EP3073222A1 - Altimeter using imaging capability - Google Patents

Altimeter using imaging capability Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3073222A1
EP3073222A1 EP16161910.1A EP16161910A EP3073222A1 EP 3073222 A1 EP3073222 A1 EP 3073222A1 EP 16161910 A EP16161910 A EP 16161910A EP 3073222 A1 EP3073222 A1 EP 3073222A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pattern
camera
altimeter
laser projector
projected
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16161910.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3073222B1 (en
Inventor
Todd A. Ell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rosemount Aerospace Inc
Original Assignee
Rosemount Aerospace Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rosemount Aerospace Inc filed Critical Rosemount Aerospace Inc
Publication of EP3073222A1 publication Critical patent/EP3073222A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3073222B1 publication Critical patent/EP3073222B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C5/00Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels
    • G01C5/005Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels altimeters for aircraft
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C5/00Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C3/00Measuring distances in line of sight; Optical rangefinders
    • G01C3/02Details
    • G01C3/06Use of electric means to obtain final indication
    • G01C3/08Use of electric radiation detectors
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C3/00Measuring distances in line of sight; Optical rangefinders
    • G01C3/26Measuring distances in line of sight; Optical rangefinders using a parallactic triangle with fixed angles and a base of variable length, at, near, or formed by the object
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S17/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
    • G01S17/02Systems using the reflection of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
    • G01S17/06Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S17/46Indirect determination of position data
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N23/00Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof
    • H04N23/20Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof for generating image signals from infrared radiation only
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N23/00Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof
    • H04N23/56Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof provided with illuminating means

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to altimetry, and more particularly to methods and systems for optical altimetry.
  • Altitude above ground level is an important consideration for all aspects of flight. For example, during critical phases of flight, many systems may need an indication of AGL altitude to perform properly. Further, AGL is important for weapon systems requiring an accurate, reliable and well-controlled burst height.
  • One way to determine AGL is to use active radar altimeters which send a radar signal to the ground.
  • active radar altimeters which send a radar signal to the ground.
  • traditional systems are expensive and require valuable space.
  • Such conventional methods and systems have generally been considered satisfactory for their intended purpose.
  • conventional AGL signals can potentially be distorted, intercepted, or the like, and may be inaccurate. As a result, there is still a need in the art for improved AGL altimeters.
  • the present disclosure provides a solution for this need.
  • An altimeter includes a laser projector for projecting a pattern onto a surface and a camera for viewing the projected pattern.
  • An image processor is operatively connected to the laser projector and camera for determining distance to the surface based on cross-correlation of the projected and imaged patterns.
  • the camera can be a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera.
  • the projected pattern can be a pseudo-random, fixed pattern.
  • the image processor can be configured to determine correlation peaks between the imaged pattern and the expected pattern when the patterns align.
  • a peak distance can be defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern.
  • a height above the surface can be a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.
  • the laser projector and camera can be fixedly attached and co-boresighted such that resolution of the imaged pattern is scaleable to a resolution of the projected pattern.
  • the image processor can be configured to control timing and repetition of the pattern emitted from the laser projector.
  • the image processor can interface to a readout integrated circuit of the camera to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera.
  • a method for determining distance to a surface includes projecting a pattern onto a surface from a laser projector and viewing the projected pattern using a camera to store an imaged pattern.
  • the imaged pattern is cross-correlated with an expected pattern using an image processor operatively connected to the laser projector and camera.
  • the method can further include determining a correlation peak between the imaged pattern and expected pattern such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern.
  • An optimal height above the surface can be calculated as a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.
  • the method can further include controlling the repetition rate of the projected pattern and exposure of the camera with the image processor.
  • Fig. 1 a partial view of an exemplary embodiment of an altimeter in accordance with the disclosure is shown in Fig. 1 and is designated generally by reference character 100.
  • the systems and methods described herein can be used for altimetry, e.g., to exploit a weapon's seeker imaging capability to perform a height of burst (HoB) function.
  • HoB burst
  • the altimeter 100 is depicted in Fig. 1 and includes a camera 102, a laser projector 104, and an image processing system 106 operatively connected to both the camera 102 and the laser projector 104.
  • the processing system 106 processes images from the camera 102 and controls the timing of the laser projector 104.
  • the camera 102 is a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera, however, other cameras that can process a laser image can be used.
  • the total field-of-view of the camera is denoted ⁇ C and the total field-of view of the laser projector is denoted ⁇ L .
  • the camera 102 and the projector 104 are co-boresighted and have an offset displacement denoted as r .
  • the laser projector 104 emits a single, fixed pattern, described below, which is viewed by the camera 102.
  • the laser projector 104 can have a very low duty cycle and is active for very short durations (i.e., nanoseconds) at a varying repetition rate.
  • the image processor 106 interfaces to the camera's 102 readout integrated circuit (ROIC) 115 to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera 102.
  • the image processor 106 is also capable of commanding the laser projector's 104 repetition rate and phasing relative to the camera's 102 exposure time.
  • the image processor 106 also hosts a two-dimensional normalized cross-correlation algorithm, which attempts to register the images from the camera 102 as an expected pattern from the laser projector 104.
  • Fig. 2 depicts the overall operation of the altimeter of Fig. 1 .
  • a pseudo-random (but fixed or predetermined) pattern 120 is projected onto the ground by an infrared laser of the laser projector 104 and viewed by the camera 102.
  • the shift of the pattern in space is measured and then mapped to height through triangulation.
  • the altimeter 100 captures dynamic distance to the ground at the frame rate of the camera 102. Since the laser projector 104 and camera 102 are co-boresighted the projected pattern, as resolved on the ground, has the same resolution regardless of the height above the ground.
  • the clarity of the pattern will degrade as the height increases due to distance-squared loss of laser energy and changes in the ground reflectivity as more of the ground surface is covered, but the pattern resolution scales with the camera's pixel resolution on the ground.
  • Shown in Fig. 2 is an example of projected patterns 120, 122, 124 across one row (or column) of the camera's image (from - ⁇ L /2 to + ⁇ L /2) and sub-portions of imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 as seen by the camera (from - ⁇ C /2 to + ⁇ C /2).
  • the resolution of the projected patterns 120, 122, 124 does not change, but which portion of the projected patterns 120, 122, 124 is seen by the camera 102 does, i.e., the imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 shift across the projected patterns 120, 122, 124.
  • the imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 are cross-correlated with the expected projection patterns 120, 130, 140, to determine the correlation output peaks when the patterns align.
  • a peak distance is determined at the point when the patterns align.
  • the peak distance is defined as the distance from the center of the projected pattern to the center of the imaged pattern and is denoted p, as shown in Fig. 3 .
  • a ranging triangle 150 (shown as a bold line in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 ) can be used to determine the altitude or height above the surface using the peak distance.
  • the ranging triangle 150 includes a distance between a center point of the camera and the center of the laser projector lens r.
  • the projected patterns 120, 130, 140 would be such that no sub-portion of the pattern correlates with any other sub-portion of the pattern.
  • One such pattern is called a Maximum Length Sequence (MLS).
  • MLS is pseudo-random sequence which has a sharp and strong auto-correlation peak when the patterns are aligned, but low auto-correlation everywhere else. Since a large number of samples (pixels) are used (across the entire length of the image), the resulting correlation peak can be resolved using a standard correlation method at a finer resolution than the camera's pixel ground sample distance (GSD).
  • a two-dimensional MLS pattern can be projected to increase the number of samples in the correlation, making the system more robust to corruption in the projected pattern. Further, if a normalized cross-correlation algorithm is used, then the correlation angle is less sensitive to ambient light background variations across the image. Although because the system controls both the laser source timing and the exposure timing of the camera, the exposure can be made very short, reducing ambient levels in the resulting image, yet still capturing the laser energy.
  • the projector's field-of-view is made larger than the camera's field-of-view ( ⁇ L > ⁇ C ) so that beyond a predefined distance (e.g., h 0 ), the projected pattern spans the entire image taken by the camera.
  • a predefined distance e.g., h 0
  • the cross-correlations at shorter distances will still work, the robustness and resolution of the correlation angle p will be degraded as only a portion of the image contains the projected pattern.
  • a method for determining distance to a surface using the altimeter of Figs 1 and 2 includes projecting a pattern onto a surface from a laser projector, e.g., laser projector 104, and viewing the projected pattern using a camera, e.g., camera 102, to store an imaged pattern.
  • the imaged pattern is cross-correlated with an expected pattern using an image processor, e.g., image processor 106, operatively connected to the laser projector and camera.
  • an image processor e.g., image processor 106
  • Based on the imaged pattern and the expected pattern a correlation peak is determined such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern.
  • An optimal height above the surface can be calculated as a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Optical Radar Systems And Details Thereof (AREA)
  • Studio Devices (AREA)

Abstract

An altimeter (100) includes a laser projector (104) for projecting a pattern onto a surface and a camera (102) for viewing the projected pattern. An image processor (106) is operatively connected to the laser projector (104) and camera (102) for determining distance to the surface based on cross-correlation of the projected and imaged patterns. The camera can be a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera (102). The projected pattern can be a pseudo-random, fixed pattern.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present disclosure relates to altimetry, and more particularly to methods and systems for optical altimetry.
  • 2. Description of Related Art
  • Altitude above ground level (AGL) is an important consideration for all aspects of flight. For example, during critical phases of flight, many systems may need an indication of AGL altitude to perform properly. Further, AGL is important for weapon systems requiring an accurate, reliable and well-controlled burst height. One way to determine AGL is to use active radar altimeters which send a radar signal to the ground. However, traditional systems are expensive and require valuable space. Such conventional methods and systems have generally been considered satisfactory for their intended purpose. However, conventional AGL signals can potentially be distorted, intercepted, or the like, and may be inaccurate. As a result, there is still a need in the art for improved AGL altimeters. The present disclosure provides a solution for this need.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • An altimeter includes a laser projector for projecting a pattern onto a surface and a camera for viewing the projected pattern. An image processor is operatively connected to the laser projector and camera for determining distance to the surface based on cross-correlation of the projected and imaged patterns. The camera can be a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera. The projected pattern can be a pseudo-random, fixed pattern.
  • The image processor can be configured to determine correlation peaks between the imaged pattern and the expected pattern when the patterns align. A peak distance can be defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern. A height above the surface can be a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.
  • The laser projector and camera can be fixedly attached and co-boresighted such that resolution of the imaged pattern is scaleable to a resolution of the projected pattern. The image processor can be configured to control timing and repetition of the pattern emitted from the laser projector. The image processor can interface to a readout integrated circuit of the camera to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera.
  • A method for determining distance to a surface includes projecting a pattern onto a surface from a laser projector and viewing the projected pattern using a camera to store an imaged pattern. The imaged pattern is cross-correlated with an expected pattern using an image processor operatively connected to the laser projector and camera.
  • The method can further include determining a correlation peak between the imaged pattern and expected pattern such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern. An optimal height above the surface can be calculated as a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance. The method can further include controlling the repetition rate of the projected pattern and exposure of the camera with the image processor.
  • These and other features of the systems and methods of the subject disclosure will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • So that those skilled in the art to which the subject disclosure appertains will readily understand how to make and use the devices and methods of the subject disclosure without undue experimentation, preferred embodiments thereof will be described in detail herein below with reference to certain figures, wherein:
    • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of an altimeter constructed in accordance with the present disclosure, showing a camera and laser projector connected to an image processor;
    • Fig. 2 is a schematic view of the altimeter of Fig. 1, showing a projected image from the laser projector compared to an image viewed by the camera at different heights; and
    • Fig. 3 is a schematic view of a ranging triangle, showing an optimal height as a relationship between a distance between correlation peaks of the projected and viewed image and a distance between the camera and laser projector of Fig. 1.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Reference will now be made to the drawings wherein like reference numerals identify similar structural features or aspects of the subject disclosure. For purposes of explanation and illustration, and not limitation, a partial view of an exemplary embodiment of an altimeter in accordance with the disclosure is shown in Fig. 1 and is designated generally by reference character 100. Other embodiments of the altimeter in accordance with the disclosure, or aspects thereof, are provided in Figs. 2-3, as will be described. The systems and methods described herein can be used for altimetry, e.g., to exploit a weapon's seeker imaging capability to perform a height of burst (HoB) function.
  • The altimeter 100 is depicted in Fig. 1 and includes a camera 102, a laser projector 104, and an image processing system 106 operatively connected to both the camera 102 and the laser projector 104. The processing system 106 processes images from the camera 102 and controls the timing of the laser projector 104. The camera 102 is a short wave infrared (SWIR) camera, however, other cameras that can process a laser image can be used. The total field-of-view of the camera is denoted θC and the total field-of view of the laser projector is denoted θL. The camera 102 and the projector 104 are co-boresighted and have an offset displacement denoted as r. The laser projector 104 emits a single, fixed pattern, described below, which is viewed by the camera 102. The laser projector 104 can have a very low duty cycle and is active for very short durations (i.e., nanoseconds) at a varying repetition rate. The image processor 106 interfaces to the camera's 102 readout integrated circuit (ROIC) 115 to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera 102. The image processor 106 is also capable of commanding the laser projector's 104 repetition rate and phasing relative to the camera's 102 exposure time. The image processor 106 also hosts a two-dimensional normalized cross-correlation algorithm, which attempts to register the images from the camera 102 as an expected pattern from the laser projector 104.
  • Fig. 2 depicts the overall operation of the altimeter of Fig. 1. Specifically, a pseudo-random (but fixed or predetermined) pattern 120 is projected onto the ground by an infrared laser of the laser projector 104 and viewed by the camera 102. The shift of the pattern in space is measured and then mapped to height through triangulation. Relying on this single-frame correspondence strategy, the altimeter 100 captures dynamic distance to the ground at the frame rate of the camera 102. Since the laser projector 104 and camera 102 are co-boresighted the projected pattern, as resolved on the ground, has the same resolution regardless of the height above the ground. The clarity of the pattern will degrade as the height increases due to distance-squared loss of laser energy and changes in the ground reflectivity as more of the ground surface is covered, but the pattern resolution scales with the camera's pixel resolution on the ground.
  • Shown in Fig. 2 is an example of projected patterns 120, 122, 124 across one row (or column) of the camera's image (from -θL/2 to +θL/2) and sub-portions of imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 as seen by the camera (from -θC/2 to +θC/2). At different heights, e.g., h0, h1, h2, respectively, the resolution of the projected patterns 120, 122, 124 does not change, but which portion of the projected patterns 120, 122, 124 is seen by the camera 102 does, i.e., the imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 shift across the projected patterns 120, 122, 124. The imaged patterns 122, 132, 142 are cross-correlated with the expected projection patterns 120, 130, 140, to determine the correlation output peaks when the patterns align. A peak distance is determined at the point when the patterns align. The peak distance is defined as the distance from the center of the projected pattern to the center of the imaged pattern and is denoted p, as shown in Fig. 3. A ranging triangle 150 (shown as a bold line in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3) can be used to determine the altitude or height above the surface using the peak distance. The ranging triangle 150 includes a distance between a center point of the camera and the center of the laser projector lens r. The altitude or height above the surface is determined based on a function between the centers and the peak distance, as shown in equation (1): h = r tan p
    Figure imgb0001
  • Ideally the projected patterns 120, 130, 140 would be such that no sub-portion of the pattern correlates with any other sub-portion of the pattern. One such pattern is called a Maximum Length Sequence (MLS). An MLS is pseudo-random sequence which has a sharp and strong auto-correlation peak when the patterns are aligned, but low auto-correlation everywhere else. Since a large number of samples (pixels) are used (across the entire length of the image), the resulting correlation peak can be resolved using a standard correlation method at a finer resolution than the camera's pixel ground sample distance (GSD).
  • A two-dimensional MLS pattern can be projected to increase the number of samples in the correlation, making the system more robust to corruption in the projected pattern. Further, if a normalized cross-correlation algorithm is used, then the correlation angle is less sensitive to ambient light background variations across the image. Although because the system controls both the laser source timing and the exposure timing of the camera, the exposure can be made very short, reducing ambient levels in the resulting image, yet still capturing the laser energy.
  • The projector's field-of-view is made larger than the camera's field-of-view (θL > θC) so that beyond a predefined distance (e.g., h 0), the projected pattern spans the entire image taken by the camera. Although the cross-correlations at shorter distances will still work, the robustness and resolution of the correlation angle p will be degraded as only a portion of the image contains the projected pattern.
  • A method for determining distance to a surface using the altimeter of Figs 1 and 2 includes projecting a pattern onto a surface from a laser projector, e.g., laser projector 104, and viewing the projected pattern using a camera, e.g., camera 102, to store an imaged pattern. The imaged pattern is cross-correlated with an expected pattern using an image processor, e.g., image processor 106, operatively connected to the laser projector and camera. Based on the imaged pattern and the expected pattern a correlation peak is determined such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern. An optimal height above the surface can be calculated as a function of a distance between the laser projector and the camera and the peak distance.
  • The methods and systems of the present disclosure, as described above and shown in the drawings, provide for an altimeter with superior properties including use of imagining capability. This, in-turn, makes the system more reliable as there would be fewer components susceptible to failure. While the apparatus and methods of the subject disclosure have been shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that changes and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the subject disclosure.

Claims (14)

  1. An altimeter (100) comprising:
    a laser projector (104) for projecting a pattern (120,130,140) onto a surface;
    a camera (102) for viewing the projected pattern (120,130,140); and
    an image processor (106) operatively connected to the laser projector (104) and camera (102) for determining distance to the surface based on cross-correlation of the projected and imaged patterns (120,130,140) (122,132,142).
  2. The altimeter of claim 1, wherein the camera (102) is a SWIR camera.
  3. The altimeter of claim 1 or 2, wherein the pattern (120,130,140) is a pseudo-random, fixed pattern.
  4. The altimeter of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the image processor (106) is configured to determine correlation peaks between the imaged pattern (122,132,142) and the expected pattern indicating when the patterns align.
  5. The altimeter of claim 4, wherein the image processor (106) is configured to define a peak distance between a center of the projected pattern (p) and a center of the imaged pattern (122,132,142).
  6. The altimeter of claim 5, wherein the image processor (106) is configured to determine height (h) above the surface as a function of a distance between the laser projector (104) and the camera (102) and the peak distance.
  7. The altimeter of any preceding claim, wherein the laser projector (104) and camera (102) are fixedly attached and co-boresighted such that resolution of the imaged pattern (122,132,142) is scaleable to a resolution of the projected pattern (120,130,140).
  8. The altimeter of any preceding claim, wherein the image processor (106) is configured to control timing and repetition of the pattern (120,130,140) emitted from the laser projector (104).
  9. The altimeter of claim 8, wherein the image processor (106) interfaces to a readout integrated circuit of the camera (102) to control the exposure time and frame rate of the camera (102).
  10. A method for determining distance to a surface, the steps comprising:
    projecting a pattern (120,130,140) onto a surface from a laser projector (104);
    viewing the projected pattern (120,130,140) using a camera (102) and storing an imaged pattern (122,132,142); and
    cross-correlating the imaged pattern (122,132,142) with an expected pattern using an image processor (106) operatively connected to the laser projector (104) and camera (102).
  11. The method of claim 10, further comprising determining correlation peaks of the imaged pattern (122,132,142) and expected pattern such that a peak distance is defined between a center of the projected pattern and a center of the imaged pattern (122,132,142).
  12. The method of claim 11, further comprising calculating a height (h) above the surface as a function of a distance between the laser projector (104) and the camera (102) and the peak distance.
  13. The method of any of claims 10 to 12, further comprising controlling the repetition rate of the projected pattern (120,130,140) and exposure of the camera (102) with the image processor (106).
  14. The method of any of claims 10 to 13, wherein the camera (102) is a SWIR.
EP16161910.1A 2015-03-23 2016-03-23 Altimeter using imaging capability Active EP3073222B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/665,294 US20160286141A1 (en) 2015-03-23 2015-03-23 Altimeter using imaging capability

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3073222A1 true EP3073222A1 (en) 2016-09-28
EP3073222B1 EP3073222B1 (en) 2022-05-04

Family

ID=55628848

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16161910.1A Active EP3073222B1 (en) 2015-03-23 2016-03-23 Altimeter using imaging capability

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20160286141A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3073222B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109470201A (en) * 2017-09-07 2019-03-15 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Method for operating a laser rangefinder

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPWO2018167999A1 (en) * 2017-03-17 2020-01-16 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Projector and projector system

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3000256A (en) * 1957-12-05 1961-09-19 American Optical Corp Optical height finders
US4948258A (en) * 1988-06-27 1990-08-14 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Inc. Structured illumination surface profiling and ranging systems and methods
US20130088575A1 (en) * 2011-10-05 2013-04-11 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method and apparatus for obtaining depth information using optical pattern

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3721985A (en) * 1970-06-22 1973-03-20 Lear Siegler Inc Navigational system
US5119444A (en) * 1986-07-22 1992-06-02 Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. System for expedited computation of laplacian and gaussian filters and correlation of their outputs for image processing
DE3703904A1 (en) * 1987-02-09 1988-08-25 Breithaupt & Sohn F W SENSOR WITH INTEGRATED SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR ONE TO THREE-DIMENSIONAL POSITIONING
FR2641871B1 (en) * 1989-01-18 1991-07-26 Telecommunications Sa SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE POSITION OF AT LEAST ONE TARGET BY TRIANGULATION
JP3400485B2 (en) * 1993-03-23 2003-04-28 株式会社ワコム Optical position detecting device and optical coordinate input device
JP3619545B2 (en) * 1994-08-23 2005-02-09 オリンパス株式会社 Camera ranging device
IL158245A0 (en) * 2003-10-02 2004-08-31 Opgal Ltd A flir camera having fov vs. sensitivity control
US20050190988A1 (en) * 2004-03-01 2005-09-01 Mass Institute Of Technology (Mit) Passive positioning sensors
JP2012515899A (en) * 2009-01-27 2012-07-12 エックスワイゼッド・インタラクティヴ・テクノロジーズ・インコーポレーテッド Method and apparatus for ranging detection, orientation determination, and / or positioning of a single device and / or multiple devices
US8583296B2 (en) * 2011-05-21 2013-11-12 University Of Kansas Low-altitude altimeter and method
US9769461B2 (en) * 2013-07-16 2017-09-19 Texas Instruments Incorporated Adaptive structured light patterns
DK2866051T3 (en) * 2013-10-23 2019-01-14 Ladar Ltd LASER DETECTION AND DISTANCE MEASURING DEVICE FOR DETECTING AN OBJECT UNDER A WATER SURFACE
US9734726B2 (en) * 2014-02-17 2017-08-15 The Boeing Company Systems and methods for providing landing exceedance warnings and avoidance

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3000256A (en) * 1957-12-05 1961-09-19 American Optical Corp Optical height finders
US4948258A (en) * 1988-06-27 1990-08-14 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Inc. Structured illumination surface profiling and ranging systems and methods
US20130088575A1 (en) * 2011-10-05 2013-04-11 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method and apparatus for obtaining depth information using optical pattern

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
LIEBE C C ET AL: "Three dimensional imaging utilizing structured light", AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2004. PROCEEDINGS. 2004 IEEE, IEEE, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA, vol. 4, 6 March 2004 (2004-03-06), pages 2647 - 2655, XP010748388, ISBN: 978-0-7803-8155-1, DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2004.1368060 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109470201A (en) * 2017-09-07 2019-03-15 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Method for operating a laser rangefinder
CN109470201B (en) * 2017-09-07 2022-05-27 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Method for operating a hand-held laser distance measuring device and hand-held laser distance measuring device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3073222B1 (en) 2022-05-04
US20160286141A1 (en) 2016-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10048356B2 (en) Distance measuring system and imaging sensor
US10916023B2 (en) Depth measurement assembly with a structured light source and a time of flight camera
EP3715907B1 (en) Methods and apparatuses for compensating light reflections from a cover of a time-of-flight camera
EP3640892B1 (en) Image calibration method and device applied to three-dimensional camera
US9194953B2 (en) 3D time-of-light camera and method
US9835718B2 (en) Range finder and optical device
US9612115B2 (en) Target-correlated electronic rangefinder
US20080018880A1 (en) Surveying apparatus
US10989605B2 (en) Streak camera calibration
US11178332B2 (en) Digital boresighting laser range finder to imaging device
US20150062302A1 (en) Measurement device, measurement method, and computer program product
US12529796B2 (en) Object detection device and object detection method
CN112740065A (en) Enhanced depth mapping using visual inertial ranging
EP3073222B1 (en) Altimeter using imaging capability
JP2019078682A (en) Laser distance measuring device, laser distance measuring method, and position adjustment program
US11686828B2 (en) Method and apparatus for compensating stray light caused by an object in a scene that is sensed by a time-of-flight camera
US8179431B2 (en) Compound eye photographing apparatus, control method therefor, and program
EP3552044B1 (en) Time-of-flight imaging apparatus and method
US20010022653A1 (en) Three-dimensional image capturing device
JP2018040929A5 (en)
CN112014858A (en) Distance image generating device for correcting distance measurement abnormality
US10733749B2 (en) Vehicle vicinity supervising device and vicinity supervising method
JP2022118809A (en) Three-dimensional measuring device, three-dimensional measuring method, three-dimensional measuring program
US20240377515A1 (en) Imaging unit and imaging method
US20250020784A1 (en) Method and device for visualising impacts of laser pulses on a target

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170328

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20201214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602016071667

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G01C0003260000

Ipc: G01C0005000000

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G01S 17/46 20060101ALI20210831BHEP

Ipc: G01C 5/00 20060101AFI20210831BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20211019

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1489496

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016071667

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20220504

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1489496

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220905

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220804

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220805

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220804

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220904

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016071667

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20230207

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20230331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230323

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230331

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230323

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160323

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160323

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Free format text: CASE NUMBER: UPC_APP_0016836_3073222/2025

Effective date: 20251210

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20260220

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20260219

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20260219

Year of fee payment: 11