CN117740381A - Bearing fault diagnosis method under low-speed heavy-load working condition - Google Patents

Bearing fault diagnosis method under low-speed heavy-load working condition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN117740381A
CN117740381A CN202410086655.9A CN202410086655A CN117740381A CN 117740381 A CN117740381 A CN 117740381A CN 202410086655 A CN202410086655 A CN 202410086655A CN 117740381 A CN117740381 A CN 117740381A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
signal
working condition
heavy
fault
low
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202410086655.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN117740381B (en
Inventor
李勇
张宏耀
马森财
程刚
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China University of Mining and Technology CUMT
Original Assignee
China University of Mining and Technology CUMT
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China University of Mining and Technology CUMT filed Critical China University of Mining and Technology CUMT
Priority to CN202410086655.9A priority Critical patent/CN117740381B/en
Publication of CN117740381A publication Critical patent/CN117740381A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN117740381B publication Critical patent/CN117740381B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T90/00Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation

Landscapes

  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a bearing fault diagnosis method under a low-speed heavy-load working condition, which adopts a single-component VMD (virtual machine model) to effectively avoid modal aliasing and end point effects, has better robustness, and has less noise interference on decomposition effects, thereby effectively separating out signal components containing main fault components in bearing vibration signals under the low-speed heavy-load working condition and forming a reconstruction signal; then, SAE is adopted to reconstruct the signal, the higher-order characteristics of the signal are effectively extracted through multi-layer coding and decoding, and the difference between different signal components is enlarged; then RF adopts a method based on Bagging random selection attribute, effectively reduces the correlation between trees, and simultaneously establishes a single non-pruning decision tree to achieve lower error, thereby constructing the mapping relation between the high-order characteristics and the fault class labels; and finally, combining the extracted high-order characteristic signals according to the mapping relation, thereby realizing the accurate diagnosis of bearing faults under the working condition of low speed and heavy load.

Description

Bearing fault diagnosis method under low-speed heavy-load working condition
Technical Field
The invention relates to a bearing fault diagnosis method, in particular to a bearing fault diagnosis method under a low-speed heavy-load working condition, and belongs to the technical field of bearing fault identification.
Background
In mechanical devices, rolling bearings are critical and common parts, which are extremely important for reliable and efficient operation of the rotating machine. The health of the rolling bearing directly affects the performance of the mechanical device. Under complex working conditions, the rolling bearing is easy to damage, and if the rolling bearing cannot be detected and maintained in time, the rolling bearing can possibly cause mechanical faults with larger area, so that the safe operation and the working efficiency of equipment are greatly influenced, the service life of the machine is shortened, and economic loss is caused. Therefore, research into fault diagnosis technology of rolling bearings is critical to ensure stability and performance of rotary machines.
Bearings are often used in closed mechanical devices, and analysis of bearing vibration signals is the most common method in bearing fault diagnosis. However, in the working condition of low speed and heavy load, bearing fault impact has certain energy, but the impact times in unit time are relatively less due to low-speed rotation, so that the generated fault characteristic signals are easily interfered by complex environmental noise, the fault characteristic signals are more difficult to extract compared with the conventional working condition, and finally the bearing fault condition cannot be accurately identified. Therefore, how to provide a new method can extract the fault characteristic signals of the bearing under the working condition of low speed and heavy load, so that the fault condition of the bearing can be accurately judged, and the method is one of the research directions in the industry.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the problems in the prior art, the invention provides a bearing fault diagnosis method under the working condition of low speed and heavy load, which can extract the fault characteristic signals of the bearing under the working condition of low speed and heavy load, thereby accurately judging the bearing fault condition.
In order to achieve the above purpose, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows: a bearing fault diagnosis method under the working condition of low speed and heavy load comprises the following specific steps:
step one, collecting mixed vibration signals under the working condition of low speed and heavy load, determining the center frequency and the number of signal components based on the frequency spectrum distribution characteristics of the signals, and extracting the signal components one by adopting single component VMD (namely, improved VMD, abbreviated as IVMD) (the parameter k value of the VMD is constantly set to be 1, and one signal component is extracted each time);
step two, the internal information of the signal is extracted in the step one through SAE (namely a stacked self-encoder), high-order characteristics are fully extracted from each signal component, and the difference characteristics among different signal components are enhanced;
and thirdly, constructing a mapping relation between the high-order features and the fault class labels by adopting RF (i.e. random forest), and combining the high-order features of the signal components obtained in the second step according to the mapping relation so as to obtain the fault class labels corresponding to the current signals, thereby finally realizing the accurate diagnosis of the bearing faults under the low-speed heavy-load working condition.
Further, the first specific process of the step is as follows:
step (1), determining the decomposition times T;
step (2), calculating coarse graining energy distribution spectrum of the signal spectrum;
step (3), component initialization center frequency is determined based on the energy distribution spectrum;
step (4), carrying out primary single-component VMD decomposition on the original signal based on the initialization center frequency to decompose a signal component, then removing the signal component from the original signal, and continuing to process the residual signal as a new original signal;
and (5) repeating the steps (1) to (4) to decompose the VMD of the next single component, and repeating the steps until the determined decomposition times T are reached.
Further, in the second step, the SAE method is adopted to effectively extract the higher-order characteristics of the signal through multi-layer encoding and decoding, so as to enlarge the difference between different signal components, and provide a better basis for the subsequent fault type identification, and the specific steps are as follows:
step A, through weight W x And bias b x For signal s= [ s ] 1 ,s 2 ,...s n ]Coding to obtain a hidden layer vector h, wherein n is the length of a single sample;
h=f(W s ·s+b s ) (1)
wherein f is an activation function;
step B, through weight W x And bias b x Decoding the hidden layer to obtain an original signal;
s'=f(W h ·h+b h ) (2)
step C, defining a reconstruction loss function;
single sample reconstruction error:
data set s= [ S ] 1 ,s 2 ,...s m ]Reconstruction error:
step D, optimizing a model by using a random gradient descent algorithm, obtaining a required gradient by using a back propagation algorithm, and updating the weight W x And bias b x
Step E, repeating the steps A to D until the error requirement is met or the iteration times are reached;
and F, decoding and encoding the hidden layer vector h as a new signal to obtain a new hidden layer vector, and continuing until the set stacking layer number is reached, thereby completing the high-order feature extraction process of each signal component.
Further, in the third step, the RF adopts a method of randomly selecting attributes based on Bagging, so that the correlation between trees is effectively reduced, meanwhile, a single non-pruning decision tree established can reach lower error, the accuracy of RF classification is ensured, and the method comprises the following specific steps:
step I, generating p training sets by using a Bagging method, and extracting n features from an original feature set by using a dropout method for each training set;
step II, for each training set, generating a decision tree without pruning, and generating t decision trees according to the number p of the training sets;
step III, classifying the samples, and determining the output class names through majority voting of trees in the forest;
wherein I is an oscillometric function wherein c is a tree h i For the classification result of the prediction class c,number of nodes in the leaf; and constructing a mapping relation between the high-order features and the fault class labels through the process.
Compared with the prior art, the improved VMD (i.e. IVMD) can effectively avoid modal aliasing and end point effect, has better robustness, and has less noise interference on the decomposition effect, so that the signal component containing main fault components in the bearing vibration signal under the low-speed heavy-load working condition is effectively separated, and a reconstruction signal is formed; then SAE (namely a stacked self-encoder) is adopted for reconstruction signals, high-order features of the signals are effectively extracted through multi-layer encoding and decoding, the difference between different signal components is enlarged, and a better foundation is provided for subsequent fault type identification; then RF adopts a method based on Bagging random selection attribute, effectively reduces the correlation between trees, simultaneously establishes a single non-pruning decision tree to achieve lower error, ensures the accuracy of RF classification, and constructs the mapping relation between high-order characteristics and fault class labels; and finally, combining the extracted high-order characteristic signals according to the mapping relation, thereby realizing the accurate diagnosis of bearing faults under the working condition of low speed and heavy load.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the comparison of time domain signals and frequency spectrums of 5 bearing states under low-speed heavy-load conditions
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a fault diagnosis method for a rolling bearing according to the present invention
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of an IVMD according to the present invention
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the comparison of the effects of IVMD and VMD
FIG. 5 is a diagram of an SAE network architecture
FIG. 6 is a SAE procedure and result diagram
FIG. 7 is a visual representation of different types of features based on T-SNE
Fig. 8 is a voting example and classification result diagram of a test sample.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be further described below.
As shown in FIG. 1, the method is a comparison graph of time domain signals and frequency spectrums of 5 bearing states under the working condition of low speed and heavy load. From the time domain diagram, it can be seen that the 4 fault signals all have a certain impact component. But the fault signature is easily overwhelmed by background noise under low speed, heavy duty conditions. In the spectrogram, no obvious difference is shown, and the difference is mainly in the side frequency part of the low-frequency resonance frequency band. In order to solve the problem, the invention provides the following solutions:
as shown in fig. 2, the specific steps are as follows:
step one, collecting mixed vibration signals under the working condition of low speed and heavy load, determining the central frequency of signal components and the number of signals based on the frequency spectrum distribution characteristics of the signals, adopting single-component VMDs to extract the signal components one by one, setting the k value of VMD parameters to be 1 constantly, and extracting one signal component at a time; the problem of inconsistent numbers of different signal components in batch processing is avoided, as shown in fig. 3, and the specific process is as follows:
step (1), determining the decomposition times T;
step (2), calculating coarse graining energy distribution spectrum of the signal spectrum;
step (3), component initialization center frequency is determined based on the energy distribution spectrum;
step (4), carrying out primary single-component VMD decomposition on the original signal based on the initialization center frequency to decompose a signal component, then removing the signal component from the original signal, and continuing to process the residual signal as a new original signal;
and (5) repeating the steps (1) to (4) to decompose the VMD of the next single component, and repeating the steps until the determined decomposition times T are reached.
As shown in fig. 4, to verify the effect of the IVMD, the original signal is decomposed by the VMD, and both sideband constraint sizes are set to 1500, it can be seen that the two components extracted by the VMD are respectively distributed in the low frequency band and the high frequency band, and are not ideal signal components in the low frequency band. The low frequency signal has a higher amplitude in the frequency spectrum and the high frequency signal has a smaller amplitude in the frequency spectrum. The IVMD can effectively optimize the representation of the spectrum distribution of the signal, avoid the problem of overhigh amplitude of individual frequency in the original signal, and finally realize the effective decomposition of the signal.
Step two, adopting an SAE method to effectively extract high-order characteristics of signals through multi-layer coding and decoding, expanding the difference between different signal components, providing a better foundation for the subsequent fault type identification, and specifically comprising the following steps:
step A, through weight W x And bias b x For signal s= [ s ] 1 ,s 2 ,...s n ]Coding to obtain a hidden layer vector h, wherein n is the length of a single sample;
h=f(W s ·s+b s ) (1)
wherein f is an activation function;
step B, through weight W x And bias b x Decoding the hidden layer to obtain an original signal;
s'=f(W h ·h+b h ) (2)
step C, defining a reconstruction loss function;
single sample reconstruction error:
data set s= [ S ] 1 ,s 2 ,...s m ]Reconstruction error:
step D, optimizing a model by using a random gradient descent algorithm, obtaining a required gradient by using a back propagation algorithm, and updating the weight W x Bias ofB is put x
Step E, repeating the steps A to D until the error requirement is met or the iteration times are reached;
and F, decoding and encoding the hidden layer vector h as a new signal to obtain a new hidden layer vector, and continuing until the set stacking layer number is reached, thereby completing the high-order feature extraction process of each signal component.
The IVMD extracts the signal components to form a reconstructed signal whose spectral distribution is centered primarily at the first 3000Hz. Taking the partial spectrum as an original characteristic, and extracting depth characteristics by utilizing SAE; using Sigmod as the activation function, the SAE network architecture is shown in fig. 5; based on the SAE structure, carrying out normalization processing on the reconstructed signal spectrum, and then training SAE network parameters through the encoding and decoding processes; the feature extraction process and results are shown in fig. 6. From this figure, it can be seen that as the number of SAE network layers increases, the difference in characteristics of the different signals becomes increasingly apparent. By the time the third hidden layer vector is reached, there is already a significant difference in characteristics between the different signals. These differences provide good basis data for subsequent signal classification.
To verify the superiority of the combination of IVMD and SAE, IVMD and TFF were used for analysis of the decomposition signal and feature extraction comparisons. The signal features are visualized with T-distributed random neighborhood embedding (T-SNE). The visualization results are shown in fig. 7. It can be seen that the method provided by the invention has better feature expression capability and can provide powerful support for subsequent pattern recognition.
Step three, adopting RF to construct a mapping relation between high-order features and fault class labels, wherein the RF adopts a Bagging random attribute selection method, so that the correlation between trees is effectively reduced, meanwhile, a single non-pruning decision tree can be built to achieve lower error, and the accuracy of RF classification is ensured, and the method comprises the following specific steps:
step I, generating p training sets by using a Bagging method, and extracting n features from an original feature set by using a dropout method for each training set;
step II, for each training set, generating a decision tree without pruning, and generating t decision trees according to the number p of the training sets;
step III, classifying the samples, and determining the output class names through majority voting of trees in the forest;
wherein I is an oscillometric function wherein c is a tree h i For the classification result of the prediction class c,number of nodes in the leaf; the mapping relation between the high-order features and the fault class labels is constructed through the process; and then, according to the mapping relation and combining the high-order characteristics of the signal components obtained in the step two, obtaining a fault class label corresponding to the current signal, and finally, accurately diagnosing the bearing fault under the low-speed heavy-load working condition.
The RF classification model introduces randomness, and effectively avoids the phenomenon of overfitting. In RF, the number of trees is 10 and the number of samples of predictors for splitting on each node is 2. The class 5 signals each contained 50 samples, 60% of which were used for training and 40% for testing. An example of voting and classification results for the test samples are shown in fig. 8.
The voting results for 5 signal test samples are given in fig. 8. The overall voting result has good consistency, which shows that the fault characteristics extracted based on IVMD and SAE have good difference characteristics, and the random forest constructed based on the independent decision tree has better robustness compared with a single decision tree. Through multiple tests, the comprehensive recognition rate can reach 97%. Therefore, the fault diagnosis algorithm provided by the invention can effectively monitor the health state of the bearing under the working condition of low speed and heavy load.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the invention, it being noted that: it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and adaptations can be made without departing from the principles of the present invention, and such modifications and adaptations are intended to be comprehended within the scope of the invention.

Claims (4)

1. A bearing fault diagnosis method under the working condition of low speed and heavy load is characterized by comprising the following specific steps:
step one, collecting mixed vibration signals under the working condition of low speed and heavy load, determining the center frequency of signal components and the number of signals based on the frequency spectrum distribution characteristics of the signals, and extracting the signal components one by adopting single component VMD;
extracting internal information of the signal through the SAE mining step I, fully extracting high-order features from each signal component, and enhancing the difference characteristics among different signal components;
and thirdly, constructing a mapping relation between the high-order features and the fault class labels by adopting RF, and combining the high-order features of the signal components obtained in the second step according to the mapping relation so as to obtain the fault class labels corresponding to the current signals, thereby finally realizing the accurate diagnosis of the bearing faults under the low-speed heavy-load working condition.
2. The method for diagnosing bearing faults under low-speed and heavy-load conditions according to claim 1, wherein the specific process in the step one is as follows:
step (1), determining the decomposition times T;
step (2), calculating coarse graining energy distribution spectrum of the signal spectrum;
step (3), component initialization center frequency is determined based on the energy distribution spectrum;
step (4), carrying out primary single-component VMD decomposition on the original signal based on the initialization center frequency to decompose a signal component, then removing the signal component from the original signal, and continuing to process the residual signal as a new original signal;
and (5) repeating the steps (1) to (4) to decompose the VMD of the next single component, and repeating the steps until the determined decomposition times T are reached.
3. The method for diagnosing bearing faults under the low-speed and heavy-load working condition according to claim 1, wherein the SAE method is adopted in the second step to effectively extract high-order features of signals through multi-layer encoding and decoding, so that the difference between different signal components is enlarged, a better foundation is provided for the subsequent fault type identification, and the method comprises the following specific steps:
step A, through weight W x And bias b x For signal s= [ s ] 1 ,s 2 ,...s n ]Coding to obtain a hidden layer vector h, wherein n is the length of a single sample;
h=f(W s ·s+b s ) (1)
wherein f is an activation function;
step B, through weight W x And bias b x Decoding the hidden layer to obtain an original signal;
s'=f(W h ·h+b h ) (2)
step C, defining a reconstruction loss function;
single sample reconstruction error:
data set s= [ S ] 1 ,s 2 ,...s m ]Reconstruction error:
step D, optimizing a model by using a random gradient descent algorithm, obtaining a required gradient by using a back propagation algorithm, and updating the weight W x And bias b x
Step E, repeating the steps A to D until the error requirement is met or the iteration times are reached;
and F, decoding and encoding the hidden layer vector h as a new signal to obtain a new hidden layer vector, and continuing until the set stacking layer number is reached, thereby completing the high-order feature extraction process of each signal component.
4. The method for diagnosing bearing faults under the low-speed heavy-load working condition according to claim 1, wherein in the third step, RF adopts a method for randomly selecting attributes based on Bagging, so that the correlation between trees is effectively reduced, and meanwhile, a single non-pruning decision tree established can achieve lower error, thereby ensuring the accuracy of RF classification, and the method comprises the following specific steps:
step I, generating p training sets by using a Bagging method, and extracting n features from an original feature set by using a dropout method for each training set;
step II, for each training set, generating a decision tree without pruning, and generating t decision trees according to the number p of the training sets;
step III, classifying the samples, and determining the output class names through majority voting of trees in the forest;
wherein I is an oscillometric function wherein c is a tree h i For the classification result of the prediction class c,number of nodes in the leaf;
and constructing a mapping relation between the high-order features and the fault class labels through the process.
CN202410086655.9A 2024-01-22 2024-01-22 Bearing fault diagnosis method under low-speed heavy-load working condition Active CN117740381B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202410086655.9A CN117740381B (en) 2024-01-22 2024-01-22 Bearing fault diagnosis method under low-speed heavy-load working condition

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202410086655.9A CN117740381B (en) 2024-01-22 2024-01-22 Bearing fault diagnosis method under low-speed heavy-load working condition

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN117740381A true CN117740381A (en) 2024-03-22
CN117740381B CN117740381B (en) 2024-06-28

Family

ID=90251041

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202410086655.9A Active CN117740381B (en) 2024-01-22 2024-01-22 Bearing fault diagnosis method under low-speed heavy-load working condition

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN117740381B (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010128928A1 (en) * 2009-05-05 2010-11-11 S.P.M. Instrument Ab An apparatus and a method for analysing the vibration of a machine having a rotating part
CN108181107A (en) * 2018-01-12 2018-06-19 东北电力大学 The Wind turbines bearing mechanical method for diagnosing faults of meter and more class objects
CN108875170A (en) * 2018-06-05 2018-11-23 天津大学 A kind of Noise Sources Identification method based on improvement variation mode decomposition
CN112163472A (en) * 2020-09-15 2021-01-01 东南大学 Rolling bearing diagnosis method based on multi-view feature fusion
CN112836604A (en) * 2021-01-22 2021-05-25 合肥工业大学 Rolling bearing fault diagnosis and classification method, system and equipment based on VMD-SSAE and storage medium thereof
US20210270244A1 (en) * 2020-03-02 2021-09-02 Wuhan University Method and system for fault diagnosis of gearbox of wind turbine generator
CN116578833A (en) * 2023-04-11 2023-08-11 上海交通大学 IGBT module aging fault diagnosis system based on optimized random forest model
CN116662872A (en) * 2023-04-07 2023-08-29 西安理工大学 Automobile panel finishing line bearing mechanical fault diagnosis method

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010128928A1 (en) * 2009-05-05 2010-11-11 S.P.M. Instrument Ab An apparatus and a method for analysing the vibration of a machine having a rotating part
CN108181107A (en) * 2018-01-12 2018-06-19 东北电力大学 The Wind turbines bearing mechanical method for diagnosing faults of meter and more class objects
CN108875170A (en) * 2018-06-05 2018-11-23 天津大学 A kind of Noise Sources Identification method based on improvement variation mode decomposition
US20210270244A1 (en) * 2020-03-02 2021-09-02 Wuhan University Method and system for fault diagnosis of gearbox of wind turbine generator
CN112163472A (en) * 2020-09-15 2021-01-01 东南大学 Rolling bearing diagnosis method based on multi-view feature fusion
CN112836604A (en) * 2021-01-22 2021-05-25 合肥工业大学 Rolling bearing fault diagnosis and classification method, system and equipment based on VMD-SSAE and storage medium thereof
CN116662872A (en) * 2023-04-07 2023-08-29 西安理工大学 Automobile panel finishing line bearing mechanical fault diagnosis method
CN116578833A (en) * 2023-04-11 2023-08-11 上海交通大学 IGBT module aging fault diagnosis system based on optimized random forest model

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
徐飞 等: "基于VMD-样本熵和SSAE的齿轮故障诊断", 组合机床与自动化加工技术, no. 08, 31 August 2020 (2020-08-31), pages 44 - 47 *
杜小磊 等: "基于同步挤压S变换和集成深层脊波自编码器的轴承故障诊断", 振动与冲击, no. 14, 31 July 2020 (2020-07-31), pages 65 - 74 *
温江涛 等: "模糊粒化非监督学习结合随机森林融合的旋转机械故障诊断", 机械科学与技术, no. 11, 30 November 2018 (2018-11-30), pages 88 - 96 *
秦喜文 等: "基于LMD与随机森林的滚动轴承故障诊断", 长春工业大学学报, no. 05, 31 October 2018 (2018-10-31), pages 7 - 13 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN117740381B (en) 2024-06-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108760327B (en) Diagnosis method for rotor fault of aircraft engine
CN108241873B (en) A kind of intelligent failure diagnosis method towards pumping plant main equipment
CN107016404A (en) Wind power generating set failure prediction method based on D S evidence fusions
CN109145706A (en) A kind of sensitive features selection and dimension reduction method for analysis of vibration signal
CN115688018B (en) Method for monitoring state and diagnosing faults of bearing under multiple working conditions
CN111238843B (en) Fan health evaluation method based on rapid spectrum kurtosis analysis
CN102736027A (en) Circuit breaker failure diagnosis method based on circuit breaker dynamic property test instrument
CN114004091B (en) CEEMDAN-BNs-based wind power variable pitch system fault diagnosis method
CN112633098A (en) Fault diagnosis method and system for rotary machine and storage medium
CN109784284A (en) The self study recognition methods of working condition based on rotating machinery
CN106846170B (en) Generator set trip monitoring method and monitoring device thereof
CN111881594A (en) Non-stationary signal state monitoring method and system for nuclear power equipment
CN114819315A (en) Bearing degradation trend prediction method based on multi-parameter fusion health factor and time convolution neural network
CN112817954A (en) Missing value interpolation method based on multi-method ensemble learning
CN114301719B (en) Malicious update detection method and system based on variational self-encoder
Zhang et al. Fault diagnosis based on optimized node entropy using lifting wavelet packet transform and genetic algorithms
CN117740381B (en) Bearing fault diagnosis method under low-speed heavy-load working condition
CN117171544B (en) Motor vibration fault diagnosis method based on multichannel fusion convolutional neural network
CN111693279A (en) Mechanical fault diagnosis method based on MPGA parametric resonance sparse decomposition
CN116625654A (en) Vibration signal fault diagnosis method, device, equipment and storage medium
Ren et al. Fault diagnosis with imbalanced data based on auto-encoder
Ceylan et al. GraphDCA--a Framework for Node Distribution Comparison in Real and Synthetic Graphs
Agrawal et al. Induction motor bearing fault classification using WPT, PCA and DSVM
CN112990257A (en) Reciprocating compressor fault diagnosis method based on principal component analysis and support vector machine
CN112560674A (en) Method and system for detecting quality of sound signal

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant