Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a power grid additional cost evaluation method considering the grid connection risk of various power supplies.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the following technical scheme: a power grid additional cost evaluation method considering multi-kind power grid connection risk comprises the following steps:
step 1: collecting various power supply data and load side data which participate in grid connection;
the power supply data and the load side data include: reference voltage U 0 Active power P consumed by load L Line equivalent reactance R+jX, active power of thermal power generating unitPower P G Active power P of wind farm W Active power P of photovoltaic PV Reactive power Q of thermal power generating unit G Reactive power Q of wind farm W Reactive power Q of a photovoltaic power plant PV Thermal power unit adjustment difference coefficient sigma, thermal power unit environment punishment cost c pun,G Cost coefficient a of fuel cost of thermal power unit G Ac bus normal voltage U considered in reactive power equipment design acN 。
Step 2: by calculating the power adjustment quantity of the thermal power generating unitCalculating the system frequency risk adjustment cost C Δf The formula is as follows:
wherein C is Δf For the conventional thermal power generating unit to participate in the frequency adjustment cost, N G Delta P is the number of thermal power units in the system G,i The active power adjustment quantity, c, of the thermal power unit i pun,G,i Punishment cost is given to unit environment of the thermal power generating unit; a, a G,i The unit output cost of the thermal power unit i is; u (u) G,i For the start-stop state of the unit i, u G,i 1 represents a unit i start; u (u) Gn A value of 0 indicates that the unit i is stopped;
the power regulating quantity of the thermal power generating unitThe calculation process of (2) is as follows:
calculating per unit value K of unit regulating power of thermal power unit G* :
Wherein: n (N) G Is the number of thermal power generating units in the system; p (P) GN,i The rated active power of the thermal power generating unit i;f N rated frequency for the system; Δf is the frequency adjustment amount; ΔP G,i The active power adjustment quantity of the thermal power generating unit i;
the unit adjusting power and the difference adjusting coefficient of the thermal power unit are reciprocal, and the per unit value of the unit adjusting power of the thermal power unit is calculated
Wherein: sigma is the difference adjustment coefficient of the thermal power generating unit;
calculating power adjustment quantity of thermal power generating unit
Step 3: considering the voltage influence on the power grid after the grid connection of various power supplies, the voltage regulation is related to reactive power regulation in the system, and the voltage risk regulation cost C is calculated by calculating the reactive power regulation quantity delta Q of the system ΔU The formula is as follows:
wherein Δq is the reactive power adjustment amount; n (N) H The number of reactive compensation devices; c H,n The unit compensation cost for the reactive compensation equipment n;
the calculation process of the reactive power adjustment quantity delta Q of the system is as follows:
calculating the AC bus voltage U ac :
Wherein: u (U) 0 For reference voltage value, N G N is the number of conventional thermal power generating units in the system W N is the number of wind power plants PV For the number of photovoltaic power stations, R, X is the equivalent impedance of the lines, P G,i 、P W,j 、P PV,k Active power of thermal power unit i, wind power station j and photovoltaic power station k respectively, Q G,i 、Q W,j 、Q PV,k Reactive power of the thermal power unit i, the wind power plant j and the photovoltaic power station k are respectively;
the voltage regulation is related to reactive power regulation in the system, and the reactive power regulation quantity delta Q of the system is calculated:
wherein: u (U) ac Is the current alternating current bus voltage; u (U) acN The normal voltage of the alternating current bus is considered in the design of reactive equipment; q (Q) total The total reactive power after the reactive compensation equipment is currently put into the system; q (Q) dc Reactive power loss for converter station consumption; q (Q) ac Is the reactive power of the alternating current system.
Step 4: calculating the active power risk adjustment cost C by calculating the active power adjustment quantity delta P in the system ΔP The formula is as follows:
C ΔP =αΔPκc pun,W +βΔPνc pun,PV +γΔP(c pun,G +a G )
wherein alpha, beta and gamma are respectively the wind discarding cost, the light discarding cost and the output cost coefficient of the thermal power unit; alpha is 0, and represents complete wind power consumption in the t period; alpha is 1, and the phenomenon of wind abandoning exists in the period t; beta is 0 to indicate complete photoelectric absorption in the t period; beta is 1, and the light rejection phenomenon exists in the t period; gamma is 0, and the output adjustment of the thermal power unit is not needed in the t period; gamma is 1, and represents the output adjustment of the thermal power unit in the t period; kappa is the total energy rejection proportion of the abandoned wind; c pun,W Punishment cost for unit abandoned wind; v is the total energy rejection ratio of the reject; c pun,PV Unit light rejection punishmentPenalty cost; c pun,G Punishment cost is given to unit environment of the thermal power generating unit; a, a G The unit output cost of the thermal power generating unit;
the calculation process of the active power adjustment quantity delta P in the system is as follows:
wherein: p (P) L Active power for load;the total active power emitted by the thermal power generating unit in the system; />The total active power emitted by the wind power field of the system; />Is the total active power of the photovoltaic power station in the system.
Step 5: calculating the additional cost F of the power grid of various power grid connection risks:
F=C Δf +C ΔU +C ΔP
and evaluating the grid additional cost of the grid-connected risks of the multiple types of power supplies according to the specific numerical value of the grid additional cost F of the grid-connected risks of the multiple types of power supplies.
The beneficial effects of adopting above-mentioned technical scheme to produce lie in: the method provided by the invention is simple in operability; the additional cost is divided according to the cost driving factor as a standard, and the real situation of the grid-connected additional cost evaluation of various power supplies can be reflected by considering various factors with clear causal relationship.
Detailed Description
The following describes in further detail the embodiments of the present invention with reference to the drawings and examples. The following examples are illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
As shown in fig. 1, the method for evaluating the additional cost of the power grid taking into consideration the grid connection risk of the multiple types of power sources in the present embodiment is as follows:
step 1: collecting various power supply data and load side data which participate in grid connection;
the power supply data and the load side data include: reference voltage U 0 Active power P consumed by load L Line equivalent reactance R+jX, active power P of thermal power generating unit G Active power P of wind farm W Active power P of photovoltaic PV Reactive power Q of thermal power generating unit G Reactive power Q of wind farm W Reactive power Q of a photovoltaic power plant PV Thermal power unit adjustment difference coefficient sigma, thermal power unit environment punishment cost c pun,G Cost coefficient a of fuel cost of thermal power unit G Ac bus normal voltage U considered in reactive power equipment design acN 。
Step 2: by calculating the power adjustment quantity of the thermal power generating unitCalculating the system frequency risk adjustment cost C Δf The formula is as follows:
wherein C is Δf For the conventional thermal power generating unit to participate in the frequency adjustment cost, N G Delta P is the number of thermal power units in the system G,i The active power adjustment quantity, c, of the thermal power unit i pun,G,i Punishment cost is given to unit environment of the thermal power generating unit; a, a G,i The unit output cost of the thermal power unit i is; u (u) G,i For the start-stop state of the unit i, u G,i 1 represents a unit i start; u (u) Gn A value of 0 indicates that the unit i is stopped;
the power regulating quantity of the thermal power generating unitThe calculation process of (2) is as follows:
calculating per unit value of unit regulating power of thermal power unit
Wherein: n (N) G Is the number of thermal power generating units in the system; p (P) GN,i The rated active power of the thermal power generating unit i; f (f) N Rated frequency for the system; Δf is the frequency adjustment amount; ΔP G,i The active power adjustment quantity of the thermal power generating unit i;
the unit adjusting power and the difference adjusting coefficient of the thermal power unit are reciprocal, and the per unit value of the unit adjusting power of the thermal power unit is calculated
Wherein: sigma is the difference adjustment coefficient of the thermal power generating unit, and the difference adjustment coefficient of the thermal power generating unit is generally 4% -5%. The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the
Calculating power adjustment quantity of thermal power generating unit
In the embodiment, the difference adjustment coefficient sigma=5% of the thermal power generating unit is measured, and the rated frequency f of the system is calculated N =50 Hz, the frequency adjustment Δf=0.5 Hz, the rated power of 3 thermal power generating units is 300mw,200 respectivelyMW,100MW. Substituting into a calculation formula of the power adjustment quantity of the thermal power generating unit to obtain
Measuring unit environment punishment cost c of thermal power generating unit pun,G,i 100 yuan/MW; thermal power unit i unit output cost a G,i 600 yuan/MW. Substituting the calculation formula of the system frequency risk adjustment cost to obtain C Δf =78000 yuan.
Step 3: considering the voltage influence on the power grid after the grid connection of various power supplies, the voltage regulation is related to reactive power regulation in the system, and the voltage risk regulation cost C is calculated by calculating the reactive power regulation quantity delta Q of the system ΔU The formula is as follows:
wherein Δq is the reactive power adjustment amount; n (N) H The number of reactive compensation devices; c H,n The unit compensation cost for the reactive compensation equipment n;
the calculation process of the reactive power adjustment quantity delta Q of the system is as follows:
calculating the AC bus voltage U ac :
Wherein: u (U) 0 For reference voltage value, N G N is the number of conventional thermal power generating units in the system W N is the number of wind power plants PV The number of the photovoltaic power stations is R, X, which are equivalent components of the circuit, P G,i 、P W,j 、P PV,k Active power of thermal power unit i, wind power station j and photovoltaic power station k respectively, Q G,i 、Q W,j 、Q PV,k Reactive power of the thermal power unit i, the wind power plant j and the photovoltaic power station k are respectively;
the voltage regulation is related to reactive power regulation in the system, and the reactive power regulation quantity delta Q of the system is calculated:
wherein: u (U) ac Is the current alternating current bus voltage; u (U) acN The normal voltage of the alternating current bus is considered in the design of reactive equipment; q (Q) total The total reactive power after the reactive compensation equipment is currently put into the system; q (Q) dc Reactive power loss for converter station consumption; q (Q) ac Is the reactive power of the alternating current system.
In the present embodiment, the voltage value U is measured 0 Number N of conventional thermal power units in system =220 kv G Number of wind farms n=3 W Number N of photovoltaic power plants =2 PV The equivalent group reactance of the line is r=30 and x=40 respectively, the active power of the thermal power unit, the wind power plant and the photovoltaic power station is 300mw,200mw,100mw,150mw,100mw and 50mw respectively, and the reactive power of the thermal power unit, the wind power plant and the photovoltaic power station is 80mvar,60mvar,20mvar,40mvar,20mvar and 10mvar respectively. Substituting the calculated formula of the voltage of the alternating current bus to obtain U ac =607.41kv。
Ac bus normal voltage U considered in reactive equipment design acN =600 kv; total reactive power Q of system after being currently put into reactive power compensation equipment total =250 Mvar; reactive power loss Q consumed by converter station dc =20 Mvar; reactive Q of AC system ac =230 Mvar. Substituting the calculated value into a system reactive power adjustment quantity calculation formula to obtain delta Q= -6.213Mvar.
The number of reactive compensation equipment in the system is N H The unit compensation cost of the reactive compensation device is 20000 yuan/Mvar, 20500 yuan/Mvar, 21000 yuan/Mvar, 19500 yuan/Mvar, 19800 yuan/Mvar, 20000 yuan/Mvar, respectively. Substituting the calculation formula of the voltage risk adjustment cost to obtain C ΔU = 125386.4169 yuan.
Step 4: calculating the active power risk adjustment cost C by calculating the active power adjustment quantity delta P in the system ΔP The formula is as follows:
C ΔP =αΔPκc pun,W +βΔPνc pun,PV +γΔP(c pun,G +a G )
wherein alpha, beta and gamma are respectively the wind discarding cost, the light discarding cost and the output cost coefficient of the thermal power unit; alpha is 0, and represents complete wind power consumption in the t period; alpha is 1, and the phenomenon of wind abandoning exists in the period t; beta is 0 to indicate complete photoelectric absorption in the t period; beta is 1, and the light rejection phenomenon exists in the t period; gamma is 0, and the output adjustment of the thermal power unit is not needed in the t period; gamma is 1, and represents the output adjustment of the thermal power unit in the t period; kappa is the total energy rejection proportion of the abandoned wind; c pun,W Punishment cost for unit abandoned wind; v is the total energy rejection ratio of the reject; c pun,PV Punishment cost is given for unit light rejection; c pun,G Punishment cost is given to unit environment of the thermal power generating unit; a, a G The unit output cost of the thermal power generating unit;
the calculation process of the active power adjustment quantity delta P in the system is as follows:
wherein: p (P) L Active power for load;the total active power emitted by the thermal power generating unit in the system; />The total active power emitted by the wind power field of the system; />Is the total active power of the photovoltaic power station in the system.
In the present embodiment, the load active power P is measured L Total active power emitted by thermal power generating unit in system of =860 MWTotal active power emitted by wind power field of system +.>Total active power of photovoltaic power station in system +.>Substituting the calculated value into an active power adjustment quantity calculation formula in the system to obtain delta P= -40MW.
With Δp < 0, α=1, β=1, γ=0, and the total energy rejection ratio of the wind to the wind is measured κ=80%; unit wind disposal penalty cost c pun,W =1000 yuan/MW; the total energy rejection ratio v=20%; unit light rejection penalty cost c pun,PV =1500 yuan/MW. Substituting into an active power risk adjustment cost calculation formula to obtain C ΔP =44000 yuan.
Step 5: calculating the additional cost F of the power grid of various power grid connection risks:
F=C Δf +C ΔU +C ΔP
in this embodiment, the calculated results in steps 2, 3, and 4 are substituted into the above formula to obtain f= 247386.4169, i.e. the total additional cost of the system risk is 247386.4169 yuan.
And evaluating the grid additional cost of the grid-connected risks of the multiple types of power supplies according to the specific numerical value of the grid additional cost F of the grid-connected risks of the multiple types of power supplies.