EP3596278A1 - A foldable scissor module for doubly curved scissor grids - Google Patents

A foldable scissor module for doubly curved scissor grids

Info

Publication number
EP3596278A1
EP3596278A1 EP18711919.3A EP18711919A EP3596278A1 EP 3596278 A1 EP3596278 A1 EP 3596278A1 EP 18711919 A EP18711919 A EP 18711919A EP 3596278 A1 EP3596278 A1 EP 3596278A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
scissor
units
module
unit
prb
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP18711919.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3596278B1 (en
Inventor
Kelvin ROOVERS
Niels DE TEMMERMAN
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel VUB
Original Assignee
Vrije Universiteit Brussel VUB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vrije Universiteit Brussel VUB filed Critical Vrije Universiteit Brussel VUB
Publication of EP3596278A1 publication Critical patent/EP3596278A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3596278B1 publication Critical patent/EP3596278B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04B—GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
    • E04B1/00—Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
    • E04B1/343—Structures characterised by movable, separable, or collapsible parts, e.g. for transport
    • E04B1/344—Structures characterised by movable, separable, or collapsible parts, e.g. for transport with hinged parts
    • E04B1/3441—Structures characterised by movable, separable, or collapsible parts, e.g. for transport with hinged parts with articulated bar-shaped elements
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
    • E04H12/00—Towers; Masts or poles; Chimney stacks; Water-towers; Methods of erecting such structures
    • E04H12/18—Towers; Masts or poles; Chimney stacks; Water-towers; Methods of erecting such structures movable or with movable sections, e.g. rotatable or telescopic
    • E04H12/187—Towers; Masts or poles; Chimney stacks; Water-towers; Methods of erecting such structures movable or with movable sections, e.g. rotatable or telescopic with hinged sections
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
    • E04H15/00—Tents or canopies, in general
    • E04H15/32—Parts, components, construction details, accessories, interior equipment, specially adapted for tents, e.g. guy-line equipment, skirts, thresholds
    • E04H15/34—Supporting means, e.g. frames
    • E04H15/44—Supporting means, e.g. frames collapsible, e.g. breakdown type
    • E04H15/48—Supporting means, e.g. frames collapsible, e.g. breakdown type foldable, i.e. having pivoted or hinged means
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
    • E04H15/00—Tents or canopies, in general
    • E04H15/32—Parts, components, construction details, accessories, interior equipment, specially adapted for tents, e.g. guy-line equipment, skirts, thresholds
    • E04H15/34—Supporting means, e.g. frames
    • E04H15/44—Supporting means, e.g. frames collapsible, e.g. breakdown type
    • E04H15/48—Supporting means, e.g. frames collapsible, e.g. breakdown type foldable, i.e. having pivoted or hinged means
    • E04H15/50—Supporting means, e.g. frames collapsible, e.g. breakdown type foldable, i.e. having pivoted or hinged means lazy-tongs type

Definitions

  • the invention is related to scissor modules and grids built from scissor units, each unit consisting of a set of two rods connected at an intermediate rotation point.
  • the invention is in particular related to modules and grids formed of polar scissor units.
  • a deployable scissor grid consists of an articulated network of bars that has the ability to rapidly and reversibly transform in shape and in volume, allowing it to answer to changing needs.
  • Most scissor grids transform between a compact bundle of bars and an expanded functional configuration, particularly useful for applications with a mobile or temporary character. As such they can be prefabricated in factory conditions, after which they are compactly transported and quickly erected on site with low skill and labour force requirements. Afterwards, they can rapidly return to their compact form either to be relocated and reused or to be stowed for later use.
  • a different group of scissor grids comprises shell-like structures that deploy towards their perimeter. These are more useful for example as retractable roofs.
  • the basic building block of any scissor linkage is the scissor unit, also commonly known as a scissor-like element (SLE), a pantograph or a duplet.
  • a scissor unit is a planar composition of two bars crosswise interconnected by a revolute joint, referred to as the intermediate hinge point. This joint allows a relative rotation of the bars about an axis orthogonal to the unit plane, which contains the two bars. The distance between the intermediate hinge point and an end point of a scissor unit is called a semi-length.
  • Different types of scissor units exist, which vary in proportions and shape.
  • the three main scissor unit types are the translational, the polar and the angulated scissor units. They can easily be distinguished through their unit lines, which are the imaginary lines connecting the upper and lower end point at both sides of the scissor unit.
  • unit lines which are the imaginary lines connecting the upper and lower end point at both sides of the scissor unit.
  • Each unit type comes in a basic and a generalized form, which in general allow to respectively generate simple and more complex shapes.
  • a regular and irregular form can each time be discerned, which tend to give rise to grids with regular and irregular patterns respectively.
  • Regular units are characterized either by rods that together with the unit lines describe a pair of congruent triangles or by parallel chords (i.e. the line connecting the upper nodes and the line connecting the lower nodes).
  • Translational scissor units consist of a pair of straight bars and have parallel unit lines throughout deployment.
  • Polar scissor units consist of a pair of straight bars as well, but are characterized by unit lines intersecting at an angle that varies during deployment. The line connecting the intersection point and the intermediate hinge point is called the radial line. In the basic form of polar unit, this radial line is perpendicular to the transverse bisector line of the bars.
  • Scissor linkages are formed by linking multiple scissor units at their end nodes using revolute joints in two- or three-dimensional configurations.
  • Most basic are the linear or curvilinear linkages formed by connecting a number of scissor units side by side, often within a plane.
  • An open chain of scissor units in which the dihedral angles between adjacent unit planes are fixed forms a mechanism with one degree of freedom.
  • Its deployment range will be determined by the scissor unit that first reaches one of its outer deployment stages. To optimize this range, the following constraint for any linkage of two scissor units with straight bars as shown in Figure 1 a was presented by F. Escrig in 'Expandable Space Structures', Int Journal of Space Structures, 1 (2), 79-91 :
  • This equation is also known as the 'deployability constraint'. Despite its name, it isn't always necessary nor sufficient for deployment. It ensures that all units in the linkage simultaneously reach their most compact state (when angles ⁇ equal ⁇ ) and the scissor linkage is theoretically reduced to a single line. As illustrated in Fig. 1 b, this constraint can be graphically represented by an ellipse with focal points coinciding with the common end points of a pair of interconnected scissor units. As the sum of the distances to the focal points is the same for any point of the ellipse, both intermediate hinge points must be located on the same ellipse.
  • any planar linkage of translational or polar units complying with the deployability constraint contains a chain of tangent ellipses, where the tangent points coincide with the intermediate hinge points of the scissor units.
  • the graphical representation of the deployability constraint for a linkage of two scissor units becomes a prolate spheroid (i.e. an ellipse revolved about its major axis).
  • prolate spheroid packing networks of mutually tangent prolate spheroids
  • a scissor module Under specific constraints the two ends of a (curvi)linear linkage of scissor units can be interconnected in order to create a single closed loop of units, called a scissor module.
  • a scissor module will describe a spatial, polyhedral shape. In some cases this module can take up the shape of a planar closed ring.
  • a module of polar units might be planar in a single deployment stage, but will be spatial in all other stages due to the varying angle between their unit lines. Forming a closed spatial module requires at least three scissor units.
  • Atake was the first to present a foldable scissor module consisting solely of polar scissor units for which the unit lines are not concurrent. This is described for example in US Patent 5,761 ,871 and in "ATAKE's structure - new variations of the scissors technique", In Brebbia, C. A. and Escrig, F., editors, Mobile and Rapidly Assembled Structures III (2000), pages 143-154. WIT Press.
  • Atake's modules comprise an even number of regular basic polar units which alternate in orientation. Either opposing units or all units in these modules are identical. In addition, all rods in these modules have the same total length. As such, the unit lines of a module describe antiprisms. Since the unit lines in these modules are not concurrent, the dihedral angles a (see Fig. 3) between the unit planes of adjacent scissor units are fixed for each deployment stage and the modules generally are geometrically rigid.
  • Scissor grids are formed by combining multiple scissor modules.
  • a first of these configurations is known as a single-layer grid (SLG).
  • SLG single-layer grid
  • An SLG is formed by stacking multiple scissor modules consisting of the same amount of scissor units. Two modules are stacked by connecting the upper nodes of one module to the lower nodes of the other module. Hence, the scissor units lie in the base surface described by the grid.
  • a double-layer grid (DLG) is formed by tessellating prismatic scissor modules along a base surface, as described for example in document "Evaluation of Deployable Structures for Space Enclosures", Hanaor and Levy, International Journal of Space Structures (2001 ), 16(4):21 1-229. As such, each module forms a cell in the scissor grid and units at a common edge of two cells are shared by two modules. The upper and lower chords of the scissor units describe two distinct layers.
  • the deployment process of a scissor grid generally knows three distinct stages : two outer stages (usually the functional ones, for example the stowed and the expanded configuration) and a transitional stage (during deployment from one outer stage to another).
  • the deployment behaviour of scissor grids is usually described through its geometric compatibility in each of these three stages.
  • a scissor grid is said to be geometrically compatible if all members in the grid fit together without deformations or tolerances. In contrast, it is incompatible when this geometric fit does not exist and some or all members have to elastically deform in order to achieve a certain stage of deployment.
  • Foldable scissor grids are geometrically compatible throughout all stages of deployment.
  • the scissor grid therefore acts as a pure mechanism with a smooth and easily controllable deployment behaviour. Once erected, the mechanism should be locked in order to become a loadbearing structure.
  • additional members are often added to the scissor grid, such as struts or cables.
  • Anchoring multiple nodes of a scissor grid to the ground can equally be a strategy to lock its degrees of freedom.
  • the process of manually locking a scissor grid is sometimes seen as a disadvantageous, time-consuming act, especially for large structures requiring many locking devices that might in addition be difficult to access. Clever design choices can nevertheless speed up this process.
  • foldable scissor grids are compatible throughout deployment, intermediate deployment stages can also become functional, e.g. in a partially deployed cover to obtain partial shading.
  • Bistable scissor grids are geometrically compatible in the outer deployment stages and incompatible throughout or during a part of the transitional stage. Consequently, the deployment of a bistable grid requires an additional amount of effort to sufficiently deform its members and overcome these incompatibilities, after which it snaps into the next compatible configuration. This way, it becomes possible to create self-locking scissor grids, which, once deployed, remain standing under their own self- weight without external locking devices.
  • Numerical references 1 through 8 are reserved in the appended drawings for numbering the scissor units within a module, and are therefore re-used in several of the drawings. Primed numbers (1 ', 2' etc) are used when identical units are applied in the same module : for example unit 1 and unit V are identical.
  • Figures 1 a and 1 b illustrate the deployability constraint of a linkage formed of scissor units.
  • Figures 2a to 2d illustrate the various types of polar scissor units.
  • Figure 3 shows three scissor modules according to the above- described prior art by Atake.
  • Figure 4 shows a scissor module according to a first embodiment of the invention, consisting of 4 polar scissor units.
  • the images from left to right and top to bottom represent : a 3D view of the scissor module, a view of the unrolled linkage, a top view, a front view and a side view.
  • Figure 5 shows a scissor module according to the first embodiment, consisting of 5 polar scissor units.
  • Figures 6a and 6b show a scissor module according to the first embodiment, consisting of 6 polar scissor units.
  • Figure 7 shows a scissor module according to a second embodiment of the invention, consisting of 4 polar scissor units.
  • Figure 8 shows a scissor module according to the second embodiment, consisting of 8 polar scissor units.
  • Figure 9 shows a scissor unit according to the second embodiment consisting of 6 units.
  • Figures 10 and 1 1 show scissor units according to a third embodiment of the invention, which combines the constraints of the first and second embodiments.
  • Fig. 12 illustrates the addition of joint lines with a uniform length in both layers added to a compatible module of polar units: (a) unrolled module with dimensionless joints; (b) unrolled module with joints; (c) three deployment stages in top and side view.
  • Fig. 13 illustrates existing concepts for DLGs consisting of all identical PRB units combining modules with concurrent and non-concurrent unit lines (top view and three deployment stages in 3D view): (a) foldable flat DLG with trihexagonal pattern; (b) pyramid; (c) dome with truncated icosahedron pattern.
  • Fig. 14 illustrates that (a) a single module according to the first and/or the second embodiment of the invention is foldable, (b) as well as an open chain of such modules, (c) while closed loops of modules generally result in a bistable assembly.
  • Fig. 15 shows an example of a rotational surface, which is generated by rotating a curve about an axis.
  • Fig. 16 shows a simulation of the deployment process of three bistable DLGs based on rotational surfaces comprising four-unit modules according to the first embodiment.
  • Fig. 17 shows a scissor grid based on a catenoid in three deployment stages comprising four-unit modules according to the first embodiment: (a) 3D view and top view of a single row of modules that is foldable and symmetrical about a plane; (b) when linking multiple rows, maximum one row of modules can retain its desired symmetry during deployment while all other are incompatible, (b) shows a 3D view, top view, front view, and side view of a grid in various deployment stages.
  • Fig. 18 shows examples of bistable DLGs with negative double curvature making use of 4-unit modules according to the second embodiment, based on: (a) a hypar, (b) a helicoid and (c) a Mobius strip with three half-twists. From top to bottom : 3D view, top view, front view, side view.
  • Fig. 19 shows a DLG of PIG units based on the helicoid comprising
  • 4-unit modules according to the second embodiment (a) principal curvature line network; (b) geometric support structure optimized to have torsion-free faces and comply to the geometric constraints imposed by the modules; (c) prolate spheroid packing on the support structure; (d) deployment simulation of the bistable scissor grid.
  • Parts a, b and c show a front view.
  • Part d shows a front view, top view and side view at various deployment stages.
  • the invention is related to a scissor module and to scissor grids in accordance with the appended claims.
  • the invention is thus firstly related to a foldable scissor module, i.e. a foldable closed loop of scissor units, comprising at least four polar scissor units characterized in that : • At least one of the polar scissor units consists of rods that are not identical in terms of their length and/or their semilengths, i.e. at least one unit is not a regular basic polar (PRB) unit,
  • PRB regular basic polar
  • the internal dihedral angles of the module are fixed for any deployment stage.
  • the module is symmetrical with respect to at least one symmetry plane (P).
  • the module may consist of
  • first and second scissor unit said first and second units being PRB units, preferably these PRB units are mutually non-identical units,
  • the third and fourth unit are interconnecting the first and second unit
  • the module is symmetrical about one symmetry plane (P) and the PRB units are orthogonal to the plane of symmetry and have their radial line in the plane of symmetry.
  • a module according to the first embodiment may consist of an uneven number of scissor units, wherein at least one scissor unit is a PRB unit, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
  • a module according to the first embodiment may consist of an even number of scissor units higher than or equal to 6, formed by pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
  • the module may consist of an even number of scissor units higher than or equal to 6, and comprise an even number of PRB units, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
  • all scissor units consist of two rods of equal length, and wherein the opposing or the adjacent semi-lengths at the connection of two units are equal.
  • the constraints of the second embodiment may be combined with those of the first or other embodiments.
  • a module according to the second embodiment may consist of an even number of scissor units.
  • a module that combines the constraints of the first and second embodiment may consist of an uneven number of scissor units, an uneven sub- number of which being PRB units, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
  • the invention is furthermore related to a scissor module according to the invention, wherein the joints between scissor units are defined by joint lines placed between the spaced-apart units of the module.
  • the invention is also related to a double layer scissor grid comprising one or more modules according to the invention.
  • a scissor grid according to the invention may be based on a rotational surface and formed of modules according to the first embodiment, wherein the meridian curves of the rotational surface are populated by identical planar linkages of irregular generalized polar units and wherein the parallel circles of the rotational surface are populated by regular basic polar units that are identical within the same circle.
  • a scissor grid according to the invention may be formed of modules according to the second embodiment, and wherein the grid is based on a surface with double negative curvature.
  • PRB unit regular basic polar scissor unit
  • PiB unit irregular basic polar scissor unit
  • PRG unit regular generalized polar scissor unit
  • PIG unit irregular generalized polar scissor unit
  • Each of the units has four semi-lengths, measured between the intermediate hinge point and the end points of the rods, where they are joined to the rods of other scissor units.
  • FIGS. 2a and 2b respectively show the structure and geometrical parameters of a PIB unit and a PRB unit.
  • Each unit comprises two rods 10 and 20 with respective semi-lengths a and a' above the transverse bisector line TT and b and b' below the transverse bisector line.
  • a PIB unit is fully determined by three size parameters plus one parameter to set the deployment stage. If one defines the three semi-lengths a, b and a' then for a certain deployment angle ⁇ , all other parameters shown in the drawings can be found as a function of these four input parameters.
  • Figures 2c and 2d respectively show the structure and geometrical parameters of a PIG unit and a PRG unit.
  • Generalized polar units require one additional size parameter in order to be fully determined.
  • the PIG unit is the most general polar scissor unit that can be obtained by interconnecting two straight bars at an intermediate point using a revolute joint.
  • the unit is fully determined by four size parameters plus one parameter to set the deployment stage. For example, by defining all four semi-lengths a, b, a' and b' and a deployment angle ⁇ , all other parameters shown in the drawings can be found. As seen in the drawings, the rotation axis of the rods relative to each other is fixed with respect to each of the two rods.
  • FIG. 3 Three examples of modules developed by Atake mentioned in the introductory section are illustrated in Figure 3.
  • the images on the left show a 3D view of the module.
  • the images on the right show the corresponding units of the module unrolled in a plane.
  • all the units are identical PRB units.
  • the module consists of four PRB units, with each pair of opposing units (one pair marked T, the other '2') being identical.
  • the present invention proposes a foldable scissor module formed of polar scissor units that is different from the Atake-approach : a foldable scissor module comprising at least four polar scissor units characterized in that :
  • At least one of the polar scissor units consists of rods that are not identical, meaning that the two rods differ in total length and/or semi-lengths,
  • At least one of the polar units is not a PRB unit. It may be a PIB, PRG or a PIG unit, generally referred to in the present specification as 'non-PRB units'.
  • a 'non-PRB' unit is thus a polar scissor unit of a type other than PRB.
  • a module of the invention may comprise PRB units. Whether or not this is the case may depend on the number of units in a module and on further constraints which ensure that the module is foldable, as will be illustrated on the basis of a number of embodiments.
  • a scissor module is said to be foldable if at least the theoretical line model of the scissor module is geometrically compatible in all the deployment stages.
  • the definition of a geometrically compatible module is the same as given in the introduction with regard to scissor grids.
  • the deployment process of a scissor module generally knows three distinct stages : two outer stages (usually the functional ones, for example the stowed and the expanded configuration) and a transitional stage (during deployment from one outer stage to another).
  • a scissor module is said to be geometrically compatible if all the units in the module fit together without deformations or tolerances. In contrast, it is incompatible when this geometric fit does not exist and some or all of the units have to elastically deform in order to achieve a certain stage of deployment.
  • the theoretical line model of a scissor module refers to a module as illustrated in the majority of the appended drawings, wherein the bars of the module are represented as lines interconnected by dimensionless joints, i.e. a point with no dimensions that interconnects two articulated lines.
  • the bars and the joint have a 2-or 3 dimensional structure, for example embodied by the addition of joint lines as described further in this text.
  • the modules according to the majority of embodiments according to the invention remain foldable in the above-defined sense, i.e. geometrically compatible in every deployment stage.
  • Some embodiments may however show small incompatibilities and result in slightly bistable modules, as will be illustrated for embodiments including joint lines. These embodiments are nevertheless foldable in the context of this description, given that the theoretical line model corresponding to the modules in question is effectively compatible throughout the three deployment stages.
  • the internal dihedral angles a of a module according to the invention are fixed for any deployment stage.
  • the internal dihedral angles are the angles between the unit planes of two adjacent scissor units of the module.
  • One dihedral angle a is illustrated in Figure 3 for a module according to Atake.
  • the fact that the internal dihedral angles a of a module are fixed for any deployment stage means that when a module is regarded in a given deployment stage wherein all the scissor units are deployed at a given angle, only one set of dihedral angles is possible. In other words, the module has exactly one geometrically compatible form for each deployment stage.
  • a first embodiment makes use of reflection symmetry to ensure a foldable scissor module.
  • it consists of four polar scissor units: two PRB units 2 and 3 that are orthogonal to and have their radial line (line r in Figures 1 and 2) located in the plane of symmetry P, and two identical polar units 1 and V that interconnect the first two units.
  • the units 1 and V are polar scissor units consisting of rods that are not identical, in the meaning as defined above. By being symmetrical about at least one plane, these modules can equally consist of more than 4 polar scissor units.
  • modules according to the first embodiment comprising an odd number of units contain at least one PRB unit, with the other units consisting of rods that are not identical.
  • Figure 5 shows a module according to the first embodiment comprising five polar units, one PRB unit 3 and two pairs of identical polar scissor units 2/2' and 3/3', each of these four units consisting of two non-identical rods.
  • Modules according to the first embodiment formed of an even number of units of 6 or higher do not require PRB units, as illustrated in the embodiment shown in Figure 6a. Nevertheless, modules according to the first embodiment having an even number of units of 6 or higher can still contain PRB units.
  • Figure 6b shows a module according to the first embodiment comprising six polar units, two of which are PRB units (units 1 and 4), and further comprising two pairs of identical non-PRB units 2/2' and 3/3' each of these four units consisting of two non- identical rods.
  • the feature that characterizes a module according to the first embodiment is that the module is symmetrical about at least one plane. Depending on the number of units n of which a module consists, this puts a number of further requirements on the choice of the polar unit types, as illustrated above : when n is uneven, at least one PRB unit is required.
  • the non-PRB units in a module according to the first embodiment are applied in pairs of identical units.
  • Figures 8 and 9 show further examples of modules according to the second embodiment.
  • the module of Figure 8 consists of six polar units wherein all opposing semi-lengths at the connection of two units are equal, i.e. all the pairs of congruent triangles form parallelograms.
  • the module of Figure 9 consists of six units.
  • the congruent triangles form a kite shape, between all other pairs, the congruent triangles form parallelograms. If no additional constraints are applied to a module according to the second embodiment, this module necessarily has an even number of polar units.
  • a third embodiment combines the constraints of the first and second embodiment.
  • Figure 10 shows an example of such a module, comprising two PRB units 1 and 4 and two pairs of identical polar (non-PRB) scissor units 2/2' and 3/3', each of these four units consisting of two non-identical rods.
  • the module is symmetric about the plane P (embodiment 1 ), while the constraints according to embodiment 2 are also satisfied.
  • modules belonging to the second embodiment that consist of an uneven amount of scissor units as illustrated in Fig. 1 1 , where a symmetric module is shown having one PRB unit 3 and two pairs 1/1 ' and 2/2' of identical non-PRB units.
  • a module that combines the constraints of embodiments 1 and 2 may consist of an uneven number of units, formed of an uneven sub-number of PRB units combined with pairs of identical non-PRB units.
  • the theoretical line model of a scissor module is based on the presence of dimensionless joints between two interconnected bars of the units included in the module.
  • its members To manufacture a physical module and grid, its members have to be given a tangible volume without damaging the kinematic behaviour of the module/grid.
  • a simple pivot hinge e.g. using a bolted joint
  • the joints at the end points of the scissor units usually have to interconnect a spatial configuration of multiple scissor units and enable the correct rotational motion of each unit, generally about different rotation axes.
  • One way to achieve this could be through high-tech ball joints.
  • each joint line comprises two articulated parts which are respectively proportional in length to the corresponding orthogonal line, by a proportionality factor c.
  • a proportionality factor c For example, joint lines with length c.m2' and c.rri3 in Figure 12b are proportional to orthogonal lines and rri3 drawn in the theoretical model of Figure 12a. The proportionality factor c is free to choose.
  • the joint lines c.m2' and c.rri3 are connected to their respective bars 30 and 31 by 2-dimensional joints J1 and J2, i.e. joints allowing one rotational degree of freedom about an axis orthogonal to the scissor unit's plane. These joints J1 and J2 ensure that the joint lines stay in the plane of the scissor unit to which they are connected.
  • the joint lines of lengths c.m2' and c.rri3 are interconnected by a 2-dimensional joint J3, allowing one rotational degree of freedom about the unit line 32 between the units comprising bars 30 and 31 respectively, ensuring that the joint lines remain orthogonal to the unit line 32.
  • the joints lines can be brought into practice by any suitable design, not necessarily by a pair of additional rods with the indicated lengths (such as c.m2' and c.rri3). Thanks to symmetry, the addition of joint lines for example in the manner as described above, allows geometrically compatible solutions for modules of the first embodiment.
  • small incompatibilities 15 may arise during deployment (Fig. 12c) when joint lines are introduced. Thanks to the constraints according to the second embodiment, the module will again be compatible in the compact stage, as all unit lines will then theoretically become parallel. The module hence becomes slightly bistable. As stated above, the presence of these incompatibilities does not exclude the module of Figure 12 from the scope of the appended claims. The module is still regarded as foldable in the present context, given that the theoretical line module to which the joint lines are added is geometrically compatible throughout the deployment stages.
  • reinforcement members such as bars, membranes or cables may be added to the modules in a deployed state and for example oriented along the unit lines or along the diagonals of a module.
  • reinforcement bars do not change the fact that scissor modules are employed in accordance with the invention.
  • Double-layer grids (DLGs) assembled from modules of polar scissor units for which the unit lines aren't all concurrent are subjected to strict constraints, as the internal dihedral angles a of a module are fixed for any deployment stage.
  • these angles should be compatible at any node of the grid during all stages of deployment.
  • K. Atake a solution was found to generate foldable two-way scissor grids with single curvature making use of PRB units for which the total lengths of all bars are equal.
  • Atake By combining non-concurrent modules with concurrent modules, Atake additionally proposed a foldable grid based on a flat trihexagonal pattern (Fig. 13a). Furthermore he designed several spatial grids with a bistable deployment, e.g. a pyramidal structure based on the flat trihexagonal grid or a dome with truncated icosahedron pattern as shown in Fig. 13b,c. In this figure they have been made foldable by cutting the grid open during deployment.
  • a first example is related to two-way DLGs based on rotational surfaces (Fig. 15-16). These scissor grids make use of the symmetrical four-unit module of Fig. 4 (the simplest form of the first embodiment).
  • a rotational surface is generated by rotating a curve about a central axis 16 (Fig. 15).
  • scissor units are arranged along the meridian curves 17 (i.e. the intersection curves of a rotational surface and the planes comprising its axis of rotation) and the parallel circles 18 (i.e.
  • the smooth base surface is discretized using its network of principal curvature lines (Fig. 19a).
  • This network is useful to obtain a mesh with a torsion- free geometric support structure, as described in "Geometric modelling with conical meshes and developable surfaces", Liu et al., 2006, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 25(3), p. 681-689.
  • the geometric support structure of a mesh consists of the quadrangular faces formed by each mesh edge and the mesh normals at its ends (Fig. 19b).
  • this support structure If the faces of this support structure are torsion free (i.e. planar), then they can be populated by planar scissor units to create double-layer scissor grids.
  • the mesh must be optimized such that the geometric constraints as described by the second embodiment are met, which automatically ensures that the deployability constraint (formula (1 )) is applied, as illustrated by the network of mutually tangent prolate spheroids in Fig. 19c.
  • This network of prolate spheroids is a 3-dimensional extension of the tangent ellipse-representation illustrated in Figure 1 b.
  • An individual module is foldable, but again assemblies comprising closed loops of modules are bistable due to angular incompatibilities at the internal nodes (Fig. 19d).
  • the major advantages of the new foldable modules according to the invention is that they generate deployable scissor grids with 'freeform' double curvature using straight bars (existing concepts using straight bars mostly have no, single or spherical double curvature). Thanks to these straight bars, the resulting scissor grids can deploy towards compact bundles (in contrast to existing concepts for (freeform) doubly curved scissor grids using kinked rods, leading to less compact scissor grids).
  • these new scissor grids display a bistable deployment behaviour using four-unit modules, which are more flexible than stiffer three-unit modules (mostly used in existing concepts for bistable scissor grids), which gives them a higher ability to cope with the incompatibilities during deployment.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Toys (AREA)
  • Prostheses (AREA)

Abstract

The invention is related to a foldable scissor module formed of polar scissor units and comprising at least four polar scissor units characterized in that: • At least one of the polar scissor units consists of rods that are not identical in terms of their length and/or their semilengths, i.e. at least one unit is not a regular basic polar (PRB) unit, • The unit lines of the polar units are not all concurrent. The major advantage of the new foldable modules according to the invention is that they generate deployable scissor grids with 'freeform' double curvature using straight bars (existing concepts using straight bars mostly have no, single or spherical double curvature).

Description

A FOLDABLE SCISSOR MODULE FOR DOUBLY CURVED SCISSOR GRIDS
Field of the invention
[0001] The invention is related to scissor modules and grids built from scissor units, each unit consisting of a set of two rods connected at an intermediate rotation point. The invention is in particular related to modules and grids formed of polar scissor units.
Background of the invention
[0002] A deployable scissor grid consists of an articulated network of bars that has the ability to rapidly and reversibly transform in shape and in volume, allowing it to answer to changing needs. Most scissor grids transform between a compact bundle of bars and an expanded functional configuration, particularly useful for applications with a mobile or temporary character. As such they can be prefabricated in factory conditions, after which they are compactly transported and quickly erected on site with low skill and labour force requirements. Afterwards, they can rapidly return to their compact form either to be relocated and reused or to be stowed for later use. A different group of scissor grids comprises shell-like structures that deploy towards their perimeter. These are more useful for example as retractable roofs.
[0003] The basic building block of any scissor linkage is the scissor unit, also commonly known as a scissor-like element (SLE), a pantograph or a duplet. A scissor unit is a planar composition of two bars crosswise interconnected by a revolute joint, referred to as the intermediate hinge point. This joint allows a relative rotation of the bars about an axis orthogonal to the unit plane, which contains the two bars. The distance between the intermediate hinge point and an end point of a scissor unit is called a semi-length. Different types of scissor units exist, which vary in proportions and shape.
The three main scissor unit types are the translational, the polar and the angulated scissor units. They can easily be distinguished through their unit lines, which are the imaginary lines connecting the upper and lower end point at both sides of the scissor unit. Each unit type comes in a basic and a generalized form, which in general allow to respectively generate simple and more complex shapes. In addition, a regular and irregular form can each time be discerned, which tend to give rise to grids with regular and irregular patterns respectively. Regular units are characterized either by rods that together with the unit lines describe a pair of congruent triangles or by parallel chords (i.e. the line connecting the upper nodes and the line connecting the lower nodes).
[0004] Translational scissor units consist of a pair of straight bars and have parallel unit lines throughout deployment. Polar scissor units consist of a pair of straight bars as well, but are characterized by unit lines intersecting at an angle that varies during deployment. The line connecting the intersection point and the intermediate hinge point is called the radial line. In the basic form of polar unit, this radial line is perpendicular to the transverse bisector line of the bars.
[0005] Scissor linkages are formed by linking multiple scissor units at their end nodes using revolute joints in two- or three-dimensional configurations. Most basic are the linear or curvilinear linkages formed by connecting a number of scissor units side by side, often within a plane. An open chain of scissor units in which the dihedral angles between adjacent unit planes are fixed forms a mechanism with one degree of freedom. Its deployment range will be determined by the scissor unit that first reaches one of its outer deployment stages. To optimize this range, the following constraint for any linkage of two scissor units with straight bars as shown in Figure 1 a was presented by F. Escrig in 'Expandable Space Structures', Int Journal of Space Structures, 1 (2), 79-91 :
This equation is also known as the 'deployability constraint'. Despite its name, it isn't always necessary nor sufficient for deployment. It ensures that all units in the linkage simultaneously reach their most compact state (when angles φ equal π) and the scissor linkage is theoretically reduced to a single line. As illustrated in Fig. 1 b, this constraint can be graphically represented by an ellipse with focal points coinciding with the common end points of a pair of interconnected scissor units. As the sum of the distances to the focal points is the same for any point of the ellipse, both intermediate hinge points must be located on the same ellipse. Consequently, any planar linkage of translational or polar units complying with the deployability constraint contains a chain of tangent ellipses, where the tangent points coincide with the intermediate hinge points of the scissor units. In three dimensions the graphical representation of the deployability constraint for a linkage of two scissor units becomes a prolate spheroid (i.e. an ellipse revolved about its major axis). Hence, three-dimensional scissor grids complying to the deployability constraint contain networks of mutually tangent prolate spheroids, referred to as prolate spheroid packing. The use of these networks in the design of scissor grids is illustrated for example in "Generalized geometry of foldable scissor grids based on polar units", Roovers, K. and De Temmerman, N., Proceedings of the IASS 2016 Symposium - Spatial Structures in the 21 st Century, Tokyo, 2016.
[0006] Under specific constraints the two ends of a (curvi)linear linkage of scissor units can be interconnected in order to create a single closed loop of units, called a scissor module. In general a scissor module will describe a spatial, polyhedral shape. In some cases this module can take up the shape of a planar closed ring. A module of polar units might be planar in a single deployment stage, but will be spatial in all other stages due to the varying angle between their unit lines. Forming a closed spatial module requires at least three scissor units.
[0007] K. Atake was the first to present a foldable scissor module consisting solely of polar scissor units for which the unit lines are not concurrent. This is described for example in US Patent 5,761 ,871 and in "ATAKE's structure - new variations of the scissors technique", In Brebbia, C. A. and Escrig, F., editors, Mobile and Rapidly Assembled Structures III (2000), pages 143-154. WIT Press. Atake's modules comprise an even number of regular basic polar units which alternate in orientation. Either opposing units or all units in these modules are identical. In addition, all rods in these modules have the same total length. As such, the unit lines of a module describe antiprisms. Since the unit lines in these modules are not concurrent, the dihedral angles a (see Fig. 3) between the unit planes of adjacent scissor units are fixed for each deployment stage and the modules generally are geometrically rigid.
[0008] The document 'Designing for uncertainty', Rosenberg, Master thesis, Dept. of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009 discloses in Figure 34 a number of foldable modules consisting of polar scissor units, wherein these modules comprise four parallel unit lines. This is realised by using so-called 'double scissor pairs', consisting of a planar linkage of two polar scissor units having two parallel unit lines. Such a double scissor pair behaves like a translational scissor unit. The modules formed of such double scissor pairs shown in Figure 34 of this document do not have fixed internal dihedral angles between two adjacent scissor units on either side of one of the parallel unit lines, for a given deployment stage (i.e. a given set of deployment angles of the scissor units making up the module). In each deployment stage, the scissor units on either side of the parallel unit lines can still rotate relative to each other.
[0009] Scissor grids are formed by combining multiple scissor modules.
The manner in which they are combined leads to distinct spatial configurations. A first of these configurations is known as a single-layer grid (SLG). An SLG is formed by stacking multiple scissor modules consisting of the same amount of scissor units. Two modules are stacked by connecting the upper nodes of one module to the lower nodes of the other module. Hence, the scissor units lie in the base surface described by the grid. A double-layer grid (DLG) is formed by tessellating prismatic scissor modules along a base surface, as described for example in document "Evaluation of Deployable Structures for Space Enclosures", Hanaor and Levy, International Journal of Space Structures (2001 ), 16(4):21 1-229. As such, each module forms a cell in the scissor grid and units at a common edge of two cells are shared by two modules. The upper and lower chords of the scissor units describe two distinct layers.
[0010] The deployment process of a scissor grid generally knows three distinct stages : two outer stages (usually the functional ones, for example the stowed and the expanded configuration) and a transitional stage (during deployment from one outer stage to another). The deployment behaviour of scissor grids is usually described through its geometric compatibility in each of these three stages. A scissor grid is said to be geometrically compatible if all members in the grid fit together without deformations or tolerances. In contrast, it is incompatible when this geometric fit does not exist and some or all members have to elastically deform in order to achieve a certain stage of deployment.
[0011] Foldable scissor grids are geometrically compatible throughout all stages of deployment. The scissor grid therefore acts as a pure mechanism with a smooth and easily controllable deployment behaviour. Once erected, the mechanism should be locked in order to become a loadbearing structure. For this purpose, additional members are often added to the scissor grid, such as struts or cables. Anchoring multiple nodes of a scissor grid to the ground can equally be a strategy to lock its degrees of freedom. The process of manually locking a scissor grid is sometimes seen as a disadvantageous, time-consuming act, especially for large structures requiring many locking devices that might in addition be difficult to access. Clever design choices can nevertheless speed up this process. Evidently, since foldable scissor grids are compatible throughout deployment, intermediate deployment stages can also become functional, e.g. in a partially deployed cover to obtain partial shading.
[0012] Bistable scissor grids are geometrically compatible in the outer deployment stages and incompatible throughout or during a part of the transitional stage. Consequently, the deployment of a bistable grid requires an additional amount of effort to sufficiently deform its members and overcome these incompatibilities, after which it snaps into the next compatible configuration. This way, it becomes possible to create self-locking scissor grids, which, once deployed, remain standing under their own self- weight without external locking devices. Brief description of the figures
[0013] Numerical references 1 through 8 are reserved in the appended drawings for numbering the scissor units within a module, and are therefore re-used in several of the drawings. Primed numbers (1 ', 2' etc) are used when identical units are applied in the same module : for example unit 1 and unit V are identical.
[0014] Figures 1 a and 1 b illustrate the deployability constraint of a linkage formed of scissor units.
[0015] Figures 2a to 2d illustrate the various types of polar scissor units.
[0016] Figure 3 shows three scissor modules according to the above- described prior art by Atake.
[0017] Figure 4 shows a scissor module according to a first embodiment of the invention, consisting of 4 polar scissor units.
[0018] In Figures 4, 5, 6a, 6b, 10 and 1 1 , the images from left to right and top to bottom represent : a 3D view of the scissor module, a view of the unrolled linkage, a top view, a front view and a side view.
[0019] Figure 5 shows a scissor module according to the first embodiment, consisting of 5 polar scissor units.
[0020] Figures 6a and 6b show a scissor module according to the first embodiment, consisting of 6 polar scissor units.
[0021] Figure 7 shows a scissor module according to a second embodiment of the invention, consisting of 4 polar scissor units.
[0022] Figure 8 shows a scissor module according to the second embodiment, consisting of 8 polar scissor units.
[0023] Figure 9 shows a scissor unit according to the second embodiment consisting of 6 units.
[0024] Figures 10 and 1 1 show scissor units according to a third embodiment of the invention, which combines the constraints of the first and second embodiments.
[0025] Fig. 12 illustrates the addition of joint lines with a uniform length in both layers added to a compatible module of polar units: (a) unrolled module with dimensionless joints; (b) unrolled module with joints; (c) three deployment stages in top and side view.
[0026] Fig. 13 illustrates existing concepts for DLGs consisting of all identical PRB units combining modules with concurrent and non-concurrent unit lines (top view and three deployment stages in 3D view): (a) foldable flat DLG with trihexagonal pattern; (b) pyramid; (c) dome with truncated icosahedron pattern.
[0027] Fig. 14 illustrates that (a) a single module according to the first and/or the second embodiment of the invention is foldable, (b) as well as an open chain of such modules, (c) while closed loops of modules generally result in a bistable assembly.
[0028] Fig. 15 shows an example of a rotational surface, which is generated by rotating a curve about an axis.
[0029] Fig. 16 shows a simulation of the deployment process of three bistable DLGs based on rotational surfaces comprising four-unit modules according to the first embodiment.
[0030] Fig. 17 shows a scissor grid based on a catenoid in three deployment stages comprising four-unit modules according to the first embodiment: (a) 3D view and top view of a single row of modules that is foldable and symmetrical about a plane; (b) when linking multiple rows, maximum one row of modules can retain its desired symmetry during deployment while all other are incompatible, (b) shows a 3D view, top view, front view, and side view of a grid in various deployment stages.
[0031] Fig. 18 shows examples of bistable DLGs with negative double curvature making use of 4-unit modules according to the second embodiment, based on: (a) a hypar, (b) a helicoid and (c) a Mobius strip with three half-twists. From top to bottom : 3D view, top view, front view, side view.
[0032] Fig. 19 shows a DLG of PIG units based on the helicoid comprising
4-unit modules according to the second embodiment: (a) principal curvature line network; (b) geometric support structure optimized to have torsion-free faces and comply to the geometric constraints imposed by the modules; (c) prolate spheroid packing on the support structure; (d) deployment simulation of the bistable scissor grid. Parts a, b and c show a front view. Part d shows a front view, top view and side view at various deployment stages. Summary of the invention
[0033] The invention is related to a scissor module and to scissor grids in accordance with the appended claims. The invention is thus firstly related to a foldable scissor module, i.e. a foldable closed loop of scissor units, comprising at least four polar scissor units characterized in that : • At least one of the polar scissor units consists of rods that are not identical in terms of their length and/or their semilengths, i.e. at least one unit is not a regular basic polar (PRB) unit,
• The unit lines of the polar units are not all concurrent.
According to a preferred embodiment, the internal dihedral angles of the module are fixed for any deployment stage.
[0034] According to a first embodiment, the module is symmetrical with respect to at least one symmetry plane (P).
[0035] According to the first embodiment, the module may consist of
· a first and second scissor unit, said first and second units being PRB units, preferably these PRB units are mutually non-identical units,
• a third and fourth scissor unit, said third and fourth unit being mutually identical non-PRB units,
wherein :
· the third and fourth unit are interconnecting the first and second unit,
• the module is symmetrical about one symmetry plane (P) and the PRB units are orthogonal to the plane of symmetry and have their radial line in the plane of symmetry.
[0036] A module according to the first embodiment may consist of an uneven number of scissor units, wherein at least one scissor unit is a PRB unit, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
[0037] Alternatively, a module according to the first embodiment may consist of an even number of scissor units higher than or equal to 6, formed by pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
[0038] According to another alternative of the first embodiment, the module may consist of an even number of scissor units higher than or equal to 6, and comprise an even number of PRB units, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
[0039] According to a second embodiment, all scissor units consist of two rods of equal length, and wherein the opposing or the adjacent semi-lengths at the connection of two units are equal. The constraints of the second embodiment may be combined with those of the first or other embodiments.
[0040] A module according to the second embodiment may consist of an even number of scissor units. A module that combines the constraints of the first and second embodiment may consist of an uneven number of scissor units, an uneven sub- number of which being PRB units, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
[0041] The invention is furthermore related to a scissor module according to the invention, wherein the joints between scissor units are defined by joint lines placed between the spaced-apart units of the module.
[0042] The invention is also related to a double layer scissor grid comprising one or more modules according to the invention.
[0043] A scissor grid according to the invention may be based on a rotational surface and formed of modules according to the first embodiment, wherein the meridian curves of the rotational surface are populated by identical planar linkages of irregular generalized polar units and wherein the parallel circles of the rotational surface are populated by regular basic polar units that are identical within the same circle.
[0044] According to another embodiment, a scissor grid according to the invention may be formed of modules according to the second embodiment, and wherein the grid is based on a surface with double negative curvature.
Detailed description of the invention
[0045] Before describing the modules and grids according to the invention in more detail, the various types of polar scissor units are described. A distinction is made between basic polar units and generalized polar units. Both types have an irregular variant and a regular variant. The following abbreviations will be used hereafter
PRB unit : regular basic polar scissor unit
PiB unit : irregular basic polar scissor unit
PRG unit : regular generalized polar scissor unit
PIG unit : irregular generalized polar scissor unit
Each of the units has four semi-lengths, measured between the intermediate hinge point and the end points of the rods, where they are joined to the rods of other scissor units.
The sizes of these semi-lengths, denoted by a, a', b and b', do not vary during deployment. Figures 2a and 2b respectively show the structure and geometrical parameters of a PIB unit and a PRB unit. Each unit comprises two rods 10 and 20 with respective semi-lengths a and a' above the transverse bisector line TT and b and b' below the transverse bisector line. It is seen that a PRB unit is a PIB unit wherein a = a' and b = b'. A PIB unit is fully determined by three size parameters plus one parameter to set the deployment stage. If one defines the three semi-lengths a, b and a' then for a certain deployment angle φ, all other parameters shown in the drawings can be found as a function of these four input parameters.
[0046] Figures 2c and 2d respectively show the structure and geometrical parameters of a PIG unit and a PRG unit. A PRG unit is a PIG unit wherein b = ka' and b' = ka with k a proportionality factor. Generalized polar units require one additional size parameter in order to be fully determined. The PIG unit is the most general polar scissor unit that can be obtained by interconnecting two straight bars at an intermediate point using a revolute joint. The unit is fully determined by four size parameters plus one parameter to set the deployment stage. For example, by defining all four semi-lengths a, b, a' and b' and a deployment angle φ, all other parameters shown in the drawings can be found. As seen in the drawings, the rotation axis of the rods relative to each other is fixed with respect to each of the two rods.
[0047] Three examples of modules developed by Atake mentioned in the introductory section are illustrated in Figure 3. The images on the left show a 3D view of the module. The images on the right show the corresponding units of the module unrolled in a plane. In the first two examples, all the units are identical PRB units. In the third example, the module consists of four PRB units, with each pair of opposing units (one pair marked T, the other '2') being identical.
[0048] As stated above, the present invention proposes a foldable scissor module formed of polar scissor units that is different from the Atake-approach : a foldable scissor module comprising at least four polar scissor units characterized in that :
• At least one of the polar scissor units consists of rods that are not identical, meaning that the two rods differ in total length and/or semi-lengths,
· The unit lines of the polar units are not all concurrent.
In other words, at least one of the polar units is not a PRB unit. It may be a PIB, PRG or a PIG unit, generally referred to in the present specification as 'non-PRB units'. A 'non-PRB' unit is thus a polar scissor unit of a type other than PRB. Besides these non-PRB units, a module of the invention may comprise PRB units. Whether or not this is the case may depend on the number of units in a module and on further constraints which ensure that the module is foldable, as will be illustrated on the basis of a number of embodiments. In the context of this description, a scissor module is said to be foldable if at least the theoretical line model of the scissor module is geometrically compatible in all the deployment stages. The definition of a geometrically compatible module is the same as given in the introduction with regard to scissor grids. The deployment process of a scissor module generally knows three distinct stages : two outer stages (usually the functional ones, for example the stowed and the expanded configuration) and a transitional stage (during deployment from one outer stage to another). A scissor module is said to be geometrically compatible if all the units in the module fit together without deformations or tolerances. In contrast, it is incompatible when this geometric fit does not exist and some or all of the units have to elastically deform in order to achieve a certain stage of deployment.
[0049] The theoretical line model of a scissor module refers to a module as illustrated in the majority of the appended drawings, wherein the bars of the module are represented as lines interconnected by dimensionless joints, i.e. a point with no dimensions that interconnects two articulated lines. In reality, the bars and the joint have a 2-or 3 dimensional structure, for example embodied by the addition of joint lines as described further in this text. In the presence of such 3-dimensional joints, the modules according to the majority of embodiments according to the invention remain foldable in the above-defined sense, i.e. geometrically compatible in every deployment stage. Some embodiments may however show small incompatibilities and result in slightly bistable modules, as will be illustrated for embodiments including joint lines. These embodiments are nevertheless foldable in the context of this description, given that the theoretical line model corresponding to the modules in question is effectively compatible throughout the three deployment stages.
[0050] According to a preferred embodiment, the internal dihedral angles a of a module according to the invention are fixed for any deployment stage. The internal dihedral angles are the angles between the unit planes of two adjacent scissor units of the module. One dihedral angle a is illustrated in Figure 3 for a module according to Atake. The fact that the internal dihedral angles a of a module are fixed for any deployment stage means that when a module is regarded in a given deployment stage wherein all the scissor units are deployed at a given angle, only one set of dihedral angles is possible. In other words, the module has exactly one geometrically compatible form for each deployment stage.
[0051] Three embodiments of a scissor module according to the invention are described hereafter : a first embodiment makes use of reflection symmetry to ensure a foldable scissor module. In its simplest form illustrated in Figure 4, it consists of four polar scissor units: two PRB units 2 and 3 that are orthogonal to and have their radial line (line r in Figures 1 and 2) located in the plane of symmetry P, and two identical polar units 1 and V that interconnect the first two units. The units 1 and V are polar scissor units consisting of rods that are not identical, in the meaning as defined above. By being symmetrical about at least one plane, these modules can equally consist of more than 4 polar scissor units. To meet the symmetry condition, modules according to the first embodiment comprising an odd number of units contain at least one PRB unit, with the other units consisting of rods that are not identical. This is illustrated in Figure 5 which shows a module according to the first embodiment comprising five polar units, one PRB unit 3 and two pairs of identical polar scissor units 2/2' and 3/3', each of these four units consisting of two non-identical rods.
[0052] Modules according to the first embodiment formed of an even number of units of 6 or higher do not require PRB units, as illustrated in the embodiment shown in Figure 6a. Nevertheless, modules according to the first embodiment having an even number of units of 6 or higher can still contain PRB units. This is illustrated in Figure 6b which shows a module according to the first embodiment comprising six polar units, two of which are PRB units (units 1 and 4), and further comprising two pairs of identical non-PRB units 2/2' and 3/3' each of these four units consisting of two non- identical rods.
[0053] The feature that characterizes a module according to the first embodiment is that the module is symmetrical about at least one plane. Depending on the number of units n of which a module consists, this puts a number of further requirements on the choice of the polar unit types, as illustrated above : when n is uneven, at least one PRB unit is required. The non-PRB units in a module according to the first embodiment are applied in pairs of identical units.
[0054] The second embodiment combines two constraints in order to obtain a foldable module: firstly, all scissor units consist of two bars of equal length (at + b'i = bi + a'i), and secondly, either the opposing semi-lengths at the connection of two units are equal (a'i = bi+1 and b'i = ai+1 , Fig. 7) or the adjacent semi-lengths at the connection of two units are equal ( a'i = ai+1 and b'i = bi+ 1 ), thus embracing two congruent triangles which unrolled in a plane form a parallelogram or kite-shape respectively. Figures 8 and 9 show further examples of modules according to the second embodiment. The module of Figure 8 consists of six polar units wherein all opposing semi-lengths at the connection of two units are equal, i.e. all the pairs of congruent triangles form parallelograms. The module of Figure 9 consists of six units.
Between units 2 and 3 as well as between units 6 and 1 , the congruent triangles form a kite shape, between all other pairs, the congruent triangles form parallelograms. If no additional constraints are applied to a module according to the second embodiment, this module necessarily has an even number of polar units.
[0055] A third embodiment combines the constraints of the first and second embodiment. Figure 10 shows an example of such a module, comprising two PRB units 1 and 4 and two pairs of identical polar (non-PRB) scissor units 2/2' and 3/3', each of these four units consisting of two non-identical rods. The module is symmetric about the plane P (embodiment 1 ), while the constraints according to embodiment 2 are also satisfied. As such it becomes possible to form modules belonging to the second embodiment that consist of an uneven amount of scissor units as illustrated in Fig. 1 1 , where a symmetric module is shown having one PRB unit 3 and two pairs 1/1 ' and 2/2' of identical non-PRB units. More generally, a module that combines the constraints of embodiments 1 and 2 may consist of an uneven number of units, formed of an uneven sub-number of PRB units combined with pairs of identical non-PRB units.
[0056] If for one deployment stage a geometrically compatible closed loop of scissor units with dimensionless joints can be found in accordance with the invention, for example according to the first, second or third embodiment, then the resulting scissor module is foldable. The design of the actual dimensions of the units requires the solving of a set of equations. The way in which these equations can be determined and solved is well known to the skilled person. The compatibility of the modules according to the invention has been empirically verified through parametric models and simulations of their deployment.
[0057] As stated above, the theoretical line model of a scissor module is based on the presence of dimensionless joints between two interconnected bars of the units included in the module. To manufacture a physical module and grid, its members have to be given a tangible volume without damaging the kinematic behaviour of the module/grid. At the intermediate hinge point of each scissor unit a simple pivot hinge (e.g. using a bolted joint) suffices to serve as a revolute joint interconnecting the pair of bars. The joints at the end points of the scissor units on the other hand usually have to interconnect a spatial configuration of multiple scissor units and enable the correct rotational motion of each unit, generally about different rotation axes. One way to achieve this could be through high-tech ball joints. These would however drastically increase the manufacturing cost of the overall structure. Often a better solution is to incorporate joint lines in the theoretical line models of the scissor grid that introduce spacings between the different axes of rotation and consequently serve as placeholders for volumetric joints with a simpler design. These joint lines can for example be added orthogonally to the unit lines, while lying within the scissor unit plane, as illustrated in Figures 12a and 12b for a module according to the second embodiment. Figure 12a shows the theoretical module, i.e. with dimensionless joints. Joint lines 1 1 and 12 that have the same length at the upper and lower nodes of the linkage are added to the module. When adding joint lines to a compatible module with dimensionless joints, compatibility of the deployed configuration can be maintained by dimensioning the joint lines proportionally to the lines running from the mid-point M between two bar ends orthogonally to the unit lines, as shown in Fig. 12 a and b : each joint line comprises two articulated parts which are respectively proportional in length to the corresponding orthogonal line, by a proportionality factor c. For example, joint lines with length c.m2' and c.rri3 in Figure 12b are proportional to orthogonal lines and rri3 drawn in the theoretical model of Figure 12a. The proportionality factor c is free to choose. The joint lines c.m2' and c.rri3 are connected to their respective bars 30 and 31 by 2-dimensional joints J1 and J2, i.e. joints allowing one rotational degree of freedom about an axis orthogonal to the scissor unit's plane. These joints J1 and J2 ensure that the joint lines stay in the plane of the scissor unit to which they are connected. The joint lines of lengths c.m2' and c.rri3 are interconnected by a 2-dimensional joint J3, allowing one rotational degree of freedom about the unit line 32 between the units comprising bars 30 and 31 respectively, ensuring that the joint lines remain orthogonal to the unit line 32.
[0058] The joints lines can be brought into practice by any suitable design, not necessarily by a pair of additional rods with the indicated lengths (such as c.m2' and c.rri3). Thanks to symmetry, the addition of joint lines for example in the manner as described above, allows geometrically compatible solutions for modules of the first embodiment. In modules according to the second embodiment, small incompatibilities 15 may arise during deployment (Fig. 12c) when joint lines are introduced. Thanks to the constraints according to the second embodiment, the module will again be compatible in the compact stage, as all unit lines will then theoretically become parallel. The module hence becomes slightly bistable. As stated above, the presence of these incompatibilities does not exclude the module of Figure 12 from the scope of the appended claims. The module is still regarded as foldable in the present context, given that the theoretical line module to which the joint lines are added is geometrically compatible throughout the deployment stages.
[0059] In any of the embodiments according to the invention, reinforcement members, such as bars, membranes or cables may be added to the modules in a deployed state and for example oriented along the unit lines or along the diagonals of a module. The presence of such reinforcement bars do not change the fact that scissor modules are employed in accordance with the invention.
[0060] Double-layer grids (DLGs) assembled from modules of polar scissor units for which the unit lines aren't all concurrent are subjected to strict constraints, as the internal dihedral angles a of a module are fixed for any deployment stage. To obtain a foldable DLG, these angles should be compatible at any node of the grid during all stages of deployment. As illustrated in the above-named references by K. Atake, a solution was found to generate foldable two-way scissor grids with single curvature making use of PRB units for which the total lengths of all bars are equal.
[0061] By combining non-concurrent modules with concurrent modules, Atake additionally proposed a foldable grid based on a flat trihexagonal pattern (Fig. 13a). Furthermore he designed several spatial grids with a bistable deployment, e.g. a pyramidal structure based on the flat trihexagonal grid or a dome with truncated icosahedron pattern as shown in Fig. 13b,c. In this figure they have been made foldable by cutting the grid open during deployment.
[0062] The above-mentioned existing proposals by Atake all consist of PRB units that have the same bar lengths throughout the grid. In contrast, the modules according to the invention give rise to various new design possibilities with a greater variety in curvature. When interconnecting multiple of these scissor modules to form open chains of modules, the resulting assembly remains foldable, as illustrated in Fig. 14b. However, when introducing closed loops of modules in these assemblies, they generally become bistable (Fig. 14c).
[0063] Two examples of scissor grids that can be generated from the modules according to the invention will be given in the following paragraphs. A first example is related to two-way DLGs based on rotational surfaces (Fig. 15-16). These scissor grids make use of the symmetrical four-unit module of Fig. 4 (the simplest form of the first embodiment). A rotational surface is generated by rotating a curve about a central axis 16 (Fig. 15). To translate this surface into a scissor grid, scissor units are arranged along the meridian curves 17 (i.e. the intersection curves of a rotational surface and the planes comprising its axis of rotation) and the parallel circles 18 (i.e. the intersection curves of a rotational surface and the planes orthogonal to its axis of rotation) of the rotational surface. The meridian curves are populated by identical planar linkages of PIG (i.e. irregular generalized polar) units, while the parallel circles are populated by PRB units that are identical within the same circle. Hence, the resulting scissor grid inherits the high degree of symmetry found in these rotational surfaces. The planar PIG linkage allows a great geometric freedom. A single row of modules is foldable, as the modules have the freedom to adapt to the required angular deformations (Fig. 17a). In assemblies of multiple rows, angular incompatibilities arise at the internal grid nodes during deployment (Fig. 17b). To ensure compatibility in the compact stage and obtain a bistable scissor grid, the deployability constraint as defined in the introductory section (formula (1 ), with reference to Fig. 1 a) must therefore be applied. [0064] The second example makes use of the four-unit module of Fig. 7
(the simplest form of the second embodiment) to generate scissor grids based on surfaces with negative double curvature, for example the hypar, Mobius strip or helicoid (Figs. 18-19). In a first step, the smooth base surface is discretized using its network of principal curvature lines (Fig. 19a). This network is useful to obtain a mesh with a torsion- free geometric support structure, as described in "Geometric modelling with conical meshes and developable surfaces", Liu et al., 2006, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 25(3), p. 681-689. The geometric support structure of a mesh consists of the quadrangular faces formed by each mesh edge and the mesh normals at its ends (Fig. 19b). If the faces of this support structure are torsion free (i.e. planar), then they can be populated by planar scissor units to create double-layer scissor grids. In addition, the mesh must be optimized such that the geometric constraints as described by the second embodiment are met, which automatically ensures that the deployability constraint (formula (1 )) is applied, as illustrated by the network of mutually tangent prolate spheroids in Fig. 19c. This network of prolate spheroids is a 3-dimensional extension of the tangent ellipse-representation illustrated in Figure 1 b. An individual module is foldable, but again assemblies comprising closed loops of modules are bistable due to angular incompatibilities at the internal nodes (Fig. 19d).
[0065] The major advantages of the new foldable modules according to the invention is that they generate deployable scissor grids with 'freeform' double curvature using straight bars (existing concepts using straight bars mostly have no, single or spherical double curvature). Thanks to these straight bars, the resulting scissor grids can deploy towards compact bundles (in contrast to existing concepts for (freeform) doubly curved scissor grids using kinked rods, leading to less compact scissor grids). In addition, these new scissor grids display a bistable deployment behaviour using four-unit modules, which are more flexible than stiffer three-unit modules (mostly used in existing concepts for bistable scissor grids), which gives them a higher ability to cope with the incompatibilities during deployment.

Claims

1 . A foldable scissor module comprising at least four polar scissor units characterized in that :
· At least one of the polar scissor units consists of rods that are not identical in terms of their length and/or their semilengths, i.e. at least one unit is not a regular basic polar (PRB) unit,
• The unit lines of the polar units are not all concurrent.
2. The scissor module according to claim 1 , wherein the internal dihedral angles of the module are fixed for any deployment stage.
3. The scissor module according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the module is symmetrical with respect to at least one symmetry plane (P).
4. The scissor module according to claim 3, consisting of
• a first and second scissor unit, said first and second units being PRB units,
• a third and fourth scissor unit, said third and fourth unit being mutually identical non-PRB units,
and wherein :
• the third and fourth unit are interconnecting the first and second unit,
• the module is symmetrical about one symmetry plane (P) and the PRB units are orthogonal to the plane of symmetry and have their radial line in the plane of symmetry.
5. The scissor module according to claim 3, consisting of an uneven number of scissor units, and wherein at least one scissor unit is a PRB unit, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
6. The scissor module according to claim 3, consisting of an even number of scissor units higher than or equal to 6, formed by pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
7. The scissor module according to claim 3, consisting of an even number of scissor units higher than or equal to 6, and comprising an even number of PRB units, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non-PRB units.
8. The scissor module according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein all scissor units consist of two rods of equal length, and wherein the opposing or the adjacent semi-lengths at the connection of two units are equal.
9. The scissor module according to claim 8, consisting of an even number of scissor units.
1 0. The scissor module according to claim 8, wherein the module is symmetrical with respect to at least one symmetry plane (P), and wherein the module consists of an uneven number of scissor units, an uneven sub-number of which being PRB units, the remainder of the units consisting of pairs of mutually identical non- PRB units.
1 1 . A scissor module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the joints between scissor units are defined by joint lines (1 1 , 12) placed between the spaced-apart units of the module.
12. A double layer scissor grid comprising one or more modules according to any one of the preceding claims.
1 3. The scissor grid according to claim 12, based on a rotational surface and formed of modules according to claim 2, wherein the meridian curves of the rotational surface are populated by identical planar linkages of irregular generalized polar units and wherein the parallel circles of the rotational surface are populated by regular basic polar units that are identical within the same circle.
14. The scissor grid according to claim 12 and formed of modules according to claim 7, wherein the grid is based on a surface with double negative curvature.
EP18711919.3A 2017-03-16 2018-03-15 A foldable scissor module for doubly curved scissor grids Active EP3596278B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP17161353 2017-03-16
EP17180268 2017-07-07
PCT/EP2018/056609 WO2018167247A1 (en) 2017-03-16 2018-03-15 A foldable scissor module for doubly curved scissor grids

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3596278A1 true EP3596278A1 (en) 2020-01-22
EP3596278B1 EP3596278B1 (en) 2023-08-30

Family

ID=61691499

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18711919.3A Active EP3596278B1 (en) 2017-03-16 2018-03-15 A foldable scissor module for doubly curved scissor grids

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3596278B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2018167247A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US12446668B1 (en) 2024-03-13 2025-10-21 Peter A Feinstein Patents LLC Band employing bistable compliant scissor linkages and hands-free actuation mechanism
US12369695B1 (en) 2024-03-13 2025-07-29 Peter A Feinstein Patents LLC Band employing bistable magnetic actuator

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995021350A1 (en) 1994-02-07 1995-08-10 Aleph Co., Ltd. Framed construction
DE102011121207B4 (en) * 2011-12-20 2023-08-24 Axel Ritter Deformable scissor construction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3596278B1 (en) 2023-08-30
WO2018167247A1 (en) 2018-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Roovers et al. Geometric design of deployable scissor grids consisting of generalized polar units
Chen et al. Design of structural mechanisms
DE102004061485B4 (en) Double curved shell and its use and method of making same
Zhang et al. Automatically assembled large-scale tensegrities by truncated regular polyhedral and prismatic elementary cells
JP3455221B2 (en) Frame structure
Gantes A design methodology for deployable structures
US12398554B2 (en) Space curved reticulated shell structure formed by stacking and combining rhombic dodecahedrons and a construction method thereof
US5540013A (en) Stellate hinged polygons forming a family of complex polyhedrons having discrete interiors and exteriors
Arnouts et al. Computational design of bistable deployable scissor structures: trends and challenges
EP3596278B1 (en) A foldable scissor module for doubly curved scissor grids
JPS63502440A (en) Polyhedral structure approximating a sphere
Jiang et al. Computational design and optimization of quad meshes based on diagonal meshes
Tellier Bundling elastic gridshells with alignable nets. Part II: Form-finding
CN107133410A (en) A kind of foldable straight space prismatic based on graph theory can open up unit mechanisms Structure Configuration Synthesis method
EP4419757A1 (en) 3d woven structures and methods of making and using same
US6070373A (en) Rigid stellate non-rectilinear polygons forming a family of concave polyhedrons having discrete interiors and exteriors
Motro Structural morphology of tensegrity systems
US20240384522A1 (en) 3d woven structures and methods of making and using same
Ramos-Jaime et al. Hyperboloid modules for deployable structures
Rivas-Adrover Classification of geometry for deployable structures used for innovation: Design of new surfaces with scissor 2 bar, and form generation method of relative ratios
CN115548623A (en) Parabolic framework deployable antenna mechanism of scissor-type networking
Liapi et al. A parametric approach to the design of vaulted tensegrity networks
Tellier Alignable nets: compacting elastic gridshells
Motro Structural morphology of tensegrity systems
CN117005546A (en) A space-foldable structure based on origami and kirigami technology and its modular application

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190916

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20220707

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: DE TEMMERMAN, NIELS

Inventor name: ROOVERS, KELVIN

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230322

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602018056357

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230824

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1605624

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20230830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231130

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231230

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231201

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602018056357

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20240603

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240315

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240315

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230830

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20260219

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20260220

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20260219

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20260219

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20260220

Year of fee payment: 9