EP2885579A1 - Shrouded-coanda multiphase burner - Google Patents

Shrouded-coanda multiphase burner

Info

Publication number
EP2885579A1
EP2885579A1 EP12891401.7A EP12891401A EP2885579A1 EP 2885579 A1 EP2885579 A1 EP 2885579A1 EP 12891401 A EP12891401 A EP 12891401A EP 2885579 A1 EP2885579 A1 EP 2885579A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gas
shroud
flare
head member
gas flow
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP12891401.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2885579B1 (en
EP2885579A4 (en
Inventor
Christian Menger
Roman Alexandrovich SKACHKOV
Roman Pavlovich SOTSKIJ
Grigory Yurievich MIKHALEV
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Schlumberger Technology BV
Schlumberger Holdings Ltd
Prad Research and Development Ltd
Original Assignee
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Schlumberger Technology BV
Schlumberger Holdings Ltd
Prad Research and Development Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA, Schlumberger Technology BV, Schlumberger Holdings Ltd, Prad Research and Development Ltd filed Critical Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Publication of EP2885579A1 publication Critical patent/EP2885579A1/en
Publication of EP2885579A4 publication Critical patent/EP2885579A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2885579B1 publication Critical patent/EP2885579B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23DBURNERS
    • F23D14/00Burners for combustion of a gas, e.g. of a gas stored under pressure as a liquid
    • F23D14/20Non-premix gas burners, i.e. in which gaseous fuel is mixed with combustion air on arrival at the combustion zone
    • F23D14/22Non-premix gas burners, i.e. in which gaseous fuel is mixed with combustion air on arrival at the combustion zone with separate air and gas feed ducts, e.g. with ducts running parallel or crossing each other
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23GCREMATION FURNACES; CONSUMING WASTE PRODUCTS BY COMBUSTION
    • F23G7/00Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals
    • F23G7/06Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals of waste gases or noxious gases, e.g. exhaust gases
    • F23G7/08Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals of waste gases or noxious gases, e.g. exhaust gases using flares, e.g. in stacks
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23DBURNERS
    • F23D14/00Burners for combustion of a gas, e.g. of a gas stored under pressure as a liquid
    • F23D14/46Details
    • F23D14/62Mixing devices; Mixing tubes
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23GCREMATION FURNACES; CONSUMING WASTE PRODUCTS BY COMBUSTION
    • F23G7/00Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals
    • F23G7/06Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals of waste gases or noxious gases, e.g. exhaust gases
    • F23G7/08Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals of waste gases or noxious gases, e.g. exhaust gases using flares, e.g. in stacks
    • F23G7/085Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals of waste gases or noxious gases, e.g. exhaust gases using flares, e.g. in stacks in stacks

Definitions

  • the disclosure relates to a gas flare, and in particular, but not exclusively to a Coanda-type gas burner flare used for combustion of waste gas during surface testing of hydrocarbon wells.
  • Hydrocarbons' importance for the world economy cannot be overstated.
  • the discovery and efficient production of hydrocarbons is becoming increasingly more difficult and poses many new technological challenges.
  • a borehole is drilled down into the earth, on land or in subsea operations, to reach a reservoir containing hydrocarbons.
  • fluid hydrocarbons take the form of oil, gas, or mixtures thereof found in reservoirs that can be produced by one or more wells.
  • Well testing includes flowing a well and measuring the response of several key parameters such as pressure and flow rate over time. Many different types of well tests are known to those skilled in the art, such as pressure drawdown, interference, reservoir limit tests, etc. Well testing enables the collection of data that help assess the economic viability of the well. However, the cost of testing operations is significant and often times it may exceed the cost associated with drilling the well. It is important, therefore, that testing operations are performed as efficiently and economically as possible.
  • the well effluent is separated into its individual phases, i.e., oil, water and gas via the use of one or more well test separators.
  • One of the key functions of a well testing operation is to combust the waste gas flow exiting the well test separator.
  • Coanda-type flaring systems are widely used in the petroleum industry for flaring waste gases of oil refineries or production platforms. Typical Coanda-type flare systems are described in the following patent documents: US 3709654, US 3915622, US 2006/0105276 Al, US 383337, EP 0054383 and RU 2315240.
  • Coanda flares offer relatively clean combustion by premixing the waste gas with ambient air prior to combustion. Coanda flares also offer generally good, stable flame combustion at high inlet pressure of combustible gas.
  • Coanda-type flaring systems offer stable and quite clean combustion of multiphase hydrocarbon effluents. Coanda-type flares are efficient and environmental friendly under proper operational conditions.
  • the Coanda-type flare apparatus described in patent US 4486167 comprises a Coanda body, a slot for gas outlet form the supply pipe, a fructo- conical shield for noise reduction, and another shield for noise reflection.
  • a fructo- conical shield for noise reduction for noise reduction
  • another shield for noise reflection for noise reflection.
  • the addition of these shield decreases the air supply to the burner and creates a narrow operational range on flow rates of gas.
  • the debris can be sand particles or other particulates present in the wellbore effluent.
  • Another source of debris is pipe scale or the built up of salt deposits around the Coanda slot that can become dislodged once they reach a critical mass. Debris ejected through the Coanda slot poses a risk of injury to the operators as well as damage to the surrounding equipment. There may also be a fraction of the big liquid droplets that do not follow the gas flow and spray sideways from the slot, causing some fallout, especially if the liquid present in gas stream is highly viscous.
  • a gas flare that overcomes the above mentioned deficiencies of existing Coanda-type gas flares.
  • the inventive gas flare comprises: a supply pipe for directing a gas flow to a head member; a slot for ejecting the gas flow; and a shroud surrounding the slot, at least part of the supply pipe and at least part of the head member.
  • the shroud directs the ejected gas flow between the shroud and the head member.
  • the shroud prevents the gas flow from being ejected substantially radially from the gas flare. So while the gas flow is still ejected radially from the slot to provide a Coanda effect and aspiration of an ambient air, such gas flow including any liquid progresses only as far as the shroud and adheres to the head member.
  • the safety of the device is improved, since any debris contained in the high-speed gas flow will be contained within the shroud.
  • a shroud for a gas flare the shroud surrounding at least a portion of the gas flare and designed for directing a gas flow ejected from the gas flare to flow between the shroud and the gas flare and for enabling an ambient air flow to be directed to mix with the gas flow ejected from the gas flare.
  • a shroud with an axial airfoil-shaped cross-section with a smooth bottom end and a sharp distal end, so that the air aspired by gas jet coming from a slot is being accelerated from the smooth bottom end to the sharp distal end of the shroud.
  • a method of combusting gas ejected from a gas flare comprising: directing the gas flow using a gas flare having a contoured shape; directing an ambient air flow using a shroud surrounding at least part of the gas flare to flow between the shroud and gas flare; mixing the gas flow with an ambient air flow; and combusting the mixture.
  • the disclosure could be used with other gas flare systems, however, it is particularly advantageous when used in combination with a Coanda-type flare, especially one having a tulip-contoured shape.
  • the Coanda gas flare comprises a stalk-shaped base member connected to a tulip-shaped head member. At least part of the stalk-shaped base member is located within at least part of a supply pipeline defining a first passage therebetween for directing a gas flow towards the head member.
  • the Coanda gas flare further comprises a slot located between the supply pipeline and the head member, substantially adjacent to where the head member is connected to the base member. The slot is surrounded by a shroud defining a second passage therebetween for directing the gas flow substantially around the tulip-shaped head member to be combusted.
  • Figure 1 shows a prior art Coanda gas flare
  • Figure 2 shows a cross-sectional view of a gas flare according to a one embodiment of the disclosure
  • 3AMEIffi0f3 ⁇ 4M JIHCT a multiphase hydrocarbon effluent into its oil, gas and water components.
  • gas effluent the effluent to be combusted
  • This liquid fraction is especially high during the flowing of high gas rate fluid at the upper operation limit of separator, or flowing bypass separator on gas-condensate wells.
  • the Coanda-type flare is often useful to combust this liquid fraction, since the gas flow ejected from the Coanda-gas flare reaches supersonic speeds. This creates Shockwaves, which atomize the liquid fraction in the gas flow into a fine mist that is more easily and completely combusted by the burner flame.
  • Figure 1 shows an example of a prior art Coanda flare having a supply pipe 1 14 connected to a tulip-shaped head member 1 10 via a base member 1 12 with pylons.
  • the tulip shape produces the Coanda effect, which is advantageous in that the waste gas flow 1 16 is directed around the bulge 108 of the tulip which causes an accelerated gas flow in this area and thus produces low pressure.
  • the gas flow is directed, by this low pressure, adjacent to the surface of the tulip-shaped head member, and also causes ambient air flow to be directed toward the low pressure.
  • ambient air flow mixes with the gas flow ejected from a slot 104 of the gas flare, making the mixture 1 17 even more suitable for combustion by the burner flame at the distal end of the head member 1 10.
  • the supply pipe 1 14 and base member 1 12 provides a first passageway there between having a particular cross-section through which the high pressured gas 116 flows. This high pressured gas flow would typically come from a well test separator gas outlet or directly from a tested well.
  • the slot 104 defines a second narrower passageway for choking the ejected gas flow between the supply pipe 1 14 and the head member 1 10. Since the second
  • 3AMEH3fOUiK3 ⁇ 4 ffiCT passageway of the slot 104 is narrower, the gas flow is accelerated to sonic speed within the slot, and furthermore (due to expansion along with the tulip) the flow reaches supersonic velocities; this produces Shockwaves that help to atomize the liquid droplets entrained by the gas flow. Then, the tulip-shaped head of the Coanda flare causes ambient air flow to mix with the combustible gas flow. This premixing allows achieving a good fuel-oxidant ratio and makes the flame more stable and clean.
  • Figure 2 shows a cross-sectional view of a gas flare according to one embodiment of the disclosure described herein.
  • Figure 2 shows a Coanda gas flare with base member 12 connected to the supply pipe 13.
  • the base member 12 may be at least partially located within a supply pipe 13.
  • the base member 12 and supply pipe 13 are shaped so as to define a passageway there between through which the gas flow is directed towards the head member 10.
  • As the gas flow reaches the head member there is a slot 4 between the supply pipe 13 and the head member 10 and base member 12.
  • the slot 4 defines a narrowed passageway for accelerating and ejecting the gas flow outside of the gas flare.
  • the directed gas flow is ejected substantially radially from the slot 4.
  • the gas flare has a shroud 14 which surrounds the slot and a portion of supply pipe and the bottom part 1 1 of the head member 10. More specifically, the shroud surrounds and yet is spaced a distance from the slot 4, to define a further passageway for the gas and aspirated air to flow around the contour of the tulip-shaped head member 10 and to mix with each other.
  • This allows for Shockwaves that aid liquid atomization, but furthermore acts as a shield in preventing particulates in the gas flow from being ejected past the shroud - which may be of danger to working nearby personnel.
  • the containment of the Shockwaves within the shroud 14 is partially responsible for the observed noise reduction in the backward direction.
  • the frusto-conical shroud 14 has an airfoil-shaped vertical cross-section with a sharp top edge 15 and a smooth bottom end 16.
  • This airfoil-shaped geometry of the shroud 14 adds additional functionality to the shroud.
  • the shroud 12 works as an efficient air ejector toward the flow of gas emitted from the slot 4.
  • the smooth and streamlined geometry of the bottom end of the shroud 14 reduces the drag effects of the inlet air.
  • the reduced area of the cross-section defined by the supply pipe 13 and shroud 14 induces acceleration of the inlet air.
  • the high velocity air flow detaches from the sharp top edge 15 of the shroud 14 and removes the portion of liquid droplets produced by atomization in the slot 4, that occasionally separate from the main gas stream.
  • top edge of shroud 14 may have a serrated rim 20.
  • serrated rim 20 are known in the designing of jet nozzles as tabs (directed inward the streamlining flow) or chevrons (sharp corner of the structure directed outward the flow). The function of this small-scale serration is for the redistribution and better atomization of liquid jets occurring on the inside surface of shroud 14 and for improving the mixing of different flows.
  • tabs Although the geometry of tabs is depicted as small sharp triangles, it should be appreciated that other shapes are possible: polygonal elements, combination of rounded elements with polygons, etc.
  • the shroud 14 is also able to absorb high-frequency noise bands resulting from the share layer and Shockwaves, for example by constructing the shroud with a sound absorption structure (porous material or honeycomb) intermediary layer.
  • a sound absorption structure porous material or honeycomb
  • the flare apparatus is equipped with a back-shield 17 for noise attenuation in the backward direction of the flare apparatus.
  • the back-shield 17 has a slightly concave geometry for improving the air inlet in the annulus defined by the bottom end 16 of the shroud and the back-shield 17.
  • the back-shield may be flat plate attached to the supply pipe 13.
  • the back-shield 17 is performed from sound-absorbing materials (similar to materials for shroud 14) with a rigid back wall for additional noise redirection towards the flame area.
  • the shroud covers a portion of the Coanda flare and is able to perform multiple functions which improve the flare.
  • the shroud may act as a protective shield to capture any debris (sand, salt deposits, etc.) that is ejected radially from the Coanda slot. It also prevents any gas or liquid from being sprayed radially in the case of an unexpected sudden flow rate spike or high liquid loading that causes the Coanda effect to break down.
  • the directed and accelerated airflow will ensure that any gas or liquid droplets, not following the Coanda profile, will be redirected in an axial direction into the combustion zone.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Nozzles (AREA)

Abstract

A gas flare disposed at an end of a supply pipe member for directing a gas flow to a head member, the flare including a slot for ejecting the gas flow and a shroud. The shroud surrounds the slot, at least part of the base member and at least part of the head member of the gas flare. The shroud directs the ejected gas flow between the shroud and the head member.

Description

SHROUDED-COANDA MULTIPHASE BURNER
Field of the Disclosure
The disclosure relates to a gas flare, and in particular, but not exclusively to a Coanda-type gas burner flare used for combustion of waste gas during surface testing of hydrocarbon wells.
Background
Hydrocarbons' importance for the world economy cannot be overstated. The discovery and efficient production of hydrocarbons is becoming increasingly more difficult and poses many new technological challenges. Typically, a borehole is drilled down into the earth, on land or in subsea operations, to reach a reservoir containing hydrocarbons. Usually, fluid hydrocarbons take the form of oil, gas, or mixtures thereof found in reservoirs that can be produced by one or more wells.
An important stage in the evaluation of a reservoir is known as well testing. Well testing includes flowing a well and measuring the response of several key parameters such as pressure and flow rate over time. Many different types of well tests are known to those skilled in the art, such as pressure drawdown, interference, reservoir limit tests, etc. Well testing enables the collection of data that help assess the economic viability of the well. However, the cost of testing operations is significant and often times it may exceed the cost associated with drilling the well. It is important, therefore, that testing operations are performed as efficiently and economically as possible.
During a typical well testing operation, the well effluent is separated into its individual phases, i.e., oil, water and gas via the use of one or more well test separators. One of the key functions of a well testing operation is to combust the waste gas flow exiting the well test separator.
Many different flaring systems have been used to burn the waste gas flow. One well known type of flare systems are the Coanda-type flaring systems. Coanda-type flare systems are widely used in the petroleum industry for flaring waste gases of oil refineries or production platforms. Typical Coanda-type flare systems are described in the following patent documents: US 3709654, US 3915622, US 2006/0105276 Al, US 383337, EP 0054383 and RU 2315240. Coanda flares offer relatively clean combustion by premixing the waste gas with ambient air prior to combustion. Coanda flares also offer generally good, stable flame combustion at high inlet pressure of combustible gas. In addition, Shockwaves generated in the vicinity of the gas exit slot of a Coanda flare help to atomize the liquid droplets that are present in the gas flow into a fine mist, thus facilitating combustion and reducing the risk of fall out even in the case of significant liquid carryover in flare line. So, generally Coanda-type flaring systems offer stable and quite clean combustion of multiphase hydrocarbon effluents. Coanda-type flares are efficient and environmental friendly under proper operational conditions.
There are, however, some disadvantages that limit the use of Coanda flares in well test operations such as noise, ejected debris, and sensitivity to flow rate variations. The noise is believed to be mainly associated with Shockwaves and is generally excessive and poses safety and environmental issues.
The Coanda-type flare apparatus described in patent US 4486167 comprises a Coanda body, a slot for gas outlet form the supply pipe, a fructo- conical shield for noise reduction, and another shield for noise reflection. However, the addition of these shield decreases the air supply to the burner and creates a narrow operational range on flow rates of gas.
Furthermore, there is also a high risk of debris being ejected radially from the Coanda slot in the form of high velocity projectiles. For example, the debris can be sand particles or other particulates present in the wellbore effluent. Another source of debris is pipe scale or the built up of salt deposits around the Coanda slot that can become dislodged once they reach a critical mass. Debris ejected through the Coanda slot poses a risk of injury to the operators as well as damage to the surrounding equipment. There may also be a fraction of the big liquid droplets that do not follow the gas flow and spray sideways from the slot, causing some fallout, especially if the liquid present in gas stream is highly viscous. Moreover, during well test operations there may be frequent and unexpected flow variations or variations in the composition of the hydrocarbon effluent (e.g. the liquid fraction in the gas stream) that can lead to a temporary cancelling of the Coanda effect (gas or liquid droplets not following the Coanda profile). Under these conditions the gas/liquid mix sprays out radially causing unintended side effects and dangers, as well as hydrocarbon spill.
It is therefore desirable to overcome the limitations of existing Coanda- type flaring systems, especially insofar as surface well testing operations are concerned.
Summary
According to a first aspect of the disclosure there is provided a gas flare that overcomes the above mentioned deficiencies of existing Coanda-type gas flares. The inventive gas flare comprises: a supply pipe for directing a gas flow to a head member; a slot for ejecting the gas flow; and a shroud surrounding the slot, at least part of the supply pipe and at least part of the head member. The shroud directs the ejected gas flow between the shroud and the head member.
Advantageously, the shroud prevents the gas flow from being ejected substantially radially from the gas flare. So while the gas flow is still ejected radially from the slot to provide a Coanda effect and aspiration of an ambient air, such gas flow including any liquid progresses only as far as the shroud and adheres to the head member. By preventing radial gas flow from the gas flare the safety of the device is improved, since any debris contained in the high-speed gas flow will be contained within the shroud.
According to a further aspect of the disclosure there is provided a shroud for a gas flare, the shroud surrounding at least a portion of the gas flare and designed for directing a gas flow ejected from the gas flare to flow between the shroud and the gas flare and for enabling an ambient air flow to be directed to mix with the gas flow ejected from the gas flare.
According to a further aspect of the disclosure there is provided a shroud with an axial airfoil-shaped cross-section with a smooth bottom end and a sharp distal end, so that the air aspired by gas jet coming from a slot is being accelerated from the smooth bottom end to the sharp distal end of the shroud.
According to yet a further aspect of the disclosure there is provided a method of combusting gas ejected from a gas flare; the method comprising: directing the gas flow using a gas flare having a contoured shape; directing an ambient air flow using a shroud surrounding at least part of the gas flare to flow between the shroud and gas flare; mixing the gas flow with an ambient air flow; and combusting the mixture.
The disclosure could be used with other gas flare systems, however, it is particularly advantageous when used in combination with a Coanda-type flare, especially one having a tulip-contoured shape.
3AMEffiO0 K¾ M According to yet a further aspect of the disclosure, the Coanda gas flare comprises a stalk-shaped base member connected to a tulip-shaped head member. At least part of the stalk-shaped base member is located within at least part of a supply pipeline defining a first passage therebetween for directing a gas flow towards the head member. The Coanda gas flare further comprises a slot located between the supply pipeline and the head member, substantially adjacent to where the head member is connected to the base member. The slot is surrounded by a shroud defining a second passage therebetween for directing the gas flow substantially around the tulip-shaped head member to be combusted.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Embodiments of the disclosure will now be described solely by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 shows a prior art Coanda gas flare; and
Figure 2 shows a cross-sectional view of a gas flare according to a one embodiment of the disclosure;
Detailed Description
So that the above features and advantages of the present disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the accompanied drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
In a typical well testing operation a gas flare is used to burn and, thus, dispose waste gas effluent exiting a well test separator that is used to separate
3AMEIffi0f¾M JIHCT a multiphase hydrocarbon effluent into its oil, gas and water components. Although the effluent to be combusted is typically referred to as gas effluent, it should be appreciated that there is still a fraction of liquid that often remains in the gas flow, which is to be combusted. This liquid fraction is especially high during the flowing of high gas rate fluid at the upper operation limit of separator, or flowing bypass separator on gas-condensate wells.
The Coanda-type flare is often useful to combust this liquid fraction, since the gas flow ejected from the Coanda-gas flare reaches supersonic speeds. This creates Shockwaves, which atomize the liquid fraction in the gas flow into a fine mist that is more easily and completely combusted by the burner flame.
Figure 1 shows an example of a prior art Coanda flare having a supply pipe 1 14 connected to a tulip-shaped head member 1 10 via a base member 1 12 with pylons. The tulip shape produces the Coanda effect, which is advantageous in that the waste gas flow 1 16 is directed around the bulge 108 of the tulip which causes an accelerated gas flow in this area and thus produces low pressure. The gas flow is directed, by this low pressure, adjacent to the surface of the tulip-shaped head member, and also causes ambient air flow to be directed toward the low pressure.
Thus, ambient air flow mixes with the gas flow ejected from a slot 104 of the gas flare, making the mixture 1 17 even more suitable for combustion by the burner flame at the distal end of the head member 1 10.
The supply pipe 1 14 and base member 1 12 provides a first passageway there between having a particular cross-section through which the high pressured gas 116 flows. This high pressured gas flow would typically come from a well test separator gas outlet or directly from a tested well. The slot 104 defines a second narrower passageway for choking the ejected gas flow between the supply pipe 1 14 and the head member 1 10. Since the second
3AMEH3fOUiK¾ ffiCT passageway of the slot 104 is narrower, the gas flow is accelerated to sonic speed within the slot, and furthermore (due to expansion along with the tulip) the flow reaches supersonic velocities; this produces Shockwaves that help to atomize the liquid droplets entrained by the gas flow. Then, the tulip-shaped head of the Coanda flare causes ambient air flow to mix with the combustible gas flow. This premixing allows achieving a good fuel-oxidant ratio and makes the flame more stable and clean.
Figure 2 shows a cross-sectional view of a gas flare according to one embodiment of the disclosure described herein. Figure 2 shows a Coanda gas flare with base member 12 connected to the supply pipe 13. The base member 12 may be at least partially located within a supply pipe 13. The base member 12 and supply pipe 13 are shaped so as to define a passageway there between through which the gas flow is directed towards the head member 10. As the gas flow reaches the head member, there is a slot 4 between the supply pipe 13 and the head member 10 and base member 12. Specifically, the slot 4 defines a narrowed passageway for accelerating and ejecting the gas flow outside of the gas flare.
The directed gas flow is ejected substantially radially from the slot 4. However, the gas flare has a shroud 14 which surrounds the slot and a portion of supply pipe and the bottom part 1 1 of the head member 10. More specifically, the shroud surrounds and yet is spaced a distance from the slot 4, to define a further passageway for the gas and aspirated air to flow around the contour of the tulip-shaped head member 10 and to mix with each other. This allows for Shockwaves that aid liquid atomization, but furthermore acts as a shield in preventing particulates in the gas flow from being ejected past the shroud - which may be of danger to working nearby personnel. Furthermore, it is believed that the containment of the Shockwaves within the shroud 14 is partially responsible for the observed noise reduction in the backward direction.
In one embodiment, the frusto-conical shroud 14 has an airfoil-shaped vertical cross-section with a sharp top edge 15 and a smooth bottom end 16. This airfoil-shaped geometry of the shroud 14 adds additional functionality to the shroud. The shroud 12 works as an efficient air ejector toward the flow of gas emitted from the slot 4. The smooth and streamlined geometry of the bottom end of the shroud 14 reduces the drag effects of the inlet air. The reduced area of the cross-section defined by the supply pipe 13 and shroud 14 induces acceleration of the inlet air. The high velocity air flow detaches from the sharp top edge 15 of the shroud 14 and removes the portion of liquid droplets produced by atomization in the slot 4, that occasionally separate from the main gas stream.
Additionally, the top edge of shroud 14 may have a serrated rim 20. The elements of serrated rim 20 are known in the designing of jet nozzles as tabs (directed inward the streamlining flow) or chevrons (sharp corner of the structure directed outward the flow). The function of this small-scale serration is for the redistribution and better atomization of liquid jets occurring on the inside surface of shroud 14 and for improving the mixing of different flows.
Although the geometry of tabs is depicted as small sharp triangles, it should be appreciated that other shapes are possible: polygonal elements, combination of rounded elements with polygons, etc.
The shroud 14 is also able to absorb high-frequency noise bands resulting from the share layer and Shockwaves, for example by constructing the shroud with a sound absorption structure (porous material or honeycomb) intermediary layer.
Additionally, the flare apparatus is equipped with a back-shield 17 for noise attenuation in the backward direction of the flare apparatus. In the
3AMEHSI0¾M JIMCT design shown in Fig. 2, the back-shield 17 has a slightly concave geometry for improving the air inlet in the annulus defined by the bottom end 16 of the shroud and the back-shield 17. In other embodiments, the back-shield may be flat plate attached to the supply pipe 13. Preferably, the back-shield 17 is performed from sound-absorbing materials (similar to materials for shroud 14) with a rigid back wall for additional noise redirection towards the flame area.
Thus, the shroud covers a portion of the Coanda flare and is able to perform multiple functions which improve the flare.
In addition to sound absorption, and hence noise suppression, the shroud may act as a protective shield to capture any debris (sand, salt deposits, etc.) that is ejected radially from the Coanda slot. It also prevents any gas or liquid from being sprayed radially in the case of an unexpected sudden flow rate spike or high liquid loading that causes the Coanda effect to break down. The directed and accelerated airflow will ensure that any gas or liquid droplets, not following the Coanda profile, will be redirected in an axial direction into the combustion zone.
It will be understood from the foregoing description that various modifications and changes may be made in the preferred and alternative embodiments of the present disclosure without departing from its true spirit. In addition, this description is intended for purposes of illustration only and should not be construed in a limiting sense.

Claims

Claims:
1. A gas flare comprising:
a supply pipe for directing a gas flow towards a head member;
a slot located between the supply pipe and head member for ejecting the gas flow; and
a shroud spaced away from and surrounding the slot to form a passage between the shroud and the head member for directing the ejected gas flow therebetween, wherein the shroud has an airfoil-shaped longitudinal cross- section with a smooth bottom end and a sharp top edge.
2. The gas flare of claim 1, wherein the shroud prevents the gas flow from being ejected in a substantially radial direction from the gas flare.
3. The gas flare of any preceding claim, wherein the shroud prevents debris in the gas flow from being ejected from the gas flare.
4. The gas flare of any preceding claim, wherein the shroud absorbs noise.
5. The gas flare of claim 1, wherein the shroud absorbs a selectable high- frequency band of the noise as the gas is ejected from the slot at a supersonic speed.
6. The gas flare of any preceding claim, wherein the shroud comprises a porous inner material layer and a solid external metal lining.
7. The gas flare of any preceding claim, further including a base member disposed near a bottom of the head member, wherein the base member is at
3AMEMI00IM JIHCT least partially located within the supply pipe defining a passage therebetween for the gas flow.
8. The gas flare of any preceding claim, wherein the shroud includes a circumferential serrated rim at the distal end.
9. A shroud for a gas flare, the shroud being at least partially disposed around a head member of the flare and comprising:
a proximate end having a generally smooth and rounded shape; and a distal end having a sharp edge, wherein the shroud and the head member define a passage for directing a gas flow.
10. A method of combusting a gas flow ejected from a gas flare; the method comprising:
directing the gas flow from a supply pipe to a head member;
drawing in an ambient air flow into a passage formed by a shroud spaced away from and surrounding at least part of the gas flare;
mixing the gas flow with the ambient air flow; and
combusting the mixture.
1 1. The method of claim 10, further comprising partially disposing the shroud between a shield and the head member, wherein the shield provides a backward noise reduction.
12. The method of claim 1 1, further comprising forming a smooth passage between the shroud and the shield.
13. A Coanda gas flare for combusting effluent, the gas flare comprising: a stalk-shaped base member connected to a tulip-shaped head member, wherein at least part of the base member is located within at least part of a supply pipeline defining a first passage therebetween for directing a gas flow towards the head member; and a slot located between the supply pipeline and the head member, substantially adjacent to where the head member is connected to the base member, wherein the slot is surrounded by a shroud defining a second passage therebetween for directing the gas flow substantially around the tulip- shaped head member to be combusted.
3AMEMI0I5HM ffiCT
EP12891401.7A 2012-08-16 2012-08-16 Shrouded-coanda multiphase burner Not-in-force EP2885579B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/RU2012/000675 WO2014027915A1 (en) 2012-08-16 2012-08-16 Shrouded-coanda multiphase burner

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2885579A1 true EP2885579A1 (en) 2015-06-24
EP2885579A4 EP2885579A4 (en) 2015-08-05
EP2885579B1 EP2885579B1 (en) 2017-07-19

Family

ID=50685660

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12891401.7A Not-in-force EP2885579B1 (en) 2012-08-16 2012-08-16 Shrouded-coanda multiphase burner

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20150211735A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2885579B1 (en)
NO (1) NO2885579T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2014027915A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014088450A1 (en) * 2012-12-06 2014-06-12 Schlumberger Canada Limited Multiphase flare for effluent flow
CN105180182B (en) * 2015-10-13 2017-11-24 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Open flow gas disposal long and narrow hole burner
US10920979B2 (en) * 2018-04-06 2021-02-16 Zeeco, Inc. Low NOx burner and flow momentum enhancing device
US11067272B2 (en) 2019-04-24 2021-07-20 Cimarron Tandem flare

Family Cites Families (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1737911A (en) * 1926-05-06 1929-12-03 James H Birch Vapor-oil heater
US1674631A (en) * 1926-10-28 1928-06-26 Benniger John Oil burner
NL7001856A (en) * 1969-02-11 1970-08-13
US3568792A (en) * 1969-06-18 1971-03-09 Rohr Corp Sound-suppressing and thrust-reversing apparatus
US3709654A (en) * 1969-11-19 1973-01-09 British Petroleum Co Burner
CH532752A (en) * 1971-02-25 1973-01-15 Finterm Spa Combustion head for burners
GB1381867A (en) * 1971-04-29 1975-01-29 British Petroleum Co Flarestacks
GB1383294A (en) * 1971-04-29 1974-02-12 British Petroleum Co Flarestacks
RO54896A2 (en) * 1971-12-13 1973-09-20
CA980258A (en) * 1973-06-14 1975-12-23 Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited Exhaust gas silencer
GB1460576A (en) * 1973-09-18 1977-01-06 British Petroleum Co Flare stack burner tip
GB1593391A (en) * 1977-01-28 1981-07-15 British Petroleum Co Flare
US4021189A (en) * 1975-01-16 1977-05-03 Porta-Test Manufacturing Ltd. Gas burner
GB1551915A (en) * 1975-11-12 1979-09-05 British Petroleum Co Burner element
US4088270A (en) * 1976-03-31 1978-05-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Two dimensional wedge/translating shroud nozzle
US4099908A (en) * 1976-08-13 1978-07-11 Martin Josef Beckmann Low pressure gas burner
US4137992A (en) * 1976-12-30 1979-02-06 The Boeing Company Turbojet engine nozzle for attenuating core and turbine noise
US4344751A (en) * 1979-03-24 1982-08-17 The British Petroleum Company Limited Flares
US4464110A (en) * 1980-12-10 1984-08-07 The British Petroleum Company Limited Flare using a Coanda director surface
US4486167A (en) * 1980-12-10 1984-12-04 The British Petroleum Company Limited Flare having noise attenuation
US4486168A (en) * 1981-06-20 1984-12-04 The British Petroleum Company P.L.C. Flare
SU987290A2 (en) * 1981-09-04 1983-01-07 Государственный Научно-Исследовательский И Проектно-Конструкторский Институт "Южниигипрогаз" Burner
EP0153866B1 (en) * 1984-03-02 1989-03-22 The British Petroleum Company p.l.c. Flare
US4643669A (en) * 1985-08-26 1987-02-17 Peabody Engineering Corporation Smokeless flare gas burner
GB8826191D0 (en) * 1988-11-09 1988-12-14 Coleman J D Improvements to hot air balloon burners
US5364262A (en) * 1993-01-22 1994-11-15 Phillips Douglas E Apparatus for the early detection and relief of unsafe conditions in a gaseous system
DE19859829A1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2000-06-29 Abb Alstom Power Ch Ag Burner for operating a heat generator
KR100413057B1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2003-12-31 한국과학기술연구원 Method to increase the flaring capacity of the ground flares by using the principle of tornado
US7175423B1 (en) * 2000-10-26 2007-02-13 Bloom Engineering Company, Inc. Air staged low-NOx burner
US7484929B1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2009-02-03 Loren Cook Company Exhaust fan systems
US20060105276A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2006-05-18 James Wilkins Linear Coanda flare methods and apparatus
US7354265B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2008-04-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Flare stack combustion method and apparatus
US7878798B2 (en) * 2006-06-14 2011-02-01 John Zink Company, Llc Coanda gas burner apparatus and methods
RU2315239C1 (en) * 2006-07-27 2008-01-20 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью Финансово-промышленная компания "Космос-Нефть-Газ" Jet burner
US8857733B1 (en) * 2009-01-14 2014-10-14 Resodyn Corporation Flameless thermal spray system using flame heat source
WO2014088450A1 (en) * 2012-12-06 2014-06-12 Schlumberger Canada Limited Multiphase flare for effluent flow
US9970658B2 (en) * 2013-01-18 2018-05-15 Steffes Corporation Pressure relief valve with rotating damper
US20140329185A1 (en) * 2013-05-03 2014-11-06 Uop Llc Apparatus and method for minimizing smoke formation in a flaring stack
US20140329186A1 (en) * 2013-05-03 2014-11-06 Uop Llc Apparatus and method for minimizing smoke formation in a flaring stack
US9470418B2 (en) * 2014-06-05 2016-10-18 David Bacon Gas assist assembly for use with a waste gas flare stack

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2885579B1 (en) 2017-07-19
NO2885579T3 (en) 2017-12-16
US20150211735A1 (en) 2015-07-30
EP2885579A4 (en) 2015-08-05
WO2014027915A1 (en) 2014-02-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20150316257A1 (en) Multiphase flare for effluent flow
US10240784B2 (en) Burner assembly for flaring low calorific gases
EP2885579B1 (en) Shrouded-coanda multiphase burner
EP2383425A2 (en) Choke assembly
EA001591B1 (en) Method of removing a gaseous component from liquid
BRPI0612038A2 (en) high speed low pressure emitter
US10281147B2 (en) Housing assembly for a flare tip apparatus for use on a waste gas flare stack
CN103596697A (en) Shale-gas separating and cleanout system
KR101825601B1 (en) Flare tip and flare apparatus including the same
CN108005598B (en) Gas jet dust remover for mine drilling
CN109779561B (en) Colliery is drilling in pit prevents spouting dust collector
Hou et al. Effects of structural parameters of pressure-swirl nozzle on atomization and dust removal characteristics
US3749377A (en) Orifice scrubber for removing solid particles from high pressure gas
CA1062245A (en) Drill cuttings separation and control apparatus
RU2170389C2 (en) Disposal gas flare plant
US4319647A (en) Flame drill channelling method and apparatus for reducing noise and dust levels
CN116867559A (en) Venturi type composite nozzle device for inhaling and removing air pollutants
KR101825625B1 (en) Flare tip for reducing noise
RU2056178C1 (en) Whirling dust collector
US10288283B2 (en) Multiphase burner
CN104234678A (en) Gas-liquid mixing device for fireflooding gas injection well and gas injection tubular column
RU156921U1 (en) DUST CATCHING PLANT FOR THERMOCHEMICAL DRILLING MACHINES AND THERMAL EXPANSION OF WELLS
Widger Improvement of high pressure water sprays used for coal dust extraction in mine safety
KR102575349B1 (en) Venturi-type compound nozzle device for remove air pollutant by suction
SU1744248A1 (en) Dust trap for thermal drilling machines and thermal reamers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20150702

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: F23D 14/20 20060101AFI20150626BHEP

Ipc: F23G 7/08 20060101ALI20150626BHEP

Ipc: F23G 7/06 20060101ALI20150626BHEP

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20150811

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170220

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 910753

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012034907

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 910753

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170719

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20171019

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20171019

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171019

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171020

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171119

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20171019

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602012034907

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170831

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170816

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170816

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170816

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: MMEP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180901

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120816

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20200805

Year of fee payment: 9

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20210816

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210816