EP3103282A1 - Traffic offloading when multiple carriers are used - Google Patents

Traffic offloading when multiple carriers are used

Info

Publication number
EP3103282A1
EP3103282A1 EP14703586.9A EP14703586A EP3103282A1 EP 3103282 A1 EP3103282 A1 EP 3103282A1 EP 14703586 A EP14703586 A EP 14703586A EP 3103282 A1 EP3103282 A1 EP 3103282A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
lte
criteria
cell
network
user terminal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP14703586.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Antti Anton Toskala
Sari Nielsen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Original Assignee
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy filed Critical Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Publication of EP3103282A1 publication Critical patent/EP3103282A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0001Arrangements for dividing the transmission path
    • H04L5/0003Two-dimensional division
    • H04L5/0005Time-frequency
    • H04L5/0007Time-frequency the frequencies being orthogonal, e.g. OFDM(A), DMT
    • H04L5/001Time-frequency the frequencies being orthogonal, e.g. OFDM(A), DMT the frequencies being arranged in component carriers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0053Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0053Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
    • H04L5/0057Physical resource allocation for CQI
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0091Signaling for the administration of the divided path
    • H04L5/0096Indication of changes in allocation
    • H04L5/0098Signalling of the activation or deactivation of component carriers, subcarriers or frequency bands
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/0005Control or signalling for completing the hand-off
    • H04W36/0055Transmission or use of information for re-establishing the radio link
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/0005Control or signalling for completing the hand-off
    • H04W36/0083Determination of parameters used for hand-off, e.g. generation or modification of neighbour cell lists
    • H04W36/00837Determination of triggering parameters for hand-off
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/0005Control or signalling for completing the hand-off
    • H04W36/0083Determination of parameters used for hand-off, e.g. generation or modification of neighbour cell lists
    • H04W36/0085Hand-off measurements
    • H04W36/0094Definition of hand-off measurement parameters
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/24Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
    • H04W36/30Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
    • H04W36/302Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data due to low signal strength
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L27/00Modulated-carrier systems
    • H04L27/0006Assessment of spectral gaps suitable for allocating digitally modulated signals, e.g. for carrier allocation in cognitive radio
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W16/00Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
    • H04W16/14Spectrum sharing arrangements between different networks

Definitions

  • the exemplary and non-limiting embodiments of this invention relate generally to wireless communications networks, and more particularly to service offloading.
  • Mobile data offloading refers to using of complementary network technologies for delivering data originally targeted to a cellular network.
  • Rules triggering a mobile offloading action may be set by a mobile subscriber or a network operator.
  • the code operating on the rules resides in an end-user device and/or in a server.
  • the end user may do data offloading for controlling data service costs and/or for the availability of a higher bandwidth.
  • the network operator may do data offloading for decreasing congestion of the cellular network.
  • An access network discovery and selection function may be used for controlling offloading between 3GPP access networks and non-3GPP access networks (such as WLAN). ANDSF assists user devices to discover nearby access networks.
  • An aspect of the invention relates to a method for defining offloading criteria in a communications system, the method comprising maintaining, in a network apparatus, a first criteria for offloading a user terminal from a mobile network to a local network;
  • a further aspect of the invention relates to an apparatus comprising at least one processor; and at least one memory including a computer program code, wherein at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform any of the method steps.
  • a still further aspect of the invention relates to an apparatus comprising at least one processor; and at least one memory including a computer program code, wherein at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to disable offloading of a user terminal from a mobile network to a local network, if a predetermined criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
  • a still further aspect of the invention relates to a computer program product comprising executable code that when executed, causes execution of functions of the method.
  • Figure 1 b illustrates LTE-U/small cell consideration for WLAN selection
  • Figure 2 shows a simplified block diagram illustrating exemplary system architecture
  • Figure 3 shows a simplified block diagram illustrating exemplary apparatuses
  • Figure 4 shows a messaging diagram illustrating an exemplary messaging event according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 5 shows a schematic diagram of a flow chart according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • 3GPP is working with WLAN-3GPP radio level interworking. 3GPP is also about to start discussions on LTE in unlicensed band operation (along with the relevant frequency variants).
  • WLAN radio interworking enhancement work it is considered that from a radio perspective a user terminal (UE) is to be offloaded to a wireless local area network (WLAN) based on serving 3GPP cell (e.g. LTE PCell or an UTRA serving cell) signal strength measurement, such as RSRP measurement, compared to a given RSRP threshold provided by a network.
  • serving 3GPP cell e.g. LTE PCell or an UTRA serving cell
  • RSRP measurement signal strength measurement
  • similar criteria may be considered for onloading i.e. moving back from WLAN to the 3GPP radio.
  • the difference between offloading and handover is that in offloading the whole connection is not necessary moved, while it is only using alternative technology and potentially for a part of the services (part of bearers or data flows). In some cases only control plane connection may remain on the 3GPP side. Also UE is expected to make a decision whether offloading conditions are fulfilled and especially whether the conditions actually experienced in WLAN (after offloading) are sufficient and if UE is to return to the 3GPP radio network. The WLAN network is not checked either whether the offloading is acceptable before giving UE parameters to guide the offloading decision. The intention is to reduce the load of the 3GPP network while using a likely less loaded WLAN for the situation when better or at least sufficient service may be obtainable from the WLAN side.
  • the use of different offloading criteria is also to ensure that the user is not provided with a service quality worse than in WLAN, thus aiming to offload users that are not having a good quality on the 3GPP side.
  • the connection with the LTE network may thus also remain in parallel for streams such as voice over LTE (VoLTE) that require seamless handling of mobility inside the 3GPP network.
  • VoIP voice over LTE
  • the difference compared to handovers is also that in some cases UE may already select WLAN before the actual data offloading decision from 3GPP to WLAN.
  • UE first finds WLAN access points and starts listening to the WLAN access points, meaning that UE selects WLAN, and only in a later phase when the offloading criteria are met, the actual offloading to WLAN takes place and data is routed from the 3GPP radio network to WLAN. For instance, if a serving cell RSRP level (i.e. the signal strength measured by UE) ⁇ the RSRP threshold (provided by the network), UE is offloaded to WLAN.
  • RSRP level i.e. the signal strength measured by UE
  • the RSRP threshold provided by the network
  • the above-mentioned simple serving cell signal strength (or signal quality such as RSRQ or CQI) based criteria and related thresholds are unlikely to be an optimum criteria for offloading UE to WLAN when UE may actually receive (or transmit) data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation, and especially by using the carrier aggregation with LTE-U (LTE in unlicensed band).
  • PCell primary cell
  • SCell secondary cells
  • the resulting metric for the selected criteria may be scaled further with a factor reflecting system load or otherwise desire to offload the traffic from the 3GPP system to WLAN, this scaling factor being obtained either from broadcast signalling or direct signaling.
  • the serving cell may remain as a LTE licensed spectrum cell, and an LTE cell on an unlicensed spectrum (an LTE-U cell) may be aggregated a secondary cell SCell with a licensed spectrum PCell.
  • the PCell or serving cell RSRP level compared to the RSRP threshold does not give enough information for making a decision whether UE is to be offloaded to WLAN or not.
  • the PCell (the serving cell) RSRP is below the given RSRP threshold and therefore traffic through the PCell may be somewhat limited, the whole traffic of a given UE may go through LTE-U SCell as this LTE-U Scell may be sufficiently strong and not interference or traffic limited.
  • An exemplary embodiment discloses using the LTE carrier aggregation and the use of LTE-U in connection with definition of WLAN offloading criteria.
  • the PCell RSRP is not solely considered as the criteria, but if UE has SCell(s) configured by RRC, then following examples may be considered: When there is a secondary cell SCell configured (and usable from the SCell RSRP threshold) the WLAN off-loading is not used unless each cell meets the criteria of RSRP being small enough. When there is a secondary cell SCell configured and in use, if RSRP is higher than the threshold in SCell, then the WLAN offloading is not used. If a MAC layer had deactivated SCell, then the off-loading does not take place as it is expected that sufficient data throughput is reached with PCell only and there is no need to use CA by activating SCell.
  • 3GPP to WLAN offloading rules and criteria may include: a) If LTE-U is deployed in the network and indicated e.g. in the broadcast channel of a serving (PCell) licensed spectrum LTE cell, UE supporting LTE-U does not offload to WLAN even if the serving cell RSRP level (measured by UE) ⁇ the RSRP threshold (provided by the network). b) Instead of making the decision whether to offload (steer) UE to WLAN, UE checks whether the serving cell RSRP level is below a given RSRP threshold and whether there is a LTE-U cell available.
  • LTE-U cell is indicated e.g. in a broadcast channel of the licensed spectrum LTE PCell, UE supporting LTE-U remains connected to LTE PCell even if PCell RSRP is below the threshold. If no LTE-U cell is indicated by PCell, UE is offloaded to WLAN if the PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold. c) If even more accurate information on the LTE-U cell is desired before deciding whether to offload UE to WLAN, UE may be requested to search, find and potentially even measure the LTE-U cell before decision making e.g. as follows: If the LTE-U cell is indicated e.g.
  • LTE PCell in the broadcast channel of the licensed spectrum LTE PCell and UE has been able to find (detect) LTE-UE and potentially also measure the RSRP (or RSRQ) level for LTE-U, UE remains connected to LTE PCell even if PCell RSRP is below the threshold. If no LTE-U cell is indicated by the PCell or UE has not been able to find (detect) LTE-UE even if indicated, UE may be offloaded to WLAN if the PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold.
  • WLAN offloading may also be defined as follows: d) Even if the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold, UE is not offloaded to WLAN if the LTE-U cell is configured by RRC even if this LTE-U SCell is not activated (the activation of the LTE-U SCell only happens when there is traffic to be transmitted and received through the LTE-U SCell). If the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold and no LTE-U cell is configured, UE is offloaded to WLAN.
  • additional criteria may be defined as follows: If LTE PCell RSRP level is below RSRP threshold and no LTE-U cell is configured but UE has been able to find a sufficiently good LTE-U cell and the LTE-U cell is indicated by LTE PCell, UE is not offloaded to WLAN. If the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold and no LTE-U cell is configured or found by UE, UE is offloaded to WLAN.
  • Figure 1 a shows an illustration of generic WLAN selection with LTE carrier aggregation (regardless of whether SCell is an LTE-U cell or a regular LTE carrier).
  • Figure 1 b shows an illustration of an LTE-U/small cell consideration for WLAN selection.
  • UE may keep the latest CQI value, or N latest values or their average or medians for the carriers UE was using as a reference to consider against the service quality experienced in WLAN.
  • CQI may be used to define an expected data rate across each carrier previously configured for CA operation and compared if the WLAN service quality is high enough compared to the service quality in the LTE side. And in case the service quality experienced in WLAN is too low compared to the LTE side expected data rate from each carrier, then UE is to return using the 3GPP network (LTE or HSPA), with this referred as onloading.
  • RSRQ may also be used instead of RSRP in the WLAN offloading criteria (rules).
  • Wi-Fi offloading is performed via access network discovery and selection function (ANDSF) policies without using handover messages inside the 3GPP network.
  • ANDSF access network discovery and selection function
  • the present invention is applicable to any network apparatus, user terminal, server, corresponding component, and/or to any communication system or any combination of different communication systems that support service offloading.
  • the communication system may be a fixed communication system or a wireless communication system or a communication system utilizing both fixed networks and wireless networks.
  • the protocols used, the specifications of communication systems, servers and user terminals, especially in wireless communication develop rapidly. Such development may require extra changes to an embodiment. Therefore, all words and expressions should be interpreted broadly and they are intended to illustrate, not to restrict, the embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified system architecture only showing some elements and functional entities, all being logical units whose implementation may differ from what is shown.
  • the connections shown in Figure 2 are logical connections; the actual physical connections may be different. It is apparent to a person skilled in the art that the systems also comprise other functions and structures. It should be appreciated that the functions, structures, elements and the protocols used in or for service offloading, are irrelevant to the actual invention. Therefore, they need not to be discussed in more detail here.
  • the exemplary radio system of Figure 2 comprises a network node 201 of a network operator.
  • the network node 201 may include e.g. an LTE (or LTE-A) base station (eNB), radio network controller (RNC), or any other network element, or a combination of network elements.
  • the network node 201 may be connected to one or more core network (CN) elements (not shown in Figure 2) such as a mobile switching centre (MSC), MSC server (MSS), mobility management entity (MME), gateway GPRS support node (GGSN), serving GPRS support node (SGSN), home location register (HLR), home subscriber server (HSS), visitor location register (VLR).
  • MSC mobile switching centre
  • MSC server MSC server
  • MME mobility management entity
  • GGSN gateway GPRS support node
  • HLR home location register
  • HSR home subscriber server
  • VLR visitor location register
  • the radio network node 201 that may also be called eNB (enhanced node-B, evolved node-B) or network apparatus of the radio system, hosts the functions for radio resource management in a public land mobile network.
  • Figure 2 shows one or more user equipment 202 located in the service area of the radio network node 201 .
  • the user equipment or UE refers to a portable computing device, and it may also be referred to as a user terminal.
  • Such computing devices include wireless mobile communication devices operating with or without a subscriber
  • SIM identification module
  • PDA personal digital assistant
  • laptop computer the user equipment 202 is capable of connecting to the radio network node 201 via a connection 203.
  • Figure 3 is a block diagram of an apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 3 shows a user equipment 202 located in the area of a radio network node 201 .
  • the user equipment 202 is configured to be in connection with the radio network node 201 .
  • the user equipment or UE 202 comprises a controller 301 operationally connected to a memory 302 and a transceiver 303.
  • the controller 301 controls the operation of the user equipment 202.
  • the memory 302 is configured to store software and data.
  • the transceiver 303 is configured to set up and maintain a wireless connection 303 to the radio network node 301 .
  • the transceiver 303 is operationally connected to a set of antenna ports 304 connected to an antenna arrangement 305.
  • the antenna arrangement 305 may comprise a set of antennas.
  • the number of antennas may be one to four, for example.
  • the number of antennas is not limited to any particular number.
  • the user equipment 202 may also comprise various other components, such as a user interface, camera, and media player. They are not displayed in the figure due to simplicity.
  • the radio network node 201 such as an LTE base station (eNode-B, eNB) comprises a controller 306 operationally connected to a memory 307, and a transceiver 308.
  • the controller 306 controls the operation of the radio network node 201 .
  • the memory 307 is configured to store software and data.
  • the transceiver 308 is configured to set up and maintain a wireless connection 203 to the user equipment 202 within the service area of the radio network node 201 .
  • the transceiver 308 is operationally connected to an antenna arrangement 309.
  • the antenna arrangement 309 may comprise a set of antennas.
  • the number of antennas may be two to four, for example.
  • the number of antennas is not limited to any particular number.
  • the radio network node 201 may be operationally connected (directly or indirectly) to another network element (not shown in Figure 3) of the communication system, such as a radio network controller (RNC), a mobility management entity (MME), an MSC server (MSS), a mobile switching centre (MSC), a radio resource management (RRM) node, a gateway GPRS support node, an operations, administrations and maintenance (OAM) node, a home location register (HLR), a visitor location register (VLR), a serving GPRS support node, a gateway, and/or a server, via an interface.
  • RNC radio network controller
  • MME mobility management entity
  • MSC server MSC server
  • MSC mobile switching centre
  • RRM radio resource management
  • gateway GPRS support node a gateway GPRS support node
  • OAM operations, administrations and maintenance
  • HLR home location register
  • VLR visitor location register
  • serving GPRS support node a gateway, and/or a server
  • a server via an
  • the apparatus 201 , 202 has been depicted as one entity, different modules and memory may be implemented in one or more physical or logical entities.
  • the apparatus may also be a user terminal which is a piece of equipment or a device that associates, or is arranged to associate, the user terminal and its user with a subscription and allows a user to interact with a communications system.
  • the user terminal presents information to the user and allows the user to input information.
  • the user terminal may be any terminal capable of receiving information from and/or transmitting information to the network, connectable to the network wirelessly or via a fixed connection. Examples of the user terminals include a personal computer, a game console, a laptop (a notebook), a personal digital assistant, a mobile station (mobile phone), a smart phone, and a line telephone.
  • the apparatus 201 , 202 may generally include a processor, controller, control unit or the like connected to a memory and to various interfaces of the apparatus.
  • the processor is a central processing unit, but the processor may be an additional operation processor.
  • the processor may comprise a computer processor, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field-programmable gate array (FPGA), and/or other hardware components that have been programmed in such a way to carry out one or more functions of an embodiment.
  • the memory 302, 307 may include volatile and/or non-volatile memory and typically stores content, data, or the like.
  • the memory 302, 307 may store computer program code such as software applications (for example for the detector unit and/or for the adjuster unit) or operating systems, information, data, content, or the like for a processor to perform steps associated with operation of the apparatus in accordance with embodiments.
  • the memory may be, for example, random access memory (RAM), a hard drive, or other fixed data memory or storage device. Further, the memory, or part of it, may be removable memory detachably connected to the apparatus.
  • an apparatus implementing one or more functions of a corresponding mobile entity described with an embodiment comprises not only prior art means, but also means for implementing the one or more functions of a corresponding apparatus described with an embodiment and it may comprise separate means for each separate function, or means may be configured to perform two or more functions.
  • these techniques may be implemented in hardware (one or more apparatuses), firmware (one or more
  • firmware or software implementation can be through modules (e.g. procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein.
  • the software codes may be stored in any suitable, processor/computer-readable data storage medium(s) or memory unit(s) or article(s) of manufacture and executed by one or more processors/computers.
  • the data storage medium or the memory unit may be implemented within the processor/computer or external to the processor/computer, in which case it can be communicatively coupled to the processor/computer via various means as is known in the art.
  • a first network apparatus 201 which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a LTE/LTE-A-capable base station eNode-B, eNB) may maintain 401 a first criteria for offloading a user terminal 202 from a mobile network to a local network.
  • the first network apparatus 201 may define 401 a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network.
  • the first network apparatus 201 may transmit the second criteria to a second network apparatus which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a user terminal, UE).
  • the second criteria is received in the user terminal 202. Based on the received second criteria, an offloading decision is made 402 in the user terminal such that the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network is disabled, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
  • the offloading decision is made 401 in the base station 201 , wherein the base station 201 instructs 402 the user terminal 202 to refrain 403 from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network.
  • Figure 5 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary embodiment.
  • a first network apparatus 201 which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a
  • LTE/LTE-A-capable base station may maintain 501 a first criteria for offloading a user terminal 202 from a mobile network to a local network.
  • the first network apparatus 201 may define 501 a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network.
  • the first network apparatus 201 may transmit the second criteria to a second network apparatus which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a user terminal, UE).
  • an offloading decision is made 501 in the base station 201 , wherein the base station 201 instructs 502 the user terminal 202 to refrain from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network.
  • the offloading decision may involve that the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network is to be disabled, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary embodiment.
  • a second network apparatus 202 which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a user terminal, UE) may receive 601 , from a first network apparatus 201 (which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a LTE/LTE-A-capable base station eNode-B, eNB)), a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal 202 from a mobile network to a local network.
  • a network element network node, e.g. a user terminal, UE
  • a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal 202 from a mobile network to a local network.
  • an offloading decision may be made 603 in the user terminal 202 such that the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network is disabled, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
  • the offloading decision is made in the base station 201 , wherein instructions are received 601 in the user terminal 202 from the base station 201 , to refrain 603 from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network.
  • the steps/points, signalling messages and related functions de-scribed above in Figures 1 to 6 are in no absolute chronological order, and some of the steps/points may be performed simultaneously or in an order differing from the given one. Other functions can also be executed between the steps/points or within the steps/points and other signalling messages sent be-tween the illustrated messages. Some of the steps/points or part of the steps/points can also be left out or replaced by a corresponding step/point or part of the step/point.
  • the apparatus operations illustrate a procedure that may be implemented in one or more physical or logical entities.
  • the signalling messages are only exemplary and may even comprise several separate messages for transmitting the same information. In addition, the messages may also contain other information.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A is disclosed for defining offloading criteria in a communications system. The method comprises maintaining, in a network apparatus, a first criteria for offloading a user terminal from a mobile network to a local network. A second criteria is defined for refraining from offloading the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network, wherein the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network is disabled, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.

Description

DESCRIPTION
TITLE TRAFFIC OFFLOADING WHEN MULTIPLE CARRIERS ARE USED
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The exemplary and non-limiting embodiments of this invention relate generally to wireless communications networks, and more particularly to service offloading. BACKGROUND ART
The following description of background art may include insights, discoveries,
understandings or disclosures, or associations together with dis-closures not known to the relevant art prior to the present invention but provided by the invention. Some such contributions of the invention may be specifically pointed out below, whereas other such contributions of the invention will be apparent from their context.
Mobile data offloading refers to using of complementary network technologies for delivering data originally targeted to a cellular network. Rules triggering a mobile offloading action may be set by a mobile subscriber or a network operator. The code operating on the rules resides in an end-user device and/or in a server. The end user may do data offloading for controlling data service costs and/or for the availability of a higher bandwidth. The network operator may do data offloading for decreasing congestion of the cellular network. An access network discovery and selection function (ANDSF) may be used for controlling offloading between 3GPP access networks and non-3GPP access networks (such as WLAN). ANDSF assists user devices to discover nearby access networks.
SUMMARY
The following presents a simplified summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention. It is not intended to identify key/critical elements of the invention or to delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later. Various aspects of the invention comprise a method, apparatuses, and a computer program product as defined in the independent claims. Further embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the dependent claims.
An aspect of the invention relates to a method for defining offloading criteria in a communications system, the method comprising maintaining, in a network apparatus, a first criteria for offloading a user terminal from a mobile network to a local network;
defining a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network; disabling the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
A further aspect of the invention relates to an apparatus comprising at least one processor; and at least one memory including a computer program code, wherein at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform any of the method steps. A still further aspect of the invention relates to an apparatus comprising at least one processor; and at least one memory including a computer program code, wherein at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to disable offloading of a user terminal from a mobile network to a local network, if a predetermined criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
A still further aspect of the invention relates to a computer program product comprising executable code that when executed, causes execution of functions of the method.
Although the various aspects, embodiments and features of the invention are recited independently, it should be appreciated that all combinations of the various aspects, embodiments and features of the invention are possible and within the scope of the present invention as claimed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the following the invention will be described in greater detail by means of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings, in which Figure 1 a illustrates generic WLAN selection with LTE carrier aggregation;
Figure 1 b illustrates LTE-U/small cell consideration for WLAN selection;
Figure 2 shows a simplified block diagram illustrating exemplary system architecture; Figure 3 shows a simplified block diagram illustrating exemplary apparatuses;
Figure 4 shows a messaging diagram illustrating an exemplary messaging event according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 5 shows a schematic diagram of a flow chart according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SOME EMBODIMENTS
3GPP is working with WLAN-3GPP radio level interworking. 3GPP is also about to start discussions on LTE in unlicensed band operation (along with the relevant frequency variants). Regarding WLAN radio interworking enhancement work it is considered that from a radio perspective a user terminal (UE) is to be offloaded to a wireless local area network (WLAN) based on serving 3GPP cell (e.g. LTE PCell or an UTRA serving cell) signal strength measurement, such as RSRP measurement, compared to a given RSRP threshold provided by a network. Respectively, similar criteria may be considered for onloading i.e. moving back from WLAN to the 3GPP radio. The difference between offloading and handover is that in offloading the whole connection is not necessary moved, while it is only using alternative technology and potentially for a part of the services (part of bearers or data flows). In some cases only control plane connection may remain on the 3GPP side. Also UE is expected to make a decision whether offloading conditions are fulfilled and especially whether the conditions actually experienced in WLAN (after offloading) are sufficient and if UE is to return to the 3GPP radio network. The WLAN network is not checked either whether the offloading is acceptable before giving UE parameters to guide the offloading decision. The intention is to reduce the load of the 3GPP network while using a likely less loaded WLAN for the situation when better or at least sufficient service may be obtainable from the WLAN side. The use of different offloading criteria is also to ensure that the user is not provided with a service quality worse than in WLAN, thus aiming to offload users that are not having a good quality on the 3GPP side. The connection with the LTE network may thus also remain in parallel for streams such as voice over LTE (VoLTE) that require seamless handling of mobility inside the 3GPP network. In case of WLAN offloading, the difference compared to handovers is also that in some cases UE may already select WLAN before the actual data offloading decision from 3GPP to WLAN. In this case UE first finds WLAN access points and starts listening to the WLAN access points, meaning that UE selects WLAN, and only in a later phase when the offloading criteria are met, the actual offloading to WLAN takes place and data is routed from the 3GPP radio network to WLAN. For instance, if a serving cell RSRP level (i.e. the signal strength measured by UE) < the RSRP threshold (provided by the network), UE is offloaded to WLAN.
The above-mentioned simple serving cell signal strength (or signal quality such as RSRQ or CQI) based criteria and related thresholds are unlikely to be an optimum criteria for offloading UE to WLAN when UE may actually receive (or transmit) data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation, and especially by using the carrier aggregation with LTE-U (LTE in unlicensed band).
With the carrier aggregation, UE is receiving data not only from a primary cell (PCell) but also from one or more secondary cells (SCell). Thus an aggregated throughput is clearly higher than for a single carrier UE. Especially with a case of inter-site carrier aggregation (dual connectivity) with an on-going small cell work, PCell may be a relatively weak macro cell, while SCell may be a well performing small cell and able to provide high data rate, wherein transferring UE to WLAN based on the macro cell RSRP/RSRQ only is not desirable (and may even lead to a reduced throughput). Also if the aggregated PCell is on a higher frequency or with a smaller bandwidth than SCell, then SCell performance may be clearly better than expected with PCell based considerations. The resulting metric for the selected criteria, taking multiple carriers into account, may be scaled further with a factor reflecting system load or otherwise desire to offload the traffic from the 3GPP system to WLAN, this scaling factor being obtained either from broadcast signalling or direct signaling.
In case of a HSPA operation, respectively receiving more than one HSDPA carrier on the same or different frequencies, causes that the primary cell does not give an impression good enough on expected QoS in HSPA side. Thus CPICH RSCP, CPICH Ec/No, or CQI from the carriers is to be considered across each available carrier. With the LTE-U operation, the serving cell (PCell) may remain as a LTE licensed spectrum cell, and an LTE cell on an unlicensed spectrum (an LTE-U cell) may be aggregated a secondary cell SCell with a licensed spectrum PCell.
In a situation where also LTE-U cells are deployed on the unlicensed spectrum such as WLAN access points, the PCell or serving cell RSRP level compared to the RSRP threshold does not give enough information for making a decision whether UE is to be offloaded to WLAN or not. Although the PCell (the serving cell) RSRP is below the given RSRP threshold and therefore traffic through the PCell may be somewhat limited, the whole traffic of a given UE may go through LTE-U SCell as this LTE-U Scell may be sufficiently strong and not interference or traffic limited. An exemplary embodiment discloses using the LTE carrier aggregation and the use of LTE-U in connection with definition of WLAN offloading criteria.
In an exemplary embodiment, with the use of LTE CA, the PCell RSRP is not solely considered as the criteria, but if UE has SCell(s) configured by RRC, then following examples may be considered: When there is a secondary cell SCell configured (and usable from the SCell RSRP threshold) the WLAN off-loading is not used unless each cell meets the criteria of RSRP being small enough. When there is a secondary cell SCell configured and in use, if RSRP is higher than the threshold in SCell, then the WLAN offloading is not used. If a MAC layer had deactivated SCell, then the off-loading does not take place as it is expected that sufficient data throughput is reached with PCell only and there is no need to use CA by activating SCell.
With the use of LTE CA together with LTE-U (LTE unlicensed band operation) it may be attractive to also define other criteria and rules for these offloading decisions. Examples of 3GPP to WLAN offloading rules and criteria may include: a) If LTE-U is deployed in the network and indicated e.g. in the broadcast channel of a serving (PCell) licensed spectrum LTE cell, UE supporting LTE-U does not offload to WLAN even if the serving cell RSRP level (measured by UE) < the RSRP threshold (provided by the network). b) Instead of making the decision whether to offload (steer) UE to WLAN, UE checks whether the serving cell RSRP level is below a given RSRP threshold and whether there is a LTE-U cell available. If the LTE-U cell is indicated e.g. in a broadcast channel of the licensed spectrum LTE PCell, UE supporting LTE-U remains connected to LTE PCell even if PCell RSRP is below the threshold. If no LTE-U cell is indicated by PCell, UE is offloaded to WLAN if the PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold. c) If even more accurate information on the LTE-U cell is desired before deciding whether to offload UE to WLAN, UE may be requested to search, find and potentially even measure the LTE-U cell before decision making e.g. as follows: If the LTE-U cell is indicated e.g. in the broadcast channel of the licensed spectrum LTE PCell and UE has been able to find (detect) LTE-UE and potentially also measure the RSRP (or RSRQ) level for LTE-U, UE remains connected to LTE PCell even if PCell RSRP is below the threshold. If no LTE-U cell is indicated by the PCell or UE has not been able to find (detect) LTE-UE even if indicated, UE may be offloaded to WLAN if the PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold.
When there is also data flow running, WLAN offloading may also be defined as follows: d) Even if the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold, UE is not offloaded to WLAN if the LTE-U cell is configured by RRC even if this LTE-U SCell is not activated (the activation of the LTE-U SCell only happens when there is traffic to be transmitted and received through the LTE-U SCell). If the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold and no LTE-U cell is configured, UE is offloaded to WLAN. e) However, even in this case additional criteria may be defined as follows: If LTE PCell RSRP level is below RSRP threshold and no LTE-U cell is configured but UE has been able to find a sufficiently good LTE-U cell and the LTE-U cell is indicated by LTE PCell, UE is not offloaded to WLAN. If the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold and no LTE-U cell is configured or found by UE, UE is offloaded to WLAN.
Figure 1 a shows an illustration of generic WLAN selection with LTE carrier aggregation (regardless of whether SCell is an LTE-U cell or a regular LTE carrier). Figure 1 b shows an illustration of an LTE-U/small cell consideration for WLAN selection.
The above examples are based on the use of RSRP which has been considered as the criteria to be broadcasted by LTE eNodeB in the WLAN-3GPP radio interworking studies in 3GPP. Further possible approaches exist to consider additional metrics with the carrier aggregation as well as with LTE-U, as follows:
Consideration of total aggregated bandwidth available (to derive then an offset for the RSRP criteria to be considered for PCell or any other cell). For example, even if the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold, UE is not offloaded to WLAN if the total aggregated bandwidth available is above a given threshold. If the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold and if the total aggregated bandwidth is below the given threshold, UE is offloaded to WLAN.
Consideration of CQI values across each carrier and theoretical aggregated data rate availability (as a criteria to offload to WLAN and also a reference value for considering returning from WLAN). For example, even if the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold, UE is not offloaded to WLAN if the total aggregated data rate derived from the CQI values for the aggregated bandwidths is above a given threshold. If the LTE PCell RSRP level is below the RSRP threshold and if the total aggregated data rate derived from the CQI values for the aggregated bandwidths is below the given threshold, UE is offloaded to WLAN. If UE is offloading each service (bearers and/or data flows) to WLAN, and is thus not reporting to LTE PCell new CQI values anymore, UE may keep the latest CQI value, or N latest values or their average or medians for the carriers UE was using as a reference to consider against the service quality experienced in WLAN. CQI may be used to define an expected data rate across each carrier previously configured for CA operation and compared if the WLAN service quality is high enough compared to the service quality in the LTE side. And in case the service quality experienced in WLAN is too low compared to the LTE side expected data rate from each carrier, then UE is to return using the 3GPP network (LTE or HSPA), with this referred as onloading. RSRQ may also be used instead of RSRP in the WLAN offloading criteria (rules).
Above cases may be further adjusted if LTE load information is available, or equivalent metric indicating "network" preference for off-loading, as operators may not be willing to broadcast actual load value of their network.
In an exemplary embodiment, Wi-Fi offloading is performed via access network discovery and selection function (ANDSF) policies without using handover messages inside the 3GPP network.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be de-scribed more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Although the specification may refer to "an", "one", or "some" embodiment(s) in several locations, this does not necessarily mean that each such reference is to the same embodiment(s), or that the feature only applies to a single embodiment. Single features of different embodiments may also be combined to provide other embodiments. Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
The present invention is applicable to any network apparatus, user terminal, server, corresponding component, and/or to any communication system or any combination of different communication systems that support service offloading. The communication system may be a fixed communication system or a wireless communication system or a communication system utilizing both fixed networks and wireless networks. The protocols used, the specifications of communication systems, servers and user terminals, especially in wireless communication, develop rapidly. Such development may require extra changes to an embodiment. Therefore, all words and expressions should be interpreted broadly and they are intended to illustrate, not to restrict, the embodiment.
In the following, different embodiments will be described using, as an example of a system architecture whereto the embodiments may be applied, an architecture based on LTE (or LTE-A) (long term evolution (advanced long term evolution)), without restricting the embodiment to such an architecture, however. A general architecture of a communication system is illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 2 is a simplified system architecture only showing some elements and functional entities, all being logical units whose implementation may differ from what is shown. The connections shown in Figure 2 are logical connections; the actual physical connections may be different. It is apparent to a person skilled in the art that the systems also comprise other functions and structures. It should be appreciated that the functions, structures, elements and the protocols used in or for service offloading, are irrelevant to the actual invention. Therefore, they need not to be discussed in more detail here.
The exemplary radio system of Figure 2 comprises a network node 201 of a network operator. The network node 201 may include e.g. an LTE (or LTE-A) base station (eNB), radio network controller (RNC), or any other network element, or a combination of network elements. The network node 201 may be connected to one or more core network (CN) elements (not shown in Figure 2) such as a mobile switching centre (MSC), MSC server (MSS), mobility management entity (MME), gateway GPRS support node (GGSN), serving GPRS support node (SGSN), home location register (HLR), home subscriber server (HSS), visitor location register (VLR). In Figure 2, the radio network node 201 that may also be called eNB (enhanced node-B, evolved node-B) or network apparatus of the radio system, hosts the functions for radio resource management in a public land mobile network. Figure 2 shows one or more user equipment 202 located in the service area of the radio network node 201 . The user equipment or UE refers to a portable computing device, and it may also be referred to as a user terminal. Such computing devices include wireless mobile communication devices operating with or without a subscriber
identification module (SIM) in hardware or in software, including, but not limited to, the following types of devices: mobile phone, smart-phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), handset, laptop computer. In the example situation of Figure 2, the user equipment 202 is capable of connecting to the radio network node 201 via a connection 203.
Figure 3 is a block diagram of an apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention. Figure 3 shows a user equipment 202 located in the area of a radio network node 201 . The user equipment 202 is configured to be in connection with the radio network node 201 . The user equipment or UE 202 comprises a controller 301 operationally connected to a memory 302 and a transceiver 303. The controller 301 controls the operation of the user equipment 202. The memory 302 is configured to store software and data. The transceiver 303 is configured to set up and maintain a wireless connection 303 to the radio network node 301 . The transceiver 303 is operationally connected to a set of antenna ports 304 connected to an antenna arrangement 305. The antenna arrangement 305 may comprise a set of antennas. The number of antennas may be one to four, for example. The number of antennas is not limited to any particular number. The user equipment 202 may also comprise various other components, such as a user interface, camera, and media player. They are not displayed in the figure due to simplicity. The radio network node 201 , such as an LTE base station (eNode-B, eNB) comprises a controller 306 operationally connected to a memory 307, and a transceiver 308. The controller 306 controls the operation of the radio network node 201 . The memory 307 is configured to store software and data. The transceiver 308 is configured to set up and maintain a wireless connection 203 to the user equipment 202 within the service area of the radio network node 201 . The transceiver 308 is operationally connected to an antenna arrangement 309. The antenna arrangement 309 may comprise a set of antennas. The number of antennas may be two to four, for example. The number of antennas is not limited to any particular number. The radio network node 201 may be operationally connected (directly or indirectly) to another network element (not shown in Figure 3) of the communication system, such as a radio network controller (RNC), a mobility management entity (MME), an MSC server (MSS), a mobile switching centre (MSC), a radio resource management (RRM) node, a gateway GPRS support node, an operations, administrations and maintenance (OAM) node, a home location register (HLR), a visitor location register (VLR), a serving GPRS support node, a gateway, and/or a server, via an interface. The embodiments are not, however, restricted to the network given above as an example, but a person skilled in the art may apply the solution to other communication networks provided with the necessary properties. For example, the connections between different network elements may be realized with internet protocol (IP) connections.
Although the apparatus 201 , 202 has been depicted as one entity, different modules and memory may be implemented in one or more physical or logical entities. The apparatus may also be a user terminal which is a piece of equipment or a device that associates, or is arranged to associate, the user terminal and its user with a subscription and allows a user to interact with a communications system. The user terminal presents information to the user and allows the user to input information. In other words, the user terminal may be any terminal capable of receiving information from and/or transmitting information to the network, connectable to the network wirelessly or via a fixed connection. Examples of the user terminals include a personal computer, a game console, a laptop (a notebook), a personal digital assistant, a mobile station (mobile phone), a smart phone, and a line telephone.
The apparatus 201 , 202 may generally include a processor, controller, control unit or the like connected to a memory and to various interfaces of the apparatus. Generally the processor is a central processing unit, but the processor may be an additional operation processor. The processor may comprise a computer processor, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field-programmable gate array (FPGA), and/or other hardware components that have been programmed in such a way to carry out one or more functions of an embodiment. The memory 302, 307 may include volatile and/or non-volatile memory and typically stores content, data, or the like. For example, the memory 302, 307 may store computer program code such as software applications (for example for the detector unit and/or for the adjuster unit) or operating systems, information, data, content, or the like for a processor to perform steps associated with operation of the apparatus in accordance with embodiments. The memory may be, for example, random access memory (RAM), a hard drive, or other fixed data memory or storage device. Further, the memory, or part of it, may be removable memory detachably connected to the apparatus.
The techniques described herein may be implemented by various means so that an apparatus implementing one or more functions of a corresponding mobile entity described with an embodiment comprises not only prior art means, but also means for implementing the one or more functions of a corresponding apparatus described with an embodiment and it may comprise separate means for each separate function, or means may be configured to perform two or more functions. For example, these techniques may be implemented in hardware (one or more apparatuses), firmware (one or more
apparatuses), software (one or more modules), or combinations thereof. For a firmware or software, implementation can be through modules (e.g. procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein. The software codes may be stored in any suitable, processor/computer-readable data storage medium(s) or memory unit(s) or article(s) of manufacture and executed by one or more processors/computers. The data storage medium or the memory unit may be implemented within the processor/computer or external to the processor/computer, in which case it can be communicatively coupled to the processor/computer via various means as is known in the art.
The signalling chart of Figure 4 illustrates the required signalling. In the example of Figure 4, a first network apparatus 201 which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a LTE/LTE-A-capable base station eNode-B, eNB) may maintain 401 a first criteria for offloading a user terminal 202 from a mobile network to a local network. The first network apparatus 201 may define 401 a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network. In item 402, the first network apparatus 201 may transmit the second criteria to a second network apparatus which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a user terminal, UE). In item 403, the second criteria is received in the user terminal 202. Based on the received second criteria, an offloading decision is made 402 in the user terminal such that the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network is disabled, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation. Alternatively, the offloading decision is made 401 in the base station 201 , wherein the base station 201 instructs 402 the user terminal 202 to refrain 403 from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network.
Figure 5 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary embodiment. In Figure 5, a first network apparatus 201 which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a
LTE/LTE-A-capable base station (eNode-B, eNB)) may maintain 501 a first criteria for offloading a user terminal 202 from a mobile network to a local network. The first network apparatus 201 may define 501 a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network. In item 502, the first network apparatus 201 may transmit the second criteria to a second network apparatus which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a user terminal, UE). Alternatively, an offloading decision is made 501 in the base station 201 , wherein the base station 201 instructs 502 the user terminal 202 to refrain from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network. The offloading decision may involve that the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network is to be disabled, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
Figure 6 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary embodiment. In Figure 6, a second network apparatus 202 which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a user terminal, UE) may receive 601 , from a first network apparatus 201 (which may comprise e.g. a network element (network node, e.g. a LTE/LTE-A-capable base station eNode-B, eNB)), a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal 202 from a mobile network to a local network. Based on the received second criteria and based on possible signal power/quality measurements performed 602 in the user terminal 202, an offloading decision may be made 603 in the user terminal 202 such that the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network is disabled, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation. Alternatively, the offloading decision is made in the base station 201 , wherein instructions are received 601 in the user terminal 202 from the base station 201 , to refrain 603 from offloading the user terminal 202 from the mobile network to the local network. The steps/points, signalling messages and related functions de-scribed above in Figures 1 to 6 are in no absolute chronological order, and some of the steps/points may be performed simultaneously or in an order differing from the given one. Other functions can also be executed between the steps/points or within the steps/points and other signalling messages sent be-tween the illustrated messages. Some of the steps/points or part of the steps/points can also be left out or replaced by a corresponding step/point or part of the step/point. The apparatus operations illustrate a procedure that may be implemented in one or more physical or logical entities. The signalling messages are only exemplary and may even comprise several separate messages for transmitting the same information. In addition, the messages may also contain other information.
It will be obvious to a person skilled in the art that, as the technology advances, the inventive concept can be implemented in various ways. The invention and its
embodiments are not limited to the examples described above but may vary within the scope of the claims.
List of abbreviations
CQI channel quality information
MAC medium access control
RRC radio resource control
RSRP reference signal received power
RSSI received signal strength indicator
RSRQ reference signal received quality
PCell primary cell
SCell secondary cell
LTE-U LTE in unlicensed band
CA carrier aggregation
CPICH common pilot channel
Wi-Fi wireless fidelity

Claims

1 . A method for defining offloading criteria in a communications system, the method comprising maintaining (401 , 501 ), in a network apparatus (201 ), a first criteria for offloading a user terminal (202) from a mobile network to a local network; defining (401 , 501 ) a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network; disabling (402, 502) the offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
2. A method for defining offloading criteria in a communications system, the method comprising receiving (403, 601 ), in a user terminal (202) from a network apparatus (201 ), a second criteria for refraining from offloading the user terminal from a mobile network to a local network, wherein a first criteria for offloading the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network is maintained in the network apparatus; disabling (403, 603) offloading of the user terminal from the mobile network to the local network, if the second criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the second criteria is fulfilled if a secondary cell is configured, unless each available cell meets the first criteria.
4. A method according to claim 1 , 2 or 3, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the second criteria is fulfilled if a secondary cell is configured and in use, and if a reference signal received power is higher than a corresponding threshold in the secondary cell.
5. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the second criteria is fulfilled if a secondary cell is configured and in use, and if channel quality information indicates a higher channel quality than a corresponding threshold in the secondary cell.
6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the second criteria is fulfilled if a medium access control layer has deactivated a secondary cell.
7. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the second criteria is fulfilled if an LTE unlicensed band operation LTE-U is deployed in the mobile network and indicated by a serving primary cell licensed spectrum LTE cell, even if a serving cell reference signal received power level measured by the user terminal < a reference signal received power threshold provided by the network.
8. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the second criteria is fulfilled if a serving cell reference signal received power threshold level is below a given reference signal received power threshold, if there is an LTE-U cell available, and if an LTE-U cell is indicated by a licensed spectrum LTE primary cell, even if a primary cell reference signal received power threshold is below the threshold.
9. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the user terminal is requested to search and potentially measure an LTE-U cell before making an offloading decision.
10. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that if a LTE-U cell is indicated by a licensed spectrum LTE primary cell and if the user terminal has detected an LTE-U cell and potentially also measured reference signal received power level or reference signal received quality level for the LTE-U cell, the user terminal remains connected to the LTE primary cell even if the primary cell reference signal is below the corresponding threshold.
11. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10, characterized in that the second criteria is fulfilled if there is data flow running, even if an LTE primary cell reference signal received power level is below a reference signal received power threshold, and if a LTE-U secondary cell is configured, even if the LTE-U secondary cell is not activated.
12. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, characterized in that the second criteria is fulfilled if there is data flow running, and if an LTE primary cell reference signal received power level is below a reference signal received power threshold and no LTE-U cell is configured but the user terminal has found a sufficient LTE-U cell and the LTE-U cell is indicated by the LTE primary cell.
13. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12, characterized in that the second criteria is fulfilled if a total aggregated bandwidth available is above a given threshold, even if an LTE primary cell reference signal received power level is below a reference signal received power threshold.
14. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13, characterized in that the second criteria is fulfilled if a total aggregated data rate derived from channel quality information values for aggregated bandwidths is above a given threshold, even if an LTE primary cell reference signal received power level is below a reference signal received power threshold.
15. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 14, characterized in that the values evaluated for offloading criteria are stored in the user terminal to be used as a benchmark compared to a wireless local area network WLAN quality in order to determine whether the quality provided WLAN is sufficient for keeping the traffic in the wireless local area network WLAN instead of returning back to mobile network.
16. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, characterized in that the local network is a wireless local area network WLAN.
17. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 16, characterized in that the mobile network is an LTE or LTE-A network
18. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 17, characterized in that the method comprises enabling offloading if the second criteria is no longer fulfilled.
19. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 18, characterized in that the first criteria is fulfilled if a serving cell reference signal received power level measured by the user terminal < a reference signal received power threshold provided by the network.
20. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 19, characterized in that deployment of LTE unlicensed band operation LTE-U is indicated in a broadcast channel of a serving primary cell licensed spectrum LTE cell.
21. An apparatus comprising at least one processor; and at least one memory including a computer program code, characterized in that the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform any of the method steps of claims 1 to 20.
22. An apparatus comprising at least one processor; and at least one memory including a computer program code, characterized in that the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to disable offloading of a user terminal from a mobile network to a local network, if a predetermined criteria is fulfilled and if the user terminal is able to receive and/or transmit data using multiple carriers by using carrier aggregation.
23. A computer program product comprising executable code that when executed, causes execution of functions of a method according to any one of claims 1 to 20.
EP14703586.9A 2014-02-07 2014-02-07 Traffic offloading when multiple carriers are used Withdrawn EP3103282A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2014/052478 WO2015117673A1 (en) 2014-02-07 2014-02-07 Traffic offloading when multiple carriers are used

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3103282A1 true EP3103282A1 (en) 2016-12-14

Family

ID=50071614

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14703586.9A Withdrawn EP3103282A1 (en) 2014-02-07 2014-02-07 Traffic offloading when multiple carriers are used

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3103282A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2015117673A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105163403B (en) * 2015-08-24 2018-09-14 宇龙计算机通信科技(深圳)有限公司 A kind of method and device of Deta bearer switching
US10716047B2 (en) * 2016-11-18 2020-07-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Techniques for selecting a radio access technology over an unlicensed radio frequency spectrum band for serving a class of traffic

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009148381A1 (en) * 2008-06-04 2009-12-10 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and arrangements in a mobile communication network

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2011136630A (en) * 2009-02-04 2013-03-10 Телефонактиеболагет Лм Эрикссон (Пабл) METHOD FOR SELECTING A CARRYING BINDING IN A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
KR20140018089A (en) * 2012-07-25 2014-02-12 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for traffic offloading to alleviate user plane congestion in wireless communication systtem

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009148381A1 (en) * 2008-06-04 2009-12-10 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and arrangements in a mobile communication network

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"3 Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Study on Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) - 3GPP radio interworking (Release 12)", 3GPP STANDARD ; TECHNICAL REPORT ; 3GPP TR 37.834, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT (3GPP), MOBILE COMPETENCE CENTRE ; 650, ROUTE DES LUCIOLES ; F-06921 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS CEDEX ; FRANCE, vol. RAN WG2, no. V12.0.0, 7 January 2014 (2014-01-07), pages 1 - 17, XP051293258 *
See also references of WO2015117673A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2015117673A1 (en) 2015-08-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10880379B2 (en) Active communication session handover between direct and relayed connections
US10638391B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling selection of the solution for WLAN and unlicensed spectrum usage
US9706448B2 (en) Selective dual network mode for LTE devices
US9736725B2 (en) Method and apparatus for applying signaling of WLAN-3GPP interworking
EP2946599B1 (en) Enhanced integration between wi-fi and mobile communication networks
US20150358893A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for access network selection
US20120282961A1 (en) Mobile radio communication devices, mobile radio communication network devices, methods for controlling a mobile radio communication device, and methods for controlling a mobile radio communication network device
EP3198937B1 (en) Enhancements to load reporting from a wireless local-area network to an lte network
EP2849493A1 (en) Network access method and device
US9769693B2 (en) Method and apparatus of improving measurement reporting involving WLAN in a wireless communication system
RU2657869C2 (en) Interworking between networks operating according to different radio access technologies
EP3017631B1 (en) Connecting to radio access networks selected based on charging data for a subscription of a user
US10455464B1 (en) Dynamic handover threshold adjustment
EP3202187B1 (en) Transmission of wlan access parameters for a group of wlan ap
CN107079347B (en) Reporting wireless local area network terminal connections to 3GPP nodes
EP3103282A1 (en) Traffic offloading when multiple carriers are used
US20150365862A1 (en) Vertical hand over scenarios considering application mobility
US9742677B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for managing communications network loading
EP3228128B1 (en) Efficient communication of network identifiers
US9072022B1 (en) Dynamic report of reference signal received quality by a wireless communication device
US9578565B1 (en) Dynamic hysteresis offset manipulation for wireless communication device handovers
WO2014127797A1 (en) Small cell deployment in communications
US9426715B1 (en) Neighbor access node determination
WO2015149856A1 (en) Cell change in communications
WO2016119451A1 (en) Method and device for user equipment to select network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160906

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20180815

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 5/00 20060101ALN20230217BHEP

Ipc: H04W 36/00 20090101AFI20230217BHEP

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 5/00 20060101ALN20230309BHEP

Ipc: H04W 36/00 20090101AFI20230309BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230328

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 5/00 20060101ALN20230801BHEP

Ipc: H04W 36/00 20090101AFI20230801BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 5/00 20060101ALN20230824BHEP

Ipc: H04W 36/00 20090101AFI20230824BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230912

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20240123