CN108225951A - A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites - Google Patents

A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108225951A
CN108225951A CN201711420411.6A CN201711420411A CN108225951A CN 108225951 A CN108225951 A CN 108225951A CN 201711420411 A CN201711420411 A CN 201711420411A CN 108225951 A CN108225951 A CN 108225951A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
test
standard specimen
specimen
damaging
group
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
CN201711420411.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
杨勇新
余建伟
赵进阶
李彪
贾彬
卢亦焱
黄辉
李杉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co Ltd MCC Group
Original Assignee
Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co Ltd MCC Group
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co Ltd MCC Group filed Critical Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co Ltd MCC Group
Priority to CN201711420411.6A priority Critical patent/CN108225951A/en
Publication of CN108225951A publication Critical patent/CN108225951A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/32Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying repeated or pulsating forces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/0001Type of application of the stress
    • G01N2203/0005Repeated or cyclic
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/0014Type of force applied
    • G01N2203/0016Tensile or compressive
    • G01N2203/0017Tensile
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/0058Kind of property studied
    • G01N2203/0069Fatigue, creep, strain-stress relations or elastic constants
    • G01N2203/0075Strain-stress relations or elastic constants
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/02Details not specific for a particular testing method
    • G01N2203/022Environment of the test

Abstract

The present invention provides a kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites, including:Multiple fibre reinforced composites test specimens of same batch are assigned in a reserved test specimen group and N number of standard specimen group;Destructive strength pull test is carried out to each reserved test specimen, determines the size of the drawing force to the non-damaging extension test of standard specimen;M non-damaging extension test experiment is carried out to each standard specimen, obtains the average elastic modulus carved at the beginning of standard specimen;Standard specimen is placed into aging in test environment;In each ageing time point, each standard specimen is taken out, M non-damaging extension test experiment is carried out, obtains the average elastic modulus in current ageing time point of each standard specimen.It can be influenced caused by composite material durability test result to avoid because of the initial mechanical performance difference of test sample using the present invention, reduce the discreteness of result of the test, improve the stability and reliability of measuring accuracy and test result.

Description

A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites
Technical field
This application involves the durable of composite material extension test technical field more particularly to a kind of fibre reinforced composites The non-damaging test method of property.
Background technology
Since nearly half a century, reinforced concrete structure since many reasons are repaired and are reinforced, lose by such as design Accidentally, quality of materials is not up to standard, changed using function, is influenced by the adverse circumstances such as corroding.Therefore, civil engineering field one Directly it is being dedicated to researching and developing reinforcement and repair material and technology.Due to fiber-reinforced composite (Fiber Reinforced Plastic, FRP) material high-strength light, good corrosion resistance many advantages, such as so that FRP material is widely used in concrete In the reparation of structure, reinforcing and composite structure.
With popularizing for this technology of FRP reinforcement and repair structures, the engineer application amount sharp increase of civil structure is reinforced, it is right The demand of FRP material is huge.The increase of demand have stimulated the research and development and production of FRP material, and the type of FRP material is also increasingly More, the performance difference of various products is also larger.
Ensure safety and the durability of reinforced structure, first have to ensure the quality of the FRP material of reinforcement and repair. Structure after FRP reinforcement and repairs in use, other than the effect for bearing external load, also suffers various use environments Test, such as temperature and humidity variation, ultraviolet light irradiation and chemical mediator corrosion destructive factor influence.These environment because It is plain on the one hand to influence the physical and mechanical property of material in itself, it on the other hand may influence the boundary of FRP material and structure The adhesive property in face.Therefore, for structure (such as port engineering, bridge structure for being exposed to adverse circumstances with FRP reinforcement and repairs With chemical building etc.), it should more pay close attention to its endurance issues.
Research starting of the foreign countries in terms of FRP durabilities is more early, and investigative technique is advanced, and corrosion mechanism research some has reached Molecular level is arrived.The country has just had begun the research in terms of FRP material is corrosion-resistant from the 1970s, but this Aspect really starts to attract a large number of researchers still since the nineties, and has reached an achievement in research eruption at the beginning of 21 century Climax.According at present to multiple material performance deterioration test, the performance change of strenthening member test and its analysis etc. achievement, For durable Journal of Sex Research still the durability research method and achievement based on existing concrete, reinforcing bar of ruggedized construction, only Simply add the influence of multiple material.For multiple material structure durability Design substantially or empirical method, it is most of all The method stated using strength character reduction coefficient.Therefore, under civil engineering environment, especially to the engineering under marine environment Speech, the durability of multiple material is still a field that research is not deep enough, application level is not high enough.With the fields such as aerospace Development it is different, for the multiple material structure of civil engineering, since the resin that the multiple material of application uses is lower end, cost Relatively low, the designability of material and the influence of the diversity of engineering-environment are very big again accordingly, and performance variation law is determined with corresponding Design method is measured also in blank, in general, the research of degradation mechanism is less, concept and theoretical shortage systematicness, design Experience is substantially based on, without rational durability quantifying design method.Due to the environment residing for engineering be it is complicated and diversified, The demand of structure durability is also that variation is various, and therefore, there is an urgent need to the durable of the multiple material of complex environment lower structure engineering Property carry out deep mechanism study, the durability Design for material structure multiple under complex environment provides underlying parameter and design theory base Plinth, to meet growing engineering design and renovation technique demand.
In the prior art, for the test method of FRP material (may be simply referred to as composite material), generally using intensity Performance reduction coefficient method.This method is the test result after the different degradation periods based on test specimen, according to certain What rule determined, there is certain centralized guidance to be worth.But this method needs to carry out destructive testing to every group of test specimen, I.e. in the different tests period using different test samples, this requires the initial mechanical performances of the test specimen of each test period batch Discreteness is small.Therefore, strength character reduction coefficient method is only applicable to test the essentially identical material (example of initial mechanical performance Such as, the materials such as steel).
Composite material by factors such as composition material type, proportionings due to being influenced, even with a batch of multiple Its initial mechanical performance difference of condensation material test specimen may also be larger, and the composite material test piece of different ratio is in certain aging week Section has different variations or increases or decreases after phase, and is difficult the accurate net cross-sectional area of test.Therefore, if to multiple Condensation material still using above-mentioned strength character reduction coefficient method of the prior art, will lead to the discreteness of strength test results very Greatly, the mechanical property datum mark disunity and between different tests sample, corresponding reduction coefficient can only express uncertain change Law, scientific poor and reliability be not high.
In addition, in the prior art for the research of composite material durability it is main or it is a kind of qualitatively study, Zhi Neng Under specific environment, research composite material endurance quality with influence factor change caused by variation tendency.Due to composite wood Expect the diversity of component diversity in itself and external environment, most of research of the prior art all can only obtain some from Then scattered data judge the variation tendency of endurance quality or obtain some simple models by these discrete datas, These all much can not be as the foundation of multiple material durability quantitative design.Therefore, composite material durability quantitative design is carried out Deeper research, by be composite material preferably in engineering especially under complex environment engineering in be applied and provide Relatively reliable guarantee.
Invention content
In view of this, the present invention provides a kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites, from And it can be effectively prevented from because of the initial mechanical performance difference of test sample shadow caused by composite material durability test result It rings, reduces the discreteness of result of the test, improves the stability and reliability of measuring accuracy and test result.
What technical scheme of the present invention was specifically realized in:
A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites, this method include:
Multiple fibre reinforced composites test specimens of same batch are assigned to a reserved test specimen group and the examination of N number of standard Include multiple fibre reinforced composites test specimens in part group, and each in reserved test specimen group and standard specimen group;Wherein, N is Natural number;
Destructive strength pull test is carried out respectively to reserving each reserved test specimen in test specimen group, is obtained each reserved The destructive test results of test specimen;
According to the destructive test results of each reserved test specimen, the stretching to the non-damaging extension test of standard specimen is determined The size of power;
According to the size of identified drawing force, each standard specimen in each standard specimen group is carried out M times respectively Non-damaging extension test experiment, obtains tensile stress-strain curve, M springform of each standard specimen is obtained by calculation Magnitude, and then obtain the average elastic modulus carved at the beginning of each standard specimen;Wherein, M is natural number;
Each standard specimen in each standard specimen group is placed individually into aging in preset test environment;
Pre-set multiple and different ageing time points;In each ageing time point, distinguish from the test environment Each standard specimen is taken out, and according to the size of identified drawing force, M non-damaging stretching is respectively carried out to each Testing experiment obtains tensile stress-strain curve, M elastic mould value of each standard specimen is obtained by calculation, and then obtain To the average elastic modulus in current ageing time point of each standard specimen;After completing test every time, by standard specimen again It is put into corresponding test environment and continues degradation.
Preferably, this method still further comprises:
According to each standard specimen in the elasticity modulus of different ageing time points, the springform of each standard specimen is obtained Measure the relation curve that changes with time.
Preferably, the N is the number of the test environment type used in test.
Preferably, the destructive test results include:
Ultimate tensile strength, limiting strain and load-deformation curve.
Preferably, the size principle for determining the drawing force is:
So that fibrous composite test specimen is in elastic stage always during entire non-damaging extension test.
Preferably, the value of the M is 1,2,3,4 or 5.
Preferably, each standard specimen in each standard specimen group carries out M non-damaging extension test respectively Experiment, obtaining the average elastic modulus carved at the beginning of each test specimen can include:
It carries out M non-damaging extension test experiment respectively to each standard specimen in each standard specimen group, is drawn Load-deformation curve is stretched, M elasticity modulus of each standard specimen is respectively obtained by calculating;
Using the average value of M elasticity modulus of each standard specimen as the average elasticity mould carved at the beginning of the test specimen Amount.
Preferably, the preset test environment includes:Hygrothermal environment, ultraviolet irradiation environment and/or seawater impregnate ring Border.
As above as it can be seen that in the non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites in the present invention, due to It has used with a batch of fibre reinforced composites test specimen as reserved test specimen and standard specimen, and has carried out based on test bullet Property modulus the different degradation periods after performance change test, and above-mentioned test method is in fiber-reinforced composite material The elastic stage of material test specimen carrys out testing elastic modulus, and can't destroy each standard specimen, without considering certain digestion period The variation (increasing or decreasing) in test specimen section afterwards, and using same fibre reinforced composites test specimen in each aging Between the test result put, i.e. the datum mark of test data is identical, therefore, compared with strength test method of the prior art, this Method in invention can be effectively reduced the discreteness of result of the test, improve measuring accuracy, and stability, reliability also have Larger improvement is efficiently avoided because the initial mechanical performance difference of test sample makes composite material durability test result Into influence.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the flow of the non-damaging test method of the durability of the fibre reinforced composites in the embodiment of the present invention Figure.
Specific embodiment
For technical scheme of the present invention and advantage is more clearly understood, below in conjunction with drawings and the specific embodiments, to this Invention is described in further detail.
Fig. 1 is the flow of the non-damaging test method of the durability of the fibre reinforced composites in the embodiment of the present invention Figure.
As shown in Figure 1, the non-damaging test method packet of the durability of fibre reinforced composites in the embodiment of the present invention Include step as described below:
Step 101, multiple fibre reinforced composites test specimens of same batch are assigned to a reserved test specimen group and N Include multiple fibre reinforced composites test specimens in a standard specimen group, and each in reserved test specimen group and standard specimen group.
Wherein, N is natural number.
In addition, preferably, in a specific embodiment of the present invention, N can be the test environment type used in test Number.If for example, N kinds will be used in the non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites in the present invention Test environment is tested, then can set N number of standard specimen group, so that each standard specimen group corresponds to one Kind test environment.If having only used a kind of test environment in testing, 1 standard specimen group can be only set.
It in the inventive solutions, can will be same after required amount of fibre reinforced composites have been made A part of test specimen in the fibre reinforced composites test specimen of one batch is as reserved test specimen group, and by another part fiber Enhancing composite material test piece is respectively divided into N number of standard specimen group.
It in the inventive solutions, can be according to the needs of practical situations (for example, the survey used in test The number of test ring border type), pre-set the value of above-mentioned N.It is pre- respectively alternatively, it is also possible to the needs of practical situations Reserved test specimen group and the number of the fibre reinforced composites test specimen in N number of standard specimen group are first set.
Step 102, destructive strength pull test is carried out respectively to reserving each reserved test specimen in test specimen group, obtain The destructive test results of each reserved test specimen.
For example, preferably, in the inventive solutions, the destructive test results can include:Ultimate elongation Intensity, limiting strain and load-deformation curve.
It is same batch due to reserving each reserved test specimen in test specimen group with each standard specimen in standard specimen group Fibre reinforced composites test specimen, therefore, can by the destructive test results of the obtained each reserved test specimen of this step Of great value reference frame is provided with the size of the controlled quentity controlled variable for the subsequent non-damaging test to standard specimen.
Step 103, according to the destructive test results of each reserved test specimen, determine that the non-damaging stretching to standard specimen is surveyed The size of the drawing force of examination.
Before not being destroyed or not damaging, fibrous composite is in linear elasticity state in all stage of stretching, Therefore any section theoretically on its load-deformation curve is used equally for calculating elasticity modulus.But in practical fiber composite In material tensile test, if too small to the drawing force of fibrous composite test specimen, load-deformation curve is unstable;And such as Fruit drawing force is excessive, then will generate damage to fibrous composite test specimen.
It therefore, in the inventive solutions, will be before non-damaging extension test experiment be carried out to standard specimen, in advance First according to the destructive test results by the obtained each reserved test specimen of above-mentioned steps 102, in this, as reference, determining pair The size of the drawing force of the non-damaging extension test of standard specimen, so that during subsequent non-damaging extension test, mark Quasi- test specimen can be stretched on tensile testing machine based on the size of identified drawing force (i.e. using proof stress or strain Mode stretches).
In addition, preferably, in a specific embodiment of the present invention, the principle for determining the size of the drawing force is:So that Fibrous composite test specimen is during entire non-damaging extension test always in elastic stage, i.e. fibrous composite test specimen Suffered drawing force will not damage the fibrous composite test specimen during non-damaging extension test.
Step 104, according to the size of identified drawing force, each standard specimen in each standard specimen group is distinguished M non-damaging extension test experiment is carried out, tensile stress-strain curve is obtained, M of each standard specimen is obtained by calculation Elastic mould value, and then obtain the average elastic modulus carved at the beginning of each standard specimen.
Wherein, M is natural number.
In the inventive solutions, taking for above-mentioned M can be pre-set according to the needs of practical situations Value.For example, preferably, in a specific embodiment of the present invention, the value of the M can be 1,2,3,4 or 5.
For example, preferably, in one particular embodiment of the present invention, the M is 3;At this point, described try each standard Each standard specimen in part group carries out M non-damaging extension test experiment respectively, obtains carving at the beginning for each test specimen Average elastic modulus can include:
It carries out M non-damaging extension test experiment respectively to each standard specimen in each standard specimen group, is drawn Load-deformation curve is stretched, M elasticity modulus of each standard specimen is respectively obtained by calculating;
Using the average value of M elasticity modulus of each standard specimen as the average elasticity mould carved at the beginning of the test specimen Amount.
Step 105, each standard specimen in each standard specimen group is placed individually into preset test environment always Change.
For example, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, if a shared N number of standard specimen group and N kinds are preset Test environment, then each standard specimen in each standard specimen group in this N number of standard specimen group can be divided It is not placed into aging in corresponding test environment.
In addition, preferably, in a specific embodiment of the present invention, the preset test environment can include:Damp and hot ring Border, ultraviolet irradiation environment and/or seawater impregnate environment etc..It is of course also possible to it is other environment that needs to be tested, herein It will not enumerate.
Step 106, multiple and different ageing time points is pre-set;In each ageing time point, from the test wrapper Take out each standard specimen in border respectively, and according to the size of identified drawing force, each is respectively carried out M times it is non- Extension test experiment is damaged, tensile stress-strain curve is obtained, M elasticity modulus of each standard specimen is obtained by calculation Value, and then obtain the average elastic modulus in current ageing time point of each standard specimen;After completing test every time, by standard Test specimen, which is reentered into corresponding test environment, continues degradation.
In the inventive solutions, multiple ageing time points can be pre-set.For example, 10 agings can be set Time point.Therefore, in the 1st ageing time point, standard specimen can all be taken out from test environment;Then, for mark Quasi- test specimen all carries out M non-damaging extension test experiment, obtains tensile stress-strain curve, mark is then obtained by calculation again M elastic mould value of quasi- test specimen, then can be using the average value of M elasticity modulus of each standard specimen as the standard The average elastic modulus in the 1st ageing time point of test specimen.The rest may be inferred, during for the 2nd~10 ageing time point into The above-mentioned operation of row, final 10 average elastic modulus that can obtain each standard specimen, i.e., in above-mentioned 10 agings Between the average elastic modulus put;During this period, each standard specimen has actually carried out (10*M) secondary non-damaging stretching survey It has a try and tests.
Therefore, through the above steps 104~106, you can to obtain each standard specimen from 0 moment (when i.e. initial Carve) play it is preset termination the time until Each point in time (including initial time and each ageing time point) springform Amount.
Due to elasticity modulus be change in its basic mechanical performance index the most stablize, and above-mentioned test method be Elastic stage testing elastic modulus can't destroy each standard specimen, therefore can obtain each standard specimen at the beginning It carves to the elasticity modulus of time point each in off-test (i.e. initial time and each ageing time point), so can be marked One elasticity modulus based on same benchmark of quasi- test specimen changes with time relation curve, so as to avoid because of test sample Benchmark different problems caused by difference, influence of the error for efficiently avoiding generating by benchmark difference to result of the test.Cause This, by measuring the elasticity modulus of fibre reinforced composites, analyzes its elastic modulus change rule, it is possible to sum up fiber Enhance deterioration rule, the elasticity modulus degradation mechanism of composite material.
Further, in the inventive solutions, the durability of above-mentioned fibre reinforced composites is non-damaging Test method can further include:
Step 107, each standard specimen is obtained in the elasticity modulus of different ageing time points according to each standard specimen Elasticity modulus change with time relation curve.
In this step, it can also be obtained further according to each standard specimen in the elasticity modulus of different ageing time points Elasticity modulus to each standard specimen changes with time relation curve, so as to preferably analyze fiber-reinforced composite Changing rule, deterioration rule, elasticity modulus degradation mechanism of the elasticity modulus of material etc..
In view of the natural environment complicated and changeable residing for civil engineering structure, durability Design demand is also will with engineering Variation is asked, in order to form unified design pattern, needs to establish various fibre reinforced composites under different engineering-environments Performance deterioration rule model.Since existing model of the prior art is all based on strength deterioration rule, before having Some defects stated.So in the elasticity modulus deterioration test and rule point of completing the fibre reinforced composites of typical condition After analysis research, the model using elasticity modulus deterioration rule can be established, forms more scientific rational mathematical model, so as to The endurance quality of quantitative analysis fibre reinforced composites.
In conclusion in the inventive solutions, due to the use of being tried with a batch of fibre reinforced composites Part has carried out the change of the performance after the different degradation periods based on testing elastic modulus as reserved test specimen and standard specimen Change test, and above-mentioned test method is to carry out testing elastic modulus in the elastic stage of fibre reinforced composites test specimen, and Each standard specimen can't be destroyed, without considering the variation (increasing or decreasing) in test specimen section after certain digestion period, and Using same fibre reinforced composites test specimen the test result, i.e. test data of each ageing time point datum mark Identical, therefore, compared with strength test method of the prior art, the method in the present invention can be effectively reduced result of the test Discreteness, improve measuring accuracy, and stability, reliability also have greatly improved, and efficiently avoid because of test sample This initial mechanical performance difference is influenced caused by composite material durability test result.Moreover, further, utilization is above-mentioned Elasticity modulus result of the test, can also durable Journal of Sex Research quantitatively be carried out to fibre reinforced composites.
The foregoing is merely illustrative of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, is not intended to limit the invention, all essences in the present invention God and any modification, equivalent substitution, improvement and etc. within principle, done, should be included within the scope of protection of the invention.

Claims (8)

1. a kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites, which is characterized in that this method includes:
Multiple fibre reinforced composites test specimens of same batch are assigned to a reserved test specimen group and N number of standard specimen group In, and each include multiple fibre reinforced composites test specimens in reserved test specimen group and standard specimen group;Wherein, N is nature Number;
Destructive strength pull test is carried out respectively to reserving each reserved test specimen in test specimen group, obtains each reserved test specimen Destructive test results;
According to the destructive test results of each reserved test specimen, determine to the drawing force of the non-damaging extension test of standard specimen Size;
According to the size of identified drawing force, M non-damage is carried out respectively to each standard specimen in each standard specimen group Hinder extension test experiment, obtain tensile stress-strain curve, M elastic mould value of each standard specimen is obtained by calculation, And then obtain the average elastic modulus carved at the beginning of each standard specimen;Wherein, M is natural number;
Each standard specimen in each standard specimen group is placed individually into aging in preset test environment;
Pre-set multiple and different ageing time points;In each ageing time point, taken out respectively from the test environment Each standard specimen, and according to the size of identified drawing force, M non-damaging extension test is respectively carried out to each Experiment, obtains tensile stress-strain curve, M elastic mould value of each standard specimen is obtained by calculation, and then obtains every The average elastic modulus in current ageing time point of a standard specimen;After completing test every time, standard specimen is reentered into Continue degradation in corresponding test environment.
2. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that, this method still further comprises:
According to each standard specimen different ageing time points elasticity modulus, obtain the elasticity modulus of each standard specimen with The variation relation curve of time.
3. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that:
The N is the number of the test environment type used in test.
4. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that, the destructive test results include:
Ultimate tensile strength, limiting strain and load-deformation curve.
5. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that, the size principle for determining the drawing force is:
So that fibrous composite test specimen is in elastic stage always during entire non-damaging extension test.
6. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that:
The value of the M is 1,2,3,4 or 5.
7. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that, each standard specimen in each standard specimen group M non-damaging extension test experiment is carried out respectively, and obtaining the average elastic modulus carved at the beginning of each test specimen can include:
It carries out M non-damaging extension test experiment respectively to each standard specimen in each standard specimen group, obtains stretching and answer Force-strain curve respectively obtains M elasticity modulus of each standard specimen by calculating;
Using the average value of M elasticity modulus of each standard specimen as the average elastic modulus carved at the beginning of the test specimen.
8. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that, the preset test environment includes:
Hygrothermal environment, ultraviolet irradiation environment and/or seawater impregnate environment.
CN201711420411.6A 2017-12-25 2017-12-25 A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites Withdrawn CN108225951A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711420411.6A CN108225951A (en) 2017-12-25 2017-12-25 A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711420411.6A CN108225951A (en) 2017-12-25 2017-12-25 A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108225951A true CN108225951A (en) 2018-06-29

Family

ID=62647902

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201711420411.6A Withdrawn CN108225951A (en) 2017-12-25 2017-12-25 A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108225951A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109187185A (en) * 2018-09-21 2019-01-11 中国石油大学(华东) A kind of polymer damage development test method and system
CN110967174A (en) * 2019-12-03 2020-04-07 中国核电工程有限公司 Method for verifying matching performance of ferrule connector and instrument tube for nuclear power station
CN111175118A (en) * 2020-01-20 2020-05-19 中国建筑科学研究院有限公司 Method for estimating remaining service life of durability of masonry block
CN111721649A (en) * 2020-06-29 2020-09-29 哈尔滨工程大学 Method for testing compression resistance and peel strength of polyimide foam in honeycomb core material
CN112304756A (en) * 2020-10-16 2021-02-02 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 Method for representing circumferential tensile property of annular structure of fiber reinforced composite material
CN112903471A (en) * 2021-01-19 2021-06-04 中国人民解放军火箭军工程大学 Aging modulus analysis method and system for material containing uniform pores
CN113707243A (en) * 2021-09-01 2021-11-26 上海交通大学 Multi-scale method for evaluating creep durability of steel-wood element wood

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6250166B1 (en) * 1999-06-04 2001-06-26 General Electric Company Simulated dovetail testing
CN102778386A (en) * 2012-08-03 2012-11-14 湘潭电机股份有限公司 Method for forecasting engineering service life of glass fiber reinforced plastic sleeve
CN104792626A (en) * 2015-04-21 2015-07-22 东南大学 Experimental device of FRP rib durability under stretching stress and environment coupling effect
CN105424474A (en) * 2015-11-03 2016-03-23 北京交通大学 Method for evaluating damage accumulation inside steel structure thick plate

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6250166B1 (en) * 1999-06-04 2001-06-26 General Electric Company Simulated dovetail testing
CN102778386A (en) * 2012-08-03 2012-11-14 湘潭电机股份有限公司 Method for forecasting engineering service life of glass fiber reinforced plastic sleeve
CN104792626A (en) * 2015-04-21 2015-07-22 东南大学 Experimental device of FRP rib durability under stretching stress and environment coupling effect
CN105424474A (en) * 2015-11-03 2016-03-23 北京交通大学 Method for evaluating damage accumulation inside steel structure thick plate

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
任慧韬 等: "纤维增强复合材料的耐久性能试验研究", 《建筑材料学报》 *
余建伟 等: "湿热环境下碳纤维增强复合材料的耐久性试验研究", 《工业建筑》 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109187185A (en) * 2018-09-21 2019-01-11 中国石油大学(华东) A kind of polymer damage development test method and system
CN110967174A (en) * 2019-12-03 2020-04-07 中国核电工程有限公司 Method for verifying matching performance of ferrule connector and instrument tube for nuclear power station
CN111175118A (en) * 2020-01-20 2020-05-19 中国建筑科学研究院有限公司 Method for estimating remaining service life of durability of masonry block
CN111175118B (en) * 2020-01-20 2022-04-29 建研院检测中心有限公司 Method for estimating remaining service life of durability of masonry block
CN111721649A (en) * 2020-06-29 2020-09-29 哈尔滨工程大学 Method for testing compression resistance and peel strength of polyimide foam in honeycomb core material
CN111721649B (en) * 2020-06-29 2022-04-22 哈尔滨工程大学 Method for testing compression resistance and peel strength of polyimide foam in honeycomb core material
CN112304756A (en) * 2020-10-16 2021-02-02 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 Method for representing circumferential tensile property of annular structure of fiber reinforced composite material
CN112304756B (en) * 2020-10-16 2023-07-21 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 Circumferential tensile property characterization method for annular structure of fiber reinforced composite material
CN112903471A (en) * 2021-01-19 2021-06-04 中国人民解放军火箭军工程大学 Aging modulus analysis method and system for material containing uniform pores
CN113707243A (en) * 2021-09-01 2021-11-26 上海交通大学 Multi-scale method for evaluating creep durability of steel-wood element wood
CN113707243B (en) * 2021-09-01 2023-10-27 上海交通大学 Multi-scale method for evaluating creep durability of steel-wood element wood

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108225951A (en) A kind of non-damaging test method of the durability of fibre reinforced composites
Shah et al. The strength of plants: theory and experimental methods to measure the mechanical properties of stems
CN105022898B (en) A kind of the crack performance measurement and optimization method of adhesive bonding of composites structure
Keryvin et al. Analysis of flax fibres viscoelastic behaviour at micro and nano scales
CN106599507B (en) A method of improving B-K criterion for fibre-bearing bridge joint influences the multidirectional Laminates With Delamination prediction of composite material
CN105928810A (en) Bending fatigue testing method of fiber reinforced material
De Moura et al. Mixed-mode I/II wood fracture characterization using the mixed-mode bending test
Salvati et al. Multiscale analysis of bamboo deformation mechanisms following NaOH treatment using X-ray and correlative microscopy
Zhang et al. Anisotropic mechanical properties and constitutive relations of PTFE coated glass fibers
Yang et al. Experimental research on mechanical properties of timber in ancient Tibetan building
Tian et al. Modeling of load responses for natural fiber reinforced composites under water absorption
CN108645706A (en) A method of Metal Material Fatigue intensity is predicted by hardening strength and tensile strength
CN106771105A (en) A kind of method for evaluating asphaltmastic water stability
Harries et al. Development of standard bond capacity test for FRP bonded to concrete
Zhang et al. Resistance uncertainty and structural reliability of hypar tensioned membrane structures with PVC coated polyesters
CN205080004U (en) Test fiber monofilament tensile strength's device
Zhong et al. Creep behavior of full-culm Moso bamboo under long-term bending
Oyedeji et al. Effect of fibre parameters on the physical and mechanical properties of epoxy-based reinforced Deleb palm fibre composite; using Taguchi grey relational optimization
Phoenix Modeling the statistical lifetime of glass fiber/polymer matrix composites in tension
Mamlouk et al. Refining conditions of fatigue testing of hot mix asphalt
Melzerová et al. Estimation of orthotropic mechanical properties of wood based on non-destructive testing
Karvan et al. Energy density and fracture parameters of coated Scots pine
CN110017972A (en) A kind of composite material single layer fan pendulum ageing properties prediction technique
Jokinen et al. Sensitivity analysis for simulated testing of composites: mapping via Isight and Abaqus
Panwitt et al. Automated crack length measurement for mixed mode fatigue cracks using digital image correlation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WW01 Invention patent application withdrawn after publication
WW01 Invention patent application withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20180629