EP0284126B1 - Stable gene amplification in prokaryotic chromosomal dna - Google Patents

Stable gene amplification in prokaryotic chromosomal dna Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0284126B1
EP0284126B1 EP88200376A EP88200376A EP0284126B1 EP 0284126 B1 EP0284126 B1 EP 0284126B1 EP 88200376 A EP88200376 A EP 88200376A EP 88200376 A EP88200376 A EP 88200376A EP 0284126 B1 EP0284126 B1 EP 0284126B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
dna
bacillus
strain
plasmid
gene
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP88200376A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0284126A1 (en
Inventor
Christiaan Albertus Gerardus Van Eekelen
Johannes Cornelis Van Der Laan
Leonardus Johannes Sofie Marie Mulleners
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Koninklijke DSM NV
Original Assignee
Gist Brocades NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=8197582&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0284126(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Gist Brocades NV filed Critical Gist Brocades NV
Priority to AT88200376T priority Critical patent/ATE92963T1/en
Publication of EP0284126A1 publication Critical patent/EP0284126A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0284126B1 publication Critical patent/EP0284126B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/24Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
    • C12N9/2402Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing O- and S- glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12N9/2405Glucanases
    • C12N9/2408Glucanases acting on alpha -1,4-glucosidic bonds
    • C12N9/2411Amylases
    • C12N9/2414Alpha-amylase (3.2.1.1.)
    • C12N9/2417Alpha-amylase (3.2.1.1.) from microbiological source
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/67General methods for enhancing the expression
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/74Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for prokaryotic hosts other than E. coli, e.g. Lactobacillus, Micromonospora
    • C12N15/75Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for prokaryotic hosts other than E. coli, e.g. Lactobacillus, Micromonospora for Bacillus
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/87Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
    • C12N15/90Stable introduction of foreign DNA into chromosome
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/48Hydrolases (3) acting on peptide bonds (3.4)
    • C12N9/50Proteinases, e.g. Endopeptidases (3.4.21-3.4.25)
    • C12N9/52Proteinases, e.g. Endopeptidases (3.4.21-3.4.25) derived from bacteria or Archaea
    • C12N9/54Proteinases, e.g. Endopeptidases (3.4.21-3.4.25) derived from bacteria or Archaea bacteria being Bacillus

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Description

    Technical Field
  • The field of this invention relates to prokaryotic cells in which stable gene amplification is obtained by scattered non-tandem integration of at least two copies of a defined DNA sequence into the chromosome of said prokaryotic cell.
  • Background
  • Bacilli have been widely used for the production of industrially important enzymes such as alpha-amylase, neutral protease and alkaline or serine proteases (cf. Debabov, "The Industrial Use of Bacilli", in: The Molecular Biology of Bacilli, Acad. Press, New York, 1982). Improvement of production of Bacillus enzymes can be achieved both by classical genetic techniques, such as mutation and subsequent selection, and by modern molecular biological techniques. In the latter case, several ways of obtaining high levels of expression of homologous and heterologous genes in certain prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms by genetic engineering have been well documented.
  • One of the approaches to achieve high level expression of a gene is to provide the gene with efficient regulatory sequences. Another approach, often used in combination with the first approach, is to increase the copy number of the gene in question. Amplification is primarily achieved by inserting the gene into a multicopy extrachromosomal DNA molecule such as a plasmid. However, a significant drawback of using plasmids as vectors for expressing and amplifying genetic information has been their instability. For large scale use, stability of the amplified gene is a prerequisite for maintaining high level production of the expression product encoded by the amplified gene, as many cell divisions have to take place before sufficient biomass is formed for obtaining substantial product formation.
  • Instability is encountered in two forms: segregational instability, where loss of the plasmid occurs during cultivation; and structural instability, where a part of the plasmid is deleted. Segregational instability can occur, for example, when a host cell is harbouring a vector carrying a gene that is overexpressed. Generally there will be selective pressure towards cells that have lost the capacity to overexpress the gene, since overexpression is an unfavorable property for the transformed host cell. A large amount of metabolic energy is spent on the overexpressed gene product, which negatively influences the cells' competitiveness (growth rate) with host cells not likewise overexpressing.
  • A method used to counter segregational instability is to select for cells containing multicopy plasmids which carry genes which confer an advantage on the plasmid containing cell, for example, conferring resistance to an antibiotic and then to add the relevant antibiotic to the fermentation broth. However, antibiotics are generally not a useful selection means in large scale commercial production processes due to regulations concerning the approval of the fermentation process or the product itself.
  • Another method used to minimize plasmid loss due to segregational instability is to insert a gene which is functionally essential for the host cell into the vector molecule (Ferrari et al., Biotechnology 3 (1985) 1003-1007). However, this method does not ensure structural stability of the vector.
  • Techniques used to solve the problem of structural plasmid instability have included avoiding expression of the gene during the phase of exponential growth, for example, by using regulatory sequences such as temperature-sensitive regulatory sequences, and integration of the exogenous DNA into the host cell chromosome. Other methods used have included avoiding the use of autonomously replicating vector molecules and instead using techniques which favor integration of the introduced DNA into the host cell chromosome.
  • Methods of achieving integration of foreign DNA into the host cell chromosome have included homologous recombination and illegitimate recombination. There are two ways of inserting DNA sequences into specific locations on a chromosome by homologous recombination: Campbell-type homologous recombination and double reciprocal recombination, which are shown in Figures 1A and 1B, respectively. A third way of introducing DNA sequences into the chromosome, this method using a two-step replacement mechanism, is shown in Figure 1C. In principle, a Campbell-type recombination is used, but the final result is a chromosomal arrangement that contains no duplicated sequences, and thus no amplifiable unit, in the recombined part of the chromosome. It therefore resembles a double reciprocal recombination.
  • Apart from using homologous recombination for the integration of foreign DNA into the chromosome it is also possible to integrate DNA by illegitimate recombination. Integrated vector molecules can be selected for under conditions which inhibit autonomous replication of non-integrated vector molecules. Use of illegitimate recombination for integration is depicted in Figure 1D. The absence of tandem duplications in the obtained chromosomal sequence arrangements make the pathways shown in Figures 1B, C and D preferred for stable introduction of DNA sequences into the genome. Chromosomally integrated genes have included both homologous and heterologous genes where the amplification of the chromosomally integrated DNA has been in a tandem array. These chromosomally amplified sequences have been reported to be unstable although stability has been reported in some cases. It is therefore desirable to develop methods whereby DNA integrated into the chromosome is stably maintained.
  • Relevant literature
  • Integration of exogenous DNA by homologous recombination into the chromosome of Bacillus subtilis has been described by Duncan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75 (1978) 3664-3668 and for Anacystis nidulans by Williams and Szalay, Gene 24 (1983) 37-51 and in International Patent Application WO 84/00381. Integration by homologous recombination of a heterologous gene, which cannot be maintained stably when carried on a plasmid vector, into the chromosome of a microorganism is described in EP-A-0127328.
  • EP-A-0124374 discloses a method of producing Staphylococcus aureus protein A in gram positive microorganisms that do not normally produce it, by introducing protein A gene containing E. coli plasmid into the host. The plasmid does not replicate in the host, and subsequently integrates into the chromosome by homologous recombination.
  • Amplification of chromosomally integrated genes, both homologous and heterologous has been documented. See for example: Saito et al., Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Genetics of Industrial Microorganisms, Kyoto, Japan, 1982, pp. 1251; Young, J. Gen. Microbiol. 130 (1984) 1613-1621; Jannière et al., Gene 40 (1985) 47-55; Sargent and Bennett, J. Bacteriol. 161 (1985) 589-595; Gutterson and Koshland, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983) 4894-4898; Hashiguchi et al., Agric. Biol. Chem. 49 (1985) 545-550; Wilson and Morgan, J. Bacteriol. 163 (1985) 445-453; French Patent Application No. 84.06701; and EP-A-0134048. Spontaneous amplification in prokaryotic cells has been reported and can be selected for. See for example the review by Anderson and Roth, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 31 (1977) 473-505.
  • In all cases referred to above, amplification of chromosomally integrated DNA was in a tandem array. This type of chromosomal amplification sequence has been reported to be unstable, although rather good stability was found in some cases, as discussed by Jannière et al., Gene 40 (1985) 47-55.
  • Stabilization of naturally occurring amplified prokaryotic genes due to the presence of other essential genes between these amplified sequences has been reported. For example, of the 9 to 10 copies of the ribosomal RNA gene sets occurring in the B. subtilis chromosome, two tandemly located sets were separated by a cluster of tRNA genes (Wawrousek and Hansen, J. Biol. Chem. 258 (1983) 291-298). In other cases, naturally occurring tandemly repeated ribosomal RNA operons were deleted, both in E. coli and in B. subtilis, with little effect on the phenotypic properties of the organism: Ellwood and Momura, J. Bacteriol. 143 (1980) 1077-1080 and Loughney et al., J. Bacteriol. 154 (1983) 529-532, respectively.
  • Integration of plasmids into the chromosome of B. subtilis by illegitimate recombination using the vector pE194 has been described by Hofemeister et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 189 (1983) 58-68 and Prorozov et al., Gene 34 (1985) 39-46.
  • Several genes for extracellular enzymes of bacilli have been successfully cloned, such as the alpha-amylase genes of B. amyloliquefaciens (Palva et al., Gene 15 (1981) 43-51), B. licheniformis (Ortlepp, Gene 23 (1983) 267), B. stearothermophilus (Mielenz et al., Proc. Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983) 5975-5979; EP-A-0057976) and B. subtilis (Yang et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 11 (1983) 237); the levansucrase gene of B. subtilis (Gay et al., J. Bacteriol. 153 (1983) 1424); the neutral protease encoding genes of B. stearothermophilus (Fuji et al., J. Bacteriol. 156 (1983) 831), B. amyloliquefaciens (Honjo et al., J. Biotech. 1 (1984) 165) and of B. subtilis (Yang et al., J. Bacteriol. 160 (1984) 115; the serine or alkaline protease encoding genes of B. subtilis (Wong et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 (1984) 1184), B. licheniformis (Jacobs et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 13 (1985) 8913) and B. amyloliquefaciens (Wells et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 11 (1983) 7911).
  • Protoplast transformation for several species of gram positive microorganisms has been reported. For B. subtilis a protocol for protoplast transformation was described by Chang and Cohen (Mol. Gen. Genet. 168 (1979) 111-115), which has been widely used. Similar successful protocols have been described for the transformation of B. megaterium protoplasts (Vorobjeva et al., FEMS Microbiol. Letters 7 (1980) 261-263), B. amyloliquefaciens protoplasts (Smith et al., Appl. and Env. Microbiol. 51 (1986) 634), B. thuringiensis protoplasts (Fisher et al., Arch. Microbiol. 139 (1981) 213-217), B. sphaericus protoplasts (McDonald, J. Gen. Microbiol. 130 (1984) 203), and B. larvae protoplasts (Bakhiet et al., Appl. and Env. Microbiol. 49 (1985) 577); in the same publication unsuccessful results were reported for B. popillae. The protocol was successful for B. polymyxa, B. licheniformis, B. macerans and B. laterosporus but not for B. coagulans, B. cereus and B. pumilus, even though good protoplast formation was observed (Mann et al., Current Microbiol. 13 (1986) 131-135).
  • Other methods of introducing DNA into protoplasts include fusion with DNA containing liposomes (Holubova, Folia Microbiol. 30 (1985) 97), or protoplast fusion using a readily transformable organism as an intermediate host cell (EP-A-0134048). The latter reference discloses also a method for the fusion of industrial host strains of unicellular microorganisms with donor unicellular microorganisms that have non-replicating plasmids integrated into the chromosome by homologous recombination. Heterologous genes may be co-integrated into the chromosome of the donor microorganism.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Prokaryotic host cells, and methods for their preparation, are provided which comprise at least two copies of a DNA sequence encoding a polypeptide of interest stably integrated into the host cell chromosome. Stable maintenance of the exogenous DNA sequence is obtained by integrating two or more copies of the sequence into the host cell chromosome wherein the copies are separated by endogenous chromosomal DNA, which is vital to the host cell.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Figures 1A-D are schematic representations of four ways for integration of extrachromosomal DNA sequences into the chromosome of prokaryotic microorganisms.
       T is the target sequence, i.e. DNA sequences present on chromosome and plasmid, between which homologous recombination can take place.
       S stands for the DNA sequence to be integrated in the chromosome.
       M stands for a marker gene sequence used for the selection of recombinant strain.
  • Figures 2A and 2B are schematic representations of two ways for obtaining stable gene amplification in a prokaryotic chromosome.
  • Figure 3 shows the results of histidine/MOPS gel electrophoresis performed on supernatant from cultures of B. subtilis DB104 containing pUB110 and pM58, respectively, compared with several subtilisins:
    • lane 1: Carlsberg subtilisin
    • lane 2: Bacillus PB92 protease
    • lane 3: Bacillus subtilis subtilisin
    • lane 4: Bacillus subtilis DB104 (pM58)
    • lane 5: Bacillus subtilis DB104 (pUB110)
  • Figure 4 shows the restriction map of plasmid pM58. Furthermore, the sequencing strategy is shown in the upper part of the figure. The arrowed solid lines represent the fragments cloned in the phage M13 vectors mp10, mp11 and mp18. The lower part of the figure shows the sequencing strategy using ten oligonucleotides located at regular distances on the protease gene.
  • Figure 5 shows the nucleotide sequence of the coding strand correlated with the amino acid sequence of Bacillus PB92 serine protease. Promoters (P₁, P₂), ribosome binding site (rbs) and termination regions (term) of the DNA sequence are also shown. The numbered solid lines represent the location of the ten oligonucleotides used for sequencing.
  • Figure 6A shows the construction of plasmid pE194-neo.
  • Figure 6B shows the construction of plasmid pMAX-4.
  • Figure 7A: Digests prepared with HindIII of chromosomal DNA of the strains PB92, PBT109 and PBT108 were subjected to electrophoresis on a 0.5% agarose gel, transferred to nitrocellulose as described by Southern and hybridized with ³²P labeled nick-translated pM58 DNA. The figure shows an autoradiograph.
  • Figures 7B and 7C illustrate the integration events occurring in case of homologous (B) recombination and illegitimate (C) recombination between pMAX-4 and the Bacillus PB92 chromosome.
  • Figure 8 shows the construction of integration vector pElatB.
  • Figure 9A illustrates the integration of plasmid pElatB into the chromosome of B. licheniformis strain T9 resulting in B. licheniformis strain TB13.
  • Figure 9B illustrates the chromosomal recombination of the B. licheniformis strains TB13 and T5 upon protoplast fusion of these strains, resulting in B. licheniformis strain T13F.
  • Figure 10 shows a chromosomal analysis of nine different colonies isolated from a fermentation of strain T13F as described in Example 11. Isolated chromosomal DNA was digested with EcoRI separated on 0.8% agarose gels and blotted onto nitrocellulose. Hybridization of the blot was performed with ³²P-labeled nick-translated pElatB DNA. The figure shows an autodiagram. The upper arrow indicates the position where an EcoRI DNA fragment of about 15kb migrates which contains the entire pElatB sequence that was integrated into the chromosome on a location not adjacent to the original alpha-amylase gene, as depicted for strain TB13 in Figure 9A. The lower arrow indicates the position where an EcoRI DNA fragment of about 3.3kbp. migrates which contains the entire alpha-amylase gene originally present in B. licheniformis strain T5 (see also Figure 9B). The following DNA samples were analyzed:
    • lane 1: Bacillus licheniformis T5 DNA
    • lane 2: Bacillus licheniformis TB13 DNA
    • lane 3: Bacillus licheniformis T390 DNA
    • lane 4: DNA from a neomycin-sensitive derivative of Bacillus licheniformis T390, isolated after fermentation, as described in Example 12.
    • lane 5: Bacillus licheniformis T13F DNA.
    • lanes 6-14: DNA from 9 different colonies isolated from a fermentation of strain T13F as described in Example 12.
    DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
  • In accordance with the present invention, prokaryotic cells, and methods for their preparation, are provided in which two or more copies of a DNA sequence are stably integrated into the chromosome. A host cell comprising a DNA sequence encoding a polypeptide of interest is transformed with a DNA construct comprising said DNA sequence. Transformed cells in which the integrated DNA sequences are separated by endogenous chromosomal sequences from the gene to be amplified are then selected for. The endogenous intervening sequences are generally vital to the host cell. Loss of amplified sequences by homologous recombination will be lethal to the host cell. Thus, there will be selection pressure for cells carrying the amplified sequences without the necessity for using antibiotics or like selection means. Integration may be achieved either by homologous recombination or by illegitimate recombination. Techniques which can be used to obtain the desired cells are as shown in Figures 2A and 2B, respectively.
  • When homologous recombination is used, several stretches of DNA sequences can be present in the vector molecules which are homologous to the host cell chromosome, especially when one or more copies of the gene to be amplified have already been introduced into the host cell. The vector molecule thus can include a DNA sequence of interest; a target DNA sequence; and a marker DNA sequence.
  • Care has to be taken that only the desired recombined chromosomal arrangements are selected for. This can be achieved by using linear DNA molecules for recombination. The circular vector molecule to be integrated is cut with a restriction enzyme in the region homologous to the target sequence. In this way recombination and integration at this specific site can occur preferentially. In addition to being present in the vector molecule, the DNA sequence of interest can also be present in the host cell chromosome. The DNA sequence may be a DNA sequence encoding any structural gene which it is desired to amplify. The DNA sequence may be endogenous to the host organism, or may have been inserted into the host chromosome in a previous transformation step.
  • Target sequences for non-tandem gene amplification will preferably be chosen from among non-essential genes, for example in the case of Bacilli as host organisms, the genes encoding extracellular enzymes or genes involved in sporulation can be used as target sequences. Integration of DNA sequences in these genes will generally inactivate the gene. Loss of expression of the gene can then be monitored and used for the selection of the desired recombinant strains.
  • When illegitimate recombination is used for chromosomal gene amplifiation as depicted in Figures 1D and 2A, conditions for integration and selection are preferred in which homologous recombination does not predominate over illegitimate recombination. A preferred means of avoiding homologous recombination is to transform first and second host cells which lack the structural gene of interest with a vector comprising a DNA sequence encoding a polypeptide of interest, and a marker gene. First and second host cells in which the DNA sequence is present at different locations can then be selected and combined under fusing conditions to yield a transformed cell with at least two copies of the DNA sequence encoding the structural gene of interest at scattered locations in the second host genome. For ease of selection the first host can be killed prior to fusion.
  • The gene(s) of interest may be any prokaryotic or eukaryotic gene. These genes may include bacterial genes, unicellular microorganism genes, mammalian genes, or the like. The structural genes may be prepared in a variety of ways, including synthesis, isolation from genomic DNA, preparation from cDNA, or combinations thereof. The various techniques of manipulation of the genes are well-known, and include restriction, digestion, resection, ligation, in vitro mutagenesis, primer repair, employing linkers and adapters, and the like. Thus, DNA sequences obtained from a host may be manipulated in a variety of ways, depending upon the requirements of the DNA construction. See Maniatis et al., Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1982.
  • The structural genes may express a variety of polypeptides or proteins, such as enzymes, hormones, lymphokines, surface proteins, blood proteins, structural proteins, immunoglobulins, or the like, from mammals, unicellular microorganisms, e.g., bacteria, fungi, such as yeast, or filamentous fungi, algae, protozoa, etc., plants or other DNA source. Of particular interest are enzymes, more particularly proteases and amylases. Illustrative of such enzymes are serine and non-serine proteases, including high alkaline serine proteases, alpha- and bêta-amylase, and the like. A preferred source for a serine protease is Bacillus novo species PB92, and for an alpha-amylase is B. licheniformis strain T5, as well as mutants and variants of these strains.
  • The gene that forms part of the suitable vector can be obtained by methods generally known in the art. Generally, the method comprises preparing a genomic library from the organism expressing the protein or polypeptide of interest. The genomic library is conveniently prepared for example by ligating DNA fragments of the donor strain into a suitable vector.
  • By the term "suitable vector" is meant a DNA construct comprising a structural gene encoding a protein or polypeptide of interest. The structural gene is joined in proper orientation to control regions such as a promoter sequence, a sequence forming the ribosome binding site and sequences controlling termination of transcription and translation of the structural gene, which control regions are functional in the host cell. Where the host cell has transformation and integration frequencies which are too low to permit direct selection for integration without intermediate isolation of plasmid containing cells, such as industrial Bacillus strains, the vector can additionally comprise an origin of replication that is capable of replicating autonomously in the host cell.
  • Where the gene is obtained from a donor cell which has transcriptional and translational initiation and termination regulatory signals which are recognized by the host prokaryotic cell strain, it will usually be convenient to maintain the original regulatory sequences of the structural gene. In addition, the transcriptional initiation region may provide for constitutive or inducible expression, so that in appropriate situations, the host may be grown to high density before high levels of expression of the structural genes of interest are obtained.
  • Where the structural gene is from a source whose regulatory signals are not recognized by the host cell, it will be necessary to obtain regulatory regions recognized by the host cell and to insert the structural gene between the initiation and termination regulatory signals. In some instances the exogenous structural gene with its own stop codon(s) may be inserted in reading frame behind the N-terminus codons of an endogenous structural gene which retains its natural regulatory signals.
  • It is desirable that the expression product be secreted. Where the expression product is naturally secreted and the leader signals and processing signal(s) are recognized by the host cell, this will entail no difficulty. However, where the product is not secreted because the host cell does not recognize the secretory leader signals and/or processing signal(s), or the signals are not functional to a satisfactory degree in the host cell, then it may be necessary to isolate or synthesize DNA sequences coding for the secretory leader signals and processing signal(s) of a host cell polypeptide and join them in proper reading frame to the 5ʹ-end of the structural gene.
  • The vector may additionally include a marker gene conferring resistance to an antibiotic to which the host strain is sensitive. The marker gene, when used in chromosomal integration of the vector, has to fulfill the demand that survival selection is possible even if only one or a few copies of the marker gene are present in the host strain. By marker is intended a structural gene capable of expression in a host, which provides for survival selection. By "survival selection" is intended imparting prototrophy to an auxotrophic host, biocide or viral resistance. For prototrophy, various genes may be employed, such as leu, his, trp, or the like. For biocide resistance this may include resistance to antibiotics, e.g., neo, cam, tet, tun, kan, or the like. Other markers include resistance to heavy metals, immunity, and the like. The various DNA sequences may be derived from diverse sources and joined together to provide for a vector which includes one or more convenient, preferably unique, restriction sites to allow for insertion or substitution of the structural genes at such sites or in place of lost fragments to provide the plasmid construct.
  • Selection for chromosomal integration may be aided by using a plasmid with an origin of replication having a mutation which makes its functioning temperature-sensitive in the host cell. See, for example, Ehrlich, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75 (1978) 1433.
  • Once the plasmid construct has been prepared, it may now be cloned in an appropriate cloning host. Any host may be used which is convenient, is readily transformable, and allows for replication of the plasmid construct and transfer to the host cell. A large number of strains are available which have a high efficiency of transformation and are usually auxotrophic and/or antibiotic sensitive. Where the host cell is an industrial Bacillus strain, the use of the same organism as the host cell for cloning of the plasmid construct has many advantages in that it permits the use of a single replication system as well as the same marker for survival selection in both the cloning host and the host strain. See, for example, European application EP-A-134048, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
  • The plasmid construct may be introduced into the cloning host in accordance with conventional techniques, such as transformation, employing calcium precipitated DNA, conjugation, or other convenient technique. The cloning host may then be grown in an appropriate nutrient medium, under selective conditions to select for a host containing the plasmid construct. For auxotrophic hosts, the nutrient medium is deficient in the required nutrient, while for biocide resistance, e.g., antibiotic resistance, a cytotoxic amount of the biocide(s) is employed in the nutrient medium.
  • Various host cells may be employed. These include E. coli, Bacillus strains, expecially Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas, and Streptomyces. In choosing a host cell, various factors are taken into account, including factors which can affect expression of the gene to be amplified and production of the desired product. Thus it is desirable to use a host cell in which there is recognition of regulatory signals; ease of secretion; reduced degradation of the desired product, etc. A preferred host cell already produces the polypeptide of interest, and may be either a wild type organism or a mutant organism. The host cell can also be a mutant of an organism which produces the polypeptide of interest which itself, however, is non-producer. Where the polypeptide of interest is a protease or an amylase, preferred strains include Bacillus novo species PB92 and Bacillus licheniformis strain T5, respectively, as well as mutants and variants of these strains.
  • In addition, industrial strains may be employed which have the desired traits of an industrial strain. Examples of strains which may be employed include strains used for the industrial production of enzymes such as: B. licheniformis, B. amyloliquefaciens and alkalophilic Bacilli. The industrial strains are chosen from organisms which may be isolated in the soil or available from depositories or other sources or obtained by modification of such strains. The industrial strains are highly robust and stable. Furthermore, said strains are resistant to phage infection and to genetic exchange, that is introduction of DNA by conventional transformation procedures. The conventional industrial strains are also prototrophic, in order to avoid adding expensive amino acids to the nutrient medium. Other characteristics of industrial strains are their high productivity until the end of the fermentation, which can be as long as a week, stable cell concentration upon exhaustion of the broth, and high productivity, usually at least 5 g/l (0.5% w/v) of a specific secreted protein.
  • Transformants can be obtained having genes either in tandem arrangement or scattered in the chromosome. In general, it is possible to select transformants containing scattered genes from mixtures of the two types of transformants mentioned, by isolating chromosomal DNA of each individual transformant, subsequently analyzing said DNA with respect to the relative locations of said genes by, for example, the method of Southern, J. Mol. Biol. 98 (1975) 503-517 or other means known to those skilled in the art, thereby identifying scattered integration of said genes.
  • Means for obtaining scattered gene transformants avoiding tandem integration include, using double reciprocal recombination as illustrated in the Figure 1B and 2B, the use of linearized DNA constructs comprising the DNA sequence to be amplified, a marker gene and target sequences for recombination.
  • Furthermore, specific means for obtaining scattered gene transformants include the use of illegitimate recombination as illustrated in Figure 2A, in which isolation of tandem transformants can be avoided by selection, using differential expression of a marker gene, for example a gene encoding antibiotic resistance, where sensitivity to the antibiotic is different in strains with tandem integration of the gene as opposed to non-tandem integration. Generally, the length of the intervening endogenous DNA sequences will be less than 10 kbp.
  • Additionally, means for obtaining scattered gene transformants avoiding tandem duplication include the use of killed protoplasts of a homologous donor strain carrying a DNA construct comprising the structural gene and a marker gene, the structural gene being integrated in the chromosomal at a different location with respect to the acceptor strain.
  • Transformation of the host cells preferably involves the use of protoplasts prepared from the host strain. Protoplasts generally are prepared from the cells in accordance with conventional ways, e.g. lysozyme or zymolyase treatment, and the protoplasts carefully suspended in an appropriate medium having proper osmolalities for maintaining the integrity of the protoplast. For industrial Bacillus strains, methods for preparing protoplasts are described in EP-A-0134048, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. Where the host strain is an alkalophilic Bacillus strain, protoplasts may conveniently be prepared at alkaline pH, preferably about pH 8.0. This procedure is disclosed in European Application No. EP-A-87200358.7, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
  • The host cell can be transformed by combining the plasmid construct or a cloning host protoplast with the host cell protoplast in the presence of an appropriate fusogen. Any fusogen may be employed which provides the desired degree of efficiency, for the most part polyethylene glycol is found to provide high efficiency of fusion with great convenience. After a short time, the fusogen mixture is replaced with an appropriate nutrient medium and cells regenerated in a selective medium, conveniently by plating on an agar plate.
  • Transformants obtained by combining a host cell with a suitable DNA construct can contain said DNA construct or part thereof either directly as an integral part of their chromosome or as free vector molecules when the DNA constructs contain an origin of replication functional in said host cell.
  • A means of selecting for transformants wherein the DNA construct is integrated into the chromosome is to use a plasmid containing a temperature-sensitive origin of replication. Transformants are grown in a selective medium at the permissive temperature, then shifted to a non-permissive temperature. Colonies expressing the marker gene at the non-permissive temperature are then isolated and cultured in selective medium at the permissive temperature. Plasmid absence can be verified, for example, by isolating total DNA from the colonies and electrophoresising on an agarose gel or by demonstrating lack of ability of the transformants to transform competent cells. Determination of the way in which integration into the chromosome has taken place can be analysis of the chromosomal DNA by, for example, the method of Southern, J. Mol. Biol. 98 (1975) 503-517 or other means known to those skilled in the art.
  • When there is a differential sensitivity to the selective agent between transformants containing additional copies of the marker gene in a tandem array as compared to those in which the marker gene is incorporated at scattered locations in the host genome, transformants can conveniently be grown in medium containing the appropriate concentration of selective agent to select for transformants with non-tandem integration.
  • Another means of obtaining transformants with scattered integration of copies of the DNA sequence of interest is to use a protoplast prepared from a homologous donor cell, containing at least one copy of the DNA sequence of interest at a location on its chromosome different from that of the recipient host cell. The homologous donor cell can be prepared, for example, by transforming a cell which does not contain the structural gene of interest with a vector comprising the structural gene. Integration of the DNA sequence into the donor cell chromosome can be facilitated by using a plasmid containing a temperature-sensitive origin of replication and growing transformants under selective conditions first at the permissive temperature and then at the non-permissive temperature as described above, then isolating colonies expressing the marker gene.
  • Following verification of the absence of plasmid DNA, the chromosomal DNA can be isolated and analyzed according to the method of Southern, supra, by hybridizing with a probe labeled with, for example, ³²P or biotinylated nucleotides. The probe may be cDNA encoding the polypeptide of interest or fragments thereof as well as DNA constructs or fragments thereof comprising the DNA sequence of interest, for example a vector. Transformants containing the gene of interest at an alternate location as compared to that of the gene donor strain can then be used as an homologous donor cell. The recipient strain host is preferably the same as the strain used as the source of the DNA sequence of interest, or a strain in which the DNA sequence of interest is located at a different region of the chromosome than in the transformed donor cell.
  • To aid in selection, the donor cell preferably is killed with a cytotixic agent prior to or during protoplast formation. Various agent may be employed to kill the donor cell, including antibiotics, but iodoacetamide is found to be convenient, efficient, and does not interfere with the subsequent fusion. When dead cloning host protoplasts are used, the ratio of dead protoplast to the acceptor strain host will be preferably at least about 1:1 and an excess of the dead protoplast may be employed.
  • Following fusion of the dead donor cell protoplast and the recipient host cell protoplast, transformants can be selected by means of the marker gene. DNA can then be isolated and analyzed as described above to identify transformants in which more than one copy of the gene of interest has been incorporated into the genome and are separated by endogenous chromosomal sequences.
  • Scattered two-gene transformants are then screened in appropriate ways for detection of increased expression of the polypeptide of interest. Various techniques may be employed, particularly where enzymes are involved which have well established methods of detection. Alternatively, where enzymes are not involved or there is no available detection system, bioassays, antibodies, or DNA or RNA hybridization can be employed for screening the clones to determine the presence of the plasmid construct and expression of the structural gene of interest.
  • The host cell containing the chromosomally integrated plasmid constructs or fragments thereof is then grown in a nutrient medium under conventional fermenting conditions. The fermenting may be continued until the broth is exhausted. Where the product has been secreted, the product may be isolated from the broth by conventional techniques, e.g., extraction, chromatography, electrophoresis, or the like. Where the product is retained in the cytoplasm, the cells may be harvested by centrifugation, filtration, etc., lysed by mechanical shearing detergent, lysozome, or other techniques and the product isolated as described previously. By employing the subject method, stable integration of at least two copies of a DNA sequence can be achieved as a means of gene amplification.
  • The following examples are offered by way of illustration and nor by way of limitation.
  • EXPERIMENTAL EXAMPLE 1 Preparation of a Genomic DNA Library from Alkalophilic Bacillus novo sp. PB92 and Isolation of the Serine Protease Gene
  • Chromosomal DNA isolated from Bacillus novo sp. PB92 (deposited under No. OR-60 with Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, Technical University of Delft, the Netherlands, see U.S. Patent No. Re. 30,602) according to the procedure described by Saito-Miuva, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 72 (1963) 619-632, was partially digested with the restriction enzyme Sau3A and ligated into the BamHI site of plasmid pUB110 (Gryczan et al., J. Bacteriol. 134 (1978) 318-329). pUB110 plasmid DNA was prepared as described by Birnboim and Doly (Nucl. Acids Res. 7 (1979) 1513-1523).
  • The ligation mixture was transformed into B. subtilis 1A40 (Bacillus Genetic Stock Centre) according to the method of Spizizen et al., J. Bacteriol. 81 (1961) 741-746, using 0.6-1 µg DNA per ml of competent cells. Cells from the transformation mixture were plated on minimal plates containing: 2.8% K₂HPO₄, 1.2% KH₂PO₄, 0.4% (NH₄)₂SO₄, 0.2% tri-Na-citrate.2H₂O, 0.04% MgSO₄.7H₂O, 0.00005% MnSO₄.4H₂O, 0.4% L-glutamic acid, 0.5% glucose, 0.02% casamino acids, 50 µg/ml trypthophan, 20 µg/ml methionine, 20 µg/ml lysine, 20 µg/ml neomycin, 0.4% casein and 1.5% agar. After overnight incubation of the plates at 37°C one out of 50,000 neomycin resistant colonies showed increased protease production, as determined by increased precipitation of a halo of casein cleavage products around the colony in the agar plate. Plasmid DNA was isolated from this colony according to the method described by Birnboim and Doly, Nucleic Acids Res. 7 (1979) 1513-1523, and named pM58.
  • EXAMPLE 2 Expression of the PB92 Serine Protease Gene
  • Bacillus subtilis 1A40 containing pM58 was grown in minimal medium (Spizizen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 44 (1958) 1072-1078) to which had been added 0.02% casamino acids 50 µg/ml trypthophan, 20 µg/ml methionine, 20 µg/ml lysine and 20 µg/ml neomycin. After 24 hours, the culture was centrifuged and the supernatant assayed for protease activity using dimethyl casein as substrate (Lin et al., J. Biol. Chem. 244 (1969) 789-793. A culture of B. subtilis 1A40 containing the plasmid pUB110 used as a control showed less than 1/60 of the protease activity shown by the pM58 transformed culture. Protease activity was completely inhibited by treatment with 1 mM phenylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), but not by treatment with 20 mM EDTA.
  • Aliquots of the above described supernatants were analyzed on protein gel according to the method of Laemmli, Nature 227 (1970) 680. Samples for analysis on these gels were prepared by treatment of the supernatants with 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Following centrifugation of the sample the pellet of precipitated protein was washed twice with acetone then dissolved in 40 µl sample buffer (0.5 M Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 10% v/v 2-mercaptoethanol, 50% v/v glycerol and 0.05% Bromophenol Blue) by boiling for 10 minutes. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Culture supernatant samples were then analyzed by electrophoresis. Three different B. subtilis 1A40 strains were used: a strain containing pUB110; or pM58; or no plasmid; and Bacillus PB92 protease as a control. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue and destained. The sample from B. subtilis strain 1A40 containing pM58 contained a 31 kD protein, which comigrates with Bacillus PB92 protease. This protein was not detected on the control lane of strain B. subtilis 1A40 containing pUB110.
  • All serine proteases have similar molecular weights. The cloned serine protease of Bacillus PB92 therefore was differentiated from known serine proteases (B. subtilis subtilisin, Carlsberg subtilisin), by transformation of pM58 and pUB110 to the protease negative B. subtilis strain DB104 (R. Doi, J. Bacteriol. 160 (1984) 442-444) and analysis of the extracellular proteases produced. The obtained transformants were grown in minimal medium (Spizizen et al., supra) containing 0.02% casamino acids, 50 µg/ml histidine and 20 µg/ml neomycin. After 24 hours, samples were taken, centrifuged and without pretreatment analysed on histidine/MOPS gels containing 75 mM KOH, 40 mM histidine, 100 mM MOPS (3-(N-morpholino)-propanesulfonic acid), pH 7.5 and 5% polyacrylamide. Electrophoresis buffer contained 40mM histidine, 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.6. Samples were run in the direction of the cathode. Protease bands were detected with Agfa Pan 100 Professional films (Zuidweg et al., Biotechnol. and Bioengin. 14 (1972) 685-714). These results are shown in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 4, pM58 harbours the gene encoding Bacillus PB92 protease.
  • EXAMPLE 3 Sequencing of the Bacillus PB92 Serine Protease Gene
  • The entire sequence of a BalI-HpaI fragment of pM58 was determined by the method of Sanger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 (1977) 6463. Restriction fragments of pM58 (see Figure 4) were cloned in phage M13 vectors mp10, mp11 and mp18 (Messing et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 9 (1981) 309-321. Insertions of pM58 fragments were screened by plaque hybridization. After sequencing, ten oligonucleotides located at regular distances on the gene were made and sequencing was repeated, confirming the sequence shown in Figure 5.
  • EXAMPLE 4 Construction of Serine Protease Containing Plasmid pMAX-4
  • To construct plasmid pUCN710 (Figure 6A) pUB110 was digested with TaqI and PvuII. The fragment containing the gene conferring neomycin resistance was purified on low melting agarose and made blunt with Klenow polymerase and NTP's (Maniatis, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor 1982). Plasmid pUC7 (Vieira et al., Gene 19 (1982) 259-268) was linearized with SalI and made blunt as described above. Both fragments were ligated with T4 ligase (Maniatis) and transformed to E. coli JM103. Selection took place on 2xTY plates (1.6% w/v Bacto-trypton, 1% w/v yeast extract, 0.5% NaCl) containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin and 10 µg/ml neomycin. The resulting plasmid, named pUCN710, was digested with BamHI. The plasmid pE194 (Jordanescu, Plasmid 1 (1978) 468-479) was digested with BclI. The fragments from both digestions were ligated with T4 ligase and transformed to B. subtilis 1A40. Selection took place on minimal plates containing 20 µg/ml neomycin (see Example 1). The plasmid obtained, pE194-neo (Figure 6A) contains the neomycin gene and a temperature sensitive origin of replication.
  • Subcloning of the protease gene in integration vector pE194-neo was performed as follows: pM58 (see Example 1) was digested with HpaI and BalI and BglII. Plasmid pE194-neo was digested with HpaI. These fragments were ligated with T4 ligase and transformed to B. subtilis 1A40. Transformants were selected based upon neomycin resistance and an increase in protease production, as judged by casein cleavage products precipitation (halo formation, see Example 1). Plasmid pMAX-4 was obtained, the structure of which was confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis (see Figure 6B).
  • EXAMPLE 5 Protoplast Transformation of Bacillus Strain PB92 by pMAX-4
  • Bacillus strain PB92 was grown overnight in 100 ml NBSG-X medium (Thorne et al., J. Bacteriol. 91 (1966) 1012-1020). The culture was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4,500 rpm in a Sorvall model GSA rotor. Protoplasts were prepared by incubating the bacilli for one hour at 37°C in 10 ml Alkalic Holding Medium (AHM) containing 0.5 M sucrose, 0.02 M MgCl₂ and 0.02 M Tris/maleate, pH 8.0, in sterile water to which 0.4 mg/ml lysozyme was added. The protoplasts were pelleted (10 minutes at 4,500 rpm), resuspended in 5 ml AHM⁺ pH 8.0 buffer (AHM buffer to which 3.5% w/v Bacto Penassay Broth and 0.04% w/v Albumine Merieux had been added) mixed, then repelleted as above. After being resuspended in 5.0 ml of alkaline holding medium, 0.5 ml of this suspension of protoplasts were mixed with 5 µg of demineralized water containing 1 µg of plasmid DNA and incubated for 2 minutes in the presence of 30% w/v polyethylene glycol 8,000, pH 8.0. After 1:3 dilution with AHM⁺ pH 8.0 medium and centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in a small volume (1 ml) of AHM⁺ and incubated for 2-3 hours. One hundred microliter aliquots were plated on freshly prepared regeneration plates containing 0.5 M Na succinate/HCl pH 8.0, 1.5% w/v agar, 0.5% w/v casamino acids, 0.5% w/v yeast extract, 0.031 M phosphate buffer pH 8.0, 0.5% w/v glucose, 0.02 M MgCl₂ and 0.02% w/v Albumine Merieux. These plates also contained 1000 µg/ml neomycin for selection. After incubation at 37°C for at least 72 hrs, the colonies were replica-plated onto heart infusion agar plates containing 20 µg/ml neomycin.
  • EXAMPLE 6 Integration of pMAX-4 in the Bacillus Strain PB92 Chromosome
  • A transformant of Bacillus PB92, containing plasmid pMAX-4, was incubated in Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) containing either 1 µg/ml or 20 µg/ml neomycin for 24 hrs at 37°C. Two ml portions of the cell suspensions were then diluted in 100 ml of TSB containing 1 µg/ml or 20 µg/ml neomycin, respectively, and incubated for 24 hrs at 50°C. After 24 hrs 5 ml samples of both cultures were diluted again, as described above, and incubated for 24 hrs at 50°C, again in the presence of 1 µg/ml or 20 µg/ml neomycin, respectively. The last procedure was repeated once more. The cell suspensions were then diluted 100-fold and plated on Heart Infusion (HI) agar plates containing 1 µg/ml neomycin for the samples from the flasks containing 1 µg/ml neomycin, and 20 µg/ml neomycin for the samples from the flasks containing 20 µg/ml neomycin. The plates were incubated for 16 hrs at 50°C. Neomycin-resistant colonies were isolated and cultured in 10 ml TSB medium containing 1 µg/ml neomycin for 16 h at 37°C. From these cultures total DNA was isolated (Holmes et al., Anal. Biochem. 114 (1981) 193-197. Plasmid absence was verified by DNA electrophoresis on agarose gel. Absence of plasmid DNA from samples in which plasmid DNA was not detectable was confirmed by transformation of total DNA to B. subtilis 1A40. Samples lacking the ability to transform B. subtilis 1A40 were considered plasmid-free.
  • To check whether and in what way integration of pMAX-4 in the chromosome took place, chromosomal DNA was isolated, digested with HindIII, run on 0.5% DNA agarose gels and blotted to nitrocellulose (Southern, J. Mol. Biol. 98 (1975) 503-517), and hybridized with ³²P labeled nick-translated pM58 (Maniatis, 1982). The result of this analysis is shown in Figure 7A.
  • Selection at 1 µg/ml neomycin resulted in protease genes tandemly located in the chromosome and separated by plasmid sequences (strain PBT109) as a result of homologous recombination (Campbell-type mechanism). In an accumulation of 30 independently isolated integrants, selection was performed at 1 µg/ml neomycin. One integrant was isolated which contained the plasmid pMAX-4 on a random location in the chromosome as a result of an illegitimate recombination (strain PBT122). Selection at 20 µg/ml neomycin resulted in a copy of plasmid pMAX-4 on a random location in the chromosome as a result of an illegitimate type of recombination. The latter strain was named PBT108. The genetic organization of the strains PBT109 and 108 are depicted in Figures 7B and 7C, respectively. Chromosomal analysis showed that integration in PBT122 and PBT108 occurred on different locations in the chromosome.
  • EXAMPLE 7 Stability of the Duplicated Protease Genes in Strains PBT108 and PBT 109
  • One hundred ml of production medium (containing: 1% starch, 4% lactose, 0.87% K₂HPO₄, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% (NH₄)₂HPO₄, 0.2% Tri Na citrate.2H₂O, 0.05% MgSO₄.7H₂O, 0.07% CaCl₂, 0.068% FeSO₄.7H₂O and antifoam 1 ml/l) without neomycin was inoculated with 0.2 ml of an overnight TSB culture (37°C) of strain PBT108 or PBT109 in 500ml shake flasks. After incubation for 44 hrs at 37°C under constant aeration the culture was tested for neomycin-resistant colonies and for protease activity.
  • Both strains PBT108 and PBT109 were also tested in Eschweiler fermenters containing the same production medium to check the effect of upscaling to 10 l. The results of the fermentation experiments are summarized in the following Table 1.
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002
  • Analysis of colonies derived from the Eschweiler fermentation of PBT109 after 2 days of culturing, showed that 3-25% of these colonies produced at the level of a strain containing only a single protease gene. These same colonies were found neomycin-sensitive due to excission of the pMAX-4 sequence by homologous recombination. However, analysis of the colonies derived from the strain PBT108 fermentation experiment showed that these cells were all neomycin-resistant. One hundred of these neomycin-resistant colonies were taken at random and individually tested for protease production potential, to determine whether they contained one or two productive protease genes. All 100 individually tested colonies produced at the level of a strain containing two genes, showing that the two randomly integrated protease genes in PBT108 are stably maintained under the fermentation conditions used.
  • EXAMPLE 8 Construction of Integration Vector pElatB
  • Plasmid pGB34, described in EPA 0134048, was digested with the restriction enzymes BclI, BglI and BglII. The restriction fragments obtained were blunt-ended with Klenow polymerase, then were ligated into the HpaI site of pE194-neo (see Example 6). Plasmid pE194-neo DNA was isolated as described by Birnboim and Doly (Nucl. Acids. Res. 7 (1979) 1513-1523).
  • The ligation mixture was transformed into B. subtilis 1-A40, according to the method of Spizizen et al (J. Bacteriol. 81 (1961) 741-746) using 0.5-1 µg DNA per ml of competent cells. Cells from the transformation mixture were plated on minimal plates containing 2.8% K₂HPO₄, 1.2% KH₂PO₄, 0.4% (NH₄)₂SO₄, 0.2% Tri Na citrate.2H₂O, 0.04% MgSO₄.7H₂O, 0.00005% MnSO₄.4H₂O, 0.4% glutamic acid, 0.5% glucose, 0.02% casamino acids, 50 µg/ml tryptophan, 20 µg/ml methionine, 20 µg/ml lysine, 20 µg/ml neomycin, 0.4% casein, 0.5% starch and 1.5% agar.
  • DNA of alpha-amylase producing colonies was isolated as described by Birnboim and Doly and checked with restriction enzymes. From one of these transformants plasmid pElatB, see Figure 8, was isolated.
  • EXAMPLE 9 Transformation of the Alpha-Amylase Negative Strain Bacillus licheniformis T9 with pElatB
  • Transformation of Bacillus licheniformis strain T9 was carried out as described in EP-A-0253455 with the exception that the entire procedure was performed at 30°C instead of 37°C. Selection for transformants was carried out on minimal plates containing 20 µg/ml neomycin. All transformants produced amylase. Restriction enzyme analysis performed on DNA prepared as described by Birnboim and Doly showed that the transformants all contained pElatB.
  • EXAMPLE 10 Integration of pElatB into the B. licheniformis T9 chromosome
  • Bacillus licheniformis strain T9 containing plasmid pElatB, was inoculated in Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) containing 20 µg/ml neomycin and incubated for 16 hours at 30°C. A 5 ml portion of the cell suspension was diluted in 100 ml of the same medium and incubated at 50°C for 24 hours.
  • This procedure was repeated once. The cell suspension was then diluted 100-fold and plated on Heart Infusion Agar plates containing 10 µg/ml neomycin. After 40 hours of incubation at 50°C, neomycin-resistant colonies were isolated and cultured in 10 ml TSB medium, containing 10 µg/ml neomycin, for 16 hours at 30°C. Total DNA from these cultures was isolated (Holmes et al., Anal. Biochem. 114 (1981) 193-197). The absence of plasmids in these cells was verified by DNA electrophoresis on agarose gels. Samples in which low molecular weight DNA was virtually absent, were rechecked on the presence of plasmid DNA by DNA transformation to B. subtilis 1-A40 (Spizizen et al., 1961). Samples lacking the ability to transform B. subtilis 1-A40 to neomycin resistance were considered plasmid minus.
  • To check whether integration of pElatB took place and how it took place, chromosomal DNA was isolated from the transformants (Saito-Minwa, Biochem. Biophys. Acta 72 (1963) 619-632), digested with EcoRI fractionated on 0.5% agarose gels, blotted onto nitro-cellulose (Southern, J. Mol. Biol. 98 (1975) 503-517) and hybridized with ³²P labeled nick-translated pGB33 (see EP-A-0134048). The results from this analysis are shown in Figure 9A. The data show that illegitimate recombination of pElatB took place resulting in a strain containing a single amylase gene on a different locus of the genome as compared with the original Bacillus licheniformis T5 amylase strain. The strain obtained containing pElatB was named TB13.
  • EXAMPLE 11 Construction of Strain T13F Containing Two Amylase Genes Separated by Endogenous Chromosomal Sequences
  • In order to develop a strain containing two amylase genes separated by endogenous chromosomal DNA sequences, a fusion experiment was performed between Bacillus licheniformis strain T5 (the original amylase gene containing amylase strain, see EP-A-0134048) and strain TB13 (the randomly integrated, amylase gene containing strain). Protoplast fusion was performed as described in EP-A-0134048, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Strain TB13 was killed with iodoacetamide prior to protoplast formation. Strain T5 (neomycin sensitive) was not killed. Selection for fusants took place on the regeneration plates containing 10 ug/ml neomycin.
  • To check and identify potential fusants, chromosomal DNA was isolated, digested with EcoRI, fractionated on 0.5% agarose gels, blotted to nitrocellulose filters (Southern, J. Mol. Biol. 98 (1975) 503-517) and hybridized with ³²P labeled nick-translated pGB33 (see EP-A-0134048). The result of this analysis is shown in Figure 9B. One of the obtained fusants, T13F, contained two amylase genes separated by endogenous chromosomal sequences.
  • EXAMPLE 12 Stability of the duplicated amylase genes in strains T390 and T13F
  • The stability of strain T13F, a strain containing two chromosomal amylase genes separated by essential chromosomal sequences, was compared with that of strain T390, a strain with two chromosomal amylase genes located in a tandem array. Preparation of strain T390 is disclosed in EP-A-134048 (page 17, Table I), where it was referred to as B. licheniformis T5 (pGB33). Strains T13F and T390 were tested under fermentation conditions, nameley 0.2 ml of an overnight TSB culture (37°C) was inoculated in 500 ml shake flasks containing 100 ml production medium (see Example 7; after sterilization the pH was adjusted to 6.9 with NaOH) without neomycin. After incubation for 6 days at 40°C under constant aeration the culture was tested for neomycin-resistant colonies and amylase activity. The results of the fermentation experiments are summarized in the following Table 2.
    Figure imgb0003
  • To exclude the possibility of excission of one amylase gene without concomitant loss of the neomycin gene in strain T13F, 20 colonies derived from T13F fermentation were analyzed. Chromosomal DNA from 20 randomly chosen colonies was isolated and characterized by hybridization experiments as described above. The results of 9 of these analyses are shown in Figure 10. All strains tested contained two amylase genes, as demonstrated by the presence of two alpha-amylase genes containing EcoRI fragments in their chromosomal DNA.
  • In contrast to the genetic stability of strain T13F, strain T390 was found to be unstable upon fermentation resulting in 12% neomycin-sensitive colonies. One of these colonies was analyzed and found to contain only one alpha-amylase gene (Figure 10, lane 4). This shows that randomly integrated amylase genes are more stable than tandemly integrated genes, under fermentation conditions.
  • It is evident from the above results that a prokaryotic cell may be obtained in which stable gene amplification is achieved by selecting for transformed cells in which non-tandem integration of at least two copies of the structural gene to be amplified has occurred. Integration may occur by homologous recombination or illegitimate recombination.
  • All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Claims (34)

  1. A method for preparing a transformed prokaryotic host cell comprising at least two copies of a DNA sequence in its chromosome, said DNA sequence encoding a polypeptide of interest, wherein said copies are separated by endogenous chromosomal DNA which is vital to the host cell, said method comprising:
       combining a recipient host cell comprising at least one copy of said DNA sequence integrated into its chromosome with (a) a DNA construct, comprising at least one copy of said DNA sequence and at least one of a marker gene and a temperature-sensitive origin of replication or (b) a donor host cell comprising said DNA construct, under transforming conditions;
       selecting for a transformant wherein said DNA construct is integrated into the chromosome of said transformant; and
       isolating from among said transformants, transformed prokaryotic host cells comprising at least two copies of said DNA sequence separated by endogenous DNA, which is vital to the host cell.
  2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said selecting comprises:
       growing said transformant comprising a DNA construct comprising a marker gene in the presence of a biocide to which said marker gene provides resistance; and
       identifying and isolating from said transformants, plasmid free transformants.
  3. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said selecting comprises:
       growing said transformant comprising a DNA construct comprising a marker gene and a temperature-sensitive origin of replication in the presence of a biocide at a non-permissive temperature; and
       selecting from said transformants, plasmid free transformants.
  4. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said isolating comprises:
       isolating chromosomal DNA from said transformants;
    and
       hybridizing said chromosomal DNA with a labelled probe comprising said DNA construct or a fragment thereof whereby said transformed prokaryotic host cells are selected by detecting said label.
  5. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said donor host cell is obtained by a method comprising:
       combining a prokaryotic cell lacking a DNA sequence encoding said polypeptide of interest with said DNA construct under fusing conditions;
       isolating transformed cells;
       growing said transformed cells at a non-permissive temperature; and
       identifying and isolating transformed cells wherein said DNA construct is integrated into a location on the chromosome other than that in said recipient host cell.
  6. A method according to any one of Claims 1-5, wherein said prokaryotic cell is a Bacillus.
  7. A method according to Claim 6, wherein said Bacillus is an alkalophilic Bacillus strain or a Bacillus licheniformis strain.
  8. A method according to Claim 7, wherein said alkalophilic Bacillus strain is Bacillus novo species PB92 or a mutant or variant thereof.
  9. A method according to Claim 7, wherein said Bacillus licheniformis strain is Bacillus licheniformis T5 or a mutant or variant thereof.
  10. A method according to any one of Claims 1-9, wherein said polypeptide of interest is an enzyme.
  11. A method according to Claim 10, wherein said enzyme is a protease or an amylase.
  12. A method according to Claim 11, wherein said protease is a serine protease.
  13. A method according to Claim 11, wherein said amylase is alpha-amylase.
  14. A method according to any one of Claims 1-13, wherein the genome of Bacillus novo species PB92 or a mutant or variant thereof comprises said DNA sequence.
  15. A method according to any one of Claims 1-13, wherein the genome of Bacillus licheniformis T5 or a mutant or a variant thereof comprises said DNA sequence.
  16. A method according to Claim 12, wherein said serine protease has at least 70% homology in nucleotide sequence with a protease encoding gene from Bacillus novo species PB92.
  17. A method according to Claim 12, wherein said serine protease has substantially the following amino acid sequence:
    Figure imgb0006
  18. A method according to any one of Claims 1-17, wherein said DNA construct is selected from the group consisting of:
       recombinant plasmid pMAX-4, having a size of 7.6 kb and a physical map as represented in Fig. 6B herein, which comprises the gene encoding Bacillus PB92 protease, which is contained in the strain Bacillus novo species PB92, a temperature-sensitive origin of replication derived from plasmid pE194, and a neomycin resistance gene, or
       recombinant plasmid pElatB, having a size of 8.2 kb and a physical map as represented in Fig. 8 herein, which comprises the gene encoding α-amylase, which is contained in plasmid pGB34, deposited in Bacillus subtilis 1S-53 under No. CBS 467.83, a temperature-sensitive origin of replication derived from plasmid pE194, and a neomycin resistance gene.
  19. A method according to any one of Claims 1-17, wherein said DNA sequence is integrated by illegitimate recombination.
  20. A method according to any one of Claims 1-17, wherein said DNA sequence is integrated by homologous recombination.
  21. A method according to any one of Claims 1-17, wherein said DNA construct further comprises a temperature-sensitive origin of replication.
  22. A method according to Claim 21, wherein said temperature-sensitive plasmid is derived from plasmid pE194.
  23. A method for preparing Bacillus strain PBT108, which comprises the steps of:
       integrating plasmid pMAX-4 as defined in claim 18 into Bacillus novo species PB92, and
       selecting, at 20 µg/ml neomycin, cells containing two genes encoding alkaline protease separated by endogenous chromosomal DNA sequence which are vital to the strain.
  24. A method for preparing Bacillus strain PBT122, which comprises the steps of:
       integrating Plasmid pMAX-4 as defined in claim 18 into Bacillus novo species PB92, and
       selecting, at 1 µg/ml neomycin, cells containing two genes encoding alkaline protease separated by endogenous chromosomal DNA sequence which are vital to the strain.
  25. A method for preparing Bacillus strain T13F, which comprises the steps of:
       fusing, by protoplast fusion, protoplasts of B. licheniformis strain T5 and B. licheniformis strain T9 being an α-amylase deficient mutant strain of B. licheniformis T5 having integrated in its genome plasmid pElatB, as defined in claim 18, and
       selecting cells containing two genes encoding α-amylase separated by endogenous chromosomal DNA sequences which are vital to the strain.
  26. A method for preparing a polypeptide of interest, which comprises:
       cultivating a transformed prokaryotic host cell encoding said polypeptide of interest, which host cell is obtainable by a method as defined in any one of Claims 1-25, under conventional fermenting conditions, and
       isolating said polypeptide of interest.
EP88200376A 1987-02-27 1988-02-29 Stable gene amplification in prokaryotic chromosomal dna Revoked EP0284126B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT88200376T ATE92963T1 (en) 1987-02-27 1988-02-29 STABLE GENE AMPLIFICATION IN PROKARYOTIC CHROMOSAL DNA.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP87200356 1987-02-27
EP87200356 1987-02-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0284126A1 EP0284126A1 (en) 1988-09-28
EP0284126B1 true EP0284126B1 (en) 1993-08-11

Family

ID=8197582

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP88200376A Revoked EP0284126B1 (en) 1987-02-27 1988-02-29 Stable gene amplification in prokaryotic chromosomal dna

Country Status (20)

Country Link
US (2) US5733723A (en)
EP (1) EP0284126B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2637532B2 (en)
KR (1) KR970000188B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1049247C (en)
AU (1) AU620326B2 (en)
BG (1) BG60920B2 (en)
BR (1) BR8805646A (en)
CA (1) CA1327175C (en)
DE (1) DE3883041T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2045081T3 (en)
FI (1) FI104326B1 (en)
HU (1) HUT50877A (en)
IE (1) IE61743B1 (en)
LT (1) LT4001B (en)
LV (1) LV10791B (en)
NO (1) NO300382B1 (en)
PT (1) PT86863B (en)
RU (1) RU2091487C1 (en)
WO (1) WO1988006623A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6100063A (en) * 1998-02-12 2000-08-08 Novo Nordisk A/S Procaryotic cell comprising at least two copies of a gene
DE102007021001A1 (en) 2007-05-04 2008-11-06 Ab Enzymes Gmbh Expression system for the antibiotic-free production of polypeptides

Families Citing this family (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2637532B2 (en) * 1987-02-27 1997-08-06 ギスト ブロカデス ナームローゼ フェンノートチャップ Stable gene amplification in chromosomal DNA of prokaryotic microorganisms
EP0479396B1 (en) * 1987-02-27 1999-06-09 Genencor International, Inc. Transformation of alkalophilic bacillus strains
US4914031A (en) * 1987-04-10 1990-04-03 Amgen, Inc. Subtilisin analogs
US6287841B1 (en) 1988-02-11 2001-09-11 Genencor International, Inc. High alkaline serine protease
DE69028890T2 (en) * 1989-08-11 1997-02-27 Gist Brocades Nv Efficient production of protease mutants
US5695976A (en) * 1989-12-18 1997-12-09 Novo Nordisk A/S Stable integration of DNA in bacterial genomes
JP3046344B2 (en) * 1990-10-24 2000-05-29 塩野義製薬株式会社 New protease
JPH07503363A (en) * 1991-11-14 1995-04-13 ノボザイムス アクティーゼルスカブ Methods for expressing genes in Bacillus licheniformis
DE4216246A1 (en) * 1992-05-16 1993-11-18 Solvay Enzymes Gmbh & Co Kg Simple procedure for stable chromosomal gene amplification
US5395763A (en) * 1992-06-24 1995-03-07 Monsanto Company Chromosomal expression vector
DK153992D0 (en) * 1992-12-22 1992-12-22 Novo Nordisk As METHOD
US5861273A (en) * 1993-12-21 1999-01-19 Celtrix Phamraceuticals, Inc. Chromosomal expression of heterologous genes in bacterial cells
US6723550B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-04-20 Genencor International, Inc. Proteases from gram-positive organisms
GB9724627D0 (en) 1997-11-20 1998-01-21 Genencor Int Bv Gram positive microorganism formate pathway
GB9727470D0 (en) 1997-12-30 1998-02-25 Genencor Int Bv Proteases from gram positive organisms
US6465186B1 (en) 1997-12-30 2002-10-15 Genecor International, Inc. Proteases from gram positive organisms
US6528255B1 (en) 1997-12-30 2003-03-04 Genencor International, Inc. Proteases from gram positive organisms
US6599731B1 (en) 1997-12-30 2003-07-29 Genencor International, Inc. Proteases from gram positive organisms
CN1160448C (en) * 1998-02-12 2004-08-04 诺维信公司 Prokaryotic cell comprising two copies of gene transcribed in different directions
US6156514A (en) * 1998-12-03 2000-12-05 Sunol Molecular Corporation Methods for making recombinant cells
US6544792B1 (en) 1999-12-21 2003-04-08 Genencor International, Inc. Production of secreted polypeptides
AU2001265835A1 (en) * 2000-06-23 2002-01-08 Novozymes A/S Method for stable chromosomal multi-copy integration of genes
US7985569B2 (en) 2003-11-19 2011-07-26 Danisco Us Inc. Cellulomonas 69B4 serine protease variants
CN103421760A (en) 2003-11-19 2013-12-04 金克克国际有限公司 Serine proteases, nucleic acids encoding serine enzymes and vectors and host cells incorporating same
US20050227356A1 (en) * 2004-04-07 2005-10-13 Lessard Philip A Novel compositions and methods for genetic manipulation of Rhodococcus bacteria
US7842479B2 (en) * 2004-05-21 2010-11-30 The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska Methods for altering acetic acid production and enhancing cell death in bacteria
US20080044853A1 (en) * 2004-06-21 2008-02-21 Novozymes A/S Stably Maintained Multiple Copies of at Least Two Orf in the Same Orientation
CN101061214B (en) 2004-10-22 2012-12-05 诺维信公司 Stable genomic integration of multiple polynucleotide copies
CN103290048B (en) * 2013-06-27 2015-07-15 天津科技大学 Plasmid and engineering bacteria suitable for bacillus homologous recombination
ES2855992T3 (en) 2015-12-11 2021-09-27 Wacker Chemie Ag Strain of microorganisms and procedure for antibiotic-free fermentative production of low molecular weight substances and proteins
CN114032189B (en) * 2021-05-10 2024-02-06 盐城师范学院 Lignin degrading fusion strain R3 and application thereof

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US30602A (en) * 1860-11-06 Improvement in revolver fire-arms
GB1519148A (en) * 1974-11-19 1978-07-26 Gist Brocades Nv Compositions of matter
NO159863C (en) * 1980-01-07 1989-02-15 Univ Rochester PROCEDURES FOR THE PREPARATION AND SELECTION OF A RANGE OF BACTERY BAG THAT CONTAINS A GENETIC FRAGMENT AND CODES FOR ALFA AMYLASE SUITABLE FOR USE IN HETEROLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF A BACILLUS HOST MICROORGANISM.
IL61982A (en) * 1980-02-15 1984-01-31 Cpc International Inc Genetically engineered microorganisms for massive production of amyloytic enzymes and process for preparing same using the corresponding recombinant dnas containing amylase coding genes
EP0074553A3 (en) * 1981-09-11 1985-01-09 The University Of Rochester Method of increasing the yield of a product by altering a microorganism
US4617266A (en) * 1983-04-28 1986-10-14 Genex Corporation Production of Protein A
JPS59205983A (en) * 1983-04-28 1984-11-21 ジエネツクス・コ−ポレイシヨン Development of different kind gene by procaryotic microorganism
IE81141B1 (en) * 1983-06-24 2000-04-05 Genencor Int Procaryotic carbonyl hydrolases
EP0134048B2 (en) * 1983-07-06 1996-08-14 Gist-Brocades N.V. Molecular cloning and expression in industrial microorganism species
FR2563533B1 (en) * 1984-04-27 1986-08-22 Centre Nat Rech Scient METHOD FOR AMPLIFYING THE EXPRESSION OF A DETERMINED GENE IN SUBACTIVE BACILLUS AND STRAINS OBTAINED
US4828994A (en) * 1984-09-21 1989-05-09 Genex Corporation Bacillus strains with reduced extracellular protease levels
FR2582316B1 (en) * 1985-05-22 1988-12-02 Centre Nat Rech Scient VECTORS FOR THE EXPRESSION OF A-AMYLASE IN SUBTIL BACILLUS, STRAINS OBTAINED AND PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A-AMYLASE
JP2599946B2 (en) * 1986-01-15 1997-04-16 アムジェン,インコーポレイテツド Subtilisin analog
JP2637532B2 (en) * 1987-02-27 1997-08-06 ギスト ブロカデス ナームローゼ フェンノートチャップ Stable gene amplification in chromosomal DNA of prokaryotic microorganisms

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6100063A (en) * 1998-02-12 2000-08-08 Novo Nordisk A/S Procaryotic cell comprising at least two copies of a gene
DE102007021001A1 (en) 2007-05-04 2008-11-06 Ab Enzymes Gmbh Expression system for the antibiotic-free production of polypeptides
US8465946B2 (en) 2007-05-04 2013-06-18 Ab Enzymes Gmbh Expression system for the antibiotic-free production of polypeptides

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FI884903A (en) 1988-10-24
LT4001B (en) 1996-06-25
IE880558L (en) 1988-08-27
HUT50877A (en) 1990-03-28
US5733723A (en) 1998-03-31
LV10791B (en) 1995-12-20
FI104326B (en) 1999-12-31
FI884903A0 (en) 1988-10-24
CA1327175C (en) 1994-02-22
CN1049247C (en) 2000-02-09
US6124097A (en) 2000-09-26
AU620326B2 (en) 1992-02-20
DE3883041D1 (en) 1993-09-16
JP2637532B2 (en) 1997-08-06
EP0284126A1 (en) 1988-09-28
LTIP1826A (en) 1995-08-25
BR8805646A (en) 1989-10-17
WO1988006623A1 (en) 1988-09-07
KR970000188B1 (en) 1997-01-06
JPH01502398A (en) 1989-08-24
PT86863A (en) 1988-03-01
KR890700664A (en) 1989-04-26
FI104326B1 (en) 1999-12-31
NO884422L (en) 1988-10-05
PT86863B (en) 1992-05-29
RU2091487C1 (en) 1997-09-27
ES2045081T3 (en) 1994-01-16
AU1398188A (en) 1988-09-26
IE61743B1 (en) 1994-11-30
DE3883041T2 (en) 1994-01-20
NO884422D0 (en) 1988-10-05
CN1030787A (en) 1989-02-01
LV10791A (en) 1995-08-20
BG60920B2 (en) 1996-06-28
NO300382B1 (en) 1997-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0284126B1 (en) Stable gene amplification in prokaryotic chromosomal dna
EP0479396B1 (en) Transformation of alkalophilic bacillus strains
US5217878A (en) Molecular cloning and expression of genes encoding proteolytic enzymes
FI85287C (en) MOLEKULAER KLONING OCH EXPRESSION I INDUSTRIELLA MIKRO-ORGANISMARTER.
US5716807A (en) Transformed industrial bacillus strains and methods for making and using them
US5238833A (en) Molecular cloning and expression in industrial Bacillus species
US5387521A (en) Gene expression in bacilli

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19881021

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920310

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 92963

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19930815

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3883041

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19930916

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI CASETTA & PERANI S.P.A.

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: FG4A

Free format text: 3009458

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2045081

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

EPTA Lu: last paid annual fee
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: NOVO NORDISK A/S

Effective date: 19940511

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: NOVO NORDISK A/S

EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 88200376.7

PLAW Interlocutory decision in opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP

APAA Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFN

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PUE

Owner name: GIST-BROCADES N.V. TRANSFER- DSM N.V.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

NLS Nl: assignments of ep-patents

Owner name: DSM N.V.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19990203

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19990203

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19990203

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 19990203

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19990204

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19990215

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19990216

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19990218

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19990223

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 19990226

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 19990310

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 19990723

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Free format text: 990723

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO