EP3104451B1 - Resonator assembly and filter - Google Patents
Resonator assembly and filter Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3104451B1 EP3104451B1 EP15305864.9A EP15305864A EP3104451B1 EP 3104451 B1 EP3104451 B1 EP 3104451B1 EP 15305864 A EP15305864 A EP 15305864A EP 3104451 B1 EP3104451 B1 EP 3104451B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- resonator
- dielectric
- resonant member
- dielectric spacer
- resonant
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 74
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000003071 parasitic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910010293 ceramic material Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000003989 dielectric material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 16
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 13
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004904 shortening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003292 glue Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000135 prohibitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005245 sintering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003746 surface roughness Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01P—WAVEGUIDES; RESONATORS, LINES, OR OTHER DEVICES OF THE WAVEGUIDE TYPE
- H01P7/00—Resonators of the waveguide type
- H01P7/04—Coaxial resonators
Definitions
- the present invention relates to cavity resonator assemblies and filters formed therefrom.
- Filters formed from resonators are essential components of radio frequency RF systems such as base stations, radar systems, point-to-point radio links, and RF signal cancellation systems.
- a specific filter is chosen or designed dependent on the particular application, there are certain desirable characteristics that are common to all filter realisations. For example, the amount of insertion loss in the pass-band of the filter should be as low as possible, while the attenuation in the stop-band should be as high as possible.
- the frequency separation between the pass-band and stop-band (guard band) needs to be very small, which requires filters of high order to be deployed in order to achieve this requirement.
- the requirement for a high order filter is always followed by an increase in the cost (due to the greater number of components that such a filter requires) and space.
- One of the challenging tasks in filter design is to reduce their size while retaining much of their electrical performance such that their performance is comparable with larger structures.
- One of the main parameters governing filter's selectivity and insertion loss is the so-called quality factor of the elements comprising the filter - the "Q factor".
- the Q factor is defined as the ratio of energy stored in the element to the time-averaged power loss.
- For lumped elements that are used especially at low RF frequencies for filter design Q can be of the order ⁇ 60-100, whereas for cavity type resonators Q can be as high as several 1000s.
- lumped components offer significant miniaturization their low Q factor prohibits their use in highly demanding applications where high rejection and/or selectivity is required.
- the standard practice is to overdesign the resonator, i.e., design the resonator for a Q factor that is say20% larger than the minimum required. Clearly this is wasteful, since typically a great deal of effort and time is dedicated to the 3D computational design of a resonator.
- JP-59223005 discloses a resonator with a a dielectric puck placed on the top of a resonant post inside a resonant cavity. There is a recess above the dielectric puck within which a frequency tuning screw extends. Adjustment of the screw changes the electrostatic capacity exhibited by the top of the resonant post, which results in frequency tunability.
- a resonator assembly comprising:
- the use of a dielectric spacer element between the resonant member and cavity produces a reflection coefficient at the cavity resonant member interface that is due to an open rather than closed circuit and the requirement to continually try to reduce the resistance between two touching conductive elements is removed. Imperfections in the contact surfaces of the dielectric spacer elements and the cavity walls and resonant member will affect the relative permittivity of this element which in turn affects the frequency of operation of the resonant member rather than the reflection coefficient.
- the Q factor of this resonant assembly is affected by the characteristic impedance of the dielectric spacer element and the value of this can be selected and can be more easily controlled than can the parasitic impedance due to imperfect contacts in a resonator assembly without the dielectric spacer. Thus, a resonant assembly where the Q factor can be more accurately determined and controlled is achieved.
- the dielectric spacer element is mounted on a first inner surface of said resonator cavity, said conductive resonant member being mounted on said dielectric spacer element and extending from said dielectric spacer element towards an opposing second inner surface of said resonator cavity.
- the conductive resonant member is spaced from the inner surface of the resonator cavity by mounting the dielectric spacer element on the cavity and the resonant member on the dielectric spacer element.
- the dielectric spacer element may be operable as an impedance transformer introducing a 90° phase change in a signal travelling through said dielectric spacer element.
- the dielectric spacer element acts as an impedance transformer and this introduces a phase shift in the signal.
- the resonant member is a 1 ⁇ 4 wavelength or 90° long and the dielectric spacer acts as an impedance transformer and is therefore also 90° long, in view of this, the signal that travels along the combined structure of the conductive post and the dielectric spacer (from top of the conductive post to the part of the dielectric spacer that is in direct contact with the housing) exhibits a phase change of 180°.
- the losses due to the reflection of the signal at the conductive cavity are dependent upon the characteristic impedance of the dielectric spacer.
- a spacer element which acts as an impedance transformer provides a resonant assembly where the characteristic impedance of this impedance transformer is the feature that affects the Q factor rather than the more difficult to control contact resistance between the conductive resonant post and conductive cavity.
- Dielectric spacer elements provide a suitable characteristic impedance in a compact and practical manner.
- said dielectric spacer element has a characteristic impedance that is less than a parasitic impedance of the reflective load between said resonant member and said resonator cavity were said dielectric spacer not present and said resonant member were mounted directly on said first inner surface of said resonator cavity.
- the characteristic impedance of the dielectric spacer element is lower than the parasitic resistance that would exist between the conductive resonant member and cavity if it were mounted directly on the inner surface of the cavity, then the reflection coefficient will be improved by the presence of the dielectric spacer element and reflection losses will be reduced.
- reducing the parasitic resistance between the resonant member and cavity wall below a certain value becomes increasingly difficult, while providing a dielectric spacer element with a characteristic impedance that is less than this, is relatively straightforward requiring a thin element, which, where an expensive dielectric material is used, is itself an advantage.
- said dielectric spacer element is formed of a ceramic material.
- dielectric spacer element Although a number of different materials are suitable for the dielectric spacer element, their suitability depending on their characteristic impedance, relative permittivity, compactness and strength, ceramics have been found to be particularly suitable, being rigid, robust and providing a low characteristic impedance in a small element. These materials are often expensive, however as only a thin element is required, this is not prohibitive.
- the dielectric spacer element is formed of a low-temperature co-fired ceramic material.
- Low-temperature co-fired ceramic material can be used to generate spacer element that are relatively inexpensive, easy to fabricate and provide suitable electrical properties.
- dielectric spacer from low-temperature co-fired ceramic materials is that they may be applied to the surface of the cavity by depositing techniques and this provides a good contact with the inner cavity wall removing air voids which affect the permittivity of the material. Furthermore, this method of manufacture effectively fixes the material to the cavity without requiring additional fixing means and furthermore, a very thin element is easily achievable.
- the dielectric spacer element can have a number of forms including a disk type form which may make it particularly suitable where the conductive resonant member is in the form of a post.
- said conductive resonant member is fixed within said resonator cavity by a dielectric fixing element.
- One challenge with resonant members is how to fix them firmly to the cavity while preserving their required electrical properties. Where an additional element is present then this can add additional challenges.
- One way of affixing the resonant member to the cavity where an intermediate dielectric spacer element is present is to use a dielectric fixing element such that no conductive link between the conductive cavity and the conductive member is inadvertently provided by the fixing means and the properties provided by the spacing element are preserved.
- said dielectric fixing element comprises a ceramic screw.
- One fixing element that can be used is a ceramic screw. These are readily available and have properties similar to that of the spacing element.
- said resonant member is glued to said dielectric spacing element.
- An alternative way of fixing the resonant member is to glue it to the dielectric spacing element.
- This spacing element may itself be glued to the inner cavity wall or alternatively it may be deposited onto the wall.
- a surface of said dielectric spacing element that abuts said resonant member is larger than a surface of said resonant member that abuts said dielectric spacing element such that said dielectric spacing element extends beyond said resonant member.
- the dielectric spacing element can have the same or a smaller surface area than the resonant member, in some cases the dielectric spacing element may have a larger surface area.
- a larger surface area reduces the current density in the dielectric spacer and increases the power handling capacity of the device.
- the resonant member is a post and the dielectric spacer is a disk then this increased surface area is reflected in a disk with a larger diameter than the diameter of the resonant post.
- said dielectric spacing element has a thickness of between 1 micron and 2 mm.
- the dielectric spacing element has a low characteristic impedance and a compact form so as not to unduly increase the size of the resonant assembly.
- Thin disks of between 1 micron and 2mm have been found to be particularly suitable.
- said dielectric material of said dielectric spacing element has a relative permittivity of between 5 and 100.
- a dielectric material is a poor conductor of electricity which can be polarised by and therefore support an electric field. This polarisation ability is measured by the dielectric constant or relative permittivity of the material.
- a dielectric material having a relative permittivity of between 5 and 100 has been found to provide suitable properties.
- a second aspect of the present invention provides, a filter comprising: a plurality of resonator assemblies according to a first aspect comprising an input resonator assembly and an output resonator assembly arranged such that a signal received at said input resonator assembly passes through said plurality of resonator assemblies and is output at said output resonator assembly; an input feed line configured to transmit a signal to an input resonator member of said input resonator assembly such that said signal excites said input resonator member, said plurality of resonator assemblies being arranged such that said signal is transferred between said corresponding plurality of resonator members to an output resonator member of said output resonator assembly; an output feed line for receiving said signal from said output resonator member and outputting said signal.
- the resonator assemblies may be used to form a filter and in such a case multiple resonator assemblies are linked together and a portion of an input signal within a pass band of the assemblies travels between the assemblies while signals outside of this pass band are impeded.
- said filter is at least one of a radio frequency filter and a combline filter.
- a further aspect of this technique provides a resonator assembly comprising: a conductive resonator cavity; a conductive resonant member mounted within said resonator cavity; and an impedance transformer mounted between said conductive resonant member and said conductive resonator cavity.
- the impedance transformer may advantageously be a dielectric spacer element.
- aspects seek to address the problem of contact impedances between a conductive resonant member and conductive cavity significantly reducing the Q factor of the resonator.
- the problem is addressed by providing an impedance transformer between the two conductive elements which removes or at least reduces the effect of the resistance of the imperfect contact between conductive members correspondingly reducing the required amount of computational overdesign, and therefore the design cost.
- Elements that are described as being conductive are formed of a material that conducts electricity well such as a metal. Such a material will typically have a conductivity of more than 1 x 10 6 S/m.
- Embodiments seek to address this by separating the conductive resonator member from the conductive resonator cavity inner wall to which it is anchored by inserting a spacer element between the two elements.
- This spacer element is formed of a dielectric material and provides an impedance transformation such that there is a 90° phase shift in the signal travelling through the spacer element. For a quarter wavelength resonator member there is thus, a total 180° phase shift in the input signal, 90° in the resonant post and 90° in the spacer element.
- the Q factor of such a resonant assembly will vary with the characteristic impedance of the spacer element and this can be selected to have a desired value.
- the spacer element has a characteristic impedance with a lower value than the value of the parasitic impedance due to an imperfect contact between a resonant member and the cavity wall without the spacer element then a resonator assembly with a higher Q factor will be achieved.
- Thin spacer elements formed from ceramic materials less than 2mm thick provide a suitable characteristic impedance and an improved resonator assembly whose size is not greatly increased by the addition of these elements.
- Figure 1a shows a coaxial resonator according to the prior art
- Figure 1b shows a similar coaxial resonator according to an embodiment, where the resonant member is attached to the housing via a dielectric spacer.
- the resonant member is attached directly to the housing using a screw.
- this connection appears to be adequate to form a good short connection, in reality - due to the fact that the surface of the bottom of the resonator is not perfectly flat and smooth - there are small air voids formed, which results in an imperfect contact. This imperfect contact manifests itself in the form of equivalent impedance between the bottom of the resonator and the housing.
- this impedance is very difficult to measure; an estimate may be derived by examining the deterioration of the measured Q factor compared to the simulated one. This has been shown even in extreme cases, when almost the smallest detail appears to have been taken into account, to provide a measured Q factor that trails the simulated one by 12-20%.
- Embodiments seek to address this by using an impedance transformer positioned at the point of contact of the resonator and the housing, see Fig. i(b).
- the impedance transformer in this case takes the form of a thin dielectric spacer, where the spacer's height and relative dielectric constant dictate the spacer's characteristic impedance and frequency of operation.
- the second solution, Z ctr ⁇ Z e requires the height of the cylinder to be small in order for the characteristic impedance of the transformer to be small.
- the demand for the small height is beneficial from the point of view that it does not result in a significant shortening of the resonant post, i.e., the resonator's frequency of operation is not impacted.
- the deterioration of the Q factor of coaxial resonators using an impedance transformer will be lower than that of its counterpart without the transformer, provided that the characteristic impedance of the transformer is lower than the equivalent impedance of the practically-achievable contact to the ground.
- the reflection coefficient, ⁇ open of the resonant post through an impedance transformer whose characteristic impedance is Z ctr is greater than the resonator's short circuit reflection coefficient counterpart, ⁇ short , in two regions.
- an impedance transformer such as a ceramic disk is used that has a characteristic impedance of less than the equivalent parasitic impedance of the reflective load without the impedance transformer, a resonant assembly with an improved quality factor when compared to the same resonant assembly without the disk is obtained. This arises due to the ceramic disk acting as an impedance transformer and reducing reflective losses due to defects in the contact surfaces of the resonant member and the inner surface of the resonator cavity.
- Fig. i(b) represents a basic conceptual embodiment of the proposed solution.
- the technique relies on the insertion of thin dielectric spacers at the bottom of the resonant post.
- the footprint of the dielectric spacer may take a variety of forms, suitably shaped to accommodate readily available stock or to ease manufacturability and improve performance.
- the footprint may be of circular, rectangular, hexagonal, octagonal or any other shape.
- Fig. 3(a) is a detailed depiction of the anchored end of the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall.
- the dielectric spacer between the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall is of a cylindrical shape and depicted in light shading.
- Dielectric disks produced by processes such as sintering, are available on the market.
- the dielectric disk is bonded to the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall.
- the dielectric spacer can be made of a low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) material; a variety of appropriate LTCC materials - e.g.
- LTCC low-temperature co-fired ceramic
- DuPontTM GreenTapeTM - are readily available in the form of tapes of suitable thicknesses and dielectric properties. Although in the figure the dielectric disk's diameter is shown to be identical with that of the resonant post, workable filters can be obtained when the disk diameter is larger or smaller than the diameter of the resonant post.
- Bold arrows in the figure show the flow of electric currents on the surfaces of the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall. Since the electric currents on the surface of the resonant post's anchored end come into contact with the dielectric spacer, it is preferable that the dielectric spacer be made of a low-loss material.
- Fig. 3(b) shows another possible embodiment of the present invention.
- the dielectric cylinder - depicted in light shading- features a hole providing room for a dielectric screw, which is depicted in black, to affix the resonant post to the resonator cavity wall in a bolted-joint fashion.
- Bold arrows show the flow of electric currents on the surfaces of the resonant post and the resonator cavity:
- Fig. 3(b) some currents on the surface of the resonant post come into contact with the dielectric screw, in addition to the dielectric spacer.
- the dielectric spacer but also the dielectric screw be made of a low-loss material.
- Such screws - made of various ceramics, etc. - are readily available on the market; they are produced for applications such as tuning screws in conventional combline resonators.
- the length of the resonant post is 39 mm for the case of a conventional, DC-coupled coaxial resonator, while in the case of the proposed AC-coupled resonator, this length is reduced by the value that corresponds to the thickness of the dielectric cylinder, namely 0.2 mm; this yields an overall length of 38.8 mm for the AC-coupled resonant post.
- the radius of the resonant post is the same in both cases and equals 3 mm.
- the performance comparison is presented in Table I.
- the highest computed increase in the frequency of operation is about 3%.
- the performance of the AC-coupled resonator with GreenTapeTM is somewhat lower than that of its ceramic-disk counterparts (similar Q factor but increased centre frequency); however, the material has many practical advantages. For example, once the LTCC tape material is deposited on the metal surface using thick-film technology, air voids are inherently ruled out of existence; in comparison, the risk of air voids reducing the effective dielectric constant of ceramic disks is small but existent. Both classes of materials - ceramic disks and LTCC tapes -exhibit mutually comparable performance; however, the LTCC technology has the potential to provide a cheaper and more-repeatable process.
- Figure 4 shows the resonant chambers of Figure 1b arranged in series to form a combline filter according to an embodiment.
- a signal in this embodiment enters the filter on the left hand side and provided it is within the frequency band of resonance of the resonator assemblies it passes through the filter to exit on the right hand side. Any portion of the signal not within the pass band of the filter is impeded.
- resonant chambers are shown as arranged in a row in a combline filter other arrangements of the resonator chambers to form different filters could be envisaged.
- embodiments address the problem of parasitic ground contact impedance between a resonant member and resonator cavity limiting the practically achievable value of the Q factor of coaxial resonators by replacing the metal-to-metal connection with a dielectric spacer.
- This dielectric spacer can be manufactured by established, mature technologies. This provides for an appreciable performance improvement compared to conventional coaxial resonators without significantly adding to the cost.
- Q-factor values higher by at least 13% can be achieved in the same volume compared to the conventional resonator, without a significant increase in the cost. Conversely, for the same achievable Q-factor value, the volume of the resonator cavity can be reduced.
Landscapes
- Control Of Motors That Do Not Use Commutators (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to cavity resonator assemblies and filters formed therefrom.
- Filters formed from resonators are essential components of radio frequency RF systems such as base stations, radar systems, point-to-point radio links, and RF signal cancellation systems. Although a specific filter is chosen or designed dependent on the particular application, there are certain desirable characteristics that are common to all filter realisations. For example, the amount of insertion loss in the pass-band of the filter should be as low as possible, while the attenuation in the stop-band should be as high as possible. Further, in some applications the frequency separation between the pass-band and stop-band (guard band) needs to be very small, which requires filters of high order to be deployed in order to achieve this requirement. However, the requirement for a high order filter is always followed by an increase in the cost (due to the greater number of components that such a filter requires) and space.
- One of the challenging tasks in filter design is to reduce their size while retaining much of their electrical performance such that their performance is comparable with larger structures. One of the main parameters governing filter's selectivity and insertion loss is the so-called quality factor of the elements comprising the filter - the "Q factor". The Q factor is defined as the ratio of energy stored in the element to the time-averaged power loss. For lumped elements that are used especially at low RF frequencies for filter design Q can be of the order ∼60-100, whereas for cavity type resonators Q can be as high as several 1000s. Although lumped components offer significant miniaturization their low Q factor prohibits their use in highly demanding applications where high rejection and/or selectivity is required.
- The requirement for a high Q factor of individual resonators of a filter being important, a great deal of effort is placed on the design of resonators that offer the highest achievable Q factor in a given volume. However, very often the measured Q factor of a resonator is significantly lower than the designed Q factor available from 3D electromagnetic simulations. In extreme cases, even when almost the smallest detail appears to have been taken into account, the measured Q factor trails the simulated one by 12-20%. The principal culprit in such cases is often the quality of contacts between the constituting parts of the resonator. This is particularly pronounced in coaxial cavity resonators, where individual resonators need to be fixed to the housing, using - by and large - screws. Since the imperfect contact of the resonator with the cavity enclosure reduces the Q factor, the standard practice is to overdesign the resonator, i.e., design the resonator for a Q factor that is say20% larger than the minimum required. Clearly this is wasteful, since typically a great deal of effort and time is dedicated to the 3D computational design of a resonator.
- It would be desirable to produce a resonator with of a limited size and good Q factor.
-
JP-59223005 - According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a resonator assembly comprising:
- a conductive resonator cavity;
- a conductive resonant member mounted within said resonator cavity; and
- a dielectric spacer element mounted between said conductive resonant member and said conductive resonator cavity; wherein
- said dielectric spacer element is mounted on a first inner surface of said resonator cavity, said conductive resonant member having an anchored end and a further end, said anchored end being mounted on said dielectric spacer element and extending from said dielectric spacer element towards an opposing second inner surface of said resonator cavity, said further end being spaced from said opposing second inner surface.
- Conventionally, the problem of a reduction in Q factor due to the imperfect contact of the resonator member with the cavity has been addressed by trying to improve this contact and/or by overdesigning the resonator assembly to compensate for the inevitable reduction in Q factor due to the imperfect contact. The inventors of the present invention have addressed the problem in a different, and in many ways, counter-intuitive manner by adding an element between the cavity and the resonant member rather than by seeking to reduce the resistance at the junction between the cavity and resonant member.
- The inventors recognised that the quality or Q factor of a resonator is dependent on the reflection coefficient at the end of the resonant member adjacent to the conductive cavity and that defects in the contact surfaces increase reflective losses. The use of a dielectric spacer element between the resonant member and cavity produces a reflection coefficient at the cavity resonant member interface that is due to an open rather than closed circuit and the requirement to continually try to reduce the resistance between two touching conductive elements is removed. Imperfections in the contact surfaces of the dielectric spacer elements and the cavity walls and resonant member will affect the relative permittivity of this element which in turn affects the frequency of operation of the resonant member rather than the reflection coefficient.
- The Q factor of this resonant assembly is affected by the characteristic impedance of the dielectric spacer element and the value of this can be selected and can be more easily controlled than can the parasitic impedance due to imperfect contacts in a resonator assembly without the dielectric spacer. Thus, a resonant assembly where the Q factor can be more accurately determined and controlled is achieved.
- The dielectric spacer element is mounted on a first inner surface of said resonator cavity, said conductive resonant member being mounted on said dielectric spacer element and extending from said dielectric spacer element towards an opposing second inner surface of said resonator cavity.
- The conductive resonant member is spaced from the inner surface of the resonator cavity by mounting the dielectric spacer element on the cavity and the resonant member on the dielectric spacer element.
- The dielectric spacer element may be operable as an impedance transformer introducing a 90° phase change in a signal travelling through said dielectric spacer element.
- The dielectric spacer element acts as an impedance transformer and this introduces a phase shift in the signal. The resonant member is a ¼ wavelength or 90° long and the dielectric spacer acts as an impedance transformer and is therefore also 90° long, in view of this, the signal that travels along the combined structure of the conductive post and the dielectric spacer (from top of the conductive post to the part of the dielectric spacer that is in direct contact with the housing) exhibits a phase change of 180°. The losses due to the reflection of the signal at the conductive cavity are dependent upon the characteristic impedance of the dielectric spacer. In effect a spacer element which acts as an impedance transformer provides a resonant assembly where the characteristic impedance of this impedance transformer is the feature that affects the Q factor rather than the more difficult to control contact resistance between the conductive resonant post and conductive cavity. Dielectric spacer elements provide a suitable characteristic impedance in a compact and practical manner.
- In some embodiments, said dielectric spacer element has a characteristic impedance that is less than a parasitic impedance of the reflective load between said resonant member and said resonator cavity were said dielectric spacer not present and said resonant member were mounted directly on said first inner surface of said resonator cavity.
- Where the characteristic impedance of the dielectric spacer element is lower than the parasitic resistance that would exist between the conductive resonant member and cavity if it were mounted directly on the inner surface of the cavity, then the reflection coefficient will be improved by the presence of the dielectric spacer element and reflection losses will be reduced. As noted previously reducing the parasitic resistance between the resonant member and cavity wall below a certain value becomes increasingly difficult, while providing a dielectric spacer element with a characteristic impedance that is less than this, is relatively straightforward requiring a thin element, which, where an expensive dielectric material is used, is itself an advantage.
- In some embodiments, said dielectric spacer element is formed of a ceramic material.
- Although a number of different materials are suitable for the dielectric spacer element, their suitability depending on their characteristic impedance, relative permittivity, compactness and strength, ceramics have been found to be particularly suitable, being rigid, robust and providing a low characteristic impedance in a small element. These materials are often expensive, however as only a thin element is required, this is not prohibitive.
- In some embodiments the dielectric spacer element is formed of a low-temperature co-fired ceramic material.
- Low-temperature co-fired ceramic material can be used to generate spacer element that are relatively inexpensive, easy to fabricate and provide suitable electrical properties.
- One advantage of forming the dielectric spacer from low-temperature co-fired ceramic materials is that they may be applied to the surface of the cavity by depositing techniques and this provides a good contact with the inner cavity wall removing air voids which affect the permittivity of the material. Furthermore, this method of manufacture effectively fixes the material to the cavity without requiring additional fixing means and furthermore, a very thin element is easily achievable.
- The dielectric spacer element can have a number of forms including a disk type form which may make it particularly suitable where the conductive resonant member is in the form of a post.
- In some embodiments, said conductive resonant member is fixed within said resonator cavity by a dielectric fixing element.
- One challenge with resonant members is how to fix them firmly to the cavity while preserving their required electrical properties. Where an additional element is present then this can add additional challenges. One way of affixing the resonant member to the cavity where an intermediate dielectric spacer element is present is to use a dielectric fixing element such that no conductive link between the conductive cavity and the conductive member is inadvertently provided by the fixing means and the properties provided by the spacing element are preserved.
- In some embodiments, said dielectric fixing element comprises a ceramic screw.
- One fixing element that can be used is a ceramic screw. These are readily available and have properties similar to that of the spacing element.
- In other embodiments, said resonant member is glued to said dielectric spacing element.
- An alternative way of fixing the resonant member is to glue it to the dielectric spacing element. This spacing element may itself be glued to the inner cavity wall or alternatively it may be deposited onto the wall.
- In some embodiments, a surface of said dielectric spacing element that abuts said resonant member is larger than a surface of said resonant member that abuts said dielectric spacing element such that said dielectric spacing element extends beyond said resonant member.
- Although the dielectric spacing element can have the same or a smaller surface area than the resonant member, in some cases the dielectric spacing element may have a larger surface area. A larger surface area reduces the current density in the dielectric spacer and increases the power handling capacity of the device. Where the resonant member is a post and the dielectric spacer is a disk then this increased surface area is reflected in a disk with a larger diameter than the diameter of the resonant post.
- In some embodiments, said dielectric spacing element has a thickness of between 1 micron and 2 mm.
- As noted previously it is desirable that the dielectric spacing element has a low characteristic impedance and a compact form so as not to unduly increase the size of the resonant assembly. Thin disks of between 1 micron and 2mm have been found to be particularly suitable.
- In some embodiments, said dielectric material of said dielectric spacing element has a relative permittivity of between 5 and 100.
- A dielectric material is a poor conductor of electricity which can be polarised by and therefore support an electric field. This polarisation ability is measured by the dielectric constant or relative permittivity of the material. A dielectric material having a relative permittivity of between 5 and 100 has been found to provide suitable properties.
- A second aspect of the present invention provides, a filter comprising: a plurality of resonator assemblies according to a first aspect comprising an input resonator assembly and an output resonator assembly arranged such that a signal received at said input resonator assembly passes through said plurality of resonator assemblies and is output at said output resonator assembly; an input feed line configured to transmit a signal to an input resonator member of said input resonator assembly such that said signal excites said input resonator member, said plurality of resonator assemblies being arranged such that said signal is transferred between said corresponding plurality of resonator members to an output resonator member of said output resonator assembly; an output feed line for receiving said signal from said output resonator member and outputting said signal.
- The resonator assemblies may be used to form a filter and in such a case multiple resonator assemblies are linked together and a portion of an input signal within a pass band of the assemblies travels between the assemblies while signals outside of this pass band are impeded.
- In some embodiments, said filter is at least one of a radio frequency filter and a combline filter.
- A further aspect of this technique provides a resonator assembly comprising: a conductive resonator cavity; a conductive resonant member mounted within said resonator cavity; and an impedance transformer mounted between said conductive resonant member and said conductive resonator cavity.
- It has been found that providing an impedance transformer mounted between said conductive resonant member and said conductive cavity provides a 90° phase shift in the signal travelling through the impedance transformer and this provides a resonant assembly where the reflection coefficient is due to an open rather than a closed circuit and thus, the reflection coefficient and the Q factor are no longer affected by imperfections in the conductive connection between the conductive member and conductive cavity. The impedance transformer may advantageously be a dielectric spacer element.
- In summary aspects seek to address the problem of contact impedances between a conductive resonant member and conductive cavity significantly reducing the Q factor of the resonator. The problem is addressed by providing an impedance transformer between the two conductive elements which removes or at least reduces the effect of the resistance of the imperfect contact between conductive members correspondingly reducing the required amount of computational overdesign, and therefore the design cost.
- Elements that are described as being conductive are formed of a material that conducts electricity well such as a metal. Such a material will typically have a conductivity of more than 1 x 106 S/m.
- Further particular and preferred aspects are set out in the accompanying independent and dependent claims. Features of the dependent claims may be combined with features of the independent claims as appropriate, and in combinations other than those explicitly set out in the claims.
- Where an apparatus feature is described as being operable to provide a function, it will be appreciated that this includes an apparatus feature which provides that function or which is adapted or configured to provide that function.
- Embodiments of the present invention will now be described further, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
Figure 1a illustrates a conventional coaxial resonator; -
Figure 1b illustrates an AC-coupled coaxial resonator according to an embodiment; -
Figure 2 illustrates variations in the reflection coefficients Γ short and Γ open versus characteristic impedance of impedance transformer zctr , when the impedance of the conductive member Zt =50Ω and the parasitic reflective load impedance is Ze =3Ω ; -
Figure 3 illustrates details of the anchored end of resonant post to resonator cavity wall; and -
Figure 4 illustrates a filter comprising multiple resonator assemblies according to an embodiment. - Before discussing the embodiments in any more detail, first an overview will be provided.
- As noted previously the imperfect contact between a resonator member and the resonator cavity enclosure can significantly reduce the Q factor. At present there exists no good solution to this problem. Manufacturers and suppliers of filters usually resort to the design of resonators with a Q factor that is higher than needed in the hope that the measured Q factor will be of the order needed. In doing so, suppliers usually rely on their archive of measured data of different resonators in order to determine by how much the simulated Q factor needs to be increased. This is generally in the range of 12-20% and, in practical terms, significantly and unnecessarily increases the volume of individual resonators.
- Embodiments seek to address this by separating the conductive resonator member from the conductive resonator cavity inner wall to which it is anchored by inserting a spacer element between the two elements. This spacer element is formed of a dielectric material and provides an impedance transformation such that there is a 90° phase shift in the signal travelling through the spacer element. For a quarter wavelength resonator member there is thus, a total 180° phase shift in the input signal, 90° in the resonant post and 90° in the spacer element. The Q factor of such a resonant assembly will vary with the characteristic impedance of the spacer element and this can be selected to have a desired value. In particular, if the spacer element has a characteristic impedance with a lower value than the value of the parasitic impedance due to an imperfect contact between a resonant member and the cavity wall without the spacer element then a resonator assembly with a higher Q factor will be achieved. Thin spacer elements formed from ceramic materials less than 2mm thick provide a suitable characteristic impedance and an improved resonator assembly whose size is not greatly increased by the addition of these elements.
-
Figure 1a shows a coaxial resonator according to the prior art, whileFigure 1b shows a similar coaxial resonator according to an embodiment, where the resonant member is attached to the housing via a dielectric spacer. Conventionally, as depicted in Fig. i(a), the resonant member is attached directly to the housing using a screw. Even though this connection appears to be adequate to form a good short connection, in reality - due to the fact that the surface of the bottom of the resonator is not perfectly flat and smooth - there are small air voids formed, which results in an imperfect contact. This imperfect contact manifests itself in the form of equivalent impedance between the bottom of the resonator and the housing. - Even though the quality of the contact may be improved by increasing the force that binds the resonator post and the housing, such a solution has obvious limitations. Firstly, this would demand more robust screws that are able to withstand the increased force and, secondly, the increased force may cause damage to the housing itself, e.g., the housing wall may buckle. Furthermore, this would still not fully solve the problem of contact, as the air voids would still continue to exist, albeit somewhat reduced in volume and/or number.
- The effort to make the equivalent contact impedance Ze zero results in the reflection coefficient at the bottom of the resonator being
- Embodiments, seek to address this by using an impedance transformer positioned at the point of contact of the resonator and the housing, see Fig. i(b). The impedance transformer in this case takes the form of a thin dielectric spacer, where the spacer's height and relative dielectric constant dictate the spacer's characteristic impedance and frequency of operation.
- It is instructive to perform a mathematical analysis in order to determine the conditions imposed on the impedance transformer which lead to the resonator with the transformer of Fig. i(b) outperforming the resonator without it, shown in Fig. i(a).
-
-
- In order for the resonator of Fig. i(b) to outperform the resonator of Fig. i(a), the following must hold: |Γ open | > |Γ short |. Solving this equation for the characteristic impedance, Zctr , one obtains the values of the characteristic impedance of the impedance transformer that satisfy this requirement
- The condition given by (5) is always achieved for practical resonators. In the arrangement presented in Fig. i(b), the solution Zctr > Zt would indicate that the height of the dielectric cylinder acting as an impedance transformer would need to be high, which would negatively impact the length of the resonant post. In effect, this would result in a significant shortening of the resonant post (metal part), inferring that the resonant frequency of such a resonator would be increased. As such, the solution, Zctr > Zt , should be discarded.
- The second solution, Zctr < Ze, requires the height of the cylinder to be small in order for the characteristic impedance of the transformer to be small. The demand for the small height is beneficial from the point of view that it does not result in a significant shortening of the resonant post, i.e., the resonator's frequency of operation is not impacted. As such, in the light of (4), it can be stated that the deterioration of the Q factor of coaxial resonators using an impedance transformer will be lower than that of its counterpart without the transformer, provided that the characteristic impedance of the transformer is lower than the equivalent impedance of the practically-achievable contact to the ground.
-
Figure 2 shows a graphical depiction of (1) and (2) for the case when Zt =50Ω and Ze =3Ω while Zctr is varied from 1 to 100 Ω. As predicted by (3), the reflection coefficient, Γ open , of the resonant post through an impedance transformer whose characteristic impedance is Zctr is greater than the resonator's short circuit reflection coefficient counterpart, Γ short , in two regions. - The regions of interest in
Fig. 2 are the ones for which Γ open is greater than Γ short . As predicted by the equations, these regions are when Zctr < Ze = 3 and Zctr > Zt = 50. If the second solution, Zctr > Zt = 50, is discarded as unrealistic, the solution that remains is Zctr < Ze = 3. Thus, provided an impedance transformer such as a ceramic disk is used that has a characteristic impedance of less than the equivalent parasitic impedance of the reflective load without the impedance transformer, a resonant assembly with an improved quality factor when compared to the same resonant assembly without the disk is obtained. This arises due to the ceramic disk acting as an impedance transformer and reducing reflective losses due to defects in the contact surfaces of the resonant member and the inner surface of the resonator cavity. - The low characteristic impedance of the impedance transformer is beneficial from two aspects:
- The frequency of operation of the resonator is not unduly disturbed; and
- The cost of short dielectric spacers is typically smaller than the cost of tall dielectric spacers.
- It is worth noting that the introduction of an impedance transformer with Zctr < Ze changes the sign of the reflection coefficient, i.e. introduces a phase shift of 180° - this is equivalent to changing a series resonance into a parallel one and vice versa.
- As discussed above Fig. i(b) represents a basic conceptual embodiment of the proposed solution. In essence, the technique relies on the insertion of thin dielectric spacers at the bottom of the resonant post. The footprint of the dielectric spacer may take a variety of forms, suitably shaped to accommodate readily available stock or to ease manufacturability and improve performance. For example, the footprint may be of circular, rectangular, hexagonal, octagonal or any other shape.
- More specifically, a possible practical embodiment is shown in
Fig. 3(a) , which is a detailed depiction of the anchored end of the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall. The dielectric spacer between the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall is of a cylindrical shape and depicted in light shading. Dielectric disks, produced by processes such as sintering, are available on the market. The dielectric disk is bonded to the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall. In an alternative production process, the dielectric spacer can be made of a low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) material; a variety of appropriate LTCC materials - e.g. DuPont™ GreenTape™ - are readily available in the form of tapes of suitable thicknesses and dielectric properties. Although in the figure the dielectric disk's diameter is shown to be identical with that of the resonant post, workable filters can be obtained when the disk diameter is larger or smaller than the diameter of the resonant post. - Bold arrows in the figure show the flow of electric currents on the surfaces of the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall. Since the electric currents on the surface of the resonant post's anchored end come into contact with the dielectric spacer, it is preferable that the dielectric spacer be made of a low-loss material.
-
Fig. 3(b) shows another possible embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the dielectric cylinder - depicted in light shading- features a hole providing room for a dielectric screw, which is depicted in black, to affix the resonant post to the resonator cavity wall in a bolted-joint fashion. Bold arrows show the flow of electric currents on the surfaces of the resonant post and the resonator cavity: When compared with the surface-current flow inFig. 3(a) , it is apparent that inFig. 3(b) some currents on the surface of the resonant post come into contact with the dielectric screw, in addition to the dielectric spacer. Therefore it is important that not only the dielectric spacer but also the dielectric screw be made of a low-loss material. Such screws - made of various ceramics, etc. - are readily available on the market; they are produced for applications such as tuning screws in conventional combline resonators. - In the following, a performance comparison between a conventional coaxial resonator of Fig. i(a) and an AC-coupled resonator of Fig. i(b) will be presented. The reported performance was obtained by utilizing the full-wave analysis software tool of CST Studio Suite. For the purpose of this comparison, both resonators are made to occupy the same volume, specifically 20 x 20 x 40 mm3. The length of the resonant post is 39 mm for the case of a conventional, DC-coupled coaxial resonator, while in the case of the proposed AC-coupled resonator, this length is reduced by the value that corresponds to the thickness of the dielectric cylinder, namely 0.2 mm; this yields an overall length of 38.8 mm for the AC-coupled resonant post. The radius of the resonant post is the same in both cases and equals 3 mm. The performance comparison is presented in Table I. The dielectric properties of the dielectric cylinder are typical of a ceramic material, and for the purpose of this comparison, they are chosen to be εr = 20 and tan δ = 1x10-4. Three cases are presented for the AC-coupled resonator, depending on the radius of the dielectric cylinder.
Table I: Performance comparison between conventional resonator and AC-coupled resonator for various radii of dielectric discs. Q factor Centre frequency (GHz) Quarter-wave post of Fig. i(a) 2561 (← 2910) 1.512 AC-coupled resonator (transformer radius = 3 mm) with ceramic 2864 1.563 AC-coupled resonator (transformer radius = 4 mm) with ceramic 2884 1.558 AC-coupled resonator (transformer radius = 5 mm) with ceramic 2884 1.558 AC-coupled resonator (transformer radius = 3 mm) with DuPont GreenTape 2869 1.592 - The computed value of the Q factor for the reference case of the conventional, DC-coupled resonator is 2910. Accounting for the least-deterioration scenario when the surface roughness and imperfect surface flatness on the interface between the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall degrade the Q-factor value by only 12%, the best practically achievable value of the Q factor is 2561 (= 2910 X 0.88).
- As evident from this table, the AC-coupled resonator with ceramic discs outperforms its DC-coupled counterpart by approximately 13% (2884/2561 = 1.13) in terms of the achievable Q factor, with a slight increase in the centre frequency. The highest computed increase in the frequency of operation is about 3%. Note the computed values of the Q factor for the cases of AC-coupled resonators do not need to be lowered, since the dielectric spacers eliminate the metal-to-metal connection between the resonant post and the resonator cavity wall that brings about the reported deterioration of the measured Q factor.
- Also presented in the table is the case of an AC-coupled resonator employing a dielectric disc formed of DuPont™ GreenTape™ with a thickness of 1.27 mm. The material allows thick films to be deposited on metal surfaces and is commonly used in low-loss LTCC applications up to millimetre-wave frequencies, specifically from 100 MHz to 150 GHz. The principal advantage of the LTCC technology compared to other materials is that it provides for a mature and relatively cheap technological process while offering ceramic-like performance: low dielectric loss (orders of tan δ = 1x10-4) and a relatively high dielectric constant (about εr = 7 - 8). The performance of the AC-coupled resonator with GreenTape™ is somewhat lower than that of its ceramic-disk counterparts (similar Q factor but increased centre frequency); however, the material has many practical advantages. For example, once the LTCC tape material is deposited on the metal surface using thick-film technology, air voids are inherently ruled out of existence; in comparison, the risk of air voids reducing the effective dielectric constant of ceramic disks is small but existent. Both classes of materials - ceramic disks and LTCC tapes -exhibit mutually comparable performance; however, the LTCC technology has the potential to provide a cheaper and more-repeatable process.
-
Figure 4 shows the resonant chambers ofFigure 1b arranged in series to form a combline filter according to an embodiment. A signal in this embodiment enters the filter on the left hand side and provided it is within the frequency band of resonance of the resonator assemblies it passes through the filter to exit on the right hand side. Any portion of the signal not within the pass band of the filter is impeded. - Although in this embodiment the resonant chambers are shown as arranged in a row in a combline filter other arrangements of the resonator chambers to form different filters could be envisaged.
- In summary embodiments address the problem of parasitic ground contact impedance between a resonant member and resonator cavity limiting the practically achievable value of the Q factor of coaxial resonators by replacing the metal-to-metal connection with a dielectric spacer. This dielectric spacer can be manufactured by established, mature technologies. This provides for an appreciable performance improvement compared to conventional coaxial resonators without significantly adding to the cost.
- In summary, Q-factor values higher by at least 13% can be achieved in the same volume compared to the conventional resonator, without a significant increase in the cost. Conversely, for the same achievable Q-factor value, the volume of the resonator cavity can be reduced.
- It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that any block diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative circuitry embodying the principles of the invention.
Claims (14)
- A resonator assembly comprising:a conductive resonator cavity;a conductive resonant member mounted within said resonator cavity; anda dielectric spacer element mounted between said conductive resonant member and said conductive resonator cavity; whereinsaid dielectric spacer element is mounted on a first inner surface of said resonator cavity, characterized in said conductive resonant member having an anchored end and a further end, said anchored end being mounted on said dielectric spacer element and extending from said dielectric spacer element towards an opposing second inner surface of said resonator cavity, said further end being spaced from said opposing second inner surface.
- A resonator assembly according to claim 1, wherein said dielectric spacer element is operable as an impedance transformer and introduces a phase change of 90° in a signal travelling through said dielectric spacer element.
- A resonator assembly according to any preceding claim, wherein said dielectric spacer element has a characteristic impedance that is less than a parasitic impedance of the reflective load that would exist between said resonant member and said resonator cavity were said dielectric spacer not present and said resonant member were mounted directly on an inner surface of said resonator cavity.
- A resonator assembly according to any preceding claim, wherein said dielectric spacer element is formed of a ceramic material.
- A resonator assembly according to any preceding claim, wherein said dielectric spacer element is formed of a low-temperature co-fired ceramic material
- A resonator assembly according to claim 5, wherein said dielectric spacer element is formed by depositing said low-temperature co-fired ceramic material on said first inner surface of said resonator cavity.
- A resonator assembly according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said dielectric spacer element comprises a disk.
- A resonator assembly according to any preceding claim, wherein said conductive resonant member is fixed within said resonator cavity by a dielectric fixing element.
- A resonator assembly according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said resonant member is glued to said dielectric spacing element.
- A resonator assembly according to any preceding claim, wherein a surface of said dielectric spacing element that abuts said resonant member is larger than a surface of said resonant member that abuts said dielectric spacing element such that said dielectric spacing element extends beyond said resonant member.
- A resonator assembly according to any preceding claim, wherein said dielectric spacing element has a thickness of between 1 micron and 2 mm.
- A resonator assembly according to any preceding claim, wherein said dielectric material of said dielectric spacing element has a relative permittivity between 5 and 100.
- A filter comprising:a plurality of resonator assemblies according to any preceding claim comprising an input resonator assembly and an output resonator assembly arranged such that a signal received at said input resonator assembly passes through said plurality of resonator assemblies and is output at said output resonator assembly;an input feed line configured to transmit a signal to an input resonant member of said input resonator assembly such that said signal excites said input resonant member, said plurality of resonator assemblies being arranged such that said signal is transferred between said corresponding plurality of resonant members to an output resonant member of said output resonator assembly;an output feed line for receiving said signal from said output resonant member and outputting said signal.
- A filter according to claim 13, said filter being at least one of a radio frequency filter and a combline filter.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP15305864.9A EP3104451B1 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2015-06-08 | Resonator assembly and filter |
PCT/EP2016/062908 WO2016198407A1 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2016-06-07 | Resonator assembly and filter |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP15305864.9A EP3104451B1 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2015-06-08 | Resonator assembly and filter |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3104451A1 EP3104451A1 (en) | 2016-12-14 |
EP3104451B1 true EP3104451B1 (en) | 2021-08-18 |
Family
ID=53404467
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15305864.9A Active EP3104451B1 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2015-06-08 | Resonator assembly and filter |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3104451B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016198407A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110823530B (en) * | 2019-11-13 | 2021-04-27 | 南京大学 | Method for obtaining quality factor of micro-resonant cavity |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS58172003A (en) * | 1982-04-02 | 1983-10-08 | Toyo Commun Equip Co Ltd | Semicoaxial resonator |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2771516A (en) * | 1952-06-07 | 1956-11-20 | Collins Radio Co | Means of coupling energy to or from a coaxial resonator |
JPS57168505A (en) * | 1981-04-08 | 1982-10-16 | Toyo Commun Equip Co Ltd | Frequency controller of re-entrant cavity resonator |
JPS59174703U (en) * | 1983-05-10 | 1984-11-21 | 株式会社村田製作所 | Resonant frequency adjustment mechanism of dielectric coaxial resonator |
JPS59223005A (en) * | 1983-06-02 | 1984-12-14 | Toyo Commun Equip Co Ltd | Frequency adjusting device of semi-coaxial cavity resonator |
US8410792B2 (en) * | 2009-03-02 | 2013-04-02 | Forschungszentrum Juelich Gmbh | Resonator arrangement and method for analyzing a sample using the resonator arrangement |
-
2015
- 2015-06-08 EP EP15305864.9A patent/EP3104451B1/en active Active
-
2016
- 2016-06-07 WO PCT/EP2016/062908 patent/WO2016198407A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS58172003A (en) * | 1982-04-02 | 1983-10-08 | Toyo Commun Equip Co Ltd | Semicoaxial resonator |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3104451A1 (en) | 2016-12-14 |
WO2016198407A1 (en) | 2016-12-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10367243B2 (en) | Miniature LTCC coupled stripline resonator filters for digital receivers | |
US7463121B2 (en) | Temperature compensating tunable cavity filter | |
US5949309A (en) | Dielectric resonator filter configured to filter radio frequency signals in a transmit system | |
US6037541A (en) | Apparatus and method for forming a housing assembly | |
US10205214B2 (en) | Radio-frequency filter | |
KR102503237B1 (en) | Radio frequency filter | |
EP0064799A1 (en) | Miniature dual-mode, dielectric-loaded cavity filter | |
KR20040014493A (en) | Low-loss tunable ferro-electric device and method of characterization | |
WO2002058185A1 (en) | High frequency circuit element and high frequency circuit module | |
WO2017134246A1 (en) | Filter structures for pim measurements | |
JP2000295009A (en) | General response dual mode, hollow resonator filter loaded into dielectric resonator | |
WO1997040546A1 (en) | High performance microwave filter with cavity and conducting or superconducting loading element | |
Psychogiou et al. | V‐band bandpass filter with continuously variable centre frequency | |
Upadhyaya et al. | Compact and high isolation microstrip diplexer for future radio science planetary applications | |
EP3104451B1 (en) | Resonator assembly and filter | |
Atia et al. | General TE/sub 011/-Mode Waveguide Bandpass Filters | |
EP1079457A2 (en) | Dielectric resonance device, dielectric filter, composite dielectric filter device, dielectric duplexer, and communication apparatus | |
US7796000B2 (en) | Filter coupled by conductive plates having curved surface | |
KR101468409B1 (en) | Dual mode resonator including the disk with notch and filter using the same | |
US9601817B2 (en) | 30 GHz IMUX dielectric filter having dielectrics inserted into receiving spaces and having a horizontal orientation | |
Bakr et al. | Dual-mode dual-band conductor-loaded dielectric resonator filters | |
JP4572819B2 (en) | Dielectric resonator and dielectric filter | |
Joshi et al. | Analytical modeling of highly loaded evanescent-mode cavity resonators for widely tunable high-Q filter applications | |
Zhao et al. | A general design method for band-pass post filters in rectangular waveguide and substrate integrated waveguide | |
JP2006121463A (en) | Band-pass filter |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170614 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ALCATEL LUCENT |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20190703 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20210305 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602015072353 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1422453 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210915 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20210818 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1422453 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211118 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211220 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211118 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211119 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602015072353 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20220519 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220608 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220630 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220608 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220630 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230502 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20150608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210818 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240502 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240509 Year of fee payment: 10 |