EP3322475A1 - Electrode lead that avoids electrode array migration from the cochlea - Google Patents

Electrode lead that avoids electrode array migration from the cochlea

Info

Publication number
EP3322475A1
EP3322475A1 EP16825162.7A EP16825162A EP3322475A1 EP 3322475 A1 EP3322475 A1 EP 3322475A1 EP 16825162 A EP16825162 A EP 16825162A EP 3322475 A1 EP3322475 A1 EP 3322475A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
electrode
retraction limiter
electrode lead
retraction
posterior tympanotomy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16825162.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3322475B1 (en
EP3322475A4 (en
Inventor
Thomas Lenarz
Claude Jolly
Anandhan Dhanasingh
Daniel Sieber
Andreas HARNISCH
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MED EL Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH
Original Assignee
MED EL Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by MED EL Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH filed Critical MED EL Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH
Publication of EP3322475A1 publication Critical patent/EP3322475A1/en
Publication of EP3322475A4 publication Critical patent/EP3322475A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3322475B1 publication Critical patent/EP3322475B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/02—Details
    • A61N1/04—Electrodes
    • A61N1/05—Electrodes for implantation or insertion into the body, e.g. heart electrode
    • A61N1/0526—Head electrodes
    • A61N1/0541—Cochlear electrodes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/36036—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation of the outer, middle or inner ear
    • A61N1/36038—Cochlear stimulation
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
    • A61B90/03—Automatic limiting or abutting means, e.g. for safety
    • A61B2090/033—Abutting means, stops, e.g. abutting on tissue or skin
    • A61B2090/034—Abutting means, stops, e.g. abutting on tissue or skin abutting on parts of the device itself

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to medical implants, and more specifically to an implantable electrode arrangement for cochlear implant systems.
  • a normal ear transmits sounds as shown in Figure 1 through the outer ear 101 to the tympanic membrane (eardrum) 102, which moves the bones of the middle ear 103, which in turn vibrate the oval window and round window openings of the cochlea 104.
  • the cochlea 104 is a long narrow duct wound spirally about its axis for approximately two and a half turns.
  • the cochlea 104 includes an upper channel known as the scala vestibuli and a lower channel known as the scala tympani, which are connected by the cochlear duct.
  • the scala tympani forms an upright spiraling cone with a center called the modiolar where the spiral ganglion cells of the acoustic nerve 113 reside.
  • the fluid filled cochlea 104 functions as a transducer to generate electric pulses that are transmitted to the cochlear nerve 113, and ultimately to the brain. Hearing is impaired when there are problems in the ability to transduce external sounds into meaningful action potentials along the neural substrate of the cochlea 104.
  • hearing impairment can be addressed by an auditory prosthesis system such as a cochlear implant that electrically stimulates auditory nerve tissue with small currents delivered by multiple stimulation contacts distributed along an implant electrode.
  • Figure 1 shows some components of a typical cochlear implant system where an external microphone provides an audio signal input to an external signal processing stage 111 which implements one of various known signal processing schemes. The processed signal is converted by the external signal processing stage 111 into a digital data format, such as a sequence of data frames, for transmission into a receiver processor in an implant housing 108.
  • the receiver processor in the implant housing 108 may perform additional signal processing such as error correction, pulse formation, etc., and produces a stimulation pattern (based on the extracted audio information) that is sent through an electrode lead 109 to an implanted electrode array 110 which penetrates into the cochlea 104 through a surgical opening in the outer surface of the cochlea 104.
  • this electrode array 110 includes multiple stimulation contacts 112 on its surface that deliver the stimulation signals to adjacent neural tissue of the cochlea 104 which the brain of the patient interprets as sound.
  • the individual stimulation contacts 112 may be activated sequentially, or simultaneously in one or more contact groups.
  • a posterior tympanotomy is performed at the facial recess opening in the mastoid process of the temporal bone. This involves creating an opening through the mastoid air cells to obtain surgical access from the implant housing 108 which is affixed on the outer surface of the temporal bone beneath the skin behind the pinna of the outer ear 101, to the air space of the middle ear 103.
  • Figure 2 is a photograph of a facial recess 200 showing the oval shape of the posterior tympanotomy opening that is created, which has a long diameter 201 and a short diameter 202.
  • the electrode array 110 can then be routed from the implant housing 108 through an opening in the outer surface of the cochlea 104.
  • FIG. 3A shows structural details of a cochlear implant electrode arrangement at the electrode opening 301 into the implanted cochlea 104.
  • the electrode array 110 tends to lie toward the outer lateral wall of the spiral-shaped cochlea 104. Over time, there can be a tendency for the electrode array to spring back and retract back out through the electrode opening 301, as shown in Figure 3B.
  • the degree of electrode spring back varies depending on how deeply the electrode array 110 is inserted into the cochlea 104, how well the electrode opening 301 is packed with fascia material, and the specific geometry at the electrode opening 301.
  • Such post-surgical electrode retraction pulls the nearest stimulation contact 112 away from its intended target neural tissue within the cochlea 104 back toward the electrode opening 301, or even further, back outside the cochlea 104 into the middle ear 104. This can produce pain sensation in the patient when that stimulation contact 112 is energized. Usually in such circumstances, that stimulation contact 112 will be inactivated and fewer stimulation contacts 112 remain for use to produce sound sensation. In some cases, an additional revision surgery may even be needed to push the electrode array 110 back inside the cochlea 104.
  • Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a cochlear implant electrode arrangement that prevents post-surgical retraction.
  • An electrode lead carries cochlear stimulation signals from an implanted signal processor, through an oval shaped posterior tympanotomy opening in the facial recess of a patient, to an electrode array implanted in a cochlea of the patient.
  • a retraction limiter has opposing projection arms, wherein a projection length is defined between the distal ends of the projection arms that is less than the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, and greater than the short diameter of the posterior tympanotomy.
  • the retraction limiter is configured to allow sliding the retraction limiter over the electrode lead through the posterior tympanotomy with the projection arms aligned along the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, rotating the retraction limiter to align the projection arms along the short diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, and securing the retraction limiter to the electrode lead so that the projection arms prevent post-surgical retraction of the electrode lead back through the posterior tympanotomy.
  • the retraction limiter may be in the specific form of a slidable clip that has a clip opening configured to allow the retraction limiter to be fit over an outer surface of the electrode lead. There may then be a pair of handling legs that project out at opposing sides of the clip opening to promote surgical handling of the retraction limiter.
  • the retraction limiter may be in the specific form of a slidable cylinder that fits over an outer surface of the electrode lead, with a distal cylinder end at which the projection arms are located, and a proximal cylinder end configured to remain outside the posterior tympanotomy after rotating the retraction limiter, wherein the proximal cylinder end of the retraction limiter is configured to be surgically deformed against the electrode lead to secure the retraction limiter to the electrode lead.
  • the retraction limiter may be made of metal or biocompatible plastic material.
  • Embodiments of the present invention also include a cochlear implant system having an electrode arrangement according to any of the foregoing.
  • Figure 1 shows various anatomical structures in a human ear and some components of a typical cochlear implant system.
  • Figure 2 is a photograph of a typical facial recess with posterior tympanotomy opening.
  • Figure 3A shows structural details of a cochlear implant electrode arrangement at the electrode opening into the implanted cochlea.
  • Figure 3B shows how the proximal end of the intracochlear electrode array can retract back out of the electrode opening to pull the nearest stimulation contact back into the electrode opening.
  • Figure 4A-4C shows an embodiment of a cochlear implant electrode arrangement having a retraction limiter clip.
  • Figure 5 shows structural details of a retraction limiter clip as in Figure 4.
  • Figure 6 shows structural details of a retraction limiter cylinder embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 7A-7D shows various aspects of another embodiment of a retraction limiter cylinder.
  • Figure 8 shows surface details of a cochlear implant electrode lead adapted for use with a retraction limiter according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • Figure 9A-9D shows structural details of a cochlear implant electrode lead adapted for use with a retraction limiter according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a cochlear implant electrode arrangement with a retraction limiter at the posterior tympanotomy that resists post-surgical retraction of the inserted electrode lead.
  • FIG. 4A-4C shows structural details of a portion of a retraction limiter 400 according to one specific embodiment of the present invention.
  • an electrode lead 404 that carries cochlear stimulation signals from the implanted signal processor (the implant housing) through an oval shaped posterior tympanotomy opening in the facial recess of a patient, to an electrode array 110 that is implanted in a cochlea 104 of the patient.
  • the electrode lead 404 is made of a resilient carrier material as is known in the art and contains electrode wires for carrying the cochlear stimulation signals.
  • the retraction limiter 400 has opposing projection arms 401 with distal ends 406 that define a projection length 405.
  • the projection length 405 between the distal ends 406 of the projection arms 401 is configured to be less than the long diameter 201 of the posterior tympanotomy 403, and greater than the short diameter 202 of the posterior tympanotomy 403.
  • the retraction limiter 400 also is configured to allow sliding it over the electrode lead 404 through the posterior tympanotomy 403 with the projection arms 401 aligned along the long diameter 201 of the posterior tympanotomy 403, as shown in Fig. 4B.
  • the surgeon can use the handling legs 402 to slide the retraction limiter 400 through the posterior tympanotomy 403, and then rotate it to align the projection arms 401 along the short diameter 202 of the posterior tympanotomy 403, as shown in Fig. 4C.
  • the surgeon can then tightly attach the retraction limiter 400 to the electrode lead 404 so that the projection arms 401 prevent post-surgical retraction of the electrode lead 404 back through the posterior tympanotomy 403; for example, by squeezing together the handling legs 402 and securing them to each other.
  • Figure 5 shows structural details of a retraction limiter clip 500 as in Figure 4, which may be made of metal or a biocompatible plastic material.
  • a central opening 510 matches the shape of the outer surface of the electrode lead 404 which may be inserted through it.
  • the central opening 510 of the retainer clip 500 may be circular with a radius that typically would be slightly shorter than the radius of the electrode lead 404 (e.g. , about 1.1 mm) to provide useful clamping force.
  • the inner perimeter 512 of the central opening 510 should be equal to or up to 20% smaller than the outer perimeter of the cylindrical electrode lead 404.
  • the central opening 510 has open ends 514 and 514' at its bottom side, at which there are handling legs 516 and 516' that extend at an angle 518 to the tangent 520 of the curvature of the central opening 510 in this point. These handling legs 516 and 516' serve as a gripping point for the surgeon to secure the retainer clip 500 onto the electrode carrier 404.
  • a second pair of projection arms 522 and 522' extend straight from the central opening 510.
  • the dimensions of the retainer clip 500 are chosen such that the projection length 524 of the projection arms 522 and 522' is slightly less than the long diameter 201 of the oval opening of the posterior tympanotomy, yet longer than the short diameter 202; e.g., between 1 and 2 mm.
  • the clip height 526 is smaller than the short diameter 202. Since the exact dimensions of the posterior tympanotomy 403 will be unknown prior to drilling, a kit may be provided with various retainer clips 500 with different length projection arms 522 and 522
  • the retraction limiter may be in the specific form of a cylinder that slides over an outer surface of the electrode lead 404 as shown in Figure 6.
  • the cylindrical retraction limiter 600 has a cylindrical body 610 with a distal cylinder end 612 at which the projection arms 622 and 622'are located.
  • the proximal end 614 has two end walls 616 and 616' separated by gaps 630 and 630' which are configured to remain outside the posterior tympanotomy after inserting and rotating the retraction limiter 600.
  • the end walls 616 and 616' are then squeezed against the electrode lead 403 to secure the retraction limiter 600 to the electrode lead 404.
  • This arrangement facilitates handling by the surgeon in that the end walls 616 and 616' to be pressed against the electrode lead 404 are, from the surgeon's point of view, on the near side of the posterior tympanotomy 403.
  • Figure 7A-7D shows various aspects of another embodiment of a cylindrical retraction limiter 700 with four projection fingers 702 circumferentially distributed at the far distal end.
  • the surgeon may first bend two opposite projection fingers aligned along the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy 703, then rotate the retraction limiter 700 by 90 ° and then bend the other two projection fingers 702. After bending the projection fingers 702, the retraction limiter 700 may be squeezed to deform it so that it holds on the electrode lead 701 tightly.
  • FIG 8 shows surface details of a cochlear implant electrode lead 801 that is adapted with surface features for use with a retraction limiter according to various of the embodiments of the present invention.
  • the electrode lead 801 has multiple locking grooves 802 on its outer surface that are perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the electrode lead 801 and offer a purchase for the retraction limiter to secure it in place.
  • a longitudinal sliding groove 803 that acts as a sliding rail to guide the retraction limiter along the outer surface of the electrode lead 801.
  • Figure 9A-9D shows structural details of a cochlear implant electrode lead with inverted cork shaped projection features according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • Conventional cork structures for the purpose of an implant fixation are also shown in U. S. Patent 4,892,108 and European Patent 1972359, but embodiments of the present invention use an inverted cork orientation.
  • the electrode lead can have inverted cork like features along the lead length as shown in Figure 9A, and/or a flexible extended ring as shown in Figure 9B.
  • the flexible extended ring can be moved to the inside of the posterior tympanotomy and the flexible extended ring becomes wedged between the skull bone and the closest inverted cork as shown in Figures 9C and 9D, thereby preventing the electrode from springing back.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Cardiology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Prostheses (AREA)

Abstract

A cochlear implant electrode arrangement is described that prevents post-surgical retraction of the electrode array from the cochlea. The arrangement includes an electrode lead that carries cochlear stimulation signals from an implanted signal processor, through an oval shaped posterior tympanotomy opening in the facial recess of a patient, to an electrode array implanted in a cochlea of the patient. A retraction limiter slides over the electrode lead through the posterior tympanotomy with projection arms aligned along the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, then is rotated to align the projection arms along the short diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, and secured to the electrode lead so that the projection arms prevent post-surgical retraction of the electrode lead back through the posterior tympanotomy.

Description

TITLE
Electrode Lead that Avoids Electrode Array Migration from the Cochlea
[0001] This application claims priority from U. S. Provisional Patent Application 62/192,607, filed July 15, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present invention relates to medical implants, and more specifically to an implantable electrode arrangement for cochlear implant systems.
BACKGROUND ART
[0003] A normal ear transmits sounds as shown in Figure 1 through the outer ear 101 to the tympanic membrane (eardrum) 102, which moves the bones of the middle ear 103, which in turn vibrate the oval window and round window openings of the cochlea 104. The cochlea 104 is a long narrow duct wound spirally about its axis for approximately two and a half turns. The cochlea 104 includes an upper channel known as the scala vestibuli and a lower channel known as the scala tympani, which are connected by the cochlear duct. The scala tympani forms an upright spiraling cone with a center called the modiolar where the spiral ganglion cells of the acoustic nerve 113 reside. In response to received sounds transmitted by the middle ear 103, the fluid filled cochlea 104 functions as a transducer to generate electric pulses that are transmitted to the cochlear nerve 113, and ultimately to the brain. Hearing is impaired when there are problems in the ability to transduce external sounds into meaningful action potentials along the neural substrate of the cochlea 104.
[0004] In some cases, hearing impairment can be addressed by an auditory prosthesis system such as a cochlear implant that electrically stimulates auditory nerve tissue with small currents delivered by multiple stimulation contacts distributed along an implant electrode. Figure 1 shows some components of a typical cochlear implant system where an external microphone provides an audio signal input to an external signal processing stage 111 which implements one of various known signal processing schemes. The processed signal is converted by the external signal processing stage 111 into a digital data format, such as a sequence of data frames, for transmission into a receiver processor in an implant housing 108. Besides extracting the audio information, the receiver processor in the implant housing 108 may perform additional signal processing such as error correction, pulse formation, etc., and produces a stimulation pattern (based on the extracted audio information) that is sent through an electrode lead 109 to an implanted electrode array 110 which penetrates into the cochlea 104 through a surgical opening in the outer surface of the cochlea 104. Typically, this electrode array 110 includes multiple stimulation contacts 112 on its surface that deliver the stimulation signals to adjacent neural tissue of the cochlea 104 which the brain of the patient interprets as sound. The individual stimulation contacts 112 may be activated sequentially, or simultaneously in one or more contact groups.
[0005] To implant the electrode array 110 into the cochlea 104, a posterior tympanotomy is performed at the facial recess opening in the mastoid process of the temporal bone. This involves creating an opening through the mastoid air cells to obtain surgical access from the implant housing 108 which is affixed on the outer surface of the temporal bone beneath the skin behind the pinna of the outer ear 101, to the air space of the middle ear 103. Figure 2 is a photograph of a facial recess 200 showing the oval shape of the posterior tympanotomy opening that is created, which has a long diameter 201 and a short diameter 202. The electrode array 110 can then be routed from the implant housing 108 through an opening in the outer surface of the cochlea 104.
[0006] Figure 3A shows structural details of a cochlear implant electrode arrangement at the electrode opening 301 into the implanted cochlea 104. After the insertion procedure, the electrode array 110 tends to lie toward the outer lateral wall of the spiral-shaped cochlea 104. Over time, there can be a tendency for the electrode array to spring back and retract back out through the electrode opening 301, as shown in Figure 3B. The degree of electrode spring back varies depending on how deeply the electrode array 110 is inserted into the cochlea 104, how well the electrode opening 301 is packed with fascia material, and the specific geometry at the electrode opening 301.
[0007] Such post-surgical electrode retraction pulls the nearest stimulation contact 112 away from its intended target neural tissue within the cochlea 104 back toward the electrode opening 301, or even further, back outside the cochlea 104 into the middle ear 104. This can produce pain sensation in the patient when that stimulation contact 112 is energized. Usually in such circumstances, that stimulation contact 112 will be inactivated and fewer stimulation contacts 112 remain for use to produce sound sensation. In some cases, an additional revision surgery may even be needed to push the electrode array 110 back inside the cochlea 104.
[0008] Various approaches have been attempted to resist such post-surgical retraction by implementing various anti-retraction sturctures at the electrode opening in the outer surface of the cochlea. A cork-shaped stopper has been used to tightly wedge the electrode lead in the electrode opening. An anti-retraction skirt has been implemented on the electrode array at the electrode opening which is made of polymer material that swells when contacted by the liquid preilymph medium, thereby holding the electrode array in place. Some electrode arrays have a permanent pre-curved shape that does not relax or spring back after insertion into the cochlea. Other electrode arrangements contain an internal malleable material on either side of the electrode opening which maintains a bent shape after full insertion of the electrode array to resist retraction. A surgical group in Hannover Germany has added to the implant electrode a wing of flexible silicone material that can be fixed to a groove in the bony material on the outer surface of the cochlea near the electrode opening. All of these efforts have suffered from various issues that leave each an imperfect solution.
SUMMARY
[0009] Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a cochlear implant electrode arrangement that prevents post-surgical retraction. An electrode lead carries cochlear stimulation signals from an implanted signal processor, through an oval shaped posterior tympanotomy opening in the facial recess of a patient, to an electrode array implanted in a cochlea of the patient. A retraction limiter has opposing projection arms, wherein a projection length is defined between the distal ends of the projection arms that is less than the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, and greater than the short diameter of the posterior tympanotomy. The retraction limiter is configured to allow sliding the retraction limiter over the electrode lead through the posterior tympanotomy with the projection arms aligned along the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, rotating the retraction limiter to align the projection arms along the short diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, and securing the retraction limiter to the electrode lead so that the projection arms prevent post-surgical retraction of the electrode lead back through the posterior tympanotomy.
[0010] The retraction limiter may be in the specific form of a slidable clip that has a clip opening configured to allow the retraction limiter to be fit over an outer surface of the electrode lead. There may then be a pair of handling legs that project out at opposing sides of the clip opening to promote surgical handling of the retraction limiter. Or the retraction limiter may be in the specific form of a slidable cylinder that fits over an outer surface of the electrode lead, with a distal cylinder end at which the projection arms are located, and a proximal cylinder end configured to remain outside the posterior tympanotomy after rotating the retraction limiter, wherein the proximal cylinder end of the retraction limiter is configured to be surgically deformed against the electrode lead to secure the retraction limiter to the electrode lead. The retraction limiter may be made of metal or biocompatible plastic material.
[0011] Embodiments of the present invention also include a cochlear implant system having an electrode arrangement according to any of the foregoing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0012] Figure 1 shows various anatomical structures in a human ear and some components of a typical cochlear implant system.
[0013] Figure 2 is a photograph of a typical facial recess with posterior tympanotomy opening.
[0014] Figure 3A shows structural details of a cochlear implant electrode arrangement at the electrode opening into the implanted cochlea. [0015] Figure 3B shows how the proximal end of the intracochlear electrode array can retract back out of the electrode opening to pull the nearest stimulation contact back into the electrode opening.
[0016] Figure 4A-4C shows an embodiment of a cochlear implant electrode arrangement having a retraction limiter clip.
[0017] Figure 5 shows structural details of a retraction limiter clip as in Figure 4.
[0018] Figure 6 shows structural details of a retraction limiter cylinder embodiment of the present invention.
[0019] Figure 7A-7D shows various aspects of another embodiment of a retraction limiter cylinder.
[0020] Figure 8 shows surface details of a cochlear implant electrode lead adapted for use with a retraction limiter according to embodiments of the present invention.
[0021] Figure 9A-9D shows structural details of a cochlear implant electrode lead adapted for use with a retraction limiter according to embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022] Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a cochlear implant electrode arrangement with a retraction limiter at the posterior tympanotomy that resists post-surgical retraction of the inserted electrode lead.
[0023] Figure 4A-4C shows structural details of a portion of a retraction limiter 400 according to one specific embodiment of the present invention. Like most conventional cochlear implant electrode arrangements, there is an electrode lead 404 that carries cochlear stimulation signals from the implanted signal processor (the implant housing) through an oval shaped posterior tympanotomy opening in the facial recess of a patient, to an electrode array 110 that is implanted in a cochlea 104 of the patient. The electrode lead 404 is made of a resilient carrier material as is known in the art and contains electrode wires for carrying the cochlear stimulation signals.
[0024] The retraction limiter 400 has opposing projection arms 401 with distal ends 406 that define a projection length 405. The projection length 405 between the distal ends 406 of the projection arms 401 is configured to be less than the long diameter 201 of the posterior tympanotomy 403, and greater than the short diameter 202 of the posterior tympanotomy 403. The retraction limiter 400 also is configured to allow sliding it over the electrode lead 404 through the posterior tympanotomy 403 with the projection arms 401 aligned along the long diameter 201 of the posterior tympanotomy 403, as shown in Fig. 4B. That allows the surgeon to use the handling legs 402 to slide the retraction limiter 400 through the posterior tympanotomy 403, and then rotate it to align the projection arms 401 along the short diameter 202 of the posterior tympanotomy 403, as shown in Fig. 4C. The surgeon can then tightly attach the retraction limiter 400 to the electrode lead 404 so that the projection arms 401 prevent post-surgical retraction of the electrode lead 404 back through the posterior tympanotomy 403; for example, by squeezing together the handling legs 402 and securing them to each other.
[0025] Figure 5 shows structural details of a retraction limiter clip 500 as in Figure 4, which may be made of metal or a biocompatible plastic material. A central opening 510 matches the shape of the outer surface of the electrode lead 404 which may be inserted through it. For example, if the electrode lead 404 has a cylindrical shape, the central opening 510 of the retainer clip 500 may be circular with a radius that typically would be slightly shorter than the radius of the electrode lead 404 (e.g. , about 1.1 mm) to provide useful clamping force. Thus, the inner perimeter 512 of the central opening 510 should be equal to or up to 20% smaller than the outer perimeter of the cylindrical electrode lead 404. The central opening 510 has open ends 514 and 514' at its bottom side, at which there are handling legs 516 and 516' that extend at an angle 518 to the tangent 520 of the curvature of the central opening 510 in this point. These handling legs 516 and 516' serve as a gripping point for the surgeon to secure the retainer clip 500 onto the electrode carrier 404. A second pair of projection arms 522 and 522' extend straight from the central opening 510. The dimensions of the retainer clip 500 are chosen such that the projection length 524 of the projection arms 522 and 522' is slightly less than the long diameter 201 of the oval opening of the posterior tympanotomy, yet longer than the short diameter 202; e.g., between 1 and 2 mm. The clip height 526 is smaller than the short diameter 202. Since the exact dimensions of the posterior tympanotomy 403 will be unknown prior to drilling, a kit may be provided with various retainer clips 500 with different length projection arms 522 and 522'.
[0026] Rather than a clip structure as described above, the retraction limiter may be in the specific form of a cylinder that slides over an outer surface of the electrode lead 404 as shown in Figure 6. The cylindrical retraction limiter 600 has a cylindrical body 610 with a distal cylinder end 612 at which the projection arms 622 and 622'are located. The proximal end 614 has two end walls 616 and 616' separated by gaps 630 and 630' which are configured to remain outside the posterior tympanotomy after inserting and rotating the retraction limiter 600. The end walls 616 and 616' are then squeezed against the electrode lead 403 to secure the retraction limiter 600 to the electrode lead 404. This arrangement facilitates handling by the surgeon in that the end walls 616 and 616' to be pressed against the electrode lead 404 are, from the surgeon's point of view, on the near side of the posterior tympanotomy 403.
[0027] Figure 7A-7D shows various aspects of another embodiment of a cylindrical retraction limiter 700 with four projection fingers 702 circumferentially distributed at the far distal end. Once the electrode array 110 is fully inserted into the cochlea 104, the retraction limiter 700 can be slid down the electrode lead 701 with the projection fingers 702 facing towards the posterior tympanotomy 703, Fig. 7C. Once the projection fingers 702 are pushed through the posterior tympanotomy 703, they are bent about 90° (Fig 7D) to form an obstruction that blocks the posterior tympanotomy 703. For bending the fingers the surgeon has to push the projection fingers 702 from the outside of the posterior tympanotomy 703. For the oval shape of a typical posterior tympanotomy 703, the surgeon may first bend two opposite projection fingers aligned along the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy 703, then rotate the retraction limiter 700 by 90 ° and then bend the other two projection fingers 702. After bending the projection fingers 702, the retraction limiter 700 may be squeezed to deform it so that it holds on the electrode lead 701 tightly.
[0028] Figure 8 shows surface details of a cochlear implant electrode lead 801 that is adapted with surface features for use with a retraction limiter according to various of the embodiments of the present invention. In the specific embodiment shown in Figure 8, the electrode lead 801 has multiple locking grooves 802 on its outer surface that are perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the electrode lead 801 and offer a purchase for the retraction limiter to secure it in place. Also shown in the electrode 801 in Figure 8 is a longitudinal sliding groove 803 that acts as a sliding rail to guide the retraction limiter along the outer surface of the electrode lead 801.
[0029] Figure 9A-9D shows structural details of a cochlear implant electrode lead with inverted cork shaped projection features according to embodiments of the present invention. Conventional cork structures for the purpose of an implant fixation are also shown in U. S. Patent 4,892,108 and European Patent 1972359, but embodiments of the present invention use an inverted cork orientation. The electrode lead can have inverted cork like features along the lead length as shown in Figure 9A, and/or a flexible extended ring as shown in Figure 9B. After the electrode array is fully inserted into the cochlea, the flexible extended ring can be moved to the inside of the posterior tympanotomy and the flexible extended ring becomes wedged between the skull bone and the closest inverted cork as shown in Figures 9C and 9D, thereby preventing the electrode from springing back.
[0030] Although various exemplary embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the true scope of the invention.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A cochlear implant electrode arrangement comprising:
an electrode lead carrying cochlear stimulation signals from an implanted signal
processor, through an oval shaped posterior tympanotomy in the facial recess of a patient, to an electrode array implanted in a cochlea of the patient, wherein the posterior tympanotomy has a long diameter and a short diameter orthogonal to the long diameter; and
a retraction limiter having opposing projection arms, each projection arm having a distal end, wherein a projection length is defined between the distal ends of the projection arms, the projection length being:
i. less than the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, and
ii. greater than the short diameter of the posterior tympanotomy; and wherein the retraction limiter is configured for:
i. sliding the retraction limiter over the electrode lead through the posterior tympanotomy with the projection arms aligned along the long diameter of the posterior tympanotomy,
ii. rotating the retraction limiter to align the projection arms along the short diameter of the posterior tympanotomy, and
iii. securing the retraction limiter to the electrode lead so that the projection arms prevent post-surgical retraction of the electrode lead back through the posterior tympanotomy.
2. The electrode arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the retraction limiter comprises a slidable clip having a clip opening configured to allow the retraction limiter to be fit over an outer surface of the electrode lead.
3. The electrode arrangement according to claim 2, wherein the retraction limiter further comprises a pair of handling legs projecting out at opposing sides of the clip opening to promote surgical handling of the retraction limiter.
4. The electrode arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the retraction limiter comprises a slidable cylinder fitting over an outer surface of the electrode lead, the retraction limiter having:
i. a distal cylinder end at which the projection arms are located, and ii. a proximal cylinder end configured to remain outside the posterior tympanotomy after rotating the retraction limiter;
wherein the proximal cylinder end of the retraction limiter is configured to be
surgically deformed against the electrode lead to secure the retraction limiter to the electrode lead.
5. The electrode arrangement of claim 1, wherein the retraction limiter is made of metal material.
6. The electrode arrangement of claim 1, wherein the retraction limiter is made of biocompatible plastic material.
EP16825162.7A 2015-07-15 2016-07-14 Electrode lead that avoids electrode array migration from the cochlea Active EP3322475B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562192607P 2015-07-15 2015-07-15
PCT/US2016/042241 WO2017011639A1 (en) 2015-07-15 2016-07-14 Electrode lead that avoids electrode array migration from the cochlea

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3322475A1 true EP3322475A1 (en) 2018-05-23
EP3322475A4 EP3322475A4 (en) 2019-01-23
EP3322475B1 EP3322475B1 (en) 2022-09-14

Family

ID=57757750

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16825162.7A Active EP3322475B1 (en) 2015-07-15 2016-07-14 Electrode lead that avoids electrode array migration from the cochlea

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US10213597B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3322475B1 (en)
CN (1) CN107847735B (en)
AU (1) AU2016291651B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2017011639A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109715113B (en) * 2016-10-24 2021-03-16 Med-El电气医疗器械有限公司 Fixing part of insertion tool for minimally invasive cochlear implant
EP3717057B1 (en) 2017-11-30 2024-07-24 Advanced Bionics AG Slotted stiffening member for facilitating an insertion of an electrode lead into a cochlea of a patient
EP3773871B1 (en) * 2018-04-13 2022-12-14 Advanced Bionics AG Pull wire displacement assemblies

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4892108A (en) 1987-07-23 1990-01-09 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Multi-channel extracochlear implant
US20020095063A1 (en) * 2001-01-12 2002-07-18 Kai Kroll Method and device for positive ossicular fixation
US20070088335A1 (en) * 2001-10-24 2007-04-19 Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh Implantable neuro-stimulation electrode with fluid reservoir
JP4398728B2 (en) * 2001-10-24 2010-01-13 メド−エル・エレクトロメディツィニシェ・ゲラーテ・ゲーエムベーハー Implantable fluid delivery device and implantable electrode
US7792586B2 (en) 2002-02-22 2010-09-07 Cochlear Limited Insertion device for an electrode array
AU2003901852A0 (en) 2003-04-16 2003-05-01 Cochlear Limited Cochlear electrode array
US7792587B2 (en) * 2006-09-12 2010-09-07 Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh Middle ear fixation structure
US8109705B1 (en) * 2007-02-23 2012-02-07 Illinois Tool Works Inc. Twist-lock anchoring fastener
US8718795B2 (en) * 2007-03-20 2014-05-06 Cochlear Limited Securing an implanted medical device in a patient
US9402990B2 (en) * 2007-03-20 2016-08-02 Cochlear Limited Securing an implanted medical device in a patient
WO2010053673A2 (en) * 2008-10-15 2010-05-14 Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh Implant electrode and accessories for use in robotic surgery
EP2451366B1 (en) 2009-07-08 2017-03-15 Advanced Bionics AG Lead insertion tools
US8909348B2 (en) 2010-03-30 2014-12-09 Domestic Legacy Limited Partnership Cochlear implant stabilization and positioning device
CN201899773U (en) * 2010-12-20 2011-07-20 熊小伟 Special clip for eardrum therapeutic electrode
CN104363952B (en) * 2012-06-08 2016-08-24 Med-El电气医疗器械有限公司 Electrode with removable insertion stop
AU2014293432A1 (en) 2013-07-26 2016-02-18 Med-El Elektromedizinische Geraete Gmbh Cochlear implant electrode insertion support device
US9375565B2 (en) * 2013-10-28 2016-06-28 Cochlear Limited Stimulating assembly fixation features
CN104739547B (en) * 2013-12-26 2017-01-04 中国人民解放军第二军医大学 Bioenergy cochlear implant

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107847735B (en) 2021-03-09
AU2016291651B2 (en) 2019-04-04
CN107847735A (en) 2018-03-27
US10213597B2 (en) 2019-02-26
EP3322475B1 (en) 2022-09-14
WO2017011639A9 (en) 2017-07-27
EP3322475A4 (en) 2019-01-23
WO2017011639A1 (en) 2017-01-19
US20170014621A1 (en) 2017-01-19
AU2016291651A1 (en) 2018-01-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9295831B2 (en) Electrode with anti-spring back component
US9522268B2 (en) Modified electrode lead for cochlear implants
US10870001B2 (en) Electrode contact with hydrogel covering
US10034797B2 (en) Cochlear implant electrode insertion bridge
US9572974B2 (en) Atraumatic modiolar hugging electrode
US20110202120A1 (en) Electrode Design for Reduced Trauma Insertion
EP3219114B1 (en) Incus short process attachment for implantable floating mass transducer
US10213597B2 (en) Electrode lead that avoids electrode array migration from the cochlea
US10994128B2 (en) Fixation component for insertion tools for minimally invasive cochlear implants
WO2014179267A1 (en) Minimal trauma cochlear implant electrode

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180103

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20190104

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04R 25/00 20060101ALI20181220BHEP

Ipc: A61N 1/05 20060101AFI20181220BHEP

Ipc: H04R 25/02 20060101ALI20181220BHEP

Ipc: A61F 2/18 20060101ALI20181220BHEP

Ipc: A61N 1/36 20060101ALI20181220BHEP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602016075046

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: A61N0001050000

Ipc: A61B0090000000

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: A61N 1/36 20060101ALI20211112BHEP

Ipc: A61N 1/05 20060101ALI20211112BHEP

Ipc: A61B 90/00 20160101AFI20211112BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220201

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220622

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016075046

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1518258

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20221015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20220914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1518258

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230116

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230114

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016075046

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20230615

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20230731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230714

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20230714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230714

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230731

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160714

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20250728

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20250725

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220914