EP4341553A1 - Individual pitch control with unavailable blade load sensor - Google Patents

Individual pitch control with unavailable blade load sensor

Info

Publication number
EP4341553A1
EP4341553A1 EP22725989.2A EP22725989A EP4341553A1 EP 4341553 A1 EP4341553 A1 EP 4341553A1 EP 22725989 A EP22725989 A EP 22725989A EP 4341553 A1 EP4341553 A1 EP 4341553A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pitch
signal
blade load
signals
load signals
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP22725989.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP4341553C0 (en
EP4341553B1 (en
Inventor
Alexander Duncan GILES
Jesper Sandberg Thomsen
Gustavo Oliveira VIOLATO
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vestas Wind Systems AS
Original Assignee
Vestas Wind Systems AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vestas Wind Systems AS filed Critical Vestas Wind Systems AS
Publication of EP4341553A1 publication Critical patent/EP4341553A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP4341553C0 publication Critical patent/EP4341553C0/en
Publication of EP4341553B1 publication Critical patent/EP4341553B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/022Adjusting aerodynamic properties of the blades
    • F03D7/0224Adjusting blade pitch
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/022Adjusting aerodynamic properties of the blades
    • F03D7/024Adjusting aerodynamic properties of the blades of individual blades
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/0298Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor to prevent, counteract or reduce vibrations
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/04Automatic control; Regulation
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/04Automatic control; Regulation
    • F03D7/042Automatic control; Regulation by means of an electrical or electronic controller
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D80/00Details, components or accessories not provided for in groups F03D1/00 - F03D17/00
    • F03D80/80Arrangement of components within nacelles or towers
    • F03D80/82Arrangement of components within nacelles or towers of electrical components
    • F03D80/821Arrangement of components within nacelles or towers of electrical components within nacelles
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D17/00Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics
    • F03D17/009Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics characterised by the purpose
    • F03D17/011Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics characterised by the purpose for monitoring mechanical loads or assessing fatigue; for monitoring structural integrity
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D17/00Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics
    • F03D17/009Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics characterised by the purpose
    • F03D17/013Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics characterised by the purpose for detecting abnormalities or damage
    • F03D17/014Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics characterised by the purpose for detecting abnormalities or damage indicative of a fault or failure
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2260/00Function
    • F05B2260/70Adjusting of angle of incidence or attack of rotating blades
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2260/00Function
    • F05B2260/82Forecasts
    • F05B2260/821Parameter estimation or prediction
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2270/00Control
    • F05B2270/30Control parameters, e.g. input parameters
    • F05B2270/331Mechanical loads
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to pitch actuation in a situation where one blade load sensor is unavailable.
  • Wind turbines as known in the art, comprise a tower supporting a nacelle and a rotor with a number of pitch-adjustable rotor blades.
  • blade load sensor signals such as blade load sensors placed in the root section of a blade.
  • Individual pitch control normally relies on all three blade sensor measurements being available. If one sensor goes offline and becomes unavailable, the wind turbine may be derated in a safe mode to ensure operation well within the design load envelope. This causes the turbine to operate in a less efficient manner, which negatively impacts on the energy capture.
  • a rotor control system for actuating pitch of pitch-adjustable rotor blades of a three-bladed wind turbine
  • the rotor control system comprises a pitch actuating unit for determining pitch modification signals to be applied to a pitch actuator for actuating the pitch of the pitch adjustable rotor blades in the event one of the blade load signals is unavailable;
  • the pitch actuation unit being arranged to: receive blade load signals for each of the pitch adjustable rotor blades and an availability signal for each of the blade load signals; construct combined load signals based on the available blade load signals, with the combined load signals being represented in a reference frame along a first and a second reference direction as a first signal component (A) and a second signal component ( B ), respectively; perform a control action (CA) to the first signal component and the second signal component; and apply the pitch modification signals (D0i, D61 ⁇ 2, A(h) to the pitch actuator; wherein the combined load signals are constructed by: apply a high pass filter
  • the pitch actuation unit may conduct the mentioned steps sequentially, and potentially with further steps being performed in between the mentioned steps.
  • the present invention provides a rotor control system which uses pitch modification signals for actuating pitch of pitch-adjustable rotor blades, with the aim to obtain a reduction in blade loads in a situation where one blade load sensor signal is unavailable.
  • Embodiments of the present invention are able to keep the turbine in normal operation with the ability to actively provide load reduction via pitching, even in a situation where a blade load signal is lost, so that only two blade load signals are available.
  • the combined load signals are constructed by applying a high pass filter to the blade load signals and transforming the two available blade load signals using a first coordinate transformation to an intermediate coordinate frame, where each of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame are orthogonal to each other, and wherein, in the transform, the unavailable blade load signal is replaced with an estimated signal.
  • the blade load signal values which are initially obtained in a rotating coordinate frame where each axis is spaced 120 degrees apart, are transformed into signal values of the intermediate coordinate frame where the axes are normal to each other.
  • the estimated signal is a superposition of the two available blade load signals. This may be obtained by constructing the estimated signal as a linear combination of the two available signals offset by a constant.
  • three pairs of available blade load measurements are possible: the AB blade load pairing, the AC blade load pairing and the BC blade load pairing, with the three blades named A, B and C respectively.
  • the AB blade load pairing the AC blade load pairing
  • the BC blade load pairing the three blades named A, B and C respectively.
  • only one pairing is valid, with the specific pairing depending on the unavailable sensor signal; as an example, if the sensor for blade C is unavailable, the only valid pairing will be the AB blade pair.
  • the first intermediate component is set as the first component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation
  • the second intermediate component is set as the second component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation.
  • the blade load signals for each of the pitch adjustable rotor blades and an availability signal for each of the blade load signals are received.
  • a blade load signal becomes unavailable, a blade load signal from the unavailable sensor is not as such received; rather, a null signal is received or a corrupt signal is received. If a signal is not available, any signal content still received from the corresponding load sensor is disregarded by the rotor control system.
  • the combined load signals being represented in a reference frame along a first and a second reference direction, thereby providing a first signal component and a second signal component.
  • the reference frame being the frame in which the control action is applied.
  • the reference frame is a fixed frame along a yaw moment direction and a tilt moment direction.
  • the reference frame may also be a fixed frame along a whirling direction of the rotor.
  • the control action is applied in the reference frame providing a first resulting signal component and a second resulting signal component.
  • the controlled signal may be transformed back into the rotating frame for application as pitch modification signals to the pitch actuator. This may be obtained by applying an m-blade coordinate transformation to the first resulting signal components.
  • the m-blade coordinate transformation may be an inverse Coleman transformation.
  • a coordinate transformation takes a signal expressed in a first coordinate frame and into a second coordinate frame.
  • a coordinate frame may also be referred to as a reference frame.
  • Such coordinate transformation may be an m-blade transformation, which is also referred to in the art as a multi-blade transformation.
  • Examples of coordinate transformations include the Clarke transformation and the Coleman transformation.
  • other transformations may also fall into the category of coordinate transformations, hereunder so-called D-Q transformation and Park transformation or similar transformations. It is within the abilities of the skilled person to determine an alternative transformation which may not strictly be a specific transformation, but which operates in an equivalent manner.
  • a coordinate transformation is applied both as is (i.e. without a prefix) and in an inverse form.
  • signals may be measured, modified and actuated in same or different coordinate frames.
  • a coordinate transformation may take a signal measured in a rotating reference, or coordinate, frame, i.e. signals obtained on rotating blades, and transforms the signal into a fixed reference frame of two components.
  • the inverse m-blade transformation takes the two signal components and transforms them back to the rotating frame to provide signal components (the pitch modification signals) which can be imposed onto the three pitch actuators.
  • the invention relates to a wind turbine comprising the rotor control system according the first aspect.
  • the invention relates to a method of actuating pitch of pitch adjustable rotor blades of a wind turbine and to a computer program product.
  • the computer program product may be provided on a computer readable storage medium or being downloadable from a communication network.
  • the computer program product comprises instructions to cause a data processing system, e.g. in the form of a controller, to carry out the instruction when loaded onto a data processing system.
  • the rotor control system may be implemented on a unit or collection of functional units which comprises one or more processors, input/output interface(s) and a memory capable of storing instructions can be executed by a processor.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates, in a schematic view, an example of a wind turbine
  • Fig. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating an embodiment of a feedback speed controller
  • Fig. 3 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a pitch actuation unit
  • Fig. 4 illustrates simulated load signals by applying the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 3.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates, in a schematic view, an example of a wind turbine 1.
  • the wind turbine 1 includes a tower 2, a nacelle 3 disposed at the apex of the tower, and a rotor 4 operatively coupled to a generator housed inside the nacelle 3.
  • the nacelle houses miscellaneous components required for converting wind energy into electrical energy and various components needed to operate, control, and optimize the performance of the wind turbine 1.
  • the rotor 4 of the wind turbine includes a central hub 5 and three blades 6 that project outwardly from the central hub 5.
  • the wind turbine comprises a control system.
  • the control system may be placed inside the nacelle, in the tower or distributed at a number of locations inside (or externally to) the turbine and communicatively connected.
  • the rotor blades are pitch-adjustable.
  • the rotor blades can be adjusted in accordance with a collective pitch setting, where each of the blades are set to the same pitch value.
  • the rotor blades are adjustable in accordance with individual pitch settings, where each blade may be provided with an individual pitch setpoint.
  • blade load signals for each of the pitch adjustable rotor blades are used.
  • Such blade load signals may be measured at the blade root 9 by means of blade load sensors placed at each blade root in a manner so that the sensor detects loading in the blade.
  • loading may be detected in the flap direction 10 (in/out of plane) or in the edgewise direction 8 (in-plane).
  • Such sensor may in embodiments be a strain gauge sensor or an optical Bragg-sensor. As the sensors are placed on the rotating blade, such load signals for each of the adjustable rotor blades are measured in the rotating reference frame of the rotor.
  • Fig. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating an embodiment of a feedback speed controller implemented to determine individual pitch actuation signals capable of reducing blade loads in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
  • the speed controller minimizes a speed error (w - 0 ⁇ between the actual rotor speed, w, and a reference rotor speed, c&e f, in order to output a requested power P (in the form of a power setpoint) and a collective pitch reference, t
  • the collective pitch reference as determined by the speed controller, in view of the rotor speed may also take further sensor values into account, this is referred to in Fig. 2 as a measurement set, ms, being input into the speed controller.
  • the feedback speed controller may be implemented by a PI, PID or similar control schemes.
  • the speed controller may alternatively be a model predictive controller which based on minimizing a cost function is arranged to determine the collective pitch reference and/or the power reference.
  • Fig. 2 further illustrates a blade load reducing control block referred to as pitch actuation units (PAU).
  • PAU pitch actuation units
  • pitch modification signals D0i, D61 ⁇ 2, A( ) are being determined based on input signal(s)
  • the input signal include blade load signals.
  • An embodiment of the implementation of the pitch actuation unit (PAU) is illustrated in Fig. 3.
  • the PAU control unit determines pitch modification signals (D0i, D61 ⁇ 2, A( ) for each rotor blade which are superimposed onto the collective pitch reference to provide resulting pitch modification signals ( QA, QB, OC) that can be applied to the pitch actuators of the rotor blades individually.
  • a collective pitch reference for the pitch-adjustable rotor blades is being determined based on a rotor speed and a resulting pitch modification signal is being applied to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades.
  • the resulting pitch modification signal being applied to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades individually, and for each individual blade being based on a signal of the collective pitch reference and the individual pitch modification signals.
  • the individual pitch modification signal is being applied in a cyclic manner.
  • pitch actuation signals are determined for each pitch adjustable rotor blade based on the pitch modification signal for each rotor blade.
  • FIG 3 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a pitch actuation unit (PAU) based on blade coordinate transformations (77, 72 ) to determine the pitch modification signals (D0i, D6>2, A(h).
  • PAU pitch actuation unit
  • the three blade load signals (Li, Li, Li) are obtained as sensor input signals, and may be blade load signal along a flapwise direction or a blade load signal along an edgewise direction.
  • the three blade load signals (Li, Li, Li) are obtained in the rotating reference frame and used as inputs.
  • These blade load signals are transformed into a references frame by application of a first coordinate transformation 77, and the desired control actions (CA ) on the signals are applied in the reference frame.
  • a second transformation, T2 is applied, typically in the form of an inverse Coleman transformation. In this manner the rotor loads are influenced in a manner so that the measured rotor loads are reduced.
  • a rotor control system is provided which is capable of operating according to the above defined general scheme in a situation where one of the blade load signals are unavailable, typically due to a malfunctioning blade load sensor.
  • the pitch actuation unit is implemented to construct combined load signals based on the available blade load signals.
  • the combined load signals are signals determined to provide a first signal component (A) and a second signal component ( B ), on which a control action can be performed in order to reduce the measured blade loads.
  • the control action may be applied to the first and second signal components to provide a first resulting signal component (A ’) and a second resulting signal component (B ’).
  • An m-blade coordinate transformation (G2) e.g. in the form of an inverse Coleman transformation, may be applied to the first resulting signal component and the second resulting signal component to obtain the pitch modification signals (D0i, D61 ⁇ 2, A(h). These pitch modification signals are then applied to the pitch actuator.
  • the combined load signals are determined in a manner so that the rotor control system can function with only two available blade load signals.
  • the combined load signals are obtained in a first transformation, 77, which advantageously is split in a number of steps.
  • Important steps include the application of a high pass filter to the blade load signals, in combination with replacing the unavailable blade load signal with an estimated signal and transforming the remaining available and valid blade load signals using a first coordinate transformation (77) to an intermediate coordinate frame, where each of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame are orthogonal to each other.
  • Transforming coordinates values from a rotating coordinate system where the axes are spaced 120 degrees (due to the blades position) to a coordinate system where each of the coordinate values are orthogonal to each other can be done using e.g. the Clarke transformation, which is known from electrical engineering: where (Li, Li, LT) are the three blade load signals, and (v a , Vp, v y ) are the components of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame.
  • Clarke transformation which is known from electrical engineering: where (Li, Li, LT) are the three blade load signals, and (v a , Vp, v y ) are the components of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame.
  • the Clarke transformation is applied to the situation where the L signal is unavailable and being replaced an estimated signal being a super position in the form of a linear transformation of the available signals, e.g. set as -(Li + /.2)+K :
  • the n g component is omitted as it will be virtually zero due to the high-pass filtering, which will also remove the k-f actor in the resulting vector components.
  • the unavailable blade load signal is replaced with the estimated signal. This gives rise to three situations depending on which blade load signal that is unavailable, and three sets of intermediate components can be determined.
  • the constant k is removed, and the three sets of intermediate components can be determined as follows:
  • the transformation is done using the appropriate representation of the load signals, and a first intermediate component, v a , is set as the first component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation, and the second intermediate component, R b , is set as the second component of the transformed blade load signals.
  • first signal component (A) and the second signal component ( B ) the first intermediate component and the second intermediate component are rotated to align with the reference frame along the first and the second reference direction.
  • the rotor azimuth angle F is used to align the first signal component and the second signal component with the nacelle fixed reference system, often referred to as the D-Q-frame or the tilt-yaw frame.
  • the ab -vector by the rotation matrix :
  • the first signal component (A) and the second signal component (B) are obtained as explained above, by the coordinate transformation to the intermediate coordinate frame, e.g. using the Clark transformation, followed by the rotation of the intermediate components to align with the reference frame in which the control action is applied, as explained above.
  • the coordinate transformation to the intermediate coordinate frame followed by the rotation of the intermediate components to align with the reference frame in which the control action is applied becomes equivalent, or at least approximatively equivalent, to applying a Coleman transformation on the relevant sets of intermediate components.
  • the implementation of the calculation can be simplified by constructing the combined load signals by: apply a high pass filter to the blade load signals; set the unavailable blade load signal as an estimated signal as the negative sum of the two available blade load signals: - ⁇ Li + Li) apply a Coleman transform to the relevant set of available load signals and estimated signal to obtain the first signal component (A) and the second signal component ( B ), respectively.
  • a notch filter in addition to applying the high pass filter to the blade load signals, is applied at a 3P blade passing frequency.
  • the blade load signals are blade load signals in the flapwise direction, it may be beneficial to notch out the 3P blade passing frequency.
  • a notch filter may be applied at a frequency where a load is synchronized for all three blades where the load disturbance appears collective on the blades.
  • 6P, 9P, etc. may be notched out.
  • the high pass filter is set at a cut off below a IP blade passing frequency, such as one decade below the IP blade passing frequency, to ensure sufficient separation between the cut off and the IP frequency.
  • the high pass filter is set at a cut off below a frequency of changes in the mean wind speed. Again, the cut off may be set one decade below the IP blade passing frequency.
  • the changes in the mean wind speed may be determined based on a predetermined determination made prior to installing the turbine and thereby based on historic data of a fixed period of time. The changes in the mean wind speed may also be determined based on a recurring determination of mean wind speed.
  • the control action (CA) applied is the same irrespectively of whether or not all three blade load signals are available, or only two blade load signals are available.
  • An important advantage of embodiments of the present invention is that it can be implemented in a manner so that the first signal component and the second signal component are independent on the control action.
  • the rotor control system can be implemented to enable the first coordinate transformation (77) in accordance with the embodiments of the present invention, and in a situation where all blade load sensors are available to use a different manner of obtaining the first signal component and the second signal component. For example, if all three available blade load signals are available, a normal Coleman transformation may be used.
  • the turbine may be operated in a safe mode, e.g. in a derated mode or shutdown.
  • Figure 4 illustrates simulated signals, with and without application of the embodiment of Fig. 3.
  • the dotted lines are from simulations obtained with three available blade load sensors and without any load reducing control action being applied, i.e. the PAU of Fig. 3 is not enabled.
  • the solid lines are from simulations obtained with two available load sensors and with a load reducing control action being applied, i.e. the PAU of Fig. 3 is being enabled.
  • the load sensors are blade load sensors in the form of blade root load moment sensors arranged to detect the load moment in the edgewise direction of the blade, i.e. in the direction along the line between the leading edge and the trailing edge of the blade.
  • Fig. 4A illustrates a time trace of the edgewise load signal of one of the rotor blades for a ranges between 400 and 430 seconds, while the two signals are somewhat overlaid, one trace (dotted) 40A is for a situation where the PAU of Fig. 3 is not enabled and all three load sensors being available, and the other trace (solid) 41 A is for a situation where the PAU of Fig. 3 is enabled and two load sensor signals being available.
  • Fig. 4B shows an FFT plot of the signals of Fig. 4A.
  • the signal 40B is for the situation where the PAU is not enabled
  • the signal 4 IB is for the situation where the PAU is enabled and only two load sensor signals being available.
  • Signal content is seen at two frequencies, namely at the IP frequency 42 and the edge frequency 43 of the rotor blade.
  • Embodiments of the present invention thus provides a rotor control system with the effect of a reduction in edgewise vibrations of the blades of the turbine, even in the situation where only two load sensors are available.
  • Fig. 4C and Fig. 4D illustrates corresponding figures, but for the so-called edge D- component.
  • the edgewise frequency component split into a forward and a backward component as can be seen in Fig. 4D.
  • the load reduction is also clearly visible in the reference frame.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Wind Motors (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to pitch actuation of pitch-adjustable rotor blades of a three-bladed wind turbine in a situation where one blade load sensor is unavailable. Based on blade load signals (L1, L2, L3) and an availability signal (v1, v2, v3) for each of the blade load signals, combined load signals are constructed based on the available blade load signals. The combined load signals are determined based on application of a high pass filter to the blade load signals and a transform (T1) of the blade load signals to an intermediate coordinate frame, wherein, in the transform, the unavailable blade load signal is replaced with an estimated signal. A control action (CA) is performed using the combined load signals, and the resulting pitch modification signals (Δθ1, Δθ2, Δθ3) are applied to the pitch actuator.

Description

INDIVIDUAL PITCH CONTROL WITH UNAVAILABLE BLADE LOAD SENSOR
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to pitch actuation in a situation where one blade load sensor is unavailable.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Wind turbines, as known in the art, comprise a tower supporting a nacelle and a rotor with a number of pitch-adjustable rotor blades.
For large wind turbines, there is generally a benefit in controlling the pitch for the purpose of load reduction, e.g. to alleviate asymmetric loads on the rotor and excessive loads experienced by a blade, either in the flap direction or in the edgewise direction. In particular, excitations experienced by a blade in the edgewise direction are generally undesirable as the blades are typically weakly damped in that direction.
It is generally known to base individual pitch control on blade load sensor signals, such as blade load sensors placed in the root section of a blade. Individual pitch control normally relies on all three blade sensor measurements being available. If one sensor goes offline and becomes unavailable, the wind turbine may be derated in a safe mode to ensure operation well within the design load envelope. This causes the turbine to operate in a less efficient manner, which negatively impacts on the energy capture.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It would be advantageous to achieve an improved manner of blade pitch control based on blade load sensor signals. In particular, it would be advantageous to provide a control system with a certain level of fault tolerance to a situation where a blade load sensor becomes unavailable.
Accordingly, in a first aspect, there is provided a rotor control system for actuating pitch of pitch-adjustable rotor blades of a three-bladed wind turbine, the rotor control system comprises a pitch actuating unit for determining pitch modification signals to be applied to a pitch actuator for actuating the pitch of the pitch adjustable rotor blades in the event one of the blade load signals is unavailable; the pitch actuation unit being arranged to: receive blade load signals for each of the pitch adjustable rotor blades and an availability signal for each of the blade load signals; construct combined load signals based on the available blade load signals, with the combined load signals being represented in a reference frame along a first and a second reference direction as a first signal component (A) and a second signal component ( B ), respectively; perform a control action (CA) to the first signal component and the second signal component; and apply the pitch modification signals (D0i, D6½, A(h) to the pitch actuator; wherein the combined load signals are constructed by: apply a high pass filter to the blade load signals; transform the blade load signals using a first coordinate transformation ( T1 ) to an intermediate coordinate frame, where each of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame are orthogonal to each other, and wherein, in the transform, the unavailable blade load signal is replaced with an estimated signal; set a first intermediate component as the first component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation ( T1 ); and set a second intermediate component as the second component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation ( T1 ); rotate the first intermediate component and the second intermediate component to align with the reference frame along the first and the second reference direction; and set the first signal component (A) and the second signal component (B) as the rotated first and second intermediate components, respectively.
In an embodiment, the pitch actuation unit may conduct the mentioned steps sequentially, and potentially with further steps being performed in between the mentioned steps. The present invention provides a rotor control system which uses pitch modification signals for actuating pitch of pitch-adjustable rotor blades, with the aim to obtain a reduction in blade loads in a situation where one blade load sensor signal is unavailable. Embodiments of the present invention are able to keep the turbine in normal operation with the ability to actively provide load reduction via pitching, even in a situation where a blade load signal is lost, so that only two blade load signals are available.
This is obtained by providing input signals to the controller performing the control action, where the input signals are based on the load signals of the available load sensors. This is obtained by constructing combined load signals based on the available blade load signals and using the combined signals in the control action.
The combined load signals are constructed by applying a high pass filter to the blade load signals and transforming the two available blade load signals using a first coordinate transformation to an intermediate coordinate frame, where each of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame are orthogonal to each other, and wherein, in the transform, the unavailable blade load signal is replaced with an estimated signal. Thus, the blade load signal values, which are initially obtained in a rotating coordinate frame where each axis is spaced 120 degrees apart, are transformed into signal values of the intermediate coordinate frame where the axes are normal to each other.
By application of the high pass filter, in combination with using an estimated signal as the unavailable signal, an accurate representation of all three load signals can be obtained in the intermediate coordinate frame. In the intermediate frame, flap moments correspond approximately to a measure of the thrust, and edge moments correspond approximately to a measure of the torque. In either case, variations in these signals will normally occur at a low frequency. Thereby, by application of a high pass filter, the contribution from the unavailable sensor is filtered out, and the unavailable signal can be estimated with a high degree of accuracy.
In an embodiment, the estimated signal is a superposition of the two available blade load signals. This may be obtained by constructing the estimated signal as a linear combination of the two available signals offset by a constant. For the three-bladed turbine, three pairs of available blade load measurements are possible: the AB blade load pairing, the AC blade load pairing and the BC blade load pairing, with the three blades named A, B and C respectively. In the event of a sensor signal being unavailable, only one pairing is valid, with the specific pairing depending on the unavailable sensor signal; as an example, if the sensor for blade C is unavailable, the only valid pairing will be the AB blade pair. The first intermediate component is set as the first component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation, and the second intermediate component is set as the second component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation. These intermediate components form a vector which is then rotated to align with the reference frame along the first and the second reference direction, and applied as inputs to a control element for performing a control action operating in the fixed frame.
As inputs to the rotor control system, the blade load signals for each of the pitch adjustable rotor blades and an availability signal for each of the blade load signals are received. In this regard, if a blade load signal becomes unavailable, a blade load signal from the unavailable sensor is not as such received; rather, a null signal is received or a corrupt signal is received. If a signal is not available, any signal content still received from the corresponding load sensor is disregarded by the rotor control system.
Based on the inputs, combined load signals are constructed. The combined load signals being represented in a reference frame along a first and a second reference direction, thereby providing a first signal component and a second signal component. The reference frame being the frame in which the control action is applied. In embodiments the reference frame is a fixed frame along a yaw moment direction and a tilt moment direction. The reference frame may also be a fixed frame along a whirling direction of the rotor. The control action is applied in the reference frame providing a first resulting signal component and a second resulting signal component. The controlled signal may be transformed back into the rotating frame for application as pitch modification signals to the pitch actuator. This may be obtained by applying an m-blade coordinate transformation to the first resulting signal components. The m-blade coordinate transformation may be an inverse Coleman transformation.
An important feature of the present invention relates to coordinate transformation. In general, a coordinate transformation takes a signal expressed in a first coordinate frame and into a second coordinate frame. A coordinate frame may also be referred to as a reference frame. Such coordinate transformation may be an m-blade transformation, which is also referred to in the art as a multi-blade transformation. Examples of coordinate transformations include the Clarke transformation and the Coleman transformation. However, other transformations may also fall into the category of coordinate transformations, hereunder so-called D-Q transformation and Park transformation or similar transformations. It is within the abilities of the skilled person to determine an alternative transformation which may not strictly be a specific transformation, but which operates in an equivalent manner.
As used herein, a coordinate transformation is applied both as is (i.e. without a prefix) and in an inverse form. In this regard, signals may be measured, modified and actuated in same or different coordinate frames. In particular, a coordinate transformation may take a signal measured in a rotating reference, or coordinate, frame, i.e. signals obtained on rotating blades, and transforms the signal into a fixed reference frame of two components. The inverse m-blade transformation takes the two signal components and transforms them back to the rotating frame to provide signal components (the pitch modification signals) which can be imposed onto the three pitch actuators.
In a further aspect, the invention relates to a wind turbine comprising the rotor control system according the first aspect. In yet further aspects, the invention relates to a method of actuating pitch of pitch adjustable rotor blades of a wind turbine and to a computer program product. The computer program product may be provided on a computer readable storage medium or being downloadable from a communication network. The computer program product comprises instructions to cause a data processing system, e.g. in the form of a controller, to carry out the instruction when loaded onto a data processing system.
In general, the rotor control system may be implemented on a unit or collection of functional units which comprises one or more processors, input/output interface(s) and a memory capable of storing instructions can be executed by a processor.
In general, the various aspects of the invention may be combined and coupled in any way possible within the scope of the invention. These and other aspects, features and/or advantages of the invention will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments of the invention will be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which
Fig. 1 illustrates, in a schematic view, an example of a wind turbine;
Fig. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating an embodiment of a feedback speed controller;
Fig. 3 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a pitch actuation unit; and
Fig. 4 illustrates simulated load signals by applying the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 3.
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
Figure 1 illustrates, in a schematic view, an example of a wind turbine 1. The wind turbine 1 includes a tower 2, a nacelle 3 disposed at the apex of the tower, and a rotor 4 operatively coupled to a generator housed inside the nacelle 3. In addition to the generator, the nacelle houses miscellaneous components required for converting wind energy into electrical energy and various components needed to operate, control, and optimize the performance of the wind turbine 1. The rotor 4 of the wind turbine includes a central hub 5 and three blades 6 that project outwardly from the central hub 5. Moreover, the wind turbine comprises a control system. The control system may be placed inside the nacelle, in the tower or distributed at a number of locations inside (or externally to) the turbine and communicatively connected. The rotor blades are pitch-adjustable. The rotor blades can be adjusted in accordance with a collective pitch setting, where each of the blades are set to the same pitch value. In addition to that, the rotor blades are adjustable in accordance with individual pitch settings, where each blade may be provided with an individual pitch setpoint.
In the embodiments of the present invention, blade load signals for each of the pitch adjustable rotor blades are used. Such blade load signals may be measured at the blade root 9 by means of blade load sensors placed at each blade root in a manner so that the sensor detects loading in the blade. Depending on the placement and the type of sensor, loading may be detected in the flap direction 10 (in/out of plane) or in the edgewise direction 8 (in-plane). Such sensor may in embodiments be a strain gauge sensor or an optical Bragg-sensor. As the sensors are placed on the rotating blade, such load signals for each of the adjustable rotor blades are measured in the rotating reference frame of the rotor.
Fig. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating an embodiment of a feedback speed controller implemented to determine individual pitch actuation signals capable of reducing blade loads in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. In the illustrated implementation, the speed controller minimizes a speed error (w - 0 ή between the actual rotor speed, w, and a reference rotor speed, c&e f, in order to output a requested power P (in the form of a power setpoint) and a collective pitch reference, t The collective pitch reference as determined by the speed controller, in view of the rotor speed, may also take further sensor values into account, this is referred to in Fig. 2 as a measurement set, ms, being input into the speed controller. The feedback speed controller may be implemented by a PI, PID or similar control schemes. In an embodiment, the speed controller may alternatively be a model predictive controller which based on minimizing a cost function is arranged to determine the collective pitch reference and/or the power reference.
Fig. 2 further illustrates a blade load reducing control block referred to as pitch actuation units (PAU). In the pitch actuation unit pitch modification signals (D0i, D6½, A( ) are being determined based on input signal(s), the input signal include blade load signals. An embodiment of the implementation of the pitch actuation unit (PAU) is illustrated in Fig. 3.
The PAU control unit determines pitch modification signals (D0i, D6½, A( ) for each rotor blade which are superimposed onto the collective pitch reference to provide resulting pitch modification signals ( QA, QB, OC) that can be applied to the pitch actuators of the rotor blades individually.
In the embodiment shown in Fig. 2, a collective pitch reference for the pitch-adjustable rotor blades is being determined based on a rotor speed and a resulting pitch modification signal is being applied to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades. The resulting pitch modification signal being applied to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades individually, and for each individual blade being based on a signal of the collective pitch reference and the individual pitch modification signals. In an embodiment, the individual pitch modification signal is being applied in a cyclic manner. Thus, pitch actuation signals are determined for each pitch adjustable rotor blade based on the pitch modification signal for each rotor blade.
Figure 3 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a pitch actuation unit (PAU) based on blade coordinate transformations (77, 72 ) to determine the pitch modification signals (D0i, D6>2, A(h).
The three blade load signals (Li, Li, Li) are obtained as sensor input signals, and may be blade load signal along a flapwise direction or a blade load signal along an edgewise direction. The three blade load signals (Li, Li, Li) are obtained in the rotating reference frame and used as inputs. These blade load signals are transformed into a references frame by application of a first coordinate transformation 77, and the desired control actions (CA ) on the signals are applied in the reference frame. To bring the modified signals back into the rotating frame to be used as pitch actuation signals, a second transformation, T2, is applied, typically in the form of an inverse Coleman transformation. In this manner the rotor loads are influenced in a manner so that the measured rotor loads are reduced.
In embodiments according to the present invention a rotor control system is provided which is capable of operating according to the above defined general scheme in a situation where one of the blade load signals are unavailable, typically due to a malfunctioning blade load sensor.
In addition to the three blade load signals for each of the blades (Li, Li, Li), availability signals (vi, V2, V3) are also received or determined. In the event one of the blade load signals is unavailable, the pitch actuation unit is implemented to construct combined load signals based on the available blade load signals. The combined load signals are signals determined to provide a first signal component (A) and a second signal component ( B ), on which a control action can be performed in order to reduce the measured blade loads.
The control action may be applied to the first and second signal components to provide a first resulting signal component (A ’) and a second resulting signal component (B ’). An m-blade coordinate transformation (G2), e.g. in the form of an inverse Coleman transformation, may be applied to the first resulting signal component and the second resulting signal component to obtain the pitch modification signals (D0i, D6½, A(h). These pitch modification signals are then applied to the pitch actuator.
The combined load signals are determined in a manner so that the rotor control system can function with only two available blade load signals. The combined load signals are obtained in a first transformation, 77, which advantageously is split in a number of steps.
Important steps include the application of a high pass filter to the blade load signals, in combination with replacing the unavailable blade load signal with an estimated signal and transforming the remaining available and valid blade load signals using a first coordinate transformation (77) to an intermediate coordinate frame, where each of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame are orthogonal to each other.
By application of the high pass filter, in combination with using an estimated signal as the unavailable signal, an accurate representation of all three load signals can be obtained in the intermediate coordinate frame.
Transforming coordinates values from a rotating coordinate system where the axes are spaced 120 degrees (due to the blades position) to a coordinate system where each of the coordinate values are orthogonal to each other can be done using e.g. the Clarke transformation, which is known from electrical engineering: where (Li, Li, LT) are the three blade load signals, and (va, Vp, vy) are the components of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame.
As an example, the Clarke transformation is applied to the situation where the L signal is unavailable and being replaced an estimated signal being a super position in the form of a linear transformation of the available signals, e.g. set as -(Li + /.2)+K : The ng component is omitted as it will be virtually zero due to the high-pass filtering, which will also remove the k-f actor in the resulting vector components.
In the transform, the unavailable blade load signal is replaced with the estimated signal. This gives rise to three situations depending on which blade load signal that is unavailable, and three sets of intermediate components can be determined. In an embodiment the unavailable signal (XUA) is replaced by: IAJA = -(LAI + AI)+K, where the subscript A1 and A2 refers to the first available signal and second available signal, respectively. After the high-pass filter, the constant k is removed, and the three sets of intermediate components can be determined as follows:
Z3 signal unavailable: va Li nb i + 2L2)/V3
Li signal unavailable:
L2 signal unavailable:
The transformation is done using the appropriate representation of the load signals, and a first intermediate component, va, is set as the first component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation, and the second intermediate component, Rb, is set as the second component of the transformed blade load signals.
It is noted that with pairings of blade load sensors, two orthogonal components can be calculated via different, but equivalent, linear combinations. To obtain the first signal component (A) and the second signal component ( B ), the first intermediate component and the second intermediate component are rotated to align with the reference frame along the first and the second reference direction. In an embodiment, the rotor azimuth angle F is used to align the first signal component and the second signal component with the nacelle fixed reference system, often referred to as the D-Q-frame or the tilt-yaw frame. In this embodiment, the ab -vector by the rotation matrix:
A cos <t> sin F] a , B —sin F cos fJ [nb_
In a general situation where a general estimated signal is applied, the first signal component (A) and the second signal component (B) are obtained as explained above, by the coordinate transformation to the intermediate coordinate frame, e.g. using the Clark transformation, followed by the rotation of the intermediate components to align with the reference frame in which the control action is applied, as explained above.
In a specific situation where the estimated signal is set as the negative sum of the two available blade load signals, the coordinate transformation to the intermediate coordinate frame followed by the rotation of the intermediate components to align with the reference frame in which the control action is applied becomes equivalent, or at least approximatively equivalent, to applying a Coleman transformation on the relevant sets of intermediate components. In this situation the implementation of the calculation can be simplified by constructing the combined load signals by: apply a high pass filter to the blade load signals; set the unavailable blade load signal as an estimated signal as the negative sum of the two available blade load signals: -{Li + Li) apply a Coleman transform to the relevant set of available load signals and estimated signal to obtain the first signal component (A) and the second signal component ( B ), respectively.
In an embodiment, in addition to applying the high pass filter to the blade load signals, a notch filter is applied at a 3P blade passing frequency. In particular, in a situation where the blade load signals are blade load signals in the flapwise direction, it may be beneficial to notch out the 3P blade passing frequency. In general, a notch filter may be applied at a frequency where a load is synchronized for all three blades where the load disturbance appears collective on the blades. In addition to the 3P blade passing frequency for flap loads, also 6P, 9P, etc. may be notched out.
In an embodiment, the high pass filter is set at a cut off below a IP blade passing frequency, such as one decade below the IP blade passing frequency, to ensure sufficient separation between the cut off and the IP frequency. In another embodiment, the high pass filter is set at a cut off below a frequency of changes in the mean wind speed. Again, the cut off may be set one decade below the IP blade passing frequency. The changes in the mean wind speed may be determined based on a predetermined determination made prior to installing the turbine and thereby based on historic data of a fixed period of time. The changes in the mean wind speed may also be determined based on a recurring determination of mean wind speed.
In an advantageous embodiment, the control action (CA) applied is the same irrespectively of whether or not all three blade load signals are available, or only two blade load signals are available. An important advantage of embodiments of the present invention is that it can be implemented in a manner so that the first signal component and the second signal component are independent on the control action. In a situation where one blade load signal becomes unavailable, the rotor control system can be implemented to enable the first coordinate transformation (77) in accordance with the embodiments of the present invention, and in a situation where all blade load sensors are available to use a different manner of obtaining the first signal component and the second signal component. For example, if all three available blade load signals are available, a normal Coleman transformation may be used.
In the event two or three blade load signals becomes unavailable, the turbine may be operated in a safe mode, e.g. in a derated mode or shutdown.
Figure 4 illustrates simulated signals, with and without application of the embodiment of Fig. 3. In the graphs the dotted lines are from simulations obtained with three available blade load sensors and without any load reducing control action being applied, i.e. the PAU of Fig. 3 is not enabled. The solid lines are from simulations obtained with two available load sensors and with a load reducing control action being applied, i.e. the PAU of Fig. 3 is being enabled. The load sensors are blade load sensors in the form of blade root load moment sensors arranged to detect the load moment in the edgewise direction of the blade, i.e. in the direction along the line between the leading edge and the trailing edge of the blade.
Fig. 4A illustrates a time trace of the edgewise load signal of one of the rotor blades for a ranges between 400 and 430 seconds, while the two signals are somewhat overlaid, one trace (dotted) 40A is for a situation where the PAU of Fig. 3 is not enabled and all three load sensors being available, and the other trace (solid) 41 A is for a situation where the PAU of Fig. 3 is enabled and two load sensor signals being available.
The differences in the two signals are better seen in Fig. 4B which shows an FFT plot of the signals of Fig. 4A. Here, the signal 40B is for the situation where the PAU is not enabled, whereas the signal 4 IB is for the situation where the PAU is enabled and only two load sensor signals being available. Signal content is seen at two frequencies, namely at the IP frequency 42 and the edge frequency 43 of the rotor blade. As can be seen there is not a difference in the signal content at the IP peak since the rotor frequency is not changed, however a clear reduction of the signal content at the edge frequency is seen, due to the load reduction from the added pitch actuation. Embodiments of the present invention thus provides a rotor control system with the effect of a reduction in edgewise vibrations of the blades of the turbine, even in the situation where only two load sensors are available.
Fig. 4C and Fig. 4D illustrates corresponding figures, but for the so-called edge D- component. This corresponds to the signal A of Fig. 3, i.e. the first signal component along the first reference direction. In the D-Q reference frame, the edgewise frequency component split into a forward and a backward component as can be seen in Fig. 4D. The load reduction is also clearly visible in the reference frame.

Claims

1. Rotor control system for actuating pitch of pitch-adjustable rotor blades of a three-bladed wind turbine, the rotor control system comprises a pitch actuating unit for determining pitch modification signals to be applied to a pitch actuator for actuating the pitch of the pitch adjustable rotor blades in the event one of the blade load signals is unavailable; the pitch actuation unit being arranged to: receive blade load signals for each of the pitch adjustable rotor blades and an availability signal for each of the blade load signals; construct combined load signals based on the available blade load signals, with the combined load signals being represented in a reference frame along a first and a second reference direction as a first signal component (A) and a second signal component ( B ), respectively; perform a control action (CA) to the first signal component and the second signal component; and apply the pitch modification signals (D0i, D6½, A(h) to the pitch actuator; wherein the combined load signals are constructed by: apply a high pass filter to the blade load signals; transform the blade load signals using a first coordinate transformation (77) to an intermediate coordinate frame, where each of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame are orthogonal to each other, and wherein, in the transform, the unavailable blade load signal is replaced with an estimated signal; set a first intermediate component as the first component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation (77); and set a second intermediate component as the second component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation (77); rotate the first intermediate component and the second intermediate component to align with the reference frame along the first and the second reference direction; and set the first signal component (A) and the second signal component ( B ) as the rotated first and second intermediate components, respectively.
2. The rotor control system according to claim 1, wherein the estimated signal is a superposition of the two available blade load signals.
3. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims wherein the blade load signal is a blade load signal along a flapwise direction or a blade load signal along an edgewise direction.
4. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims wherein in addition to applying the high pass filter to the blade load signals, a notch filter is applied at a frequency where a load is synchronized for all three blades.
5. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims wherein the high pass filter is set at a cut off below a IP blade passing frequency
6. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims wherein the high pass filter is set at a cut off below a frequency of changes in the mean wind speed.
7. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims wherein the transform of the blade load signals using the first coordinate transformation (77) comprises applying a Clarke transformation.
8. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims wherein the rotation of the first intermediate component and the second intermediate component is a rotation with the rotor azimuth angle.
9. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims wherein in a situation were all blade load signals are available, the first signal component and the second signal component are determined based on the available blade load signals, and the control action (CA) performed on the first signal component and the second signal component is the same control action (CA) performed on the first signal component and the second signal component when one of the blade load signals becomes unavailable.
10. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims, in the event a two or three blade load signals are unavailable, the turbine is operated in a safe mode.
11. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims further comprising applying an m-blade coordinate transformation ( T2 ) to the first signal component and the second signal component to obtain the pitch modification signals (D0i, D6½, A( ).
12. The rotor control system according to any preceding claims further comprising: determine a collective pitch reference for the pitch-adjustable rotor blades, the collective pitch reference being determined based on a rotor speed, apply a resulting pitch modification signal to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades, the resulting pitch modification signal being applied to the pitch-adjustable rotor blades individually, and for each individual blade being based on a signal of the collective pitch reference and the pitch modification signals.
13. A wind turbine comprising the rotor control system according to any of the claims 1 to 12.
14. A method of actuating pitch of pitch adjustable rotor blades of a three-bladed wind turbine, the wind turbine comprises a pitch actuator for actuating the pitch of the pitch adjustable rotor blades, the method comprises: receive blade load signals for each of the pitch adjustable rotor blades and an availability signal for each of the blade load signals; construct combined load signals based on the available blade load signals, with the combined load signals being represented in a reference frame along a first and a second reference direction as a first signal component (A) and a second signal component ( B ), respectively; perform a control action (CA) to the first signal component and the second signal component; and apply the pitch modification signals (D0i, D6½, A(h) to the pitch actuator; wherein the combined load signals are constructed by: apply a high pass filter to the blade load signals; transform the blade load signals using a first coordinate transformation ( T1 ) to an intermediate coordinate frame, where each of the associated components of the load signal in the intermediate coordinate frame are orthogonal to each other, and wherein, in the transform, the unavailable blade load signal is replaced with an estimated signal; set a first intermediate component as the first component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation ( T1 ); and set a second intermediate component as the second component of the transformed blade load signals resulting from the first coordinate transformation ( T1 ); rotate the first intermediate component and the second intermediate component to align with the reference frame along the first and the second reference direction; and set the first signal component (A) and the second signal component (B) as the rotated first and second intermediate components, respectively.
15. A computer program product comprising software code adapted to control a wind turbine when executed on a data processing system, the computer program product being adapted to perform the method of claim 14.
EP22725989.2A 2021-05-17 2022-05-16 Individual pitch control with unavailable blade load sensor Active EP4341553B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DKPA202170245 2021-05-17
PCT/DK2022/050100 WO2022242816A1 (en) 2021-05-17 2022-05-16 Individual pitch control with unavailable blade load sensor

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4341553A1 true EP4341553A1 (en) 2024-03-27
EP4341553C0 EP4341553C0 (en) 2026-02-04
EP4341553B1 EP4341553B1 (en) 2026-02-04

Family

ID=81850597

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP22725989.2A Active EP4341553B1 (en) 2021-05-17 2022-05-16 Individual pitch control with unavailable blade load sensor

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20240254964A1 (en)
EP (1) EP4341553B1 (en)
CN (1) CN117561377A (en)
ES (1) ES3062808T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2022242816A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4317683B1 (en) * 2022-08-05 2025-04-09 General Electric Renovables España S.L. Determination of a state of a wind turbine blade

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101592127B (en) * 2009-06-22 2011-09-14 浙江运达风电股份有限公司 Independent pitch control method for large wind turbine
GB2481461A (en) * 2010-06-21 2011-12-28 Vestas Wind Sys As Control of a downstream wind turbine in a wind park by sensing the wake turbulence of an upstream turbine
AU2011202348A1 (en) * 2011-03-11 2012-09-27 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Blade pitch control system, wind turbine generator, and blade pitch control method
ES2408246B1 (en) * 2011-12-15 2014-09-02 Acciona Windpower, S.A. METHOD OF OPERATION OF AN AEROGENERATOR
EP2859225B1 (en) * 2012-06-08 2017-09-27 Vestas Wind Systems A/S A method of operating a wind turbine as well as a system suitable therefore
WO2015192852A1 (en) * 2014-06-20 2015-12-23 Mita-Teknik A/S System for dynamic pitch control
CN110446853B (en) * 2017-03-21 2021-01-01 维斯塔斯风力系统集团公司 System and method for managing torsional oscillations of a wind turbine tower
US11286911B2 (en) * 2017-05-26 2022-03-29 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Relating to wind turbine rotor angle sensing systems
CN108035848A (en) * 2017-11-21 2018-05-15 明阳智慧能源集团股份公司 Independent variable pitch control method of wind generating set based on tower top load
WO2020239177A1 (en) * 2019-05-28 2020-12-03 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Reduction of edgewise vibrations using blade load signal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2022242816A1 (en) 2022-11-24
EP4341553C0 (en) 2026-02-04
CN117561377A (en) 2024-02-13
ES3062808T3 (en) 2026-04-14
US20240254964A1 (en) 2024-08-01
EP4341553B1 (en) 2026-02-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104214045B (en) The independent pitch of double-fed type speed-changing oar-changing wind power generating set is away from control method
CN114258459B (en) Using blade load signals to reduce edgewise vibration
EP2115299B1 (en) Wind turbine damping of tower resonant motion and symmetric blade motion using estimation methods
EP3724489B1 (en) Tower damping in wind turbine power production
US9341159B2 (en) Methods for controlling wind turbine loading
EP3821125A1 (en) Method and system for controlling a wind turbine to reduce nacelle vibration
CN108644069B (en) Blade unbalance detection method and device
WO2019042515A1 (en) Damping of torsional oscillation in a multi-rotor wind turbine
CN111502913A (en) Wind turbine, pitch control method and device
CN114294158A (en) Aerodynamic unbalanced load control method for wind turbine based on robust control
EP3225838A1 (en) Method and arrangement for performing a wind direction measurement
EP4341553B1 (en) Individual pitch control with unavailable blade load sensor
EP4448957B1 (en) Wind turbine rotor blade pitch control for tower fatigue reduction
EP4062054B1 (en) Stopping a wind turbine rotor based on stored pitch angle signal
US12612894B2 (en) Controlling activation of individual pitch control of wind turbine rotor blades based on detected wind events
CN116971917B (en) Yaw control method, device, controller and wind turbine generator
WO2024183867A1 (en) Gain-adjusted collective pitch control for reducing fore-aft oscillation amplitude of a wind turbine tower
CN121474051B (en) Wind turbine generator set real-time regulation and control method, device and equipment based on thrust estimation
WO2026092814A1 (en) Controlling activation of individual pitch control of wind turbine rotor blades based on blade load volatility
EP4677219A1 (en) Estimating velocity in a fore-aft direction of a top of a wind turbine tower based on blade flap loads
WO2024099527A1 (en) Determining wind speed at a wind turbine

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20231214

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: F03D 7/02 20060101AFI20251029BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20251117

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: F10

Free format text: ST27 STATUS EVENT CODE: U-0-0-F10-F00 (AS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL OFFICE)

Effective date: 20260204

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602022029656

Country of ref document: DE

U01 Request for unitary effect filed

Effective date: 20260217

U07 Unitary effect registered

Designated state(s): AT BE BG DE DK EE FI FR IT LT LU LV MT NL PT RO SE SI

Effective date: 20260223

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20260304

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 3062808

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20260414