CN114238003A - Method and device, electronic device, and storage medium for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server - Google Patents

Method and device, electronic device, and storage medium for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114238003A
CN114238003A CN202111629423.6A CN202111629423A CN114238003A CN 114238003 A CN114238003 A CN 114238003A CN 202111629423 A CN202111629423 A CN 202111629423A CN 114238003 A CN114238003 A CN 114238003A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
performance
tested
accelerator card
data
server
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202111629423.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
孙聪
李洁
郭亮
王月
王少鹏
谢丽娜
吴美希
邱奔
许可欣
宫伟文
常金凤
柯芊
李宁东
张一星
赵精华
杨晓彤
盛凯
郑常奎
芦帅
石秀江
林寅豪
江畅
刘鹏云
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology CAICT
Original Assignee
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology CAICT
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China Academy of Information and Communications Technology CAICT filed Critical China Academy of Information and Communications Technology CAICT
Priority to CN202111629423.6A priority Critical patent/CN114238003A/en
Publication of CN114238003A publication Critical patent/CN114238003A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/22Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
    • G06F11/2205Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing using arrangements specific to the hardware being tested
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/22Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
    • G06F11/2273Test methods

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)

Abstract

The application relates to the technical field of server accelerator card testing, and discloses a method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server, which comprises the following steps: determining a plurality of performances to be tested of an accelerator card in a server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, and acquiring data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested; under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, inputting each data to be tested into a performance test model preset in a server to obtain the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested; and acquiring a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested. The performance test of the accelerator card is realized by determining the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested, obtaining the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested, and obtaining the performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy corresponding to the weight. The application also discloses a device for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server, electronic equipment and a storage medium.

Description

Method and device for testing performance of accelerator card in server, electronic equipment and storage medium
Technical Field
The present application relates to the technical field of server accelerator card testing, and for example, to a method and an apparatus for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server, an electronic device, and a storage medium.
Background
With the development and application of technologies such as 5G, the Internet of things and the like, the traditional cloud computing technology cannot meet the requirements of 'large connection, low time delay and large bandwidth' on a terminal side, the cloud computing capability is expanded to the edge side closest to the terminal by the appearance of the edge cloud, and the cloud computing service is sunk through unified management and control of the cloud edge side so as to provide end-to-end cloud service. Under the changes of diversification, complication, intellectualization and the like of network application, the edge cloud accelerator card is evolving from full force to the direction of artificial intelligence. The evolution direction of the edge cloud acceleration card mainly solves the challenges in various aspects such as deep packet detection, safety processing and real-time processing of mass data. Because the performance of the accelerator card cannot be directly tested, in the prior art, a user can only randomly select the accelerator card when designing and deploying the cloud platform. In order to understand the performance of the accelerator card more and facilitate a user to design a cloud platform according to the performance of the accelerator card, a method for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server is urgently needed.
Disclosure of Invention
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the disclosed embodiments. This summary is not an extensive overview nor is intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope of such embodiments but rather as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The embodiment of the disclosure provides a method and a device for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server, electronic equipment and a storage medium, so that the performance of the accelerator card in the server can be tested.
In some embodiments, the method for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server comprises the following steps: determining a plurality of performances to be tested of an accelerator card in a server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, and acquiring data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested; under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, inputting the data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server to obtain the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to the performance to be tested; and acquiring a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested.
In some embodiments, the apparatus for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server includes a determining module configured to determine a plurality of performances to be tested of the accelerator card in the server and a weight corresponding to each of the performances to be tested, and obtain data to be tested corresponding to each of the performances to be tested; the acquisition module is configured to input the data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and obtain inference accuracy corresponding to the performance to be tested; and the test module is configured to obtain a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested.
In some embodiments, the apparatus for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server includes a processor and a memory storing program instructions, and the processor is configured to execute the method for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server as described above when executing the program instructions.
In some embodiments, the electronic device includes the apparatus for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server as described above.
In some embodiments, the storage medium stores program instructions that, when executed, perform the method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server as described above.
The method and the device for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server, the electronic equipment and the storage medium provided by the embodiment of the disclosure can realize the following technical effects: the method comprises the steps of determining a plurality of performances to be tested of an accelerator card in a server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, obtaining data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested, obtaining inference accuracy rates corresponding to the performances to be tested by using performance test models preset in the server through the data to be tested under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and obtaining performance test results of the accelerator card by using the weights corresponding to the performances to be tested and the inference accuracy rates corresponding to the performances to be tested. The performance test of the accelerator card in the server is realized, so that the performance of the accelerator card can be known conveniently.
The foregoing general description and the following description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the application.
Drawings
One or more embodiments are illustrated by way of example in the accompanying drawings, which correspond to the accompanying drawings and not in limitation thereof, in which elements having the same reference numeral designations are shown as like elements and not in limitation thereof, and wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of another method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of another method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of another method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an apparatus for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of another apparatus for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
So that the manner in which the features and elements of the disclosed embodiments can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosed embodiments, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. In the following description of the technology, for purposes of explanation, numerous details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. However, one or more embodiments may be practiced without these details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices may be shown in simplified form in order to simplify the drawing.
The terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and in the claims, and the above-described drawings of embodiments of the present disclosure, are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It should be understood that the data so used may be interchanged under appropriate circumstances such that embodiments of the present disclosure described herein may be made. Furthermore, the terms "comprising" and "having," as well as any variations thereof, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions.
The term "plurality" means two or more unless otherwise specified.
In the embodiment of the present disclosure, the character "/" indicates that the preceding and following objects are in an or relationship. For example, A/B represents: a or B.
The term "and/or" is an associative relationship that describes objects, meaning that three relationships may exist. For example, a and/or B, represents: a or B, or A and B.
The term "correspond" may refer to an association or binding relationship, and a corresponds to B refers to an association or binding relationship between a and B.
With reference to fig. 1, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides a method for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server, including:
step S101, determining a plurality of performances to be tested of the accelerator card in the server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, and acquiring data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested.
And S102, inputting the data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and obtaining the reasoning accuracy corresponding to the performance to be tested.
And step S103, acquiring a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested.
By adopting the method for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server provided by the embodiment of the disclosure, the plurality of performances to be tested of the accelerator card in the server and the corresponding weights thereof are determined, the data to be tested corresponding to each performance to be tested is obtained, under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested is obtained through each data to be tested by using the performance test model preset in the server, and then the performance test result of the accelerator card is obtained by using the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested. The performance test of the accelerator card in the server is realized, so that the performance of the accelerator card can be known conveniently.
In some embodiments, the server for testing the performance of the accelerator card is powered normally, the version is a stable commercial BIOS version, a Linux operating system is installed, and a driver can run normally, and an accelerator card hardware interface driver, an accelerator card driver, a deep learning software library and the like are installed and can run normally.
In some embodiments, the accelerator card comprises an artificial intelligence accelerator card. In some embodiments, the to-be-tested performance of the accelerator card in the server includes one or more of an image classification performance, a target detection performance, a semantic segmentation performance, a language inference performance, a recommendation performance, and the like.
Optionally, obtaining to-be-tested data corresponding to each to-be-tested performance includes: and screening the data to be tested corresponding to each performance to be tested from a preset data set.
In some embodiments, the data set comprises: ImageNet2012 Dataset, COCO (common Objects in context) Dataset, BraTS 2019 Dataset, SQuAD v1.1(The Stanford query Answering Dataset) Dataset, and Criteo Terabbyte Dataset, among others. The ImageNet2012 dataset stores several annotated or labeled training set pictures, several verification set pictures, and several unlabeled test set pictures. The COCO data set stores a training set of a plurality of pictures with labels and label files, a verification set of a plurality of pictures and label files, and a test set of a plurality of pictures without labels and label files. The BraTS 2019 dataset stores a training set of several labeled case data, a validation set of several case data, and a test set of several unlabeled case data. The SQuAD v1.1 data set stores a plurality of training sets of tagged question-answer pairs, a plurality of verification sets of question-answer pairs and a plurality of test sets of untagged question-answer pairs. The Criteo Terabbyte dataset stores a plurality of training sets with labeled numerical variables and category variables, a plurality of verification sets with the numerical variables and the category variables, and a plurality of test sets with the numerical variables and the category variables without labels.
Optionally, determining the weight corresponding to each performance to be measured includes: performing table look-up operation on each performance to be tested according to a preset weight matching table to obtain the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested; the weight matching table stores the corresponding relationship between the performance to be measured and the weight. Therefore, the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested is determined by looking up the table, and when the performance of the accelerator card in the server is tested, the weight of each performance to be tested of the accelerator card is taken into consideration, so that the obtained performance test result of the accelerator card is more suitable for the requirement condition of a user on the accelerator card.
Optionally, inputting each data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server, and obtaining inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested, including: inputting each data to be tested into a performance test model preset in a server to obtain a model output result corresponding to each data to be tested; comparing the model output result corresponding to each data to be detected with the preset label corresponding to each data to be detected to obtain the comparison result corresponding to each data to be detected; and obtaining the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested according to each comparison result. Therefore, the inference accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested is obtained according to the comparison result of the model output result corresponding to each data to be tested and the preset label corresponding to each data to be tested, so that the performance test result of the accelerator card can be obtained according to the inference accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested and the weight corresponding to the inference accuracy rate, the performance test of the accelerator card is realized, and the performance of the accelerator card is convenient to know.
In some embodiments, in conjunction with fig. 2, a method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server includes:
step S201, determining a plurality of performances to be tested of an accelerator card in a server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, and acquiring data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested;
step S202, under the condition that the accelerator card normally runs, inputting each data to be tested into a performance test model preset in a server, and obtaining a model output result corresponding to each data to be tested;
step S203, comparing the model output result corresponding to each data to be tested with the preset label corresponding to each data to be tested to obtain the comparison result corresponding to each data to be tested;
step S204, obtaining the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested according to each comparison result;
and step S205, acquiring a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested.
Therefore, the performance test result of the accelerator card is obtained by using the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested of the accelerator card and the corresponding reasoning accuracy rate. The performance test of the accelerator card in the server is realized, so that the performance of the accelerator card can be known conveniently, and a user can design a cloud platform conveniently according to the performance of the accelerator card.
Optionally, the server is preset with performance test models corresponding to different types of data to be tested, and each data to be tested is input into the corresponding performance test model.
Optionally, the different types of data to be tested correspond to different performance test models respectively.
Optionally, before inputting each piece of data to be tested into the performance test model preset in the server, the method further includes: and acquiring a performance test model preset in the server. Optionally, the performance test model is obtained by: acquiring training data corresponding to each performance to be tested; and respectively inputting the training data into a preset model to be trained for training to obtain a performance test model corresponding to each performance to be tested.
Optionally, obtaining training data corresponding to each performance to be measured includes: and screening out data to be trained corresponding to each performance to be tested from a preset data set, and determining the screened data to be trained as training data corresponding to the performance to be tested.
In some embodiments, the model to be trained comprises: one or more of Inception V3 model, SSD ResNet-34 model, 3D-UNet model, BERT-base model, DLRM model, and the like.
In some embodiments, the performance to be tested is image classification performance, data to be trained corresponding to the image classification performance is screened out from the ImageNet2012 data set, the screened data to be trained is determined as training data corresponding to the image classification performance, the training data corresponding to the image classification performance is input into an Inception V3 model for training, and a performance test model corresponding to the image classification performance is obtained; and screening the data to be tested corresponding to the image classification performance from the ImageNet2012 data set, inputting the data to be tested corresponding to the image classification performance into the performance test model corresponding to the image classification performance under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and obtaining a model output result corresponding to the data to be tested of the image classification performance.
In some embodiments, the performance to be tested is target detection performance, the data to be trained corresponding to the target detection performance is screened out from the COCO data set, the screened data to be trained is determined as training data corresponding to the target detection performance, the training data corresponding to the target detection performance is input into the SSD ResNet-34 model for training, a performance test model corresponding to the target detection performance is obtained, the data to be tested corresponding to the target detection performance is screened out from the COCO data set, and under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, the data to be tested corresponding to the target detection performance is input into the performance test model corresponding to the target detection performance, and a model output result corresponding to the data to be tested of the target detection performance is obtained.
In some embodiments, the performance to be tested is semantic segmentation performance, the data to be trained corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance is screened out from the BraTS 2019 data set, the screened data to be trained is determined as training data corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance, the training data corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance is input into a 3D-UNet model to be trained, a performance test model corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance is obtained, the data to be tested corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance is screened out from the BraTS 2019 data set, the data to be tested corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance is input into the performance test model corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and a model output result corresponding to the data to be tested of the semantic segmentation performance is obtained.
In some embodiments, the performance to be tested is language reasoning performance, the data to be trained corresponding to the language reasoning performance is screened out from the SQuAD v1.1 data set, the screened data to be trained is determined as training data corresponding to the language reasoning performance, the training data corresponding to the language reasoning performance is input into a BERT-base model for training, a performance test model corresponding to the language reasoning performance is obtained, the data to be tested corresponding to the language reasoning performance is screened out from the SQuAD v1.1 data set, the data to be tested corresponding to the language reasoning performance is input into the performance test model corresponding to the language reasoning performance under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and a model output result corresponding to the data to be tested corresponding to the language reasoning performance is obtained.
In some embodiments, the performance to be tested is recommended performance, the data to be trained corresponding to the recommended performance is screened from the Criteo Terabyte dataset data set, the screened data to be trained is determined as training data corresponding to the recommended performance, the training data corresponding to the recommended performance is input into a DLRM model for training, a performance test model corresponding to the recommended performance is obtained, the data to be tested corresponding to the recommended performance is screened from the Criteo Terabyte dataset data set, the data to be tested corresponding to the recommended performance is input into the performance test model corresponding to the recommended performance under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and a model output result corresponding to the data to be tested of the recommended performance is obtained.
Optionally, obtaining training data corresponding to each performance to be measured includes: acquiring test items corresponding to various performances to be tested; determining a data set corresponding to each performance to be tested according to the test item corresponding to each performance to be tested, and screening out data to be trained corresponding to each performance to be tested from each data set; and determining the screened data to be trained as the training data corresponding to the performance to be tested.
Optionally, obtaining a test item corresponding to each performance to be tested includes: and performing table look-up operation on each performance to be tested according to a preset test item matching table to obtain a test item corresponding to each performance to be tested, wherein the test item matching table stores the corresponding relation between the performance to be tested and the test item.
Optionally, determining a data set corresponding to each performance to be tested according to the test item corresponding to each performance to be tested includes: and performing table look-up operation on the test items corresponding to the performances to be tested according to a preset data set matching table to obtain data sets corresponding to the test items of the performances to be tested, wherein the data set matching table stores the corresponding relation between the test items corresponding to the performances to be tested and the data sets.
In some embodiments, the weight matching table and the test item matching table are different matching tables, and table lookup operations are performed on each to-be-tested performance in the preset weight matching table and the preset test item matching table, respectively, to obtain a weight and a test item corresponding to each to-be-tested performance.
In some embodiments, the weight matching table and the test item matching table are the same matching table, i.e. the weight and test item matching table. And performing table look-up operation on each performance to be tested in a preset weight and test item matching table to obtain the weight and the test item corresponding to each performance to be tested. The weight and test item matching table stores the corresponding relations among the performances to be tested, the weights and the test items.
In some embodiments, table 1 is an example table of the weight and test item matching table, as shown in table 1, the performance to be tested is image classification performance, the weight corresponding to the image classification performance is 20%, and the test item corresponding to the image classification performance is a network inference performance test based on ImageNet2012 data set inclusion v 3; the performance to be tested is target detection performance, the weight corresponding to the target detection performance is 20%, and the test item corresponding to the target detection performance is SSD ResNet-34 network inference performance test based on a COCO data set; the performance to be tested is semantic segmentation performance, the weight corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance is 20%, and the test item corresponding to the semantic segmentation performance is a 3D-UNet network inference performance test based on a BraTS 2019 data set; the performance to be tested is language reasoning performance, the weight corresponding to the language reasoning performance is 20%, and the test item corresponding to the language reasoning performance is a BERT-base network reasoning performance test based on the SQuAD v1.1 data set; the performance to be tested is recommended performance, the weight corresponding to the recommended performance is 20%, and the test item corresponding to the recommended performance is a DLRM network reasoning performance test based on a Criteo Terabbyte dataset.
Figure BDA0003439793860000081
Figure BDA0003439793860000091
TABLE 1
Optionally, obtaining the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be measured according to each comparison result includes: dividing the first number corresponding to each performance to be measured by the second number corresponding to each performance to be measured to obtain the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be measured; the first quantity is the quantity of the data to be detected, of which the comparison result is the model output result and the corresponding preset label are consistent, and the second quantity is the total quantity of the data to be detected. In this way, the ratio of the number of the output results of each model, which is consistent with the corresponding preset labels, to the total number of the data to be tested is determined as the inference accuracy rate of the corresponding performance to be tested, so that the performance inference result of the accelerator card can be obtained according to the inference accuracy rate of the performance to be tested and the corresponding weight. Therefore, the performance test of the accelerator card from a plurality of performance angles is realized, so that the performance of the accelerator card can be known.
In some embodiments, the performance to be tested is image classification performance, the test item corresponding to the image classification performance is determined to be a network inference performance test based on an ImageNet2012 data set increment V3, the ImageNet2012 data set is imported into a tested service system in a server, 70% of data in the ImageNet2012 data set is screened out to serve as data to be trained corresponding to the image classification, the screened data to be trained serves as training data of the image classification, the training data corresponding to the image classification is input into an increment V3 model to be trained, and a performance test model corresponding to the image classification performance is obtained. Screening 30% of data from the ImageNet2012 data set as to-be-detected data corresponding to the image classification performance, inputting the to-be-detected data corresponding to the image classification performance into a performance test model corresponding to the image classification performance under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, obtaining a model output result corresponding to the to-be-detected data, comparing the model output result corresponding to the to-be-detected data with a preset label corresponding to the to-be-detected data, obtaining a comparison result corresponding to the to-be-detected data, and dividing the number of the to-be-detected data with the model output result consistent with the preset label by the total number of the to-be-detected data to obtain the inference accuracy corresponding to the image classification performance.
Optionally, obtaining a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested, includes: obtaining a score corresponding to each performance to be tested according to the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested; obtaining the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card according to the score corresponding to each performance to be tested and the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested; and obtaining a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the comprehensive performance score. Therefore, the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card is obtained according to the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested and the weight corresponding to the performance to be tested, and further the performance test result of the accelerator card is obtained, so that the performance test of the accelerator card is realized, and the performance of the accelerator card is known more conveniently.
Optionally, obtaining a score corresponding to each performance to be measured according to the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be measured includes: and performing table look-up operation on the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested according to a preset score matching table to obtain a score corresponding to each performance to be tested, wherein the score matching table stores the corresponding relation between the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested and the score.
In some embodiments, fig. 2 is an example table of the score matching table, as shown in table 2, the performance to be measured is image classification, and the score corresponding to the image classification is 1 score when the inference accuracy corresponding to the image classification is greater than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 20%; under the condition that the value range of the reasoning accuracy corresponding to the image classification is more than 20% and less than or equal to 40%, the score corresponding to the image classification is 2; under the condition that the value range of the reasoning accuracy corresponding to the image classification is 40 percent and more than or equal to 60 percent, the score corresponding to the image classification is 3 points; under the condition that the value range of the reasoning accuracy corresponding to the image classification is more than 60% and less than or equal to 80%, the score corresponding to the image classification is 4; under the condition that the value range of the reasoning accuracy corresponding to the image classification is more than 80% and less than or equal to 100%, the score corresponding to the image classification is 5. The performance to be tested is recommended, and under the condition that the value range of the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to the recommendation is not less than 0 and not more than 20 percent, the corresponding score is recommended to be 1 score; under the condition that the value range of the inference accuracy rate corresponding to the recommendation is 20 percent and more than or equal to 40 percent, the score corresponding to the recommendation is 2 scores; under the condition that the value range of the inference accuracy rate corresponding to the recommendation is 40 percent and more than or equal to 60 percent, the score corresponding to the recommendation is 3 points; under the condition that the value range of the inference accuracy rate corresponding to the recommendation is 60 percent and more than or equal to 80 percent, the score corresponding to the recommendation is 4; and under the condition that the value range of the inference accuracy rate corresponding to the recommendation is 80 percent and the inference accuracy rate is less than or equal to 100 percent, the score corresponding to the recommendation is 5.
Figure BDA0003439793860000101
Figure BDA0003439793860000111
TABLE 2
Optionally, obtaining the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card according to the score corresponding to each performance to be measured and the weight corresponding to each performance to be measured includes: and respectively dividing the score corresponding to each performance to be tested by the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested to obtain the single performance score corresponding to each performance to be tested, and adding the single performance scores corresponding to each performance to be tested to obtain the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card.
Optionally, obtaining a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the comprehensive performance score includes: and determining a score interval where the comprehensive performance score is located, and acquiring a performance test result corresponding to the accelerator card according to the score interval where the comprehensive performance score is located. Therefore, the performance test result of the accelerator card is obtained through the score interval where the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card is located, so that the normalized test of the performance of the accelerator card can be realized, and the normalized performance test result of the accelerator card is obtained.
Optionally, obtaining a performance test result corresponding to the accelerator card according to a score interval where the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card is located includes: and performing table look-up operation on a score interval where the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card is located according to a preset performance test result matching table to obtain a performance test result corresponding to the accelerator card, wherein the performance test result matching table stores a corresponding relation between the score interval and the performance test result.
In some embodiments, in the case that the overall performance score is in the score interval equal to 25 points, the performance test result of the corresponding accelerator card is: "performance level is L1, accelerator card is not mature yet, reasoning performance is low"; under the condition that the comprehensive performance score is in a score interval of 25 points < the comprehensive performance score < 50 points, the performance test result corresponding to the accelerator card is as follows: "performance level L2, accelerator card has basic capability, slightly lower inference performance or equal performance"; under the condition that the comprehensive performance score is in a score interval of more than or equal to 50 scores and less than 75 scores, the performance test result corresponding to the accelerator card is as follows: "performance level L3, accelerated card reasoning ability mature"; under the condition that the comprehensive performance score is in a score interval that the comprehensive performance score is not less than 75 scores and is less than 100 scores, the performance test result corresponding to the accelerator card is as follows: "performance level L4, accelerator card reasoning ability is good"; under the condition that the comprehensive performance score is in a score interval of more than or equal to 100 scores and less than or equal to 125 scores, the performance test result corresponding to the accelerator card is as follows: "performance level L5, accelerated card reasoning ability is excellent".
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 3, a method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server includes:
step S301, determining a plurality of performances to be tested of an accelerator card in a server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, and acquiring data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested;
step S302, under the condition that the accelerator card normally runs, inputting each data to be tested into a performance test model preset in a server to obtain the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested;
step S303, obtaining a score corresponding to each performance to be measured according to the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be measured;
step S304, obtaining the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card according to the score corresponding to each performance to be tested and the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested;
and S305, obtaining a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the comprehensive performance score.
Therefore, the performance test of the accelerator card in the server is realized by determining a plurality of performances to be tested of the accelerator card in the server and the corresponding weights thereof, acquiring data to be tested corresponding to each performance to be tested, acquiring the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested by using the performance test model preset in the server through each data to be tested under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, acquiring the score corresponding to each performance to be tested according to the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested, acquiring the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card by using the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the corresponding score, and acquiring the performance test result of the accelerator card according to the comprehensive performance score, thereby facilitating the understanding of the performance of the accelerator card. Because a plurality of performance angles are considered when the performance test is carried out on the accelerator card, the performance test result of the accelerator card is more comprehensive and accurate.
Optionally, after obtaining the data to be tested corresponding to each performance to be tested, the method further includes: and under the condition that the accelerator card in the server does not normally operate, early warning is carried out on the abnormal operation of the accelerator card. By early warning the abnormal operation of the accelerator card, the user can conveniently process the abnormal operation of the accelerator card, and the test error of the accelerator card is reduced.
Optionally, the accelerator card does not operate normally, including: the accelerator card is not in a preset position on the server or the accelerator card is in a preset position on the server but cannot operate.
Optionally, the early warning of the abnormal operation of the accelerator card includes: and sending preset prompt information to a preset user terminal. The user is prompted to process the abnormal operation of the accelerator card conveniently. For example, the prompt message is "accelerator card is not operating normally".
Optionally, the early warning of the abnormal operation of the accelerator card includes: and displaying the preset prompt information through a display device. The user is prompted to process the abnormal operation of the accelerator card conveniently. For example, the prompt message is "accelerator card is not operating normally".
Optionally, the user terminal includes: smart phones, tablets or phone watches, etc.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 4, a method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server includes:
step S401, determining a plurality of performances to be tested of an accelerator card in a server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, and acquiring data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested; the server is normally powered and is a stable commercial BIOS version, a Linux operating system is installed, a driving program can normally run, and an accelerator card hardware interface driver, an accelerator card driver, a deep learning software library and the like are installed and can normally run; the performance to be tested of the accelerator card in the server comprises one or more of image classification performance, target detection performance, semantic segmentation performance, language reasoning performance and recommendation performance.
Step S402, under the condition that the accelerator card normally runs, inputting each data to be tested into a performance test model preset in a server, and obtaining a model output result corresponding to each data to be tested;
step S403, comparing the model output result corresponding to each data to be tested with the preset label corresponding to each data to be tested, and obtaining the comparison result corresponding to each data to be tested;
s404, obtaining reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested according to each comparison result;
step S405, obtaining a score corresponding to each performance to be measured according to the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be measured;
step S406, obtaining the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card according to the score corresponding to each performance to be tested and the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested;
and step S407, obtaining a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the comprehensive performance score.
Therefore, a plurality of performances to be tested of the accelerator card in the server and corresponding weights thereof are determined, data to be tested corresponding to each performance to be tested are obtained, under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, a model output result corresponding to each data to be tested is obtained through a performance test model preset in the server according to each data to be tested, inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested is obtained according to a comparison result of the model output result corresponding to each data to be tested and a preset label corresponding to each data to be tested, then comprehensive performance scores of the accelerator card are obtained according to the weights corresponding to each performance to be tested and the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested, further performance test results of the accelerator card are obtained according to the comprehensive performance scores of the accelerator card, performance test on the accelerator card is achieved, and a user can design a cloud platform according to the performance of the accelerator card. Moreover, multiple performance dimensions of image classification performance, target detection performance, semantic segmentation performance, language inference performance and recommendation performance are considered when the accelerator card is subjected to performance test, so that performance indexes of the accelerator card during inference performance test are comprehensive, the performance of the accelerator card can be subjected to normative test, and the performance test of the accelerator card in all directions and multiple angles is standardized. Meanwhile, the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested is also considered when the accelerator card is subjected to performance test, so that the performance test result of the accelerator card can be closer to the actual requirement, and the quality of the accelerator card can be known conveniently.
As shown in fig. 5, an apparatus for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server according to an embodiment of the present disclosure includes a determining module 101, an obtaining module 102, and a testing module 103. The determining module 101 is configured to determine a plurality of performances to be measured of the accelerator card in the server and a weight corresponding to each of the performances to be measured, and obtain data to be measured corresponding to each of the performances to be measured; the obtaining module 102 is configured to input each piece of data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and obtain a reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each piece of performance to be tested; the test module 103 is configured to obtain a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested.
By adopting the device for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server provided by the embodiment of the disclosure, the plurality of performances to be tested of the accelerator card in the server and the weights corresponding to the performances to be tested are determined, the data to be tested corresponding to each performance to be tested is obtained, under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested is obtained by using the data to be tested and the performance test model preset in the server, and then the performance test result of the accelerator card is obtained by using the weights corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested. The performance test of the accelerator card in the server is realized, so that the performance of the accelerator card can be known conveniently.
Optionally, the determining module is configured to determine the weight corresponding to each performance to be measured by: performing table look-up operation on each performance to be tested according to a preset weight matching table to obtain the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested; the weight matching table stores the corresponding relationship between the performance to be measured and the weight.
Optionally, the obtaining module is configured to input each piece of data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server, and obtain an inference accuracy corresponding to each piece of performance to be tested, by: inputting each data to be tested into a performance test model preset in a server to obtain a model output result corresponding to each data to be tested; comparing the model output result corresponding to each data to be detected with the preset label corresponding to each data to be detected to obtain the comparison result corresponding to each data to be detected; and obtaining the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested according to each comparison result.
Optionally, the obtaining module is configured to obtain the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be measured according to each comparison result by: dividing the first number corresponding to each performance to be measured by the second number corresponding to each performance to be measured to obtain the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be measured; the first quantity is the quantity of the data to be detected, of which the comparison result is the model output result and the preset label are consistent, and the second quantity is the total quantity of the data to be detected.
Optionally, the test module is configured to obtain the performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested by: obtaining a score corresponding to each performance to be tested according to the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested; obtaining the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card according to the score corresponding to each performance to be tested and the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested; and obtaining a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the comprehensive performance score.
Optionally, the apparatus for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server further includes an early warning module. The early warning module is configured to perform early warning on abnormal operation of the accelerator card in the server under the condition that the accelerator card does not operate normally.
As shown in fig. 6, an apparatus for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server according to an embodiment of the present disclosure includes a processor (processor)200 and a memory (memory) 201. Optionally, the apparatus may also include a Communication Interface (Communication Interface)202 and a bus 203. The processor 200, the communication interface 202 and the memory 201 can communicate with each other through the bus 203. The communication interface 202 may be used for information transfer. The processor 200 may call logic instructions in the memory 201 to perform the method for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server of the above embodiment.
In addition, the logic instructions in the memory 201 may be implemented in the form of software functional units and stored in a computer readable storage medium when the logic instructions are sold or used as independent products.
The memory 201 is a computer-readable storage medium, and can be used for storing software programs, computer-executable programs, such as program instructions/modules corresponding to the methods in the embodiments of the present disclosure. The processor 200 executes functional applications and data processing by executing program instructions/modules stored in the memory 201, i.e. implements the method for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server in the above-described embodiment.
The memory 201 may include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, an application program required for at least one function; the storage data area may store data created according to the use of the terminal device, and the like. Further, the memory 201 may include a high-speed random access memory, and may also include a nonvolatile memory.
By adopting the device for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server provided by the embodiment of the disclosure, the plurality of performances to be tested of the accelerator card in the server and the weights corresponding to the performances to be tested are determined, the data to be tested corresponding to each performance to be tested is obtained, under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested is obtained by using the data to be tested and the performance test model preset in the server, and then the performance test result of the accelerator card is obtained by using the weights corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested. The performance test of the accelerator card in the server is realized, so that the performance of the accelerator card can be known conveniently.
The embodiment of the disclosure provides an electronic device, which includes the above-mentioned apparatus for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server. The electronic equipment determines a plurality of performances to be tested of the accelerator card in the server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, acquires data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested, acquires inference accuracy corresponding to the performances to be tested by using a performance test model preset in the server through the data to be tested under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and acquires a performance test result of the accelerator card by using the weights corresponding to the performances to be tested and the inference accuracy corresponding to the weights. The performance test of the accelerator card in the server is realized, so that the performance of the accelerator card can be known conveniently.
Optionally, the electronic device comprises: a computer or server, etc.
Optionally, in the case that the electronic device is a computer, the server determines whether the accelerator card is operating normally. Optionally, when the electronic device is a server, sending a preset prompt message to a preset user terminal.
The embodiment of the disclosure provides a storage medium, which stores program instructions, and when the program instructions are executed, the method for testing the performance of the accelerator card in the server is executed.
The disclosed embodiments provide a computer program product comprising a computer program stored on a computer readable storage medium, the computer program comprising program instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform the above-described method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server.
The computer-readable storage medium described above may be a transitory computer-readable storage medium or a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium.
The technical solution of the embodiments of the present disclosure may be embodied in the form of a software product, where the computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes one or more instructions to enable a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method of the embodiments of the present disclosure. And the aforementioned storage medium may be a non-transitory storage medium comprising: a U-disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes, and may also be a transient storage medium.
The above description and drawings sufficiently illustrate embodiments of the disclosure to enable those skilled in the art to practice them. Other embodiments may incorporate structural, logical, electrical, process, and other changes. The examples merely typify possible variations. Individual components and functions are optional unless explicitly required, and the sequence of operations may vary. Portions and features of some embodiments may be included in or substituted for those of others. Furthermore, the words used in the specification are words of description only and are not intended to limit the claims. As used in the description of the embodiments and the claims, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, the term "and/or" as used in this application is meant to encompass any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed. Furthermore, the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this application, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method or apparatus that comprises the element. In this document, each embodiment may be described with emphasis on differences from other embodiments, and the same and similar parts between the respective embodiments may be referred to each other. For methods, products, etc. of the embodiment disclosures, reference may be made to the description of the method section for relevance if it corresponds to the method section of the embodiment disclosure.
Those of skill in the art would appreciate that the various illustrative elements and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware or combinations of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software may depend upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the solution. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the disclosed embodiments. It can be clearly understood by the skilled person that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the system, the apparatus and the unit described above may refer to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and are not described herein again.
In the embodiments disclosed herein, the disclosed methods, products (including but not limited to devices, apparatuses, etc.) may be implemented in other ways. For example, the above-described apparatus embodiments are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units may be merely a logical division, and in actual implementation, there may be another division, for example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form. The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to implement the present embodiment. In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present disclosure may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to embodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. In the description corresponding to the flowcharts and block diagrams in the figures, operations or steps corresponding to different blocks may also occur in different orders than disclosed in the description, and sometimes there is no specific order between the different operations or steps. For example, two sequential operations or steps may in fact be executed substantially concurrently, or they may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. Each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustrations, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.

Claims (10)

1. A method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server, comprising:
determining a plurality of performances to be tested of an accelerator card in a server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, and acquiring data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested;
under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, inputting the data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server to obtain the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to the performance to be tested;
and acquiring a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the weight corresponding to each of the to-be-tested performances comprises:
performing table look-up operation on each performance to be tested according to a preset weight matching table to obtain the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested; and the weight matching table stores the corresponding relation between the performance to be measured and the weight.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein inputting each of the data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server to obtain inference accuracy corresponding to each of the performance to be tested comprises:
inputting each data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server to obtain a model output result corresponding to each data to be tested;
comparing the model output result corresponding to each data to be detected with the preset label corresponding to each data to be detected to obtain the comparison result corresponding to each data to be detected;
and obtaining the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be tested according to each comparison result.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein obtaining the inference accuracy corresponding to each of the to-be-tested performances according to each of the comparison results comprises:
dividing the first quantity corresponding to each performance to be measured by the second quantity corresponding to each performance to be measured to obtain the reasoning accuracy rate corresponding to each performance to be measured; the first quantity is the quantity of the data to be detected, of which the comparison result is the model output result and the preset label are consistent, and the second quantity is the total number of the data to be detected.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining the performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the inference accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested comprises:
obtaining a score corresponding to each performance to be tested according to the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested;
obtaining the comprehensive performance score of the accelerator card according to the score corresponding to each performance to be tested and the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested;
and obtaining a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the comprehensive performance score.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein after the obtaining of the data to be tested corresponding to each performance to be tested, the method further comprises:
and under the condition that the accelerator card in the server does not normally operate, early warning is carried out on the abnormal operation of the accelerator card.
7. An apparatus for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server, comprising:
the system comprises a determining module, a judging module and a judging module, wherein the determining module is configured to determine a plurality of performances to be tested of an accelerator card in a server and weights corresponding to the performances to be tested, and acquire data to be tested corresponding to the performances to be tested;
the acquisition module is configured to input the data to be tested into a performance test model preset in the server under the condition that the accelerator card normally operates, and obtain inference accuracy corresponding to the performance to be tested;
and the test module is configured to obtain a performance test result of the accelerator card according to the weight corresponding to each performance to be tested and the reasoning accuracy corresponding to each performance to be tested.
8. An apparatus for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server, comprising a processor and a memory storing program instructions, wherein the processor is configured to perform a method for testing performance of an accelerator card in a server according to any one of claims 1 to 6 when executing the program instructions.
9. An electronic device comprising an apparatus for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server according to claim 8.
10. A storage medium storing program instructions which, when executed, perform a method for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
CN202111629423.6A 2021-12-28 2021-12-28 Method and device, electronic device, and storage medium for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server Pending CN114238003A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111629423.6A CN114238003A (en) 2021-12-28 2021-12-28 Method and device, electronic device, and storage medium for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111629423.6A CN114238003A (en) 2021-12-28 2021-12-28 Method and device, electronic device, and storage medium for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114238003A true CN114238003A (en) 2022-03-25

Family

ID=80764213

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202111629423.6A Pending CN114238003A (en) 2021-12-28 2021-12-28 Method and device, electronic device, and storage medium for testing the performance of an accelerator card in a server

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114238003A (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103607309A (en) * 2013-11-29 2014-02-26 中国移动通信集团广东有限公司江门分公司 Mapping method for service KQI and QOE
CN105573898A (en) * 2015-12-11 2016-05-11 中国航空工业集团公司西安航空计算技术研究所 Automatic test and evaluation method for comprehensive performance of airborne computer
CN110543920A (en) * 2019-09-12 2019-12-06 北京达佳互联信息技术有限公司 Performance detection method and device of image recognition model, server and storage medium
CN111242314A (en) * 2020-01-08 2020-06-05 中国信息通信研究院 Deep Learning Accelerator Benchmarking Method and Apparatus

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103607309A (en) * 2013-11-29 2014-02-26 中国移动通信集团广东有限公司江门分公司 Mapping method for service KQI and QOE
CN105573898A (en) * 2015-12-11 2016-05-11 中国航空工业集团公司西安航空计算技术研究所 Automatic test and evaluation method for comprehensive performance of airborne computer
CN110543920A (en) * 2019-09-12 2019-12-06 北京达佳互联信息技术有限公司 Performance detection method and device of image recognition model, server and storage medium
CN111242314A (en) * 2020-01-08 2020-06-05 中国信息通信研究院 Deep Learning Accelerator Benchmarking Method and Apparatus

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112632385B (en) Course recommendation method, course recommendation device, computer equipment and medium
US10049270B1 (en) Using visual features to identify document sections
US12079579B2 (en) Intention identification model learning method, apparatus, and device
CN107038484A (en) Method and apparatus for handling service request
CN102279889B (en) A kind of question pushing method and system based on geography information
CN109299399B (en) Method and terminal device for recommending learning content
CN109102206A (en) A kind of evaluation method and relevant device of Automobile Service Factory
US20180314883A1 (en) Automatic Detection on String and Column Delimiters in Tabular Data Files
CN112417128B (en) Method and device for recommending dialect, computer equipment and storage medium
US20200301908A1 (en) Dynamic Document Reliability Formulation
CN112036153B (en) Work order error correction method and device, computer readable storage medium and computer equipment
CN113312258A (en) Interface testing method, device, equipment and storage medium
US20180189298A1 (en) Random Index Pattern Matching Based Email Relations Finder System
CN110968664A (en) Document retrieval method, device, equipment and medium
CN113486203A (en) Data processing method and device based on question-answering platform and related equipment
EP3635575A1 (en) Sibling search queries
CN112069833B (en) Log analysis method, log analysis device and electronic equipment
CN106998336B (en) Method and device for detecting user in channel
US10762089B2 (en) Open ended question identification for investigations
US12008442B2 (en) Analysing machine-learned classifier models
CN110414591B (en) Data processing method and equipment
CN111369294A (en) Software cost estimation method and device
CN111339290A (en) Text classification method and system
CN110377706B (en) Search sentence mining method and device based on deep learning
CN112579781A (en) Text classification method and device, electronic equipment and medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Guo Liang

Inventor after: Sun Cong

Inventor after: Li Jie

Inventor after: Xie Lina

Inventor after: Lu Shuai

Inventor before: Sun Cong

Inventor before: Gong Weiwen

Inventor before: Chang Jinfeng

Inventor before: Ke Qian

Inventor before: Li Ningdong

Inventor before: Zhang Yixing

Inventor before: Zhao Jinghua

Inventor before: Yang Xiaotong

Inventor before: Sheng Kai

Inventor before: Zheng Changkui

Inventor before: Lu Shuai

Inventor before: Li Jie

Inventor before: Shi Xiujiang

Inventor before: Lin Yinhao

Inventor before: Jiang Chang

Inventor before: Liu Pengyun

Inventor before: Guo Liang

Inventor before: Wang Yue

Inventor before: Wang Shaopeng

Inventor before: Xie Lina

Inventor before: Wu Meixi

Inventor before: Qiu Ben

Inventor before: Xu Kexin