EP1440958B1 - Lead-free nontoxic priming mix - Google Patents

Lead-free nontoxic priming mix Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1440958B1
EP1440958B1 EP04250243A EP04250243A EP1440958B1 EP 1440958 B1 EP1440958 B1 EP 1440958B1 EP 04250243 A EP04250243 A EP 04250243A EP 04250243 A EP04250243 A EP 04250243A EP 1440958 B1 EP1440958 B1 EP 1440958B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
lead
free
composition
total weight
priming mix
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP04250243A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1440958A1 (en
Inventor
George C. Mei
James W. Pickett
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Olin Corp
Original Assignee
Olin Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Olin Corp filed Critical Olin Corp
Publication of EP1440958A1 publication Critical patent/EP1440958A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1440958B1 publication Critical patent/EP1440958B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C06EXPLOSIVES; MATCHES
    • C06CDETONATING OR PRIMING DEVICES; FUSES; CHEMICAL LIGHTERS; PYROPHORIC COMPOSITIONS
    • C06C7/00Non-electric detonators; Blasting caps; Primers

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to priming mixes for explosives, and more particularly lead-free and non-toxic priming mixes
  • a nontoxic, noncorrosive priming mix described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,675,059 is one such composition.
  • This priming composition is specifically adapted to rim fire cartridges and contains diazodinitrophenol, also known as dinol or DDNP, manganese dioxide, tetrazene and glass.
  • diazodinitrophenol also known as dinol or DDNP
  • manganese dioxide manganese dioxide
  • tetrazene and glass a nontoxic priming mixture
  • Another example of a nontoxic priming mixture is disclosed in U.S. Pat No. 4,963,201, issued to Bjerke et al. This composition comprises dinol or potassium dinitrobenzofuroxan as the primary explosive, tetrazene as a secondary explosive, a nitrate ester fuel and strontium nitrate as the oxidizer.
  • Dinol also known as diazodinitrophenol or DDNP
  • DDNP diazodinitrophenol
  • Dinol exhibit an inherent disadvantage called non-ideality of explosives. This phenomenon is a propagation failure which occurs when the diameter or the cross-section of the explosive becomes too small or too thin - generally smaller than a critical diameter or cross-section. Such effects become prominent in rimfire priming applications where the priming mix is, by necessity, spread thinly.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,353,707 to Duget discloses a priming charge made from 40-70% dinitrobenzofuran salt (also known as dinitrobenzofuroxane salt, and the potassium salt - "KDNBF"), 3-15% tetrazene, 10-30% cupric oxide, 5-25% pulverulent reducing agent, 0.5-20% of an inert abrasive powder and 0-5% of a binder.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,538,569 to Carter discloses a nontoxic priming composition comprising a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt, oxidizer, and a friction agent.
  • a preferred set of components are potassium salts of dinitrobenzofuroxan salt, potassium nitrate, and ground glass and/or boron as a friction agent.
  • tetrazene is explicitly excluded from this composition, and the friction agent comprises a maximum of 45 wt%.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,993,577 to Erickson et al. discloses a lead-free priming composition made from diazodinitrophenol (DDNP), a low percentage of tetrazene, and a high percentage of an abrasive such as ground glass.
  • the present invention is directed to a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition, comprising: 20-40 wt% of a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt; 2-10 wt% of a sensitizer; 0-30 wt% of an oxidizer; and 48-70 wt% of an abrasive, wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.
  • the present invention is directed to a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition, comprising: 30-40 wt% of potassium dinitrobenzofuroxan salt; 3-8 wt% of tetrazene; 0-15 wt% potassium nitrate; and 50-60 wt% of glass particles having an average particle size of from 90 to 150 microns, wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.
  • a priming mix composition comprising dinitrobenzofuroxan salts, a sensitizer, an oxidizer, and a high weight percentage of abrasive.
  • the present inventors have unexpectedly discovered that in using dinitrobenzofuroxan salts, the composition of the present invention provides a more "ideal" (in propagation sense) explosive than compositions using dinol or DDNP.
  • the present invention is directed to a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition, comprising: 20-40 wt% of a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt; 2-10 wt% of a sensitizer; 0-30 wt% of an oxidizer; and 48-70 wt% of an abrasive wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.
  • a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition comprising: 20-40 wt% of a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt; 2-10 wt% of a sensitizer; 0-30 wt% of an oxidizer; and 48-70 wt% of an abrasive wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.
  • the dinitrobenzofuroxan salt may be any salt, including potassium salt, sodium salt, calcium salt, magnesium salt, and the like, with the potassium salt being preferred.
  • the preferred amount of this component in the composition of the present invention ranges from about 20-40 wt%, and more preferably from about 30 to about 40 wt%, based on the total weight of the composition. A particularly preferred amount is 35 wt%.
  • the sensitizer component of the present invention is preferably tetrazene.
  • Preferred ranges of this component in the composition of the invention are from about 2 to about 10 wt%, and more preferably from about 3 to about 8 wt%, based on the total weight of the composition.
  • a particularly preferred amount of tetrazene sensitizer is 5 wt%.
  • the oxidizer component of the present invention includes any oxidizer known in the art such as sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, barium nitrate, and the like. Potassium nitrate is particularly preferred. Useful amounts of the oxidizer component range from about 0 to about 30 wt%, and more preferably from about 0 to about 20 wt%, based on the total weight of the composition. About 3 wt% of potassium nitrate is preferred.
  • the abrasive component of the present invention is preferably glass fines, although other abrasives common and known in the art may also be used.
  • the abrasive component comprises from about 48 to about 70 wt%, and more preferably from about 50 to about 60 wt%, based on the total weight of the composition.
  • a particularly preferred amount of glass abrasive is about 57 wt%.
  • a preferred range of particle sizes for the abrasive component ranges from about 75 to about 150 micrometer, and more preferably from about 90 to about 150 micrometer.
  • a particularly useful average size is about 110 micrometer. It is believed that coarser (e.g., larger) abrasive particle sizes provide larger interstitial spaces where larger aggregates of materials can form, thereby providing more focused energy generation.
  • the relatively large proportion of abrasive component of the present invention is believed to provide a more rigid support matrix and provides more anvil points which improve the sensitivity of the composition of the invention.
  • composition of the present invention is easily substituted for leaded priming mixtures, and can be processed using conventional techniques.
  • composition of the invention is made using conventional techniques well-known in the art.
  • the appropriate amounts of dinitrobenzofuroxan salt and tetrazene sensitizer are processed in water to minimize the chance of premature explosion.
  • the dinitrobenzofuroxan salt and tetrazene are allowed to settle, and excess water is decanted off.
  • the resulting paste is further processed by adding appropriate amounts of abrasive and, if desired, oxidizer.
  • the paste is mixed while moisture is maintained within the paste to a level of approximately 10-30% for safety reasons.
  • the processed paste is formed into pellets by pushing the paste into a block having a plurality of holes, each having a specified size and volume.
  • the processed pellets may be isolated and installed into cartridges using procedures well known in the art.
  • Control rounds used in the testing of the 22 caliber was a round primed with a standard leaded mix known as 22LRPAT purple.
  • the control used in the testing of the 27 caliber was a round primed with a leaded mix known as 27SR-1 Red.
  • the experimental round contained approximately 35 wt% potassium dinitrobenzofuroxan salt, approximately 5 wt% tetrazene, approximately 3 wt% potassium nitrate, and approximately 57 wt% glass fines, wherein the glass fines have an average particle size of approximately 120 micrometer.
  • test barrel Prior to firing the control or experimental rounds, a test barrel was rigged with a pressure gauge or copper crusher to measure the pressure generated by each round. The test barrel was also rigged with a velocity screen at the muzzle to measure the velocity of the nail exiting the muzzle. Function and casualty tests were performed on each round by shooting it in commercial tools. The following tables show the results of ballistic testing performed with the rounds. In Tables 1 and 2, “sd” refers to the standard deviation of each firing, and “ev” refers to the extreme variation between firings (defined as the difference between the maximum value and minimum value in the data set).

Abstract

The present invention is directed to a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition, comprising: 20-40 wt% of a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt; 2-10 wt% of a sensitizer; 0-30 wt% of an oxidizer; and 45-70 wt% of an abrasive, wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention is directed to priming mixes for explosives, and more particularly lead-free and non-toxic priming mixes
  • 2. Brief Description of the Related Art
  • Various lead free priming mixtures for use in ammunition have been disclosed over the years. For example, a nontoxic, noncorrosive priming mix described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,675,059 is one such composition. This priming composition is specifically adapted to rim fire cartridges and contains diazodinitrophenol, also known as dinol or DDNP, manganese dioxide, tetrazene and glass. Another example of a nontoxic priming mixture is disclosed in U.S. Pat No. 4,963,201, issued to Bjerke et al. This composition comprises dinol or potassium dinitrobenzofuroxan as the primary explosive, tetrazene as a secondary explosive, a nitrate ester fuel and strontium nitrate as the oxidizer.
  • Dinol (also known as diazodinitrophenol or DDNP), or mixtures based on dinol, exhibit an inherent disadvantage called non-ideality of explosives. This phenomenon is a propagation failure which occurs when the diameter or the cross-section of the explosive becomes too small or too thin - generally smaller than a critical diameter or cross-section. Such effects become prominent in rimfire priming applications where the priming mix is, by necessity, spread thinly.
  • Various means have been proposed to mitigate the disadvantage caused by the non-ideality phenomenon, including changing the physical parameters of the explosive used in the ammunition by building up mix stock (to increase cross-section of the explosive), or by using highly consolidated propellant beds on top of the explosive mix. However, these approaches require using either a two-step mix charging process (e.g., one step to spin mix into the rim, and the other step to build the web), or a two-stage propellant charge with a highly consolidated first stage for keeping the propagation active. Unfortunately, both of these approaches are expensive and time-consuming.
  • New priming mix compositions have also been proposed. For example, U.S. Patent No. 5,353,707 to Duget discloses a priming charge made from 40-70% dinitrobenzofuran salt (also known as dinitrobenzofuroxane salt, and the potassium salt - "KDNBF"), 3-15% tetrazene, 10-30% cupric oxide, 5-25% pulverulent reducing agent, 0.5-20% of an inert abrasive powder and 0-5% of a binder. U.S. Patent No. 5,538,569 to Carter discloses a nontoxic priming composition comprising a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt, oxidizer, and a friction agent. According to this disclosure, a preferred set of components are potassium salts of dinitrobenzofuroxan salt, potassium nitrate, and ground glass and/or boron as a friction agent. However, tetrazene is explicitly excluded from this composition, and the friction agent comprises a maximum of 45 wt%. U.S. Patent No. 5,993,577 to Erickson et al. discloses a lead-free priming composition made from diazodinitrophenol (DDNP), a low percentage of tetrazene, and a high percentage of an abrasive such as ground glass.
  • What is needed in the art is a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition that addresses the phenomenon of non-ideality of explosives, yet is economical and easy to produce. The present invention is believed to be an answer to that need.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In one aspect, the present invention is directed to a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition, comprising: 20-40 wt% of a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt; 2-10 wt% of a sensitizer; 0-30 wt% of an oxidizer; and 48-70 wt% of an abrasive, wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.
  • In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition, comprising: 30-40 wt% of potassium dinitrobenzofuroxan salt; 3-8 wt% of tetrazene; 0-15 wt% potassium nitrate; and 50-60 wt% of glass particles having an average particle size of from 90 to 150 microns, wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.
  • These and other aspects will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • It has now been unexpectedly found by the inventors that the problem of non-ideality of explosives may be addressed by a priming mix composition comprising dinitrobenzofuroxan salts, a sensitizer, an oxidizer, and a high weight percentage of abrasive. The present inventors have unexpectedly discovered that in using dinitrobenzofuroxan salts, the composition of the present invention provides a more "ideal" (in propagation sense) explosive than compositions using dinol or DDNP.
  • As indicated above, the present invention is directed to a lead-free, non-toxic priming composition, comprising: 20-40 wt% of a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt; 2-10 wt% of a sensitizer; 0-30 wt% of an oxidizer; and 48-70 wt% of an abrasive wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition. Each of these components are discussed in more detail below.
  • The dinitrobenzofuroxan salt may be any salt, including potassium salt, sodium salt, calcium salt, magnesium salt, and the like, with the potassium salt being preferred. The preferred amount of this component in the composition of the present invention ranges from about 20-40 wt%, and more preferably from about 30 to about 40 wt%, based on the total weight of the composition. A particularly preferred amount is 35 wt%.
  • The sensitizer component of the present invention is preferably tetrazene. Preferred ranges of this component in the composition of the invention are from about 2 to about 10 wt%, and more preferably from about 3 to about 8 wt%, based on the total weight of the composition. A particularly preferred amount of tetrazene sensitizer is 5 wt%.
  • The oxidizer component of the present invention includes any oxidizer known in the art such as sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, barium nitrate, and the like. Potassium nitrate is particularly preferred. Useful amounts of the oxidizer component range from about 0 to about 30 wt%, and more preferably from about 0 to about 20 wt%, based on the total weight of the composition. About 3 wt% of potassium nitrate is preferred.
  • The abrasive component of the present invention is preferably glass fines, although other abrasives common and known in the art may also be used. Preferably, the abrasive component comprises from about 48 to about 70 wt%, and more preferably from about 50 to about 60 wt%, based on the total weight of the composition. A particularly preferred amount of glass abrasive is about 57 wt%. In addition, a preferred range of particle sizes for the abrasive component ranges from about 75 to about 150 micrometer, and more preferably from about 90 to about 150 micrometer. A particularly useful average size is about 110 micrometer. It is believed that coarser (e.g., larger) abrasive particle sizes provide larger interstitial spaces where larger aggregates of materials can form, thereby providing more focused energy generation.
  • The relatively large proportion of abrasive component of the present invention is believed to provide a more rigid support matrix and provides more anvil points which improve the sensitivity of the composition of the invention.
  • The composition of the present invention is easily substituted for leaded priming mixtures, and can be processed using conventional techniques.
  • EXAMPLES
  • In general, the composition of the invention is made using conventional techniques well-known in the art.
  • Typically, the appropriate amounts of dinitrobenzofuroxan salt and tetrazene sensitizer are processed in water to minimize the chance of premature explosion. Following mixing in water, the dinitrobenzofuroxan salt and tetrazene are allowed to settle, and excess water is decanted off. The resulting paste is further processed by adding appropriate amounts of abrasive and, if desired, oxidizer. The paste is mixed while moisture is maintained within the paste to a level of approximately 10-30% for safety reasons.
  • The processed paste is formed into pellets by pushing the paste into a block having a plurality of holes, each having a specified size and volume. The processed pellets may be isolated and installed into cartridges using procedures well known in the art.
  • Pressure and velocity testing of 22 and 27 caliber pellets was performed by shooting control and experimental rounds in a test barrel Control rounds used in the testing of the 22 caliber was a round primed with a standard leaded mix known as 22LRPAT purple. The control used in the testing of the 27 caliber was a round primed with a leaded mix known as 27SR-1 Red. The experimental round contained approximately 35 wt% potassium dinitrobenzofuroxan salt, approximately 5 wt% tetrazene, approximately 3 wt% potassium nitrate, and approximately 57 wt% glass fines, wherein the glass fines have an average particle size of approximately 120 micrometer.
  • Prior to firing the control or experimental rounds, a test barrel was rigged with a pressure gauge or copper crusher to measure the pressure generated by each round. The test barrel was also rigged with a velocity screen at the muzzle to measure the velocity of the nail exiting the muzzle. Function and casualty tests were performed on each round by shooting it in commercial tools. The following tables show the results of ballistic testing performed with the rounds. In Tables 1 and 2, "sd" refers to the standard deviation of each firing, and "ev" refers to the extreme variation between firings (defined as the difference between the maximum value and minimum value in the data set).
    Pressure and Velocity Tests for 22 Caliber Pellets
    N=20 Velocity (m/s (ft/s)) Pressure (108 Pa (100 psi))
    Mean ev sd mean ev sd
    Control 209.7 (688) 9.8 (32) 2.4 (8) 3.48 (504) 0.50 (72) 0.15 (22)
    Experimental 208.2 (683) 12.2 (40) 2.7 (9) 3.29 (477) 0.61 (88) 0.20 (29)
    Pressure and Velocity Tests for 22 Caliber Pellets
    N=20 Velocity (m/s (ft/s)) Pressure (108 Pa (100 psi))
    Mean ev sd mean ev sd
    Control 192 (630) 15.2 (50) 3.7 (12) 1.30 (188) 0.45 (65) 0.12 (18)
    Experimental 189.6 (622) 6.4 (21) 1.8 (6) 1.26 (182) 0.61 (88) 0.18 (26)
    (ev = extreme variation; sd = standard deviation)
    Function and Casualty Test
    Sample Tool Fastener N Results
    92 J (22 cal) Control OMARK721 HD-150 50 OK
    92 J (22 cal) Experimental OMARK 721 HD-150 50 OK
    113 J (27 cal) Control Hilti DX450 NK -42 20 OK
    113 J (27 cal) Experimental Hilti DX450 NK-42 20 OK
  • The results shown in the tables above indicate that the experimental rounds with the lead-free mixture perform substantially the same as the control rounds that are primed with a leaded mixture. These results confirm that the lead-free, non-toxic composition of the present invention can be easily substituted for rounds that are primed with leaded priming mixtures.

Claims (18)

  1. A lead-free, non-toxic priming composition, comprising:
    20-40 wt% of a dinitrobenzofuroxan salt;
    2-10 wt% of a sensitizer;
    0-30 wt% of an oxidizer, and
    48-70 wt% of an abrasive
       wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.
  2. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said dinitrobenzofuran salt is the potassium salt.
  3. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said dinitrobenzofuran salt comprises from about 30 to about 40 wt%, based on the total weight of said composition.
  4. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said dinitrobenzofuran salt comprises approximately 35 wt%, based on the total weight of said composition.
  5. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said sensitizer is tetrazene.
  6. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said sensitizer comprises from about 3 to about 8 wt%, based on the total weight of said composition.
  7. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said sensitizer comprises approximately 5 wt%, based on the total weight of said composition.
  8. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said oxidizer is a nitrate salt.
  9. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said oxidizer is potassium nitrate.
  10. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said oxidizer comprises from about 0 to about 15 wt%, based on the total weight of said composition.
  11. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said oxidizer comprises approximately 3 wt%, based on the total weight of said composition.
  12. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said abrasive is glass particles.
  13. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said abrasive comprises from about 50 to about 60 wt%, based on the total weight of said composition.
  14. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said abrasive comprises approximately 57 wt%, based on the total weight of said composition.
  15. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said abrasive has an average particle size of from about 75 to about 150 micrometer.
  16. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said abrasive has an average particle size of from about 90 to about 150 micrometer.
  17. The lead-free, non-toxic priming mix of claim 1, wherein said abrasive has an average particle size of approximatly 110 micrometer.
  18. The lead-free, non-toxic priming composition of claim 1, comprising:
    30-40 wt% of potassium dinitrobenzofuroxan salt;
    3-8 wt% of tetrazene;
    0-15 wt% potassium nitrate; and
    50-60 wt% of glass particles having an average particle size of from 90 to 150 microns,
       wherein all weight percents are based on the total weight of said composition.
EP04250243A 2003-01-23 2004-01-19 Lead-free nontoxic priming mix Expired - Lifetime EP1440958B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US746601 1996-11-13
US44218403P 2003-01-23 2003-01-23
US442184P 2003-01-23
US10/746,601 US20040154713A1 (en) 2003-01-23 2003-12-23 Lead-free nontoxic priming mix

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1440958A1 EP1440958A1 (en) 2004-07-28
EP1440958B1 true EP1440958B1 (en) 2005-09-14

Family

ID=32600304

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04250243A Expired - Lifetime EP1440958B1 (en) 2003-01-23 2004-01-19 Lead-free nontoxic priming mix

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20040154713A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1440958B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE304519T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602004000086T2 (en)
HK (1) HK1064359A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050098248A1 (en) * 2003-06-26 2005-05-12 Vladimir Nikolaevich Khovonskov Ammunition primer composition for small arms
DE102006024511A1 (en) * 2006-05-23 2007-11-29 Ruag Ammotec Gmbh ignition
RU2669637C1 (en) * 2017-08-11 2018-10-12 Акционерное общество "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт точного машиностроения" (АО "ЦНИИТОЧМАШ") Method for manufacture of suspension shock-igniting composition and method of equipping round ignition cartridges with such composition
RU2674964C1 (en) * 2018-03-12 2018-12-13 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Российский химико-технологический университет имени Д.И. Менделеева" (РХТУ им. Д.И. Менделеева) 1,1-dinitro-1-(4-nitro-3-(1h-tetrazol-1-yl)-1h-pyrazole-1-yl)methane potassium salt and method for preparation thereof

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3135636A (en) * 1962-01-02 1964-06-02 Atlas Chem Ind Ignition composition containing an alkali metal salt of dinitrobenzfuroxan and a lacqer binder
US3423259A (en) * 1966-03-28 1969-01-21 Olin Mathieson Ammunition priming composition of dry particulate ingredients with karaya gum binder
FR2693721B1 (en) * 1992-07-20 1994-10-21 Ncs Pyrotechnie Technologies Priming charge with annular percussion and its manufacturing process.
ATE177074T1 (en) * 1994-08-27 1999-03-15 Eley Ltd INITIAL CHARGE
US5610367A (en) * 1995-10-06 1997-03-11 Federal-Hoffman, Inc. Non-toxic rim-fire primer
US20010001970A1 (en) * 1995-10-28 2001-05-31 Rainer Hagel Lead- and barium-free propellant charges
DE19540278A1 (en) * 1995-10-28 1997-04-30 Dynamit Nobel Ag Lead- and barium-free igniters
US5993577A (en) * 1998-09-04 1999-11-30 Federal Cartridge Company Lead-free, heavy-metal-free rim-fire priming composition dedicated for Ralph B. Lynn

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20040154713A1 (en) 2004-08-12
EP1440958A1 (en) 2004-07-28
ATE304519T1 (en) 2005-09-15
DE602004000086D1 (en) 2005-10-20
DE602004000086T2 (en) 2006-06-14
HK1064359A1 (en) 2005-01-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5167736A (en) Nontoxic priming mix
CA2556595C (en) Priming mixtures for small arms
AU679301B2 (en) Lead-free priming mixture for percussion primer
EP0440873B1 (en) Improved primer composition
EP1195366B1 (en) Non-toxic primer mix
US8062443B2 (en) Lead-free primers
US5831208A (en) Lead-free centerfire primer with DDNP and barium nitrate oxidizer
CA2156974C (en) Primer composition
EP1062188B1 (en) Non-toxic primers for small caliber ammunition
AU741414B2 (en) Conductive primer mix
US5672219A (en) Printing mixture containing no toxic materials, and cartridge percussion primer employing such a mixture
US5547528A (en) Non-toxic primer
EP1440958B1 (en) Lead-free nontoxic priming mix
US6786986B2 (en) Non-toxic composition for priming mixture for small caliber arms ammunition
US6946042B2 (en) Pyrotechnic body
US7459043B2 (en) Moisture-resistant black powder substitute compositions
WO2012011897A1 (en) Priming mix
US20110011502A1 (en) Priming mix
CA2294877C (en) Conductive primer mix
CA2135462A1 (en) Low toxicity primer composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20040906

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: DE

Ref document number: 1064359

Country of ref document: HK

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AXX Extension fees paid

Extension state: MK

Payment date: 20041004

Extension state: LV

Payment date: 20041004

Extension state: LT

Payment date: 20041004

Extension state: AL

Payment date: 20041004

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050914

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602004000086

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20051020

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: BOVARD AG PATENTANWAELTE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051214

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051214

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051214

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: GR

Ref document number: 1064359

Country of ref document: HK

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060214

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20050914

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060315

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20060615

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050914

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: OLIN CORPORATION

Free format text: OLIN CORPORATION#SOMERS THIN STRIP/BRASS, 215 PIEDMONT STREET, P.O. BOX 270 WATERBURY,#CONNECTICUT 06706-2152 (US) -TRANSFER TO- OLIN CORPORATION#SOMERS THIN STRIP/BRASS, 215 PIEDMONT STREET, P.O. BOX 270 WATERBURY,#CONNECTICUT 06706-2152 (US)

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20230127

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20230127

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230125

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230130

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20230103

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230127

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230127

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20230127

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 602004000086

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20240118

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20240119

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MK9A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK07

Ref document number: 304519

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20240119