MULTILEVEL PRECEDENCE AND PRE-EMPTION IN A CALL AND BEARER
SEPARATED NETWORK FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates to signaling in a telecommunications system. More particularly, the invention relates to standardising signalling over multi-vendor telecommunication infrastructures. BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
For cost-efficiency reasons telecommunication operators are increasingly deploying non-STM transport technologies (e.g. ATM, IP, FR, etc) inside their networks and, therefore, requiring a standardised solution to support existing services of today's public telecommunication networks over multi-vendor non-STM infrastructures.
In the current public telecommunication networks the call control (CC) and bearer control (BC) are tightly coupled in the same public network protocol (e.g. ISUP) see figure 1a. As a result of this trend to run over multi-vendor non-STM infrastructures a new network architecture has been developed that requires the splitting of call control (CC) and bearer control (BC) into separate protocols see figure 1 b.
Figures 1 a and 1 b show the evolution from current integrated CC/BC public network protocols (e.g. ISUP) (figure 1a) to the separated CC/BC solution (figure 1b). Referring to figure 1a, in current public NNI protocols: call and bearer control are integrated inside the same protocol, i.e. each node in the network must have call and bearer control capabilities. Referring to figure 1 b in separated CC and BC: call and bearer control are performed by different protocols. A single CC protocol is needed for the various transport technologies (e.g. ATM, IP, etc.). Only some nodes (e.g. nodes at the edge of a network) need to couple the CC and BC, for instance for a specific call, other nodes, only need BC capabilities (e.g. transit nodes inside an operator's network).
As a result of the split of CC and BC, a new interface is required between the CC function and BC function. A new protocol is also thus required to enable coupling between the CC and BC functions when a node is implemented in a
separated environment. The common term for this protocol is a 'Media Gateway Control Protocol', and which is being developed by ITU Study Group 16 (H.248, previously known as H.GCP) (reference: ITU-T H.248, Gateway Control Protocol) and in IETF MEGACO (MGCP) working group (reference: IETF < RFC2805> Media Gateway Control protocol architecture and requirements). In ITU Study Group 16 and IETF MEGACO, the CC function is known as 'Media Controller (MC)' and the BC function is known as 'Media Gateway (MG)'.
Figure 2 shows a Media Gateway Control Protocol in separated CC & BC
Architecture. The Media Gateway Control Protocol describes resources in the BC function in terms of contexts and terminations. Terminations can be reserved and used at a later time. A termination represents a physical endpoint and can be assigned different characteristics, for example: the transport type (Circuit, IP, ATM) media or codec type (GSM, G.711 ) priority
A context groups a number of terminations to describe a path or call through the BC function.
One of the services that runs in ISUP based public communications networks (figure 1a) is Multilevel Precedence and Pre-emption (MLPP). This service needs to be supported by separated CC & BC networks also. (See reference: ITU-T Q.735.3, Description for Community of Interest Supplementary
Services - Multilevel precedence and pre-emption.)
In today's public telecommunications networks based on ISUP, the MLPP information, which has two parts - precedence and pre-emption, is signalled in Initial Address Messages (IAM), Release Message (REL), Address Complete Message (ACM) and Call Progress Message (CPG). The Precedence parameter is used to identify the precedence level, the network and MLPP service domain, and whether a path has been reserved or path reservation is allowed. In prior art arrangements, this is handled at the CC level. In the new architecture of separated CC and BC, the MLPP information needs to be also implemented partly at the CC and BC level. If the BC level
implements the functionality that is required for MLPP, the Media Gateway Control Protocol needs to be updated to carry to the MLPP information between the CC and BC functions.
Whilst the Media Gateway Control Protocol today allows a termination to be reserved and assigned and a priority given, however, it does not have the capability to: express that a reserved termination is for 'pre-emption reserved for reuse' express that a termination belongs to an MLPP service domain express that a termination belongs to a certain 'Network Identity' Without the ability to express these parameters, the BC function is considered not able to implement the necessary functionality for the MLPP supplementary service to operate in a separated BC and CC network.
This may lead to problems like:
Resources freed by the MLPP pre-emptive service could be seized by another call process rather than being used by MLPP thus leading to failure of the MLPP service.
Resources not belonging to a MLPP service domain may be freed leading to non-related calls in another domain being terminated, all of which are considered undesirable. An object of the present invention is to alleviate at least one disadvantage of the prior art arrangement. SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
To this end, the present invention provides a method of operating a MLPP supplementary service in a separated BC and CC network, in which there is provided in the BC functionality, at least one of the following properties: a) an indication of the termination's membership of a domain or group (i.e. MLPP service domain) b) an indication of why a termination is reserved (e.g. pre-emption reserved for reuse) c) an indication of which network a termination is assigned (e.g.
Network Identity)
Preferably, the properties are additional termination properties.
The present invention also provides a separated Call Control (CC) and Bearer Control (BC) network, operating a MLPP supplementary service, which includes a means of implementing BC functionality having context and termination, a first indicating means to indicate membership of a domain or group by the termination, a second indicating means to indicate why the termination is reserved, and a third indicating means to indicate to which network the termination is assigned. Preferably, the network above is used in conjunction with a TICC Transport
Independent Call Control or more aptly, BICC Bearer Independent Call Control protocol. In one form, the present invention may be implemented in a UMTS core network.
The present invention is based on the realisation that in a new separated architecture, because the CC and BC are split, there is a requirement to provide additional properties, such as termination properties. A further realisation is that in a gateway, the signalling information including protocols can be interworked to a new protocol or the protocol may be transferred through the gateway. Thus, the invention stems from recognising that, in interworking or transferring, a number (one or more), commands can be added to enable provision of certain desired properties. Further, the Media Gateway Control Protocol describes several commands to create, modify, subtract and query the properties associated with a termination and/or context. To ensure correct operation of the MLPP supplementary services additional termination properties such as the following can be added:
An indication of the termination's membership of a domain or group (i.e.
MLPP service domain)
An indication of why a termination is reserved (e.g. pre-emption reserved for reuse) An indication of which network a termination is assigned (e.g. Network
Identity)
Preferably, the invention can be implemented by way of the following Media
Gateway Control Protocol API type commands: Add Modify
Subtract Move Audit Notify ServiceChange
In the present specification, we refer to CC and BC being 'separated'. By separated, we mean separating the functionality of the CC and BC. The separation can be physical or logical. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1a illustrates a public network configuration in which call control (CC) and bearer control (BC) protocols are tightly coupled,
Figure 1 b illustrates a network configuration that allows for splitting of call control(CC) and bearer control (BC) into separated protocols,
Figure 2 illustrates a Media Gateway Control Protocol in a separated CC & BC architecture, and
Figure 3 illustrates H.248 connection model highlighting Terminations and Contexts. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS
As previously described, as a result of the split of CC and BC, a new interface is exposed between the CC function and BC function. A protocol is required to enable coupling between the CC and BC functions when a node is implemented in a separated environment. The common term for this protocol is a 'Media Gateway Control Protocol'. Figure 2 shows a Media Gateway Control Protocol in separated CC and BC Architecture.
The Media Gateway Control Protocol describes resources in the BC function in terms of context and termination. Terminations can be reserved and used at a later time. A termination represents a physical endpoint or resource and can be assigned different characteristics, for example: the transport type (Circuit, IP, ATM) media or codec type (GSM, G.711 ) priority
A context groups a number of terminations to describe a path or call through the BC function. A context is an association between a number of terminations. The context describes the topology (who hears/sees whom) and the media mixing and/or switching parameters if more than two terminations are involved in the association. There is a special context called the null context. It contains terminations that are not associated to any other terminations. Terminations in the null context can have their parameters examined or modified, and may have events detected on them. In general, an Add command is used to add terminations to contexts. If the MGC Media Gateway Controller does not specify an existing context to which the termination is to be added, the MG Media Gateway creates a new context. A termination may be removed from a context with a Subtract command, and a termination may be moved from one context to another with a Move command. A termination exists in one and only one context at a time. The maximum number of terminations in a context is a MG property. Media gateways that offer only point-to-point connectivity might allow at most two terminations per context. Media gateways that support multipoint conferences might allow three or more terminations per context. The attributes of contexts are:
Context ID; • The topology (who hears/sees whom)
The topology of a context describes the flow of media between the terminations within a context. In contrast, the mode of a termination (send/receive/...) describes the flow of the media at the ingress/egress of the media gateway.
• The priority is used for a context in order to provide the MG with information about a certain precedence handling for a context. The MGC can also use the priority to control autonomously the traffic precedence in the MG in a smooth way in certain situations (e.g. restart), when a lot of contexts must be handled simultaneously.
• An indicator for an emergency call is also provided to allow a preference handling in the MG.
Thus the attributes of a Context may imply certain termination properties. Figure 3 illustrates three possible services of a connection model suitable for the protocol of figure 2 and is not meant to be an all-inclusive illustration. The asterisk box in each of the contexts represents the logical association of terminations implied by the context. The connections illustrated by paths A, B, C represent, for example, a conference with a 3 party communication. The scenario of paths D & E represent, for example, call hold and the scenario of paths F & G represent a 2 party communication. The examples are not the only scenarios applicable to figure 3 as would be understood by those skilled in the art. The Multilevel Precedence and Pre-emption (MLPP) service needs to be supported by separated CC and BC networks also. Reference to ITU-T .735.3, Description for Community of Interest Supplementary Services - Multilevel precedence and pre- emption can be made in this regard. The Multilevel Precedence and Pre-emption (MLPP) supplementary service provides a prioritised call handling service. This service has two parts - precedence and pre-emption. Precedence involves assigning a priority level to a call. Pre-emption involves the seizing of resources, which are in use by a call of a lower precedence, by a higher level precedence call in the absence of idle resources. Users in networks that do not support this service will not be affected by this service.
The MLPP service is provided as a network provider's option to a domain of a network. The domain can be the whole network or a subset of the network. The MLPP service applies to all network resources in the domain that is in common use. The maximum precedence level of a subscriber is set at the subscription time by the service provider based on the subscriber's need. The subscriber may select
a precedence level up to and including the maximum subscribed to precedence level on a per call basis.
Precedence calls (MLPP calls that have a higher precedence than the lowest level of precedence) that are not responded to by the called party (e.g. call unanswered and/or unacknowledged, called party busy with call of equal or higher precedence, or called party busy and non-pre-emptable) are diverted to a predetermined alternate party. This alternate party may be another subscriber or a network operating position.
Pre-emption may take one of two forms. First, the called party may be busy with a lower precedence call which must be pre-empted in favour of completing the higher precedence all from the calling party. Second, the network resources may be busy with calls some of which are of lower precedence than the call requested by the calling party. One or more of these lower precedence calls must be preempted to complete the higher precedence call. There are at least three characteristics of pre-emption:
Any party whose connection was terminated (whether that resource is reused of not) must receive a distinctive pre-emption notification. Any called party of an active call that is being pre-empted by a higher precedence call should be required to acknowledge the pre-emption before being connected to the new calling party.
When there are no idle resources, pre-emption of the lowest lower level of precedence resources shall occur.
To ensure correct operation of the MLPP supplementary services additional termination properties are added in accordance with the present invention based on the Media Gateway Control Protocol which describes several commands, such as, to create, modify, subtract and query the properties associated with a termination and/or context.
Thus the present invention seeks to incorporate additional termination properties such as: An indication of the termination's membership of a domain or group (i.e.
MLPP service domain)
An indication of why a termination is reserved (e.g. pre-emption reserved for reuse)
An indication of which network a termination is assigned (e.g. Network
Identity) It is contemplated to indicate these properties by adding them to the Media
Gateway Control Protocol command application programming interface (API). The updated commands contemplated to enable signalling of these properties are:
Add
Modify • Subtract
Move
Audit
Notify
ServiceChange The Media Gateway Control Protocol has a number of network applications including but not limited to:
UMTS core network
UMTS access network
GPRS networks H.323 Multimedia networks
SIP based Multimedia networks
Cable based networks
ATM networks
Circuit Switched Networks And could be realised, for example but not limited to, equipment such as: trunking gateways access gateways access servers base stations ■ Mobile Switching Centres (MSCs)
Gateway Mobile Switching Centre (GMSCs)
residential gateways transit switches local switches
Specific applications of the invention include a UMTS core network, H.323 VoIP and/or SIP (Session initiation Protocol) based VoIP networks. Particularly, the present invention has application to MLPP used with a TICC or BICC protocol in separated CC and BC networks.
Example realisations of the present invention are as shown below. The options are exemplary and not expansive. Thus, other realisations are contemplated within the scope of the present invention. EXAMPLE REALISATIONS Option 1 Add (Termination Id,
[Local Termination State,]1 [Local Termination Descriptor,]
[Remote Termination Descriptor,] [Events descriptor,] [Signal Descriptor,] [Service Domain,]2 [Termination Network])3
*Note: The new states and parameters could equally apply to other MGCP commands as specified in the present invention. Option 2
Add (Termination Id,4 [ : ])
*Note: There are no parameters. The actual termination Id would be formatted to represent the circumstances of note 4, below, ie. Terminationld = Circuit23/MLPPdomain/NI2. Option 3 ServiceChange (Termination Id,
ServiceChange Method,
ServiceChange Reason,5 [ServiceChange Delay]) Option 4
Add (Context Id, [Context Attribute,])1
Notes: 1 - New states added: Reserved
Reserved Pre-emption 2 - New parameter 3 - New parameter
4 - Formatted to indicate 2 identities:
MLPP Service Domain Network Identity
5 - New Reasons: - Reserved
- Reserved pre-emption