EP1785497A2 - Method for bioleaching metal containing sulphidic materials - Google Patents

Method for bioleaching metal containing sulphidic materials Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1785497A2
EP1785497A2 EP20060445067 EP06445067A EP1785497A2 EP 1785497 A2 EP1785497 A2 EP 1785497A2 EP 20060445067 EP20060445067 EP 20060445067 EP 06445067 A EP06445067 A EP 06445067A EP 1785497 A2 EP1785497 A2 EP 1785497A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
circuit
fed
bioleaching
leaching
oxidation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP20060445067
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1785497A3 (en
EP1785497B1 (en
Inventor
Jan-Eric Sundkvist
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Boliden Mineral AB
Original Assignee
Boliden Mineral AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=37729927&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1785497(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Boliden Mineral AB filed Critical Boliden Mineral AB
Publication of EP1785497A2 publication Critical patent/EP1785497A2/en
Publication of EP1785497A3 publication Critical patent/EP1785497A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1785497B1 publication Critical patent/EP1785497B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/18Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes with the aid of microorganisms or enzymes, e.g. bacteria or algae
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B11/00Obtaining noble metals
    • C22B11/04Obtaining noble metals by wet processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B15/00Obtaining copper
    • C22B15/0063Hydrometallurgy
    • C22B15/0065Leaching or slurrying
    • C22B15/0067Leaching or slurrying with acids or salts thereof
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method when continuously bioleaching metal containing sulphidic materials.
  • bioleaching It has long been known to leach sulphidic material, such as ores and ore concentrates, in the presence of oxygen and microorganisms in the form of varying types of bacteria and other similar microorganisms capable of favouring oxidation of both sulphur and iron and other metals in the materials, with the object of winning the valuable metal content of the material.
  • This type of leaching is called bioleaching.
  • valuable metals can be leached out by a bioleaching and brought into a solution and the formed solution can then be treated for a selective winning of valuable metals, such as copper, nickel, cobalt, uranium and zinc.
  • valuable metals such as copper, nickel, cobalt, uranium and zinc.
  • the noble or precious metal content that cannot be recovered directly by leaching in this way for instance the precious metal or noble metal content of refractory materials, such as iron pyrite and arsenopyrite, can, however, also be recovered by first dissolving any surrounding metal sulphides so as to free the precious or noble metals, and thereafter treating the bioleaching residue hydrometallurgically in a conventional manner to leach out the precious or noble metals.
  • Bioleaching processes afford certain advantages over other possible hydrometallurgical processes for working-up metal sulphide material, for instance pressure leaching, by virtue of the fact that bacteria will favour oxidation of both sulphidic sulphur and elementary sulphur to form sulphates.
  • An oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III) as well as As(III) to As(V) is also favoured.
  • the bacteria-leached material can thus at best be further leached in subsequent stages, for instance in a precious metal recovery process, without any risk of problems caused by the presence of elementary sulphur.
  • Bioleaching can be accomplished by a so called heap leaching in situ or in heaps, where the leaching liquid is brought to pass downwards through a material heap, or also by a so called tank leaching, where the leaching liquid and a material in the form of a slurry or pulp is passed into reactors, for example tanks, often at elevated temperatures.
  • Tank leaching is more often, especially in commercial plants, performed as a continuous process, where the ingoing matters are brought to flow through said reactors, but may also be performed batch-wise especially in smaller size.
  • Bioleaching of different types of sulphidic material using various types of microorganisms is described in our earlier publication US-A-5,397,380 and the basic background art in this field may be found in AU-A-11201/92 , CA-A-1 023 947 and US-A-4, 571,387 for instance.
  • the leaching times are very long, nearly about a year, but these may be a little diminished if a part of the material is leached in tanks and the leaching residue from the tank leaching is mixed with the material to be leached.
  • the leaching residue rich in microorganisms may be used as a starting culture, which is inocculated into the bed. In this way the total time until a complete leaching in the bed is achieved can be accelerated.
  • the aim is to obtain an oxidation as fast as possible.
  • Cultures of microorganisms are with respect to their optimal growth temperatures divided into groups.
  • the most common cultures in the bioleaching field are mesophilic, e.g. Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, which have a use range of up to 40°C at most, moderate thermophilic cultures (thermo tolerant), e.g. Acidithiobacillus caldus, that have a use range of up to about 50-55°C, and extremely thermophilic cultures e.g. Sulfolobus metallicus, of which some can be used up to a temperature of about 90°C, although the majority are used effectively at temperatures of 65-70°C.
  • mesophilic e.g. Thiobacillus ferrooxidans
  • moderate thermophilic cultures e.g. Acidithiobacillus caldus
  • extremely thermophilic cultures e.g. Sulfolobus metallicus, of which some can be used up to a temperature of about 90°C, although the majority are used effectively at temperatures of 65-70°
  • ores or concentrates which are bioleached, are often a mixture of several minerals, primary as well as secondary sulphides, such as chalcopyrite and chalcocite, arsenopyrite and iron pyrite.
  • the precious metal content is present encased (embedded) in for example arsenopyrite or iron pyrite (so called refractory precious metals) the exposed precious metal particles can after bioleaching be won in a following process, e.g. by cyanidation or any conventional process, such as a CIL (carbon-in-leach), a CIP (carbon-in pulp), a Merrill-Crowe or a RIP (resin-in-pulp).
  • CIL carbon-in-leach
  • CIP carbon-in pulp
  • Merrill-Crowe or a RIP (resin-in-pulp).
  • the material is leached continuously in a number of reactors connected parallel and in series.
  • the first leaching stage will normally be two or more reactors connected parallel.
  • the other reactors in the circuit are then connected in series.
  • the first stage will normally comprise a great part of the total leaching time in the circuit.
  • the shortest possible staying time that can be used for a so called "steady state" in the first stage, when the ingoing pulp is sterile, i.e. without any active amounts of microorganisms, being the normal case, is determined by the maximal growth factor of the microorganisms. This factor in turn varies with the type of microorganism, type of restricting substrates and the pulp environment.
  • such a sulphidic material in the form of a pulp or a slurry is fed to a main circuit, where bioleaching is performed in one or more stages using a culture of microorganisms suitable as regards the ingoing material.
  • a material having the capability to favour and maintain a growth of microorganisms suitable at the bioleaching in the main circuit i.e. that they are capable to be active there, is fed to a side circuit, for the generation of such microorganisms.
  • the outgoing pulp from the side circuit is fed to the main circuit in a predetermined flow so that as high enough activity of the culture is obtained also in this circuit even at staying times shorter than the critical one as should prevail without such an addition.
  • the leaching procedure in the main circuit is thereby allowed to be controlled of the oxidation degree and temperature, so that a selective oxidation of different ingoing materials is made possible as well as obtaining a predetermined oxidation ratio in the outgoing material from the main circuit.
  • This leaching goods can then be further led to a subsequent process suitable for metal winning.
  • the growth maintaining material may be an external one, for example a material containing elementary sulphur or a solution of ferrous iron, but as such a material suitably a part flow of the material intended for the bioleaching in the main circuit (the main flow) is withdrawn and fed to the side circuit.
  • the sulphidic material can, thus, totally or partly first be fed to a pre-circuit for a partial oxidation by bioleaching with a suitable culture before being fed to the main circuit.
  • a part of the outgoing material from the pre-circuit may also be fed to the side circuit.
  • At least a part of a leaching residue separated from the outgoing content from the pre-circuit may also advantageously be fed to the side circuit.
  • a predetermined staying time suitable for a subsequent circuit may be chosen for each circuit, at which the staying time suitably is chosen so that a predetermined oxidation ratio is achieved in the material outgoing from the circuit.
  • Microorganisms having different properties may be used in different circuits and stages, e.g. a mesophilic or moderate thermophilic culture may be used in the precircuit and an extreme thermophilic culture used in the main and the side circuits.
  • a mesophilic or moderate thermophilic culture may be used in the precircuit and an extreme thermophilic culture used in the main and the side circuits.
  • the process makes it possible also to flexibly make use of pure sulphur or iron oxidizing cultures.
  • the invention in other words implies that a leaching process besides performed in a main circuit also is performed in a separate (side) circuit, to which a part flow of the actual material is led.
  • a quite other, "external" oxidizable material may be fed to the circuit totally or partly, i.e. this external material may be fed together with a part flow of the actual material or without any part flow of this kind.
  • this side circuit a biomass is generated, i.e. pulp including present active contents of a culture being suitable for the main circuit, in order to make it possible to get a controlled oxidation, why this circuit also is called "biogenerator".
  • the choice of the shortest possible staying time in the first stage of the main circuit is not limited by the "critical dilution rate" that otherwise would prevail if only sterile materials would be supplied, i.e. materials lacking any active culture, since microorganisms are fed to the circuit in an active culture from an external source (the biogenerator).
  • the material flows, staying times and other process parameters are chosen and programmed with regard to the production of the activity of the biomass culture in the main circuit.
  • the conditions in the biogenerator are chosen so that so little "shock” as possible is met with by the culture in the biomass, when the same is fed into the main circuit, so that the culture present therein gets a maximum activity.
  • the leaching in the biogenerator in a side circuit makes possible many advantages and generally the degree of freedom relating to staying time and to any combinations of different cultures of microorganisms in the different oxidation stages will increase. As indicated above the possibility for a selective oxidation of several minerals and substances is increased.
  • the invention allows a possibility to optimally make use of the advantages with leaching steps performed at varying temperatures and using different cultures, where an extreme thermophilic culture may be used in a combination with a mesophilic and/or moderate thermophilic culture, e.g. by the performing of a bulk oxidation at a lower temperature, since it is the oxygen transfer rate that often will restrict the initial oxidation rate, not the temperature.
  • a lower temperature is normally favouring the oxygen transfer rate, since the solubility of oxygen in water decreases with an increasing temperature.
  • the final oxidation then can be performed at higher temperatures, since the oxygen transfer rate not longer is limiting the oxidation rate.
  • Figure 1 is a flow sheet of a general process concept according to the invention
  • Figure 2 is a flow sheet of a preferred process for the treatment of a refractory gold-arsenopyrite concentrate containing iron pyrite
  • Figure 3 is a flow sheet of a preferred process for the treatment of a copper concentrate having also a content of arsenic.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a general process outline, where concentrate/ore in the form of a main flow first is supplied to a conventional bioleaching circuit for a partial oxidation (bulk oxidation) using a culture suitable for this purpose.
  • This partial oxidation can be a leaching of more lightly oxidizable components, e.g. zinc or arsenic.
  • the main flow can alternately be fed direct or via a dewatering step to the subsequent main circuit, i.e. the leaching circuit for a controlled biooxidation.
  • a part of the main flow is led either before or immediately after the preparatory bioleaching circuit and is led to a side circuit, consisting of a biogenerator for the production of a biomass being suitable for the controlled biooxidation in the main circuit, i.e. a mass having both a suitable type and amount of microorganisms.
  • a side circuit consisting of a biogenerator for the production of a biomass being suitable for the controlled biooxidation in the main circuit, i.e. a mass having both a suitable type and amount of microorganisms.
  • an external material that can be of a different type than the material in the main flow, may, fully or partly, constitute the ingoing flow to this circuit.
  • a material is oxidized in the presence of a culture that is possible to be supplied to the main circuit.
  • This side circuit is, thus not in the first place to achieve any required oxidation degree of the material but to produce a biomass with an active culture in a predetermined amount to be supplied to the main circuit, so that an enough high activity in the culture is obtained in this circuit even at staying times in its first leaching stage that are shorter than the critical staying time, if only the main flow should be supplied.
  • the process in the main circuit is then possible to control concerning the oxidation degree, without any regard to the staying time, pulp density or temperature.
  • a gold containing arsenopyrite concentrate having also some iron pyrite content is first supplied to a conventional leaching circuit for an oxidation of the arsenic content and the leaching of this. After a phase separation the leaching solution is withdrawn and led to a separate circuit for the precipitation of iron arsenate. The main flow of the earlier leached material dewatered by the phase separation is led further to the main circuit, which is a leaching circuit, where a controlled biooxidation is performed with an extreme thermophilic culture.
  • a leaching residue not containing any amounts of reactive sulphur being harmful for the winning of any precious metals in a subsequent cyanide leaching process can be withdrawn, while a leaching solution having a remaining amount of arsenic is put together with the leaching solution from the first leaching circuit.
  • FIG 3 illustrates a process suitable for the treatment of materials especially problematic when leaching, where often a passivation occurs at long staying times.
  • This relates i.e. to such chalcopyrite concentrates that also contain arsenopyrite and precious metals.
  • a conventional bioleaching with a moderate thermophilic culture for a preoxidation so that at most some limited oxidation is achieved so as to minimize the passivation of any chalcopyrite surfaces that otherwise will occur at higher oxidation degrees.
  • a controlled biooxidation is then performed by means of supplying a biomass containing an extremely thermophilic culture produced in a biogenerator in a side circuit, to which a part flow is fed after the conventional leaching circuit.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Saccharide Compounds (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for a continuous bioleaching of a metal containing sulphidic materials. Such a material in the form of a pulp or slurry is fed to a main circuit, where a bioleaching is performed in one or more stages with a culture of microorganisms which is suitable as regards the ingoing materials. A material having the ability to promote growth of microorganisms suitable for the bioleaching in the main circuit is fed to a side circuit for the generation of such microorganism. The content from the side circuit is fed to the main circuit in a predetermined flow so that an activity high enough is obtained in the culture in this circuit also at staying times shorter than the critical as should prevail without such an addition. The leaching in the main circuit is, thus, allowed to be controlled of the oxidation degree and temperature, so that a selective oxidation of different ingoing materials is allowed as well as the achievement of a predetermined oxidation ratio of the outgoing material from the main circuit. A separated leaching residue from this material is withdrawn having an oxidation ratio suitable for a following metal winning process.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method when continuously bioleaching metal containing sulphidic materials.
  • It has long been known to leach sulphidic material, such as ores and ore concentrates, in the presence of oxygen and microorganisms in the form of varying types of bacteria and other similar microorganisms capable of favouring oxidation of both sulphur and iron and other metals in the materials, with the object of winning the valuable metal content of the material. This type of leaching is called bioleaching.
  • For instance, valuable metals can be leached out by a bioleaching and brought into a solution and the formed solution can then be treated for a selective winning of valuable metals, such as copper, nickel, cobalt, uranium and zinc. The noble or precious metal content that cannot be recovered directly by leaching in this way, for instance the precious metal or noble metal content of refractory materials, such as iron pyrite and arsenopyrite, can, however, also be recovered by first dissolving any surrounding metal sulphides so as to free the precious or noble metals, and thereafter treating the bioleaching residue hydrometallurgically in a conventional manner to leach out the precious or noble metals.
  • Bioleaching processes afford certain advantages over other possible hydrometallurgical processes for working-up metal sulphide material, for instance pressure leaching, by virtue of the fact that bacteria will favour oxidation of both sulphidic sulphur and elementary sulphur to form sulphates. An oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III) as well as As(III) to As(V) is also favoured. The bacteria-leached material can thus at best be further leached in subsequent stages, for instance in a precious metal recovery process, without any risk of problems caused by the presence of elementary sulphur. It has, however, turned up that also a minor amount of any elementary sulphur, as can often be present in a bioleached material, is unfavourable in a subsequent cyanide leaching process for precious metal winning purposes, since such sulphur will consume cyanide to form thiocyanates that will negatively affect the economy of the process.
  • Bioleaching can be accomplished by a so called heap leaching in situ or in heaps, where the leaching liquid is brought to pass downwards through a material heap, or also by a so called tank leaching, where the leaching liquid and a material in the form of a slurry or pulp is passed into reactors, for example tanks, often at elevated temperatures. Tank leaching is more often, especially in commercial plants, performed as a continuous process, where the ingoing matters are brought to flow through said reactors, but may also be performed batch-wise especially in smaller size.
  • Bioleaching of different types of sulphidic material using various types of microorganisms is described in our earlier publication US-A-5,397,380 and the basic background art in this field may be found in AU-A-11201/92 , CA-A-1 023 947 and US-A-4, 571,387 for instance.
  • One serious drawback in bioleaching is that very long leaching times are required at room temperature in order to achieve sufficiently high metal yields.
  • At heap leaching, where a material is leached in heaps (beds) out-doors at the temperatures prevailing, the leaching times are very long, nearly about a year, but these may be a little diminished if a part of the material is leached in tanks and the leaching residue from the tank leaching is mixed with the material to be leached. By this procedure the leaching residue rich in microorganisms may be used as a starting culture, which is inocculated into the bed. In this way the total time until a complete leaching in the bed is achieved can be accelerated. Thus, the aim is to obtain an oxidation as fast as possible. Such processes, where a tank leaching process is integrated with a heap leaching, are described in US-A-6,207,443 , WO-00/50651 and US-A-5,688,304 . Heap leaching is among all used for lean ores or for ores with easily leached metal sulphides. For other types of ores a tank leaching is a more suitable process and in this case in a bigger size in the form of a continuous leaching due to the possibility for a good agitation and, thus, a better kinetic and also for the possibility easily to obtain leaching at elevated temperatures and thereby a more rapid leaching procedure. In the following only continuous leaching processes will be discussed and thereby those inconveniencies especially associated with such a process.
  • Cultures of microorganisms are with respect to their optimal growth temperatures divided into groups. The most common cultures in the bioleaching field are mesophilic, e.g. Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, which have a use range of up to 40°C at most, moderate thermophilic cultures (thermo tolerant), e.g. Acidithiobacillus caldus, that have a use range of up to about 50-55°C, and extremely thermophilic cultures e.g. Sulfolobus metallicus, of which some can be used up to a temperature of about 90°C, although the majority are used effectively at temperatures of 65-70°C.
  • In a continuous two-stage process, at which valuable metals are won from an arsenic containing mineral, there is in a first stage used a culture of a mesophilic and/ or moderate thermophilic type for the leaching of the main part of the arsenic content, and in a second stage there is used a culture an extreme thermophilic type at an elevated temperature over 55°C for the leaching of any remaining metal and sulphur content. This method is described in one of Bolden's earlier patents in this field, US-A-6,461,577 and is further discussed in a posterior article in Hydrometallurgy 71 (2003) p.21-30.
  • Those ores or concentrates, which are bioleached, are often a mixture of several minerals, primary as well as secondary sulphides, such as chalcopyrite and chalcocite, arsenopyrite and iron pyrite. In those case the precious metal content is present encased (embedded) in for example arsenopyrite or iron pyrite (so called refractory precious metals) the exposed precious metal particles can after bioleaching be won in a following process, e.g. by cyanidation or any conventional process, such as a CIL (carbon-in-leach), a CIP (carbon-in pulp), a Merrill-Crowe or a RIP (resin-in-pulp).
  • In the bioleaching an oxidation and leaching of the various materials will occur during varying long leaching times, the so-called staying time. Many minerals require so long staying times that the leaching must be performed at elevated temperatures, as indicated here above for such conditions suitable microorganisms. From this it also appears that a high leaching temperature is favourable for the reagent consumption in a following precious metal winning process. Furthermore, the efficiency of the type of microorganism being present at the leaching and the pulp density, i.e. the amount mineral per pulp unity, will be affected.
  • In conventional, continuous commercial bioleaching processes e.g. those described in a paper by PC van Aswegen and J van Niekirk (Bac-Min Conference Bendigo Vic. 8-10 November 2004, p.181-189) the material is leached continuously in a number of reactors connected parallel and in series. The first leaching stage will normally be two or more reactors connected parallel. The other reactors in the circuit are then connected in series. The first stage will normally comprise a great part of the total leaching time in the circuit. The shortest possible staying time that can be used for a so called "steady state" in the first stage, when the ingoing pulp is sterile, i.e. without any active amounts of microorganisms, being the normal case, is determined by the maximal growth factor of the microorganisms. This factor in turn varies with the type of microorganism, type of restricting substrates and the pulp environment.
  • At a given minimum staying time, corresponding to the so called "critical dilution rate", which is 1/ the staying time, in all continuous bioleaching processes something commonly called "wash-out" of the culture will occur, which means that the microorganisms do not have time to grow into the same rate as they will be flushed out with the pulp. This renders a continuous bioleaching no more possible, since the circuit will be totally depleted of microorganisms at steady state.
  • In many cases it can be of great importance, i.e. be favourable or eligible, to leach with staying times being considerably shorter than those corresponding to the critical time for getting a "wash-out". One example of such a case is the above-described two-stage process according to our patent US-A-6,461,577 , where sulphidic concentrates are bio-oxidized in two stages at different temperatures and using different cultures. It has been shown that leaching refractory precious- metal concentrates at higher temperatures using extreme thermophilic cultures will give a leaching residue that consumes a considerable smaller cyanide amount in a subsequent cyanide leaching process if compared with a leaching residue from an oxidation process using mesophilic and/or moderate thermophilic cultures. The reason hereto is not quite clear, but it must possibly be due to some minor amounts of reactive sulphur that can be present in the form of elementary sulphur (S0) or of any reduced sulphur compounds, such as thiosulphates or the like, which will consume cyanides forming thiocyanates, as is introductory indicated. In such a process that will result in a leaching residue containing also minor amounts of reactive sulphur, it would consequently be desirable to oxidize the amount of such sulphur by a choice of suitable microorganisms and a limiting of the staying time to be beneath the one needed for a normal critical time.
  • It can also be of a great value to be able to "control" the oxidation so that a selective oxidation is made possible for different types of mineral, i.e. arsenopyrite in relation to iron pyrite in relation to elementary sulphur. This is especially interesting in those cases where refractory gold mainly occurs as inclusions into arseno-pyrite. The operating costs of a bioleaching process are mainly related to the total oxygen and neutralisation need.
  • At the heap-leaching process mentioned above such a control is on the whole not contemplated due to the more simple and lean ore types that are actually leached and, thus, such a leaching is always performed so complete as ever possible.
  • It has, however, surprisingly been found that a continuous bioleaching of metal containing sulphidic materials can be performed during shorter staying times than otherwise could be possible at a conventional process with regard to the above mentioned "wash-out" problem, which makes a selective leaching possible and, thus, a better process economy.
  • The invention is characterized by the steps that are set forth in the following claims.
  • According to the invention such a sulphidic material in the form of a pulp or a slurry is fed to a main circuit, where bioleaching is performed in one or more stages using a culture of microorganisms suitable as regards the ingoing material. A material having the capability to favour and maintain a growth of microorganisms suitable at the bioleaching in the main circuit i.e. that they are capable to be active there, is fed to a side circuit, for the generation of such microorganisms. The outgoing pulp from the side circuit is fed to the main circuit in a predetermined flow so that as high enough activity of the culture is obtained also in this circuit even at staying times shorter than the critical one as should prevail without such an addition. The leaching procedure in the main circuit is thereby allowed to be controlled of the oxidation degree and temperature, so that a selective oxidation of different ingoing materials is made possible as well as obtaining a predetermined oxidation ratio in the outgoing material from the main circuit. There is withdrawn a separated leaching residue of this material having a oxidation ratio suitable for a following metal winning process. This leaching goods can then be further led to a subsequent process suitable for metal winning.
  • The growth maintaining material may be an external one, for example a material containing elementary sulphur or a solution of ferrous iron, but as such a material suitably a part flow of the material intended for the bioleaching in the main circuit (the main flow) is withdrawn and fed to the side circuit. The sulphidic material can, thus, totally or partly first be fed to a pre-circuit for a partial oxidation by bioleaching with a suitable culture before being fed to the main circuit. A part of the outgoing material from the pre-circuit may also be fed to the side circuit. At least a part of a leaching residue separated from the outgoing content from the pre-circuit may also advantageously be fed to the side circuit. A predetermined staying time suitable for a subsequent circuit may be chosen for each circuit, at which the staying time suitably is chosen so that a predetermined oxidation ratio is achieved in the material outgoing from the circuit.
  • Microorganisms having different properties may be used in different circuits and stages, e.g. a mesophilic or moderate thermophilic culture may be used in the precircuit and an extreme thermophilic culture used in the main and the side circuits. The process makes it possible also to flexibly make use of pure sulphur or iron oxidizing cultures.
  • The invention in other words implies that a leaching process besides performed in a main circuit also is performed in a separate (side) circuit, to which a part flow of the actual material is led. Alternately, a quite other, "external" oxidizable material may be fed to the circuit totally or partly, i.e. this external material may be fed together with a part flow of the actual material or without any part flow of this kind. In this side circuit a biomass is generated, i.e. pulp including present active contents of a culture being suitable for the main circuit, in order to make it possible to get a controlled oxidation, why this circuit also is called "biogenerator".
  • By a biomass feed from the biogenerator the choice of the shortest possible staying time in the first stage of the main circuit is not limited by the "critical dilution rate" that otherwise would prevail if only sterile materials would be supplied, i.e. materials lacking any active culture, since microorganisms are fed to the circuit in an active culture from an external source (the biogenerator). The material flows, staying times and other process parameters are chosen and programmed with regard to the production of the activity of the biomass culture in the main circuit. The conditions in the biogenerator are chosen so that so little "shock" as possible is met with by the culture in the biomass, when the same is fed into the main circuit, so that the culture present therein gets a maximum activity.
  • The leaching in the biogenerator in a side circuit makes possible many advantages and generally the degree of freedom relating to staying time and to any combinations of different cultures of microorganisms in the different oxidation stages will increase. As indicated above the possibility for a selective oxidation of several minerals and substances is increased.
  • The invention allows a possibility to optimally make use of the advantages with leaching steps performed at varying temperatures and using different cultures, where an extreme thermophilic culture may be used in a combination with a mesophilic and/or moderate thermophilic culture, e.g. by the performing of a bulk oxidation at a lower temperature, since it is the oxygen transfer rate that often will restrict the initial oxidation rate, not the temperature. A lower temperature is normally favouring the oxygen transfer rate, since the solubility of oxygen in water decreases with an increasing temperature. The final oxidation then can be performed at higher temperatures, since the oxygen transfer rate not longer is limiting the oxidation rate. Such a two-stage process, in which the oxidation may be controlled by means of a biogenerator implies that only a shorter time will be necessary in the second stage and, thus, only a limited use of an extreme thermophilic culture is needed, whereby i.e. the costs for any reactors can be decreased, since the material quantity such as heating exchange surfaces belonging to the reactor unit controlling temperature, oxygen transfer etc. will considerably decrease.
  • The invention will now more in detail be described with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which Figure 1 is a flow sheet of a general process concept according to the invention, Figure 2 is a flow sheet of a preferred process for the treatment of a refractory gold-arsenopyrite concentrate containing iron pyrite and Figure 3 is a flow sheet of a preferred process for the treatment of a copper concentrate having also a content of arsenic.
  • In Figure 1 there is shown a general process outline, where concentrate/ore in the form of a main flow first is supplied to a conventional bioleaching circuit for a partial oxidation (bulk oxidation) using a culture suitable for this purpose. This partial oxidation can be a leaching of more lightly oxidizable components, e.g. zinc or arsenic. The main flow can alternately be fed direct or via a dewatering step to the subsequent main circuit, i.e. the leaching circuit for a controlled biooxidation. A part of the main flow is led either before or immediately after the preparatory bioleaching circuit and is led to a side circuit, consisting of a biogenerator for the production of a biomass being suitable for the controlled biooxidation in the main circuit, i.e. a mass having both a suitable type and amount of microorganisms. Alternatively an external material that can be of a different type than the material in the main flow, may, fully or partly, constitute the ingoing flow to this circuit. In the biogenerator a material is oxidized in the presence of a culture that is possible to be supplied to the main circuit. The purpose with this side circuit is, thus not in the first place to achieve any required oxidation degree of the material but to produce a biomass with an active culture in a predetermined amount to be supplied to the main circuit, so that an enough high activity in the culture is obtained in this circuit even at staying times in its first leaching stage that are shorter than the critical staying time, if only the main flow should be supplied. The process in the main circuit is then possible to control concerning the oxidation degree, without any regard to the staying time, pulp density or temperature.
  • According the process described in the form of a flow sheet in Figure 2 a gold containing arsenopyrite concentrate having also some iron pyrite content is first supplied to a conventional leaching circuit for an oxidation of the arsenic content and the leaching of this. After a phase separation the leaching solution is withdrawn and led to a separate circuit for the precipitation of iron arsenate. The main flow of the earlier leached material dewatered by the phase separation is led further to the main circuit, which is a leaching circuit, where a controlled biooxidation is performed with an extreme thermophilic culture. In order to avoiding any problems with the forming of any reactive sulphur from the arsenopyrite as well from the iron pyrite this oxidation is performed controlled, so that only a partial oxidation of the material is obtained for a selective oxidation of any formed reactive sulphur. Supplying an extreme thermophilic culture from a biogenerator in a side circuit does the control of the necessary staying time. To this side circuit a part flow of the material leached in the conventional circuit is fed. By the controlled partial oxidation in the main circuit the oxidation can be performed so that except any remaining arsenopyrite only reactive sulphur is oxidized. After the phase separation a leaching residue not containing any amounts of reactive sulphur being harmful for the winning of any precious metals in a subsequent cyanide leaching process can be withdrawn, while a leaching solution having a remaining amount of arsenic is put together with the leaching solution from the first leaching circuit.
  • Figure 3 illustrates a process suitable for the treatment of materials especially problematic when leaching, where often a passivation occurs at long staying times. This relates i.e. to such chalcopyrite concentrates that also contain arsenopyrite and precious metals. First, there is performed a conventional bioleaching with a moderate thermophilic culture for a preoxidation, so that at most some limited oxidation is achieved so as to minimize the passivation of any chalcopyrite surfaces that otherwise will occur at higher oxidation degrees. Like in the process according to Figure 2 a controlled biooxidation is then performed by means of supplying a biomass containing an extremely thermophilic culture produced in a biogenerator in a side circuit, to which a part flow is fed after the conventional leaching circuit. At this controlled partial oxidation the earlier passivated surfaces are restored. After a phase separation there is performed a further oxidation with a moderate thermophilic culture in a conventional leaching circuit. A limited oxidation degree will also here be aimed at in order to avoid to passivate any surfaces. Thereafter, a further partial controlled oxidation takes place, this time in order to minimize the amount of any reactive sulphur of the leaching residue, which is fed to a cyanidation process for the winning of precious metals. All the separated leaching solutions are being put together for the precipitation of arsenates and for the subsequent process for the winning of copper. A part flow of the leaching solution may also be fed to the second circuit with a conventional leaching process for a repeated oxidation.

Claims (9)

  1. A method for a continuous bioleaching of a metal containing sulphidic materials, characterized in that such a material in the form of a pulp or slurry is fed to a main circuit, where a bioleaching is performed in one or more stages with a culture of microorganisms which is suitable as regards the ingoing materials, that a material having the ability to favour growth of microorganisms suitable for the bioleaching in the main circuit is fed to a side circuit for the generation of such microorganisms, that the content from the side circuit is fed to the main circuit in a predetermined flow so that an activity high enough is obtained in the culture in this circuit also at staying times shorter than the critical as should prevail without such an addition, whereby the leaching in the main circuit is allowed to be controlled of the oxidation degree and temperature, so that a selective oxidation of different ingoing materials is allowed as well as the achievement of a predetermined oxidation ratio of the outgoing material from the main circuit and that a separated leaching residue from this material is withdrawn having an oxidation ratio suitable for a following metal winning process.
  2. A method according to Claim 1, characterized in that a part flow of the material meant for the bioleaching in the main circuit is withdrawn and fed to the side circuit as such a growth promoting material.
  3. A method according to anyone of Claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the sulphidic material wholly or partially is first fed to a pre-circuit for a partial oxidation by bioleaching with a suitable culture before it is fed to the main circuit.
  4. A method according to Claim 3, characterized in that a part of the outgoing content from the pre-circuit is fed to the side circuit.
  5. A method according to anyone of Claims 3 and 4, characterized in that at least a part of a separated leaching residue from the outgoing content in the pre-circuit is fed to the side circuit.
  6. A method according to anyone of Claims 1 to 5, characterized in that a predetermined staying time suitable for a following circuit as well as the reactor configuration is chosen for each circuit.
  7. A method according to Claim 6, characterized in that the staying time is chosen so that a predetermined oxidation ratio is achieved in the material outgoing from the circuit.
  8. A method according to anyone of Claims 1 to 7, characterized in that cultures having different characters are used in different circuits and stages.
  9. A method according to Claim 8, characterized in that a mesophilic or moderate thermophilic culture is used in the precircuit and an extreme thermophilic culture is used in the main and the side circuits.
EP20060445067 2005-11-09 2006-10-25 Method for bioleaching metal containing sulphidic materials Active EP1785497B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0502471A SE0502471L (en) 2005-11-09 2005-11-09 Process for bio-leaching of metal-containing sulphidic materials

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1785497A2 true EP1785497A2 (en) 2007-05-16
EP1785497A3 EP1785497A3 (en) 2007-06-13
EP1785497B1 EP1785497B1 (en) 2008-08-13

Family

ID=37729927

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20060445067 Active EP1785497B1 (en) 2005-11-09 2006-10-25 Method for bioleaching metal containing sulphidic materials

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1785497B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101177736B (en)
AT (1) ATE404702T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2006207850B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2559243C (en)
DE (1) DE602006002223D1 (en)
EA (1) EA010230B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2312102T3 (en)
MX (1) MXPA06012946A (en)
PT (1) PT1785497E (en)
SE (1) SE0502471L (en)
ZA (1) ZA200608910B (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008032288A2 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Geobiotics Llc Pre-treatment of feed to non-stirred surface bioreactor
WO2011059380A1 (en) * 2009-11-10 2011-05-19 Boliden Mineral Ab Process for recovering a valuable metal from a sulfidic material by hydrometallurgy
RU2467081C1 (en) * 2011-07-01 2012-11-20 Сергей Юрьевич Абрамовский Tower for recovery of mineral stock leaching solutions by iron-oxidising microorganisms
EP2813586A1 (en) * 2013-06-10 2014-12-17 Meurice Recherche et Développement Method of bioleaching of a metal present in a material
EP2697401A4 (en) * 2011-04-13 2015-04-08 Bioheap Ltd Leach process

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101608260B (en) * 2008-06-20 2011-04-06 中国科学院过程工程研究所 Biological-chemical metallurgy method by jointly utilizing oxidized ore and sulfide ore

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3347661A (en) * 1964-07-29 1967-10-17 Bio Metals Corp Ltd Cyclic leaching process employing iron oxidizing bacteria
US3455679A (en) * 1967-02-01 1969-07-15 Roan Selection Ltd Bacterial leaching of ores with an alkaline matrix
WO2000050651A1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2000-08-31 Echo Bay Mines, Limited Integrated, closed tank biooxidation/heap processes for leaching refractory sulfide ores
WO2001044519A1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2001-06-21 Pacific Ore Technology (Australia) Ltd A bacterially assisted heap leach
US6498031B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2002-12-24 Oxidor Corporation, Inc. Column reactor for testing and evaluating refractory ores

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2011691C1 (en) * 1991-05-05 1994-04-30 Уральский научно-исследовательский и проектный институт медной промышленности "УНИПРОМЕДЬ" Apparatus for biochemically leaching ores
US5914441A (en) * 1996-06-12 1999-06-22 Yellowstone Environmental Science, Inc. Biocatalyzed anaerobic oxidation of metal sulfides for recovery of metal values
US5873927A (en) * 1997-05-16 1999-02-23 Echo Bay Mines, Limited Integrated, tank/heap biooxidation process

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3347661A (en) * 1964-07-29 1967-10-17 Bio Metals Corp Ltd Cyclic leaching process employing iron oxidizing bacteria
US3455679A (en) * 1967-02-01 1969-07-15 Roan Selection Ltd Bacterial leaching of ores with an alkaline matrix
WO2000050651A1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2000-08-31 Echo Bay Mines, Limited Integrated, closed tank biooxidation/heap processes for leaching refractory sulfide ores
US6498031B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2002-12-24 Oxidor Corporation, Inc. Column reactor for testing and evaluating refractory ores
WO2001044519A1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2001-06-21 Pacific Ore Technology (Australia) Ltd A bacterially assisted heap leach

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BOON M ET AL: "Use of on-line off-gas analyses and stoichiometry in the bio-oxidation kinetics of sulphide minerals" HYDROMETALLURGY; HYDROMETALLURGY MAR 1998 ELSEVIER SCI B.V., AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, vol. 48, no. 1, March 1998 (1998-03), pages 1-26, XP004112386 *
DATABASE WPI Week 199504 Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; AN 1995-029230 XP002423921 & RU 2 011 691 C1 (URALS COPPER IND RES DES INST) 30 April 1994 (1994-04-30) *

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008032288A2 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Geobiotics Llc Pre-treatment of feed to non-stirred surface bioreactor
WO2008032288A3 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-05-29 Geobiotics Llc Pre-treatment of feed to non-stirred surface bioreactor
WO2011059380A1 (en) * 2009-11-10 2011-05-19 Boliden Mineral Ab Process for recovering a valuable metal from a sulfidic material by hydrometallurgy
EP2697401A4 (en) * 2011-04-13 2015-04-08 Bioheap Ltd Leach process
RU2467081C1 (en) * 2011-07-01 2012-11-20 Сергей Юрьевич Абрамовский Tower for recovery of mineral stock leaching solutions by iron-oxidising microorganisms
EP2813586A1 (en) * 2013-06-10 2014-12-17 Meurice Recherche et Développement Method of bioleaching of a metal present in a material
WO2014198690A1 (en) * 2013-06-10 2014-12-18 Meurice Recherche Et Developpement Method for bioleaching a metal present in a material

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2312102T3 (en) 2009-02-16
DE602006002223D1 (en) 2008-09-25
CA2559243C (en) 2011-01-11
PT1785497E (en) 2008-11-18
AU2006207850B2 (en) 2010-05-27
ATE404702T1 (en) 2008-08-15
CN101177736A (en) 2008-05-14
EP1785497A3 (en) 2007-06-13
ZA200608910B (en) 2009-10-28
SE0502471L (en) 2007-05-10
MXPA06012946A (en) 2008-10-08
EP1785497B1 (en) 2008-08-13
EA010230B1 (en) 2008-06-30
EA200601881A1 (en) 2007-06-29
AU2006207850A1 (en) 2007-05-24
CN101177736B (en) 2010-11-10
CA2559243A1 (en) 2007-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2305052C (en) Bioleaching sulfidic materials
RU2188243C2 (en) Integrated biological oxidation method for leaching sulfide ores involving tank/heap technique
EP2066819B1 (en) Recovery of molybdenum from molybdenum bearing sulfide materials by bioleaching in the presence of iron
EP1866447B1 (en) Heap leaching of sulphide ores
US6969499B1 (en) Bacterially assisted heap leach
EP1785497B1 (en) Method for bioleaching metal containing sulphidic materials
Harvey et al. Thermophilic Bioleaching of Chalcopyrite Concentrates with GEOCOAT Process
Natarajan Bioprocessing for enhanced gold recovery
Natarajan Biotechnology in gold processing
Harvey et al. Thermophilic bioheap leaching of chalcopyrite concentrates
AU2004239345B2 (en) Treatment of base metal concentrate by a two-step bioleaching process
AU779793B2 (en) A bacterially assisted heap leach

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20071115

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602006002223

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080925

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20081104

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20080402962

Country of ref document: GR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081213

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2312102

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081113

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081031

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: BHP BILLITON SA LIMITED

Effective date: 20090513

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: BHP BILLITON SA LIMITED

Effective date: 20090513

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20090630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081025

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090214

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080813

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101031

PLBD Termination of opposition procedure: decision despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPC1

PLBP Opposition withdrawn

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264

PLBM Termination of opposition procedure: date of legal effect published

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009276

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION PROCEDURE CLOSED

27C Opposition proceedings terminated

Effective date: 20120506

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230913

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230912

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20231106

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20231013

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20231011

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230830

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20240910

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20240912

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240906

Year of fee payment: 19