EP3073222A1 - Altimeter using imaging capability - Google Patents
Altimeter using imaging capability Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3073222A1 EP3073222A1 EP16161910.1A EP16161910A EP3073222A1 EP 3073222 A1 EP3073222 A1 EP 3073222A1 EP 16161910 A EP16161910 A EP 16161910A EP 3073222 A1 EP3073222 A1 EP 3073222A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- pattern
- camera
- altimeter
- laser projector
- projected
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C5/00—Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels
- G01C5/005—Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels altimeters for aircraft
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C5/00—Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C3/00—Measuring distances in line of sight; Optical rangefinders
- G01C3/02—Details
- G01C3/06—Use of electric means to obtain final indication
- G01C3/08—Use of electric radiation detectors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C3/00—Measuring distances in line of sight; Optical rangefinders
- G01C3/26—Measuring distances in line of sight; Optical rangefinders using a parallactic triangle with fixed angles and a base of variable length, at, near, or formed by the object
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
- G01S17/02—Systems using the reflection of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
- G01S17/06—Systems determining position data of a target
- G01S17/46—Indirect determination of position data
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N23/00—Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof
- H04N23/20—Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof for generating image signals from infrared radiation only
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N23/00—Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof
- H04N23/56—Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof provided with illuminating means
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to altimetry, and more particularly to methods and systems for optical altimetry.
- Altitude above ground level is an important consideration for all aspects of flight. For example, during critical phases of flight, many systems may need an indication of AGL altitude to perform properly. Further, AGL is important for weapon systems requiring an accurate, reliable and well-controlled burst height.
- One way to determine AGL is to use active radar altimeters which send a radar signal to the ground.
- active radar altimeters which send a radar signal to the ground.
- traditional systems are expensive and require valuable space.
- Such conventional methods and systems have generally been considered satisfactory for their intended purpose.
- conventional AGL signals can potentially be distorted, intercepted, or the like, and may be inaccurate. As a result, there is still a need in the art for improved AGL altimeters.
- the present disclosure provides a solution for this need.
- An altimeter includes a laser projector for projecting a pattern onto a surface and a camera for viewing the projected pattern.
- An image processor is operatively connected to the laser projector and camera for determining distance to the surface based on cross-correlation of the projected and imaged patterns.
- the camera can be a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera.
- the projected pattern can be a pseudo-random, fixed pattern.
- the image processor can be configured to determine correlation peaks between the imaged pattern and the expected pattern when the patterns align.
- a peak distance can be defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern.
- a height above the surface can be a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.
- the laser projector and camera can be fixedly attached and co-boresighted such that resolution of the imaged pattern is scaleable to a resolution of the projected pattern.
- the image processor can be configured to control timing and repetition of the pattern emitted from the laser projector.
- the image processor can interface to a readout integrated circuit of the camera to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera.
- a method for determining distance to a surface includes projecting a pattern onto a surface from a laser projector and viewing the projected pattern using a camera to store an imaged pattern.
- the imaged pattern is cross-correlated with an expected pattern using an image processor operatively connected to the laser projector and camera.
- the method can further include determining a correlation peak between the imaged pattern and expected pattern such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern.
- An optimal height above the surface can be calculated as a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.
- the method can further include controlling the repetition rate of the projected pattern and exposure of the camera with the image processor.
- Fig. 1 a partial view of an exemplary embodiment of an altimeter in accordance with the disclosure is shown in Fig. 1 and is designated generally by reference character 100.
- the systems and methods described herein can be used for altimetry, e.g., to exploit a weapon's seeker imaging capability to perform a height of burst (HoB) function.
- HoB burst
- the altimeter 100 is depicted in Fig. 1 and includes a camera 102, a laser projector 104, and an image processing system 106 operatively connected to both the camera 102 and the laser projector 104.
- the processing system 106 processes images from the camera 102 and controls the timing of the laser projector 104.
- the camera 102 is a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera, however, other cameras that can process a laser image can be used.
- the total field-of-view of the camera is denoted ⁇ C and the total field-of view of the laser projector is denoted ⁇ L .
- the camera 102 and the projector 104 are co-boresighted and have an offset displacement denoted as r .
- the laser projector 104 emits a single, fixed pattern, described below, which is viewed by the camera 102.
- the laser projector 104 can have a very low duty cycle and is active for very short durations (i.e., nanoseconds) at a varying repetition rate.
- the image processor 106 interfaces to the camera's 102 readout integrated circuit (ROIC) 115 to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera 102.
- the image processor 106 is also capable of commanding the laser projector's 104 repetition rate and phasing relative to the camera's 102 exposure time.
- the image processor 106 also hosts a two-dimensional normalized cross-correlation algorithm, which attempts to register the images from the camera 102 as an expected pattern from the laser projector 104.
- Fig. 2 depicts the overall operation of the altimeter of Fig. 1 .
- a pseudo-random (but fixed or predetermined) pattern 120 is projected onto the ground by an infrared laser of the laser projector 104 and viewed by the camera 102.
- the shift of the pattern in space is measured and then mapped to height through triangulation.
- the altimeter 100 captures dynamic distance to the ground at the frame rate of the camera 102. Since the laser projector 104 and camera 102 are co-boresighted the projected pattern, as resolved on the ground, has the same resolution regardless of the height above the ground.
- the clarity of the pattern will degrade as the height increases due to distance-squared loss of laser energy and changes in the ground reflectivity as more of the ground surface is covered, but the pattern resolution scales with the camera's pixel resolution on the ground.
- Shown in Fig. 2 is an example of projected patterns 120, 122, 124 across one row (or column) of the camera's image (from - ⁇ L /2 to + ⁇ L /2) and sub-portions of imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 as seen by the camera (from - ⁇ C /2 to + ⁇ C /2).
- the resolution of the projected patterns 120, 122, 124 does not change, but which portion of the projected patterns 120, 122, 124 is seen by the camera 102 does, i.e., the imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 shift across the projected patterns 120, 122, 124.
- the imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 are cross-correlated with the expected projection patterns 120, 130, 140, to determine the correlation output peaks when the patterns align.
- a peak distance is determined at the point when the patterns align.
- the peak distance is defined as the distance from the center of the projected pattern to the center of the imaged pattern and is denoted p, as shown in Fig. 3 .
- a ranging triangle 150 (shown as a bold line in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 ) can be used to determine the altitude or height above the surface using the peak distance.
- the ranging triangle 150 includes a distance between a center point of the camera and the center of the laser projector lens r.
- the projected patterns 120, 130, 140 would be such that no sub-portion of the pattern correlates with any other sub-portion of the pattern.
- One such pattern is called a Maximum Length Sequence (MLS).
- MLS is pseudo-random sequence which has a sharp and strong auto-correlation peak when the patterns are aligned, but low auto-correlation everywhere else. Since a large number of samples (pixels) are used (across the entire length of the image), the resulting correlation peak can be resolved using a standard correlation method at a finer resolution than the camera's pixel ground sample distance (GSD).
- a two-dimensional MLS pattern can be projected to increase the number of samples in the correlation, making the system more robust to corruption in the projected pattern. Further, if a normalized cross-correlation algorithm is used, then the correlation angle is less sensitive to ambient light background variations across the image. Although because the system controls both the laser source timing and the exposure timing of the camera, the exposure can be made very short, reducing ambient levels in the resulting image, yet still capturing the laser energy.
- the projector's field-of-view is made larger than the camera's field-of-view ( ⁇ L > ⁇ C ) so that beyond a predefined distance (e.g., h 0 ), the projected pattern spans the entire image taken by the camera.
- a predefined distance e.g., h 0
- the cross-correlations at shorter distances will still work, the robustness and resolution of the correlation angle p will be degraded as only a portion of the image contains the projected pattern.
- a method for determining distance to a surface using the altimeter of Figs 1 and 2 includes projecting a pattern onto a surface from a laser projector, e.g., laser projector 104, and viewing the projected pattern using a camera, e.g., camera 102, to store an imaged pattern.
- the imaged pattern is cross-correlated with an expected pattern using an image processor, e.g., image processor 106, operatively connected to the laser projector and camera.
- an image processor e.g., image processor 106
- Based on the imaged pattern and the expected pattern a correlation peak is determined such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern.
- An optimal height above the surface can be calculated as a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Optical Radar Systems And Details Thereof (AREA)
- Studio Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present disclosure relates to altimetry, and more particularly to methods and systems for optical altimetry.
- Altitude above ground level (AGL) is an important consideration for all aspects of flight. For example, during critical phases of flight, many systems may need an indication of AGL altitude to perform properly. Further, AGL is important for weapon systems requiring an accurate, reliable and well-controlled burst height. One way to determine AGL is to use active radar altimeters which send a radar signal to the ground. However, traditional systems are expensive and require valuable space. Such conventional methods and systems have generally been considered satisfactory for their intended purpose. However, conventional AGL signals can potentially be distorted, intercepted, or the like, and may be inaccurate. As a result, there is still a need in the art for improved AGL altimeters. The present disclosure provides a solution for this need.
- An altimeter includes a laser projector for projecting a pattern onto a surface and a camera for viewing the projected pattern. An image processor is operatively connected to the laser projector and camera for determining distance to the surface based on cross-correlation of the projected and imaged patterns. The camera can be a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera. The projected pattern can be a pseudo-random, fixed pattern.
- The image processor can be configured to determine correlation peaks between the imaged pattern and the expected pattern when the patterns align. A peak distance can be defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern. A height above the surface can be a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.
- The laser projector and camera can be fixedly attached and co-boresighted such that resolution of the imaged pattern is scaleable to a resolution of the projected pattern. The image processor can be configured to control timing and repetition of the pattern emitted from the laser projector. The image processor can interface to a readout integrated circuit of the camera to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera.
- A method for determining distance to a surface includes projecting a pattern onto a surface from a laser projector and viewing the projected pattern using a camera to store an imaged pattern. The imaged pattern is cross-correlated with an expected pattern using an image processor operatively connected to the laser projector and camera.
- The method can further include determining a correlation peak between the imaged pattern and expected pattern such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern. An optimal height above the surface can be calculated as a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance. The method can further include controlling the repetition rate of the projected pattern and exposure of the camera with the image processor.
- These and other features of the systems and methods of the subject disclosure will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings.
- So that those skilled in the art to which the subject disclosure appertains will readily understand how to make and use the devices and methods of the subject disclosure without undue experimentation, preferred embodiments thereof will be described in detail herein below with reference to certain figures, wherein:
-
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of an altimeter constructed in accordance with the present disclosure, showing a camera and laser projector connected to an image processor; -
Fig. 2 is a schematic view of the altimeter ofFig. 1 , showing a projected image from the laser projector compared to an image viewed by the camera at different heights; and -
Fig. 3 is a schematic view of a ranging triangle, showing an optimal height as a relationship between a distance between correlation peaks of the projected and viewed image and a distance between the camera and laser projector ofFig. 1 . - Reference will now be made to the drawings wherein like reference numerals identify similar structural features or aspects of the subject disclosure. For purposes of explanation and illustration, and not limitation, a partial view of an exemplary embodiment of an altimeter in accordance with the disclosure is shown in
Fig. 1 and is designated generally byreference character 100. Other embodiments of the altimeter in accordance with the disclosure, or aspects thereof, are provided inFigs. 2-3 , as will be described. The systems and methods described herein can be used for altimetry, e.g., to exploit a weapon's seeker imaging capability to perform a height of burst (HoB) function. - The
altimeter 100 is depicted inFig. 1 and includes acamera 102, alaser projector 104, and animage processing system 106 operatively connected to both thecamera 102 and thelaser projector 104. Theprocessing system 106 processes images from thecamera 102 and controls the timing of thelaser projector 104. Thecamera 102 is a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera, however, other cameras that can process a laser image can be used. The total field-of-view of the camera is denoted θC and the total field-of view of the laser projector is denoted θL. Thecamera 102 and theprojector 104 are co-boresighted and have an offset displacement denoted as r. Thelaser projector 104 emits a single, fixed pattern, described below, which is viewed by thecamera 102. Thelaser projector 104 can have a very low duty cycle and is active for very short durations (i.e., nanoseconds) at a varying repetition rate. Theimage processor 106 interfaces to the camera's 102 readout integrated circuit (ROIC) 115 to control the exposure time and frame rate of thecamera 102. Theimage processor 106 is also capable of commanding the laser projector's 104 repetition rate and phasing relative to the camera's 102 exposure time. Theimage processor 106 also hosts a two-dimensional normalized cross-correlation algorithm, which attempts to register the images from thecamera 102 as an expected pattern from thelaser projector 104. -
Fig. 2 depicts the overall operation of the altimeter ofFig. 1 . Specifically, a pseudo-random (but fixed or predetermined)pattern 120 is projected onto the ground by an infrared laser of thelaser projector 104 and viewed by thecamera 102. The shift of the pattern in space is measured and then mapped to height through triangulation. Relying on this single-frame correspondence strategy, thealtimeter 100 captures dynamic distance to the ground at the frame rate of thecamera 102. Since thelaser projector 104 andcamera 102 are co-boresighted the projected pattern, as resolved on the ground, has the same resolution regardless of the height above the ground. The clarity of the pattern will degrade as the height increases due to distance-squared loss of laser energy and changes in the ground reflectivity as more of the ground surface is covered, but the pattern resolution scales with the camera's pixel resolution on the ground. - Shown in
Fig. 2 is an example of projected 120, 122, 124 across one row (or column) of the camera's image (from -θL/2 to +θL/2) and sub-portions ofpatterns 122, 132, 142 as seen by the camera (from -θC/2 to +θC/2). At different heights, e.g., h0, h1, h2, respectively, the resolution of the projectedimaged patterns 120, 122, 124 does not change, but which portion of the projectedpatterns 120, 122, 124 is seen by thepatterns camera 102 does, i.e., the 122, 132, 142 shift across theimaged patterns 120, 122, 124. Theprojected patterns 122, 132, 142 are cross-correlated with the expectedimaged patterns 120, 130, 140, to determine the correlation output peaks when the patterns align. A peak distance is determined at the point when the patterns align. The peak distance is defined as the distance from the center of the projected pattern to the center of the imaged pattern and is denoted p, as shown inprojection patterns Fig. 3 . A ranging triangle 150 (shown as a bold line inFig. 2 and Fig. 3 ) can be used to determine the altitude or height above the surface using the peak distance. The rangingtriangle 150 includes a distance between a center point of the camera and the center of the laser projector lens r. The altitude or height above the surface is determined based on a function between the centers and the peak distance, as shown in equation (1): - Ideally the projected
120, 130, 140 would be such that no sub-portion of the pattern correlates with any other sub-portion of the pattern. One such pattern is called a Maximum Length Sequence (MLS). An MLS is pseudo-random sequence which has a sharp and strong auto-correlation peak when the patterns are aligned, but low auto-correlation everywhere else. Since a large number of samples (pixels) are used (across the entire length of the image), the resulting correlation peak can be resolved using a standard correlation method at a finer resolution than the camera's pixel ground sample distance (GSD).patterns - A two-dimensional MLS pattern can be projected to increase the number of samples in the correlation, making the system more robust to corruption in the projected pattern. Further, if a normalized cross-correlation algorithm is used, then the correlation angle is less sensitive to ambient light background variations across the image. Although because the system controls both the laser source timing and the exposure timing of the camera, the exposure can be made very short, reducing ambient levels in the resulting image, yet still capturing the laser energy.
- The projector's field-of-view is made larger than the camera's field-of-view (θL > θC) so that beyond a predefined distance (e.g., h 0), the projected pattern spans the entire image taken by the camera. Although the cross-correlations at shorter distances will still work, the robustness and resolution of the correlation angle p will be degraded as only a portion of the image contains the projected pattern.
- A method for determining distance to a surface using the altimeter of
Figs 1 and2 includes projecting a pattern onto a surface from a laser projector, e.g.,laser projector 104, and viewing the projected pattern using a camera, e.g.,camera 102, to store an imaged pattern. The imaged pattern is cross-correlated with an expected pattern using an image processor, e.g.,image processor 106, operatively connected to the laser projector and camera. Based on the imaged pattern and the expected pattern a correlation peak is determined such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern. An optimal height above the surface can be calculated as a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance. - The methods and systems of the present disclosure, as described above and shown in the drawings, provide for an altimeter with superior properties including use of imagining capability. This, in-turn, makes the system more reliable as there would be fewer components susceptible to failure. While the apparatus and methods of the subject disclosure have been shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that changes and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the subject disclosure.
Claims (14)
- An altimeter (100) comprising:a laser projector (104) for projecting a pattern (120,130,140) onto a surface;a camera (102) for viewing the projected pattern (120,130,140); andan image processor (106) operatively connected to the laser projector (104) and camera (102) for determining distance to the surface based on cross-correlation of the projected and imaged patterns (120,130,140) (122,132,142).
- The altimeter of claim 1, wherein the camera (102) is a SWIR camera.
- The altimeter of claim 1 or 2, wherein the pattern (120,130,140) is a pseudo-random, fixed pattern.
- The altimeter of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the image processor (106) is configured to determine correlation peaks between the imaged pattern (122,132,142) and the expected pattern indicating when the patterns align.
- The altimeter of claim 4, wherein the image processor (106) is configured to define a peak distance between a center of the projected pattern (p) and a center of the imaged pattern (122,132,142).
- The altimeter of claim 5, wherein the image processor (106) is configured to determine height (h) above the surface as a function of a distance between the laser projector (104) and the camera (102) and the peak distance.
- The altimeter of any preceding claim, wherein the laser projector (104) and camera (102) are fixedly attached and co-boresighted such that resolution of the imaged pattern (122,132,142) is scaleable to a resolution of the projected pattern (120,130,140).
- The altimeter of any preceding claim, wherein the image processor (106) is configured to control timing and repetition of the pattern (120,130,140) emitted from the laser projector (104).
- The altimeter of claim 8, wherein the image processor (106) interfaces to a readout integrated circuit of the camera (102) to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera (102).
- A method for determining distance to a surface, the steps comprising:projecting a pattern (120,130,140) onto a surface from a laser projector (104);viewing the projected pattern (120,130,140) using a camera (102) and storing an imaged pattern (122,132,142); andcross-correlating the imaged pattern (122,132,142) with an expected pattern using an image processor (106) operatively connected to the laser projector (104) and camera (102).
- The method of claim 10, further comprising determining correlation peaks of the imaged pattern (122,132,142) and expected pattern such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern (122,132,142).
- The method of claim 11, further comprising calculating a height (h) above the surface as a function of a distance between the laser projector (104) and the camera (102) and the peak distance.
- The method of any of claims 10 to 12, further comprising controlling the repetition rate of the projected pattern (120,130,140) and exposure of the camera (102) with the image processor (106).
- The method of any of claims 10 to 13, wherein the camera (102) is a SWIR.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US14/665,294 US20160286141A1 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2015-03-23 | Altimeter using imaging capability |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3073222A1 true EP3073222A1 (en) | 2016-09-28 |
| EP3073222B1 EP3073222B1 (en) | 2022-05-04 |
Family
ID=55628848
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP16161910.1A Active EP3073222B1 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2016-03-23 | Altimeter using imaging capability |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20160286141A1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP3073222B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109470201A (en) * | 2017-09-07 | 2019-03-15 | 罗伯特·博世有限公司 | Method for operating a laser rangefinder |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPWO2018167999A1 (en) * | 2017-03-17 | 2020-01-16 | パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 | Projector and projector system |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3000256A (en) * | 1957-12-05 | 1961-09-19 | American Optical Corp | Optical height finders |
| US4948258A (en) * | 1988-06-27 | 1990-08-14 | Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Inc. | Structured illumination surface profiling and ranging systems and methods |
| US20130088575A1 (en) * | 2011-10-05 | 2013-04-11 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Method and apparatus for obtaining depth information using optical pattern |
Family Cites Families (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3721985A (en) * | 1970-06-22 | 1973-03-20 | Lear Siegler Inc | Navigational system |
| US5119444A (en) * | 1986-07-22 | 1992-06-02 | Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. | System for expedited computation of laplacian and gaussian filters and correlation of their outputs for image processing |
| DE3703904A1 (en) * | 1987-02-09 | 1988-08-25 | Breithaupt & Sohn F W | SENSOR WITH INTEGRATED SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR ONE TO THREE-DIMENSIONAL POSITIONING |
| FR2641871B1 (en) * | 1989-01-18 | 1991-07-26 | Telecommunications Sa | SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE POSITION OF AT LEAST ONE TARGET BY TRIANGULATION |
| JP3400485B2 (en) * | 1993-03-23 | 2003-04-28 | 株式会社ワコム | Optical position detecting device and optical coordinate input device |
| JP3619545B2 (en) * | 1994-08-23 | 2005-02-09 | オリンパス株式会社 | Camera ranging device |
| IL158245A0 (en) * | 2003-10-02 | 2004-08-31 | Opgal Ltd | A flir camera having fov vs. sensitivity control |
| US20050190988A1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2005-09-01 | Mass Institute Of Technology (Mit) | Passive positioning sensors |
| JP2012515899A (en) * | 2009-01-27 | 2012-07-12 | エックスワイゼッド・インタラクティヴ・テクノロジーズ・インコーポレーテッド | Method and apparatus for ranging detection, orientation determination, and / or positioning of a single device and / or multiple devices |
| US8583296B2 (en) * | 2011-05-21 | 2013-11-12 | University Of Kansas | Low-altitude altimeter and method |
| US9769461B2 (en) * | 2013-07-16 | 2017-09-19 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Adaptive structured light patterns |
| DK2866051T3 (en) * | 2013-10-23 | 2019-01-14 | Ladar Ltd | LASER DETECTION AND DISTANCE MEASURING DEVICE FOR DETECTING AN OBJECT UNDER A WATER SURFACE |
| US9734726B2 (en) * | 2014-02-17 | 2017-08-15 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for providing landing exceedance warnings and avoidance |
-
2015
- 2015-03-23 US US14/665,294 patent/US20160286141A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2016
- 2016-03-23 EP EP16161910.1A patent/EP3073222B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3000256A (en) * | 1957-12-05 | 1961-09-19 | American Optical Corp | Optical height finders |
| US4948258A (en) * | 1988-06-27 | 1990-08-14 | Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Inc. | Structured illumination surface profiling and ranging systems and methods |
| US20130088575A1 (en) * | 2011-10-05 | 2013-04-11 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Method and apparatus for obtaining depth information using optical pattern |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| LIEBE C C ET AL: "Three dimensional imaging utilizing structured light", AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2004. PROCEEDINGS. 2004 IEEE, IEEE, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA, vol. 4, 6 March 2004 (2004-03-06), pages 2647 - 2655, XP010748388, ISBN: 978-0-7803-8155-1, DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2004.1368060 * |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109470201A (en) * | 2017-09-07 | 2019-03-15 | 罗伯特·博世有限公司 | Method for operating a laser rangefinder |
| CN109470201B (en) * | 2017-09-07 | 2022-05-27 | 罗伯特·博世有限公司 | Method for operating a hand-held laser distance measuring device and hand-held laser distance measuring device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP3073222B1 (en) | 2022-05-04 |
| US20160286141A1 (en) | 2016-09-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10048356B2 (en) | Distance measuring system and imaging sensor | |
| US10916023B2 (en) | Depth measurement assembly with a structured light source and a time of flight camera | |
| EP3715907B1 (en) | Methods and apparatuses for compensating light reflections from a cover of a time-of-flight camera | |
| EP3640892B1 (en) | Image calibration method and device applied to three-dimensional camera | |
| US9194953B2 (en) | 3D time-of-light camera and method | |
| US9835718B2 (en) | Range finder and optical device | |
| US9612115B2 (en) | Target-correlated electronic rangefinder | |
| US20080018880A1 (en) | Surveying apparatus | |
| US10989605B2 (en) | Streak camera calibration | |
| US11178332B2 (en) | Digital boresighting laser range finder to imaging device | |
| US20150062302A1 (en) | Measurement device, measurement method, and computer program product | |
| US12529796B2 (en) | Object detection device and object detection method | |
| CN112740065A (en) | Enhanced depth mapping using visual inertial ranging | |
| EP3073222B1 (en) | Altimeter using imaging capability | |
| JP2019078682A (en) | Laser distance measuring device, laser distance measuring method, and position adjustment program | |
| US11686828B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for compensating stray light caused by an object in a scene that is sensed by a time-of-flight camera | |
| US8179431B2 (en) | Compound eye photographing apparatus, control method therefor, and program | |
| EP3552044B1 (en) | Time-of-flight imaging apparatus and method | |
| US20010022653A1 (en) | Three-dimensional image capturing device | |
| JP2018040929A5 (en) | ||
| CN112014858A (en) | Distance image generating device for correcting distance measurement abnormality | |
| US10733749B2 (en) | Vehicle vicinity supervising device and vicinity supervising method | |
| JP2022118809A (en) | Three-dimensional measuring device, three-dimensional measuring method, three-dimensional measuring program | |
| US20240377515A1 (en) | Imaging unit and imaging method | |
| US20250020784A1 (en) | Method and device for visualising impacts of laser pulses on a target |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170328 |
|
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20201214 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 602016071667 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G01C0003260000 Ipc: G01C0005000000 |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G01S 17/46 20060101ALI20210831BHEP Ipc: G01C 5/00 20060101AFI20210831BHEP |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20211019 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1489496 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20220515 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602016071667 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1489496 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220905 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220804 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220805 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220804 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220904 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602016071667 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20230207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20230331 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230323 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230331 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230323 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230331 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230331 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20160323 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20160323 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220504 |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Free format text: CASE NUMBER: UPC_APP_0016836_3073222/2025 Effective date: 20251210 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20260220 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20260219 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20260219 Year of fee payment: 11 |