EP2891211A1 - Radome attachment band clamp - Google Patents
Radome attachment band clampInfo
- Publication number
- EP2891211A1 EP2891211A1 EP13833558.3A EP13833558A EP2891211A1 EP 2891211 A1 EP2891211 A1 EP 2891211A1 EP 13833558 A EP13833558 A EP 13833558A EP 2891211 A1 EP2891211 A1 EP 2891211A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- band clamp
- reflector dish
- band
- lip
- reflector
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
- H01Q1/42—Housings not intimately mechanically associated with radiating elements, e.g. radome
- H01Q1/421—Means for correcting aberrations introduced by a radome
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
- H01Q1/42—Housings not intimately mechanically associated with radiating elements, e.g. radome
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q19/00—Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic
- H01Q19/02—Details
- H01Q19/021—Means for reducing undesirable effects
- H01Q19/022—Means for reducing undesirable effects for reducing the edge scattering of reflectors
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q19/00—Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic
- H01Q19/10—Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces
- H01Q19/12—Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces wherein the surfaces are concave
Definitions
- This invention relates to microwave reflector antennas. More particularly, the invention relates to a reflector antenna with a radome and reflector dish interconnection band clamp which enhances signal pattern and mechanical interconnection characteristics.
- the open end of a reflector antenna is typically enclosed by a radome coupled to the distal end of the reflector dish.
- the radome provides environmental protection and improves wind load characteristics of the antenna.
- Edges and/or channel paths of the reflector dish, radome and/or interconnection hardware may diffract or enable spill-over of signal energy present in these areas, introducing undesirable backlobes into the reflector antenna signal pattern quantified as the front to back ratio (F/B) of the antenna.
- the F/B is regulated by international standards, and is specified by for example, the FCC in 47 CFR Ch.1 Part 101 .1 15 in the United States, by ETSI in EN302217-4-1 and EN302217-4-12 in Europe, and by ACMA RALI FX 3 Appendix 1 1 in Australia.
- Prior antenna signal pattern backlobe suppression techniques include adding a backlobe suppression ring to the radome, for example via metalizing of the radome periphery as disclosed in commonly owned US Utility Patent No. 7,138,958, titled "Reflector Antenna Radome with Backlobe Suppressor Ring and Method of
- the required metalizing operations may increase manufacturing complexity and/or cost, including elaborate coupling arrangements configured to securely retain the shroud upon the reflector dish without presenting undesired reflection edges, signal leakage paths and/or extending the overall size of the radome.
- the thin metalized ring layer applied to the periphery of the radome may be fragile, requiring increased care to avoid damage during delivery and/or installation.
- Reflectors employing castellated edge geometries to generate constructive interference of the edge diffraction components have also been shown to improve the F/B, for example as disclosed in commonly owned Canada Patent No. CA887303 "Backlobe Reduction in Reflector-Type Antennas" by Holtum et al.
- Such arrangements increase the overall diameter of the antenna, which may complicate radome attachment, packaging and installation.
- the addition of a shroud to a reflector antenna improves the signal pattern generally as a function of the shroud length, but also similarly introduces significant costs as the increasing length of the shroud also increases wind loading of the reflector antenna, requiring a corresponding increase in the antenna and antenna support structure strength.
- an interconnection between the shroud and a radome may introduce significant F/B degradation.
- a conventional band clamp 1 applied to retain a radome 3 upon the reflector dish 7 or shroud may introduce diffraction edges and/or signal leakage paths, for example as shown in Figure 1 .
- Metal taping, RF gaskets or the like may be applied to reduce F/B degradation resulting from band clamp use.
- these materials and procedures increase manufacturing costs and/or installation complexity and may be of limited long- term reliability.
- Figure 1 is a schematic enlarged cut-away side view of a conventional prior art band clamp radome and reflector dish interconnection, demonstrating an RF signal leakage path.
- Figure 2 is a schematic isometric cut-away view of a reflector antenna with radome to reflector dish band clamp interconnection.
- Figure 3 is a schematic partial cut-away side view of a radome to reflector dish band clamp interconnection.
- Figure 4 is an enlarged cut-away side view of a first exemplary radome to reflector dish band clamp interconnection.
- Figure 5 is a graph illustrating a range of exemplary band clamp distal lip inner diameter to reflector dish aperture ratios and their effect upon corresponding reflector antenna F/B over a range of operating frequencies.
- Figure 6 is a graph illustrating a range of band clamp widths and their effect upon corresponding reflector antenna F/B.
- Figure 7 is a graph comparing measured co-polar F/B performance related to RF signal leakage between conventional band clamp and presently disclosed "new" band clamp configurations.
- Figure 8 is a graph comparing measured cross-polar F/B performance related to RF signal leakage between conventional band clamp and presently disclosed "new" band clamp configurations.
- Figure 9 is a graph of measured co-polar radiation patterns of a 0.6m reflector antenna with a band clamp with a 1 .1 wavelength width.
- Figure 10 is a graph of measured cross-polar radiation patterns of a 0.6m reflector antenna with a band clamp with a 1 .1 wavelength width.
- Figure 1 1 is an enlarged cut-away side view of a second exemplary radome to reflector dish band clamp interconnection.
- Figure 12 is an enlarged cut-away side view of a third exemplary radome to reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring.
- Figure 13 is a graph comparing predicted F/B enhancement with a band clamp of width of 0.5 and 1 .2 wavelengths.
- Figure 14 is a graph of measured co-polar radiation patterns for a reflector antenna with a band clamp with a 0.5 wavelength width.
- Figure 15 is a graph of measured cross-polar radiation patterns for a reflector antenna with a band clamp with a 0.5 wavelength width.
- Figure 16 is a graph of measured co-polar radiation patterns for a reflector antenna with a band clamp with a 1 .2 wavelength width.
- Figure 17 is a graph of measured cross-polar radiation patterns for a reflector antenna with a band clamp with a 1 .2 wavelength width.
- Figure 18 is an enlarged cut-away side view of a third exemplary radome to reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with radial outward bend.
- Figure 19 is a graph comparing predicted F/B enhancement with a band clamp with a width ring configuration of between 0 and 60 degrees radial outward bend.
- Figure 20 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion aligned parallel to a longitudinal axis of the reflector dish.
- Figure 21 is an isometric view of a section of the band clamp of Figure 20.
- Figure 22 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion angled at 60 degrees with respect to a longitudinal axis of the reflector dish.
- Figure 23 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 22.
- Figure 24 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion angled at 60 degrees with respect to a longitudinal axis of the reflector dish, demonstrating a distal edge serration.
- Figure 25 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 24.
- Figure 26 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion angled at 60 degrees with respect to a longitudinal axis of the reflector dish, demonstrating a distal edge serration and an interference fit against the reflector dish via proximal lip inward bias.
- Figure 27 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 26.
- Figure 28 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion angled at 60 degrees with respect to a longitudinal axis of the reflector dish, demonstrating a distal edge castellation.
- Figure 29 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 28.
- Figure 30 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion angled at 60 degrees with respect to a longitudinal axis of the reflector dish, demonstrating an alternative distal edge castellation.
- Figure 31 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 30.
- Figure 32 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion forming a choke groove open to a distal end of reflector dish.
- Figure 33 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 32.
- Figure 34 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion forming a choke groove open to a distal end of reflector dish and an annular protrusion of the proximal lip contacting the reflector dish.
- Figure 35 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 34.
- Figure 36 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion forming two concentric choke grooves open to a distal end of reflector dish.
- Figure 37 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 36.
- Figure 38 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a width ring with a protruding portion forming two concentric choke grooves open to a distal end of reflector dish and interference fit against the reflector dish via proximal lip inward bias.
- Figure 39 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 38.
- Figure 40 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including an arc segment transition between the distal lip and the proximal lip.
- Figure 41 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 40.
- Figure 42 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including an arc segment transition between the distal lip and the proximal lip and an interference fit against the reflector dish via proximal lip inward bias.
- Figure 43 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 42.
- Figure 44 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a choke groove in the transition between the distal lip and the proximal lip, the choke groove open to the outer diameter.
- Figure 45 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 44.
- Figure 46 is an enlarged cut-away view of another exemplary reflector dish band clamp interconnection, including a choke groove in the transition between the distal lip and the proximal lip, the choke groove open to the outer diameter and an interference fit against the reflector dish via proximal lip inward bias.
- Figure 47 is an isometric view of the interconnection of Figure 46.
- a band clamp 1 is generally operative to retain a radome 3 upon the open distal end 5 of a reflector dish 7, creating an environmental seal that protects the reflector dish 7, subreflector 9 and/or feed 1 1 of a reflector antenna 13 from environmental fouling.
- the band clamp 1 is provided with inward facing distal and proximal lips 15, 17.
- a turnback region 19 of the proximal lip 17 is dimensioned to engage the outer surface 21 of the signal area 23 of the reflector dish 7. The turnback region 19 may be applied, for example, as an outward bend prior to the inward end 25 of the proximal lip 17.
- the diameter of the band clamp 1 is progressively reduced, driving the turnback region 19 against the convex outer surface 21 of the signal area 23 of the reflector dish 7, into a uniform circumferential interference fit.
- the turnback region 19 slides progressively inward along the outer surface 21 of the signal area 23 of the reflector dish 7 toward the reflector dish proximal end 27.
- the distal lip 15 of the band clamp 1 also moves towards the reflector dish proximal end 27, securely clamping the radome 3 against the distal end 5 of the reflector dish 7. Because the interference fit between the turnback region 19 and the outer surface 21 of the reflector dish 7 is circumferentially uniform, any RF leakage between these surfaces is reduced.
- the radome 3 may be provided with a greater diameter than the reflector dish 7, an annular lip 29 of the radome periphery mating with an outer diameter of the distal end 5 of the reflector dish 7, keying the radome 3 coaxial with the reflector dish 7 and providing surface area for spacing the band clamp 1 from the signal area 23 of the reflector dish 7.
- the flanges may be dimensioned and the band clamp 1 similarly dimensioned such that the distal lip 15 of the band clamp 1 is even with or extends slightly inward of a reflector aperture H, defined as the largest diameter of the reflector dish surface upon which signal energy is distributed by the subreflector 9, to form a band clamp inner diameter D.
- a reflector aperture H defined as the largest diameter of the reflector dish surface upon which signal energy is distributed by the subreflector 9, to form a band clamp inner diameter D.
- the band clamp inner diameter D may be dimensioned with respect to reflector aperture H, resulting in significant F/B enhancement as illustrated in Figure 5.
- a D/H ratio of 0.97- 1 .0 may be applied.
- band clamp 1 width "A" determines the distance between band clamp outer corner(s) 31 acting as diffraction/scatter surfaces.
- normalized F/B is improved when the width "A" is between 0.8 and 1 .5 wavelengths of the operating frequency, which can be operative to generate mutual interference of surface currents traveling along the band clamp outer periphery and/or scatter interference.
- the significant improvement in measured F/B performance in a 0.6 meter reflector antenna configurations for both co-polar and cross-polar responses with a conventional prior art band clamp 1 and the "new" presently disclosed band clamp configuration are illustrated in Figures 7 and 8.
- Figures 9 and 10 illustrate measured backlobe levels of co-polar and cross-polar radiation patterns in the 26 GHz band within the regulatory envelopes at greater than 71 dB with the band clamp configuration shown in Figure 4, in which the width "A" is equal to 1 .1 wavelengths.
- width "A” may be difficult to achieve for some operating frequencies without incorporating further structure in the radome and/or reflector dish periphery.
- the width "A” may be increased via the application of a fold 33 in the band clamp from the desired extent of the width "A” back toward the reflector dish 7.
- the pictured embodiment is simplified for demonstration purposes with respect to extending the width "A” but may similarly be applied with a fold 33 and proximal lip 17 that extends further inward and includes a turnback region 19 contacting the outer surface 21 of the signal area 23 of the reflector dish 7.
- an extension of the width "A" may be cost effectively achieved by attaching a further width ring 35 of metallic and/or metal coated material to the band clamp 1 outer diameter.
- the width ring 35 may be applied with any desired width, cost effectively securely attached by spot welding or fasteners such as screws, rivets or the like.
- Figure 13 illustrates 18 GHz band RF modeling software predictions of F/B
- the width ring 35 may be provided in an angled configuration as demonstrated in Figure 18. As shown in Figure 19, RF modeling software predictions of F/B improvement indicate progressively increasing improvement as the angle applied increases from zero (flat width ring cross section) to sixty degrees of diffraction gradient.
- structures similar in electrical effect to the width ring 35 may be formed integral with the band clamp cross section as a protruding portion 37 of desired dimension.
- These complex structures may be cost efficiently formed with high precision via, for example, extrusion, injection molding, progressive punching and/or stretch forming.
- the protruding portion 37 creates a band clamp 1 with a generally uniform cross section in which the proximal lip 17, distal lip 15 and protruding portion 37 form a unitary contiguous portion.
- the unitary contiguous portion simplifies manufacture by eliminating additional attachment steps and long term interconnection reliability concerns that may arise when separate elements such as width bands 35 are applied to the band clamp 1 .
- the protruding portion 37 may be provided extending from an outer diameter of the band clamp 1 parallel to a longitudinal axis of the reflector dish 7, effectively extending the width "A" of the band clamp 1 without requiring a separate width band 35 as described herein above with respect to Figure 12.
- the protruding portion 37 may be dimensioned, for example, such that the resulting band width "A" is a multiple of a quarter wavelength of a desired operating frequency of the reflector dish 7.
- the protruding portion 37 may be angled as described hereinabove with respect to Figures 18 and 19. As modeled in Figure 19, the angle applied to the protruding portion 37 may be, for example, 60 degrees with respect to a longitudinal axis of the reflector dish 7.
- the distal edge 39 of the protruding portion may be provided with a serration 41 ( Figures 24-27) or a castellation 43 ( Figures 28-31 ) to further inhibit backlobe generation at specific operating frequencies.
- Treatments of the distal edge 39 to form the serration(s) 41 and/or castellation 43 may be applied as an additional fabrication step upon a uniform cross section band with protruding portion 37, for example as shown in Figures 22 and 23, by stamping, cutting or the like to remove the desired portions of the distal edge 39.
- the protruding portion 37 may also be dimensioned to extend from the outer diameter of the band clamp 1 to form at least one choke groove 45 open to a distal end 5 of the reflector dish 7, for example as shown in Figures 32-35.
- the number of choke grooves 45 may be increased.
- band clamp 1 may be provided with two concentric choke grooves 45.
- the interference fit between the band clamp 1 and the outer surface 21 of the reflector dish 7 may be alternatively obtained by providing the proximal lip 17 with an inward bias, for example as shown in Figures 26, 27, 34, 35, 38, 39, 42, 43, 46 and 47.
- a distal sidewall 47 of the proximal lip 17 may be provided with an annular protrusion 49 which contacts the reflector dish 7, for example as shown in Figures 34 and 35.
- the inward end 25 operates as an assembly guide for the band clamp 1 over the reflector dish 7 and radome 3, prior to engaging the interference fit as the band clamp 1 is inserted far enough for the annular protrusion 49 to enage the reflector dish 7 in the interference fit.
- the band clamp 1 may be dimensioned with a transition between the distal lip 15 and the proximal lip 17 formed as a continuous arc segment 51 .
- a material stress applied to the transition to create the bias between the distal lip 15 and the proximal lip 17 against the reflector dish 7 may be distributed across a larger portion of material, instead of being concentrated in the outer corners 31 demonstrated in the other embodiments.
- the outer diameter of the band clamp 1 (the transition between the distal lip 15 and the proximal lip 17) may be provided with a choke groove 45 open to the outer diameter of the band clamp 1 .
- the disclosed band clamp 1 can enable significant manufacturing, delivery, installation and/or maintenance efficiencies.
- the resulting reflector antenna 13 may have improved materials and manufacturing costs. Because the band clamp 1 is simply and securely attached, installation and maintenance may be simplified compared to prior reflector antenna configurations with complex peripheral geometries, delicate back lobe suppression ring coatings, platings and/or RF absorbing materials. Because the band clamp 1 may be compact and applied close to the reflector antenna aperture H, the overall diameter of the reflector antenna 13 may be reduced, which can reduce the reflector antenna wind loading characteristics and the required packaging dimensions.
- band clamp 1 is fabricated utilizing extrusion, injection molding, progressive punching and/or stretch forming
- complex band clamp 1 cross sections providing additional electrical performance may be provided in the form of a protruding portion 37 with specific geometries, without requiring separate elements with additional attachment and/or reliability concerns.
Landscapes
- Aerials With Secondary Devices (AREA)
- Clamps And Clips (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/600,544 US9083083B2 (en) | 2009-12-11 | 2012-08-31 | Radome attachment band clamp |
| PCT/US2013/040130 WO2014035493A1 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2013-05-08 | Radome attachment band clamp |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2891211A1 true EP2891211A1 (en) | 2015-07-08 |
| EP2891211A4 EP2891211A4 (en) | 2016-04-20 |
| EP2891211B1 EP2891211B1 (en) | 2022-02-16 |
Family
ID=50184086
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP13833558.3A Not-in-force EP2891211B1 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2013-05-08 | Radome attachment band clamp |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP2891211B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN104685711B (en) |
| BR (1) | BR112015003156B1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2014035493A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA887303A (en) | 1971-11-30 | H. Hansen Laurence | Backlobe reduction in reflector-type antennas | |
| US4710777A (en) * | 1985-01-24 | 1987-12-01 | Kaultronics, Inc. | Dish antenna structure |
| US5729241A (en) * | 1996-05-28 | 1998-03-17 | Ergen; Charles W. | Direct broadcast satellite antenna cover |
| WO2001057954A1 (en) * | 2000-02-04 | 2001-08-09 | Satellite Mobile Systems, Inc. | Edge guard for a signal receiving device deployably mounted to a vehicle |
| US7138958B2 (en) * | 2004-02-27 | 2006-11-21 | Andrew Corporation | Reflector antenna radome with backlobe suppressor ring and method of manufacturing |
| CN201369389Y (en) * | 2009-01-13 | 2009-12-23 | 广东盛路通信科技股份有限公司 | Shielding ring structure capable of increasing front-to-back ratio of antenna |
| US8077113B2 (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2011-12-13 | Andrew Llc | Radome and shroud enclosure for reflector antenna |
| US8259028B2 (en) | 2009-12-11 | 2012-09-04 | Andrew Llc | Reflector antenna radome attachment band clamp |
-
2013
- 2013-05-08 CN CN201380044510.2A patent/CN104685711B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-05-08 WO PCT/US2013/040130 patent/WO2014035493A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2013-05-08 EP EP13833558.3A patent/EP2891211B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2013-05-08 BR BR112015003156-0A patent/BR112015003156B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| BR112015003156B1 (en) | 2022-04-19 |
| WO2014035493A1 (en) | 2014-03-06 |
| CN104685711A (en) | 2015-06-03 |
| BR112015003156A2 (en) | 2017-07-04 |
| CN104685711B (en) | 2017-05-31 |
| EP2891211B1 (en) | 2022-02-16 |
| EP2891211A4 (en) | 2016-04-20 |
| BR112015003156A8 (en) | 2017-12-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US9083083B2 (en) | Radome attachment band clamp | |
| EP2510576B1 (en) | Reflector antenna radome attachment band clamp | |
| CA2552290C (en) | Reflector antenna radome with backlobe suppressor ring and method of manufacturing | |
| EP2267839B1 (en) | Radome and shroud enclosure for reflector antenna | |
| US9019164B2 (en) | Low sidelobe reflector antenna with shield | |
| US8581795B2 (en) | Low sidelobe reflector antenna | |
| US9948009B2 (en) | Controlled illumination dielectric cone radiator for reflector antenna | |
| US20120287007A1 (en) | Method and Apparatus for Reflector Antenna with Vertex Region Scatter Compensation | |
| AU2012331250B2 (en) | Reflector antenna including dual band splashplate support | |
| US20180115085A1 (en) | Sub-reflector assembly with extended dielectric radiator | |
| EP2891211B1 (en) | Radome attachment band clamp | |
| EP3673537A2 (en) | Parabolic reflector antennas that support low side lobe radiation patterns | |
| WO2014132190A1 (en) | System for fastening a flat radome onto the concave reflector of an antenna | |
| WO2020260045A1 (en) | An antenna with reduced back-lobe radiation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20150224 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| RA4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected) |
Effective date: 20160322 |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H01Q 1/42 20060101AFI20160316BHEP Ipc: H01Q 19/12 20060101ALI20160316BHEP Ipc: H01Q 15/14 20060101ALI20160316BHEP Ipc: H01Q 1/12 20060101ALI20160316BHEP Ipc: H01Q 19/02 20060101ALI20160316BHEP |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20190205 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20210908 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602013080921 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1469471 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20220315 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1469471 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220616 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220516 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220516 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220517 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220616 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602013080921 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602013080921 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220531 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20221117 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20220516 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220508 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220531 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220531 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220508 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220531 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220516 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221201 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220531 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20130508 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220216 |