EP3127262B1 - Enhanced grant detection method - Google Patents

Enhanced grant detection method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3127262B1
EP3127262B1 EP15774013.5A EP15774013A EP3127262B1 EP 3127262 B1 EP3127262 B1 EP 3127262B1 EP 15774013 A EP15774013 A EP 15774013A EP 3127262 B1 EP3127262 B1 EP 3127262B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sequence
wireless device
grant
threshold
bits
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP15774013.5A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3127262A2 (en
EP3127262A4 (en
Inventor
Stefania Sesia
Gerardo Agni MEDINA ACOSTA
Waikwok Kwong
Göran Bergman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
Original Assignee
Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd filed Critical Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
Publication of EP3127262A2 publication Critical patent/EP3127262A2/en
Publication of EP3127262A4 publication Critical patent/EP3127262A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3127262B1 publication Critical patent/EP3127262B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0045Arrangements at the receiver end
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N7/00Computing arrangements based on specific mathematical models
    • G06N7/01Probabilistic graphical models, e.g. probabilistic networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0056Systems characterized by the type of code used
    • H04L1/0061Error detection codes
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0072Error control for data other than payload data, e.g. control data
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/08Testing, supervising or monitoring using real traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/20Control channels or signalling for resource management
    • H04W72/23Control channels or signalling for resource management in the downlink direction of a wireless link, i.e. towards a terminal

Definitions

  • This written description relates to wireless communication, and in particular to a method and system for reducing a probability of incorrect interruption of an uplink transmission of a wireless device.
  • a base station communicates with a wireless device by transmitting information to the wireless device on a downlink channel and receiving information from the wireless device on an uplink channel. Because many wireless devices may be trying to send information to the base station at the same time, a mechanism is provided to control which wireless device may transmit on the uplink to the base station during a specified time slot. This mechanism includes transmitting, to a wireless device, a grant sequence of bits that informs the wireless device that the wireless device is selected for uplink transmission. The grant sequence is typically transmitted to the wireless device via a dedicated channel.
  • E-DCH enhanced dedicated channel
  • E-AGCH Absolute Grant Channel
  • higher layer signaling means signaling at an open system interconnect (OSI) layer higher than OSI layer 2.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the frame 2 and sub-frame 4 structure of the E-AGCH.
  • An E-DCH absolute grant is transmitted over one E-AGCH sub-frame 4 or one E-AGCH frame 2, depending on the E-DCH transmission time interval (TTI) to be used by a wireless device such as a user equipment (UE).
  • TTI E-DCH transmission time interval
  • the TTI can be set either to 2ms or 10ms.
  • the Absolute Grant Value is transmitted using the E-AGCH.
  • the Absolute Grant Value consists of 5 bits Xagv,1, Xagv,2, ..., Xagv,5.
  • a 1 bit Absolute Grant Scope, Xags,1 is appended to these five bits.
  • the Absolute Grant Value information is specified in tables that are selected by higher layer signaling and which indicate how to perform the mapping of an index described in terms of bits to a power ratio.
  • the Absolute Grant Scope is an activation flag used for (de)activating individual hybrid automatic repeat request (ARQ).
  • the Absolute Grant Value information Xagv,1, Xagv,2, ..., Xagv,5 and the Absolute Grant Scope information Xags,1 are multiplexed together.
  • the E-RNTI stands for the E DCH Radio Network Temporary Identifier, and is mapped such that xid,1 corresponds to the most significant bit (MSB). From the sequence of bits Xag,1, Xag,2, ..., Xag,6 a 16 bit cyclic redundancy code (CRC) is calculated.
  • MSB most significant bit
  • Rate 1/3 convolutional coding is applied to the sequence of bits y1, y2, ..., y22, resulting in the sequence of bits z1, z2, ..., z90.
  • the bits z1, z2, z5, z6, z7, z11, z12, z14, z15, z17, z23, z24, z31, z37, z44, z47, z61, z63, z64, z71, z72, z75, z77, z80, z83, z84, z85, z87, z88, z90 are punctured to obtain the output sequence r 1 , r 2 , ... , r 60 .
  • the sequence of bits r1, r2, ..., r60 is mapped to the corresponding E-AGCH sub frame.
  • the bits r k are mapped so that they are transmitted over the air in ascending order with respect to k. If the E-DCH TTI is equal to 10 ms the same sequence of bits is transmitted in all the E-AGCH sub frames of the E-AGCH radio frame.
  • a receiving wireless device must de-puncture and decode the received signal on the E-AGCH.
  • the UEs are supposed to transmit sequentially by following a time division multiplex (TDM) operation.
  • TDM time division multiplex
  • the TDM operation can be performed by using the legacy E-AGCH.
  • the wireless device e.g., user equipment (UE) keeps quiet and does not transmit if the CRC of the detected message is incorrect, otherwise the wireless device can start the transmission and continue transmission until detecting an incorrect CRC in the grant.
  • the method consists of sending the grant information to a certain wireless device to indicate that the wireless device can start its uplink transmission. Then, discontinuous transmission (DTX) is used until another wireless device has to be granted.
  • DTX discontinuous transmission
  • wireless device When a wireless device detects that a grant for uplink transmission is for the wireless device, then the wireless device can start transmitting in the uplink. If the wireless device detects that a grant is sent for another wireless device, then the wireless device should stop transmitting immediately.
  • wireless device and “UE” may be used herein interchangeably to denote a wireless device such as a mobile phone, computer, tablet computer, iPad, and the like. Embodiments are not limited to devices such as mobile phones.
  • the UE transmits only if successful decoding of the grant occurs, while the wireless device stops transmitting if the wireless device detects that a grant was sent to someone else.
  • event (2) if the corresponding probability is not sufficiently negligible, this may lead to several interruptions in the wireless device transmission with negative consequences on the overall achieved throughput. There is a large potential probability during DTX that the wireless device wrongly detects that a grant is sent for another wireless device, which would lead to frequent wrong interruption of its uplink transmission.
  • TP on TDM Scheduling Solutions 3GPP DRAFT; R1-134831 TP ON TDM SCHEDULING SOLUTIONS, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT (3GPP) discloses a grant handling enhancement to avoid the drawbacks with operating a bursty high data rate traffic using legacy E-AGCH channel.
  • US 2011/083065 discloses a method wherein a decoding-reliability metric from a received-signal decoder is compared with a threshold to decrease significantly the probability of false detection in a receiver and thus increase communication reliability and performance.
  • US 2011/182385 discloses reliability metrics, based on output of a decoder module, associated with each possible hypothesis associated with blind decoding are provided that aids a pruning process by rejecting unreliable CRC-passed hypotheses.
  • UE performance impact for EUL enhancement feature 3GPP DRAFT; R4-141496 EUL ENHANCEMENTS UE PERFORMANCEV5, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIO PROJECT (3GPP) discloses enhancements of the TDM behavior with regard to UL scheduling grant such as E-AGCH timing for deactivation, Grant Detection and Time Limited Grants.
  • T is the threshold; comparing the probability metric to a threshold; and treating the received signal as having a grant sequence if the probability metric is greater than the threshold; treating the received signal as noise if the probability metric is not greater than the threshold; and if the probability metric is greater than the threshold, then determining if a cyclic redundancy code, CRC, check is positive, a positive CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device, and a negative CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device.
  • CRC cyclic redundancy code
  • CRC cyclic redundancy code
  • the embodiments reside primarily in combinations of apparatus components and processing steps related to differentiating between a grant sequence and noise received at a wireless device and for reducing a probability of incorrect interruption of an uplink transmission of a wireless device.
  • relational terms such as “first” and “second,” “top” and “bottom,” and the like, may be used solely to distinguish one entity or element from another entity or element without necessarily requiring or implying any physical or logical relationship or order between such entities or elements
  • a methodology to reduce the probability of wrong interruption of a wireless device uplink transmission is implemented. Embodiments described herein improve the reliability of DTX detection in order to decrease to an acceptable level the probability that a wireless device may wrongly detect that a grant is sent to someone else when nothing has actually been transmitted.
  • a wireless device decodes of a sequence of bits obtained from a signal received by the wireless device. The decoding is performed without knowing whether the sequence corresponds to a grant for uplink transmission or noise. Decoding of the sequence of bits is performed to determine a probability metric associated with a first m bits of the sequence, where m is an integer greater than 1. The probability metric is compared to a threshold.
  • the received signal is interpreted as having a grant sequence if the probability metric is greater than the threshold.
  • the received signal is interpreted as noise if the probability metric is not greater than the threshold. If the received signal is interpreted as having a grant sequence, a CRC check is performed to determine if the grant is to the wireless device or another wireless device.
  • a method exploits the Viterbi decoder and the reliability associated with a certain amount of bits of the E-AGCH.
  • a method may be based on running the Viterbi decoder on the received sequence without a priori knowledge of whether the sequence corresponds to a grant (for this or another wireless device) or noise.
  • the output or the metric of the Viterbi decoder may be used to define a decision threshold based on a set of bits of the sequence.
  • the wireless device may exploit the decoder in order to reliably detect whether DTX was performed.
  • the decoder which may be implemented in order to decode a convolutional code, is a Viterbi decoder, and performs maximum likelihood decoding.
  • a Viterbi decoder can be implemented in a soft manner, called a Soft Viterbi decoder whose output corresponds to soft reliability information.
  • the wireless device performs the following steps, as in the legacy E-AGCH receiver:
  • the wireless device exploits the decoded sequence to check whether the CRC is correct in order to determine whether the transmitted grant is intended for the wireless device or for some other wireless device.
  • the Node B has performed DTX, there is a large probability that the wireless device will not find a correct CRC check and hence may interpret noise as a grant sent to another user. This may cause the wireless device to erroneously discontinue its uplink transmission.
  • the wireless device may perform the following additional steps:
  • m can be any number from 6 to 22, i.e. the CRC bits are also used in order to detect whether only noise is received). Note that this algorithm exploits the fact that in case only noise is received it is likely that ⁇ (bi) is close to 0. The higher in absolute level the values of ⁇ (bi), the higher the probability that the sequence received is not noise.
  • the wireless device implements the classical Viterbi decoder.
  • the decision-reliability metric generated by the decoder to output the maximum likelihood hard sequence is used in order to compute a suitable threshold to distinguish case B from the cases C and D defined above.
  • cases A-D are repeated here:
  • the decision reliability metric is the s metric commonly used in convolutional decoders and can be used to set the threshold.
  • the s metric output from the convolutional decoder represents the reliability of the decoding.
  • a threshold to distinguishing case B from cases C and D could be introduced. For example, If M s ⁇ ⁇ AGCH s , where M s is the s matrix and ⁇ AGCH s , is the threshold, the wireless device would assume something is transmitted on the E-AGCH. The CRC check would then be used to distinguish between cases C and D. If the CRC check is positive, this would be regarded as case C. If the CRC check is negative, this would be regarded as case D. On the other hand, if M s ⁇ ⁇ AGCH s , the wireless device would assume nothing is transmitted on the E-AGCH (case B).
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a wireless device 10 constructed in accordance with principles of the present invention.
  • the wireless device 10 includes a memory 12 and a processor 14.
  • the memory 12 includes executable program code 16, a bit sequence 18 and a threshold 20.
  • the executable program code 16, the bit sequence 18 and the threshold 20 may be stored in different non-contiguous memory.
  • the executable program code 16, when executed by the processor 14, configures the processor to perform functions to differentiate a received bit sequence as being one of a grant or noise, and if a grant sequence is received to determine whether the grant is for the wireless device 10 or for another wireless device.
  • the functions performed by the processor include decoding 22, comparison 24, grant determination 26 and CRC checking 28.
  • the decoder 22 decodes a sequence of bits of a signal received by the wireless device 10. This decoding takes place without knowing in advance whether the sequence corresponds to one of a grant for uplink transmission and noise.
  • the decoder 22 determines a probability metric associated with receiving the first m bits of the sequence, where m is an integer greater than 1.
  • the comparator 24 compares the probability metric to a threshold.
  • the grant determiner 26 determines whether a grant sequence is received or whether noise is received. A determination is made that a grant sequence is received if the probability metric exceeds the threshold. Otherwise, a determination is made that noise is received.
  • the CRC check function 28 performs a CRC check to determine whether a CRC check is positive, indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device, and whether the CRC check is negative, indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device.
  • the processor is further configured to generate a decision-reliability metric that is used to determine the threshold to which the probability metric is compared.
  • the decision-reliability metric may be an s metric generated by convolutional decoding.
  • the decoding may be maximum likelihood decoding.
  • the probability metric may be a log-likelihood metric based on a sequence of bits obtained from the signal received by the wireless device.
  • FIG. 3 shows software modules that can be executed by a processor to differentiate a received bit sequence as being one of a grant or noise, and if a grant, then whether the grant is meant for the wireless device 10 or another wireless device.
  • a decoder module 30 determines a probability metric associated with receiving the first m bits of the sequence, where m is an integer greater than 1.
  • a comparator module 32 compares the probability metric to a threshold.
  • a decision module 34 determines whether a grant sequence is received or whether noise is received. A determination is made that a grant sequence is received if the probability metric exceeds the threshold. Otherwise, a determination is made that noise is received. If a grant is received, a CRC check module performs a CRC check to determine whether a CRC check is positive, indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device, and whether the CRC check is negative, indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an exemplary process for reducing a probability of incorrect interruption of an uplink transmission of a wireless device 10.
  • a sequence of bits 18 in a received signal is decoded 22 without knowing whether the sequence corresponds to a grant or noise, to determine a probability metric (block S100).
  • the probability metric is compared 24 to a threshold (block S102). If the probability metric is greater than the threshold (block S102), then the sequence is interpreted as a grant sequence (block S106). Otherwise, the sequence is interpreted as noise (block S108).
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a continuation of the process used when the sequence is determined to be a grant sequence.
  • the probability metric is greater than the threshold the received sequence of bits 18 is interpreted as a grant sequence (block S110). If a CRC check 28 is positive, (block S112), the grant is interpreted as being a grant to the wireless device (block S114), whereas, if the CRC check 28 is negative, the grant is interpreted as being a grant to another wireless device (block S118).
  • Embodiments provide an efficient way to perform time domain scheduling where a wireless device's grant can be revoked implicitly by a grant sent to another wireless device. Otherwise, a wireless device might stop its transmission prematurely by mistaking pure noise as grant transmissions intended for other wireless devices.
  • Embodiments can be realized in hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. Any kind of computing system, or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein, is suited to perform the functions described herein.
  • a typical combination of hardware and software could be a specialized computer system, having one or more processing elements and a computer program stored on a storage medium that, when loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein.
  • the present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which, when loaded in a computing system is able to carry out these methods.
  • Storage medium refers to any volatile or non-volatile storage device.
  • Computer program or application in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • This written description relates to wireless communication, and in particular to a method and system for reducing a probability of incorrect interruption of an uplink transmission of a wireless device.
  • BACKGROUND
  • In wireless systems, a base station communicates with a wireless device by transmitting information to the wireless device on a downlink channel and receiving information from the wireless device on an uplink channel. Because many wireless devices may be trying to send information to the base station at the same time, a mechanism is provided to control which wireless device may transmit on the uplink to the base station during a specified time slot. This mechanism includes transmitting, to a wireless device, a grant sequence of bits that informs the wireless device that the wireless device is selected for uplink transmission. The grant sequence is typically transmitted to the wireless device via a dedicated channel.
  • The enhanced dedicated channel (E-DCH) Absolute Grant Channel (E-AGCH) is a fixed rate (30 kbps, SF=256) downlink physical channel that carries uplink E-DCH absolute grants for uplink E-DCHs associated with the E-AGCH set by higher layer signaling. As used herein, higher layer signaling means signaling at an open system interconnect (OSI) layer higher than OSI layer 2. FIG. 1 illustrates the frame 2 and sub-frame 4 structure of the E-AGCH. An E-DCH absolute grant is transmitted over one E-AGCH sub-frame 4 or one E-AGCH frame 2, depending on the E-DCH transmission time interval (TTI) to be used by a wireless device such as a user equipment (UE). The TTI can be set either to 2ms or 10ms. The Absolute Grant Value is transmitted using the E-AGCH. The Absolute Grant Value consists of 5 bits Xagv,1, Xagv,2, ..., Xagv,5. In addition a 1 bit Absolute Grant Scope, Xags,1, is appended to these five bits.
  • The Absolute Grant Value information is specified in tables that are selected by higher layer signaling and which indicate how to perform the mapping of an index described in terms of bits to a power ratio. The Absolute Grant Scope is an activation flag used for (de)activating individual hybrid automatic repeat request (ARQ). The Absolute Grant Value information Xagv,1, Xagv,2, ..., Xagv,5 and the Absolute Grant Scope information Xags,1 are multiplexed together. This gives a sequence of bits Xag,1, Xag,2, ..., Xag,6 where Xag , k = Xagv , k k = 1,2 , , 5 Xag , k = Xags , 7 k k = 6
    Figure imgb0001
  • The E-RNTI stands for the E DCH Radio Network Temporary Identifier, and is mapped such that xid,1 corresponds to the most significant bit (MSB). From the sequence of bits Xag,1, Xag,2, ..., Xag,6 a 16 bit cyclic redundancy code (CRC) is calculated. That gives the sequence of bits c1, c2, ..., c16 where
    ck =P im(17-k) k=1,2,...,16
    This sequence of bits is then masked with xid,1, xid,2, ..., xid,16 and appended to the sequence of bits Xag,1, Xag,2, ..., Xag,6 to form the sequence of bits y1, y2, ..., y22 where yi = Xag , i i = 1,2 , , 6 yi = ci 6 + xid , i 6 mod 2 i = 7 , , 22
    Figure imgb0002
  • Rate 1/3 convolutional coding is applied to the sequence of bits y1, y2, ..., y22, resulting in the sequence of bits z1, z2, ..., z90. From the input sequence z 1 , z 2 , , z 90
    Figure imgb0003
    the bits z1, z2, z5, z6, z7, z11, z12, z14, z15, z17, z23, z24, z31, z37, z44, z47, z61, z63, z64, z71, z72, z75, z77, z80, z83, z84, z85, z87, z88, z90 are punctured to obtain the output sequence r 1 , r 2 , , r 60 .
    Figure imgb0004
  • The sequence of bits r1, r2, ..., r60 is mapped to the corresponding E-AGCH sub frame. The bits rk are mapped so that they are transmitted over the air in ascending order with respect to k. If the E-DCH TTI is equal to 10 ms the same sequence of bits is transmitted in all the E-AGCH sub frames of the E-AGCH radio frame.
  • Thus, to recover the grant bit sequence, a receiving wireless device must de-puncture and decode the received signal on the E-AGCH.
  • On the secondary carrier, the UEs are supposed to transmit sequentially by following a time division multiplex (TDM) operation. The TDM operation can be performed by using the legacy E-AGCH. However, the following disadvantages have been identified:
    • Signaling Overhead: two E-AGCHs must be signaled, one for starting the data transmission, and one more for stopping the data transmission;
    • Scheduling Efficiency: the above activation /deactivation signaling overhead leads to a gap between the data transmissions of different UEs; and
    • Serious consequences arise from missed detection of the terminating grant, such as collisions of uplinks from multiple wireless devices.
  • Methods have been proposed to avoid the drawbacks found in legacy systems. For example, when a grant is sent, the wireless device, e.g., user equipment (UE) keeps quiet and does not transmit if the CRC of the detected message is incorrect, otherwise the wireless device can start the transmission and continue transmission until detecting an incorrect CRC in the grant. In particular, the method consists of sending the grant information to a certain wireless device to indicate that the wireless device can start its uplink transmission. Then, discontinuous transmission (DTX) is used until another wireless device has to be granted.
  • When a wireless device detects that a grant for uplink transmission is for the wireless device, then the wireless device can start transmitting in the uplink. If the wireless device detects that a grant is sent for another wireless device, then the wireless device should stop transmitting immediately. Note that the terms "wireless device" and "UE" may be used herein interchangeably to denote a wireless device such as a mobile phone, computer, tablet computer, iPad, and the like. Embodiments are not limited to devices such as mobile phones.
  • Currently, requirements for the E-AGCH are defined only in terms of missed detection probability. According to this method, the UE transmits only if successful decoding of the grant occurs, while the wireless device stops transmitting if the wireless device detects that a grant was sent to someone else. Let:
    • Case A = wireless device 'U' successfully decodes its grant;
    • Case B = The E-AGCH is in DTX;
    • Case C = The NodeB transmits the grant for wireless device 'U'; and
    • Case D = The NodeB transmits the grant for wireless device 'K'.
    Several important events can occur as follows:
    • Missed detection: 1 - Pr(A|C) corresponds to the usual missed detection probability, i.e. the wireless device 'U' cannot correctly detect its grant and hence the wireless device U does not start transmitting. This is linked to the CRC length, hence the missed detection probability is considered to be sufficiently low.
    • Wrong grant detection probability: Pr(A|D). This probability corresponds to the case when the wireless device 'U' decodes that a grant is sent for wireless device U when the network instead was transmitting a grant aimed for another wireless device. This condition happens with very low probability as again it is linked to the CRC length and the use of the E-RNTI as a mask. When this event happens, it can create a collision in uplink between 2 users.
    • False alarm probability: Pr(A|B). This corresponds to the conditional probability that the wireless device 'U' detects its grant given that no grant has been transmitted. This metric is already defined and the same requirement could be considered as valid also for this method. This probability is again linked to the CRC length and it is considered to be sufficiently small. However the corresponding complementary probability can be very high, 1 - Pr(A|B). The complementary probability can be considered as the sum of two events, i.e.:
      1. (1) the wireless device detects that nothing is transmitted (and hence it continues its uplink transmission if the wireless device was transmitting) even though nothing has been transmitted
      2. (2) the wireless device detects that a grant is sent to someone else given that nothing has been transmitted (and hence the wireless device stops its uplink transmission if the wireless device was transmitting)
  • In particular, for event (2), if the corresponding probability is not sufficiently negligible, this may lead to several interruptions in the wireless device transmission with negative consequences on the overall achieved throughput. There is a large potential probability during DTX that the wireless device wrongly detects that a grant is sent for another wireless device, which would lead to frequent wrong interruption of its uplink transmission.
  • "TP on TDM Scheduling Solutions", 3GPP DRAFT; R1-134831 TP ON TDM SCHEDULING SOLUTIONS, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT (3GPP) discloses a grant handling enhancement to avoid the drawbacks with operating a bursty high data rate traffic using legacy E-AGCH channel.
  • US 2011/083065 discloses a method wherein a decoding-reliability metric from a received-signal decoder is compared with a threshold to decrease significantly the probability of false detection in a receiver and thus increase communication reliability and performance.
  • US 2011/182385 discloses reliability metrics, based on output of a decoder module, associated with each possible hypothesis associated with blind decoding are provided that aids a pruning process by rejecting unreliable CRC-passed hypotheses.
  • "UE performance impact for EUL enhancement feature", 3GPP DRAFT; R4-141496 EUL ENHANCEMENTS UE PERFORMANCEV5, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIO PROJECT (3GPP) discloses enhancements of the TDM behavior with regard to UL scheduling grant such as E-AGCH timing for deactivation, Grant Detection and Time Limited Grants.
  • SUMMARY
  • One aspect of the present invention provides a method to reduce a probability of incorrect interruption of an uplink transmission of a wireless device, the method comprising: performing decoding of a sequence of bits obtained from a signal received by the wireless device, without knowing whether the sequence corresponds to one of a grant for uplink transmission and noise, to determine a probability metric associated with a first m bits of the sequence, wherein m is an integer greater than 1, and the probability metric is a log-likelihood metric given by: Λ(yi) = Log (Prob(yi = 1) / Prob(yi = -1)) ∀ i = 1..m where y is a sequence of bits (18) obtained from the signal received by the wireless device (10) and the probability metric being greater than the threshold is defined by the condition D = { Λ(yi) > T ∀ i = 1 .. m} where T is the threshold; comparing the probability metric to a threshold; and treating the received signal as having a grant sequence if the probability metric is greater than the threshold; treating the received signal as noise if the probability metric is not greater than the threshold; and if the probability metric is greater than the threshold, then determining if a cyclic redundancy code, CRC, check is positive, a positive CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device, and a negative CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device.
  • A further aspect of the present invention provides a wireless device, comprising: a memory configured to store: a sequence of bits obtained from a received signal; and a threshold; and a processor in communication with the memory, the processor configured to execute the executable program code to: decode the sequence of bits obtained from the received signal, without knowing whether the sequence corresponds to one of a grant for uplink transmission and noise, to determine a probability metric associated with receiving a first m bits of the sequence wherein m is an integer greater than 1 and the probability metric is a log-likelihood metric given by: Λ(yi) = Log (Prob(yi = 1) / Prob(yi = -1)) ∀ i = 1 .. m where y is a sequence of bits obtained from the signal received by the wireless device and the probability metric being greater than the threshold is defined by the condition D = { Λ (yi) > T ∀ i = 1 .. m} where T is the threshold; compare the probability metric to the threshold; determine that the received signal has a grant sequence if the probability metric is greater than the threshold; and determine that the received signal is noise if the probability metric is not greater than the threshold, wherein, when the processor determines that the received signal has a grant sequence, the processor is further configured to perform a cyclic redundancy code, CRC, check to determine whether a CRC check is positive, a positive CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device, and a negative CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • A more complete understanding of the present invention, and the attendant advantages and features thereof, will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
    • FIG. 1 is a diagram of the frame and sub-frame structure of the E-AGCH;
    • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a wireless device constructed in accordance with embodiments described herein;
    • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an alternative wireless device constructed in accordance with embodiments described herein;
    • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an exemplary process of differentiating between a grant sequence and noise; and
    • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an exemplary process of determining whether a grant is for a one wireless device or another.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Before describing in detail example embodiments that are in accordance with the present disclosure, it is noted that the embodiments reside primarily in combinations of apparatus components and processing steps related to differentiating between a grant sequence and noise received at a wireless device and for reducing a probability of incorrect interruption of an uplink transmission of a wireless device.
  • Accordingly, the system and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
  • As used herein, relational terms, such as "first" and "second," "top" and "bottom," and the like, may be used solely to distinguish one entity or element from another entity or element without necessarily requiring or implying any physical or logical relationship or order between such entities or elements
  • In some embodiments, a methodology to reduce the probability of wrong interruption of a wireless device uplink transmission is implemented. Embodiments described herein improve the reliability of DTX detection in order to decrease to an acceptable level the probability that a wireless device may wrongly detect that a grant is sent to someone else when nothing has actually been transmitted. In some embodiments, a wireless device decodes of a sequence of bits obtained from a signal received by the wireless device. The decoding is performed without knowing whether the sequence corresponds to a grant for uplink transmission or noise. Decoding of the sequence of bits is performed to determine a probability metric associated with a first m bits of the sequence, where m is an integer greater than 1. The probability metric is compared to a threshold. The received signal is interpreted as having a grant sequence if the probability metric is greater than the threshold. The received signal is interpreted as noise if the probability metric is not greater than the threshold. If the received signal is interpreted as having a grant sequence, a CRC check is performed to determine if the grant is to the wireless device or another wireless device.
  • In some embodiments, a method exploits the Viterbi decoder and the reliability associated with a certain amount of bits of the E-AGCH. In particular, a method may be based on running the Viterbi decoder on the received sequence without a priori knowledge of whether the sequence corresponds to a grant (for this or another wireless device) or noise. The output or the metric of the Viterbi decoder may be used to define a decision threshold based on a set of bits of the sequence.
  • In operation, the wireless device receives the sequence of 60 bits defined as s = H r + n
    Figure imgb0005
    if the Node B transmits a grant (for wireless device 'U' or wireless device 'K'), where r = r1, r2, ..., r60 is the 60 bits sequence corresponding to a grant (defined in Equation (4)), n = n1, ..., n60 is the noise sequence, and H the matrix corresponding to the wireless channel. If the Node B is using discontinuous transmission (DTX), the wireless device receives, instead:
    s = n
  • When the sequence r is obtained by the Node B as the outcome of a rate 1/3 convolutional code applied to a 22 bit sequence with trellis termination, and then punctured to obtain 60 bits, the wireless device may exploit the decoder in order to reliably detect whether DTX was performed.
  • In some embodiments, the decoder, which may be implemented in order to decode a convolutional code, is a Viterbi decoder, and performs maximum likelihood decoding. A Viterbi decoder can be implemented in a soft manner, called a Soft Viterbi decoder whose output corresponds to soft reliability information.
  • The wireless device performs the following steps, as in the legacy E-AGCH receiver:
    1. (1) The wireless device receives the sequence is defined in Equation (5);
    2. (2) The wireless device applies de-puncturing on the sequence s and obtains the sequence z (as defined in Equation (3));
    3. (3) The wireless device applies the decoder to the sequence z; and
    4. (4) The wireless device obtains the most likely sequence of 22 bits y of Eq. 2.
  • In the legacy case, the wireless device exploits the decoded sequence to check whether the CRC is correct in order to determine whether the transmitted grant is intended for the wireless device or for some other wireless device. However if the Node B has performed DTX, there is a large probability that the wireless device will not find a correct CRC check and hence may interpret noise as a grant sent to another user. This may cause the wireless device to erroneously discontinue its uplink transmission.
  • In order to ensure that the wireless device discriminates between the case when only 'noise' is received or the case when a grant is sent, the wireless device may perform the following additional steps:
    • Step (1) The wireless device selects the first m bits of sequence y = y1,..., ym, as defined in Equation (2);
    • Step (2) In one embodiment the wireless device implements a soft decoder. The wireless device collects the log-likelihood associated with the first m bits yi, i.e. Λ(yi) = Log (Prob(yi= 1) / Prob(yi= -1)) ∀ i = 1..m. Note that other metrics related to the soft decoder can be applied, e.g., no Log (.) function, conditional probabilities, a-posteriori probabilities (APP), and extrinsic information.
      1. (a) The wireless device defines a condition D = { Λ(yi) > T ∀ i = 1..m}, where T is the threshold.
      2. (b) If condition D is satisfied then the wireless device considers the received signal as a grant sequence and it applies known techniques in order to check, via the CRC, whether the grant sent is intended for it or for another wireless device.
      3. (c) If condition D is not satisfied then the wireless device considers the received signal as noise.
  • Since in order to fulfill the condition D all of the elements in the received sequence of bits y have to be above the threshold T, then equivalently the received signal can also be distinguished from noise when the conditional operator is inverted and the threshold condition is fulfilled for any of the elements of the sequence of bits y. Therefore, in the alternative to the condition applied in (a) above, the wireless device may define the condition D = { Λ(yi) < T, for any i = 1..m}. If this condition is satisfied, the wireless device considers the received signal to be noise. Otherwise, the wireless device considers the received signal to contain a grant sequence, and applies known techniques to check, via the CRC, whether the grant sent is intended for it or another wireless device.
  • In step (2), in one embodiment, m = 6 and the sequence used in order to detect DTX corresponds only to the information bits.
  • In step (2), in a different embodiment m can be any number from 6 to 22, i.e. the CRC bits are also used in order to detect whether only noise is received). Note that this algorithm exploits the fact that in case only noise is received it is likely that Λ(bi) is close to 0. The higher in absolute level the values of Λ(bi), the higher the probability that the sequence received is not noise.
  • In a different, non-claimed embodiment the wireless device implements the classical Viterbi decoder. The decision-reliability metric generated by the decoder to output the maximum likelihood hard sequence is used in order to compute a suitable threshold to distinguish case B from the cases C and D defined above. For convenience, cases A-D are repeated here:
    • Case A = wireless device 'U' successfully decodes its grant;
    • Case B = The E-AGCH is in DTX;
    • Case C = The NodeB transmits the grant for wireless device 'U'; and
    • Case D = The NodeB transmits the grant for wireless device 'K'.
  • Under the conditions defined in the preceding paragraph, in one, non-claimed embodiment, the decision reliability metric is the s metric commonly used in convolutional decoders and can be used to set the threshold. The s metric output from the convolutional decoder represents the reliability of the decoding. A threshold to distinguishing case B from cases C and D could be introduced. For example, If Ms τ AGCH s ,
    Figure imgb0006
    where Ms is the s matrix and τ AGCH s ,
    Figure imgb0007
    is the threshold, the wireless device would assume something is transmitted on the E-AGCH. The CRC check would then be used to distinguish between cases C and D. If the CRC check is positive, this would be regarded as case C. If the CRC check is negative, this would be regarded as case D. On the other hand, if M s < τ AGCH s ,
    Figure imgb0008
    the wireless device would assume nothing is transmitted on the E-AGCH (case B).
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a wireless device 10 constructed in accordance with principles of the present invention. The wireless device 10 includes a memory 12 and a processor 14. The memory 12 includes executable program code 16, a bit sequence 18 and a threshold 20. In some embodiments, the executable program code 16, the bit sequence 18 and the threshold 20 may be stored in different non-contiguous memory. The executable program code 16, when executed by the processor 14, configures the processor to perform functions to differentiate a received bit sequence as being one of a grant or noise, and if a grant sequence is received to determine whether the grant is for the wireless device 10 or for another wireless device. The functions performed by the processor include decoding 22, comparison 24, grant determination 26 and CRC checking 28.
  • The decoder 22 decodes a sequence of bits of a signal received by the wireless device 10. This decoding takes place without knowing in advance whether the sequence corresponds to one of a grant for uplink transmission and noise. The decoder 22 determines a probability metric associated with receiving the first m bits of the sequence, where m is an integer greater than 1. The comparator 24 compares the probability metric to a threshold. The grant determiner 26 determines whether a grant sequence is received or whether noise is received. A determination is made that a grant sequence is received if the probability metric exceeds the threshold. Otherwise, a determination is made that noise is received. If the determination is made that a grant sequence is received, the CRC check function 28 performs a CRC check to determine whether a CRC check is positive, indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device, and whether the CRC check is negative, indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device.
  • In some, non-claimed embodiments, the processor is further configured to generate a decision-reliability metric that is used to determine the threshold to which the probability metric is compared. The decision-reliability metric may be an s metric generated by convolutional decoding. The decoding may be maximum likelihood decoding. The probability metric may be a log-likelihood metric based on a sequence of bits obtained from the signal received by the wireless device.
  • An alternative, non-claimed embodiment of the wireless device 10 is shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 3 shows software modules that can be executed by a processor to differentiate a received bit sequence as being one of a grant or noise, and if a grant, then whether the grant is meant for the wireless device 10 or another wireless device. A decoder module 30 determines a probability metric associated with receiving the first m bits of the sequence, where m is an integer greater than 1. A comparator module 32 compares the probability metric to a threshold.
  • A decision module 34 determines whether a grant sequence is received or whether noise is received. A determination is made that a grant sequence is received if the probability metric exceeds the threshold. Otherwise, a determination is made that noise is received. If a grant is received, a CRC check module performs a CRC check to determine whether a CRC check is positive, indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device, and whether the CRC check is negative, indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an exemplary process for reducing a probability of incorrect interruption of an uplink transmission of a wireless device 10. A sequence of bits 18 in a received signal is decoded 22 without knowing whether the sequence corresponds to a grant or noise, to determine a probability metric (block S100). The probability metric is compared 24 to a threshold (block S102). If the probability metric is greater than the threshold (block S102), then the sequence is interpreted as a grant sequence (block S106). Otherwise, the sequence is interpreted as noise (block S108).
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a continuation of the process used when the sequence is determined to be a grant sequence. When the probability metric is greater than the threshold the received sequence of bits 18 is interpreted as a grant sequence (block S110). If a CRC check 28 is positive, (block S112), the grant is interpreted as being a grant to the wireless device (block S114), whereas, if the CRC check 28 is negative, the grant is interpreted as being a grant to another wireless device (block S118).
  • Embodiments provide an efficient way to perform time domain scheduling where a wireless device's grant can be revoked implicitly by a grant sent to another wireless device. Otherwise, a wireless device might stop its transmission prematurely by mistaking pure noise as grant transmissions intended for other wireless devices.
  • Embodiments can be realized in hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. Any kind of computing system, or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein, is suited to perform the functions described herein. A typical combination of hardware and software could be a specialized computer system, having one or more processing elements and a computer program stored on a storage medium that, when loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein. The present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which, when loaded in a computing system is able to carry out these methods. Storage medium refers to any volatile or non-volatile storage device.
  • Computer program or application in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.
  • It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the embodiments are not limited to what has been particularly shown and described herein above. In addition, unless mention was made above to the contrary, it should be noted that all of the accompanying drawings are not to scale. A variety of modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings without departing from the scope of the following claims.

Claims (6)

  1. A method to reduce a probability of incorrect interruption of an uplink transmission of a wireless device, the method comprising:
    performing decoding of a sequence of bits (18) obtained from a signal received by the wireless device (10), without knowing whether the sequence corresponds to one of a grant for uplink transmission and noise, to determine a probability metric associated with a first m bits of the sequence, wherein m is an integer greater than 1 (S100), and the probability metric is a log-likelihood metric given by: Λ y i = Log Prob y i = 1 / Prob y i = 1 i = 1 . . m
    Figure imgb0009
    where y is a sequence of bits (18) obtained from the signal received by the wireless device (10) and the probability metric being greater than the threshold (22) is defined by the condition D = { Λ(yi) > T ∀ i = 1 .. m} where T is the threshold (22);
    comparing the probability metric to a threshold (20, S102); and
    treating the received signal as having a grant sequence if the probability metric is greater than the threshold (s106);
    treating the received signal as noise if the probability metric is not greater than the threshold (S108); and
    if the probability metric is greater than the threshold (S110), then determining if a cyclic redundancy code, CRC, check is positive (s112), a positive CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device (s114), and a negative CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device (s118).
  2. The method of Claim 1, wherein m=6 and the sequence corresponds to absolute grant value information and absolute grant scope information.
  3. The method of Claim 1, wherein the sequence of bits, y, (18) is obtained from the signal received by the wireless device (10) by a process that includes depuncturing of a sequence, z, in the received signal.
  4. A wireless device, comprising:
    a memory (12) configured to store:
    executable program code (16);
    a sequence of bits (18) obtained from a received signal; and
    a threshold (20); and
    a processor (14) in communication with the memory (12), the processor (14) configured to execute the executable program code (16) to:
    decode (22) the sequence of bits obtained from the received signal, without knowing whether the sequence corresponds to one of a grant for uplink transmission and noise, to determine a probability metric associated with receiving a first m bits of the sequence, wherein m is an integer greater than 1 and the probability metric is a log-likelihood metric given by:
    Λ(yi) = Log (Prob(yi = 1) / Prob(yi = -1)) ∀ i = 1 .. m
    where y is a sequence of bits (18) obtained from the signal received by the wireless device (10) and the probability metric being greater than the threshold (20) is defined by the condition D = { Λ (yi) > T ∀ i = 1 .. m} where T is the threshold (20);
    compare (24) the probability metric to the threshold;
    determine (26) that the received signal has a grant sequence if the probability metric is greater than the threshold; and
    determine (26) that the received signal is noise if the probability metric is not greater than the threshold,
    wherein, when the processor (14) determines that the received signal has a grant sequence, the processor (14) is further configured to perform a cyclic redundancy code, CRC, check (28) to determine whether a CRC check is positive, a positive CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for the wireless device, and a negative CRC check indicating that the grant sequence is for a different wireless device.
  5. The wireless device of Claim 4, wherein m=6 and the sequence of bits (18) corresponds to absolute grant value information and absolute grant scope information.
  6. The wireless device of Claim 4, wherein the sequence of bits, y, (18) is obtained from the signal received by the wireless device (10) by a process that includes depuncturing of a sequence, z, in the received signal.
EP15774013.5A 2014-03-31 2015-03-31 Enhanced grant detection method Active EP3127262B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201461972818P 2014-03-31 2014-03-31
PCT/SE2015/050391 WO2015152806A2 (en) 2014-03-31 2015-03-31 Enhanced grant detection method

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3127262A2 EP3127262A2 (en) 2017-02-08
EP3127262A4 EP3127262A4 (en) 2017-11-22
EP3127262B1 true EP3127262B1 (en) 2021-08-04

Family

ID=54241413

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15774013.5A Active EP3127262B1 (en) 2014-03-31 2015-03-31 Enhanced grant detection method

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US10064214B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3127262B1 (en)
CN (2) CN106464429B (en)
WO (1) WO2015152806A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015169376A1 (en) * 2014-05-08 2015-11-12 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Uplink grant detection for partial time division multiplexing mode
CN104133836B (en) * 2014-06-24 2015-09-09 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 A kind of method and device realizing change Data Detection

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6427219B1 (en) * 1998-06-24 2002-07-30 Conexant Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting and correcting errors using cyclic redundancy check
US7392459B2 (en) * 2004-04-14 2008-06-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for preventing a false pass of a cyclic redundancy check at a receiver during weak receiving conditions in a wireless communications system
US7716554B2 (en) * 2005-07-18 2010-05-11 Industrial Technology Research Institute System and method for blind transport format detection with cyclic redundancy check
US20110182385A1 (en) * 2009-07-30 2011-07-28 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for reliability-aided pruning of blind decoding results
US20110083065A1 (en) * 2009-10-01 2011-04-07 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) False Detection Reduction in Communication Systems
CN101778396B (en) * 2010-01-13 2012-05-09 南京邮电大学 Method for detecting cognitive user in opportunity spectrum sharing system
US8578250B2 (en) * 2010-09-10 2013-11-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Data classification in a wireless communication system
CN102209364B (en) * 2011-05-20 2014-03-12 北京邮电大学 Multi-user admission control method and system in cognitive radio communication system
US9036498B2 (en) * 2012-02-28 2015-05-19 Marvell International Ltd. Mitigation of false PDCCH detection

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN106464429A (en) 2017-02-22
US20180220446A1 (en) 2018-08-02
EP3127262A2 (en) 2017-02-08
US10064214B2 (en) 2018-08-28
EP3127262A4 (en) 2017-11-22
CN111049620A (en) 2020-04-21
WO2015152806A3 (en) 2015-11-19
CN106464429B (en) 2019-11-05
WO2015152806A2 (en) 2015-10-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10631179B2 (en) HARQ frame data structure and method of transmitting and receiving with HARQ in systems using blind detection
CN110463109B (en) Method, apparatus and storage medium for transmitting puncturing signal
EP2232752B1 (en) A method and apparatus for blind decoding
US7480279B2 (en) Apparatus and method for transmitting a control message on a packet data control channel in a mobile communication system supporting a packet data service
CN107852281B (en) Baseband processor, base station, user equipment and method thereof
US9264189B2 (en) Method and device for detecting downlink control information
US8578250B2 (en) Data classification in a wireless communication system
WO2011047506A1 (en) Method for blind detection of physical downlink control channel (pdcch), and method and device for scheduling resources
WO2017020679A1 (en) A transmitting method, receiving method and nodes for harq information
US10931405B2 (en) Relaying method and device and destination with feedback in an OMAMRC system
WO2011111234A1 (en) Receiver, receiving method, and wireless communication system
EP3127262B1 (en) Enhanced grant detection method
US11611987B2 (en) Method and device for detecting partial discontinuous transmission (DTX) using soft bits correlation
US9281920B2 (en) Mobile station and control information decoding method
US8612825B2 (en) Data classification based on cyclic redundancy check and decoder metric
US11375486B1 (en) Method and device for detecting discontinuous transmission (DTX) assisted by noise estimation
US9158611B2 (en) Telecommunications methods for increasing reliability of early termination of transmission
CN113597745B (en) Method and apparatus for assisted detection of Discontinuous Transmission (DTX) by noise estimation
EP3876446B1 (en) Variable data rate broadcast method for channels requiring equalization
WO2015131551A1 (en) Method and device for controlling transmission power of mobile terminal
JP2004320359A (en) Reception processing method, receiver and terminal

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160908

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20171023

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04W 52/28 20090101ALI20171017BHEP

Ipc: H03M 13/09 20060101ALI20171017BHEP

Ipc: H04W 72/14 20090101ALI20171017BHEP

Ipc: H04L 1/00 20060101AFI20171017BHEP

Ipc: H04W 52/16 20090101ALI20171017BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190513

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., LT

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., LT

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210406

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1418077

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602015071954

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20210804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1418077

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211206

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211104

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211104

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602015071954

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220506

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602015071954

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221001

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230412

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20150331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804