EP4445574A2 - Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in combined radar and communication systems - Google Patents

Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in combined radar and communication systems

Info

Publication number
EP4445574A2
EP4445574A2 EP22904837.6A EP22904837A EP4445574A2 EP 4445574 A2 EP4445574 A2 EP 4445574A2 EP 22904837 A EP22904837 A EP 22904837A EP 4445574 A2 EP4445574 A2 EP 4445574A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
radar
signal
communication
papr
radar signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP22904837.6A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP4445574A4 (en
Inventor
Ebubekir MEMISOGLU
Hüseyin ARSLAN
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Istanbul Medipol Universitesi
Original Assignee
Istanbul Medipol Universitesi
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Istanbul Medipol Universitesi filed Critical Istanbul Medipol Universitesi
Priority claimed from PCT/TR2022/051434 external-priority patent/WO2023107074A2/en
Publication of EP4445574A2 publication Critical patent/EP4445574A2/en
Publication of EP4445574A4 publication Critical patent/EP4445574A4/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/003Transmission of data between radar, sonar or lidar systems and remote stations
    • G01S7/006Transmission of data between radar, sonar or lidar systems and remote stations using shared front-end circuitry, e.g. antennas
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/023Interference mitigation, e.g. reducing or avoiding non-intentional interference with other HF-transmitters, base station transmitters for mobile communication or other radar systems, e.g. using electro-magnetic interference [EMI] reduction techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/03Details of HF subsystems specially adapted therefor, e.g. common to transmitter and receiver
    • G01S7/038Feedthrough nulling circuits
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/40Means for monitoring or calibrating
    • G01S7/4004Means for monitoring or calibrating of parts of a radar system
    • G01S7/4008Means for monitoring or calibrating of parts of a radar system of transmitters
    • G01S7/4013Means for monitoring or calibrating of parts of a radar system of transmitters involving adjustment of the transmitted power
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/02Transmitters
    • H04B1/04Circuits
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/93Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
    • G01S13/931Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of reducing the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR) for signals produced by both systems when radar and communication systems are located on the same hardware.
  • PAPR Peak-to-Average Power Ratio
  • orthogonal frequency division multiplexing In 4th Generation (4G) and 5th Generation (5G) cellular communication standards, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is used as a waveform. Although this waveform has a particularly good spectral efficiency, one of its major disadvantages is its high Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR) value. In the literature, there are techniques developed to solve this problem, but these techniques cause losses in communication performance.
  • OFDM orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
  • Radar systems generally have two different scenarios, monostatic and bistatic.
  • the receiver and the transmitter are in the same hardware, while in the bistatic scenario, they are in different hardware. Therefore, for detection in monostatic radar systems, a radio signal is generated, transmitted to the channel, and then received by the transmitter in the same hardware.
  • Many different waveforms have been developed for radar systems in order to increase detection performance in the literature.
  • One of the biggest disadvantages of radar systems is the interference signals from other users. Orthogonal resources should be allocated to different users to prevent interference. This is possible in synchronous networks.
  • Radar signal adjustment techniques have been developed in order to increase the interference resistance in radar systems and to provide radar-sensing security. For this, radar signals called noise radar has been developed. Since the generated radar signal is random and known by the joint radar-communication transceiver, detection security against other users and reducing the effects of interference signals is possible. In addition, studies on reducing the interference effects and providing detection security in linear continuous wave radars are also carried out with different phase or frequency adjustments. The method according to the invention differs from such radar techniques in that the radar signal is adjusted according to the communication signal.
  • the inventors intend to develop a method that will ensure that the sum of the radar and communication signals has a low PAPR value by adjusting the radar signal in combination with the radar and communication systems. In this way, it is intended to increase energy efficiency by reducing the PAPR value for both systems without any performance loss.
  • the method of the invention is intended to have the advantages of low PAPR value, resistance to interference, and detection security for radar systems.
  • One of the important objects of the invention is to meet the radar requirements on the one hand, and on the other hand, ensure that the radar and communication signals have a low PAPR value without causing an extra performance loss.
  • the invention relates to a method for reducing PAPR values in combination with radar and communication systems, and the said method comprises the following steps:
  • Figure 1 The default system model for the invention
  • Figure 2 Block diagram describing the invention 201 : Communication Signal
  • FIG. 3 The PAPR in Figure 2 shows a detailed explanation of the reduction-based adjustment process.
  • 505 Collecting the communication and radar signals and sending them to the channel by passing them through the power amplifier
  • the invention relates to a method for reducing PAPR values in combination with radar and communication systems, and the said method comprises the following steps:
  • Figure 1 shows the default system model for the invention.
  • the system model consists of a joint radar-communications transceiver (101), antenna (102), Total transmitted radar and communication signal (103), reflected signal (104), object to be detected (105), and the communication receiver (106).
  • the joint radar-communications receiver (101) different waveforms are generated for the radar and communication systems. OFDM for communication and the linear continuous wave (LCW) forms for radar is widely used in practice. Other waveforms may also be used for the invention. Both systems use bands separated from each other in the frequency space. In addition, signals are transmitted simultaneously. Therefore, the orthogonal coexistence of radar and communication systems is achieved by using different frequency sources. Here, the orthogonal coexistence of the two systems can also be provided for a different source, excluding the time source.
  • the two systems must share the time in common at the same time, therefore, the systems can provide orthogonal coexistence at a source different from the frequency provided that this condition is met.
  • the communication system aims to send data
  • the radar system aims to detect objects around it monostatically.
  • FIG. 2 shows the block diagram of the invention.
  • the diagram of the invention consists of the communication signal (201), radar signal (202), PAPR reductionbased adjustment (203), signal collector (204), power amplifier (205), and antenna (206) parts.
  • the communication signal in time is denoted by x(t).
  • the radar signal is denoted by c(t), assuming that all necessary digital and analog processing is done in the radar signal (202) block.
  • the PAPR reduction-based adjustment (203) block the necessary amplitude and phase changes for the radar signal is calculated by looking at the communication signal. These changes are generally made as a(t)*e ⁇ (b(t)).
  • the PAPR value of the y(t) signal determines the performance efficiency of the power amplifier (205).
  • time (/) denotes an instant of time such as 0 ⁇ t ⁇ T in the selected time period (7).
  • max(.) and E() functions calculate the maximum value of the signal power and the average signal power for the range 0 ⁇ t ⁇ Z, respectively.
  • the chosen time (7) is usually taken to be equal to the total symbol length of the communication signal.
  • Figure 3 shows the PAPR reduction-based adjustment (202) process in detail.
  • Figure 3 consists of the communication signal (301), radar signal (302), radar signal segment (303), and PAPR reduction-based adjustment factor (304).
  • the purpose here is to minimize the PAPR value of the total signal by adjusting the radar signal. This adjustment may precisely cause the performance of the radar systems to decrease.
  • radar signal adjustments without considering PAPR reduction are common in the literature. Radar signal adjustment techniques in the literature are used to increase the resistance against interference caused by other radars and to provide detection security. Therefore, the invention proposes that the PAPR of the total signal can be reduced while meeting these radar requirements. For this, the radar signal (302) at the chosen time T is divided into N segments.
  • the time T is taken as the total symbol length in the communication system, and each radar signal segment (Figure (303)) is represented by dashed rectangles.
  • the amplitude and phase changes to each of these radar signal segments (303) are expressed by the adjustment factor (304).
  • This factor is calculated by the PAPR reduction-based adjustment (202) block, looking at the communication signal (301).
  • the time interval of the //th radar signal segment (303) is taken as t (n-1) ⁇ t (n) ⁇ t_(n+l).
  • the factors are calculated as follows:
  • [a(t (n)), b(t (n))] min ⁇ a(t (n)), P(t_(n)) ⁇ (x(t_(n))+ a(t_(n))*c(t_(n)) *e '(P(t_(n)))) (Formula 1) where the function min ⁇ a(t (n)), >( t_(n)) ⁇ () finds the values of a(t_(n)) and f>( t_(n)) that minimize the expression. These calculated values are then assigned to (t (n)) and b(t (n)) values, respectively.
  • the adjusted radar signal and communication signal (301) are then collected.
  • Figure 4 shows two examples for a better understanding of this method.
  • the so-called conventional method (401) the sum of the communication signal and the radar signal worsens the PAPR performance. If a different amplifier were used for both systems, only the communication signal would have the PAPR problem.
  • the invention is suitable (402), even if the PAPR performance of both signals were poor, the PAPR performance of the total signal would be exceptionally good.
  • step 501 is described in detail with 201 and 301.
  • step 502 is described in detail with 202 and 302.
  • Step 503 is described in detail with 304.
  • Step 504 is described in detail with 203 and 303.
  • Step 505 is described in detail with 204.
  • the invention can be implemented in devices with joint radar-communication systems, using the radar signal using digital and/or analog processes as in the invention.
  • the invention does not require a change in communication standards and has the potential to be applied especially to autonomous vehicles.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method of reducing the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR) for signals produced by both systems when radar and communication systems are located on the same hardware. The invention has significant potential in improving the performance of the system and reducing hardware costs, especially in autonomous vehicles that use simultaneous radar and communication signals.

Description

PEAK-TO-A VERAGE POWER RATIO REDUCTION IN COMBINED RADAR
AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
Technical Field
The present invention relates to a method of reducing the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR) for signals produced by both systems when radar and communication systems are located on the same hardware.
State of the Art
In 4th Generation (4G) and 5th Generation (5G) cellular communication standards, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is used as a waveform. Although this waveform has a particularly good spectral efficiency, one of its major disadvantages is its high Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR) value. In the literature, there are techniques developed to solve this problem, but these techniques cause losses in communication performance.
Radar systems generally have two different scenarios, monostatic and bistatic. In the monostatic scenario, the receiver and the transmitter are in the same hardware, while in the bistatic scenario, they are in different hardware. Therefore, for detection in monostatic radar systems, a radio signal is generated, transmitted to the channel, and then received by the transmitter in the same hardware. Many different waveforms have been developed for radar systems in order to increase detection performance in the literature. One of the biggest disadvantages of radar systems is the interference signals from other users. Orthogonal resources should be allocated to different users to prevent interference. This is possible in synchronous networks.
Prior to the invention, technical studies were being developed on resource management and channel access problems in general, in combination with radar and communication systems. The method according to the invention, unlike these approaches, proposes a way to reduce the PAPR value in the combination of radar and communication systems. Many techniques have been developed to reduce the PAPR value in communication systems. Especially since the OFDM waveform has a disadvantage in terms of PAPR and is used with standards such as 4G and 5G, most of the studies in the literature try to reduce the PAPR value of the OFDM waveform. OFDM waveform PAPR reduction techniques can be classified under three headings: (i) signal degradation, (ii) multiple signaling and probability, and (iii) coding techniques. The method according to the invention is excluded from this classification as it does not make any changes in the communication waveform.
Radar signal adjustment techniques have been developed in order to increase the interference resistance in radar systems and to provide radar-sensing security. For this, radar signals called noise radar has been developed. Since the generated radar signal is random and known by the joint radar-communication transceiver, detection security against other users and reducing the effects of interference signals is possible. In addition, studies on reducing the interference effects and providing detection security in linear continuous wave radars are also carried out with different phase or frequency adjustments. The method according to the invention differs from such radar techniques in that the radar signal is adjusted according to the communication signal.
Considering the state of the art, it is seen that there is a need for methods that can reduce the distortions caused by power amplifiers by reducing the PAPR value of the total signal, both for monostatic radar systems and in combination with radar and communication systems, and accordingly, to reduce the necessary power amplifier hardware costs.
Objects and Brief Description of the Invention
With the present invention, the inventors intend to develop a method that will ensure that the sum of the radar and communication signals has a low PAPR value by adjusting the radar signal in combination with the radar and communication systems. In this way, it is intended to increase energy efficiency by reducing the PAPR value for both systems without any performance loss.
Moreover, with the method of the invention, it is intended to have the advantages of low PAPR value, resistance to interference, and detection security for radar systems. One of the important objects of the invention is to meet the radar requirements on the one hand, and on the other hand, ensure that the radar and communication signals have a low PAPR value without causing an extra performance loss.
The invention relates to a method for reducing PAPR values in combination with radar and communication systems, and the said method comprises the following steps:
Generating the communication signal.
Generating the radar signal.
Calculating the amplitude and phase values required to reduce the PAPR value of the communication and radar total signals.
Adjusting the radar signal with the calculated amplitude and phase values.
Collecting the communication and radar signals and sending them to the channel by passing them through the power amplifier.
Description of the Figures
Figure 1 : The default system model for the invention
101 : Joint radar-communications receiver
102: Antenna
103: Total transmitted radar and communication signal
104: Reflected signal
105: Object to be detected
106: Communication receiver
Figure 2: Block diagram describing the invention 201 : Communication Signal
202: Radar Signal
203: PAPR reduction-based adjustment
204: Signal collector
205: Power amplifier
206: Antenna
2A: Bits transmitted
Figure 3: The PAPR in Figure 2 shows a detailed explanation of the reduction-based adjustment process.
301 : Communication signal
302: Radar signal
303: Radar signal segment
304: PAPR reduction-based adjustment factor
T. Time
Figure 4: Examples of the method according to the invention
401 : Conventional method
402: Method according to the invention
4A: Communication Signal 4B: Radar Signal
4C: Total Signal
X: Time examples
Y: Amplitude absolute value
Figure 5: Flow chart showing the necessary method steps for the invention
501 : Generating the communication signal.
502: Generating the radar signal
503: Calculating the amplitude and phase values required to reduce the PAPR value of the communication and radar total signals
504: Adjusting the radar signal with the calculated amplitude and phase values
505: Collecting the communication and radar signals and sending them to the channel by passing them through the power amplifier
Detailed Description of the Invention
As mentioned above, the invention relates to a method for reducing PAPR values in combination with radar and communication systems, and the said method comprises the following steps:
Generating the communication signal (501).
Generating the radar signal (502).
Calculating the amplitude and phase values required to reduce the PAPR value of the communication and radar total signals (503).
Adjusting the radar signal with the calculated amplitude and phase values (504). Collecting the communication and radar signals and sending them to the channel by passing them through the power (505).
Figure 1 shows the default system model for the invention. The system model consists of a joint radar-communications transceiver (101), antenna (102), Total transmitted radar and communication signal (103), reflected signal (104), object to be detected (105), and the communication receiver (106). In the joint radar-communications receiver (101), different waveforms are generated for the radar and communication systems. OFDM for communication and the linear continuous wave (LCW) forms for radar is widely used in practice. Other waveforms may also be used for the invention. Both systems use bands separated from each other in the frequency space. In addition, signals are transmitted simultaneously. Therefore, the orthogonal coexistence of radar and communication systems is achieved by using different frequency sources. Here, the orthogonal coexistence of the two systems can also be provided for a different source, excluding the time source. In other words; the two systems must share the time in common at the same time, therefore, the systems can provide orthogonal coexistence at a source different from the frequency provided that this condition is met. In this system, the communication system aims to send data, on the other hand, the radar system aims to detect objects around it monostatically.
Figure 2 shows the block diagram of the invention. As seen in the figure, the diagram of the invention consists of the communication signal (201), radar signal (202), PAPR reductionbased adjustment (203), signal collector (204), power amplifier (205), and antenna (206) parts. It is assumed that all the necessary digital and analog processing to generate the waveform is done in the communication signal (201) block; thus, the communication signal in time is denoted by x(t). In the same way, the radar signal is denoted by c(t), assuming that all necessary digital and analog processing is done in the radar signal (202) block. In the PAPR reduction-based adjustment (203) block, the necessary amplitude and phase changes for the radar signal is calculated by looking at the communication signal. These changes are generally made as a(t)*e^(b(t)). Here, a(t) and b(t) denote changes in the amplitude and phase of the signal over time, respectively. Therefore, the signal obtained as a result of PAPR reduction-based adjustment (203) to the radar signal (202) c(t) is a(t)*c(t)*e^(b(t)). Then, the communication signal and the PAPR reduction-based adjusted radar signal are collected by the signal collector (204) to obtain y(t) = x(t)+ a(t)*c(t)*e^(b(t)) . The power amplifier (205) amplifies this signal and sends it to the channel via an antenna (206). During this amplification, the PAPR value of the y(t) signal determines the performance efficiency of the power amplifier (205). The PAPR value of the signal is calculated as PAPR(y(t)) = max(\y(t)\^(2))/E(\y(t)\^(2)) . Here, time (/) denotes an instant of time such as 0 < t < T in the selected time period (7). In addition, max(.) and E() functions calculate the maximum value of the signal power and the average signal power for the range 0 < t < Z, respectively. The chosen time (7) is usually taken to be equal to the total symbol length of the communication signal.
Figure 3 shows the PAPR reduction-based adjustment (202) process in detail. Figure 3 consists of the communication signal (301), radar signal (302), radar signal segment (303), and PAPR reduction-based adjustment factor (304). The purpose here is to minimize the PAPR value of the total signal by adjusting the radar signal. This adjustment may precisely cause the performance of the radar systems to decrease. However, radar signal adjustments without considering PAPR reduction are common in the literature. Radar signal adjustment techniques in the literature are used to increase the resistance against interference caused by other radars and to provide detection security. Therefore, the invention proposes that the PAPR of the total signal can be reduced while meeting these radar requirements. For this, the radar signal (302) at the chosen time T is divided into N segments. Here, the time T is taken as the total symbol length in the communication system, and each radar signal segment (Figure (303)) is represented by dashed rectangles. The amplitude and phase changes to each of these radar signal segments (303) are expressed by the adjustment factor (304). This factor is calculated by the PAPR reduction-based adjustment (202) block, looking at the communication signal (301). Here, the time interval of the //th radar signal segment (303) is taken as t (n-1) < t (n) < t_(n+l). The factors are calculated as follows:
[a(t (n)), b(t (n))] = min {a(t (n)), P(t_(n))}(x(t_(n))+ a(t_(n))*c(t_(n)) *e '(P(t_(n)))) (Formula 1) where the function min {a(t (n)), >( t_(n))}() finds the values of a(t_(n)) and f>( t_(n)) that minimize the expression. These calculated values are then assigned to (t (n)) and b(t (n)) values, respectively. After these values are calculated, the //th (n=l,2, ...,N) radar signal segment is adjusted as a(t_(n))*c(t_(n))*eA(b(t_(n))). The adjusted radar signal and communication signal (301) are then collected. Figure 4 shows two examples for a better understanding of this method. In the so-called conventional method (401), the sum of the communication signal and the radar signal worsens the PAPR performance. If a different amplifier were used for both systems, only the communication signal would have the PAPR problem. In the case that the invention is suitable (402), even if the PAPR performance of both signals were poor, the PAPR performance of the total signal would be exceptionally good. In the invention, it is suggested to use a power amplifier for both systems. Therefore, this can help reduce hardware costs.
In brief; step 501 is described in detail with 201 and 301. Step 502 is described in detail with 202 and 302. Step 503 is described in detail with 304. Step 504 is described in detail with 203 and 303. Step 505 is described in detail with 204.
The technical and all other features mentioned in each claim are followed by a reference number, these reference numbers are used only for a better understanding of the claims, therefore, they should not be considered as limiting the scope of any of the elements indicated by these reference numbers for illustrative purposes.
Within these basic concepts, it is possible to develop a wide variety of embodiments of the subject matter of the invention, and the invention cannot be limited to the examples described herein but is essentially as set forth in the claims.
It is clear that those skilled in the art can demonstrate the innovation revealed in the invention by using similar embodiments and/or can apply this embodiment to other similar fields used in the related art. Therefore, it is obvious that such embodiments will lack the criteria of innovation and especially of exceeding the state of the art.
Industrial Applicability
The invention can be implemented in devices with joint radar-communication systems, using the radar signal using digital and/or analog processes as in the invention. The invention does not require a change in communication standards and has the potential to be applied especially to autonomous vehicles.

Claims

CLAIMS A method for reducing PAPR values in combination with radar and communication systems, and the said method comprises the following steps:
Generating the communication signal (501).
Generating the radar signal (502).
Calculating the amplitude and phase values required to reduce the PAPR value of the communication and radar total signals (503).
Adjusting the radar signal with the calculated amplitude and phase values (504).
Collecting the communication and radar signals and sending them to the channel by passing them through the power amplifier (505). A method according to Claim 1, characterized in that it uses OFDM waveform for communication. A method according to any one of Claims 1 and 2, characterized in that it uses linear continuous wave (LCW) form for radar. A method according to any one of Claims 1-3, characterized in that the radar is monostatic or bistatic. A method according to Claim 4, characterized in that the radar is a monostatic radar. A method according to Claim 1, characterized in that in step 501, the communication signal is denoted by x(t), assuming that all digital and analog operations necessary for the generation of the waveform in the communication signal (201) block have been performed. A method according to Claim 1, characterized in that in step 502, the radar signal is
9 denoted by c(t), assuming that all the necessary digital and analog operations have been performed in the radar signal (202) block. A method according to Claim 1, characterized in that the process of calculating (503) the amplitude and phase values required to decrease the PAPR value of the communication and radar total signals, and adjusting (504) the radar signal with the calculated amplitude and phase values comprise the steps of; obtaining radar signal segments (303) by dividing the radar signal (302) of the selected duration T into N segments, where T is the total symbol length in the communication system, calculating the adjustment factor (304), which expresses the amplitude and phase change to each radar and signal segment (303), by the PAPR reduction-based adjustment (202) block, looking at the communication signal (301) and using the formula I,
[a(t (n)), b(t (n))] = min {a(t (n)), P(t_(n))}(x(t_(n))+ a(t_(n)) *c(t_(n))*e '(P(t_(n)))) ( Formula 1) finding the values of a(t_(n)) and f>( t_(n)) that minimize the equation in the function min {a(t (n)), f>( t_(n))}() in Formula 1. assigning a(t_(n)) and f>( t_(n)) values calculated in the previous step to a(t_(n)) and b(t (n)) values, respectively, setting the nth (n=l,2,...,N) radar signal fragment as a(t_(n))*c(t_(n))*e^(b(t_(n))) after value assignment and obtaining the communication signal and the PAPR reduction-based adjusted radar signal as y(t) = x(t) + a(t)*c(t)*e^(b(t)) by collecting them with the signal collector (204). A method according to Claim 8, characterized in that the changes in the radar signal are used to solve a different problem in radar and communication systems. A method according to Claim 9, characterized in that changes in the radar signal are used to reduce the out-of-band emission (OOBE) of radar and communication systems. A method according to claims 1-9, characterized in that it is used to improve system performance in autonomous vehicles using simultaneous radar and communication signals.
11
EP22904837.6A 2021-12-07 2022-12-07 REDUCED PEAK TO AVERAGE PERFORMANCE RATIO IN COMBINED RADAR AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Pending EP4445574A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TR202119284 2021-12-07
PCT/TR2022/051434 WO2023107074A2 (en) 2021-12-07 2022-12-07 Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in combined radar and communication systems

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4445574A2 true EP4445574A2 (en) 2024-10-16
EP4445574A4 EP4445574A4 (en) 2025-12-24

Family

ID=92799924

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP22904837.6A Pending EP4445574A4 (en) 2021-12-07 2022-12-07 REDUCED PEAK TO AVERAGE PERFORMANCE RATIO IN COMBINED RADAR AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP4445574A4 (en)

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IL134518A0 (en) * 2000-02-13 2001-04-30 Hexagon System Engineering Ltd Integrated radar and communication system
EP3865896A1 (en) * 2020-02-11 2021-08-18 Veoneer Sweden AB A radar transceiver

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP4445574A4 (en) 2025-12-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7583583B2 (en) System and method for reducing peak-to-average power ratio in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing signals using reserved spectrum
Zhang et al. A modified waveform design for radar-communication integration based on LFM-CPM
EP2124071B1 (en) A method for estimating the position and the speed of a target with a radar emitting an OFDM waveform
KR101679105B1 (en) Peak power suppression circuit, and communication device provided with said circuit
CN113364718A (en) Perception communication integration system based on 5G NR
Panta et al. Spectral analysis of OFDM signals and its improvement by polynomial cancellation coding
CN108535701B (en) A method for reducing out-of-band spectrum spread in radar communication integrated waveform design
Lvovich et al. The simulation of error-correcting communication channel for video transmission
Liu et al. PAPR reduction of OFDM waveform in integrated passive radar and communication systems
KR101664797B1 (en) Method for PAPR Reduction of OFDM Signals and OFDM Transmitter using the same
Huang et al. Partially-reserved cyclic algorithm for OFDM-based RadCom PAPR reduction
US20250044410A1 (en) Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in combined radar and communication systems
EP4445574A2 (en) Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in combined radar and communication systems
CN116132242A (en) Method for optimizing general sense fusion performance based on amplitude equalization
JP7546307B2 (en) Automatic gain control method, sensor and wireless electrical element
US7062289B2 (en) Method and apparatus of multi-carrier power control of base station in broad-band digital mobile communication system
CN110351826B (en) Rapid estimation method applied to SSB RBoffset of 5GNR system
CN100525276C (en) Peak-to-average power ratio optimizing process and apparatus
US8009718B2 (en) Wireless transmitter and receiver for use in an ultra-wideband direct spread pulse communication system
CN117579198A (en) Squelch judgment method and system
CN116470934A (en) A method and system for adaptively capturing Chirp signals
CN1352505A (en) Method for transmitting diversity in orthogonal multiple carrier wave system
KR100391565B1 (en) An Rayleigh Fading Compensation Method with Modified Sinc Interpolation
CN114928520A (en) Generalized frequency division multiplexing time-frequency synchronization method for compensating frequency deviation
CN107426127B (en) Peak-to-average power ratio adjusting method and terminal

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20240622

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC ME MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20251120

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 27/26 20060101AFI20251114BHEP

Ipc: H04B 1/04 20060101ALI20251114BHEP