EP4588592A1 - Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same - Google Patents

Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same

Info

Publication number
EP4588592A1
EP4588592A1 EP24152105.3A EP24152105A EP4588592A1 EP 4588592 A1 EP4588592 A1 EP 4588592A1 EP 24152105 A EP24152105 A EP 24152105A EP 4588592 A1 EP4588592 A1 EP 4588592A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
chromium
based powder
bcc
present
powder
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP24152105.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Barbara MAROLI
Arashk Memarpour
Oliver Lanz
Florian Baumgartner
Sedigheh Bigdeli
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hoganas Germany GmbH
Hoganas AB
Original Assignee
Hoganas Germany GmbH
Hoganas AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hoganas Germany GmbH, Hoganas AB filed Critical Hoganas Germany GmbH
Priority to EP24152105.3A priority Critical patent/EP4588592A1/en
Priority to TW114101869A priority patent/TW202544264A/en
Priority to PCT/EP2025/050987 priority patent/WO2025153591A1/en
Publication of EP4588592A1 publication Critical patent/EP4588592A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0257Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements
    • C22C33/0278Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements with at least one alloying element having a minimum content above 5%
    • C22C33/0285Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements with at least one alloying element having a minimum content above 5% with Cr, Co, or Ni having a minimum content higher than 5%
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F1/00Metallic powder; Treatment of metallic powder, e.g. to facilitate working or to improve properties
    • B22F1/05Metallic powder characterised by the size or surface area of the particles
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C27/00Alloys based on rhenium or a refractory metal not mentioned in groups C22C14/00 or C22C16/00
    • C22C27/06Alloys based on chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C29/00Alloys based on carbides, oxides, nitrides, borides, or silicides, e.g. cermets, or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides
    • C22C29/005Alloys based on carbides, oxides, nitrides, borides, or silicides, e.g. cermets, or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides comprising a particular metallic binder
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C30/00Alloys containing less than 50% by weight of each constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C32/00Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ
    • C22C32/0047Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ with carbides, nitrides, borides or silicides as the main non-metallic constituents
    • C22C32/0052Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ with carbides, nitrides, borides or silicides as the main non-metallic constituents only carbides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/22Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/26Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with niobium or tantalum
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/32Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with boron
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/34Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with more than 1.5% by weight of silicon

Definitions

  • the detailed alloys are essentially free of hazardous species, i.e., Ni and Co, they are excellent candidates for all industries wherein sustainability and trace mineral contamination is a concern.
  • Food industries for example are promoting a new class of "new food” where coating made from the present alloys can be used for packaging materials.
  • they are strong candidates for coating different components in aerospace or power plants, e.g., sliding tubes, sliding pistons, axles, bolts, bushings, flanges, etc., as well as having potential uses for coating grinding rolls, crushers, and calender rolls in the relevant industries.
  • the amount of iron (Fe) is from 15.5 wt% to 17.5 wt%, preferably from 16.0 wt% to 17.0 wt%.
  • the amount of molybdenum (Mo) is from 1.6 wt% to 2.1 wt%, preferably from 1.7 wt% to 2.0 wt%.
  • the amount of boron (B) is from 0.4 to 0.9 wt%, preferably from 0.5 wt% to 0.8 wt%.
  • the amount of niobium (Nb) is from 0.40 wt% to 0.55 wt%, preferably from 0.45 wt% to 0.50 wt%.
  • chromium-based powder primarily chromium and tungsten carbides
  • carbides primarily chromium and tungsten carbides
  • the chromium-based powder preferably comprises at least 80% by weight of the chromium-based powder contained within a sieved fraction of the chromium-based powder having a size distribution from 1 ⁇ m to 100 pm, preferably from 2.5 ⁇ m to 75 pm, or even more preferably from 5 ⁇ m to 50 ⁇ m, as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving, and/or preferably comprises at least 85% by weight, at least 90% by weight, or more preferably at least 95% by weight of the chromium-based powder having a size distribution from 2.5 ⁇ m to 100 ⁇ m as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving.
  • the powders of the present invention will have optimal sizes for the intended use in thermal spray processing methods.
  • the starting pre-alloyed powders' compositions were selected such that the formed BCC-phase, which is predominately an iron-chromium-silicon alloy, forms a soft solid solution matrix having optimized elastic properties for the resulting coatings from thermal spraying while being able to contain the formed carbide phases strongly in solid solution.
  • niobium, boron, and carbon has been consumed in the formation of the various carbide phases distributed in the matrix alloy, although at least the amount of carbon remains sufficient for interaction with the main alloy elements of iron (Fe), silicon (Si), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), and chromium (Cr) as the balance, whereas niobium (Nb) and boron (B) appear to be present only in amounts commensurate with both of these elements being present in the matrix alloy as unavoidable impurities based on the starting materials used.
  • Figure 2 A) and B) show (EM) the same cross section of the atomized powder at two resolutions (B enlarged).
  • Dark gray carbides M 23 C 6 and M 7 C 3 according to the phase diagram in Figure 1
  • Small amounts of Cr-boride precipitates also form which improve hardness.
  • Figure 3 shows indexes correlated to deposition efficiency and coating's thickness for different spraying methods and parameters in accordance with Tables 1 and 2. The results are also compared with an existing product, Amperit ® 588.
  • Figures 4 and 5 show cross sections of the coating using JP and DJ techniques respectively.
  • JP method seems to be able to create denser coatings (at about 0.2 - 0.9 area% porosity), while the porosity level of DJ sprayed sample appears higher (at about 3 area%).
  • the porosity content is measured by image analysis, which is based on the contrast of dark spots versus light bulk in the micrographs, the certainty of these values is not very high, as it is possible that the dark spots are small oxide particles. Nevertheless, it should be noted that even 3% porosity is completely acceptable for this type of coatings.
  • Cavitation test was run on the coated samples using a KLN Type 587 machine in accordance with standard ASTM G32-85. Results are shown in Figure 8 .
  • DJ sprayed coatings are less dense (also confirmed by gas permeability and EM), they show a better corrosion resistance in the NSS test.
  • Hardness Vickers was measured using a Struers Dura Scan machine according to standard ISO 6507,1-4:2018.
  • the present product shows a general hardness of 900-1000 HV, c.f. Figure 9 , which makes it a good candidate for the intended applications.
  • Wear resistance of the coated samples was measured according to ASTM G65 ( Figure 12 ) using a built-in machine. Volume loss is shown versus material consumption for spraying in this figure.
  • FIG. 13 shows the cross section together with EDX map for high-content elements, using voltage of 15kV. The results are aligned with the thermodynamic calculation, showing different types of carbides in a BCC matrix.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Coating By Spraying Or Casting (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)

Abstract

In the present disclosure there is detailed a chromium-based powder consisting by total weight of powder of:
Iron (Fe) :
15 - 18 wt%,
Carbon (C) :
4.7 - 5.5 wt%,
Tungsten (W) :
2.2 - 3.4 wt%,
Molybdenum (Mo):
1.4 - 2.3 wt%,
Boron (B) :
0.3 - 1.0 wt%,
Silicon (Si) :
0.1 - 1.0 wt%,
Niobium (Nb) :
0.35 - 0.60 wt%,
the balance being chromium (Cr) and unavoidable impurities not exceeding 0.3 wt%, wherein nickel (Ni) if present is only present as an unavoidable impurity in amounts not exceeding 0.10 wt%, which when used in a HVOF and/or a HVAF process provides primarily chromium carbides in solid solution in a BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy. As the binder is free of nickel and cobalt it provides a sustainable yet cost beneficial replacement for conventional binders for carbide products in particular for uses where nickel and/or cobalt contamination is undesired.
It is recommended that Figure 2 is published with the abstract.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • In the field of powder technology for HVOF and HVAF applications there is suggested a range of solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying together with method of making the same and uses thereof.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Tungsten/chromium Carbide powders are hard materials (hardness ≈1000 HV), used for dense coatings. They can be sprayed using High-Velocity Oxygen-Fuel (HVOF) and High-Velocity Air-Fuel (HVAF) spray methods onto various metallic parts and structures to improve the surface resistance of these parts and structures to severe wear and corrosion. Conventional carbide powders consist of hard WC or Cr3C2 particles in a binder matrix, for which the CoCr powders are used. Different alloying elements, e.g., Ni, Fe, Ti, etc., may be added to the matrix to improve mechanical, corrosion, and spray-ability properties, c.f. e.g., J. Garcia et al. (J. Garcia, V. Collado Ciprés, A. Blomqvist and B. Kaplan, "Cemented carbide microstructures: a review," International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, vol. 80, pp. 40-68, 2019.)
  • In the recent years, use of some elements, such as Co and Ni in particular, has become of concern due to their harmful characteristics to the environment and health and there have been attempts to replace these elements by less harmful elements in the binder, c.f., e.g., M. Walbrühl et al. (M Walbrühl, D. Linder, K. Ågren and A. Borgenstam, "Diffusion modeling in cemented carbides: Solubility assessment for Co, Fe and Ni binder systems," International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, vol. 68, pp. 41-48, 2017) .
  • It is known that conventional binders can be replaced by high-alloyed steels, or atomized powders, c.f., e.g., J. Garcia et al. Herein, the present inventors introduce new alloys that suitable for use as hard face coatings prepared by thermal spraying from an atomized powder. In the type of material introduced, instead of conventional carbide/binder concept, hard carbides precipitate in solid solution as a coherent phase during cooling after melting in the herein detailed matrix BCC-phase iron-chromium alloy, as the solid solution.
  • Since the detailed alloys are essentially free of hazardous species, i.e., Ni and Co, they are excellent candidates for all industries wherein sustainability and trace mineral contamination is a concern. Food industries for example are promoting a new class of "new food" where coating made from the present alloys can be used for packaging materials. Also, they are strong candidates for coating different components in aerospace or power plants, e.g., sliding tubes, sliding pistons, axles, bolts, bushings, flanges, etc., as well as having potential uses for coating grinding rolls, crushers, and calender rolls in the relevant industries.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Figure 1:
    Phase diagram for the molten alloy in the temperature as a function of carbon-content calculated using Thermo-Calc.
    Figure 2:
    EM-cross section of pre-alloyed, gas atomized powder according to the invention. A) powder particle, B) enlarged section of particle.
    Figure 3:
    Material consumption versus coverage rate for different spray techniques and parameters, with comparative.
    Figure 4:
    Cross section of the coating achieved by JP spraying, in different magnifications. A) scalebar 100 pm, B) scalebar 50 µm.
    Figure 5:
    Cross section of the coating achieved by DJ spraying, in different magnifications. A) scalebar 100 pm, B) scalebar 50 µm.
    Figure 6:
    NSS tested coupons after A) 168 hours for JP-sprayed and B) after 504 hours for DJ-sprayed samples.
    Figure 7:
    Gas permeability test results for coated samples.
    Figure 8:
    Cavitation test results versus material consumption for coated samples.
    Figure 9:
    Hardness measurements for sprayed samples using different techniques and parameters.
    Figure 10:
    Roughness measurements for sprayed samples using different techniques and parameters.
    Figure 11:
    Young modulus measurements for sprayed samples using different techniques and parameters.
    Figure 12:
    Material consumption for spraying versus wear resistance for sprayed samples.
    Figure 13:
    SEM image and EDX map of elements showing different types of carbides in a BCC-matrix.
  • It is to be understood, that the embodiments shown in the figures are for illustration of the present invention and cannot be construed as being limiting on the present invention. Unless otherwise indicated, the drawings are intended to be read (e.g., cross-hatching, arrangement of parts, proportion, degree, etc.) together with the specification, and are to be considered a portion of the entire written description of this disclosure.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In a first aspect of the present invention and embodiment thereof, a BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy consisting by total weight of alloy of:
    Iron (Fe) : 44.0 - 47.0 wt%,
    Silicon (Si) : 5.0 - 7.0 wt%,
    Molybdenum (Mo): 0.60 - 0.80 wt%,
    Tungsten (W) : 0.40 - 0.60 wt%,
    Carbon (C) : 0.01 - 0.10 wt%,
    Boron (B) : 0.001 - 0.010 wt%,
    Niobium (Nb) : 0.005 - 0.010 wt%,
    the balance being chromium (Cr) and unavoidable impurities not exceeding 0.1 wt%, wherein nickel (Ni) if present is only present as an unavoidable impurity in amounts not exceeding 0.05 wt%.
  • In a preferred aspect thereof, the BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy of is present as a powder. In particularly preferred embodiments thereof, wherein the comprises at least 80% by weight of the stainless-steel powder contained within a sieved fraction of the stainless-steel powder having a size distribution from 1 µm to 100 pm, preferably from 2.5 µm to 75 µm, or even more preferably from 5 µm to 50 pm, as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving, and/or preferably comprises at least 85% by weight, at least 90% by weight, or more preferably at least 95% by weight of the stainless-steel powder having a size distribution from 2.5 µm to 100 µm as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving.
  • In embodiments of the BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any embodiment herein, iron (Fe) is present in the alloy from 44.5 wt% to 46.5 wt%, preferably from 45.0 wt% to 46.0 wt%, more preferably from 45.4 wt% to 45.9 wt%.
  • In embodiments of the BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any embodiment herein, silicon (Si) is present in the alloy from 5.3 wt% to 6.7 wt%, preferably from 5.5 wt% to 6.3 wt%, more preferably from 5.7 wt% to 6.1 wt%.
  • In embodiments of the BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any embodiment herein, molybdenum (Mo) is present in the alloy from 0.62 wt% to 0.78 wt%, preferably from 0.65 wt% to 0.75 wt%, more preferably from 0.63 wt% to 0.73 wt%.
  • In embodiments of the BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any embodiment herein, tungsten (W) is present in the alloy from 0.42 wt% to 0.58 wt%, preferably from 0.45 wt% to 0.55 wt%, more preferably from 0.47 wt% to 0.53 wt%.
  • As detailed in the below experimental section, the stainless-steel alloys of the present invention are useful as solid solution matrix alloys for various carbides, in particular for chromium and tungsten carbides.
  • The alloys of the invention can be manufactured as powders for HVOF and/or HVAF spray coating by pre-alloying the elements of the alloy, atomizing, e.g., water-atomizing, the pre-alloyed elements, whereby a pre-alloyed stainless-steel powder containing the alloys of the invention is obtained.
  • An advantage of the alloys of the present invention is that they can be mixed with carbides of a suitable powder size for HVOF and/or HVAF spray coating and spray coated together directly onto a suitable surface.
  • However, it is more preferable to allow the alloys of the invention to form jointly with the carbides from melt during thermal spray coating as will be detailed herein below.
  • To this purpose, it is preferable to prepare a chromium-based powder consisting by total weight of powder of:
    Iron (Fe) : 15 - 18 wt%,
    Carbon (C) : 4.7 - 5.5 wt%,
    Tungsten (W) : 2.2 - 3.4 wt%,
    Molybdenum (Mo): 1.4 - 2.3 wt%,
    Boron (B) : 0.3 - 1.0 wt%,
    Silicon (Si) : 0.1 - 1.0 wt%,
    Niobium (Nb) : 0.35 - 0.60 wt%,
    the balance being chromium (Cr) and unavoidable impurities not exceeding 0.3 wt%, wherein nickel (Ni) if present is only present as an unavoidable impurity in amounts not exceeding 0.10 wt%.
  • In the most preferred embodiments of the present invention, the chromium-based powder is a pre-alloyed powder, preferably pre-alloyed from a melt. When the powder is pre-alloyed before powder formation, such as pre-alloyed from melt, e.g., done by gas or water atomization, the abovementioned BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy will form as a solid solution matrix for co-precipitated carbide phases in solid solution. As discussed below, such pre-alloyed powders are directly useable in thermal spray processes with high transfer ratios of the elemental constituents to the surfaces coated by thermal spray coating processes.
  • Preferred embodiments of the chromium-based powder are detailed herein below.
  • In embodiments of the chromium-based powder according to invention, the amount of iron (Fe) is from 15.5 wt% to 17.5 wt%, preferably from 16.0 wt% to 17.0 wt%.
  • In embodiments of the chromium-based powder according to invention, the amount of carbon (C) is from 4.9 to 5.3 wt%, preferably from 5.0 to 5.2 wt%.
  • In embodiments of the chromium-based powder according to invention, the amount of tungsten (W) is from 2.5 wt% to 3.1 wt%, preferably from 2.7 wt% to 2.9 wt%.
  • In embodiments of the chromium-based powder according to invention, the amount of molybdenum (Mo) is from 1.6 wt% to 2.1 wt%, preferably from 1.7 wt% to 2.0 wt%.
  • In embodiments of the chromium-based powder according to invention, the amount of boron (B) is from 0.4 to 0.9 wt%, preferably from 0.5 wt% to 0.8 wt%.
  • In embodiments of the chromium-based powder according to invention, the amount of silicon (Si) is from 0.3 wt% to 0.9 wt%, preferably from 0.5 wt% to 0.8 wt%. In general, enough silicon must be present in the chromium-based powders for the subsequent forming of the abovementioned alloys of the invention.
  • In embodiments of the chromium-based powder according to invention, the amount of niobium (Nb) is from 0.40 wt% to 0.55 wt%, preferably from 0.45 wt% to 0.50 wt%.
  • When the chromium-based powder detailed herein is a pre-alloyed powder, carbides, primarily chromium and tungsten carbides, will be in solid solution in a BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any of the herein detailed embodiments.
  • In preferred embodiments of the chromium-based powder whether pre-alloyed or mixed, the chromium-based powder preferably comprises at least 80% by weight of the chromium-based powder contained within a sieved fraction of the chromium-based powder having a size distribution from 1 µm to 100 pm, preferably from 2.5 µm to 75 pm, or even more preferably from 5 µm to 50 µm, as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving, and/or preferably comprises at least 85% by weight, at least 90% by weight, or more preferably at least 95% by weight of the chromium-based powder having a size distribution from 2.5 µm to 100 µm as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving. Thereby the powders of the present invention will have optimal sizes for the intended use in thermal spray processing methods.
  • Accordingly, there is herein detailed the use of a chromium-based powder according to any embodiment of the present invention for the coating of a surface by means of a thermal spray method.
  • Further, there is herein detailed a shaped object having a coating comprising a BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any embodiment of the herein detailed invention.
  • Further, there is herein detailed a method for the production of a shaped object having the steps:
    • provision of a chromium-based powder according to any embodiment herein detailed in a form or formulation that is suitable for thermal spraying;
    • carrying-out of a thermal spraying process using the chromium-based powder;
    • obtaining of the shaped object.
    EXPERIMENTAL Preparation of pre-alloyed and gas atomized powders
  • In preparation to the herein detailed experiments, powder mixtures as detailed herein above and having the below given specific compositions were pre-alloyed, and either stored as a pre-alloyed ingot for subsequent gas atomization, or directly gas atomized from the pre-alloy melt. In this way, each powder particle was cooled fast enough for the atomized powder to be considered as a separate bulk material, in which carbides can nucleate and grow upon cooling as intermetallics. These intermetallics form a coherent part of the material and no fusion was needed to create or bind them.
  • Powder sizes were determined in accordance with ISO-14232 - 1-2017-E Particle distribution by sieving and are stated as 95% of the powder mass falling inside the given size exclusion interval. The measured size exclusion range for the particular atomized powders of the present experiments was: 3 wt% > 53µm ≥ 45µm; 30 wt% > 45µm ≥ 38µm; 55 wt% > 38 µm ≥ 15pm; 2 wt% > 15pm.
  • HVOF-coating experiments
  • Coating properties were tested for different HVOF spray parameters. In the present work, two different jet guns were used for thermal spraying of the samples: Diamond jet gun (DJ), and high-pressure jet gun (JP) . The fuel for the DJ consisted of O2+H2+air and for the JP it was a mixture of oxygen and argon.
  • The high-pressure jet gun (JP-5000) is designed for liquid-fuel (kerosene) and oxygen operation. Fuel and oxygen are fed into the gun, atomized by the coaxial stabilizer, and ignited in the combustion chamber, resulting in a supersonic flame. Spray powder from the powder feeder is fed radially into the supersonic flame through two powder ports positioned directly after the combustion chamber. The spray stream is accelerated through a converging/diverging nozzle several times the speed of sound. The spray particles are heated to a molten or semi-molten state and propelled at high velocity, impacting the coating surface in a plastic state. Table 1 provides an overview of the spray parameters used in the present experiments. Table 1: Spray parameters for high-pressure jet gun (JP-5000)
    Chemistry X-CrNiC X-CrNiC X-CrNiC X-CrNiC CrC-FeCr CrC-FeCr
    Grain size [µm] 45/10 45/10 45/15 45/15 45/15 45/15
    Parameter
    O2 scfh 336 489 336 489 336 489
    nlpm 148 215 148 215 148 215
    H2 scfh 1637 1450 1637 1450 1637 1450
    nlpm 720 638 720 638 720 638
    Shroud (Air) scfh 1000 786 1000 786 1000 786
    nlpm 440 346 440 346 440 346
    Powder feeder
    Feed rate g/min 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
    Coating procedure
    Surface speed m/min 75 75 75 75 75 75
    Offset mm 5 5 5 5 5 5
    Spray distance mm 240 240 240 240 240 240
  • The DiamondJet, DJ-process, uses oxygen, fuel gas and air to produce a high-pressure annular flame, which provides uniform heating of the axially introduced powder spray material. The gas stream is accelerated through a converging/diverging nozzle to supersonic speeds. The gas stream propels the powder particles towards the substrate. Individual particles deform plastically upon impact, tenaciously bonding the coating to the substrate. Table 2 details the spray parameters used for the present experiments. Table 2: Spray parameters for Diamond jet gun
    Chemistry CrC-FeCr CrC-FeCr CrC-FeCr CrC-FeCr CrC-FeCr CrC-FeCr CrC-FeCr CrC-FeCr
    Grain size [µm] 45/15 45/15 45/15 45/15 45/15 45/15 45/15 45/15
    Parameter
    inch 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6
    mm 101,6 101,6 101,6 101,6 101,6 101,6 152.4 152.4
    Oxygen nlpm 860 800 835,5 900 900 835,5 835,5 810
    scfh 1956 1820 1900 2047 2047 1900 1900
    Fuel lph 25 23,5 20,79 24 24 20,79 22 23
    Powder feeder
    g/min 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
    Coating procedure
    Surface speed m/min 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
    Offset mm/U 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
    Spray distance mm 320 300 380 300 300 380 380 320
  • Different spray parameters were tested, e.g., power feeder, nozzle size, combustion pressure, etc., c.f., Tables 1 and 2. Parameters were adjusted in a way that a dense coating with optimal deposition efficiency is achieved. Separate coupons were sprayed with the same parameters for different tests.
  • Hardness, roughness, gas permeability, Young's modulus, and wear resistance were measured for each spray parameter.
  • After spraying, coated samples were analyzed with optical microscope to measure the coating thickness and porosity and additionally examined using electron microscopy.
  • Another set of coupons were placed in the natural salt spray chamber and evaluated after specific periods of time to study the corrosion properties. Corrosion resistance of the material was also evaluated based on gas permeability and cavitation tests, c.f. Figure 8.
  • Finally, coated samples were analyzed using SEM/EDX analysis to find a better understanding of the final product.
  • Calphad-based calculation
  • Figure 1 shows the phase diagram for the presently developed alloys as calculated using Thermo-Calc software, steel database TCFE12.
  • Composition range marked with vertical stippled lines in Figure 1 shows composition ranges of for the carbon (C) content for this powder, which results in carbides as hard phase, precipitated in a BCC matrix. Small amounts of Cr-boride precipitates also form which can have a positive effect on hardness.
  • The starting pre-alloyed powders' compositions were selected such that the formed BCC-phase, which is predominately an iron-chromium-silicon alloy, forms a soft solid solution matrix having optimized elastic properties for the resulting coatings from thermal spraying while being able to contain the formed carbide phases strongly in solid solution.
  • In the shown calculations, the BCC-phase forms as an eutectic composition having the composition given below in Table 3. Table 3: Composition of BCC-phase from Thermo-Calc
    Fe Nb B Mo C W Si Cr
    45.7 0.07 0.008 0.7 0.066 0.5 5.9 Bal.
  • As can be seen from the resulting equilibrium composition, essentially all niobium, boron, and carbon has been consumed in the formation of the various carbide phases distributed in the matrix alloy, although at least the amount of carbon remains sufficient for interaction with the main alloy elements of iron (Fe), silicon (Si), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), and chromium (Cr) as the balance, whereas niobium (Nb) and boron (B) appear to be present only in amounts commensurate with both of these elements being present in the matrix alloy as unavoidable impurities based on the starting materials used.
  • Microstructure analysis Examination of pre-alloyed powder
  • Figure 2 A) and B) show (EM) the same cross section of the atomized powder at two resolutions (B enlarged). Dark gray carbides (M23C6 and M7C3 according to the phase diagram in Figure 1) can be seen in a light-color matrix of solid solution BCC. Small amounts of Cr-boride precipitates also form which improve hardness.
  • Sprayed coupons
  • Sprayed coupons were cut and analyzed by a LEICA DM6 M light optical microscope, to measure the coating thickness and porosity.
  • Figure 3 shows indexes correlated to deposition efficiency and coating's thickness for different spraying methods and parameters in accordance with Tables 1 and 2. The results are also compared with an existing product, Amperit® 588.
  • Most of the trails fall in the high-productivity/high-efficiency area of the plot (compatible with, and in some cases better than the existing products) which shows that this product is cost-beneficial through which a dense coating can be achieved. The JP-technique seems to have higher productivity than Amperit® 588, while the DJ-technique has a higher efficiency.
  • Figures 4 and 5 show cross sections of the coating using JP and DJ techniques respectively. JP method seems to be able to create denser coatings (at about 0.2 - 0.9 area% porosity), while the porosity level of DJ sprayed sample appears higher (at about 3 area%). However, since the porosity content is measured by image analysis, which is based on the contrast of dark spots versus light bulk in the micrographs, the certainty of these values is not very high, as it is possible that the dark spots are small oxide particles. Nevertheless, it should be noted that even 3% porosity is completely acceptable for this type of coatings.
  • Corrosion Properties Salt Spray Testing:
  • Corrosion properties of the coating was studied using natural salt spray (NSS) test by natural salt spray (NSS) test using a SC1000 Weiss GmbH machines according to standard ASTM B117. Samples were placed in the chamber and inspected after specific times, i.e., 168, 336, 504, 672, 840 and 1008 hours.
  • Figure 6 shows the tested coupons after A) 168 hours for JP-sprayed samples, at which time severe corrosion became observable, and after B) 504 hours for DJ sprayed samples, when signs of corrosion were only then becoming observable. Accordingly, the corrosion resistance of the present coatings is compatible or better than currently marketed products, such as e.g., Amperit® 588, which complies with a minimum of 168 hours exposure to the test conditions before severe corrosion becomes observable.
  • Gas Permeability:
  • Gas permeability test results were used as further tool for providing an index useful in evaluating corrosion resistance of the coated samples. Figure 7 shows these results for the two different spray techniques measured using a GPT-03 machine in accordance with standard ISO 4022.
  • The coating seems rather dense but at higher experimental pressures the gas penetration accelerates.
  • Cavitation Tests:
  • Cavitation test was run on the coated samples using a KLN Type 587 machine in accordance with standard ASTM G32-85. Results are shown in Figure 8.
  • It is interesting that although DJ sprayed coatings are less dense (also confirmed by gas permeability and EM), they show a better corrosion resistance in the NSS test.
  • Overall, the present experiments confirm the corrosion resistance of the present coatings, ranking at on par with or better than commercialized products, but in general being intermediate corrosion resistance coatings.
  • Mechanical Properties
  • Mechanical properties of the coatings were measured. Results for hardness, roughness, Young's modulus and wear resistance are shown in Figures 9 to 12.
  • Hardness Vickers was measured using a Struers Dura Scan machine according to standard ISO 6507,1-4:2018. The present product shows a general hardness of 900-1000 HV, c.f. Figure 9, which makes it a good candidate for the intended applications.
  • Roughness of coated samples were measured based on standards DIN EN ISO 4287 and ASME B46.1, using a MarSurf PS10 machine. The results presented in Figure 10 show an average value of 5-7 Ra for these compositions, which is slightly higher than expected for this property among different carbides (c.f., J. Garcia et al.).
  • Young's modulus represents elastic properties of material and is correlated to hardness. The measurements were done using a LA-wave V2-1 Fraunhofer IWS apparatus. The average value of 100-130 GPa (Figure 11) is expected for a hard material and makes it a good candidate for applications where heavy loading is applied.
  • Wear resistance of the coated samples was measured according to ASTM G65 (Figure 12) using a built-in machine. Volume loss is shown versus material consumption for spraying in this figure.
  • It shows that all coatings have excellent wear resistance, i.e., very low volume loss for medium powder consumption in comparison with Amperit® 588. This makes the present product significantly beneficial from cost point of view and a strong candidate for application where wear properties play an important role.
  • SEM Analysis
  • A Hitachi SU6600 Scanning Electron Microscope was used to analyze coated samples. Figure 13 shows the cross section together with EDX map for high-content elements, using voltage of 15kV. The results are aligned with the thermodynamic calculation, showing different types of carbides in a BCC matrix.
  • CLOSING COMMENTS
  • Although the present invention has been described in detail for purpose of illustration, it is understood that such detail is solely for that purpose, and variations can be made therein by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed subject matter, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims.
  • The term "comprising" as used in the claims does not exclude other elements or steps. The indefinite article "a" or "an" as used in the claims does not exclude a plurality. A unit may fulfill the functions of several means recited in the claims. A reference sign used in a claim shall not be construed as limiting the scope.

Claims (21)

  1. A BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy consisting by total weight of alloy of: Iron (Fe) : 44.0 - 47.0 wt%, Silicon (Si) : 5.0 - 7.0 wt%, Molybdenum (Mo): 0.60 - 0.80 wt%, Tungsten (W) : 0.40 - 0.60 wt%, Carbon (C) : 0.01 - 0.10 wt%, Boron (B) : 0.001 - 0.010 wt%, Niobium (Nb) : 0.005 - 0.010 wt%,
    the balance being chromium (Cr) and unavoidable impurities not exceeding 0.1 wt%, wherein nickel (Ni) if present is only present as an unavoidable impurity in amounts not exceeding 0.05 wt%.
  2. A BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy of claim 1 as a powder.
  3. A BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to claim 2, wherein the stainless-steel powder comprises at least 80% by weight of the stainless-steel powder contained within a sieved fraction of the stainless-steel powder having a size distribution from 1 µm to 100 pm, preferably from 2.5 µm to 75 pm, or even more preferably from 5 µm to 50 pm, as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving, and/or preferably comprises at least 85% by weight, at least 90% by weight, or more preferably at least 95% by weight of the stainless-steel powder having a size distribution from 2.5 µm to 100 µm as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving.
  4. A BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any of the claims 1 to 3, wherein iron (Fe) is present in the alloy from 44.5 wt% to 46.5 wt%, preferably from 45.0 wt% to 46.0 wt%, more preferably from 45.4 wt% to 45.9 wt%.
  5. A BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any of the claims 1 to 4, wherein silicon (Si) is present in the alloy from 5.3 wt% to 6.7 wt%, preferably from 5.5 wt% to 6.3 wt%, more preferably from 5.7 wt% to 6.1 wt%.
  6. A BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any of the claims 1 to 5, wherein molybdenum (Mo) is present in the alloy from 0.62 wt% to 0.78 wt%, preferably from 0.65 wt% to 0.75 wt%, more preferably from 0.63 wt% to 0.73 wt%.
  7. A BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any of the claims 1 to 6, wherein tungsten (W) is present in the alloy from 0.42 wt% to 0.58 wt%, preferably from 0.45 wt% to 0.55 wt%, more preferably from 0.47 wt% to 0.53 wt%.
  8. A chromium-based powder consisting by total weight of powder of: Iron (Fe) : 15 - 18 wt%, Carbon (C) : 4.7 - 5.5 wt%, Tungsten (W) : 2.2 - 3.4 wt%, Molybdenum (Mo): 1.4 - 2.3 wt%, Boron (B) : 0.3 - 1.0 wt%, Silicon (Si) : 0.1 - 1.0 wt%, Niobium (Nb) : 0.35 - 0.60 wt%,
    the balance being chromium (Cr) and unavoidable impurities not exceeding 0.3 wt%, wherein nickel (Ni) if present is only present as an unavoidable impurity in amounts not exceeding 0.10 wt%.
  9. A chromium-based powder according to claim 8, wherein the amount of iron (Fe) is from 15.5 wt% to 17.5 wt%, preferably from 16.0 wt% to 17.0 wt%.
  10. A chromium-based powder according to claim 8 or claim 9, wherein the amount of carbon (C) is from 4.9 to 5.3 wt%, preferably from 5.0 to 5.2 wt%.
  11. A chromium-based powder according to any of the claims 8 to 10, wherein the amount of tungsten (W) is from 2.5 wt% to 3.1 wt%, preferably from 2.7 wt% to 2.9 wt%.
  12. A chromium-based powder according to any of the claims 8 to 11, wherein the amount of molybdenum (Mo) is from 1.6 wt% to 2.1 wt%, preferably from 1.7 wt% to 2.0 wt%.
  13. A chromium-based powder according to any of the claims 8 to 12, wherein the amount of boron (B) is from 0.4 to 0.9 wt%, preferably from 0.5 wt% to 0.8 wt%.
  14. A chromium-based powder according to any of the claims 8 to 13, wherein the amount of silicon (Si) is from 0.3 wt% to 0.9 wt%, preferably from 0.5 wt% to 0.8 wt%.
  15. A chromium-based powder according to any of the claims 8 to 14, wherein the amount of niobium (Nb) is from 0.40 wt% to 0.55 wt%, preferably from 0.45 wt% to 0.50 wt%.
  16. A chromium-based powder according to any of the claims 8 to 15 as a pre-alloyed powder.
  17. A chromium-based powder according to claim 16, wherein carbides are in solid solution in a BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any of the claims 1 to 7.
  18. A chromium-based powder according to either of the claims 16 or 17, wherein the chromium-based powder comprises at least 80% by weight of the chromium-based powder contained within a sieved fraction of the chromium-based powder having a size distribution from 1 µm to 100 pm, preferably from 2.5 µm to 75 pm, or even more preferably from 5 µm to 50 pm, as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving, and/or preferably comprises at least 85% by weight, at least 90% by weight, or more preferably at least 95% by weight of the chromium-based powder having a size distribution from 2.5 µm to 100 µm as measured by sieving in accordance with ISO-14232-1-2017-E, Particle distribution by sieving.
  19. Use of a chromium-based powder according to any one of claims 8 to 18 for the coating of a surface by means of a thermal spray method.
  20. A shaped object having a coating comprising a BCC-phase iron-chrome stainless-steel alloy according to any of the claims 1 to 7.
  21. A method for the production of a shaped object according to claim 20, having the steps:
    - provision of a chromium-based powder according to one or more of claims 8 to 18 in a form or formulation that is suitable for thermal spraying;
    - carrying-out of a thermal spraying process using said chromium-based powder;
    - obtaining of said shaped object.
EP24152105.3A 2024-01-16 2024-01-16 Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same Pending EP4588592A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP24152105.3A EP4588592A1 (en) 2024-01-16 2024-01-16 Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same
TW114101869A TW202544264A (en) 2024-01-16 2025-01-16 Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same
PCT/EP2025/050987 WO2025153591A1 (en) 2024-01-16 2025-01-16 Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP24152105.3A EP4588592A1 (en) 2024-01-16 2024-01-16 Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4588592A1 true EP4588592A1 (en) 2025-07-23

Family

ID=89619543

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP24152105.3A Pending EP4588592A1 (en) 2024-01-16 2024-01-16 Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP4588592A1 (en)
TW (1) TW202544264A (en)
WO (1) WO2025153591A1 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003253405A (en) * 2002-02-27 2003-09-10 Nippon Piston Ring Co Ltd Porous metallic sintered compact
US8658934B2 (en) * 2009-08-10 2014-02-25 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. Feedstock powder for production of high hardness overlays
US20220389549A1 (en) * 2019-12-18 2022-12-08 Oerlikon Metco (Us) Inc. Iron-based high corrosion and wear resistance alloys
EP4112222A1 (en) * 2021-06-30 2023-01-04 National Tsing Hua University High corrosion resistance ferrochrome alloy bulk and article comprising the same

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102612741B (en) 2009-11-06 2014-11-12 株式会社半导体能源研究所 Semiconductor device

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003253405A (en) * 2002-02-27 2003-09-10 Nippon Piston Ring Co Ltd Porous metallic sintered compact
US8658934B2 (en) * 2009-08-10 2014-02-25 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. Feedstock powder for production of high hardness overlays
US20220389549A1 (en) * 2019-12-18 2022-12-08 Oerlikon Metco (Us) Inc. Iron-based high corrosion and wear resistance alloys
EP4112222A1 (en) * 2021-06-30 2023-01-04 National Tsing Hua University High corrosion resistance ferrochrome alloy bulk and article comprising the same

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
J. GARCIAV. COLLADO CIPRESA. BLOMQVISTB. KAPLAN: "Cemented carbide microstructures: a review", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRACTORY METALS AND HARD MATERIALS, vol. 80, 2019, pages 40 - 68, XP085612963, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.12.004
M WALBRUHLD. LINDERK. AGRENA. BORGENSTAM: "Diffusion modeling in cemented carbides: Solubility assessment for Co, Fe and Ni binder systems", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRACTORY METALS AND HARD MATERIALS, vol. 68, 2017, pages 41 - 48, XP085182290, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.06.006
SÁRKA HOUDKOVÁ ET AL: "The High-Temperature Wear and Oxidation Behavior of CrC-Based HVOF Coatings | Journal of Thermal Spray Technology", 13 September 2017 (2017-09-13), XP093207330, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11666-017-0637-3> [retrieved on 20240920] *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW202544264A (en) 2025-11-16
WO2025153591A1 (en) 2025-07-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Meghwal et al. Thermal spray high-entropy alloy coatings: a review
US11326239B2 (en) Iron based alloy suitable for providing a hard and corrosion resistant coating on a substrate, article having a hard and corrosion resistant coating, and method for its manufacture
Patel et al. Enhanced wear resistance of AlCoCrFeMo high entropy coatings (HECs) through various thermal spray techniques
EP3084026B1 (en) Powder for surface coating
EP0960954B2 (en) Powder of chromium carbide and nickel chromium
US11359268B2 (en) Iron based alloy suitable for providing a hard and wear resistant coating on a substrate, article having a hard and wear resistant coating, and method for its manufacture
CN100432277C (en) Iron-based thermal spray coating material with high corrosion resistance and wear resistance and preparation method thereof
TW202302875A (en) Wear and corrosion resistant iron based coating
EP2130933B1 (en) Coating material, method for production thereof, coating method, rotor blade equipped with shroud
CN105063499A (en) Surface coating part for reproduction of ball mill liner plate and manufacturing method for surface coating part
CN113136532B (en) Iron-based alloy powder for laser cladding and preparation method thereof
Sharma et al. Deposition behaviour of FeCrMnNiCo coatings deposited using mechanically alloyed powder: Comparing Cold Spray, HVOF, HVAF, and Laser Cladding processes
EP4588592A1 (en) Solid solution held chromium carbides for thermal spraying and method of making the same
US4678511A (en) Spray micropellets
CN105063539B (en) A kind of preparation method of ball grinding machine lining board wear-resistant coating
EP4570939A1 (en) Fecrni-steel alloys as carbide binders
Kai et al. Fabrication of conventional and nanostructured NiCrC coatings via HVAF technique
Żórawski et al. Tribological properties of hypersonically sprayed carbide coatings
CN114318164A (en) Wear-resistant corrosion-resistant tool steel
Nagabhushana et al. Erosion studies of plasma-sprayed NiCrBSi, Mo and flyash cenosphere coating
US20250290177A1 (en) Non-magnetic metal matrix composites
EP1443125B1 (en) CoCrC coating for surfaces liable to consumption
Bortolotti Spruzzatura HVOF di rivestimenti a base leghe ad alta entropia (HEA)
Supekar Tribological response of thermally sprayed high entropy alloys for aerospace applications
WO2024084057A2 (en) Nickel-chrome alloys

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC ME MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20260123