CN102858015B - Multi-service scheduling method - Google Patents

Multi-service scheduling method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN102858015B
CN102858015B CN201110181669.1A CN201110181669A CN102858015B CN 102858015 B CN102858015 B CN 102858015B CN 201110181669 A CN201110181669 A CN 201110181669A CN 102858015 B CN102858015 B CN 102858015B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
user
business
priority
unit resource
scheduling
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201110181669.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN102858015A (en
Inventor
李�远
宿淑艳
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Petevio Institute Of Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Potevio Institute of Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Potevio Institute of Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Potevio Institute of Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201110181669.1A priority Critical patent/CN102858015B/en
Publication of CN102858015A publication Critical patent/CN102858015A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN102858015B publication Critical patent/CN102858015B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

The invention provides a multi-service scheduling method. The method comprises the steps of dividing a user to be scheduled into a priority scheduling user set and a non-priority scheduling user set according to time delay and average speed of service and a pre-set priority scheduling condition; preferentially scheduling users in the priority scheduling user set and taking requirements of QoS (Quality of Service) as a target in a scheduling process; ensuring that the requirements of the quality of service of the users needing to be scheduled are met; and meanwhile, selecting a matched user in the prior scheduling user set aiming at the users in the prior scheduling user set; aiming at the users in the prior scheduling user set, if the QoS requirements are met after a resource is distributed, putting the users into the non-priority scheduling user set; and furthermore, aiming at the users in the non-prior scheduling user set, carrying out scheduling according to instantaneous throughput and the sum of the lengths of queues of all services, so as to optimize a system capacity under the condition of guaranteeing service requirements. With the adoption of the multi-service scheduling method, the transmission speed can be improved, the service requirements can be better met, and the system capacity is improved.

Description

A kind of multi-service scheduling method
Technical field
The present invention relates to the dispatching technique of GSM, particularly relate to the multi-service scheduling method based on multiple-input and multiple-output (MU-MIMO) of LTE system.
Background technology
The business of number of different types is supported in 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) system, as speech business, video stream traffic, WWW business and ftp business etc., and by these business according to different QoS demand, as service delay, ensure that bit rate etc. is divided into session service, stream business, interactive service and background business four class.A usual user can apply multiple business at one time concurrently, such as can browse webpage or transmitting video-frequency flow while speech business, therefore in order to support the multiple services application scenarios of this multi-user, the multilayer transmission Resource Allocation Formula of LTE system needs for the rational scheduling scheme of dissimilar service design.In general, according to the difference of QoS demand, carrying can be divided into two classes, namely ensures bit rate (GBR) carrying and non-guaranteed bit rate (Non-GBR) carrying.The former can be used to provide the real-time service such as speech business and video stream traffic, has higher requirement to time delay, and has requirement to transmitted bit speed, needs for the enough bandwidth of this kind of traffic assignments is to ensure bit rate; The latter can provide the non-real time services such as WWW business and ftp business, does not need to ensure bit rate, therefore to distribution bandwidth not requirement, and in general to delay requirement also lower than real-time service.In order to the QoS demand in conjunction with business is dispatched, credit rating instruction (quality class indicator, QCI) that the Access Network of LTE system utilizes S1 interface to transmit indicates the layer resource scheduling being applied to eNodeB MAC.
After R5 UMTS system in, the function of packet scheduling is transplanted to base station end and is completed, thus can carry out rapid link self adaptation according to real-time link circuit condition and realize packet scheduling more flexibly.In LTE system, the task that packet scheduling algorithm will complete is exactly that the user that different delay requires in order to have, different QoS grade and different rates require in each dispatching cycle provides rational Resourse Distribute, makes scheduling result can meet the demand of different business.The performance weighing a kind of dispatching algorithm will see whether it can meet business demand and the user fairness of user on the one hand, whether can in conjunction with the instantaneous mass of time varying channel realize frequency selective scheduling on the other hand if then paying close attention to it, realize higher downstream data rate.Common packet scheduling algorithm comprises poll (Round Robin) algorithm, max carrier to interference (MAXC/I) algorithm, equitable proportion (Proportional Fair) algorithm etc.
The basic thought of polling algorithm is: cyclically call each user, and with regard to the probability be scheduled, to K user, the probability that once in circulation, each user is just scheduled equals 1/K, and each user occupies assignable resource with identical probability.The situation that this algorithm is scheduled before not considering user, belongs to the dispatching algorithm not having to remember.Polling algorithm thinks that the transmission priority of different user is equal, thus achieves the best fairness between user, consider fairness time, generally all using polling algorithm as standards of measurement.The advantage of polling algorithm is to ensure the time fairness in the long-time and short time between user, and realizes simple.But polling algorithm mainly considers the time fairness between user, do not consider the service efficiency of resource and the concrete condition of different user wireless channel, therefore in general use throughput of system during this algorithm to be very low.
MAX C/I algorithm and proportional fair algorithm are two kinds of dispatching algorithms based on channel fading.MAXC/I algorithm only considers the user that schedules channel quality is best, and system resource gives these users service always, and the good user of channel quality is served always, user's transmission of this user channel quality selective channel better quality again after being deteriorated by the time.Due to system be forever channel quality best user service, therefore this algorithm can obtain higher frequency selectivity gain.The handling capacity of maximum C/I dispatching algorithm is the handling capacity limit of dispatching algorithm, and its advantage is, when system adopts Adaptive Modulation and Coding technology, to adopt the wireless system of max carrier to interference algorithm can obtain maximum throughput of system, and realize simple; But MAXC/I algorithm does not consider user fairness, the edge customer causing channel conditions poor is difficult to effectively be served.
Comparatively speaking, according to the momentary channel quality of user and user, the Mean Speed in a time window calculates a priority factors to PF dispatching algorithm, by Resourse Distribute to the highest user of priority factors; Priority factors formula is expressed as the ratio of momentary rate and Mean Speed, if the channel condition of user is better, such as closer from serving BS, then the instantaneous throughput of this user is larger, and from priority formula, the priority of this user improves.Otherwise, if user is because channel condition is poor, particularly because it is in cell edge, SINR is long-time lower, and can not get transmission opportunity, then its average transmission rate will reduce, from priority formula, this can make its priority improve equally and make edge obtain transmission opportunity.PF algorithm can obtain compromise preferably between handling capacity and user fairness, and can regulate long-term fairness and the short-term fairness of scheduling by the length of adjustment time slip-window.
The introducing of multiple antennas provides larger power system capacity, also for the realization of dispatching algorithm provides more possibilities.Compared to Single User MIMO, multiuser MIMO can pass through space division multiple access (SDMA) dispatches multiple user on same running time-frequency resource simultaneously, utilize the precoding of transmitting terminal to eliminate inter-user interference, thus utilize multi-user diversity gain to improve power system capacity.Support based on the multiuser MIMO scheme of closed loop code book feedback and the multiuser MIMO scheme based on wave beam forming in LTE R9 standard, strategy can be matched by Resourse Distribute to user's set by corresponding user, and utilize precoding to suppress interference between stream.MU-MIMO, in conjunction with the advantage of space diversity and spatial reuse, will obtain applying more widely as a kind of effective means improving spectrum efficiency.
Above-mentioned conventional resource scheduling algorithm, as polling algorithm, MAX C/I algorithm and PF algorithm, all not considering the QoS characteristic of business, therefore can not meet the QoS demand of business well when dispatching.Although the QoS demand such as time delay, packet loss and channel fading characteristic combine when considering scheduling by some single traffic dispatch, but, owing to usually there is the multiple real time business of different QoS requirements and non real-time situation about coexisting in real system, therefore, these single traffic dispatch are selected for the multiple services priority of single user and for scheduling, cannot be played good effect.
Summary of the invention
In view of this, main purpose of the present invention is to provide a kind of multi-service scheduling method, and the method can meet the QoS demand of business when carrying out multi-business scheduling based on MU-MIMO.
In order to achieve the above object, the technical scheme that the present invention proposes is:
A kind of multi-service scheduling method, the method comprises the following steps:
A, calculate and respectively treat time delay and the business Mean Speed of the miscellaneous service of dispatched users, described time delay is the stand-by period after the packet of service queue head enters this service queue; According to described time delay and described business Mean Speed, determining the priority factors of described often kind of business, for respectively treating dispatched users, selecting the maximum described priority factors in its business as the priority factors of this user;
B, according to described time delay, described business Mean Speed and default priority scheduling condition, needed dispatched users is divided priority scheduling user group and non-preferential dispatched users group, if have user in described priority scheduling user group, perform step c, otherwise perform steps d;
C, the unit resource of an optional free time, according to the priority factors of described user, the user of this unit resource of choice for use from described priority scheduling user group, calculating configures to after selected user by this unit resource, the described time delay of the miscellaneous service of each user in current described priority scheduling user group, described business Mean Speed and described priority factors, and according to this result of calculation, the user not meeting described priority scheduling condition is transferred in described non-preferential dispatched users group from described priority scheduling user group, if have user and current available free resource in current described priority scheduling user group, then repeat this step, otherwise, judge current whether available free resource and have user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, if, then perform steps d, otherwise perform step e,
D, the unit resource of an optional free time, for each user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, determine the queue length sum of all business of the instantaneous throughput of this user in this unit resource and this user, according to the queue length sum of described instantaneous throughput and described all business, the user of this unit resource of choice for use from described non-preferential dispatched users group, calculate and this unit resource is configured to the queue length sum of all business of each user selected after selected user, judge current whether available free resource and have user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, if, then repeat this step, otherwise, perform step e,
E, the user profile for constituent parts resource selection is informed to corresponding user.
In sum, the multi-service scheduling method that the present invention proposes, according to the time delay of business, Mean Speed and default priority scheduling condition, needed dispatched users is divided into two groups, namely priority scheduling user group and non-preferential dispatched users group, preferentially dispatch the user in priority scheduling user group, to meet qos requirement for target during scheduling, like this, can guarantee to meet the QoS requirement being badly in need of dispatched users.In addition, namely user in non-preferential dispatched users group is met to the user of qos requirement, queue length sum according to instantaneous throughput and all business is dispatched, that is, dispatch to maximize transfer rate for target, so, can ensure business demand condition under optimization system capacity.Therefore, the present invention can improve transfer rate in conjunction with MU-MIMO transmission scheme in the process of multi-business scheduling, meets business demand and capacity better.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is main flow schematic diagram of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is the schematic flow sheet of the embodiment of the present invention one;
Fig. 3 is the schematic flow sheet of step 206 in Fig. 2;
Fig. 4 is the schematic flow sheet of step 213 in Fig. 2.
Detailed description of the invention
For making the object, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearly, the present invention is described in further detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the specific embodiments.
Core concept of the present invention is, when dispatching preferentially for time delay and transfer rate two kinds of business demands, the business being badly in need of scheduling being assigned to the first priority scheduling set, carries out the scheduling of first priority, and the demand of this kind of user can be made to obtain maximum meeting; Provide a kind of multi-priority services aligning method in addition, prioritization can be carried out in conjunction with time delay and speed characteristic and corresponding QoS demand to different user; For the user being badly in need of scheduling, to meet qos requirement for target, after completing the Resourse Distribute being badly in need of dispatched users, the user meeting qos requirement is dispatched to maximize transfer rate for target, can under the condition of guarantee business demand optimization system capacity.Like this, the present invention can improve transfer rate in conjunction with MU-MIMO transmission scheme in the process of multi-business scheduling, meets business demand and capacity better.
Fig. 1 is main flow schematic diagram of the present invention, and as shown in Figure 1, the present invention mainly comprises the following steps:
Step 101, calculating respectively treat time delay and the business Mean Speed of the miscellaneous service of dispatched users, described time delay is the stand-by period after the packet of service queue head enters this service queue, and described business Mean Speed is the average transmission rate of a kind of business in a time window; According to described time delay and described business Mean Speed, determining the priority factors of described often kind of business, for respectively treating dispatched users, selecting the maximum described priority factors in its business as the priority factors of this user.
Here, determine that the method for the priority factors of described often kind of business can be:
For GBR traffic, according to ω k , i = α · e d k , i / D i + ( 1 - α ) e ( 1 - R ‾ k , i / GBR i ) · u ( GBR i - R ‾ k , i ) , Determine the priority factors ω of this GBR traffic k, i,
For non-GBR traffic, according to determine the priority factors ω of this non-GBR traffic k, i;
Wherein, α is weighted factor, α ∈ [0,1], d k, ifor the time delay of a kth user i-th kind of business, D ibe the time delay thresholding of i-th kind of business, GBR ibe the minimum transmission rate request of i-th kind of GBR traffic, for the Mean Speed of kth user i-th business, u () is jump function, u ( x ) = 0 , x < 0 1 , x > = 0 .
Step 102-103, according to described time delay and described business Mean Speed, and the priority scheduling condition preset, needed dispatched users is divided priority scheduling user group and non-preferential dispatched users group, if have user in described priority scheduling user group, then perform step 104, otherwise perform step 107.
Here, described priority scheduling condition is: user has at least a kind of business to meet: the described time delay of this business exceedes the time delay thresholding of this kind of business or the described Mean Speed rate threshold lower than this kind of business.The user namely meeting this condition will be divided in priority scheduling user organizes.
Step 104-106, the unit resource of an optional free time, according to the priority factors of described user, the user of this unit resource of choice for use from described priority scheduling user group, calculating configures to after selected user by this unit resource, the described time delay of the miscellaneous service of each user and described business Mean Speed in current described priority scheduling user group, and according to this result of calculation, the user not meeting described priority scheduling condition is transferred in described non-preferential dispatched users group from described priority scheduling user group, if have user and current available free resource in current described priority scheduling user group, then repeated execution of steps 104, otherwise, judge current whether available free resource and have user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, if, then perform step 107, otherwise perform step 109.
Here, according to the priority factors of described user, from described priority scheduling user group, user's detailed process of this unit resource of choice for use can be:
From described priority scheduling user group, the user selecting described priority factors maximum is as this unit resource n of current use *primary user, according to this primary user at this unit resource n *on speed and the described priority factors of this primary user, determine the pairing preferred value of this primary user;
According to user at this unit resource n *on speed, within the scope of the maximum configured number of users of the unit resource preset, maximum combined priority factors can be obtained when selecting and match with this primary user from described priority scheduling user group and this maximum combined priority factors is greater than the user of described pairing preferred value, and using selected go out user as the pairing user of described primary user;
If there is the pairing user of described primary user, then determine that described primary user and described pairing user use this unit resource n jointly *, otherwise, determine that described primary user uses this unit resource n *.
It should be noted that, in actual applications, multiple method can be adopted to determine the pairing preferred value of primary user, and associating priority factors.Provide two kinds of preferably methods below, but be not limited thereto:
Method one:
According to &mu; k * = &omega; k * max &CenterDot; PF k * , Determine the pairing preferred value of described primary user
Wherein, for primary user k *single user mode under momentary rate, for primary user k *mean Speed;
Accordingly, the defining method of described associating priority factors can be:
Calculating utilizes unit resource n *when carrying out multi-user transmission, carry out the transfer rate R of each user l transmitted l_MU;
For each user l carrying out described multi-user transmission, according to determine the pairing preferred value μ of this user l l_MU, wherein, ω l_MAXfor the priority factors of user l;
To the pairing preferred value summation carrying out the user of multi-user transmission described in all, summed result is defined as utilizing unit resource n *carry out associating priority factors during described multi-user transmission.
Method two:
According to determine described primary user k *pairing preferred value wherein, for primary user k *single user mode under momentary rate.
Accordingly, the defining method of described associating priority factors can be:
Calculating utilizes unit resource n *when carrying out multi-user transmission, carry out the transfer rate of each user l transmitted;
For each user l carrying out described multi-user transmission, according to μ l_MU=R l_MU, determine the pairing preferred value μ of this user l l_MU;
To the pairing preferred value summation carrying out the user of multi-user transmission described in all, summed result is defined as utilizing unit resource n *carry out associating priority factors during described multi-user transmission.
Step 107-108, the unit resource of an optional free time, for each user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, determine the queue length sum of all business of the instantaneous throughput of this user in this unit resource and this user, described instantaneous throughput is the transmitted bit number in Subscriber Unit resource, according to the queue length sum of described instantaneous throughput and described all business, the user of this unit resource of choice for use from described non-preferential dispatched users group, calculate and this unit resource is configured to the queue length sum of all business of each user selected after selected user, judge current whether available free resource and have user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, if, then repeated execution of steps 107, otherwise, perform step 109.
Here, according to the queue length sum of described instantaneous throughput and described all business in this step, from described non-preferential dispatched users group, the concrete grammar of the user of this unit resource of choice for use can be:
According to described instantaneous throughput B lwith the queue length sum Q of described all business tot_l, according to B eff_l=min (Q tot_l.B l) to calculate in described non-preferential dispatched users group each user l at this unit resource n *on effective speed B eff_l, select effective speed B eff_lmaximum user is as this unit resource n of current use *primary user;
Within the scope of the maximum configured number of users of the unit resource preset, maximum combined effective speed can be obtained when selecting and match with described primary user from described priority scheduling user group and this maximum combined effective speed is greater than described primary user at this unit resource n *on the user of effective speed, as the pairing user of described primary user;
If there is the pairing user of described primary user, then determine that described primary user and described pairing user use this unit resource n jointly *, otherwise determine that described primary user uses this unit resource n *.
Preferably, can be according in said method B MU _ eff = &Sigma; m &Element; &Gamma; min ( B m , Q tot _ m ) , Determine described associating effective speed B mU_eff, wherein, user's set when Γ is multi-user transmission, B mfor the momentary rate of user m under multi-user transmission pattern, Q tot_mfor the queue length sum of all business of user m.
Preferably, can according to Q tot_m=Q tot_m-min (B m, Q tot_m), calculate and this unit resource is configured to the queue length sum Q of all business of each user selected after selected user tot_m; Wherein, m ∈ Γ, Γ are selected user's set, B mfor user m carries out the momentary rate transmitted under multi-user transmission pattern in this unit resource.
Step 109, the user profile for constituent parts resource selection is informed to corresponding user.
Specific implementation below by embodiments of the invention a pair such scheme further illustrates.
Step 201, initialization.
All resources, user's set and priority parameters are initialized, all available bandwidth resources of system are initialized as resource collection, Lv1 and Lv2 user set is initialized as empty set.
Step 202, service priority calculate.
Calculate time delay and business Mean Speed that each user often plants business.The packet that service delay is expressed as certain service queue head enters the time of queue; Business Mean Speed is expressed as the average transmission rate of certain business in a time window, and for ensureing GBR demand, length and the Mean Speed computational methods of concrete time window belong to known technology, no longer elaborate here.Time delay and average transmission rate is utilized to calculate the service priority factor ω of often kind of business k, i, wherein k represents a kth user, and i represents i-th kind of business; The priority of different service types can calculate with formula (1), ω k, ilarger then priority is higher.For GBR traffic, priority factors comprises time delay part and service rate part; For non-GBR traffic, priority factors comprises time delay part.
&omega; k , i = &alpha; &CenterDot; e d k , i D i + ( 1 - &alpha; ) e ( 1 - R &OverBar; k , i GBR i ) &CenterDot; u ( GBR i - R &OverBar; k , i ) , GBR &alpha; &CenterDot; e d k , i D i , Non - GBR - - - ( 1 )
Wherein:
α is weighted factor, α ∈ [0,1], and the value of adjustment α can regulate the weight to time delay and GBR demand in scheduling process, and α is larger then more responsive to time delay, otherwise then more responsive to service rate.
D k, irepresent the time delay of a kth user i-th kind of business
D irepresent the time delay thresholding of i-th kind of business, different types of service is different to the susceptibility of time delay, and the time delay thresholding of non-real time service is higher than the thresholding of real time business, thus higher to the patience of time delay.The span of priority factors time delay part is α [1, e].
GBR ibe the minimum transmission rate request of i-th kind of GBR traffic, different business is different to the requirement of GBR, corresponding different thresholdings;
represent the Mean Speed of kth user i-th business.U () is jump function, u ( x ) = 0 , x < 0 1 , x > = 0 . When business Mean Speed is more than GBR thresholding speed, the GBR part in priority factors is 0, and after representing that meeting GBR requires, service rate no longer affects priority.When Mean Speed is lower than GBR thresholding, the span of priority factors GBR part is (1-α) [1, e].
Formula (1) can be used for doing the priority ratio of different service types comparatively, the target realized comprises: for GBR traffic, the queue factor affecting priority comprises time delay and business Mean Speed, and for non-GBR traffic, queue factor only has time delay; Service priority improves with the rising of time delay and the decline of Mean Speed, and improves in accelerating; When business meets GBR demand, the Mean Speed of GBR traffic no longer affects the priority of this business, compares priority between GBR traffic and non-GBR traffic by time delay; In GBR traffic, time delay and speed are embodied by a weight factor the influence degree of priority, so that base station is according to the weight of both result adjustment.
After priority factors calculates and terminates between business, formula (2) can be passed through and obtain User Priority factor ω k max, equal the priority factors of the highest business of this user all business medium priority.
&omega; k max = arg max i ( &omega; k , i ) - - - ( 2 )
Step 203, user grouping.
Often plant queue heads time delay and the Mean Speed of business according to each user obtained in previous step, judged whether that service delay exceedes time delay thresholding α i, or Mean Speed is lower than rate threshold β iuser, the user these being exceeded thresholding is classified as the user being badly in need of scheduling, adds in Lv1 user's set omega.This kind of user has the highest priority, needs priority scheduling before other users, and Lv1 user scheduling target guarantees time delay and the GBR demand of user, and scheduling strategy is for user resource allocation.All the other users add Lv2 user to and gather in Ψ, and Lv2 user scheduling target is maximum system throughput, and scheduling strategy is for resource selection user.
Step 204, judge whether have user in Lv1 user's group, if there is this kind of qualified user being badly in need of scheduling, then perform step 205, enter Lv1 scheduling, if Lv1 user's set omega is empty set, perform step 211, enter Lv2 scheduling of resource.
Step 205, Lv1 primary user select.
In scheduling process, first for the user in Lv1 set carries out prioritization, sequencer procedure only considers the queue characteristics of user, does not consider the characteristic of channel, the User Priority factor calculated according to formula (2) sorts, and the larger then priority of priority factors is higher.Selected user k *as primary user, the resource n selecting speed maximum in available resource collection Λ *distribute to user k *.
Step 206, Lv1 user's pairing.
In Lv1 user's pairing process, the user in order to ensure Lv1 set can obtain priority scheduling, and the user of candidate's pairing can only select from the set of Lv1.User's pairing is according to greedy criterion, in conjunction with handling capacity and business demand, the user selecting associating priority factors maximum is as best pairing user, and the pairing user after then this user is added in contrast gathers with the priority factors of the pairing user set not adding this user thus judges whether this user to be added in pairing user set.Concrete steps following (as shown in Figure 3):
Step 2061, initialising subscriber set Γ={ k *, and the primary user k will selected in step 205 *add pairing user to gather in Γ.
Step 2062, according to primary user k *at resource n *on rate calculations User Priority (i.e. the pairing preferred value of aforesaid primary user), this priority is also the initialization priority that user gathers Γ.
All the other users of step 2063, poll, select alternative pairing user l from remaining user's set omega-Γ, calculate and to be added to by l after set Γ at resource n *on associating speed R Γ ∪ { l}, and obtain associating priority factors F (R according to certain associating priority formulae discovery Γ ∪ { l}).The user l that associating priority factors is maximum is selected after end of polling(EOP) *as best pairing user,
Step 2064, judgement add l *the rear Γ ∪ { priority factors F (R of the associating priority factors of l} and before Γ Γ), if the latter is greater than the former, stops pairing process, and perform step 2066, and do not add this user in pairing user set; If the former is greater than latter perform step 2064-1), this best pairing user is added in user's set, upgrade set Γ=Γ ∪ { l}.
Step 2065, judge that pairing user gathers number of users in Γ and whether reaches the maximum number of user of pairing, if reach maximum number of user, then perform step 2066, otherwise perform step 2063, then select next pairing user to match.
Step 2066, end pairing process, by resource n *distribute to user and gather Γ.
Step 207, more new resources and Lv1 user.
Be that a pairing user gathers distribution resource units at every turn, just upgrade the queue heads time delay of all users in this user set, Mean Speed calculate the User Priority factor ω of this user k max.By resource n *delete from resource collection Λ.
User profile after step 208, utilization upgrade judges whether the user in current Lv1 user set meets time delay and the GBR requirement of Lv1 set, if the time delay of all business i is lower than thresholding α after in active user's set, certain user upgrades queuing message iand Mean Speed is higher than thresholding β i, then step 209 is performed.
Step 209, the user not meeting Lv1 thresholding in step 208 removed from Lv1 set omega, add in Lv2 set, be no longer this user resource allocation in follow-up Lv1 dispatches.
Step 210, to judge in Lv1 set omega whether also have user, if there is no user in Lv1 set, then perform step 210-1, if still have user, then perform step 210-2.
Step 210-1, to judge in resource collection Λ whether also have resource, if there is resource, then performs step 211, enter Lv2 scheduling of resource, if there is no resource, then perform step 216.
Step 210-2, to judge in resource collection Λ whether also have resource, if system also has surplus resources, then perform step 5, if there is no surplus resources, then perform step 16.
Step 211, Lv2 initialize.
It is maximum system throughput that Lv2 dispatches the target that will meet, and only considers the characteristic of channel of user, and do not consider the traffic performance of user in resource allocation process.Due in Lv1 scheduling, the user meeting business demand thresholding is divided into the set of Lv2, and therefore the user of Lv2 gathers Ψ and comprises all users in community, and available resources are the surplus resources after Lv1 scheduling.A resource units n is selected arbitrarily in the resource that residue is available *, obtain user and to gather in Ψ all users at resource n *on instantaneous throughput B kwith the queue length Q of all business of user tot_k.
Step 212, Lv2 primary user select.
Be that all users on Current resource sort according to subscriber channel information, principle of ordering is maximum rate principle.Cause the wasting of resources in order to the user preventing queue length shorter assigns to larger resource, in conjunction with the queue length of user in Lv2 scheduling process, utilize effective speed to represent user rate in certain resource.Momentary rate can be expressed as user k at resource n *on transmitted bit number B k(bit), the queue length sum of all business of user k is expressed as Q tot_k(bit), so the effective speed of user k can be expressed as B eff_k=min (Q tot_k, B k).At resource units n *upper selection B eff_kmaximum user k *as primary user.
k * = arg max k &Element; &Psi; ( B eff _ k ) - - - ( 3 )
Step 213, Lv2 user's pairing.
Whether successfully the process of pairing still adopts effective speed as measurement pairing criterion.Consider that the algorithm of traversal can cause the lifting of computation complexity, adopt greedy algorithm to select pairing user here.Concrete steps following (as shown in Figure 4):
Step 2131, initialising subscriber set Γ={ k *, and the primary user k will selected in step 208 *add pairing user to gather in Γ.Calculate user k *at n *on effective speed B eff_ Γ.
All the other users of step 2132, poll.Gather in Ψ-Γ user and select alternative pairing user l, added in set Γ, and obtain the set Γ ∪ { momentary rate of each user in l} wherein B mrepresent the Γ ∪ { momentary rate of l} under MU transmission mode.Utilize formula (4) set of computations Γ ∪ { the associating effective speed B of l} eff_ Γ ∪ { l}, as the weighing criteria of pairing.
B eff _ &Gamma; &cup; { l } = &Sigma; m &Element; &Gamma; &cup; { l } min ( B m , Q tot _ m ) - - - ( 4 )
Travel through alternative pairing user and gather all users in Ψ-Γ, and utilize the user l that formula (5) selects effective speed maximum *as best pairing user.
l * = arg max l &Element; &psi; - &Gamma; ( B eff _ &Gamma; &cup; { l } ) - - - ( 5 )
Step 2133, judgement add best pairing user l *effective speed afterwards with the effective speed B of former set Γ eff_ Γif the latter is greater than the former, then stop pairing process, perform step 2135, and do not add this user in pairing user set; If the former is greater than the latter, then perform 2133-1), by l *adding pairing user to gathers in Γ, upgrades set Γ=Γ ∪ { l}.
Step 2134, judge that pairing user gathers number of users in Γ and whether reaches the maximum number of user of pairing, if reach maximum number of user, then perform step 2135, otherwise perform step 2133, then select next candidate to match user to match.
Step 2135, end pairing process, by resource n *distribute to user and gather Γ.
Step 214, more new resources and Subscriber Queue.By resource n *distribute to user and gather Γ, more new resources Λ=Λ-{ n *, and be that all users gathered in Γ upgrade queue length, Q tot_m=Q tot_m-min (B m, Q tot_m), m ∈ Γ.
Step 215, inspection surplus resources, if also have surplus resources, then enter step 211 and continue to perform Resourse Distribute, if do not have surplus resources, then perform step 216.
Step 216, end of packet resource allocation process, inform user by PDCCH channel by scheduling result.
In sum, these are only preferred embodiment of the present invention, be not intended to limit protection scope of the present invention.Within the spirit and principles in the present invention all, any amendment done, equivalent replacement, improvement etc., all should be included within protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (8)

1. a multi-service scheduling method, is characterized in that, the method comprises the following steps:
A, calculate and respectively treat time delay and the business Mean Speed of the miscellaneous service of dispatched users, described time delay is the stand-by period after the packet of service queue head enters this service queue; According to described time delay and described business Mean Speed, determining the priority factors of often kind of business, for respectively treating dispatched users, selecting the maximum described priority factors in its business as the priority factors of this user;
B, according to described time delay, described business Mean Speed and default priority scheduling condition, needed dispatched users is divided priority scheduling user group and non-preferential dispatched users group, if have user in described priority scheduling user group, perform step c, otherwise perform steps d;
C, the unit resource of an optional free time, according to the priority factors of described user, the user of this unit resource of choice for use from described priority scheduling user group, calculating configures to after selected user by this unit resource, the described time delay of the miscellaneous service of each user in current described priority scheduling user group, described business Mean Speed and described priority factors, and according to this result of calculation, the user not meeting described priority scheduling condition is transferred in described non-preferential dispatched users group from described priority scheduling user group, if have user and current available free resource in current described priority scheduling user group, then repeat this step, otherwise, judge current whether available free resource and have user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, if, then perform steps d, otherwise perform step e,
D, the unit resource of an optional free time, for each user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, determine the queue length sum of all business of the instantaneous throughput of this user in this unit resource and this user, according to the queue length sum of described instantaneous throughput and described all business, the user of this unit resource of choice for use from described non-preferential dispatched users group, calculate and this unit resource is configured to the queue length sum of all business of each user selected after selected user, judge current whether available free resource and have user in described non-preferential dispatched users group, if, then repeat this step, otherwise, perform step e,
E, the user profile for constituent parts resource selection is informed to corresponding user;
Wherein, determine described in step a that the priority factors of described often kind of business is:
For guarantee bit rate GBR traffic, according to &omega; k , i = &alpha; &CenterDot; e d k , i / D i + ( 1 - &alpha; ) e ( 1 - R &OverBar; k , i / GBR i ) &CenterDot; u ( GBR i - R &OverBar; k , i ) , Determine the priority factors ω of this GBR traffic k,i,
For non-GBR traffic, according to determine the priority factors ω of this non-GBR traffic k,i;
Wherein, α is weighted factor, α ∈ [0,1], d k,ifor the time delay of a kth user i-th kind of business, D ibe the time delay thresholding of i-th kind of business, GBR ibe the minimum transmission rate request of i-th kind of GBR traffic, for the Mean Speed of a kth user i-th kind of business, u () is jump function,
2. method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, described priority scheduling condition is:
User has at least a kind of business to meet: the described time delay of this business exceedes the time delay thresholding of this kind of business or the described Mean Speed rate threshold lower than this kind of business.
3. method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, according to the priority factors of described user in step c, from described priority scheduling user group, the user of this unit resource of choice for use is:
From described priority scheduling user group, the user selecting described priority factors maximum is as this unit resource n of current use *primary user, according to this primary user at this unit resource n *on speed and the described priority factors of this primary user, determine the pairing preferred value of this primary user;
According to user at this unit resource n *on speed, within the scope of the maximum configured number of users of the unit resource preset, maximum combined priority factors can be obtained when selecting and match with this primary user from described priority scheduling user group and this maximum combined priority factors is greater than the user of described pairing preferred value, and using selected go out user as the pairing user of described primary user;
If there is the pairing user of described primary user, then determine that described primary user and described pairing user use this unit resource n jointly *, otherwise determine that described primary user uses this unit resource n *.
4. method according to claim 3, is characterized in that, according to determine the pairing preferred value of described primary user
Wherein, for primary user k *single user mode under momentary rate, for primary user k *mean Speed;
Being defined as of described associating priority factors:
Calculating utilizes unit resource n *when carrying out multi-user transmission, carry out the transfer rate R of each user l transmitted l_MU;
For each user l carrying out described multi-user transmission, according to determine the pairing preferred value μ of this user l l_MU, wherein, ω l_MAXfor the priority factors of user l;
To the pairing preferred value summation carrying out the user of multi-user transmission described in all, summed result is defined as utilizing unit resource n *carry out associating priority factors during described multi-user transmission.
5. method according to claim 3, is characterized in that, according to determine described primary user k *pairing preferred value
Wherein, for primary user k *single user mode under momentary rate;
Being defined as of described associating priority factors:
Calculating utilizes unit resource n *when carrying out multi-user transmission, carry out the transfer rate R of each user l transmitted l_MU;
For each user l carrying out described multi-user transmission, according to μ l_MU=R l_MU, determine the pairing preferred value μ of this user l l_MU;
To the pairing preferred value summation carrying out the user of multi-user transmission described in all, summed result is defined as utilizing unit resource n *carry out associating priority factors during described multi-user transmission.
6. method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, according to the queue length sum of described instantaneous throughput and described all business in steps d, from described non-preferential dispatched users group, the user of this unit resource of choice for use is:
According to the queue length sum Q of described instantaneous throughput Bl and described all business tot_l, according to B eff_l=min (Q tot_l, B l) to calculate in described non-preferential dispatched users group each user l at this unit resource n *on effective speed B eff_l, select effective speed B eff_lmaximum user is as this unit resource n of current use *primary user;
Within the scope of the maximum configured number of users of the unit resource preset, maximum combined effective speed can be obtained when selecting and match with described primary user from described non-preferential dispatched users group and this maximum combined effective speed is greater than described primary user at this unit resource n *on the user of effective speed, as the pairing user of described primary user;
If there is the pairing user of described primary user, then determine that described primary user and described pairing user use this unit resource n jointly *, otherwise determine that described primary user uses this unit resource n *.
7. method according to claim 6, is characterized in that, according to determine described associating effective speed B mU_eff, wherein, user's set when Γ is multi-user transmission, B mfor the momentary rate of user m under multi-user transmission pattern, Q tot_mfor the queue length sum of all business of user m.
8. method according to claim 1, is characterized in that, in steps d, according to Q tot_m=Q tot_m-min (B m, Q tot_m), calculate and this unit resource is configured to the queue length sum Q of all business of each user selected after selected user tot_m; Wherein, m ∈ Γ, Γ are selected user's set, B mfor user m carries out the momentary rate transmitted under multi-user transmission pattern in this unit resource.
CN201110181669.1A 2011-06-30 2011-06-30 Multi-service scheduling method Expired - Fee Related CN102858015B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201110181669.1A CN102858015B (en) 2011-06-30 2011-06-30 Multi-service scheduling method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201110181669.1A CN102858015B (en) 2011-06-30 2011-06-30 Multi-service scheduling method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN102858015A CN102858015A (en) 2013-01-02
CN102858015B true CN102858015B (en) 2015-04-29

Family

ID=47404116

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201110181669.1A Expired - Fee Related CN102858015B (en) 2011-06-30 2011-06-30 Multi-service scheduling method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102858015B (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103687033B (en) * 2013-12-03 2017-08-29 北京北方烽火科技有限公司 A kind of resource allocation methods and device of LTE MU mimo systems
CN105657843B (en) * 2016-01-27 2018-11-02 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 A kind of outbound capacity is limited the outbound resource regulating method of asymmetric satellite channel and device
US10362507B2 (en) 2016-06-10 2019-07-23 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Systems and method for quality of service monitoring, policy enforcement, and charging in a communications network
CN107105505B (en) * 2017-04-05 2019-09-03 华信咨询设计研究院有限公司 Multi-service dynamic dispatching method based on QCI
CN107294571B (en) * 2017-06-26 2020-11-13 维沃移动通信有限公司 Data transmission method, base station and mobile terminal
CN111865705A (en) * 2019-04-24 2020-10-30 普天信息技术有限公司 Scheduling performance evaluation method and device
CN112312174B (en) * 2019-07-31 2022-04-01 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 Video service acceleration method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN115996431A (en) * 2021-06-16 2023-04-21 国网山东省电力公司武城县供电公司 Multi-system wireless network data transmission method for power grid

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101227226A (en) * 2007-01-17 2008-07-23 上海无线通信研究中心 Method for multi-business scheduling based on communication system real buffer memory
CN101232705A (en) * 2007-01-23 2008-07-30 上海无线通信研究中心 Scheduling method of multi service multiplexing supporting medium access control lay

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6195532B1 (en) * 1996-06-28 2001-02-27 At&T Wireless Srcs. Inc. Method for categorization of multiple providers in a wireless communications service environment

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101227226A (en) * 2007-01-17 2008-07-23 上海无线通信研究中心 Method for multi-business scheduling based on communication system real buffer memory
CN101232705A (en) * 2007-01-23 2008-07-30 上海无线通信研究中心 Scheduling method of multi service multiplexing supporting medium access control lay

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102858015A (en) 2013-01-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102858015B (en) Multi-service scheduling method
Mostafa et al. Connectivity maximization for narrowband IoT systems with NOMA
US8964867B2 (en) LTE scheduling
Katoozian et al. Utility-based adaptive radio resource allocation in OFDM wireless networks with traffic prioritization
Kalil et al. Efficient low-complexity scheduler for wireless resource virtualization
CN103096485B (en) A kind of method of multi-user&#39;s multiple-input, multiple-output frequency selection scheduling in LTE system
CN101841916A (en) Downlink multiuser scheduling method, device and base station
Rezende et al. An adaptive network slicing for LTE radio access networks
Li et al. Dynamic load balancing in 3GPP LTE multi-cell fractional frequency reuse networks
CN104066197B (en) A kind of real time scheduling of traffic method of low packet loss ratio in TD LTE
Niu et al. Downlink scheduling with transmission strategy selection for multi-cell MIMO systems
CN104602355A (en) Method for scheduling mixed services in LTE (long term evolution) system
CN106793132A (en) A kind of resource allocation methods and network communicating system based on carrier aggregation
Cohen et al. Joint scheduling and fast cell selection in OFDMA wireless networks
Torabzadeh et al. Packet scheduling and fairness for multiuser MIMO systems
CN105187163A (en) Multi-cell joint adaptive modulation coding method based on round robin scheduling
Zubow et al. sGSA: An SDMA-OFDMA scheduling solution
Tsai et al. Downlink radio resource allocation with Carrier Aggregation in MIMO LTE-advanced systems
Todini et al. WLC46-1: A modular cross-layer scheduling and resource allocation architecture for OFDMA systems
Ben Hassen et al. A gain-computation enhancements resource allocation for heterogeneous service flows in IEEE 802.16 m mobile networks
Li et al. Adaptive user scheduling and resource management for multiuser MIMO downlink systems with heterogeneous delay requirements
Nurcahyani et al. Performance analysis of packet scheduling algorithm for video service in downlink LTE
CN111083796B (en) Mixed scheduling method based on data large and small packet services
Shaqfeh et al. Channel-aware scheduling with resource-sharing constraints in wireless networks
Ciftcioglu et al. Access scheduling based on time water-filling for next generation wireless LANs

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
ASS Succession or assignment of patent right

Owner name: CHINA POTEVIO CO., LTD.

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: PUTIAN IT TECH INST CO., LTD.

Effective date: 20130911

C41 Transfer of patent application or patent right or utility model
TA01 Transfer of patent application right

Effective date of registration: 20130911

Address after: 100080, No. two, 2 street, Zhongguancun science and Technology Park, Beijing, Haidian District

Applicant after: CHINA POTEVIO CO.,LTD.

Address before: 100080 Beijing, Haidian, North Street, No. two, No. 6, No.

Applicant before: PETEVIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd.

ASS Succession or assignment of patent right

Owner name: PUTIAN IT TECH INST CO., LTD.

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: CHINA POTEVIO CO., LTD.

Effective date: 20131205

C41 Transfer of patent application or patent right or utility model
TA01 Transfer of patent application right

Effective date of registration: 20131205

Address after: 100080 Beijing, Haidian, North Street, No. two, No. 6, No.

Applicant after: PETEVIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd.

Address before: 100080, No. two, 2 street, Zhongguancun science and Technology Park, Beijing, Haidian District

Applicant before: CHINA POTEVIO CO.,LTD.

C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20150429

CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee