EP1123206A1

EP1123206A1 - Calendered weft inserted warp knit fabric

Info

Publication number: EP1123206A1
Application number: EP00939925A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Brian Callaway; John R. Murphy
Original assignee: Milliken and Co
Current assignee: Milliken and Co
Priority date: 1999-06-22
Filing date: 2000-06-15
Publication date: 2001-08-16
Also published as: WO2000078544A1; US20010003081A1; CA2341447A1; AU5493300A; US20010051483A1

Abstract

A warp knit, weft inserted fabric (62) having the face thereof calendered to produce a fabric when a PVC film is laminated thereto that has a surface roughness of 2.0 microns or below.

Description

CALENDERED WEFT INSERTED WARP KNIT FABRIC

Technical Field

This invention relates generally to a coated or laminated fabric which can be printed evenly and clearly on both sides and in particular to a calendered weft inserted

warp knit fabric for such use in laminated or coated fabrics or applications.

Background Art

Prior to this invention, weft inserted, warp knit fabrics were supplied to the customer generally in the condition that it comes off the knitting machine and the

customer usually applied any further treatment required by them for their particular

use. Warp knit farics with weft inserted yarns therein generally provided a face side which was rough and uneven due to the weft inserted yarns which did not allow good adhesion for a film or other substance to be laminated or coated thereon.

Therefore the object of the invention is to provide a warp knit, weft inserted

fabric which when coated or laminated provides excellent adhesion as well as

printability.

Other objects and advantages of the invention will become readily apparent as the specification proceeds to describe the invention in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

Figure 1 is a schematic representation of the process of treating the warp knit, weft inserted fabric; Figure 2 is a schematic representation of the process to laminate the fabric

treated in Figure 1 ;

Figure 3 is a cross-section of the fabric produced by the treatments shown in

Figures 1 and 2;

Figures 4 and 5 are schematic representations of the equipment used to

measure surface roughness of a fabric;

Figure 6 is a table comparing surface roughness of an untreated and a treated

warp knit, weft inserted fabric; and

Figures 7 and 8 represent, respectively, a running graph of the measurements made by the equipment of Figures 4 and 5 on the untreated and treated fabric.

Looking now to the drawings and especially to Figure 1, a roll of waφ knit,

weft inserted fabric 10 is shown being processed and taken-up on the surface driven

roll 12. The preferred warp knit, weft inserted fabric is a two bar, 100% polyester

fabric having a 70 denier multifilament stitch yam, a 1000 denier multifilament waφ yarn and a 1000 denier multifilament weft inserted yarn.

The fabric 14 from the supply roll 10 is supplied over a series of guide rolls

16, 18, 20 and 22 to the calendering machine 24 wherein the face of the fabric 14 is

calendered between the heated steel roll 26 and the rubber coated roll 28 wherein the weft inserted yarn 74 is crushed to provide a smooth face. From the calendering

machine 24 the calendered fabric 15 is guided by the rubber roll 32 to the inspection

machine 34 and then, after inspection, is guided by another series of rolls 36, 38, 40

and 42 to the take-up roll 12 driven by the surface drive rolls 44 and 46.

In the preferred form of the invention the face calendered fabric 15 is taken-up on the take-up roll 12 and delivered to the machine shown in Figure 2 but obviously,

if desired, the face calendered fabric 15 could be delivered continuously in line with machine in Figure 2. From the roll 12 the face calendered fabric 15 is guided into the

nip of heated steel rolls 48 and 50 by a series of idler rolls 52, 54 and 56 wherein it is

mated with a PVC thermoplastic film 58 from rolls 60 to provide the coated fabric 62

shown in Figure 3. From the nip of calender rolls 48 and 50, the coated fabric 62 is

taken upon a take-up roll 64 driven by surface drive rolls 66 and 68.

The fabric 62, as shown in Figure 3, consists of the outer PVC film layers 58 and the calendered waφ knit, weft inserted fabric 15 consisting of waφ yams 70,

stitch yams 72 and weft inserted yams 74. The fabric 62, in the preferred form of the

invention is 19 - 20 mils thick with each of the films 58 being approximately 5 mils

thick. This particular fabric is desirably used as a banner fabric which can be printed

on both sides due to the evenness or smoothness of the face of the waφ knit, weft inserted fabric.

To measure the surface roughness of the face of the calendered waφ knit, weft

inserted fabric after it has been laminated to the film, the surface tester machine 76

shown in Figures 4 and 5 is used to obtain the data shown in Figure 6 and the graphs

of Figures 7 and 8. The surface roughness tester machine illustrated is a KES-FB-4

machine sold by Kato-Tekko Co., Ltd. of Kyoto, Japan.

The sample 78 of the fabric 62 to be tested is clamped at one end to the

winding drum 80 by chuck 82 and to the chuck 84 at the other end. A transducer (not

shown) is hooked to the cage 86 to record the up and down movement thereof as dictated by the finger 88 as it senses the face of the fabric sample 78 as it moves back and forth thereunder by rotation of the winding drum.

Looking at Figure 6 the mean deviation in microns of the waφ knit, weft inserted fabric before and after calendered as shown in Figure 1 and treated as in Figure 2 is shown with the face of the calendered fabric A having a surface roughness

of less than 2.0 microns whereas the face of the sample fabric coated without calendering had a surface roughness almost four times greater. Note the difference in

amplitude of the face of the non-calendered fabric in Figure 7 versus that of the calendered fabric in Figure 8. It is clearly evident that the fabric of Figure 8 is very

smooth which increases the adhesion of the waφ knit fabric to the film as well as

enhancing the printability on the surface thereof.

It is abundantly clear that the calendered waφ knit, weft inserted fabric has a face with a surface roughness of less than 2.0 microns which can readily be used as a

banner fabric on which the face could be printed or in other applications such as a

substrate for roofing fabric where adhesion and thickness is a factor or in a tenting

fabric where smoothness thereof makes it more readily cleanable. As indicated the use of the waφ knit, weft inserted fabric for the production of banner material is the

preferred use thereof but other suitable uses may be made thereof where a low surface

roughness below 2.0 microns is necessary to provide a viable product.

The above described embodiment is given for the puφose of illustration only

and it is understood that improvements and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims set forth below.

Claims

CLAIMSWE CLAIM:

1. A waφ knit, weft inserted fabric comprising: waφ yams and weft inserted

yarns connected thereto with stitch yams and having the face thereof calendered to provide a surface roughness of less than 2.0 microns when the

face thereof is covered with a thermoplastic film.

2. The fabric of Claim 1 wherein all of said yams are polyester.

3. A coated fabric having a substrate and a film connected to face and back side

thereof, said substrate having a waφ knit, weft knit fabric with the face thereof

calendered thereof to provide a surface roughness of less than 2.0 microns.

4. The coated fabric of Claim 3 wherein the back side thereof is calendered.

5. The substrate fabric of Claim 4 wherein said fabric is combined of 100%

polyester yams.