EP3884013A1

EP3884013A1 - Direct conversion of plastic materials into methane and/or liquid fuels

Info

Publication number: EP3884013A1
Application number: EP19801607.3A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Paul Dyson; Wei-Tse LEE; Antoine VAN MUYDEN; Felix Daniel BOBBINK
Original assignee: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne EPFL
Current assignee: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne EPFL
Priority date: 2018-11-19
Filing date: 2019-11-18
Publication date: 2021-09-29
Anticipated expiration: 2039-11-18
Also published as: WO2020104385A1; EP3653687A1; EP3884013B1

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for direct conversion of plastic materials into methane and/or liquid fuel and use of ruthenium-modified zeolite to catalyse this conversion.

Description

DIRECT CONVERSION OF PLASTIC MATERIALS INTO METHANE AND/OR

LIQUID FUELS

Field of the Invention

The invention relates to a method for direct conversion of plastic materials into methane and/or liquid fuels and the use of ruthenium- modified zeolite to catalyse this conversion.

Background of the Invention

Plastics have become useful and versatile materials with a wide range of applications. More and more new polymeric materials are developed to meet increasing demands. Plastics and other polymers are in theory recyclable, but after a relatively short functional life, are destined to arrive as a significant component of waste. Most of these plastics and other polymers disposed of in landfills are chemically stable and degrade minimally. This is an increasing problem of plastic pollution in the environment, while the demand for plastics keeps on increasing in most consumer products.

There are several well-known technologies for plastic polymer oxidation and degradation such as thermal decomposition, incineration, photochemical and electrochemical oxidation. Another solution to reduce environmental and economic impacts correlated to the accumulation of these plastic polymers is closed-loop recycling wherein plastic material is mechanically reprocessed to manufacture new products. For example, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) wastes are subjected to successive treatments leading to recycled PET, PE or PP which are collected, sorted, pressed into bales, crushed, washed, chopped into flakes, melted and extruded in pellets and offered for sale. Then, these recycled PET, PE or PP may be used to create textile fibers, plastic tubes for the construction industry or plastic films, plastic sheets, or new packaging such as flasks or blister packs, etc.

However, these plastic recycling processes require an efficient upstream sorting process and use huge amounts of energy, particularly during the extruding step. The equipment used is also expensive, leading to high prices, which may be non-competitive compared to virgin plastic. Moreover, the recycled plastic gradually loses its interesting properties (rigidity, thermal resistance, etc.) due to the recycling process, and become less interesting compared to virgin plastics.

Therefore, there exists a need for an effective, less expensive, robust and practical technology for degrading plastic waste and simultaneously producing value-added products.

Summary of the Invention

An aspect of the present invention provides a method for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels comprising

a) contacting one or more plastic polymers with a ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst in water or in dry condition to provide a reaction mixture;

b) placing the reaction mixture under the pressure of 40 to 200 bars of ¾ at 140 to 300 °C; c) cooling the reaction mixture to 20 to 25 °C;

d) recovering methane from the reaction mixture; and/or

e) recovering liquid fuels from the reaction mixture.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for preparing a ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst for direct conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuel comprising

a) providing a zeolite

b) preparing a mixture of ruthenium (Ru) salt and the zeolite of step a) in a solvent; c) stirring the mixture of step b) at 20 to 100°C and cooling the mixture to 20 to 25°C; d) adding NaBH4_{(a )} in the mixture of step c);

e) stirring the mixture of step d);

f) recovering ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst.

A further aspect of the present invention provides a ruthenium- modified catalyst obtained by the method of the invention.

A further aspect of the present invention provides a use of the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst obtained by the method of the invention for direct conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuel. Brief description of figures

Figure 1 illustrates the synthesis of solid phase Ru catalyst a) FAU-zeolite (type X); b) Ion exchange of Na⁺ by Ru³⁺; c) Ru-FAU.

Figure 2 shows SEM images of the FAU-zeolite (top) and the Ru-FAU catalyst (bottom).

Figure 3 shows al) SEM image of the FAU-zeolite support; a2) SEM image of the Ru-FAU catalyst; bl) HRTEM image of the FAU-zeolite support; b2) HRTEM image of the Ru-FAU catalyst, yellow circle: crystalline Ru nano-structures; cl) HAADF-STEM image of the Ru- FAU catalyst; c2, c3, c4) STEM elemental mapping of the Ru-FAU catalyst: Ru, Si, Al, respectively.

Figure 4 shows al) HAADF-STEM image of the Ru-FAU catalyst; a2) HAADF-STEM with integrated elemental mapping image (Ru, Si, and Al; smoothed); bl, b2, b3) STEM elemental mapping of Ru-FAU: Ru, Si and Al, respectively.

Figure 5 shows EDX of the Ru-FAU catalyst (Region 1).

Figure 6 shows EDX of the Ru-FAU catalyst (Region 2).

Figure 7 shows EDX of the Ru-FAU catalyst (Region 3).

Figure 8 shows BET isotherms (N2) of the FAU-zeolite and Ru-FAU materials; b) Powder XRDs of the FAU-zeolite and Ru-FAU materials.

Detailed description of the Invention

All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. The publications and applications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and are not intended to be limiting. In the case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of skill in art to which the subject matter herein belongs. As used herein, the following definitions are supplied in order to facilitate the understanding of the present invention.

The term“comprise” is generally used in the sense of include, that is to say permitting the presence of one or more features or components. In addition, as used in the specification and claims, the language "comprising" can include analogous embodiments described in terms of“consisting of’ and/or“consisting essentially of’.

As used in the specification and claims, the term "and/or” used in a phrase such as "A and/or B" herein is intended to include "A and B", "A or B", "A", and "B".

As used in the specification and claims, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

The present invention reports a ruthenium-modified zeolite that efficiently transforms plastic polymers to methane and/or liquid fuels, using water as the solvent or using no water and no solvent (dry condition). The catalyst achieves high product selectivity, high/excellent yields of specifically methane compared to the prior art and no significant ageing effect was observed after multiple cycles. The resulting methane can directly be used as an energy carrier in the form of ¾- enriched methane.

The method of the present invention for direct converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels is a catalytic process that converts plastic polymers directly into methane and/or liquid fuels, such as cyclohexane and methylcyclohexane, and thereby producing value-added gaseous-phase and water immicible products. The method relies on a heterogeneous catalyst (Ru nanoclusters stabilized by zeolites). The catalyst is robust and operates with water as a solvent or without water (dry condition) to afford a ready-to-use hydrogen-enriched methane gas and/or liquid fuels, such as cyclohexane and methylcyclohexane. The catalyst is also easily recovered and recycled. An aspect of the present invention provides a method for preparing a ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst for direct conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuel comprising

a) providing a zeolite

e) stirring the mixture of step d);

f) recovering ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst.

In preferred embodiments, the zeolite is a faujasite type x zeolite (FAU-zeolite) or zeolite type support having Si/Al ratio from 2-3: 1 (type x) to >3 : 1 (type y) and pore size from 3-10

A.

In preferred embodiments, Ru salt is selected from the group comprising RuCh · x H₂0,

[Ru(NH₃)₆]Cl₃, [Ru(NH₃)₅Cl]Cl2, RuCh, RUC1_{3 * X}H₂0, Rul₃, RuI_3*H₂0, Ru(NO)(N0₃)_x(OH)_y, x+y=3, RuBr₃, and/or combination thereof

In preferred embodiments, solvent is water or alcohol. Preferrably the solvent is deionized water. Preferred alcohol solvent is methanol or ethanol.

In some embodiments, the reaction mixture in step c) is stirred at 20 to 80 °C, 20 to 60 °C, 20 to 40 °C; 40 to 100 °C, 60 to 100 °C, 70 to 100 °C, or 70 to 80 °C; preferably at 70 °C or 75 °C or 80 °C.

In some embodiments, the reaction mixture in step c) is stirred during suitable period of time in order to allow incorporation (immobilization, embedding) of ruthenium on to and/or in to zeolite structure. A suitable period of time is typically 1 to 20 hours, 1 to 18 hours, 1 to 14 hours; 1 to 12 hours, 1 to 8 hours, 1 to 4 hours; 4 to 18 hours, 8 to 18 hours, 12 to 18 hours, or 16 to 18 hours; preferably the suitable period of time is 1 to 18 hours. Also preferably the suitable period of time is 1 hour, 5 hours, 10 hours, 14 hours, 18 hours or 20 hours. In some embodiments, the mixture in step e) is stirred during suitable period of time in order to allow appropriate reaction (reduction) with NaBFU. A suitable period of time is typically 0.5 to 5 hours, 0.5 to 3 hours, 0.5 to 2 hours; 0.5 to 1 hour; 1 to 5 hours, 2 to 5 hours; 3 to 5 hours, or 4 to 5 hours; preferably the suitable period of time is 0.5 to 3 hours. Also preferably the suitable period of time is 0.5 hour, 1 hour, or 2 hours.

A cation exchange procedure is used (Figure 1) followed by reduction with excess NaBH4_{(a )} to prepare ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst, such as Ru-FAU catalyst, of the invention. The reducing process constructs ruthenium (Ru) nanoparticles (NPs) embedded into the zeolite framework resulting to the final catalytic solid term ruthenium-modified zeolite, such as Ru-FAU, Figre lc). The FAU-zeolite (in the absence of Ru nanoparticles (NPs)) has a particle diameter ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 pm (Figure 2), which remains essentially the same in the Ru-FAU catalyst (Figure 3al vs. a2). HRTEM images reveal that crystalline Ru NPs protrude from the FAU-zeolite surface with diameters typically ranging from 10 to 20 nm (see figure 3b 1 and 3b2 for a comparison between the FAU-zeolite and the Ru-FAU catalyst). The protruding Ru NPs were further analyzed by high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM, Figure 3) together with STEM-energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (STEM- EDX, Figures 4-7). Strong Ru signals were associated with these structures (Figure 3cl and c2), whereas Si and A1 are absent within the protruding Ru nanostructure (Figure 3c3 and c4). Elemental mapping indicates that the pores of the FAU-zeolite are partially filled with Ru (Figure

3c2), firmly embedding the Ru NPs on the support. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis showed that the porosity of the FAU-zeolite decreases upon formation of the Ru NPs. The FAU- zeolite displays a surface area of 423.32 m²/g (Figure 8) and the Ru-FAU catalyst has a similar adsorption curve, i.e. the adsorption of a microporous material, but with decreased N2 adsorption and a surface area of 214.45 m²/g. This decrease in adsorption indirectly confirms that Ru NPs partially fill the FAU-zeolite pores. Powder X-ray diffraction (powder-XRD) further demonstrates the crystalline nature of the Ru-FAU catalyst (Figure 8b) and showed that the native structure of the FAU support is conserved. Broadening of the peaks combined with a decrease in peak intensity suggests that the different crystalline frameworks are entangled and slightly amorphous. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed the presence of Ru species at 4.4% ± 0.1% on the surface of the Ru-FAU catalyst. (Ru(3p) was selected to represent the elemental concentration). As expected, aluminum silicate is the major component of both solids (Table 1). Table 1. XPS elemental compositions

Note the signal of Na (Is, 1071.50 eV) was chosen as the calibration due to the lack of suitable C(ls) species. Mg²⁺ ions are also present in the support material. The native cations (Na⁺ and Mg²⁺) are observed by XPS before and after ion exchange indicating that the exchange process is not quantitative under the conditions used herein (Table 1). The metal loadings were further examined by means of ICP-OES analysis with 7.3 wt% of Ru, 8.2 wt% of Na and 0.9 wt% of Mg determined.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a ruthenium-modified catalyst obtained by the method of the present invention.

A further aspect of the present invention provides a use of the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst obtained by the method of the present invention for direct conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuel. In a preferred embodiment, the direct conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuel is according to the method of the present invention.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels comprising

b) placing the reaction mixture under the pressure of 40 to 200 bars of ¾ at 140 to 300 °C, preferably at 200 to 300 °C, most preferably 200 to 250°C;

c) cooling the reaction mixture to 20 to 25 °C;

d) recovering methane from the reaction mixture; and/or

e) recovering liquid fuels from the reaction mixture. According to an embodiment, the present invention provides a method for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels comprising

a) contacting one or more plastic polymers with a ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst in water to provide a reaction mixture;

b) placing the reaction mixture under the pressure of 40 to 200 bars of H2 at 140 to 300 °C, preferably at 200 to 300 °C, most preferably 200 to 250°C;

c) cooling the reaction mixture to 20 to 25 °C; d) recovering methane from the reaction mixture; and/or

e) recovering liquid fuels from the reaction mixture.

In preferred embodiments, the water is selected from the group comprising deinoized water, wastewater, seasalt water, tap water, river water, lake water. Most preferably the water is deinoized water.

Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels comprising

a) contacting one or more plastic polymers with a ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst in dry condition to provide a reaction mixture;

c) cooling the reaction mixture to 20 to 25 °C;

d) recovering methane from the reaction mixture; and/or

e) recovering liquid fuels from the reaction mixture.

In preferred embodiments of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the one or more plastic polymers are selected from the group comprising polyolefins, ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH), poly lactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT), polyethylene isosorbide terephthalate (PEIT), polyethylene furanoate (PEF), polyamide (PA), polyamide-6 or Poly(e-caprolactam) or polycaproamide (PA6), polyamide-6,6 or Poly(hexamethylene adipamide) (PA6,6), Poly(l 1-aminoundecanoamide) (PA11), poly dodecano lactam (PA 12), poly(tetramethylene adipamide) (PA4,6), poly(pentamethylene sebacamide) (PA5,10), polyhexamethylene nonanediamideaamide (PA6,9), poly(hexamethylene sebacamide) (PA6,10), poly(hexamethylene dodecanoamide) (PA6,12), poly(m-xylylene adipamide) (PAMXD6), polyhexamethylene adipamide/polyhexamethyleneterephtalamide copolymer (PA66/6T), polyhexamethylene adipamide/polyhexamethyleneisophtalamide copolymer (PA66/6I) polyurethane (PU), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), poly(oxide phenylene) (PPO), polycarbonate (PC), copolymer of phosphono and carboxylic acid (PCA), high molecular weight polyacrylate, polymethacrylate methyle (PMMA), polyoxymethylene (POM), styrene acrylonitrile (SAN), polyester polymer alloy (PEP A), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), styrene-butadiene (SB), nylon, polypropylene (PP), poly(bisphenol A carbonate) (PC) and blends/mixtures of these materials.

In a particular embodiment of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the polyolefin is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene, polypropylene, polymethylpentene, polybutene- 1, polyisobutylene, ethylene propylene rubber, ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber. In a particular embodiment, the polyethylene is divided into low-density and high-density polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE, respectively).

In another particular embodiment of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the one or more plastic polymers is a polyester polymer, preferably selected from the group consisting of poly lactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT), polyethylene isosorbide terephthalate (PEIT), polyethylene furanoate (PEF).

In a particular embodiment of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the one or more plastic polymers is a polyamide polymer, preferably selected from the group consisting of polyamide-6 or poly(e-capro lactam) or polycaproamide (PA6), polyamide-6,6 or poly(hexamethylene adipamide) (PA6,6), poly(l 1-aminoundecanoamide) (PA11).

In a particular embodiment of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the one or more plastic polymers further comprises at least one polymer selected from the group consisting of aliphatic polyester, polyvinyl alcohol, cellulose, polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), starch-based polymers, poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), polybutylene succinate (PBS), polybutylene succinate adipate (PBSA), and polycapro lactone (PCL). Preferably one or more plastic polymers comprise C=0 moiety.

The one or more plastic polymers can be found in textile fibers, plastic tubes, plastic films, plastic sheets, or plastic packaging such as flasks, bottles, blister packs, etc. In some embodiments, the one of more plastic is not pretreated (no pretreatment is required, the plastic polymer as such is put in contact with the ruthenium-modified catalyst). In other embodiments, the one or more plastic can undergo a pretreatment, such as as cutting, crushing, chemical pretreatment, etc....

The main gaseous product obtained by the method of the invention is methane with traces of CO2 (1%) detected. The gas phase also contains unreacted ¾. For example, methane can be recovered from the reaction mixture (step d) by venting the reactor in the case of a batch reactor setup. Methane is a natural gas widely used in many industries both as a feedstock for chemical synthesis and as a major source of electricity generation through the use of gas and steam turbines. Natural gas bums cleaner than other fossil fuels, such as oil and coal, and produces less greenhouse gas per unit energy released. Power generation using natural gas is thus the cleanest fossil fuel source of energy available and this technology is used wherever competitive.

Liquid fuels are combustible or energy-generating hydrocarbon molecules, selected from the group comprising alkanes (such as paraffins, isoparaffins, n-hexane), cycloalkanes (such as cyclohexane and methy ley clo hexane), alkenes, aromatic hydrocarbons (arenes) and/or combination thereof. In preferred embodiments, the liquid fuels are cyclic and linear hydrocarbons, most preferably cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane, n-hexane and/or combination thereof.

The liquid phase of the reaction mixture contains the initial water and immicible liquid fuels. Typically, the liquid fuel is recovered from the reaction mixture by distillation or by recovering the top (oil) layer that is formed.

As used herein, the ruthenium-modified zeolite is a zeolite that incorporates ruthenium (Ru) in its structure. The ruthenium-modified zeolite can be typically prepared by a cation exchange method followed by a chemical reduction by NaBFL. In some preferred embodiments, the zeolite present in the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst is microporous/mesoporous metallosilicate that include frameworks of type MWW, MFI, LTL, MOR, BEA, TON, MTW, MTT, FER, MRE, MFS, MEL, DDR, EUO, and FAU (such as zeolite beta, mordenite, faujasite, Zeolite L, ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-35, ZSM-48, ZSM-50, ZSM-57, ZSM-58, and MCM-22 family materials) where one or more metals from groups 8, 11, and 13 of the Periodic Table of the Elements (preferably one or more of Fe, Cu, Ag, Au, B, Al, Ga, and/or In) are incorporated in the crystal structure during synthesis or impregnated post crystallization. It is recognized that a metallosilicate may have one of more metals present and, for example, a material may be referred to as a ferrosilicate, but it will most likely still contain small amounts of aluminum. In other preferred embodiments, the zeolite present in the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst is a faujasite type x zeolite (FAU-zeolite) or zeolite type support having Si/Al ratio from 2-3: 1 (type x) to >3: 1 (type y) and pore size from 3-10 A.

In othere preferred embodiments of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst is doped with one or more metals selected from the group comprising molybdenum (Mo), rhenium (Re), zirconium (Zr), zinc (Zn), tungsten (W), Cobalt (Co), Iridium (Ir), Nickel (Ni). Doping of the catalyst can enhance catalytic activity by means of activation of either the substrate (here the plastic) and/or the ¾.

The ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst can be created with variable meso-/microporosity, with zeolite porosity optimized for methane and/or liquid fuels conversion, for example, using a dual template assisted synthesis method or a hydrothermal method.

In some embodiments of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the one or more plastic polymers and the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst are introduced within a reaction vessel, such as a reactor, simultaneously or subsequently. In further embodiments of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the one or more plastic polymers and the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst are introduced within the reaction vessel, such as a reactor, batchwise or continuously. In another embodiments of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the one or more plastic polymers are continuously introduced within the reaction vessel, such as a reactor, that already contains the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst. In a preferred embodiment, the whole method for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels is conducted continuously.

The influence of hydrogen pressure was studied with the conversion of plastic polymer ranging from 54% at 50 bar to 99% at 100 bar of hydrogen. Applied hydrogen pressure strongly impacts on the selectivity of gaseous products, with less CO2 formed at higher hydrogen pressures. This indicates that either hydrolysis is suppressed or CO2 is reduced via a Sabatier-type pathway under the reaction conditions. In this respect, a reaction using CO2 as substrate demonstrated that Ru- FAU is also able to catalyze the methanation of CO2 at temperatures well below those typically used in the Sabatier process. Remarkably, higher hydrogen pressure also favored the conversion of plastic polymers to gaseous products. In some embodiments, the hydrogen pressure is 40 to 200 bars, 40 to 150 bars, or 40 to 100 bars, preferably 50 to 100 bars, most preferably 70 to 100 bars. In other embodiments, the hydrogen pressure is 40 bars, 50 bars, 60 bars, 70 bars, 80 bars, 90 bars, 100 bars; 110 bars, 120 bars, 130 bars, 140 bars, 150 bars, 160 bars, 170 bars, 180 bars, 190 bars, 200 bars; preferably 70 bars or 100 bars.

In some embodiments of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels, the reaction mixture is placed under the pressure and temperature according to step b) during a suitable period of time to allow sufficient interaction of one or more plastic polymers with the ruthenium- modified zeolite catalyst. The suitable period of time depends on temperature, pressure, ratio between plastic polymers and catalyst, etc... The suitable period of time is typically 1 to 24 hours, 1 to 20 hours, 1 to 18 hours, 1 to 16 hours, 1 to 14 hours, 1 to 12 hours, 1 to 10 hours, 1 to 8 hours, 1 to 6 hours; 5 to 24 hours, 5 to 20 hours, 5 to 18 hours, 5 to 16 hours, 5 to 14 hours, 5 to 12 hours, 5 to 10 hours, 5 to 8 hours, 5 to 6 hours; 8 to 20 hours, 10 to 20 hours, 12 to 20 hours, 14 to 20 hours, 16 to 20 hours, or 18 to 20 hours. Preferably, the suitable period of time is 5 to 20 hours or 10 to 20 hours or 10 to 24 hours. Also preferably, the suitable period of time is 10 hours, 18 hours, 18.5 hours, or 20 hours. The step b) can be also a continuous process, wherein at regular or selected time intervals a portion of the reaction mixture is withdrawn and cooled according to step c).

The advantages of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels of the present invention are that the reaction can be conducted in water. No extra solid residue is observed in the resulting liquid-solid mixtures (very highly active catalyst, no apparent deactivation). The solid catalyst is easily recycled since there are no solid by-products or solid resudials.

Another advantages of the methods for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels of the present invention are that the reaction can be conducted in dry condition (solvent-free condition), i.e. without water and without use of any other solvent. Specifically, contacting the one or more plastic polymers with the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst is in dry condition, without water and without any other solvent. The solvent- free condition is advantageous because it requires less energy for the reaction. For example contacting the one or more plastic polymers with the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst occurs in a microwave reaction vial (glass vial), without water and without any other solvent.

This type of conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels according to the present invention is advantageous compared to the current measures which deal with plastic wastes (burning or limited recycled usages) because the plastics are converted into fuel chemicals without the release of toxic compounds. Moreover, the fuel becomes“transportable” (i.e. chemicals are generated and not heat).

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention described herein is susceptible to variations and modifications other than those specifically described. It is to be understood that the invention includes all such variations and modifications without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The invention also includes all of the steps, features, compositions and compounds referred to or indicated in this specification, individually or collectively, and any and all combinations or any two or more of said steps or features. The present disclosure is therefore to be considered as in all aspects illustrated and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended Claims, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency are intended to be embraced therein.

The foregoing description will be more fully understood with reference to the following Examples. Such Examples, are, however, exemplary of methods of practising the present invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

Examples

All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Molecular sieve 10 A (FAU-zeolite) is a commercially (ROTH) available Faujasite type X zeolite with general chemical composition Na₈₆[(A10₂)s_6-

(SiO₂)i06] * x¾0 (composition given by the supplier). A Parr stainless-steel autoclave was used for high-pressure experiments (75 mL capacity). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) measurements were performed on a Belsorp-max gas adsorption analyzer using N2 as the adsorbate at 77 K. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) of liquid samples was performed on an Agilent 7890B Gas Chromatograph together with Agilent 7000C MS triple quad detector using He as the carrier gas. GC of gaseous samples were injected manually and detected by Agilent 7890B Gas Chromatograph together with the kit FID detector using N2 as the carrier gas. A reference gas bottle for calibration was purchased from Air Liquide. 'H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz instrument. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Carl Zeiss Gemini 300 microscope. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) mappings were conducted on a FEI Tecnai Osiris microscope. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy XPS measurements were obtained on a PHI VersaProbe II scanning XPS microprobe. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured on a Bruker D8 Discover. Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis were conducted on a ICP-OES 5100 from Agilent. Samples were digested in Aqua regia and filtered prior to measurement.

Example 1 - Preparation of the Ru-FAU catalyst

Commercial granules of FAU-zeolite (10.0 g) were grounded to powder using a ceramic mortar. The powder was dispersed in deionized water (Di-water, 75.0 mL) in a round bottle flask (100 mL). The suspension was sonicated for 10 min and suction filtered. The residual solid FAU-zeolite was washed with Di-water (3 ^x 50.0 mL) and dried at 250 °C in an oven for 18 h. RuCb · 3 H2O (207 mg, 1.0 mmol) and the FAU-zeolite (1.0 g) were mixed with Di-water (24.0 mL) in a round bottle flask (100 mL). The suspension was stirred (350 rpm) at 75 °C for 18 h and cooled to room temperature. NaBH4(s) (189 mg, 5.0 mmol) was dissolved in Di-water (24.0 mL), and added to the round bottle flask in one portion. The suspension was stirred (800 rpm) for 1 h. The solid was vacuum filtered and then washed with Di-water (3 ^x 25 mL). The washed Ru-FAU catalyst was dried at 250 °C in an oven for

18 h. Schematic representation of the Ru-FAU catalyst preparation:

Example 2 - Catalyst robustness

To evaluate the robustness of the catalyst, recycling experiments were performed with a total of 5 catalytic cycles of the Ru-FAU catalyst demonstrating that the conversions maintained quantitatively and the methane yields stabilited after 2 cycles (Table 2). Propylene carbonate (a cyclic carbonate compound representing the monomer of polycarbonates) was used in these recycling studies at 170 °C.

Table 2. Recycling of the Ru-FAU catalyst

As a comparison, a commercial Ru/C was tested, which led to 69% conversion of propylene carbonate (PC) and produced methane and other products, but upon recycling the activity decreased markedly and methane was obtained in a lower yield (Table 3). The FAU-zeolite or RuCh alone are able to convert PC, but are not selective towards glycol and methane. No conversion was achieved by these three catalysts under nitrogen, confirming that the potential presence of water in the catalyst does not participate in the hydrolysis of the cyclic carbonate.

Table 3. Control experiments

Example 3 - PC plastic polymer conversion

Poly(Bisphenol A carbonate) (PC, 952.5 mg, based on monomer weight, 3.75 mmol) and Ru- FAU (100 mg) were added to a glass vial (15 mL) with a glass magnetic stir and the vial is then placed into an autoclave (75 mL). The autoclave was purged 3 times with FL and then pressurized to 100 bar FL. The pressurized autoclave was placed in a heating block at 300 °C and stirred (500 rpm) for 5 h. After the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in a water bath. The gaseous products were transferred into a balloon and injected into a GC/FID for analysis p-x ylene (1 mmol, 106 mg) was added to the vial as the internal standard and analytical grade acetone was used as the solvent for GC/MS analysis of liquid products. The vial was then vacuumed to dry and weighted to acquire the conversion.

Results:

Example 4 - PET plastic polymer conversion

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET, 1152 mg, based on monomer weight, 6 mmol) and Ru-FAU (100 mg) were added to a glass vial (15 mL) with a glass magnetic stir and the vial is then placed into an autoclave (75 mL). The autoclave was purged 3 times with FL and then pressurized to 100 bar FL. The pressurized autoclave was placed in a heating block at 300 °C and stirred (500 rpm) for 18 h. After the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in a water bath. The gaseous products were transferred into a balloon and injected into a GC/FID for analysis p-x ylene (1 mmol, 106 mg) was added to the vial as the internal standard and analytical grade acetone was used as the solvent for GC/MS analysis of liquid products. The vial was then vacuumed to dry and weighted to acquire the conversion. Results:

Example 5 - PE plastic polymer conversion

Polyethylene (PE, 1680 mg, based on monomer weight, 60 mmol) and Ru-FAU (100 mg) were added to a glass vial (15 mL) with a glass magnetic stir and the vial is then placed into an autoclave (75 mL). The autoclave was purged 3 times with EE and then pressurized to 50 bar EE. The pressurized autoclave was placed in a heating block at 300 °C and stirred (500 rpm) for 3 h. After the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in a water bath. The gaseous products were transferred into a balloon and injected into a GC/FID for analysis p-x ylene (1 mmol, 106 mg) was added to the vial as the internal standard and analytical grade acetone was used as the solvent for GC/MS analysis of liquid products. The vial was then vacuumed to dry and weighted to acquire the conversion.

Results:

Example 6 - PP plastic polymer conversion

Polypropylene (PP, 1680 mg, based on monomer weight, 40 mmol) and Ru-FAU (100 mg) were added to a glass vial (15 mL) with a glass magnetic stir and the vial is then placed into an autoclave (75 mL). The autoclave was purged 3 times with Fb and then pressurized to 50 bar ¾. The pressurized autoclave was placed in a heating block at 300 °C and stirred (500 rpm) for 3h. After the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in a water bath. The gaseous products were transferred into a balloon and injected into a GC/FID for analysis p-x ylene (1 mmol, 106 mg) was added to the vial as the internal standard and analytical grade acetone was used as the solvent for GC/MS analysis of liquid products. The vial was then vacuumed to dry and weighted to acquire the conversion.

Results:

Example 7 - Nylon 6 plastic polymer conversion

Nylon 6 (1130 mg, based on monomer weight, 10 mmol) and Ru-FAU (52 mg) were added to a glass vial (15 mL) with a glass magnetic stir and the vial is then placed into an autoclave (75 mL). The autoclave was purged 3 times with Fb and then pressurized to 50 bar Fb. The pressurized autoclave was placed in a heating block at 300 °C and stirred (500 rpm) for the given reaction time 18. After the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in a water bath. The gaseous products were transferred into a balloon and injected into a GC/FID for analysis p-x ylene (1 mmol, 106 mg) was added to the vial as the internal standard and analytical grade acetone was used as the solvent for GC/MS analysis of liquid products. The vial was then vacuumed to dry and weighted to acquire the conversion. Note that the nylon 6 conversion produced simultaneously quantitative ammonia and water as side products. Results:

Example 8 - Mixed plastic polymer conversion

PE (840 mg, based on monomer weight, 30 mmol), PP (840 mg, based on monomer weight, 20 mmol) and Ru-FAU (100 mg) were added to a glass vial (15 mL) with a glass magnetic stir and the vial is then placed into an autoclave (75 mL). The autoclave was purged 3 times with Eb and then pressurized to 50 bar EE. The pressurized autoclave was placed in a heating block at 300 °C and stirred (500 rpm) for 18 h. After the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in a water bath. The gaseous products were transferred into a balloon and injected into a GC/FID for analysis p-x ylene (1 mmol, 106 mg) was added to the vial as the internal standard and analytical grade acetone was used as the solvent for GC/MS analysis of liquid products. The vial was then vacuumed to dry and weighted to acquire the conversion.

Results:

Example 9 - PE plastic polymer conversion (into liquid fuels)

Polyethylene (PE, 1680 mg, based on monomer weight, 60 mmol) and Ru-FAU (100 mg) were added to a glass vial (15 mL) with a glass magnetic stir and the vial is then placed into an autoclave (75 mL). The autoclave was purged 3 times with ¾ and then pressurized to 50 bar EE. The pressurized autoclave was placed in a heating block at 300 °C and stirred (500 rpm) for 2 h. After the reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in a water bath. The gaseous products were transferred into a balloon and injected into a GC/FID for analysis p-x ylene (1 mmol, 106 mg) was added to the vial as the internal standard and analytical grade acetone was used as the solvent for GC/MS analysis of liquid products. The vial was then vacuumed to dry and weighted to acquire the conversion.

Results:

Claims

1. A method for converting one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuels comprising

b) placing the reaction mixture under the pressure of 40 to 200 bars of ¾ at 140 to 300°C; c) cooling the reaction mixture to 20 to 25°C;

d) recovering methane from the reaction mixture; and/or

e) recovering liquid fuels from the reaction mixture.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the temperature in step b) is 200 to 300 °C or 200 to 250 °C.

3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the water is selected from the group comprising deinoized water, wastewater, seasalt water, tap water, river water, lake water.

4. The method of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein one or more plastic polymers are selected from the group comprising polyolefins, ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH), poly lactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT), polyethylene isosorbide terephthalate (PEIT), polyethylene furanoate (PEF), polyamide (PA), polyamide-6 or Poly(e-caprolactam) or polycaproamide (PA6), polyamide-6,6 or Poly(hexamethylene adipamide) (PA6,6), Poly(l 1-aminoundecanoamide) (PA11), polydodecano lactam (PA 12), poly(tetramethylene adipamide) (PA4,6), poly(pentamethylene sebacamide) (PA5,10), polyhexamethylene nonanediamideaamide (PA6,9), poly(hexamethylene sebacamide) (PA6,10), poly(hexamethylene dodecanoamide) (PA6,12), poly(m-xylylene adipamide) (PAMXD6), polyhexamethylene adipamide/polyhexamethyleneterephtalamide copolymer (PA66/6T), polyhexamethylene adipamide/polyhexamethyleneisophtalamide copolymer (PA66/6I) polyurethane (PU), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), poly(oxide phenylene) (PPO), polycarbonate (PC), copolymer of phosphono and carboxylic acid (PCA), high molecular weight polyacrylate, polymethacrylate methyle (PMMA), polyoxymethylene (POM), styrene acrylonitrile (SAN), polyester polymer alloy (PEP A), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), styrene-butadiene (SB), nylon, polypropylene (PP), poly(bisphenol A carbonate) (PC) and blends/mixtures of these materials.

5. The method of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the liquid fuels are combustible or energy generating hydrocarbon molecules, selected from the group comprising alkanes, cycloalkanes, alkenes, aromatic hydrocarbons and/or combination thereof

6. The method of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the liquid fuels selected from the group comprising cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane, n-hexane and/or combination thereof

7. The method of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst is doped with one or more metals selected from the group comprising molybdenum (Mo), rhenium (Re), zirconium (Zr), zinc (Zn), tungsten (W), Cobalt (Co), Iridium (Ir), Nickel (Ni).

8. The method of any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the method is conducted continuously.

9. A method for preparing a ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst for direct conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuel comprising

a) providing a zeolite

b) preparing a mixture of ruthenium (Ru) salt and the zeolite of step a) in a solvent; c) stirring the mixture of step b) at 20 to 100 °C and cooling the mixture to 20 to 25°C;

d) adding NaBH4_{(a )} in the mixture of step c);

e) stirring the mixture of step d);

f) recovering ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the zeolite is a faujasite type x zeolite (FAU-zeolite) or zeolite type support having Si/Al ratio from 2-3 : 1 (type x) to >3 : 1 (type y) and pore size from 3-10 A.

11. The method of claims 9 or 10, wherein Ru salt is selected from the group comprising RuCh ^• x H2O, [RU(NH )₆]C13, [Ru(NH₃)₅Cl]Cl2, RuCh, RuCh · xH₂0, Rul₃, Rul₃ · H₂0, Ru(NO)(N0₃)_x(OH)_y, x+y=3, RuBr₃, and/or combination thereof.

12. The method of any one of claims 9 to 11, wherein the solvent is water or alcohol, preferrably deionized water.

13. A ruthenium- modified catalyst obtained by the method of any one of claims 9 to 12.

14. Use of the ruthenium-modified zeolite catalyst obtained by the method of any one of claims 9 to 12 for direct conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuel.

15. The use of claim 14, wherein the direct conversion of one or more plastic polymers into methane and/or liquid fuel is according to the method of claims 1 to 8.