EP3842624B1 - Method and system for determining sulfur poisoning state of selectively catalytic reduction device - Google Patents

Method and system for determining sulfur poisoning state of selectively catalytic reduction device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3842624B1
EP3842624B1 EP20196612.4A EP20196612A EP3842624B1 EP 3842624 B1 EP3842624 B1 EP 3842624B1 EP 20196612 A EP20196612 A EP 20196612A EP 3842624 B1 EP3842624 B1 EP 3842624B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
scr device
predetermined
efficiency
determining
value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP20196612.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3842624A1 (en
Inventor
Xuguang TAN
Dehui Tong
Jun Zhang
Jingfei Zhang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Weichai Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Weichai Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Weichai Power Co Ltd filed Critical Weichai Power Co Ltd
Publication of EP3842624A1 publication Critical patent/EP3842624A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3842624B1 publication Critical patent/EP3842624B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N11/00Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N3/00Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
    • F01N3/08Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
    • F01N3/10Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust
    • F01N3/18Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control
    • F01N3/20Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control specially adapted for catalytic conversion
    • F01N3/206Adding periodically or continuously substances to exhaust gases for promoting purification, e.g. catalytic material in liquid form, NOx reducing agents
    • F01N3/2066Selective catalytic reduction [SCR]
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N3/00Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
    • F01N3/08Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
    • F01N3/10Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust
    • F01N3/18Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control
    • F01N3/20Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control specially adapted for catalytic conversion
    • F01N3/206Adding periodically or continuously substances to exhaust gases for promoting purification, e.g. catalytic material in liquid form, NOx reducing agents
    • F01N3/208Control of selective catalytic reduction [SCR], e.g. by adjusting the dosing of reducing agent
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2550/00Monitoring or diagnosing the deterioration of exhaust systems
    • F01N2550/02Catalytic activity of catalytic converters
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2570/00Exhaust treating apparatus eliminating, absorbing or adsorbing specific elements or compounds
    • F01N2570/04Sulfur or sulfur oxides
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2610/00Adding substances to exhaust gases
    • F01N2610/02Adding substances to exhaust gases the substance being ammonia or urea
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2900/00Details of electrical control or of the monitoring of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • F01N2900/06Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing
    • F01N2900/16Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing said parameters being related to the exhaust apparatus, e.g. particulate filter or catalyst
    • F01N2900/1612SOx amount trapped in catalyst
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2900/00Details of electrical control or of the monitoring of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • F01N2900/06Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing
    • F01N2900/16Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing said parameters being related to the exhaust apparatus, e.g. particulate filter or catalyst
    • F01N2900/1621Catalyst conversion efficiency

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to the technical field of vehicle post-treatment, and in particular to a method and a system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device.
  • a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device is used to perform treatment for processing nitrogen oxides (NOx) in diesel vehicle exhaust gas, which is to inject reducing agent of ammonia or urea to reduce the NOx in the exhaust gas into nitrogen and water under the action of catalyst.
  • NOx nitrogen oxides
  • the copper based SCR which has a good low-temperature performance, is widely used in SCR systems in the current market.
  • the copper based SCR may have a serious sulfur poisoning problem, which may seriously decrease the efficiency of reducing NOx. Therefore, in practices, it is required to monitor the sulfur poisoning state of the copper based SCR and perform desulfurization regularly.
  • a method and a system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of an SCR device are provided according to the present disclosure to realize the purpose of improving the accuracy of determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device.
  • a method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device of a vehicle post-treatment system includes the SCR device and a urea injector. The method includes:
  • the determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition includes: monitoring a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector; and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range.
  • the monitoring a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device includes:
  • the calculating accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped includes:
  • the predetermined concentration range is 32.5% ⁇ 2.5%.
  • the method further includes sending a stationary regeneration request.
  • the consumption limit value is determined according to an aging factor and an average temperature of the SCR device.
  • a system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device of a vehicle post-treatment system where the vehicle post-treatment system includes the SCR device and a urea injector, and the system for determining the sulfur poisoning state includes:
  • the ammonia storage determination module is configured to:
  • the predetermined concentration range is 32.5% ⁇ 2.5%.
  • the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module is further configured to send a stationary regeneration request after determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state.
  • the consumption limit value is determined according to an aging factor and an average temperature of the SCR device.
  • the method and the system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device are provided according to the embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the ammonia storage capacity is detected.
  • the urea injection is stopped and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is calculated. If the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, it is determined that there is large ammonia storage. Therefore the subsequent detection is not performed, and the process of sulfur poisoning determination ends.
  • the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, since the ammonia storage of the SCR is continuously consumed by NOx in upstream gas of SCR, and the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device will be gradually decreased.
  • the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value and the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value, it is determined that ammonia is not leaked, and the problem of low reduction efficiency of the SCR device may be caused by sulfur poisoning or insufficient ammonia storage. In this case, the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR is required to be monitored.
  • the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state. It can be seen from the above process, whether the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state can be accurately determined by the method without being effected by other facts such as ammonia leakage, aging, ammonia storage control accuracy.
  • a method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device is provided according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the method is used for determining whether an SCR device of a vehicle post-treatment system is in a sulfur poisoning state.
  • the post-treatment system includes the SCR device and a urea injector.
  • the method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device includes the following steps S101 and S102.
  • step S101 it is determined whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition. If it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, the urea injector is controlled to stop urea injection, A first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is detected after the urea injection is stopped, and accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped is calculated.
  • step S102 it is determined whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value, and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value. If it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value, and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR is monitored, else the process returns to step of determining whether the SCR and urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • the process of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition includes steps S1011 and S1012.
  • step S1011 a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector are monitored.
  • step S1012 when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency, and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range, it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • the process of monitoring the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device includes steps S1021 to S1023.
  • step S1021 the urea injector is controlled to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio.
  • step S1022 the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device for a second predetermined temperature range is monitored.
  • step S1023 in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, it is determined whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value, and if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state.
  • the ammonia storage setting value is determined by searching an ammonia storage mapping table according to a current space velocity and a current average temperature.
  • the ammonia storage mapping table stores a correspondence between the space velocity, the average temperature and the ammonia storage setting value.
  • the average temperature of the SCR device refers to an average temperature of various parts of the SCR device at a same time. Since the SCR material has a relatively large specific heat capacity, the temperature at an outlet of the SCR device may be changed later than a change in the temperature at an inlet of the SCR device. Therefore, the average temperature of various parts in the SCR device is taken as the average temperature of the SCR device.
  • the ammonia storage value calculated by the ammonia storage model is calculated according to a one-dimensional physical model of the SCR device.
  • the ammonia storage, an internal temperature, a NOx concentration in downstream gas of the SCR device and other state parameters are calculated by the model in real time according to NOx quantity in upstream gas of the SCR device, exhaust gas volume, urea injection amount, temperature and other conditions.
  • the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device is calculated by using the one-dimensional physical model of the SCR device, which is equal to one minus a ratio of a NOx value in downstream gas of the SCR model to a NOx value in upstream gas of the SCR model.
  • FIG 4 is a schematic structural diagram of a vehicle post-treatment system.
  • the post-treatment system includes a turbocharger (TC), a hydrocarbon (HC) injector, a urea injector, a diesel oxide catalyst (DOC) device, a diesel particulate filter (DPF), a selectively catalytic reduction (SCR) device, and multiple temperature sensors and NOx sensors.
  • the urea injector is arranged with a high-precision urea concentration sensor to accurately detect the urea concentration.
  • reference sign 10 represents the turbocharger
  • reference sign 20 represents the diesel oxide catalyst device
  • reference sign 30 represents the diesel particulate filter
  • reference sign 40 represents the selectively catalytic reduction device
  • reference sign 50 represents the NOx sensors
  • reference sign 60 represents the urea injector
  • reference sign 70 represents the temperature sensor.
  • the direction of the arrow indicates the direction of vehicle exhaust emission.
  • the upstream gas of the SCR device refers to the vehicle exhaust inputted into the SCR device
  • the downstream gas of the SCR device refers to the vehicle exhaust outputted from the SCR device (as the direction indicated by the arrow).
  • the predetermined triggering condition involves SCR low-temperature efficiency monitoring and urea concentration monitoring.
  • the SCR low-temperature efficiency monitoring is to monitor the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range, and determine whether the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency. If the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than the second predetermined efficiency, it is determined that the SCR device meets the predetermined triggering condition.
  • the first predetermined temperature range may be determined according to the type of the SCR.
  • the first predetermined temperature range may be a range of 220 Celsius degree to 260 Celsius degree.
  • the monitoring of the urea concentration range is to determine whether the concentration of urea in the urea injector is in a predetermined concentration range. If the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range, it is determined that the urea injector meets the predetermined triggering condition.
  • the predetermined concentration range may be 32.5% ⁇ 2.5%.
  • the urea injector In the detection of ammonia storage capacity, the urea injector is controlled to stop urea injection, the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device after the urea injection is stopped is detected, and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped is calculated.
  • the process returns to the step of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device will be gradually decreased.
  • the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency, and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, it is determined that the ammonia is not leaked and the low efficiency may be caused by sulfur poisoning or insufficient ammonia storage. In this case, the SCR low-temperature efficiency monitoring is performed.
  • the predetermined efficiency value may be 0.5, 0.55 and 0.45, but is not limited thereto.
  • the consumption limit value is determined according to an SCR aging factor and the average temperature of the SCR device.
  • the SCR aging factor is determined according to temperature levels experienced by the SCR device.
  • the consumption limit value may be determined by searching a predetermined mapping table including the correspondence between the SCR aging factor, the average temperature of the SCR device and the consumption limit value.
  • the SCR low-temperature efficiency monitoring is to monitor the reduction efficiency under a condition that the average temperature of the SCR device is in a second predetermined temperature range.
  • the second predetermined temperature range is a low operating temperature range for the SCR device.
  • the second predetermined temperature range is determined according to the type of SCR.
  • the second predetermined temperature range may be the same as the first predetermined temperature range. That is, the second predetermined temperature range may be the range of 220 Celsius degree to 260 Celsius degree.
  • the second preset temperature range certainly may be different from the first predetermined temperature range, which is not limited in the present disclosure, and depends on the actual situation.
  • the urea injector is controlled to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio.
  • the fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio may be equal to 1:1.
  • the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is monitored in the process of urea injection. In a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, it is determined whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value.
  • the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the ammonia storage is not low and the SCR is in a sulfur poisoning state. If the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is less than or equal to the difference threshold value, it is determined that the actual ammonia storage is low, and the process returns to the step of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • a method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device includes steps S201 to S204.
  • step S201 it is determined whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition. If the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, the urea injector is controlled to stop urea injection. A first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is detected after the urea injection is stopped and a NOx mass flow in upstream gas of the SCR is integrated for a first predetermined time period to determine a first integral value.
  • step S202 the NOx mass flow in downstream gas of the SCR is integrated for a first predetermined time period to determine a second integral value.
  • step S203 a value of the first integral value minus the second integral value is multiplied by a molar mass ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxide in reaction to determine accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  • step S204 it is determined whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value. If the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR is monitored. If the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is not less than the first predetermined efficiency value or the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, the process returns to the step of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • the process of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition includes: monitoring the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector, and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range.
  • the process of monitoring the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device includes step S2041 to S2043.
  • step S2041 the urea injector is controlled to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio.
  • step S2042 a second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a second predetermined temperature range is monitored.
  • step S2043 in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, it is determined whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value. If the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state, and a stationary regeneration request is sent.
  • a method for calculating accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped is provided according to the embodiment of the present disclosure. Furthermore, when it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state, the stationary regeneration request is sent for regeneration and desulphurization to restore the performance of SCR catalyst.
  • the system is used for determining whether the SCR of a vehicle post-treatment system is in a sulfur poisoning state.
  • the post-treatment system includes the SCR device and the urea injector.
  • the system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device includes a trigger determining module, an ammonia storage determination module and a low-temperature efficiency monitoring module.
  • the trigger determining module is configured to determine whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition, and trigger the ammonia storage determination module if it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • the ammonia storage determination module is configured to control the urea injector to stop urea injection, detect a first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device after the urea injection is stopped and calculate accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  • the ammonia storage determination module is configured to determine whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value, trigger the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module if determining that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value, and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, and trigger the trigger determining module if determining that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is not less than the first predetermined efficiency value, or the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value.
  • the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module is configured to monitor the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device by controlling the urea injector to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio, and monitoring a second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a second predetermined temperature range, and determining, in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value, and determining that the SCR is in a sulfur poisoning state if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value.
  • the trigger determining module is configured to determine whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition by monitoring a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector, and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device for the first predetermined temperature range is less than the second predetermined efficiency, and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range.
  • the ammonia storage determination module is configured to calculate the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped, by integrating a NOx mass flow in upstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a first integral value; integrating a NOx mass flow in downstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a second integral value; and multiplying a value of the first integral value minus the second integral value by a molar mass ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxide in reaction to determine the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  • the predetermined concentration range may be 32.5% ⁇ 2.5%.
  • the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module may be further configured to send a stationary regeneration request when determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state.
  • the consumption limit value may be determined according to an aging factor and an average temperature of the SCR device.
  • the method and the system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device are provided according to the embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • the ammonia storage capacity is detected.
  • the urea injection is stopped and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is calculated. If the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, it is determined that there is large ammonia storage. Therefore the subsequent detection is not performed, and the process of sulfur poisoning determination ends.
  • the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, since the ammonia storage of the SCR is continuously consumed by NOx in upstream gas of SCR, and the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device will be gradually decreased.
  • the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value and the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value, it is determined that ammonia is not leaked, and the problem of low reduction efficiency of the SCR device may be caused by sulfur poisoning or insufficient ammonia storage. In this case, the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR is required to be monitored.
  • the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state. It can be seen from the above process, whether the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state can be accurately determined by the method without being effected by other facts such as ammonia leakage, aging, ammonia storage control accuracy.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)

Description

    FIELD
  • The present disclosure relates to the technical field of vehicle post-treatment, and in particular to a method and a system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device.
  • BACKGROUND
  • A selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device is used to perform treatment for processing nitrogen oxides (NOx) in diesel vehicle exhaust gas, which is to inject reducing agent of ammonia or urea to reduce the NOx in the exhaust gas into nitrogen and water under the action of catalyst.
  • The copper based SCR, which has a good low-temperature performance, is widely used in SCR systems in the current market. However, the copper based SCR may have a serious sulfur poisoning problem, which may seriously decrease the efficiency of reducing NOx. Therefore, in practices, it is required to monitor the sulfur poisoning state of the copper based SCR and perform desulfurization regularly.
  • Currently, whether a vehicle post-treatment system is in a sulfur poisoning state is determined according to the deterioration of a light-off characteristic of a Diesel Oxidation Catalyzator (DOC), and a diesel particulate filter (DPF) regeneration method is used for recovery. Such a method is disclosed in the publication WO2018/132059A1 . These methods however result in a low accuracy of determining the sulfur poisoning state of the vehicle post-treatment system.
  • SUMMARY
  • To solve the above technical problem, a method and a system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of an SCR device are provided according to the present disclosure to realize the purpose of improving the accuracy of determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device.
  • To achieve the above objectives, the following technical solutions are provided according to the embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • A method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device of a vehicle post-treatment system is provided. The vehicle post-treatment system includes the SCR device and a urea injector. The method includes:
    • determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition; if it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, controlling the urea injector to stop urea injection; and detecting a first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device after the urea injection is stopped and calculating accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped; and
    • determining whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value, and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value; if it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, monitoring a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device; if it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is not less than the first predetermined efficiency value, or the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, returning to the step of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • The determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition includes: monitoring a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector; and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range.
  • The monitoring a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device includes:
    • controlling the urea injector to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio, and monitoring a second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a second predetermined temperature range;
    • determining, in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value; and
    • determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value.
  • In some embodiment, the calculating accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped includes:
    • integrating a nitrogen oxides (NOx) mass flow in upstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a first integral value;
    • integrating a NOx mass flow in downstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a second integral value; and
    • multiplying a value of the first integral value minus the second integral value by a molar mass ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxide in reaction, to determine the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  • In some embodiments, the predetermined concentration range is 32.5%±2.5%.
  • In some embodiments, after determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state, the method further includes sending a stationary regeneration request.
  • In some embodiments, the consumption limit value is determined according to an aging factor and an average temperature of the SCR device.
  • A system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device of a vehicle post-treatment system, where the vehicle post-treatment system includes the SCR device and a urea injector, and the system for determining the sulfur poisoning state includes:
    • an trigger determining module, configured to determine whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition, and trigger an ammonia storage determination module if it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition;
    • the ammonia storage determination module, configured to: control the urea injector to stop urea injection; detect a first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device after the urea injection is stopped and calculate accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped; determine whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value, and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value; trigger a low-temperature efficiency monitoring module if it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value; and trigger the trigger determining module, if it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is not less than the first predetermined efficiency value, or the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value; and
    • the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module, configured to monitor a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device by controlling the urea injector to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio, and monitoring a second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a second predetermined temperature range; determining, in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value; and determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value;
    • where the trigger determining module is configured to determine whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition by: monitoring a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector; and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range.
  • In some embodiments, the ammonia storage determination module is configured to:
    • integrate a nitrogen oxides (NOx) mass flow in upstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a first integral value;
    • integrate a NOx mass flow in downstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a second integral value; and
    • multiply a value of the first integral value minus the second integral value by a molar mass ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxide in reaction, to determine the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  • In some embodiments, the predetermined concentration range is 32.5%±2.5%.
  • In some embodiments, the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module is further configured to send a stationary regeneration request after determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state.
  • In some embodiments, the consumption limit value is determined according to an aging factor and an average temperature of the SCR device.
  • It can be seen from the above technical solution, the method and the system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device are provided according to the embodiments of the present disclosure. In the method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device, if the reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the concentration of urea meet the predetermined triggering condition, the ammonia storage capacity is detected. In the process of detecting ammonia storage capacity, the urea injection is stopped and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is calculated. If the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, it is determined that there is large ammonia storage. Therefore the subsequent detection is not performed, and the process of sulfur poisoning determination ends. If the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, since the ammonia storage of the SCR is continuously consumed by NOx in upstream gas of SCR, and the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device will be gradually decreased. In a case that the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value and the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value, it is determined that ammonia is not leaked, and the problem of low reduction efficiency of the SCR device may be caused by sulfur poisoning or insufficient ammonia storage. In this case, the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR is required to be monitored. In the process of monitoring low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device, if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state. It can be seen from the above process, whether the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state can be accurately determined by the method without being effected by other facts such as ammonia leakage, aging, ammonia storage control accuracy.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The drawings to be used in the description of the embodiments or the conventional technology will be described briefly as follows, so that the technical solutions according to the embodiments of the present disclosure or according to the conventional technology will become clearer. It is apparent that the drawings in the following description only illustrate some embodiments of the present disclosure. For those skilled in the art, other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without any creative work.
    • Figure 1 is a flow chart of a method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
    • Figure 2 is a flow chart of a method for determining whether a SCR and a urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
    • Figure 3 is a flow chart of a method for monitoring a low-temperature efficiency of a SCR device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
    • Figure 4 is a schematic structural diagram of a vehicle post-treatment system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
    • Figure 5 is a flow chart of a method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to another embodiment of the present disclosure; and
    • Figure 6 is a flow chart of a method for monitoring a low-temperature efficiency of a SCR according to another embodiment of the present disclosure.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Hereinafter, the technical solutions of the present disclosure are explained clearly and in further detail in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments. It is apparent that the embodiments in the following description are only some embodiments of the technical solution of the present disclosure, rather than all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiment of the present disclosure, other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without any creative work all fall within the scope of protection of the present disclosure.
  • Referring to Figure 1, a method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device is provided according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The method is used for determining whether an SCR device of a vehicle post-treatment system is in a sulfur poisoning state. The post-treatment system includes the SCR device and a urea injector. The method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device includes the following steps S101 and S102.
  • In step S101, it is determined whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition. If it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, the urea injector is controlled to stop urea injection, A first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is detected after the urea injection is stopped, and accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped is calculated.
  • In step S102, it is determined whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value, and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value. If it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value, and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR is monitored, else the process returns to step of determining whether the SCR and urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • Referring to Figure 2, the process of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition includes steps S1011 and S1012.
  • In step S1011, a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector are monitored.
  • In step S1012, when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency, and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range, it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • Referring to Figure 3, the process of monitoring the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device includes steps S1021 to S1023.
  • In step S1021, the urea injector is controlled to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio.
  • In step S1022, the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device for a second predetermined temperature range is monitored.
  • In step S1023, in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, it is determined whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value, and if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state.
  • The ammonia storage setting value is determined by searching an ammonia storage mapping table according to a current space velocity and a current average temperature. The ammonia storage mapping table stores a correspondence between the space velocity, the average temperature and the ammonia storage setting value. The average temperature of the SCR device refers to an average temperature of various parts of the SCR device at a same time. Since the SCR material has a relatively large specific heat capacity, the temperature at an outlet of the SCR device may be changed later than a change in the temperature at an inlet of the SCR device. Therefore, the average temperature of various parts in the SCR device is taken as the average temperature of the SCR device.
  • The ammonia storage value calculated by the ammonia storage model is calculated according to a one-dimensional physical model of the SCR device. The ammonia storage, an internal temperature, a NOx concentration in downstream gas of the SCR device and other state parameters are calculated by the model in real time according to NOx quantity in upstream gas of the SCR device, exhaust gas volume, urea injection amount, temperature and other conditions.
  • The theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device is calculated by using the one-dimensional physical model of the SCR device, which is equal to one minus a ratio of a NOx value in downstream gas of the SCR model to a NOx value in upstream gas of the SCR model.
  • Figure 4 is a schematic structural diagram of a vehicle post-treatment system. Referring to Figure 4, the post-treatment system includes a turbocharger (TC), a hydrocarbon (HC) injector, a urea injector, a diesel oxide catalyst (DOC) device, a diesel particulate filter (DPF), a selectively catalytic reduction (SCR) device, and multiple temperature sensors and NOx sensors. The urea injector is arranged with a high-precision urea concentration sensor to accurately detect the urea concentration. In Figure 4, reference sign 10 represents the turbocharger, reference sign 20 represents the diesel oxide catalyst device, reference sign 30 represents the diesel particulate filter, reference sign 40 represents the selectively catalytic reduction device, reference sign 50 represents the NOx sensors, reference sign 60 represents the urea injector and reference sign 70 represents the temperature sensor. In Figure 4, the direction of the arrow indicates the direction of vehicle exhaust emission. The upstream gas of the SCR device refers to the vehicle exhaust inputted into the SCR device, and the downstream gas of the SCR device refers to the vehicle exhaust outputted from the SCR device (as the direction indicated by the arrow).
  • In the method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to the embodiment of present disclosure, it is first determined whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition. The predetermined triggering condition involves SCR low-temperature efficiency monitoring and urea concentration monitoring. The SCR low-temperature efficiency monitoring is to monitor the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range, and determine whether the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency. If the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than the second predetermined efficiency, it is determined that the SCR device meets the predetermined triggering condition.
  • The first predetermined temperature range may be determined according to the type of the SCR. For the copper based SCR, the first predetermined temperature range may be a range of 220 Celsius degree to 260 Celsius degree.
  • The monitoring of the urea concentration range is to determine whether the concentration of urea in the urea injector is in a predetermined concentration range. If the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range, it is determined that the urea injector meets the predetermined triggering condition.
  • In some embodiments, the predetermined concentration range may be 32.5%±2.5%.
  • If the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, detection of ammonia storage capacity is performed. If the SCR device or the urea injector does not meet the predetermined triggering condition, the detection of ammonia storage capacity is not performed.
  • In the detection of ammonia storage capacity, the urea injector is controlled to stop urea injection, the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device after the urea injection is stopped is detected, and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped is calculated.
  • It is determined whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value, and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value. In the detection of ammonia storage capacity, if the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, it is determined that the catalyst of SCR is not affected by sulfur, and the problem that the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than the second predetermined efficiency is not caused by the sulfur poisoning. In this case, the process returns to the step of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition. If the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, since ammonia storage of the SCR is continuously consumed by NOx in upstream gas of SCR device, the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device will be gradually decreased. In a case that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency, and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, it is determined that the ammonia is not leaked and the low efficiency may be caused by sulfur poisoning or insufficient ammonia storage. In this case, the SCR low-temperature efficiency monitoring is performed.
  • In some embodiments, the predetermined efficiency value may be 0.5, 0.55 and 0.45, but is not limited thereto.
  • The consumption limit value is determined according to an SCR aging factor and the average temperature of the SCR device. The SCR aging factor is determined according to temperature levels experienced by the SCR device. In a case that the aging factor and the average temperature of the SCR device are determined, the consumption limit value may be determined by searching a predetermined mapping table including the correspondence between the SCR aging factor, the average temperature of the SCR device and the consumption limit value.
  • The SCR low-temperature efficiency monitoring is to monitor the reduction efficiency under a condition that the average temperature of the SCR device is in a second predetermined temperature range. The second predetermined temperature range is a low operating temperature range for the SCR device. Similarly, the second predetermined temperature range is determined according to the type of SCR. For the copper based SCR, the second predetermined temperature range may be the same as the first predetermined temperature range. That is, the second predetermined temperature range may be the range of 220 Celsius degree to 260 Celsius degree. The second preset temperature range certainly may be different from the first predetermined temperature range, which is not limited in the present disclosure, and depends on the actual situation.
  • In the process of monitoring the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device, the urea injector is controlled to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio. For example, the fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio may be equal to 1:1. The second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is monitored in the process of urea injection. In a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, it is determined whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value. If the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the ammonia storage is not low and the SCR is in a sulfur poisoning state. If the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is less than or equal to the difference threshold value, it is determined that the actual ammonia storage is low, and the process returns to the step of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • It can be seen from the above process, with the method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device, it can be accurately determined whether the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state without being effected by other facts such as ammonia leakage, aging and ammonia storage control accuracy.
  • Based on the above embodiment, referring to Figure 5, a method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to another embodiment of the present disclosure includes steps S201 to S204.
  • In step S201, it is determined whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition. If the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, the urea injector is controlled to stop urea injection. A first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is detected after the urea injection is stopped and a NOx mass flow in upstream gas of the SCR is integrated for a first predetermined time period to determine a first integral value.
  • In step S202, the NOx mass flow in downstream gas of the SCR is integrated for a first predetermined time period to determine a second integral value.
  • In step S203, a value of the first integral value minus the second integral value is multiplied by a molar mass ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxide in reaction to determine accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  • In step S204, it is determined whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value. If the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR is monitored. If the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is not less than the first predetermined efficiency value or the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, the process returns to the step of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • The process of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition includes: monitoring the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector, and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range.
  • Referring to Figure 6, the process of monitoring the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device includes step S2041 to S2043.
  • In step S2041, the urea injector is controlled to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio.
  • In step S2042, a second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a second predetermined temperature range is monitored.
  • In step S2043, in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, it is determined whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value. If the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state, and a stationary regeneration request is sent.
  • A method for calculating accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped is provided according to the embodiment of the present disclosure. Furthermore, when it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state, the stationary regeneration request is sent for regeneration and desulphurization to restore the performance of SCR catalyst.
  • Hereinafter, a system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure is described. The above method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device may be referred to for details of the system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device.
  • The system is used for determining whether the SCR of a vehicle post-treatment system is in a sulfur poisoning state. The post-treatment system includes the SCR device and the urea injector. The system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device includes a trigger determining module, an ammonia storage determination module and a low-temperature efficiency monitoring module.
  • The trigger determining module is configured to determine whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition, and trigger the ammonia storage determination module if it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition.
  • The ammonia storage determination module is configured to control the urea injector to stop urea injection, detect a first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device after the urea injection is stopped and calculate accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  • The ammonia storage determination module is configured to determine whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value, trigger the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module if determining that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value, and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, and trigger the trigger determining module if determining that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is not less than the first predetermined efficiency value, or the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value.
  • The low-temperature efficiency monitoring module is configured to monitor the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device by controlling the urea injector to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio, and monitoring a second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a second predetermined temperature range, and determining, in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value, and determining that the SCR is in a sulfur poisoning state if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value.
  • The trigger determining module is configured to determine whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition by monitoring a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector, and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device for the first predetermined temperature range is less than the second predetermined efficiency, and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range.
  • In some embodiments, the ammonia storage determination module is configured to calculate the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped, by integrating a NOx mass flow in upstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a first integral value; integrating a NOx mass flow in downstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a second integral value; and multiplying a value of the first integral value minus the second integral value by a molar mass ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxide in reaction to determine the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  • In some embodiments, the predetermined concentration range may be 32.5%±2.5%.
  • In some embodiments, the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module may be further configured to send a stationary regeneration request when determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state.
  • In some embodiments, the consumption limit value may be determined according to an aging factor and an average temperature of the SCR device.
  • In summary, the method and the system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device are provided according to the embodiments of the present disclosure. In the method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device, if the reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the concentration of urea meet the predetermined triggering condition, the ammonia storage capacity is detected. In the process of detecting ammonia storage capacity, the urea injection is stopped and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is calculated. If the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, it is determined that there is large ammonia storage. Therefore the subsequent detection is not performed, and the process of sulfur poisoning determination ends. If the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, since the ammonia storage of the SCR is continuously consumed by NOx in upstream gas of SCR, and the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device will be gradually decreased. In a case that the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value and the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value, it is determined that ammonia is not leaked, and the problem of low reduction efficiency of the SCR device may be caused by sulfur poisoning or insufficient ammonia storage. In this case, the low-temperature efficiency of the SCR is required to be monitored. In the process of monitoring low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device, if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value, it is determined that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state. It can be seen from the above process, whether the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state can be accurately determined by the method without being effected by other facts such as ammonia leakage, aging, ammonia storage control accuracy.
  • The embodiments in the present disclosure are described in a progressive manner, each of which emphasizes differences from others. The same or similar parts among the embodiments can be referred to each other.
  • Based on the above description of the disclosed embodiments, those skilled in the art can implement or use the present disclosure.

Claims (10)

  1. A method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device of a vehicle post-treatment system, wherein the vehicle post-treatment system comprises the SCR device (40) and a urea injector (60), and the method comprises:
    determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition; if it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, controlling the urea injector to stop urea injection; and detecting a first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device after the urea injection is stopped and calculating accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped; and
    determining whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value, and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value; if it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value, monitoring a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device; if it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is not less than the first predetermined efficiency value, or the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value, returning to the step of determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition;
    wherein the determining whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition comprises:
    monitoring a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector; and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range; and
    wherein the monitoring a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device comprises:
    controlling the urea injector to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio, and monitoring a second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a second predetermined temperature range;
    determining, in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value; and
    determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value.
  2. The method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to claim 1, wherein the calculating accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped comprises:
    integrating a nitrogen oxides (NOx) mass flow in upstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a first integral value;
    integrating a NOx mass flow in downstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a second integral value; and
    multiplying a value of the first integral value minus the second integral value by a molar mass ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxide in reaction, to determine the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  3. The method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined concentration range is 32.5%±2.5%.
  4. The method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to claim 1, wherein after determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state, the method further comprises:
    sending a stationary regeneration request.
  5. The method for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to claim 1, wherein the consumption limit value is determined according to an aging factor and an average temperature of the SCR device.
  6. A system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device of a vehicle post-treatment system, wherein the vehicle post-treatment system comprises the SCR device (40) and a urea injector (60), and the system for determining the sulfur poisoning state comprises:
    an trigger determining module, configured to determine whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet a predetermined triggering condition, and trigger an ammonia storage determination module if it is determined that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition;
    the ammonia storage determination module, configured to
    control the urea injector to stop urea injection;
    detect a first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device after the urea injection is stopped and calculate accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for a first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped;
    determine whether the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than a first predetermined efficiency value, and whether the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to a consumption limit value;
    trigger a low-temperature efficiency monitoring module if it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is less than the first predetermined efficiency value and the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is less than or equal to the consumption limit value; and
    trigger the trigger determining module, if it is determined that the first actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device is not less than the first predetermined efficiency value, or the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia is greater than the consumption limit value; and
    the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module, configured to monitor a low-temperature efficiency of the SCR device by controlling the urea injector to perform urea injection with a fixed ammonia-nitrogen mole ratio, and monitoring a second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a second predetermined temperature range; determining, in a state that the second actual reduction efficiency of the SCR device, an ammonia storage setting value and an ammonia storage value calculated by an ammonia storage model are all stable, whether a difference value between a theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than a difference threshold value; and determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state if the difference value between the theoretical reduction efficiency of the SCR device and the second actual reduction efficiency is greater than the difference threshold value;
    wherein the trigger determining module is configured to determine whether the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition by: monitoring a reduction efficiency of the SCR device in a first predetermined temperature range and a concentration of urea in the urea injector; and determining that the SCR device and the urea injector meet the predetermined triggering condition, when the reduction efficiency of the SCR device in the first predetermined temperature range is less than a second predetermined efficiency and the concentration of urea is in a predetermined concentration range.
  7. The system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to claim 6, wherein the ammonia storage determination module is configured to:
    integrate a nitrogen oxides (NOx) mass flow in upstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a first integral value;
    integrate a NOx mass flow in downstream gas of the SCR device for the first predetermined time period to determine a second integral value; and
    multiply a value of the first integral value minus the second integral value by a molar mass ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxide in reaction, to determine the accumulated consumption amount of stored ammonia for the first predetermined time period after the urea injection is stopped.
  8. The system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to claim 6, wherein the predetermined concentration range is 32.5%±2.5%.
  9. The system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to claim 6, wherein the low-temperature efficiency monitoring module is further configured to send a stationary regeneration request after determining that the SCR device is in the sulfur poisoning state.
  10. The system for determining a sulfur poisoning state of a SCR device according to claim 6, wherein the consumption limit value is determined according to an aging factor and an average temperature of the SCR device.
EP20196612.4A 2019-12-26 2020-09-17 Method and system for determining sulfur poisoning state of selectively catalytic reduction device Active EP3842624B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911361702.1A CN110761882B (en) 2019-12-26 2019-12-26 Method and system for judging SCR sulfur poisoning

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3842624A1 EP3842624A1 (en) 2021-06-30
EP3842624B1 true EP3842624B1 (en) 2022-07-13

Family

ID=69341654

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20196612.4A Active EP3842624B1 (en) 2019-12-26 2020-09-17 Method and system for determining sulfur poisoning state of selectively catalytic reduction device

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3842624B1 (en)
CN (1) CN110761882B (en)

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113946173B (en) * 2020-07-15 2022-12-06 中冶长天国际工程有限责任公司 Temperature control system, method and device for analytical tower
CN112594044B (en) * 2020-12-14 2022-04-26 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Aging prediction method and device for post-processing system
CN112682134B (en) * 2020-12-25 2022-04-26 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Parking regeneration system and parking regeneration method of aftertreatment system
CN112696251A (en) * 2020-12-29 2021-04-23 潍柴动力股份有限公司 SCR conversion efficiency recovery method and device and vehicle
CN112814770B (en) * 2020-12-31 2022-04-05 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Uniformity evaluation method and device of parallel SCR system
CN113417726B (en) * 2021-06-25 2022-07-15 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Detecting method for ammonia leakage in post-processing system and controller of post-processing system
CN113488115B (en) * 2021-07-28 2024-10-22 潍柴动力股份有限公司 A method and device for detecting sulfur poisoning
CN113803143B (en) * 2021-09-02 2022-09-23 潍柴动力股份有限公司 DOC sulfur poisoning judgment method and control device with same
CN113864048B (en) * 2021-09-28 2024-04-02 昆山三一动力有限公司 High sulfur oil identification processing method, device, vehicle and computer readable storage medium
CN113756921B (en) * 2021-09-29 2023-01-06 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Method, device, vehicle and medium for determining sulfur poisoning in SCR system
CN113790094B (en) * 2021-09-29 2022-10-25 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Method, device, vehicle and medium for determining sulfur poisoning of aftertreatment system
CN114964793B (en) * 2022-04-24 2024-07-19 潍柴动力股份有限公司 SDPF ash load detection method and equipment, monitoring method and device, vehicle
CN114961956B (en) * 2022-07-06 2023-12-15 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Selective catalytic reduction conversion efficiency diagnosis method and device
CN115419841B (en) * 2022-10-13 2025-07-18 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Ammonia leak detection method, ammonia leak detection device, readable storage medium, and ammonia leak detection system
CN115628128B (en) * 2022-11-02 2024-05-14 一汽解放汽车有限公司 Gas-driven urea system fault automatic detection method, device, system and storage medium
CN115653735B (en) * 2022-12-27 2023-04-07 卓品智能科技无锡股份有限公司 Method and system for recovering diesel engine SCR sulfur poisoning
CN115977769B (en) * 2023-02-01 2026-02-17 常州易控汽车电子股份有限公司 Method and device for judging maximum performance of SCR
CN116066223B (en) * 2023-02-22 2025-07-18 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Method and device for detecting urea consumption deviation fault, processor and vehicle
CN116950745B (en) * 2023-07-27 2026-02-24 三一重型装备有限公司 Engine thermal management method, system, electronic equipment, engine and vehicle
CN117869043B (en) * 2024-01-09 2025-12-26 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Methods, apparatus, storage media and electronic devices for preventing N2O generation
CN118110589B (en) * 2024-03-13 2026-01-23 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Desulfurization method, equipment, vehicle and medium of SCR system
CN118622445B (en) * 2024-06-24 2025-11-18 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Monitoring methods, devices, and electronic equipment for DOC sulfur poisoning
CN118934174B (en) * 2024-07-31 2025-09-23 广西玉柴机器股份有限公司 A NOx and N2O emission suppression control method based on ammonia storage synergy

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100821793B1 (en) * 2005-12-12 2008-04-11 현대자동차주식회사 NOx storage catalyst regeneration method
DE602006015210D1 (en) * 2006-12-22 2010-08-12 Ford Global Tech Llc An internal combustion engine system and method for determining the condition of an exhaust treatment device in such a system
US8091416B2 (en) * 2009-01-16 2012-01-10 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Robust design of diagnostic enabling conditions for SCR NOx conversion efficiency monitor
SE538378C2 (en) * 2012-05-03 2016-06-07 Scania Cv Ab Method for detecting sulfur poisoning in an exhaust after-treatment system
US9657665B2 (en) * 2013-02-25 2017-05-23 Cummins Inc. System, method, and apparatus for sulfur recovery on an SCR catalyst
US20140331644A1 (en) * 2013-05-08 2014-11-13 Cummins Ip, Inc. Exhaust aftertreatment component condition estimation and regeneration
JP6252518B2 (en) * 2015-03-04 2017-12-27 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Exhaust gas purification device for internal combustion engine
JP6278039B2 (en) * 2015-12-14 2018-02-14 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Degradation diagnosis device for selective catalytic reduction catalyst
KR101816430B1 (en) * 2016-08-17 2018-02-21 현대자동차주식회사 Control method of exhaust gas purification system
US11549423B2 (en) * 2017-01-16 2023-01-10 Scania Cv Ab System and a method for determining a cause for impaired performance of a catalytic configuration
US10215072B2 (en) * 2017-03-23 2019-02-26 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Methods for controlling and detecting catalyst poisoning of selective catalytic reduction devices
CN108295891B (en) * 2018-01-10 2021-04-06 绍兴文理学院 In-situ regeneration system and method of Cu-based molecular sieve denitration catalyst for diesel vehicle tail gas purification
CN109707494B (en) * 2018-12-28 2020-04-24 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Treatment method and device for post-treatment of sulfur poisoning

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3842624A1 (en) 2021-06-30
CN110761882B (en) 2020-04-07
CN110761882A (en) 2020-02-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3842624A1 (en) Method and system for determining sulfur poisoning state of selectively catalytic reduction device
EP2551480B1 (en) Engine exhaust purification device
CN113669143B (en) Performance detection method, detection device and medium for tail gas aftertreatment system
EP2126306B1 (en) On-board-diagnosis method for an exhaust aftertreatment system and on-board-diagnosis system for an exhaust aftertreatment system
US9957872B2 (en) Abnormality diagnosing apparatus
US20110296905A1 (en) Method for monitoring an scr catalytic converter
US20130227935A1 (en) Diagnostics for hydrocarbon injection for filter regeneration
CN101278110A (en) Diagnostic method for an exhaust gas aftertreatment system
CN110645076A (en) NH based on model3Leak diagnosis method
US10662847B2 (en) Integrated start/stop and after-treatment controls
CN113756921B (en) Method, device, vehicle and medium for determining sulfur poisoning in SCR system
CN116066223B (en) Method and device for detecting urea consumption deviation fault, processor and vehicle
CN110131024B (en) A kind of leakage detection method and device of urea
CN116085097A (en) Vehicle aftertreatment system control method and device, storage medium and vehicle
US10100701B2 (en) Method for the diagnosis of an exhaust gas aftertreatment system for an internal combustion engine
CN112177714A (en) SCR system conversion rate monitoring method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN115095416A (en) Method, device and system for detecting vehicle tail gas signal
EP3401522B1 (en) Exhaust gas control system for internal combustion engine and method of controlling exhaust gas control system for internal combustion engine
US8434298B2 (en) Method for injecting ammonia into an exhaust gas stream
CN110872975B (en) Method for controlling and/or regulating an SCR catalytic converter of an internal combustion engine arranged in a motor vehicle
CN114033538A (en) Double DPF regeneration control method and device and engine
CN116291818B (en) Determination method, control method, controller and SCR (selective catalytic reduction) system for ammonia demand
JP6149686B2 (en) HC catalyst poisoning detection system for SCR catalyst and HC catalyst poisoning detection method for SCR catalyst
KR102571849B1 (en) Method for predicting and controlling reducing agent occlusion amount of simultaneous removal device having heat source
CN104040153A (en) Optimized management of an scr catalyst by means of the periodic regeneration of a particle filter

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200917

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220127

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602020003975

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1504404

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20220713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221114

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221013

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221113

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221014

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602020003975

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20230414

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220917

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20200917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230930

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20250925

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20250930

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20251001

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20250924

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220713

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20251015

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20251023

Year of fee payment: 6