EP0831442B1 - Dispositif de sécurité contre l'effraction - Google Patents

Dispositif de sécurité contre l'effraction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0831442B1
EP0831442B1 EP97116204A EP97116204A EP0831442B1 EP 0831442 B1 EP0831442 B1 EP 0831442B1 EP 97116204 A EP97116204 A EP 97116204A EP 97116204 A EP97116204 A EP 97116204A EP 0831442 B1 EP0831442 B1 EP 0831442B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
threshold value
indicator
value indicator
frame
windows
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP97116204A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0831442A2 (fr
EP0831442A3 (fr
Inventor
Fritz Dr. Struth
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pax AG
Original Assignee
Pax AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Pax AG filed Critical Pax AG
Publication of EP0831442A2 publication Critical patent/EP0831442A2/fr
Publication of EP0831442A3 publication Critical patent/EP0831442A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0831442B1 publication Critical patent/EP0831442B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05B—LOCKS; ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; HANDCUFFS
    • E05B45/00—Alarm locks
    • E05B45/06—Electric alarm locks
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05B—LOCKS; ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; HANDCUFFS
    • E05B17/00—Accessories in connection with locks
    • E05B17/0054—Fraction or shear lines; Slip-clutches, resilient parts or the like for preventing damage when forced or slammed
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05C—BOLTS OR FASTENING DEVICES FOR WINGS, SPECIALLY FOR DOORS OR WINDOWS
    • E05C9/00—Arrangements of simultaneously actuated bolts or other securing devices at well-separated positions on the same wing
    • E05C9/06—Arrangements of simultaneously actuated bolts or other securing devices at well-separated positions on the same wing with three or more sliding bars
    • E05C9/063—Arrangements of simultaneously actuated bolts or other securing devices at well-separated positions on the same wing with three or more sliding bars extending along three or more sides of the wing or frame

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a burglar alarm for windows / doors according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • Such burglar alarms are known. For that be for example DE-OS 44 32 221, DE-OS 44 04 548, called DE-OS 42 21 585 and DE-OS-39 36 084. With these burglar alarms there is mechanical separation of a first break resistance from a second break resistance. Between the two The wing has a clear opening resistance. For this the two opening resistors have a predetermined distance on. The alarm that triggers the alarm will then be activated within the clearance Element irreversibly deformed. Because of the irreversible Deformation the alarm signal is generated.
  • the break-in resistances are realized by closing points between sash and frame.
  • the first break resistance to be relatively weak during the second burglary resistance the burglar considerable holding forces opposed to bind him in time.
  • This basic idea makes sense when you consider that the threshold indicator, which is the element that triggers the alarm should have been before the second resistance is addressed. At this point it was done Already the alarm, so that the law enforcement officers are approaching can.
  • This filter offers the first break resistance, the is weaker in relation to the second opening resistance.
  • the first break resistance must be overcome so that the alarm signal can be generated. A de facto destruction of the first break resistance is therefore necessary. In the event of attempts to break open that trigger an alarm the first break resistance must therefore always be renewed.
  • a fundamental problem of such burglary protection but also consists in that by overcoming the first break resistance the casement relative to the frame within of his free path between the first and second opening resistance becomes freely movable. Within the freeway the casement does not offer any resistance to the burglar. The burglar is thus enabled to two-stage opening resistance clearly recognizable.
  • Such Burglar alarms are therefore used by professional burglars easily recognized. But this is also connected with the knowledge that with reaching the second break resistance an alarm has already been triggered most likely is.
  • Another disadvantage of this concept is that by overcoming the first opening resistance the gap widths between the casement and frame are enlarged. As a result, larger and therefore stronger lever tools can also be used be introduced, creating the inherently positive effect of the second and increased opening resistance practically at least is partially compensated.
  • the sensor is preloaded there and detects the deformation of the locking part, which is under the breaking load.
  • the senor With a predetermined deformation path, the sensor should break and then generate the alarm signal.
  • this version does not take into account that one strives fundamentally, the closing points between sash and frame as stiff as possible to execute.
  • the invention assumes that between sash and frame a slight relative displacement caused by violence is also possible if the Locking points are engaged and the attempt to break open first withstand while staying engaged and during the threshold indicator is not yet loaded.
  • the larger one Deformation as the predeterminable traffic loads the sash causes a certain safety distance can be added. Only then should the Threshold indicator subjected to irreversible deformation become. When a predetermined deformation value is exceeded, e.g. Breakage of a glass rod or the like. then the Alarm.
  • the invention therefore represents the successful integration of known elastically biased locking points with a initially unloaded threshold indicator, but within the deformation path between the sash and Frame in which the locking points are still engaged are irreversibly deformed.
  • the threshold value indicator only becomes visible after the distance has been overcome loaded.
  • This safety distance also carries the manufacturing-related assembly tolerances because the relative Position between those involved in the locking points Hardware components is taken into account.
  • the principle of this invention applies to windows / doors the closing points of the sash frame against lifting keep out of the frame. This is done through locking points, whose locking partner is effective against the direction of removal are in mutual engagement, so that lifting of the casement only under deformation / destruction of the Locking point or the profile spars of the casement possible is.
  • the deformation of the locking point or the profile bars however, causes a deflection at the installation location of the threshold indicator, which is so large that it is relative to the indicator stop is moved so far that its to trigger the alarm required minimum deformation is exceeded.
  • Such locking points can e.g. through so deep in Locking bolts retracting locking bolts can be realized that the closing point was only overcome with plastic deformation can be.
  • the entrance depth should be significantly larger than the production-related free relative path between the sash and frame.
  • locking points are e.g. known as the designation PaX-Secura, see also EU 94 107 819.
  • the specialty of these locking points also consists here that the closing engagement between the two Locking partners can only be overcome with a considerable amount of time can be because the locking partners or those attached to it Fasteners here also only through permanent deformation can be separated.
  • closing points come for the invention considered, the closing partner of the relative movement between sash and frame to a predetermined Limit value, the limit being set by one from this Relative deflection increased lifting resistance is specified.
  • the present invention is clear from the two-stage Closure systems of the writings mentioned at the beginning differentiate.
  • the alarm is triggered there during none of the two locking points is engaged.
  • the alarm is triggered against the resistance of the Locking point with a precisely defined free path between Casement and frame, which has no effect on the Threshold indicator is. It must also be taken into account that the alarm triggering threshold value is then already exceeded should be if the locking point is far from complete should be overcome.
  • the alarm should expediently already be triggered, after the maximum possible displacement of the casement is completed by the traffic load and above in addition, a slight path of the casement as a safety distance was bridged against premature alarm triggering.
  • the minor route is said to be well before disproportionately increasing Breakout forces are necessary to be completed.
  • the alarm trigger is already suggested to be provided if there is an intrusion on the burglar the sash can still reset elastically.
  • Training is an essential aspect of the invention the locking points with locking partners behind each other, because these characteristics one with increasing deformation allow the sash frame to start with increasing locking force, that only long after the alarm has been triggered reached its maximum.
  • Threshold indicator Glass tube in front with integrated electrical conductor, which would drive against a fixed indicator stop this requirement has already been met.
  • the Threshold indicator can be irreversibly deformed to be unique to be able to provide evidence of an attempt to break open.
  • brittle fracture sensitive material proposed. This can e.g. Glass, ceramics, porcelain or something like that. Glass or ceramic also offers that Advantage that it is practically difficult to locate and from this Basically represents an additional risk for the burglar.
  • the threshold indicator is proposed Easily accessible and replaceable when the casement is open to provide after a failed break-in attempt to have the necessary security again.
  • the threshold indicator can, for example, in a version on the casement or fixed to the frame. You can see the attachment on the frame in front, this offers the additional Advantage that the lead out of the alarm signal lines none Problems and especially not from the outside it can be seen where the alarming element is located. You go once from the usual hardware technology on such windows / doors off, the threshold indicator is still suggested attached to the frame and the corresponding Indicator stop with the connecting rod of the fitting couple. In the closed position of the espagnolette fitting the indicator stop then sits in front of the head of the threshold indicator and is given a predetermined deformation path of the casement relative to the frame e.g. to break the threshold indicator to lead.
  • the threshold value indicator is designed as a separate plug-in part which is inserted into a striker on the frame can be.
  • the threshold indicator becomes the one hand attached to the frame, which reduces cabling means.
  • the threshold indicator also easily exchangeable if a break-in attempt is made was revealed. It is also the distance between the indicator stops for locking pin on the drive rod known what reduced construction costs in the manufacture of fittings means.
  • Fig. 1 shows the basic in a force-displacement diagram Concept of burglar alarm according to the invention. On the Horizontal is the relative displacement ⁇ s between the casement and frame applied. The ordinate shows qualitatively the amount associated with each relative shift Force.
  • the ordinate is also mirror axis for the area to the left of the zero point the relative displacement between the sash and Frame. This area can be seen in mirror image, he states that when closing the casement the question upcoming closing points before their closed position stand. This area is labeled I. After each Locking point has come into locking engagement, the Chart area II.
  • the window / door would be in this position, when an attempt is made to break out.
  • the irreversible deformation can e.g. through plastic Material flow.
  • the irreversible deformation can also exist in the fraction 23 of the threshold indicator 11.
  • the irreversible deformation of the Threshold indicator 11 necessary load on the threshold indicator regardless of the loads at the locking point, because the closing point and threshold indicator are separate components are.
  • the burden of irreversible deformation of the Threshold indicator is orders of magnitude smaller than the load to generate the seal contact pressure.
  • the threshold indicator first an elastic deformation 21 begins the end of which then results in material fatigue, creep effects, hardening effects stand. With further force on the Threshold indicator this will come to break 23.
  • the alarm signal can, as is known per se, be communicated to the security forces by telephone. additionally can blink LEDs on the casement to deter be provided.
  • Fig.1 shows that on the casement another must act much higher force before the casement separated from the frame by failure of the locking point becomes. Only at the end point of the curve is the locking force of the Closing points in engagement are overcome. This point is designated 25. It is therefore already at extreme little relative displacement between the sash and frame, which easily in the linear elastic range of involved materials may be due to the threshold indicator an irreversible deformation occurs which is a sure sign for a serious attempt to break in. This deformation took place long before the closing point at point 25 was overcome.
  • the irreversibly deformed threshold indicator shows the point in the house where the break-in occurred. The break-in point can thus be clearly identified become.
  • the start of the deflection present on the threshold value indicator lies just outside the relative shift, which the casement may be due to the maximum occurring Traffic loads experienced, plus an additive safety constant.
  • the end of the deflection of the threshold indicator is far from the end of the force-displacement diagram of the window / door at the moment of opening.
  • the figures show a burglar alarm for windows / doors 1.
  • Such windows / doors consist of one Sash frame 2 which is guided in a frame 3.
  • the sash 2 has a stop side 4 Pivot hinge on.
  • the stop page 4 is on the Handle side 5 a handle 10 attached.
  • the handle 10 cooperates a circumferential fitting 6 together.
  • On the surrounding fitting 6 sit individual locking bolts 7 that move of the fitting 6 with closing pockets 8 on the frame side interact.
  • By retracting the locking bolt 7 in the closing pockets 8 each have a closing point 9 defined, which is characterized by a firm connection. This can e.g. through deep into corresponding insertion holes engaging locking bolts can be realized.
  • the locking bolts for this purpose 7 expanded like a mushroom head, while the closing pockets attacked by the mushroom-shaped extensions become.
  • the closing pockets 8 form entry slots, the Slit width adapted to the necks of the locking bolts 7 is.
  • the locking bolts reach behind with the mushroom heads 7 the associated lock pocket 8.
  • a predetermined relative shift takes place between Casement and frame.
  • the dashed line on lower profile spar shows a possible deformation qualitatively on.
  • the threshold indicator 11 which is here firmly on the sash 2 against Indicator stop 12 fastened on the frame side. There the indicator stop 12 is stationary, becomes the threshold indicator 11 first elastic then irreversible deformed. From a predetermined deformation value, the Intrusion alarm signal 24 is generated.
  • a predetermined irreversible Deformation on the threshold indicator is present.
  • the irreversible deformation can be plastic.
  • the threshold indicator may break. In both cases can, for example, via an electrical circuit with negating Element the alarm signal can be initiated. In this regard, the state of the art is used.
  • Threshold indicator and indicator stop can determine the optimal relative position between Threshold indicator and indicator stop also experimental be determined. This is done e.g. by specifying certain Traffic load and measurement of the associated deflection. In this Deflection is intended to be a predetermined safety distance 20 be added. Only then is the activation of the Threshold value indicator 11 Given the minimum time in which the sash frame attempts to break open must resist (e.g. 12 min.).
  • Locking points are also to be used which under a steadily increasing locking force the attempt to break open resist.
  • This includes locking points whose Locking partners are plastically deformed until failure must and can then separate from each other. This can be realized by deeply retracting cross bolts or through interlocking locking partners. This condition requires that at least one of the locking partners to the extent that it must be plastically deformed until it disengages with the other locking partner.
  • the plastic deformation can only have a steadily increasing up to a maximum increasing locking force can be achieved, the Maximum at the moment of irreversible deformation of the threshold indicator has not yet been reached (e.g. is only 3%).
  • Mushroom bolts and undercut entry pockets are available used as a locking partner, on the one hand on the casement and anchored to the frame. there drive the mushroom bolts with their necks into the entry pockets while the mushroom heads reach behind the entrance pockets.
  • Locking points 9 are provided on the individual window bars, where threshold indicator 11 and indicator stop 12 between two locking points on a profile bar are arranged.
  • the threshold indicator on the lower cross member 27 of the Window / door Since usually the lower cross member 27 of the window / Door is particularly vulnerable to break-in, it is additionally proposed the threshold indicator on the lower cross member 27 of the Window / door. In addition, however, can be any many threshold value indicators in all possible places of the window / door.
  • Fig. 3 also shows that the threshold indicator at open sash easily accessible and replaceable is.
  • the threshold indicator 11 set in a frame-side version 28 is.
  • the socket 28 can be made from a commercially available building material such as bulb holder, fuse holder or the like. consist.
  • the frame-side version 28 consists of a receiving body 29 which struck the frame 3 is.
  • the receptacle 29 On the outside, the receptacle 29 has a thread which is screwed a union nut 30. Downtown the union nut 30 holds the threshold indicator used there 11 firmly in the picture 29.
  • the threshold indicator has a protruding pin 31 which with a Indicator stop 12 fixed on the casement side interacts.
  • Figure 4 shows that the threshold indicator 11 also as a separate insert part 33 for a on the frame fixed locking part 34 is.
  • the closing part 34 for this purpose has the locking pockets 8, in which the locking bolt 7 retracts.
  • Coupled with the drive rod of the Fitting is the indicator stop 12. Dashed in the the indicator stop sits with the drawn right position clear distance in front of the threshold indicator 11. In this The indicator stop 12 comes into position when the locking bolt 7 on the end slope of the pocket 8 accumulates.
  • the bevel serves the sash to press firmly against the outside sealing lip 13.
  • the handle of the circumferential fitting 6 some force rotated after the sash 2 in the Sealing system position 18 has been brought.
  • the indicator stop 12 be coupled with the drive rod 32 of the fitting, so that the indicator stop 12 a proper distance from him facing end face of the threshold indicator 11. This ensures that as a result of the usual traffic loads a touch between threshold indicator 11 and Indicator stop 12 is eliminated. Nevertheless, the threshold indicator 11 when traffic loads are exceeded in Was able to recognize this as an attempted break-in and the alarm signal trigger.
  • the threshold indicator 11 can with its Pin inserted into a simple pocket of the closing part 34 become. In this way it is easy to replace, and after a break-in attempt, the window / the Newly secured door against burglary attempts become.
  • Fig. 4a also shows the view of the indicator stop 12, like this overlapping in front of it Face of the threshold indicator 11 is seated. Is moving the indicator stop 12 corresponding to the threshold indicator 11 too, it can be deformed so plastically that the alarm trigger 24 takes place.
  • FIG. 5 A further development of the invention is shown in FIG. 5. Here sits in the joint between frame 3 and casement 2 of a window / door in a common aligned Bore the threshold indicator 11 and extends transverse to the possible opening direction of the casement 2.
  • the threshold indicator 11 connects both the casement 2 and the frame 3 with each other. From one predetermined deformation path 35 becomes the threshold indicator 11 break and the alarm is triggered. Opposite a further distance 36 is provided for bridging any Manufacturing tolerance.
  • the threshold value indicator so coupled with the door fitting that he automatically when the door is locked in a corresponding indicator holder is inserted.
  • the bridged Threshold indicator the joint between the sash 2 and the frame 3 as long as the door fitting the corresponding Has locked position.
  • This training can also be used for window fittings use.
  • the threshold indicator 11 coupled with a transmission, which with Arming the system is activated. At the moment of The threshold indicator will then be armed in its proper position spent and only with permitted switching off the monitoring system is removed from this position.

Landscapes

  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)

Claims (16)

  1. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil (11) qui est placé sur le châssis dormant ou sur le châssis ouvrant, qui, lorsque le châssis ouvrant (2) est fermé et est alors soumis à la pression d'étanchéité, est déplacé par rapport à une butée d'indicateur (12) placée sur le châssis ouvrant ou sur le châssis dormant et est déformé de manière irréversible en raison du déplacement relatif prédéfini entre le châssis ouvrant (2) et le châssis dormant (3), et qui génère à partir d'une valeur de déformation prédéfinie un signal avertisseur d'effraction (24), étant précisé qu'il est prévu entre le châssis ouvrant (2) et le châssis dormant (3) dés points de fermeture (9) qui, quand le châssis ouvrant est fermé, sont soumis à une contrainte élastique contre la pression des éléments d'étanchéité entre le châssis ouvrant et le châssis dormant et dont les organes complémentaires de fermeture (7, 8) sont en contact de fermeture jusqu'à ce qu'une force d'effraction prédéfinie par la destruction plastique du point de fermeture soit dépassée, caractérisé
    1.0 en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) et la butée d'indicateur (12), quand le châssis ouvrant est fermé, sont positionnés l'un par rapport à l'autre avec un écartement prédéfini,
    1.1 en ce que cet écartement est calculé pour qu'en présence des charges mobiles courantes sur le châssis ouvrant, il n'y ait pas de contact entre l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) et la butée d'indicateur (12),
    1.2 et en ce que, à partir de la position fermée du châssis ouvrant, l'écartement diminue tout d'abord lorsque le châssis ouvrant est contraint contre la déformabilité élastique des organes complémentaires de fermeture impliqués, jusqu'à ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil touche la butée d'indicateur, et
    1.3 ce n'est qu'à partir d'une contrainte qui dépasse les charges mobiles courantes que l'indicateur de valeur seuil est de plus en plus contraint, jusqu'à la déformation irréversible, avec une contrainte croissante du châssis ouvrant, alors que les points de fermeture sont toujours fermés.
  2. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'écartement entre l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) et la butée d'indicateur (12) est calculé pour que la déformation irréversible de l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) ait eu lieu pendant que les points de fermeture (9) sont encore contraints dans la zone de la déformation élastique.
  3. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le déclenchement de l'alarme (24) a lieu quand la moitié, de préférence un tiers et de préférence 10 % de la distance à l'encontre de la force de fermeture n'a pas encore été parcouru.
  4. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé en ce que le déclenchement de l'alarme (24) a lieu à l'intérieur d'une distance, à l'encontre de la force de fermeture, sur laquelle le châssis ouvrant (2) revient encore à sa place élastiquement.
  5. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que les points de fermeture (9) comportent des organes complémentaires de fermeture (7, 8) qui viennent en prise mutuellement par l'arrière de telle sorte que la distance pour la déformation irréversible (22) est parcourue à l'encontre d'une forme de fermeture qui augmente jusqu'à une valeur maximale qui n'a pas encore été atteinte au moment de la déformation irréversible.
  6. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que les organes complémentaires de fermeture comprennent des tétons en forme de champignon (7) et des poches d'introduction contre-dépouillées (8) qui sont ancrés d'une part sur le châssis ouvrant (2) et d'autre part sur le châssis dormant (3).
  7. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que les tétons en forme de champignon (7) sont en acier à résistance élevée avec une proportion de chrome et de nickel, et en ce que les poches d'introduction contre-dépouillées sont placées sur des pièces de fermeture trempées (34).
  8. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisé en ce qu'il prévu plusieurs points de fermeture (9) sur les éléments de fenêtre individuels, et en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) et la butée d'indicateur (12) sont disposés entre deux points de fermeture (9) placés sur un élément profilé.
  9. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 8, caractérisé en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) et la butée d'indicateur (12) sont placés sur la traverse inférieure (27) de la fenêtre/porte.
  10. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 9, caractérisé en ce que la force nécessaire à la déformation irréversible (22) de l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) est imperceptiblement inférieure (par exemple de 1:10.000 ou moins) à la force exercée sur le châssis ouvrant au moment du déclenchement de l'alarme (24).
  11. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 10, caractérisé en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil se compose d'une matière sensible à la rupture de fragilité.
  12. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) est en verre ou en céramique.
  13. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 12, caractérisé en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) est facilement accessible et facilement remplaçable quand le châssis ouvrant (2) est ouvert.
  14. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon la revendication 13, caractérisé en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) est immobilisé dans un support (28) prévu côté châssis.
  15. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon l'une des revendications 1 à 14, caractérisé en ce que la butée d'indicateur (12) consiste en un axe de poussée sur la ferrure de tringle de commande (32), et en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) est placé sur le châssis dormant (3).
  16. Dispositif anti-effraction pour fenêtres/portes comportant un indicateur de valeur seuil selon la revendication 15, caractérisé en ce que l'indicateur de valeur seuil (11) est un élément enfichable séparé pour une pièce de fermeture (34) fixée au châssis dormant (3).
EP97116204A 1996-09-19 1997-09-18 Dispositif de sécurité contre l'effraction Expired - Lifetime EP0831442B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19638359 1996-09-19
DE19638359A DE19638359B4 (de) 1996-09-19 1996-09-19 Einbruchsicherung

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0831442A2 EP0831442A2 (fr) 1998-03-25
EP0831442A3 EP0831442A3 (fr) 1999-03-03
EP0831442B1 true EP0831442B1 (fr) 2002-12-04

Family

ID=7806205

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97116204A Expired - Lifetime EP0831442B1 (fr) 1996-09-19 1997-09-18 Dispositif de sécurité contre l'effraction

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0831442B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE229209T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE19638359B4 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE202010004284U1 (de) 2010-03-27 2010-07-01 Gealan Fenster-Systeme Gmbh Einbruchsicherung gegen Aushebeln von ein- oder zweiflügeligen, nach innen aufgehenden Fenstern

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19826141B4 (de) * 1998-06-12 2013-01-03 Roto Frank Ag Zuhaltevorrichtung mit Einbruchssicherung
DE10211989A1 (de) * 2002-03-18 2003-10-09 Pax Ag Kombination aus der Umrandung einer Öffnung, einem Verschlusselement für die Öffnung und einem Angriffsdetektor sowie elektrisch leitfähiger langprismatischer Körper zur Verwendung als Angriffsdetektor
JP4468788B2 (ja) * 2004-10-29 2010-05-26 家研販売株式会社 警報錠
WO2011057308A1 (fr) * 2009-09-17 2011-05-19 Helmut Katherl Système de verrouillage avec fonction alarme pour un élément de construction tel que porte ou fenêtre
AT12525U1 (de) 2011-03-30 2012-07-15 Gunnar Ing Auboeck Einbruchsicherung
DE102013009544A1 (de) 2013-06-04 2014-12-04 Erich Matouschek Alarmauslösende Einbruchsicherung
EP2704117A2 (fr) 2012-08-28 2014-03-05 Erich Matouschek Dispositif de déclenchement d'alarme et de sécurité contre l'effraction
DE102013100133B4 (de) * 2013-01-08 2014-10-16 Pax Ag Rahmenhohlprofil für einen Flügelrahmen eines Fensters oder einer Tür
DE102014106532B4 (de) 2014-05-09 2017-06-22 Erich Matouschek Vorrichtung zur Alarmauslösung und Einbruchsicherung
GB2589113B (en) 2019-11-20 2021-11-17 Kingsway Enterprises Uk Ltd Pressure monitor
GB202018613D0 (en) 2020-11-26 2021-01-13 Kingsway Enterprises Uk Ltd Anti-ligature device

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1960207U (de) * 1967-02-22 1967-05-11 Voss Kg J Tuere mit einbruchs-alarmeinrichtung.
DD71180A1 (de) * 1968-12-04 1970-02-05 Endschalteinrichtung für Krananlagen
DE3936084A1 (de) * 1989-10-30 1991-05-02 Erich Matouschek Sensoren fuer die einbruchmeldeanlage
ATE87065T1 (de) * 1989-03-01 1993-04-15 Thomas Matouschek Wertbehaelter.
DE4221585A1 (de) * 1992-07-01 1994-01-13 Erich Matouschek Alarm- und Zuhaltevorrichtung für den Schließ- und/oder Scharnierbereich mit anschließender mechanischer Verankerung
DE9308472U1 (de) * 1993-06-07 1993-09-02 Pax Schweikhard GmbH, 55218 Ingelheim Dreh-Kipp-Beschlag für Fenster, Türen o.dgl.
DE4432221A1 (de) * 1994-02-12 1996-03-14 Erich Matouschek Alarmauslösende Zuhaltevorrichtung für den Schloß- und/oder Scharnierbereich einer zu sichernden Tür oder eines zu sichernden Fensters
DE4404548A1 (de) * 1994-02-12 1995-08-17 Erich Matouschek Alarmauslösende Zuhaltevorrichtung für den Schließ- und/oder Scharnierbereich einer zu sichernden Tür oder eines zu sichernden Fensters
DE19506856C2 (de) * 1995-02-14 2000-06-08 Mannesmann Ag Gleisgebundener Mobilkran
DE19505856A1 (de) * 1995-02-21 1996-08-22 Erich Matouschek Alarmauslösende Zuhaltevorrichtung für den Schließ- und/oder Scharnierbereich einer zu sichernden Tür oder eines zu sichernden Fensters
DE19516398A1 (de) * 1995-05-04 1996-11-07 Gunther Neumann Sensoren für Einbruchmeldeanlagen

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE202010004284U1 (de) 2010-03-27 2010-07-01 Gealan Fenster-Systeme Gmbh Einbruchsicherung gegen Aushebeln von ein- oder zweiflügeligen, nach innen aufgehenden Fenstern
WO2011124498A2 (fr) 2010-03-27 2011-10-13 Gealan Fenster-Systeme Gmbh Protection anti-effraction contre l'ouverture par effet de levier de fenêtres à un ou deux battants, s'ouvrant vers l'intérieur

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE19638359A1 (de) 1998-04-02
DE19638359B4 (de) 2013-07-18
EP0831442A2 (fr) 1998-03-25
EP0831442A3 (fr) 1999-03-03
DE59708872D1 (de) 2003-01-16
ATE229209T1 (de) 2002-12-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0744002B1 (fr) Systeme de verrouillage declencheur d'alarme pour la zone de fermeture et/ou de charniere d'une porte ou d'une fenetre a acces protege
EP0831442B1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurité contre l'effraction
EP2058460B1 (fr) Dispositif de verrouillage anti-effraction pour batiment
DE3315351A1 (de) Selbsttaetig ausloesendes verriegelungselement fuer eine brandschutztuer
WO2011124498A2 (fr) Protection anti-effraction contre l'ouverture par effet de levier de fenêtres à un ou deux battants, s'ouvrant vers l'intérieur
EP0433623A2 (fr) Dispositif de verrouillage d'une fenêtre, d'une porte ou similaires
EP0722156B1 (fr) Procédé pour armer une installation de signalisation d'intrusion utilisant une serrure encastrée avec blockage intégré
EP0779945B1 (fr) Dispositif de fermeture declenchant une alarme pour la zone de fermeture et/ou charniere d'une porte ou d'une fenetre a rendre sure
DE29901298U1 (de) Vorrichtung zum Erfassen der Stellung eines Schloßriegels
DE19603679C5 (de) Alarmauslösende Schließeinrichtung für Fenster oder Türen
DE3241846C2 (fr)
DE102017002647A1 (de) Einbruchsicherung für mindestens einen Flügel eines Fensters oder einer Tür
DE102014106532B4 (de) Vorrichtung zur Alarmauslösung und Einbruchsicherung
AT524565B1 (de) Türspaltsperre
EP0854259A1 (fr) Serrure anti-effraction pour la protection électronique et méchanique d'une porte ou d'un portail
DE10007552A1 (de) Verriegelung für Brandschutzkonstruktionen
DE20308042U1 (de) Schließzustandsmelder für Türen oder Fenster o.dgl.
EP0213356B1 (fr) Dispositif pour surveiller et/ou assurer mécaniquement la position opérationnelle de détecteurs de proximité électriques ou électroniques, par exemple contacts magnétiques
EP1525364A1 (fr) Ferrure pour dispositif anti-effraction de fenetre ou de porte a plusieurs vantaux
DE10150122A1 (de) Zuhalte- und Alarmvorrichtung sowie öffenbarer Abschnitt, insbesondere Türe, Fahrzeug oder Eisenbahnwagon mit einer Zuhalte- und Alarmvorrichtung
DE102020203078B4 (de) Schiebetüranlage
EP0964121B1 (fr) Système de verrouillage avec dispositif anti-intrusion
DE1960207U (de) Tuere mit einbruchs-alarmeinrichtung.
EP2704117A2 (fr) Dispositif de déclenchement d'alarme et de sécurité contre l'effraction
EP3907356A1 (fr) Serrure à verrouillage automatique

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;RO;SI

TPAD Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS TIPA

TPAD Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS TIPA

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990217

TPAD Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS TIPA

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL PT SE

19U Interruption of proceedings before grant

Effective date: 20010501

19W Proceedings resumed before grant after interruption of proceedings

Effective date: 20011116

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020311

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: PAX AG

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20021204

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20021204

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 229209

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20021215

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59708872

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20030116

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: E. BLUM & CO. PATENTANWAELTE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030304

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030304

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030305

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20030315

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030627

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030930

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20030905

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *PAX A.G.

Effective date: 20030930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: PAX AG

Free format text: PAX AG#NEUWEG 7#55218 INGELHEIM (DE) -TRANSFER TO- PAX AG#NEUWEG 7#55218 INGELHEIM (DE)

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20100914

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20100916

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20111124

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20111125

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 59708872

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MUELLER, JOCHEN, DIPL.-ING., DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 59708872

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: JOCHEN MUELLER, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 229209

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120918

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20120918

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120930

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120918

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120930

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121001

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20160922

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 59708872

Country of ref document: DE