EP3529749A1 - Graphic protective element authenticity check system - Google Patents

Graphic protective element authenticity check system

Info

Publication number
EP3529749A1
EP3529749A1 EP18734317.3A EP18734317A EP3529749A1 EP 3529749 A1 EP3529749 A1 EP 3529749A1 EP 18734317 A EP18734317 A EP 18734317A EP 3529749 A1 EP3529749 A1 EP 3529749A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
dimensional code
logic comparison
comparison unit
data
digital image
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP18734317.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3529749B1 (en
Inventor
designation of the inventor has not yet been filed The
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cipherme Technology Ltd
Original Assignee
Cipherme Technology Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from UAU201713163U external-priority patent/UA124051U/en
Priority claimed from UAA201804482A external-priority patent/UA119020C2/en
Application filed by Cipherme Technology Ltd filed Critical Cipherme Technology Ltd
Publication of EP3529749A1 publication Critical patent/EP3529749A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3529749B1 publication Critical patent/EP3529749B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/32—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
    • H04L9/3271—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials using challenge-response
    • H04L9/3278—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials using challenge-response using physically unclonable functions [PUF]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/10—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
    • G06K7/14—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation using light without selection of wavelength, e.g. sensing reflected white light
    • G06K7/1404—Methods for optical code recognition
    • G06K7/1408—Methods for optical code recognition the method being specifically adapted for the type of code
    • G06K7/1417—2D bar codes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/80—Recognising image objects characterised by unique random patterns
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/95—Pattern authentication; Markers therefor; Forgery detection
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L2209/00—Additional information or applications relating to cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication H04L9/00
    • H04L2209/12—Details relating to cryptographic hardware or logic circuitry

Definitions

  • This invention refers to the devices for checking the correctness of marking on the record medium, devices for reading from the record medium, devices for reading and identifying printed or written characters or for identifying images etc. More specifically, the claimed system refers to digital automated electronic system for the protection of the graphic protective element against the unauthorized reproduction of the graphic protective element.
  • Document US2004079800 (Al) dated 29.04.2004 is known in the art, disclosing the document check system, which allows checking whether the document is original.
  • the terminal receives the recorded information about the vector function pointing to the non-reproducible fraction of differences in the print field of the original document and saves the recorded vector element on hard disk through the Internet.
  • the server receives as a calculated vector of functions the same information as the recorded vector element in the document being checked if the document is original, reads the recorded vector element from the hard disk, compares the received vector of calculated functions with the read recorded vector element and checks whether the document being checked is original on the basis of the comparison result.
  • the instant invention works at the micro-level and requires additional special optical devices or technical solutions. Such configuration limits the method usability.
  • the microscopic texture image consists of the plurality of code domains of the same sizes, each code domain consists of several ink dots, and its image resolution is from 300 to 1200 dpi, the minimum distance between two ink dots is 3 ⁇ 8 pixels, but the size of each ink dot is l ⁇ 4 pixels.
  • the coordinates and specific number of pixels of each ink dot in the form of microscopic shader are calculated through the software algorithm and the image data are created for the printing or printing on the product surface. It means that the image of microscopic texture contains the product code and is difficult for copying.
  • the microscopic texture copy protection under this invention is characterized by the difficulty of the copying process. Using this invention, the identification of products requiring the protection against forgery can be carried out quickly, accurately and reliably. Besides, this invention can generate microscopic image of texture, which is highly secure and has a high number of reports through the regular printing, therefore, the cost of printing significantly decreases whereas the copy prevention effect increases.
  • This invention stipulates that the pattern should be randomly generated under specific printing and check conditions.
  • the forgery is detected through the comparison of preset parameters with the candidate’s image.
  • the tolerances are indicated as the value of dots - 1-4 pixels and 3-8 pixels between each dot and are fixed. Such methodology just complicates the copying but does not protect against it.
  • Patent application US2017091505 (Al) dated 30.03.2017 is known in the art, disclosing the system, which includes the resolution of the template of 2D bar code, containing several standard 2D elements of bar codes printed on the printed surface, and which is fixed to the unique product; and at least one glyph printed in the area of 2D bar code. At least one glyph is formed from the information identifying the unique product.
  • the elements of 2D standard bar code can be decoded by the first 2D scanner with the bar code for receiving the information about the product, but the second scanning shall be performed by the user to check whether the mark corresponds to relevant glyph shown on the screen.
  • 2D bar code template which includes at least one glyph, can be decoded with a second 2D scanner with the bar code for receiving different information about the product.
  • the elements of the bar code are returned to the user in the form of a specific character.
  • the user shall perform the second scanning, for example, using the remote tools of the user to check the compliance of the mark with the glyph shown on the screen.
  • standard elements of the bar codes can be proper, that is to say, original and the method of decoding the elements of the standard bar code may not be subject to public disclosure; it may be done, for example, for ensuring the additional level of protection against forgery.
  • a well-known system allows for checking the presence of information provided by the 2D bar code on the remote server.
  • As the identification of the 2D bar code and the glyph is carried out according to standardized decoding modes, it allows for unobstructed copying of the graphic protective element provided that the copy is reproduced in a qualitative manner.
  • the objective of the instant invention is to create the system allowing for the graphic protective element authenticity check.
  • the graphic protective element authenticity check system comprises the input block configured to receive a sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code.
  • the input block is further configured to receive the digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
  • the system includes the electronic database comprising
  • the first set of data which includes the set of unique data for at least a part of sequence of characters which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code Ml, where the length of each sequence of characters includes the set of unique data
  • the second set of data which includes the set of keys for the identification of digital image of the second two-dimensional code characterized by at least the presence of control points and/or graphic pattern where each key is associated with at least a part of points of the graphic pattern and sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code from the plurality of Ml and which creates the preset key M2’,
  • the third set of data which includes the plurality of unique encoded values, each of which was assigned the relevant digital image of the second two-dimensional code M2,
  • each set of reference parameters is assigned to the digital image of the second two-dimensional code based on its analysis.
  • the system includes the decoder configured to identify the digital image of the second two-dimensional code for receiving the encoded key M2” using the preset key M2’ and set of calculated Q’ quality parameters, based at least on the determination of the presence of points and/or graphic pattern and sequence of characters of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
  • the system includes the first logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the decoded key M2” with the preset key M2’, saved in the second set of data.
  • the system comprises the second logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the set of calculated quality Q’ parameters with the set of reference quality parameters Q.
  • the system includes the output block configured to receive the results of the logic comparison from the first logic comparison unit and the second logic comparison unit and transfer the results of the graphic protective element authenticity check, based on the results of the logic comparison of the first logic comparison unit and second comparison unit.
  • the inputs of the input block are the inputs of the system and the outputs of the input block are connected to the input of the electronic database and input of the decoder,
  • the outputs of the decoder and electronic database are connected to the inputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit,
  • the outputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit are connected to the input of the output block and the outputs of the output block are the outputs of the system.
  • the graphic protective element authenticity check system comprises the input block configured to receive a sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code.
  • the input block is further configured to receive the digital image of the second two-dimensional code connected with the first two-dimensional code.
  • the system includes the electronic database comprising
  • the first set of data which includes the set of unique data for at least a part of sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code Ml, where the length of each sequence of characters includes the set of unique data
  • the second set of data which includes the set of keys for the identification of digital image of the second two-dimensional code characterized by at least the presence of control points and/or graphic pattern where each key is associated with at least a part of points of the graphic pattern and sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code from the plurality of Ml and which creates the preset key M2’,
  • the third set of data corresponding to the generated and scattered set of points of the graphic pattern, forming another two-dimensional code, and including the plurality of unique encoded values, each of which is assigned a relevant digital image of the second two-dimensional code M2 based on the set of the first two-dimensional code Ml, - the fourth set of data, which includes the predetermined set of reference quality parameters Q, where each set of reference parameters is assigned to the digital image of the second two-dimensional code based on its analysis.
  • the system includes the decoder configured to identify the digital image of the second two-dimensional code for receiving the encoded key M2” using the preset key M2’ and set of calculated Q’ quality parameters, based at least on the determination of the presence of points and/or graphic pattern and sequence of characters of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
  • the system includes the first logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the decoded key M2” with the preset key M2’, saved in the second set of data.
  • the system comprises the second logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the set of calculated parameters of Q’ quality with the plurality of reference quality parameters Q.
  • the system includes the output block configured to receive the results of the logic comparison from the first logic comparison unit and the second logic comparison unit and transfer the results of the graphic protective element authenticity check, based on the results of the logic comparison of the first logic comparison unit and second comparison unit.
  • the inputs of the input block are the inputs of the system and the outputs of the input block are connected to the input of the electronic database and input of the decoder,
  • the outputs of the decoder and electronic database are connected to the inputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit,
  • the outputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit are connected to the input of the output block and the outputs of the output block are the outputs of the system.
  • the system includes the third set of data corresponding to the generated and scattered set of points of the graphic pattern, forming another two-dimensional code, and including the plurality of unique encoded values, each of which is assigned a relevant digital image of the second two- dimensional code M2 based on the set of the first two-dimensional code Ml .
  • the technical result being achieved when using the technical solution consists in ensuring the determination of the increased level of protection of the graphic protective element using the comprehensive analysis of the data, which are the result of the identification from the code medium.
  • the monitoring is carried out with regard to the quality of the printed graphic protective element as an additional level of authenticity check. That is to say, the claimed system provides a high level of authenticity when determining the originality of the graphic protective element.
  • the claimed system allows for more accurate detection of the forged protective graphic element during the check.
  • the additionally claimed technical solution is simple to use, that extends the scope of its implementation.
  • the claimed technical solution uses the principle of physical unclonable function (PUF).
  • the reproducing device converts the data from the digital form to the analogue one. During the conversion, the noises occur, being superimposed on the reproducible data and create unique configuration. Such unique configuration is characterized by the data reproduced in the analogue form and distortions caused by superimposed noises. That is to say, the reproduced data will be somewhat different from the digital type.
  • the said noises are accidental, making impossible their repeated occurrence and reproduction. Even when copying the graphic protective element into the graphic pattern, aside from occurred accidental noises, the noises and distortions are also added by the copy machine.
  • the set of reference quality parameters Q of the primary graphic protective element will differ from the set of calculated Q’ quality parameters of the copied graphic protective element showing its forgery.
  • the point of the claimed technical solution is explained by the schematic drawing (Fig. 1), which in no way limits the use of the claimed system and their other possible embodiments within the technical solution disclosed in the claims.
  • the said drawing (Fig. 1) explains the point through the conditional material objects with intrinsic features included in the claims.
  • the graphic protective element authenticity check is the hardware or hardware- software complex, data inputs and outputs configured to receive and transfer the digital data.
  • the system allows for simultaneous processing, conversion, identification, decoding etc. of at least two parameters related to the graphic protective element.
  • the graphic protective element means the matrix of protected information having high density and complexity, containing binary values, which may include alphanumeric values.
  • the graphic protective element has at least two areas encoded under different methods and requiring different decoding algorithms. The function of physical protection is performed through the optimal use of natural and irreversible losses of information occurring during the printing process. The reading of the graphic protective element allows for the determination of its feature (original or copy) and determination of authenticity of the graphic protective element.
  • the input block is the hardware or hardware-software tool, preferably - multichannel digital receiver.
  • the input block may comprise a separator for the separation of the sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code and digital image of the second two-dimensional code. The subsequent redirection of separate input data ensures their parallel processing.
  • the electronic database should be understood as the hardware-software solution, preferably produced in the form of the tangible medium characterized by the arrangement of digital data entered, saved, reproduced and deleted via the hardware and software intervention.
  • the decoder is understood as the hardware-software tool intended for the conversion of data and their provision for further processing.
  • the logic comparison unit is understood as the hardware or hardware-software tool performing the comparison between the data received at the input pursuant to the preset parameters.
  • the logic comparison unit further performs the evaluation of the result of comparison with the predetermined comparison functions for the establishment of the degree of similarity.
  • the input block is the hardware or hardware-software tool, in particular, is the digital transmitter.
  • the medium comprises the graphic protective element represented in the first embodiment by two encoded readable elements.
  • the first encoded element is represented by two-dimensional code containing public information, which may be available during the code reading.
  • the elements of the standard two-dimensional code can use existing standard and can correspond to any existing format of 2D bar code, such as, for example, Aztec Coding, Datamatrix, PDF417, MaxiCode or QR-coding etc.
  • the colour format of 2D bar code can also be used, for example, high capacity (HCCB) SVC coding format.
  • the second two-dimensional code contains private information, which can be identified under certain conditions.
  • the algorithm of decoding a second two-dimensional code differs from the algorithm of decoding the first two-dimensional code.
  • the second two-dimensional code is transmitted to the system as a graphic file, that is to say, digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
  • the result of reading is transmitted to the system for the graphic protective element authenticity check.
  • the sequence of characters is received being the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code and digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
  • the input block transmits the received results of reading the graphic protective element to the electronic database and to the decoder.
  • a set of relevant records characterizing the graphic protective element Ml, M2, M2 ', and Q is selected from these results of reading.
  • the electronic database comprises four sets of data.
  • the received results of reading the graphic protective element come to the first set of data.
  • Ml value received in the first set of data is at least a part of read public section of information from the graphic protective element.
  • the preset key M2’ is determined in the second set of data.
  • the preset key M2’ is required for the identification of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code through the decoder. After the identification of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code through the decoder, it will be assigned a decoded M2” key.
  • the third set of data comprises reference values M2 generated on the basis of the preset M2’ key.
  • the reference value M2 and the decoded M2” key identified by the decoder are delivered to the input of the first logic comparison unit.
  • the predefined set of reference quality parameters Q saved in the fourth set of data is determined, which is assigned to the digital image of the second two-dimensional code based on its specific analysis.
  • the example of the analysis of the second two-dimensional code is, in particular, topological analysis.
  • the decoder identifies the digital image of the second two-dimensional code to receive M2” decoded key and a set of calculated Q’ quality parameters.
  • the set of calculated Q’ quality parameters is the indicators of deviation from the reference image used when applying the image, that is the part, which is distinctive, that is to say, with changes incorporated during the reproduction, part of the graphic protective element represented by the second two-dimensional code, on the medium. It allows for the performance of the check of authenticity of the graphic protective element having a high level of protection.
  • the set of reference quality parameters can be represented by a set of indicators.
  • the set of indicators can comprise, in particular, the data on the number of control points being compared with the number of control points on the readable graphic protective element, or data on the distance between reference points, where this data is compared with analogous distances from the readable graphic protective element, or data on the geometric figure where the quality indicator will be determined by the degree of similarity between the reference form and determined form of the readable graphic element or random combination of the above-mentioned sets etc.
  • a certain definition function is used, which defines, for example, the threshold on exceeding the array of limit values of relative similarity for each set of indicators.
  • the forged graphic protective element can be detected by processing at least one parameter, or after processing the entire set of indicators, if the previous definitions, in addition to the latter, did not detect forgery. This allows for more adapted distribution of resources of the claimed system.
  • the decoded M2” key is correlated and compared with the preset M2’ key, saved in the second set of data and through the help of the second logic comparison unit, the set of calculated Q’ quality parameters are correlated and compared with the set of reference quality parameters Q. It allows for the performance of simultaneous check of authenticity of the graphic protective element by several parameters.
  • the summary results are received with regard to the logic comparison from the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit and these results are transferred for the graphic protective element authenticity check based on the results of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit.
  • the medium comprises the graphic protective element represented by one encoded element.
  • the protective graphic element is not linked to the performance in certain two-dimensional code.
  • the protective element in this version is embodied as a single image of two-dimensional code.
  • the single image of two-dimensional code should be understood that the digital image of the second two-dimensional code is linked to the first two-dimensional code, as shown below.
  • Ml is contained directly on the graphic protective element. That is to say, the encoding algorithm directly applies to the graphic protective element.
  • the encoding algorithm can be random but it does not refer to the quality assessment algorithm to determine the predefined set of reference quality parameters Q.
  • the certain relevant area will be defined where the public information Ml is saved.
  • the unique sequences of binary data for the pattern of a certain graphic protective element are formed according to the algorithm involving the placement of points in several layers.
  • each layer is responsible for different functions, for instance, positioning, identification, verification.
  • the generation algorithm provides for the generation of binary data such that the combination of binary data could determine the authenticity through the identification and verification of certain layers, which, in such interpretation, correspond to the encoded data M2 with the use of the preset key M2’. Therefore, the placement of the first two-dimensional code is possible as a single (essentially - integrated, complex) two-dimensional code.
  • the electronic database includes the third set of data corresponding to the generated and scattered set of points of the graphic pattern, creating a second two-dimensional code, and comprising the set of unique encoded values, each of which is assigned a relevant digital image of the second two-dimensional code M2 based on the set of the first two-dimensional code Ml.
  • the important difference from the first embodiment is the formation of the graphic protective element produced in the form of a single two-dimensional code, where the graphic protective element is produced in any form (round, square, rhomb etc.), wherein the two-dimensional code concurrently represents the encoded public information Ml and encoded data M2.
  • the code selection is preferably applied for the identification. That is, based on the appearance of the two-dimensional code it is not possible to identify clearly the decoding algorithm for the detection of public information. This allows for not limiting to a certain embodiment of the graphic protective element and the algorithm of decoding public information.
  • the claimed system can be combined with external electronic complexes for different purposes depending on the aim of the utilization.
  • this system allows for marking the products with unique graphic protective elements, ensures control and monitoring of the sales of such products, in particular, through original graphic protective elements.
  • the detection of non-original protective elements shows their non-uniqueness, thereby pointing to the probable attempt of counterfeiting or counterfeiting of products, or marking the product with forged graphic protective elements.
  • this system can be produced as fixed or mobile, expanding the opportunities for its use in various fields of activity.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Editing Of Facsimile Originals (AREA)
  • Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)

Abstract

This invention refers to the digital automated electronic systems for the protection of the graphic protective element against the unauthorized reproduction of the graphic protective element. The system allows for simultaneous processing, conversion, identification, decoding etc. of at least two parameters related to the graphic protective element. The technical result consists in determining the increased level of protection of the graphic protective element using the comprehensive analysis of the received data, which is the result of the identification of the code from the medium.

Description

GRAPHIC PROTECTIVE ELEMENT AUTHENTICITY CHECK SYSTEM
This invention refers to the devices for checking the correctness of marking on the record medium, devices for reading from the record medium, devices for reading and identifying printed or written characters or for identifying images etc. More specifically, the claimed system refers to digital automated electronic system for the protection of the graphic protective element against the unauthorized reproduction of the graphic protective element.
Document US2004079800 (Al) dated 29.04.2004 is known in the art, disclosing the document check system, which allows checking whether the document is original. The terminal receives the recorded information about the vector function pointing to the non-reproducible fraction of differences in the print field of the original document and saves the recorded vector element on hard disk through the Internet. The server receives as a calculated vector of functions the same information as the recorded vector element in the document being checked if the document is original, reads the recorded vector element from the hard disk, compares the received vector of calculated functions with the read recorded vector element and checks whether the document being checked is original on the basis of the comparison result.
Technically, the instant invention works at the micro-level and requires additional special optical devices or technical solutions. Such configuration limits the method usability.
Document TW201711438 dated 16.03.2017 is known in the art, disclosing the copy protection method and forgery prevention method based on the microscopic texture image. The microscopic texture image consists of the plurality of code domains of the same sizes, each code domain consists of several ink dots, and its image resolution is from 300 to 1200 dpi, the minimum distance between two ink dots is 3~8 pixels, but the size of each ink dot is l~4 pixels. The coordinates and specific number of pixels of each ink dot in the form of microscopic shader are calculated through the software algorithm and the image data are created for the printing or printing on the product surface. It means that the image of microscopic texture contains the product code and is difficult for copying. The microscopic texture copy protection under this invention is characterized by the difficulty of the copying process. Using this invention, the identification of products requiring the protection against forgery can be carried out quickly, accurately and reliably. Besides, this invention can generate microscopic image of texture, which is highly secure and has a high number of reports through the regular printing, therefore, the cost of printing significantly decreases whereas the copy prevention effect increases.
This invention stipulates that the pattern should be randomly generated under specific printing and check conditions. The forgery is detected through the comparison of preset parameters with the candidate’s image. The tolerances are indicated as the value of dots - 1-4 pixels and 3-8 pixels between each dot and are fixed. Such methodology just complicates the copying but does not protect against it.
Patent application US2017091505 (Al) dated 30.03.2017 is known in the art, disclosing the system, which includes the resolution of the template of 2D bar code, containing several standard 2D elements of bar codes printed on the printed surface, and which is fixed to the unique product; and at least one glyph printed in the area of 2D bar code. At least one glyph is formed from the information identifying the unique product. The elements of 2D standard bar code can be decoded by the first 2D scanner with the bar code for receiving the information about the product, but the second scanning shall be performed by the user to check whether the mark corresponds to relevant glyph shown on the screen. In other embodiment, 2D bar code template, which includes at least one glyph, can be decoded with a second 2D scanner with the bar code for receiving different information about the product.
The elements of the bar code are returned to the user in the form of a specific character. The user shall perform the second scanning, for example, using the remote tools of the user to check the compliance of the mark with the glyph shown on the screen. Alternatively, standard elements of the bar codes can be proper, that is to say, original and the method of decoding the elements of the standard bar code may not be subject to public disclosure; it may be done, for example, for ensuring the additional level of protection against forgery.
A well-known system allows for checking the presence of information provided by the 2D bar code on the remote server. As the identification of the 2D bar code and the glyph is carried out according to standardized decoding modes, it allows for unobstructed copying of the graphic protective element provided that the copy is reproduced in a qualitative manner.
This technical solution is pegged as the closest analogue. The common features of the claimed utility model and closest analogue in view of the terminology used in the following description are the input block configured to receive a sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code.
The objective of the instant invention is to create the system allowing for the graphic protective element authenticity check. As seen from the prior art, there is a need to increase the level of protection of the graphic protective element to reduce the likelihood of its forgery, copying, reproduction etc.
Such objective can be achieved based on the fact that the graphic protective element authenticity check system comprises the input block configured to receive a sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code.
In accordance with the technical solution, the input block is further configured to receive the digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
The system includes the electronic database comprising
- the first set of data, which includes the set of unique data for at least a part of sequence of characters which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code Ml, where the length of each sequence of characters includes the set of unique data,
- the second set of data, which includes the set of keys for the identification of digital image of the second two-dimensional code characterized by at least the presence of control points and/or graphic pattern where each key is associated with at least a part of points of the graphic pattern and sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code from the plurality of Ml and which creates the preset key M2’,
- the third set of data, which includes the plurality of unique encoded values, each of which was assigned the relevant digital image of the second two-dimensional code M2,
- the fourth set of data, which includes the predetermined set of reference quality parameters Q, where each set of reference parameters is assigned to the digital image of the second two-dimensional code based on its analysis.
Besides, the system includes the decoder configured to identify the digital image of the second two-dimensional code for receiving the encoded key M2” using the preset key M2’ and set of calculated Q’ quality parameters, based at least on the determination of the presence of points and/or graphic pattern and sequence of characters of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
Besides, the system includes the first logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the decoded key M2” with the preset key M2’, saved in the second set of data.
The system comprises the second logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the set of calculated quality Q’ parameters with the set of reference quality parameters Q.
Besides, the system includes the output block configured to receive the results of the logic comparison from the first logic comparison unit and the second logic comparison unit and transfer the results of the graphic protective element authenticity check, based on the results of the logic comparison of the first logic comparison unit and second comparison unit.
In this case, the inputs of the input block are the inputs of the system and the outputs of the input block are connected to the input of the electronic database and input of the decoder, The outputs of the decoder and electronic database are connected to the inputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit,
The outputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit are connected to the input of the output block and the outputs of the output block are the outputs of the system.
According to another embodiment, the graphic protective element authenticity check system comprises the input block configured to receive a sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code.
According to the claimed technical solution, the input block is further configured to receive the digital image of the second two-dimensional code connected with the first two-dimensional code.
The system includes the electronic database comprising
- the first set of data, which includes the set of unique data for at least a part of sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code Ml, where the length of each sequence of characters includes the set of unique data,
- the second set of data, which includes the set of keys for the identification of digital image of the second two-dimensional code characterized by at least the presence of control points and/or graphic pattern where each key is associated with at least a part of points of the graphic pattern and sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code from the plurality of Ml and which creates the preset key M2’,
- the third set of data corresponding to the generated and scattered set of points of the graphic pattern, forming another two-dimensional code, and including the plurality of unique encoded values, each of which is assigned a relevant digital image of the second two-dimensional code M2 based on the set of the first two-dimensional code Ml, - the fourth set of data, which includes the predetermined set of reference quality parameters Q, where each set of reference parameters is assigned to the digital image of the second two-dimensional code based on its analysis.
Besides, the system includes the decoder configured to identify the digital image of the second two-dimensional code for receiving the encoded key M2” using the preset key M2’ and set of calculated Q’ quality parameters, based at least on the determination of the presence of points and/or graphic pattern and sequence of characters of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
Besides, the system includes the first logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the decoded key M2” with the preset key M2’, saved in the second set of data.
The system comprises the second logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the set of calculated parameters of Q’ quality with the plurality of reference quality parameters Q.
Besides, the system includes the output block configured to receive the results of the logic comparison from the first logic comparison unit and the second logic comparison unit and transfer the results of the graphic protective element authenticity check, based on the results of the logic comparison of the first logic comparison unit and second comparison unit.
Moreover, the inputs of the input block are the inputs of the system and the outputs of the input block are connected to the input of the electronic database and input of the decoder,
The outputs of the decoder and electronic database are connected to the inputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit,
The outputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit are connected to the input of the output block and the outputs of the output block are the outputs of the system.
According to another embodiment, the system includes the third set of data corresponding to the generated and scattered set of points of the graphic pattern, forming another two-dimensional code, and including the plurality of unique encoded values, each of which is assigned a relevant digital image of the second two- dimensional code M2 based on the set of the first two-dimensional code Ml .
The technical result being achieved when using the technical solution consists in ensuring the determination of the increased level of protection of the graphic protective element using the comprehensive analysis of the data, which are the result of the identification from the code medium. In this case, the monitoring is carried out with regard to the quality of the printed graphic protective element as an additional level of authenticity check. That is to say, the claimed system provides a high level of authenticity when determining the originality of the graphic protective element. Besides, the claimed system allows for more accurate detection of the forged protective graphic element during the check. The additionally claimed technical solution is simple to use, that extends the scope of its implementation.
The claimed technical solution uses the principle of physical unclonable function (PUF). The reproducing device converts the data from the digital form to the analogue one. During the conversion, the noises occur, being superimposed on the reproducible data and create unique configuration. Such unique configuration is characterized by the data reproduced in the analogue form and distortions caused by superimposed noises. That is to say, the reproduced data will be somewhat different from the digital type. The said noises are accidental, making impossible their repeated occurrence and reproduction. Even when copying the graphic protective element into the graphic pattern, aside from occurred accidental noises, the noises and distortions are also added by the copy machine. In this regard, the set of reference quality parameters Q of the primary graphic protective element will differ from the set of calculated Q’ quality parameters of the copied graphic protective element showing its forgery. The point of the claimed technical solution is explained by the schematic drawing (Fig. 1), which in no way limits the use of the claimed system and their other possible embodiments within the technical solution disclosed in the claims. The said drawing (Fig. 1) explains the point through the conditional material objects with intrinsic features included in the claims.
The following terms will be used in the description for the explanation of the point of the claimed system and its components on the attached drawing and further description.
The graphic protective element authenticity check is the hardware or hardware- software complex, data inputs and outputs configured to receive and transfer the digital data. The system allows for simultaneous processing, conversion, identification, decoding etc. of at least two parameters related to the graphic protective element.
The graphic protective element means the matrix of protected information having high density and complexity, containing binary values, which may include alphanumeric values. In the first embodiment, the graphic protective element has at least two areas encoded under different methods and requiring different decoding algorithms. The function of physical protection is performed through the optimal use of natural and irreversible losses of information occurring during the printing process. The reading of the graphic protective element allows for the determination of its feature (original or copy) and determination of authenticity of the graphic protective element.
The input block is the hardware or hardware-software tool, preferably - multichannel digital receiver. The input block may comprise a separator for the separation of the sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code and digital image of the second two-dimensional code. The subsequent redirection of separate input data ensures their parallel processing.
The electronic database should be understood as the hardware-software solution, preferably produced in the form of the tangible medium characterized by the arrangement of digital data entered, saved, reproduced and deleted via the hardware and software intervention.
The decoder is understood as the hardware-software tool intended for the conversion of data and their provision for further processing. The logic comparison unit is understood as the hardware or hardware-software tool performing the comparison between the data received at the input pursuant to the preset parameters. The logic comparison unit further performs the evaluation of the result of comparison with the predetermined comparison functions for the establishment of the degree of similarity.
The input block is the hardware or hardware-software tool, in particular, is the digital transmitter.
The following is the example of the invention. As this technical solution may be modified and have alternative embodiments, the following description is set out as an example for the characterization of the essence and possibility of its implementation. It should be obvious that the provided detailed description is not intended for the limitation of its essence to some embodiments but on the contrary, it includes all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the essence and scope of the patent protection set forth in the claims.
The medium comprises the graphic protective element represented in the first embodiment by two encoded readable elements. The first encoded element is represented by two-dimensional code containing public information, which may be available during the code reading. The elements of the standard two-dimensional code can use existing standard and can correspond to any existing format of 2D bar code, such as, for example, Aztec Coding, Datamatrix, PDF417, MaxiCode or QR-coding etc. The colour format of 2D bar code can also be used, for example, high capacity (HCCB) SVC coding format. The second two-dimensional code contains private information, which can be identified under certain conditions. Preferably, the algorithm of decoding a second two-dimensional code differs from the algorithm of decoding the first two-dimensional code. This allows increasing the level of protection of the graphic protective element, and thereby, decreasing both the size of the medium containing the graphic protective element and the length of encoded information requiring lesser load of the system during the processing of the input data. Thus, when reading the graphic protective element, the second two-dimensional code is transmitted to the system as a graphic file, that is to say, digital image of the second two-dimensional code. The result of reading is transmitted to the system for the graphic protective element authenticity check. At the input of the said system the sequence of characters is received being the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code and digital image of the second two-dimensional code.
The input block transmits the received results of reading the graphic protective element to the electronic database and to the decoder. A set of relevant records characterizing the graphic protective element Ml, M2, M2 ', and Q is selected from these results of reading.
The electronic database comprises four sets of data. The received results of reading the graphic protective element come to the first set of data. Ml value received in the first set of data is at least a part of read public section of information from the graphic protective element. Based on the determined Ml value, the preset key M2’ is determined in the second set of data. The preset key M2’ is required for the identification of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code through the decoder. After the identification of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code through the decoder, it will be assigned a decoded M2” key.
The third set of data comprises reference values M2 generated on the basis of the preset M2’ key. The reference value M2 and the decoded M2” key identified by the decoder are delivered to the input of the first logic comparison unit.
Based on Ml value, the predefined set of reference quality parameters Q saved in the fourth set of data is determined, which is assigned to the digital image of the second two-dimensional code based on its specific analysis. The example of the analysis of the second two-dimensional code is, in particular, topological analysis.
The decoder identifies the digital image of the second two-dimensional code to receive M2” decoded key and a set of calculated Q’ quality parameters. As the choice of algorithm is unknown to third parties, it restricts the access for third parties to the encoded information and makes it impossible to forge the graphic protective element and relevant medium. The set of calculated Q’ quality parameters is the indicators of deviation from the reference image used when applying the image, that is the part, which is distinctive, that is to say, with changes incorporated during the reproduction, part of the graphic protective element represented by the second two-dimensional code, on the medium. It allows for the performance of the check of authenticity of the graphic protective element having a high level of protection. The set of reference quality parameters can be represented by a set of indicators. It provides a higher level of protection of the graphic protective element. The set of indicators can comprise, in particular, the data on the number of control points being compared with the number of control points on the readable graphic protective element, or data on the distance between reference points, where this data is compared with analogous distances from the readable graphic protective element, or data on the geometric figure where the quality indicator will be determined by the degree of similarity between the reference form and determined form of the readable graphic element or random combination of the above-mentioned sets etc.
In the course of evaluation of the general quality parameter, a certain definition function is used, which defines, for example, the threshold on exceeding the array of limit values of relative similarity for each set of indicators. As a result of this definition, the forged graphic protective element can be detected by processing at least one parameter, or after processing the entire set of indicators, if the previous definitions, in addition to the latter, did not detect forgery. This allows for more adapted distribution of resources of the claimed system.
Using the first logic comparison unit, the decoded M2” key is correlated and compared with the preset M2’ key, saved in the second set of data and through the help of the second logic comparison unit, the set of calculated Q’ quality parameters are correlated and compared with the set of reference quality parameters Q. It allows for the performance of simultaneous check of authenticity of the graphic protective element by several parameters.
Using the input block, the summary results are received with regard to the logic comparison from the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit and these results are transferred for the graphic protective element authenticity check based on the results of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit.
In the second embodiment, the medium comprises the graphic protective element represented by one encoded element. The difference of the second embodiment from the first embodiment will be shown below. In this embodiment, the protective graphic element is not linked to the performance in certain two-dimensional code. Besides, the protective element in this version is embodied as a single image of two-dimensional code. The single image of two-dimensional code should be understood that the digital image of the second two-dimensional code is linked to the first two-dimensional code, as shown below. Such embodiment allows for the production of the graphic protective element in any form, for example, in the form of certain geometric figure, abstract figure etc. In this case, Ml is contained directly on the graphic protective element. That is to say, the encoding algorithm directly applies to the graphic protective element. The encoding algorithm can be random but it does not refer to the quality assessment algorithm to determine the predefined set of reference quality parameters Q. Preferably, after reading the graphic protective element, the certain relevant area will be defined where the public information Ml is saved.
The unique sequences of binary data for the pattern of a certain graphic protective element are formed according to the algorithm involving the placement of points in several layers. During the generation, each layer is responsible for different functions, for instance, positioning, identification, verification. The generation algorithm provides for the generation of binary data such that the combination of binary data could determine the authenticity through the identification and verification of certain layers, which, in such interpretation, correspond to the encoded data M2 with the use of the preset key M2’. Therefore, the placement of the first two-dimensional code is possible as a single (essentially - integrated, complex) two-dimensional code.
In this case, the electronic database includes the third set of data corresponding to the generated and scattered set of points of the graphic pattern, creating a second two-dimensional code, and comprising the set of unique encoded values, each of which is assigned a relevant digital image of the second two-dimensional code M2 based on the set of the first two-dimensional code Ml.
The important difference from the first embodiment is the formation of the graphic protective element produced in the form of a single two-dimensional code, where the graphic protective element is produced in any form (round, square, rhomb etc.), wherein the two-dimensional code concurrently represents the encoded public information Ml and encoded data M2.
When identifying the two-dimensional code, the code selection is preferably applied for the identification. That is, based on the appearance of the two-dimensional code it is not possible to identify clearly the decoding algorithm for the detection of public information. This allows for not limiting to a certain embodiment of the graphic protective element and the algorithm of decoding public information.
The claimed system can be combined with external electronic complexes for different purposes depending on the aim of the utilization. For example, this system allows for marking the products with unique graphic protective elements, ensures control and monitoring of the sales of such products, in particular, through original graphic protective elements. The detection of non-original protective elements shows their non-uniqueness, thereby pointing to the probable attempt of counterfeiting or counterfeiting of products, or marking the product with forged graphic protective elements. It extends the functionality of the claimed system. Besides, this system can be produced as fixed or mobile, expanding the opportunities for its use in various fields of activity.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that further modifications to the claimed object are possible that is encompassed by the nature and scope of the claimed object as disclosed in the claims.

Claims

1. The graphic protective element authenticity check comprising the input block configured to receive a sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code,
wherein
the input block is further configured to receive the digital image of the second two-dimensional code,
where the system includes:
the electronic database comprising
- the first set of data, which includes the set of unique data for at least a part of sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code Ml, where the length of each sequence of characters includes the set of unique data,
- the second set of data, which includes the set of keys for the identification of digital image of the second two-dimensional code characterized by at least the presence of control points and/or graphic pattern where each key is associated with at least a part of points of the graphic pattern and sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code from the plurality of Ml and which creates the preset key M2’,
- the third set of data, which includes a plurality of unique encoded values, each of which was assigned the relevant digital image of the second two-dimensional code M2,
- the fourth set of data which includes the predetermined set of reference quality parameters Q, where each set of reference parameters is assigned to the digital image of the second two-dimensional code based on its analysis;
the decoder configured to identify the digital image of the second two- dimensional code for receiving the encoded key M2” using the preset key M2’ and set of calculated Q’ quality parameters, based at least on the determination of the presence of points and/or graphic pattern and sequence of characters of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code;
the first logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the decoded key M2” with the preset key M2’, saved in the second set of data;
the second logic comparison configured for logic comparison of the set of calculated quality Q’ parameters with the set of reference parameters of Q quality; the output block configured to receive the results of logic comparison from the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit and transfer the results of the graphic protective element authenticity check based on the results of logic comparison of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit;
where the inputs of the input block are the inputs of the system and the outputs of the input block are connected to the input of the electronic database and input of the decoder,
the outputs of the decoder and electronic database are connected to the input of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit,
the outputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit are connected to the input of the output block and the outputs of the output block are the outputs of the system.
2. The graphic protective element authenticity check comprising the input block configured to receive a sequence of characters which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code,
wherein
the input block is further configured to receive the digital image of the second two-dimensional code connected with the first two-dimensional code,
where the system includes:
the electronic database comprising
- the first set of data, which includes the set of unique data for at least a part of sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code Ml, where the length of each sequence of characters includes the set of unique data,
- the second set of data, which includes the set of keys for the identification of digital image of the second two-dimensional code characterized by at least the presence of control points and/or graphic pattern where each key is associated with at least a part of points of the graphic pattern and sequence of characters, which is the result of identification of the first two-dimensional code from the plurality of Ml and which creates the preset key M2’,
- the third set of data corresponding to the generated and scattered set of points of the graphic pattern, forming another two-dimensional code, and including the plurality of unique encoded values, each of which is assigned a relevant digital image of the second two-dimensional code M2 based on the set of the first two-dimensional code Ml,
- the fourth set of data which includes the predetermined set of reference quality parameters Q, where each reference parameter is assigned to the digital image of the second two-dimensional code based on its analysis;
decoder configured to identify the digital image of the second two-dimensional code for receiving the encoded key M2” using the preset key M2’ and set of calculated Q’ quality parameters, based at least on the determination of the presence of points and/or graphic pattern and sequence of characters of the digital image of the second two-dimensional code;
the first logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the preset key M2” with the decoded key M2”, saved in the second set of data;
the second logic comparison unit configured for logic comparison of the set of calculated quality Q’ parameters with the set of reference quality parameters Q;
output block configured to receive the results of the logic comparison from the first logic comparison unit and the second logic comparison unit and transfer the results of the graphic protective element authenticity check, based on the results of the logic comparison of the first logic comparison unit and second comparison unit; where the inputs of the input block are the inputs of the system and the outputs of the input block are connected to the input of the electronic database and input of the decoder,
the outputs of the decoder and electronic database are connected to the inputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit,
the outputs of the first logic comparison unit and second logic comparison unit are connected to the input of the output block and the outputs of the output block are the outputs of the system.
EP18734317.3A 2017-12-29 2018-05-17 Graphic protective element authenticity check system Active EP3529749B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
UAU201713163U UA124051U (en) 2017-12-29 2017-12-29 SYSTEM OF DETERMINATION OF GOODS WITH THE USE OF GRAPHIC PROTECTIVE ELEMENTS
UAA201804482A UA119020C2 (en) 2018-04-24 2018-04-24 SYSTEM FOR CHECKING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE GRAPHIC PROTECTIVE ELEMENT
PCT/UA2018/000047 WO2019132853A1 (en) 2017-12-29 2018-05-17 Graphic protective element authenticity check system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3529749A1 true EP3529749A1 (en) 2019-08-28
EP3529749B1 EP3529749B1 (en) 2020-12-30

Family

ID=67064012

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18734317.3A Active EP3529749B1 (en) 2017-12-29 2018-05-17 Graphic protective element authenticity check system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20210326590A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3529749B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2019132853A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4366916B2 (en) 2002-10-29 2009-11-18 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Document confirmation system, document confirmation method, and document confirmation program
FR2904130B1 (en) * 2006-07-19 2014-08-15 Advanced Track Et Trace METHODS AND DEVICES FOR SECURING AND AUTHENTICATING DOCUMENTS
CN103400059B (en) * 2006-07-19 2016-12-28 先进追踪和寻踪公司 Protection and the method and apparatus of checking file
FR2931979B1 (en) * 2008-06-02 2014-02-28 Advanced Track & Trace METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IDENTIFYING A PRINTING PLATE OF A DOCUMENT
TW201711438A (en) 2015-09-04 2017-03-16 Shenzhen Three Primary Colors Digital Technology Co Ltd Anti-copy method and anti-forging method based on microcosmic texture image capable of generating a microcosmic texture image of high security and huge message amount through regular printing
JP7029398B2 (en) 2015-09-28 2022-03-03 エイヴェリー デニソン リテール インフォメーション サービシズ リミテッド ライアビリティ カンパニー Forensic encryption methods and systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2019132853A1 (en) 2019-07-04
EP3529749B1 (en) 2020-12-30
US20210326590A1 (en) 2021-10-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6505732B2 (en) Two-dimensional barcode and authentication method of such barcode
RU2477522C2 (en) Method and apparatus for protecting documents
KR100405828B1 (en) Apparatus and method for producing a document which is capable of preventing a forgery or an alteration of itself, and apparatus and method for authenticating the document
EP3311336B2 (en) Authentication feature in a barcode
JP2020516092A (en) Composite two-dimensional barcode, electronic certificate medium, generation, reading device and method
EA003919B1 (en) Method and system for authentication of articles
Nguyen et al. A watermarking technique to secure printed QR codes using a statistical test
Noore et al. Embedding biometric identifiers in 2D barcodes for improved security
US20230394267A1 (en) Method and device for securing a document and method and device for authenticating a document, document secured using such a method
EP3529749B1 (en) Graphic protective element authenticity check system
US20200311245A1 (en) Authenticating object instances
CN104751341A (en) Commodity anti-counterfeiting method based on two-dimensional code dynamic passwords
CN1691087B (en) System and method for decoding digitally encoded images
UA119020C2 (en) SYSTEM FOR CHECKING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE GRAPHIC PROTECTIVE ELEMENT
EP3622666B1 (en) A method and a system for creating and authenticating a binary graphic code
EP4537486B1 (en) Method and system for the unequivocal characterization of a product by means of an intelligent paint
CA3157415C (en) Computer-implemented method for copy protection, data processing device and computer program product
JP7696361B2 (en) COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR COPY PROTECTION, DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM - Patent application
EA006012B1 (en) Protection system of authenticity of printed information carrier

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190508

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200724

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1350660

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602018011389

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PK

Free format text: BERICHTIGUNGEN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

RIN2 Information on inventor provided after grant (corrected)

Inventor name: DMYTRENKO, VADYM PETROVYCH

Inventor name: NECHAIEV, MAKSYM SERHIIOVYCH

Inventor name: VASYLIEV, MAKSYM VASYLOVYCH

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210330

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1350660

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210330

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20201230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210430

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20210528

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20210507

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20210416

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20210521

Year of fee payment: 4

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20210521

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602018011389

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602018011389

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G06K0009000000

Ipc: G06V0010000000

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20211001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210517

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602018011389

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220517

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221201

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180517

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20250521

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230