EP1149709A2 - Security coating process of documents - Google Patents

Security coating process of documents Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1149709A2
EP1149709A2 EP01303870A EP01303870A EP1149709A2 EP 1149709 A2 EP1149709 A2 EP 1149709A2 EP 01303870 A EP01303870 A EP 01303870A EP 01303870 A EP01303870 A EP 01303870A EP 1149709 A2 EP1149709 A2 EP 1149709A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
coating
toner
process according
substrate
printing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP01303870A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1149709B1 (en
EP1149709A3 (en
Inventor
Paul Mann
Ivan Wells
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
3M Security Printing and Systems Ltd
Original Assignee
Security Printing and Systems Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Security Printing and Systems Ltd filed Critical Security Printing and Systems Ltd
Publication of EP1149709A2 publication Critical patent/EP1149709A2/en
Publication of EP1149709A3 publication Critical patent/EP1149709A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1149709B1 publication Critical patent/EP1149709B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03G—ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G8/00—Layers covering the final reproduction, e.g. for protecting, for writing thereon
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41M—PRINTING, DUPLICATING, MARKING, OR COPYING PROCESSES; COLOUR PRINTING
    • B41M7/00—After-treatment of prints, e.g. heating, irradiating, setting of the ink, protection of the printed stock
    • B41M7/0045—After-treatment of prints, e.g. heating, irradiating, setting of the ink, protection of the printed stock using protective coatings or film forming compositions cured by mechanical wave energy, e.g. ultrasonics, cured by electromagnetic radiation or waves, e.g. ultraviolet radiation, electron beams, or cured by magnetic or electric fields, e.g. electric discharge, plasma
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41M—PRINTING, DUPLICATING, MARKING, OR COPYING PROCESSES; COLOUR PRINTING
    • B41M7/00—After-treatment of prints, e.g. heating, irradiating, setting of the ink, protection of the printed stock
    • B41M7/0054—After-treatment of prints, e.g. heating, irradiating, setting of the ink, protection of the printed stock using protective coatings or film forming compositions cured by thermal means, e.g. infrared radiation, heat

Definitions

  • This invention relates to improvements in toner bonding and security.
  • the first is the effect that variations in paper surface have on the bond, it has been shown that indentations i.e. watermarks and normal variation to surface characteristics of the paper can reduce the strength of the bond between the toner and the surface. This can result in the toner breaking off during the life of the document or in the extreme cases not bonding at all.
  • Documents with poor bonding or incomplete characters from this problem impact upon the detection of deliberate alterations, as the persons checking the document become use to seeing variations within the characters on genuine data and therefore becomes less able to determine what is altered.
  • the second problem is that, as the bond of the toner does not penetrate the surface of the paper it means that the bond can be broken by physical force alone and this may mean that the level of distribution to the surface of the substrate is low which means the detection by visual means is very difficult.
  • the third problem is due to the material used to produce the toner. Toner was never intended for use as a security feature and therefore the majority of common toners do not contain materials that lend themselves to detection by machine-readable techniques.
  • the object of this process is three-fold the first is to produce a surface that gives a stronger bond to toner than the surface of the paper.
  • the second is to add a security coating to selected areas of the document, that will improve the security of the toner allowing the integrity of the data below to be validated by machine reading techniques.
  • This process also allows the materials to be applied only where the toner-generated data may be applied, minimising the use of materials.
  • the invention provides a two-part security coating process, the first part being a coating that improves the bonding of hot melt toner this is applied to the substrate in selected areas, and the second part a coating applied to the fused toner in the areas of data that are at high risk of alteration to be checked for integrity by machine reading techniques.
  • This coating may contain materials that allow the integrity of the coating to be verified by machine-readable techniques.
  • the process is for coating a secure bond for toner deposition images and the application of a secure coating and may comprise a selective coating applied to selective areas of the fused toner.
  • the coating applied on to the fused toner may be machine readable by the use of transmission and reflectance of any or a combination of visible light, Ultra violet light and/or infra red light.
  • the material applied to the surface of the substrate may be cured by the use of one or more external energy sources comprising any of IR, UV radiation, Electron beam or any other suitable energy source.
  • the coating applied on top of the toner may be cured by the use of one or more external energy sources comprising any of IR, UV radiation, Electron beam or any other suitable energy source.
  • the coating to the substrate may be applied using a printing process i.e. a lithographic process, a flexographic and Gravure process or any or any other printing process.
  • a printing process i.e. a lithographic process, a flexographic and Gravure process or any or any other printing process.
  • the coating applied on top of the toner maybe applied using a printing process i.e. lithographic process, flexographic and Gravure process or any other printing process.
  • a separate coating may be applied to the substrate and a further coating then applied on top of the fused toner.
  • the first step in the process is preferably to print a coating onto the surface of the paper in at least the areas where the toner would be applied.
  • This coating is preferably applied on the top of any other printed designs.
  • the coating can be applied by a printing process such a lithographic, Gravure or flexographic or any other printing process.
  • the documents may then be processed in toner deposition system and the toner is then fused as normal within the machine.
  • the fused images are than preferably coated with a material over all or some of the toner generated marking.
  • the coating may be applied by the flexographic lithographic printing process or Gravure or any other printing process.
  • the coating gives improved security against deliberate remove of toner by physical means and a method by which the area of toner generated data can be scanned using machine reading techniques.
  • the first process step is to print a coating on to the document to be laser (toner-deposition) printed in at least the areas where the toner is to be deposited on to the substrate. This is done using a printing process and the material is applied on top of any other printings on the document, in at least the areas onto which the toner is to be applied.
  • the second process is to laserprint the variable details onto the document. The toner is then fused in the standard way.
  • the document with the fused toner is then coated with a second layer using a printing process; the coating is used to cover at least the most sensitive toner generated data.
  • the document is then issued, once the document is used and returned for reconciliation it can be passed along a track with a reader that checks if the coating is till intact and therefore if the data safety has been compromised.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Cleaning In Electrography (AREA)
  • Developing Agents For Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Printing Methods (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Accessory Devices And Overall Control Thereof (AREA)
  • Amplifiers (AREA)
  • Diaphragms For Electromechanical Transducers (AREA)
  • Optical Communication System (AREA)
  • Laser Beam Printer (AREA)

Abstract

A method of making a secure printed document comprises printing a first coating onto to selected areas of a substrate, laser printing a toner image onto the coated areas, fusing the toner image, and printing a second coating onto at least part of the toner image. The second coating is selected to allow the toner generated image to be scanned through the second coating using machine reading techniques.

Description

This invention relates to improvements in toner bonding and security.
It has long been recognised that toner deposition systems have a number of weaknesses that make them unsuitable for use with data that is vulnerable to alteration.
Two of these weaknesses are related to the way the toner is bonded to the surface of the paper and both affect the security of the document. A third is associated with the material composition of toner.
The first is the effect that variations in paper surface have on the bond, it has been shown that indentations i.e. watermarks and normal variation to surface characteristics of the paper can reduce the strength of the bond between the toner and the surface. This can result in the toner breaking off during the life of the document or in the extreme cases not bonding at all. Documents with poor bonding or incomplete characters from this problem impact upon the detection of deliberate alterations, as the persons checking the document become use to seeing variations within the characters on genuine data and therefore becomes less able to determine what is altered.
The second problem is that, as the bond of the toner does not penetrate the surface of the paper it means that the bond can be broken by physical force alone and this may mean that the level of distribution to the surface of the substrate is low which means the detection by visual means is very difficult. The third problem is due to the material used to produce the toner. Toner was never intended for use as a security feature and therefore the majority of common toners do not contain materials that lend themselves to detection by machine-readable techniques.
With the increasing demand for higher speeds in personalisation of security documents, the use of toner deposition systems has increased and this process has been developed to tackle these three major problems. It is a process that will give increased security to toner produced data and will introduce a method by which the integrity of the coating can be verified by machine-readable techniques.
The object of this process is three-fold the first is to produce a surface that gives a stronger bond to toner than the surface of the paper. The second is to add a security coating to selected areas of the document, that will improve the security of the toner allowing the integrity of the data below to be validated by machine reading techniques. This process also allows the materials to be applied only where the toner-generated data may be applied, minimising the use of materials.
The invention provides a two-part security coating process, the first part being a coating that improves the bonding of hot melt toner this is applied to the substrate in selected areas, and the second part a coating applied to the fused toner in the areas of data that are at high risk of alteration to be checked for integrity by machine reading techniques. This coating may contain materials that allow the integrity of the coating to be verified by machine-readable techniques.
The process is for coating a secure bond for toner deposition images and the application of a secure coating and may comprise a selective coating applied to selective areas of the fused toner.
The coating applied on to the fused toner may be machine readable by the use of transmission and reflectance of any or a combination of visible light, Ultra violet light and/or infra red light.
The material applied to the surface of the substrate may be cured by the use of one or more external energy sources comprising any of IR, UV radiation, Electron beam or any other suitable energy source.
The coating applied on top of the toner may be cured by the use of one or more external energy sources comprising any of IR, UV radiation, Electron beam or any other suitable energy source.
The coating to the substrate may be applied using a printing process i.e. a lithographic process, a flexographic and Gravure process or any or any other printing process.
The coating applied on top of the toner maybe applied using a printing process i.e. lithographic process, flexographic and Gravure process or any other printing process.
A separate coating may be applied to the substrate and a further coating then applied on top of the fused toner.
The first step in the process is preferably to print a coating onto the surface of the paper in at least the areas where the toner would be applied. This coating is preferably applied on the top of any other printed designs. The coating can be applied by a printing process such a lithographic, Gravure or flexographic or any other printing process. The documents may then be processed in toner deposition system and the toner is then fused as normal within the machine.
The fused images are than preferably coated with a material over all or some of the toner generated marking. The coating may be applied by the flexographic lithographic printing process or Gravure or any other printing process.
With the use of this process the toner bonding variations that occur naturally on the surface of the paper can be reduced thus increasing the bonding of the toner to the paper. The coating gives improved security against deliberate remove of toner by physical means and a method by which the area of toner generated data can be scanned using machine reading techniques.
A process according to the invention will now be explained by way of an example.
Example Laser Printing
In accordance with the invention, the first process step is to print a coating on to the document to be laser (toner-deposition) printed in at least the areas where the toner is to be deposited on to the substrate. This is done using a printing process and the material is applied on top of any other printings on the document, in at least the areas onto which the toner is to be applied. The second process is to laserprint the variable details onto the document. The toner is then fused in the standard way.
The document with the fused toner is then coated with a second layer using a printing process; the coating is used to cover at least the most sensitive toner generated data. The document is then issued, once the document is used and returned for reconciliation it can be passed along a track with a reader that checks if the coating is till intact and therefore if the data safety has been compromised.

Claims (9)

  1. A document security coating process, characterised by applying a first coating to a substrate to cover selected areas of the substrate to improve the bonding of a hot melt toner to the substrate, and applying a second coating to said toner after fusing of the toner, in selected areas of the document.
  2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said coating includes one or more materials which allow the integrity of the coating to be verified by machine-reading techniques.
  3. A process according to claim 2 wherein said second coating may be machine readable by transmission and reflectance of any one or a combination of visible, ultra-violet or infrared light.
  4. A process according to any proceeding claim wherein said first coating is cured by use of one or more external energy sources.
  5. A process according to any proceeding claim wherein said second coating is cured by use of one or more external energy sources.
  6. A process according to claim 4 or 5 where said respective one or more external energy sources comprise one or more of infrared, ultra violet or electron beam emitting devices.
  7. A process according to any proceeding claim wherein said first coating is applied to the substrate using a printing process.
  8. A process according to any preceding claim wherein said second coating is applied over the toner using a printing process.
  9. A method of making a secure printed document comprising printing a first coating onto selected areas of substrate, laser printing a toner image onto said coated areas, fusing said toner image, and printing a second coating onto at least part of said toner image, and the second coating being of material to permit the toner generated image to be scanned using machine reading techniques through the second coating.
EP01303870A 2000-04-27 2001-04-27 Security coating process of documents Expired - Lifetime EP1149709B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0010146 2000-04-27
GBGB0010146.9A GB0010146D0 (en) 2000-04-27 2000-04-27 Improvements in toner bonding security

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1149709A2 true EP1149709A2 (en) 2001-10-31
EP1149709A3 EP1149709A3 (en) 2004-04-14
EP1149709B1 EP1149709B1 (en) 2006-07-05

Family

ID=9890530

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01303870A Expired - Lifetime EP1149709B1 (en) 2000-04-27 2001-04-27 Security coating process of documents

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1149709B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE332520T1 (en)
DE (1) DE60121246T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1149709T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2267681T3 (en)
GB (1) GB0010146D0 (en)
PT (1) PT1149709E (en)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5045426A (en) * 1989-06-21 1991-09-03 The Standard Register Company Toner adhesion-enhancing coating for security documents
GB9622747D0 (en) * 1996-11-01 1997-01-08 Stationery Office The Ltd Security marking of documents
EP0885753A1 (en) * 1997-06-17 1998-12-23 Gelderse Papiergroep N.V. Security paper

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DK1149709T3 (en) 2006-11-06
DE60121246D1 (en) 2006-08-17
GB0010146D0 (en) 2000-06-14
DE60121246T2 (en) 2007-12-06
PT1149709E (en) 2006-11-30
EP1149709B1 (en) 2006-07-05
ES2267681T3 (en) 2007-03-16
ATE332520T1 (en) 2006-07-15
EP1149709A3 (en) 2004-04-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0658146B1 (en) Variable data clear mark imagin
US8773724B2 (en) Method of superimposing an image onto another, method of personalizing a data carrier using the image superimposing method and a personalized data carrier
RU2316058C2 (en) System and method for product authentication
US4522429A (en) Method of rendering documents resistant to photocopying, and anti-copying paper and ink therefor
RU2424909C2 (en) Data medium and method for its manufacturing
US20080042427A1 (en) Security Article with Multicoloured Image
EP0721849B1 (en) Copy-protected documents and printing method for obtaining copy-protected documents
US20060151993A1 (en) Tamper evident security document
RU2308757C2 (en) Protective element for data carrier
CA2050228C (en) Security device comprising optically variable data and method for making the same
KR100736481B1 (en) Anti-falsification holographic thin film containing digital watermark image and its manufacturing method
US6926968B2 (en) Paper/plastic laminate and method for making same
EP1149709B1 (en) Security coating process of documents
JP2005041023A (en) Personal identification card
JPH10278460A (en) Anti-duplication article, article authenticity discriminating method and article authenticity discriminating apparatus
WO2001033301A1 (en) Printing method
JP2002127649A (en) Hidden information formation
KR20000039203A (en) Method for preparation of security film for preventing forgery and alteration
JP2969167B2 (en) Engraved intaglio printed matter and method for producing the same
NZ246064A (en) Printing on plastic films; use of particulate material to take up ink for subsequent transfer to plastics film
EP1228888A3 (en) Security document, print media, printing method, and apparatus
JPS6285994A (en) Securities that prevent counterfeiting
JPH11348473A (en) Copy prevention printed matter and method of manufacturing the same
MXPA06006860A (en) Security article with multicoloured image

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: 7B 41M 7/00 B

Ipc: 7G 03G 8/00 B

Ipc: 7G 03G 7/00 A

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20040719

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20050216

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20060705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60121246

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20060817

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20060403475

Country of ref document: GR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20060926

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: 3M SECURITY PRINTING AND SYSTEMS LIMITED

Free format text: SECURITY PRINTING AND SYSTEMS LIMITED#GORSE STREET, CHADDERTON#OLDHAM, LANCASHIRE OL9 9QH (GB) -TRANSFER TO- 3M SECURITY PRINTING AND SYSTEMS LIMITED#GORSE STREET CHADDERTON#OLDHAM, LANCASHIRE OL9 9QH (GB)

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2267681

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: LUCHS & PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: PD4A

Owner name: 3M SECURITY PRINTING AND SYSTEMS LIMITED, GB

Effective date: 20070302

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

NLT1 Nl: modifications of names registered in virtue of documents presented to the patent office pursuant to art. 16 a, paragraph 1

Owner name: 3M SECURITY PRINTING AND SYSTEMS LIMITED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20070410

BECN Be: change of holder's name

Owner name: *3M SECURITY PRINTING AND SYSTEMS LTD

Effective date: 20060705

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070427

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Payment date: 20120327

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20120326

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20120320

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20120413

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20120502

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20120412

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20120504

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20120411

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20120411

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20120412

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20120411

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20120411

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20120504

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120419

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20120510

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20120416

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20120327

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20130424

Year of fee payment: 13

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *3M SECURITY PRINTING AND SYSTEMS LTD

Effective date: 20130430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES

Effective date: 20131028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20131101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20130430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 332520

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: ML

Ref document number: 20060403475

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20131104

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130428

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131028

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20131231

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60121246

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131101

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130427

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130427

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131104

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130427

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20140912

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130428

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130427