CN106199703A - A kind of microseism focus is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology - Google Patents
A kind of microseism focus is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106199703A CN106199703A CN201610739828.8A CN201610739828A CN106199703A CN 106199703 A CN106199703 A CN 106199703A CN 201610739828 A CN201610739828 A CN 201610739828A CN 106199703 A CN106199703 A CN 106199703A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- microseism
- focus
- ripple
- simplex
- automatically positioned
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 52
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 48
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- XPRGFWCOARUGAL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-anilino-1-phenylpyrrolidine-2,5-dione Chemical compound O=C1N(C=2C=CC=CC=2)C(=O)CC1NC1=CC=CC=C1 XPRGFWCOARUGAL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005422 blasting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012804 iterative process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
- G01V1/288—Event detection in seismic signals, e.g. microseismics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V13/00—Manufacturing, calibrating, cleaning, or repairing instruments or devices covered by groups G01V1/00 – G01V11/00
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
A kind of microseism focus disclosed by the invention is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, it is adaptable to the microseism focus of the various Geotechnical Engineerings such as mine, tunnel, side slope and oil and gas development is automatically positioned and reliability of positioning evaluation.Including envelope function based on instantaneous frequency and variable-resolution microseism waveform then automatic Picking algorithm IFEP, be automatically positioned based on then difference and residual analysis microseism Waveform Auto-specification method APSI, simplex microseism focus algorithm Simplex, microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis appraisement system SLRE tetra-major part;Four parts are orderly combinations, premised on they are mutual and basis, all linked with one another, are that the microseism focus that set of system is complete is automatically positioned and method for evaluating reliability.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of microseism focus be automatically positioned and positioning result evaluation methodology, especially one are applicable to ore deposit
The method that the microseism focus of the various Geotechnical Engineerings such as mountain, tunnel, side slope and oil and gas development is automatically positioned and reliability of positioning is evaluated,
Belong to micro seismic monitoring field.
Background technology
On Microseismic Monitoring Technique is to utilize coal petrography material stand under load to destroy the microseism waveshape signal produced study and evaluate coal petrography
A kind of geophysics real time monitoring of stability.In recent years, On Microseismic Monitoring Technique is pre-in the monitoring of mine coal rock dynamic disaster
All kinds of Geotechnical Engineerings such as police, oil and gas development, side slope and stability of earth dams monitoring are widely applied.Microseism seismic source location is
The important content of On Microseismic Monitoring Technique and study hotspot, along with development and the raising of field requirement of science and technology, high-precision
Microseism focus is automatically positioned and positioning result reliability (positioning precision and focus solving system stability) evaluation is micro seismic monitoring
Development trend.Micro seismic monitoring platform screen cloth sets, microseism waveform recognition and then pickup, Velocity model, location algorithm are that impact is micro-
The principal element of shake seismic source location.Wherein, P, S involve unusual waveforms identification, high accuracy then automatic Picking and sane location
Algorithm is High Precision Automatic location key, is also required to provide correct evaluation to being automatically positioned result reliability simultaneously.
Microseism waveform is mainly analyzed by features such as time-frequency, amplitude-frequency, persistent period at present, the identification to background noise
Preferable with filtration result, however bigger for P, S ripple and unusual waveforms identification difficulty.Document " Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering ",
8th phase in 2014, Li Nan, " microseism ripple abnormal signal recognition methods based on then difference ", the document is divided according to then difference
Analyse and delay ripple and outside two kinds of unusual waveforms signals of extraordinary wave are identified, know without reference to P, S ripple and other unusual waveforms
Not.Microseism waveform then picks up main long Short-time Window (STA/LTA) ratio method that uses, but when waveshape signal signal to noise ratio is relatively low or
When first motion is inconspicuous, then picking error is relatively big, and the frequecy characteristic that such method does not utilize waveshape signal picks up
Time.In terms of microseism location, apply and most be namely based on the various seismic source location methods that then different principle develops, example
Such as Geiger method and the various methods improved on this basis, but initial value is relied on higher by this kind of algorithm, works as initial value
It is improper to choose, and positioning precision will be substantially reduced, and even can not restrain.The Powell method that proposes in recent years, particle cluster algorithm etc. one
Determine in degree, to reduce the degree of dependence to initial value, but the most fundamentally solve solving system divergence problem.Document
" coal journal ", the 12nd phase in 2014, Li Nan, " simplex microseism seismic source location method based on L1 norm statistics ", the document
Use pure algorithm based on L1 norm statistical criteria to carry out seismic source location, then pickup and unusual waveforms identification are not carried out
Discuss, use P, S ripple to position the most simultaneously.It addition, current microseism waveform then automatic Picking precision and microseism focus
Be automatically positioned precision and can not meet field demand, a lot of in the case of need manually to be modified, this not only considerably increases work
Measure, waste time and energy;And be positioned manually and affected bigger by individuals subjective judgment.Microseism positioning result evaluation aspect master at present
Considering the evaluation to positioning precision, but microseism seismic source location evaluation not only should include positioning precision evaluation, it is fixed to should also contain
Position estimation of stability, i.e. reliability of positioning overall merit.Document " coal journal ", o. 11th in 2013, Li Nan, " microseism focus
Reliability of positioning comprehensive evaluation model ", this document propose and a kind of positioning precision and stability can be carried out thoroughly evaluating
Model, but this model will not relate to microseism seismic source location method, and be only that existing positioning result is evaluated.Cause
This, lack a kind of have simultaneously microseism focus be automatically positioned with reliability of positioning Function of Evaluation in one integrated approach.
Therefore, invention one collection microseism waveform then automatic Picking, microseism Waveform Auto-specification, microseism focus is automatically fixed
Position, reliability of positioning overall merit in one microseism seismic source location and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology be significantly.
Summary of the invention
Technical problem: for the problems referred to above, it is an object of the invention to provide a kind of microseism focus and is automatically positioned and reliably
Property integrated evaluating method, picks up the most automatically by setting up microseism waveform in the micro seismic monitorings such as mine, tunnel, side slope and oil and gas development
Take algorithm, P, S involve unusual waveforms automatic identifying method, sane be automatically positioned algorithm, microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis
Appraisement system, ultimately forms a kind of high-precision microseism focus and is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, and the method can
It is greatly improved microseism focus and is automatically positioned precision, and provide correct reliability of positioning evaluation result, thus be micro seismic monitoring
Successful Application lay the foundation.
Technical scheme: a kind of microseism focus is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, including based on instantaneous frequency and
The microseism waveform of the envelope function of variable-resolution then automatic Picking algorithm IFEP, based on then difference and residual analysis microseism
Waveform Auto-specification method APSI, simplex microseism focus are automatically positioned algorithm Simplex, microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis
Appraisement system SLRE tetra-major part;
Described IFEP can automatic Picking high-precision microseism waveform then data, lay the foundation for APSI and Simplex;
Described APSI IFEP automatic Picking then on the basis of, based on then differential analysis and residual analysis, in conjunction with micro-
Shake sensor space lays form, automatically identifies the delay ripple in microseism waveform and outside extraordinary wave two class unusual waveforms
Reject, P, S ripple type of each sensor pickup microseism ripple can also be determined simultaneously, lay the foundation for Simplex;
Described Simplex can correctly use P, S ripple of correspondence then to carry out focus with velocity of wave and be automatically positioned, and can
L1 norm statistical criteria and L2 norm statistical criteria is arbitrarily selected to calculate event residual error;
Described SLRE can carry out effective evaluation to microseism seismic source location reliability (positioning precision and stability);
IFEP, APSI, Simplex, SLRE tetra-partial order combine, mutually premised on and basis, all linked with one another, formed a set of
Complete microseism focus is automatically positioned and method for evaluating reliability.
Described microseism waveform then automatic Picking algorithm IFEP based on instantaneous frequency and the envelope function of variable-resolution,
Specifically comprise the following steps that
(1) microseism waveform clock signal is carried out wavelet transformation, obtain the time-frequency two-dimensional Joint Distribution of waveshape signal, pass through
Solve the marginal distribution of waveshape signal time-frequency two-dimensional distribution, obtain waveshape signal frequency relation over time;Formula is as follows:
Thus it is calculated the instantaneous frequency of any time of waveshape signal;In formula: gf,tRepresent a certain frequency content f to exist
The probability that t occurs sometime;
(2) Envelope Analysis resolution d is set;Ask for the waveshape signal all extreme points when resolution d, it is thus achieved that this resolution
Extreme point time series data under rate;Use cubic spline interpolation, it is thus achieved that complete envelope function sequence;Change resolution d, thus
Obtain the envelope function sequence of different resolution, the final acquisition different resolution signal envelope sequence of function;
(3) variable-resolution that will obtain in the instantaneous frequency of the microseism waveshape signal obtained in step (1) and step (2)
Envelope function input as time series, calculate respectively envelope signal and instantaneous frequency long short time-window sequence of ratio values R1 and
R2, makes R=R1 × R1, R value is compared with the threshold value set, thus automatic Picking microseism waveform is then, by automatic Picking
Microseism waveform when being then referred to as observing, i-th sensor be designated as t when observingi。
Described based on then difference with residual analysis microseism Waveform Auto-specification method APSI, specifically comprise the following steps that
If arbitrarily two sensors TiAnd TjBetween Euclidean distance be 2cij, observe according to the IFEP described in claim 2
Then it is respectively tiAnd tj, and make ti< tj;In field measurement micro seismic monitoring region, P wave-wave speed is vP, S wave-wave speed is vS;Respectively
Calculate and observe time difference value OAD between sensorijWith P ripple then difference theoretical limit TLPij:
OADij=tj-ti
If sensor TiBe P ripple then, TjBe S ripple then, when two sensors and focus are located along the same line, they
Between observe that time difference value obtains maximum, and this maximum computing formula is as follows:
In formula: DADijIt is designated as sensor TjDelay ripple then difference theoretical limit, diFor sensor TiTo surveying edges of regions
Ultimate range;
According to observing time difference value OADij, P ripple then difference theoretical limit TLPij, postpone ripple then difference theoretical limit
DADij, set up then difference analytical table 1:
Table 1 then difference analytical table
In table:
Microseismic sensors station residual error uses following formula to be indicated:
γi=ti-tti
In formula: tiWhen being to observe, ttiWhen being to calculate;Wherein tiDo not affected by calculating, therefore station residual error γiMain
Tt when being walked by calculatingiImpact;Set up residual analysis table 2:
Table 2 residual analysis table
In table: k is residual error coefficient, and k > 0.
According to then differential analysis, residual analysis, in combination with microseismic sensors platform net spatial arrangement form, to microseism ripple
Delay ripple in shape and outside extraordinary wave two class unusual waveforms are identified rejecting, and can also identify simultaneously and determine each sensor
P, S ripple type of pickup microseism ripple, lays the foundation for seismic source location.
Described simplex microseism focus is automatically positioned algorithm Simplex, specifically comprises the following steps that
(1) first by microseism origin time t0Separate, use simplex microseism focus to be automatically positioned algorithm Simplex
To focus space coordinates (x0,y0,z0) solve, calculate origin time t0 the most again;
(2) described in IFEP microseism waveform then automatic Picking result according to claim 2 and claim 3
APSI microseism Waveform Auto-specification result, rejecting abnormalities waveshape signal, use correct, corresponding P ripple and S ripple then simultaneously and
Velocity of wave carries out seismic source location;
(3) select to use L1 norm statistical criteria or L2 norm statistical criteria to calculate event residual error;
Event residual computations formula based on L1 norm statistical criteria is:
Event residual computations formula based on L2 norm statistical criteria is:
In formula: tmedianIt is all (ti-tti) median;N is the number of effective microseismic sensors station;M represents freely
Degree, i.e. the number of unknown number.
Described microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis appraisement system SLRE, comprises event residual error index R, sensitivity indexes M
With trigger sequence index T, and three kinds of Index Establishments of summary microseism seismic source location Comprehensive Reliability Evaluation Index of District P, energy
Enough microseism seismic source location reliability is carried out overall merit;Specifically comprise the following steps that
(1) utilize the simplex microseism focus described in claim 4 to be automatically positioned algorithm Simplex and obtain microseism focus certainly
After dynamic positioning result, SLRE can carry out overall merit to positioning precision and stability automatically;
(2) according to L1 norm statistical criteria calculated event residual error size, the evaluation mark of event residual error index R is determined
Accurate;After microseism wave-wave speed is increased or decreased 10%, Simplex is used to reorientate, according to reorientation result with original
The size of error L between positioning result, determines the evaluation criterion of sensitivity indexes M;Touch according to observation trigger sequence and calculating
Send out the extent of mismatch between sequence, in combination with microseism effective sensor number, determine the evaluation criterion of trigger sequence index T;
(3) introduce microseism seismic source location comprehensive evaluation index P, and have P=R+M+T, according to the scoring situation of P, SLRE
Seismic source location result is divided into 5 grades, respectively A, B, C, D, E, it is achieved that microseism seismic source location Quantitative Reliability is commented
Valency.
Beneficial effect: the present invention is that the microseism focus of a kind of system is automatically positioned and reliability of positioning integrated evaluating method
(AMSLRE), it is achieved that microseism waveform then automatic Picking, microseism Waveform Auto-specification, focus are automatically positioned and position reliably
Property overall merit, its major advantage is:
(1) IFEP envelope function based on instantaneous frequency and variable-resolution carries out microseism waveform then automatic Picking, holds concurrently
Turn round and look at amplitude and the frequency information of microseism waveform, for the microseism waveshape signal that signal to noise ratio is relatively low, greatly improved then certainly
Dynamic pickup precision, thus be automatically positioned lay the foundation for microseism Waveform Auto-specification and microseism focus.
(2) APSI need not be identified microseism ripple type by complicated waveform analysis, but based on then difference
It is different to the delay ripple in microseism waveform and outside extraordinary wave two kinds that analysis, residual analysis and microseismic sensors platform screen cloth set form
Ordinary wave shape automatically identifies and rejects, and can also identify P, S ripple type determining each sensor pickup microseism ripple simultaneously, for
Use corresponding P, S ripple then to carry out seismic source location with velocity of wave to lay the foundation.
(3) simplex microseism seismic source location algorithm (Simplex) need not solve partial derivative and inverse matrix, greatly reduces
Amount of calculation, and do not have divergence problem, so that the process of calculating is more stable and strong.Additionally Simplex can be simultaneously
Use corresponding P, S ripple then to carry out seismic source location with velocity of wave, and also be able to use L1 norm statistical criteria or L2 model flexibly
Number statistical criteria, thus be greatly improved microseism focus and be automatically positioned precision.
(4) microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis appraisement system (SLRE) combines event residual error index R, sensitivity indexes
M and trigger sequence index T, can not only be evaluated microseism seismic source location precision, additionally it is possible to Position-Solving system with fixed
Position result stability carries out effective evaluation;SLRE gives quantitatively evaluating standard and the focus of correspondence of comprehensive evaluation index P
Location divided rank, it is achieved that microseism seismic source location Quantitative Reliabilityization is evaluated.
(5) AMSLRE is the orderly combination of IFEP, APSI, Simplex and SLRE, is the microseism focus that set of system is complete
It is automatically positioned and method for evaluating reliability, premised on IFEP, APSI, Simplex and SLRE are all linked with one another, mutual and basis, finally
Realize high accuracy microseism focus to be automatically positioned and reliability of positioning overall merit.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is to postpone ripple then differential analysis schematic diagram.
Fig. 2 is the simplex mobile example in the error space.
Fig. 3 is that a kind of microseism focus is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology (AMSLRE) main contents and flow process
Figure.
Fig. 4 is IFEP microseism waveform then automatic Picking example.Give the on-the-spot microseism of two of which difference signal to noise ratio
Waveform uses IFEP automatic Picking example then, and Fig. 4 (a) is that the on-the-spot microseism waveform of high s/n ratio uses IFEP automatic Picking
Instance graph then, Fig. 4 (b) is that the on-the-spot microseism waveform of low signal-to-noise ratio uses IFEP automatic Picking instance graph then.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with embodiment, the invention will be further described:
The microseism focus of the present invention is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, and specific embodiments is as follows:
(1) microseism waveform then automatic Picking algorithm (IFEP) based on instantaneous frequency and the envelope function of variable-resolution
According to Wavelet Analysis Theory, microseism waveform clock signal is carried out wavelet transformation, obtains time-frequency two-dimensional Joint Distribution:
gf,t=G (f, t) value g of any point on (1) time-frequency figuref,tRepresent a certain frequency content f to occur at t sometime
Probability.
By solving the marginal distribution of waveshape signal time-frequency two-dimensional distribution, obtain waveshape signal frequency and close over time
System.Its formula is as follows:
Formula (2) is the instantaneous frequency computing formula of waveshape signal, can accurately obtain waveshape signal according to formula (2)
The instantaneous frequency of any time, thus for then laying the foundation from the frequecy characteristic automatic Picking of waveshape signal.
Envelope Analysis is a kind of signal analysis method conventional in engineering, and the basic feature point forming envelope is waveform letter
Number extreme point.It is specific as follows that the envelope function of variable-resolution realizes step:
A. whole extreme points of waveshape signal are obtained;
B. Envelope Analysis resolution d is set;
C. the waveshape signal all extreme points when resolution d are asked for, it is thus achieved that the extreme point time series data under this resolution;
D. cubic spline interpolation is used, it is thus achieved that complete envelope function sequence;
E. return the first step, repeat the above steps, obtain the envelope function sequence of different resolution.Finally, it is thus achieved that different
Resolution signal envelope function sequence.
The instantaneous frequency of microseism waveshape signal and the envelope function of variable-resolution are inputted as time series, counts respectively
Calculate envelope signal and long short time-window sequence of ratio values R1 of instantaneous frequency and R2, make R=R1 × R1, R value is entered with the threshold value set
Row compares, thus automatic Picking microseism waveform is then, and when being then referred to as observing by the microseism waveform of automatic Picking, i-th passes
Sensor be designated as t when observingi.Thus be automatically positioned lay the foundation for microseism Waveform Auto-specification and microseism focus.
(2) based on then difference and residual analysis microseism Waveform Auto-specification method (APSI)
If arbitrarily two sensors TiAnd TjBetween Euclidean distance be 2cij, when they observe, it is respectively tiAnd tj, and make
ti< tj;In field measurement micro seismic monitoring region, P wave-wave speed is vP, S wave-wave speed is vS;According to formula (3) and formula (4) difference
Calculate and observe time difference value OAD between sensorijWith P ripple then difference theoretical limit TLPij:
OADij=tj-ti (3)
As it is shown in figure 1, set sensor TiBe P ripple then, TjBe S ripple then, when two sensors and focus are positioned at same straight line
Time upper, observing that time difference value obtained maximum between them, and this maximum computing formula is as follows:
DAD in above formulaijIt is designated as sensor TjDelay ripple then difference theoretical limit, diFor sensor TiTo surveying regional edge
The ultimate range of edge, uses formula (5) computing relay ripple then difference theoretical limit.
According to observing time difference value OADij, P ripple then difference theoretical limit TLPij, postpone ripple then difference theoretical limit
DADij, set up then difference analytical table (table 1).
Table 1 then difference analytical table
Note: wherein
Microseismic sensors station residual error can be indicated with following formula:
γi=ti-tti (6)
In above formula, tiWhen being to observe, ttiWhen being to calculate.Wherein tiDo not affected by calculating, therefore station residual error γi
Tt when mainly being walked by calculatingiImpact.According to formula (6), set up residual analysis table (table 2).
Table 2 residual analysis table
Note: in table, k is residual error coefficient, and k > 0, and in application, k chooses according to practical situation.
According to then differential analysis, residual analysis, in combination with microseismic sensors platform net spatial arrangement form, to microseism ripple
Delay ripple in shape and outside extraordinary wave two class unusual waveforms are identified rejecting, and can also identify simultaneously and determine each sensor
P, S ripple type of pickup microseism ripple, lays the foundation for seismic source location.
(3) simplex microseism seismic source location algorithm (Simplex)
It is respectively adopted L1 norm statistical criteria and L2 norm statistical criteria calculates time residual error, wherein add up based on L1 norm
The event residual computations formula of criterion is:
T in formula (7)medianIt is all (ti-tti) median.
Event residual computations formula based on L2 norm statistical criteria is:
In formula (7) and (8), n is the number of effective microseismic sensors station;M represents degree of freedom, i.e. the number of unknown number,
M=4 in microseism seismic source location.
The enforcement key step of simplex microseism seismic source location algorithm (Simplex) is as follows:
A. by microseism origin time t0Separate, to focus space coordinates (x0,y0,z0) solve, calculate the most again
Origin time t0;
B. optional 4 points in micro seismic monitoring region, construct initial simplex with these four points for summit;
C. according to IFEP microseism waveform then automatic Picking result and APSI microseism Waveform Auto-specification result, rejecting abnormalities
Waveshape signal, chooses P, S ripple of correspondence then and velocity of wave simultaneously;
D. use L1 norm statistical criteria (formula (7)) or L2 norm statistical criteria (formula (8)) calculate simplex each
The event residual error on summit;
E. it is respectively compared the event residual error of four points, determines maximum and minima;According to extending, map, shrink, compressing
Four kinds of variations find new summit in the error space, form new simplex;
F. repeat above step, constantly move simplex, until obtaining optimal focus space coordinates or meeting iteration eventually
Only during condition, iteration ends, calculate microseism origin time simultaneously, finally give microseism seismic source location result (x0,y0,z0,t0)。
Fig. 2 represents simplex iterative process in the error space.
(4) microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis appraisement system (SLRE)
Event residual error can reflect the size of position error to a certain extent, it is proposed that evaluate microseism seismic source location essence
Event residual error index R of degree.L1 norm statistical criteria (formula (7)) is used to calculate event residual error, according to event residual error size,
To the evaluation criterion of event residual error index R, refer to table 3.
Table 3 event residual error metrics evaluation standard
Note: in table, α is event residual GM coefficient.
After microseism wave-wave speed is increased or decreased 10%, Simplex is used to reorientate, by reorientation result with former
Error between the positioning result come is designated as L, L and following formula can be used to calculate:
L=S ' (x0,y0,z0)|v′=v ± 10%v-S(x0,y0,z0) (9)
In above formula, M is sensitivity indexes, S (x0,y0,z0) it is original positioning result, S ' (x0,y0,z0) it is microseism wave velocity
After being increased or decreased 10%, in the case of using identical seismic source location method, the reorientation result obtained.
The most stable resistivity to input data of system is the strongest, therefore according to formula (9), proposes to evaluate microseism
Sensitivity indexes M of seismic source location stability.According to the size of reorientation error L, determine the evaluation criterion of sensitivity indexes M,
Refer to table 4.
Table 4 sensitivity indexes evaluation criterion
Note: in table, β is sensitivity correction factor.
According to observation trigger sequence and the extent of mismatch that calculates between trigger sequence, trigger sequence is divided into I, II, III,
IV, V totally 5 grades, its middle grade is the highest shows to observe trigger sequence and the extent of mismatch calculated between trigger sequence is the least;
Simultaneously in order to consider that seismic source location is affected by microseismic sensors platform net, in conjunction with effective number of sensors, foundation can be evaluated simultaneously
Microseism seismic source location precision and trigger sequence index T of position stability, concrete evaluation criterion is as shown in table 5.
Table 5 trigger sequence metrics evaluation standard
In sum, introduce microseism seismic source location Comprehensive Reliability Evaluation Index of District P, and make P=R+M+T, thus set up micro-
Shake seismic source location reliability (positioning precision and stability) overall evaluation system (SLRE), draws seismic source location result according to SLRE
It is divided into 5 grades, respectively A, B, C, D, E.The evaluation criterion of SLRE is as shown in table 6.
Table 6 microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis appraisement system
(6) IFEP, APSI, Simplex, SLRE are combined in order, set up microseism focus and be automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis
Evaluation methodology (AMSLRE), main contents and the flow process of AMSLRE are shown in Fig. 3.
Microseismic monitoring system has 16 sensors, is designated as T1 (x respectively1,y1,z1),T2(x2,y2,z2),T3(x3,y3,
z3),…,T16(x16,y16,z16), micro seismic monitoring region carries out the human-generated explosives experiment of known hypocentral location, explosion events
(x, y, z, t), wherein t is blasting time to be designated as B;It is that 4158m/s, S wave-wave speed is according to field measurement microseism ripple P wave-wave speed
2483m/s。
During 18 days 15 May in 2016 37 points 30 seconds 879 milliseconds carried out a human-generated explosives test in micro seismic monitoring region.
The space coordinates accurately measuring this human-generated explosives event is x=2672.2, y=4712.8, z=-132.5, by this human-generated explosives
Event is designated as B (2672.2,4712.8 ,-132.5,879).
Microseismic monitoring system have received this explosion events induction microseism waveform, initially with IFEP automatic Picking each
Then, Fig. 4 gives the on-the-spot microseism waveform of two of which difference signal to noise ratio and uses the microseism waveform that microseismic sensors receives
IFEP automatic Picking example then, as can be seen from the figure for low signal-to-noise ratio microseism waveshape signal (Fig. 4 (b)) IFEP still
So can the high-precision waveform of automatic Picking then.Each sensor using IFEP automatic Picking then refers to table 7.
Table 7 IFEP automatic Picking sensor is then
Note: "/" represents that respective sensor is not received by microseism waveform.
According to formula (3), (4), (5), by being calculated the then difference analytical table of this explosion events, refer to table 8.
Table 8 explosion events then difference analytical table
According to then difference analytical table, sensor T16 and T1 pickup is all to postpone ripple then, and therefore they should not participate in
Location Calculation.
Carrying out residual analysis according to formula (6), in the present embodiment, residual error coefficient k is set as 1.2.Residual analysis the results are shown in Table
9。
Table 9 explosion events residual analysis table
According to residual analysis, sensor T3 pickup is then modified to S ripple then.Therefore, based on then difference and residual error
The explosion events microseism waveform recognition result that analysis microseism Waveform Auto-specification method (APSI) obtains is as shown in table 10.
Table 10 APSI explosion events microseism waveform recognition result
IFEP automatic Picking then with APSI microseism waveform recognition on the basis of, use simplex microseism seismic source location calculate
Method (Simplex) carries out focus to explosion events B and is automatically positioned, and is automatically positioned result as shown in table 11.
Table 11 Simplex focus is automatically positioned result
Part uses microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis appraisement system (SLRE) automatically fixed to the microseism focus of explosion events
Position reliability is evaluated, and wherein event residual error index R must be divided into 8, and sensitivity indexes M must be divided into-2, triggers sequence indicator T by mistake
Must be divided into 4, comprehensive evaluation index P must be divided into:
P=R+M+T=8+ (-2)+4=10 (10)
Microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis evaluation result is shown in Table 12 in detail.
Table 12 SLRE reliability of positioning comprehensive evaluation result
Knowable to embodiment, a kind of microseism focus of the present invention is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology
(AMSLRE), not only achieve high-precision microseism focus and be automatically positioned, and meet being automatically positioned reliability evaluation result
Practical situation.
Although above-described embodiment compares detailed description to technical scheme, but is not to this
Bright restriction, any modify to technical scheme or replaces on an equal basis, without deviating from technical solution of the present invention
Connotation and scope, all should contain in scope of the presently claimed invention.
Claims (5)
1. a microseism focus is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, it is characterised in that: include based on instantaneous frequency and
The microseism waveform of the envelope function of variable-resolution then automatic Picking algorithm IFEP, based on then difference and residual analysis microseism
Waveform Auto-specification method APSI, simplex microseism focus are automatically positioned algorithm Simplex, microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis
Appraisement system SLRE tetra-major part;
Described IFEP can automatic Picking high-precision microseism waveform then data, lay the foundation for APSI and Simplex;
Described APSI IFEP automatic Picking then on the basis of, based on then differential analysis and residual analysis, pass in conjunction with microseism
Sensor spatial arrangement form, automatically identifies pick the delay ripple in microseism waveform and outside extraordinary wave two class unusual waveforms
Remove, P, S ripple type of each sensor pickup microseism ripple can also be determined simultaneously, lay the foundation for Simplex;
Described Simplex can correctly use P, S ripple of correspondence then to carry out focus with velocity of wave and be automatically positioned, and can be any
L1 norm statistical criteria and L2 norm statistical criteria is selected to calculate event residual error;
Described SLRE can carry out effective evaluation to microseism seismic source location reliability;
IFEP, APSI, Simplex, SLRE tetra-partial order combine, mutually premised on and basis, all linked with one another, form complete set
Microseism focus be automatically positioned and method for evaluating reliability.
A kind of microseism focus the most according to claim 1 is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, it is characterised in that:
Described microseism waveform then automatic Picking algorithm IFEP, concrete steps of based on instantaneous frequency and the envelope function of variable-resolution
As follows:
(1) microseism waveform clock signal is carried out wavelet transformation, obtain the time-frequency two-dimensional Joint Distribution of waveshape signal, by solving
The marginal distribution of waveshape signal time-frequency two-dimensional distribution, obtains waveshape signal frequency relation over time;Formula is as follows:
Thus it is calculated the instantaneous frequency of any time of waveshape signal;In formula: gf,tRepresent a certain frequency content f at certain
The probability that moment t occurs;
(2) Envelope Analysis resolution d is set;Ask for the waveshape signal all extreme points when resolution d, it is thus achieved that under this resolution
Extreme point time series data;Use cubic spline interpolation, it is thus achieved that complete envelope function sequence;Change resolution d, thus obtain
The envelope function sequence of different resolution, the final acquisition different resolution signal envelope sequence of function;
(3) bag of variable-resolution that will obtain in the instantaneous frequency of the microseism waveshape signal obtained in step (1) and step (2)
Network function inputs as time series, calculates envelope signal and long short time-window sequence of ratio values R1 of instantaneous frequency and R2 respectively, makes R
=R1 × R1, compares R value with the threshold value set, thus automatic Picking microseism waveform is then, by the microseism of automatic Picking
When waveform is then referred to as observing, i-th sensor be designated as t when observingi。
A kind of microseism focus the most according to claim 2 is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, it is characterised in that:
If arbitrarily two sensors TiAnd TjBetween Euclidean distance be 2cij, when observing according to the IFEP described in claim 2 respectively
For tiAnd tj, and make ti< tj;In field measurement micro seismic monitoring region, P wave-wave speed is vP, S wave-wave speed is vS;Calculate sensing respectively
Time difference value OAD is observed between deviceijWith P ripple then difference theoretical limit TLPij:
OADij=tj-ti
If sensor TiBe P ripple then, TjBe S ripple then, when two sensors and focus are located along the same line, between them
Observe that time difference value obtains maximum, and this maximum computing formula is as follows:
In formula: DADijIt is designated as sensor TjDelay ripple then difference theoretical limit, diFor sensor TiTo surveying edges of regions
Big distance;
According to observing time difference value OADij, P ripple then difference theoretical limit TLPij, postpone ripple then difference theoretical limit DADij,
Set up then difference analytical table 1:
Table 1 then difference analytical table
In table:
Microseismic sensors station residual error uses following formula to be indicated:
γi=ti-tti
In formula: tiWhen being to observe, ttiWhen being to calculate;Wherein tiDo not affected by calculating, therefore station residual error γiMainly it is subject to
Tt when calculatingiImpact;Set up residual analysis table 2:
Table 2 residual analysis table
In table: k is residual error coefficient, and k > 0;
Be integrated into time difference value analysis, residual analysis and microseismic sensors platform screen cloth set form to the delay ripple in microseism waveform and
Outside extraordinary wave two class unusual waveforms identifies rejecting automatically, can also determine simultaneously each sensor pickup microseism ripple P,
S ripple type.
A kind of microseism focus the most according to claim 3 is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, it is characterised in that:
Described simplex microseism focus is automatically positioned algorithm Simplex, specifically comprises the following steps that
(1) first by microseism origin time t0Separate, use simplex microseism focus to be automatically positioned algorithm Simplex to shake
Source space coordinate (x0,y0,z0) solve, calculate origin time t the most again0;
(2) IFEP microseism waveform then automatic Picking result according to claim 2 and the APSI described in claim 3 are micro-
The automatic recognition result of seismic wave shape, rejecting abnormalities waveshape signal, use correct, corresponding P ripple and S ripple then to enter with velocity of wave simultaneously
Row seismic source location;
(3) select to use L1 norm statistical criteria or L2 norm statistical criteria to calculate event residual error;
Event residual computations formula based on L1 norm statistical criteria is:
Event residual computations formula based on L2 norm statistical criteria is:
In formula: tmedianIt is all (ti-tti) median;N is the number of effective microseismic sensors station;M represents degree of freedom,
The i.e. number of unknown number.
A kind of microseism focus the most according to claim 4 is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology, it is characterised in that:
Described microseism seismic source location Reliability Synthesis appraisement system SLRE, comprises event residual error index R, sensitivity indexes M and triggers sequence
Row index T, and three kinds of Index Establishments of summary microseism seismic source location Comprehensive Reliability Evaluation Index of District P, it is possible to microseism
Seismic source location reliability carries out overall merit;Specifically comprise the following steps that
(1) utilize the simplex microseism focus described in claim 4 to be automatically positioned algorithm Simplex and obtain microseism focus automatically calmly
After the result of position, SLRE can carry out overall merit to positioning precision and stability automatically;
(2) according to L1 norm statistical criteria calculated event residual error size, the evaluation criterion of event residual error index R is determined;
After microseism wave-wave speed is increased or decreased 10%, Simplex is used to reorientate, according to reorientation result and original location
The size of error L between result, determines the evaluation criterion of sensitivity indexes M;Sequence is triggered according to observation trigger sequence and calculating
Extent of mismatch between row, in combination with microseism effective sensor number, determines the evaluation criterion of trigger sequence index T;
(3) introducing microseism seismic source location comprehensive evaluation index P, and have P=R+M+T, according to the scoring situation of P, SLRE will shake
Source location result is divided into 5 grades, respectively A, B, C, D, E, it is achieved that microseism seismic source location Quantitative Reliabilityization is evaluated.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610739828.8A CN106199703B (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2016-08-26 | A kind of automatic positioning of microseism focus and Reliability Synthesis evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610739828.8A CN106199703B (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2016-08-26 | A kind of automatic positioning of microseism focus and Reliability Synthesis evaluation method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106199703A true CN106199703A (en) | 2016-12-07 |
CN106199703B CN106199703B (en) | 2018-11-16 |
Family
ID=57526121
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610739828.8A Active CN106199703B (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2016-08-26 | A kind of automatic positioning of microseism focus and Reliability Synthesis evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106199703B (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107884822A (en) * | 2017-11-13 | 2018-04-06 | 北京矿冶研究总院 | Method for improving positioning precision of mining micro-seismic source |
CN108279435A (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2018-07-13 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining fault section |
CN109828235A (en) * | 2019-02-14 | 2019-05-31 | 中南大学 | A kind of acoustic emission source locating method in hollow cylinder |
CN110646844A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-03 | 东北大学 | Tunnel rock fracture microseismic S wave arrival time picking method based on waveform envelope curve |
CN110954952A (en) * | 2019-12-05 | 2020-04-03 | 山东省科学院激光研究所 | Method for discriminating type of first-motion wave of microseismic signal and correcting wave velocity |
CN112320520A (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2021-02-05 | 浙江新再灵科技股份有限公司 | Elevator abnormal vibration detection method based on residual error analysis |
CN113050159A (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2021-06-29 | 中国矿业大学 | Coal rock hydraulic fracturing crack micro-seismic positioning and propagation mechanism monitoring method |
CN113153430A (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2021-07-23 | 中国矿业大学 | Roadway surrounding rock damage acoustic emission positioning and wave velocity imaging monitoring and catastrophe early warning method |
CN114333246A (en) * | 2022-01-06 | 2022-04-12 | 广西北投交通养护科技集团有限公司 | Geological disaster indoor alarm system |
CN114814940A (en) * | 2022-06-28 | 2022-07-29 | 矿冶科技集团有限公司 | Microseismic monitoring station network evaluation method, microseismic monitoring station network evaluation device, electronic equipment and medium |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070276604A1 (en) * | 2006-05-25 | 2007-11-29 | Williams Ralph A | Method of locating oil and gas exploration prospects by data visualization and organization |
CN101685634A (en) * | 2008-09-27 | 2010-03-31 | 上海盛淘智能科技有限公司 | Children speech emotion recognition method |
CN103064111A (en) * | 2012-12-12 | 2013-04-24 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | Micro seismic event recognition method based on morphological filtering |
CN103135035A (en) * | 2011-11-25 | 2013-06-05 | 江西省电力科学研究院 | Transformer winding state diagnosis method |
CN103711523A (en) * | 2013-12-24 | 2014-04-09 | 华北科技学院 | Method for predicating gas concentration in real time based on local decomposition-evolution neural network |
CN105527650A (en) * | 2016-02-17 | 2016-04-27 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | Automatic identification algorithm for microseismic signal and p wave first arrival at engineering scale |
-
2016
- 2016-08-26 CN CN201610739828.8A patent/CN106199703B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070276604A1 (en) * | 2006-05-25 | 2007-11-29 | Williams Ralph A | Method of locating oil and gas exploration prospects by data visualization and organization |
CN101685634A (en) * | 2008-09-27 | 2010-03-31 | 上海盛淘智能科技有限公司 | Children speech emotion recognition method |
CN103135035A (en) * | 2011-11-25 | 2013-06-05 | 江西省电力科学研究院 | Transformer winding state diagnosis method |
CN103064111A (en) * | 2012-12-12 | 2013-04-24 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | Micro seismic event recognition method based on morphological filtering |
CN103711523A (en) * | 2013-12-24 | 2014-04-09 | 华北科技学院 | Method for predicating gas concentration in real time based on local decomposition-evolution neural network |
CN105527650A (en) * | 2016-02-17 | 2016-04-27 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | Automatic identification algorithm for microseismic signal and p wave first arrival at engineering scale |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
周银兴: "微震事件检测及震相自动识别研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 基础科学辑》 * |
李楠: "微震震源定位的关键因素作用机制及可靠性研究", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅰ辑》 * |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107884822B (en) * | 2017-11-13 | 2019-09-27 | 北京矿冶研究总院 | Method for improving positioning precision of mining micro-seismic source |
CN107884822A (en) * | 2017-11-13 | 2018-04-06 | 北京矿冶研究总院 | Method for improving positioning precision of mining micro-seismic source |
CN108279435A (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2018-07-13 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining fault section |
CN108279435B (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2020-02-14 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and device for determining fault section |
CN109828235A (en) * | 2019-02-14 | 2019-05-31 | 中南大学 | A kind of acoustic emission source locating method in hollow cylinder |
CN110646844A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-03 | 东北大学 | Tunnel rock fracture microseismic S wave arrival time picking method based on waveform envelope curve |
CN110646844B (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2021-01-26 | 东北大学 | Tunnel rock fracture microseismic S wave arrival time picking method based on waveform envelope curve |
CN110954952B (en) * | 2019-12-05 | 2021-06-18 | 山东省科学院激光研究所 | Method for discriminating type of first-motion wave of microseismic signal and correcting wave velocity |
CN110954952A (en) * | 2019-12-05 | 2020-04-03 | 山东省科学院激光研究所 | Method for discriminating type of first-motion wave of microseismic signal and correcting wave velocity |
CN112320520A (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2021-02-05 | 浙江新再灵科技股份有限公司 | Elevator abnormal vibration detection method based on residual error analysis |
CN113050159A (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2021-06-29 | 中国矿业大学 | Coal rock hydraulic fracturing crack micro-seismic positioning and propagation mechanism monitoring method |
CN113153430A (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2021-07-23 | 中国矿业大学 | Roadway surrounding rock damage acoustic emission positioning and wave velocity imaging monitoring and catastrophe early warning method |
CN113050159B (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2021-11-16 | 中国矿业大学 | Coal rock hydraulic fracturing crack micro-seismic positioning and propagation mechanism monitoring method |
CN113153430B (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2022-02-08 | 中国矿业大学 | Roadway surrounding rock damage acoustic emission positioning and wave velocity imaging monitoring and catastrophe early warning method |
CN114333246A (en) * | 2022-01-06 | 2022-04-12 | 广西北投交通养护科技集团有限公司 | Geological disaster indoor alarm system |
CN114333246B (en) * | 2022-01-06 | 2024-05-28 | 广西北投交通养护科技集团有限公司 | Indoor alarm system for geological disasters |
CN114814940A (en) * | 2022-06-28 | 2022-07-29 | 矿冶科技集团有限公司 | Microseismic monitoring station network evaluation method, microseismic monitoring station network evaluation device, electronic equipment and medium |
CN114814940B (en) * | 2022-06-28 | 2022-09-09 | 矿冶科技集团有限公司 | Microseism monitoring station network evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and medium |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106199703B (en) | 2018-11-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106199703A (en) | A kind of microseism focus is automatically positioned and Reliability Synthesis evaluation methodology | |
Klinkenberg | Fractals and morphometric measures: is there a relationship? | |
Li et al. | Rainfall and earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and Artificial Neural Network | |
CN107274679B (en) | Vehicle identification method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
CN102096944A (en) | Cloud recognition method of three-dimensional laser scanning point in geological body structural plane | |
CN104199103B (en) | Static correction method and static correction device for converted wave | |
CN103886555A (en) | Processing method based on mass three-dimensional laser scanning point cloud data | |
CN106845559A (en) | Take the ground mulching verification method and system of POI data special heterogeneity into account | |
CN105355047B (en) | The Data Fusion method of many Vehicle Detection source dynamic time granularities | |
CN108629760A (en) | A kind of remote sensing image Changing Area Detection method and device | |
CN101950436A (en) | Method for manufacturing digital elevation model by using data of laser altimeter | |
Rodríguez et al. | Comparison of spectral ratio techniques for estimation of site effects using microtremor data and earthquake motions recorded at the surface and in boreholes | |
CN112686522A (en) | Newmark correction model earthquake landslide risk assessment method | |
CN106324671A (en) | Method and device for checking shot point offset | |
Stark et al. | First evidence of Archean mafic dykes at 2.62 Ga in the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia: Links to cratonisation and the Zimbabwe Craton | |
CN105116377A (en) | An FDOA positioning method based on an HHT instantaneous energy spectrum | |
Nguyen et al. | Spatial cluster and outlier identification of geochemical association of elements: A case study in Juirui copper mining area | |
Sengupta et al. | Statistical analysis of cross-bedding azimuths from the Kamthi Formation around Bheemaram, Pranhita: Godavari Valley | |
CN105866839A (en) | Static correction method and static correction device on basis of common-attitude trace gathers | |
CN102706348A (en) | Gravimetric map fast matching method based on triangle | |
CN112801481A (en) | Smart power grid infrastructure project construction cost evaluation management cloud platform based on cloud computing and big data | |
CN108375789A (en) | The simultaneously match method of Collect jointly seismic data | |
CN111721263A (en) | Management method and system for detecting building settlement | |
Schubert et al. | Geological and geodetic investigations on the movement along the Boconó Fault, Venezuelan Andes | |
CN105223630B (en) | Omnibearing observation systematic parameter Demonstration Method based on geological model |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |