EP2399403A2 - Method for testing a wireless communication system in connection with a fitting device and a hearing device as well as a communication system - Google Patents

Method for testing a wireless communication system in connection with a fitting device and a hearing device as well as a communication system

Info

Publication number
EP2399403A2
EP2399403A2 EP09700035A EP09700035A EP2399403A2 EP 2399403 A2 EP2399403 A2 EP 2399403A2 EP 09700035 A EP09700035 A EP 09700035A EP 09700035 A EP09700035 A EP 09700035A EP 2399403 A2 EP2399403 A2 EP 2399403A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
testing
hdl
transceiver
hearing
acc
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP09700035A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2399403B1 (en
Inventor
Fethi Cherigui
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sonova Holding AG
Original Assignee
Phonak AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Phonak AG filed Critical Phonak AG
Publication of EP2399403A2 publication Critical patent/EP2399403A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2399403B1 publication Critical patent/EP2399403B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; ELECTRIC HEARING AIDS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Electric hearing aids
    • H04R25/30—Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; ELECTRIC HEARING AIDS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00—Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/55—Communication between hearing aids and external devices via a network for data exchange

Definitions

  • the present invention is related to a method for testing a wireless communication system comprising a fitting device and at least one of a hearing device and an accessory device to the hearing device as well as to a communication system.
  • the manufacturing of hearing devices with wireless communication facilities requires wireless testing procedures.
  • BTE- (behind-the-ear) hearing devices for example, the wireless system is tested and validated at the manufacturing site, i.e. well before the hearing devices are delivered to the fitter that is adjusting the hearing device to the needs of the hearing device user.
  • the proper functionality cannot be guaranteed since the hearing devices, and its possible accessory devices, are exposed to possible stress, such as chock or fall, and aging.
  • the aging effect is the gluing process that is used to fix the transmission coil within the hearing device housing or within the accessory device housing, respectively.
  • the transmission coils have to be processed before being inserted in the respective housing.
  • the transmission coil leads are twisted and glued at the twisting point then fixed on a faceplate that is used for mounting the other components of a hearing device.
  • the transmission coil is glued to a holder which is then inserted into the hearing device housing.
  • the present invention is firstly directed to a method for testing a wireless communication system comprising a fitting device and at least one of a hearing device and an accessory device to the hearing device, the fitting device comprising means for communicating with at least one of the hearing device and the accessory device, the method comprising the steps of:
  • the present invention has at least the following advantages: It is a simple, fast and easy method to test the wireless functionality of a wireless hearing system.
  • the end-user or the fitter (audiologist ) can run the tests using the fitting device and its adapted software without further hardware or test equipment.
  • the software can rely on the device driver for the hearing devices as well as for the accessory device, if need be.
  • the concept is based on a debug tool that helps to monitor the wireless functionality and the radio hardware status by means of a set of on-chip tests using the application/end- user software.
  • the tests can be executed on a standalone hearing device, an accessory device and/or a pair of hearing devices or a combination of a hearing device and an accessory device.
  • the results give a precise diagnostic of the radio hardware status in a user friendly graphical user interface implemented in the fitting software for fitting hearing devices for being used by the user.
  • This concept is extendable to wireless self-testing of a hearing device using the fitting device.
  • the self-testing procedure is controlled by the fitting software.
  • the present invention is not intended to replace the complicated and expensive wireless testing, like the so called LDT- (Link Distance Test), performed at the manufacturing site of a hearing device company because the RF- (radio frequency) -environment is well under control at the manufacturing site.
  • the present invention is mainly directed to be used as a debug tool for the audiologists, in the final ITE- (in-the-ear) /ITC- (In-the- canal) hearing device assembly labs as wells as in the worldwide service facilities.
  • the quality of hearing devices can significantly be improved because any changes due to ageing, assembling, etc. can now be recognized and those hearing devices or accessory devices that do not fulfill the requirements can be eliminated before delivering it to the end-user.
  • the hearing device or the accessory device to be tested is connected to the fitting device via a wire before carrying out the step of testing a transceiver of the hearing device or of the accessory device.
  • the wired connection to the devices which comprise a transceiver to be tested, enables a stand-alone test of the transceiver in the respective device. It guarantees testing of the corresponding transceiver only while any possible insufficiency of a wireless connection between the fitting device and the device to be tested is eliminated beforehand.
  • the step of testing comprises checking a transmission coil of the transceiver using tuning values of a resonant circuit. In a more specific embodiment of the present invention, the step of testing comprises checking noise floor based on at least one of wide-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator and base-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator.
  • the step of testing comprises checking a transmitter of a transceiver by using at least one of Radio Signal Strength Indicator, Frame Error Rate and Bit Error Rate. This procedure is used for testing wireless links only.
  • the step of testing comprises checking a receiver of a transceiver by using Frame Error Rate and equivalent Bit Error Rate in both transmission directions.
  • a further embodiment of the present invention further comprises the step of wirelessly connecting the fitting device with at least one of the hearing device and the accessory device, tuning values and calibration values of a transmission coil of the at least one of the hearing device and the accessory device are being checked.
  • the method further comprises the step of monitoring the quality _ -j _
  • the method further comprises the step of transmitting the result of the testing via the accessory device to the fitting device.
  • the present invention is also directed to a wireless communication system comprising:
  • the fitting device comprising means for communicating with at least one of the hearing device and the accessory device
  • the fitting device is operationally connected to at least one of a hearing device and the accessory device.
  • the hearing device or the accessory device to be tested is connected to the fitting device via a wire before carrying out the testing of a transceiver of the hearing device or of the accessory device.
  • a transceiver comprises a transmission coil.
  • the means for testing comprises means for checking noise floor based on at least one of wide-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator and base-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator.
  • the means for testing comprises means for checking a transmitter of a transceiver by using at least one of Radio Signal Strength Indicator, Frame Error Rate and Bit Error Rate.
  • the means for testing comprises means for checking a receiver of a transceiver by using Frame Error Rate and equivalent Bit Error Rate in both transmission directions.
  • the present invention is further explained in more detail by referring to a drawing showing an exemplified embodiment of the present invention.
  • the only figure shows a communication system according to the present invention comprising a fitting device, two hearing devices and an accessory device.
  • a communication system comprising a fitting device 1, two hearing devices HDl and HD2, and an accessory device ACC.
  • the fitting device 1 comprises an interface unit IF and a calculation unit PC, which is, for example, a commercially available personal computer.
  • the calculation unit PC and the interface unit IF are operationally connected via a cable 51 - e.g. an USB- (Universal Serial Bus) -cable - or via a wireless link 52, implementing, for example, the Bluetooth standard.
  • the interface unit IF may be, in a further embodiment of the present invention, implemented in the calculation unit PC resulting in that the fitting device 1 is a single unit comprising all necessary interface facilities for the tasks to be performed.
  • the interface unit IF is able to be connected to the hearing devices HDl and HD2 as well as to the accessory device ACC.
  • a wired and a wireless connection are offered for all the connection 10, 20, 30 to the interface unit IF.
  • a wireless link is provided between the two hearing devices HDl and HD2.
  • the wired connections 11, 21, 31 are made available for certain test procedures that will be described later on. Furthermore, and in view of the fact that the wireless link 41 between the hearing devices HDl and HD2, and the wireless links 42 and 43 between the accessory device ACC and the hearing devices HDl and HD2, are being used during regular operation of the hearing system by the hearing device user, a testing and diagnosing is particularly important for these wireless links 41, 42, 43.
  • the fitting device 1 has control on all testing procedures that are applied by the fitter or audiologist, i.e. the testing procedures are designed, in first instance, to be applied outside the manufacturing site.
  • the testing procedures are designed, in first instance, to be applied outside the manufacturing site.
  • it is a tool implemented in the fitting device 1 in order to give the fitter the possibility to improve and guarantee the well functioning of the wireless links 41, 42, 43 of the communication system comprising the hearing devices HDl and HD2 as well as the accessory device ACC.
  • the quality of service for the wireless hearing systems can be better guaranteed, and a possible malfunction can be detected earlier without sending the whole hearing system back to the manufacturer.
  • the present invention is based on a set of tests that can be selected by the fitter or that are automatically selected by the fitting software in dependence on the available hardware structure.
  • the tests according to the present invention are incorporated at a high software level, at which also the fitting software is implemented. Therewith, the fitter can initiate the test procedures as needed, or the fitting software can initiate test procedures automatically. Thereby, the test procedures make use of the hearing device interface or the accessory device interface, respectively.
  • the tests used by the present invention can be divided into at least five categories:
  • a first category is directed for testing standalone hearing devices HDl, HD2 or accessory devices ACC, i.e. the wireless transceiver of only one hearing device HDl, HD2 or accessory device ACC is tested.
  • the hearing device HDl, HD2 or accessory device ACC is connected with a physical wire (indicated by reference sign 11, 21 and 51 in the figure) to the interface unit IF, via which at least one of the following test procedures is applied:
  • a transceiver of the devices present is tested by checking a RF- (Radio Frequency) -coil using tuning values of a resonant circuit that is inherent to every transceiver. Therewith, it is possible to obtain information regarding short/open circuit, broken wires, fractured ferrite core and/or out of resonance behavior, for example.
  • the RF- (radio frequency) -environment and/or the noise floor picked-up by the transceiver based on the wideband RSSI- (Radio Signal Strength Indicator) or the base-band RSSI accumulation, for example (continuous or instantaneous sink of self or RF- (radio frequency) - environment noise) are checked.
  • the transceiver of the device to be tested is checked using self-level calibration.
  • a second category is directed for testing the fitting device 1, respectively the wireless connection between the interface unit IF and the calculation unit PC.
  • the interface unit IF is wirelessly connected to the calculation unit PC. At least one of the following procedures is applied:
  • a transceiver of the calculation unit PC or the interface unit IF, respectively, is tested by checking a RF- (Radio Frequency) -coil using tuning values of a resonant circuit that is inherent to the transceivers. Therewith, it is possible to obtain information regarding short/open circuit, broken wires, fractured ferrite core and/or out of resonance behavior, for example.
  • RF- Radio Frequency
  • RSSI- Radio Signal Strength Indicator
  • base-band RSSI accumulation for example (continuous or instantaneous sink of self or RF- (radio frequency) -environment noise) are checked.
  • the transceivers of the fitting device are checked using self-level calibration.
  • a third category is directed to testing a wireless link between the two hearing devices HDl and HD2.
  • the hearing devices HDl and HD2 are connected to the fitting device 1 via cables (indicated by reference sign 11 and 21 in Fig. 1) .
  • For the testing of wireless connectivity at least one of the following procedures is applied:
  • each hearing devices HDl and HD2 are checked by determining base-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) .
  • RSSI Radio Signal Strength Indicator
  • FER- Fre Error Rate
  • BER- Bit Error Rate
  • each hearing device HDl and HD2 are checked by determining the FER- (Frame Error Rate) or BER-(BIt Error Rate) .
  • a fourth category is directed to testing the hardware of a hearing device HDl, HD2 as well as the wireless link between the hearing device HDl, HD2 and the fitting device 1, particularly the interface unit IF.
  • the wireless link may also be directed to the accessory device ACC. For the testing, at least one of the following procedures is applied:
  • the hearing device hardware status and tuning parameters are checked as well as the software versions of the embedded software used in connection with the wireless link or the hearing device.
  • the tuning values of hearing device RF- (radio Frequency) -coil tuning values are checked, i.e. the tuning values are determined and compared to predefined values.
  • the internal radio status is checked and the link quality of the wireless link between the hearing device HDl, HD2 with the fitting device 1 (interface unit IF, accessory device ACC) is monitored.
  • a fifth category is directed to testing of a wireless network comprising at least two of the following devices :
  • the corresponding devices form a wireless network (i.e. no physical connections are required) , for which at least one of the following procedures is applied for testing:
  • the RF- (Radio Frequency) -coil tuning values for a device to be tested as well as its calibration values are determined and compared to preset values defining a range in which proper functioning of the device is guaranteed.
  • the internal radio status is checked and the wireless link quality of the devices under test is monitored.
  • Testing the RF- (Radio Frequency) -coil could be, in one embodiment, handled using the tuning values. This is a very important test that helps to check the Q factor and gives indication about possible broken lead wires and/or core fracture.
  • the lead wires may break if a certain stress is applied to the RF-coil.
  • a dumped Q factor might be due to coil position with respect to the battery and loudspeaker housing after shell assembly. This might in particular be the case for ITE- (in-the-ear) hearing devices .
  • a change of the Q factor with time due to antenna gluing is likely and leads to parasitic capacitance. Furthermore, the tests are a good indicator for checking the resonance frequency because it helps to show whether the coil is at the edge or out of the tuning range due to a strong magnetization or wrong inductance value. On the other hand, it is important to measure the amount of RF- (Radio Frequency) -environment noise using a continuous or an instantaneous sink of the RSSI- (Radio Signal Strength Indicator) to be sure that there are no external interferences, which may interfere with the wireless fitting or other wireless functionalities during the test.
  • RF- Radio Frequency
  • RSSI- Radio Signal Strength Indicator
  • test would give the amount of self-noise, which gives an idea about the noise floor in case of assembled ITE- (in-the-ear) shell devices.
  • Another useful feature is the real-time continuous or instantaneous link quality check using FER- (Frame Error
  • the results of these tests are wirelessly communicated to the fitting device 1 (or the interface unit IF, respectively) .
  • - check inter-chip communication interfaces via read/write or by means of IRQ- (interrupt request) status; - check fitting parameters and hearing device tuning values "e.g. OSCs tuning values, battery voltage EOL (end of life) and shutdown levels” (compare them with defaults values before the Pro&Go) ;

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Monitoring And Testing Of Transmission In General (AREA)
  • Transceivers (AREA)

Abstract

A method for testing a wireless communication system is disclosed comprising a fitting device (1; IF, PC) and at least one of a hearing device (HD1, HD2) and an accessory device (ACC) to the hearing device (HD1, HD2). The fitting device (1; IF, PC) comprising means for communicating with at least one of the hearing device (HD1, HD2) and the accessory device (ACC). The method comprises the steps of: - testing at least one of the following elements: - a transceiver of the hearing device (HD1, HD2); - a transceiver of the accessory device (ACC); - a transceiver of the fitting device (1; IF, PC); - quality of a link between two transceivers; - comparing results of the testing with predefined values, - presenting a result of the comparison to the user of the fitting device (1; IF, PC) by indicating failure or non-failure for the corresponding element tested, wherein the step of testing is controlled by the fitting device (1; IF, PC). Furthermore, a wireless communication system is disclosed, which is used for implementing the inventive method.

Description

Method for testing a wireless communication system in connection with a fitting device and a hearing device as well as a communication system
The present invention is related to a method for testing a wireless communication system comprising a fitting device and at least one of a hearing device and an accessory device to the hearing device as well as to a communication system.
The manufacturing of hearing devices with wireless communication facilities requires wireless testing procedures. For BTE- (behind-the-ear) hearing devices, for example, the wireless system is tested and validated at the manufacturing site, i.e. well before the hearing devices are delivered to the fitter that is adjusting the hearing device to the needs of the hearing device user. The proper functionality cannot be guaranteed since the hearing devices, and its possible accessory devices, are exposed to possible stress, such as chock or fall, and aging.
An example for the aging effect is the gluing process that is used to fix the transmission coil within the hearing device housing or within the accessory device housing, respectively. In fact, the transmission coils have to be processed before being inserted in the respective housing. For an ITE- (in-the-ear) hearing device, for example, the transmission coil leads are twisted and glued at the twisting point then fixed on a faceplate that is used for mounting the other components of a hearing device. For a BTE- (behind-the-ear) hearing device, the transmission coil is glued to a holder which is then inserted into the hearing device housing.
It has been realized that the gluing process adds parasitic capacitance, which cannot be determined in advance, and additional losses, which changes the inductance value as well as the Q-factor. A part of the resulting impact is taken into account after coil testing and after a so called Link Distance Test has been performed. All these tests are performed at the manufacturing site. Therefore, any variations in connection with the transmission coil after the hearing devices or the accessory devices, respectively, have been delivered to the fitter, cannot be taken into account anymore. This is in particular disadvantageous since investigations showed that the parasitic capacitance and the damping factor (DF=1/Q) of the glue itself varies over time due to thermal stress. Hence, the Q-factor and the corresponding inductance present a rather large variation.
In addition, with respect to ITE- (in-the-ear) and ITC-(In- the-canal) hearing devices, it has already been proposed to use the LDT- (Link Distance Test) to properly test the wireless link. However, the LDT is rather time consuming and results in higher costs.
Therefore, it is one object of the present invention to provide a method for testing a wireless communication system comprising a fitting device and at least one of a hearing device and an accessory device that do not have the above-mentioned disadvantages.
This and other objects are accomplished by the measures specified in claim 1. Further embodiments of the present invention as well as a communication system for testing hearing devices and its accessory devices are specified in further claims.
The present invention is firstly directed to a method for testing a wireless communication system comprising a fitting device and at least one of a hearing device and an accessory device to the hearing device, the fitting device comprising means for communicating with at least one of the hearing device and the accessory device, the method comprising the steps of:
- testing at least one of the following elements:
— a transceiver of the hearing device; - a transceiver of the accessory device;
— a transceiver of the fitting device;
— quality of a link between two transceivers;
— comparing results of the testing with predefined values, - presenting a result of the comparison to the user of the fitting device by indicating failure or non- failure for the corresponding element tested, wherein the step of testing is controlled by the fitting device . - A -
The present invention has at least the following advantages: It is a simple, fast and easy method to test the wireless functionality of a wireless hearing system. The end-user or the fitter (audiologist ) can run the tests using the fitting device and its adapted software without further hardware or test equipment. Also the software can rely on the device driver for the hearing devices as well as for the accessory device, if need be.
The concept is based on a debug tool that helps to monitor the wireless functionality and the radio hardware status by means of a set of on-chip tests using the application/end- user software. The tests can be executed on a standalone hearing device, an accessory device and/or a pair of hearing devices or a combination of a hearing device and an accessory device. The results give a precise diagnostic of the radio hardware status in a user friendly graphical user interface implemented in the fitting software for fitting hearing devices for being used by the user.
This concept is extendable to wireless self-testing of a hearing device using the fitting device. The self-testing procedure is controlled by the fitting software.
The present invention is not intended to replace the complicated and expensive wireless testing, like the so called LDT- (Link Distance Test), performed at the manufacturing site of a hearing device company because the RF- (radio frequency) -environment is well under control at the manufacturing site. However, the present invention is mainly directed to be used as a debug tool for the audiologists, in the final ITE- (in-the-ear) /ITC- (In-the- canal) hearing device assembly labs as wells as in the worldwide service facilities. Therewith, the quality of hearing devices can significantly be improved because any changes due to ageing, assembling, etc. can now be recognized and those hearing devices or accessory devices that do not fulfill the requirements can be eliminated before delivering it to the end-user.
In a more specific embodiment of the present invention, the hearing device or the accessory device to be tested is connected to the fitting device via a wire before carrying out the step of testing a transceiver of the hearing device or of the accessory device.
The wired connection to the devices, which comprise a transceiver to be tested, enables a stand-alone test of the transceiver in the respective device. It guarantees testing of the corresponding transceiver only while any possible insufficiency of a wireless connection between the fitting device and the device to be tested is eliminated beforehand.
In a still more specific embodiment of the present invention, the step of testing comprises checking a transmission coil of the transceiver using tuning values of a resonant circuit. In a more specific embodiment of the present invention, the step of testing comprises checking noise floor based on at least one of wide-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator and base-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator.
In a more specific embodiment of the present invention, the step of testing comprises checking a transmitter of a transceiver by using at least one of Radio Signal Strength Indicator, Frame Error Rate and Bit Error Rate. This procedure is used for testing wireless links only.
In a more specific embodiment of the present invention, the step of testing comprises checking a receiver of a transceiver by using Frame Error Rate and equivalent Bit Error Rate in both transmission directions.
A further embodiment of the present invention further comprises the step of wirelessly connecting the fitting device with at least one of the hearing device and the accessory device, tuning values and calibration values of a transmission coil of the at least one of the hearing device and the accessory device are being checked.
Therewith, a wireless connection between the fitting device and the device to be tested is checked in order to detect possible malfunctions.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, the method further comprises the step of monitoring the quality _ -j _
of a wireless link between two hearing devices, or between a hearing device and an accessory device.
In a still further embodiment of the present invention, the method further comprises the step of transmitting the result of the testing via the accessory device to the fitting device.
Furthermore, the present invention is also directed to a wireless communication system comprising:
- a fitting device;
- at least one of a hearing device and an accessory device to the hearing device, the fitting device comprising means for communicating with at least one of the hearing device and the accessory device,
- means for testing at least one of the following elements :
— a transceiver of the hearing device;
— a transceiver of the accessory device; - a transceiver of the fitting device;
— quality of a link between two transceivers;
- means for comparing results of the testing with predefined values,
- means for presenting a result of the comparison to the user of the fitting device by indicating failure or non-failure for the corresponding element tested, wherein the fitting device is operationally connected to at least one of a hearing device and the accessory device. In an embodiment of the present invention, the hearing device or the accessory device to be tested is connected to the fitting device via a wire before carrying out the testing of a transceiver of the hearing device or of the accessory device.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, a transceiver comprises a transmission coil.
In a still further embodiment of the present invention, the means for testing comprises means for checking noise floor based on at least one of wide-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator and base-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator.
In a still further embodiment of the present invention, the means for testing comprises means for checking a transmitter of a transceiver by using at least one of Radio Signal Strength Indicator, Frame Error Rate and Bit Error Rate.
In a still further embodiment of the present invention, the means for testing comprises means for checking a receiver of a transceiver by using Frame Error Rate and equivalent Bit Error Rate in both transmission directions.
The present invention is further explained in more detail by referring to a drawing showing an exemplified embodiment of the present invention. The only figure shows a communication system according to the present invention comprising a fitting device, two hearing devices and an accessory device.
In the only figure, a communication system is depicted comprising a fitting device 1, two hearing devices HDl and HD2, and an accessory device ACC. The fitting device 1 comprises an interface unit IF and a calculation unit PC, which is, for example, a commercially available personal computer. The calculation unit PC and the interface unit IF are operationally connected via a cable 51 - e.g. an USB- (Universal Serial Bus) -cable - or via a wireless link 52, implementing, for example, the Bluetooth standard. It is pointed out that the interface unit IF may be, in a further embodiment of the present invention, implemented in the calculation unit PC resulting in that the fitting device 1 is a single unit comprising all necessary interface facilities for the tasks to be performed.
The interface unit IF is able to be connected to the hearing devices HDl and HD2 as well as to the accessory device ACC. A wired and a wireless connection are offered for all the connection 10, 20, 30 to the interface unit IF. As more than one hearing devices HDl and HD2 are present, e.g. for a binaural hearing system, a wireless link is provided between the two hearing devices HDl and HD2.
As the present invention is directed to testing wireless connections, the wired connections 11, 21, 31 are made available for certain test procedures that will be described later on. Furthermore, and in view of the fact that the wireless link 41 between the hearing devices HDl and HD2, and the wireless links 42 and 43 between the accessory device ACC and the hearing devices HDl and HD2, are being used during regular operation of the hearing system by the hearing device user, a testing and diagnosing is particularly important for these wireless links 41, 42, 43.
According to the present invention, the fitting device 1 has control on all testing procedures that are applied by the fitter or audiologist, i.e. the testing procedures are designed, in first instance, to be applied outside the manufacturing site. In fact, it is a tool implemented in the fitting device 1 in order to give the fitter the possibility to improve and guarantee the well functioning of the wireless links 41, 42, 43 of the communication system comprising the hearing devices HDl and HD2 as well as the accessory device ACC. As a result, the quality of service for the wireless hearing systems can be better guaranteed, and a possible malfunction can be detected earlier without sending the whole hearing system back to the manufacturer. In fact, it is possible to identify the defective part of the tested wireless hearing system and to only replace the defective part. Therewith, costs and logistic efforts can be reduced significantly.
The present invention is based on a set of tests that can be selected by the fitter or that are automatically selected by the fitting software in dependence on the available hardware structure.
The tests according to the present invention are incorporated at a high software level, at which also the fitting software is implemented. Therewith, the fitter can initiate the test procedures as needed, or the fitting software can initiate test procedures automatically. Thereby, the test procedures make use of the hearing device interface or the accessory device interface, respectively.
The tests used by the present invention can be divided into at least five categories:
A first category is directed for testing standalone hearing devices HDl, HD2 or accessory devices ACC, i.e. the wireless transceiver of only one hearing device HDl, HD2 or accessory device ACC is tested. In this test, the hearing device HDl, HD2 or accessory device ACC is connected with a physical wire (indicated by reference sign 11, 21 and 51 in the figure) to the interface unit IF, via which at least one of the following test procedures is applied:
- A transceiver of the devices present is tested by checking a RF- (Radio Frequency) -coil using tuning values of a resonant circuit that is inherent to every transceiver. Therewith, it is possible to obtain information regarding short/open circuit, broken wires, fractured ferrite core and/or out of resonance behavior, for example. - The RF- (radio frequency) -environment and/or the noise floor picked-up by the transceiver based on the wideband RSSI- (Radio Signal Strength Indicator) or the base-band RSSI accumulation, for example (continuous or instantaneous sink of self or RF- (radio frequency) - environment noise) are checked.
- The transceiver of the device to be tested is checked using self-level calibration.
A second category is directed for testing the fitting device 1, respectively the wireless connection between the interface unit IF and the calculation unit PC. In this test, the interface unit IF is wirelessly connected to the calculation unit PC. At least one of the following procedures is applied:
- A transceiver of the calculation unit PC or the interface unit IF, respectively, is tested by checking a RF- (Radio Frequency) -coil using tuning values of a resonant circuit that is inherent to the transceivers. Therewith, it is possible to obtain information regarding short/open circuit, broken wires, fractured ferrite core and/or out of resonance behavior, for example.
- The RF- (radio frequency) -environment and/or the noise floor picked-up by the fitting device transceivers based on the wide-band RSSI- (Radio Signal Strength Indicator) or the base-band RSSI accumulation, for example (continuous or instantaneous sink of self or RF- (radio frequency) -environment noise) are checked.
- The transceivers of the fitting device are checked using self-level calibration.
A third category is directed to testing a wireless link between the two hearing devices HDl and HD2. Thereto, the hearing devices HDl and HD2 are connected to the fitting device 1 via cables (indicated by reference sign 11 and 21 in Fig. 1) . For the testing of wireless connectivity, at least one of the following procedures is applied:
— The transmitters of each hearing devices HDl and HD2 are checked by determining base-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) . In addition, the FER- (Frame Error Rate) or the BER-(BIt Error Rate) is/are also determined in a further embodiment.
- The receiver of each hearing device HDl and HD2 are checked by determining the FER- (Frame Error Rate) or BER-(BIt Error Rate) .
A fourth category is directed to testing the hardware of a hearing device HDl, HD2 as well as the wireless link between the hearing device HDl, HD2 and the fitting device 1, particularly the interface unit IF. Alternatively, the wireless link may also be directed to the accessory device ACC. For the testing, at least one of the following procedures is applied:
- The hearing device hardware status and tuning parameters are checked as well as the software versions of the embedded software used in connection with the wireless link or the hearing device.
- The tuning values of hearing device RF- (radio Frequency) -coil tuning values are checked, i.e. the tuning values are determined and compared to predefined values.
- The internal radio status is checked and the link quality of the wireless link between the hearing device HDl, HD2 with the fitting device 1 (interface unit IF, accessory device ACC) is monitored.
Finally, a fifth category is directed to testing of a wireless network comprising at least two of the following devices :
- hearing device HDl;
- hearing device HD2; - accessory device ACC;
- fitting device 1, interface unit IF, respectively. The corresponding devices form a wireless network (i.e. no physical connections are required) , for which at least one of the following procedures is applied for testing:
— The RF- (Radio Frequency) -coil tuning values for a device to be tested as well as its calibration values are determined and compared to preset values defining a range in which proper functioning of the device is guaranteed.
- The internal radio status is checked and the wireless link quality of the devices under test is monitored.
Testing the RF- (Radio Frequency) -coil could be, in one embodiment, handled using the tuning values. This is a very important test that helps to check the Q factor and gives indication about possible broken lead wires and/or core fracture. The lead wires may break if a certain stress is applied to the RF-coil. Further, a dumped Q factor might be due to coil position with respect to the battery and loudspeaker housing after shell assembly. This might in particular be the case for ITE- (in-the-ear) hearing devices .
A change of the Q factor with time due to antenna gluing is likely and leads to parasitic capacitance. Furthermore, the tests are a good indicator for checking the resonance frequency because it helps to show whether the coil is at the edge or out of the tuning range due to a strong magnetization or wrong inductance value. On the other hand, it is important to measure the amount of RF- (Radio Frequency) -environment noise using a continuous or an instantaneous sink of the RSSI- (Radio Signal Strength Indicator) to be sure that there are no external interferences, which may interfere with the wireless fitting or other wireless functionalities during the test.
In the absence of such external interferences, the test would give the amount of self-noise, which gives an idea about the noise floor in case of assembled ITE- (in-the-ear) shell devices.
Another useful feature is the real-time continuous or instantaneous link quality check using FER- (Frame Error
Rate) and equivalent BER- (Bit Error Rate) in both direction when two devices are used. This test is a good indicator of Frame synchronization loss and/or audio dropouts versus link distance and/or external disturbances.
Furthermore, one can image a large set of hearing device wireless self-tests in order to check the internal hardware/software status. The results of these tests are wirelessly communicated to the fitting device 1 (or the interface unit IF, respectively) .
For example, one or more of the following tests can be performed:
- check the wireless device serial number; - check the image software version;
- check inter-chip communication interfaces via read/write or by means of IRQ- (interrupt request) status; - check fitting parameters and hearing device tuning values "e.g. OSCs tuning values, battery voltage EOL (end of life) and shutdown levels" (compare them with defaults values before the Pro&Go) ;
- check the hardware logic and memory status by performing a logical and memory bist, if necessary.
- check the DSP- (digital signal processor) gain using internal sound generators;
- check the hardware external components (e.g. capacitors, resistors, switches, etc.) connection by performing on-chip test boundary scans;
- check loudspeaker impedance (loudspeaker type) by doing on-chip measurement technique (using the front- end for analog-to-digital conversion) ;
- check battery status .

Claims

Claims
1. A method for testing a wireless communication system comprising a fitting device (1; IF, PC) and at least one of a hearing device (HDl, HD2) and an accessory device (ACC) to the hearing device (HDl, HD2), the fitting device (1; IF, PC) comprising means for communicating with at least one of the hearing device (HDl, HD2) and the accessory device (ACC), the method comprising the steps of:
- testing at least one of the following elements:
- a transceiver of the hearing device (HDl, HD2);
- a transceiver of the accessory device (ACC) ;
- a transceiver of the fitting device (1; IF, PC) ; — quality of a link between two transceivers;
- comparing results of the testing with predefined values,
- presenting a result of the comparison to the user of the fitting device (1; IF, PC) by indicating failure or non-failure for the corresponding element tested, wherein the step of testing is controlled by the fitting device (1; IF, PC) .
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the hearing device (HDl, HD2) or the accessory device (ACC) to be tested is connected to the fitting device (1; IF, PC) via a wire (11,
21, 31) before carrying out the step of testing a transceiver of the hearing device (HDl, HD2) or of the accessory device (ACC) .
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the step of testing comprises checking a transmission coil of a transceiver using tuning values of a resonant circuit.
4. The method of one of the claims 1 to 3, wherein the step of testing comprises checking noise floor based on at least one of wide-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator and baseband Radio Signal Strength Indicator.
5. The method of one of the claims 1 to 4, wherein the step of testing comprises checking a transmitter of a transceiver by using at least one of Radio Signal Strength Indicator, Frame Error Rate and Bit Error Rate.
6. The method of one of the claims 1 to 5, wherein the step of testing comprises checking a receiver of a transceiver by using Frame Error Rate and equivalent Bit Error Rate in both transmission directions.
7. The method of one of the claims 1 to 6, further comprising the step of wirelessly connecting the fitting device (1; IF, PC) with at least one of the hearing device (HDl, HD2) and the accessory device (ACC), tuning values and calibration values of a transmission coil of the at least one of the hearing device (HDl, HD2) and the accessory device (ACC) are being checked.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of monitoring the quality of a wireless link (12, 22, 41, 42, 43) between two hearing devices (HDl, HD2), or between a hearing device (HDl, HD2) and an accessory device (ACC) .
9. The method of one of the claims 1 to 8, further comprising the step of transmitting the result of the testing via the accessory device (ACC) to the fitting device (1; IF, PC) .
10. A wireless communication system comprising: - a fitting device (1; IF, PC),
- at least one of a hearing device (HDl, HD2) and an accessory device (ACC) to the hearing device (HDl, HD2), the fitting device (1; IF, PC) comprising means for communicating with at least one of the hearing device (HDl, HD2) and the accessory device (ACC),
— means for testing at least one of the following elements :
- a transceiver of the hearing device (HDl, HD2);
- a transceiver of the accessory device (ACC) ; - a transceiver of the fitting device (1; IF, PC);
- quality of a link between two transceivers;
— means for comparing results of the testing with predefined values,
- means for presenting a result of the comparison to the user of the fitting device (1; IF, PC) by indicating failure or non-failure for the corresponding element tested, wherein the fitting device (1; IF, PC) is operationally connected to at least one of a hearing device (HDl, HD2) and the accessory device (AAC) .
11. The communication system of claim 10, wherein the hearing device (HDl, HD2) or the accessory device (ACC) to be tested is connected to the fitting device (1; IF, PC) via a wire (11, 21, 31) before carrying out the testing of a transceiver of the hearing device (HDl, HD2) or of the accessory device (ACC) .
12. The communication system of claim 10 or 11, wherein a transceiver comprises a transmission coil.
13. The communication system of one of the claims 10 to 12, wherein the means for testing comprises means for checking noise floor based on at least one of wide-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator and base-band Radio Signal Strength Indicator.
14. The communication system of one of the claims 10 to 13, wherein the means for testing comprises means for checking a transmitter of a transceiver by using at least one of Radio Signal Strength Indicator, Frame Error Rate and Bit Error Rate.
15. The communication system of one of the claims 10 to 14, wherein the means for testing comprises means for checking a receiver of a transceiver by using Frame Error Rate and equivalent Bit Error Rate in both transmission directions.
EP09700035A 2009-02-19 2009-02-19 Method for testing a wireless communication system in connection with a fitting device and a hearing device as well as a communication system Active EP2399403B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2009/051992 WO2009063097A2 (en) 2009-02-19 2009-02-19 Method for testing a wireless communication system in connection with a fitting device and a hearing device as well as a communication system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2399403A2 true EP2399403A2 (en) 2011-12-28
EP2399403B1 EP2399403B1 (en) 2012-12-05

Family

ID=40568716

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09700035A Active EP2399403B1 (en) 2009-02-19 2009-02-19 Method for testing a wireless communication system in connection with a fitting device and a hearing device as well as a communication system

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US8744092B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2399403B1 (en)
DK (1) DK2399403T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2009063097A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3737116A1 (en) 2019-05-10 2020-11-11 Sonova AG Binaural hearing system with in-situ calibration of rf receiver

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9774961B2 (en) 2005-06-05 2017-09-26 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Hearing assistance device ear-to-ear communication using an intermediate device
US8041066B2 (en) 2007-01-03 2011-10-18 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Wireless system for hearing communication devices providing wireless stereo reception modes
US8208642B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2012-06-26 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus for a binaural hearing assistance system using monaural audio signals
US8442248B2 (en) 2008-09-03 2013-05-14 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Systems and methods for managing wireless communication links for hearing assistance devices
US8891793B1 (en) 2009-06-26 2014-11-18 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Remote control for a hearing assistance device
JP5090585B1 (en) * 2009-10-19 2012-12-05 ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ Hearing aid system with lost partner function
US9420385B2 (en) 2009-12-21 2016-08-16 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Low power intermittent messaging for hearing assistance devices
US8712083B2 (en) 2010-10-11 2014-04-29 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus for monitoring wireless communication in hearing assistance systems
WO2013009672A1 (en) 2011-07-08 2013-01-17 R2 Wellness, Llc Audio input device
US9414170B2 (en) * 2012-12-28 2016-08-09 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid having an adaptive antenna matching mechanism and a method for adaptively matching a hearing aid antenna
EP3288292B1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2020-08-19 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Hearing aid using wireless test modes as diagnostic tool
US9584927B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-02-28 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Wireless environment interference diagnostic hearing assistance device system
US10003379B2 (en) 2014-05-06 2018-06-19 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Wireless communication with probing bandwidth
US10708157B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2020-07-07 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Link quality diagnostic application

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7529565B2 (en) 2004-04-08 2009-05-05 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Wireless communication protocol
US7593538B2 (en) 2005-03-28 2009-09-22 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Antennas for hearing aids
WO2007068243A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Widex A/S Method and system for surveillance of a wireless connection in a hearing aid fitting system
US20070167155A1 (en) * 2006-01-19 2007-07-19 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Tester and test system for wireless device
US8077891B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2011-12-13 Phonak Ag Method and system for adjusting a hearing device

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2009063097A2 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3737116A1 (en) 2019-05-10 2020-11-11 Sonova AG Binaural hearing system with in-situ calibration of rf receiver

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20110299693A1 (en) 2011-12-08
EP2399403B1 (en) 2012-12-05
WO2009063097A2 (en) 2009-05-22
DK2399403T3 (en) 2013-03-25
WO2009063097A3 (en) 2009-07-23
US8744092B2 (en) 2014-06-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8744092B2 (en) Method for testing a wireless communication system in connection with a fitting device and a hearing device as well as a communication system
JP5410504B2 (en) Microphone device with built-in self-test circuit
US20110009770A1 (en) Audiometric Testing and Calibration Devices and Methods
US8249262B2 (en) Device for acoustically analyzing a hearing device and analysis method
CN106686511A (en) Earphone function testing method and testing system
WO1997019573A1 (en) An apparatus and method for monitoring magnetic audio systems
CN116438781B (en) Signal transmission device, signal transmission system, and information providing method
US10048302B2 (en) Vehicle communications signal diagnostics using radio receiver
CN103874001B (en) The method of the output translator of hearing instrument and identification hearing instrument
CN109982232A (en) Vehicle, the audio system of vehicle and its test method, device
CN210609672U (en) acoustic receiver
US20130033270A1 (en) Electromagnetic interference test sytem with self-checking function and self-checking method
WO2019238799A1 (en) Method of testing microphone performance of a hearing aid system and a hearing aid system
CN113242594A (en) Antenna power control method, antenna power control device, storage medium, and device
US20150172829A1 (en) Method of determining a fit of a hearing device and hearing device with fit recognition
CN103961106A (en) Method for measuring thickness of skin flap and detecting receiving coil
JP6657307B2 (en) Method for characterizing a receiver of a hearing device, a hearing device, and a test device for a hearing device
CN110611870B (en) Method for identifying receiver, hearing system and earphone
JP2020513182A5 (en)
US20160204882A1 (en) Rf device and power control performed therein
US10841715B2 (en) Method of adapting a hearing apparatus
CN119071830A (en) Vehicle networking function detection method, device, electronic device and readable storage medium
CN111474502A (en) Transformer listening contrast equipment, listening positioning method, device and storage medium
US20170118570A1 (en) Microphone Assembly and Method for Determining Parameters of a Transducer in a Microphone Assembly
US11277701B2 (en) Microphone

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110607

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: TROESCH SCHEIDEGGER WERNER AG, CH

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 587845

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009011697

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 587845

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130305

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130316

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20121205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130305

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130405

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130405

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130228

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130906

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20131031

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20130305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009011697

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130906

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130228

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130731

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130219

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121205

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20090219

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130219

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 602009011697

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: U11

Free format text: ST27 STATUS EVENT CODE: U-0-0-U10-U11 (AS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL OFFICE)

Effective date: 20260301

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20260225

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20260227

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20260301

Year of fee payment: 18