EP3893896A1 - Barn dust extract for the prevention and treatment of diseases - Google Patents
Barn dust extract for the prevention and treatment of diseasesInfo
- Publication number
- EP3893896A1 EP3893896A1 EP19832854.4A EP19832854A EP3893896A1 EP 3893896 A1 EP3893896 A1 EP 3893896A1 EP 19832854 A EP19832854 A EP 19832854A EP 3893896 A1 EP3893896 A1 EP 3893896A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- dust
- kda
- extract
- barn
- composition
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
- A61K35/02—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution from inanimate materials
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P11/00—Drugs for disorders of the respiratory system
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P37/00—Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
- A61P37/08—Antiallergic agents
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of preparing a barn dust extract, said barn dust extract, and a composition comprising said barn dust extract.
- the bam dust extract is useful in the prevention or treatment of a disease.
- J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:648-56 el- 4) were administered in aerosolized form (Peters M, Kauth M, Schemer O, et al. Arabinogalactan isolated from cowshed dust extract protects mice from allergic airway inflammation and sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:648-56 el -4) or intranasally (Schuijs MJ, Willart MA, Vergote K, et al. Farm dust and endotoxin protect against allergy through A20 induction in lung epithelial cells. Science 2015;349: 1106-10) in ovalbumin (OVA)-induced allergic asthma model (Peters M, Kauth M, Schemer O, et al.
- OVA ovalbumin
- the present invention relates to a method of preparing a bam dust extract, comprising: (d) providing a mixture comprising a bam dust and a liquid; and (e) isolating a fraction of the mixture, wherein the bam dust extract comprised in the fraction consists essentially of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least of about 10 kDa.
- the present invention also relates to a barn dust extract obtainable by a method described herein.
- the present invention also relates to a barn dust extract consisting to at least about 90% by dry matter of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa, wherein a size exclusion chromatogram of the barn dust extract has in the fraction having a molecular weight of at least about 10 kDa two characteristic peaks A and B, wherein (a) peak A has its maximum in the range of 35 to 75 kDa (corresponding to a retention time of about 17 min, preferably as measured in an size exclusion chromatography assay as described herein); and (b) peak B has its maximum in the range of 300 to 700 kDa (corresponding to a retention time of about 11 min, preferably as measured in an size exclusion chromatography assay as described herein).
- the present invention also relates to a composition comprising the bam dust extract of the invention, in particular a pharmaceutical composition.
- the present invention also relates to a barn dust extract of the invention or a composition of the invention for use in the prevention or treatment of a disease.
- the present invention also relates to a use of the bam dust extract of the invention for the manufacture of a composition for the prevention or treatment of a disease.
- the present invention also relates to a method of preventing or treating a disease comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a bam dust extract of the invention to a subject.
- FIGURE 1 A first figure.
- Figure 1 shows a HPLC chromatogram of the stable dust total extract that has been not lyophilized and not autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL.
- Figure 2 shows a HPLC chromatogram of the stable dust total extract that has been lyophilized and not autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL (12.3 mg/mL lyophilized dust in water).
- Figure 3 shows a chromatogram of the stable dust Total extract that has been lyophilized and autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL (9.9 mg/mL lyophilized dust in water).
- Figure 4 provides an overview allowing comparison of the chromatograms depicted in Figures 1, 2 and 3.
- Figure 5 shows a chromatogram of the > 10 kDa fraction of a stable dust extract that has not been lyophilized and not autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL.
- Figure 6 shows a chromatogram of the > 10 kDa fraction of a stable dust extract that has been lyophilized and not autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL (13.0 mg/mL lyophilized dust in water).
- Figure 7 shows a chromatogram of the > 10 kDa fraction of a stable dust extract that has been lyophilized and autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL (8.4 mg/mL lyophilized dust in water).
- Figure 8 provides an overview allowing comparison of the chromatograms depicted in Figures 5, 6 and 7.
- Figure 9 illustrates the change in liquid extract (not autoclaved) measured after 8 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, refrigerated (storage at 4 °C) and freezed (storage at -20 °C)
- Figure 10 illustrates the change in peak height for the peaks of respectively 27 kDA, 5 kDA, 1 kDa, and 0.6 kDa, measured after 8 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, storage at 4 °C and storage at -20 °C.
- Figure 11 illustrates the difference between non-autoclaved and autoclaved liquid extracts obtained from barn dust from Hechfellner Hof.
- FIGURE 12 illustrates the change in liquid extract (autoclaved) measured after 5 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, storage at 4 °C and storage at -20 °C.
- Figure 13 illustrates the change in liquid extract (autoclaved) measured after 12 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, storage at 4 °C and storage at -20 °C.
- Figure 14 illustrates the change in peak height for the peaks of respectively 309 kDa, 6 kDa, 2 kDa, and 0.8 kDa, measured after 8 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, storage at 4° and storage at -20°.
- FIG. 15 illustrates the experimental setup used to measure eosinophil recruitment to the lung in mice after intra-nasal administration of fractionated or unfractionated stable dust extracts.
- Dust extracts (0.8 mg dry weight in 50 m ⁇ /treatment) are instilled intra-nasally every 2-3 days for a total of 8 times beginning at day 0 into 7-week old Balb/c mice that are sensitized intra-peritoneally with 50 pg of OVA-Alum (6 mg) at day 0 and 7, and challenged intra-nasally with 100 pg OVA at day 14, 15, and 16.
- Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) is performed at day 17 by delivering cold 1% BSA in PBS (2 mL) into the airway via a tracheal cannula and gently aspirating the fluid. Cells are counted using a Countess P FL automated cell counter (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and differentials are determined by an operator blinded to mouse ID/grouping after staining with Hema 3 (Fischer) (at least 400 cells/slide). Statistical significance for BAL cellularity measurements is determined by an unpaired two tailed Student’s t-test. P-values ⁇ 0.05 are considered significant. Each treatment group includes a minimum of 5 mice
- Left panel of figure 16 illustrates eosinophils count after treating mice with a saline solution (negative control), an allergen (OVA, positive control), unfractionated, autoclaved stable dust extract (BAV Autoclaved), and unfractionated, non-autoclaved stable dust extract (BAV Non-Autoclaved).
- a saline solution negative control
- an allergen OVA, positive control
- unfractionated, autoclaved stable dust extract BAV Autoclaved
- BAV Non-Autoclaved unfractionated, non-autoclaved stable dust extract
- Figure 17 illustrates the experimental setup used to measure proportions of gd T cells in the lungs of mice following intra-nasal administration of a saline solution (negative control), an allergen (OVA, positive control), unfractionated, autoclaved barn dust extract, fractions between 10 kDa and 100 kDa of autoclaved stable dust extract, and fractions bigger than 10 kDa of autoclaved stable dust extract.
- a saline solution negative control
- OVA allergen
- OVA allergen
- mice are euthanized by lethal dose of anesthetic. Lungs are perfused and removed. To prepare single-cell suspension the lungs are minced with scissors and digested with 0.26 Wunsch U/ml of Liberase TM (Roche) and 4 U/ml of DNAse I (Sigma) at 37°C for 1 h with shaking (60-70 rpm). The resulting suspension is passed through 20-22G needle and through the 70 pm cell strainer. After washing with complete medium, lung cells are resuspended in PBS/0.1% NaN3/1.0% BSA at 5xl0 6 cells/ml.
- Cells are treated with Fc-Block for 10 min on ice and stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies to cell surface antigens for 30 min on ice in the dark. Cells are then washed and resuspended in PBS/0.1% NaN3/1.0% BSA for flow cytometry.
- Flow cytometry is performed on a FACSCalibur or LSRII (BD Sciences) flow cytometers. Data is collected on 10000-20000 events. Data analysis is performed using CellQuest (BD) or FlowJo (FlowJo) software. Proportions of gd T cells are reported as % of CD3+ T cells gating on lung lymphocytes.
- Figure 18 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y6 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with a saline solution (negative control).
- FIG. 19 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y5 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with an allergen (OVA).
- CD3 + y5 T cells are positive for both CD3 staining (FL1, vertical axis) and gd staining (FL2, horizontal axis) and are located in the upper right quadrants of the two panels on the left.
- FL1, vertical axis CD3 staining
- FL2, horizontal axis gd staining
- the two panels on the right present quantitative analyses for the corresponding panels on the left. Circled in red are the proportions of gd T cells among CD3 + T cells found in each mouse
- Figure 20 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y6 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with allergen (OVA) + unfractionated, autoclaved bam dust extract.
- Figure 21 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y6 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with allergen (OVA) + fractions of autoclaved stable dust extract between 10 kDa and 100 kDa.
- Figure 22 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y6 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with allergen (OVA) + fractions of autoclaved stable dust extract > 10 kDa.
- the present invention is based on the surprising finding that certain processing step(s) may improve the quality and/or anti-allergenic potential of a barn dust (extract).
- the inventors of the present application have surprisingly found that certain fractions of bam dust extracts obtained after fractionation according to molecular weight of bam dust components exhibit an improved anti -allergenic potential as compared to the whole extract.
- the present invention relates to a method of preparing a barn dust extract, comprising: (d) providing a mixture comprising a barn dust and a liquid; (e) isolating a fraction of the mixture, wherein the barn dust extract comprised in the fraction consists essentially of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa.
- bam dust relates to dust that can be, is, or has been collected from a barn.
- bam dust comprises immunostimulatory substances derived from microorganisms, animals, plants, fungi, viruses and/or protozoa that are protective against allergies, asthma and/or other diseases disclosed herein.
- the bam dust is from a farm.
- the origin of the barn dust is not limited to certain types of bams and can be any type of barn, including barns for any type of livestock such as cows, pigs, chicken, sheep, horse, or others. Dust from cow barns are however preferred.
- the geographic location of the bam is believed to be not essential for the invention.
- barn dust may be obtained from Hechfellner Hof, Mettenheim, Bavaria, Germany.
- barn dust can be collected by any suitable method known to the person skilled in the art optionally by applying any type of collection system that is suitable for collecting bam dust.
- barn dust can for example be collected by sweeping, vacuuming, or swiping.
- Bam dust can also be collected by filtration of barn air, for example by using the membrane filter or a granular material that is capable of adsorbing barn dust.
- Barn dust can also be collected using an impinge or an impactor, such as a cascade impactor.
- the dust may be homogenized.
- a suitable type of technique is any technique which leads to a uniform homogenization of the dust, in particular one which removes agglomerations and lumps of the dust. Suitable for these purposes are methods such as rubbing, smashing or crushing, stirring or introducing into a blender, without being limited thereto.
- Digesting the dust may also be part of the process according to the invention. Digesting of the constituents present in the dust, such as cells, microorganisms, in particular their spores and the like can be effected, for example by grinding, squashing and similar methods.
- a sieving step for removing (large) particles such as particles having a size of about 100 pm, about 90 pm, about 80 pm, about 70 pm, about 60 pm, about 50 pm, about 40 pm, about 30 pm, about 20 pm, or about 10 pm may be applied after homogenization.
- am dust extract as used herein preferably refers to a composition that is obtainable by the methods disclosed herein and may refer to both, a solution or suspension, or a dry composition.
- the bam dust is optionally in a mixture with a liquid.
- the liquid may be water, an aqueous solution, or a water miscible solvent, or a combination thereof. It can be pure water, but it can also be a saline solution.
- a saline solution may contain sodium salts or similar monovalent or divalent salts, such as sodium sulfate, potassium chloride, magnesium chloride, or calcium chloride.
- a preferred saline solution is a solution of sodium chloride, preferably a physiologic aqueous solution of sodium chloride, such as normal saline.
- normal saline preferably refers to a mixture of sodium chloride and water at a concentration of about 9 g/L.
- the aqueous solution may also comprise a buffer, such as phosphate buffered saline.
- the water- miscible solvent may for example be an alcohol such as ethanol.
- the water-miscible solvent may also be a mixture of water-miscible solvents.
- the liquid may also be a mixture of water and/or an aqueous solution and one or more water-miscible solvent(s).
- fraction preferably refers to fractions that can be obtained by fractioning a mixture according to the molecular weight and/or size of the molecules comprising the mixture.
- isolation or“isolation” as used herein preferably refers to enriching a portion that is to be isolated as compared to a portion that is not to be isolated by mass, or depleting a portion that is not to be isolated as compared to a portion that is to be isolated by mass.
- step (e) of the methods of the present invention may comprise enriching a fraction wherein the barn dust extract comprised therein consists essentially of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa by factor of at least about 5, preferably at least about 10, preferably at least about 20, preferably at least about 100.
- Step (e) of the methods of the present invention may also comprises depleting a fraction wherein the barn dust extract comprised therein consists essentially of molecules having a molecular weight of at most about 5 kDa, preferably at most about 10 kDa by factor of at least about 5, preferably at least about 10, preferably at least about 20, preferably at least about 100.
- the term“consists essentially of’ means that further components, such as impurities, can be present but that the further components do not markedly affect the essential characteristics of the components that the mixture, fraction, compound etc. essentially consists of.
- Such further component(s) may amount to up to about 10%, up to about 9%, up to about 8%, up to about 7%, up to about 6%, up to about 5%, up to about 4%, up to about 3%, up to about 2%, up to about 1%, up to about 0.5%, up to about 0.2%, or up to about 0.1% by weight of component(s) that the mixture, fraction, compound etc. essentially consists of.
- bam dust comprised therein consists essentially of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa, will yield a highly standardized product that is essentially independent from the origin of the starting material.
- the method of the present invention may further comprise the step of subjecting a mixture comprising a bam dust and liquid to heat treatment.
- the heat treatment may be at a temperature of at least about 110 °C and/or a pressure of at least about 1.5 bar for at least about 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 minutes.
- the heat treatment may comprise subjecting the mixture to a moist heat, such as a saturated steam.
- the heat treatment may comprise autoclaving the mixture. Autoclaving may be performed using steam heated to about 121-134 °C, for at least about 3 minutes, such as at least about 5 minutes, at least about 8 minutes, at least about 10 minutes, at least about 15 minutes or at least about 20 minutes.
- Such a heat treatment may be performed for up to about 2 hours, up to about 1.5 hours, up to about 1 hour, up to about 45 min or up to about 30 min.
- a preferred heat treatment may be subjecting the mixture to moist heat at 121 °C (2.1 bar) for at least about 15 minutes (such as about 20 minutes), at 134°C (3 bar) for at least about 3 minutes (such as about 5 minutes), or at 134 °C (3 bar) for at least about 18 minutes.
- the latter conditions may further inactivate prions.
- Heat treatment can also be performed using dry heat, for example at about 160 °C to about 200 °C for up to about two hours. Optimal duration for dry heat treatment may vary depending of the temperature. Typical conditions for dry heat treatment are for example about 2 h at about 160 °C, or about 1 h at about 170 °C, or about 6 to 12 minutes at 190 °C.
- the inventors of the present application have surprisingly found that heat treatment alters the molecular weight distribution of the molecules comprised in the barn dust extract. However, it has surprisingly been found that this altered molecular weight distribution does not essentially affect the therapeutic potency of the bam dust extract. However, heat treatment is believed to result in a sterile product that meets safety requirements for pharmaceuticals and also improves stability of the product.
- the barn dust extract may undergo sterile filtration. A sterile filtration step may be conducted before step (e). A sterile filtration step may also be conducted before step (g).
- the methods of the present invention may further comprise step (g), drying the fraction obtained in step (e).“Drying” as used herein preferably refers to complete or partial removal of solvents, in particular water.
- the drying step can be performed by any means or methods known to the person skilled in the art. Non-limiting examples include lyophilization, spray drying, sun drying, or air drying. Preferred methods are lyophilization or spray drying. A dry barn dust extract is believed to be more stable than a liquid extract and is thus particularly suited for long-term storage.
- the methods of the present invention may comprise the step of (a) collecting barn dust. This collecting step can be performed by any method described here in. After collection of the bam dust, the bam dust may be mixed with a liquid described herein.
- this suspension may be either left to stand or stirred, so that the soluble substances, or the substances which can be removed from the dusts by the liquid, may enter into the liquid phase.
- insoluble substances may be subsequently removed from the mixture. Removal can for example be conducted by filtration or a sedimentation step. The removal step is not limiting for the process according to the invention; any removal method which is known to the skilled worker may be employed. Also, leaving the suspension to stand so that sedimentation of the solid constituents can be accomplished by the earth's gravity may be considered as being for the purposes of the invention. A preferred way of removing the solid constituents is centrifuging, whereafter the supernatant is removed from the sediment.
- the methods of the present invention may comprise step (c) depleting particles having a size of at least about 0.2 pm, which may comprise one or more filtration steps. Particles having a size of at least about 0.2 pm may be depleted by factor of at least about 10, preferably at least about 100, preferably at least about 1000.
- barn dust extract fractions that consists essentially of molecules having molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa with no defined upper limit for the molecular weight have a higher therapeutic potency than fractions that consist essentially of molecules having molecular weight about 5 kDa to about 100 kDa or about 10 kDa to about 100 kDa.
- the maximum molecular weight or size of the molecules comprised in the barn dust extract may thus only be limited by the solubility of the molecules in water or the cut-off value of a filtration step in the preparation of the bam dust extract. Such a cut-off value may e.g. about 0.2 pm.
- the methods of the present invention preferably do not comprise the step of depleting molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 100 kDa from the bam dust extract.
- the bam dust extract that consists essentially of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa, preferably also comprises molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 100 kDa.
- the methods of preparing a bam dust extract of the present invention may therefore comprise steps of:
- bam dust extract comprised in the fraction consists essentially of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa;
- step (f) (optionally) subjecting the mixture to heat treatment; (g) (optionally) drying the fraction obtained in step (f).
- the present invention further relates to a barn dust extract.
- the bam dust extract is preferably obtainable by a method of the invention.
- a barn dust extract of the invention may consist to at least about 90% by dry matter of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa.
- Such a bam dust extract has a distinct molecular weight distribution of the molecules comprised in the extract.
- a size exclusion chromatogram of the barn dust extract has in the fraction having a molecular weight of at least about 10 kDa two characteristic peaks A and B, wherein peak A has its maximum in the range of 35 to 75 kDa (corresponding to a retention time of about 17 min, preferably as measured in an size exclusion chromatography assay as described herein); and (b) peak B has its maximum in the range of 300 to 700 kDa (corresponding to a retention time of about 11 min, preferably as measured in an size exclusion chromatography assay as described herein), as shown e.g. in Figure 7.
- Size exclusion chromatography is preferably carried out using an Agilent Advance Bio SEC 130 A (2.7 pm, 4.6 x 300 mm) and/or an Agilent Advance Bio SEC 300 A (2.7 pm, 4.6 x 300 mm) column and a 0.15 M NaCl solution as mobile phase, and wherein compounds are detected by an optical detector at a wavelength of 210 nm.
- Further conditions that are believed to be non-essential may be an injection volume (sample) of 10 pL, a column temperature of 30 °C, and/or a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min.
- the barn dust extract of the invention may have undergone heat treatment as defined in the methods of the invention.
- the barn dust extract of the invention may consist essentially of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa, preferably at least about 10 kDa. Accordingly, the barn dust extract may consist consists to at least about 75%, preferably 80%, preferably 85%, preferably 90%, preferably 95%, preferably 98%, preferably 99%, preferably 99.5%, preferably 99.9% by dry matter of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 5 kDa.
- the barn dust extract preferably consists to at least about 75%, preferably 80%, preferably 85%, preferably 90%, preferably 95%, preferably 98%, preferably 99%, preferably 99.5%, preferably 99.9% by dry matter of molecules having a molecular weight of at least about 10 kDa.
- the bam dust extract disclosed herein preferably comprises one or more bacterial antigens. It can further comprise fungal, viral or protozoal antigens.
- a barn dust or barn dust extract disclosed herein may comprises a fragment of a bacterium selected from the group consisting of Staphylococcus sciuri , Jeotgalicoccus spp., preferably J. halotolerans , J. pinnipedialis, J.
- psychrophilus Salinicoccus alkaliphilus, Salinicoccus halodurans, Salinicoccus kunmingensis, Salinicoccus roseus, Macrococcusbrunensis, Duganella spp., preferably I) violaceinigra, D. zoogloeoides, Moraxella boevrei, Moraxella canis, Moraxella caprae, Moraxella cuniculi, Moraxella lincolnii, Corynebacterium variabile, Corynebacterium macburgense , and Zooglea spp., preferably Z. caeni, Z. ramigera, Z. resiniphila , or a mixture thereof.
- a barn dust or barn dust extract disclosed herein may comprise a fragment of a bacterium selected from the group consisting of Lactobacillus spp., preferably Lactobacillus curvatus , Lactobacillus sakei, and Lactobacillus iners, Delftia spp., preferably D. tsuruhatensis, Brevibacterium spp., preferably B. iodinum, B. linens, Rhizobium spp., preferably R gallicum, Psychromonas spp., Alteromonas spp., Lactococcus lactis, and Acinetobacter spp., preferably Acinetobacter Iwoffii or mixtures thereof
- the present invention also relates to a composition comprising a bam dust extract of the present invention.
- Such a composition may be a pharmaceutical composition comprises the barn dust extract as active ingredient and optionally, one or more pharmaceutically excipient(s). Accordingly, the use of a bam dust extract described herein, for the manufacture of a pharmaceutical composition or medicament is also envisaged herein.
- composition particularly refers to a composition suitable for administering to a human.
- compositions suitable for administration to non-human animals are generally also encompassed by the term.
- the pharmaceutical composition and its components are preferably pharmaceutically acceptable, i.e. capable of eliciting the desired therapeutic effect without causing any undesirable local or systemic effects in the recipient.
- Pharmaceutically acceptable compositions of the invention may for instance be sterile or non-sterile.
- the term "pharmaceutically acceptable” may mean approved by a regulatory agency or other generally recognized pharmacopoeia for use in animals, and more particularly in humans.
- the barn dust extract is preferably present in the pharmaceutical composition in a therapeutically effective amount.
- therapeutically effective amount is meant an amount of the active agent that elicits the desired therapeutic or prophylactic effect.
- Therapeutic efficacy can be determined by standard procedures, e.g. in test animals, e.g., ED 50 (the dose therapeutically effective in 50% of the population).
- excipient includes fillers, binders, disintegrants, coatings, sorbents, anti adherents, glidants, preservatives, antioxidants, flavoring, coloring, sweeting agents, solvents, co-solvents, buffering agents, chelating agents, viscosity imparting agents, surface active agents, diluents, humectants, carriers, diluents, preservatives, emulsifiers, stabilizers and tonicity modifiers. It is within the knowledge of the skilled person to select suitable excipients for preparing the desired pharmaceutical composition of the invention.
- Exemplary carriers for use in the pharmaceutical composition of the invention include saline, buffered saline, dextrose, and water.
- suitable excipients will inter alia depend on the specific active agent used, the disease to be treated, and the desired formulation of the pharmaceutical composition.
- compositions of the invention can be formulated in various forms, e.g. in solid, liquid, gaseous or lyophilized form and may be, for instance, in the form of a solution, an aerosol, a suspension, a lyophilisate, a powder, a tablet, a dragee, a suppository, a pill, a capsule, granule, an ointment, a cream, transdermal patches, a gel, suspensions, emulsions, syrups, liquids, elixirs, extracts, tincture or fluid extracts or in a form which is particularly suitable for the desired method of administration.
- a variety of routes are applicable for administration of the composition according to the present invention.
- the composition may be prepared for nasal, inhalative, oral, conjunctival, subcutaneous, intraarticular, intraperitoneal, rectal, or vaginal administration.
- the composition may be in a form of a food additive, a food ingredient, or a composition suitable to be distributed in indoor air.
- a barn dust extract of the invention or a composition of the invention, in particular a pharmaceutical composition may be for use in the prevention or treatment of a disease. The use preferably comprises administering the barn dust extract or the composition to a subject that is preferably in need thereof.
- a bam dust extract of the invention or a composition of the invention, in particular a pharmaceutical composition may be used for the manufacture of a composition for the prevention or treatment of a disease.
- the present invention also contemplates a method of preventing or treating a disease comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a bam dust extract of the invention or a composition of the invention to a subject.
- treatment in all its grammatical forms includes therapeutic or prophylactic treatment of a subject in need thereof.
- A“therapeutic or prophylactic treatment” comprises prophylactic treatments aimed at the complete prevention of clinical and/or pathological manifestations or therapeutic treatment aimed at amelioration or remission of clinical and/or pathological manifestations.
- treatment thus also includes the amelioration or prevention of diseases.
- the disease may be selected from the group consisting of an allergic disease, a chronic inflammatory disease, and an autoimmune disease.
- the disease is selected from the group consisting of hay fever, food allergy, asthma, urticaria, neurodermitis, atopy, including atopic sensitisation and atopic dermatitis, contact eczema, psoriasis, diabetes type 1 or 2, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, diseases of the thyroid gland, including Hashimoto Thyreoditis and Graves disease, preferably selected from the group consisting of atopy, including atopic sensitisation and atopic dermatitis, asthma and hay fever.
- the “subject” may be an animal, preferably a vertebrate, preferably a mammal.
- Preferred subjects include human, mouse, rat, rabbit, hamster, pig, dog, cat, cattle, sheep, goat, camel, monkey, or ape. It is envisioned by the invention that a human subject is preferred over other species, wherein a baby, and infant, or a pregnant woman is most preferred.
- Example 2 Effects of lyophilization and/or autoclaving on the chromatographic profile of a total stable dust extract and a stable dust extract comprising fractions >10 kDa.
- bam dust extracts were prepared as described in Example 1.
- Figure 1 shows a HPLC chromatogram of the stable dust total extract that has been not lyophilized and not autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL.
- Figure 2 shows a HPLC chromatogram of the stable dust total extract that has been lyophilized and not autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL (12.3 mg/mL lyophilized dust in water).
- Figure 3 shows a chromatogram of the stable dust Total extract that has been lyophilized and autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL (9.9 mg/mL lyophilized dust in water).
- Figure 5 shows a chromatogram of the > 10 kDa fraction of a stable dust extract that has not been lyophilized and not autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL.
- Figure 6 shows a chromatogram of the > 10 kDa fraction of a stable dust extract that has been lyophilized and not autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Figure 7 shows a chromatogram of the > 10 kDa fraction of a stable dust extract that has been lyophilized and autoclaved.
- Diode array detector wavelength 210 nm.
- Injection volume 10 pL (8.4 mg/mL lyophilized dust in water).
- Example 3 Change in chromatographic profile of a non-autoclaved and an autoclaved liquid extract over time under different storage conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and -20 °C).
- bam dust extracts were prepared as described in Example 1. Ultracentrifugation step 9 was omitted.
- Figure 9 illustrates the change in liquid extract (not autoclaved) measured after 8 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, refrigerated (storage at 4 °C) and freezed (storage at -20 °C)
- Figure 10 illustrates the change in peak height for the peaks of respectively 27 kDA, 5 kDA, 1 kDa, and 0.6 kDa, measured after 8 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, storage at 4 °C and storage at -20 °C.
- Figure 11 illustrates the difference between non-autoclaved and autoclaved liquid extracts obtained from bam dust from Hechfellner Hof.
- Figure 12 illustrates the change in liquid extract (autoclaved) measured after 5 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, storage at 4 °C and storage at -20 °C.
- Figure 13 illustrates the change in liquid extract (autoclaved) measured after 12 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, storage at 4 °C and storage at -20 °C.
- Figure 14 illustrates the change in peak height for the peaks of respectively 309 kDa, 6 kDa, 2 kDa, and 0.8 kDa, measured after 8 days of storage under different conditions, namely storage at room temperature, storage at 4° and storage at -20°.
- Example 4 Measurement of eosinophil production in mice after intranasal administration of fractionated or unfractionated stable dust extracts
- Figure 15 illustrates the experimental setup used to measure eosinophil recruitment to the lung in mice after intra-nasal administration of fractionated or unfractionated stable dust extracts.
- Dust extracts (0.8 mg dry weight in 50 pL/treatment) are instilled intra-nasally every 2-3 days for a total of 8 times beginning at day 0 into 7-week old Balb/c mice that are sensitized intra-peritoneally with 50 pg of OVA-Alum (6 mg) at day 0 and 7, and challenged intra-nasally with 100 pg OVA at day 14, 15, and 16.
- Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) is performed at day 17 by delivering cold 1% BSA in PBS (2 mL) into the airway via a tracheal cannula and gently aspirating the fluid.
- Figure 16 (left panel) illustrates eosinophils count after treating mice with a saline solution (negative control), an allergen (OVA, positive control), unfractionated, autoclaved stable dust extract, and unfractionated, non -autoclaved stable dust extract.
- a saline solution negative control
- an allergen OVA, positive control
- unfractionated, autoclaved stable dust extract unfractionated, non -autoclaved stable dust extract.
- Figure 16 illustrates eosinophils counts after treating mice with a saline solution (negative control), an allergen (OVA, positive control), unfractionated, autoclaved barn dust extract, fractions between 10 kDa and 100 kDa of autoclaved stable dust extract, and fractions bigger than 10 kDa of autoclaved stable dust extract.
- Example 5 Measurement of gd T cell production in mice after intra-nasal administration of fractionated or unfractionated stable dust extracts
- mice are euthanized by lethal dose of anesthetic. Lungs are perfused and removed. To prepare single-cell suspension the lungs are minced with scissors and digested with 0.26 Wunsch U/mL of Liberase TM (Roche) and 4 U/ml of DNAse I (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C for 1 h with shaking (60-70 rpm). The resulting suspension is passed through 20-22G needle and through the 70 pm cell strainer. After washing with complete medium, lung cells are resuspended in PBS/0.1% NaN 3 /1.0% BSA at 5 c 10 6 cells/mL.
- Cells are treated with Fc- Block for 10 min on ice and stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies to cell surface antigens for 30 min on ice in the dark. Cells are then washed and resuspended in PBS/0.1% NaN 3 /1.0% BSA for flow cytometry.
- Flow cytometry is performed on a FACSCalibur or LSRII (BD Sciences) flow cytometers. Data is collected on 10000-20000 events. Data analysis is performed using CellQuest (BD) or FlowJo (FlowJo) software. Proportions of gd T cells are reported as % of CD3+ T cells gating on lung lymphocytes.
- Figure 18 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y5 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with a saline solution (negative control).
- FIG 19 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y6 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with an allergen (OVA).
- Figure 20 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y6 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with allergen (OVA) + unfractionated, autoclaved bam dust extract.
- FIG. 21 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y5 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with allergen (OVA) + fractions of autoclaved stable dust extract between 10 kDa and 100 kDa.
- Figure 22 illustrates the results of flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of CD3 + y6 + cells found in the lungs after treating mice with allergen (OVA) + fractions of autoclaved stable dust extract > 10 kDa.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Pulmonology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| LU101064 | 2018-12-14 | ||
| PCT/EP2019/085016 WO2020120724A1 (en) | 2018-12-14 | 2019-12-13 | Barn dust extract for the prevention and treatment of diseases |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3893896A1 true EP3893896A1 (en) | 2021-10-20 |
| EP3893896B1 EP3893896B1 (en) | 2025-11-19 |
Family
ID=65234614
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP19832854.4A Active EP3893896B1 (en) | 2018-12-14 | 2019-12-13 | Barn dust extract for use in the treatment of allergic diseases |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20220047630A1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP3893896B1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2020120724A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20240316187A1 (en) | 2021-08-03 | 2024-09-26 | Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH) | Proteins identified from barn dust extract for the prevention and treatment of diseases |
| EP4162970A1 (en) | 2021-10-06 | 2023-04-12 | Hipp & Co | Dust applicator device |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE4422859C2 (en) * | 1994-06-30 | 2000-10-05 | Laves Arzneimittel Gmbh | Aqueous cell extracts from mycobacteria |
| DE19963840A1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2001-09-13 | Erika Von Mutius | Composition for the prevention and treatment of allergic diseases |
| DE502004008649D1 (en) * | 2004-09-18 | 2009-01-22 | Protectimmun Gmbh | Barn dust extract for protection against allergies |
-
2019
- 2019-12-13 US US17/413,468 patent/US20220047630A1/en active Pending
- 2019-12-13 WO PCT/EP2019/085016 patent/WO2020120724A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2019-12-13 EP EP19832854.4A patent/EP3893896B1/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20220047630A1 (en) | 2022-02-17 |
| WO2020120724A1 (en) | 2020-06-18 |
| EP3893896B1 (en) | 2025-11-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Calderón et al. | Multiple-allergen and single-allergen immunotherapy strategies in polysensitized patients: looking at the published evidence | |
| Wingender et al. | Invariant NKT cells are required for airway inflammation induced by environmental antigens | |
| Curin et al. | Next-generation of allergen-specific immunotherapies: molecular approaches | |
| Martínez-Gómez et al. | Intralymphatic injections as a new administration route for allergen-specific immunotherapy | |
| Casale et al. | Future forms of immunotherapy | |
| JP6644002B2 (en) | Algal extract for use as an immunomodulator | |
| KR102072683B1 (en) | Method of preventing allergies | |
| RU2710544C2 (en) | Pharmaceutical product containing mites allergen extract(s), and method for production thereof | |
| AU701024B2 (en) | Method for preparing an influenza virus, antigens obtained and applications thereof | |
| Hassanzadeh-Taheri et al. | Rosmarinic acid attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment in rats | |
| WO2016155581A1 (en) | Isolated and purified acellular pertussis-haemophilus influenza type b-serogroup a and serogroup c meningococcal joint vaccine and preparation method therefor | |
| JP2021536257A (en) | Use of plant exosomes to show regulatory effects on immune system cells | |
| EP3893896B1 (en) | Barn dust extract for use in the treatment of allergic diseases | |
| CN102258780A (en) | Lyophilized mite allergen vaccine and preparation method thereof | |
| Grammar et al. | Principles of immunologic management of allergic diseases due to extrinsic antigens | |
| US20240316187A1 (en) | Proteins identified from barn dust extract for the prevention and treatment of diseases | |
| Ribi et al. | Biologically active components from mycobacterial cell walls: IV. protection of mice against aerosol infection with virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis | |
| Nelson | Allergy immunotherapy: Future directions for the 2020s. | |
| US6365192B1 (en) | Bioactivating substance | |
| Edlmayr et al. | Allergen-specific immunotherapy: towards combination vaccines for allergic and infectious diseases | |
| Ling et al. | Pet dander and difficult-to-control asthma: Therapeutic options. | |
| Rask et al. | An alternative allergen: adjuvant formulation potentiates the immunogenicity and reduces allergenicity of a novel subcutaneous immunotherapy product for treatment of grass‐pollen allergy | |
| TWI439279B (en) | Methods for treating allergic disease | |
| Amir et al. | Immunogenicity and safety of a liquid combination of DT-PRP-T vs lyophilized PRP-T reconstituted with DTP | |
| Karam et al. | New approach for improving production of Naja haje snake antivenom |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20210714 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: DE Ref document number: 40062286 Country of ref document: HK |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230525 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20230705 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20250221 |
|
| GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20250715 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: F10 Free format text: ST27 STATUS EVENT CODE: U-0-0-F10-F00 (AS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL OFFICE) Effective date: 20251119 Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602019078334 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: U11 Free format text: ST27 STATUS EVENT CODE: U-0-0-U10-U11 (AS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL OFFICE) Effective date: 20260101 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20251219 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: R17 Free format text: ST27 STATUS EVENT CODE: U-0-0-R10-R17 (AS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL OFFICE) Effective date: 20260113 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20251226 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20251119 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20251119 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20260219 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20251229 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20251119 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20251119 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20251119 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1858257 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20251119 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20251119 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20260219 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20260319 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20260319 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20260101 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20251119 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20251119 |