EP2392464A2 - Registration device for mitigating the production/removal of particulate matter from a substrate/mailpiece envelope - Google Patents

Registration device for mitigating the production/removal of particulate matter from a substrate/mailpiece envelope Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2392464A2
EP2392464A2 EP11168413A EP11168413A EP2392464A2 EP 2392464 A2 EP2392464 A2 EP 2392464A2 EP 11168413 A EP11168413 A EP 11168413A EP 11168413 A EP11168413 A EP 11168413A EP 2392464 A2 EP2392464 A2 EP 2392464A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mailpiece
print station
station according
contact surfaces
substrate material
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP11168413A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2392464B1 (en
EP2392464A3 (en
Inventor
Steven J. Dacunha
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pitney Bowes Inc
Original Assignee
Pitney Bowes Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=44461924&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2392464(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Pitney Bowes Inc filed Critical Pitney Bowes Inc
Publication of EP2392464A2 publication Critical patent/EP2392464A2/en
Publication of EP2392464A3 publication Critical patent/EP2392464A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2392464B1 publication Critical patent/EP2392464B1/en
Revoked legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41JTYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J13/00Devices or arrangements of selective printing mechanisms, e.g. ink-jet printers or thermal printers, specially adapted for supporting or handling copy material in short lengths, e.g. sheets
    • B41J13/10Sheet holders, retainers, movable guides, or stationary guides
    • B41J13/12Sheet holders, retainers, movable guides, or stationary guides specially adapted for small cards, envelopes, or the like, e.g. credit cards, cut visiting cards
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41JTYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J11/00Devices or arrangements  of selective printing mechanisms, e.g. ink-jet printers or thermal printers, for supporting or handling copy material in sheet or web form
    • B41J11/0045Guides for printing material
    • B41J11/005Guides in the printing zone, e.g. guides for preventing contact of conveyed sheets with printhead

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a registration device for use in a substrate print station and, more particularly, to a new and useful registration device for mitigating the production/removal of particulate matter, i.e., dust and debris, from the substrate material/mailpiece envelope as it engages a registration surface during print operations.
  • particulate matter i.e., dust and debris
  • Mailpiece creation systems such as mailpiece inserters are typically used by organizations such as banks, insurance companies, and utility companies to periodically produce a large volume of mailpieces, e.g., monthly billing or shareholders income/dividend statements.
  • mailpiece inserters are analogous to automated assembly equipment inasmuch as sheets, inserts and envelopes are conveyed along a feed path and assembled in or at various modules of the mailpiece inserter. That is, the various modules work cooperatively to process the sheets until a finished mailpiece is produced.
  • a mailpiece inserter includes a variety of apparatus/modules for conveying and processing a substrate/sheet material along the feed path.
  • mailpiece inserters include apparatus/modules for (i) feeding and singulating printed content material in a "feeder module”, (ii) accumulating the content material to form a multi-sheet collation in an "accumulator”, (iii) folding the content material to produce a variety of fold configurations such as a C-fold, Z-fold, bi-fold and gate fold, in a "folder”, (iv) feeding mailpiece inserts such as coupons, brochures, and pamphlets, in combination with the content material, in a "chassis module” (v) inserting the folded/unfolded and/or nested content material into an envelope in an "envelope inserter", (vi) sealing the filled envelope in "sealing module” (vii) printing recipient/return addresses and/or postage indicia on the face of the mailpiece envelope at a "print station” and (viii)
  • mailpiece inserter may also include other modules for (i) binding/stitching an edge of sheet material to form a bound collation, i.e., via a stitcher/stapler module, and (ii) reversing the orientation of the substrate/sheet material, via a "sheet inverter" to print information on an opposite side of the sheet/content material.
  • the printing station it is common to register a face surface of each mailpiece with a registration plate such that an array of print heads may print information such as destination and return addresses on the face of each mailpiece.
  • the registration plate includes an aperture for accepting a stepped array of print head nozzles. The thickness of the registration plate provides a threshold "stand-off" dimension from the face surface of each mailpiece to each of the print head nozzles such that ink droplets may be precisely deposited.
  • the array of print heads and registration plate are typically disposed over, and/or in opposed relation to, an underlying conveyance system such as one or more conveyor belts.
  • Mailpieces are conveyed along the belt(s), move under the registration plate and passed by the print head nozzles as ink is deposited.
  • the spacing between the underlying conveyance system, e.g., the conveyance belt (s), and the registration plate must be closely controlled. That is, with each mail run/print job performed by the print module, the necessary clearance gap must be established based upon the anticipated thickness of mailpieces being processed.
  • the underlying conveyance system/belt may be compliant to allow envelopes of variable thickness dimension move under the registration plate while the deck the of conveyance system/belt is displaced by the geometric variation in envelope thickness.
  • particulate matter which may have collected on an envelope during pre-processing, can be disturbed and become airborne due to engagement of the envelope with the registration plate. Additionally, the frictional engagement with the registration plate may produce additional dust and debris. As more particulate matter is disturbed/removed/produced, the print station must perform additional purge cycles to clear the print head nozzles of dust and debris. As a result, the mailpiece inserter is halted, or momentarily/temporarily discontinued, to allow the purge cycle to clear/clean the print head nozzles. While such purge cycles must be tolerated to permit smooth operation of the print station, the down time is unproductive and costly to the operator. Furthermore, inasmuch as the ink used to purge the print head nozzles is costly, it is desirable to minimize the number of purge cycles that a print station performs to minimize the cost of the ink consumed.
  • a registration device for use in combination with an array of print head nozzles operative to deposit ink on a substrate material.
  • the registration device is operative to maintain a prescribed separation distance between an array of print head nozzles and a substrate material during print operations and includes a registration surface which opposes a face surface of the substrate material and is textured to define a plurality of contact points.
  • the contact points are substantially evenly distributed over, and engage, the face surface of the substrate material, to reduce the total surface area in contact with the substrate material and the particulate matter which may be shed from, and/or produced by frictional engagement with, the substrate material.
  • a registration device and print station are described for printing information on a mailpiece envelope such as a destination address, return address and postage indicia for delivery of the mailpiece. While the invention is described in the context of a mailpiece inserter, the registration device and print station described herein are applicable to any printer wherein a substrate material is registered against a registration device for maintaining a prescribed separation distance between an array of print head nozzles and a substrate material during print operations. Consequently, the detailed description and illustrations are merely indicative of an embodiment of the invention, and, accordingly, the invention should be broadly interpreted in accordance with the appended claims.
  • Fig. 1 depicts a side view of a print station 10 having a plurality of print heads 12.
  • Each print head 12 deposits ink, i.e., prints, on a face surface 14 of a substrate material 16 (e.g., such as a mailpiece envelope) as the substrate material 16 is conveyed through the print station 10.
  • a substrate material 16 e.g., such as a mailpiece envelope
  • mailpiece envelope 16 will, hereinafter, be used to mean any sheet and/or substrate material.
  • Each of the print heads 12 includes one or more rows of print head nozzles 12N which deposit ink through an aperture/opening 18 in a registration device 20.
  • the registration device 20 is disposed in combination with the print heads 12 and functions to maintain a prescribed separation distance between a face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16 and each of the print head nozzles 12N.
  • the separation distance ensures the efficacy of print operations inasmuch as the deposited ink requires a certain stand-off distance, i.e., spacing from the exit of the nozzles 12N to the face surface 14, to be deposited at a precise location on the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16.
  • the mailpiece envelope 16 is conveyed through the print station 10 by a conventional transport system such as a conveyor belt 22 which may be supported on, or by, a series of spring-biased rollers 24.
  • the spring-biased rollers 24 urge the conveyor belt 22, and consequently, mailpiece envelope 16, upwardly toward a registration surface 20S of the registration device 20.
  • the separation distance between the print head nozzles 12N and the top face surface 20S of the mailpiece envelope may be accurately controlled. As a consequence, print quality is accurately maintained for optimum print performance.
  • the registration surface 20S opposes and engages the face surface 16S (see Fig. 1 ) of the envelope 16 as the conveyor belt 22 transports the envelope 16 beneath the print head nozzles 12N of the print station 12.
  • the registration surface 20S is textured to contact the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16 at multiple points, or regions, along the face surface 16S.
  • the registration surface 20S defines a plurality of contact surfaces 30 which are substantially evenly distributed across the registration surface 20S and a plurality of non-contact regions 32 disposed therebetween.
  • the contact surfaces 30 are (i) raised, (ii) have a substantially convex or arcuate contour, and, (iii) are operative to effect bridging of the mailpiece envelope 16, i.e., across the non-contact regions 32, such that registration surface 20S does not frictionally engage the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope at these regions 32.
  • the textured surface i.e., which includes the contact surfaces 30 and non-contact regions 32, reduces the surface area in contact with the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16, i.e., as compared to the total surface area of a purely planar/flat registration surface employed in prior art registration devices. That is, the textured surface of the registration device 20 mitigates particulate matter removed/shed from the mailpiece envelope 16 by minimizing the friction and/or profile drag developed between the registration surface 20S of the registration device 20 and the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16.
  • the contact surfaces 30 may be produced by plurality of serpentine-shaped grooves 34 which extend in a direction substantially parallel to the feed path of the mailpiece envelope 16 (shown in the direction of arrow FP in Fig. 3 ).
  • the grooves 34 may be aligned, i.e., in phase, or staggered, i.e., out-of-phase, relative to the feed path FP of the mailpiece envelope 16.
  • Figs. 2 and 3 show the grooves in a staggered pattern such that the crest 34C of one groove 34a aligns a trough 34T of an adjacent groove 34b.
  • each of the contact surfaces 30 define an elongate-diamond or elliptical shape (best seen in Fig. 3 ).
  • serpentine-shaped grooves 34 having a pitch P (i.e., a distance or length between a pair of adjacent crests 34C or a pair of adjacent troughs 34T), of between about three-eights inches (3/8") to about one-quarter inches (1/4"), and a rise R (i.e., a distance or height from a minimum depth along one trough 34T to a maximum height along an adjacent crest 34C) of between about five thirty-seconds inches (5/34") to about seven thirty-seconds inches (7/34"), produces favorable results.
  • a groove 34 having a substantially linear segment LS i.e., a segment shown in Fig.
  • a textured registration surface 20S of the type described above may be fabricated from 304 polished stainless steel sheets having a 5-SM surface pattern available from RIMEX Metals Inc. located in the town of Edison, State of New Jersey.
  • the surface texture of the registration device 20 has been discussed to mitigate particulate matter produced/removed/shed from the mailpiece envelope 16.
  • Yet another characteristic of the registration device 20, which synergistically reduces the particulate matter relates to the shape of the opening 18, and, more particularly, to the shape or angle of the edges 40 upstream of each of the print head nozzles 12N. Referring back to Fig. 2 , the edges 40 define an obtuse angle ⁇ relative to the feed path FP of the mailpiece envelope 16 (i.e., the angle produced between line segments FP and FE).
  • the obtuse angfe ⁇ is greater than about one-hundred and five degrees (105°) relative to the feed path of the substrate material. More preferably, the obtuse angle ⁇ is greater than about ninety-five degrees (95°) relative to the feed path of the substrate material.
  • the registration surface 20S has been cut to produce an edge 40, i.e., along the lead angle ⁇ , wherein several of the contact surfaces 30 are severed at a point corresponding, or proximal, to the apex of a respective one of the contact surfaces 30. Additionally, the registration surface 20S has been cut such that the edge 40 is severed at a point corresponding to the non-contact areas 32, i.e., between adjacent contact surfaces 30.
  • an edge 40 having fewer contact surfaces 30 and more non-contact regions 32 will shed/remove less particulate matter from the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16 than one with more contact surfaces and less non-contact regions 32.
  • this configuration i.e., an edge which is cut along an incline, or at an obtuse angle relative to the feed path, ensures that the edge 40 will produce less particulate matter by reducing its tendency to whip or disturb the surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16.
  • the present invention provides a registration device for a print station which mitigates the removal/production of particulate matter to optimize print station/inserter efficiency.
  • the registration surface minimizes the disturbance of existing particulate matter by reducing the surface area contacting the surface of a substrate material/mailpiece envelope.
  • an incline i.e., at an obtuse angle relative to the feed path, or off-axis relative to a line orthogonal to the feed path
  • Increased efficiency is achieved by reducing the number purge cycles necessary to clear/clean the print head nozzles and the cost associated with lost productivity and ink consumption.

Landscapes

  • Accessory Devices And Overall Control Thereof (AREA)
  • Handling Of Sheets (AREA)

Abstract

A registration device for use in combination with an array of print head nozzles (12N) and operative to deposit ink on a substrate material (16). The registration device is operative to maintain a prescribed separation distance between an array of print head nozzles (12N) and a substrate material (16) during print operations and includes a registration surface (20S) which opposes a face surface of the substrate material and is textured to define a plurality of contact points (30). The contact points are substantially evenly distributed over, and engage, the face surface of the substrate material, to reduce the total surface area in contact with the substrate material and the particulate matter which may be shed from, and/or produced by frictional engagement with, the substrate material.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a registration device for use in a substrate print station and, more particularly, to a new and useful registration device for mitigating the production/removal of particulate matter, i.e., dust and debris, from the substrate material/mailpiece envelope as it engages a registration surface during print operations.
  • Mailpiece creation systems such as mailpiece inserters are typically used by organizations such as banks, insurance companies, and utility companies to periodically produce a large volume of mailpieces, e.g., monthly billing or shareholders income/dividend statements. In many respects, mailpiece inserters are analogous to automated assembly equipment inasmuch as sheets, inserts and envelopes are conveyed along a feed path and assembled in or at various modules of the mailpiece inserter. That is, the various modules work cooperatively to process the sheets until a finished mailpiece is produced.
  • A mailpiece inserter includes a variety of apparatus/modules for conveying and processing a substrate/sheet material along the feed path. Commonly mailpiece inserters include apparatus/modules for (i) feeding and singulating printed content material in a "feeder module", (ii) accumulating the content material to form a multi-sheet collation in an "accumulator", (iii) folding the content material to produce a variety of fold configurations such as a C-fold, Z-fold, bi-fold and gate fold, in a "folder", (iv) feeding mailpiece inserts such as coupons, brochures, and pamphlets, in combination with the content material, in a "chassis module" (v) inserting the folded/unfolded and/or nested content material into an envelope in an "envelope inserter", (vi) sealing the filled envelope in "sealing module" (vii) printing recipient/return addresses and/or postage indicia on the face of the mailpiece envelope at a "print station" and (viii) controlling the flow and speed of the content material at various locations along the feed path of the mailpiece inserter by a series of "buffer stations". In addition to these commonly employed apparatus/modules, mailpiece inserter may also include other modules for (i) binding/stitching an edge of sheet material to form a bound collation, i.e., via a stitcher/stapler module, and (ii) reversing the orientation of the substrate/sheet material, via a "sheet inverter" to print information on an opposite side of the sheet/content material.
  • With respect to the printing station, it is common to register a face surface of each mailpiece with a registration plate such that an array of print heads may print information such as destination and return addresses on the face of each mailpiece. More specifically, the registration plate includes an aperture for accepting a stepped array of print head nozzles. The thickness of the registration plate provides a threshold "stand-off" dimension from the face surface of each mailpiece to each of the print head nozzles such that ink droplets may be precisely deposited.
  • Furthermore, the array of print heads and registration plate are typically disposed over, and/or in opposed relation to, an underlying conveyance system such as one or more conveyor belts. Mailpieces are conveyed along the belt(s), move under the registration plate and passed by the print head nozzles as ink is deposited. To ensure that mailpieces slide smoothly beneath the registration plate, i.e., without jamming, the spacing between the underlying conveyance system, e.g., the conveyance belt (s), and the registration plate must be closely controlled. That is, with each mail run/print job performed by the print module, the necessary clearance gap must be established based upon the anticipated thickness of mailpieces being processed. Alternatively, the underlying conveyance system/belt may be compliant to allow envelopes of variable thickness dimension move under the registration plate while the deck the of conveyance system/belt is displaced by the geometric variation in envelope thickness.
  • Furthermore, as a mailpiece passes the registration plate, particulate matter, which may have collected on an envelope during pre-processing, can be disturbed and become airborne due to engagement of the envelope with the registration plate. Additionally, the frictional engagement with the registration plate may produce additional dust and debris. As more particulate matter is disturbed/removed/produced, the print station must perform additional purge cycles to clear the print head nozzles of dust and debris. As a result, the mailpiece inserter is halted, or momentarily/temporarily discontinued, to allow the purge cycle to clear/clean the print head nozzles. While such purge cycles must be tolerated to permit smooth operation of the print station, the down time is unproductive and costly to the operator. Furthermore, inasmuch as the ink used to purge the print head nozzles is costly, it is desirable to minimize the number of purge cycles that a print station performs to minimize the cost of the ink consumed.
  • A need, therefore, exists for a print station which mitigates the removal/production of particulate matter to optimize print station/inserter efficiency. Such increased efficiency may be achieved by reducing the number purge cycles necessary to clear/clean the print head nozzles and the cost associated with lost productivity and ink consumption.
  • A registration device is provided for use in combination with an array of print head nozzles operative to deposit ink on a substrate material. The registration device is operative to maintain a prescribed separation distance between an array of print head nozzles and a substrate material during print operations and includes a registration surface which opposes a face surface of the substrate material and is textured to define a plurality of contact points. The contact points are substantially evenly distributed over, and engage, the face surface of the substrate material, to reduce the total surface area in contact with the substrate material and the particulate matter which may be shed from, and/or produced by frictional engagement with, the substrate material.
  • The accompanying drawings illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
    • Figure 1 is a side view of a registration device and print station according to the present invention wherein an array of print heads is disposed in combination with the registration device to deposit ink on a face surface of a mailpiece envelope.
    • Figure 2 is a view taken substantially along line 2 - 2 of Fig. 1 depicting a textured surface of the registration device which includes a plurality of raised contact surfaces and at least one upstream edge which is inclined relative to a line orthogonal to the feed path of the mailpiece envelope.
    • Figure 3 is an enlarged view of the textured registration surface within a region 3 of Fig. 2, wherein the contact surfaces are defined by a plurality of serpentine-shaped surface grooves which are out-of-phase to stagger the arrangement of contact surfaces.
    • Figure 4 is an enlarged cross sectional view taken substantially along line 4 - 4 of Fig. 3 depicting a convex or arcuate surface of each contact surface.
    • Figure 5 is an enlarged cross sectional view taken substantially along line 5 - 5 of Fig. 3 depicting an upstream edge to emphasize the effect of severing/cutting the textured surface of the registration device along an edge which is off-axis relative to a line orthogonal to the feed path of the mailpiece envelope.
  • A registration device and print station are described for printing information on a mailpiece envelope such as a destination address, return address and postage indicia for delivery of the mailpiece. While the invention is described in the context of a mailpiece inserter, the registration device and print station described herein are applicable to any printer wherein a substrate material is registered against a registration device for maintaining a prescribed separation distance between an array of print head nozzles and a substrate material during print operations. Consequently, the detailed description and illustrations are merely indicative of an embodiment of the invention, and, accordingly, the invention should be broadly interpreted in accordance with the appended claims.
  • Fig. 1 depicts a side view of a print station 10 having a plurality of print heads 12. Each print head 12 deposits ink, i.e., prints, on a face surface 14 of a substrate material 16 (e.g., such as a mailpiece envelope) as the substrate material 16 is conveyed through the print station 10. Inasmuch as the invention is principally described in the context of a print station 12 for a mailpiece inserter, the term mailpiece envelope 16 will, hereinafter, be used to mean any sheet and/or substrate material. Each of the print heads 12 includes one or more rows of print head nozzles 12N which deposit ink through an aperture/opening 18 in a registration device 20.
  • The registration device 20 is disposed in combination with the print heads 12 and functions to maintain a prescribed separation distance between a face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16 and each of the print head nozzles 12N. The separation distance ensures the efficacy of print operations inasmuch as the deposited ink requires a certain stand-off distance, i.e., spacing from the exit of the nozzles 12N to the face surface 14, to be deposited at a precise location on the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16.
  • The mailpiece envelope 16 is conveyed through the print station 10 by a conventional transport system such as a conveyor belt 22 which may be supported on, or by, a series of spring-biased rollers 24. The spring-biased rollers 24 urge the conveyor belt 22, and consequently, mailpiece envelope 16, upwardly toward a registration surface 20S of the registration device 20. By urging the envelope 16 upwardly against the registration surface 20S, the separation distance between the print head nozzles 12N and the top face surface 20S of the mailpiece envelope may be accurately controlled. As a consequence, print quality is accurately maintained for optimum print performance.
  • In Figs. 1 through 4, the registration surface 20S opposes and engages the face surface 16S (see Fig. 1) of the envelope 16 as the conveyor belt 22 transports the envelope 16 beneath the print head nozzles 12N of the print station 12. The registration surface 20S is textured to contact the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16 at multiple points, or regions, along the face surface 16S. The registration surface 20S defines a plurality of contact surfaces 30 which are substantially evenly distributed across the registration surface 20S and a plurality of non-contact regions 32 disposed therebetween. The contact surfaces 30 are (i) raised, (ii) have a substantially convex or arcuate contour, and, (iii) are operative to effect bridging of the mailpiece envelope 16, i.e., across the non-contact regions 32, such that registration surface 20S does not frictionally engage the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope at these regions 32.
  • As will be discussed in greater detail hereinafter, the textured surface, i.e., which includes the contact surfaces 30 and non-contact regions 32, reduces the surface area in contact with the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16, i.e., as compared to the total surface area of a purely planar/flat registration surface employed in prior art registration devices. That is, the textured surface of the registration device 20 mitigates particulate matter removed/shed from the mailpiece envelope 16 by minimizing the friction and/or profile drag developed between the registration surface 20S of the registration device 20 and the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16.
  • The contact surfaces 30 may be produced by plurality of serpentine-shaped grooves 34 which extend in a direction substantially parallel to the feed path of the mailpiece envelope 16 (shown in the direction of arrow FP in Fig. 3). The grooves 34 may be aligned, i.e., in phase, or staggered, i.e., out-of-phase, relative to the feed path FP of the mailpiece envelope 16. Figs. 2 and 3 show the grooves in a staggered pattern such that the crest 34C of one groove 34a aligns a trough 34T of an adjacent groove 34b. Furthermore, by aligning grooves 34 in an out-of-phase arrangement, the contact surfaces 30 are staggered from one, or a first, row of tandem contact surfaces 30 to an adjacent, or second, row of tandem contact surfaces 30. Moreover, as a consequence of the shape and alignment of the grooves 34, each of the contact surfaces 30 define an elongate-diamond or elliptical shape (best seen in Fig. 3).
  • Upon examination of various patterns, shapes and sizes, it has been determined that serpentine-shaped grooves 34 having a pitch P (i.e., a distance or length between a pair of adjacent crests 34C or a pair of adjacent troughs 34T), of between about three-eights inches (3/8") to about one-quarter inches (1/4"), and a rise R (i.e., a distance or height from a minimum depth along one trough 34T to a maximum height along an adjacent crest 34C) of between about five thirty-seconds inches (5/34") to about seven thirty-seconds inches (7/34"), produces favorable results. Moreover, a groove 34 having a substantially linear segment LS (i.e., a segment shown in Fig. 3 connecting curvilinear segments at the apex of one crest 34C and the base of an adjacent trough 34T) such as the serpentine groove shown in the described embodiment, defines a lead angle θ which is between about five degrees (5°) to about fifteen degrees (15°) yields favorable results. In the described embodiment, a textured registration surface 20S of the type described above may be fabricated from 304 polished stainless steel sheets having a 5-SM surface pattern available from RIMEX Metals Inc. located in the town of Edison, State of New Jersey.
  • Thus far in our discussion, the surface texture of the registration device 20 has been discussed to mitigate particulate matter produced/removed/shed from the mailpiece envelope 16. Yet another characteristic of the registration device 20, which synergistically reduces the particulate matter, relates to the shape of the opening 18, and, more particularly, to the shape or angle of the edges 40 upstream of each of the print head nozzles 12N. Referring back to Fig. 2, the edges 40 define an obtuse angle β relative to the feed path FP of the mailpiece envelope 16 (i.e., the angle produced between line segments FP and FE). More particularly, in the described embodiment, the obtuse angfe β is greater than about one-hundred and five degrees (105°) relative to the feed path of the substrate material. More preferably, the obtuse angle β is greater than about ninety-five degrees (95°) relative to the feed path of the substrate material.
  • The significance of producing/ cutting the upstream edges 40 along an incline will be appreciated by examining Fig. 5. Therein, the registration surface 20S has been cut to produce an edge 40, i.e., along the lead angle β, wherein several of the contact surfaces 30 are severed at a point corresponding, or proximal, to the apex of a respective one of the contact surfaces 30. Additionally, the registration surface 20S has been cut such that the edge 40 is severed at a point corresponding to the non-contact areas 32, i.e., between adjacent contact surfaces 30.
  • Inasmuch a discontinuous edge, or portion, of the registration device 20 has a tendency to whip, or disturb, the surface 16S of a mailpiece envelope 16 more thoroughly, than a continuous surface, an edge 40 having fewer contact surfaces 30 and more non-contact regions 32 will shed/remove less particulate matter from the face surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16 than one with more contact surfaces and less non-contact regions 32. By cutting the upstream edge 40 at an angle relative to a line FO orthogonal to the feed path, the edge 40 will be severed at several locations along the surface 20, however, at least one location will correspond to at least one non-contact region 32 of the surface 20S. Consequently, this configuration, i.e., an edge which is cut along an incline, or at an obtuse angle relative to the feed path, ensures that the edge 40 will produce less particulate matter by reducing its tendency to whip or disturb the surface 16S of the mailpiece envelope 16.
  • In summary, the present invention provides a registration device for a print station which mitigates the removal/production of particulate matter to optimize print station/inserter efficiency. The registration surface minimizes the disturbance of existing particulate matter by reducing the surface area contacting the surface of a substrate material/mailpiece envelope. By cutting an opening, through which ink is deposited, along an incline (i.e., at an obtuse angle relative to the feed path, or off-axis relative to a line orthogonal to the feed path) the tendency of the edge to disturb or remove particulate mater is also reduced. Increased efficiency is achieved by reducing the number purge cycles necessary to clear/clean the print head nozzles and the cost associated with lost productivity and ink consumption.
  • It is to be understood that all of the present figures, and the accompanying narrative discussions of preferred embodiments, do not purport to be completely rigorous treatments of the methods and systems under consideration. For example, while the invention describes an interval of time for completing a phase of sorting operations, it should be appreciated that the processing time may differ. A person skilled in the art will understand that the steps of the present application represent general cause-and-effect relationships that do not exclude intermediate interactions of various types, and will further understand that the various structures and mechanisms described in this application can be implemented by a variety of different combinations of hardware and software, methods of escorting and storing individual mailpieces and in various configurations which need not be further elaborated herein.

Claims (10)

  1. A print station for a mailpiece inserter comprising:
    an array of print head nozzles operative to deposit ink on a mailpiece envelope being conveyed along a feed path; and
    a registration plate spatially positioned relative to the print head nozzles and operative to maintain a prescribed separation distance between the registration plate and the print head nozzles, the registration plate having a registration surface opposing a top face surface of the mailpiece envelope and being textured to define a plurality of contact surfaces substantially evenly-distributed over, and engaging, the face surface of the substrate material, the contact points reducing a surface area in contact with the substrate material to mitigate particulate matter shed from the substrate material.
  2. The print station according to claim 1 wherein the contact surfaces have a substantially arcuate shaped surface contour.
  3. The print station according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the contact surfaces have a substantially elongate diamond shape.
  4. The print station according to any preceding claim, wherein the contact surfaces are defined by a plurality of grooves oriented substantially parallel to a feed path of the mailpiece envelope.
  5. The print station according to claim 4 wherein each of the grooves defines a substantially serpentine-shape.
  6. The print station according to claim 4 or claim 5 wherein adjacent grooves are out-of-phase and the contact surfaces are staggered from one row of contact surfaces to an adjacent row of contact surfaces.
  7. The print station according to any of claims 4 to 6 wherein each groove defines a lead angle within a range of between about five degrees (5°) to about fifteen degrees (15°).
  8. The print station according to any preceding claim wherein the registration surface includes an opening through which ink is deposited, the opening having a trailing edge upstream of at least one of the nozzles and wherein the trailing edge defines an obtuse angle relative to the feed path of the mailpiece envelope.
  9. The print station according to claim 8 wherein the obtuse angle is greater than about one-hundred and five degrees (105°) relative to the feed path of the mailpiece envelope.
  10. The print station according to claim 8 wherein the obtuse angle is greater than about ninety-five degrees (95°) relative to the feed path of the mailpiece envelope.
EP11168413.0A 2010-06-01 2011-06-01 Registration device for mitigating the production/removal of particulate matter from a substrate/mailpiece envelope Revoked EP2392464B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/791,487 US8328328B2 (en) 2010-06-01 2010-06-01 Device for mitigating the production/removal of particulate matter from a substrate/mailpiece envelope

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2392464A2 true EP2392464A2 (en) 2011-12-07
EP2392464A3 EP2392464A3 (en) 2012-08-29
EP2392464B1 EP2392464B1 (en) 2013-05-29

Family

ID=44461924

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11168413.0A Revoked EP2392464B1 (en) 2010-06-01 2011-06-01 Registration device for mitigating the production/removal of particulate matter from a substrate/mailpiece envelope

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US8328328B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2392464B1 (en)

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4821049A (en) 1987-12-02 1989-04-11 Pitney Bowes Inc. Substrate transport apparatus, especially for mail handling
JP3841315B2 (en) 1995-12-26 2006-11-01 キヤノン株式会社 Printing apparatus and printing method used in the apparatus
US5913627A (en) 1997-12-11 1999-06-22 Pitney Bowes Inc. Guide and support structure for a mailing machine
US20080218547A1 (en) * 2007-03-06 2008-09-11 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Ink jet printing apparatus and ink jet printing method
US8235491B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2012-08-07 Pitney Bowes Inc. Registration plate assembly for mailpiece conveyance system
US8506051B2 (en) * 2009-12-28 2013-08-13 Xerox Corporation Process for preparing an ink jet print head front face having a textured superoleophobic surface

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2392464B1 (en) 2013-05-29
US20110292119A1 (en) 2011-12-01
US8328328B2 (en) 2012-12-11
EP2392464A3 (en) 2012-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102448860B (en) Accumulation device for discrete paper or film objects and related method
CA2292066C (en) High speed pneumatic document input system
US20100328399A1 (en) Print module having pivotable support/instrumentation rack for print head assembly
EP2886472B1 (en) System and method for ensuring cutting accuracy in a mailpiece wrapper
EP2179862A2 (en) System and method for preventing envelope distortion in a mailpiece fabrication system
US8439182B2 (en) Mailpiece inserter including system for controlling friction forces developed on an envelope
JP2012501880A (en) Envelope transport positioning apparatus and related methods
EP2226199A1 (en) Mailpiece conveyance system
EP2392464B1 (en) Registration device for mitigating the production/removal of particulate matter from a substrate/mailpiece envelope
US7971865B2 (en) Inserting apparatus for discrete objects into envelopes and related methods
US8235491B2 (en) Registration plate assembly for mailpiece conveyance system
EP1414728B1 (en) Device for aligning a stack of sheets arranged one above the other
US5975519A (en) Separator stone adjustment assembly
US8215629B2 (en) System and method for producing and arranging sheet material for use in a mailpiece inserter
CA2548718C (en) Cut sheet feeder
US20090083198A1 (en) Process for franking, printing, and/or producing images on flat mail items
US20100078873A1 (en) Singulating sheet feeder
AU2009288645B2 (en) Transporting apparatus for web products and related methods
US8096932B2 (en) System and method for processing nested/unnested mailpiece content material
US7600747B2 (en) Platen for cut sheet feeder
US20100059919A1 (en) Transporting apparatus for discrete sheets into envelopes and related methods
US8327993B2 (en) Safety device for a linear actuation system
EP1803667B1 (en) Apparatus and method for separating flat items from stacks
JP2026023725A (en) automatic collation device
US20080211175A1 (en) Method and apparatus for feeding multi-sheet documents

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B41J 13/12 20060101ALI20120720BHEP

Ipc: B41J 11/00 20060101AFI20120720BHEP

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121024

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 614113

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011001785

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 614113

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130529

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130929

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130830

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130909

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130829

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130829

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA GMBH

Effective date: 20140124

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602011001785

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140124

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA GMBH

Effective date: 20140124

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130601

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110601

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20150629

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20150629

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20150617

Year of fee payment: 5

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R103

Ref document number: 602011001785

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R064

Ref document number: 602011001785

Country of ref document: DE

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20151204

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Effective date: 20151204

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130529