EP1132896A1 - Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of acoustic signals - Google Patents

Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of acoustic signals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1132896A1
EP1132896A1 EP00400623A EP00400623A EP1132896A1 EP 1132896 A1 EP1132896 A1 EP 1132896A1 EP 00400623 A EP00400623 A EP 00400623A EP 00400623 A EP00400623 A EP 00400623A EP 1132896 A1 EP1132896 A1 EP 1132896A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
magnitude
noise
frequency component
estimated
frequency
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00400623A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
François Bourzeix
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Motorola Solutions Inc
Original Assignee
Motorola Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Motorola Inc filed Critical Motorola Inc
Priority to EP00400623A priority Critical patent/EP1132896A1/en
Publication of EP1132896A1 publication Critical patent/EP1132896A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L21/00Speech or voice signal processing techniques to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
    • G10L21/02Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
    • G10L21/0208Noise filtering

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for processing an acoustic signal and in particular for suppressing background acoustic noise from the acoustic signal.
  • Portable communication devices such as cellular telephones often need to detect and transmit a speech or similar signal in noisy environments such as a fast moving vehicle.
  • Methods of suppressing background acoustic noise have thus been developed which permit much better communication with such devices in noisy environments.
  • the general approach adopted by some such methods is to represent the overall acoustic signal as the frequency components of a plurality of frames, each frame basically representing a small portion (e.g., about 10 ms) of the acoustic signal, and then to attempt to detect and remove or suppress any noise components occurring within each frequency component of each frame.
  • One simple and crude method estimates the average magnitude of noise
  • This method can be enhanced by providing that the magnitudes
  • a more sophisticated method multiplies the magnitudes
  • G(k).
  • this must be estimated (e.g., by assuming that X(k) ⁇ S(k)).
  • MMSE Minimum Mean Square Estimation
  • of the frequency components s(k) are again multiplied by denoising filter components G(k) such that
  • G(k).
  • MIPS Millions of Instructions Per Second
  • a method of suppressing acoustic noise in an acoustic signal represented by the frequency components of a plurality of frames, each frame representing a small portion of the acoustic signal comprising the steps of estimating the average magnitude of noise in each frequency component over a plurality of frames, estimating the variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component; and generating denoising filter components in dependence on the estimated magnitude of noise in each frequency component, the estimated variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component and the magnitude of each frequency component, and varying the magnitude of each frequency component in dependence on the corresponding denoising filter component.
  • This method has the significant advantage of taking account of the variability of the magnitude of noise within each frequency component over time. In this way, it is possible to determine an approximate probability of any one frequency component being largely comprised of noise or alternatively of being largely comprised of wanted speech signal.
  • the method further comprises setting the filter components in dependence on the ratio of the magnitude of each frequency component to an estimated likely maximum magnitude of noise for that frequency component, whereby, if the ratio exceeds a predetermined amount for a given frequency component, the filter component corresponding to such a frequency component may be set to a maximum value which is preferably substantially equal to one, whereas, if the ratio is less than a second predetermined amount, the corresponding filter component may be set to a minimum value, which is preferably substantially equal to 0.15.
  • the filter components are varied in a linear dependence on the ratio of the magnitude of each frequency component to the estimated likely maximum magnitude of noise for that frequency component between a minimum value of the filter components at or below the second predetermined amount and a maximum value at or above the first predetermined value.
  • each filtering component By having a maximum value of each filtering component of about 1, it provides that for signals which are much larger than the maximum likely noise content, there is no signal attenuation. This is actually very beneficial for frequency components which are much larger than the likely maximum noise component, because since the phase of the noise component is not necessarily aligned to the phase of the speech (or similar) signal, the noise component is almost as likely to destructively interfere with the speech signal (thus reducing the overall magnitude of the frequency component relative to the clean speech equivalent) as to constructively interfere with it (thus increasing the magnitude of the frequency component relative to the clean speech equivalent).
  • the magnitudes of the frequency components are filtered to remove high frequency fluctuations thereof.
  • This filtering of the magnitudes of the frequency components is preferably achieved by generating a short term mean estimation of the mean magnitudes of the frequency components, preferably over approximately three frames.
  • an apparatus for suppressing acoustic noise in an acoustic signal represented by the frequency components of a plurality of frames, each frame representing a small portion of the acoustic signal comprising: means for estimating the average magnitude of noise in each frequency component over a plurality of frames; means for estimating the variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component; means for generating denoising filter components in dependence on the estimated magnitude of noise in each frequency component, the estimated variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component and the magnitude of each frequency component, and means for varying the magnitude of each frequency component in dependence on the corresponding denoising filter component.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a series of steps or apparatus blocks showing the overall approach of noise suppression according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 initially as representing a series of method steps, these are now described in detail below.
  • the first step 10 is to take the acoustic signal s(n) (in the form of digital audio signal amplitude samples) and to perform high pass filtering to remove low frequency components (which do not carry much speech signal information although they may contain a large amount of unwanted background acoustic noise).
  • the second step 20 windows and overlaps (for example, by 50%) the high pass filtered acoustic signal. This step involves separating the signal into a series of overlapping segments and windowing them to form frames so that at the edge of each frame the amplitude of the signal is zero.
  • the third step 30 performs the Fast Fourier Transform on each windowed vector. Given a 256 input signal vector s(n), we obtain a 256 vector s(k) where n and k stand respectively for some time, and frequency indices. In what follows we shall indicate spectral data with bold characters: n, s....
  • the fourth step 40 performs a transformation of the FFT outputs, from Cartesian to polar co-ordinates.
  • the fifth step 50 uses the magnitude of the Fourier Transform, to evaluate the mean magnitude of spectral background noise mag(n(k)).
  • the sixth step 60 performs the estimation of de-noised speech spectral magnitude mag(s(k)) using the noise evaluation from block 50, and the noisy speech spectral magnitude.
  • the seventh, eighth and ninth steps perform the symmetrical operations to those performed by respectively 30,20 and 10: conversion from polar to Cartesian, inverse Fourier transforms and overlap add. It is to be noted that the signal phases is not modified by the algorithm since the noisy speech phases is used to reconstruct the clean speech signal in step 70. The main structure of this algorithm is very classical. The innovative feature of the algorithm is in the way noise is removed from speech in step 60. This step is now described in detail.
  • the step 60 can be subdivided into 3 sub-steps.
  • the first sub-step 110 is dedicated to evaluating the noise variance.
  • Step 50 output is the mean magnitude of background noise.
  • ⁇ (k) mean(mag(s(k)-n(k)))/mag(n(k)).
  • the third sub-step 130 is dedicated to calculating the denoising filter gain for each frequency channel. It is done as follows:

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Noise Elimination (AREA)

Abstract

A method and apparatus for suppressing acoustic noise in an acoustic signal (s(n)) represented by the frequency components of a plurality of frames each representing a small portion of the acoustic signal, comprising estimating the average magnitude of noise in each frequency component over a plurality of frames; estimating the variability of the magnitude of noise (110) in each frequency component; and generating denoising filter components in dependence on the estimated noise magnitudes, the estimated variability of the noise magnitude in each frequency component and the magnitude of each frequency component, and varying the magnitude of each frequency component (140) in dependence on the corresponding denoising filter component.
This has the significant advantage of taking account of the variability of the magnitude of noise within each frequency component over time, making possible determination of an approximate probability of any one frequency component being largely comprised of noise or alternatively of wanted speech signal.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for processing an acoustic signal and in particular for suppressing background acoustic noise from the acoustic signal.
  • Background of the Invention
  • Portable communication devices such as cellular telephones often need to detect and transmit a speech or similar signal in noisy environments such as a fast moving vehicle. Methods of suppressing background acoustic noise have thus been developed which permit much better communication with such devices in noisy environments.
  • The general approach adopted by some such methods is to represent the overall acoustic signal as the frequency components of a plurality of frames, each frame basically representing a small portion (e.g., about 10 ms) of the acoustic signal, and then to attempt to detect and remove or suppress any noise components occurring within each frequency component of each frame.
  • One simple and crude method estimates the average magnitude of noise |n(k)| in each frequency component s(k) over a large number of frames (e.g., of the order of about 100 frames) and then simply subtracts this from the magnitude of the frequency component |s(k)| to generate modified or noise suppressed frequency component magnitudes |S(k)|. This method can be enhanced by providing that the magnitudes |S(k)l of the modified frequency components are never allowed to fall below a minimum comfort noise floor level η.
  • A more sophisticated method, known as wiener filtering, multiplies the magnitudes |s(k)| of the frequency components in each frame by a denoising filter having components G(k) such that |S(k)| = G(k).|s(k)| , where the G(k) are generated in respect of each frame according to the formula: -
    Figure 00020001
    where
    Figure 00020002
    is the expected value of the square of the magnitude of the clean or denoised speech. Clearly, in a real system this must be estimated (e.g., by assuming that X(k) ≈ S(k)).
  • In a third method, known as Minimum Mean Square Estimation (MMSE), the magnitudes |s(k)| of the frequency components s(k) are again multiplied by denoising filter components G(k) such that |S(k)| = G(k).|s(k)|, but in this case, the G(k) are estimated using modified Bessel functions (which must be sampled). This method is intensive in the amount of processing power which it requires (in terms of Millions of Instructions Per Second (MIPS)) which makes it unsuitable for portable communication devices where processing power is at a premium.
  • Furthermore, none of the above methods takes any account of the variability of the noise components over time.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of suppressing acoustic noise in an acoustic signal represented by the frequency components of a plurality of frames, each frame representing a small portion of the acoustic signal, comprising the steps of estimating the average magnitude of noise in each frequency component over a plurality of frames, estimating the variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component; and generating denoising filter components in dependence on the estimated magnitude of noise in each frequency component, the estimated variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component and the magnitude of each frequency component, and varying the magnitude of each frequency component in dependence on the corresponding denoising filter component.
  • This method has the significant advantage of taking account of the variability of the magnitude of noise within each frequency component over time. In this way, it is possible to determine an approximate probability of any one frequency component being largely comprised of noise or alternatively of being largely comprised of wanted speech signal.
  • Preferably, the method further comprises setting the filter components in dependence on the ratio of the magnitude of each frequency component to an estimated likely maximum magnitude of noise for that frequency component, whereby, if the ratio exceeds a predetermined amount for a given frequency component, the filter component corresponding to such a frequency component may be set to a maximum value which is preferably substantially equal to one, whereas, if the ratio is less than a second predetermined amount, the corresponding filter component may be set to a minimum value, which is preferably substantially equal to 0.15. In one preferred embodiment, the filter components are varied in a linear dependence on the ratio of the magnitude of each frequency component to the estimated likely maximum magnitude of noise for that frequency component between a minimum value of the filter components at or below the second predetermined amount and a maximum value at or above the first predetermined value.
  • By having a maximum value of each filtering component of about 1, it provides that for signals which are much larger than the maximum likely noise content, there is no signal attenuation. This is actually very beneficial for frequency components which are much larger than the likely maximum noise component, because since the phase of the noise component is not necessarily aligned to the phase of the speech (or similar) signal, the noise component is almost as likely to destructively interfere with the speech signal (thus reducing the overall magnitude of the frequency component relative to the clean speech equivalent) as to constructively interfere with it (thus increasing the magnitude of the frequency component relative to the clean speech equivalent).
  • According to a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, prior to calculating the ratio of the magnitude of each frequency component to the estimated likely maximum magnitude of noise for that frequency component, the magnitudes of the frequency components are filtered to remove high frequency fluctuations thereof. This filtering of the magnitudes of the frequency components is preferably achieved by generating a short term mean estimation of the mean magnitudes of the frequency components, preferably over approximately three frames.
  • According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for suppressing acoustic noise in an acoustic signal represented by the frequency components of a plurality of frames, each frame representing a small portion of the acoustic signal, comprising: means for estimating the average magnitude of noise in each frequency component over a plurality of frames; means for estimating the variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component; means for generating denoising filter components in dependence on the estimated magnitude of noise in each frequency component, the estimated variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component and the magnitude of each frequency component, and means for varying the magnitude of each frequency component in dependence on the corresponding denoising filter component.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
  • In order that the present invention may be better understood, embodiments thereof will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:-
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of apparatus or method steps suitable for carrying out the present invention; and
  • FIG. 2 is a more detailed block diagram of noise suppression apparatus or method steps in the apparatus or method of FIG. 1.
  • Detailed Description of the Invention
  • Referring firstly to FIG. 1, there is shown a series of steps or apparatus blocks showing the overall approach of noise suppression according to the present invention. Considering FIG. 1 initially as representing a series of method steps, these are now described in detail below.
  • The first step 10 is to take the acoustic signal s(n) (in the form of digital audio signal amplitude samples) and to perform high pass filtering to remove low frequency components (which do not carry much speech signal information although they may contain a large amount of unwanted background acoustic noise).
  • The second step 20 windows and overlaps (for example, by 50%) the high pass filtered acoustic signal. This step involves separating the signal into a series of overlapping segments and windowing them to form frames so that at the edge of each frame the amplitude of the signal is zero.
  • The third step 30 performs the Fast Fourier Transform on each windowed vector. Given a 256 input signal vector s(n), we obtain a 256 vector s(k) where n and k stand respectively for some time, and frequency indices. In what follows we shall indicate spectral data with bold characters: n, s....
  • The fourth step 40 performs a transformation of the FFT outputs, from Cartesian to polar co-ordinates.
  • The fifth step 50 uses the magnitude of the Fourier Transform, to evaluate the mean magnitude of spectral background noise mag(n(k)).
  • The sixth step 60 performs the estimation of de-noised speech spectral magnitude mag(s(k)) using the noise evaluation from block 50, and the noisy speech spectral magnitude.
  • The seventh, eighth and ninth steps (70,80,90) perform the symmetrical operations to those performed by respectively 30,20 and 10: conversion from polar to Cartesian, inverse Fourier transforms and overlap add. It is to be noted that the signal phases is not modified by the algorithm since the noisy speech phases is used to reconstruct the clean speech signal in step 70.
    The main structure of this algorithm is very classical. The innovative feature of the algorithm is in the way noise is removed from speech in step 60. This step is now described in detail.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, the step 60 can be subdivided into 3 sub-steps.
  • The first sub-step 110 is dedicated to evaluating the noise variance. Step 50 output is the mean magnitude of background noise. Thus on speechless frames input data can be used to evaluate the noise variance σ(k) = mean(mag(s(k)-n(k)))/mag(n(k)). In fact the variance is obtained by low filtering the selected speech-free s(k) : σp(k)=δ. σp-1(k)+(1-δ) mag(s(k)-n(k))/mag(n(k)) where superscript p indicates the number of the speechless frame. For a given frequency channel, a sample is considered to be only noise if mag (s(k))<4*mag(n(k)).
  • The second sub-step 120 is dedicated to evaluating the input signal short term mean M(k) (smoothed version of s(k)). It is obtained thanks to a one-tap IR filter: Mq(k) =γ. Mq-1(k)+(1-γ) mag(s(k)) where superscript q indicates the frame number.
  • The third sub-step 130 is dedicated to calculating the denoising filter gain for each frequency channel. It is done as follows:
    • If M(k)/n(k) < 1 then it is considered that there is only noise and the minimum gain factor K is applied, thus G(k)=K.
    • If M(k)/n(k) > 1+βσ(k) it is considered that noise is negligible and G(k) is set to 1, which is the maximum gain factor (β is typically equal to 20).
    • In between we use a linear interpolation to calculate the gain factor: G(k)=K + (1-K) (M(k)/n(k)-1)/(βσ(k)).
  • The last operation of the algorithm consists in applying, at mixer 140, the gain to the noisy speech spectral magnitude to obtain the estimation of the clean speech: mag(S(k))=G(k)*mag(s(k)).

Claims (9)

  1. A method of suppressing acoustic noise in an acoustic signal (s(k)) represented by the frequency components of a plurality of frames, each frame representing a small portion of the acoustic signal, comprising the steps of estimating the average magnitude of noise (50) in each frequency component over a plurality of frames, estimating the variability of the magnitude of noise (110) in each frequency component; and generating de-noising filter components (60) in dependence on the estimated magnitude of noise in each frequency component, the estimated variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component and the magnitude of each frequency component, and varying the magnitude of each frequency component (140) in dependence on the corresponding de-noising filter component.
  2. The method according to claim 1 further comprising calculating the ratio of the magnitude of each frequency component to an estimated likely maximum magnitude of noise for that frequency component and setting the filter components in dependence on the calculated ratio for that frequency component, whereby, if the ratio exceeds a predetermined amount, which depends on the noise estimated variability of the magnitude, for a given frequency component, the filter component corresponding to such a frequency component may be set to a maximum value, whereas, if the ratio is less than a second predetermined amount, the corresponding filter component may be set to a minimum value.
  3. The method according to claim 2 wherein the filter components are varied in a linear dependence on the ratio of the magnitude of each frequency component to the estimated likely maximum magnitude of noise for that frequency component between a minimum value of the filter components at or below the second predetermined amount and a maximum value at or above the first predetermined value.
  4. The method according to claim 2 or 3 wherein the first predetermined value is in a linear dependence to the estimated variability of the noise variability.
  5. The method according to claim 2 or 3 wherein the minimum value is substantially equal to 0.15.
  6. The method according to claim 4 wherein the variability of the noise magnitude for a given frequency component is estimated by filtering on speechless frames, with a one tap IR filter, the distance between the noise estimated magnitude and the noisy speech magnitude, divided by the noise estimated magnitude.
  7. The method according to claim 2 wherein prior to calculating the ratio of the magnitude of each frequency component to the estimated likely maximum magnitude of noise for that frequency component, the magnitudes of the frequency components are filtered to remove high frequency fluctuations thereof.
  8. The method according to claim 6 wherein the filtering of the magnitudes of the frequency components is achieved by generating a short term mean estimation of the mean magnitudes of the frequency components.
  9. An apparatus for suppressing acoustic noise in an acoustic signal (s(k)) represented by the frequency components of a plurality of frames, each frame representing a small portion of the acoustic signal, comprising:
    means for estimating the average magnitude of noise in each frequency component over a plurality of frames (50);
    means for estimating the variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component (110);
    means for generating de-noising filter components (60) in dependence on the estimated magnitude of noise in each frequency component, the estimated variability of the magnitude of noise in each frequency component and
    the magnitude of each frequency component, and
    means for varying the magnitude of each frequency component (140) in dependence on the corresponding de-noising filter component.
EP00400623A 2000-03-08 2000-03-08 Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of acoustic signals Withdrawn EP1132896A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP00400623A EP1132896A1 (en) 2000-03-08 2000-03-08 Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of acoustic signals

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP00400623A EP1132896A1 (en) 2000-03-08 2000-03-08 Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of acoustic signals

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1132896A1 true EP1132896A1 (en) 2001-09-12

Family

ID=8173589

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00400623A Withdrawn EP1132896A1 (en) 2000-03-08 2000-03-08 Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of acoustic signals

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1132896A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7613608B2 (en) 2003-11-12 2009-11-03 Telecom Italia S.P.A. Method and circuit for noise estimation, related filter, terminal and communication network using same, and computer program product therefor
CN101950563A (en) * 2010-08-20 2011-01-19 东南大学 Fractional Fourier transform based evidence-obtaining voice enhancing method of two-dimensional Wiener filtering
CN111613239A (en) * 2020-05-29 2020-09-01 北京达佳互联信息技术有限公司 Audio denoising method and device, server and storage medium

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0913810A2 (en) * 1997-10-31 1999-05-06 Sony Corporation Feature extraction and pattern recognition
EP0918317A1 (en) * 1997-11-21 1999-05-26 Sextant Avionique Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of audio signals

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0913810A2 (en) * 1997-10-31 1999-05-06 Sony Corporation Feature extraction and pattern recognition
EP0918317A1 (en) * 1997-11-21 1999-05-26 Sextant Avionique Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of audio signals

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
FEI X ET AL: "Speech enhancement by spectral magnitude estimation - A unifying approach", SPEECH COMMUNICATION,NL,ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS, AMSTERDAM, vol. 19, no. 2, 1 August 1996 (1996-08-01), pages 89 - 104, XP004013500, ISSN: 0167-6393 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7613608B2 (en) 2003-11-12 2009-11-03 Telecom Italia S.P.A. Method and circuit for noise estimation, related filter, terminal and communication network using same, and computer program product therefor
CN101950563A (en) * 2010-08-20 2011-01-19 东南大学 Fractional Fourier transform based evidence-obtaining voice enhancing method of two-dimensional Wiener filtering
CN101950563B (en) * 2010-08-20 2012-04-11 东南大学 Fractional Fourier transform based evidence-obtaining voice enhancing method of two-dimensional Wiener filtering
CN111613239A (en) * 2020-05-29 2020-09-01 北京达佳互联信息技术有限公司 Audio denoising method and device, server and storage medium
CN111613239B (en) * 2020-05-29 2023-09-05 北京达佳互联信息技术有限公司 Audio denoising method and device, server and storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4567655B2 (en) Method and apparatus for suppressing background noise in audio signals, and corresponding apparatus with echo cancellation
US8010355B2 (en) Low complexity noise reduction method
JP4210521B2 (en) Noise reduction method and apparatus
US6377637B1 (en) Sub-band exponential smoothing noise canceling system
US7620172B2 (en) Method and system for eliminating noises and echo in voice signals
EP1855457B1 (en) Multi channel echo compensation using a decorrelation stage
JP4162604B2 (en) Noise suppression device and noise suppression method
KR101052445B1 (en) Method and apparatus for suppressing noise, and computer program
EP1806739B1 (en) Noise suppressor
EP2045801B1 (en) Efficient audio signal processing in the sub-band regime, method, system and associated computer program
EP2031583B1 (en) Fast estimation of spectral noise power density for speech signal enhancement
JP2003534570A (en) How to suppress noise in adaptive beamformers
JP2002517021A (en) Signal Noise Reduction by Spectral Subtraction Using Linear Convolution and Causal Filtering
EP1526510B1 (en) Systems and methods for echo cancellation with arbitrary playback sampling rates
US20030018471A1 (en) Mel-frequency domain based audible noise filter and method
JP2008052277A (en) Method and system for providing acoustic signal with extended bandwidth
US20080152157A1 (en) Method and system for eliminating noises in voice signals
EP1995722B1 (en) Method for processing an acoustic input signal to provide an output signal with reduced noise
JP2000330597A (en) Noise suppressing device
US20060184361A1 (en) Method and apparatus for reducing an interference noise signal fraction in a microphone signal
US20030033139A1 (en) Method and circuit arrangement for reducing noise during voice communication in communications systems
EP1132896A1 (en) Frequency filtering method using a Wiener filter applied to noise reduction of acoustic signals
WO2006077934A1 (en) Band division noise suppressor and band division noise suppressing method
CN108074580B (en) Noise elimination method and device
US7177805B1 (en) Simplified noise suppression circuit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

AKX Designation fees paid
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8566

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20020313