar reference signs. Indicating the orientation and relative position is related to the associated figure, and indication of the orientation and/or relative position has to be amended in different figures accordingly as the case may be.

Fig. 1 shows an arrangement of a simple electric circuit and a detection system 1 for detecting electric series arcs or glowing contacts. The electric circuit comprises a voltage source 2, a switch 3 and a load 4. Further on, the arrangement comprises current measuring means 5, which are part of the detection system 1 and which are provided to measure a current I flowing over the switch 3. Additionally, the detection system 1 comprises an evaluation module 6 which is connected to the current measuring means 5 and to an external control or display 7.

Embodiment 1 : Fast Fourier Transformation

Fig. 2 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of a first example of a detection system 1a to illustrate the disclosed method. The detection system 1a comprises current measuring means 5 and a first example of an evaluation module 6a connected thereto. The evaluation module 6a comprises an optional filter 8a, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a fast Fourier transformation module 9a (“FFT module” for short), a maximum detection module 10a and a decision making module 11a.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, an electric series arc event may occur between the switching contacts of the switch 3 or between two electric conductors in general. Accordingly, the switching contacts are to be seen as a special case of two electric conductors in the following. A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the detection system 1a can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5, generating a frequency course of said current I by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course by use of the FFT module 9a, detecting an absolute maximum of the frequency course by use of the maximum detection module 10a and a1) classifying the event as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges

3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz by use of the decision making module 11a.

The result can be sent to the external control or display 7 for further processing either by wire or wireless.

Optionally, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8a before it is passed over to the FFT module 9a. A lower cutoff frequency may be set below 3.6 MHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 6.7 MHz.

Fig. 3 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of a second example of a detection system 1b, which is similar to the detection system 1a of Fig. 2. In contrast, there is a summation module 12b and a different decision making module 11b.

A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the detection system 1b can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5, generating a frequency course of said current I by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course by use of the FFT module 9b, summing the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges

80 kHz to 1 MHz, 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz by use of the summation module 12b and classifying the event by use of the decision making module 11b, wherein a2) the event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 iA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 A after exceeding current threshold level of 5 A.

Again, the result can be sent to the external control or display 7 for further processing either by wire or wireless. And again, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8b before it is passed over to the FFT module 9b, wherein a lower cutoff frequency may be set below 3.6 MHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 6.7 MHz if electric series arcs shall be detected or wherein a lower cutoff frequency may be set below 80 kHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 1 MHz if a glowing contact shall be detected.

Fig. 4 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of an example of a combined detection system 1c, which comprises current measuring means 5, four different branches for signal preparation and a common decision making module 11c. In a first branch, there is an optional filter 8a, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a fast Fourier transformation module 9a (“FFT module” for short) and a maximum detection module 10a like it is the case in Fig. 2. The second branch comprises an optional filter 8b, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, too, a FFT module 9b and a summation module 12b like it is the case in Fig. 3. In a third branch, additionally there is an optional filter 8c, which again is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a time differential module 13c and an optional summation module 12c. Finally, the fourth branch comprises an optional filter 8d, which again is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a maximum detection module 10d and a summation module 12d.

The first branch up to the maximum detection module 10a works like the detection system 1a of Fig. 2, and the second branch up to the summation module 12b works like the detection system 1b of Fig. 3. However, the third and the fourth branch work differently.

A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the third branch can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5 and differentiating the time course of said current by use of the time differential module 13c.

Optionally, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8c before it is passed over to the time differential module 13c, and optionally, the time differential may be summed up over a defined time period by means of the summation module 12c. Alternatively, also an averaging module may be used for calculating the average of the time differential over a defined time period.

In a method of detecting events at two electric conductors by use of the fourth branch, partial discharge equivalents can be used as a further criterion to classify an event at two electric conductors. In particular, partial discharge equivalents can be used, which are the charges of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors during a first time span.

A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the fourth branch can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5, detecting a maximum in the time course by use of the maximum detection module 10d and summing the time course over a first time span at a detected maximum to obtain a partial discharge equivalent by use of the summation module 12d.

Beneficially the first time span can be in a range of 0.5 to 5.0 is and in particular can be 2.0 jis. For example, the partial discharge equivalent can be determined by summation or integration of the time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors or of a filtered course of said time course over +/- 1 is around a detected maximum. "Summation” in the given context may also be a multiplication of the maximum value with a multiplicator. Doing so in particular is useful if the shape of a current pulse around its maximum is known. For example, the time course of the current I around a maximum can have a Gaussian shape.

Optionally, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8d before it is passed over to the maximum detection module 10d, wherein a lower cutoff frequency may be set below 100 kHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 200 kHz or above 1 MHz dependent on whether the partial discharge equivalents are determined by real integration or quasi integration. In the first case, the upper cutoff frequency in particular can be set above 1 MHz, in the second case in a range of 200 kHz to 1 MHz.

The common decision making module 11c can classify an event as an electric series arc if one or more of the following conditions are fulfilled: an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz, a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA and it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s, at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second time span have a charge over 100 pC.

The common decision making module 11c can classify an event as a glowing contact if one or more of the following conditions are fulfilled: a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA and it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA, the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s, at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

For example, the second time span can be in a range of 100 to 500 ps and in particular can be 200 ps. Again, the result can be sent to the external control or display 7 either by wire or wireless.

In particular, weighting factors may be used in the above context to classify events as electric series arcs or glowing contacts. For example, the classification resulting from the first branch may be multiplied by 0.5, the classification resulting from the second branch may be multiplied by 0.2, the classification resulting from the third branch may be multiplied by 0.2 and the classification resulting from the fourth branch may be multiplied by 0.1. An event can be classified as an electric series arc if the sum of the four single classifications is above a first decision threshold of 0.3.

In Fig. 4, there is only the common decision making module 11c. However, in an alternative embodiment each branch may have its own decision making sub module (see decision making module 11a in Fig. 2 and decision making module 11b in Fig. 3 for example), the results of which are fed to the common decision making module 11c.

The filters 8a..8d may be different in terms of their design and their function. However, filters 8a..8d may also be commonly used in the four branches as the case may be. It should be noted that any combination of branches may be used in a combined detection system 1c as long as the first or the second branch are part of. For example two of four branches, three of four branches or all four branches can be used.

The current flowing over the two electric conductors can be measured by any current measuring means 5.

Embodiment 2: Differentiated Time Course

Fig. 5 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of an example of a detection system 1a to illustrate the disclosed method. The detection system 1a comprises current measuring means 5 and an example of an evaluation module 6a connected thereto. The evaluation module 6a comprises an optional filter 8a, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a time differential module 13a, an optional summation module 12a and a decision making module 11a.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, an electric series arc event may occur between the switching contacts of the switch 3 or between two electric conductors in general. Accordingly, the switching contacts are to be seen as a special case of two electric conductors in the following.

A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the detection system 1a can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5, differentiating the time course of said current, and classifying the event by use of the decision making module 11a, wherein a) the event is classified as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

Optionally, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8a before it is passed over to the time differential module 13a, and optionally, the time differential may be summed up over a defined time period by means of the summation module 12a. Alternatively, also an averaging module may be used for calculating the average of the time differential over a defined time period. Fig. 6 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of an example of a combined detection system 1b, which comprises current measuring means 5, four different branches for signal preparation and a common decision making module 11b. In a first branch, there is an optional filter 8a, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a time differential module 13a and an optional summation module 12a like it is the case in Fig. 5. In a second branch, there is an optional filter 8b, which again is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a fast Fourier transformation module 9b (“FFT module” for short) and a maximum detection module 10b. The third branch comprises an optional filter 8c, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, too, a FFT module 9c and a summation module 12c. Finally, the fourth branch comprises an optional filter 8d, which again is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a maximum detection module 10d and a summation module 12d.

The first branch up to the summation module 12a works like the detection system 1a of Fig. 5. However, the second to the fourth branches work differently.

A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the second branch can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5, generating a frequency course of said current I by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course by use of the FFT module 9b and detecting an absolute maximum of the frequency course by use of the maximum detection module 10b.

Optionally, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8b before it is passed over to the FFT module 9b. A lower cutoff frequency may be set below 3.6 MHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 6.7 MHz.

A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the third branch can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5, generating a frequency course of said current I by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course by use of the FFT module 9c and summing the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges

80 kHz to 1 MHz, 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz by use of the summation module 12c. Again, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8c before it is passed over to the FFT module 9c, wherein a lower cutoff frequency may be set below 3.6 MHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 6.7 MHz if electric series arcs shall be detected or wherein a lower cutoff frequency may be set below 80 kHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 1 MHz if a glowing contact shall be detected.

The common decision making module 11b can classify an event as an electric series arc if one or more of the following conditions are fulfilled: the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s, an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz, a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges

3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA and it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second time span have a charge over 100 pC.

The common decision making module 11b can classify an event as a glowing contact if one or more of the following conditions are fulfilled: the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s, a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA and it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA, at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

In Fig. 6, there is only the common decision making module 11b. However, in an alternative embodiment each branch may have its own decision making sub module (see decision making module 11a in Fig. 5 for example), the results of which are fed to the common decision making module 11b. The filters 8a..8d may be different in terms of their design and their function. However, filters 8a..8d may also be commonly used in the four branches as the case may be.

It should be noted that any combination of branches may be used in a combined detection system 1b as long as the first branch is part of. For example two of four branches, three of four branches or all four branches can be used.

Embodiment 3: Partial Discharge Equivalent

Fig. 7 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of an example of a detection system 1a to illustrate the disclosed method. The detection system 1a comprises current measuring means 5 and an example of an evaluation module 6a connected thereto. The evaluation module 6a comprises an optional filter 8a, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a maximum detection module 10a, a summation module 12a and a decision making module 11a.

In a method of detecting events at two electric conductors by use of the detection system 1a, partial discharge equivalents are used as a criterion to classify an event at two electric conductors. In particular, partial discharge equivalents are used, which are the charges of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors during a first time span.

A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the detection system 1a can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5, detecting a maximum in the time course by use of the maximum detection module 10a, summing the time course over a first time span at a detected maximum to obtain a partial discharge equivalent and by use of the summation module 12a and classifying the event by use of the decision making module 11a, wherein a) the event is classified as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge over 100 pC or b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

For example, the second time span can be in a range of 100 to 500 is and in particular can be 200 jis.

Optionally, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8a before it is passed over to the maximum detection module 10a, wherein a lower cutoff frequency may be set below 100 kHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 200 kHz or above 1 MHz dependent on whether the partial discharge equivalents are determined by real integration or quasi integration. In the first case, the upper cutoff frequency in particular can be set above 1 MHz, in the second case in a range of 200 kHz to 1 MHz.

Fig. 8 shows a schematically drawn functional block diagram of an example of a combined detection system 1b, which comprises current measuring means 5, four different branches for signal preparation and a common decision making module 11b. In a first branch, there is an optional filter 8a, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a maximum detection module 10a and a summation module 12a like it is the case in Fig. 7. In a second branch, there is an optional filter 8b, which again is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a fast Fourier transformation module 9b (“FFT module” for short) and a maximum detection module 10b. The third branch comprises an optional filter 8c, which is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, too, a FFT module 9c and a summation module 12c. Finally, the fourth branch comprises an optional filter 8d, which again is embodied as a bandpass filter in this example, a time differential module 13d and an optional summation module 12d.

The first branch up to the summation module 12a works like the detection system 1a of Fig. 7. However, the second to the fourth branches work differently.

80 kHz to 1 MHz, 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz by use of the summation module 12c.

Again, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8c before it is passed over to the FFT module 9c, wherein a lower cutoff frequency may be set below 3.6 MHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 6.7 MHz if electric series arcs shall be detected or wherein a lower cutoff frequency may be set below 80 kHz and an upper cutoff frequency may be set above 1 MHz if a glowing contact shall be detected.

A method of detecting an event at two electric conductors by use of the fourth branch can comprise the following steps: measuring a time course of the current I flowing over the two electric conductors by use of the current measuring means 5 and differentiating the time course of said current I by use of the time differential module 13d.

Optionally, the time course may be filtered by the optional filter 8d before it is passed over to the time differential module 13d, and optionally, the time differential may be summed up over a defined time period by means of the summation module 12d. Alternatively, also an averaging module may be used for calculating the average of the time differential over a defined time period.

The common decision making module 11b can classify an event as an electric series arc if one or more of the following conditions are fulfilled: at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second time span have a charge over 100 pC, an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz, a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges

3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA and it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s.

The common decision making module 11b can classify an event as a glowing contact if one or more of the following conditions are fulfilled: at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC, the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s, a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA and it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA, the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

Again, the result can be sent to the external control or display 7 either by wire or wireless.

In Fig. 8, there is only the common decision making module 11b. However, in an alternative embodiment each branch may have its own decision making sub module (see decision making module 11a in Fig. 7 for example), the results of which are fed to the common decision making module 11b.

The filters 8a..8d may be different in terms of their design and their function. However, filters 8a..8d may also be commonly used in the four branches as the case may be.

Example current measuring means

Fig. 9 shows an advantageous embodiment of current measuring means 5a, which comprise a magnetic core 14, a winding 15 and a Hall sensor 16. In this example, the current I over the two electric conductors flows through the winding 15 and the current measurement is done by means of the Hall sensor 16, which measures the magnetic flux generated by the current I through the winding 15. Alternatively, a transformer can be used, wherein the current I over the two electric conductors flows through a primary winding of the transformer and the current measurement takes places at the secondary winding of the transformer. Basically, the Hall sensor 16 is replaced by the secondary winding then. In both cases, current pulses before and during an electric arc can be measured with high accuracy.

It should be noted that the schematically drawn functional block diagrams depicted in Figs. 2 to 8 shall not be used to construe the scope of the patent claims, and its functional structure is no prejudice for a physical structure of a real evaluation module 6, 6a, 6a, 6c or detection system 1, 1a, 1b, 1c. Instead, functions may be embodied in software and/or hardware in any desired grouping.

As has been noted before, numerical values in particular shall include a deviation of +/- 10% from their base value. Finally, it is noted that in reality, the evaluation module 6, 6a, 6b, 6c and the detection system 1, 1a, 1b, 1c may have more or less parts than shown in the figures. Moreover, the description may comprise subject matter of further independent inventions.

It should also be noted that the term "comprising" does not exclude other elements and the use of articles "a" or "an" does not exclude a plurality. Also elements described in association with different embodiments may be combined. It should also be noted that reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims.

Embodiment 1 : numbered clauses

1. Method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, generating a frequency course of said current by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course or on a filtered course of said time course, characterized in that, a1) the event is classified as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or a2) the event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or

6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

2. Method as in clause 1 , characterized in that the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or a filtered course of said time course is differentiated and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein c) the event is classified as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s in cases a1) and a2) or d) the event is classified as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s in case b).

3. Method as in clause 1 or 2, characterized in that partial discharge equivalents based on the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or on a filtered course of said time course are used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein a partial discharge equivalent is the charge of said current during a first time span, wherein e) the event is classified as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC in cases a1) and a2) or f) the event is classified as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC in case b).

4. Method as in clause 3, characterized in that the first time span is in a range of 0.5 to 5.0 jis and/or the second time span is in a range of 100 to 500 .s.

5. Method as in clause 3 or 4, characterized in that for obtaining the filtered time course the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is band pass filtered with a band pass filter having a lower cut off frequency of 100 kHz and an upper cut off frequency of 1 MHz.

6. Method as in clause 3 or 4, characterized in that for obtaining the filtered time course the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is band pass filtered with a band pass filter having a lower cut off frequency of 100 kHz and an upper cut off frequency in a range of 200 kHz to 1 MHz.

7. Method as in any one of clauses 3 to 6, characterized in that an event is classified as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including at least option a1) and/or a2) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

8. Method as in any one of clauses 3 to 6, characterized in that an event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including the weighted result of condition a1) and/or a2) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

9. Method as in any one of clauses 1 to 8, characterized in that the current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors is measured by means of a transformer, wherein the current (I) over the two electric conductors flows through a primary winding of the transformer and the current measurement takes places at the secondary winding of the transformer or by means of an arrangement, comprising a magnetic core (14), a winding (15), which is wound around the magnetic core (14) and through which the current (I) over the two electric conductors flows, and a Hall sensor (16), which is arranged in an air gap of the magnetic core (14) and which is prepared to measure the magnetic flux generated by the current (I) through the winding.

10. Evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) for detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising an input for a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, a fast Fourier transformation module (9a, 9b), which is coupled to said input and which is designed to generate a frequency course of said current (I) by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course and in a case A) a maximum detection module (10a), which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module (9a) and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the frequency course and a decision making module (11a, 11c), which is coupled to the maximum detection module (10a) and which a1) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or in a case B) a summation module (12b), which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module (9b) and which is designed to sum the frequency course and a decision making module (11 b, 11c), which is coupled to the summation module (12b) and which a2) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or b) to classify the event as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

11. Evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) as in clause 10, characterized in a filter (8a, 8b) between the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) and the fast Fourier transformation module (9a, 9b).

12. Evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as in clause 10 or 11, characterized in a time differential module (13c), which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) and which is designed to differentiate the time course, wherein the decision making module (11c) is further prepared c) to classify the event as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or d) to classify the event as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

13. Evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as in any one of clauses 10 to 12, characterized in a maximum detection module (1 Od), which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the time course and a summation module (12d), which is coupled to the maximum detection module (10d) and which is designed to generate a partial discharge equivalent, which is a sum of the time course at the detected maximum during a first time span, wherein the decision making module (11c) is further prepared e) to classify the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC or f) to classify the event as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

14. Evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as in clause 13, characterized in a decision making module (11c), which is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including the weighted result of condition a1) and/or a2) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

15. Detection system (1 , 1a..1c), comprising current measuring means (5, 5a) and an evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as in any one of the clauses 10 to 14, the input of which is connected to the current measuring means (5, 5a).

Embodiment 2: numbered clauses

1. Method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, generating a differentiated time course by differentiating said time course or a filtered course of said time course, characterized in that, a) the event is classified as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

2. Method as in clause 1, characterized in that a frequency course of said current is generated by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course or on a filtered course of said time course and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein, c1) the event is classified as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course additionally is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz in case a) or c2) the event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or

6.1 to 6.7 MHz additionally exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA in case a) or d) the event is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz additionally exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA in case b). 3. Method as in clause 1 or 2, characterized in that partial discharge equivalents based on the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or on a filtered course of said time course are used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein a partial discharge equivalent is the charge of said current during a first time span, wherein e) the event is classified as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC in case a) or f) the event is classified as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC in case b).

7. Method as in any one of clauses 3 to 6, characterized in that an event is classified as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including at least option a) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

8. Method as in any one of clauses 3 to 6, characterized in that an event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including the weighted result of condition a) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold. 9. Method as in any one of clauses 1 to 8, characterized in that the current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors is measured by means of a transformer, wherein the current (I) over the two electric conductors flows through a primary winding of the transformer and the current measurement takes places at the secondary winding of the transformer or by means of an arrangement, comprising a magnetic core (14), a winding (15), which is wound around the magnetic core (14) and through which the current (I) over the two electric conductors flows, and a Hall sensor (16), which is arranged in an air gap of the magnetic core (14) and which is prepared to measure the magnetic flux generated by the current (I) through the winding.

10. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) for detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising an input for a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, a time differential module (13a), which is coupled to said input and which is designed to differentiate the time course, and a decision making module (11a, 11b), which is coupled to the time differential module (13a) and which a) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or b) to classify the event as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

11. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) as in clause 10, characterized in a fast Fourier transformation module (9b, 9c), which is coupled to said input and which is designed to generate a frequency course of said current (I) by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course and in a case C) a maximum detection module (10b), which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module (9b) and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the frequency course, wherein the decision making module (11b) is further prepared c1) to classify the event as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course additionally is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz,

4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or in a case D) a summation module (12c), which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module (9c) and which is designed to sum the frequency course, wherein the decision making module (11b) is further prepared c2) to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz additionally exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or d) to classify the event as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz additionally exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

12. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) as in clause 11 , characterized in a filter (8b, 8c) between the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) and the fast Fourier transformation module (9b, 9c).

13. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) as in any one of clauses 10 to 12, characterized in a maximum detection module (1 Od), which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the time course and a summation module (12d), which is coupled to the maximum detection module (10d) and which is designed to generate a partial discharge equivalent, which is a sum of the time course at the detected maximum during a first time span, wherein the decision making module (11b) is further prepared e) to classify the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC or f) to classify the event as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

14. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) as in clause 13, characterized in a decision making module (11b), which is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including the weighted result of condition a) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold. 15. Detection system (1 , 1a..1c), comprising current measuring means (5, 5a) and an evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) as in any one of the clauses 10 to 14, the input of which is connected to the current measuring means (5, 5a).

Embodiment 3: numbered clauses

1. Method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, determining partial discharge equivalents based on the time course of said current or on a filtered course of said time course, wherein a partial discharge equivalent is the charge of said current during a first time span, and a) classifying the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge over 100 pC or b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

2. Method as in clause 1, characterized in that the first time span is in a range of 0.5 to 5.0 jis and/or the second time span is in a range of 100 to 500 .s.

3. Method as in clause 1 or 2, characterized in that for obtaining the filtered time course the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is band pass filtered with a band pass filter having a lower cut off frequency of 100 kHz and an upper cut off frequency of 1 MHz.

4. Method as in clause 1 or 2, characterized in that for obtaining the filtered time course the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is band pass filtered with a band pass filter having a lower cut off frequency of 100 kHz and an upper cut off frequency in a range of 200 kHz to 1 MHz.

5. Method as in any one of clauses 1 to 4, characterized in that a frequency course of said current is generated by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course or on a filtered course of said time course and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein, c1) the event is classified as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course additionally is located in one or more of the frequency ranges

6. Method as in any one of clauses 1 to 5, characterized in that the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or a filtered course of said time course is differentiated and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein e) the event is classified as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s in case a) or f) the event is classified as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s in case b).

7. Method as in clause 6, characterized in that an event is classified as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including at least option a) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

8. Method as in clause 6, characterized in that an event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including the weighted result of condition a) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

10. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) for detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising an input for a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, a maximum detection module (10a), which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the time course, a summation module (12d), which is coupled to the maximum detection module (10a) and which is designed to generate a partial discharge equivalent, which is a sum of the time course at the detected maximum during a first time span, and a decision making module (11a, 11b), which is coupled to the time differential module (13a) and which a) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge over 100 pC or b) to classify the event as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

11. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) as in clause 10, characterized in a fast Fourier transformation module (9b, 9c), which is coupled to said input and which is designed to generate a frequency course of said current (I) by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course and in a case C) a maximum detection module (10b), which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module (9b) and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the frequency course, wherein the decision making module (11b) is further prepared c1) to classify the event as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course additionally is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or in a case D) a summation module (12c), which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module (9c) and which is designed to sum the frequency course, wherein the decision making module (11b) is further prepared c2) to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz additionally exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or d) to classify the event as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz additionally exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

13. Evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as in any one of clauses 10 to 12, characterized in a time differential module (13c), which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) and which is designed to differentiate the time course, wherein the decision making module (11c) is further prepared e) to classify the event as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or f) to classify the event as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

14. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) as in clause 13, characterized in a decision making module (11b), which is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a), c1), c2) and e) including the weighted result of condition a) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

15. Detection system (1 , 1a..1c), comprising current measuring means (5, 5a) and an evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) as in any one of the clauses 10 to 14, the input of which is connected to the current measuring means (5, 5a). LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

1, 1a, 1b, 1c detection system

2 voltage source

3 switch

4 load

5, 5a current measuring means

6, 6a, 6b, 6c evaluation module

7 external control or display

8a, 8b, 8c, 8d filter

9a, 9b, 9c fast Fourier transformation module

10a, 10b, 10d maximum detection module

11a, 11b, 11c decision making module

13a, 13c, 13d time differential module

12a, 12, 12c, 12d summation module

14 magnetic core

15 primary winding

16 Hall sensor

I current

Claims

1. Method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, generating a frequency course of said current by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course or on a filtered course of said time course, characterized in that, a1) the event is classified as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz, or a2) the event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or

6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA; and b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

2. Method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or a filtered course of said time course is differentiated and used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein c) the event is classified as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate above 100 A/s in cases a1) and a2) or d) the event is classified as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course additionally has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s in case b).

3. Method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that partial discharge equivalents based on the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors or on a filtered course of said time course are used as a further criterion to classify the event at two electric conductors, wherein a partial discharge equivalent is the charge of said current during a first time span, wherein e) the event is classified as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC in cases a1) and a2) or f) the event is classified as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC in case b).

4. Method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that: the first time span is in a range of 0.5 to 5.0 is and/or the second time span is in a range of 100 to 500 .s; and/or for obtaining the filtered time course, the time course of the current flowing over the two electric conductors is band pass filtered with a band pass filter having a lower cut off frequency of 100 kHz and an upper cut off frequency of 1 MHz.

5. Method as claimed in any one of claims 3 to 4, characterized in that an event is classified as an electric series arc if one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including at least option a1) and/or a2) are fulfilled or is classified as a glowing contact if one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including at least option b) are fulfilled.

6. Method as claimed in any one of claims 3 to 4, characterized in that an event is classified as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including the weighted result of condition a1) and/or a2) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

7. Method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, generating a differentiated time course by differentiating said time course or a filtered course of said time course, characterized in that, a) the event is classified as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s and b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

8. Method of detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising the steps of measuring a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, determining partial discharge equivalents based on the time course of said current or on a filtered course of said time course, wherein a partial discharge equivalent is the charge of said current during a first time span, and a) classifying the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge over 100 pC and b) the event is classified as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

9. Method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors is measured by means of a transformer, wherein the current (I) over the two electric conductors flows through a primary winding of the transformer and the current measurement takes places at the secondary winding of the transformer or by means of an arrangement, comprising a magnetic core (14), a winding (15), which is wound around the magnetic core (14) and through which the current (I) over the two electric conductors flows, and a Hall sensor (16), which is arranged in an air gap of the magnetic core (14) and which is prepared to measure the magnetic flux generated by the current (I) through the winding.

10. Evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) for detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising an input for a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, a fast Fourier transformation module (9a, 9b), which is coupled to said input and which is designed to generate a frequency course of said current (I) by performing a fast Fourier transformation on said time course and in a case A) a maximum detection module (10a), which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module (9a) and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the frequency course and a decision making module (11a, 11c), which is coupled to the maximum detection module (10a) and which a1) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if an absolute maximum of the frequency course is located in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz or in a case B) a summation module (12b), which is coupled to the fast Fourier transformation module (9b) and which is designed to sum the frequency course and a decision making module (11b, 11c), which is coupled to the summation module (12b) and which a2) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of the frequency course in one or more of the frequency ranges 3.6 to 3.8 MHz, 4.5 to 4.8 MHz and/or 6.1 to 6.7 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 1.6 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA or b) to classify the event as a glowing contact if a sum of the frequency course in a frequency range of 80 kHz to 1 MHz exceeds a current threshold level of 5 pA as long as it stays above a sustain level of 0.55 pA after exceeding current threshold level of 5 pA.

11. Evaluation module (6, 6a, 6b) for detecting an event at two electric conductors, comprising an input for a time course of a current (I) flowing over the two electric conductors, a time differential module (13a), which is coupled to said input and which is designed to differentiate the time course, and a decision making module (11a, 11b), which is coupled to the time differential module (13a) and which a) is designed to classify the event as an electric series arc if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate above 100 A/s or b) to classify the event as a glowing contact if the differentiated time course has a current changing rate in a range of 20 A/s to 100 A/s.

12. Evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as claimed in any of claims 10 to 11 , characterized in a filter (8a, 8b) between the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) and the fast Fourier transformation module (9a, 9b).

13. Evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 12, characterized in a maximum detection module (1 Od), which is coupled to the input of the evaluation module (6, 6a..6c) and which is designed to detect an absolute maximum of the time course and a summation module (12d), which is coupled to the maximum detection module (10d) and which is designed to generate a partial discharge equivalent, which is a sum of the time course at the detected maximum during a first time span, wherein the decision making module (11c) is further prepared e) to classify the event as an electric series arc if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge over 100 pC or - f) to classify the event as a glowing contact if at least 90% of the partial discharge equivalents or the sum of the partial discharge equivalents during a second longer time span additionally have a charge in a range of 1 pC to 100 pC.

14. Evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as claimed in claim 13, characterized in a decision making module (11c), which is designed to - classify the event as an electric series arc if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions a1), a2), c) and e) including the weighted result of condition a1) and/or a2) exceeds a first decision threshold or is classified as a glowing contact if a sum of weighted results of one or more of the conditions b), d) and f) including the weighted result of condition b) exceeds a second decision threshold.

15. Detection system (1 , 1a..1c), comprising current measuring means (5, 5a) and an evaluation module (6, 6a. ,6c) as claimed in any one of the claims 10 to 14, the input of which is connected to the current measuring means (5, 5a).