EP3091540B1 - Dispositif de generation de faisceaux thermiques de neutrons tres brillants et procede de fabrication - Google Patents

Dispositif de generation de faisceaux thermiques de neutrons tres brillants et procede de fabrication Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3091540B1
EP3091540B1 EP16166567.4A EP16166567A EP3091540B1 EP 3091540 B1 EP3091540 B1 EP 3091540B1 EP 16166567 A EP16166567 A EP 16166567A EP 3091540 B1 EP3091540 B1 EP 3091540B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
moderator
neutrons
channels
neutron
thermal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16166567.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3091540A1 (fr
Inventor
Dr. Ulrich RÜCKER
Prof. Dr. Thomas BRÜCKEL
Tobias CRONERT
Jan Philipp DABRUCK
Prof. Dr. Rahim NABBI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
Original Assignee
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH filed Critical Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
Publication of EP3091540A1 publication Critical patent/EP3091540A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3091540B1 publication Critical patent/EP3091540B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21G—CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ELEMENTS; RADIOACTIVE SOURCES
    • G21G4/00—Radioactive sources
    • G21G4/02—Neutron sources

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a device for generating thermal neutrons for neutron scattering experiments and other applications of thermal neutron beams, e.g. Boron neutron capture therapy for tumor treatment and a method of making the device.
  • Neutron radiation used. When neutrons hit atoms, they are scattered by them. The directional distribution of the scattered neutrons is the desired quantity that can be used to determine the material structure or material properties. The generation of neutron beams for scattering experiments with high intensity and defined direction is a challenge.
  • neutron production is based on nuclear fission in thermal nuclear reactors, as described on the website http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron.
  • the thus generated primary neutrons with energy in the MeV range must be braked in the moderator area of the reactor to energies in the range of 1 eV (thermal neutrons) and then fed into beam tubes for the neutron scattering experiments.
  • an extended moderator (usually light or heavy water) is an integral part of the nuclear reactor because the nuclear chain reaction is maintained only by thermal neutrons.
  • the neutrons for the scattering instruments are extracted from the moderator volume by tangential beam tubes. These lances are sac tubes made of a neutron transparent material that extend into the moderator and penetrate the biological shield of the reactor. Their orientation is such that the reactor core is not visible through the opening in the reactor shield, so that high-energy primary neutrons can not reach the experiments directly through the jet pipe.
  • the openings of the jet pipes and the angular range, under which neutrons can escape, are so large that several instruments are supplied from a jet pipe can be shielded by the neutron beam in the angular range between the instruments with a neutron absorber.
  • primary neutrons are generated by nuclear reactions triggered by charged particles (e.g., electrons, protons, or deuterons) that have been accelerated to high energies in an accelerator.
  • charged particles e.g., electrons, protons, or deuterons
  • a target also called a converter
  • high-energy neutrons which are then moderated in a downstream moderator.
  • a presenter is, according to the current state of the art, a massive block of water or polyethylene, which in many cases is surrounded by a graphite or beryllium reflector in order to reduce the neutron losses at the edge of the moderator.
  • the jet pipes are usually connected to the surface of the moderator block. They penetrate the reflector through an opening provided and record at the moderator surface all the divergence experienced by the neutrons as they travel through the moderation volume. This results in a uniform neutron flux over the entire moderator surface.
  • the neutron beams are removed in the case of accelerator-driven neutron sources at the periphery of the moderator, there is so much moderator volume on the neutron path that many already moderated neutrons, which actually move in the direction of the desired beam, are scattered out of this direction again.
  • the neutrons that reach the point where a beam is to be extracted come randomly randomly from all directions, so that the tapped beam has a strong isotropy.
  • the neutron flux is distributed over the entire moderator surface. Therefore, there are no excellent sites where more neutrons can be extracted than at others, and there are no excellent directions in which many neutrons are preferentially emitted from the moderator volume.
  • the neutron beams generated in this way therefore have no preferred direction and thus a low intensity (beam density per unit area) and a low brilliance (intensity per solid angle unit).
  • the direction of the neutron beam in the scattering instrument must be better defined than 2 °. Therefore, collimation systems remove all neutrons from the beam that are outside the accepted angular range.
  • the object of the invention is to extract as many suitable and as few as possible unsuitable neutrons from a moderator in beam tubes, also called neutron guides, to the neutron scattering instruments.
  • the object of the invention is achieved by a device having the features of claim 1.
  • a method comprises the features of the independent claim.
  • Advantageous embodiments emerge from the dependent claims.
  • the object of the invention is achieved by a device comprising an accelerator- or laser-driven neutron source and a moderator for moderating neutrons of the neutron source, characterized in that one or more channels are present in the moderator, or from a central region in the interior of the Guide the moderator to the moderator's interface.
  • a channel according to the present invention is much more transparent, d. H. permeable, for thermal neutrons compared to the adjoining material of the moderator.
  • a channel according to the present invention may be drilled in the moderator material if the material of the moderator is a solid. If the material of the moderator is a liquid, then a metallic tube such as an aluminum tube can serve as a channel in the sense of the present invention.
  • Thermal neutrons which move from an inner, central region of the moderator to the surface of the moderator, basically have a suitable direction, also referred to below as the forward direction, in order to be able to escape from the surface of the moderator. From such a central region, the neutron intensity in the forward direction decreases toward the outside since the thermal neutrons can be scattered or absorbed on their way to the extraction site.
  • the neutron intensity in the forward direction is completely retained. It is therefore possible to increase the intensity of thermal neutrons in the forward direction, which are led out via one channel from the moderator. As a result, the neutron flux provided for the experiments is increased, which on the one hand benefits the time required for measurement and the measurement accuracy limited by the neutron flux.
  • the interior region of the moderator is adjacent to the neutron source converter or generally adjacent to the primary neutron source.
  • This source of primary neutrons is surrounded by moderator material. Adjacent to this source, there is basically a high flux of thermal neutrons, especially in comparison to near-surface areas within the moderator, so that such an arrangement further improves the yield of thermal neutrons.
  • Adjacent means that the distance between the inner region and the neutron source is less than the distance from the inner region to a surface of the moderator.
  • the distance from the central region to the neutron source is at least half as small as the smallest distance between the central region and a surface of the moderator.
  • the inner region is a determined region with a maximum flux of thermal neutrons.
  • the center is determined in particular by computer simulation, whereby a further increase in the intensity of the thermal neutrons can be achieved.
  • Computer simulation programs with which the spatial distribution of thermal neutrons and thus a flux maximum inside a moderator can be determined, are commercially available, so that This is a simple and reliable way to determine such a region with a maximum flow, also called center.
  • the thermal flux in the moderator material increases to a certain saturation value, since already thermalized neutrons (ie thermal neutrons) can be reflected back from the outer layers of the moderator.
  • the thermal flow decreases again beyond a certain moderator volume.
  • the volume of the moderator is therefore 50-200 liters, preferably 100-150 liters, in order to be able to moderately moderate primary neutrons on the one hand and to manage on the other hand with suitable channel lengths.
  • the moderator is preferably in the form of a block, which may be spherical, cube-shaped, cuboidal, conical or ellipsoidal.
  • the moderator is cylindrical, since with this form a particularly suitable spatial distribution of the thermal neutrons is achieved and thus a plurality of thermally brilliant neutron beams are obtained particularly well.
  • One side length of the block is generally not many times longer than other side lengths, so that the shape is compact. In principle, a diameter does not exceed the height many times in the case of a cylindrical shape so as to obtain a compact shape. So the moderator does not have a particularly elongated shape.
  • At least four, preferably at least six channels are present, which lead from an inner region of the moderator to the surface, and in particular in a star shape.
  • no more than 10, more preferably no more than 8, channels are present which lead from an inner region of the moderator to the surface.
  • an increasing number of channels leads to an improved yield of thermal neutrons.
  • primary neutrons or primary neutrons can no longer be adequately moderated so that the yield can not be continuously improved by increasing the number of channels, but, on the contrary, the intensity in each individual channel decreases.
  • the distance between channels on the surface of the moderator is at least twice the free path of thermal neutrons in the moderator material in order to increase the yield further improved.
  • the neutron source used is in particular a linear accelerator with a converter which can be produced with relatively little technical effort and which does not require any thermal neutrons for a chain reaction, so that a considerably smaller moderator volume than in a thermal nuclear reactor is possible.
  • the material of the moderator is then a solid into which the one or more channels are drilled.
  • channels are polished internally to provide a further improved thermal neutron yield by being able to be reflected from the inner portion of the moderator to the surface on the walls of the channel as they pass through the channel.
  • Mechanical polishing is sufficient, in particular in the case of beryllium, to further increase the yield of thermal neutrons.
  • the inside of the channel is preferably further coated so as to be able to conduct thermal neutrons out of the moderator in an appropriate manner. Polishing reduces surface roughness created by making the channel.
  • the channel is produced, for example by drilling.
  • a second processing step takes place, through which the surface roughness is reduced.
  • the polished surface is coated, particularly in the case of aluminum tubes, to obtain further improved results.
  • the material suitable for the coating is, in particular, nickel, which has a high reflection coefficient for neutrons.
  • Even multiple layers are suitable as a coating of the inner walls of the channels. These coatings are z. B. applied by sputtering or galvanic on the already polished inner walls of the flow channels.
  • each channel is less than the mean free path of thermal neutrons in the moderator material.
  • a channel is capable of thermal neutrons suitable from the moderator lead out. It also avoids unnecessarily dimensioning a channel, which would be detrimental to the efficiency of the moderator material.
  • each channel depends on the requirements of the connected experiment and can be reduced to the technically feasible.
  • the diameter to length ratio of the channel determines exit angles of thermal neutrons from the channel. The longer the channel is compared to the diameter, the smaller is the exit angle of thermal neutrons.
  • filters may be provided inside each channel to filter out or prevent primary neutrons from exiting the respective channel.
  • Suitable filter materials are, for example, lead and sapphire single crystals.
  • the moderator comprises an outer reflective sheath of, for example, graphite or polyethylene.
  • the yield can be improved further improved.
  • the intensity of the extracted thermal neutrons in a certain preferred direction is the forward component of the thermal neutron flux on the axis of the neutron instrumentation in the direction of the experiment.
  • both the total flux and the forward component of the flux decrease outwardly as the thermal neutrons can be scattered or absorbed on their way to the extraction site on the moderator surface.
  • the forward component of the flux is fully conserved and can be passed without attenuation, for example to the beginning of the neutron guide of the connected neutron scattering instrument. Since the forward component at this point is independent of the size of the moderator, the volume of the Moderators or the reflector are chosen so that the thermal flux in the center and thus also the forward component can be increased.
  • the moderator is surrounded by a 20 cm thick layer of graphite as a reflector, whereby the thermal flow at the surface of the moderator can be increased by an order of magnitude.
  • the axis of the cylinder lies on the beam axis of the primary ions (eg deuterium ions in the energy range of about 20 MeV energy), with the reflector at the entry point of the ions is interrupted, so that the accelerated by a linear accelerator ions strike the surface of the beryllium moderator and in the first layer of about 0.4 cm are converted into neutrons.
  • This area, where the ions are converted into neutrons, is called a converter.
  • the converter can also be moved further into the moderator.
  • the converter is also surrounded on its back by moderator and reflector material, so that backscattered neutrons in favor of the overall thermal flux are more likely to remain in the moderator.
  • this variant is associated with a higher design effort, since the converter must be laboriously cooled in most cases.
  • the moderator can be operated with many different sources of fast neutrons, resulting in a high flexibility for the use and the use.
  • the low-price segment would include commercial fusion-based neutron generators, which essentially have an isotropic neutron field.
  • linear accelerators or cyclotrons come into question.
  • Even high-intensity, short-pulse lasers are capable of generating intense primary ion beams, so that a more compact design of the entire system can be achieved with such a laser.
  • the increase of the forward thermal flux at the opening of the flow channel depends on the underlying geometric shape and arrangement of the flow channel River channel in the moderator. Different angles of attack between the flow channel and the axis of the primary ion beam are possible, depending on the intended use.
  • the thermal intensity at the opening of the flow channel in the forward direction can be increased by a factor of 6, compared to an arrangement without a channel, as studies have shown. If a smaller proportion of fast neutrons is desired, in one embodiment, the channel is positioned orthogonal to the direction of irradiation of the primary ions. The intensity of thermal neutrons is stronger by a factor of 3 in this case.
  • the neutron flux can be strongly influenced by the choice of moderator material.
  • moderator material In question are water, graphite, heavy water or beryllium, these materials increase in both moderation capacity and in terms of effort in turn.
  • a combination of beryllium as a moderator surrounded by a layer of graphite as a reflector is a preferred solution.
  • the channel can be equipped with a lead or sapphire filter to suppress the flow of fast neutrons without significantly affecting the intensity of forward thermal neutrons.
  • the channels may be arranged in a star shape, for example, so that the channels can lead away from the central area in the moderator in two or three dimensions in different directions and the various experiments do not have to restrict their space requirements.
  • the FIG. 1 shows a moderator 1 with a linear accelerator 2.
  • a moderator 1 with a linear accelerator 2.
  • the end 3 of the beam pipe for the primary ions from the linear accelerator 2 arise in a converter primary neutrons.
  • the end 3 of the linear accelerator 2 formed by the converter extends into the moderator 1.
  • the flux maximum was determined by computer simulations. Starting from this maximum flux 4, four channels 5 designed as neutron conductors extend approximately in a star shape to the surface 6 of the moderator 1.
  • FIG. 2 shows a further embodiment with six channels 5 and with an outer shell 6, for example made of graphite or polyethylene.
  • the device consists of a linear accelerator which accelerates deuterons to 25 MeV and leads through the tube 2 to the converter 3, which here consists of a 0.7 mm thick layer of beryllium.
  • Moderator 1 is a cylinder of beryllium 62 cm in diameter and 41 cm in length. The end of tube 2 and the converter 3 located there is embedded 5 cm deep along the cylinder axis in the moderator. The moderator is surrounded by a 10 cm thick reflector layer 6 made of graphite. The thermal neutron flux has in this construction its maximum 4 in 15 cm distance from the converter along the cylinder axis. At this point begin the six flow channels 5, each of which is cylindrical holes with a diameter of 2 cm.
  • the neutron beams from the two backward (backward in the direction of the ion beam) channels have a factor of 1.5 higher brilliance than the neutrons on the surface of the moderator, the neutron beams from the two channels orthogonal to the cylinder axis one around the Factor 3.5 higher brilliance than the neutrons on the surface of the moderator and the neutron beams from the two forward channels a brilliance higher by a factor of 6 than the neutrons on the surface of a moderator of the same dimensions without flow channels.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
  • Particle Accelerators (AREA)
  • Radiation-Therapy Devices (AREA)

Claims (14)

  1. Dispositif de génération de neutrons thermiques pour des essais de diffusion de neutrons, comprenant une source de neutrons (3) entraînée par accélérateur ou par laser et un modérateur (1) pour modérer des neutrons de la source de neutrons (2, 3), caractérisé en ce qu'un canal ou plusieurs canaux (5) se trouve(nt) dans le modérateur (1), lequel/lesquels s'étend(ent) à partir d'une zone intérieure (4) dans le modérateur jusqu'à la surface (6) du modérateur (1), caractérisé en ce que la partie intérieure (4) se trouve au ou dans le maximum de flux de neutrons thermiques.
  2. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le modérateur (1) consiste en une matière solide et les canaux (5) sont forés dans la matière solide.
  3. Dispositif selon la revendication précédente, caractérisé en ce que la matière solide consiste en béryllium.
  4. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la zone intérieure (4) est arrangée de manière adjacente à la source de neutrons (3).
  5. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la source de neutrons (3) est un convertisseur (3) à l'extrémité d'un accélérateur linéaire (2).
  6. Dispositif selon la revendication précédente, caractérisé en ce que la zone intérieure (4) se trouve, vu dans la direction d'accélération de l'accélérateur linéaire (2), derrière l'accélérateur linéaire.
  7. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la source de neutrons (3) se trouve dans le modérateur (1).
  8. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le modérateur comprend un volume compris entre 100 et 150 litres.
  9. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'il y a 4-10 canaux (5) dans le modérateur (1), lesquels s'étendent à partir d'une zone intérieure (4) jusqu'à la surface (6) du modérateur (1).
  10. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le diamètre de chaque canal (5) est plus petit que le double du libre parcours moyen des neutrons thermiques dans le modérateur.
  11. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le modérateur (1) est enveloppé par une gaine extérieure en graphite ou en polyéthylène.
  12. Procédé de fabrication d'un dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'un maximum de flux de neutrons thermiques dans le modérateur est déterminé et des extrémités des canaux (5) sont disposées dans la zone du maximum de flux déterminé.
  13. Procédé selon la revendication précédente, caractérisé en ce que les surfaces des canaux sont polies à l'intérieur ou sont chemisées d'un revêtement poli.
  14. Dispositif selon les revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'un filtre en plomb ou en monocristal de saphir est disposé à l'intérieur d'un ou de plusieurs canaux pour filtrer des neutrons rapides primaires.
EP16166567.4A 2015-05-08 2016-04-22 Dispositif de generation de faisceaux thermiques de neutrons tres brillants et procede de fabrication Active EP3091540B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102015208564.3A DE102015208564A1 (de) 2015-05-08 2015-05-08 Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung von thermischen Neutronenstrahlen mit hoher Brillanz und Herstellungsverfahren

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3091540A1 EP3091540A1 (fr) 2016-11-09
EP3091540B1 true EP3091540B1 (fr) 2017-11-29

Family

ID=55919599

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16166567.4A Active EP3091540B1 (fr) 2015-05-08 2016-04-22 Dispositif de generation de faisceaux thermiques de neutrons tres brillants et procede de fabrication

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3091540B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102015208564A1 (fr)
DK (1) DK3091540T3 (fr)
ES (1) ES2658093T3 (fr)
HU (1) HUE036291T2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114283952B (zh) * 2021-11-19 2023-05-16 核工业西南物理研究院 垂直向中子相机屏蔽与准直结构

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3778627A (en) * 1973-04-17 1973-12-11 Atomic Energy Commission High intensity, pulsed thermal neutron source
BE1008113A3 (fr) * 1994-03-04 1996-01-23 Ion Beam Applic Sa Procede de production de neutrons thermiques, dispositif pour la mise en oeuvre dudit procede, et utilisation pour la production de radio-isotopes.
CN102855954A (zh) * 2011-06-30 2013-01-02 长春工业大学 14MeV中子热化装置

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2658093T3 (es) 2018-03-08
DK3091540T3 (en) 2018-02-05
HUE036291T2 (hu) 2018-06-28
EP3091540A1 (fr) 2016-11-09
DE102015208564A1 (de) 2016-11-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1987859B1 (fr) Installation de thérapie à particules
RU2691322C2 (ru) Облучатель для нейтронно-захватной терапии
EP2417477B1 (fr) Dispositif de détection
EP2183026B1 (fr) Équipement de thérapie particulaire
RU2717364C1 (ru) Система нейтрон-захватной терапии
DE102005012059A1 (de) Laserbestrahlter Hohlzylinder als Linse für Ionenstrahlen
DE2805111C2 (de) Neutronen-Strahlentherapiegerät
DE102004057726A1 (de) Medizinische Untersuchungs- und Behandlungseinrichtung
EP2353647A1 (fr) Dispositif doté d'une combinaison à partir d'un dispositif à résonance magnétique et d'un dispositif de thérapie par rayonnement
EP1482519B1 (fr) Dispositif de filtrage en énergie
EP2247339B1 (fr) Système de thérapie par un faisceau de protons
DE212022000080U1 (de) Eine Strahlformungsvorrichtung für thermische Neutronen
EP3091540B1 (fr) Dispositif de generation de faisceaux thermiques de neutrons tres brillants et procede de fabrication
DE60308640T2 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schlag-verdichten eines stoffes und plasmakathode dazu
DE3138693A1 (de) "thermonuklearer fusionsreaktor"
DE102011079179A1 (de) Monochromatische Röntgenquelle
DE10235116B4 (de) Abgeschirmter Raum für die Ionentherapie für Neutronen bis in den Energiebereich GeV
DE1279859B (de) Einrichtung zur Erzeugung von Neutronen aus Kernfusionsreaktionen
EP3174069A1 (fr) Agent de dégradation comprenant du carbure de bore
WO2012080118A1 (fr) Filtre d'énergie chromatique
JP2023542251A (ja) 中性子捕捉療法のための中性子ビームの生成、減速および構成のためのデバイス
DE2511926A1 (de) Ring-laser fuer durchdringende elektromagnetische wellen
DE102008044781A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Beschleunigung von Ionen eines Ionenstrahls
DE102012025244A1 (de) Fusionsraktor mit sphärischer Petawattlasereinstrahlung
DE102005018342A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Erzeugung von Röntgenstrahlung

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170509

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170706

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 951077

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502016000312

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20180131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2658093

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20180308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20171129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180228

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180301

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E036291

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502016000312

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180329

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 951077

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210422

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230522

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230418

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240423

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20240422

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240501

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240517

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20240430

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240419

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20240423

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20240419

Year of fee payment: 9